Upload
terry-ford
View
221
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AGUINALDO vs. SANTOS, G.R. No. 94115, August 21, 1992Pertinent provision o t!e Lo"#$ Govern%ent &o'e( Se"tion )*GroundsforDisciplinaryActionsInthispetitionforcertiorariandprohibitionwith preliminary mandatory injunction and/or restraining order,petitioner RodolfoEAguinaldoassailsthedecisionofrespondent!ecretaryof"ocal Go#ernment dated $arch %&,%&&' in Adm (ase )o *+%',-.+/&dismissing him as Go#ernor of (agayan 0acts1*etitioner was the duly elected Go#ernor of the pro#ince of (agayan, ha#ing beenelectedtosaidpositionduringthelocalelectionsheldon2anuary%., %&//, toser#e a termof four 3,4 years therefrom 5nDecember ., %&/&, a sworncomplaint for disloyalty to the Republic and culpable #iolation of the (onstitutionwas filed by 6eronico Agatep, $anuel$amba and 5rlino Agatep, respecti#ely themayors of the municipalities of Gattaran, 7uao and "asam, all in (agayan,againstpetitioner for acts the latter committed during the coup *etitioner was re8uiredtofilea#erifiedanswertothecomplaintInhisletter, petitionerdeniedbeingpri#y to the planning of the coup or acti#ely participating in itse9ecution, thoughhe admitted that he was sympathetic to the cause of the rebel soldiersRespondent!ecretaryconsideredpetitioner:sreplyletterashisanswertothecomplaint of $ayor 6eronico Agatep andothers 5n the basis thereof, respondent!ecretary suspended petitioner from office for si9ty 3;'4 days fromnotice,pending the outcome of the formal in#estigation into the charges againsthim During the hearing conducted on thecharges against petitioner,complainants presentedtestimonial anddocumentary e#idence topro#e thecharges*etitioner neither presented e#idence nor e#en cross+e9amined thecomplainant:s witnesses, choosing insteadtomo#ethat respondent !ecretaryinhibit himself fromdecidingthecase, whichmotionwasdenied 7hereafter,respondent !ecretary rendered the 8uestioned decision finding petitioner guiltyaschargedandorderinghisremo#al fromoffice