7
1 | Page Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION pg. 2 ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ELEMENTS pg. 2 REQUIRED LIFE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: pg. 4 PROBABLE COST OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS pg.6 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS pg.6 CONCLUSION pg.7 APPENDIX A: MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL/PLUMBING ENGINEER’S REPORT by Spectrum Engineering, Inc. APPENDIX B: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER’S REPORT by Skarda & Associates, Inc. APPENDIX C: PROBABLE COST ITEMIZED BREAKDOWN APPENDIX D: LIFE SAFETY PLAN (11x17) FLOOR AND FRAMING PLANS (11x17) BUILDING ELEVATIONS (11x17) BUILDING SECTIONS (11x17) MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AGRICULTURAL BARN at the Agricultural History Farm Park CONDITION SURVEY

Ag Barn Condition Survey - Montgomery Parks | Page Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011 Table of Contents

  • Upload
    vunga

  • View
    217

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1 | P a g e Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION pg. 2 ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ELEMENTS pg. 2 REQUIRED LIFE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: pg. 4 PROBABLE COST OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS pg.6 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS pg.6 CONCLUSION pg.7 APPENDIX A:

MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL/PLUMBING ENGINEER’S REPORT by Spectrum Engineering, Inc.

APPENDIX B: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER’S REPORT by Skarda & Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX C:

PROBABLE COST ITEMIZED BREAKDOWN APPENDIX D:

LIFE SAFETY PLAN (11x17) FLOOR AND FRAMING PLANS (11x17) BUILDING ELEVATIONS (11x17) BUILDING SECTIONS (11x17)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS

AGRICULTURAL BARN at the Agricultural History Farm Park

CONDITION SURVEY

2 | P a g e Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

INTRODUCTION: The Montgomery County Department of Parks has made the Agricultural History Farm Park in Derwood, Maryland available for rent as an event venue. Currently, renters have the use of the House, outdoor areas for parking and tented receptions and bathroom facilities both in the House and the Center. All events are catered, and no cooking, warming or cold storage facilities are provided at the Park – these must all be brought to the site by the caterer. Restroom facilities are available in the main house (within 500 feet of the barn), in the more remote conference center, and, for events, these are frequently supplemented by portable toilets. Kate McCullough of Symmetry First met with Ed Trey, Park Manager, at the project site and discussed the condition of the property and the intended use of the Agricultural Barn. M-NCPPC-MC Facilities Management Division provided ‘95% CD’ Barn Conversion Drawings, dated 05.01.01, which included new beams, post and pier footings in the undercroft to support the barn floor, and a new mezzanine above the barn floor. The undercroft work appears to have been executed, while the mezzanine was not. In order to understand the scope of work that would be needed to obtain a Use and Occupancy Permit for the Agricultural Barn so it could be used for indoor receptions, Symmetry First Architects and our engineering consultants have surveyed the building to establish:

• existing condition of the building envelope and interior finishes • allocation of existing interior space and means of egress • existing condition of the barn’s electrical, fire alarm and sprinkler systems • existing condition of the barn’s structure and envelope

The 2009 International Building Code and the 2009 NFPA Life Safety Code 101 were reviewed to establish code criteria for the proposed use as a venue for wedding receptions and similar gatherings. ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ELEMENTS The Agricultural Barn was built c 1895. Undercroft:

• Walls ¾ of the perimeter is stone, north wall is wood lap siding with ventilated wood on upper ½ of wall.

• Ceiling Exposed rough beams supporting rough 2x10 wood planking. • Floor Dirt • Doors Five, approximately 3’-6” x7’-0” wood • The clear height is 8’-0”+/- to underside of beams, 8’-8” +/- to underside of deck

Barn Floor: • Walls Exposed wood lap siding • Ceiling Exposed to underside of roof shingles • Floor Rough 2x10 wood planking in center; 1x10 at both ends • Doors Six 9’-8” x 13’-8” sliding wood doors • The clear height is 20’-6” at perimeter, 35’-10” at center

• Windows – None. Ventilation is provided by 22 wood louvers on the Barn level, each 6.8 square feet,

with bird screening. On the lower level, there are 6 wood louvers in the end walls and wood slat ventilation along the north side of the Undercroft.

