Agency and Vendor Benchmarks - Wild Apricot · Agency and Vendor Benchmarks. Government Executive Media Group and Govini proudly present . The 2017 Federal Scorecard, the premier

THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks

TRUMP EDITION


Government Executive Media Group and Govini proudly present The 2017 Federal Scorecard, the premier annual ranking of vendor and agency performance. This annual publication provides a big data view of the Federal market, with thousands of data points creating a broad picture of the complex and changing ecosystem of agencies and vendors.

We are in uncharted territory: 2017 is a year defined by unprecedented change and uncertainty. The Trump Administration is intent on reprioritizing government spending and collapsing the existing bureaucracy. The President’s ability to enact his agenda will be enabled by his unprecedented access to big data and analytics, including applications that were spearheaded, but ultimately unrealized, by the previous Obama and Bush Administrations.

Government Executive Media Group has tirelessly covered the issues and opportunities surrounding the Trump Agenda. Govini complements this rich editorial content and predicts emerging trends by taking an empirical, fact-based, data science approach to the market. Together, we look forward to continuing to provide unique insights and forecasts to you throughout this exciting year.

Sincerely,

Tim Hartman, CEO, Government Executive Media Group Eric Gillespie, CEO and Founder, Govini

Introduction


Table of Contents

Rank RankPagePage Section Section

1 67

64

10.4

3.4

2 70

65

65

83

5.2

2.9

4.0

80.63 71

68

4.7

5.4

4 66 6414.3 6.5

5

6

65

70

6772.4

3.1

3.8

7 70

68

14.6 8.467

3.3

8

10

66

66

72

4.4

3.7

3.1

9 65

68

8.1

2.7

66 6.0

11 63

61

8.4

2.2

1231

5 14

13

16

37

33

41

7 1539

9

174311

184513

15 1947

17 2049

2151

21

25

2253

23

2459

2357

29

Department of the Navy Department of the Treasury

Department of Transportation

General Services Administration

Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Commerce

Environmental Protection Agency

Department of the Army Department of Agriculture

Department of the Interior

Department of State

Department of the Air Force

Defense-Wide

Defense Research Labs

Department of Energy

Agency for International Development

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Department of Education

Department of Health & Human Services

Department of Homeland Security

Department of Labor

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Department of Justice

Social Security Administration

Agency Contract Complexity

Agency Contract Complexity

Avg. Competitors per Contract Action

Avg. Competitors per Contract Action

3 Dynamic Radically Changes as New Administration and Agency Leadership Settle In 35 Tech Companies Prep for Trump’s Infrastructure Plan - Even Without Details

55 The 10 Largest Programs on Trump’s Chopping Block

Vendor Rankings Overview

Agency Analytics Overview1

2

Index61

27 Government Needs ‘Heavy Artillery’ for Cyberspace, DHS Chief Says

19 Is Trump’s Budget an Opportunity for Contractors?


1

Contracting Overview

Product and Service Spend

Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $

3 YR %

Set-Aside Performance

Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

SEAPORT - E

70 - General Purpose Commercial IT

SEWP V

2604

582

67

$5.8 B

$301.6 M

$218.7 M

Navy FIP 2 $157.6 M

President Trump has signaled a turn towards prioritizing ships over aircraft. A growing demand for ships will benefit builders like General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls and Textron. Lockheed Martin may be challenged by the Administration with an expiring contract for the Joint Strike Fighter in the spotlight. Booz Allen Hamilton is the Navy’s most at-risk contractor from exposure to $600M in expiring SEAPORT-E task orders for mission readiness.

$159.3 B Budget Authority

$95.8 B Contract Spend

6.6%

8.8% 89.1 K Contracts

24.3 K Vendors

4.4%

1.3%

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

6.3%

3.1%

2.1%

1.1%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 21.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions

Aircraft Jet Engines (2840)

Fixed Wing Aircraft (1510)

Aircraft Operational Systems Development R&D (AC15)

Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)

Combat Ships & Landing Vessels (1905)Actual 17.4%

Agency Analytics Overview

Welcome to The 2017 Federal Scorecard, our annual ranking of vendor and agency performance in the Federal market. The Scorecard is designed to provide visibility into agency contract activity and relationships with prominent contractors. The top 24 agencies are ordered by the total dollar value of contract obligations and the health of their respective vendor ecosystems. Below is a breakout of the various analytics within the Scorecard that gauge agency performance.


Provides agency contract details at a glance and how they changed year-over-year. FY16 key highlights are noted.

Contract Spend: Dollar value of contract obligations.

Contracts: Count of distinct contracts with positive obligations.

Budget Authority: Dollar value of enacted discretionary budget authority.

Vendors: Count of distinct vendors with positive contract obligations for the year.


Charts the agency’s FY16 spend on the top five products and services,

as well as growth in spend compared

to the previous three-year average. The methodology

demonstrates how FY16 spend deviates from the

average of FY13 - 15.


Compares agency small business goals to actual performance in FY16 and over a three-year period (FY14 - 16).

SB: Small Business

SDB: Small Disadvantaged Business

WOSB: Women-Owned Small Business

SDVOB: Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Business

HZ: HUBZone

Contract Vehicles

Shows the top four Indefinite Delivery

Vehicles (IDVs) used by agencies, transaction count and obligated dollars over a three-

year period (FY14 - 16).


2

2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)

Rank VendorShare of Agency

MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor

Contract ActionsVendor Contract

ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action

15 26

36

78 77 4.3 7.4

75 70 3.3 4.8

83 87 2.1 2.9

70

196

10

53

152

12$290.4 M

$806.5 M

$515.9 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

21 50

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)

VSE Corp.

16

RankThe relative vendor

position based on total revenue captured and vendor performance.

Current and last FY ranks are displayed.

Share of Agency MarketThe delta between

a vendor’s FY15 and FY16 share of an agency’s total contract spend.

Vendor Revenue Captured

The dollar amount of contract obligations

captured.

Vendor Contract Actions

Count of distinct contract actions with positive obligations.

Vendor Contract Complexity

A measure of the overall sophistication of a contract won, on a scale from 1 to 100.

Competitors Per Contract Action

The average number of competitor bids placed per contract

awarded.

Vendor Rankings Overview

Govini creates a top-level view of the market from a set of proprietary benchmarks and analytics, all based on its database of record. As the Federal contracting landscape continues to evolve, it is increasingly important for contractors to leverage big data to inform strategic planning, business development, capture, teaming and partnering.

Vendor rankings are split into three sections: Significant Movers, calling out vendors that have seen transformative change in market or performance conditions; Notable Vendors, representing market leaders worth tracking; and Top Vendors, the top 10 performers by rank. Illustrated below are the benchmark metrics provided for each ranked vendor.

0.18%

0.44%

0.17%


3

Dynamic Radically Changes as New Administration and Agency Leadership Settle In

President Trump has argued that it is time to completely reimagine government and has telegraphed an agenda that impacts nearly every major Federal agency. The actions of President Trump in the early days of his presidency have largely aligned with his key campaign agenda points.

It is highly possible that over the next few years there will be a successive series of agency reorganizations and revisions announced supporting the Trump Agenda. Every change will prompt disruption and reaction by agency and industry alike. Participants in the Federal market can safely

assume their business environments will see dramatic shifts when compared to the previous administration.

71 percent of Scorecard agencies saw increased Contract Spend in FY16. Based on the roster of newly appointed secretaries, as well as President Trump’s Budget Blueprint for 2018, non-defense agencies should not expect budget increases in the foreseeable future.

Right: Agencies in the top-right quadrant are larger and have demonstrated a year-over-year increase in reprogramming potential. They are most able to underwrite President Trump’s spending priority changes. Agencies in the bottom-left quadrant are smaller and have demonstrated a year-over-year decrease in reprogramming potential. They are the least able to underwrite President Trump’s spending priority changes.

4

Change will not come easily. Conflicts between the White House and Congress will certainly arise over budgets and spending as the President pursues his agenda. Agencies themselves will have a varying degree of capacity to pivot toward new directives in 2017. Vendors will need to evaluate their public sector strategies as their agency clients adjust to new realities.

Opportunities for both vendors and agencies will also be present. For example, President Trump’s plan to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is expected to cost tens of billions of dollars. In early March 2017, DHS said that it could find only $20 million for the project. Digging a little deeper, Govini’s analysis shows that the DHS is looking at $9.1 billion in 2017 expiring contracts (below). Granted, while not all of these contracts can be repurposed for construction, it does provide an avenue for the critical evaluation of funds becoming available for potential reallocation.

In fact, $406.9 billion in contracts are set to expire across the largest 19 Federal agencies in 2017. Agencies will begin to pinpoint contracts that need to be cut, renegotiated or restructured in the scramble to account for budget cuts. Vendors will be required to gain awareness of risk and begin to tailor their goods and services to the Administration’s priorities.

Understanding where and how procurement trends will play out provides big-data adopters with an indisputable advantage when mapping out their strategies. With so much at stake, a data-driven approach to understanding Federal spending will be critical for agencies, contractors, Congress and the Trump Administration itself.

In the following pages of The 2017 Federal Scorecard, Govini presents an overview to orient both seasoned contracting experts and new entrants to the Federal market. This overview provides insight into the

complex relationships between agencies and their vendors, including a summary of FY16 spending details, top product service categories, procurement methods, set-aside classifications and the top vendors ranked.

Left: Large agencies including Army, HHS, NASA, VA and State with missions that rely heavily on technical services and IT have greater potential for redirecting funds in 2017 than in 2016. Others such as Navy, Air Force and DOE that manage large multi-year programs have less flexibility.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

5

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

SEAPORT - E


SEWP V

2604

582

67

$5.4 B

$301.6 M

$218.7 M

Navy FIP 2 $157.6 M

President Trump has signaled a turn towards prioritizing ships over aircraft. A growing demand for ships will benefit builders like General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls and Textron. Lockheed Martin may be challenged by the Administration with an expiring contract for the Joint Strike Fighter in the spotlight. Booz Allen Hamilton is the Navy’s most at-risk contractor from exposure to $600M in expiring SEAPORT-E task orders for mission readiness.



6.6%


24.3 K Vendors

4.4%

1.3%

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

6.3%

3.1%

2.1%

1.1%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 21.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

Navy MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



15 26

36

0.18% 78 77 4.3 7.4

75 70 3.3 4.8

83 87 2.1 2.9

70

196

10

53

152

12

0.44%

0.17% $290.4 M

$806.5 M

$515.9 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

21 50

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)


VSE Corp.

16

Aircraft Jet Engines (2840)

Fixed Wing Aircraft (1510)

Aircraft Operational Systems Development R&D (AC15)


Combat Ships & Landing Vessels (1905)Actual 17.4%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

6

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

Navy MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

4

7

12

11

15

12

3.48%

1.10%

0.02%

0.20%

70

75

68

78

67

70

66

78

5.1

2.4

2.5

6.8

6.4

3.7

2.4

8.2

70

70

69

67

68

68

67

66

4.4

10.1

4.0

1.2

6.9

11.3

4.2

2.0

68

67

72

80

66

65

67

69

70

66

81

64

3.1

7.9

7.5

2.1

2.0

6.1

5.4

17.8

7.4

1.8

2.4

9.3

745

100

35

11

674

507

584

233

424

301

411

11

14

308

714

137

42

11

650

589

576

232

431

306

399

24

7

288

0.05%

0.71%

0.63%

0.05%

2.92%

0.84%

0.24%

0.16%

0.08%

0.01%

$7.0 B

$3.5 B

$2.4 B

$2.6 B

$874.8 M

$897.8 M

$8.7 B

$4.6 B

$4.2 B

$1.1 B

$14.7 B

$4.4 B

$2.2 B

$716.6 M

2

6

8

10

14

3

9

11

5

2018

Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)

Huntington Ingalls Inc. (HII)

Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office

DXC Technology Co. (DXC)

General Dynamics Corp. (GD)

Raytheon Co. (RTN)

Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)

Textron Inc. (TXT)

The Boeing Co. (BA)

United Technologies Corp. (UTX)

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY)

Bechtel Group Inc.

Austal USA Inc. (ASB)

General Electric Co. (GE)

Notable Vendors

Related Govini Market View: Navy FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=8d9eb123e577a931f65d2b0839e3076a

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

7

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

Rapid Response 3rd Generation

Warfighter FOCUS

LOGCAP

1

1

13

$930.8 M

$926.8 M

$871.3 M

Army ITES 2S 1 $781.4 M

Army saw an increase to its FY16 spend compared to the year prior. Years of force reductions and budget pressure brought contract obligations down 50.1 percent from a high in FY10. Multi-year tactical vehicle and vertical lift procurements kicking-off will benefit OEMs including Oshkosh, AM General, Lockheed Martin, General Atomics and Boeing. The President will look to increase Army budget in its priority to revitalize defense initiatives.



