Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment ... in support... · Industry, Mining, Construction, Trade & Tourim USD 20.5 bn Coverage – As not all DAC members report

Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment - Donor Charts

March 2013

Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality Policy Marker, 2010-2011

Creditor Reporting System database

DEFINITION

THE GENDER EQUALITY POLICY MARKER

DEFINITION

An activity should be classified as gender equality focused (score Principal or Significant) if:

It is intended to advance gender equality and women‟s empowerment or reduce discrimination and inequalities based on sex.

CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY Gender equality is explicitly promoted in activity documentation through specific measures which:

a) Reduce social, economic or political power inequalities between women and men, girls and boys, ensure that women benefit equally with men from the activity, or compensate for past discrimination; or

b) Develop or strengthen gender equality or anti-discrimination policies, legislation or institutions.

This approach requires analysing gender inequalities either separately or as an integral part of agencies‟ standard procedures.

EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL ACTIVITIES

Examples of activities that could be marked as principal objective:

-- legal literacy for women and girls; -- male networks against gender violence; -- a social safety net project which focuses specifically on assisting women and girls as a particularly disadvantaged group in a society; -- capacity building of Ministries of Finance and Planning to incorporate gender equality objectives in national poverty reduction or comparable strategies.

Such activities can target women specifically, men specifically or both women and men. Examples of activities that could be marked as significant objective:

-- activity which has as its principal objective to provide drinking water to a district or community while at the same time ensuring that women and girls have safe and easy access to the facilities; -- a social safety net project which focuses on the community as a whole and ensures that women and girls benefit equally with men and boys.

N.B. Support to women‟s equality organisations and institutions (CRS sector code 15170) scores, by definition, principal objective.

OVERVIEW

Gender Equality Focus of DAC Members’ Aid by Sector Average annual value of commitments in 2010-2011

constant 2010 USD 20.5 billion

19%

9%

4%

9%

21%

5%2%

2%1%

3%

8%

2%

4%

11%

Education

Health

Population Pol./Progr. & Reproductive Health

Water Supply & Sanitation

Government & Civil Society

Other Social Infrastructure & Services

Other Economic Infrastrustures & Services

Energy

Banking & Financial Services

Business & Other Services

Agriculture & Rural Development

Other Multisector

General Environment Protection

Industry, Mining, Construction, Trade & Tourim

USD 20.5 bn

Coverage – As not all DAC members report fully the gender equality focus of their aid, this chart covers

only a part of total reported aid that is allocable by sector in 2010-2011. The implementation of a new typology of aid in 2010 by DAC members has raised the coverage including aid for core support to NGOs, private bodies, PPPs and research institutes that was previously counted in non sector-allocable aid.

For reference, total sector-allocable aid (including members not reporting on the gender equality policy marker), average 2010-2011: constant 2010 USD 91.9 billion.

This chart is based on commitment data, which best reflect current policies by donors. A two-year average is given, as the focus and volume of commitments vary from year to year. DAC members use a „marker‟ to identify activities that have gender equality as a principal or significant objective. Reporting has improved in recent years, although data analysis is hampered by the difficulties some members have in applying the methodology. The currently available data nevertheless give an indication of the extent to which those donors that report address gender equality in their aid programmes.

AID AT A GLANCE - DONORS' CHARTS

The following charts (2010-2011) summarise statistics on aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment extended by each DAC member. Information shown includes the gender equality policy marker coverage, the top ten recipients and a sector breakdown of aid focused on gender equality and women‟s empowerment.

Guidance for the interpretation of the charts: The first element to take into account when analysing the data for one country or when comparing data between countries is the COVERAGE RATIO, i.e. the proportion of aid which is screened. A high percentage of gender equality focused aid ALONE does not mean that aid is well aligned with the gender equality policy objective, such a conclusion would only be valid for a donor with 100% coverage. When comparing data between donors, both coverage ratio and % of aid focused on gender equality and women‟s empowerment have to be considered. (A number of members do not screen contributions that are by nature likely to fall under the “not targeted” category, e.g. imputed student costs. Therefore, a high amount in the category “not screened” generally increases the percentage of gender equality focused aid significantly.)