• Gutters and Downspouts – The gutters and downspouts are in good condition. Downspouts should be extended to direct rainwater farther away from the stone foundation walls.

• Insulation – None.

3 | P a g e Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

Exterior Walls– The exterior walls are painted wood lap siding in fair to good condition.

Roof – The roof is wood shake shingles on wood slats, with visible daylight.

Doors – There are nine exterior wood doors in the Undercroft, each approximately 3’-6” x 7’-0”.

At the south entrance side of the barn, there are 4 sliding wood barn doors. Each panel is 13’-8” tall by 9’-8” wide. The total opening is 13’- 8” tall by 38’ -0” wide

4 | P a g e Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

REQUIRED LIFE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: Based on our examination of the existing building and the review of applicable codes, we list below our recommendations for the construction work required to bring the building into code-compliant and usable condition for the proposed Assembly occupancy. Architectural Life Safety Improvements In accordance with the Life Safety Plan Drawing (See Appendix) the following items are required:

EXIT DOORS: The IBC 2009 code requires 77” of egress, and that the egress openings be 30’-2” apart from each other. To comply with the code, and maintain the historical integrity of the building we recommend the sliding barn door be held open in a configuration that complies with both regulations, using the existing wood door stop system to prohibit the doors from being closed while the building is occupied. The door stop must comply with ADA height and profile requirements to allow wheelchairs to cross the threshold.

GUARDRAIL: A 42” high guardrail must be installed at the sliding door opening on the north wall to protect patrons from falling.

STOREROOMS: At the two existing storerooms on the Barn level, the wall, ceiling and floor assemblies are required to have a one-hour fire rating. The storeroom doors must have a 45 minute fire-rated door and frame assembly.

5 | P a g e Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

All items stored above the storage rooms will need to be removed.

Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Life Safety Improvements For a complete description of existing conditions and recommendations, see the Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Report by Spectrum Engineers, in Appendix A The following items are required:

Exit Signs – Install exit signs at exits. Interior Emergency Lighting – Install emergency lighting throughout barn with battery packs. Exterior Emergency Egress Lighting – Install emergency egress lighting with battery packs. Additional sprinkler heads – Add sprinkler heads in storage rooms Properly spaced heat detectors – Provide all new heat detectors tied to fire alarm panel. Fire Alarm System signaling sprinkler flow and heat detection, dialed into local fire services.

Structural Repairs For a complete description of existing conditions and recommendations, see the Structural Report by Skarda & Associates, in Appendix B. The following items are required :

Roof Framing – (to meet 30lbs/sf live load) Reinforce roof rafters with sistered 2x6s and connect to walls and roof beams with metal connectors.

Install 2x8 collar tie between roof beams. Reinforce roof beams with sistered LVL beams.

Barn Floor (Second Floor) Framing – (to meet 100lbs/sf live load) Reinforce floor joists with LVL joists Reinforce beams with (2) LVL beams

End Walls – (to meet wind and seismic requirements) Install 4x4 let-in diagonal bracing and tie with metal straps. Reinforce horizontal gits with 4x4 posts at mid-point between existing 8x8 columns. Existing cable bracing should remain in place.

Interior Beam-and-Column Frames Reinforce mortise and tenon joints at interior column frames with thru-bolts.

Foundation – Verify 30” footing depth below grade. Install metal connectors at all wood column bases. Install 8” thick concrete wall at perimeter stone foundation walls, down to 30” below grade.

6 | P a g e Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

PROBABLE COST OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS An itemized cost breakdown is provided in Appendix C. For Life Safety improvements, the probable cost, including overhead, profit, general conditions, performance and payment bond and a 5% contingency, is approximately $55,000. For structural repairs, also including overhead, profit, general conditions, performance and payment bond and a 5% contingency, the probable cost is approximately $77,000. Probable costs for optional improvements noted in this report are as follows: Roof Replacement $50,000 Accent Lighting/Add’l Receptacles $25,000 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS Maintenance And Repairs We list below our recommendations for OPTIONAL construction work that would improve deteriorated conditions, which, if left unchecked, will cause damage:

DRAINAGE AROUND THE FOUNDATION: Extend downspouts to carry water away from foundation walls. Re-grade the drainage pattern at the east and west end walls to direct water away from the barn building.