2.7%


29.2 K Vendors

6.3%

2.8%

15.8%

6.7%

5.7%

3.6%

Actual 31.3%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 24.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

Army MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



18 33

34

79 79 3.3 5.9

70 69 1.5 1.4

100 100 17.0 16.2

43

73

15

33

96

12$252.5 M

$572.6 M

$611.2 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

24 42

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Textron Inc. (TXT)

Torch Technologies Inc.

19

Professional Support (R499)

IT & Telecommunications (D399) Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)

Rotary Wing Aircraft (1520)

Logistics Support (R706)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.44%

0.28%

0.05%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

8

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

Army MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3

2

6

13

17

9

13

73

70

73

72

72

72

70

74

1.7

4.2

6.7

3.1

1.7

3.0

5.6

3.0

70

74

80

70

71

74

76

71

3.0

1.8

2.9

13.2

4.3

2.0

3.1

9.6

70

72

77

77

68

70

68

71

76

72

65

72

1.5

2.6

1.9

1.7

2.9

4.8

1.5

3.3

4.4

1.4

3.0

1.1

245

325

164

76

194

309

62

207

142

315

54

42

183

33

241

291

184

66

208

290

37

197

140

321

61

57

232

30

$3.2 B

$2.8 B

$759.4 M

$1.3 B

$1.4 B

$448.8 M

$3.9 B

$3.2 B

$879.5 M

$1.3 B

$4.3 B

$3.8 B

$1.5 B

$777.3 M

11

4

10

15

15

5

1

11

7

1620


Leidos Inc. (LDOS)


CACI International Inc. (CACI)




L3 Technologies Inc. (LLL)

The Boeing Co. (BA)

Raytheon Co. (RTN)

Orbital ATK Inc. (OA)

Oshkosh Corp. (OSK)

Harris Corp. (HRS)

General Atomics Inc.

Notable Vendors

1.17%

0.16%

0.80%

0.08%

3.08%

0.02%

0.06%

0.42%

1.54%

1.48%

0.05%

0.04%

0.04%

0.34%

Related Govini Market View: Army FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=2399e68f29221d78149cdc3a2cbf6fe2

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

9

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

AF NETCENTS II


Alliant - IT Services

42

573

1

$844.8 M

$739.0 M

$611.5 M

OASIS Small Business 1 $570.4 M

Several of the Air Force’s top contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman and United Launch Alliance have retained their Scorecard ranking. These vendors will likely see less disruption from the Trump Administration as many of the Air Force’s priorities tend to revolve around long-term, next-generation weapons platforms.



6.2%


17.4 K Vendors

1.0%

1.3%

7.6%

3.1%

3.3%

1.1%

Actual 19.6%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 21.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

Air Force MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



19 27

55

61 61 1.0 1.0

71 65 2.9 5.4

73 71 2.2 2.4

2

56

13

2

49

16$270.1 M

$338.2 M

$322.5 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

23 40

Sallyport Global Holdings Inc.

Rolls-Royce Corp. (RR)

Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ)

22

Fixed Wing Aircraft (1510)Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)


Aircraft Maintenance & Equipment (J015)

Space Launch (V126)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.16%

0.32%

0.21%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

10

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

Air Force MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

4

10

9

12

13

12

73

64

66

78

72

65

63

70

2.2

1.0

1.8

1.0

2.3

1.0

2.0

1.0

70

69

69

96

69

69

65

96

2.0

1.8

1.4

5.5

1.8

1.8

1.4

7.5

71

67

74

70

70

93

71

71

71

71

72

93

1.8

1.1

4.0

2.5

4.7

5.1

1.9

1.3

4.6

2.0

4.0

6.2

260

7

13

1

311

337

35

3

332

44

187

215

298

9

287

8

12

2

310

331

27

3

341

31

203

230

218

8

$4.2 B

$1.0 B

$1.2 B

$2.4 B

$1.7 B

$477.8 M

$11.5 B

$3.0 B

$935.9 M

$535.7 M

$12.1 B

$1.5 B

$975.1 M

$866.0 M

2

5

11

8

13

3

7

11

6

1614

The Boeing Co. (BA)

United Launch Alliance LLC

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The Aerospace Corp.


Raytheon Co. (RTN)

Sierra Nevada Corp.

Patriot Team




L3 Technologies Inc. (LLL)

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Federal Express Corp. (FDX)

Notable Vendors

4.54%

0.92%

0.10%

0.25%

4.35%

1.58%

0.16%

0.22%

0.40%

0.79%

0.14%

0.97%

0.06%

0.14%

Related Govini Market View: Air Force FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=4f18d6238986a2e2caaf7f9425d62a96

DEFENSE - WIDEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

11

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

DLA TLSP


Tricare TPharm4

2

455

1

$1.2 B

$858.6 M

$799.4 M

DOD DS TAT 1 $676.3 M

Defense-Wide agencies cover non-military DoD functions including health, personnel, logistics and IT. Drugs & Biologicals and General Healthcare dominate the top spending PSC codes. Humana maintains its number one ranking among top health-related vendors which include Health Net, UnitedHealth Group, McKesson and Express Scripts.



2.9%


18.9 K Vendors

17.3%

3.5%

8.8%

4.1%

3.4%

1.6%

Actual 23.0%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 21.6%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of DoD - Wide Market


VendorContract Actions



23 72

47

87 73 19.5 17.0

100 100 12.1 8.2

55 56 3.0 3.7

8

36

211

7

47

261$499.0 M

$270.7 M

$235.9 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

25 15

National Fuel Gas Co. (NFG)

SupplyCore Inc.

Cardinal Health Inc. (CAH)

24

General Healthcare (Q201)

Drugs & Biologicals (6505)


IT & Telecommunications (D399)

Liquid Propellants & Fuels (9130)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.18%

0.13%

0.63%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEFENSE - WIDE

12

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of DoD - Wide Market


VendorContract Actions



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

10

18

16

29

17

84

77

63

72

89

67

60

72

2.0

2.1

1.7

4.6

2.0

2.1

1.6

4.7

72

72

67

68

80

73

64

64

2.0

4.9

3.9

2.4

2.0

4.2

4.8

2.5

60

91

75

52

83

55

52

91

74

54

81

52

3.3

2.3

2.1

4.0

33.8

8.5

3.0

3.2

2.3

4.4

24.3

9.5

3

4

388

106

3

395

596

560

13

2

19

354

8

791

1

4

387

84

3

198

594

534

15

2

14

464

8

666

$2.7 B

$789.3 M

$467.1 M

$2.1 B

$537.4 M

$1.1 B

$2.7 B

$2.9 B

$2.2 B

$1.0 B

$3.6 B

$2.7 B

$1.9 B

$523.9 M

3

5

13

7

20

4

12

13

8

2322

Humana Inc. (HUM)

Health Net Inc. (HNT)

The Boeing Co. (BA)


UnitedHealth Group Inc. (UNH)

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Raytheon Co. (RTN)


McKesson Corp. (MCK)

Express Scripts Inc. (ESRX)

Alion Science & Technology Corp. (ALON)

AmerisourceBergen Corp. (ABC)

Shell Oil Co. (RDS)

ADS Tactical Inc.

Notable Vendors

0.04%

0.37%

0.57%

0.02%

0.25%

1.38%

0.62%

0.25%

0.80%

0.36%

0.04%

0.34%

0.54%

0.11%

DEFENSE RESEARCH LABSAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

13

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

SEAPORT - E

OASIS Small Business

ALLSB - Alliant Small Business

43

1

2

$103.8 M

$69.9 M

$43.8 M

70 - General Purpose Commercial IT 84 $33.6 M

Defense Research Labs saw a sharp increase in contract obligations while experiencing a decrease in the volume of both contracts and vendors compared to the previous year. Electronics & Communication Equipment R&D emerged in this year’s top five PSC codes with the highest FY16 growth. This growth was driven by contracts coming from the Air Force Research Laboratory.



1.1%


2.8 K Vendors

7.9%

7.3%

9.3%

4.2%

3.1%

1.3%

Actual 23.6%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 21%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

DRL MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



19 39

41

71 68 35.5 74.8

76 74 8.5 13.0

68 68 15.3 10.5

15

14

2

20

12

2$21.0 M

$24.1 M

$24.6 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

25

Oceus Networks Inc.

Sotera Defense Solutions Inc.

MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates LTD (MDA)

22

Electronics & Communications Equipment R&D (AC62)

Exploratory Defense R&D (AD92)

Advanced Defense Development (AD93)


Advanced Science & Technology Engineering (AJ43)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.08%

0.12%

0.53%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEFENSE RESEARCH LABS

14

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DRL MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

11

9

30

10

12

12

69

59

75

81

70

58

75

77

120.3

1.0

6.2

1.4

134.1

1.0

1.8

1.3

65

71

66

66

64

68

66

68

98.4

7.8

1.7

97.9

111.5

15.7

1.5

134.1

71

68

86

65

69

80

70

67

87

63

69

75

65.6

135.1

2.0

37.5

7.0

2.6

45.3

116.1

1.8

18.1

7.0

2.5

71

3

20

10

124

59

6

71

71

73

8

24

1

9

78

2

20

8

145

63

3

73

79

84

9

9

1

12

$223.5 M

$117.9 M

$42.0 M

$96.9 M

$43.6 M

$31.5 M

$226.7 M

$124.6 M

$64.5 M

$57.4 M

$242.7 M

$128.8 M

$71.3 M

$33.9 M

3

8

21

37

13

2

4

11

29

1814


CNA Financial Corp. (CNA)

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. (BAH)

Praxis Inc.

Raytheon Co. (RTN)

Harris Corp. (HRS)

Technology Service Corp.

SRI International



Assurance Technology Corp.

Aurora Flight Sciences Corp.

Agile Defense Inc.

Strategic Analysis Inc.

Notable Vendors

0.49%

2.44%

0.57%

0.30%

0.85%

1.20%

1.05%

0.06%

1.16%

0.29%

0.10%

2.03%

0.62%

0.03%

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

15

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

ALLSB - Alliant Small Business

874 - MOBIS


5

39

122

$196.9 M

$134.7 M

$111.9 M

00CORP - The Consolidated Schedule 6 $56.4 M

DOE manages a network of labs critical in developing nuclear arms and technologies for other agencies, notably the Intelligence Community, DoD and DHS. Priorities under the Trump Administration will be reversing clean energy initiatives, stalling advancements in climate change and investing in nuclear weapons capabilities. A large portion of DOE spend goes toward managing government facilities and research & development.



8.2%


2.4 K Vendors

4.3%

2.2%

2.9%

1.2%

0.7%

0.2%

Actual 5.4%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 6.4%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

DOE MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



19 16

25

65 83 4.3 2.1

74 68 2.4 2.7

67 67 4.0 4.0

11

3

1

5

4

1$274.0 M

$336.7 M

$607.5 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

23 66

Honeywell International Inc. (HON)

Fluor Corp. (FLR)

Mission Support Alliance LLC

22

Operation of Miscellaneous Buildings (M1JZ)

Real Property Restoration Operations (M300)

Technology/Science R&D (AJ31)

Basic R&D (AZ11)

Operations of Government R&D Facilities (M181)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.02%

0.02%

0.97%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

16

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DOE MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

3

9

13

11

12

12

73

76

65

81

73

85

78

77

1.3

2.1

0.8

3.7

1.9

1.5

1.0

3.4

95

74

79

75

95

74

79

76

3.0

2.8

2.0

2.1

3.0

2.2

2.0

2.3

78

68

78

90

68

77

69

68

78

90

68

71

2.4

3.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

3.0

2.5

3.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

2.9

2

3

5

11

1

11

1

4

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

12

1

10

1

5

4

1

1

1

1

2

$1.9 B

$1.4 B

$719.2 M

$1.4 B

$744.0 M

$455.6 M

$2.0 B

$2.2 B

$891.8 M

$626.9 M

$2.3 B

$1.9 B

$1.7 B

$808.4 M

2

5

8

10

13

4

6

11

7

1817

Los Alamos National Security LLC

Battelle Memorial Institute Inc.

The Regents of the University of California

AECOM Inc. (ACM)

Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC

CH2M HILL Companies LTD

Bechtel Group Inc.

Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC

URS-FNI-HZ Team

UT-Battelle LLC

UChicago Argonne LLC

National Security Technologies LLC

Notable Vendors

0.13%

0.02%

2.89%

0.55%

0.48%

0.08%

0.24%

0.82%

0.41%

0.61%

0.23%

0.08%

0.17%

0.22%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Energy FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=d51fa76558d41ac8687fd9a88416825b

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRSAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

17

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

VA PPV

T4

65 II A - Medical Equipment and Supplies

1

2

748

$5.5 B

$1.2 B

$505.6 M

SEWP V 202 $453.7 M

Under the Obama Administration the VA’s contract obligations had increased 46.6 percent from FY08 to FY16, with much of it going into digital transformation, mobility and IT modernization. The Trump Administration will closely examine IT systems, operational processes and professional services for managing care. The VA will likely have the contracting flexibility to support changes coming from the Administration in 2017.



9.9%


19.3 K Vendors

3.3%

1.5%

7.1%

3.0%

17.8%

1.6%

Actual 29.9%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 32.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

VA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



14 4

7

88 80 10.5 12.1

67 81 2.5 2.9

95 96 14.3 23.0

5

15

3

4

6

1$75.1 M

$139.4 M

$124.5 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

20 15

Accenture PLC (ACN)

MicroTech LLC

Longview International Technology Solutions Inc.

18

Other Medical (Q999)

Drugs & Biologicals (6505)Medical Instruments (6515)


Medical Imaging Equipment (6525)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.46%

0.32%

0.02%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

18

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

VA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

14

12

81

87

100

90

81

89

96

88

1.8

1.9

4.4

10.3

1.6

34.3

2.3

11.6

100

88

91

83

100

91

77

80

2.3

6.0

8.6

2.7

2.9

9.2

8.2

6.7

86

84

90

58

80

77

86

84

86

59

63

67

17.2

9.5

8.8

7.9

11.5

1.3

20.5

16.0

8.2

11.2

8.8

1.8

1

5

2

10

5

6

3

5

9

10

4

416

6

7

1

7

1

5

3

5

7

4

10

9

3

281

9

13

$498.9 M

$254.3 M

$154.8 M

$5.5 B

$158.8 M

$83.9 M

$602.5 M

$204.5 M

$156.6 M

$109.4 M

$1.2 B

$458.9 M

$174.9 M

$166.7 M

2

6

10

8

17

1

5

11

3

6922

TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp.

Health Net Inc. (HNT)

Genco Distribution System Inc.

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Kiewit-Turner JV

DaVita Inc. (DVA)

Phonak Inc.

Valador Inc.

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. (BAH)

By Light Professional IT Services Inc.

McKesson Corp. (MCK)

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. (FMS)

Iron Bow Technologies

Notable Vendors

5.64%

2.17%

0.75%

0.18%

1.49%

0.11%

0.05%

0.47%

0.62%

0.04%

0.29%

5.99%

0.17%

0.20%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Veterans Affairs FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=00be1aaccec7937f9c6fa0b14cf1e0bf

Is Trump’s Budget an Opportunity for Contractors?

19

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRSAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

used to fortify its internal IT to support the 2020 Census.

But despite scarce details or dollar amounts in the blueprint, contractors might see an opportunity to start selling their technology as a service directly to government, Govini analyst Matt Hummer told Nextgov.

President Donald Trump’s administration has prioritized reducing the federal workforce and government spending by cracking down on duplicative programs, Hummer explained, which is a “natural progression to outsource [technology services]” instead of buying the components separately and relying

By Mohana Ravindranath, Nextgov

The White House revealed its $1.1 trillion skinny budget in March 2017, slashing funding for many federal technology research and grant programs, including the Energy Department’s R&D unit, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.

It’s less clear how the administration plans to address the federal government’s internal information technology challenges. In the last Congress, lawmakers proposed legislation that would create working capital funds at agencies for IT modernization programs, but the White House’s budget blueprint is light on details about IT spending.

It mentions information technology just a handful of times: pledging to build up the Veterans Affairs Department’s IT system to “improve the efficiency and efficacy” of its services; committing to “strategically enhance” the Treasury Department’s security systems and “preempt fragmentation” of its IT management to prevent cyberattack; and allotting an additional $100 million to the Census Bureau, some of which would be

Right: VA vendors at risk include systems integrators, enterprise IT, value-added resellers and professional services providers. Competition is most fierce among integrators and enterprise IT and less so among resellers. Managing the ecosystem of IT solution providers is critical to improved services.

20

on an agency’s internal workforce, or a systems integrator, to set up the system.

“What we’re talking about is a massive transition in the way things are bought and provided,” he said; systems integrators could soon lose out to companies who provide their technology as a service.

The White House’s fiscal 2017 budget requests $11 million for a real-time data analytics program to help crunch information that would be used for immigration enforcement; though also light on specifics, the inclusion of that program in the request suggests that the Administration may be interested in the analytics-as-a-service model, Hummer said. Broadly, the budget demonstrates “emphasis on collecting information and using that information to organize resources.”

Tech contractors may not be so optimistic. “We are particularly concerned about arbitrary and disproportionate reductions in some agencies,” Professional Services Council President and Chief Executive Officer Dave Berteau said in a statement. But contractors can “help bridge that gap” when “cuts ... do not align with the vital missions and functions of those agencies.”

Steep budget cuts “may make IT acquisition a challenge,” Elizabeth Hyman, Executive Vice President for Public Advocacy at CompTIA, told Nextgov in a statement. “But some might choose to see this as a moment of opportunity—where smart acquisitions to modernize IT systems can make agency missions more efficient.”

Left: M&A activity is creating a size and scale play for the bow wave of Cloud spending. Mid-tier integrators like Harris Corporation, that have a mix of high-end engineering and low-end hardware and software services, are jettisoning their IT Services business due to a lack of growth. Others will soon follow.

DXC Technologies became the market leader as the combined entity of CSC and Hewlett-Packard’s services business. Leidos became the second largest after its acquisition of Lockheed Martin’s Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS). Harris Corporation moves down three spots after its divestiture of Harris IT Services to Veritas Capital, while others including Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics and CGI Federal could be next to sell their IT Services business.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

21

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal


874 - MOBIS

CMS VDC

490

119

1

$997.4 M

$593.5 M

$550.1 M

NIH CIO-SP3 1 $536.1 M

The effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act has brought HHS into the national spotlight. Ramping up the ACA over the past several years has driven considerable spend towards Professional Support and IT Services. In fact, 60.7% of expiring HHS contracts in 2017 can be allocated into these two categories. It is these very same expiring contracts that may provide the Trump Administration with the capability to reshape the department.



1.9%


11.1 K Vendors

5.1%

0.8%

10.9%

7.3%

1.6%

1.0%

Actual 23.0%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 22.8%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

HHS MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



11 21

81

76 76 1.6 2.4

83 78 23.4 4.3

85 85 5.6 8.2

6

3

5

6

2

5$108.0 M

$121.0 M

$246.7 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

24 45

Palmetto GBA LLC

Ventech Solutions Inc.

Medical Science & Computing LLC

20

Drugs & Biologicals (6505)



Government Health Insurance Programs (G007)

Biomedical R&D (AN11)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.41%

0.39%

0.14%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

22

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

HHS MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

6

9

17

8

14

13

77

73

85

70

82

64

79

70

3.4

9.1

5.6

7.3

3.7

7.3

4.5

4.5

68

95

72

83

77

92

74

85

3.1

3.0

2.7

2.0

2.4

2.8

2.6

3.3

75

85

76

73

66

92

76

85

76

73

66

92

6.2

11.9

10.0

8.1

5.0

4.1

6.1

21.9

3.3

5.7

3.4

4.8

9

9

10

31

21

3

33

3

23

2

2

49

41

4

7

13

13

35

12

4

27

2

22

2

2

52

29

4

$897.9 M

$251.1 M

$202.7 M

$989.6 M

$813.7 M

$158.7 M

$1.5 B

$258.3 M

$766.2 M

$179.4 M

$1.1 B

$380.3 M

$348.1 M

$398.1 M

1

10

4

7

14

3

12

12

5

2219

Pfizer Inc. (PFE)


National Government Services Inc.

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Merck & Co. Inc. (MRK)

Highmark Inc.

Sanofi Pasteur (SNY)

Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (EBS)


Serco Inc. (SRP)

Kelly Services Inc. (KELYB)

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK)

CGS Administrators LLC

Notable Vendors

0.65%

0.06%

0.11%

0.15%

0.09%

0.08%

0.32%

0.15%

0.18%

0.21%

0.12%

0.12%

0.70%

0.13%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Health and Human Services FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=6f24b706c88f209fe3186527f5a9a59e

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksNATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

23

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

NASA GSMO

SEWP V


1

25

107

$100.3 M

$55.3 M

$36.0 M

874 - MOBIS 39 $31.4 M

NASA plays a vital role in advancing technology for space exploration and the aerospace and defense industries. This will compel the Trump Administration to make NASA a critical part of its strategy in developing capabilities that provide an asymmetric military advantage over potential adversaries such as Russia and China. The Trump Administration is also highly interested in commercial spaceflight and executing a manned Mars mission by 2033.



7.1%


4.8 K Vendors

6.2%

1.9%

8.2%

4.1%

0.9%

0.5%

Actual 16.7%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 16.8%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

NASA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



11 95 95 6.0 6.0

52 52 7.0 7.0

88 88 9.0 5.0

1

1

1

1

1

1$61.3 M

$80.3 M

$143.0 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

25

Syncom Space Services LLC

ATA Aerospace LLC

Aerie Aerospace LLC

19

Space Launch (V126)

Applied Research & Exploratory Development (AR22)

Space & Aeronautics Technology Research (AR11)


Space Flight R&D (AR33)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.82%

0.43%

0.33%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksNATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

24

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

NASA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

8

4

12

16

15

15

90

75

68

61

88

70

68

71

3.7

4.9

1.0

5.0

3.4

4.4

1.0

3.8

64

71

76

69

66

70

78

63

4.8

9.9

5.1

8.2

3.7

15.2

6.5

10.9

65

48

70

81

76

77

59

51

66

77

76

73

10.7

2.3

2.6

4.6

7.6

3.3

8.0

2.9

2.2

4.7

8.3

3.3

5

33

1

6

75

5

13

36

43

108

14

15

28

10

4

33

1

2

78

4

16

37

55

94

21

21

24

10

$1.2 B

$2.1 B

$222.8 M

$563.0 M

$350.3 M

$157.1 M

$2.1 B

$379.8 M

$320.2 M

$318.8 M

$957.8 M

$1.0 B

$235.8 M

$146.5 M

1

6

9

11

16

7

5

13

3

1417

SpaceX

Orbital ATK Inc. (OA)

Russia Space Agency

QinetiQ Group PLC (QQ)

The Boeing Co. (BA)


Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies Inc.



California Institute of Technology

Harris Corp. (HRS)

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (JEC)

Arctic Slope Regional Corp.

Wyle Inc.

Notable Vendors

1.43%

1.06%

1.56%

0.00%

0.33%

0.21%

0.91%

0.27%

0.23%

0.59%

0.17%

1.04%

0.17%

0.14%

Related Govini Market View: National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=76c929e33448d16a6087ba941c67d922

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

25

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

EAGLE II

EAGLE II Small Business

874 - MOBIS

32

52

119

$446.5 M

$403.0 M

$388.6 M

FirstSource II 17 $380.1 M

DHS presents an opportunity for immediate reform by the Trump Administration. Part of the reason is that a large share of the agency’s spending comes from contracts set to expire in 2017, giving it the flexibility to reshape partnerships with industry. This will be important as President Trump pursues his agenda item to secure the U.S. border, where DHS will need to strike a balance between investing in infrastructure, technologies and people.



5.2%


15.2 K Vendors

16.5%

21.8%

15.6%

7.7%

6.0%

4.2%

Actual 36.9%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 33.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

DHS MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



18 2

52

69 63 1.0 1.1

84 84 12.3 12.6

82 82 3.7 4.6

7

2

3

6

2

3$65.6 M

$67.1 M

$91.9 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

22 42

Huntington Ingalls Inc. (HII)

Knowledge Consulting Group Inc.

Knight Point Systems LLC

19


Guard/Housekeeping (S206)

Program Management (R408)

Computer Software (7030)


SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

3.11%

0.23%

0.15%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

26

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DHS MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

4

7

35

9

15

10

13

75

67

55

96

69

67

57

82

1.2

2.0

3.0

6.3

1.6

2.0

4.4

3.9

71

72

73

73

66

71

77

62

15.2

9.6

1.7

2.6

3.4

7.8

1.7

3.1

77

93

77

52

81

95

76

92

78

52

73

92

2.4

14.6

3.6

8.0

3.8

8.7

3.5

13.5

3.7

8.0

3.8

8.8

3

3

35

2

11

8

16

26

35

30

57

1

8

10

6

3

15

2

14

6

14

22

35

29

61

1

8

10

$499.9 M

$349.7 M

$504.1 M

$110.3 M

$136.1 M

$100.7 M

$270.5 M

$186.4 M

$199.0 M

$266.6 M

$180.7 M

$139.5 M

$364.7 M

$90.6 M

6

5

8

14

3

12

12

2020

Mythics Inc.

