Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Adriatic-Baltic Landbridge:
OverviewRegione Veneto, Ing. Paolo Menegazzo
Net Engineering, Dott.ssa Francesca Forestieri
Spatial Development in the Baltic-Adriatic Development CorridorBerlin, 29 November 2007
2
Contents
AB Landbridge Overview
Project Structure and Phase of Development
First Results
Future Project Opportunities
Contacts
3
Adriatic-Baltic Landbridge Overview: Objectives
Objective:
Facilitate intermodal maritime freight traffic and hinterland
penetration between the Baltic and Adriatic Seas
Scope:
•Identification, characterisation and assessment of the
Baltic-Adriatic Landbridge corridor in terms of 3 multi-
modal itineraries (pre-feasibility)
•Exploration of supporting measures: potential logistics
services, pilot projects, institutional setting
Objective:
Facilitate intermodal maritime freight traffic and hinterland
penetration between the Baltic and Adriatic Seas
Scope:
•Identification, characterisation and assessment of the
Baltic-Adriatic Landbridge corridor in terms of 3 multi-
modal itineraries (pre-feasibility)
•Exploration of supporting measures: potential logistics
services, pilot projects, institutional settingProject Duration:
1st June 2006 - 30th April 2008
4
Adriatic-Baltic Landbridge Overview: Strategic Results
The project will result in:
A Roadmap for the three itineraries examined, which
Defines tailored multimodal infrastructure and logistic
interventions for facilitating freight flows
Identifies existing and future critical or missing links/bottlenecks
Describes the technical, institutional, environmental, and
financial considerations (motivations and conditions) for deployment
Policy Recommendations for transport and spatial policy in the A-B
landbridge area
5
Adriatic-Baltic Landbridge Overview: Project Partners
Italy: Veneto Region, AMRIE, CEI, CSST, Venice Port Authority
Slovenia: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transportation
Austria: Austrian Transport Ministry, Telepark Bärnbach Errichtungs- u. Betriebs GmbH
Germany: Baltic Energy Forum E V, EPV-GIV Europroject Traffic, Rostock Port, German Association for
Housing, Urban and Spatial Development
Czech Republic: South Bohemia Region SBH, City Plan Ltd, Czech Railways (České Dráhy, a.s.), Central
Bohemia Region (CBR)
Poland: Ministry of Transport, Amber Road Cities Association - Gdynia (ARCA), Port of Gdynia Authority
S.A, Maritime Institute in Gdansk (MIG), Self-Government of the Pomorskie Region, Szczecin and
Swinoujscie Seaports Port Authority, West Pomerian Region
6
Contents
AB Landbridge Overview
Project Structure and Phase of Development
First Results
Future Project Opportunities
Contacts
7
AB Landbridge Project Structure: Trans-national Collaboration Project
Management & Dissemination (WP6)
Scenario Integration and Deployment (WP5)
Landbridge Sectoral Scenario Analysis
Transport(WP1)
•Rail•Road
•Maritime
Spatial Planning
(WP3)
InstitutionalSetting (WP4)
•Spatial Development Forum•Extra-CADSES Consultation•High Level Advisory Board•Pilot Projects•Profiling of Institutional Framework
Logistics (WP2)
8
AB Landbridge Project: Phase of Development
Landbridge Sectoral Scenario Analysis:WP 1: Road, Rail, Inland Waterways, MaritimeWP 2: LogisticsWP3: Regional and Economic Development
Landbridge Sectoral Scenario Analysis:WP 1: Road, Rail, Inland Waterways, MaritimeWP 2: LogisticsWP3: Regional and Economic Development
06/06 08/06 10/06 12/06 02/07 04/07 06/07 08/07 10/07 12/07 02/08 04/08
Institutional Setting (WP4):Spatial Development ForumExtra-CADSES ConsultationHigh Level Advisory BoardPilot ProjectsProfiling of Institutional Framework
Institutional Setting (WP4):Spatial Development ForumExtra-CADSES ConsultationHigh Level Advisory BoardPilot ProjectsProfiling of Institutional Framework
CCCCCC
CCC CCC
MMM MMM
Legend:
Consultations
Transnational Meetings
Current Date
Legend:
Consultations
Transnational Meetings
Current Date
Scenario Integration & Deployment (WP5):Definition of Selected Business Cases Improvement Packages for LinksAnalysis of Environmental ImplicationsDevelopment of Financing StrategiesDrafting of Policy RecommendationsDevelopment of Roadmap
Scenario Integration & Deployment (WP5):Definition of Selected Business Cases Improvement Packages for LinksAnalysis of Environmental ImplicationsDevelopment of Financing StrategiesDrafting of Policy RecommendationsDevelopment of Roadmap
CCC
MMM
Final MeetingFinal Report and BrochuresFinal MeetingFinal Report and Brochures
9
Contents
AB Landbridge Overview
Project Structure and Phase of Development
First Results
Future Project Opportunities
Contacts
10
First Results: Transport Itineraries
Detailing of Adriatic – Baltic Landbridge Corridor with respect to 3 primary intermodal
itineraries, each of which is vitally important for its respective catchment areas
1. Eastern Corridor
Rail and Road – from Gdynia/Gdansk to Adriatic Sea
Inland Waterways Feeder – River Wisla
2. Central Corridor
Rail and Road – from Sczecin/Swinoujscie to Adriatic Sea
Inland Waterways Feeder – River Oder
3. Western Corridor
Rail and Road– from Rostock to Adriatic Sea
Inland Waterways Feeder– River Labe, Havel, Vltava
11
First Results: Road and Rail Networks
12
First Results: Analysis of Transport Networks – Scope
• Transport Networks Conditions:
Capacity utilisation levels,
Identification of critical bottlenecks,
Definition of modal infrastructure state
• Planned investments and
improvements
• Identification of priorities in road and
rail infrastructure development.
