Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Department of Conservation and Development County Planning Commission Meeting Date: September 23, 2014
________________________________________________________________________ North Richmond Urban Agriculture General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text
Amendment (County Files: GP#12-0002 and ZT#14-0001)
I. INTRODUCTION
The project entails a General Plan Amendment that would add new policies in the Contra
Costa County General Plan (2005-2020) Land Use Element for the North Richmond Area
to support and promote urban agriculture and a Zoning Text Amendment to the North
Richmond P-1 (Planned Unit) Zoning District to include and permit a wider range of
urban agriculture uses and activities in North Richmond. The project was initiated by the
Board of Supervisors on April 24, 2012.
A. General Plan Amendment (County File: GP#12-0002): Amend the subsection in
Chapter 3. Land Use Element entitled “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND
AREA”, Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020 (starting at page 3-67, see
online version), to add two new policies:
Policy #3-191 – A policy statement that defines urban agriculture,
provides specific support and promotion of urban agriculture in North
Richmond, and recognizes specific activities and uses related to urban
agriculture in North Richmond.
Policy #3-192 – A policy statement supporting the development and
implementation of best management practices for urban agriculture in
North Richmond.
B. Zoning Text Amendment (County File: ZT#14-0001): Amend the North Richmond P-
1, Planned-Unit Zoning District Program, as follows:
Update Section B. Development Standards Table to add footnote to clarify
that structures housing animals must comply with the setback
requirements under existing County Ordinance Code Section 84-14.1402
(Animal Structures – General Provisions).
Staff Report Agenda Items #4 & #5
2
Update Section C. Land Use Matrix to add Community Garden,
Demonstration/Education Garden, Edible Landscape, Home Garden,
Processing Incidental to Agriculture, Urban Agriculture Demonstration
Site, and Urban Farm (on parcel more than 1 acre in size) as permitted
uses under the “Agricultural” category to the matrix, and add Petting Zoo
under the “Animals” category to the matrix as a use permitted subject to a
Land Use Permit.
Update Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the
North Richmond Area to add under subsection heading “Development
Standards” development standards for a Community Garden,
Demonstration/Educational Garden, Urban Agricultural Demonstration
Site, or Urban Farm, and operating standards for a petting zoo based on
safe petting zoo operating procedures recommended by the National
Association of State Public Health Veterinarians.
II. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the County Planning Commission approve a resolution
recommending the Board of Supervisors adopt the General Plan Amendment, County
File: GP#12-0004, to add new policies in the Contra Costa County General Plan (2005-
2020) Land Use Element for the North Richmond Area to support and promote urban
agriculture; and, the Zoning Text Amendment, County File: ZT#14-0001, to amend the
North Richmond P-1 (Planned Unit) Zoning District to update Section B. Development
Standards adding a footnote to clarify that structures housing animals must comply with
the setback requirements under exiting County Ordinance Code Section 84-14.1402, to
update Section C. Land Use Matrix adding Community Garden,
Demonstration/Education Garden, Edible Landscape, Home Garden, Processing
Incidental to Agriculture, Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site, and Urban Farm (on
parcel more than 1 acre in size) as permitted uses under the “Agricultural” category to the
matrix, and to add Petting Zoo under the “Animals” category to the matrix as a use
permitted subject to a Land Use Permit and updating Section D. Conditions for
Development and Use of Property in the North Richmond Area adding under subsection
heading “Development Standards” to establish development standards for a Community
Garden, Demonstration/Educational Garden, Urban Agricultural Demonstration Site, or
Urban Farm, and operating standards for a petting zoo based on safe petting zoo
operating procedures recommended by the National Association of State Public Health
Veterinarians.
III. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Area and Setting: North Richmond is an unincorporated community located on the west
edge of Contra Costa County between the City of San Pablo and the San Pablo Bay.
Almost entirely surrounded by the municipal boundaries of the City of Richmond,
unincorporated North Richmond consists of approximately 900 acres of flat bayside land
with the lower reaches of two drainages, Wildcat Creek and San Pablo Creek, traversing
3
the area. The area north of Wildcat Creek consists primarily of industrial-related uses.
The area south of Wildcat Creek is occupied for the most part by the North Richmond
residential community of approximately 765 mostly single family residences in a
conventional grid pattern. There are 3,717 residents in unincorporated North Richmond
according to the 2010 U.S. Census.
B. General Plan: The following Contra Costa County General Plan (2005-2020) land use
designations are present within the approximately 900-acre unincorporated area of North
Richmond: Single Family Residential – High Density (SH); Multiple Family
Residential-Very High Density (MV); Multiple Family Residential – Medium Density
(MM); Public/Semi-Public (PS); Parks and Recreation (PR); Open Space (OS); Heavy
Industry (HI); and, Light Industry (LI).
C. Zoning: The entirety of the North Richmond community is within a P-1, Planned Unit
District adopted by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on December 12,
1994. See Figure 1: North Richmond Area P-1, Planned Unit Zoning District.
D. CEQA Status: Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the Department of Conservation and Development determined that the
proposed project would not result in significant impacts on the environment, and
subsequently prepared a Negative Declaration for the proposed project. A notice of
public review and intent to adopt the Negative Declaration was issued on March 31,
2014 for a 30-day comment period. No comments were received by the Department on
the Negative Declaration (see Attachment #2).
IV. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. Urban Agriculture and the Local Food System: Terms and Concepts: Urban agriculture
is defined as the practice of growing, processing, and distributing fresh food products by
people living in an urban area. Urban agriculture includes a wide range of agriculture
activities related to food production, ranging from simple home gardens, to community
gardens, and to urban farms with extensive cultivation and raising animals. Several cities
and counties in the San Francisco Bay Area and across the state and nation have
recognized the importance of urban agriculture as a functional part of a local food
system, and within municipal zoning codes cities (and counties) are now permitting
various agricultural uses and activities in urbanized areas to foster a local food system,
to increase access to healthy foods for city dwellers, and to promote environmental
sustainability.
A food system includes everything associated with growing, processing, storing,
distributing transporting, and selling food. Generally speaking, a food system is
considered local when it is direct to consumer (farmer to you) or direct to retail/food
service (farmer to restaurant, hospital, school, and other public organization). Locally
grown produce, community gardens, farmers markets, and community supported
agriculture or community shared agriculture (CSA, is a particular network or association of
individuals who have pledged to support one or more local farms, with growers and consumers
sharing the risks and benefits of food production) all fall under the umbrella term “local food
4
system”. The underlying concept behind the local food system is to minimize the cost
and distance between food production and consumption. A well-developed local food
system can provide numerous benefits, including:
Support to local farmers/growers by providing them with a stable market to sell
their products;
Provide underserved communities access to fresh, locally grown farm products;
and,
Potentially reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing the distance
farm products must travel to reach the consumer.
B. North Richmond is a “Food Desert”: “Food deserts” are defined by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) as urban neighborhoods and rural towns without ready access to
fresh, healthy, and affordable food. Instead of supermarkets and grocery stores, these
communities may have no food access or are served only by fast food restaurants and
convenience stores that offer few healthy, affordable food options.
According to the USDA’s Food Access Research Atlas, the unincorporated community of
North Richmond falls within their definition of a food desert, because it is a low-income
community where a significant number or share of the population is more than one mile
from the nearest supermarket (http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-
research-atlas/go-to-the-atlas). For example, the nearest major supermarket chain stores
(Safeway, Lucky’s, SaveMart, and the Grocery Outlet) are predominantly located along
the I-80 freeway corridor several miles from North Richmond. This problem of access to
a supermarket or grocery store is compounded for North Richmond residents without an
automobile, or who are unable to drive, because the community is served by one regular
fixed route bus line, Route 76, operated by AC Transit on 30-minute intervals with
service to between Hilltop-Richmond and El Cerrito Del Norte BART Station via San
Pablo from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m.
C. North Richmond’s Agricultural Legacy: Given its food desert status, it is ironic that
North Richmond was once an area that was predominantly productive farmland.
Historical records dating back seventy five years indicate it was the location for truck
farming, cattle grazing, and flower growing operations. During World War II (WWII),
portions of the North Richmond area began to urbanize with the development of a mix of
residential, commercial, and industrial uses. Post-WWII saw continued urbanization with
more land converted to mainly industrial or residential uses
Floriculture or flowers growing operations until recently were the predominant
agriculture use in North Richmond. During the 1920-30’s the areas around El Cerrito,
Richmond, and San Pablo had emerged as home to the East Bay’s thriving floriculture
industry led in large part by Japanese immigrant families. As the City of Richmond began
to rapidly develop, however, with the influx of new industries and residents, many
Japanese-American families that owned commercial nurseries in Richmond sought larger
and less expensive acreage in outlying areas, including unincorporated North Richmond.
These Japanese-American families and others that had bought land in North Richmond
5
operated their commercial or wholesale nurseries up to the 1990’s-2000’s until
fundamental market changes in the wholesale flower growing business and other
economic factors resulted in shift of flower growing operations outside of the East Bay.
Several greenhouses or remnant structures of the East Bay’s once thriving floriculture
industry are still present today on several parcels within North Richmond.