Aid in support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment,

2010-2011 average (2010 USD million)

Principal Significant

Sub-Total:

Gender

Equality

focused

as % of aid

screenedNot targeted

Total:

aid screenedNot screened

Sector allocable,

total

a b c = a + b c / e d e = c + d e included in (a)

Australia 245 1,629 1,875 59 1,328 3,203 391 3,594 6

Austria 11 51 62 16 325 387 2 389 2

Belgium 63 554 617 57 461 1,078 94 1,172 5

Canada 1,080 485 1,566 62 947 2,513 171 2,684 5

Denmark 77 649 725 56 569 1,295 0 1,295 19

EU Institutions 163 1,665 1,828 17 8,984 10,812 28 10,840 69

Finland 21 406 426 55 354 780 0 780 7

France 3 1,963 1,966 34 3,869 5,834 351 6,185 0

Germany 216 3,998 4,213 47 4,661 8,874 1,289 10,163 23

Greece 0 86 86 68 40 126 0 126 0

Ireland 11 172 183 46 214 396 0 396 10

Italy 29 88 117 31 259 377 138 515 9

Japan 125 1,576 1,701 14 10,036 11,737 1,840 13,578 4

Korea 18 75 94 6 1,485 1,579 0 1,579 1

Luxembourg 9 44 53 39 84 137 47 184 0

Netherlands 258 436 694 18 3,246 3,940 0 3,940 65

New Zealand 8 129 136 50 135 271 0 271 0

Norway 204 537 742 29 1,793 2,535 0 2,535 71

Portugal 2 40 42 24 136 179 13 192 0

Spain 202 575 777 30 1,841 2,617 81 2,699 104

Sweden 283 1,123 1,406 82 301 1,707 25 1,732 30

Switzerland 28 237 265 24 826 1,090 0 1,090 4

United Kingdom 133 810 944 46 1,092 2,036 1,312 3,348 13

United States (1) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 22,567 8

Total DAC members 3,190 17,327 20,517 32 42,987 63,504 5,783 91,854 457

Support to

women's

equality

organisations

and institutions

(1) : The United States has implemented an improved data collection for the gender equality marker; data for 2011 will be available in the coming months (no data

available for 2010).

Note: An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and fundamental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened for promoting gender equality, but was found to not be targeted to it.

Australia

2010 2011

Principal objective 306 185

Significant objective 2002 1256

Not targeted 1546 1111

Not screened 421 362

Total sector-allocable aid 4275 2914

Gender equality focused aid (2) 60% 56%

Memo:

Total non sector-allocable aid (3) -555 587

Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 11

Indonesia 602 544 65%

Papua New Guinea 512 486 56%

Solomon Islands 254 252 58%

Vietnam 173 167 38%

Afghanistan 145 102 10%

Philippines 133 114 62%

Timor-Leste 99 95 84%

Pakistan 93 64 74%

Sri Lanka 72 24 78%

Laos 59 56 86%





Vietnam 167 59 38%


Laos 56 46 86%

Pakistan 64 45 74%

Vanuatu 47 40 89%

Bangladesh 49 33 72%

(2) % of sector allocable aid. Activities not screened against the gender equality marker have been excluded.

(3) The negative amounts shown here refer to cancellation of commitments made in earlier years which were reported as an aggregate and not allocated by

sector.

Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude non sector-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category

includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and emergency aid.

Top ten recipients of gender equality

focused aid

Gender equality focus of sectors

2010 USD million2010 USD million

Total sector

allocable aid

Gender equality focused aid

(2)

(1) DAC Guidelines for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development Co-operation, 1999

Total aid Total sector

allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)

Investment in gender equality and women‟s empowerment is vital for improving economic, social and political conditions in developing countries within the

framework of sustainable development. A focus on gender equality and women‟s empowerment in development co-operation is a means for enhancing the

total effectiveness of aid (1).

