Upload
terance-j-rephann
View
49
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This report describes the results of the 2007-2008 annual evaluation of the Allegany County (MD) Judith P. Hoyer Early Child Care and Education Center (i.e., “Judy Center”). The Judy Center operated from three primary locations during the year: Beall Elementary School in Frostburg, Maryland, Westernport Elementary in Westerport, and John Humbird Elementary in Cumberland, Maryland. It offered a wide variety of non-duplicative early childhood services in support of pre-school children and their families in conjunction with a wide network of area partners including the Allegany County Board of Education, Allegany County Department of Social Services, Allegany County Health Department, Frostburg State University, the Human Resource Development Commission (HRDC), Office of Children, Youth, and Families, and YMCA. The report describes attainment of Allegany County Judy Center goals, the results of parent, teacher, and partner surveys, and pupil learning and developmental outcomes.Graphics and layout by Jim House.
Citation preview
July 2007-June 2008
Judy CenterEvaluation
Terance J. Rephann96 Red Cedar Road
Barboursville, VA 22923e-mail: [email protected]
July 31, 2008
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Judy Center Evaluation, July 2007-June 2008
TeranceJ.Rephann96RedCedarRoad
Barboursville,VA22923e-mail:[email protected]
July31,2008
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Page
Table of Contents i-iii
List of tables, figures, and appendices.......................................................................... i-iii
1.0ReviewofLastYear’sResults...................................................................................12.0CharacteristicsandDeliveryofThisYear’sTraining................................................3
3.0Enrollment,Training,andValidation.......................................................................14
4.0PartnerSurveys........................................................................................................18
5.0TeacherSurveys.......................................................................................................23
6.0ParentSurveys.........................................................................................................26
7.0ChildReadiness.......................................................................................................43
8.0SpecialResearchQuestions.....................................................................................47
9.0ChangesIntroduced................................................................................................49
10.0SummaryandConclusions....................................................................................51
References.......................................................................................................................52
Appendices......................................................................................................................54
PAGE I
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
List of TablesTable2.1 Implementationplan............................................................................... 6-11Table2.2 Evaluationquestions.................................................................................. 12Table2.3 Specialresearchquestions......................................................................... 13Table3.1 Enrollmentofchildrenbyage.................................................................... 14Table4.1 Activitylevelofpartners........................................................................... 18Table4.2 Collaborationsuccess................................................................................. 19Table4.3 Goalsuccess............................................................................................... 20Table4.4 Performancearearatings.......................................................................20-21Table4.5 PartnersatisfactionwithJudyCenter........................................................ 22Table5.1 Yearsteaching............................................................................................ 23Table5.2 Teachersatisfaction.................................................................................... 23Table5.3 Performancearearatings.......................................................................24-25Table5.4 FeelingoffamiliesservedbyJudyCenter................................................. 25Table6.1 Respondentcharacteristics....................................................................27-28Table6.2 Programsused.......................................................................................29-30Table6.3 Learning/readingmaterialsathome........................................................... 31Table6.4 Activitieswithchildren.............................................................................. 32Table6.5 Programinterest....................................................................................32-22Table6.6 SatisfactionwithJudyCenterServices...................................................... 33Table6.7 SatisfactionwithJudyCenterinperformanceareas.............................36-37Table6.8 ParentparticipationinJudyCenteractivities............................................ 39Table6.9 ParentratingofJudyCenterparentactivities.......................................39-40Table6.10Reasonfornotattendingparentactivities.................................................. 41Table6.11Improvementinchildlearningand habitsbecauseoftheJudyCenter.............................................................. 41Table6.12Learning/readingmaterialsathomebefore andafterJudyCenter,percentageofparents............................................. 42Table6.13Activitieswithchildren,percentageofparents whodid‘frequently’beforeandafterJudyCenter.................................... 42Table8.1 Parentreporting“much”improvementinchild learningandhabitsbecauseoftheJudyCenter......................................... 48Table8.2 Regressionanalysisofchildreadiness forBeallElementarySchool...................................................................... 49
Table of Contents
PAGE II
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
List of FiguresFigure3.1Enrollmentbyrace..................................................................................... 15Figure3.2Enrollmentoftargetedgroups.................................................................... 15Figure3.3Healthscreenings....................................................................................... 16Figure3.4Childdaycareattendance........................................................................... 16Figure3.5Familytrainingparticipation...................................................................... 17Figure6.1Parentsatisfaction...................................................................................... 34Figure6.2Top10performanceareas.......................................................................... 35Figure6.3Bottom10performanceareas.................................................................... 36Figure6.4Familyparticipationin3+activities.......................................................... 38Figure7.1Kindergartenreadinessbydomain,2005................................................... 44Figure7.2Kindergartenreadiness,JudyCenter,County,andState........................... 44Figure7.3Kindergartenreadinessbydomain,JudyCenter,County,andState......... 45Figure7.4Period4FARMSreadinessbydomain...................................................... 46
AppendicesA.1PartnerSurvey...................................................................................................... 54A.2PartnerComments................................................................................................ 56A.3Pre-K/KindergartenStaffSurvey.......................................................................... 60A.4First-GradeStaffSurvey....................................................................................... 62A.5FallParentSurvey................................................................................................. 64A.6SpringParentSurvey............................................................................................ 66A.7FallParentSurveyComments.............................................................................. 68A.8SpringParentSurveyComments.......................................................................... 72
Table of Contents
PAGE III
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
1.0 Review of Sixth Year of Program
TheBeallElementaryJudyCenter’ssixthyearcontinuedthemodelbuiltduringthe2000-2002periodwhichincludedpre-k(multi-ageand4-yearold),kindergartenclassesandon-siteservicesdeliveredbyavarietyoflocalpartners.Severalnewactivitieswereintroducedtoimprovechildreadinessforcertaincategoriesofstudents(specialneedsandFARMS)thatshowedachievementgapsinpreviousyears(eQuotient,Inc.2007).Theyearsawcurriculumimprovements, continued training activities, new family activities, and further refinement of evaluationefforts.NewinitiativesincludedtheexpansionofJudyCenterservicestoJohnHumbirdandWesternportElementaryschools.PartnershipswerealsobegunduringtheFY2007year,suchasfreedentalscreeningsforstudentsatJohnHumbirdElementary,freevisionscreeningsforstudentsatBeallElementary,JohnHumbirdElementary,andWesternportElementary,andFamilyLiteracyProgramsatJohnHumbird,andWesternportElementaryschools.Theseactivitiesaredescribedfurtherinthesixthyearevaluationreport(eQuotient,Inc. 2006). The following findings from the sixth year report are notable:
V EnrollmentinJudyCenterrelatedactivitiescontinuedtoexpandfromalevelof637inFY06to756inFY07.
V Aslightlysmallershareofchildrenwitheducationalneed(76%)wereadmittedtotheCenterduringtheyearthanthepreviousyear(83%).Thisisareversal of a five year trend.
V Morechildrenreceivedhealthscreenings(320hadvisionscreenings,256hadhearingscreeningsand113haddentalscreeningscomparedto149vision,149hearing,and82dentalscreeningstheyearbefore).
PAGE 1
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
V ProgressreportresultsfromtheAlleganyCountyBoardofEducationandHRDCassessmentdataindicatethatchildreadinessimprovedduringtheyear.Schoolreadinessforeachofthetargetedgroups(i.e.,studentsreceivingfreeandreducedschoolmeals,studentsreceivingSpecialEducationservices)improvedaswell.ThestrategiesfortheSocialandPersonaldomainworkedwithreadinessincreasingtomilestonelevelsforbothFARMSandSpecialEducationstudents.ThegoalsandstrategiesfortheLanguageandLiteracydomainworkedaswell.Onlyoneactivitywasnotcarriedoutinthemannerdescribedinthegrantapplicationbecauseofexpectationsoflowattendancebasedonapilotseminarofferedthepreviousyear.
V Parent,partner,andteachersurveyscontinuetoshowastronglevelofsatisfactionwiththeJudyCenter.Inaddition,parentsrecognizedsizeableimprovementsinchildlearninganddevelopmentduringtheyear.Abefore/afterstudyofapanelofparentsshowsthatfamilylearningresourcesathomeandfamilyactivitieswerestrengthenedduringtheyear.
V TheJudyCentercontinuedtoimproveitsfamilyprogrammingbyofferingavarietyofparenttrainingandfamilyactivities.Duplicatedattendanceatthesesessionsimprovedfromfourhundredandsixty-seventosixhundredandnineteen.
V InitsfourthfullyearofoperationattheJudyCenter,theKidsKornerChildcareCentercontinuedtoseeitsattendanceexpand.
V A five-year trend analysis of MMSR results by domain shows that there has been significant progress in the area of language and literacy but little improvementintheareaofsocialandpersonaldevelopment.
PAGE 2
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
2.0 Characteristics and Delivery of the Seventh Year
In year seven, the Judy Center continued to refine and improve the model and programs developedinpreviousyears.
TheJudyCenterintroducedseveralnewinitiativestoimprovetheeffectivenessoftheCenter.Thisnewagendawasdevelopedusinginformationobtainedfromstudentassessmentresults,externalevaluation,self-evaluation,andstakeholdersurveys.Asinthesixthyearofthegrant,objectivescenteredonimprovements(detailedinAlleganyCountyBoardofEducation2007)forpupilswhoreceivedFreeandReducedMeals(FARMS)andchildrenwhoreceivedspecialeducationalservices.Somechangesintheactivitiesforeachofthesesubgroupsweremade.
Thedomainsofconcentrationandtargetedgroupsremainedthesameforthisyearasthepreviousyear.TheSocialandPersonalDevelopmentwasthefocusforbothFARMSandspecialeducationchildren.However,thesegroupsofchildrenhadexceededtheirrespectivemilestonesduringtheFY07fundingcycle.Therefore,manyoftheprogrammingelementsremainedthesame.EmphasiscontinuedtobemadeonimprovingoutcomesinthedomainoflanguageandliteracyforFARMSchildren.Onceagain,thesechildrenrealizedtheirmilestonesandmanyoftheJudyCenteractivitieswereretainedtoreinforcethispatternofsuccess.
Severalmajorchanges,however,didresultasaresultofnewgrantstrategiesintroducedduringthe2007-08schoolyear.TheyarelistedherearrangedintothecategoriesCurriculumandPrograms,ProfessionalDevelopment,FamilyActivitiesandEvaluationandPlanningaredescribedfurtherbelow:
PAGE 3
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Curriculum and Programs
Expanded geographical childcare.TheJudyCenterinconjunctionwiththeBoardofEducationestablishedtwonewchildcarecenters:oneinFlintstoneElementarySchoolandanotherinCashValleyElementarySchool.Also,planningandlicensurewerecompletedforaWesternportElementarySchoolsite.
Foreign language instruction.TheJudyCenterhostedFSUstudentswhotaughtbeginningSpanishandJapanesetoJudyCenterstudents.ThisinstructionoccurredafterschoolwiththeKidsKornerchildcarestudents.
Professional Development
Instructional Computer Training. JudyCenterstaffreceivedtrainingonusingeducationalinternetsitesintheclassroom.Computerequipment(includinglaptops,projectors,andcarts)werealsopurchasedforthisuse.
Family Activities
Expanded GED classes.TheJudyCenterwasabletoestablishGEDclassesinWesternportandJohnHumbirdElementaryschoolsaspartoftheexpansionofservicesthere.
Evaluation and Planning
Think Tank Sessions.TheJudyCenterheldtwo“thinktank”sessionsbyinvitingregionalpartnerstobrainstormaboutstrategiesforaddressingchildneeds.Asaresultofthesesessions,theJudyCenterwasabletodevelopnewworkingrelationshipswithareapediatriciansandreinstalltheHealthDepartment’s“FreshStart”program.
PAGE 4
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
OtherfeaturesoftheJudyCenterremainedbasicallythesameasthesixthyear.Forinstance,reportingandinternalevaluationwerecarriedoutinmuchthesamemannerasthesixthyearwithadesignatedSteeringBoardthatmetonaquarterlybasisandmonthlymeetingsofJudyCenterstaff.Programmarketingwassimilartothefourthyear,includingtheuseofbroadcast,newspaperannouncements,website,andprintmaterials.
Theparametersforevaluationwerespelledoutintheproposalandarelistedintable2.1.Theultimategoalsoftheprogramaretoimprovechildreadinessforelementaryschool.Intermediateobjectivesinvolveparticularkeycurriculumcomponentswherefocusedinputswereanticipatedtohavethegreatestpotentialimpact.Strategiesdescribeprogrammaticimprovementsandactivities include specific program inputs that were to be expanded in order to realize a particular strategy. The final column briefly describes the achievement of each goal, objective, strategy,andactivity.Tosummarizethistable,onegoalanditstwocorrespondingobjectiveswererealized.Anothergoal(languageandliteracy)anditscorrespondingobjectivewerenotaccomplished.Theactivitieswerecarriedoutasoutlinedintheoriginalcontinuinggrantapplication with some modifications due to changing circumstances.
PAGE 5
Table 2
.1 Im
plementatio
n P
lan
Con
tinu
ed o
n ne
xt p
age
Goal
Objective
Mileston
eStrategy
Activities
Achievement
By Ju
ne 3
0, 2
008,
90%
of
all
exiti
ng k
inde
rgar
-te
n stu
dent
s at t
he Ju
dy
Cen
ter w
ill a
chie
ve fu
ll re
adin
ess l
evel
in th
e ar
ea o
f Soc
ial a
nd E
mo-
tiona
l Dev
elop
men
t as
det
erm
ined
by
the
Wor
k Sa
mpl
ing
Syste
m
indi
cato
rs.
1. B
y Ju
ne 3
0, 2
008,
80
% o
f exi
ting
kin-
derg
arte
n stu
dent
s at
the
Judy
Cen
ter w
ho
rece
ive
Free
and
Re-
duce
d M
eals
(FAR
MS)
w
ill a
chie
ve fu
ll re
adi-
ness
leve
l in
the
area
of
Soci
al a
nd E
mot
iona
l D
evel
opm
ent a
s de-
term
ined
by
the W
ork
Sam
plin
g Sy
stem
indi
-ca
tors
.2.
By
June
30,
200
8,
45%
of e
xitin
g ki
nder
-ga
rten
stud
ents
at th
e JC
who
rece
ive
Spec
ial
Educ
atio
n se
rvic
es
will
ach
ieve
full
read
i-ne
ss le
vel i
n th
e ar
ea
of S
ocia
l and
Em
o-tio
nal D
evel
opm
ent
as d
eter
min
ed b
y th
e W
ork
Sam
plin
g Sy
stem
in
dica
tors
.