D. Specific Plan: The decline of North Richmond’s floriculture industry was one of the
reasons that the Board of Supervisors in June 2007 authorized the then County
Redevelopment Agency and Department of Conservation and Development to prepare a
Specific Plan for a proposal to develop a new mixed use residential neighborhood in a
254-acre area within North Richmond bounded by the Richmond Parkway on the west,
San Pablo Creek on the north, the Union Pacific railroad tracks on the east, and Wildcat
Creek on the south. The commercial nurseries (or flower growing operations) were once
largely concentrated within this 254-acre area of North Richmond.
The Specific Plan process for this area of North Richmond had reached the administrative
draft stage by late December 2011. The Department of Conservation and Development
was readying for public release of a Draft Specific Plan and an accompanying Draft
Environmental Impact Report when the California State Supreme Court upheld state
legislation to dissolve redevelopment agencies. As a consequence of the Supreme Court
decision, the Specific Plan process was suspended by the County and it was eventually
abandoned altogether under the dissolution of the County Redevelopment Agency.
E. Board Request: The concept of incorporating policies to support and promote urban
agriculture had been included in the above referenced Draft North Richmond Specific
Plan. At the request of Supervisor John Gioia, District I, the Board of Supervisors on
April 24, 2012 authorized the Department of Conservation and Development to initiate a
review of General Plan policies for North Richmond and to prepare necessary revisions
to the North Richmond P-1 Planned Unit District to permit urban agriculture uses and
activities within North Richmond (see Attachment #1). Supervisor Gioia did not want to
discard the work on urban agriculture prepared for the Specific Plan and believed that the
urban agriculture concepts could proceed without the Specific Plan or the Redevelopment
Agency.
V. STAFF ANALYSIS / DISCUSSION
A. Proposed General Plan Amendment (County File: GP#12-0002): This is a proposed
amendment that would add new policy text to the Land Use Element under the section
entitled “POLICIES OF THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA” for the purpose of
providing direct policy support for and promotion of the urban agriculture concept
specifically in North Richmond. It begins with proposed Policy #3-191 a policy
statement that defines urban agriculture, declares the intent of the General Plan to
support urban agriculture development within North Richmond, and then provides a
description and explanation of urban agriculture activities and uses that the General Plan
intends to allow in North Richmond. The amendment proposes to recognize the
following as urban agriculture activities and uses:
6
Edible Landscape
Home Gardens
Community Gardens
Demonstration/Education Garden
Urban Farm
Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site
Proposed Policy #3-192 directs that the County working through the County
Agricultural Commissioner, County Environmental Health Officer, Contra Costa
Resources Conservation District, UC Agriculture Extension, and urban agriculture
practioners to develop best management practices for urban agriculture. This is in
recognition that certain urban agriculture activities and uses may introduce by products
or have environmental consequences that could become a hazard to public health or
safety (e.g. disposal of food and agricultural by products, application of pesticides in an
urban setting, etc.). The intent of the best management practices is to promote
environmentally safe and sustainable methods for growing, processing, storing , and
transporting agricultural products.
See Attachment #4 for draft policies #3-191 and #3-192 with the proposed policy text
language highlighted in red.
B. Proposed Zoning Text Amendment (ZT#14-0001): As noted above the entirety of North
Richmond is within a P-1, Planned Unit District that was adopted in December 1994.
Certain agricultural-related activities are currently allowed under the North Richmond P-
1, Planned Unit District. The purpose of the zoning text amendment is to expand and
match the urban agriculture activities and uses that would be allowed under the General
Plan Amendment described above with the corresponding zoning district, in this case the
North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District. The proposed text amendment would
involve changes to two sections within the North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District,
as follows:
Update Section B. Development Standards Table to add footnote to clarify that
structures housing animals must comply with the setback requirements under
existing County Ordinance Code Section 84-14.1402 (Animal Structures –
General Provisions).
Update Section C. Land Use Matrix to add as permitted uses to the “Agriculture”
category in the matrix: Edible Landscape, Home Garden, Community Garden,
Demonstration/Educational Garden, Processing Incidental to Agriculture, Urban
Agriculture, Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site, and Urban Farm. Under the
“Animals” category to the matrix add Petting Zoo as use permitted subject to
Land use Permit. Also, in the footnotes portion of the Land Use Matrix several
notes are proposed to be revised or updated to provide further clarification and
guidance.
7
Update Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the North
Richmond Area to add under subsection heading “Development Standards”
development standards for a Community Garden, Demonstration/Educational
Garden, Urban Agricultural Demonstration Site, or Urban Farm; and, operating
standards for a petting zoo based on operating procedures recommended by the
National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians.
See Attachment #5 for the proposed zoning text amendment to the North Richmond P-1,
Planned Unit District with the proposed text amendment language or changes
highlighted in red.
VI. AGENCY AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
To date, written public agency and public comments on the proposed North Richmond
Urban Agriculture General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment have been
received from State Clearinghouse, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and
the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. These were
comment letters in response to the project’s proposed CEQA Negative Declaration. The
purpose of the State Clearinghouse letter was to acknowledge receipt of the proposed
Negative Declaration and to indicate that no state agencies had any comments. The
County Flood District submitted an interoffice memo to indicate no comments on the
proposed Negative Declaration, but the memo does explain that the Flood Control
District is the local agency with jurisdiction over the Wildcat Creek and San Pablo
Creek flood control channel and recommends that future urban agriculture applicants be
advised that permits may be needed if certain activities/uses encroach on the flood
control system serving North Richmond. Copies of written comment letters received by
the Department are provided under Attachment #3.
Additionally, staff has been in telephone and email contact with the UC Extension
Agriculture Specialist, Contra Costa County, and the County’s Animal Services
Department and Environmental Health Division, Health Services Department, regarding
the proposal.
The UC Extension Agricultural Specialist acknowledged receipt of the proposal and
indicated general support for the proposal. The UC Extension Agriculture Specialist
pointed out that under the recently enacted “California Homemade Food Act” (AB
1616) cottage food operations are now classified by state law as a permitted use of
residential property for zoning purposes. There was a concern that adding the category
“Processing Incidental to Agriculture” to the Land Use Matrix might be in conflict with
this newly enacted law. In response to this comment, a new footnote was added to the
Land Use Matrix, footnote 1.c, which clarifies that pursuant to the California
Homemade Food Act” (AB 1616) cottage food operations are allowed to prepare and/or
package certain non-potentially hazardous foods in private-home kitchens within
residential zones. For more information on cottage food operations and the California
Homemade Food Act” (AB 1616) sees Attachment #6.
8
Discussions with County Animal Services Department concerned raising farm animals
within an urbanized area. They were satisfied with the proposal’s provisions for farm
animals and supported the proposal’s clarification that poultry raising would only mean
hen chickens for egg production (no Roosters).
Communications with County Environmental Health focused on aspects of the proposal
related to safe handling of food and best management practices for community gardens.
Their comments have been incorporated into the proposal.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
The proposed North Richmond Urban Agriculture General Plan Amendment and Zoning
Text Amendment would expand urban agriculture opportunities for residents within a
low-income unincorporated community, which has become a “food desert”. The new
land use policies and zoning changes would enable North Richmond residents to pursue
a wider range of urban agriculture uses and activities than currently allowed. The
proposed changes may in turn help North Richmond residents gain better access to fresh,
healthy, and affordable food.
g:\advance planning\urban agriculture\north richmond p-1\cpc.rpt.9.23.2014.docx
9
List of Figures and Attachments
Figures
Figure 1: North Richmond Area P-1, Planned Unit Zoning District
Attachments
1. April 24, 2012 Board Order re: Authorizing North Richmond Urban Agriculture
General Plan Amendment Study and P-1 Text Amendment
2. CEQA Review: Proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study (issued 3/31/2014)
3. Comment Letters
4. General Plan Amendment (County File: GP#12-0002): Adding Policies to Support
and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond
a. Draft Policy #3-191
b. Draft Policy #3-192
5. Zoning Text Amendment (County File: ZT#14-0001): Amending the North
Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District
a. Update Section B. Development Standards Table
b. Update Section C. Land Use Matrix
c. Update Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the North
Richmond Area
6. Background Information on the California Homemade Food Act” (AB 1616)
7. Draft County Planning Commission Resolution No. 9-2014
{This page intentionally left blank}
Figure #1
North Richmond Area P-1, Planned Unit Zoning District
Richmond
Pinole
El Cerrito
San Pablo
Hercules
Richmond
North Richmond
Wildcat Creek
San Pablo Creek
Map Created 3/18/2014by Contra Costa County Department of
Conservation and Development, GIS Group30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 9455337:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756WI 0 0.5 10.25
Miles This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation andDevelopment with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some
base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the CA State Board of Equalization'stax rate areas. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for
its accuracy. This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited. Users of this map agree to read and
accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.
