Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/9/2019
1
An American Progress Note:A Health Reform Update for Healthcare Professionals
B. Cameron Webb, MD, JDHospitalist and Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of General, Geriatric, Palliative & Hospital Medicine
Director, Health Policy and EquityDepartment of Public Health Sciences
University of Virginia School of Medicine
Medicine Grand Rounds Friday, June 28, 2019
Department of MedicineUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine
Disclosures• I have no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this presentation.
• In 2016, I spent six months working in the White House for the Obama administration as they worked to implement/execute the Affordable Care Act.
• In 2017, I spent six months working in the White House for the Trump administration as they worked to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act
Healthcare – Front and Center Chief Complaint:
• One decade after debating health reform at the start of the Obama administration, the American healthcare system is still sick.
• How should we fix it?
7/9/2019
2
Chief Complaint: Presentation Overview
SubjectiveCurrent Attitudes on the State of American Healthcare
Subjective - Patients
7/9/2019
3
Subjective - Patients
• Gallup’s annual Healthcare poll (November 1-11, 2018)• Telephone interviews with a random sample of –1,037
adults, ages 18+, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
• Gender: 586 men | 451 women
Subjective - Patients
Subjective - Patients Subjective - Patients
7/9/2019
4
Subjective - Patients Subjective - Patients
Subjective - Patients Subjective - Physicians
7/9/2019
5
Subjective – Physicians
• Pilot survey distributed via email in August/September 2018 to 1,000 physicians in the AMA Physician Masterfile
• 129 respondents (12.9% response rate)• Gender: 62.6% male, 35.88% female
• Age: 92.36% > 40 years old
• Race/Ethnicity: 70.8% white | 10.22% Asian | 7.3% Hispanic | 4.38% Black
• Political leanings: 43.5% liberal | 32.8% conservative | 17.6% moderate
• Specialty: • 36.4% primary care
• 24.0% office-based subspecialties
• 11.6% surgical specialties,
• Practice location: 58.1% outpatient-based | 41.9% inpatient-based
Subjective - Physicians
• Healthcare spending in the U.S. continues to rise steadily, far outpacing healthcare spending in other countries that are similarly large and wealthy. As a physician, what level of concern do you have regarding this trend?
Conservative Liberal Moderate Total
Extremely Concerned
26(63.4%)
44(75.9%)
15(71.4%)
85(70.8%)
Somewhat Concerned
11(26.8%)
10(17.2%)
5(23.8%)
26(21.7%)
Slightly Concerned
2(4.9%)
3(5.2%)
1(4.8%)
6(5.0%)
Not at all Concerned
2(4.9%)
1(1.7%)
0(0.0%)
3(2.5%)
Total 41(34.2%)
58(48.3%)
21(17.5%)
120(100%)
Subjective - Physicians
• In the past year, approximately how many of your patients faced out-of-pocket healthcare costs that were a significant barrier to their care? In this case, "barrier" is defined as something that negatively impacts the way your patients seek or receive care.
Conservative Liberal Moderate Total
All 0(0.0%)
1(1.7%)
1(4.8%)
2(1.7%)
Most 7(16.7%)
8(13.9%)
2(9.5%)
17(14.0%)
Many 17(40.5%)
32(55.2%)
14(66.7%)
63(52.1%)
Few 13(31.0%)
14(24.1%)
2(9.5%)
29(24.0%)
None 3(7.1%)
1(1.7%)
0(0.0%)
4(3.3%)
Don’t know 2(4.8%)
2(3.4%)
2(9.5%)
6(5.0%)
Total 42(34.7%)
58(47.9%)
21(17.4%)
121(100%)
Subjective - Physicians
• How would you grade the quality of care provided to the general public in the U.S. healthcare system?
Conservative Liberal Moderate Total
Poor quality 3(7.1%)
2(3.4%)
0(0.0%)
5(4.1%)
Fair quality 4(9.5%)
16(27.6%)
6(28.6%)
26(21.5%)
Good quality 13(31.0%)
24(41.4%)
8(38.1%)
45(37.2%)
High quality 17(40.5%)
11(19.0%)
6(28.6%)
34(28.1%)
Exceptional quality
5(11.9%)
5(8.6%)
1(4.8%)
11(9.1%)
Total 42(34.7%)
58(47.9%)
21(17.4%)
121(100%)
7/9/2019
6
Subjective - Physicians
• Listed below are some past or proposed policy changes. Please choose the option that most closely matches your attitude regarding the following: Transitioning to a system where a single public agency (“single payer”) organizes the healthcare financing?