1. Q
uart
erly
MM
SR
Dat
a ge
nera
ted
as p
rog-
ress
repo
rts t
o pa
rent
s w
ill sh
ow fu
ll re
adi-
ness
qua
rter
ly sc
ores
of
65%
1st
quar
ter,
70%
2n
d qu
arte
r, 75
% 3
rd
quar
ter,
and
80%
4th
qu
arte
r.2.
Qua
rter
ly M
MSR
da
ta g
ener
ated
as p
rog-
ress
repo
rts t
o pa
rent
s w
ill sh
ow fu
ll re
adi-
ness
qua
rter
ly sc
ores
of
25%
1st
quar
ter,
30%
2n
d qu
arte
r, 38
% 3
rd
quar
ter,
and
45%
4th
qu
arte
r.
Incr
ease
the
read
ines
s le
vel o
f FAR
MS
chil-
dren
in th
e do
mai
n of
So
cial
and
Em
otio
nal
Dev
elop
men
t.
(1) P
rovi
de w
eekl
y Se
cond
Ste
p le
sson
s in
clas
sroo
ms,
(2) I
m-
prov
e co
mm
unic
atio
n th
roug
h a
mon
thly
ne
wsle
tter t
o th
e JC
co
mm
unity
, foc
usin
g on
men
tal h
ealth
issu
es
by p
rovi
ding
art
icle
s on
men
tal h
ealth
, soc
ial/
emot
iona
l iss
ues,
and
beha
vior
al c
once
rns,
(3) P
rovi
de su
ppor
t gr
oups
and
par
ent
trai
ning
s for
par
ents
with
chi
ldre
n w
ho
have
a m
enta
l hea
lth
diag
nosis
(AD
HD
Su
ppor
t Gro
up, B
i-Po
lar S
uppo
rt G
roup
, Au
tism
Sup
port
Gro
up,
Beha
vior
Mod
ifica
tion
trai
ning
for P
aren
ts),
(4) I
dent
ify c
hild
ren
who
hav
e be
havi
oral
an
d/or
men
tal h
ealth
co
ncer
ns p
rior t
o th
eir
ente
ring
publ
ic sc
hool
: (a
) Edu
cate
Chi
ldca
re
prov
ider
s on
how
to
mak
e re
ferr
als,
(b)
Info
rm p
edia
tric
ians
on
how
to m
ake
refe
r-ra
ls to
Pub
lic S
choo
l Be
havi
oral
supp
ort,
Goa
l and
obj
ectiv
e rea
l-ize
d. R
eadi
ness
of al
l ch
ildre
n in
Soc
ial a
nd
Emot
iona
l Dev
elop-
men
t dom
ain
was
90%
at
end
of y
ear.
Rea
di-
ness
of F
ARM
S ch
ildre
n w
as 8
8%.
Read
ines
s of
stude
nts r
eceiv
ing
Spe-
cial
Educ
atio
n se
rvic
es
was
91%
. Ac
tiviti
es
impl
emen
ted
as fo
llow
s: (1
) Sec
ond
Step
lesso
ns
prov
ided
for 4
th y
ear
in ro
w. (2
) Mon
thly
ne
wsle
tter u
sed
to co
m-
mun
icat
e inf
orm
atio
n ab
out v
ariet
y of
men
tal
healt
h iss
ues.
(3) S
up-
port
grou
ps an
d pa
rent
tra
inin
g pr
ovid
ed fo
r AD
HD
, Aut
ism, a
nd
Beha
vior
Mod
ifica
tion
but n
ot B
i-Pol
ar.
Dow
n Sy
ndro
me s
uppo
rt
grou
p an
d In
fant
Mas
-sa
ge w
ere a
dded
dur
ing
year
. (4)
Judy
Cen
ter
staff
wor
ked
with
App
les
for c
hild
ren
for c
hild
care
tra
inin
g, ar
ea p
edia
tri-
cian
s, an
d H
ead
Star
t to
iden
tify
child
ren
with
be
havi
oral
conc
erns
.
(c) C
oord
inat
e w
ith
Chi
ldfin
d C
linic
to
iden
tify
child
ren
birt
h to
3 y
ears
old
who
are
re
ceiv
ing
serv
ices
in
the
hom
e. J
udy
Cen
-te
r sta
ff ca
n pr
ovid
e re
sour
ces a
nd re
ferr
als
to p
artn
er p
rogr
ams a
s ne
eded
, (d)
Coo
rdin
ate
with
the
Infa
nt a
nd
Todd
ler p
rogr
am to
id
entif
y ch
ildre
n w
ho
are
tran
sitio
ning
into
a
Judy
Cen
ter p
rogr
am,
(e) C
olla
bora
te w
ith
the
Hea
d St
art P
rogr
am
to id
entif
y ch
ildre
n w
ho h
ave
beha
vior
al
conc
erns
whi
ch im
pact
th
eir a
bilit
y to
par
-tic
ipat
e in
cla
ssro
om
activ
ities
, (5)
Dev
elop
sc
hool
-wid
e in
cent
ive
prog
ram
s usin
g th
e PB
IS m
odel
: Reo
rien-
tatio
n an
d co
ntin
ued
trai
ning
in th
e PB
IS
mod
el fo
r new
peo
ple,
(6
) Tra
in c
hild
care
pr
ovid
ers o
n be
havi
or
man
agem
ent a
nd th
e re
ferr
al p
roce
ss, a
nd (7
) Pr
ovid
e th
e fo
llow
ing
in p
ublic
scho
ols a
nd
Hea
d St
art c
lass
room
s.
Less
inte
ract
ion
oc-
curre
d w
ith C
hild
find
Clin
ic an
d In
fant
and
Todd
ler p
rogr
am.
Ser-
vice
Coo
rdin
ator
pro
-vi
ded
beha
vior
man
age-
men
t for
all P
re-k
and
Kin
derg
arte
n stu
dent
s in
Alle
gany
coun
ty w
ith
beha
vior
pro
blem
s. S
er-
vice
s wer
e coo
rdin
ated
w
ith F
resh
Sta
rt, H
ead
Star
t and
spec
ial e
duca
-tio
n. (5
) PBI
S m
odel
was
us
ed an
d PB
IS w
as u
sed
in K
inde
rgar
ten
Clas
s-ro
om b
ehav
ior p
lan.
Cou
pons
(“G
olde
n St
ar”)
wer
e use
d to
re
info
rce g
ood
beha
v-io
r. P
BIS
conc
ept w
as
expa
nded
into
Pre
-K,
Hea
d St
art,
and
Kid
s K
orne
r. Th
is in
clude
s th
e 4 co
lor c
lassro
om
beha
vior
man
agem
ent
proc
ess a
nd th
e gol
d sta
r co
upon
s.(6
) APP
LES
for C
hil-
dren
rece
ived
a gr
ant f
or
this
purp
ose a
nd p
ro-
vide
d th
ese s
ervi
ces.
(7)
Indi
vidu
al a
nd g
roup
so
cial
skill
s wer
e el
imin
ated
.
Table 2
.1 Im
plementatio
n P
lan
Con
tinu
ed o
n ne
xt p
age
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
unty
: be
havi
oral
obs
erva
tions
, cl
assr
oom
man
agem
ent
tech
niqu
es, i
ndiv
idua
l an
d sm
all g
roup
soci
al
skill
less
ons,
coor
di-
natio
n of
fam
ily se
r-vi
ces,
(8) I
nvite
cur
rent
pa
rtne
rs fr
om w
hom
w
e’d li
ke in
crea
sed
col-
labo
ratio
n an
d po
tent
ial
part
ners
to a
Thin
k Ta
nk se
ssio
n to
exp
lore
op
tions
as t
o ho
w to
m
eet t
he n
eeds
of t
he
child
ren
in o
ur c
om-
mun
ity, t
he re
sour
ces
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
e re
fer-
ral p
roce
ss.
Inst
ead,
a n
ew c
lass
-ro
om w
as in
corp
orat
ed
at W
ests
ide
scho
ol to
fo
cus o
n so
cial
skill
s.C
hild
ren
with
beh
av-
ior p
robl
ems i
n Pr
e-K
an
d K
and
who
live
in
Cum
berla
nd w
ould
be
tran
sfer
red
to th
is
prog
ram
for i
nten
sive
so
cial
skill
s tra
in-
ing.
Ser
vice
s wer
e al
so c
oord
inat
ed w
ith
Fres
h St
art f
or th
ese
stud
ents
. A
tota
l of 1
6 st
uden
ts w
ere
serv
ed
this
scho
ol y
ear.
(8)
Thin
k ta
nk se
ssio
n w
as c
onve
ned
with
ag
reem
ents
to fi
ll so
me
exis
ting
serv
ice
gaps
.
Table 2
.1 Im
plementatio
n P
lan
Con
tinu
ed o
n ne
xt p
age
Goal
Objective
Mileston
eStrategy
Activities
Achievement
By Ju
ne 3
0, 2
008,
88%
of
exi
ting
kind
erga
rten
stu
dent
s at t
he Ju
dy
Cen
ter w
ill a
chie
ve fu
ll re
adin
ess l
evel
in th
e La
ngua
ge a
nd L
itera
cy
asse
ssed
are
a of
the
Wor
k Sa
mpl
ing
Syste
m
indi
cato
rs.
By Ju
ne 3
0, 2
008,
80%
of
exi
ting
FAR
MS
kind
erga
rten
stud
ents
at th
e Ju
dy C
ente
r w
ill
achi
eve
full
read
ines
s in
the
Lang
uage
and
Li
tera
cy a
sses
sed
area
of
the W
ork
Sam
plin
g Sy
stem
.
Qua
rter
ly M
MSR
Dat
a ge
nera
ted
as p
rogr
ess
repo
rts t
o pa
rent
s will
sh
ow fu
ll re
adin
ess
quar
terly
scor
es o
f 62%
2n
d qu
arte
r, 74
% 3
rd
quar
ter,
and
80%
4th
qu
arte
r.
Incr
ease
the
read
ines
s le
vel o
f kin
derg
arte
n ch
ildre
n in
the
do-
mai
n of
Lan
guag
e an
d Li
tera
cy.
(1) C
ontin
ue k
inde
r-ga
rten
cur
ricul
um,
incl
udin
g us
e of
a c
ore
read
ing
prog
ram
that
is
base
d on
Sci
entifi
c ba
sed
Read
ing
Rese
arch
(S
BRR
) as d
efine
d by
Rea
ding
Firs
t, (2
) C
ontin
ue th
e H
ough
-to
n-M
ifflin
Pre
-k
curr
icul
um d
urin
g th
e 20
07-0
8 sc
hool
yea
r, (3
) Dur
ing
the
2007
-08
scho
ol y
ear,
a re
sear
ch
base
d in
terv
entio
n pr
ogra
m (
ERI)
will
be
cont
inue
d by
a re
adin
g in
terv
entio
n sp
ecia
list,
for c
hild
ren
iden
tified
by
the
kind
erga
rten
te
ache
rs, (
4) In
vite
cu
rren
t and
pot
entia
l pa
rtne
rs to
a Th
ink
Tank
sess
ion
to e
xplo
re
optio
ns a
s to
how
to
mee
t the
nee
ds o
f the
ch
ildre
n in
the
com
-m
unity
, the
reso
urce
s av
aila
ble,
and
the
refe
r-ra
l pro
cess
, (5)
Edu
ca-
tiona
l sum
mer
cam
p w
ill b
e pr
ovid
ed fo
r JC
stu
dent
s enr
olle
d in
the
2007
-08
scho
ol y
ear.
Goa
l and
obj
ectiv
e no
t re
alize
d. R
eadi
ness
of
all c
hild
ren
in la
ngua
ge
and
liter
acy
dom
ain
was
83%
at e
nd o
f yea
r. Re
adin
ess o
f FAR
MS
child
ren
was
77%
. Ac
-tiv
ities
impl
emen
ted
as
follo
ws:
(1)-
(2) H
ough
-to
n-M
ifflin
pro
gram
co
ntin
ued
to b
e us
ed
durin
g th
e ye
ar.
(3)
Read
ing
inte
rven
tion
prog
ram
ER
I was
use
d.
(4) Th
ink
tank
sess
ion
was
con
vene
d w
ith
agre
emen
ts to
fill
som
e ex
istin
g se
rvic
e ga
ps. (
5)
Educ
atio
nal s
umm
er
cam
p w
as c
ondu
cted
as
prop
osed
. (6)
A re
adin
g sp
ecia
list (
paid
for b
y th
e Ju
dy C
ente
r) w
as
prov
ided
onc
e a
mon
th
at b
oth
Beal
l Ele
men
-ta
ry a
nd W
este
rnpo
rt
Elem
enta
ry. (
7) Th
is pr
ogra
m w
as c
ontin
-ue
d. (
8) Th
is pr
ogra
m
was
con
tinue
d in
col
-la
bora
tion
with
Fam
-ily
Junc
tion.
(9) Th
e pr
ogra
m w
as e
xpan
ded.
H
owev
er, p
arent
train
ing
Table 2
.1 Im
plementatio
n P
lan
Con
tinu
ed o
n ne
xt p
age
Spec
ial E
duca
tion
will
also
run
a 6 w
eek
sum
-m
er ca
mp
at th
e Jud
y C
ente
r for
stud
ents
have
be
en d
iagno
sed
with
th
e Aut
ism S
pect
rum
D
isord
er. F
rostb
urg
Park
s and
Rec
reat
ion
Dep
artm
ent w
ill p
rovi
de
an 8
wee
k su
mm
er ca
mp
at th
e Jud
y C
ente
r whi
ch
will
focu
s on
gros
s mot
or
deve
lopm
ent i
n ch
ildre
n ag
es 5
to 1
2 ye
ars o
ld.
Mea
ls wi
ll be
pro
vide
d to
all
stud
ents
thro
ugh
the
sum
mer
food
and
nutri
-tio
n pr
ogra
m g
rant
. K
ids
Korn
er C
hild
care
Cen
ter
will
oper
ate d
urin
g th
e su
mm
er an
d pr
ovid
ed
by th
e abo
ve m
entio
ned
prog
ram
s, (6
) Pro
vide
a lit
erac
y sp
ecial
ist fo
r sum
-m
er ca
mp
and
for F
amily
Li
tera
cy n
ight
s thr
ough
-ou
t the
regu
lar sc
hool
ye
ar, (7
) Pro
vide
Lite
racy
Ba
gs in
Kin
derg
arte
n,
Chi
ldca
re, a
nd H
ead
Star
t clas
sroom
s. C
on-
tinue
to g
ive aw
ay fr
ee
book
s to
all Ju
dy C
ente
r ch
ildre
n in
cludi
ng th
ose
serv
ed in
the h
ome b
y
did
not o
ccur
bec
ause
of
poo
r par
ticip
atio
n ra
te w
hen
offer
ed la
st ye
ar.