An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity

and fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity

was screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.

Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for sector-allocable activities is 89%.

Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2010 USD million

Sector breakdown Top ten recipients

Sectoral components of gender equality focused aid

percentages

Gender equality focus in aid to

top ten recipients 2010 USD million

Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2010-2011

Amounts are average commitments for 2010-2011, unless otherwise shown

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total sector allocable aid

Gender equality

focused aid

EducationHealth and PopulationOther Social Infrast., incl. Women's equalityEconomic InfrastructureProductionMultisector

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Education Health and Population

Other Social Infrast., incl.

Women's equality

Economic Infrastructure

Production Multisector

Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

600

1200

1800

2400

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011

Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %

2010 USD million % of sector allocable

Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS dataset “Aid activities targeting gender equality and women’s empowerment” at www.oecd.org/dac/stats/gender

Austria

2010 2011




Not screened 2 2



Memo:

Total non sector-allocable aid 261 131


Congo, Dem. Rep. 65 0 13%

China 51 51 0%

Bosnia-Herzegovina 31 31 4%

Turkey 29 29 0%

Togo 15 0 0%

Kosovo 14 13 13%

Vietnam 12 12 0%

Uganda 12 12 87%

Albania 11 11 24%

Ukraine 10 10 2%

Uganda 12 10 87%

Nicaragua 9 8 89%

Ethiopia 8 6 76%

Albania 11 2 24%

Burkina Faso 3 2 77%

Kosovo 13 2 13%

Moldova 5 1 28%


Georgia 2 1 50%

Nepal 2 1 39%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)







All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.




percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

25

50

75

100

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Belgium

2010 2011




Not screened 67 121



Memo:



Congo, Dem. Rep. 382 107 71%

Burundi 84 79 86%

Rwanda 62 60 89%

Togo 47 4 20%

Mozambique 38 34 92%

Congo, Rep. 37 7 1%

Benin 37 35 82%

Senegal 36 35 83%

Morocco 35 33 92%

Bolivia 34 33 74%


Burundi 79 67 86%

Rwanda 60 51 89%


Morocco 33 30 92%

Senegal 35 29 83%

Benin 35 28 82%

Mali 31 27 92%

Uganda 25 22 93%

Bolivia 33 17 74%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

50

100

150

200

250



Women's equality




0%

20%

40%

60%

0

200

400

600

2005 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Canada

2010 2011

Principal objective (3) 1092 1069

Significant objective (3) 370 601





Memo:



Haiti 345 207 58%

Tanzania 197 172 93%


Ethiopia 125 95 94%

Mali 119 115 87%


West Bank & Gaza Strip 92 65 37%

Pakistan 89 36 96%

Sudan 77 52 70%



Haiti 207 120 58%

Mali 115 100 87%

Ethiopia 95 89 94%




Vietnam 42 37 89%

Sudan 52 36 70%

Honduras 45 36 80%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)


(3) In CIDA‟s internal reporting system, the gender equality marker can take four values: “specific”, “fully integrated”, “limited integration” and “none”. For CRS

reporting purposes, the first two values are mapped to score “principal” whilst the third value is mapped to score “significant”. The extent to which Canada‟s

methodology matches the DAC scoring system is under review.


allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

200

400

600

800

1000



Women's equality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Denmark

2010 2011




Not screened 0 0



Memo:




Kenya 118 107 63%

Uganda 98 97 83%

Tanzania 93 38 71%



Ghana 61 31 24%

Somalia 56 29 96%

Vietnam 46 41 81%

Bolivia 33 33 87%

Uganda 97 81 83%

Kenya 107 68 63%



Vietnam 41 33 81%


Bolivia 33 29 87%

Somalia 29 28 96%

Tanzania 38 27 71%

Nepal 31 24 77%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700



Women's equality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

200

400

600

800

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


EU Institutions

2010 2011




Not screened 0 56



Memo:



Turkey 943 943 2%



Nigeria 380 377 3%

Congo, Dem. Rep. 290 188 53%

Sudan 290 111 45%

Kosovo 257 253 0%

Serbia 246 246 0%

Haiti 218 46 6%

Pakistan 215 33 0%


South Africa 136 118 89%


Ukraine 199 56 28%


Sudan 111 50 45%

Burundi 60 46 77%

Indonesia 60 46 76%

Jordan 120 39 33%

Morocco 205 36 18%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Finland

2010 2011




Not screened 0 0



Memo:



Tanzania 55 52 51%

Kenya 45 40 90%

Ethiopia 41 36 85%


Nepal 38 36 84%

Vietnam 36 34 18%


Zambia 24 16 48%

Namibia 18 16 82%

South Sudan 16 15 100%

Kenya 40 36 90%

Ethiopia 36 31 85%

Nepal 36 30 84%

Tanzania 52 27 51%



Namibia 16 14 82%


Nicaragua 14 11 83%

Zambia 16 8 48%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350



Women's equality




20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0

100

200

300

400

500

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


France

2010 2011




Not screened 702 0



Memo:




Morocco 500 493 33%

Congo, Rep. 495 25 64%

China 344 337 46%

Mexico 344 341 5%

Cote d'Ivoire 330 30 62%

Tunisia 288 283 29%

Cameroon 256 130 27%

Vietnam 243 173 23%

Kenya 219 213 20%

Morocco 493 158 33%

China 337 151 46%

Algeria 132 122 98%

Turkey 152 114 77%

Tunisia 283 80 29%

Jordan 70 66 96%

Senegal 173 63 39%

Brazil 65 49 84%

Wallis & Futuna 117 46 39%

Kenya 213 42 20%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2008 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Germany

2010 2011







Memo:



China 743 739 14%


India 548 548 17%

Vietnam 367 367 64%

Egypt 302 276 18%

Brazil 287 286 53%

Kenya 204 171 57%

Serbia 198 198 23%

Turkey 196 195 45%

Pakistan 166 87 82%


Vietnam 367 220 64%

Brazil 286 141 53%

Peru 135 107 84%


Kenya 171 94 57%

India 548 87 17%

China 739 78 14%

Ethiopia 88 72 86%

Mali 78 65 84%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000



Women's equality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Greece

2010 2011



Not targeted 49 31

Not screened 0 0



Memo:



Albania 50 50 85%

Serbia 12 12 10%

Egypt 8 8 32%


Turkey 5 5 75%

Ukraine 3 3 97%

Syria 3 3 95%

Jordan 2 2 93%

Armenia 2 2 87%

Georgia 2 2 96%

Albania 50 42 85%

Turkey 5 3 75%

Ukraine 3 3 97%

Syria 3 3 95%

Egypt 8 3 32%

Jordan 2 2 93%


Georgia 2 2 96%

Armenia 2 2 87%

Nigeria 1 1 99%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

20

40

60

80

100



Women's equality




5%

25%

45%

65%

0

40

80

120

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Ireland

2010 2011




Not screened 0 0



Memo:



Uganda 57 54 57%


Tanzania 48 31 65%

Ethiopia 48 31 59%

Zambia 30 27 70%

Malawi 22 19 25%

Vietnam 16 15 38%

Lesotho 15 14 28%

Sudan 13 6 40%

Kenya 12 11 31%

Uganda 54 31 57%


Tanzania 31 20 65%

Zambia 27 19 70%

Ethiopia 31 18 59%

Vietnam 15 6 38%

Liberia 7 5 66%

Malawi 19 5 25%

Zimbabwe 7 4 65%

Sierra Leone 8 4 49%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160



Women's equality




0%

20%

40%

60%

0

100

200

300

2007 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Italy

2010 2011




Not screened 253 23



Memo:





Congo, Rep. 49 0 11%

Bolivia 35 33 5%

Haiti 34 1 13%


Lebanon 27 23 37%

Equatorial Guinea 27 0 100%

Ethiopia 23 21 49%



Ethiopia 21 7 49%

Mozambique 24 6 40%

Sudan 13 6 64%

India 16 6 39%

Brazil 16 5 34%

Lebanon 23 4 37%

Somalia 6 4 90%

Senegal 8 4 69%

Kenya 8 3 46%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0

50

100

150

200

250

2008 09 10 2011



Right hand scaleLeft hand scale


Japan

2010 2011







Memo:



India 2318 2318 18%

Vietnam 1568 1545 4%





Pakistan 521 331 2%

Iraq 516 514 0%

Sri Lanka 504 499 21%

Kenya 446 405 28%

India 2318 411 18%

Morocco 290 227 80%



Kenya 405 108 28%

Sri Lanka 499 104 21%

Vietnam 1545 66 4%

Paraguay 49 28 71%

Uganda 150 26 20%






focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000



Women's equality




0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Korea

2010 2011




Not screened 0 0



Memo:



Vietnam 243 243 0%

Bangladesh 92 92 2%

Indonesia 90 90 1%

Cambodia 75 75 6%

Ghana 69 68 6%

Tanzania 67 67 1%

Mongolia 65 65 22%


Pakistan 51 48 1%

Ethiopia 50 50 7%

Mongolia 65 14 22%

Azerbaijan 28 13 47%

Bolivia 43 7 16%

Cambodia 75 5 6%

Sri Lanka 40 4 10%

Laos 26 4 16%

Nigeria 6 4 60%

Ghana 68 4 6%

Ethiopia 50 3 7%

Senegal 30 3 11%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700



Women's equality




0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

0

30

60

90

120

2007 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Luxembourg

2010 2011



Not targeted 98 69

Not screened 32 62



Memo:



Mali 18 15 41%


Senegal 16 13 62%

Cape Verde 15 11 5%

Laos 14 11 53%

Nicaragua 10 9 9%

Vietnam 10 8 23%

Namibia 9 8 5%

Kosovo 8 7 10%

Niger 8 5 90%


Senegal 13 8 62%

Mali 15 5 41%

Laos 11 5 53%

El Salvador 6 3 50%

Rwanda 4 2 55%

Niger 5 2 90%

Vietnam 8 2 23%

Brazil 2 1 82%

India 3 1 58%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

10

20

30

40

50

60



Women's equality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

20

40

60

80

2008 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Netherlands

2010 2011




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Ethiopia 63 33 86%

Sudan 61 46 23%

Mali 58 29 79%

Pakistan 45 33 61%

Mozambique 34 34 4%

Bolivia 34 34 77%

Uganda 33 33 42%


Ethiopia 33 28 86%

Bolivia 34 26 77%

Mali 29 23 79%

Pakistan 33 20 61%

Uganda 33 14 42%

Zambia 17 13 80%

Sudan 46 10 23%

Tanzania 19 10 52%

Yemen 13 10 76%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

500

1000

1500

2000



Women's equality




0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


New Zealand

2010 2011



Not targeted 84 185

Not screened 0 0



Memo:





Cook Islands 20 17 26%

Tonga 19 18 33%

Vanuatu 17 17 52%

Tokelau 17 7 53%

Indonesia 17 14 54%

Vietnam 16 15 56%


Niue 15 10 11%



Vanuatu 17 9 52%

Vietnam 15 9 56%


Samoa 10 8 77%

Indonesia 14 8 54%

Tonga 18 6 33%

Cook Islands 17 4 26%

Fiji 4 4 95%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



Women's equality




0%

25%

50%

75%

0

50

100

150

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Norway

2010 2011




Not screened 0 0



Memo:



Brazil 192 192 0%


Guyana 125 125 0%


Tanzania 98 72 40%

Zambia 98 81 20%

Sudan 85 51 12%

Uganda 71 64 27%

Pakistan 51 23 61%

Somalia 50 18 42%


Malawi 39 31 81%

Tanzania 72 29 40%


Haiti 26 22 87%

Nepal 43 20 46%

Indonesia 32 19 60%

Uganda 64 17 27%

Zambia 81 16 20%

India 23 15 63%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

300

600

900

1200

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Portugal

2010 2011



Not targeted 174 98

Not screened 27 0



Memo:




Cape Verde 114 63 3%


Sao Tome & Principe 27 12 35%

Angola 17 13 45%

Guinea-Bissau 14 14 36%

Afghanistan 8 8 12%

Brazil 8 8 0.2%

Serbia 6 6 0.0%

China 3 0.2 0.1%



Angola 13 5 45%

Guinea-Bissau 14 5 36%

Sao Tome & Principe 12 4 35%

Cape Verde 63 1 3%

Afghanistan 8 1 12%

Rwanda 1 0.3 53%

Kosovo 0.2 0.2 100%

Bosnia-Herzegovina 2 0.1 3%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

15

30

45

60

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Spain

2010 2011




Not screened 0 163



Memo:




Haiti 161 83 16%

Peru 92 90 65%


Tunisia 79 79 1%

El Salvador 78 75 69%

Bolivia 74 68 59%

Nicaragua 70 66 37%

Guatemala 68 64 72%

Colombia 67 62 47%

Peru 90 56 65%

Guatemala 64 44 72%

El Salvador 75 42 69%

Bolivia 68 38 59%

Honduras 59 36 62%

Ecuador 60 36 61%

Morocco 58 30 54%

Colombia 62 28 47%

Nicaragua 66 24 37%

Dominican Republic 41 20 50%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

200

400

600

800



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

300

600

900

1200

2006 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Sweden

2010 2011




Not screened 7 43



Memo:







Sudan 60 27 98%

Kenya 54 40 91%

Liberia 49 41 98%

Tanzania 48 48 87%

Uganda 45 42 96%





Tanzania 48 42 87%


Uganda 42 41 96%

Liberia 41 40 98%

Kenya 40 36 91%

Cambodia 34 34 99%

Bolivia 36 27 76%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

200

400

600

800

1000



Women's equality




70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


Switzerland

2010 2011




Not screened 0 0



Memo:



Kosovo 57 55 15%

Nepal 43 41 31%


Togo 32 1 7%


Peru 31 28 4%

Ukraine 30 29 3%

Tanzania 28 25 38%

Mali 27 23 27%



Nepal 41 13 31%

Tanzania 25 9 38%

Benin 15 9 60%

Kosovo 55 8 15%


Bolivia 17 7 40%

Burundi 9 6 71%

Niger 11 6 57%

Mali 23 6 27%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

100

200

300

400

500



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

0

100

200

300

400

2007 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


United Kingdom

2010 2011







Memo:




India 223 223 80%

Ethiopia 212 86 39%

Pakistan 180 89 94%

Uganda 135 73 78%


Nigeria 108 107 64%

China 81 81 21%

Malawi 76 38 80%

Somalia 72 16 80%

Pakistan 89 71 94%

Uganda 73 54 78%

Nepal 53 48 92%

Kenya 52 41 96%

India 223 36 80%


Ethiopia 86 33 39%

Nigeria 107 29 64%


Rwanda 30 26 93%





focused aid



Total sector

allocable aid


(2)



allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (2)











percentages





0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Gender equality

focused aid


0

200

400

600

800

1000



Women's equality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

600

1200

1800

2400

3000

3600

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 2011



Right hand scale

Left hand scale


OECD-DAC Secretariatwww.oecd.org/dac/stats/gender

www.oecd.org/dac/stats/gender

Documents

Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment ... in support... · Industry, Mining, Construction, Trade & Tourim USD 20.5 bn Coverage – As not all DAC members report