13
First Results: Analysis of Transport Networks –Ex. Current Rail Network Conditions for Individual Itineraries
19 26 17 44 30 4 17 48 5 50 28 21 8
22
100 160 150
<20
4
78 47 39 N/A 50 88
LineGradient
PL - PLK CZ - SŽDC
120
GC/GČD
Clear-ance
Gauge
LineCategory
Max.Speed [kph]
< 10 ‰
Distance [km]
25 kV AC 15 kV, 16 2/3 HZ
64.57
constr.
D4
58.19 N/A65.57
N/A
N/A
Contract.of
Capacity
Numberof
Tracks
LineOpening
TimesComm.System
Electric.system
(overhead lin.)
Max. lengthof train
21 2044931 217 52 78 5492 41 41
D3
80 150 140160140 plan.
60.9? 57.1 %
A - ÖBB Infrastruktur B. I - RFI
UIC-505-1
5774 4960.4
HSL in
DC 3000 V
C3D3
60-70100
2
ZOV 7 Table 7/2N/A
140
40%50-70%
Without restrictions Non - stop
Train radio TRS (Train radio) Train radio
71.7 101.9 63.9 %
N/AMax. 12 per mille < 25 ‰
700 m450 m
<20‰<10‰
GSM-R
P/C 80N/A
49% 52.22 65.56%
0 - 24
N/A
DC 3000 V
<20‰
IntermodalFreight Code N/A P/C 78 - 402
60-7060-70
C3D3
160100100
14
First Results: Analysis of Transport Networks – Rail Capacity
15
First Results: Logistics Situation
• Qualification of current situation of
logistics within the AB Landbridge
Area, based upon questionnaires and
desk research for:
Supply of Logistics Services
(Terminals Conditions and Plans) and
Demand for Logistics Services
(Shippers, Forwarders, and Operators
– Desired Services and User Needs)
14
3
2
56
7 8
9
10 1112
13 14
1516
5657
5875
6465
52
59
6061
6263
17
18
2021
22
27
23
71
72
78
77
79
7624
25
26
28
29
3031
32
33
34
35
3637
38
66
67
68
69
70
3940
41
4243
73
74
47
48
4950
51
5354 55
44
45 46
19
80
Terminals
16
Of lowerimportance
Of lowerimportance
Of higherimportanceOf higher
importance
Itinerary numberItinerary number
III, II, I
First Results: Logistics – Recommendations for Solutions to Individual Itineraries
17
First Results: Regional and Economic Development Conditions – Population, GDP, Economic Structure, etc.