Defense Support Services LLC

Bollinger Shipyards Inc.

Covenant Aviation Security LLC

Unisys Corp. (UIS)

Hanford Mission Support Co. LLC

The Geo Group Inc. (GEO)

International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Tri-S Security Corp. (TRIS)

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Inc.


Akal Security Inc.

Notable Vendors

0.04%

0.00%

1.91%

0.16%

0.36%

1.17%

0.29%

0.00%

1.42%

0.41%

0.47%

0.77%

0.29%

0.02%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Homeland Security FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=6890a2eb674701ddf274b22e58d476c1

Government Needs ‘Heavy Artillery’ for Cyberspace, DHS Chief Says

27

By Joseph Marks, Nextgov

The government must upgrade the digital weapons it uses to defend federal networks from nation-state and criminal hackers, Homeland Security Secretary Gen. John Kelly said in April.

Kelly cited “nation-state actors with extremely sophisticated tools,” “lone wolves” and “cyber terrorists that simply buy malware on the internet” as top cyber adversaries during his first major speech as secretary at George Washington University’s Center for Cyber and Homeland Security.

Government risks being outgunned in cyberspace because of the “plodding pace of bureaucracy,” Kelly warned during prepared remarks, though he skipped over that section in his formal address.

Allowing digital defenses to develop at government pace is akin to “sending troops to take Fallujah armed with muskets and powdered wigs,” Kelly warned in those remarks, adding that “our federal cybersecurity needs heavy artillery.”

Kelly warned during the speech itself that cop-proof encryption systems are making it much easier for terrorists to recruit and plan operations.

“These individuals are becoming harder and harder and, I predict, eventually impossible to detect,” he said.

Kelly said he has no update about a long-delayed executive order on

cybersecurity the Trump administration floated during its first weeks in office but then abruptly pulled.

“I’m standing by with bated breath. I can’t wait,” Kelly said.

The secretary also talked up cybersecurity cooperation between government and industry, touting President Donald Trump’s outreach to the private sector. Kelly himself recently discussed cybersecurity with leaders at Microsoft, he said.

“It’s something that certainly President Trump has taken on and is organized and is very, very involved in outreaching,” he said. “The government, god knows, can’t do it by itself.”

Cybersecurity was one of three main prongs of Kelly’s remarks, which also covered the threats of terrorism and of criminal drug gangs.

Several times during his speech, Kelly lashed out at critics of the department, especially lawmakers who have suggested the Trump administration is not sufficiently protecting the civil liberties of people detained at airports or land borders or unfairly targeting Muslims and other minorities.

“If lawmakers do not like the laws they’ve passed and we are charged to enforce—then they should have the courage and skill to change the laws,” he said. “Otherwise, they should shut up and support the men and women on the front lines.”

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

28

Kelly predicted the notoriously low morale at DHS will rebound because of the Trump administration’s more aggressive posture.

“My people have been discouraged from doing their jobs for nearly a decade, disabled by pointless bureaucracy and political meddling,

and suffered disrespect and contempt by public officials who have no idea what it means to serve,” he said, adding that “the best way to improve morale is to let employees do the jobs they were hired and trained to do, and recognize them for doing it.”

Above: CBP and ICE budget accounts fund some of the largest competitive contracts set to expire in 2017. OPO is also a critical funding source for Cybersecurity. USCG, TSA and NPPD are worthy of focus for vendors that sell via popular contract vehicles.

DEPARTMENT OF STATEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

29

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal


8(a) STARS II


228

1

1

$253.6 M

$229.1 M

$221.5 M

SEWP V 29 $120.1 M

The Department of State’s high contract turnover, particularly in Professional Services and IT, makes this agency a powerful asset for transitioning toward the Trump Administration’s foreign policy agenda. Physical security contractors, system integrators, enterprise IT service providers, integrated logistics firms and general professional service firms are among the DOS’ most at risk for having their contracts reprogrammed in 2017.



0.4%


6.6 K Vendors

3.3%

0.8%

14.8%

6.2%

5.4%

2.4%

Actual 28.6%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 22.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

DOS MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



16 69

24

71 71 3.0 1.4

70 70 2.1 2.1

78 78 1.0 1.0

3

5

2

3

6

3$52.2 M

$66.9 M

$60.7 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

19 42

Mythics Inc.

Buchanan & Edwards Inc.

GPC Consolidated Reporting

17

Office BuildingConstruction (Y1AA)


Guard/Housekeeping (S206)


Logistics Support (R706)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.49%

0.08%

0.26%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF STATE

30

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DOS MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

70

6

13

7

9

12

76

63

65

74

74

62

66

85

2.6

3.5

4.0

1.1

3.1

3.3

4.1

1.2

80

77

73

79

73

78

96

76

1.6

1.7

7.3

2.5

2.1

2.3

7.9

2.5

77

74

78

93

96

83

57

79

64

93

96

81

7.6

3.1

2.8

3.1

5.0

2.1

7.8

3.0

2.0

3.1

6.8

1.8

14

7

48

1

4

14

2

8

2

9

8

3

2

7

11

11

37

2

5

14

1

6

1

4

10

3

1

6

$211.1 M

$243.0 M

$178.8 M

$199.7 M

$138.0 M

$83.4 M

$456.5 M

$367.0 M

$169.5 M

$169.7 M

$585.1 M

$283.9 M

$605.6 M

$101.9 M

1

3

12

11

13

4

10

11

8

2315

Caddell Construction Co.

In-Tec Construction Co.

PAE Inc.

Accenture PLC (ACN)

CGI Federal Inc. (GIB)

DynCorp International Inc.

International Development Solutions LLC

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Aegis Defense Services LLC

Triple Canopy Inc.



Day & Zimmerman Group Inc.

Deloitte Consulting LLP

Notable Vendors

6.21%

3.16%

0.08%

0.06%

1.66%

0.58%

0.23%

0.78%

0.39%

0.18%

0.98%

0.40%

0.14%

0.17%

Related Govini Market View: Department of State FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=8d02840d0c427290fdc94c400b11c852

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

31

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal


DOE ESPC

874 - MOBIS

360

5

50

$473.3 M

$269.9 M

$236.0 M

SEWP V 56 $177.1 M

DOJ has been in the midst of modernizing legacy enterprise IT and building entirely new data systems. Nearly 85 percent of the value of contracts set to expire in 2017 comes from IT and Professional Services. This percentage has been steadily increasing since 2014. DOJ is finding that Big Data serves its law enforcement mission well and President Trump is unlikely to refute this.



9.2%


12.7 K Vendors

8.2%

0.8%

12.1%

6.1%

3.7%

1.1%

Actual 31.6%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 30.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Millions


Rank VendorShare of

DOJ MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



13 38 64 61 2.7 2,6

71 66 1.4 1.3

66 62 3.0 2.3

7

19

29

11

31

37$79.1 M

$69.5 M

$61.5 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

22 43


Siemens Corp. (SIE)

NANA Regional Corp.

17



General Healthcare (Q201)

Other Management Support Services (R799)

Social Rehabilitation (G004)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.47%

0.96%

0.36%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

32

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DOJ MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

7

9

8

30

15

68

67

60

63

67

94

55

57

2.1

13.3

1.0

1.4

1.8

1.0

1.0

1.3

48

69

74

55

52

70

70

58

5.1

3.1

3.5

1.5

5.1

3.1

3.1

2.2

78

71

66

61

76

67

76

63

60

63

79

65

3.5

3.7

3.3

2.9

2.7

7.1

2.2

3.5

3.4

1.8

2.8

6.0

13

1

5

13

14

15

2

21

20

6

27

21

15

7

14

1

4

17

25

16

3

35

21

7

34

25

12

10

$174.8 M

$77.4 M

$112.2 M

$120.8 M

$88.6 M

$42.8 M

$129.0 M

$128.0 M

$63.9 M

$68.8 M

$205.1 M

$82.0 M

$70.4 M

$65.3 M

12

5

10

6

19

3

28

12

1621

CoreCivic Inc. (CXW)

Ameresco Inc. (AMRC)

Rolling Bay LLC

World Wide Technology Inc.

Forfeiture Support Associates LLC



PCMG Inc.

The Geo Group Inc. (GEO)

Accenture PLC (ACN)

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)



ManTech International Corp. (MANT)

Notable Vendors

3.54%

1.16%

0.15%

0.25%

0.46%

0.36%

0.13%

0.07%

3.11%

0.67%

0.28%

1.63%

0.66%

0.12%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Justice FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=4233ba3850681b13dd7ed69bba383c47

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

FAA eFast


874 - MOBIS

130

149

40

$391.2 M

$62.8 M

$52.8 M

8(a) STARS II 1 $27.2 M

A key pillar in President Trump’s campaign platform was increased infrastructure spending and the jobs that would follow along with it. Should a large infrastructure spending bill pass, expect architecture, engineering and construction firms to directly benefit. DOT planning consultants, infrastructure financiers and providers of connected infrastructure will also see work come their way.



20.1%


4.4 K Vendors

19.2%

17.1%

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

21.9%

10.7%

3.1%

11.1%

Actual 52.0%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 49.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

DOT MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



15 10

24

61 66 3.1 3.1

66 66 9.5 3.7

61 57 3.0 3.0

18

2

1

17

2

3$33.8 M

$41.6 M

$118.6 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

22 12

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

LS Technologies LLC

Robinson Aviation Inc.

19

33

Road, Bridge & Rail Construction (Y1LB)

Technical Engineering &Professional Support (R425)

Radio/Television Equipment (5820)

Management Support/Services R&D (AD26)


0.06%

0.19%

0.30%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DOT MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

4

7

9

16

13

12

75

72

79

56

75

72

68

61

2.6

2.9

2.7

3.0

2.8

2.9

2.6

3.0

59

60

83

72

61

61

80

73

2.6

2.6

2.8

5.6

2.8

2.8

3.2

5.7

71

57

58

62

55

95

64

58

59

61

52

95

1.3

3.0

4.3

2.3

3.0

3.2

1.1

3.0

2.9

2.8

3.0

4.5

29

2

4

3

19

16

11

6

3

5

5

6

2

2

30

2

4

2

13

19

8

6

3

8

4

6

2

2

$144.8 M

$79.3 M

$61.7 M

$91.5 M

$59.5 M

$35.7 M

$512.6 M

$250.1 M

$113.4 M

$55.2 M

$733.9M

$138.4 M

$77.1 M

$59.1 M

2

5

8

17

3

14

11

6

2521

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Parsons Corp.

Noblis Inc.

Human Solutions Inc.

Harris Corp. (HRS)

Raytheon Co. (RTN)


ActioNet Inc.

The MITRE Corp.

Midwest Air Traffic Control Service Inc.

Chickasaw Nation Industries Inc.

Engility Corp. (EGL)

The Walsh Group LTD


Notable Vendors

34

1.02%

0.28%

0.24%

0.07%

0.03%

1.44%

0.11%

0.13%

0.27%

0.22%

0.22%

0.46%

0.91%

0.12%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Transportation FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=f16a7d5820e0f5b6653e9166d7463fa2

Tech Companies Prep for Trump’s Infrastructure Plan - Even Without Details

35

By Mohana Ravindranath, Nextgov

For the past few years, French entrepreneur Fabrice Brassart has been building what he thinks will be the backbone of the city of the future: a network of app-summoned self-driving cars that seamlessly navigate roads on a rubber pad lined with radio frequency identification tags.

It’s an ambitious project that’s still in the conceptual stage, at least a year from pilot deployment and four years from commercialization. Brassart is still raising funds in Europe for his Nice-based startup, REVA2, and already aims to use French cities Cagnes-sur-Mer and Rennes as testbeds—they have already expressed interest, he said. But he’s found a reason to pursue entering the American market as well: President Donald Trump’s campaign promise for a $1 trillion infrastructure spending plan, meted out over 10 years.

“We will harness technology and make smarter decisions on how we build and utilize our infrastructure,” Trump’s transition team wrote in a brief description of his plans. “Our roads, bridges, airports, transit systems and ports will be the envy of the world and enhance the lives of all Americans.”

But details are sparse; it could potentially be fueled a combination of public and private dollars and a system of tax credits. By some estimates, the massive investment in infrastructure could create millions of jobs. Senate Democrats have proffered their own $1 trillion plan, which consists largely of federal investment in areas including roads and bridges, water and sewers, and broadband.