(10)
Sta
ff m
oni-
tore
d at
tend
ance
and
pe
rform
ed fo
llow
-up.
Table 2
.1 Im
plementatio
n P
lan
Con
tinu
ed o
n ne
xt p
age
Table 2
.1 Im
plementatio
n P
lan
partn
er ag
encie
s, (8
) Pr
ovid
e a fr
ee b
ook
and
a Jud
y C
ente
r bro
chur
e to
all n
ewbo
rn b
abies
wh
o ar
e a re
siden
t of
Alleg
any
Cou
nty,
(9)
Expa
nd JC
serv
ices i
nto
two
addi
tiona
l sch
ools,
W
este
rnpo
rt El
emen
-ta
ry an
d Jo
hn H
umbi
rd
Elem
enta
ry.
Expa
nsio
n wi
ll in
clude
addi
tiona
l G
ED cl
asse
s and
fam
ily
liter
acy
activ
ities
, (10
) Be
proa
ctive
with
stud
ent
atte
ndan
ce b
y us
ing
phon
e call
s, Pu
pil S
ervi
ce
Wor
ker,
pare
nt m
eetin
g,
and
Trua
ncy
Offi
cer.
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Inthisreport,abroaderspectrumofmeasures(seetable2.2)isusedtomeasureprogrameffectiveness.Thisincludesthefollowingelements:(1)marketingandoutreachefforts(didtheJudyCentermeetexpectationsforprogrammarketingandconductoutreachtootherschoolsinthecounty?)(2)programenrollmentandattendance(wereenrollmentandattendanceexpectationsforchildprogramsandfamilyactivitiesachieved?),(3)stafftraining,curriculumresources,andvalidation(werenecessarystafftraining,programvalidation,andcurriculummaterialsavailableasplanned?),(4)partnersatisfaction(howdidpartnersratecollaborationsuccess?),(5)teachersatisfaction(howdidteachersinPre-K,Kindergarten,and1stgradeviewtheJudyCenter?),(6)parentsatisfaction(howdidparentsviewtheJudyCenter?),(7)childlearning(howwasschoolreadinessimprovedaccordingtoinformationfrompupilprogressreportsandotherassessmentdata?),(9)JudyCentercomponentstandardratings(howdidparents,staffandpartnersviewaccomplishmentofJudyCentergoals),and(10)answerstospecialresearchquestionsposedinthecontinuationgrantproposal(seetable2.3).
Table 2.2 Evaluation questions.
Issues Measurement
Marketingandoutreach publicschooloutreachactivities,ParentsurveyresultsChildrenenrolled #childrenenrolledinJudyCenterprogramsbyarea
Parentinvolvement #,type,andparticipationinparentworkshops,Parentsurveyresults
Staffprofessionaldevelopment #andtypetrainingworkshopsattendedProgramaccreditation #programsvalidatedPartnersatisfaction Partnersurveyresults
Teachersatisfaction Teachersurveyresults
Parentsatisfaction Parentsurveyresults
Childreadiness PupilProgressReports,HeadStartObservationStudyresults
AlignmentwithJudyCenterGoals teachersurvey,parentsurvey
Specialresearchquestionsregardingeffectsofinitiativesonsocialandpersonaldevelopmentandlanguageandliteracy
MMSRresults
PAGE 12
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Theremainderofthereportisdividedintosevensections.Thenextsection(3.0)addressespupilenrollment,familyservice,training,andvalidationstrategiesoftheprogram.Section4.0describestheresultsofasteeringboardpartnersurvey.Section5.0describestheresultsofanend-of year teacher survey and section 6.0 describes the findings of fall and spring surveys of parents.ThefallsurveyasksmainlyquestionsaboutparentingpracticesandfamilyresourcesforuseindesigningJudyCenteractivitiesduringtheremainderoftheyearwhilethespringsurveywasdesignedtoprovidesummativeinformationabouttheperceivedeffectivenessoftheJudyCenter,differentstrategies,andoverallparentsatisfaction.Section7.0providesinformationonchildlearningachievementasrevealedbyperformanceonvariouspupilprogressreportsandtestsusingbenchmarkcomparisons.Section8.0describesJudyCenterComponentsselfassessmentsandMSDEvalidationofthesecomponentsduringthelastyear.Section9.0answersspecialresearchquestions(seetable2.3)introducedinlastyear’scontinuationgrantapplication.Section10.0describeschangesthatareanticipatedfornextyear’sJudyCenter.Thereportendswithasummary.
Table 2.3 Special research questions
Question
(1)HowhastheintroductionofJudyCenteractivitiesattheexpandedelementaryschools,JohnHumbirdandWesternport,impactedthoselocationsintermsofthevariousoutcomesmeasures?
(2)WhathasbeentheeffectonchildrenwhoparticipatedinsummerJCactivitiesversusthosewhodonot(controllingforenrollmentinFARMSandSpecialEducation?)
PAGE 13
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
3.0 Enrollment, training, and validation
Aduplicatedheadcountofsix-hundredandtwenty-two(622)wasservedbyprogramshousedattheJudyCenterduringFY2008.Thisfigurecomparestosevenhundredandfifty-six(756)duringFY2007.Theduplicateddistributionofchildrenbyageisshownintable3.1anddistributionbyraceforPre-K,Kindergarten,andafter-school/beforeschoolprogramsinfigure3.1.
Childenrollmentracialdemographicsfromavailablepartnersshowedthatminorityenrollmentwashigherthantheservicearea—12.6%ofchildrenwereminorityversus7.0%reportedinthe2000U.S.CensusforAlleganyCounty.
Table 3.1 Enrollment of children by age.
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08Birthto3 78 190 317 290 2013-yearold 75 135 88 91 1024yearold 110 127 137 200 1605yearold 88 85 95 175 159Total 351 537 637 756 622
One strategy identified in the FY 2008 grant was to narrow the achievement gap for children whoreceivefreeandreducedpricemeals(FARMS)andforstudentsreceivingspecialeducationservices.Enrollmentoftargetedgroupsforpre-kindergartenincreasedslightlyto80%forneedcategories(automaticenrollmentandpriorityenrollment)versus76%inFY200/7(seeFigure3.2).Healthscreeningsforvision,hearing,anddentalremainedsteadyfromlastyear(seeFigure3.3).
Enrollment in the Kids Korner daycare center leveled off in FY 2008 after five years of rapid growth. These totals reflect both Judy Center children and other elementary school age children. The figures do not include enrollment at the other Judy Center child care sites.
Inanefforttoimproveparent-childconnectednessandreinforcepositivebehaviorslearnedinschool,theJudyCentercontinuedtoofferafter-schoolactivitiesandparentworkshops/trainings.Familytraining/workshopsandeventsincludedparentorientation(44participants),parent
PAGE 14
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Native American
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
87%
3% 4%6%
0%
Figure 3.1 Enrollment by Race
Figure 3.2 Enrollment of Targeted Groups
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
Per
cent
age
PAGE 15
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Figure 3.3 Health Screenings
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
# of
chi
ldre
n Dental
Vision
Hearing
Growth and Nutrition
Immunizations
Amblyopia
Blood Lead Testing
Fig. 3.4 Child Daycare Attendance
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
Per
cent
age
PAGE 16
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
conferences(67participants),Grandparent’sDay(179participants),MeettheTeacher(30participants)andParentHolidayActivity(55participants).Aduplicatedcountofsixhundredand ninety attended. This continues a pattern of increases over the last five years (see Figure 3.5).AsinpreviousyearsactivitieswereannouncedintheTimes-Newsnewspaper,JudyCenterflyers and/or calendars distributed to children and parents.
JudyCenterstaffparticipatedinMMSRtrainingduringtheschoolyear.TheyalsoparticipatedinSafariMontagetrainingwhichinvolvedlearninghowtouseshortvideoclipstosupportinstruction.Also,fourteachersattendedaKindergartenconferenceinBaltimore.
Nonewaccreditationswereobtainedduringthe2007-08schoolyear.TheJudyCenterpre-k,kindergartenandchildcareprogramsobtainedaccreditationbytheMSDEinsummer2006.TheHeadStartprogramreceivedaccreditationfrombothNationalAssociationfortheEducationofYoungChildren(NAEYC)andMSDEduring2004.TheKidsKornerdaycarecenterobtainedMSDEaccreditationforitschildcareprograminspring2006.HeadStartandKidsKornerwillbegoingthroughthere-accreditationprocessduringthe2008-09schoolyear.Also,twonewchildcaresitesatCashValleyElementaryandFlintstoneElementarywillundergotheprocessforaccreditation.Lastly,Pre-K,Multi-ageandKindergartenclassroomswillbegoingthroughre-validationthisyearalso.
Figure 3.5 Family Training Participation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
PAGE 17
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
4.0 Partner Surveys
Partnersurveys(seeAppendixA.1)wereadministeredtotheJudyCenterpartnersinspring2008.Thesurveyinstrumentwasthesameoneadministeredinspring2003,2005-2007andincludedquestionsaboutpartners’levelofparticipationintheJudyCenter,collaborationsuccess,grantachievement,CenterperformanceonanumberoffeaturesthatalignwiththeJudyCentercomponentstandards,andsatisfactionwiththeJudyCenter.Onlyfourpartnersrespondedtothisyear’ssurveywhichwaslowerthanpreviousyears.
The first two tables indicate that the Judy Center partners continue to maintain good working relationships.Table4.1showsthattwoofthepartnerscharacterizedthemselvesasbeing“veryactive”intheJudyCenterandtwoweresomewhatactive.Asinpreviousyears,allofthepartnersratedcollaborationsuccesshighly(seetable4.2).Partnersagreed(seetable4.3)thattheJudyCenterhadbecomemorevisibleinthecommunity,wasimplementingstrategiesdescribedinthegrant,andwasrealizingpositiveresults.OnepartnerindicatedthattheyfelttheJudyCenter did not have enough financial resources to accomplish its charge.
Table 4.1 Activity levels of partners, percentage of partners.
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08VeryActive 50 20 29 50Somewhatactive 50 70 43 50NotveryActive 0 10 14 0Inactive 0 0 14 0
PAGE 18
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 4.2 Collaboration success, percentage of partners agreeing.
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
ThecompositionoftheSteeringCommitteemembersisappropriateformakingJudyCenterdecisions. 100 100 100 100
TheJudyCenterstaffcommunicatedopenlyandclearlyduringmeetings. 100 100 100 100
TheJudyCenterstaffcommunicatedopenlyandclearlybetweenmeetings. 100 100 100 100
MemberoftheJudyCenterstaffestablishedinformalcommunicationnetworks(e-mailcommunication,phonecalls,etc.)
100 100 100 100
MembersoftheJudyCenterstaffhaverelationshipsbuiltontrustandmutualrespect 100 100 100 100
IunderstandthegoalsandobjectivesoftheJudyCenterproject 100 100 100 100
Iunderstandmyrolesandresponsibilitiesasamemberofthisproject 100 100 100 100
TheJudyCenterteamhasclearandeffectivedecisionmakingprocedures. 100 100 100 100
PAGE 19
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 4.3 Goal success, percentage of partners
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
CommunityawarenessoftheJudyCenterhasincreasedinthepastyear. 100 100 100 100
Resourcesforthisprojectwereadequatetomeetobjectives 100 89 83 75
Thestrategiesofthisgranthavebeenimplemented. 100 100 100 100
Thestrategiesofthisgrantaredemonstratingpositiveoutcomes. 100 100 100 100
Table4.4showspartnerassessmentofvariousfeaturesoftheJudyCenter.Theratingsformostcharacteristicswerehigh.Twofeaturesweregivenlowermarksbypartners.Onepartnergave“space sufficiency” an “inadequate” rating. Provision of services for children with disabilities receiveda“minimal”ratingsfromonepartner.HalfofthepartnersindicatedthattheywerenotfamiliarwithhowtheCenterwasperforminginpresentingvariouselementsofthecurriculum(e.g.,activitiesforart,music,physicaleducation,language/reading/writing,math,science)andcouldnotjudgethequalityofschoolmeals,materialsforlearningandplay,playactivities,andtheJudyCenterwebpage.
Table 4.4 Performance area ratings, percentage of partners (4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Minimal, 1=Inadequate, 0=NA/Don’t Know).
(4) (3) (2) (1) (0)
a.HoursanddaysofJCoperation 100 0 0 0 0b.Childcarebeforeorafterday 100 0 0 0 0c.QualityofSchoolmeals(lunch,breakfast) 50 0 0 0 50d.ServiceCoordination/Familysupport 75 0 0 0 25
e.Arrayofchildandfamilysupportservicesonsite 100 0 0 0 0
f.Arrayofchildservicesforallages(e.g.,infantsandtoddlers,pre-k,kindergarten) 100 0 0 0 0
g.Screeningfordisabilities 100 0 0 0 0
Continued on next page
PAGE 20
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 4.4 Performance area ratings, percentage of partners (4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Minimal, 1=Inadequate, 0=NA/Don’t Know).
h.Provisionofservicesforchildrenwithdisabilities 75 0 25 0 0i.Healthservices(e.g.,immunizations,dentalassessment,vision/hearingscreening) 100 0 0 0 0
j.Friendliness/helpfulnessofstaffandteachers 100 0 0 0 0k.Supervisionofchildren/discipline 75 25 0 0 0l.Materialsforlearningandplay 50 0 0 0 50m.Playactivities 50 0 0 0 50n.ActivitiesforlearningArt 50 0 0 0 50o.ActivitiesforlearningMusic 50 0 0 0 50p.ActivitiesforlearningPhysicaleducation 50 0 0 0 50q.Activitiesforlearninglanguage/reading/writing 50 0 0 0 50r.ActivitiesforlearningNature/science 50 0 0 0 50s.ActivitiesforlearningMath 50 0 0 0 50t.ActivitiesforlearningComputers 50 0 0 0 50u.Progressreportsandfollow-upconferences 75 0 0 0 25
v.Activitiesforparentsandfamilies(e.g., field trips, picnics) 75 0 0 0 25
w.Educationprogramsforfamilies(e.g.,parentingworkshops,GEDclasses) 75 0 0 0 25
x.InformationprovidedbyJudyCenteraboutupcomingactivities 100 0 0 0 0
y.JudyCenterwebpage 50 0 0 0 50z.Foodandnutritionassistance(e.g.,WIC) 100 0 0 0 0aa.CleanlinessandsafetyofJudyCenter 100 0 0 0 0bb. Sufficiency of space 50 25 0 25 0
Continued from previous page
PAGE 21
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table4.5showspartnersatisfactioncomparedto2002-03and2004-05.Allofthepartnersexpressed that they were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the Center. Additional written commentsareprovidedinAppendixA.2.PartnersindicatethattheJudyCenterhasbeenbeneficial to children, families, and the community. However, they expressed concern about spacelimitationsforGEDclassesandtransportationissues.
