Upload
aseem-khan
View
124
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MEDIATION AS AN EFFECTIVE MEANS TO ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
MECHANISM
Shashank Bahadur Nagar 0171033807Astha Sharma 0831033807Sanskriti Jain 0851033807
Nayanjyoti Jha 0991033807Deeksha Shukla 1611033807
WHAT IS MEDIATON
Compromise between two parties.
Facilitator assist in resolving dispute.
High degree of client satisfaction.
Time needed for settlement.
Earlier Panchayat SystemPopular among businessmanAnother form of dispute resolution- PANCHASLok AdalatsDevelopment of mediationJustice Malimath Committee ReportPilot project on mediationMediation centers
EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Non-binding procedure
Confidential procedure
Interest-based procedure
CHARACTERSTICS OF MEDIATION
Settles the disputeEstablishes and enforces procedureShould not be biasedActs as a catalystShould have ability to understand issueShould act as a convenerCommunication facilitator as a counselor
RESPONSIBILITY OF MEDIATOR
WHY TO PREFER MEDIATION
Less expensive and less time consumingConfidential processMultiple and flexible possibilities for resolving disputeMutual endeavorAid of mediator
MEDIATION PROCESS
Communication between partiesUnderstanding between partiesTry and find common ground of disputeFocuses on real interests of partiesCreative solutionResponsibility to decide outcomeAgreement between parties
STAGES OF MEDIATION
Presentation of opening statements
Identification of facts
Discussions
Decision
Agreement
Consumer mediationEldercare mediationEnvironmental mediationDivorce mediationReal-estate mediationEmployment mediationCommercial mediationLand/tenant mediation
TYPES OF MEDIATION
MEDIATION STYLES
Evaluative mediation
Facilitative mediation
Transformative mediation
EFFECTIVE MEDIATION TECHNIQUES
Listen to mediatorUse logical approachDon’t be afraidFollow principlesPrepare the clientThe opening lineResearch and more research
ADVANTAGES
Less costlyFaster processFull participationWork together and reach settlementExperienced mediatorRight to know about background of mediatorPrivate processBinding mediationAgreement is enforceable
DISADVANTAGES
Parties withholding informationProblem of legal resourceStronger partyCases of domestic violenceMediation does not succeed
CRIMINAL MEDIATION
INTRODUCTION
Also called restorative mediationCriminal system – do not address victim’s specific needsVictim-Offender MediationExample of 9 children vandalizing propertyProsecution – no prima facie caseLegal burden to prove case beyond reasonable doubtMakes sense for prosecution for Mediation
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
Mainstream criminal justice system - Retributive justiceGuilt and punishment, victims feel empty and unsatisfied Cannot restore their lossesRestorative justice – focus on restoring their emotional and material lossesConcerned far more about restoration of victim than about punishment of offenderElevates importance of victim Offenders be held directly accountable
Cont..
Encourages entire community to be involvedPlaces greater emphasis on having offenders accept responsibility Community responsibilityU.S. and Canada - VOM and VORP
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
MATTERS IN CRIMINAL MEDIATION
Juvenile casesLess heinous adult crimesMutual assaults and the disputes between neighbors Crimes against propertyMotor Accident Claims - Drunk-drivingDowry harassment and cruelty u/s 406/498-A IPCComplaints u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments ActPetitions u/s 125 Cr. P.C.Any other compoundable offence
Case Characteristics• case not to involve complex legal
issues, ambiguous precedent, Constitutional issues or Public Policy
• referral Judge should ascertain whether previous attempts to mediation have failed and why
Cont..
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED BY REFERRAL JUDGE
Party Characteristics• costs and time - not more than litigation • parties and their advocates have positive
attitude • government is not a party
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED BY REFERRAL JUDGE
PROCESS
Any stage in the processSign an agreement ReferralFirst ContactPreliminary InterviewsFace-to-Face MeetingConclusionsAgreement reached is not necessarily final
CRIMINAL MEDIATOR
Acts as a catalyst Third party who referees disputed parties Neutral party but not neutral as to the wrongAttending to the needs of crime victims Process of facilitating meaningful accountability Trained prepare victims and offenders to come face to-faceSkills for working with trauma victimsRule 3 of the Mediation and Conciliation Rules, 2004
PARTICIPANTS IN MEDIATION
The Defendant Defendant’s lawyerThe Victim - a natural or a legal personPublic ProsecutorVictim’s AdvocateA representative from Law Enforcement Juvenile mediations - juvenile, parent/ guardian, victim, victim’s relative or advocateAll participants to meet at scheduled place on scheduled date with the mediator
CRIMINAL MEDIATION VIS-À-VIS TRADITIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Criminal Mediation• Resolution by compromise • Both parties have opportunity to explain their behavior • Quick, inexpensive, and effective• Mediators charge affordable flat rate or hourly fee • Enhance chances of winning • Mediation can give guidance, support, and compassion• Voluntary and feeling of satisfaction to parties
Contd..