Despite uncertainty about what the spending bill could look like, executives at some tech companies—including at REVA2—view the discussions as signals that American infrastructure could soon get an upgrade. For some companies, especially those focused on creating modern cities that are networks of self-driving cars, sensors embedded in traffic lights, and smart trash cans that never overflow, it may be an opportunity for tech companies to rebrand their offerings as infrastructure-related.

Brassart told Nextgov he “won’t wait” to start investigating how the French company could enter the American market, even though the plan hasn’t taken shape. “I just cannot afford it.” Though he expects to have a pilot by 2018, in anticipation of potential future contracts, he has started to contact connections in Washington to facilitate an expansion into the U.S. market.

It’s not just the startups. Blue chip tech companies including IBM are taking note of Trump’s plans. In an open letter to Trump first reported by CNBC, Chief Executive Officer Ginni Rometty—one of his business policy advisers—urged the newly elected president to “focus on infrastructure investments that incorporate Internet of Things (IoT) technology and artificial intelligence to improve performance,” which might include higher tech buildings and public facilities. Rometty also warned that smarter infrastructure increases cybersecurity concerns.

Cisco, an established federal contractor, may also reposition itself as a high-tech infrastructure company, Mark Sanders, the company’s Director of Client & Market Development, told Nextgov.

In the past three years, the company has entered a handful of “sub-verticals” that could find a place in future cities, including water meters that, when coupled with sensors, allow people to monitor their water consumption remotely.

“We have done some select hiring to bring on expertise in transportation, specifically because we recognize that the country’s infrastructure is due for a major investment,” he said. Over the past few months, the company has also brought on civil engineers to help go after potential contracts. “Building our brand is critically important, because today many people think of Cisco as the networking company. Not necessarily do they think of them as the transportation company.”

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

36

With some public-sector customers, Cisco has started to conduct workshops that help customers prioritize their infrastructure investments, he said.

But for at least one young company, the specifics of the plan aren’t important. Daniel Shani, CEO and founder of a Boston-based startup that sells a product that, when laid on top of a road, generates energy when cars drive over it. Customers include parking garages that set the system up at slowdown points, potentially as a way to reduce their electricity spending.

Asked whether a robust infrastructure plan could persuade the company to more aggressively chase the federal market, Shani told Nextgov that his company will “absolutely be paying attention to it,” but that “it’s not taking us into any pivot or change in direction.”

The plan, whatever shape it takes, would take several years to implement, he said.

“From the lens of a startup, we are generally not looking too far out, so predictions only carry so much weight,” he said, though he added that it’s “very encouraging to feel there’s going to be support for domestic manufacturing, infrastructure [and] national security.”

More concrete discussions about infrastructure spending, and the opportunities it could provide for contractors, could emerge soon. During her confirmation hearing in mid-January 2017, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao said she would try to provide more details about plans in about 30 days.

“One of the major complaints is how long it takes for projects to be ready for bidding,” she said during that hearing. “So the issue is not only how to fund infrastructure projects, but how to increase the pipeline of available projects for all groups, private sector included, to be able to participate.”

Right: DOT vendors most at risk for agency reprogramming and spending reallocation. Consulting service providers and system integrators for the DOT could see a wave of new spending if the Trump Administration can find its way to passing a large infrastructure spending bill.

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

37

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

TIPPS-4


SEWP V

2

224

27

$717.4 M

$395.2 M

$230.6 M

SEWP IV Small Business 16 $63.6 M

President Trump and Congressional Republicans have made it clear that tax reform is a high priority. Any new legislation could spur market opportunity for Treasury contractors as any overhaul of the tax code could create a wave of spending on consulting services and IT. Such a realization may even prompt merger and acquisition activity among the Treasury’s competitive landscape.



3.5%


4.0 K Vendors

8.4%

1.3%

15.4%

11.6%

4.1%

4.5%

Actual 36.2%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 37.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

TRE MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



19 38

54

100 100 2.0 2.0

52 58 3.8 2.9

67 62 2.3 2.5

4

34

30

5

35

55$99.9 M

$110.1 M

$41.0 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

25 35

Purisolve Inc.

FCN Inc.

AT&T Inc. (T)

24

IT & Telecommunications Programming (D308)

Computer Software (7030) Precious Metals (9660)Base Metal Refinery (9650)


SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.37%

1.17%

0.14%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

38

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

TRE MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

6

3

11

12

16

12

62

84

54

84

62

77

58

80

4.9

1.0

2.4

4.3

7.2

1.0

2.3

3.3

66

56

50

72

66

56

46

70

4.5

2.6

3.6

4.4

7.1

2.4

3.8

5.9

51

86

82

80

81

86

49

86

82

76

67

74

3.2

4.0

1.0

6.2

3.8

6.5

3.4

4.2

1.0

4.7

4.1

2.7

1

3

3

5

1

1

31

16

52

7

2

16

8

7

1

4

4

7

1

1

40

18

42

7

2

15

9

7

$708.3 M

$142.3 M

$85.2 M

$225.0 M

$127.0 M

$71.9 M

$576.5 M

$143.3 M

$286.6 M

$138.4 M

$860.9 M

$145.9 M

$131.2 M

$98.9 M

2

4

7

10

13

5

9

11

8

1715

Coins ‘N Things Inc.

Crane & Co. Inc.

Gold Brass and Copper Holdings Inc. (BRSS)


A-Mark Precious Metals Inc. (AMRK)

PMX Industries Inc.

LeachGarner Inc.


Sunshine Minting Inc.

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH)

Jarden Corp. (JAH)


Accenture PLC (ACN)

Unisys Corp. (UIS)

Notable Vendors

0.34%

0.25%

1.31%

0.54%

0.68%

1.05%

1.32%

0.19%

2.97%

0.16%

0.45%

0.59%

0.12%

0.16%

Related Govini Market View: Department of the Treasury FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=0a1f7bf1bd199a19a253d00759a4b958

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

39

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal



8(a) STARS II

375

1

1

$211.0 M

$125.4 M

$123.9 M

874 - MOBIS 67 $60.1 M

USDA’s landscape can be defined as food producers, food transporters, management consultants and technology integrators. The ecosystem is designed to fulfill USDA’s mission in supporting the safe production of food. The established contractor ecosystem is critical to efficiency. It will be difficult for the Trump Administration to drastically reprogram USDA spending as the agency has a less flexible contracting environment.



2.7%


16.6 K Vendors

3.1%

4.2%

16.9%

9.9%

4.0%

3.9%

Actual56.2%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 52.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

USDA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



13

39

82 74 1.5 1.4

63 56 2.1 1.9

43 42 11.4 10.0

4

14

9

4

19

15$36.7 M

$52.0 M

$35.5 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

22 48


Dell Inc.

Frozsun Inc.

14

Dairy Foods & Eggs (8910)

Meat, Poultry & Fish (8905)

Fruits & Vegetables (8915)

Conservation/Forest Fire Suppression (F003)

Crude Agricultural & Forestry Products (9440)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.49%

0.20%

0.06%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

40

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

USDA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

25

26

6

20

17

16

16

88

46

76

87

87

42

75

88

3.2

1.7

3.1

15.8

3.5

2.8

3.1

14.5

95

74

95

48

95

65

81

46

3.6

1.3

6.7

3.7

3.1

1.2

7.1

4.3

65

81

96

63

62

78

61

73

96

62

51

77

7.9

3.8

1.0

7.8

8.0

1.2

8.0

1.6

1.0

8.0

7.0

1.3

5

23

13

31

4

6

5

43

3

20

1

5

41

9

4

18

9

37

4

6

8

58

2

8

1

2

23

9

$51.1 M

$88.9 M

$33.7 M

$49.3 M

$131.3 M

$39.5 M

$54.0 M

$49.7 M

$48.6 M

$103.6 M

$66.6 M

$108.6 M

$62.7 M

$83.8 M

2

24

8

22

18

7

12

19

2320

Aero Flite Inc.

Hormel Foods Corp. (HRL)


Archer Daniels Midland Co. (ADM)

Neptune Aviation Services Inc.

ICL Performance Products LP

LD Commodities Grains Merchandising LLC

Tyson Foods Inc. (TSN)

Leprino Foods Co.

CHS Inc. (CHSCP)

Heartland Technology Group LLC

Dairy Farmers of America Inc.

Cargill Kitchen Solutions Inc.


Notable Vendors

0.62%

1.02%

0.05%

0.01%

0.65%

0.28%

0.09%

0.59%

0.06%

1.40%

0.06%

0.32%

1.28%

0.05%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Agriculture FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=0011683a9252ce6d9da65a85adbf8f17

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

41

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal



DOE ESPC

1867

1

9

$232.6 M

$217.0 M

$188.6 M

874 - MOBIS 603 $85.2 M

GSA’s mission to deliver the best value in real estate acquisition and technology services by driving down the price of procurement and reducing cost to agencies aligns with the Trump Administration’s goal of reducing government spending. Motor Vehicle vendors have a strong representation in this year’s Scorecard with Ford, Chrysler and General Motors solidifying top rankings.

N/A Budget Authority

$4.9 B Contract Spend 15.4% 24.4 K Contracts

16.8 K Vendors

0.5%

2.1%

21.6%

9.2%

5.3%

3.9%

Actual 39.2%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 36.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

GSA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



11 15 82 82 406.7 251.1

76 74 191.1 200.7

82 85 455.5 473.4

31

4

19

29

2

15$71.4 M

$43.8 M

$161.3 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

19 44

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

The Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (DNB)


13

Office Building Repair (Z2AA)

Motor Vehicles (2310)Office Building Construction (Y1AA)


Janitorial/Housekeeping (S201) SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

1.07%

0.75%

0.89%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

42

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

GSA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3

6

30

18

14

81

95

96

95

85

N/A

96

78

6.0

3.0

6.0

3.3

5.0

N/A

5.0

2.0

79

95

68

87

100

84

72

87

6.0

7.3

97.7

8.0

3.3

7.9

114.5

8.4

83

95

100

95

95

90

83

N/A

96

95

82

82

6.0

5.0

139.6

3.0

10.0

4.6

5.0

N/A

70.5

3.0

10.1

16.0

3

1

1

2

2

2

29

4

3

1

2

1

1

2

4

N/A

3

1

3

3

27

4

6

N/A

1

1

3

4

$206.5 M

$78.3 M

$42.9 M

$101.1 M

$50.6 M

$28.3 M

$222.4 M

$144.5 M

$170.1 M

$31.9 M

$330.1 M

$150.1 M

$55.4 M

$39.7 M

10

15

4

12

61

916

Ford Motor Co. (F)

Atkinson/Clark JV

RP Automotive Inc.

Stronghold Engineering Inc.

Chrysler Group LLC (FCAU)

M.A. Mortenson Co.

Honeywell International Inc. (HON)

Navistar International Corp. (NAV)

General Motors Co. (GM)

Walsh Puerto Rico LLC

Alliant Solutions Partner LLC

The Christman Co.

Brasada Ford LTD

Brasfield & Gorrie LLC

Notable Vendors

1.66%

1.07%

0.81%

4.53%

2.93%

3.40%

0.00%

0.35%

0.50%

1.84%

0.09%

0.92%

Related Govini Market View: General Services Administration FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=c8674e30b0bc18420fa368d9e2edef1d

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

43

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

SWIFT IV

874 - MOBIS


4

23

51

$177.6 M

$126.4 M

$89.8 M

520 - FABS 14 $31.3 M

USAID, like several civilian agencies, is facing proposed budget cuts by the Trump Administration. Despite a modest decline in contract spend, USAID saw a strong increase in Technical Engineering & Professional Support in FY16 compared to the past 3 year average. This growth led to increases for Chemonics, Tetra Tech and Creative Associates International.



3.0%


1.6 K Vendors

9.6%

5.3%

5.6%

3.4%

1.2%

0.2%

Actual 13.2%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 11.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

USAID MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



16 49

12

72 72 2.0 3.3

74 83 1.9 2.0

79 77 5.2 5.2

4

5

12

4

5

17$42.7 M

$37.4 M

$40.1 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

23 50

MacFadden & Associates Inc.

ICF International Inc. (ICFI)

International Business & Technical Consultants Inc.

20

Medical Instruments (6515)

Technical Assistance (R421)




SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.58%

0.26%

0.46%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksAGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

44

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

USAID MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

4

5

7

10

9

16

12

78

80

76

75

78

74

75

71

4.6

4.1

5.4

6.3

4.3

3.2

4.9

5.8

81

66

71

79

76

66

75

78

4.5

1.0

2.7

5.7

4.4

1.0

2.2

6.8

69

82

89

72

96

77

N/A

81

93

71

96

74

1.0

5.8

7.7

5.9

7.0

4.5

N/A

6.0

8.3

5.9

7.0

4.1

77

14

62

20

48

1

5

21

1

20

3

12

1

29

96

17

52

18

48

1

7

16

N/A

18

2

14

1

31

$136.2 M

$148.8 M

$48.1 M

$146.2 M

$67.0 M

$93.5 M

$372.0 M

$122.7 M

$76.6 M

$89.5 M

$1.0 B

$154.7 M

$348.9 M

$95.4 M

11

30

2

52

14

3

11

29

1317

Chemonics International Inc.