Table 4.5 Partner satisfaction with Judy Center, percentage of partners.
2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07 2007-08
Very Satisfied 100 90 71 75
Satisfied 0 10 29 25
Somewhat Satisfied 0 0 0 0
Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 0 0 0
Not Satisfied at All 0 0 0 0
PAGE 22
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
5.0 Teacher Surveys
Teacher surveys used to obtain feedback from staff in kindergarten/pre-k and first-grade teachers. The twosurveys(includedinAppendixA.2andA.3)are thesameasusedinpreviousyears. Theyaskaboutteacherbackground,satisfactionwithschoolresourcesandstaffandparentinvolvement,Centerperformance on Judy Center component standards, and overall satisfaction with the Center. Seventeachers in total were surveyed, including five pre-k/kindergarten teachers and two first grade teachers. Astable5.1showsteacherexperienceisvariedwithbothnewerandmoreexperiencedteachers.
Table 5.1 Years teaching, percentage of teachers.
1-2 03-5 435-10 4311-15 016ormore 14
Table 5.2 shows that teachers are generally satisfied with resources and cooperation at Beall Elementary. However, one teacher is dissatisfied with the size of classes and one teacher is dissatisfied with the levelofparentalinvolvement.Teachersexpressedgreatersatisfactionwithprofessionaldevelopmentopportunities thanlastyearbut lowersatisfactionwithqualityoffacilities. Table5.3showsthatnoperformanceareasreceivedminimalorinadequateratingsfromanyteacher.
Table 5.2 Teacher satisfaction, percentage of teachers (5=Very Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Satisfied, 1=Not Satisfied)
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Qualityofclassroomequipment 57 43 0 0 0Qualityoffacilities0 71 29 0 0Sizeofclasses 14 57 14 14 0Administrativesupport 57 43 0 0 0Professionaldevelopmentopportunities 57 29 14 0 0Collaborationwithteachers 71 29 0 0 0Collaborationwithearlychildhoodagencies 57 43 0 0 0Levelofparentalinvolvementinchildren’seducation 14 57 14 0 14
PAGE 23
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 5.3 Performance area ratings, percentage of teachers (4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Minimal, 1=Inadequate, 0=NA/Don’t Know).
(4) (3) (2) (1) (0)
a.HoursanddaysofJCoperation 100 0 0 0 0
b.Childcarebeforeorafterday 86 14 0 0 0
c.QualityofSchoolmeals(lunch,breakfast) 29 57 14 0 0
d.ServiceCoordination/FamilySupport 100 0 0 0 0e.Arrayofchildandfamilysupportservicesonsite 100 0 0 0
f.Arrayofchildservicesforallages(e.g.,infantsandtoddlers,pre-k,kindergarten) 86 0 0 0 14
g.Screeningfordisabilities 29 57 0 0 14h.Provisionofservicesforchildrenwithdisabilities 71 14 0 0 14
i.Healthservices(e.g.,immunizations,dentalassessment,vision/hearingscreening) 100 0 0 0 0
j.Friendliness/helpfulnessofstaffandteachers 100 0 0 0 0
k.Supervisionofchildren/discipline 71 14 0 0 14
l.Materialsforlearningandplay 86 0 0 0 14
m.Playactivities 86 0 0 0 14
n.ActivitiesforlearningArt 86 0 0 0 14
o.ActivitiesforlearningMusic 86 0 0 0 14
p.ActivitiesforlearningPhysicaleducation 71 14 0 0 14q.Activitiesforlearninglanguage/reading/writing 86 0 0 0 14
r.ActivitiesforlearningNature/science 86 0 0 0 14
Continued on next page
PAGE 24
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 5.3 Performance area ratings, percentage of teachers (4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Minimal, 1=Inadequate, 0=NA/Don’t Know).
s.ActivitiesforlearningMath 86 0 0 0 14
t.ActivitiesforlearningComputers 71 14 0 0 14
u.Progressreportsandfollow-upconferences 86 0 0 0 14v. Activities for parents and families (e.g., field trips,picnics) 100 0 0 0 0
w.Educationprogramsforfamilies(e.g.,parentingworkshops,GEDclasses) 100 0 0 0 0
x.InformationprovidedbyJudyCenteraboutupcomingactivities 100 0 0 0 0
y.JudyCenterwebpage 86 14 0 0 0
z.Foodandnutritionassistance(e.g.,WIC) 100 0 0 0 0
aa.CleanlinessandsafetyofJudyCenter 100 0 0 0 0
bb. Sufficiency of space 57 29 0 0 14
All teaching staff felt that families served by the Judy Center were either “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the Judy Center (see table 5.4). In addition, both 1st grade teachers indicated that they were “very satisfied” with the Center.
Table 5.4 Feeling of families served by Judy Center, percentage of teachers
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08Very Satisfied 62.5 100 71 50 57Satisfied 25.0 0 29 50 43Somewhat Satisfied 0 0 0 0 0Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 0 0 0 0Not Satisfied at All 0 0 0 0 0Don’tKnow 12.5 0 0 0 0
Continued from previous page
PAGE 25
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
6.0 Parent Surveys
Twoparentsurveyswereadministeredduringtheschoolyear.Thesurveyinstrumentsweresimilartopreviousyears.Thefallsurvey(seeAppendixA.4)collectedinformationonfamilyresourcesandattitudesforuseindesigningcurriculumimprovementsandoutsideactivitiesfortheschoolyear.Thespringsurvey(seeAppendixA.5)collectedinformationonparentsatisfactionwithvariousfeaturesoftheJudyCenter,parentalassessmentsofchilddevelopmentduringtheschoolyear,andinformationonfamilyresourcesandattitudes.
Sinceacontinuedeffortwasmadetoimprovefamilyservicesduringtheyear,thepre-testsandpost-testswereconstructedtomakecomparisonsforpre-testandpost-testresponsestoseeiftheprogramhadapositiveeffectonfamilyattitudesandresources.Surveyparticipantsweregiventheoptionofprovidingthelastfourdigitsoftheirsocialsecuritynumberssothatpairwisematchingofpost-testandpre-testresponsescouldbeaccomplished.Asinpreviousyears,therewasadropoffinsurveyparticipationbetweenthefallandspring(from58collectedinthefallto53inthespring).Nineteen(19)responseswerereceivedinthespringfromparticipantsinthefallsurveysothatcomparisonscouldbemadeovertime.Thiscomparestoseventeen(17)parentpanelparticipantslastyear.
Table6.1showsthecharacteristicsofJudyCenterparentrespondentstothefallsurveybasedonthe58respondents.Halfoftherespondingparentsisthirtyyearsorolderandninety-onepercentisfemale.Approximatelyeightoutoftenwork(eitherfullorpart-time)andsixty-threepercentismarried.Approximatelysixtypercenthasatleastsomecollegeandslightlyoverhalfishomeowners.Asinthepreviousyears,thetypicalJudyCentersurveyrespondenthasaslightlyhighersocioeconomiclevelthantheaverageFrostburgcityorAlleganyCountyresident(seeeQuotient2003).
Mostparents(86%)haveonlyonechildenrolledintheCenter.Mostchildrenareenrolledinkindergarten,pre-kormulti-ageprograms(seeTable6.2).Participationinschoollunchandbreakfastisalsohigh.Enrollmentinvariousdaycareservicesremainsathighlevels.HigherproportionsofparticipantsreportedthattheyparticipatedinWIC,infantandtoddler,HealthyStart,andHeadStart.
Aslightlyhigherpercentageofsurveyrespondentsreportedhavingchildrenwithspecialneeds(twenty-onepercentcomparedtoseventeenlastyear).Amongthespecialneedscitedbyparents,ten (10) children had speech difficulties, three (3) had vision needs, two (2) have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and eight parents identified other special needs.
PAGE 26
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 6.1 Respondent characteristics, percentage of parents.
Age # %15-19 0 020-24 5 925-29 24 4130-34 10 1735-39 10 1740+ 7 12NA 2 3Total 58 100.0
Gender # %Male 5 9Female 53 91
Employment Status %Employedfull-time 52EmployedPart-time 27NotEmployedandseekingjob 4NotEmployedandnotseekingjob 0Homemaker 16Other 2
Marital Status %Married 63Single 25Divorced 12Widowed/Widower 0
Continued on next page
PAGE 27
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Educational level %Somehighschool 5Highschooldiploma 26GED 0SomeCollege 37AssociatesDegree 11Bachelor’sdegreeorhigher 21
Own or rent home %Own 56Rent 33Livewithrelatives 9Other 2
Number of children %One 86Two 11Three 2
Special needs %Yes 21No 77Don’tknow 2
Continued from previous page
Table 6.1 Respondent characteristics, percentage of parents.
PAGE 28
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 6.2 Programs used, percentage of parents.
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Kindergarten 42 44 32 46 39 454-yearoldPre-K 32 35 39 40 38 672-3yearoldPre-K 11 - - - - -3-4-5yearoldPre-K 10 - - - - -3&4yearoldPre-K - 28 44 33 32 41HeadStart 22 22 17 17 18 28InfantandToddler 2 - 2 4 0 16ChildcareScholarshipAssistance - - - - - 2
Beforeschoolchildcare 5 13 18 14 20 14Afterschoolchildcare 10 15 24 18 23 19Duringschoolchildcare 5 7 9 2 8 10Schoolclosingchildcare 4 10 17 12 17 16Summerchildcare - - - - 10 12CaseManagement 1 1 - - - -ComputerClasses - - 0 1 1 -PreschoolSpecialEducation 1 4 3 1 4 3DentalScreening/Services 2 6 0 49 26 24FreeVisionScreenings - - - 62 27 27PartnersforSuccess 1 6 2 3 - -SpecialEducationServices - - - 6 2 5Pre-schoolSpecialEducation - - - - - 3FamilySupportNetwork - 6 3 3 2 0JudyCenterFamilyLiteracyNights - - - - - 3
JudyCentersummercamp - - - - - 10
Continued on next page
PAGE 29
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
FrostburgLibraryFamilyNights - 4 2 4 2 -
PreschoolPartners 1 1 6 2 4 -FamilyLiteracy 0 0 0 12 5 -GED - - - 2 0 0AutisticSpectrumClassroom - - - - - 5FamilyPreservation(DSS) 0 7 3 3 1 2FreshStart 0 6 3 4 - -WIC 28 40 39 34 27 43HealthyStart(HealthDept) 3 3 8 9 2 16Adultseminars - - 2 0 - -NurturingProgram 2 - - - - -Dr.Miller’s“BreakfastClub” - 10 - - - -FamilyJunction 1 6 0 0 0 3YMCA—FamilyCenter 0 - - - - -
YMCAclass@JudyCenter 0 - - - - -
YMCAParent/Childactivities - 4 - - - -
YMCAFathers&Families - - - 4 - -YMCAParentPower - - 2 0 2 -EnglishasSecondLanguage 1 0 0 0 1 0MentalHealth(HealthDept) 0 3 8 2 4 0
Breakfast 26 38 42 59 52 43Lunch 29 42 41 52 49 44SupportGroups - - - - 0 0
Table 6.2 Programs used, percentage of parents.
Continued from previous page
PAGE 30
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Parentsweresurveyedabouttheavailabilityoflearningsupportmaterialsinthehouseholdandparentalparticipationinlearningactivities(seetable6.3).Forthefourthconsecutiveyear,alloftheparentsreportedthatchildren’sbookswereavailable.Seventy-eightpercentofhouseholdshad computers and seventy-one percent had Internet access. These figures are comparable to the last few years. These high levels of home learning resources, in part, may reflect the success ofJudyCentereffortsinbuildingfamilylearningresourcessincesomeoftheparentshavemultiplechildrenwhohavebeenschooledattheCenterandmanychildrenwereenrolledinJudyCenterprogramsduringpreviousyears(e.g.,InfantandToddlers,Pre-k,multi-ageprograms,Kindergarten).
Nearlyallparentsreported“frequently”praisingtheirchildrenfordoingwellandnearlyall“frequently”sitandtalkwiththeirchildrenabouttheirday(seetable6.4).Nineintenparentsreported“frequently”eatingadinnertogetherasafamilyandeightintenindicatedthattheyreadwiththeirchildren.Threequartersindicatedthatthey“frequently”playedwiththeirchildren.Halfofparents“rarely”or“never”wenttoalibraryormuseumwiththeirchildren.Parents identified programming of interest for the upcoming year (see table 6.5). Parent child activitiesandeducationalprogramsfor3,4,or5yearoldswereratedhighlyasinpreviousyears.Freevisionanddentalscreeningsdroppedperhapsbecausetheseservicesarenowassumed.
Table 6.3 Learning/reading materials at home, percentage of parents.
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Children’sbooks 84 97 100 100 100 100Magazinesforchildren 41 54 55 57 54 55Adultbooks 63 68 79 81 77 74Newspapers 60 58 67 65 67 69Television 83 93 97 96 94 95Homecomputer 61 74 77 77 77 78ComputerwithInternetAccess 54 64 68 68 71 71
PAGE 31
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 6.4 Activities with children, percentage of parents.
Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never NA
Readastory 86 14 0 0Playedwithtoysorplayedgames. 76 22 2 0Praisedyourchildfordoingwell. 98 2 0 0Visitedpubliclibraryormuseum. 12 40 37 11Visitedaplayground,park,orwentonapicnic 48 50 2 0
Eatamealtogetherasafamily 90 10 0 0Attendedaneventhostedbyacommunityorreligiousgroup 40 29 26 5
Sitandtalktoyourchildabouthis/herday 93 4 0 4
Table 6.5 Program interest, percentage of parents.