Figure 1: North Richmond Area P-1 Planned Unit Zoning District
Cutting Blvd
San Pablo Ave
Richmond Pkwy
§̈¦80
§̈¦80
§̈¦580
§̈¦580
North Richmond P-1 Planned Unit DistrictWaterBodiesContra Costa County BoundaryCreeks
City Limits
Attachment #1
April 24, 2012 Board Order,
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
Subject: Authorizing North Richmond Urban Agriculture General Plan
Amendment Study and P-1 Text Amendment
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. AUTHORIZE the Department of Conservation & Development to initiate a review of General Plan policies for
North Richmond and prepare necessary revisions to the North Richmond P-1 (Planned Unit) Zoning District to
permit urban agriculture uses and activities within North Richmond.
2. REQUEST that the Department of Conservation & Development to collaborate with Supervisorial District I to
pursue potential grant funding opportunities from public agencies or private foundations to support this new planning
initiative for North Richmond.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If authorized, the cost in staff time and materials to undertake this new planning initiative for North Richmond, which
is estimated in the range of $40,000 to $50,000, would be absorbed under the Department of Conservation &
Development’s existing budget. However, should potential grant funding be secured it would be used to backfill the
Department’s costs for this new planning initiative.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD
COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 04/24/2012 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYES 4 NOES ____
ABSENT 1 ABSTAIN ____
RECUSE ____
Contact: Luz Gomez, 510-374-3231
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes ofthe Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: April 24, 2012
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
SD. 4
To: Board of Supervisors
From: John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Date: April 24, 2012
Contra Costa County
Subject: Permitting Urban Agriculture Land Uses and Activities within NorthRichmond
BACKGROUND:
Urban agriculture is the practice of growing, processing, and distributing fresh food products by people living in an
urban area. Urban agriculture includes a wide range of activities related to food production, including home gardens,
community gardens, institutional gardens, urban farms that raise animals, and farmers’ markets. Many cities and
counties throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and across the nation have recognized the importance of urban
agriculture as part of a local food system, and are now permitting various agriculture uses and activities in urbanized
areas to foster both sustainability and access to healthy food.
The concept of urban agriculture was included in a Specific Plan being prepared to transform a 200 acre industrial
area of North Richmond into a new residential neighborhood. The Specific Plan was in preparation by the
Department of Conservation & Development and the County Redevelopment Agency when the State Supreme Court
in late December 2011 upheld state legislation to dissolve redevelopment agencies. As a result of the Redevelopment
Agency dissolution process, all work on the Specific Plan was suspended and it is unknown at this time whether the
plan can proceed without redevelopment. It would be unfortunate to discard the Specific Plan’s work on urban
agriculture. Much of this work could be incorporated into the County General Plan’s existing policies for North
Richmond and transferred into the existing North Richmond P-1 (Planned Unit) Zoning District.
It is recommended that the Board authorize the Department of Conservation & Development to initiate a review of
General Plan policies for North Richmond and prepare necessary revisions to the North Richmond P-1 (Planned
Unit) Zoning District to permit urban agriculture uses and activities in North Richmond based upon abovementioned
draft Specific Plan. Additionally, while the costs for staff time and materials could be assumed under the
Department’s existing budget, it is further recommended that staff from District I and the Department work together
to secure potential grant funding for this project from other public agencies or private foundations to demonstrate
how urban agriculture could be incorporated into local land use policies and regulations.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Department of Conservation & Development would not initiate new planning initiative for North Richmond to
review General Plan policies and prepare necessary revisions to the North Richmond P-1 (Planned Unit) Zoning
District to permit urban agricultural uses and activities within North Richmond.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not applicable.
{This page intentionally left blank}
Attachment #2
CEQA Review: Proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study (issued
3/31/2014)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Attachment #3
Comment Letters
Attachment #4
General Plan Amendment (County File: GP#12-0002): Adding Policies to Support
and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond
a. Draft Policy #3-191
b. Draft Policy #3-192
General Plan Amendment (County File GP#12-0002): To Support and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond Add New Policies 3-191 and 3-192 (see new policy text in red),
Ch. 3 Land Use Element, “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”
1
POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA
3-185. For all industrial categories, the Plan should accommodate and guide the growth and development of industry. With growth and development there needs to be a recognition of environmental, social
and economic values which will work to minimize land use conflicts, to establish a reasonably pleasing setting and to protect natural
resources that are irreplaceable. Through appropriate regulatory mechanisms (e.g., zoning ordinance, nuisance ordinance, etc.) provide for the following:
o Require a setback from San Pablo and Wildcat Creeks for new structures. The size of the setback will be developed through
site development review in conjunction with responsible agencies (e.g., Department of Fish and Game, Flood Control District). Lands within these setback areas shall reinforce the
habitat values and/or trail setting of the adjacent flood control project for these creeks.
o Require setbacks within shoreline areas to protect wetlands designated by State or Federal regulatory agencies and to provide public access as appropriate. The size of the setback
or mitigation will be developed in conjunction with all affected agencies.
o Require health risks assessments and, where appropriate, provide necessary buffers for all new applications handling
substantial amounts of hazardous materials. o Achieve an upgrading of the visual appearance and unity of
the area through architectural and landscape requirements
and utility under-grounding. o Require special geotechnical studies and construction
techniques in areas of potential seismic or geological hazards (e.g., Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone, high liquefaction, and reclaimed wetland areas).
o Use established standards to limit activities that may endanger human health and can cause damage to the
environment. o Use established standards to limit activities which may be
objectionable such as odors, fumes or other emissions so they
will be contained within the property boundaries. o Require projects adjacent to parks or recreational corridors to
minimize impacts on the recreational values of those facilities. o Require a shadow analysis for projects adjacent to commercial
nurseries and protect the solar access of affected properties.
General Plan Amendment (County File GP#12-0002): To Support and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond Add New Policies 3-191 and 3-192 (see new policy text in red),
Ch. 3 Land Use Element, “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”
2
o Require archaeology reconnaissance surveys for all projects within an archaeological sensitivity area. When cultural
resources are located within a project, measures to deal with the historic resource shall be recommended by a qualified archeologist.
o Require all uses to comply with the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the Regional Water Quality
Control Board, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, the State and County health departments, and any other regulatory agencies which exist or
may be established to ensure environmental quality in the San Francisco Bay Region.
o Screen all outside storage/maintenance areas from public streets.
a. LIGHT INDUSTRY
Amend the "Light Industry" land use category of the General Plan Land Use Element for North Richmond to read as follows:
Industrial activities in this category are established in areas where development is carefully controlled to ensure compatibility between the industrial operations and other activities and the character of
the district, community and environment in which they are located. The appearance of each site, building or industrial operation, and
each industrial district as a whole, should establish a reasonably pleasing and harmonious setting.
Types of uses within this category can range from research, engineering, product development and testing, and sales development to light manufacturing, warehousing, distribution
centers, and commercial nurseries. Support retail/service uses may also be found in this category.
In addition to the policies and factors established to guide development in all commercial and industrial areas, the following policies and factors are established to guide the development of
Special Industrial areas:
(1) "Apply special zoning designations or planned unit
districts to provide use limitations, in cases where uses need to be limited to protect the character of an area, "in all cases where.
(2) Limit activities which may result in noise, glare or vibrations extending beyond the property boundary."
b. HEAVY INDUSTRY
General Plan Amendment (County File GP#12-0002): To Support and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond Add New Policies 3-191 and 3-192 (see new policy text in red),
Ch. 3 Land Use Element, “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”
3
Amend the "Heavy Industry" land use category of the County General Plan Land Use Element for North Richmond to read as
follows:
"Industry activities in this category are traditionally larger scale and include very little or no office space. Sufficient visual open
space and/or landscaped screening between industrial operations and adjacent residential or recreational activities shall be required
as needed."
This category accommodates a wide variety of industrial activities including, but not limited to, oil refining, contractors'
storage yards, warehouses, and machine shops. For the North Richmond area, this category also includes commercial
nurseries. Support retail/service uses may also be found in this category.
In addition to the policies and factors established to guide development
in all commercial and industrial areas, the following policies and factors are established to guide the development of General Industrial areas:
o Encourage commercial nurseries to remain in the area. o Require projects involving auto-dismantling activities to be
enclosed and prohibit outside storage of vehicles.
o Limit activities which may result in noise, glare or vibrations beyond the designated industrial areas.
o Make a finding that new residential uses within this designation are incompatible.
3-186. IMPLEMENTATION
The City of Richmond and the County shall undertake a rezoning study
of the area to bring the zoning in conformance with their respective General Plans.
All new permits with conditions of approval shall be monitored by
the County or City. Additionally, the City of Richmond and the County shall undertake a more vigorous zoning investigation and
enforcement program.
The County and City shall require verification that all appropriate State and Federal or regional permits are granted before building
permits are issued for the projects.
Project applicants shall provide a site history for uses that have previously
been on the property as part of any permit application process. As appropriate, soils analysis for toxic wastes shall be required for permit
applications.
General Plan Amendment (County File GP#12-0002): To Support and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond Add New Policies 3-191 and 3-192 (see new policy text in red),
Ch. 3 Land Use Element, “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”
4
3-187. A Redevelopment Plan for the North Richmond area was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in July 1987. All development proposals
should be reviewed by, and coordinated with, Redevelopment Agency staff to ensure compatibility with the Redevelopment Plan. Additionally, involvement with the redevelopment process will allow
the County to coordinate concurrent development proposals and to possibly facilitate the construction of public improvements that will
further the goals of the Redevelopment Plan.