Abt Associates Inc.

Development Alternatives Inc.

Research Triangle Institute

Tetra Tech Inc. (TTEK)

Kenya Medical Supplies Authority

John Snow Inc.

FHI 360 LLC

Partnership for Supply Chain Management Inc.

AECOM Inc. (ACM)

Renaissance Information Systems Inc.

Creative Associates International Inc.

Remote Medical International

Management Systems International

Notable Vendors

10.83%

0.30%

1.37%

0.19%

3.08%

2.26%

7.08%

0.59%

0.04%

0.11%

2.22%

1.22%

0.66%

Related Govini Market View: Agency for International Development FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=aa91de8ae7ed0db9a669f8343d6351bb

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

45

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal


NOAALink

874 - MOBIS

314

10

59

$240.0 M

$109.7 M

$105.6 M

NIH CIO-SP3 Small Business 2 $77.0 M

Trade and Commerce has been a primary pillar in President Trump’s political platform. The Trump Administration may find contracting flexibility at the DOC via sub-agencies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Institute of Standards. Together these agencies account for 62.2 percent of the DOC’s 2017 expiring contracts.



9.2%


7.8 K Vendors

1.8%

4.6%

17.4%

11.6%

4.9%

4.2%

Actual 41.4%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 40.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Millions


Rank VendorShare of

DOC MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



12 6

11

72 66 2.2 2.4

68 72 3.4 3.4

69 60 1.8 1.6

3

10

5

5

9

10$27.3 M

$49.4 M

$32.4 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

17 44

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Earth Resources Technology Inc.

MITRE Corp.

14

Space Vehicle Components (1820)

Support - Management: Other (R799)

Space Systems R&D (AR35)


IT & Telecommunications Systems Development (D302)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.33%

0.09%

0.30%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

46

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DOC MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

15

12

33

8

18

68

72

90

65

70

77

90

66

3.1

2.9

2.0

1.5

2.8

4.3

2.0

1.4

73

95

81

81

73

N/A

68

81

1.0

7.0

2.0

3.2

1.0

N/A

1.3

2.8

61

66

77

63

86

100

64

70

77

60

86

68

1.9

1.0

1.7

1.7

3.1

11.3

1.9

1.1

2.0

1.7

3.4

6.0

6

3

1

14

3

1

6

4

20

7

11

34

3

2

7

4

1

19

3

N/A

7

4

21

9

9

27

3

1

$296.0 M

$103.4 M

$43.4 M

$308.2 M

$40.9 M

$20.0 M

$111.2 M

$54.7 M

$50.3 M

$26.7 M

$337.2 M

$96.4 M

$32.5 M

$43.9 M

4

19

10

20

3

7

16

2

522

Raytheon Co. (RTN)

T-Rex Corp.

UT-Battelle LLC


Ball Corp. (BLL)

Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Accenture PLC (ACN)

Cyberdata Technologies Inc.




Harris Corp. (HRS)

Ace Info Solutions Inc.

Diversified Global Partners JV LLC

Notable Vendors

1.32%

2.71%

0.30%

1.47%

0.13%

0.56%

0.23%

1.60%

1.05%

0.55%

1.59%

0.31%

0.37%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Commerce FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=91070c69d6871d7ae591f64ebab976e7

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

47

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal


SEWP V

874 - MOBIS

388

63

51

$105.0 M

$88.5 M

$35.2 M

84 - Total Solutions for Law Enforcement 76 $30.2 M

DOI will be critical for President Trump’s energy development goals as it oversees energy exploration on public lands. The Trump Administration will have the opportunity to reverse Obama-era rules that limit public land development and promote clean energy. Vendors that perform construction or facility maintenance may find themselves in a strong position to capture spending from Trump-driven energy policies.



8.4%


16.2 K Vendors

1.1%

2.7%

27.1%

12.8%

5.0%

4.9%

Actual 59.7%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 53.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Millions


Rank VendorShare of

DOI MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



13

99

71 71 2.2 3.9

82 92 5.3 5.7

73 70 5.1 6.7

5

3

6

5

2

6$16.7 M

$13.5 M

$20.8 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

20

Software House International Inc.

Valdez International Corp.

Chenega Corp.

18


General Architecture & Engineering (C219)



Transportation, Travel &Lodging (V221)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.67%

0.11%

0.37%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

48

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DOI MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2

10

11

13

32

12

92

96

86

84

90

84

80

81

5.0

3.0

1.6

2.3

5.0

7.0

2.6

2.3

73

95

85

62

73

N/A

68

62

4.2

6.0

1.8

7.3

5.5

N/A

1.0

6.2

80

77

79

74

80

82

72

72

60

52

80

72

4.9

3.0

1.5

2.5

1.0

2.0

5.0

3.1

2.2

1.0

1.0

2.0

2

2

7

7

6

1

2

11

3

10

3

2

1

5

3

1

10

6

8

N/A

4

12

2

11

4

1

1

4

$29.6 M

$37.8 M

$19.1 M

$21.4 M

$17.6 M

$16.6 M

$37.0 M

$21.8 M

$20.4 M

$28.9 M

$35.6 M

$22.7 M

$32.3 M

$24.4 M

5

4

15

11

97

2017


Swank Enterprises



SEACOR Holdings Inc. (CKH)

NW Construction Inc.

Kaktovik Inupiat Corp.

Nuaxis LLC

Moltz Constructors Inc.


Dewberry & Davis LLC

Martin Brothers Construction

SEI Investments Co. (SEIC)

Mythics Inc.

Notable Vendors

0.33%

0.73%

0.02%

0.09%

0.02%

0.66%

0.34%

0.96%

1.29%

0.06%

0.55%

0.06%

0.10%

Related Govini Market View: Department of the Interior FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=720dee58165597035e9ab78323032f3d

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

49

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

520 - FABS


874 - MOBIS

13

67

22

$634.2 M

$72.1 M

$44.4 M

GSA USA Contact 1 $42.7 M

The Department of Education will see privatization efforts coming from the Trump Administration. Policy change may include an emphasis in charter schools and greater private sector involvement regarding Federal student loans. This may cause disruption for vendors that manage and service student loan payment systems including Great Lakes Higher Education, Navient and Continental Services Group.



2.0%


827 Vendors

4.4%

0.6%

6.0%

6.0%

1.2%

0.6%

Actual 23.4%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 25.5%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Billions


Rank VendorShare of

EDU MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



13 31

29

96 94 2.1 2.1

71 71 4.8 4.0

96 96 26.0 26.0

2

4

1

3

4

1$24.7 M

$49.4 M

$47.6 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

24 43

Educational Testing Service Inc.


Transworld Systems Inc.

15

Special Studies & Analysis(Other Than Scientific) (B506)

IT Facility Operations & Maintenance (D301)

Special Studies & Analysis (B542)

Financial Management (R710)

Debt Collection Management (R705)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.75%

0.67%

0.45%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

50

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

EDU MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3

2

11

17

14

26

14

53

76

79

81

53

69

79

82

3.5

2.9

26.0

2.7

1.6

2.4

26.0

2.5

57

69

79

86

57

69

79

88

3.7

3.6

26.0

4.6

2.1

1.7

26.0

4.6

56

88

96

93

96

100

56

88

96

93

96

78

3.1

4.0

26.0

2.0

26.0

52.0

1.7

3.4

26.0

2.0

26.0

26.0

2

2

1

22

1

1

1

14

1

3

1

1

1

2

2

3

1

22

1

1

1

13

1

2

1

1

1

1

$150.0 M

$106.7 M

$50.0 M

$86.6 M

$53.6 M

$40.5 M

$183.8 M

$146.5 M

$54.9 M

$57.3 M

$202.8 M

$161.0 M

$62.8 M

$69.4 M

1

5

12

7

16

4

6

11

8

1017

Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of

Accenture PLC (ACN)

Continental Service Group Inc.

Westat Inc.

Great Lakes Higher Education Corp.

Navient Corp. (NAVI)

Windham Professionals Inc.

American Institutes for Research

Nelnet Inc. (NNI)

Dell Inc.

GC Services Limited Partnership

MAXIMUS Inc. (MMS)

Account Control Technology Inc.

Financial Management Systems

Notable Vendors

2.85%

0.35%

0.16%

0.01%

2.82%

2.70%

0.26%

0.71%

1.78%

0.55%

0.06%

0.73%

0.78%

1.13%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Education FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=9c95f545064ef3d39585160f86746901

DEPARTMENT OF LABORAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

51

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal


874 - MOBIS

NIH CIO-SP3 Small Business

172

30

1

$140.4 M

$44.4 M

$33.9 M

8(a) STARS II 1 $27.4 M

The DOL is an agency that relies heavily on services. In fact, this poses an opportunity for the Trump Administration to realign priorities within the agency as 81 percent of DOL contracts set to expire in 2017 are services related. Most of this work involves operating training facilities, managing job education programs and financial services related to pensions.



1.9%


1.8 K Vendors

9.6%

8.0%

22.9%

12.0%

4.7%

2.8%

Actual 36.0%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 35.1%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Millions


Rank VendorShare of

DOL MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



12 36

38

77 72 1.0 2.0

78 70 3.5 2.9

96 92 4.0 4.1

2

15

1

1

10

2$14.5 M

$48.0 M

$19.0 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

19 57

MAXIMUS Inc. (MMS)

Odle Management Group LLC

Inforeliance Corp.

17

Non-Government Owned Educational Building Operations (M1CZ)Vocational & Technical Training (U006)



Government Owned Educational Building Operations (M139)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.46%

1.42%

0.33%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF LABOR

52

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

DOL MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

5

25

8

9

11

13

71

71

91

71

73

72

91

76

1.7

1.9

1.0

1.6

1.6

2.0

1.0

1.7

96

75

70

76

96

78

76

75

1.5

2.0

1.5

2.0

1.6

1.9

1.9

2.0

63

65

69

78

75

72

80

67

78

78

77

95

3.9

1.8

3.1

2.0

2.2

2.4

5.8

1.8

3.2

2.1

2.4

5.0

41

33

1

10

2

14

22

18

1

10

10

1

20

4

34

30

1

8

2

7

17

22

2

9

7

1

17

1

$22.5 M

$51.3 M

$49.4 M

$21.9 M

$80.0 M

$20.4 M

$29.5 M

$70.5 M

$85.1 M

$56.2 M

$236.5 M

$147.1 M

$21.5 M

$40.9 M

12

13

4

7

15

19

2

11

10

2616

Management and Training Corp.

Adams & Associates Inc.

Parsons Corp.

Foxmar Inc.

Trowbridge & Trowbridge LLC


ResCare Inc.

Minact Inc.


Chugach Alaska Corp.

Alutiiq LLC

Office Remedies Inc.

Career Systems Development Corp.

Serrato Corp.

Notable Vendors

2.32%

0.81%

0.46%

0.25%

0.43%

1.78%

0.58%

1.15%

0.29%

1.13%

0.32%

0.00%

0.28%

0.43%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Labor FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=21eb8b14863a55042a7ffd1df8151c5f

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

53

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal



EPA ITS-BISS II

144

1

1

$135.6 M

$73.7 M

$19.2 M

EPA IMCS III 3 $18.1 M

President Trump has stated publicly that he does not believe in climate change nor does he support the majority of the EPA’s mission. The Trump Administration will work to roll back many of the Obama-era climate change policies and regulations. Construction and Environmental Service vendors will face the most risk with a dismantling of the EPA. These two categories account for 65.2 percent of EPA’s 2017 expiring contracts.



0.0%


2.1 K Vendors

6.4%

5.6%

14.8%

5.9%

4.0%

0.6%

Actual 40.1%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 41.8%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Millions


Rank VendorShare of

EPA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



17 91

32

82 83 1.7 2.6

87 82 3.6 4.0

81 81 1.8 1.7

3

8

4

5

9

4$15.0 M

$24.8 M

$16.0 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

23 41

KEMRON Environmental Services Inc.

CB&I (CBI) (formerly The Shaw Group Inc.)