ROOF: The roof is wood shingles on wood slats. The roof is not currently watertight. Replacement of wood shingles is advisable.

7 | P a g e Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

TRAP DOOR: The trap door in the Barn floor that accesses the Undercroft will need to be secured and locked from the Undercroft side. Flush hinges would be recommended.

Aesthetic Upgrades We list below our recommendations for OPTIONAL work that would enhance the barn’s appearance.

ENHANCED INTERIOR LIGHTING: We understand that free-standing lightpoles are often used to up-light the barn’s roof structure during events. Permanent accent lighting could be installed for this purpose. Additional power receptacles could be provided to reduce the use of extension cords and to avoid overloading circuits.

REMOVAL OF STORED ITEMS TO ANOTHER LOCATION: Period farm tools and equipment add to the ambience of the barn’s assembly space. Even the goats have a certain charm. Any other stored items could be relocated to another storage site.

CONCLUSION The required upgrades, modifications and repairs described above will bring the barn into compliance with current building and life safety codes. The optional improvements described above will improve the barn’s durability and aesthetics. Respectfully submitted, Kate McCullough Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

Agricultural History Farm Barn Condition Survey Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011

APPENDIX D:

LIFE SAFETY PLAN (11x17)

FLOOR AND FRAMING PLANS (11x17)

BUILDING ELEVATIONS (11x17)

BUILDING SECTIONS (11x17)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS

AGRICULTURAL BARN at the Agricultural History Farm Park

CONDITION SURVEY

Memorandum

DISTRIBUTED VIA:

Pickup Delivery Mail/Express Mail Express Shipping

e�Mail Enclosure Fax Other

The following analysis outlines the existing conditions observed during our visit to the existing building and our resulting recommendations and cost estimates. The estimates presented in this report are based on labor and materials and do not include contractor profit, overhead, or contingency allowances. Summary As more fully described below, we recommend/anticipate the following:

• adding a basic fire alarm system to the building; • replacing all existing smoke and heat detectors; • replacing the upper floor lighting; and • adding a digital programmable time clock for automatic lighting control.

Utility Services Electric � The existing building is served from an existing service distribution panel located on the exterior wall of the nearby equipment barn. The service distribution panel is served by Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco) from an adjacent pole�mounted utility transformer. Service is provided underground to the service distribution panel at 240/120 volts, single phase, three wire, with a single utility meter mounted next to the service distribution panel. The service distribution panel is protected by a main circuit breaker (rated for 200 amperes) and distributes power to the barn through underground conductors protected by a second circuit breaker (rated for 70 amperes). Telecommunications � The existing building does not have telecommunications service. Natural Gas � The existing building does not have natural gas service. Water Service � The existing building does not appear to have water service other than for fire protection. Proposed Design/Recommendations: Electric � The existing electrical service should be sufficient for the proposed assembly occupancy.

To: Kate McCullough Telephone: 240.568.0700

Company: Symmetry First Architects Fax: 240.568.0354

8600 Foundry Street Box 2069

Savage, Maryland 20763 Copies to: File

From: Carlton Getz Telephone: 765.414.2773

Job: Agricultural History Farm Park Barn

Toll Free: 800�678�7077

Re: Report and Recommendations

Fax:

Job Number:

20110100 E#mail: cag@spectrum�engineers.com

Date: October 10, 2011 Page: 1 of 3

Telecommunications � Telecommunications service is not required for the proposed use and has been excluded from this analysis. Natural Gas � Natural gas service is not readily available at the site and has been excluded from this analysis. Water Service � Domestic water service is not presently provided to the building and may not be required for the proposed occupancy. However, consideration should be given to requirements in the International Building Code concerning mop sinks and drinking fountains to determine whether domestic water service would need to be added to the building to meet current codes. Mechanical Systems The existing building does not have any existing mechanical systems (aside from an electric unit heater in the main sprinkler room) and none are anticipated for the building. Electrical Distribution System The existing electrical distribution system consists of a single branch circuit panelboard rated for 240/120 volt, single phase, three wire service. The panelboard is rated for 125 amperes and includes a 60 ampere, two pole main circuit breaker which acts as the service disconnect for the building. The majority of loads served by the panelboard are convenience receptacles and light fixtures with a few refrigerators and freezers. The panelboard appears to be about 20+/� years old but is serviceable and in reasonably good condition. The building's existing electrical cabling is primarily conductors in rigid conduit and is generally compliant with current codes. The existing electrical components (including receptacles, boxes, etc.) are generally in good condition. Proposed Design/Recommendations: We recommend maintaining most of the existing electrical system while adding additional convenience receptacles on the upper level for occupant use. However, the additional receptacles are not required by code and would be optional. We estimate that adding approximately twelve (12) additional duplex receptacles on two separate circuits would cost roughly $5,000. Lighting The building's existing interior lighting is a combination of incandescent lamps in screw sockets with glass enclosures (located on both the upper and lower levels) and suspended "high bay" metal halide fixtures on the upper level. In some locations the incandescent lamps have been replaced by retrofit screw base compact fluorescent lamps. The lighting is controlled by local toggle switches located in reasonably accessible locations. The current lighting installation on the upper level is functional but probably not ideal for the intended application. Additionally, the building does not have any emergency lighting. Exterior lighting is provided by a surface mounted metal halide fixture near the roof line over the barn doors to the upper level. The existing fixture is functional for the intended use but should be inspected to ensure functionality. The building's existing interior and exterior lighting does not appear to have any automatic control although the exterior fixture may have an integral photocell. Proposed Design/Recommendations: We recommend removing and replacing all of the existing interior lighting on the upper level, replacing this lighting with new high efficiency metal halide or light emitting diode (LED) fixtures suspended from the rafters. In conjunction with this work, the switching configuration would be modified to reflect the new layout and wall mounted self contained emergency lighting fixtures and exit signs would be added as appropriate for the proposed occupancy. However, the building also offers unique uplighting and accent lighting opportunities if desired by the owner. We also recommend installing a digital programmable time clock for control of interior and exterior lighting with an override switch located on the upper floor for control during special events. Additionally, it would be advisable, though not necessary, to recircuit the lower level lighting to the time clock and replace all existing incandescent lamps with retrofit screw base compact fluorescent lamps.

The recommended modifications required by current code (the emergency lighting and time clock) would cost approximately $7,500. The remaining optional recommendations, excluding any accent lighting, would add approximately $12,000 to the cost of the required modifications. Fire Alarm The existing building has heat detectors located on the upper and lower levels. The spacing of some of the existing heat detectors on the lower level is excessive and should be reduced to provide appropriate coverage. Additionally, the detectors on the upper level are not installed in accordance with current codes and would be ineffective in detecting a fire. The smoke detectors and the tamper and flow switches associated with the sprinkler system appear to be connected to a system which activates existing interior and exterior sirens upon detection of a fire. It appears that the system is also connected to the site fire alarm system located in the farmhouse which incorporates a dialer function to automatically contact local fire services. However, it is neither clear that the system as installed is a listed application nor that the existing system is functional (none of those at the site were aware of the system ever having been tested). The system has a temperature alarm located in the main sprinkler room to detect freezing conditions. Proposed Design/Recommendations: We recommend removing all of the existing fire alarm system components (except possibly the existing flow and tamper switches associated with the sprinkler main) and providing a new basic light commercial fire alarm system for the building. Current county code does not require a comprehensive fire alarm system in this type of building; however, given the scope of work required to bring the system into compliance and the existence of the sprinkler main, a comprehensive fire alarm system would simplify future maintenance and operation at minimal additional cost to the project. We estimate the fire alarm system upgrades would cost approximately $14,500, with $1,000 of this amount associated with incorporating a fire alarm panel rather than a simple dialer system. Emergency Power The existing building does not have emergency power. Proposed Design/Recommendations: We recommend using battery backup for required emergency lighting. The batteries would be integral to the emergency light fixtures and would be equipped with automatic power loss detection and transfer capabilities. The estimated cost of this functionality is included in the emergency lighting in Lighting, above. Fire Protection The existing building has a sprinkler system serving all levels of the building. In general, the existing fire protection system appears to be adequate for the intended occupancy provided that significant amounts of combustible materials (such as stacked hay) are not present on the upper level. Proposed Design/Recommendations:

No recommendations � the existing fire protection system appears suitable for the intended occupancy provided that significant quantities hay and/or other highly combustible materials not generally found in an assembly occupancy are not present on the upper level of the building. If you have any questions concerning this report or our recommendations, please feel free to contact me at 765.414.2773. Regards, Carlton A. Getz, P.E., CFA, LEED AP Associate Principal � Spectrum Engineers, Inc.

1 of 7

2439 N. Charles Street / Baltimore, Maryland 21218-5110 / (410) 366-9384 / FAX (410) 366-9389

November 04, 2011

Symmetry First Architects, LLCMailroom Box 2069Savage, MD 20763

Attn: Ms. Kate McCullough

Re: Agricultural Farm - Barn InvestigationS&A Job No. 11647

Dear Kate,

Submitted herewith is the structural investigation report for the above referenced project. This reportcontains the results of our investigation and an engineering interpretation of our findings andrecommendations.

Pursuant to your request, we visited the site to ascertain the nature and condition of the existing structure. Drawings of framing, that were developed in 2001, were made available to aid us in our observations andstructural analysis.

We are to verify framing member sizes and perform a structural analysis to determine whether or not thebuilding can safely support its code required live, wind, and seismic loadings in accordance with buildingcodes.

EXISTING OBSERVATIONS

The barn is 3 stories and is approximately 45' x 80'. The 3rd story in the past could have been used as storage. However, today there is no presence of floor framing for the 3rd floor. Interior space is clear story from 2nd

floor to roof. The building is constructed of solid wood oak timber beams and columns connected togetherwith mortise and tendons. Joints are held together with wood pins. The exterior shell is wood siding. Thebarn is built on a hill, in a north/ south direction, making it grade access on both the first and second floor.

The first floor is dirt. The second floor is 1x wood planking on each end of the barn and 2x wood plankingin the middle. The decking spans between 8"x 8" hand hewed wood joists spaced at 3'-0" o/c. The joistsspan 15'-0" between 12" x 12" wood beams spanning 20'-0" between columns. The roof is framed with 2"x6" rafters spaced 24" o/c. Support beams are approximately 8" x 6" spaced mid span between exterior walland ridge (11'-0" o/c) and span between beam/column rows at 20' o/c.

The beam and column rows are spaced 15'-0" form front to back and 20'-0" o/c side to side. The beams andcolumns are 8" x 8". Beams and column rows are braced by wood diagonals at the roof line and diagonalsteel cables down the 2nd floor framing. The end walls are braced by diagonal steel cables from corner ofroof at one end to floor line at opposite end.

2 of 7

2439 N. Charles Street / Baltimore, Maryland 21218-5110 / (410) 366-9384 / FAX (410) 366-9389

The foundation wall for the front (south elevation) and 2 side walls are stone bearing on natural soil. Supportfor the north side wall is a wood beam and the continuation of the wood columns from above. It is notknown if the columns bear on stone or concrete foundations. Excavations would need to be performed todetermine existing conditions of footers.

CONDITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURE

Existing framing as constructed is in good structural condition. Existing framing can remain in place. However, in order to be code compliant, the roof joists and beams need to reinforced to support 30 lbs./sq.ft.Live load. The horizontal girts for the end walls need to be reinforced to support a wind loading of 15lbs./sq.ft.. The end walls need addition of diagonal bracing for wind and seismic(8 kips base shear). Thefloor framing as it exists now is only good for 80 lbs./sq,ft. live load. To be code compliant, live load is 100lbs./sq.ft.. Therefore, the floor joists and beams need to be reinforced.

