Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 169 –
An Analysis of Employer Requirements of
University Graduates
Tünde Tóth-Téglás1, Erika Hlédik
2, Laura Fónadová
3
1 Óbuda University, Faculty of Business and Management, Tavaszmező utca 17,
H-1084 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected]
2 Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Economic and
Social Sciences, Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary;
3 Masaryk University Brno, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Lipová
41a, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic; [email protected]
Abstract: It is of equally outstanding importance for university graduates and universities
alike to learn what requirements workplaces have of graduates and what knowledge and
skills they are expected to have. Previous research in Hungary conducted by GVI MKIK
and DPR examined employer and higher education graduate views based on the
importance of expected competencies. In our research we focused on understanding
employer requirements related to the recruitment of graduates. Therefore, we examined the
opinions of companies that assumingly had a conscious strategy for employing graduates,
and we carried out comprehensive analyses of the findings of comprehensive research. Our
research findings reveal that the large companies surveyed assigned primary importance to
competencies ensuring present performance; at the same time, the aspect of competencies
enabling future performance also emerged as relevant. It was also analysed in our study to
what extent the companies surveyed had different requirements of economic and technical
graduates. The research furthermore explored with the help of factor analysis in what ways
the respective competency requirements were interrelated in the employers’ approach.
Although our research was conducted among Hungarian companies exclusively, we believe
that the findings related to the role of corporate size and field of specialisation may
generate conclusions of interest for research carried out in other countries as well.
Keywords: workplace requirements; competencies; skill requirements; graduate
recruitment process
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 170 –
1 An Analysis of Employer Requirements of
Graduates
Understanding what requirements workplaces have of graduates, what knowledge
and skills they are expected to have is extremely important for university
graduates and universities. Previous research in Hungary conducted by the
Institute for Economic and Enterprise Research of the Hungarian Chamber of
Commerce and Industry (GVI MKIK) examined employer views based on the
importance of expected competencies. One of the main findings of this research
was that the demand for higher education graduates in the technical field is more
significant than that of graduates in the field of economy. The research showed
that the most important competencies appeared to be precision, self-reliance, high
work endurance, ability to work in teams and ability to achieve goals. Our
research focuses on understanding employer requirements related to the
recruitment of graduates. We examined large companies, who have a conscious
strategy for employing graduates. As previous research shows there is a difference
on the demand side, therefore our aim was to investigate whether there exists a
difference also in the competency requirements toward technical and economic
higher education graduates.
1.1 The Higher Education and the World of Work
Considering the significant changes apparent at the labour market as well as the
growing efforts aimed to improve the quality of ‘graduate output’, understanding
labour market requirements has become an important field of study recently.
Szabó and Hámori point out that “at the information age, companies undergo
constant transformation and reorganization, their strategy and organization are
both flexible.” [26] The trends experienced in economic transformation,
globalisation, networking, the emergence of new technologies and the changes in
consumer habits generate rearrangements in the form and content framework of
the world of work as well. Researchers conducting career tracking surveys on
graduates in the European region formulate these changes the following way:
“While traditional organisations regarded employee care as a basic value, today’s
workplaces rather expect their employees to have a kind of responsible and self-
caring attitude and make efforts in order that their employees identify with the
organisation’s values and goals.”[9] In the ‘looser’ relations of work performance,
the emphasis is on task performance, which requires of employees greater
independence, fast response, pro-activity and flexible adaptation and significantly
“influences the value and contents of the competencies necessary”. [13]
In the system of changing environmental factors, companies re-interpret their
recruitment and training strategies as well. There is no clear formulation of
employer requirements of employees, either, making up for which shortcoming
can be regarded as a task which is a key to future success. In the technical
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 171 –
literature on management, McClelland examines, based on his definition of
competency, the relationship between workforce proficiency and employer
requirements by researching into the criteria ensuring successful work
performance. [18] In a labour market undergoing a transformation as an effect of
economic and social changes, the interpretation of success criteria can be
interpreted as a relationship dynamically changing both on employers’ and
employees’ sides. [16] Employers constantly look for the personal abilities and
knowledge that ensure the implementation of their strategic plans both in the short
and long run. [4] On the other hand, the ‘competency set’ of an organisation,
which determines the company’s performance, is also influenced by the
employees’ proficiency, motivations and competency mismatches. [1]
Accordingly, the practice of competency management is based on the broad-scale
and regular communication of the company’s management, HR specialists and
employees, in the course of which the specification of recruitment criteria and
training goals and the elaboration of employee assessment factors are based on the
formulation of current and future employer competency requirements that support
serving the strategic goals.
Some employees find it easier, others more difficult to adapt to the requirements
that are new or under transition. “Technological change generates a conflict
between the demand for and the supply of competencies.” [9] The salary
differences emerging between high and low skilled employees draw attention to
the fact that “the demand for high skilled workforce has emerged in the economy.
