Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ADVANCED DIGESTION – FROM CONCEPT TO COMMISSIONING
Powell, C. and Plaza M.
GHD, United Kingdom
Abstract
A review and discussion of the design processes and challenges encountered to develop an advanced
digestion project at an existing WwTW from client concept through tender stage, detailed design,
construction and commissioning. Managing change within the design and the implications for
programme and costs
Following the client’s decision to proceed with an advanced digestion solution sized for 11.5tds / day,
and to provide an enhanced product, GHD were engaged by the Framework Construction Partner as
Civil & MEICA designers to ensure that the proposed solution could be engineered, designed and
constructed to overcome a number of challenges;
• Regulatory date to be achieved.
• Less detailed client scope document than previous projects.
• A novel, containerised Thermal Hydrolysis Plant.
• A restricted site footprint, congested with operational infrastructure above & below ground.
• An existing sludge digestion and dewatering process to be re-engineered for changing sludge
consistency, composition and rheology.
• Existing assets that the client wished to reuse / convert.
• Management of additional liquor flows, solids and nutrient load.
• Management of changes to scope, client requirements and design elements.
Under the clients’ procurement model, the client provides a basis of design, a project scope and takes
process responsibility for the proposed solution and process throughputs. Leading the detailed design
from front end mass & energy balances, to construction stage MEICA & Civil design with extensive use
of 3D modelling, GHD ensured that robust, cost effective design was delivered on time. GHD were
responsible for specifying and integrating numerous vendor packages into the scheme including the
THP plant & steam boiler, new sludge thickening & storage, existing CHP system, Ultra Violet (UV)
Disinfection of Final Effluent service water, Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) clarification for liquors
treatment and chemical dosing.
Effective collaboration between stakeholders was achieved with regular design reviews, site inspections
and participation in the detailed HAZOP / ALM process ensured safe construction, operation and
maintenance.
Keywords
Thermal Hydrolysis, thickening, liquors, dilution, 3D, compact, change, programme
Introduction
The project comprised the installation of a new Thermal Hydrolysis Plant (THP) plant at a large WwTW
(P.E. 100,000) with the main driver to produce an enhanced digested sludge cake by a set regulatory
date.
The THP plant selected by the client was a CAMBI B2-4 modular, skid mounted system, believed to be
the first installation of this type in the UK. In addition to the THP plant, new sludge processing assets
were required and some existing assets converted to accommodate the works.
The capital value of the project was approx. £20million and the initial construction programme as follows
• Client scoping design 2013
• Tender design Dec 2013 – Apr 2014
• Order placed with construction contractor Jun 2014
• Design start up July 2014
o Delete air blast cooler July 2014
• Coding issue MEICA design Aug – Dec 2014
• Coding issue civil design Jan – Mar 2015
• Start on Site Sep 2014
o Change design for 3% s/s raw sludge Apr 2015
o Delete UV for dewatering Apr 2015
o Layout changes Mar 2015
o Delete LTP, add DAF Unit May 2015
• Wet Commissioning & start up Dec 2015
• Project In use Jan 2016
Discussion
Existing Sludge Treatment Process
The WwTW is a conventional ASP treatment site with tertiary ammonia reduction via Nitrifying Trickling
Filter (NTF) and serves a PE of approx. 100,000.
Prior to the project, and as per Figur, co-settled primary & secondary sludge’s were screened before
being transferred to a sludge storage tank. The screened sludge was pumped to the 2 No. primary
mesophilic digesters with heating provided by waste heat from a CHP engine and a backup propane
boiler if required. Following primary digestion, sludge flowed under gravity to 4 No secondary digesters
for a further 22 days aerobic treatment to inhibit biogas production. Sludge’s were then pumped to
smaller storage tanks prior to final dewatering via centrifuges with conveyors placing the final cake in
the cake storage area before transport offsite and disposal onto agricultural land.