Conservative Liberal Moderate Total
Favor 8(19.0%)
44(75.9%)
12(57.1%)
64(57.0%)
Oppose 33(78.6%)
9(15.5%)
7(33.3%)
49(43.0%)
Neither Favor Nor Oppose
1(2.4%)
5(8.6%)
2(9.5%)
8(6.6%)
Total 42(34.7%)
58(47.9%)
21(17.4%)
121(100%)
ObjectiveA Look at the Data Describing the Current State of Affairs
Vitals
SOURCE: OECD Health Statistics 2018.
National Health Expenditures
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$3.5 trillion
7/9/2019
7
What is a Trillion?
30,000 BCE
ONE MILLION SECONDS AGO
ONE BILLION SECONDS AGO
ONE TRILLION SECONDS AGO
=
=
=
11.57 days ago
31.7 years ago
31,709.8 years ago
Areas of Greatest Spending GrowthType of Service/Product
Hospital Care
Physician/Clinical Services
Retail Prescription Drugs
Other Health, Residential, and Personal Care Services
Nursing Care Facilities
Dental Services
Home Health Care
Other Professional Services
Non-durable Medical Products
Durable Medical Equipment
% Share
33%
20%
10%
5%
5%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
% Growth
4.6%
4.2%
0.4%
5.6%
2.6%
3.2%
4.3%
4.6%
2.2%
6.8%
Total Spent 2017
$1.1 trillion
$694.3 billion
$333.4 billion
$183.1 billion
$166.3 billion
$129.1 billion
$97.0 billion
$96.6 billion
$64.1 billion
$54.4 billion
Out-of-Pocket Expenditures Out-of-Pocket Expenditures
7/9/2019
8
Prescription Drug Spending Health Insurance Premiums
Life Expectancy Mortality
7/9/2019
9
Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL)
https://data.oecd.org/healthstat/potential-years-of-life-lost.htm
Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL)
https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/virginia/2019/measure/outcomes/1/map
County YPLL
Albemarle 3,800
Fluvanna 6,400
Greene 6,700
Louisa 7,200
Nelson 9,000
Top U.S. Performers (10th percentile)
5,400
Quality of Care Insurance Status
7/9/2019
10
Insurance Status Uninsured Rates
Uninsured Rates
AssessmentThe Differential for What’s Wrong with American Healthcare
7/9/2019
11
1. Healthcare Spending Overload, Chronic
What is Driving Expenditures?
Growth in Expenditures
7/9/2019
12
Prices vs Use Healthcare is not a “Normal” MarketStandard Supply & Demand Model1. The main interested parties are the
buyers and sellers in the market.
2. Buyers are good judges of what they get from sellers.
3. Buyers pay sellers directly for the goods and services being exchanged.
4. Market prices are the primary mechanism for coordinating the decisions of market participants.
5. The invisible hand, left to its own devices, leads to an efficient allocation of resources.
Healthcare Market Features1. Third parties—insurers, governments,
and unwitting bystanders—often have an interest in healthcare outcomes.
2. Patients often don’t know what they need and cannot evaluate the treatment they are getting.
3. Healthcare providers are often paid not by the patients but by private or government health insurance.
4. The rules established by these insurers, more than market prices, determine the allocation of resources.
5. In light of the foregoing four points, the invisible hand can’t work its magic, and so the allocation of resources in the healthcare market can end up highly inefficient.
What to Do With THIS Market?
• It’s the Nature of the Beast. Regulate!• Bureaucracy is to Blame. De-regulate!
2. Inadequate Outcomes / Value
7/9/2019
13
3. Healthcare Access Deficiency, Chronic
Understanding “Access”
• “Universal access” vs “universal coverage”• Republicans tend to focus on ensuring that people have access to health
insurance.• Democrats tend to focus ensuring that people have health insurance.
Understanding “Access”
• Healthcare reform hinges on the answer to one basic question: Is healthcare a right or a market product?
• Republicans are using the word “access” to describe a consumer-driven model for healthcare. Access means that there are sufficient facilities and providers for everyone, but this approach enables individuals to decide how much they want to pay for health insurance and how much coverage they want.
• On the other side of the spectrum, Democrats use the phrase “universal coverage” to define healthcare as a right, which by definition demands a viable option for every individual. This approach uses government-dictated directives to ensure that healthcare is available to everyone.
Understanding “Access”
• With universal healthcare access, people would not be obligated to obtain health insurance, but everyone would have the opportunity to do so. This mindset aims to repeal the burden of mandatory healthcare premiums and allows healthcare to be dictated by the consumer instead of the government.
• There is concern that this method of health insurance delivery will create a barrier for people who cannot afford the services that they could theoretically obtain. Some theorize that, if consumers have more options in the private healthcare marketplace, then they have the opportunity to shop around for coverage and potentially lessen the financial burden.