18
First Results: Regional and Economic Development Conditions – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats
• SWOT analysis conducted at regional level for all countries involved
• Transversal SWOT analysis and recommendations developed for:
AB Landbridge Corridor, as well as with regards to
Principle itineraries
• Overarching Conclusions:
Diverse level of economic development and growth in AB Landbridge Regions
Diversified accessibility to AB Landbridge Markets
Identification of opportunities and directions for economic development in the AB Landbridge
region ( by sector, driving force of metropolitan centres and restructured industrial centres)
AB Landbridge as a bridge for improving accessibility to markets in Europe and beyond
link between western Europe, Eastern Europe and Asia, as well
Link between Scandinavia and North Africa/ Middle East
19
First Results: Regional and Economic Recommendations 1/4
•• Preserving and protecting natural and cultural heritagePreserving and protecting natural and cultural heritage of the area as unquestioned
values, improving its tourist attractiveness
•• Improving institutional methodsImproving institutional methods for solving conflicts between investment needs and
environmental protection in a part of the A-B Landbridge area (e.g. Poland);
•• Stimulating the development of metropolitan functionsStimulating the development of metropolitan functions in capital cities and European
urban centres, such as Berlin, Warsaw, Prague, Vienna, Bratislava, Ljubljana,
Munich, and Venice and cities developing their metropolitan functions, including
Wrocław, Poznań, Szczecin, Gdańsk and surrounding urban areas, Łodź, Katowice
and Silesia, Ratyzbon, Nurnberg, and Triest;
20
First Results: Regional and Economic Recommendations 2/4
• Completing the process of restructuring main industrial areas in Germany, Poland restructuring main industrial areas in Germany, Poland
and the Czech Republicand the Czech Republic; shifting to modern industries, technologies and production
organisation methods;
• Methodical implementation of development prioritiesimplementation of development priorities in line with EU regional and
transport policies by national and regional governments;
•• Highlighting northHighlighting north--south transsouth trans--national linksnational links by countries and regions in their
development strategies and plans, as well as their actual implementation;
21
First Results: Regional and Economic Recommendations 3/4
• Developing mechanisms for efficient coordination of planningmechanisms for efficient coordination of planning between countries and
regions in the A-B Landbridge area which should enable the development of
compatible transport systems;
•• Developing rail transport (e.g. Poland) and modernising the railDeveloping rail transport (e.g. Poland) and modernising the railway networkway network (Poland,
Czech Rep., Slovakia), building new railway lines (e.g. in Italian regions, and in
Slovenia) and efficiency of such links;
• Improving the standard of the road networkstandard of the road network: construction of motorways and
expressways (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia), modernisation of existing low
standard roads, implementation of flood prevention projects;
22
First Results: Regional and Economic Recommendations 4/4
• Commencing the construction of the OderOder--Danube canalDanube canal;
• Extending the ferry transport potentialferry transport potential (increasing the number of ferries, extension
and modernisation of ferry bases), in particular in Baltic ports;
• Implementing the policy of shifting from road to rail, and wherever possible also to
inland shipping; increasing the multimodal and combined cargo transportincreasing the multimodal and combined cargo transport;
• Building logistic centreslogistic centres;
• Maintaining and extending education systemseducation systems;
• Developing transtrans--regional cooperation.regional cooperation.
23
First Results: Institutional Setting
• Identification and exploration of considerations and synergies with ongoing external
projects, from Consultations:
Spatial Development Forum, Extra – Cadses Consultation, High Level Advisory Board on
Transport Supply and Future Trends
• Pre-feasibility of pilot services between Adriatic and Baltic ports – both port to port, as well
as hinterland penetration
• Institutional Profiling for:
Infrastructure Planning and Realisation in the AB Landbridge Area,
Transnational cooperation opportunities
Potential private sector cooperation areas
24
Next Results: Phases Under Development
Landbridge Sectoral Scenario Analysis:WP 1: Road, Rail, Inland Waterways, MaritimeWP 2: LogisticsWP 3: Regional and Economic Development
Scenario Integration & Deployment (WP5):Definition of Selected Business Cases Improvement Packages for LinksAnalysis of Environmental ImplicationsDevelopment of Financing StrategiesDrafting of Policy RecommendationsDevelopment of Roadmap
Dissemination (WP6):Final ConferenceFinal Report and Targeted Brochures (regional decision-makers, private operators, ports)
Institutional Setting (WP4):Spatial Development ForumExtra-CADSES ConsultationHigh Level Advisory BoardPilot ProjectsProfiling of Institutional Framework
Legend:Activities currently under development
25
Contents
AB Landbridge Overview
Project Structure and Phase of Development
First Results
Future Project Opportunities
Contacts
26
Future Project Opportunities 1/2?
Possibilities to extend the activities of the A-B Landbridge beyond the end of the administrative
conclusion (April 2008) through the:
Submission of a new proposal in the Central Europe Programme - INTERREG IV B
Creating an umbrella framework for N-S itineraries within a single corridor connecting the Baltic
with the Adriatic Sea,
focusing on synergy/cooperation among the parties
instead of competition between the single itineraries
27
Future Project Opportunities 2/2
Creating a platform for transnational planning during implementation and investigate longer term
options beyond the end of the project
Proceeding with Feasibility Studies for the defined infrastructure intervention priorities for
individual itineraries
Investigate interconnections between itineraries
Evaluating and selecting innovative logistics services to facilitate/deploy
Conducting Pilot Projects for the new services
Deepening the Inland Waterways Analysis
28
Contents
AB Landbridge Overview
Project Structure and Phase of Development
First Results
Future Project Opportunities
Contacts
29
For more information: contact…..
Project Web site: www.ablandbridge.eu
Coordination Team:
Arch. Luigi Crimì
Regione Veneto - Unità Complessa Logistica
Tel. +39-041/2792105 Fax. +39-041/2792022
Email: [email protected]
Francesca Romana Forestieri
NET Engineering -Research and Development Unit,
Tel. +39-06-489-06379 Cell. +39-3355301560
Email. [email protected] or [email protected]
30
Thank You!Thank You!