160
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 Continued Planning Application for Review Resume consideration of a request for review of refusal of planning permission which the Local Review Body at the meeting held on 4 December 2013 decided to continue for an unaccompanied site inspection. Mr D Kettlewell Single Storey Extension with Integral Garage: Old Fire Station, 1 Torr Avenue, Quarriers Village (12/0345/IC) Contents Planning Application and plans Site photograph Report of Handling dated 1 July 2013 Consultation Responses Representations Decision Notice dated 1 July 2013 Notice of Review form dated 13 September 2013 together with supporting documentation (NB drawings FS/2012/002, FS/2012/003, FS/2012/004, FS/2012/21, FS/2012/022 and FS/2012/023 enclosed with Appendix 1 forming part of the supporting documentation submitted with Notice of Review form dated 13 September 2013 submitted with planning application) Further representation Email dated 21 October 2013 from Mr A Matheson responding to further representation Suggested condition should planning permission be granted on review Content Sheet - 1 Torr Ave

AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material

AGENDA ITEM NO. 2

Local Review Body 5 February 2014

Continued Planning Application for Review

Resume consideration of a request for review of refusal of planning permission which the Local Review Body at the meeting held on 4 December 2013 decided to continue for an unaccompanied site inspection.

Mr D Kettlewell Single Storey Extension with Integral Garage: Old Fire Station, 1 Torr Avenue, Quarriers Village (12/0345/IC)

Contents

Planning Application and plans Site photograph Report of Handling dated 1 July 2013 Consultation Responses RepresentationsDecision Notice dated 1 July 2013 Notice of Review form dated 13 September 2013 together with supporting documentation(NB drawings FS/2012/002, FS/2012/003, FS/2012/004, FS/2012/21, FS/2012/022 and FS/2012/023 enclosed with Appendix 1 forming part of the supporting documentation submitted with Notice of Review form dated 13 September 2013 submitted with planning application) Further representation Email dated 21 October 2013 from Mr A Matheson responding to further representation Suggested condition should planning permission be granted on review

Content Sheet - 1 Torr Ave

Page 2: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 3: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 4: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 5: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 6: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 7: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 8: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 9: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 10: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 11: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 12: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 13: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 14: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 15: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 16: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 17: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 18: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 19: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 20: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 21: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 22: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 23: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 24: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 25: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 26: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 27: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 28: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 29: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 30: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 31: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 32: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 33: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 34: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 35: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 36: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 37: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 38: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 39: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 40: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 41: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 42: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 43: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 44: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 45: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 46: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 47: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 48: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 49: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 50: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 51: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 52: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 53: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 54: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 55: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 56: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 57: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 58: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 59: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 60: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 61: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 62: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 63: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 64: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 65: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 66: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 67: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 68: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 69: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 70: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 71: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 72: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 73: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 74: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 75: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 76: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 77: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 78: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 79: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 80: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 81: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 82: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 83: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 84: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 85: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 86: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 87: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 88: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 89: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 90: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 91: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 92: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 93: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 94: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 95: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 96: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 97: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 98: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 99: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 100: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 101: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 102: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 103: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 104: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 105: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 106: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 107: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 108: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 109: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 110: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 111: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 112: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 113: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 114: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 115: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 116: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 117: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 118: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 119: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 120: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 121: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 122: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 123: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 124: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 125: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 126: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 127: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 128: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 129: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 130: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 131: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 132: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 133: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 134: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 135: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 136: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 137: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 138: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 139: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 140: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 141: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 142: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 143: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 144: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 145: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 146: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 147: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 148: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 149: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 150: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 151: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 152: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 153: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 154: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 155: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 156: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 157: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 158: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 159: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material
Page 160: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 Local Review Body 5 February 2014 ... · 3. NO is to the from . Existing impacts upon at at 3 The extension would exacerbate loss of natural Sght. ASSESSMENT material