AgnesBrokerhof - Risk Management in Collection Care

7/26/2019 AgnesBrokerhof - Risk Management in Collection Care

1/32

Risk Managementin Collection Care

Agnes BrokerhofSector Moveable Heritage Research

Karlstad 21 November 201


2/32


M! goal" reach the to#

$ st%died the vario%s #aths to the to#

$ assessed if there is a #ath $ daretake

$ am not s%re $ can reach m! goal

$f $ reach the to#& $ 'ill be #ro%d

$f $ fall do'n& $ 'ill be h%rt

$ decided $ dare do it& and set off

(he %ncertaint! of reaching m! goal

or the chance of h%rting m!selfis therisk that $ took

$ do as m%ch as $ can to make s%re $reach the to# and not fall do'n


3/32


(he goal of theheritage #rofession is

to #ass on the heritagethat is given in o%rcare& to ne)t

generations 'ith

o#tim%m significanceand o#tim%maccessibilit!*

+e can en,o! and %se it foro%r o'n #%r#oses b%t

'itho%t im#airing f%t%reinter#retation and %se*

-ean .%b%ffet&Jardin d'email& 1/Kroller M%ller M%se%m#hoto" Sanneke Stigter'''*kmm*nl


4/32


se

3reservation .evelo#ment

HeritageC%lt%ral val%e

MeaningSignificance

HeritageManagement4After +aller 2005

$ncrease val%e

6#erate val%e

Minimi7e loss of val%e


5/32


Heritage managementis making

'ell9arg%ed decisionsabo%t the

allocation of reso%rces

tomost effectivel!and

efficientl!

achieve o%r goal"o#tim%m

accessible val%e*-ean .%b%ffet&Jardin d'email& 1/Kroller M%ller M%se%m#hoto" Sanneke Stigter'''*kmm*nl


6/32

Karlstad 21 November 201:

Methodolog! for val%e assessment


7/32


Significance ; val%e criteria

Attrib%tes

State Com#leteness oral%es C%lt%ral histor!

Historic

Artistic$nformation

SocialSocietal


8/32

Karlstad 21 November 201?

>al%es C%lt%ral histor! - + +

Historic 9 @ @Artistic 9 o @$nformation 9 9 9

Social - - -

Societal 9 9 9


9/32

Karlstad 21 November 201/

se

3reservation .evelo#ment

HeritageC%lt%ral val%e

MeaningSignificance

HeritageManagement4After +aller 2005

$ncrease val%e

6#erate val%e

Minimi7e loss of val%e

R$SK R$SK


10/32


(hreats that ma! ca%se loss of val%e*

(he ten agents of deterioration

3h!sical forces ire+ater Criminals = >andals

3ests Contaminantsight& >& $R $ncorrect (em# $ncorrect RH .issociation


11/32


.ealing 'ith the Agents

3h!sical forces(hieves = >andalsire+ater3ests = +eeds

ight& >9& $R9Radiation

Contaminants

$ncorrect (em#erat%re

$ncorrect RH.issociation

HandlingSafet! = Sec%rit!

Maintenance

acilit! management$ntegrated 3est Management

3reventive conservation

Registration

.oc%mentation


12/32


Agents of deterioration 9 (!#es

andalsire

+ater3ests = +eeds

ight& >& $R9Radiation

Contaminants$ncorrect (em#erat%re

$ncorrect RH.issociation


13/32


3reservationrisks

Health = Safet!risks


14/32



15/32


Risk assessment

Risk Identification

Risk Analysis

Risk Evaluation

Risk Treatment

Establish context

Monitoring

andReview

Com

municate

andCons

ult


16/32


3robabilit! E $m#act

Ho' soon F Ho' oftenG E Ho' badG

Scenario

of val%ethe chance of lossRisk is


17/32


So%rce

Ca%se

3ath

Mechanism

6b,ect


18/32


Ho' soonG

Ho' sensitiveG $S6 ; 1 ,nf after &000&000 l)*h+hat is light dosisG 200 ) 000 :00&000 l)*hF! 1 ,nf in 8 !earsHo' badG

Ho' m%ch significanceFval%e does the ob,ect loseGHo' im#ortant is the ob,ect in the collection 'e assessG

Scenario"


19/32


Ho' badG

+here can material be lostGHo' m%ch significanceFval%e 'ill be lostGHo' soonG

Ho' can it lose materialG Ho' m%chGHo' likel! is that to ha##enG

Scenario" loss of material d%e to *GG


20/32


Ho' soonG

evel of sec%rit!G (heft statisticsG+hat is likelihood of theftGHo' badG

(otal loss of ob,ectGHo' im#ortant is ob,ect in collection 'e assesG

Scenario" thief enters thro%gh 'eak link and takes ob,ect


21/32


I%alif! and


22/32


Mild

Significant

Ca

tastro#hic

Rare reD%ent Constant

$

m#act

3robabilit!


23/32


Semi9D%antif! and


24/32


1

2

8

:

0


25/32


I%antif! and


26/32


+hich methodG

Choose

bet'eent'o

o#tions

Confection

si7es

(ailor made

to fit


27/32


As sim#le as #ossible

6%tcome is 'orth the effort it to s%it the reason 'h! !o% do it orm that is %nderstood b! those !o% 'ant to reach

Choose bet'eeno#tion A or B

3rioriti7e for#reservation strateg!

+hich methodG


28/32


Risk treatment o#tions

$ e)#ect that m! hands get

s'eat! and sli##er!& that $'ill lose m! gri#& fall do'n

and smash m! head

(ake a'a!the ca%se

Sec%re the#ath'a!

Red%cethe effect


29/32


Can !o% reach !o%r goal 'ith acce#table riskG

.o !o% need to red%ce risksG

+hich risksG

+h!G

o Biggest risk

o Most %rgent risk

o Biggest %ncertaint!

And ho'Go Cost9effective

o S%stainable

Risk (reatment

1

2

8

:

0


30/32


Comm%nicate and Cons%lt

+ithin organisation +ith e)#erts

+ith decision makers

+ith stakeholders

+ith #%blic


31/32


$n concl%sion

$f 'e 'ant to be able to make 'ell9arg%ed decisionsabo%t the allocation of reso%rces to most effectivel!and efficientl! achieve o%r goal&

of #assing on the heritage that is given in o%r careto ne)t generations 'ith o#tim%m accessible val%e&

then 'e need to assess and %nderstand the val%e&

and assess and manage the risks to o%r heritage&in a cost9effective manner*


32/32


Nice to read

Ashle!9Smith& -* 41///5 LRisk assessment for object conservation& B%tter'orth9Heinemann& 6)ford& 8? ##*Brokerhof& A*+* et al* 420085 LRisk Assessment of M%se%m Amstelkring" A##lication to an historic b%ilding

and its collections and the conseD%ences for #reservation management in Preprints of the 14th ICOMCC

!riennial Meetin"& (he Hag%e& ##* 8/098/:*Brokerhof& A*+* et al* 42015 LHet .igitale Handboek Collectie9Risicomanagement Ri,ksdienst voor het

C%lt%reel

Documents

AgnesBrokerhof - Risk Management in Collection Care