The wood beam frames need to locked in at the joints. The columns are structurally acceptable. However,the columns in the 1st floor will need permanent attachment at top and bottom.

New concrete footers will need to be implemented to columns and the stone foundation wall will need tosupported by a new concrete liner wall.

Existing exterior wood siding is in good shape and can remain.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Roof framing: Reinforce each joist with a new 2x6. Provide metal hold down anchors for joist to wall andbeam connections. Provide horizontal 2x8 collar tie between the two interior high beams. Lap with joistsand attach to side of joists. Reinforce interior roof beams with LVL lumber.

Second floor Framing: Reinforce existing joists with 1 -1 3/4" x 9 ½" LVL. Reinforce beams with 2- LVL’s1 3/4" x 11 7/8". Reinforce connection of beams to columns by installing collar ties to underside of beams. This will tie beams together and aid in reinforcing of beams. (See enclosed detail).

End walls: Provide addition let in 4"x 4" wood diagonal “X” bracing to two interior bays and tie togetherwith metal straps. This will up grade building to comply with code for wind and seismic resistance. Horizontal 4" x 4" girt at 8'-6" and 19'-0" height need to be reinforced with a new 4" x 4" between 8x8columns. Existing cable bracing aids in lateral bracing and should remain in place.

Interior beam and column frames: Reinforce mortise and tendon joints with thru bolts thru the diagonalbracing, columns and beams. With a new plywood sheathing roof and the joints in the frames reinforced, thediagonal; steel cable bracing for the interior frames can be removed.

First floor: There will need to be further inspection on interior column footers to assure that they have theproper 30" deep frost protection in accordance with code. If not, the existing footers will have to be removedand replace with proper footers. The connection of the columns to the footers need to have positive metalconnections.

The perimeter stone walls will need to relined on the interior face with new 8" minimum thick concrete

3 of 7

2439 N. Charles Street / Baltimore, Maryland 21218-5110 / (410) 366-9384 / FAX (410) 366-9389

reinforced wall. The wall will need to go down to 30" frost depth protection.

See enclosed sketches SSK-001 thru SSK-004 for general guidelines for reinforcing.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve you on this project and hope that we can be of service to you in thefuture. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.

Very truly yours,

Douglas KettermanProject Manager

Stephen M. Brown, P.E.President

4 of 7

2439 N. Charles Street / Baltimore, Maryland 21218-5110 / (410) 366-9384 / FAX (410) 366-9389

Interior column and brace. Exterior col at top of wall w/beam and dig. Brace.

5 of 7

2439 N. Charles Street / Baltimore, Maryland 21218-5110 / (410) 366-9384 / FAX (410) 366-9389

End wall column and horiz. Girt.

Interior horizontal beam to col.Interior diagonal brace

End wall column to bottom of bm.

Interior cable brace.

6 of 7

2439 N. Charles Street / Baltimore, Maryland 21218-5110 / (410) 366-9384 / FAX (410) 366-9389

Corner of stone foundations

Added column to 1st floor beam1st fl.joists with deterioration.

Interior column w/Diag.brace

Rear first floor beam splicewith block wedge between beamand column.

7 of 7

2439 N. Charles Street / Baltimore, Maryland 21218-5110 / (410) 366-9384 / FAX (410) 366-9389

Lower level wall foundationsLower level column foundation.

REQUIRED LIFE SAFETY MODIFICATIONSItem Quantity Unit Cost Item Total Div. Total

Div. 2: SiteworkSelective Demolition 1 ls $2 500 00 $2 500 $2,500

AGRICULTURAL HISTORY FARM BARN CONDITION SURVEY

Probable Cost Estimate of Required Repairs

Page 1 of 2

Selective Demolition 1 ls $2,500.00 $2,500 $2,500Div. 4: Masonry NOT USEDDiv. 5: Metals

Galvanized steel pipe guardrails 20 lf $50.00 $1,000 $1,000Div. 7: Thermal/Moisture Protection NOT USEDDiv. 8: Doors

Double doors/frames/hardware (45-minute) 2 ea $2,000.00 $4,000Custom door stops for sliding door threshold 2 ea $200.00 $400 $4,400

