1
Full 2014 report: leg.wa.gov/jlarc/AuditAndStudyReports/documents/14-2.pdf The complete report is on the JLARC web site: www.leg.wa.gov/jlarc For more informaon, contact: Keenan Konopaski, Washington State Legislave Auditor [email protected] (360) 786-5187 Follow us on Twier @WaLegAuditor July 2019 • Materials incorporated into a prototype for aircraſt parts, auxiliary equipment, or modificaons. • Materials that are incorporated into a prototype but later destroyed in the tesng or development of the prototype. The exempon applies to sales or use of: The preference is limited to businesses whose gross income and value of products manufactured was $20 million or less in the previous year. A business may not claim more than $100,000 in tax savings in a calendar year. To claim the preference, a business must first pay the tax on a sale subject to the preference, and then apply to the Department of Revenue (DOR) for a refund. A 2014 JLARC review of the preference includes addional detail and history. The Legislature stated two public policy objecves when it enacted the tax preference in 1996. The preference was part of a larger bill that addressed machinery and equipment used in research, development, and tesng. The objecves applied to all exempons in the bill. No substanve legislave changes. Since 2014, there has been no legislaon considered that is specific to the provisions of this preference. No businesses claimed the preference. Beneficiaries must pay the sales or use tax and then apply for a refund from DOR. This process allows DOR to track the number of firms that claim the exempon. DOR reports that there have been no requests for refunds, and thus, no beneficiaries. Efforts to reach two Washington companies that supported the legislaon to create the preference in 1996 were unsuccessful. In 2014 these same companies indicated they were not claiming the preference. Preference applies to the sale of materials used to make prototypes of aircraſt parts and equipment In 2014, the Legislave Auditor found no businesses were claiming the tax preference and recommended terminaon With no legislave changes to the preference and no beneficiaries, the Legislave Auditor's 2014 recommendaon to terminate remains applicable Terminate • The Legislature should terminate the sales and use tax exempon for prototypes for aircraſt parts, auxiliary equipment, and modificaons because the tax preference is not being used and has not contributed to the stated public policy objecves. • The Legislature may wish to consider other strategies beyond this tax incenve to accomplish the public policy objecves. Aircraſt Part Prototypes LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR’S RECOMMENDATION Esmated 2021-23 beneficiary savings: $0 Sales and use tax LEGISLATURE’S STATED PUBLIC POLICY OBJECTIVES 2014 JLARC REVIEW RESULTS Encourage, develop, and expand opportunies for family wage employment in manufacturing industries. Solidify and enhance the state’s compeve posion. No businesses claim the tax preference. 2019 JLARC TAX PREFERENCE REVIEW The preference has no expiraon date. Full report

Aircraft Part Prototypes - Washingtonleg.wa.gov/jlarc/taxReports/2019/OnePage/AircraftPartPrototypes.pdf · Aircraft Part Prototypes LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR’S RECOMMENDATION Estimated

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Full 2014 report: leg.wa.gov/jlarc/AuditAndStudyReports/documents/14-2.pdf

    The complete report is on the JLARC web site: www.leg.wa.gov/jlarcFor more information, contact: Keenan Konopaski, Washington State Legislative [email protected] (360) 786-5187

    Follow us on Twitter @WaLegAuditor

    July 2019

    • Materials incorporated into a prototype for aircraft parts, auxiliary equipment, or modifications.

    • Materials that are incorporated into a prototype but later destroyed in the testing or development of the prototype.

    The exemption applies to sales or use of:

    The preference is limited to businesses whose gross income and value of products manufactured was $20 million or less in the previous year. A business may not claim more than $100,000 in tax savings in a calendar year. To claim the preference, a business must first pay the tax on a sale subject to the preference, and then apply to the Department of Revenue (DOR) for a refund.

    A 2014 JLARC review of the preference includes additional detail and history.

    The Legislature stated two public policy objectives when it enacted the tax preference in 1996. The preference was part of a larger bill that addressed machinery and equipment used in research, development, and testing. The objectives applied to all exemptions in the bill.

    No substantive legislative changes. Since 2014, there has been no legislation considered that is specific to the provisions of this preference.No businesses claimed the preference. Beneficiaries must pay the sales or use tax and then apply for a refund from DOR. This process allows DOR to track the number of firms that claim the exemption. DOR reports that there have been no requests for refunds, and thus, no beneficiaries. Efforts to reach two Washington companies that supported the legislation to create the preference in 1996 were unsuccessful. In 2014 these same companies indicated they were not claiming the preference.

    Preference applies to the sale of materials used to make prototypes of aircraft parts and equipment

    In 2014, the Legislative Auditor found no businesses were claiming the tax preference and recommended termination

    With no legislative changes to the preference and no beneficiaries, the Legislative Auditor's 2014 recommendation to terminate remains applicable

    Terminate• The Legislature should terminate the sales and use tax exemption for prototypes for aircraft parts, auxiliary

    equipment, and modifications because the tax preference is not being used and has not contributed to the stated public policy objectives.

    • The Legislature may wish to consider other strategies beyond this tax incentive to accomplish the public policy objectives.

    Aircraft Part Prototypes

    LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR’S RECOMMENDATION

    Estimated 2021-23 beneficiary savings: $0 Sales and use tax

    LEGISLATURE’S STATED PUBLIC POLICY OBJECTIVES

    2014 JLARC REVIEW RESULTS

    Encourage, develop, and expand opportunities for family wage employment in manufacturing industries.Solidify and enhance the state’s competitive position.

    No businesses claim the tax preference.

    2019 JLARC TAX PREFERENCE REVIEW

    The preference has no expiration date.

    Full

    repo

    rt