Figure 1: Existing Process Flow
Modified Sludge Treatment Process
The main changes to the existing process are as follows and shown in Figur
• Pre-thickening of the existing co-settled sludge from 2-3% to 16-20% via new decanter
centrifuges.
• Storage of thickened cake in a new 400m3 silo
• Installation of the pre-treatment THP process & steam boiler
• Modification of existing CHP engine to divert exhaust to a waste heat recovery boiler and jacket
water to heat exchanger.
• Post THP Sludge cooling to avoid excess temperature within digester.
• Decommissioning of 1No digester leaving 1No in service.
• Decommissioning of 4No secondary digesters
• New, intensive de-gassing process with air saturation via low pressure blowers.
• Thickening process centrate liquor balancing and return
• New dewatering liquors liquor treatment via DAF.
• New Odour Control Unit for sludge process
Figure 2: Modified Process Flow
Design process & programme
Initial Engagement & Tender Stage Design Services
Following appointment by the Framework Construction Partner, GHD undertook a series of meetings
with the client and their process consultant to discuss the agreed solution and review the initial tender
/ scoping design.
The client had completed an outline design consisting of basic P&IDs, mass balance / PFD, unit sizes,
a basic electrical single line diagram (SLD) and a proposal for the area of site to be used for the new
project (see Figur) . GHD were required to develop the design sufficiently to allow the contractor to
accurately price the project as per the terms of their contract with the client.
One of the biggest challenges at this point was the small footprint available within the existing works;
there was a large amount of equipment to add within a very confined site. Other significant challenges
were constructability and sequencing of the build and ensuring that the existing site operations weren’t
unduly affected. The novel nature of the selected THP unit was also a consideration.
To address these issues, GHD proposed that most effective way to develop this project was to
undertake as much design as possible in 3D software as this would allow rapid updates and allow walk
through visualisation during review meetings, allowing all parties to see and understand the design
development. This approach combined with weekly reviews with the contractor and the client also
ensured continuous HSEQ reviews with regard to access and safe operations.
Using our experience and examples from previous projects, we successfully provided tender stage
design deliverables including;
• Initial 3D model of the project (see Figur)
• Civil & mechanical layouts of the major plant areas and equipment.(see Figu)
• Estimates of piling and RC requirements
• Tender P&IDs giving details of the equipment, instruments and valving required.
• Pump and equipment sizing for all process items
• Detailed SLD’s and SCADA / PLC control systems
• Control Philosophy
The tender design was completed within 12 weeks and permitted accurate tender pricing and early
supplier engagement. After a short period for internal client approval, the tender stage design was
agreed by all parties and following contract exchange, the project moved to the detailed design &
delivery phase.
Figure 4: Site layout provided by client
Figure 4: GHD Developed Site Layout for Pricing – note additional detail, connections and
unit sizing
Detailed Design Phase
As is essential at this stage of a large, technically complex project, we worked with the contractor to
prepare a design & construction programme sequencing the work to allow identification of the key
design issues and programme milestones that would influence how GHD would provide suitable and
timely design to the contractor.
Figure 5: Extract from 3D model showing thickening and THP area
Figure 6: Thickening area following construction
Key Design Challenges & Issues
Programme & need for accelerated design phase
The key driver for the project was the need to meet a regulatory date for achieving enhanced sludge
cake hence programme was a key challenge throughout the design and construction phases. GHD
worked with the contractor to produce a detailed programme which identified a number of items that
required early M&E design to allow subsequent civil design and / or sub contract procurement;
Early review of bore hole data had identified that ground conditions in the area allocated for new
equipment was of poor quality and structures supporting large loads would require piling; mechanical
and civil design of these items was required within a tight time frame and was achieved by GHD working
collaboratively with the contractor and potential vendors; centrifuge support platform, thickened sludge
storage silo, pipe bridges and degassing tank design progressed quickly to allow groundworks to be
started as per programme requirements. Mechanical & civil layouts, load calculations, structural design
and piling design were all provided within a number of weeks to allow the site team to procure the piling
works.