19

Environmental Services (F999)


Environmental Remediation (F108)


Landscaping & Interior Design (C211)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.73%

0.37%

0.36%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

54

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

EPA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

3

11

2

4

24

12

81

82

79

76

81

84

77

76

3.3

6.1

1.9

2.1

3.1

4.7

1.8

2.3

83

81

85

79

82

82

80

80

2.0

1.9

2.1

2.3

1.7

1.9

2.1

2.2

100

87

81

81

82

85

100

84

79

79

81

83

3.3

6.0

2.0

2.1

2.1

2.3

8.6

5.7

1.9

2.2

2.1

2.0

4

4

11

3

13

26

25

11

9

5

13

11

3

18

4

4

13

3

12

24

25

10

7

7

13

10

4

20

$64.9 M

$36.6 M

$40.7 M

$44.4 M

$28.9 M

$36.0 M

$78.2 M

$84.4 M

$56.1 M

$36.2 M

$91.9 M

$43.5 M

$39.5 M

$25.7 M

6

5

18

39

13

33

15

11

7

2120


Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (JEC)

Weston Solutions Inc.

Electronics Consulting Services Inc.

Environmental Restoration LLC

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Tetra Tech Inc. (TTEK)


Amec Foster Wheeler PLC (AMFW)

EA Engineering, Science & Technology Inc.

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Environmental Quality Management Inc.

Guardian Environmental Service Co. Inc.

ICF International Inc. (ICFI)

Notable Vendors

2.50%

0.01%

0.08%

1.34%

1.94%

0.15%

0.91%

0.87%

3.07%

0.53%

1.11%

0.38%

1.21%

0.01%

Related Govini Market View: Environmental Protection Agency FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=f7ab22d8e96e063dfbeae5312262860a

The 10 Largest Programs on Trump’s Chopping Block

55

By Eric Katz, Government Executive

President Trump requested an array of cuts in his fiscal 2018 budget to arrive at $54 billion in overall reductions in domestic agency discretionary spending.

He proposed eliminating entirely 19 independent agencies, though the real meat in terms of dollars came from inside Cabinet-level agencies. By the White House’s estimate, Trump proposed cutting hundreds of programs entirely. More than 50 activities would be on the chopping block at the Environmental Protection Agency alone, though that accounts for only 0.6 percent of the total cuts.

The White House defended most of the program cuts by saying they have not lived up to their stated purpose, or they fail to demonstrate evidence of their success. In some cases, the programs simply do not align with Trump’s priorities.

“Every agency and department will be driven to achieve greater efficiency and to eliminate wasteful spending in carrying out their honorable service to the American people,” Trump wrote in his budget.

Ultimately, Congress will have final say in how agencies fund their programs, and many activities that enjoy bipartisan support are likely to survive. Here’s a look at the 10 largest programs Trump proposed to eliminate and their fiscal 2017 appropriation.

Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program ($3.4B): Trump’s budget proposed cutting 18 percent of the Health and Human Services Department’s fiscal 2018 budget, in part by eliminating LIHEAP. The reduction would account for nearly one-quarter of the overall cuts at HHS. LIHEAP, created in 1981, subsidizes energy costs for low-income families and is run by HHS’ Administration for Children and Families. The program makes

up 6 percent of the budget for ACF, which employs more than 1,300 individuals. Trump would also eliminate the Energy Department’s Weatherization Assistance Program, a $121 million program that works in conjunction with LIHEAP by helping low-income families reduce energy consumption by making their homes more energy efficient.

Community Development Block Grant ($3B): One of the Housing and Urban Development Department’s most high-profile projects provides grants to state and local governments for infrastructure, housing and other public services. The program, created in 1974, represents about half of Trump’s proposed cuts at HUD. It is administered by HUD’s Community Planning and Development office, which has its own assistant secretary and employs 258 people. The block grant program makes up about 45 percent of the CPD budget.

Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants Program ($2.4B): The Education Department would absorb more than 25 percent of its cuts through the elimination of this program, which provides funding to state and local education agencies to hire more teachers and principals and to improve their quality and effectiveness. The program falls under the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, which has 244 employees.

Global Climate Change Initiative ($1.3B): Obama created this initiative in response to United Nations agreements reached in 2009 and 2010. Administered by the State Department, it has integrated climate change priorities into U.S. foreign assistance. Eliminating the initiative would also affect programs at the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Treasury Department. State and Treasury rely on the UN and other international organizations to implement the program.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

56

21st Century Community Learning Centers Program ($1.2B): Trump proposed significantly increasing funding for school choice initiatives such as charter schools and vouchers for private institutions, leading to significant cuts at the rest of the Education Department. The community learning centers help “high-need” schools implement in and out-of-school activities in non-school hours, such as expanded learning time programs. The program is administered in the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education’s Office of Academic Improvement. Trump’s proposal to cut funding for after-school programs caused a significant stir in the days since he released his budget.

Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant Program ($732M): The third Education Department program in the 10 largest proposed cuts would eliminate funding for undergraduate students with demonstrated financial need to receive up to $4,000 per academic year. It is administered in Education’s Federal Student Aid office, which houses about one-third of the department’s 4,300 employees. Colleges and universities partially match the federal funding, which provides assistance to 1.6 million students.

Community Services Block Grants ($715M): Like LIHEAP, CSBG is administered by HHS’ Administration for Children and families. The program aims to “alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty in communities,” such as employment, education, nutrition and emergency services. CSBG has staff at 10 different regions throughout the country, as well at ACF’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. Together with LIHEAP, Trump’s elimination of CSBG would zero-out ACF’s Office of Community Services’ discretionary programs altogether.

Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Grant ($499M): TIGER grants fund local transportation projects that are “difficult to fund through traditional federal programs.” The funding must go to construction rather than design and planning with grants awarded on a competitive basis. Obama created the Transportation Department program in 2009.

Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program ($498M): The largest cut at the Agriculture Department eliminates a program that helps rural households and businesses obtain reliable drinking water systems, sanitary waste and sewage disposal and storm water drainage. It is administered by USDA Rural Development’s Rural Utility Service, which employs 265 individuals.

Senior Community Service Employment Program ($434M): The Labor Department’s largest cut would eliminate a program designed to help low-income, unemployed seniors engage in job training. It was created in 1965 and allows older Americans to participate in activities at schools, hospitals, day-care centers and other facilities. Labor’s Employment and Training Administration, which has 1,100 employees, runs the program.

Left: Agencies with increasing reprogramming potential are candidates to support President Trump’s reform agenda in the near-term.

Agencies such as EPA and Education are already in the Administration’s sights as President Trump’s proposed budget attempts to reprioritize spending.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

57

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal

SSA ITSSC



4

110

1

$314.2 M

$206.2 M

$23.0 M

00CORP - The Consolidated Schedule 4 $10.0 M

On the campaign trail, then-candidate Trump promised to leave Social Security and Medicaid alone, and in his Budget Blueprint no cuts were proposed to these popular entitlement programs. Northrop Grumman and Leidos retain the top two rankings in part due to large IT support services contracts due to expire by the end of 2017.



3.4%


4.2 K Vendors

1.9%

4.8%

8.7%

13.4%

3.2%

1.6%

Actual 36.7%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 36.8%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Millions


Rank VendorShare of

SSA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



11 8

5

79 69 4.2 3.8

83 88 1.5 1.2

89 89 1.5 1.7

3

4

3

3

3

3$17.4 M

$31.2 M

$35.5 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

22 18

Red River Computer Co. Inc.


XMCO Inc.

14

Medical/Psychiatric Consultation (Q526)



Expert Witness (R424)

Software Components & Services (7050)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

0.73%

2.12%

0.07%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksSOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

58

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

SSA MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

7

21

11

15

13

73

92

74

96

82

96

75

96

1.8

5.0

2.3

1.0

1.6

3.0

2.1

1.0

76

80

96

92

82

80

94

88

2.5

1.1

2.3

1.2

2.3

1.1

2.1

1.8

93

96

95

95

70

86

93

90

95

93

70

77

1.2

4.0

12.0

2.4

4.0

1.4

1.1

4.6

12.0

1.9

4.0

1.7

3

2

3

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

3

2

1

2

1

3

1

3

3

2

3

1

1

1

5

$80.9 M

$47.4 M

$24.1 M

$48.7 M

$26.6 M

$18.8 M

$104.4 M

$47.5 M

$35.9 M

$17.5 M

$124.5 M

$63.9 M

$43.3 M

$23.0 M

2

9

10

13

17

3

12

12

4

2718


Westat Inc.

Accenture PLC (ACN)

EPS Corp.

Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

CA Inc. (CA)

Dell Inc.

PCMG Inc.

Four Inc.

EMC Corp. (EMC)

MVM Inc.

CSRA Inc. (CSRA)

Avaya Inc.

DLT Solutions Inc.

Notable Vendors

0.35%

4.17%

0.05%

0.81%

0.87%

0.27%

0.53%

0.32%

0.04%

1.57%

0.07%

0.34%

0.48%

0.39%

Related Govini Market View: Social Security Administration FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=deee324b6d82f78d015df05c872ab3c7

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENTAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

59

Significant Movers




3 YR %


Contract Vehicles

Actual Against Goal


SEWP V

8(a) STARS II

30

8

1

$62.4 M

$31.9 M

$24.2 M

874 - MOBIS 16 $23.7 M

Despite having the smallest amount of contract spend of all the Scorecard agencies, HUD may be a bright spot for the Trump Administration as it looks to reallocate spending. HUD has large Professional Service and IT contracts set to expire in 2017. The Professional Service contracts involve real estate brokerage and property management, while the IT work is related to debt collection and asset management systems.



24.4%

6.2% 981 Contracts

662 Vendors

33.1%

24.7%

23.3%

20.1%

4.4%

1.2%

Actual 46.3%

2016

Gro

wth

Com

pare

d to

3 Y

R Av

erag

e

Goal 35.0%

5.0%

5.0%

3.0%

3.0%

2016 Spend Millions


Rank VendorShare of

HUD MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



14 86

39

74 78 1.9 2.5

96 96 2.3 1.9

96 96 1.0 1.0

3

3

1

4

2

1$9.5 M

$12.0 M

$22.5 M

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

21 42

KPMG LLP


Ampcus Inc.

20

IT & Telecommunications Strategy and Architecture (D307)


Residential Building Maintenance (Z1FZ)


Real Estate Brokerage Support (R402)

SB

WOSB

SDB

HZ

SDVOB

1.81%

0.55%

0.42%

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

60

Top Vendors


Rank VendorShare of

HUD MarketVendor Revenue

CapturedVendor



1

2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3

10

11

15

25

22

12

95

88

100

77

95

88

100

60

7.0

6.9

79.1

1.0

7.0

6.7

83.9

1.0

96

69

62

66

96

65

62

69

53.2

1.6

2.7

1.0

53.0

1.2

2.3

1.0

84

82

79

61

88

67

96

69

96

61

73

67

82.6

1.0

85.9

7.0

1.6

51.4

94.4

1.0

97.0

7.0

2.0

43.1

1

1

3

3

1

4

6

2

3

1

2

1

6

3

1

1

3

1

1

3

7

4

2

2

1

1

10

3

$83.8 M

$52.8 M

$23.5 M

$63.3 M

$45.2 M

$19.3 M

$111.7 M

$74.8 M

$50.4 M

$18.9 M

$119.1 M

$67.8 M

$39.3 M

$26.4 M

4

1

5

7

15

14

9

11

2

616

Carrington Mortgage Services LLC

Sage Acquisitions LLC

Matt Martin Real Estate Management LLC

EY

BLM Companies LLC


Leidos Inc. (LDOS)

Dynaxys LLC

P.K. Management Group Inc.

The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK)

CWIS LLC

Selene Finance LP


A2Z Field Services

Notable Vendors

4.86%

2.78%

0.11%

0.85%

5.13%

3.42%

0.58%

0.60%

5.21%

0.88%

1.39%

0.48%

1.21%

2.22%

Related Govini Market View: Department of Housing and Urban Development FY16

https://analytics.govini.com/search/overview/?s=6b5c081ccdf8d7981ac08773a7b8cfb6

INDEXAgency and Vendor Benchmarks

61

Vendor Vendor Vendor PagePagePage

34, 36

52

12

14

42

6

17, 20, 30, 32, 38, 46, 50, 58

26

54

19, 20, 37

46

60

52

19

59

6

60

50

12

32

23

16

46

42

50

6, 16

44

7

6, 8, 14

58

36

12

16, 44

40

Ace Info Solutions Inc.

American Institutes for Research

Alliant Solutions Partner LLC

Austal USA Inc.

BLM Companies LLC

Abt Associates Inc.

AM General LLC

Amerisource Bergen Corp.

Battelle Memorial Institute Inc.

ActioNet Inc.

Alutiiq LLC

Arctic Slope Regional Corp.

BAE Systems PLC

Avaya Inc.

23

20

Aegis Defense Services LLC

Astrix Inc.

