28
Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation

Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation

Page 2: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

NUCLEAR

Page 4: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

The Good, Bad and Ugly on Nuclear

Pro• Technology is readily

available and relatively efficient

• Cheap• Clean (both pollutants and

greenhouse gases)

Con• Risk of Nuclear Accidents

that expose people to high levels of radiation

• What do we do with the radioactive waste once it has been used?

• Non-renewable

Page 5: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Biomass

(wood, wood pellets, ethanol, vegetable oil)

Page 6: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Wood Burning

Page 7: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Pellet Stoves• No need for chimney – just a small vent

hole in wall• Need to re-fueled less frequently than

woodstoves• Need regular maintenance and cleaning• Require Electricity• Low emissions, low CO2 and low odor• Pellets are made from “left-over” wood

– sawdust, scraps etc.

Page 8: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Biofuels

Ethanol Biodiesel (from vegetable oil)

Page 9: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Are you a good witch or a bad witch?

Pro• Somewhat renewable – as

long as we aren’t using them faster than we can replace them

• Cleaner than burning fossil fuels

• Wood can easilly provide heat for the home and for cooking

• Growing plants increases our ability to absorb CO2

Con• Does produce some air

pollution and greenhouse gasses (combustion and/or machinery used for growing)

• Competition for land used to grow the fuels

• Burning wood does not provide as much energy as fossil fuels

Page 10: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Hydroelectric

Page 12: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Hoover Dam

Page 13: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Grand Coulee Dam

Page 14: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR
Page 15: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

To be or not to be….

Pro• Clean energy – no emissions

or air pollution• Cheap

Con• Large Amounts of Habitat

Destruction and ecological interference

• Only available where there are rivers and/or running water

Page 16: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Solar

Page 18: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR
Page 19: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

The bottom line…

Pro• Solar is a perpetual

resource• Once installed – solar power

is free• Clean – no emissions, no

pollution, no greenhouse gases

Con• Panels are expensive• Installation can be

expensive• Works better in areas with

more sun• Efficiency of Panels

(currently)

Page 20: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Wind

Page 22: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

What’s one or two birds?

Pro• Completely renewable• Completely clean

Con• Not able to provide the

entire world’s energy• Complaints of noise and

bird killing• Space needed to build them

(they’re REALLY big)

Page 23: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Geothermal

Page 25: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Heating and cooling Your HOME!

Page 26: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

The dirt on geothermal…

PRO• Once installed – cheap• No emissions, pollution or

greenhouse gases

Con• Expensive installation• Not able to provide enough

energy to meet world demands

• Must be able to access groundwater

Page 27: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

What can you do to reduce energy demands?

Page 28: Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation. NUCLEAR

Why should reduction in energy demands be an essential component to ANY energy plan?