Following completion of the early stage civil related design, numerous long lead items with GHD’s scope
required detailed process and electrical design to ensure that procurement could start to meet
construction programme; High Voltage Transformers & switching gear, Motor control centres (MCC),
sludge thickening centrifuges, large capacity progressive cavity (PC) pumps, silos and tanks were
specified, laid out and sized.
GHD’s extensive capabilities and experience with these types of equipment meant that the contractor
benefitted from rapid design with minimal need for lengthy TQ processes. In the case of the PC pumps,
early stage vendor involvement verified the challenges of pumping thickened sludge at 20% solids w/w
into the storage silo; system duties of 13m3/hr at 25.5 barg had significant implications for the 250NB
pipework system. MCC design was required to allow order placement and also to allow us to size and
locate the control kiosk with a high degree of accuracy.
Novel THP equipment & Interfaces & modifications to CHP & digesters
In order to integrate the new THP system and provide the appropriate process connections, GHD had
to identify and design a number of interfaces to the existing site infrastructure, particularly the existing
biogas and CHP systems. A combination of site survey, laser 3D scanning, review of third party design
documents and face to face discussions with the CHP engine supplier allowed GHD to identify tie in
points, line sizes and materials for the services and show proposed pipework routes within our model
to allow all parties to clearly understand the design concept and scope boundaries. The CHP engine
exhaust was redirected to provide waste heat to the steam boiler and the engine water circuit was
passed through a new heat exchanger system to recover further heat for the boiler feed water system.
The existing biogas cleaning and boosting equipment was modified to supply the new boiler in parallel
with the CHP engine. The complexity of the interfaces are indicated in Figur.
Figure 7: Interfaces between New THP & Existing CHP
A key feature of the move to THP is that the digester feed concentration is increased from 4 to 10%
giving a more than 50% reduction in volume; as a result, only a single digester would be required for
treatment in the future. This also required a re-engineering of the sludge recirculation system and the
need to cool the sludge prior to digestion rather than heating as with traditional mesophilic digestion.
The original design called for an air blast cooler to provide this cooling duty; however, GHD quickly
proposed that this be replaced with a tube type water cooled item using final effluent as the cooling
media in order to significantly reduce power consumption; this also provided heated final effluent which
was to be used for pre THP sludge dilution.
Managing change during design period
However well-defined a projects’ design basis, or however well-developed a design, the requirement to
manage change throughout a project is inevitable. Changes can occur for a number of reasons and for
this paper we can identify 3 main drivers of change; client driven, contractor driven and GHD driven.
Client driven
Client driven change is often associated with significant changes in scope or design basis – usually for
sound technical or commercial reasons as was the case during this project. However, irrespective of
the driver, significant amounts of redesign are often required, potentially extending programme. For
this project the regulatory date couldn’t be moved, hence GHD and the contractor had to assess the
changes and incorporate the impact in a short space of time – something that we were able to do
successfully.
Centrifuge Liquors Management
In THP type processes, the liquors arising from dewatering digested sludge are known to contain
significant concentrations of ammonia (up to 1500mg/l) and this may affect downstream treatment
processes if not managed correctly. At the outset of this project, the client had carried out a process
review of the downstream system and concluded that a dedicated biological liquor treatment plant (LTP)
was required to reduce the ammonia content to a level suitable for blending with the works inlet flows.
Design of the LTP had progressed to the stage where an area of site had been allocated, civils design
begun on tank bases and layouts, power supplies assessed and allocated and vendor submissions had
been reviewed and an order imminent.
