Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Microstructural CharacterizationMicrostructural Characterizationof of
MaterialsMaterials
EunEun SooSoo ParkPark
Office: 33-316 Telephone: 880-7221Email: [email protected] hours: by an appointment
2009 spring
03.04.2009
2
Contents for previous classContents for previous classMicrostructure: structure inside a material
that could be observed with the aid of a microscope
OM, SEM, TEM, AFM, SPM
Observation of Microstructure: to make imagefrom the collection of defects in the materials
3
Contents for previous classContents for previous class
Microstructure Properties
ProcessingPerformance
DesignDesign
““TailorTailor--made Materials Designmade Materials Design””
optimization of material properties through control of microstructure
4
ex: hardness vs structure of steel• Properties depend on structure
Data obtained from Figs. 10.21(a)and 10.23 with 4wt%C composition,and from Fig. 11.13 and associateddiscussion, Callister 6e.Micrographs adapted from (a) Fig.10.10; (b) Fig. 9.27;(c) Fig. 10.24;and (d) Fig. 10.12, Callister 6e.
ex: structure vs cooling rate of steel• Processing can change structure
Structure, Processing, & PropertiesStructure, Processing, & Properties
Cooling Rate (C/s)
100
200
300
400
500
600
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
(a)
30μm
(b)
30μm
(d)
30μm(c)
4μm
Ha
rdn
ess
(B
HN
)
5
Contents for todayContents for today’’s classs class
-- Length Scale of MicrostructureLength Scale of Microstructure
1) Effect of atomistic length scale on material’s properties
including brief introduction for microstructural observation methods
--
2) Effect of defect structure on material’s propertiesincluding brief explanation of polycrystals and crystal
orientation
6
Length Scale of MicrostructureLength Scale of Microstructure
<0.1 nm1 nm = 4x10-8 in
0.1-10 nm
HRTEM, STEM
AFM
1-1000 μm
Optical Microscope
SEM,TEM, XRD
>1 mm
Naked Eye
Nanostructure 0.1-100 nm
7
Length Scales of MicrostructureLength Scales of Microstructure
• Many important intrinsic material properties are determined at the atomistic length scale.
• The Properties of materials are, how, often strongly affected by the defect structure. For example, polycrystals have different properties than single crystals just because of the variation of crystal orientation, combined with the anisotropy of the property. This immediately introduces the idea that the behavior of a material can vary from on location to another.
8
• AmorphousAmorphous – from the Greek for “without form”not to materials that have no shape, but rather to materials with no particular structure
• grain boundaries
nearly random = non-periodic
• no grain boundaries
Building block: arranged in orderly, 3-dimensional, periodic array
9
XX--ray diffraction resultsray diffraction results
Location and intensity of peaks~ location and arrangement of atoms
~analogous to a fingerprint
Diffuse halo pattern~summation of interference
Peak position
10
XRD (XXRD (X--ray Diffraction)ray Diffraction)X선을 결정에 부딪히게 하면 그 중 일부는 회절을 일으키고 그 회절각과 강도는 물질구조상
고유한 것으로서 이 회절 X선을 이용하여 시료에 함유된 결정성 물질의 종류와 양에 관계되
는 정보를 알 수 있다.
11
Recent BMGs with critical size Recent BMGs with critical size ≥≥ 10 mm10 mm
A.L. Greer, E. Ma, MRS Bulletin, 2007; 32: 612.
Zr47Ti8Cu8Ni10Be27 Johnson (Caltech)Vitreloy
Pd60Cu30Ni10P20 Inoue (Tohoku Univ.)
Fe48Cr15Mo14Y2C15B6 Poon (Virginia Univ.)Amorphous steel
Ca65Mg15Zn20 15mm Kim (Yonsei Univ.)Ca60Mg25Ni20 13mmMg65Cu20Ag5Gd10 11mmMg65Cu7.5Ni7.5Zn5Ag5Gd5Y5 14mm
12
High fracture strength over 5 GPa in Fe-based BMGs
10 100 1000
10
100
1000
10,000
Young’s Modulus (GPa)
Stre
ngth
σy
(MPa
)
Lead alloysTin alloys
Al alloysMg alloys
Beryllium
Steels
Ti alloys
La50Al25Cu25
La55Al35Cu10
Mg65Cu25Al10
La50Al30Cu20
Zr65Ti17.5Ni10Cu17.5
Ti50Ni20Cu25Sn5
Ti60Be35Si5Metallic glasses
Fe81.1C13.8Si5.1
Fe80C7.5P12.5
Theoreticalstrength
Engineering alloys
Contours ofσy / E
Contours ofσy
2 / E
A.L. Greer, E. Ma, MRS Bulletin, 2007; 32: 612.