3-188. Lands which were the site of the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill ownership and which are designated as Open Space, will continue to
allow solid waste facilities on the property as an interim use of the land.
3-189. "The West County Integrated Resource Recovery Facility site, circumscribed by Central Street, Brookside Drive, Third Street and the Wildcat Creek, is recognized as a non-disposal facility in the
countywide Integrated waste Management Plan."
3-190. The Fifth Street and Market Avenue General Plan Amendment is
intended to support up to three residential units. Development of new residential units should be visually compatible with the existing residences which are just south and adjacent to this area. A density
bonus is to also be considered as part of potential future development for further implementing the North Richmond
Redevelopment Plan."
3-191. Urban agriculture is the practice of growing, processing, and distributing fresh food by people living in an urban area. Urban
agriculture includes a wide range of activities related to food production, including home gardens, community gardens,
demonstration or educational gardens, urban farms, and farmers’ markets. This plan acknowledges that urban agriculture can help meet
local food needs for residents of North Richmond and the surrounding area while also promoting environmental sustainability, good health and nutrition, and opportunities for economic and community
development. It is the intent of this plan to promote and support the development of urban agriculture in North Richmond by permitting the
following activities and uses related to agricultural production:
a. Edible Landscapes: Edible landscapes are to be encouraged and
permitted in North Richmond. These are defined as cultivating food-producing plants and trees in the landscaping of both
private and public outdoor open spaces within North Richmond, attended by an individual, community organization, or business.
General Plan Amendment (County File GP#12-0002): To Support and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond Add New Policies 3-191 and 3-192 (see new policy text in red),
Ch. 3 Land Use Element, “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”
5
b. Home Garden: A Home Garden is defined as a home or private food-producing garden located in the front or backyard, rooftop,
courtyard, balcony, fence, or wall window sill of a private single family residence, which is attended by an individual. It is permitted in all residential designated areas of North Richmond
when the gardening activity is incidental to a residential use. Home gardens are permitted in all single family residential
designated areas and multi-family residential designated areas . Bee keeping and raising of poultry and animals are not permitted in a Home Garden. The products grown in a Home
Garden are intended for personal consumption and are not intended for on-site sale but may be sold off-site.
c. Community Garden: Community Gardens are permitted in
residential, commercial, industrial, and public or open space
designated areas within North Richmond. A Community Garden is defined as contiguous or non-contiguous plots of land set
aside for growing food producing or ornamental plants and trees, which is collectively shared, managed, and attended to by an organized group of people. Oftentimes, a Community Garden
is comprised of a series of plots attended to individually by community members. Small-scale bee keeping (no more than 4
bee hives), and the raising of hen chickens for egg production on parcel not less than 20,000 square feet of area, is permitted
in a Community Garden. Maintaining more than four bee hives, and raising poultry other than hen chickens and farm animals, are not permitted in a Community Garden. Although products
grown in a Community Garden are normally intended for personal consumption, limited on-site sales at a Community
Garden may be allowed under the administrative review procedures of the amended North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District.
d. Demonstration or Educational Garden: A Demonstration or
Educational Garden is defined as a plot of land, either contiguous or non-contiguous, set aside for a small to medium-scale (non-mechanized) food-producing garden on public or
private property for growing food producing or ornamental plants and trees, which is attended to by a community
organization or public or private educational based institution. Demonstration or Educational Gardens are permitted in the residential, commercial, industrial, and public or open space
designated areas within North Richmond through the administrative review procedures under the amended North
General Plan Amendment (County File GP#12-0002): To Support and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond Add New Policies 3-191 and 3-192 (see new policy text in red),
Ch. 3 Land Use Element, “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”
6
Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District. Small-scale bee keeping, meaning no more than 4 bee hives, and raising hen chickens for
egg production is permitted, but no other form of poultry or animal raising is permitted. On-site sale of agricultural products for educational, therapeutic, community service, or philanthropic
purposes may be allowed under the administrative review procedures of the amended North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit
District. e. Urban Farm: An Urban Farm describes the production of food-
producing or ornamental plants, bees, fish, poultry, or small farm animals located on private property at least one (1) acre in
size, and designed and managed for commercial purposes using a variety of horizontal and vertical growing techniques, including in-soil, container, hydroponic and aquaponic growing systems.
An Urban Farm may be allowed under the administrative review procedures of the amended North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit
District in those areas designated for industrial use, public, open, and park uses, and, in a commercial designated area subject to a Land Use Permit; but an Urban Farm is not allowed
in any residential designated area. The establishment of on-site processing facilities (e.g. commercial kitchen, packing or
packaging, etc.) and on-site sale of agricultural products may be allowed under the administrative review procedures of the
amended North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District. Certain forms of on-site processing or on-site sale (e.g. winery) will be subject to a Land Use Permit process.
f. Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site: Contra Costa County will
collaborate with community based organizations, other public agencies, and interested businesses to explore the feasibility of establishing an urban agriculture learning and demonstration
site within the non-residential designated area of North Richmond. The purpose is to establish a suitable location to
demonstrate and practice a full range of urban agriculture uses and related activities for the benefit of the North Richmond community and surrounding area by providing opportunities for
children and adults alike to learn and participate in the growing and production of locally raised food. The Urban Agriculture
Demonstration Site may be managed and operated by a community based organization, by a public entity, or by a commercial operator. The Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site
may be located on public land, or private property, or co-located with another public use or facility (e.g. park or open space
General Plan Amendment (County File GP#12-0002): To Support and Promote Urban Agriculture in North Richmond Add New Policies 3-191 and 3-192 (see new policy text in red),
Ch. 3 Land Use Element, “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”
7
area). One potential location for the Urban Agricultural Demonstration Site is an approximately 4 acre parcel (Assessor
Parcel No. 408-201-017) owned by Contra Costa County located at the northeast corner of Fred Jackson Way (formerly 3rd Street) and Brookside Drive.
3-192. Contra Costa County working through the County Agricultural
Commissioner, County Environmental Health Officer, and Department of Conservation and Development, and in collaboration with the University of California Cooperative Extension, Contra Costa
Resource Conservation District, urban agriculture practioners, community based organization, and other interested parties, will
develop and implement a set of best management practices for urban agriculture within the North Richmond area. The best management practices should be directed at promoting
environmentally safe and sustainable methods for growing, producing, processing, and transporting agricultural products raised
in North Richmond, including disposal of food and agricultural by-products. The best management practices will include the physical and operational standards for the community,
demonstration/educational garden categories, and the urban farm and urban agriculture demonstration site categories, as defined
above in policies 3-191.b. through 3-191.f., which may in turn be translated into a zoning code text amendment under the North
Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District. The overall objective of these best management practices will be to protect public health and safety and to assure sustainable use of the land.
g:\advance planning\urban agriculture\north richmond p-1\june ver. north richmond urban ag proposak\gpa add policy 3-191, support and
promote urban agriculture, policies for the north richmond area.doc
Attachment #5
Zoning Text Amendment (County File: ZT#14-0001): Amending the North
Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District
a. Update Section B. Development Standards Table
b. Update Section C. Land Use Matrix
c. Update Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in
the North Richmond Area
g:\advance planning\urban agriculture\north richmond p-1\development standards.6.5.2014docx.docx
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Approved 2/11/03 C
omm
erci
al
(CO
)
Ligh
t In
dust
rial (
L-I)
Hea
vy
Indu
stria
l (H
-I)
Spec
ial L
ight
In
dust
rial
(Spc
I-LI)
Spec
ial H
eavy
In
dust
rial
(Spc
l-HI)
Sing
le-F
amily
R
esid
entia
l (S
L/SM
/SH
)
Mul
ti-Fa
mily
R
esid
entia
l (M
L/M
M/M
H)
Minimum Lot Area
3,500 sq.ft.
7,500 sq.ft.
N/A
½ acre
1 acre
4,500 sq. ft. single fam 7,000 sq. ft. – duplex
10,000 sq.ft.
Minimum Lot Width
35’
N/A
N/A
125’
100’
N/A
Maximum Building Height
35’
50’
40’
35’ (b)
40’
30’ or 2 stories
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
1.0
0.67
0.67
0.40 (c)
0.40 (c)
N/A (g)
Maximum Lot Coverage
40%
50%
30% (C)
50%
30%
N/A
Residential Density (units per net acre)
---
---
---
---
---
SL: 1-2.9 SM: 3-4.9 SH:5-7.2
ML: 7.3-11.9 MM: 12-20.9 MH: 21-29.9 MV: 30-44.9
Front Yard Setback (h)
10’
10’
10’
15’
15’
20’ to garage 10’ to house
10’
Side Yard Setback (h)
0’
10’
0’
10’
0’
Lot width min.setback/agg/ Up to 31’ 3’ / 6’ 31’ – 41’ 3’ / 8’ 41’ – 51’ 5’ / 10’ 51’ – 80’ 5’ / 15’ 80’ – 120’ 10’ / 20’ 120’ – 140’ 15’ / 35’ 104’ and up 20’ / 40’
Street Side Yard Setback
10’
10’
0’
15’
15’
10’
Rear Yard Setback (e) (h)
0’
0”
0’
0’
0’
15’
Building Setback from Natural Conservation District
N/A
N/A
N/A
20’
N/A
N/A
Setback from Parkway
N/A
50’
50’
50’
50’
50’
Parking area setbacks 0’ 5’ front yard
0’ side/rear yard 10’ front yard 5’ side/rear yard
Same as building
Parking Office: 5 p/1000 sq. ft. Lab: 2 p/1000 sq. ft. CO: 4 p/1000 sq. ft. Warehouse: 1 p/1000 sq. ft.