Given the significant capital costs of the plant (circa £1million) and the operational costs associated
with the proposed plant (power consumption - 100 kW aeration and potentially 250kW water heater),
the client carried out a further review and risk analysis. The outcome of this final review determined
that the existing biological treatment process had sufficient nitrification capacity to permit the deletion
of the LTP. However, balancing of two liquor streams and a DAF unit for solids removal from the
dewatering liquors was specified and had to be integrated into the design in a short timescale – (see
Figur). An existing sludge holding tank was reused as a new balancing tank and a liquor return system
controlled by works inlet ammonia load was to be introduced.
Figure 8: Compact DAF Unit in place of full biological LTP
Challenges included finding a suitable location for the equipment, providing timely design and lead
time for manufacture. Deliverables prepared by GHD in a short timescale included full P&IDs, process
calculations, MCC designs and control philosophy. Mechanical design followed upon receipt of vendor
information at tender stage. GHD worked with a vendor to provide a compact, safe and cost effective
design, with a temporary unit providing treatment due to long lead time (24 weeks) for the permanent
works. Whilst achieving this significant change was difficult, the benefits to the project were
considerable; the capital cost was approx. 50% of the LTP scheme and power consumption
significantly lower at approx. 45kW.
Change to specified raw sludge solids concentration
During the solution identification & development stage the client based the process design upon raw
sludge solids concentration of 2.0% w/w, and this information was used to produce the mass balances
used to size main equipment items and process flows. Detail design had been completed for vessel
sizing and modelling, equipment sizing and pump duty calculations on this data, and hence motor sizing,
MCC design and power supplies had also been developed and used in detailed layout drawings.
Shortly after the civil site works had commenced, the client advised that the raw sludge concentration
was to be changed to 3.0% w/w following an operational change at the primary settlement tanks. This
change had a significant impact upon numerous items that subsequently required rapid assessment
and redesign. Pump duty calculations, vessel sizing, pipeline sizing all required changing to
accommodate lower flowrates with MCC and electrical design following rapidly. The changes were
made within a few weeks to allow the contractor to go back to vendors with new specifications without
unduly affecting delivery times.
Contractor driven constructability & risk reduction
Following the completion of the initial design stage, GHD and the contractor began to review the
proposed layout from a constructability and cost approach and a number of changes were tabled to
provide some value engineering;
• Combining two proposed kiosks to form a large MCC / polymer dosing kiosk with separate
rooms.
This was a relatively simple change to accommodate, simplified the construction process and reduced
risk in parallel – although the resulting kiosk was a significant size the need to only build a single
basement & foundation in a tight area was a large positive for the project in terms of safer working,
programme reduction and cost savings.
• Retaining an existing building
Figure 9: Retained building (foreground) giving reduced footprint for new installation
Adjacent to the kiosk area was a storage small building (see Figur) which was due to be demolished
and replaced in another location to allow more space for the new process equipment. The contractor
stated a preference to retain this structure to avoid demolition and the need to relocate. This had
beneficial safety, programme and cost implications to the project as a whole and after consultation with
the client, it was agreed that the structure would remain, however this significantly reduced the space
available for the new equipment which resulted in further redesign and a much tighter footprint for the
new centrifuges, UV equipment and cake silo.
GHD Proposed
In addition to changes instigated by the client and contractor, there were several examples of change
proposed by GHD in order to solve technical issues and / or improve efficiency for the client.
Examples include the GHD proposal to use a final effluent cooler as noted earlier and the proposal to
use potable / service water for flushing the final centrifuges rather than install a UV unit. To prevent the
reintroduction of pathogens, final effluent can’t be used to flush the centrifuges, hence UV had been
proposed to provide clean water. However, due to the need to have water available at very short notice
in case of centrifuge shutdown, a UV plant would have been running for extended periods of time,
consuming power and potentially overheating the water circuit. The CAPEX, OPEX and operational
benefits of using potable / service water were examined by the client who approved the proposal.
Key Commissioning Issues
As with most D&B type projects, construction had started with civils underway prior to completion of
M&E design and a discussion of the construction period is beyond the scope of this paper, however, in
general all items progressed as per programme and commissioning began late 2015 as planned.