2004 2005 2006 2007% % % %
GED 2 1 4 2Childcare 6 10 7 3FamilyPreservation 2 0 2 0FamilyLiteracyPrograms - 9 4 3MCHIP(children’shealthinsurance) 3 1 1 2Educationalprogramsfor3,4,or5yearolds 12 13 8 12Parentingclasses 14 5 6 2Parent/childactivities 23 19 23 19Programsforchildrenwithdisabilities 12 3 2 3WIC 2 2 1 2HeadStart 3 1 2 3
Continued on next page
PAGE 32
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
FreshStart 2 2 - 3HealthyStart 2 1 1 0AdultTrainingSeminars 6 5 7 0Fathers&FamiliesProgram - 2 3 -FreeVisionand/orDentalScreenings - 17 29 9MentalHealthServicesforChildren - - 11 3FreshStartSocialSkillsGroupsforChildren - - - 9
The spring survey received fifty-three responses. The responses include four from Westernport ElementaryandninefromJohnHumbirdElementary.Theanswersaretabulatedintables6.6-6.9forallthreeschools.Table6.6andFigure6.1showthatparentsatisfactionwiththeJudy Center remains high even with the expansion to additional sites. The ninety-five percent satisfaction rating (combining “very satisfied” and “satisfied”) is higher than the eighty-nine percentstate-wideaveragesatisfactionreportedforallMarylandJudyCenters(MGTofAmerica,Inc.2003).
Table 6.6 Satisfaction with Judy Center services, percentage of parents.
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Very Satisfied 72.7 75.5 73.5 80 72 72Satisfied 36.1 21.2 18.9 22.5 17 23Somewhat Satisfied 3.3 6.1 1.9 3.1 0 4Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 0 1.9 0 0 0Not Satisfied at All 0 0 0 0 0 2Don’tknow/Confusedoruniformedabouttheservicesprovided
0 0 0 0 0 0
Don’tknow/Nofeelingaboutthecenter 0 0 1.9 0 3 0
Table 6.5 Program interest, percentage of parents.Continued from previous page
PAGE 33
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table6.7showsparentsatisfactionwithfeaturesoftheJudyCenterthatalignwiththeJudyCenter Component Standards. Figure 6.2 displays the top 10 rated areas and figure 6.3 shows thebottom10ratedareasasdeterminedbyweightingtheresponsesbythefollowingscale:(4=excellent;3=good,2=minimal,1=inadequate).
Overall,thefeaturesoftheJudyCenterwereratedhigherthisyearthanlast.Thefeaturerankingalsochanged.Thetopratedfeatureswas“screeningfordisabilities”whichhadnotappearedinthetop10lastyear.Alsonewtothelistwere“activitiesforparentsandfamilies,”“educationprogramsforfamilies,”“provisionofservicesforchildrenwithdisabilities,”and“progressreportsand follow-up conferences.” These higher ratings may reflect upgrades in services directed at childrenwithspecialneedsandenhancedfamilyactivities.Otherareassuchas“informationprovidedbyJudyCenteraboutupcomingactivities,“arrayofchildservicesforallages,”“friendliness/helpfulnessofstaffandteachers,”“hoursanddaysofJCoperation,”and“foodandnutritionassistance”haveappearedinpreviousyears.
Figure 6.1 Parent Satisfaction
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Don't Know
Not Satisfied at All
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Somewhat Satisfied
Satisfied
Very Satisfied
Percentage
May-08
May-07
May-06
May-05
May-04
May-03
May-02
PAGE 34
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Therewasahighdegreeofcontinuityinthelistofbottom10ratedfeaturesfromlastyear.Seven also appeared in last year’s list. These include: “Quality of school meals,” “Sufficiency ofspace”,“Familysupportservices/servicecoordination,”“Activitiesforlearningcomputers,”“Activitiesforlearningart,”“Activitiesforlearningnature/science,”and“Activitiesforlearningphysical education.” In part, these lower ratings may simply reflect lower levels of awareness for parents who do not need to specified service. New to this list were “Judy Center Summer Camp,”“Supervisionofchildren/discipline,”and“Activitiesforlearninglanguage/reading/writing.”Althoughthesefeatureswereamongthelowestrated,theystillwereratedas“good.”
In open-ended comments, several parents also identified a desire for additional parent and child activities (e.g., field trips, parents night out) (see Appendices A.6 and A.7).
Figure 6.2 Top 10 Performance Areas
3.5 3.55145 3.6029 3.65435 3.7058 3.75725 3.8087 3.86015
Food and nutrition assistance
Progress reports and follow-up
conferences
Hours and days of JC operation
Provision of services for children
with disabilities
Education programs for families
Friendliness/helpfulness of staff
and teachers
Activities for parents and families
Array of child services for all
Information provided by Judy Center
about upcoming activities
Screening for disabilities
Mean Rating
PAGE 35
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Figure 6.3 Bottom 10 Performance Areas
3.3 3.35 3.4 3.45 3.5 3.55 3.6 3.65 3.7
Quality of School meals
Judy Center Summer Camp
Sufficiency of space
Family support services/Service Coordination
Supervision of children/discipline
Activities for learning Computers
Activities for learning Art
Activities for learning Nature/science
Activities for learning language/reading/writing
Activities for learning Physical education
Mean Rating
Table 6.7 Satisfaction with Judy Center in performance areas, percentage of parents (E=Excellent, G=Good, M=Minimal, I=Inadequate, A=Not applicable/Not available).
(E) (G) (M) (I) (NA)HoursanddaysofJCoperation 73 21 2 0 4KidsKornerChildcareCenter 47 19 0 0 35QualityofSchoolmeals(lunch,breakfast) 49 43 2 2 4Familysupportservices/ServiceCoordination 59 27 2 2 10Arrayofchildandfamilysupportservicesonsite 62 26 0 0 6Arrayofchildservicesforallages(e.g.,infantsandtoddlers,pre-k,kindergarten) 72 22 0 0 6
Screeningfordisabilities 72 16 0 0 12Provisionofservicesforchildrenwithdisabilities 53 18 0 0 29Healthservices(e.g.,immunizations,dentalassessment,vision/hearingscreening) 71 29 0 0 0
Friendliness/helpfulnessofstaffandteachers 75 25 0 0 0
Continued on next page
PAGE 36
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Supervisionofchildren/discipline 66 30 4 0 0JudyCenterSummerCamp 27 24 0 0 49Materialsforlearningandplay 69 29 0 0 2Playactivities 69 29 0 0 2ActivitiesforlearningArt 63 29 2 0 6ActivitiesforlearningMusic 67 27 0 0 6ActivitiesforlearningPhysicaleducation 61 29 0 0 10Activitiesforlearninglanguage/reading/writing 66 32 0 0 2ActivitiesforlearningNature/science 65 33 0 0 2ActivitiesforlearningMath 65 29 0 0 6ActivitiesforlearningComputers 55 30 0 0 15Progressreportsandfollow-upconferences 75 20 3 0 3Activitiesforparentsandfamilies(e.g., field trips, picnics) 79 18 3 0 0
Educationprogramsforfamilies(e.g.,parentingworkshops,GEDclasses) 62 21 0 0 16
InformationprovidedbyJudyCenteraboutupcomingactivities 82 15 3 0 0
Foodandnutritionassistance(e.g.,WIC) 51 19 0 0 30CleanlinessandsafetyofJudyCenter 73 23 3 0 3Sufficiency of space 66 26 3 3 3
Table 6.8 shows that eighty-two percent of the parents “frequently” read flyers and newsletters whicharesenthomewiththechildren.Thisisaboutthesameaslastyear.Fifty-eightpercentreportedthatthey“frequently”attendedparent-teacherconferencewhichwasaslightincreasefromthepreviousyear.Alowerpercentageofparentsthantheprevioustwoyearsindicatedthat they had attended Judy Center after-school special events or field trips (forty-seven percent atleast“sometimes”comparedtosixty-fourpercentfor2005-06and2006-07).Nearlyfourintenparentsparticipatedinparenteducationorworkshopsduringtheyear(either“frequently,”“sometimes,”or“rarely”)whichisaboutthesameastheperiod2004-07.
Continued from previous page
Table 6.7 Satisfaction with Judy Center in performance areas, percentage of parents (E=Excellent, G=Good, M=Minimal, I=Inadequate, A=Not applicable/Not available).
PAGE 37
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Figure 6.4 Family Participation in 3+ Activities
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Perc
enta
ge
Table6.9showsparentratingsofvariousparent-childactivitiesthatwereheldduringtheyear.Levelsofparticipationintheactivitiescanbedeterminedbycomputingthepercentageofrespondentswhowereabletorateeachoftheactivities.Thenumberofparentsthatparticipatedinatleastthreeactivities(83%forparentsatBeallElementary)waslowerthanlastyear(94%)(seeFigure6.4).Thepercentagewaslowerattheothersites(38%)becausefeweractivitieswereofferedthere.Severalnewactivitieswereoffered,including:homeworknight,brainfood,autism support groups, getting ready for Kindergarten, and muffins for moms.
Table6.10indicatesthatwhenparentswerenotabletoparticipateinJudyCenteractivities,itwasgenerallynotbecauseofalackofinterestinthetopics,butratherbecauseofworkschedulesandthetimeofthescheduledactivity.
PAGE 38
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 6.8 Parent participation in Judy Center activities, percentage of parents.
Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never NA
VolunteeredattheJudyCenter 2 15 17 59 7Observedchild’sclassroomduringtheday 29 35 12 25 0
AttendedJudyCenterafter-schoolspecial events or field trips 18 29 10 25 18
Attendedparenteducationmeetingsorworkshopsaboutjobskillsorparenting? 6 15 17 35 27
Attendedaparent-teacherconference 58 21 6 8 8
Read a Judy Center flyer/newsletter 82 14 4 0 0
Table 6.9 Parent rating of Judy Center parent activities, percentage of parents.
Beall ElementaryExcellent Good Minimal Inadequate NA
FamilyLiteracyNights 38 5 0 3 54Homeworknight 17 9 0 3 71FallFamilyFunFest 31 25 0 0 44BrainFood 12 12 0 0 76Grandparent’sDay 33 17 0 3 47AutismSupportGroups 14 6 0 3 77EasterHatDecoratingDay 42 11 0 0 47PumpkinCarvingDay 25 17 0 0 58VolunteerWorkshop 17 11 0 3 69Veteran’sDayProgram 30 8 0 3 59Reading@Home/FreeBookInitiative 63 11 0 3 24
MeettheTeachersnight 57 11 0 0 33
Continued on next page
PAGE 39
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Pre-K,Multi-ageand/orKorientation 58 8 0 0 34
PTOOpenHouse 19 11 0 0 69Infantmassageclass 9 3 0 0 89FetalAlcoholSyndrome 9 3 0 0 89DownSyndromeSupportgroup 9 3 0 0 89HeadStartParentmeetings/Familyactivities/Programs 23 9 0 0
DonutsforDads 21 9 0 3 68Shriner’sCircus 65 16 3 0 16FamilySupportNetworkChristmasParty 23 6 0 3 69
ClassroomThanksgivingFeast 35 12 0 0 53FamilySupportNetworkChristmasParty 14 3 0 3 80
FamilyGameNight@BeallElementary 22 11 0 3 64
GettingReadyforKindergarten 22 11 0 0 67Muffins for Moms
John Humbird and Westernport Elementary
Excellent Good Minimal Inadequate NAReading@Home/FreeBookInitiative 75 0 0 0 25
FamilyLiteracyNights 8 33 0 0 58Shriner’sCircusFreeTickets 50 8 8 0FreeLionsClubvisionscreenings. 58 0 0 0 42
Table 6.9 Parent rating of Judy Center parent activities, percentage of parents.
Continued from previous page
PAGE 40
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 6.10 Reason for not attending parent activities, percentage of parents.
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Workschedule 61 48 37 42 32Timeofactivitywasnotconvenient 58 44 51 42 45
Notinterestedintopics 18 17 14 14 2Lackoftransportation 6 6 10 6 9Other 27 23 16 8 15
Table6.11indicatesthatparentsrecognizeimprovementsinmostchildlearningandhabitsbecauseoftheJudyCenter.Threeinfourparentsreport“much”improvementincountingnumbers.Eightintensawimprovementinrecognizinglettersofthealphabet.Sevenintenobserved“much”improvementinwriting,drawingandvocabulary.Approximatelytwothirdssawimprovementsinchildhygiene,includingwashinghandsandbrushingteeth.Theseimprovementsarecomparabletopreviousyears.
Table 6.11 Improvement in child learning and habits because of the Judy Center, percentage of parents.
Much A little Not at All NACountingnumbers 75 22 0 4Recognizinglettersofthealphabet 79 15 0 6Writing 68 22 0 10Drawing 71 26 0 4Speakingandarticulation 59 35 6 0Vocabulary 68 30 2 0Eatingnutritiousandhealthymeals 47 47 2 4Exercising 59 33 0 8Washinghandsbeforemealsafterusingtoilet 63 31 0 6Brushingteeth 69 22 0 8
PAGE 41
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Abeforeandafterstudyofacohortof19respondentswhohadrepliedtobothfallandspringsurveyswasconductedinordertoanalyzetheeffectoftheJudyCenteronfamilyresourcesandinteractioninthehome.Table6.12showschangesinlearning/readingmaterialsandtable6.13shows changes in parent-child interaction. Statistically significant changes using a pairwise t-testofmeansareindicatedbyasterisks.Althoughparentresourcesincreasedinallbuttwoareas(children’sbooksandtelevisionremainedthesame)noneofthedifferenceswasstatisticallysignificant. Seven of the parent-child interaction factors increased. Two of the positive results were statistically significant--parents were more likely to have visited a public library or museum ortohavevisitedaplayground,park,orgoonapicnicafterinvolvementwiththeJudyCenter.
Table 6.12 Learning/reading materials at home before and after Judy Center, percentage of parents.
Before AfterChildren’sbooks 100 100Magazinesforchildren 42.1 47.4Adultbooks 68.4 78.9Newspapers 68.4 73.7Television 94.7 94.7Homecomputer 68.4 78.9ComputerwithInternetAccess 47.4 63.2
Table 6.13 Activities with children, percentage of parents who did “frequently” before and after Judy Center.
Before After
Readastory 89.5 94.7Playedwithtoysorplayedgames 73.7 84.2Praisedyourchildfordoingwell 100 100Visitedpubliclibraryormuseum 10.5 36.8*Visitedaplayground,park,orwentonapicnic 42.1 84.2***Eatamealtogetherasafamily 89.5 94.7Attendedaneventhostedbyacommunityorreligiousgroup 36.8 47.4Sitandtalktochildabouthis/herday 94.7 100*α=.10,**α=.05,***α=.01
PAGE 42
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
7.0 Child Readiness
TheACBOE2007-08JudyCenterContinuationGrantproposaloutlinedseveralchilddevelopmentobjectivesandmilestonesforFY2008.Theyareasfollows:
Goal #1
ByJune30,2008,90%ofallexitingkindergartenstudentsattheJudyCenterwillachievefullreadinesslevelintheareaofSocialandEmotionalDevelopmentasdeterminedbytheWorkSamplingSystemindicators.