1 space – garage/1 driveway <3 bdrm 2 space – garage/2 driveway- >4 bdrm
Studio: 1 p/unit 1 bdrm: 1.5 p/unit 2+ bdrm: 2 p/unit Plus ¼ p/unit
Minimum Landscaped Area 10% Front and corner side yards, excluding approved driveway
(a) Senior housing block area not subject to the above development guidelines (see condition #64) (b) Height exception up to 45 feet for structure necessary to the operation of the use (c) With additional study and mitigation for cumulative traffic impacts, the floor area ration (FAR) may be increased to 0.65 (d) 50% lot coverage is allowed for Light industrial uses within Heavy Industrial land use designations (e) Detached accessory structure, located behind the residence and not adjacent to any street may have side and rear yard of 3 feet minimum, must be no longer higher than
15 feet and are limited to 500 sq. ft. (f) Side yards may be reduced to 0 feet with the approval of an Administrative Permit and in compliance with all applicable building codes. (g) For lots less than minimum standards, FAR limitation of 0.60 applies (h) Structures provided for the housing of animals must comply with the setback requirements as described in County Ord. Code Section 84-14.1402 (Animal structure- General
provisions)
Note: Proposed new text shown in red
1
Key [-----] = Not a Permitted Use P = Permitted Use A = Permitted Use - Requires Administrative Review L = Use Requires a Land Use Permit
Development Permit Required for all development of new non-residential projects and additions to non-residential projects over 50% of the existing gross floor area or 10,000 square feet (whichever is less) and residential projects over 3 units.
North Richmond Land Use Matrix
RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE & OTHER
Single Family
(SL, SM, SH)
Multi-Family
(ML, MM, MH)
Comm. (CO)
Light Industrial(
L-I) / Business Park (BP)
(9)
Heavy
Industrial (HI) (9)
Public/ Semi Public (P, SP)
Parks & Recreation
(PR)
Open Space (OS)
Agriculture
Agricultural Production ----- ----- ----- A A P P P
Agricultural Storage ----- ----- P P P ----- ----- -----
Community Garden A (18) A (18) A (18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18)
Commercial Nurseries/ Greenhouses
L L L A A ----- ----- -----
Demonstration / Educational Garden
A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18)
Edible Landscape P P P P P P P P
Home Garden (1.a) P P ----- ----- ----- P P P
Horticulture (1.b) ----- ----- P P P ----- ----- -----
Selling Incidental to Agriculture ----- ----- A A A A A A
Processing Incidental to Agriculture
----- (1.c)
----- (1.c)
A A A A A A
Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site
-----
-----
A(18)
A(18)
A(18)
A(18)
A(18)
A(18)
Urban Farm ( >1 acre) ----- ----- L(18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18) A(18)
Animals
Animal Hospital/Clinic ----- ----- A L L A L -----
Apiary P ----- ----- P P ----- ----- -----
Aviaries L ----- P P P P P -----
Dog Kennel ----- ----- L L L ----- ----- -----
3 dogs/5 cats (or less) P P P P P P P P
3 dogs/5 cats (or more) L L L L L L L L
Horse Riding Academy ----- ----- ----- L L L L -----
Livestock P (2) ----- ----- A P ----- ----- -----
Poultry P (3) ----- ----- P (3) P (3) ----- A (3) -----
Petting Zoo (Interactive Animal
Display) ----- ----- ----- L L L L -----
Automotive
Auto Garage ----- ----- L L L ----- ----- -----
Body Repair ----- ----- L L L ----- ----- -----
Gas Station ----- ----- L L L ----- ----- -----
Wrecking Yard ----- ----- ----- L L ----- -----
Note: Proposed new text shown in red
2
Key [-----] = Not a Permitted Use P = Permitted Use A = Permitted Use - Requires Administrative Review L = Use Requires a Land Use Permit
Development Permit Required for all development of new non-residential projects and additions to non-residential projects over 50% of the existing gross floor area or 10,000 square feet (whichever is less) and residential projects over 3 units.
North Richmond Land Use Matrix
RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE & OTHER
Single Family
(SL, SM, SH)
Multi-Family
(ML, MM, MH)
Comm. (CO)
Light Industrial(
L-I) / Business Park (BP)
(9)
Heavy
Industrial (HI) (9)
Public/ Semi Public (P, SP)
Parks & Recreation
(PR)
Open Space (OS)
Commercial
Adult Entertainment (4) ----- ----- L ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Area Serving Retail ----- ----- A L L ----- ----- ----- Bakery ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- ----- Barber/Beauty Shop ----- ----- A A(12) A(12) ----- ----- ----- Bed & Breakfast A A A ----- ----- ----- A (5) A (5)
Contractor's Yard ----- ----- L A A ----- ----- ----- Distribution ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- ----- Drug Store ----- ----- A A (12) A(12) ----- ----- ----- Equip. Repair & Welding ----- ----- L A A ----- ----- ----- Freight Terminal ----- ----- L A A ----- ----- ----- Grocery Store ----- ----- A ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Hotel/Motel ----- L A ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Laundry ----- ----- A P P ----- ----- ----- Liquor Store (6) ----- ----- L ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Lumber Yard ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- ----- Personal Services ----- ----- A A (12) A(12) ----- ----- ----- Restaurant ----- ----- A A (12) A(12) ----- A(12) ----- Retail Sales ----- ----- A A (12) A(12) ----- A(12) ----- Shopping Malls ----- ----- A ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Take Out Food (7) ----- ----- A A (12) A(12) ----- ----- -----
Temporary Sales ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Trucking Yard ----- ----- ----- A A ----- ----- -----
Warehousing ----- ----- L A A ----- ----- -----
Manufacturing
Book Binding ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Cabinet Shop ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Note: Proposed new text shown in red
3
Key [-----] = Not a Permitted Use P = Permitted Use A = Permitted Use - Requires Administrative Review L = Use Requires a Land Use Permit
Development Permit Required for all development of new non-residential projects and additions to non-residential projects over 50% of the existing gross floor area or 10,000 square feet (whichever is less) and residential projects over 3 units.
North Richmond Land Use Matrix
RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE & OTHER
Single Family
(SL, SM, SH)
Multi-Family
(ML, MM, MH)
Comm. (CO)
Light Industrial(
L-I) / Business Park (BP)
(9)
Heavy
Industrial (HI) (9)
Public/ Semi Public (P, SP)
Parks & Recreation
(PR)
Open Space (OS)
Chem./Petro Processing ----- ----- ----- A A ----- ----- -----
Fabricating ----- ----- L A A ----- ----- -----
Light Industry ----- ----- ----- A A ----- ----- -----
Manufacturing ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Metal Working ----- ----- ----- A A ----- ----- -----
Oil & Gas Drilling L L L L L A(14) A (14) A(14)
Packaging ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- ----- Printing/Lithography ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- ----- Processing ----- ----- L A A ----- ----- ----- Product Development & Testing
----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Mobile Homes
Caretaker Mobile ----- ----- L L L L L L
Family Member Mobile Home L L L ----- ----- L L L
Mobile Home Parks ----- L ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Mobile Home Subdivision ----- L ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Permanent Mobile Home A A A ----- ----- A A A
R.V. Parks or Campgrounds ----- ----- L ----- ----- ----- L -----
Temporary Mobile Home L L L ----- ----- L L L
Temp. Construction Trailer A A A A A A A A
Miscellaneous
Accessory Structure P P P P P P P P
Athletic Complex ----- L (12) A L L L L L
Outdoor Recreation Complex ----- ----- L L L L L L
Outdoor Storage ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Private Retreats ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- L L L
Shooting Ranges ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- L L L
Temporary Use ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Office
Admin/Executive Offices ----- ----- A A (12) A (12) ----- ----- -----
Business/Professional Offices ----- ----- A A (12) A (12) ----- ----- -----
Medical Clinics ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Note: Proposed new text shown in red
4
Key [-----] = Not a Permitted Use P = Permitted Use A = Permitted Use - Requires Administrative Review L = Use Requires a Land Use Permit
Development Permit Required for all development of new non-residential projects and additions to non-residential projects over 50% of the existing gross floor area or 10,000 square feet (whichever is less) and residential projects over 3 units.