7/9/2019
14
Understanding “Access”
• With the idea of universal coverage, the goal is for every—or almost every—citizen to have health insurance regardless of the ability to pay.
• This approach regards healthcare as a basic individual right, akin to the right to representation in court during a trial. The Affordable Care Act sought to get the American healthcare system closer to universal coverage via a combination of an individual mandate, an employer mandate, federal health insurance subsidies, and the Medicaid expansion.
Who are the uninsured?
Why are they uninsured? Understanding “Access”
7/9/2019
15
Plan(s)Reviewing Leading Proposals for How to “Fix” Our Healthcare System
Plans
Medicare for All The Public Option
Medicare Buy-InMedicaid Buy-In Executive Order:
Improving Price & Quality Transparency
Drug PricingSurprise Medical Bills
EO: Healthcare Price Transparency & Quality
• Goal: To help consumers know the prices and quality of a good or service and to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
• Actions: Directs different federal agencies to adopt rules, issue guidance, or develop reports with the goal of increasing the transparency of healthcare price and quality information.
• Effect: NOT a change in law or regulations, but, rather, a directive to draft new rules or guidance.
7/9/2019
16
EO: Healthcare Price Transparency & Quality
• Calls for increased transparency of healthcare price and quality information.
• Requires the disclosure of “actual” prices• “Actual” = charges based on the rates negotiated between insurance
companies and providers (as opposed to list prices charged to patients without insurance)
• Maximizing Access to HDHP-HSAs and Health Care Sharing Ministries
• Research, Quality, and Surprise Medical Bills
EO: Healthcare Price Transparency & Quality
Medicare for All
• Every single American would be covered by a government insurance plan, after a short phase-in period.
• Would eliminate employer-sponsored coverage completely. Under these options, all Americans who currently get insurance at work would transition to one big government health care plan.
• Both single-payer options envision Medicare covering more benefits than it currently does.
7/9/2019
17
Medicare for All
• Both single-payer options envision Medicare covering more benefits than it currently does.
• The Sanders bill, for example, would change Medicare to cover vision, dental, and prescription drugs, as well as long-term care services as nursing homes. It would also cover a wide breadth of women’s reproductive health services including abortion, a feature that would likely draw controversy.
• The House bill covers a slightly different set of benefits but, according to one Democratic House aide, is undergoing revisions to look more similar to the Sanders package. “We want to make sure we’re able to align the coverage services [of our bill] with the Sanders plan,” said the aide, who asked to speak anonymously to discuss the ongoing negotiations.
Medicare for All
• Both Medicare-for-all bills would eliminate cost sharing completely. This means no monthly premiums, no copayments for going to the doctor, and no deductible to meet before coverage kicks in.
• Senate: Sanders’s office has released a list of financing options that generally impose higher taxes on the wealthiest Americans, such as increased income and estate taxes, establishing a new wealth tax on the top 0.1 percent, and imposing new fees on large banks.
• House: Over on the House side, aides say that while they are currently working on revisions to HR 676, that focuses mostly on updating the benefits package —and less on deciding how to pay for the package. They do not currently expect to release a financing plan in early 2019.
Medicare for All Medicare for All
7/9/2019
18
Medicare for All Medicare for All vs Public Option
Medicare Buy-In & Medicaid Buy-In Medicaid Buy-In
• State Public Option Act (H.R. 1277)• Introduced by Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM3)• To establish a State public option through Medicaid to
provide Americans with the choice of a high-quality, low-cost health insurance plan.
• 46 cosponsors
7/9/2019
19
Medicare Buy-In
• Medicare Buy-In and Health Care Stabilization Act of 2019 (H.R. 1346)
• Introduced by Rep. Brian Higgins (D-NY26)• To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an option
for individuals who are ages 50 to 64 to buy into Medicare, to provide for health insurance market stabilization, and for other purposes.
• 30 cosponsors
Plans
• Bipartisan “consensus” around:• Addressing the cost of prescription drugs• Addressing Surprise Medical Bills• Protecting patients with pre-existing conditions
AddendumHow to be an effective advocate for your policy preference
Physician Advocacy
7/9/2019
20
Advocacy in Organizations Legislative Advocacy
• Find your Representative• Find your Senators
• Call, write, and stop by when in D.C.
Administrative Agencies: Notice and Comment
• When agencies create new rules, they must submit them for public comment and respond to all comments before enacting the rule.
Use Your Pen!
• Your hometown newspapers• Large distribution newspapers (NYT, WaPo)• Blogs (KevinMD)
7/9/2019
21
Questions?