Objectives
1. ByJune30,2008,80%ofexitingkindergartenstudentsattheJudyCenterwhoreceiveFreeandReducedMeals(FARMS)willachievefullreadinesslevelintheareaofSocialandEmotionalDevelopmentasdeterminedbytheWorkSamplingSystemindicators.
2. ByJune30,2008,45%ofexitingkindergartenstudentsattheJCwhoreceiveSpecialEducationserviceswillachievefullreadinesslevelintheareaofSocialandEmotionalDevelopmentasdeterminedbytheWorkSamplingSystemindicators
Goal #2
ByJune30,2008,88%ofexitingkindergartenstudentsattheJudyCenterwillachievefullreadinesslevelintheLanguageandLiteracyassessedareaoftheWorkSamplingSystemindicators.
Objective
ByJune30,2008,80%ofexitingFARMSkindergartenstudentsattheJudyCenterwillachievefullreadinessintheLanguageandLiteracyassessedareaoftheWorkSamplingSystem.
ThedatasourcefortheseindicatorsistheAlleganyCountyBoardofEducationKindergartenPupilProgressReportwhichusestheWorkSamplingSystem(WSS)andisalignedwith30MMSRindicatorsthataredividedintosevendomains(SocialandPersonal,LanguageandLiteracy, Mathematical Thinking, Scientific Thinking, Social Studies, The Arts, and Physical
PAGE 43
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Figure 7.1 Kindergarten Readiness by Domain, 2007
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Social and Personal
Language and Literacy
Mathematical Thinking
Scientific Thinking
Social Studies
The Arts
Physical Development
Composite
Percentage
All
FARM
Special Ed.
Development) and that measure pupil readiness with three levels of progress: (3) “Proficient,” (3)“Inprocess,”or(1)“NeedsDevelopment.”Individualdomainscoresareobtainedfromaggregatingdomainindicatorsandacompositescoreisanaggregationofall30MMSRindicators.Threereadinesscategoriesareassignedbasedontheaggregatedscore:“full”readiness,“approaching”readiness,and“developing”readiness.
Judy Center Kindergarten pupils arrived at school with high readiness levels (see figure 7.1). FARMS andSpecialeducationreadinesslaggedbehindotherstudents.Figure7.2indicatesthatJudyCenterpupilsoutperformedtheirpeersintheCountyandStateintermsofoverallreadiness.However,JohnHumbird pupils lagged Allegany County as a whole. After the first progress report period, eighty percentofchildrenwerefullypreparedcomparedtoseventy-sevenpercentforAlleganyCountyandsixty-eightpercentfortheState.Amongindividualdomains,JudyCenterpupilreadinesslevelsexceedtheStateandCountyineverydomainexceptmathematicalthinking(seeFigure7.3).
PupilprogressreportresultsforstudentswhobeganandendedtheyearattheJudyCenterwerealsohigh(thecompositescorewas89%attheendattheendoftheyear.ForstudentswhoreceivedFreeandReducedMeals(FARMS),overallreadinesswas84%attheendoftheyear(seeFigure7.4).Forstudentswhoreceivedspecialeducationservices,readinesswas82%attheendtheyear.Thereadinesslevelforsocialstudieswasquitelow—only43%.However,
PAGE 45
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
PAGE 46
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
Maryland
Allegany
Beall Elem.
John Humbird
Westernport
All Judy Center
Figure 7.2 Kindergarten Readiness, Judy Center, County, and State
Full
Approaching
Developing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percentage
Social and Personal
Language and Literacy
Mathematical Thinking
Scientific Thinking
Social Studies
The Arts
Physical Development
Composite
Figure 7.3 Kindergarten Readiness by Domain, Judy Center, County, and State
Md
Allegany
Judy Center
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
thisindicatorwasplaguedwithaproblemofmissingprogressreportdata–manychildrenwerenotassessedforoneindicatorwithinthedomain.Whetherthiswasanerrorintroducedbythekeypunchingofpupilprogressdataorwhetherthesestudentswerenotassessedcannotyetbedetermined.However,morecarefulattentionshouldbepaidtothismatter.Missingdatawas also found for several students and indicators for the language and literacy and scientific understanding domains. The missing data for five students in the language and literacy domain mayhaveimpactedthenon-achievementofthesecondgoalofthegrantintheareaoflanguageandliteracy.
Usingthedataavailable,itcouldbedeterminedthattheactivitiesusedtoincreasethereadinesslevelofFARMSchildreninthedomainsofSocialandPersonalweresuccessfulinachievingmilestones.TheentireJudyCentercohort,FARMSstudentsandSpecialEducationstudentsachievedtheirmilestones.However,themilestonesestablishedforLanguageandLiteracywerenotreached.ForFARMSstudents,LanguageandLiteracyreadinessimprovedfrom57%to77%,whichfellshortof80%.Also,thegoalof88%readinessbyallstudentsadvancedfrom65% in the first quarter to only 83% in the final quarter.
Figure 7.4 Period 4 Full Readiness by Domain
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Social and Personal
Language and Literacy
Mathematical Thinking
Scientific Thinking
Social Studies
The Arts
Physical Development
Composite
Percentage
All
FARMS
Special Ed.
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
8.0 Special Research Questions
Aspartofthe2007-08JudyCentercontinuationgrantapplication,theAlleganyCountyBoardofEducationposedtwoquestionsabouttheproceduresandeffectivenessoftheCenter.Thequestionsandanswersarearrangedasfollows:
• How has the introduction of Judy Center activities at the expanded elementary schools, John Humbird and Westernport, impacted those locations in terms of the various outcomes measures?
Figure7.2shownaboveshowsreadinesslevelsandprogressreportchangesduringtheschoolyearforJohnHumbird,Westernport,BeallandallAlleganyCountyschools.WhileBeallandWesternportbeganabovedistrictaverages,JohnHumbirdlaggedbehindthedistrictaverage.However, this result is mainly a result of the socioeconomic backgrounds of students reflected in the percentage of students receiving free and reduced school lunch. Eighty-five percent of John HumbirdElementaryKindergartenstudentsreceivedfreeandreducedschoollunchversussixty-four percent for Beall Elementary and forty-five percent for Westernport Elementary.
Table8.1showsparentalresponsestothespringparentsurveyquestionregardinghowmuchchildlearningandhabitsimprovedduringtheschoolyear.Thepercentagereporting“much”improvementforvariousoutcomeswasbroadlysimilaramongtheschools.BecauserelativelylownumbersofparentsreportedforJohnHumbird(9parents)andWesternport(4parents),statistically significance tests are not described.
PAGE 47
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 8.1 Parents reporting “much” improvement in child learning and habits because of the Judy Center, Beall, John Humbird, and Westernport Elementary, percentage of Parents.
All Beall John Humbird Westernport
Countingnumbers 75 74 78 75Recognizinglettersofthealphabet 79 79 78 75Writing 68 68 67 75Drawing 71 68 78 75Speakingandarticulation 59 58 56 75Vocabulary 68 70 56 75Eatingnutritiousandhealthymeals 47 46 50 50Exercising 59 62 50 50Washinghandsbeforemealsafterusingtoilet 63 59 75 75
Brushingteeth 69 55 88 75
• What has been the effect on children who participated in summer JC activities versus those who do not (controlling for enrollment in FARMS and Special Education?)
NinestudentsfromtheBeallElementary2007-08KindergartenclasswereenrolledinJudyCentersummercampandforty-twowerenot.Table8.1showsaregressionanalysisofperiod1readiness(i.e.,thecompositescore)againstSUMMER(adummyvariablerepresenting1ifthestudentattendedsummercampand0otherwise),FARMS(adummyvariablerepresenting1ifthestudentreceivedfreeorreducedlunchand0otherwise),andSPECED(adummyvariablerepresenting1ifthestudentwasenrolledinspecialeducationor0otherwise).Studentsreceivingfreeorreducedschoollunchcamewithlowerlevelsofreadinessthanotherstudents.However,oncethisfactoriscontrolledfor,specialeducationandsummercampstudentsreadiness levels were not statistically significantly different.
PAGE 48
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Table 8.2 Regression analysis of child readiness for Beall Elementary School
Variable Coef. Std. Err. T P>|t|SPECED -1.155319 5.709583 -0.20 0.841FARMS -7.329787 2.836265 -2.58 0.013SUMMER 2.682979 3.497229 0.77 0.447CONSTANT 82.25745 2.246179 36.62 0.000
9.0 Changes Introduced
TheJudyCenterwillmaintaintheprogrammingandactivitiesthatwerecontinuedand/orintroduced during the fiscal year 08 funding cycle. The basic model and areas of emphasis on FARMSandSpecialEducationpupilswillcontinue(detailscanbefoundinAlleganyCountyBoardofEducation2008).Asinmostpreviousyears,thestrategieswillfocusonthedomainsofLanguageandLiteracyandSocialandEmotionaldevelopment.Also,theJudyCenterwillcontinuetoofferservicesatJohnHumbirdElementarySchool.However,theprogramwillnotbecontinuedatWesternportElementaryduetoalackofparentalsupport.Amongtheneworexpandedactivitiestobeconductedduringtheyeararethefollowing:
Expanded Childcare. TheJudyCenterwillexpandBeallElementarychildcarebylicensinganotherroom.
Expanded Family Literacy Night Support. TheJudyCenterwillcommitanadditionalteachertoFamilyLiteraryNightsthroughouttheregularschoolyearandpayformaterials.
Fresh Step Mental Health Groups. TheJudyCenterwillofferscholarshipstochildreninvolvedintheFreshStepMentalHealthGroupsintheeventthattheycannotpayfortheserviceswithinsurance.
Parents as Teachers Program.TheYMCAwillofferitsParentsasTeachersProgramattheJudyCenter.Thisprogramprovidesparent/childactivitiesforfamiliesthathavechildrenagedinfantstothreeyearolds.
PAGE 49
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
Infant Parent Institute.TheJudyCenterwillhostMichaelTroutoftheInfantParentInstitutetoprovidestaffstrainingfor20teachersina2-dayworkshop.TheInfantParentInstituteisnationallyknownforitstraininginissuesrelatedtodistressedfamilies,infants,andmentalhealthissues.
Annual Kindergarten Conference. TheJudyCenterwillsponsorKindergartenandPre-Kteacherstoattendtheannualkindergartenconferenceinsupportofthegoalsforthegrant.
Improve Teacher Coordination. Pre-K,Multi-ageandKindergartenteacherswillmeet2hourseachmonthafterschoolforplanningpurposes.
Interact Story Theatre. TheInteractStoryTheatrewillgointoclassroomsatBeallandJohnHumbirdElementaryschoolstoprovideworkshopsandgiveperformancestochildreninKindergarten,Pre-K,andHeadStart.Theseactivitieswillhelpbuildchildlanguageandliteracyskills.
Field Trips. The Judy Center will pay for Judy Center students to go on field trips thatsupportbuildinglanguage/literacyandsocial/emotionalskills.
PAGE 50
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
10.0 Summary and conclusions
Theseventhfundingcycle(FY2008)fortheBeallElementaryJudyCentercontinuedthemodeldevelopedduringthepreviousyear,includingactivitiesdesignedtoenhancechildreadinessintargetedcategoriesofstudents(FARMSandSpecialEducation)andthesocialandpersonalandlanguageandliteracydomains.ThefundingcyclewasthesecondyearforactivitiesintroducedatJohnHumbirdandWesternportelementaryschools.Inaddition,theJudyCenterinconjunctionwiththeBoardofEducationestablishedtwonewchildcarecentersinFlintstoneandCashValleyelementaryschools.Also,GEDclasseswereintroducedatJohnHumbirdElementaryandWesternportElementary.Onegoal(inthesocialandpersonaldomain)andtwoobjectivesestablishedinthegrantcontinuationapplicationweremet.Anothergoalintheareaoflanguageandliteracywasnotmet.Theactivitieswerecarriedoutasoutlinedintheoriginalcontinuing grant application with some modifications due to changing circumstances.
Partnersurveysindicatearelativelyhighdegreeofparticipationandcooperation.StaffandparentsurveyscontinuetoshowastrongsatisfactionwiththeBeallElementaryJudyCenter.TeacherscontinuetoagreethattheamountofresourcesandcooperationavailableatBeallElementary were good, and teachers were satisfied with the Judy Center. Parent satisfaction levelsremainedhighinthecurrentsurveyandareabovestateJudyCenterstatewideaverages.ParentswereslightlylesslikelytoparticipateinJudyCenterfamilyactivitiesthaninpreviousyears.Parentsrecognizedimprovementsintheirchildren’slearninganddevelopmentduringtheyear.Abefore/afterstudyofparentalresponsesshowsthatfamilyactivitieswerestrengthenedduringtheyear.
ProgressreportresultsfromtheAlleganyCountyBoardofEducationdataindicatethatchildreadinessimprovedduringtheyear.Schoolreadinessforeachofthetargetedgroups(i.e.,studentsreceivingfreeandreducedschoolmeals,studentsreceivingSpecialEducationservices)improved. However, there was not sufficient evidence that the strategies for the Language and Literacy domains were sufficient to achieve the expected levels.
PAGE 51
Judy Center EvaluationJuly 2007-June 2008
REFERENCES
AlleganyCountyBoardofEducation.2007.ContinuationGrantApplicationforJudithP.HoyerEarlyChildCareandEducationCenterGrants(JudyCenters).(June2007)
AlleganyCountyBoardofEducation.2007.ContinuationGrantApplicationforJudithP.HoyerEarlyChildCareandEducationCenterGrants(JudyCenters).(June2008)
eQuotient,Inc.2007.AlleganyCountyJudyCenterEvaluation:July2006-June2007.Cumberland,MD:eQuotient,Inc.
MarylandStateDepartmentofEducation.2008.ChildrenEnteringSchoolReadytoLearn:SchoolReadinessInformation.Baltimore:MSDE.
MGTofAmerica,Inc.2004.JudithP.HoyerEarlyChildCareandEducationEnhancementProgramEvaluation:FinalResultsBrief.