North Richmond Land Use Matrix
RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE & OTHER
Single Family
(SL, SM, SH)
Multi-Family
(ML, MM, MH)
Comm. (CO)
Light Industrial(
L-I) / Business Park (BP)
(9)
Heavy
Industrial (HI) (9)
Public/ Semi Public (P, SP)
Parks & Recreation
(PR)
Open Space (OS)
Medical/Dental Offices ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Multi-Tenant Offices ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Professional Offices ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Research Laboratories ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Public/Semi Public
Cemeteries L L ----- ----- ----- L L L
Child Care (12 or less) P P P P P P P P
Child Care (13 or more) L L A A (12) A(12) L L L
Churches L L A L L ----- ----- -----
Convalescent Care (<6 or >6) P/A P/A P/A ----- ----- P/A P/A P/A
Communication Towers/Facilities
L L L L L L L L
Golf/Outdoor Sports L L ----- ----- ----- L A A
Hospitals/Institutions ----- ----- A ----- ----- A ----- -----
Museums ----- ----- A ----- ----- A ----- -----
Parking Lots (8) A A A A (12) A(12) A A A
Public Buildings A A P P P P P A
Public Utilities/Pipelines (10) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Quasi-Public Facilities L L A L L A L L
Radio/TV Trans. & Receiving L L L L L L L L
Residential Care (<6 or >6) P/A PA P/A ----- ----- P/A P/A P/A
Recycling/Disposal Facilities
Buy-Back Facility/Container ----- ----- ----- A A ----- ----- ----- Buy-Back Facility/Non-Container
----- ----- ----- A A ----- ----- -----
Bulk Material Processing ----- ----- ----- L L ----- ----- -----
Composting Facility ----- ----- ----- L L ----- L -----
Drop-Off - Unattended ----- P P P P ----- ----- -----
Interim Recycling Facility (16) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- L
Intermediate Processing ----- ----- ----- L L L ----- L
Note: Proposed new text shown in red
5
Key [-----] = Not a Permitted Use P = Permitted Use A = Permitted Use - Requires Administrative Review L = Use Requires a Land Use Permit
Development Permit Required for all development of new non-residential projects and additions to non-residential projects over 50% of the existing gross floor area or 10,000 square feet (whichever is less) and residential projects over 3 units.
North Richmond Land Use Matrix
RESIDENTIAL
NON RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE & OTHER
Single Family
(SL, SM, SH)
Multi-Family
(ML, MM, MH)
Comm. (CO)
Light Industrial(
L-I) / Business Park (BP)
(9)
Heavy
Industrial (HI) (9)
Public/ Semi Public (P, SP)
Parks & Recreation
(PR)
Open Space (OS)
Material Recovery Facility ----- ----- ----- L L ----- ----- -----
Solid Waste Disposal (15) ----- ----- ----- L L ----- ----- -----
Transfer Station
Redemption Center ----- ----- A A A ----- ----- -----
Residential
Accessory Structures P P P P P P P P
Boarding Homes ----- A A ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Single-Family Res. Attached L P ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Single-Family Res. Detached P P ----- ----- ----- P P P
Note: Proposed new text shown in red
6
Footnotes (1.a.) Must be incidental to residential use (1.b.) Commercial Horticulture requires a minimum of 2 1/2 acres. (1.c.) Pursuant to the “California Homemade Food Act” (AB 1616), cottage food operations are allowed to prepare and/or
package certain non-potentially hazardous foods in private-home kitchens within residential zones. For more details, consult with the Environmental Health Division, Health Services Dept., Contra Costa County.
(2) 40,000 sq. ft. minimum is required to keep livestock. One head of livestock is permitted per 20,000 sq. ft. (3) Poultry means hen chickens for egg production on a parcel of not less than 20,000 sq. ft. in area, with chicken
coops or chicken houses setback in compliance with Chapter 84-14.1402 (Animal Structure—General Provisions). (4) Adult Entertainment must comply with Chapter 88-12 of the County Ordinance Code. (5) Bed and Breakfasts in Park and Recreation and Open Space require a minimum parcel size of 20 acres. (6) Liquor Stores may not be closer than 300 and may only be open from noon to 9:00 p.m. (7) Food outlets designed for take-out must comply with the bonding requirements of Section 88-16.010. (8) Parking lots are only allowed adjacent to a public transportation hub or for an adjacent business use. (9) LUP required if the proposal is hazardous per chapter 84-63 or use with the potential for groundwater or air
contamination. (10) Exempt except within Railroad Right-of-Way. (11) If consistent with intent of existing approvals or on existing commercial site an admin. Permit only is required. (12) If clearly incidental to primary use (< 5% of gross floor area of building) or where the ZA finds the site is not
feasible for Heavy Industrial uses primarily due to parcel size. (13) Home occupation permitted only if the house exists. (14) Oil & Gas drilling to comply with Section 88-14.402 of the zoning ordinance. (15) Subject to Division 418 of the County Code. (16) "Interim Recycling Facility" refers to the uses permitted and regulated by LUP 2054-92, as it may be amended,
which uses may include all of the specific uses listed under the heading "Recycling/Disposal Facilities." LUP 2054-92 and subsequent amendments rather than this ordinance shall govern the uses permitted, and the procedures and standards applied to approval, construction, and operation of new facilities at the Bulk Materials Processing Center located on the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill.
(17) LUP 2053-92 and subsequent amendments rather than this ordinance shall govern the uses permitted, and the procedures and standards applied to approval, construction and operation of new facilities at the Central Processing Facility authorized by LUP 2053-92.
(18) Subject to compliance with development standards for Community Garden, Demonstration/Educational Garden, Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site, and Urban Farm as described in #60. Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in North Richmond. Note certain operating standards described in #60. Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in North Richmond do not apply to Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site or Urban Farm categories.
g:\advance planning\urban agriculture\north richmond p-1\north richmond land use matrix (5).docx
Proposed new text shown in red to North Richmond Planned Unit District (P-1),
Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the North
Richmond Area, under subsection heading “DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS”
59. A petting zoo, or an interactive animal display, which may involve the boarding, caring,
and displaying of small farm animals, is permitted subject to compliance with the
following operating standards:
a. Petting zoo must only feature small (e.g., animals weighing 100 pounds or less),
miniature, or young animals. Full grown cows, horses, hogs or other large
animals pose a greater risk of injury to petting zoo visitors and may not be
featured in petting zoos.
b. Newborn animals are not appropriate for petting zoos and shall not be featured.
c. Petting zoo animals shall be screened to eliminate those that exhibit
aggressiveness, signs of illness, or other types of poor behavior.
d. Petting zoo pen and enclosure areas shall be effectively managed and supervised
to provide environments that are safe and healthy for both visitors and animals
and their interactions.
e. Petting zoo animal exhibit or visit area shall be designed and located separate
from areas where people may eat food.
f. Hand washing stations shall be located in all animal-visiting areas (animal
exhibits and petting zoos) so that animal handlers and visitors can wash their
hands. Hand washing stations should be conveniently located, sufficient for the
maximum anticipated attendance, and configured for use by children and adults.
g. Signs shall be posted to advise visitors to use the hand washing station upon entry
to and exit from the animal exhibit or visiting area and to notify visitors that they
are entering an animal area and that there are risks associated with animal contact.
h. The group operating the petting zoo shall provide proof of insurance coverage for
liability, and accident and sickness.
i. In addition to any state or County regulations, the group operating the petting zoo
shall follow the recommendations of the most current version of the
“Compendium of Measures to Prevent Disease Associated with Animals in
Public Settings”, published by the National Association of State Public Health
Veterinarians.(NASPHV).http://www.nasphv.org/Documents/AnimalsInPublicSettings.
pdf)
g:\advance planning\urban agriculture\north richmond p-1\june ver. north richmond urban ag proposak\petting zoo.standard.docx
Proposed new text shown in red to North Richmond Planned Unit District (P-1), Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the North Richmond Area, under subsection heading “DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS”
60. In reviewing a proposal to establish a Community Garden, Demonstration/Educational Garden, Urban Agricultural Demonstration Site, or Urban Farm the following development standards shall be applied:
SITE LOCATION a. A site plan shall be submitted. It shall indicate the proposed site location, site size,
appurtenant structures and facilities, fencing, and lighting. b. The site should be located on land that is level enough to support the intended use and in
areas that receive adequate sunlight for the intended purpose without the removal or excessive trimming of trees.
c. The site should be located in an area that is agriculturally suitable, including soil conditions, topography, and solar access.
d. The site should not be located on park land currently used for active or passive recreation. e. The site should not be located on designated or dedicated open space lands. Exceptions
may be granted for open space land that does not contain sensitive habitat and is not contiguous to open space or land with sensitive habitat.
