Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Alvarado Elementary North
Student Support TeamsJanuary 2010
Welcome
A
3:00
E
Session Goals
What RtI means to us Shift of responsibility/accountability Development of the SST process SST meetings What the process has done for us Plans to continue/tweak process
N
RtI…a seamless problem-solving process that
enhances the learning of all students.
(Even for Johnny)
Response to Intervention
B
Response to Intervention
RtI…matching high-quality instruction with student needs by using frequent data collection to
guide all decisions regarding student progress.
C
The RtI process is a mind-set change among administrators, general education and special
education teachers.
Response to Intervention
B
Combination of unique talents of both general educators and specialists in creating an
intervention plan that ensures student success.
Purpose of RtI
N
6:00
E
AccountabilityWho is responsible for
monitoringdocumenting evaluating
STUDENT SUCCESS????
C
AEN’s Accountability
Third Grade: 2007 – 2008Reading – 77 students tested (71/77 = 92%)
Males 36 – 92%Females 35 – 92%
White 53 – 93%Hispanic 11 – 85%A. Am. 5 – 100%Asian 2 – 100%
Econo Disadv. 29 – 85%LEP Students 8 – 80%Special Educ. 6 - 100% At-Risk 43 – 88%
N
AEN’s Accountability
Third Grade: 2007 - 2008Math – 80 students tested (45/80 = 56%)
Males 27 – 68%Females 18 – 45%
White 34 – 58%Hispanic 7 – 50%A. Am. 2 – 40%Asian 2 – 100%
Econo Disadv. 15 – 44%LEP Students 4 – 40%Special Educ. 5 - 71%At-Risk 21 – 42% N
AEN’s Accountability
Fourth Grade: 2007 – 2008 Reading – 73 students tested (62/73 = 85%)
Males 33 – 87%Females 29 – 83%
White 52 – 87%Hispanic 5 – 71%A. Am. 5 – 83%
Econo Disadv. 25 – 78%LEP Students 0 Special Educ. 4 - 80% At-Risk 16 – 73%
N
AEN’s Accountability
Fourth Grade: 2007 – 2008 Math – 73 students tested (56/73 = 77%)
Males 27 – 79%Females 18 – 74%
White 34 – 78%Hispanic 5 – 71%A. Am. 4 – 67%
Econo Disadv. 19 – 59%LEP Students 0 Special Educ. 4 - 80% At-Risk 10 – 45%
N
Special Education Referrals
50
20
80
63
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2007-2008 2008-2009
SpeechSp Ed
B
Percentage of Qualifying Referrals
Student Support Team (SST)
A group of stakeholders that come together to make sound, data-driven decisions to instructionally support the progress of all students in the
general education curriculum.
E
Stakeholders in SST
Campus Administrator At-Risk Coordinator Diagnostician Central Office Administrator Teacher(s) Parent(s) Student
N
Starting the SST Process
Establish a vision and level of expectation Train stakeholders Develop procedural guidelines Develop user friendly documentation forms Identify universal and progress monitoring
assessments Identify tiers of intervention (research-based)
SST Meetings
Schedule meetings and notify parents Review data
Universal screeners Assessments Classroom/daily work Accommodations/Interventions
Collaborate and problem-solve Inform and involve parents Create individualized Student Intervention
Plan
Video
B
9:00E
Successes
What the “Process” has done for us… Campus resources became more
flexible. Interventions were implemented within
the general education setting. Involved additional support from district
level staff. Parents became more involved. Student achievement increased!
2008 – 2009 TAKS Results
3rd Grade Reading: 82 students testedMales 44 – 100%Females 38 – 100%
White 65 – 100%Hispanic 16 – 100%A. Am 1 – 100%
Econo Disadv 43 – 100%LEP Students 4 – 100%Special Educ. 4 – 100%At-Risk 54 – 100% N
2008 – 2009 TAKS Results
3rd Grade Math: 81 students tested (66/81 = 81%)Males 43 – 88%Females 38 – 74%
White 64 – 81%Hispanic 16 – 81%A. Am 1 - 0%
Econo Disadv 42 – 76%LEP Students 4 – 50%At-Risk 54 – 74% N
2008 – 2009 TAKS Results
4th Grade Reading: 78 students tested (67/78 = 86%)Males 43 – 88%Females 35 – 83%
White 58 – 86%Hispanic 13 – 85%A. Am 6 - 83%Asian 1 – 100%
Econo Disadv 40 – 93%LEP Students 9 – 100%At-Risk 45 – 79% N
2008 – 2009 TAKS Results
4th Grade Math: 78 students tested (58/78 = 74%)Males 44 – 75%Females 34 – 74%
White 58 – 78%Hispanic 13 – 69%A. Am 6 - 50%Asian 1 – 100%
Econo Disadv 42 – 76%LEP Students 4 – 50%At-Risk 45 – 74% N
67
8980
94
0102030405060708090
100
2007-2008
2008-2009
Math
Reading
TAKS Results
Exemplary Campus
Reading: 96%
Math:
92%
N
Commended Percentages
19
26
31
48
15
26
2119
05
101520253035404550
Math -3rd
Reading- 3rd
Math -4th
Reading- 4th
2007-20082008-2009
N
Special Education Referrals
50
20
80
63
100100
0102030405060708090
100
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010
SpeechSp Ed
B
Percentage of Qualifying Referrals
Plans to Continue/Tweak
Continue training of administrator and teachers
Tweak document forms – improve data documentation
Research ways to train/inform parents Improve assessments and interventions Continue student improvement
Resources Ogonosky, A. (2009). The response to intervention handbook: Moving from theory to
paractice. Park Place Publication, L.P., Texas. Ogonosky, A. (2009). The response to intervention for secondary school administrators:
How to implement RtI in middle and high schools. Park Place Publication, L.P., Texas.
Questions
ConcernsComments
ContactsAlvarado Elementary North – Alvarado ISD
817-783-6863Lori Nunez, Ed.D. – Principal
[email protected] Campbell – Administrative Asst./At-Risk Coordinator
[email protected] Beskow – Diagnostician
[email protected] Estes, Ed.D. – Director of Special Programs