Contd..
CRIMINAL MEDIATION VIS-À-VIS TRADITIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Criminal Mediation• Presents open-minded opportunity • Casual neutral setting• Personalizing a plan to encourage mutually fair resolution
agreementCourt system
• Follow strict standards • Opportunity to explain may be denied as it is legal counsel
who puts forward their case• Burdens the parties financially, emotionally and
inconvenientlyContd..
Contd..
CRIMINAL MEDIATION VIS-À-VIS TRADITIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Court system• Courts and lawyers charge excess fees• Odds of winning a criminal dispute are slim• Lawyers and court systems have no mercy• Decision always enforced on one party. Thus
discontentment - leads to filing of multiple appeals
• Judge presents his/her legal opinion in the verdict
• Most people do not like attending court• Dictate the resolve by making biased decisions
MEDIATION IN CASES INVOLVING JUVENILE OFFENDERS
Diversion from prosecutionOpportunity to avoid getting a juvenile or criminal recordCharges may be dismissed Case of 1974Other countries
ADVANTAGES
Cheaper, quick and less adversarial Entirely voluntary Flexible, often informal, and adaptableConfidentialityNo technicalities involvedNeutral environmentMutual agreementCriminal Arbitration and lawsuit litigation still remain as optionsAvoids psychological sufferingsLess time consuming
Contd..
ADVANTAGES
Puts a face on deeply felt emotional issuesReduce burden on court system Judge (mediator) acts as a facilitatorEnforceable in Court if parties fail to honor the settlement agreementParties may choose to re-enter the formal processHave a positive effect on the participants
DISADVANTAGES
Unawareness among peopleDoes not necessarily save the accused person any moneyUnequal bargaining power Victims should have the right to opt out, even during the process itself, if the mediation becomes uncomfortableNot available for all types of crimes and to all criminals
INTERNATIONAL MEDIATION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
90% casesLaw Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA)• Pilot Neighbourhood justice centres• Increased support from private sector• Children, Courts and Dispute Resolution
Types of Mediation• Rights – based• Interest or needs based
Cont..
Dispute Resolution in Judicial System• US District court• Court of Appeals
State courts • California• Minnesota• New Jersey• Texas
Cont..
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Corporate use of ADR• Companies• Banks• Food companies• Manufacturers of non- prescription
drugs• Franchisors
Multi- door courthouse approach
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED KINGDOM
International MediationAnglo- Saxon legal baseADR not litigation or arbitration
Types of Mediation• Standard Mediation• Mini- trial/ Executive Tribunal• Adjudication/ Med- Arb/ Rent a judge
Cont..
Advantages• Parties autonomy• Flexible and neutral• Confidential and without prejudice• Relatively inexpensive• Not adversarial• Cultural differences are eased out• Future relationships are preserved and
continuedDisadvantages• Serious Business• Consent of both sides
UNITED KINGDOM
SRI LANKA
Evolution of Mediation in Sri LankaConciliation Board Act, 1958Mediation Board Act, 1988Features of the Act:• Institutionalising Mediation Board• Boards are appointed at community level
Cont..
SRI LANKA
Features of the Act:• Appointment by independent
commission• Training of mediators• Informal functioning• Voluntary settlement• Major problem – lack of provision to
compel attendances
HONG KONG
Family disputes and Construction IndustryHong Kong Mediation Council (HKMC)• Part of Hong Kong International
Arbitration Centre (HKIAC)• Mediation Interest Groups
• Construction Mediation Interest Group• Family Mediation Interest Group• Commercial Mediation Interest Group• General Mediation Interest Group
Cont..
HONG KONG
Aims of HKMC:• Development of Mediation• Collaboration• Facilitating exchange of information• Education and training
Function of HKMC:• Holding seminars and meetings• Training of mediators• Publishing a newsletter
Cont..
HONG KONG
Function of HKMC:• Coordinating the development of
mediation• Establishing standards of practice for
mediation
Mediation Process:• Written request• Notification within 14 days• Mediation within 42 days• Appointment of mediator
AUSTRALIA
Voluntary, unbounded and mutually accepted agreementFacilitation of mutually agreeable agreementsIntra – family and neighbourhood disputesDivorce, custody and related disputesConsumer, landlord- tenant and other economic disputesAdministrative actionsCommunity disputesMulti – party disputesPublic policy creation issues
Cont..
Factors:• Complexity of matter• Involvement of more than one plaintiff or
defendant• Cross claims• Relationship of parties• Frequent litigations• Outcome• Matter – private and confidential• Party is a litigant• Appropriate time• Desire of mediation• Number of facets
Cont..
AUSTRALIA
Mediation Act, 1997• Salient features:
• Registration• Renewal of Registration• Cancellation of Registration
AUSTRALIA
THANK YOU