High strength of BMGsHigh strength of BMGs
13
Limited Plasticity by shear softening and shear bandLimited Plasticity by shear softening and shear band
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Engi
neer
ing
Stre
ss (G
Pa)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Engineering Strain (%)
- low strength
- limited plasticity (0~2%) - catastrophic failure
20㎛
200㎛
Microscopically brittle fracture
Death of a material for structural applications
14
SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy)SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy)SEM은 Electron beam이 Sample의 표면에 주사하면서 Sample과의 상호작용에 의
해 발생된 Secondary Electron를 이용해서 Sample의 표면을 관찰하는 장비이다.
15
interrupt the localization of stress and deformation
• Prevent propagation of single shear band BMG matrix composites
• Multiple shear band formation
Plastic deformation in metallic glass•• No dislocation / No slip plane
• Inhomogeneously localized plastic flow in the shear band
Plastic deformation in metallic glassesPlastic deformation in metallic glasses
16
1) Casting : hard/ductile particle
2) Extrusion : ductile powder
extrusion direction
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.100
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
MGMC(20vol% brass)Max. compressive strength: 2.05 GPaTotal strain: 2.8 %Plastic strain: 0.8 %
MGMC(40vol% brass)Max. compressive strength: 1.64 GPaTotal strain: 4.7 %Plastic strain: 2.7 %
strain rate at room temp. = 6x10-5s-1
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
Strain
Monolithic BMGMax. compressive strength: 2.44 GPa
(Johnson et al., Acta Mater.,1999)
(Kim et al., J. Non-cryst. Solids, 2002)
ExEx--situ BMG matrix compositessitu BMG matrix composites
17
1) Solidification : formation of primary ductile phase
(Johnson et al., Acta Mater., 2001)
2) Solidification : precipitation of ductile phase
InIn--situ BMG matrix compositessitu BMG matrix composites
(Cu60Zr30Ti10)95Ta5
Ta rich particle (Johnson et al., Acta Mater., 2001)
18
TEM Image of a shear band
~20 nm
Shear bands are ~20 nm in width
Size of heterogeneitySize of heterogeneity
• Prevent propagation of single shear band
Micro- or nanometer scale heterogeneity
19
TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy)TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy)
TEM은 electron beam이 통과할 수 있도록 ultrathin sections을 만들어 관찰할 수
있도록 하는 기능적 장치로 여러 가지 각각의 시스템으로 구성되어 있다.
20
J. J. Lewandowski et al., Nature Mater. 5 (2006) 15
Melting of Sn coating on the surface of Vit. 1 on the compression side→ evidence for temperature rise (Tm, Sn = 232℃)
Observation of SBs after three point beam bend testObservation of SBs after three point beam bend test
212 nm
Width of shear band : 10 nmNo crystallization in the shear band
Branching shear bands
Crack propagation direction
Angle between split shear bands: 25~30º
Ti40Zr29Cu9Ni8Be14
Observation of shear bands after tensile testObservation of shear bands after tensile test
H.J. Chang et al. Unpublished. (2008)
22
OM images for interruptions during compressionOM images for interruptions during compression
• Stress–strain curves and related OM images for each interruptions during compression test
(a)
(a)
(b) (c)
(b)
(c)
J. Y. Lee et al. Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 5271-5279
23
Optical MicroscopeOptical Microscope OM과 TEM은 기본적인 구성 즉 렌즈의 배열은 같으나 렌즈를
무엇을 사용하느냐 하는 차이 이다. OM은 유리(glass)를 EM은
magnetic lens를 사용한다. 광원은 OM이 시광을 EM이 전자
(빔)를 사용하므로 전자현미경은 칼라 상을 볼 수 없는 것이다.