PAGE 52
A.1 Partner Survey Instrument
PAGE 54
Judy Center Allegany County Public Schools
3 College Ave. Frostburg, Md. 21532
301-689-8489 Partner Survey Spring 2008 1. How active have you been with the Judy Center team? _____ Very active _____ Somewhat active _____ Not very active _____ Inactive 2. If you have not been very active, is there a specific reason, or is there something that could be changed that would allow you to be a more active participant? 3. The following factors have an effect on collaboration success. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements:
(A) Agree (D) Disagree _____ The composition of the Case Management team was “right” for this program _____ The composition of the Steering Committee members is appropriate for making Judy Center decisions. _____ The Judy Center staff communicated openly and clearly during meetings _____ The Judy Center staff communicated openly and clearly between meetings _____ Member of the Judy Center staff established informal communication networks (E-mail communication, phone calls, etc.) _____ Members of the Judy Center staff have relationships built on trust and mutual respect. _____ I understand the goals and objectives of the Judy Center project _____ I understand my roles and responsibilities as a member of this project _____ The Judy Center team has clear and effective decision making procedures 4. Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements (A) Agree (D) Disagree _____ a. Community awareness of the Judy Center has increased in the past year. _____ b. Resources for this project were adequate to meet objectives _____ c. The strategies of this grant have been implemented. _____ d. The strategies of this grant are demonstrating positive outcomes
If you indicated that you disagree, please explain: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. How do you rate the Judy Center in each of the performance areas listed below? Please use the following scale:
(4) (3) (2) (1) (0) Excellent Good Minimal Inadequate NA/Don’t know
_____ a. Hours and days of JC operation _____ b. Child care before or after day _____ c. Quality of School meals (lunch, breakfast) _____ d. Family case management _____ e. Array of child and family support services on site _____ f. Array of child services for all ages (e.g., infants and toddlers, pre-k, kindergarten) _____ g. Screening for disabilities _____ h. Provision of services for children with disabilities _____ i. Health services (e.g., immunizations, dental assessment, vision/hearing screening) _____ j. Friendliness/helpfulness of staff and teachers _____ k. Supervision of children/discipline _____ l. Materials for learning and play _____ m. Play activities _____ n. Activities for learning Art _____ o. Activities for learning Music _____ p. Activities for learning Physical education _____ q. Activities for learning language/reading/writing _____ r. Activities for learning Nature/science _____ s. Activities for learning Math _____ t. Activities for learning Computers _____ u. Progress reports and follow-up conferences _____ v. Activities for parents and families (e.g., field trips, picnics) _____ w. Education programs for families (e.g., parenting workshops, GED classes) _____ x. Information provided by Judy Center about upcoming activities _____ y. Judy Center webpage _____ z. Food and nutrition assistance (e.g., WIC) _____ aa. Cleanliness and safety of Judy Center _____ bb. Sufficiency of space _____ cc. Other (please describe _______________)
6. Has involvement as a partner with the Judy Center been cost-effective for your organization? _____ Yes _____ No 7. How satisfied are you overall with the Judy Center? _____ Very Satisfied _____ Satisfied _____ Somewhat Satisfied _____ Somewhat Dissatisfied _____ Not satisfied at all 8. Is there anything that could be done differently regarding the education of children? 0-5, and family services? 9. We have now expanded the Judy Center services into John Humbird and Westernport
schools. GED classes, behavior support services, family literacy projects, and vision screenings are currently being offered in each Judy Center school. Dental screenings were conducted in Beall and John Humbird.
a. Do you have any suggestions as to what additional services we should
offer these schools?
b. If appropriate, would your agency be willing to provide services in these Judy Center schools?
10. Do you think that your families who have had children involved with the Judy Center benefited more than families whose children were not involved with the Judy Center? If so, how? If not, why?
11. Do you have any additional comments or suggestions? ________________________________________ ________________ Name & Agency Date
A.2 Partner Comments
PAGE 56
Do you think that your families who have had children involved with the Judy Center benefited more than families whose children were not involved with the Judy Center? If so, how? If not, why?
HealthyStarthasalwaysreceivedgoodfeedbackwhenquestioningclientsaboutJudyCenterservicesduringourhomevisits.HealthyStartfeelstheJudyCenterhasofferedfamiliestremendous,invaluableopportunitieswiththeirparentingworkshops,GEDavailabilityandfamilyliteracyprojects.Theseprogramscanmakeadifferenceinafamily’soutcome.Weascommunityagenciescanoffermanyopportunitiestohelpfamiliessucceedbutitisthefamilythathastobecomeawillingpartner.
IhavenotspokendirectlytotheparentsbutIwouldsayhavinganypreschoolsituationforchildrenwould be beneficial to the families. Many cases this is the first educational situation for the children andthefamilies.
Yes.ExtramonetaryhelpwithHolidayParty.Booksforourchildren.
Yes.Familiesweremoreawareofresourcesandsupportsavailabletothem.
Do you have any additional comments or suggestions?
SometimesIthinktherearetoomanyagenciesinvolvedandthefamiliesbecomeoverwhelmedwithservices.TheJudyCenterhastheabilityanddoesoffermanyservicesunderoneroofwhichissuchapositiveimpactforrenderingservices.I’mnotsuretheresultsofyoureveningprogramsoffhand,butHealthyStarthasalwaysfoundthattransportationhasbeenanoverallcommunityneedforourlow income clients which makes it difficult to attend extra activities.
CurrentlytheAdultEd/GEDclassroomistoosmallofanareaforouradultstudentstouse.Theareaiscrampedandourprogramisinneedofalargerareatoholdboththemorningandeveningclass.Also,theclassislocatedtooclosetothechildcarechangingtablewhichcausesproblemsonoccasion.
ThankstotheJudyCenterforhelpandsupport.
PAGE 58
A.3 Pre-K/Kindergarten Staff Survey
PAGE 60
Teacher Survey, 2008 (Pre-K, Multi-age and Kindergarten) 1. Years Teaching - How many years have you been teaching?
_____ 1-2 _____ 3-5 _____ 5-10 _____ 11-15 _____ 16 or more
2. Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following using the following numerical scale: (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Not Satisfied _____ Quality of classroom equipment _____ Quality of facilities _____ Size of classes _____ Administrative support _____ Professional Development opportunities _____ Collaboration with other teachers _____ Collaboration with early childhood agencies _____ Level of parental involvement in children’s education. _____ Other (please indicate _______________) 3. How do you rate the Judy Center in each of the following performance areas? Please use the following scale:
(4) (3) (2) (1) (0)
Excellent Good Minimal Inadequate NA/Don’t know _____ a. Hours and days of JC operation _____ b. Child care before-or-after day _____ c. Quality of School meals (lunch, breakfast) _____ d. Family case management _____ e. Array of child and family support services on site _____ f. Array of child services for all ages (e.g., Infants and Toddlers, Pre-K, Kindergarten, Head Start, Multi-age, Childcare, WIC) _____ g. Screening for disabilities
The Judy Center Allegany County
Beall Elementary School 3 College Ave.
Frostburg, Md. 21532 301-689-8489
_____ h. Provision of services for children with disabilities _____ i. Health services (e.g., immunizations, dental assessment, vision/hearing screening) _____ j. Friendliness/helpfulness of staff and teachers _____ k. Supervision of children/discipline _____ l. Materials for learning and play _____ m. Play activities _____ n. Activities for learning Art _____ o. Activities for learning Music _____ p. Activities for learning Physical education _____ q. Activities for learning language/reading/writing _____ r. Activities for learning Nature/science _____ s. Activities for learning Math _____ t. Activities for learning Computers _____ u. Progress reports and follow-up conferences _____ v. Activities for parents and families (e.g., field trips, picnics) _____ w. Education programs for families (e.g., parenting workshops, GED classes) _____ x. Information provided by Judy Center about upcoming activities (fliers) _____ y. Judy Center newsletter _____ z. Food and nutrition assistance (e.g., WIC) _____ aa. Cleanliness and safety of Judy Center _____ bb. Sufficiency of space _____ cc. Other (please describe _______________) 4. What do you feel is the most common feeling of the families you serve in regards to the Judy Center? Please choose one that best represents the feeling of the population you serve. _____ Very Satisfied _____ Satisfied _____ Somewhat Satisfied _____ Somewhat Dissatisfied _____ Not Satisfied at All _____ Don’t Know 5. What activities could be added to the Judy Center to further its goal? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A.4 First-Grade Staff Survey
PAGE 62
Teacher Survey 2008, First Grade Teachers
1. Years Teaching - How many years have you been teaching? _____ 1-2 _____ 3-5 _____ 5-10 _____ 11-15 _____ 16 or more 2. Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following aspects of Beall Elementary using the following numerical scale: (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Not Satisfied _____ Quality of classroom equipment _____ Quality of facilities _____ Size of classes _____ Administrative support _____ Professional Development opportunities _____ Collaboration with other teachers _____ Collaboration with other early childhood agencies _____ Level of parental involvement in children’s education. _____ Other (please indicate _______________)
3. How many of your current students were enrolled in Beall Elementary kindergarten last year? __________
The Judy Center Allegany County
Beall Elementary School 3 College Ave.
Frostburg, Md. 21532 301-689-8489
4. How satisfied are you with the readiness of these students for first grade (check one). _____ Very Satisfied _____ Satisfied _____ Somewhat Satisfied _____ Somewhat Dissatisfied _____ Not Satisfied at All _____ Don’t Know Please explain ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. From what you know about the Judy Center, how do you rate it in each of the performance areas listed below? Please use the following scale:
(4) (3) (2) (1) (0)
Excellent Good Minimal Inadequate NA/Don’t know _____ a. Hours and days of JC operation _____ b. Child care before or after day _____ c. Quality of School meals (lunch, breakfast) _____ d. Family case management _____ e. Array of child and family support services on site _____ f. Array of child services for all ages (e.g., infants and toddlers, pre-k,
kindergarten) _____ g. Screening for disabilities _____ h. Provision of services for children with disabilities _____ i. Health services (e.g., immunizations, dental screenings, vision/hearing screening) _____ j. Friendliness/helpfulness of staff and teachers _____ k. Supervision of children/discipline _____ l. Materials for learning and play _____ m. Play activities _____ n. Activities for learning Art _____ o. Activities for learning Music _____ p. Activities for learning Physical education _____ q. Activities for learning language/reading/writing _____ r. Activities for learning Nature/science _____ s. Activities for learning Math _____ t. Activities for learning Computers _____ u. Progress reports and follow-up conferences _____ v. Activities for parents and families (e.g., field trips, picnics) _____ w. Education programs for families (e.g., parenting workshops, GED classes)
_____ x. Information provided by Judy Center about upcoming activities _____ y. Judy Center webpage _____ z. Food and nutrition assistance (e.g., WIC) _____ aa. Cleanliness and safety of Judy Center _____ bb. Sufficiency of space _____ cc. Other (please describe _______________) 6. What do you feel is the most common feeling of the families you serve in regards to the Judy Center? Please check one that best represents the feeling of the population you serve. _____ Very Satisfied _____ Satisfied _____ Somewhat Satisfied _____ Somewhat Dissatisfied _____ Not Satisfied at All _____ Don’t Know 7. How do you feel about the Judy Center? _____ Very Satisfied _____ Satisfied _____ Somewhat Satisfied _____ Somewhat Dissatisfied _____ Not Satisfied at All 8. What activities could be added to the Judy Center to further its goal? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A.5 Fall Parent Survey
PAGE 64
The Judy Center Allegany County Public Schools
3 College Ave. Frostburg, Md. 21532
301-689-8489
(Last Four Digits of the Social Security Number of the Person Completing this Form – for tracking purposes only)
JUDY CENTER PARENT SURVEY A. Family Background Information: 1. Age of person completing this form: ________ 2. Gender: Male Female 3. Employed: Employed full-time Employed Part-time
Not employed, but currently seeking work Not employed and not seeking work Homemaker Other (Please describe _____________)
4. Marital Status: Married
Single Divorced Widowed/Widower
5. Educational level: Some high school
High school diploma GED
______Some College Associates Degree
Bachelor’s degree or higher 6. Does your family: ____Own your home? Rent _____ Live with relatives Other (Please describe ____________________________________) B. Program Use Information: 1. Number of children enrolled in Judy Center programs: _________
(Pre-K, Multi-age classroom, Kindergarten, Kids Korner Childcare, Head Start, Infants & Toddlers Program) Ages of children enrolled in Judy Center Programs: ________________________
2. My child/children/family use the following Judy Center programs: (check all that apply)
Kindergarten Preschool Partners (Autistic Classroom) 4-year old Pre-K GED 3 & 4-year old Multi-age classroom ______ Mental Health Programs (Health Dept.) Head Start WIC Infant and Toddler __School closing childcare ____ Frostburg Library Family Nights _ During school childcare ____ Family Junction __Before school childcare ____ Family Literacy Programs __After school childcare _____Healthy Start (Health Dept) ______Summer Childcare _____YMCA Parent Power ______ Family Preservation (DSS) ____ Computer Classes English as Second Language Preschool Special Education School Lunch Free Dental Screenings School Breakfast Free Vision Screenings ______ Support Groups (ADHD, Preemie ____ Family Preservation (DSS) Babies, Downs Syndrome) ____ Special Education Services Other (Please describe) _______________ Family Support Network ________________________________________ C. Family Resources: 1. Check all of the following learning/reading materials that you have at home: a. Children’s books (Please let the Judy Center know if you need more children’s books) b. Magazines for children c. Adult books d. Newspapers e. Television f. Home computer g. Computer with Internet Access h. Other (please describe _______________________) 2. How often do you participate in the following activities with your child (children)? Frequently(F) Sometimes(S) Rarely(R) Never(N) Does Not Apply (NA) a. Read a story with your child b. Play with toys or play games with your child c. Praise your child for doing well d. ____ Visit the public library or museum with your child e. ____ Visit a playground, park, or go on a picnic or walk with your child f. ____ Eat a meal together as a family g. ____ Attend an event with your child that is hosted by a community or religious group h. ____ Sit and talk to your child about his/her day i. Other (please describe ___________________________________)
3. How often do you anticipate participating in the following? Frequently (F) Sometimes (S) Rarely (R) Never (N) Does Not Apply (NA) a. ____Visit your child’s school b. ____Volunteer at your child’s school c. ____ Attend Parent/Teacher Conferences d. ____ Communicate with your child’s teacher e. ____ Attend a parent activity during school hours at the Judy Center f. ____ Attend an evening parent activity at the Judy Center
D. Child information: 1. Do any of your children have special needs or disabilities (e.g., physical, emotional, speech or language, hearing, vision, learning problems, serious health problems)? Yes* No I don’t know *If so, please describe: ____________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 2. In the past week, how many hours a day did your child watch TV? _________ 3. Does your child have a library card? __________ 4. Approximately how many children’s books do you have in your home? __________ 5. Would you like to find out how you can get free books for your children? ________
E. Judy Center Information: 1. I would like information on the following Judy Center services: ______ GED/Adult Education Classes _____ Mental Health Services for Children Childcare _____ Adult Training Seminars Family Preservation _____ Fathers & Families Program Family Literacy Programs _____ Education programs for 3, 4, or 5 year olds ______ Parenting classes _____ Healthy Start (birth – 3-yr. old program) ______ Parent/child activities _____ Fathers & Families Program ______ WIC _____ Free Vision and/or Dental Screenings ______ Head Start _____ Programs for children with disabilities ______ MCHIP (children’s health insurance) ______ Other (Please identify __________________________________________________) 2. I would like to see the Judy Center provide: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 3. Do you have any comments or questions about the Judy Center? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ My name is: ____________________________ Phone number: __________________ ONLY NECESSARY IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey!