14

28

Aero Flite Inc.

Aerospace Corp., The

AT&T Inc.

Agile Defense Inc.

ATA Aerospace LLC

Account Control Technology Inc.

Ameresco Inc.

Alion Science & Technology Corp.

Archer Daniels Midland Co.

Aurora Flight Services Corp.

Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office

40

10 20

14

Aerie Aerospace LLC

Adams & Associates Inc.

Alvarez & Associates

Arrow Electronics Inc.

Ball Corp.

Bank of New York Mellon Corp., The

30

24

ADC LTD

ADS Tactical Inc.

AECOM Inc.

Artel

Assurance Technology Corp.

Accenture PLC

Amec Foster Wheeler

Akal Security Inc.

Ampcus Inc.

Atkinson/Clark JV

Bechtel Group Inc.

AMFW

AMRC

ABC

ADM

ARW

ACM

BAESY

ALON

BLL

BK

ASB

T

Symbol Symbol Symbol

38A-Mark Precious Metals Inc.

A2Z Field Services

AMRK

ACN

60

Boeing Co., The

26Bollinger Shipyards Inc.

6, 7, 8, 9, 10,12, 24, 36

BA

Agency and Vendor BenchmarksINDEX


24

52

43, 44

38

30

8, 12, 20, 32, 39, 48, 59

42

26

46

20

35, 36

28

26

30

41, 42

32

40

19

40

18

58

60

5, 7, 18, 19, 20, 22, 26,28, 30, 33, 36, 45, 54, 58

11

52

40

14

Calibre Systems Inc.

CHS Inc.

CSI Aviation Inc.

Defense Support Services LLC

CA Inc.

Chugach Alaska Corp. Dairy Farmers of America Inc.

California Institute of Technology

Coins ‘N Things Inc.

CWIS LLC

CSRA Inc.

20Carrington Mortgage Services LLC

Continental Services Group Inc. 49, 50

Covenant Aviation Security LLC

CoreCivic Inc.

Caddell Construction Co.

Chrysler Group LLC

CNA Financial Corp.

Creative Associates International

Day & Zimmerman Group Inc.

20

16

Carahsoft Technology Corp.

Companion Data Services

Cyberdata Technologies Inc.

38

Cardinal Health Inc.

Career Systems Development Corp.

Cargill Kitchen Solutions Inc.

Computer Sciences Corp.

Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC

CACI International Inc.

Christman Group Co., The

Cisco Systems Inc.

Crane & Co. Inc.

DaVita Inc.

62

CSCOCAH

CXW

CSRA

CACI

CHSCP

DVA

CNA

CSC


29Buchanan & Edwards Inc.

By Light Professional IT Services Inc.

CA

18

22

53

20, 30, 32, 54

CDW Corp.

CGI Federal Inc.

20

CB&I (formerly The Shaw Group)

60

CGS Administrators LLC

CBI

CDW

GIB

Brasfield & Gorrie LLC 42

16, 36, 48, 54

43, 44

47

34, 36


Chemonics International Inc.

Chenega Corp.

Chickasaw Nation Industries Inc.

FCAU

42

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.5, 14, 18, 19, 20,

36, 38, 41, 52

Brasada Ford LTD

BAH

20, 50, 58, 39Dell Inc.

Deloitte Consulting LLP19, 30, 32, 38,

40, 46, 60


63


54

36, 60

41, 42

6

5, 6, 8, 20, 22, 30, 48

54

6, 22, 26, 49, 60

54

44

18

38

45

37

32

41, 42

26

60

58

50

7, 8, 10

29

27

30

11, 12

15

49, 50

41

10

22

26, 32

26

49

54 58

DynCorp International Inc.

Fluor Corp.

Express Scripts Inc.

General Motors Co.

Hanford Mission Support Co. LLC

Dun & Bradstreet Corp., The

Federal Express Corp.

Ford Motor Co.

GPC Consolidated Reporting

George Washington University, TheEA Engineering, Science & Technology Inc.

EY

Four Points Technology

GlaxoSmithKline LLC

Geo Group Inc., The

22 52

EMC Corp.

GC Services Limited Partnership

54

50

Engility Corp.

Genco Distribution System Inc.

Environmental Quality Management Inc.


Dynaxys LLC

Financial Management Systems

EPS Corp.

Four Inc.

General Electric Co.

Guardian EnvironmentalService Co. Inc.

34, 36 18

39

Emergent BioSolutions Inc.

Earth Resources Technology Inc.

FCN Inc.

Foxmar Inc.

Gold Brass and Copper Holdings Inc.

58 19

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Inc.

Educational Testing Service Inc.

Electronics Consulting Services Inc.

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.

Frozsun Inc.

DXC Technology Co.

FHI 360 LLC

Environmental Restoration LLC

Forfeiture Support Associates LLC

General Dynamics Corp.

Great Lakes Higher Education Corp.

F

FLR

ESRX

EMC

EBS

EGL

GD

GEO

GSK

DXC

FDX

BRSS

GE

GM

FMS


46Diversified Global Partners JV LLC

DLT Solutions Inc.

DNB

20, 58

44

Dewberry & Davis LLC 48

Development Alternatives Inc.

8, 14, 19, 20, 24, 34, 36, 46Harris Corp. HRS


64


11, 12

44

5-10, 14, 19, 20, 24, 36, 46

40

52

15, 36, 42

20, 26, 28, 35, 36, 38, 46, 57

48

38

425, 6, 25

38

25

17, 19

44

40

30

22

8, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 22, 26, 32, 34,

36, 41, 54, 57, 58, 60

13

34

18, 19

53

43

22

44

33, 36

16

43, 54

40

30 25

Human Solutions Inc.

KEMRON Environmental Services Inc.

Iron Bow Technologies

Longview InternationalTechnology Solutions Inc.

Management Systems International

Highmark Inc.

John Snow Inc.

Kenya Medical Supplies AuthorityMacDonald Dettwiler & Associates LTD

Humana Inc.

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Knowledge Consulting Group Inc.

LS Technologies LLC

Los Alamos National Security LLC

28 59

Inforeliance Corp.

LD Commodities GrainsMerchandising LLC

43

40

Insight Public Sector

LeachGarner Inc.

International Business & Technical Consultants Inc.

Leidos Inc.

Hormel Foods Corp.

Kelly Services Inc.

International DevelopmentSolutions LLC

Knight Point Systems LLC

Lockheed Martin Corp.

Management and Training Corp.

20 8, 10

16

InGenesis Inc.

Huntington Ingalls Inc.

Jarden Corp.

KPMG LLP

M.A. Mortenson Co.

51 25

ICF International Inc.

ICL Performance Products LP

In-Tec Construction Co.

L3 Technologies Inc. LLC

Lawrence LivermoreNational Security LLC

Honeywell International Inc.

Kaktovik Inupiat Corp.

International Business Machines Corp.

Kiewit-Turner JV

Leprino Foods Co.

MacFadden & Associates Inc.

ICFI

IBM

HUM

LDOS

HON

HRL

KELYB

JEC

JAH

MDA

LMT

LLL


46Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

Hewlett-Packard Co. HPQ 9, 19

11, 12, 18

Heartland Technology Group LLC 40

Health Net Inc. HNT

32ManTech International Corp. MANT

Harris IT Services 20

24, 54


65


17, 19, 20, 36

49, 50

48

44

34, 52

14

22

11

40

30

2234

42

48

10

36

19

22

34

21

18

27

16

6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 24, 36, 38, 46, 57, 58

38

21

50

50

32, 58

52

15

34, 45 13

Microsoft Corp.

Northrop Grumman Corp.

National Security Technologies LLC

Patriot Team

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Medical Science & Computing LLC

Nelnet Inc.

Nuaxis LLC Phonak Inc.

MicroTech LLC

Navient Corp.

Odle Management Group LLC

Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of

PCMG Inc.

58 52

Moltz Constructors Inc.

P.K. Management Group Inc.

31

60

Mythics Inc.

PAE Inc.

NANA Regional Corp.

Palmetto GBA LLC

Merlin International

Noblis Inc.

National Government Services Inc.

Oceus Networks Inc.

Partnership for Supply Chain Management Inc.

Praxis Inc.

19, 20, 26, 29, 48 8, 24

7, 8

MVM Inc.

Midwest Air Traffic Control Service Inc.

Navistar International Corp.

Office Remedies Inc.

Pfizer Inc.

48 51

Minact Inc.

Mission Support Alliance LLC

MITRE Corp., The

Orbital ATK Inc.

Oshkosh Corp.

Merck & Co. Inc.

Neptune Aviation Services Inc.

National Fuel Gas Co.

NW Construction Inc.

Parsons Corp.

PMX Industries Inc.

NNI

NOC

NFG

OSK

MRK

MSFT

MCK

NAV

NAVI

PFE

OA


50, 51MAXIMUS Inc.

McKesson Corp.

MMS

11, 12, 18

10

Matt Martin Real EstateManagement LLC 60

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

37Purisolve Inc.

Martin Brothers Construction 48


35

48

10

11

38

44

16

52

14

33

60

47

48

52

5, 8, 20, 30, 34, 36, 40, 52, 53

12

42

43, 44, 54

44

48

3

5, 6, 7

44

22

46

23

32

9

42 13, 31

19

Research Triangle Institute

Siemens Corp.

SEACOR Holdings Inc.

Swank Enterprises

Remote Medical International

Serco Inc.

Sierra Nevada Corp.

Tetra Tech Inc.

REVA2

SEI Investments Co.

SpaceX

T-Rex Corp.

Syncom Space Services LLC

Thundercat Technology

60

Russia Space Agency

Strategic Analysis Inc.

22

14

Sallyport Global Holdings Inc.

Sanofi Pasteur

Stronghold Engineering Inc.

ResCare Inc.

Shell Oil Co.

Science Applications International Corp.


SupplyCore Inc.

9

24, 34, 48

Sage Acquisitions LLC

Robinson Aviation Inc.

Selene Finance LP

Technatomy Service Corp.

Torch Technologies Inc.

24 24

7

Rolling Bay LLC

Rolls-Royce Corp.

RP Automotive Inc.


Renaissance Information Systems Inc.

Serrato Corp.

Savannah River NuclearSolutions LLC

Software House International Inc.

Sunshine Minting Inc.

Textron Inc.

SRP

SIE

RR

TXT

SAIC

CKH

RDS

SEIC

TTEK


20, 57Red River Computer Co. Inc.

Regents of the University of California, The

SNY

16

19

Raytheon Co. 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 34, 36, 46

Quest Diagnostics Inc.

RTN

DGX

19

14

Spherion Global Technology Inc.

SRI International

49

Tri-S Security Corp. 26

Transworld Systems Inc.

TRIS


66

QinetiQ Group PLC 24QQ


67

Vendor Vendor PagePage

9, 10, 24

42

57

40

50

6, 10, 32

50, 58

16

5

32

20, 26, 28, 38

34

24

52

54

11, 12

16

16, 46

Unisys Corp.

Wyle Inc.

Walsh Group LTD, The

Trowbridge & Trowbridge LLC

Weston Solutions Inc.

XMCO Inc.


Walsh Puerto Rico LLC

47

Valador Inc.

Ventech Solutions Inc.

UChicago Argonna LLC

World Wide Technology Inc.

VSE Corp.

21

Valdez International Corp.

United Technologies Corp.

Westat Inc.

18

UnitedHealth Group Inc.

URS-FNI-HZ Team

UT-Battelle LLC

Tyson Foods Inc.

Windham Professionals Inc.

UTX

UIS

UNH

Symbol Symbol

TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp.

TSN

18

19

20Verizon Communications Inc.

Veterans Evaluation Services

VZ

30Triple Canopy Inc.

© 2017 Govini | All Rights Reserved


Govini is the leading business intelligence platform for companies that sell to the public sector.

Across the entire business development lifecycle, Govini creates proprietary analytics which answer critical questions pertaining to addressable market size, opportunity qualification, competitive positioning and partner profiling.

By leveraging big data technology, Govini takes a fact-based approach to help clients master their market and follow the money.

The Govini database of record gives companies in every industry a distinct advantage when working with the government.

Govini

The public sector division of Atlantic Media, Government Executive Media Group is dedicated to providing government and national security leaders with trusted and useful insights and best practices to help them advance their organizations’ missions.

Through its market-leading Government Executive, Nextgov, Defense One, and Route Fifty brands, GEMG reaches over one million government influencers nationwide each month across digital, print and events offerings.

Government Executive Media Group

Govini.comGovExecMediaGroup.com

Documents

Agency and Vendor Benchmarks - Wild Apricot · Agency and Vendor Benchmarks. Government Executive Media Group and Govini proudly present . The 2017 Federal Scorecard, the premier