Di 9 Fi i hDiv. 9: Finishes5/8 Type X gwb both sides 735 sf $3.00 $2,205

5/8" gwb ceiling direct to underside 540 sf $1.70 $918Interior painting: storage rooms 540 sf $2.50 $1,350 $4,473

Div. 10: SpecialtiesFire extinguisher w/cabinet 4 ea $350.00 $1,400 $1,400

Div. 11 - 14 NOT USEDDiv. 15: Mechanical

Sprinkler Modifications 1 ls $2,000.00 $2,000 $2,000Div. 16: Electrical

Emergency Lighting/Exit Lights/Time clock 1 ls $7,500.00 $7,500Fire Alarm System 1 ls $14,500.00 $14,500 $22,000

SUBTOTAL $37,773 $37,773Gen. Conditions/Overhead/Profit (35%) $13,221

SUBTOTAL $50,994Performance and Payment Bond (2%) $1 020Performance and Payment Bond (2%) $1,020

SUBTOTAL $52,013Contingency (5%) $2,601

GRAND TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $54,614REQUIRED STRUCTURAL REPAIRS

Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Total Div. TotalDiv. 3: Concrete

Column footers 4.44 cy $300.00 $1,332$ $ $Foundations wall 40 cy $500.00 $20,000 $21,332

Div. 6: Wood2x6 Roof joists 2 M.B.F. $2,050.00 $4,100

2x8 collar ties at roof 1.40 M.B.F. $3,700.00 $5,180Framing anchors 40 ea. $60.00 $2,400

lift rental 200 day $15.00 $3,000metal column bases 50 ea. $37.66 $1,883

2x10 LVL 1st floor joists reinforcing 2 M.B.F. $2,710.00 $4,0652x10 LVL 1st floor joists reinforcing 2 M.B.F. $2,710.00 $4,0651st floor beam reinforcing 2 M.B.F. $700.00 $1,400

End wall X bracing - 4x4 and straps 2 M.B.F. $2,400.00 $4,8004x4 Shoring 1st fl column footing replacement 1.40 M.B.F. $2,200.00 $3,080

8x10 Collar ties 1st fl beam to column connections 1 M.B.F. $2,000.00 $2,000 $31,908SUBTOTAL $53,240 $53,240

Gen. Conditions/Overhead/Profit (35%) $18,634SUBTOTAL $71,874

Performance and Payment Bond (2%) $1 437Performance and Payment Bond (2%) $1,437SUBTOTAL $73,311

Contingency (5%) $3,666GRAND TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $76,977

Symmetry First Architects November 11, 2011 Revised December 5, 2011

Page 1 of 2

OPTIONAL ROOF REPLACEMENTItem Quantity Unit Cost Item Total Div. Total

AGRICULTURAL HISTORY FARM BARN CONDITION SURVEY

Probable Cost Estimate of Optional Repairs

Page 2 of 2

Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Total Div. TotalDiv. 7: Thermal and Moisture Protection

Removal of Wood Shingles 4,920 sf $0.90 $4,428Selective Replacement of Board Sheathing 1,000 sf $2.50 $3,080

Wood Shingles 4,920 sf $5.40 $26,568 $34,076

SUBTOTAL $34,076 $34,076Gen. Conditions/Overhead/Profit (35%) $11,927

SUBTOTAL $46 003SUBTOTAL $46,003Performance and Payment Bond (2%) $920

SUBTOTAL $46,923Contingency (5%) $2,346

GRAND TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $49,269

OPTIONAL LIGHTING AND POWER IMPROVEMENTSItem Quantity Unit Cost Item Total Div. Total

Div. 16: ElectricalAdditional Receptacles 1 ls $5,000.00 $5,000

Accent Lighting 1 ls $12,000.00 $12,000 $17,000

SUBTOTAL $17,000 $17,000Gen. Conditions/Overhead/Profit (35%) $5,950

SUBTOTAL $22,950Performance and Payment Bond (2%) $459

SUBTOTAL $23,409Contingency (5%) $1,170

GRAND TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $24,579,

Page 2 of 2