A.6 Spring Parent Survey
PAGE 66
Judy Center Allegany County Public Schools
3 College Ave. Frostburg, Md. 21532
301-689-8489 JUDY CENTER PARENT SURVEY Spring 2008
(Last Four Digits of the Social Security Number of the Person Completing this Form – for tracking purposes only) 1. How satisfied are you with the services at the Judy Center? (check one) _____ Very Satisfied _____ Satisfied _____ Somewhat Satisfied _____ Somewhat Dissatisfied _____ Not Satisfied at All _____ Don’t know/Confused or uninformed about the services provided _____ Don’t know/No feeling about the center 2. How do you rate the Judy Center in each of the following performance areas? (E) Excellent (G) Good (M) Minimal (I) Inadequate (NA) Not Applicable _____ a. Hours and days of Judy Center operation _____ b. Kids Korner Childcare Center, if applicable _____ c. Quality of school meals (lunch, breakfast) _____ d. Family case management _____ e. Array of child and family support services on site _____ f. Array of child services for all ages (e.g., Infants and Toddlers Program, Pre-K,
Multi-age, Kindergarten, Head Start, Kids Korner Childcare Center) _____ g. Screening for disabilities _____ h. Provision of services for children with disabilities _____ i. Health services (e.g., immunizations, dental assessment, vision/hearing screening) _____ j. Friendliness/helpfulness of staff and teachers _____ k. Supervision of children/discipline _____ l. Judy Center Summer Camp _____ m. Materials for learning and play _____ n. Play activities _____ o. Activities for learning Art _____ p. Activities for learning Music
_____ q. Activities for learning Physical Education _____ r. Activities for learning Language/Reading/Writing _____ s. Activities for learning Nature/science _____ t. Activities for learning Math _____ u. Activities for learning Computers _____ v. Progress reports and follow-up conferences _____ w. Activities for parents and families (e.g., field trips, picnics, family literacy activities, circus tickets) _____x. Education programs for families (e.g., parenting workshops, GED classes) _____ y. Information provided by Judy Center about upcoming activities (Judy Center
newsletter) _____ aa. Food and nutrition assistance (e.g., WIC) _____ bb. Cleanliness and safety of Judy Center _____ cc. Sufficiency of space _____ dd. Other (please describe ___________________________________) 3. Family participation. How often have you done the following? (F) Frequently (S) Sometimes (R) Rarely (N) Never (NA) Not applicable _____ a. Volunteered at the Judy Center _____ b. Observed in your child’s classroom or participated in a parent/child activity
during the day _____ c. Attended Judy Center after-school special events or field trips _____ d. Attended parent education meetings or workshops about job skills or parenting? _____ e. Attended a parent-teacher conference _____ f. Read a Judy Center flyer, newsletter or information in the Beall-a-Bration
newsletter _____ g. Other (Please describe _______________________________________) 4. Have your child’s habits and/or abilities improved at home in the following areas because of the Judy Center? (M) Much (L) A little (N) Not at All (NA) Not applicable _____ a. Counting numbers _____ b. Recognizing letters of the alphabet _____ c. Writing _____ d. Drawing _____ e. Speaking and articulation _____ f. Vocabulary _____ g. Eating nutritious and healthy meals _____ h. Exercising _____ i. Washing hands before meals and after using toilet _____ j. Brushing teeth _____ k. Other (please describe __________________________________________
5. Check any of the following learning/reading materials that you have at home: _____a. Children’s books _____b. Magazines for children _____c. Adult books _____d. Newspapers _____e. Television _____f. Home computer _____g. Computer with Internet Access _____h. Other (please describe ____________________) 6. How often do you participate in the following activities with your child (children)? (F)Frequently (S)Sometimes (R)Rarely (N)Never (NA)Does Not Apply _____a. Read a story with your child _____b. Play with toys or play games with your child _____c. Praise your child for doing well _____d. Visit the public library or museum with your child _____e. Visit a playground, park, or go on a picnic or walk with your child _____f. Eat a meal together as a family _____g. Attend an event with your child that is hosted by a community or religious group _____h. Sit and talk to your child about his/her day _____i. Other (please describe ___________________________________) 7. Please rate the following Judy Center parent activities offered during this year: (E) Excellent (G) Good (M) Minimal (I) Inadequate (NA) Not Applicable/
Did not attend _____ a. Bullying workshop/Developmental Assets training _____ b. Letter of Intent workshop for special needs students _____ c. Fall Family Fun Fest _____ d. Family Literacy Night Program _____ e. Grandparent’s Day _____ f. Family Movie Night _____ g. Easter Hat Decorating Day _____ h. Pumpkin Carving Day _____ i. Volunteer workshop _____ j. Veteran’s Day Program _____ k. Reading @ Home/Free Book Initiative _____ l. Meet the Teachers night _____ m. Pre-K, Multi-age and/or K orientation _____ n. PTO Open House _____ o. Infant massage class _____ p. Family Support Group summer picnic _____ q. Down Syndrome Support group _____ s. Head Start Parent meetings/Family activities/Programs
_____ t. Donuts for Dads _____ u. Shriner’s Circus _____ v. Family Support Network Christmas Party _____ w. Classroom Thanksgiving Feast _____ x. Family Support Group Mom’s Night Out _____ y. Family Game Night @ Beall Elementary _____ z. Make-and-take activity for Pre-K & Multi-age _____ aa. Other (please identify _____________________________) 8. If you did not attend any parent activities during the year, please indicate below any reasons that you did not attend. (Check all that apply) _____ a. Time of activity was not convenient _____ b. Work schedule _____ c. Not interested in topics _____ d. Lack of transportation _____ e. Other (please describe _________________________________) 9. In what ways has the Judy Center helped your child? 10. In what ways has the Judy Center helped you and/or other members of your family? 11. What activities would you like to see added at the Judy Center for your child and/or family?
Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. It has been a pleasure to work with you and your child! Do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of further assistance
to you. Have a wonderful summer!
A.7 Fall Parent Survey Comments
PAGE 68
I would like to see the Judy Center provide
Dailyreportcardonmychild’sdaysoIknowhowmychildisbehavingandotherchildren’sbehaviortowardsmychild.
I’mnotsure.
ClosenetworkingwithAlleganyCountyprofessionalFamilyChildCareAssociation.
Moreinfoaboutprograms,costs.
Morecommunicationfromtheparentsandteachers.
Do you have any comments or questions about the Judy Center?
Greatopportunities!Thankyou.
TheJudyCenterisagreatprogram!
Keepupthegreatwork.
Greatprogram
TheJudyCenterisawonderfulprogramforyoungchildren.Mysonlovesgoingtoschoolandbeingwithhisnewfriends.
Itisawonderfulprogram.[Mychild]lovesgoingtheretoo.Teachersarededicated.
Iamverypleasedwiththeservicesandstaffofthecenter.
Ithasbeenawonderfulassetforbothofourdaughtersages4and6.Haverecommendedittoallfamilyandfriends.
Greatprogramsandopportunities.Thankyou!
Thankyou!
PAGE 70
PAGE 71
Itisagreatprogram.Iamgladtoseethatithasexpandedintootherschools.
Great!
IthinktheJudyCenterisdoingaverygoodjob.
Parentsnightout.
Agoodyearformychild.
Theprogramswehaveparticipatedinhavebeenwonderful.
Loveit!
A.8 Spring Parent Survey Comments
PAGE 72
In what ways has the Judy Center helped your child?
Togrowinlearnexperiences.
Sharingwasthemainthing.Interactingwithotherkidsherage.
Mychildhashadmanyfriends.Hehaslearnedagreatdealthroughouttheyear!
Hashelpedtointroducemychildtoavarietyoflearningexperiences.Shemaynothavehadtheopportunitytoparticipatein.
Socialinteraction.
Brianhasacquiredsocialskillsandsomeindependence.IthinktheJudyCenterisexcellent!
Moresocialized,readinessskills.
Reallyhelpwithvocabularyandphysicalabilityandhisspeech.
Helpedinthepottytrainingprocess,morecommunicationwithmomanddad.
Socially somewhat, although he still seems isolated from the other kids. Confidence in himself and hisabilities.
Bettersocialskills,letterrecognition.
Gainpositivesocializationskills.
Mychildhaslearnedagreatdeal.Hissocialskillsaredevelopingaswell.
Learningtowork/playwellwithothers,morestructured,overallinterestinschoolrelatedactivitieshaveimproved(readingbookstogether,vocabulary,letterrecognition,numberswriting).
Socializationskills,listening,sharing,structure,routines.Herearlyeducationbuildingblocks,responsibility,thatsupportsherelearningathome.Thankyou!
Heseemstoplaywithotherchildbetterthanhehad.HehasmorerolemodelsthanjustMomandDad.
PAGE 74
Alot!Heknowsalotmorenumbersandletters.Hecanwritehisnameandotherwordswithhelp.Healsosharesmorewithtoys.
Ithashelpedmysonlearntoadapttosocialactivitiesandworktogetherwithotherchildren.Ithastaughthimgoodstructuredenvironments.
Strongsocialskills.
Ithashelpedmydaughterinsomanyways.Sheisalotmorerespectfulandsheislearningnewthingseveryday!
Reading,writing.
Readinglettersandbasicword.
Heisbecomingmoreverbal.Recognizingmorewordsonpaper.
Ithashelpedwiththeireducation.
Ineverything.
Learning,socialization.
Helpedhimtointeractwithotherchildren.AndlearningtoassociatehisABC’s.
Learnedtoparticipateingroupsandexpressherself.
[Mychild]hasexcelledinreading,matchingandrhymingactivities,hehaslearnedalot.
Madeherahappierchild.
Heloveshisteachers.Heloveslearningandtakingcareofhimself.Healsolovesthebooksandactivitiesthathegets.Helovesbringinghismomcardsforallholidays.
Thanks.
It has helped my child have more confidence to try and learn new things.
Readingathomebookinitiative.
PAGE 75
Ithashelpedhimcommunicatewithothers.
Schoolhashelpedsocialandlearningabilities,interactingwithotherchildren.
[Mychild]ismoresociallyactive.Hisspeechhasimprovedgreatly!
Wellmysonhelovestohavebooksreadtoyou.Whenyouhadtoreadabookandtoldaboutitandhadtodrawapicture,helovedthat.
Sharingandmanners.
In what ways has the Judy Center helped you and/or other members of your family?
TheyhelpedmewiththemoneytotakemyGEDtest.Gavemeajobasasubstituteteacher.
Spendingtimedoingactivitiestogether.
Beingabletodothingsasafamilyandnothavetoworryaboutcost.
Familytime/activities.
Gettingreadyforkindergarten.
InfantandToddlersprogramisgreat.
Ismorecalmaboutwantingstuff.Mysonlovesbeingaroundotherkidssincehe’stheonlychild.
NonethatIknowof.
Our daughter has more self confidence.
Helpedmyfamilymembersunderstandmychild’sdisabled.
Providingsomeadditionalhomeactivitiesforourfamily.
Ithasgivenmethepeaceofmindtoknowthathehasagoodfoundationfortherestofhiseducation.
Abreakfrom2childrenwhoconstantlyneedattention.Allowsmetoconcentrate2timesaweekonmyyoungestneeds,andgivesmyoldestthetoolsandbuildingblocksneededforherfutureandeducation,i.e.,amore1on1.
PAGE 76
Idon’tthinkthatthereisanythinglefttoadd.But,Ithinkallclassesshoulddothingsforeveryholiday,Easter,Xmas,Halloween,Thanksgiving.
Myoldestwasabletoreadtohisclass.
Ithashelpedmetogetmysonadaptedintotheschoolsettingandlearningmode.Theyhavebeenatremendoushelpwiththedaycare.
Communication.
Wetalkedmorethingsoutandweexplainmorethingstoeachother!
Learnedparentingideas.
KidsKornerisablessing.Ihavenootherwaytogetmychildtoschoolontime.
Tobecomemoreawareofservices.
Ithasallowedmetocontinueinmyeducationaljourney.
Goingtothecircus.
Providedchildcareforworkschedule.
OurotherchildrenwillmostlikelyattendalsoatappropriateagessoI’msuretheywilllearnalotalso.
InsomanywaysIlovetheJudyCenter.
Justtowatchmysongrowandtoseehowfastheislearningeverything.
Ithashelpedusspendmorequalitytimetogetherbysittingdowneveryeveningandreadingwithourchild.Thankyou!
Easiertogethiminterestedinreadingandwriting.
Helpedmychildwithbecomingveryexcellentprogram.
PAGE 77
PAGE 78
What activities would you like to see added at the Judy Center for your child and/or family?
Take the kids to the police station to get fingerprinted, have the police officers explain their job.
JudyCenterisdoingawonderfuljob.Ithinkalltheactivitiesaregreat.
Justanidea!Maybeatriptothezoo.
Momanddadnightoutfor2to3hours.
IwouldlovetolearnmoreabouttheprogramsattheJudyCenter.It’sbeenverymucha“trickledown”experience,butjustthissurveyindicatesthattherearealotofgreatthingsgoingon.
BetterwaytounderstandyourIEP.Whyearlyinterventionissoimportant(infantandtoddlergroupandPreK-Kparents)
More field trips.
AnythingIwasabletodowithhim.
Playtime/groupsintheeveningsonoccasion(i.e.,playtimegroup).
IthinktheJudyCenterisdoingeverythingpossible.
Moreautism.
Theyareperfect.
Everythingwasgreat.Maybesobettermealsthatthekidsliketoeatbutarestillgoodforthem.
Moreactivitieswiththefamily!