SITE DESIGN
f. The site shall be designed and maintained so that water, fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides will not drain to adjacent property or to the public right of way.
g. A minimum 3-foot-wide, clearly marked entrance path shall be provided from the public right-of-way to the garden. (Community Garden or Demonstration/Educational Garden only)
h. A permanent fence shall be provided on the perimeter of the site. Any fence within the front yard or street side yard shall be an open fence. The fence shall be at least five (5’) feet in height and shall not exceed six (6’) feet in height. The fence shall include at least one access gate. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, fences shall be in compliance with the County Ordinance Code. (Community Garden or Demonstration/Educational Garden only)
i. Fencing for the perimeter of the site shall be chain link or ornamental tubular steel. Internal fencing for screening purposes may be solid fence provided the height does not exceed four feet (4’). The maximum height for any site structures such as trellises, arbors, or other plant supports shall be six feet (6’).
j. Refuse storage areas shall be provided and screened to enclose all refuse generated from the garden. Refuse areas shall be located as close as practicable to the rear and center of the property.
k. Walkways inside the site shall be a minimum width of four feet (4’). All walkways, turning areas and landings and walkway materials shall meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. (Community Garden or Demonstration/Educational Garden only)
l. On-site storage facilities are permitted. This may include tool sheds, shade structures, hoop houses, small greenhouses, plant preparation houses, and other similar structures. Cargo containers or similar storage facilities shall not be allowed. The maximum size for any storage structure is hundred twenty (120’) square feet and the maximum height is ten (10’) feet, any larger storage structure would require a building permit. Storage facilities shall be located within the setback standards for the North Richmond, P-1, Planned Unit District.
Proposed new text shown in red to North Richmond Planned Unit District (P-1), Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the North Richmond Area, under subsection heading “DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS”
m. To the extent possible, the site plan should identify the storage location and use of potentially hazardous materials (e.g. fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides, fuels, etc.), as their use may require the approval by other County departments or public agencies. For example, the application of certain types of pesticides and herbicides, and their quantities, may require a permit from the Contra Costa County Agriculture Commissioner.
n. Trash cans or dumpsters for the site shall be provided and located away and screened from adjacent parcels.
o. On-site composting areas are permitted so long as they are setback three (3’) feet from adjacent parcels, and cover no more than ten (10) percent of the total site area. Composting bins, if provided, shall be specifically designed for that purpose, they shall be screened from adjacent parcels or public right of way. The composting areas shall be managed to prevent rodents and pests, to prevent odors, and to prevent leachate from flowing onto adjacent parcels and the public right of way. All compost materials must be used on-site and not transported off-site.
p. Lighting to provide safety and security for the site is permitted. Any proposed lighting, however, must be shielded so that lighting is focused down on the subject site and shielded so that it is not directly visible from adjacent properties. Low-profile solar light that does not connect to an electrical circuit or junction is permitted.
q. Signage shall be posted at the entrance to a Community Garden site or Demonstration/Educational Garden site. Signage shall be constructed of durable and permanent material, such as aluminum or steel. The sign shall not exceed a maximum of area of six (6’) square feet (2’x3’), and at minimum, it shall include the following information:
i. Garden Name ii. Hours of operation iii. Contact name and phone number, include emergency contact name and phone number iv. Indicate that Community Garden operates under approved rules v. County Code statement that “The on-site sale of produce is not permitted.”
OPERATING STANDARDS (Community Garden or Demonstration/Education Garden only) r. Along with the site plan a set of written operating rules addressing the governance and
management structure of the site shall be submitted. It shall identify the name of the entity or organization operating the site. It shall include hours of operation, maintenance and security requirements and responsibilities, and identify a garden coordinator (the person responsible for site management and contact in case of emergency). It shall indicate if fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, organic or inorganic, will be used on-site, and the procedures for their handling and storage within an enclosed, ventilated, and locked unit. It shall indicate procedures for removing refuse from the site, and how it will be maintained free of high grass, weeds, or other debris. The minimum number of individual plots for the site shall be identified within the operating rules or by the site plan. The written operating rules shall identify the name and telephone contact number for the garden coordinator. A copy of the written operating rules shall be kept on file with the Department of Conservation and Development.
s. The on-site sale of produce is not permitted.
Proposed new text shown in red to North Richmond Planned Unit District (P-1), Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the North Richmond Area, under subsection heading “DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS”
t. Site hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between sunrise and sunset and the site shall be locked during non-operating hours.
g:\advance planning\urban agriculture\north richmond p-1\devstandards.communitygardens .docx
Attachment #6
Background Information on the California Homemade Food Act” (AB 1616)
Cottage Food Operations Overview 1
COTTAGE FOOD OPERATIONS
Assembly Bill (AB) 1616 authored by Assembly Member Gatto, Chapter 415, Statutes of 2012, was signed into law by Governor Brown on September 21, 2012, and became effective on January 1, 2013. The bill allows individuals to prepare and/or package certain non-potentially hazardous foods in private-home kitchens referred to as “cottage food operations” (CFOs). AB 1616 creates a two-tier cottage food operator registration and permitting system to be enforced by local county or city environmental health agencies: 1) “Class A” cottage food operators are those operations that sell CFO prepared foods directly to the public (at the home where the cottage food operation is located or at a community event), and 2) “Class B” cottage food operators are those operations that sell CFO prepared foods either indirectly through restaurants and stores or both directly to the public as well as indirectly to the public via sale to retail food facilities such as restaurants and markets. There are different requirements for “Class A” and “Class B” cottage food operations. “Class A” cottage food operations must submit a completed self-certification checklist approved by the local environmental health agency when they submit their registration application. “Class B” operations must submit a permit application and be inspected prior to obtaining a permit from the local environmental health agency. All cottage food operations must be registered or permitted by their local environmental health agency before commencing business. Please contact your local environmental health agency for more information. All cottage food operators will have to meet specified requirements pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code related to preparing foods that are on the approved food list, completing a food processor training course within three months of registering, implementing sanitary operations, creating state and federal compliant labels, and operating within established gross annual sales limits. The local environmental health agency may inspect the permitted or registered area of the private home in which the cottage food operation prepares, handles, or stores food (1) prior to issuing a permit to “Class B” CFOs and (2) on the basis of a consumer complaint where there is reason to suspect that adulterated or otherwise unsafe food has been produced by the cottage food operation or that the cottage food operation has violated provisions of law related to cottage food operations. Cottage food operations are not allowed to manufacture potentially hazardous foods, acidified foods, or low acid canned food products that would support the growth of botulism if not properly prepared. These foods, as well as other foods not on the approved foods list, are regulated by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). The enactment of AB 1616 provides cottage food operators with the opportunity to operate a small scale food business. Once the cottage food operation exceeds the gross sales volume established in the law, they must move their operations to a commercial processing facility and register with the CDPH under the Processed Food Registration Program. You may contact CDPH at (916) 650-6516 for more information about registration.
Starting your Contra Costa County Cottage Food Operation (CFO)
Please allow at least 15 working days from the time of submittal of your completed application packet for review. Approval is required from Environmental Health prior to starting your CFO business.
See listing of approved Cottage Foods on the reverse side.
It is highly recommended you have a solid business plan in place prior to submitting for permits from various agencies. Please consider contacting the Contra Costa Small Business Development Center
925-602-6806 or www.contracostasbdc.org for guidance.
Step 1 . . . Obtain and complete required items below needed for application submittal to Contra Costa Environmental Health: Fees paid in full at the time of submission* Copy of received & date stamped City/County Planning /Zoning Department CFO Home Occupation Application EH Consumer Protection Services Application – 1 page http://cchealth.org/eh/ (for all forms needed) EH California Homemade Food Act AB1616 (Gatto) Registration/Permitting Form – 5 pages EH Cottage Food Operations Self Certification Checklist (CFOs – Class A/B) – 2 pages Copies of all product labels using required California Department of Public Health format/wording (if stating the use of
organic ingredients, must attach a copy of the USDA certification for each item) Copy of current Food Handler Course Certification – on line courses are available
.Completed within 3 months.
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/Documents/fdbCFOtrain.pdf Copy of certification may be faxed to CCEH 925-692-2502 be sure to state the name of your CFO Photocopy of your current CA Driver’s License (must be a clear, legible copy)
Fees:All fees are subject to change without notice. New Class A – Direct Sales Packet Review $400.00 + $39.00 Includes review, application fee, 1st year registration Total: $439.00
New Class B – Indirect/Direct Sales Packet Review $679.00 +$39.00
Total: $718.00
*Subsequent years with no changes $95.00 – due annually
Jan 1-Dec 31
Jan 1-Dec 31
* Contra Costa Environmental Health must be notified if there are any changes to thelabels, place of residence or products being made, a packet review charge will apply.
California Department of Public Health information and updates: For approved food listing and program updates regarding the new California CFO AB1616 Gatto bill, please visit the California Department of Public Health: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/Pages/fdbCottageFood.aspx
Step 2 . . . After submittal: When completed application and payment are received, all applications are date stamped, reviewed by the Inspector and CFO Supervisor. You will be contacted via e-mail, and/or phone to be advised of any changes, or additional documentation and approval or denial. It is your responsibility to return calls and e-mails in a timely manner for a turnaround time of approximately 15 working days. Keep in mind there are other applications on review ahead of yours.
Continued . . .
APPLICATION FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE (SERVICE FEES ARE ADDITIONAL. REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE.)