Although GHD were not involved in day to day commissioning role, regular updates took place between
all parties to ensure safe and consistent progress was maintained. As the commissioning activities were
undertaken, the majority of processes were started and optimised without issue; however, a number of
key operational issues had to be addressed;
• Maintaining 27/7 operation of the THP with intermittent up and downstream operations.
• Consistent raw sludge thickening for storage.
• Discharge from cake storage silo.
• Consistent pre THP dilution.
• Sensor blinding.
To achieve best efficiencies, the THP plant is to be operated 24/7 with a feed solid consistency of 14 -
16%. The sludge thickening plant to increase solids from 3% is intended to operate approx. 8hrs/day
for 5 days week, meaning that a reserve of solids is required to keep the THP plant operating at night
and weekends. In order to store sludge as a cake within a silo, a consistency of 16 – 22% is required
meaning dilution back to 14-16% is required.
Thickening of the raw sludge to storage consistency was achieved after a brief amount of centrifuge set
up as would be expected; centrifuges are normally operated to achieve maximum solids capture, but
for this application a compromise is required – after extensive trials and testing, the correct operating
parameters (poly dose, speed, torque etc.) were achieved and maintained.
Storage of the sludge proved relatively straightforward, however, the discharge of sludge into the THP
feed pumps inlet hoppers proved more difficult to optimise and caused operational issues such as
inability to control flow and over operation of the outlet valves, leading to actuator failure, sludge spillage
and unwanted THP shutdowns. Investigations showed that improved level control within the pump
hoppers (lower ‘high’ level settings) and modified silo outlet chutes (flexible rubber replaced with solid
chutes) rectified these problems and allowed the silo outlet system and THP feed pumps to operate as
required.
Figure 10: Original Silo Outlet (left) and modified (right)
It was also noted that the pre THP dilution system was performing erratically, leading to inconsistent
feed solids entering the THP unit; the system used positive displacement type dosing pumps to add
heated final effluent into the feed pump hopper where an auger mixed the sludge and water into a
consistent mixture. Heated final effluent from the main sludge cooler was used for dilution as previous
projects had indicated to the client that dilution water needed to be heated. Calculating the correct flow
rate of dilution water was carried out via extensive site trials and lab work as online solids measuring
instruments were unavailable for the site operating conditions. A look up table correlating THP pump
speed with dilution water flow was used to provide a control loop. This system provided consistent
solids to the THP unit, however, the dilution water pumps themselves became problematic with frequent
vibration, failure and poor reliability. Eventually the pumps were replaced with modulating valves and
this proved a more robust solution.
A further issue was the tendency for level sensors in centrate and sludge vessels to blind and give
incorrect measurements, over a period of time a number of these instruments where fitted with flushing
systems where heated final effluent was used to regularly flush instruments via a control system of
timers and solenoids as per Figure .
Figure 11: Typical Level Sensor flushing Installation
Conclusions
1. By working collaboratively with the contractor and client, GHD provided a safe, effective and
cost effective design for a challenging installation using novel equipment into an existing works.
2. Managing change throughout the project lifecycle is inevitable and in this project, change
proved beneficial for overall project outcome – positive relationships between client, contractor
and designer are crucial for successful outcomes.
3. Due to our ability to react quickly and decisively, GHD were able to react to change and provide
effective solutions without adversely impacting programme
4. The management of thickening and dewatering operation liquors is critical for overall works
performance. Existing works capacity should be investigated and modelled thoroughly for any
THP project as part of the scoping phase. The clients’ internal design challenge process proved
beneficial and allowed significant cost and operational complexity to be deleted from this
project.
5. Effective Pre-thickening operations are critical and management of storage and transfer of
thickened sludge at 16-22% is challenging.
6. Controlling silo outlet and pre THP dilution are critical to ensure consistent THP operation,
efficient steam usage due to reduced water content and flow / load management due to
improved cycle time.