24
Elementary flow event in an metallic glasses
Size of heterogeneitySize of heterogeneity
σ
σ
v>v*atomic volume
free volumefluctuation
ε0
Ω
defect volume shear strain
atomic scale heterogeneity
Probability )*
exp(fv
vA
average free volume
⎪⎪⎭
⎪⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎪⎩
⎪⎪⎨
⎧
=f
VV
A 00expηη
Flow governed by localized defect (~10 atoms) and creates defects
25
Enhancement plasticity in BMGs with atomic scale heterogeneity
Effect of quenched in Effect of quenched in quasicrystalquasicrystal nuclei nuclei
26
Effect of quenchedEffect of quenched--in in quasicrystalquasicrystal nucleinuclei
Fully amorphous structureβ-Zr particle(~70 nm) in amorphous matrix
50 nm200 nm(a)
β-Zr
(b)
(b) Zr57Ti8Nb2.5Cu13.9Ni11.1Al7.5(a) Zr63Ti5Nb2Cu15.8Ni6.3Al7.9
2 mm rod
200 nm
I5 I3 I2
I-phase
3 mm rod
27
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
500
1000
1500
2000
[b][a]
d = 2mminjection-cast
Uniaxial CompressionStrain Rate = 1 x 10-4s-1
[a] [b]
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
Strain (%)
σf = 1.70 GPa, εf= 2.37 %σf = 1.71 Gpa, εf= 4.64 %
σf = 1.72 Gpa, εf= 2.05 %
5 nm
HRTEM image in [b] alloy
Compression test
Effect of quenchedEffect of quenched--in in quasicrystalquasicrystal nucleinuclei
28
1 2 3 4 5 60.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
FT
[k3 ·χ
(k)]
r(A)
alloy (2) rib. alloy (2) 1 mm alloy (2) 2 mm alloy (2) 3 mm
(c)
1 2 3 4 5 60.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
r(A)
FT[k
2 ·χ(k
)]
alloy (2) rib. alloy (2) 1 mm alloy (2) 2 mm alloy (2) 3 mm
(a)
Zr-K edge
Ni-K edge
1 2 3 4 5 60.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
r(A)
FT[k
3 ·χ(k
)]
alloy (2) rib. alloy (2) 1 mm alloy (2) 2 mm alloy (2) 3 mm
(b)
Cu-K edge
EXAFS analysis
Distinctive structural change around Ni atom
Intensity change due to microstructural change
(b) Zr57Ti8Nb2.5Cu13.9Ni11.1Al7.5
Effect of quenchedEffect of quenched--in in quasicrystalquasicrystal nucleinuclei
Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure
29
EXAFS AnalysisEXAFS Analysis
Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS)는 고체를 통과한 X-선
의 흡수 spectrum을 분석하여 원자단위의 구조를 분석하는 방법으로 그 동안 전
이금속을 포함한 분자, 촉매, 비정질 재료, 초전도재료 등 다양한 재료들에 있는
특정 원소 주위의 local structure 분석하기 위하여 많이 사용되어 왔다.
포항방사광가속기
30
T ( )캜-200 -100 0
Cu + 3.32 at%Ni
Cu + 2.16 at%Ni
deformed Cu + 1.12 at%Ni
1
2
3
4
5
6
Re
sist
ivit
y, ρ
(1
0-8
Oh
m-m
)
0
Cu + 1.12 at%Ni
ure?Cu밣
• Electrical Resistivity of Copper:
• Adding “impurity” atoms to Cu increases resistivity.• Deforming Cu increases resistivity.
Adapted from Fig. 18.8, Callister 6e.(Fig. 18.8 adapted from: J.O. Linde,Ann Physik 5, 219 (1932); andC.A. Wert and R.M. Thomson,Physics of Solids, 2nd edition,McGraw-Hill Company, New York,1970.)
ELECTRICAL PropertiesELECTRICAL Properties
pure Cu
(oC)
31
Composition (wt%Zinc)Th
erm
al C
on
du
cti
vity
(W
/m-K
)
400
300
200
100
00 10 20 30 40
Adapted from Fig. 19.4, Callister 6e.(Fig. 19.4 is adapted from Metals Handbook: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous alloys and Pure Metals, Vol. 2, 9th ed., H. Baker, (Managing Editor), American Society for Metals, 1979, p. 315.)
THERMAL PropertiesTHERMAL Properties
• Thermal Conductivity of Copper:--It decreases when you add zinc!
32
• Transmittance:--Aluminum oxide may be transparent, translucent, or
opaque depending on the material structure.
Adapted from Fig. 1.2,Callister 6e.(Specimen preparation,P.A. Lessing; photo by J. Telford.)
single crystalpolycrystal:low porosity
polycrystal:high porosity
OPTICAL PropertyOPTICAL Property
33
34
Grain growth
35