*Subsequent years with no changes $304.00 – due annuallyIncludes review, application fee, travel, inspection,1st year registration
Step 3 . . . After final approval: You will be sent your registration / permit with your number to be printed on all labels and the registration for Class A or permit for Class B. If you are planning to sell your products at Farmer’s Markets or Temp Events, you must contact the Market Manager or Temp Event Coordinator to be accepted and approved by them, pay all appropriate fees and added to their vendor list. You must show proof of Contra Costa CFO registration/permit. Do not make, prepare or sell food, including business transactions, prior to receiving your final Environmental Health approval.
Should you have additional questions after reviewing the websites above, feel free to call your lead inspector: Don Hwang 925-692-2542 or program clerk, Linda Whalen 925-692-2529.
Approved Cottage Foods
Cottage food operations are allowed to produce certain non-potentially hazardous foods. These are foods that do not support the rapid growth of bacteria that would make people sick when held outside of refrigeration temperatures. The list of approved cottage food categories and their ethnic variations, which cottage food operations are allowed to produce, are listed below. The list will be maintained and updated by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) on its Internet website as necessary. CDPH may add to or delete food products from the approved products list. Notice of any change, reason for the change, the authority for the change, and the nature of the change to the approved food products list will be posted on the CDPH website and shall be become effective thirty (30) days after the notice is posted.
Approved Food Products List (January 1, 2013): (1) Baked goods, without cream, custard, or meat fillings, such as breads, biscuits, churros, cookies, pastries, and tortillas. (2) Candy, such as brittle and toffee. (3) Chocolate-covered nonperishable foods, such as nuts and dried fruits. (4) Dried fruit. (5) Dried pasta. (6) Dry baking mixes. (7) Fruit pies, fruit empanadas, and fruit tamales. (8) Granola, cereals, and trail mixes. (9) Herb blends and dried mole paste. (10)Honey and sweet sorghum syrup. (11) Jams, jellies, preserves, and fruit butter that comply with the standard described in Part 150 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations. * see below(12) Nut mixes and nut butters. (13) Popcorn., (14) Vinegar and mustard. (15) Roasted coffee and dried tea. (16) Waffle cones and pizelles.
* Jams, jellies, preserves, and fruit butter: Cottage food operations which produce jams, jellies, preserves, and other related productsmust be sure that their products meet the legal established standards of identity requirements for those products as set forth in 21 CFR Part 150. The purpose of the regulation is to maintain the integrity of the food product to ensure consumers consistently get what they expect. The product name and ingredients listed on the label must be factual and comply with the legal definitions and standards of identity or the product may be considered misbranded. Products made with other ingredients that are not defined in 21 CFR 150 cannot be produced by cottage food operations. Addition of other ingredients or alteration of ingredient profiles changes the chemistry of the food, which can allow the growth of various bacteria and toxins under the right conditions. For example, addition of peppers (i.e. jalapeno pepper) to make pepper jelly is not supported by 21 CFR 150 and the addition of this low
acid ingredient could cause the formation of botulism toxin in the product if the proper controls are not used.
Product Requests: Requests for approval of food not found on the CDPH list, submit to: [email protected] The request should include: Your contact information, name of the product as well as a brief description of the ingredients and/or the processing method.
Revised 03.31.14
Attachment #7
Draft County Planning Commission Resolution No. 9-2014
RESOLUTION NO. 9-2014
1
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF
CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDATION ON THE COUNTY INITIATED PROPOSAL RELATING TO A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT TO SUPPORT URBAN
AGRICULTURE IN THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA (COUNTY FILES: GP#12-0002
AND ZT#14-0001)
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2012 the Board of Supervisors directed the Department of
Conservation and Development to initiate General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text
Amendment studies to incorporate policies aimed at supporting and promoting urban agriculture
in the North Richmond area; and
WHEREAS, a report and recommendation from the Department of Conservation and
Development on the North Richmond Urban Agriculture General Plan Amendment and Zoning
Text Amendment studies (County Files: GP#12-0002 and ZT#14-0001) were presented to the
County Planning Commission on September 23, 2014; and
WHEREAS, for the purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the Department of Conservation and Development on March 31, 2014 issued a
Notice of Public Review and Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental
Significance and an Initial Study on the North Richmond Urban Agriculture Project and the
proposed Negative Declaration was posted and noticed as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was scheduled before the
County Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 23, 2014, whereat all persons interested
might appear and be heard; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, September 23, 2014, the County Planning Commission having
fully reviewed, considered, and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter
closed the public hearing; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the County Planning Commission (“this
Commission”) takes the following actions:
1) In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State
CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.), and the County
own CEQA Guidelines, this Commission FINDS the Initial Study/Negative
Declaration prepared for this project is adequate for purposes of compliance the
California Environmental Quality Act prior to forwarding this recommendation; and,
RECOMMENDS the Board of Supervisors certify the Initial Study/Negative
Declaration prepared for this project.
RESOLUTION NO. 9-2014
2
2) RECOMMENDS to the Board of Supervisors the APPROVAL of General Plan
Amendment (County File: GP#12-0002) to amend the subsection in Chapter 3. Land
Use Element entitled “POLICIES FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA”, Contra
Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020 (starting at page 3-67, see online version), to
add the policies, and, as more fully described in the September 23, 2014 report
prepared by the Department of Conservation and Development:
Policy #3-191 – A policy statement that defines urban agriculture, provides
specific support and promotion of urban agriculture in North Richmond, and
recognizes specific activities and uses related to urban agriculture in North
Richmond.
Policy #3-192 – A policy statement supporting the development and
implementation of best management practices for urban agriculture in North
Richmond.
3) RECOMMENDS to the Board of Supervisors the APPROVAL of Zoning Text
Amendment (County File: ZT#14-0001) to amend the North Richmond P-1, Planned-
Unit Zoning District Program, as follows, and, as more fully described in the
September 23, 2014 report prepared by the Department of Conservation and
Development:
Update Section B. Development Standards Table to add footnote to clarify
that structures housing animals must comply with the setback requirements
under existing County Ordinance Code Section 84-14.1402 (Animal
Structures – General Provisions).
Update Section C. Land Use Matrix to add Community Garden,
Demonstration/Education Garden, Edible Landscape, Home Garden,
Processing Incidental to Agriculture, Urban Agriculture Demonstration Site,
and Urban Farm (on parcel more than 1 acre in size) as permitted uses under
the “Agricultural” category to the matrix, and add Petting Zoo under the
“Animals” category to the matrix as use permitted subject to a Land Use
Permit.
Update Section D. Conditions for Development and Use of Property in the
North Richmond Area to add under subsection heading “Development
Standards” development standards for a Community Garden,
Demonstration/Educational Garden, Urban Agricultural Demonstration Site,
or Urban Farm, and operating standards for a petting zoo based on safe petting
zoo operating procedures recommended by the National Association of State
Public Health Veterinarians.
RESOLUTION NO. 9-2014
3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommendation are as follows:
P-1 REZONING FINDINGS FOR ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT (COUNTY FILE:
ZT#14-0001)
1) The change proposed will substantially comply with the General Plan.
The proposal to amend the text to the North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District to
expand the range of agriculture uses and activities will substantially comply with the
Contra Costa County General Plan (2005-2020), as amended (County File: GP#12-
0001), by establishing constituency between the Planned Unit District and new
General Plan policies concerning urban agriculture for the North Richmond Area.
2) The uses authorized or proposed in the land use district are compatible within
the district and the uses authorized in adjacent district.
The proposal to amend the text to the North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District will
allow more compatible uses within the Planned Unit District. In its current form, the
North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit District does not provide the range of agricultural
uses and activities recommended under the General Plan Amendment (County File:
GP#12-0001). The text amendment would allow the desired uses under the General
Plan Amendment (County File: GP#13-0001).
3) Community need has been demonstrated for the use proposal.
The North Richmond community meets the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
definition of a “food desert”, because it is a low-income urban neighborhood without
ready access to fresh, healthy, and affordable food, or is served only by fast food
restaurants and convenience stores that offer few healthy, affordable food options.
Significantly, access to healthy food alternatives is compounded by the distance of
the nearest supermarkets stores or outlets, making the simple daily function of
grocery shopping very difficult for residents without an automobile or who are unable
to drive. The proposal to amend the text to the North Richmond P-1, Planned Unit
District will expand the range of agriculture uses and activities providing an
alternative for North Richmond residents to raise their own agricultural products
which would improve their access to fresh, healthy, and affordable food.
RESOLUTION NO. 9-2014
4
The instructions by the County Planning Commission to prepare this resolution were
given by motion of the County Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 23, 2014, by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioners - (Chair)
NOES: Commissioners -
ABSENT: Commissioners -
ABSTAIN: Commissioners -
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the County Planning Commission shall
respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to the Board
of Supervisors all in accordance with the Planning Laws of the State of California.
Marvin Terrell,
Chair of the County Planning Commission,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
ATTEST:
Aruna Bhat, Secretary
County Planning Commission
County of Contra Costa
State of California
G:\ADVANCE PLANNING\URBAN AGRICULTURE\NORTH RICHMOND P-1\JUNE VER. NORTH RICHMOND URBAN AG PROPOSAK\CPC RESOLUTION .9-2014DOC.DOC