Inequalities in remuneration are rooted in the fact that the supply side is unable to
keep pace with the needs of the demand side.” [9] Cedefop’s European skills and
jobs (ESJ) survey pointed out that “skill mismatch” might be one of the reasons
why employers are unable to fill vacancies, despite the high level of
unemployment in certain areas. [3] Skill mismatch is “the gap between the skills
required on the job and those possessed by individuals”. [3] This gap may be
caused partly because of the increase in company expectations or changes in job
requirements observed in the labour market. [10] On the other hand, the gap
between required and possessed competencies may have its roots in imperfect
information about job opportunities, but also in individual educational and skill
shortage or underlying problems of higher education. [17] The role of higher
educational institutions is essential, as it is shown in research conducted by
Hungarian institutions, there is a gap between theoretical oriented practice of
universities and the practice oriented requirements of the labour market. [8]
This process generates new tasks for institutions preparing graduates. Based on the
educational implications of EU 2020 strategy [6], the initiative “Agenda for new
skills and jobs” aims to increase the match between the labour market supply and
demand side by supporting life-long learning and skills development. [19]
Interpreting education as a value creating process, its task is to ‘deliver’ the
competencies required by society and the labour market. “It is increasingly
through this that the content requirements and achievements of studies are
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 172 –
monitored and developed in higher education.” [15] The concept of competency
was used in pedagogy in a different interpretation before (discussed in Tóthné
Téglás [31]), but there is a shift from this interpretation of competence towards
interpretation used management practice in order to understand better the
expectations of labour market. In this context the process of learning is
approached from the direction of the achievements attained [11] [29] [30] [12],
and various learning and carrier building opportunities are available for students.
[14] [21] In such an output approach, institutions make efforts to learn about
labour market requirements following a pull strategy and aim to train graduates
employable in the labour market. [2]
Correspondence between the level and field of studies and the requirements of a
position can be examined by identifying under and overqualified areas, assessing
learning skills and measuring to what extent students are prepared for future tasks
as well as the performance of indeterminable, innovative tasks. [28] From the
beginning of the 2000’s the international graduate career tracking system research
(CHEERS, REFLEX, HEGESCO) focused on the identification of general
competencies essential in the rapidly changing environment and the contribution
of higher education. In those research projects the role of competencies, too, was
examined among factors determining professional success. Even though no factors
were found to have outstanding effects, it could be concluded as regards to
competencies, that they primarily influenced the subjective elements of work. [22]
In the international graduate career tracking system research, the examination of
workplace requirements measures the necessary and the acquired levels of
competency based on fresh graduate’s opinions several years after their entry to
work. As the further development of previous research, the Tuning project carried
out by cooperating European universities “initiated a series of consultations at the
European level with employers, higher education graduates and university
lecturers participating in order to determine the competencies considered to be of
key importance for a higher education degree.” [16] The main finding of this
research was that there were distinctive differences between graduate’s and
employer’s responses although the correlation between the competencies
considered most important was high (r = 0.9).
The role of competency assessment in higher education research is to implement
education better adjusted to labour market needs. Differences in the interpretation
of competency in pedagogy and management made the compilation of
competency lists applied in competency research difficult. As an effect of
employer requirements, both cognitive and non-cognitive elements determining
success at work have been included in the range of competencies assessed in the
research. [16] A uniform competency model generally accepted in the respective
fields is not available either in higher education research or in management;
several approaches can be applied. [31] [23] The criteria for outstanding
performance in a given position can be investigated by examining the
characteristic features of the people filling the positions or by considering the
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 173 –
skills and knowledge required to fulfil the tasks. These correspond to what are
referred to as the income and outcome approaches to competencies. [32] [27] The
competency models can differ in what components they consider important.
Applying the income approach, American models emphasise personal and social
skills, while in the British approach using the outcome approach of competencies,
the role of functional skills is underlined. The models worked out in the course of
developing German technical training complemented personal and social
competencies by professional and methodological/learning competences. [32]
Accordingly, various competency lists can be found in the research that makes it
more difficult to compare results.
1.2 Hungarian Research Findings
Labour market requirements of graduates can be examined on the basis of
employer views or the experience of fresh graduate entrants. In what follows, we
summarize the findings of research conducted in Hungary. The Institute for
Economic and Enterprise Research of the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and
Industry (GVI MKIK) set out to survey the current situation and changes of the
demand side, i.e. the labour market, within the framework of which they have
made several surveys of the characteristics of the current and future employment
of graduates among Hungarian enterprises since 2005. Research conducted by
GVI MKIK in 2008 and 2011 (herein after GVI 2008 and GVI 2011) examined
employer views also on the basis of experience from recruitment process and the
importance of expected competencies. [33]
Figure 1
Competency requirements as perceived by graduates with a higher education degree and employers’
actual competency requirements based on research by GVI 2011 and DPR2010 [16] [33]
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 174 –
Considering research focusing on issues related to the quality of fresh graduate
output, national graduate career tracking system research (hereinafter DPR)
conducted by Educatio Social Services Nonprofit Ltd. analyses the opinion and
the workplace experience of persons who graduated a few years ago and have
already entered the labour market. In their research programme, they primarily
examine the roles of socio-demographic, motivational, institutional and field-
specific features in the process of transition from higher education to the world of
labour. Building on experience from the international Tuning-project, the
comprehensive graduate career tracking system research conducted in Hungary in
2010 (hereinafter DPR 2010) complemented the study of workplace adjustment, in
addition to examining qualifications, by examining the competencies required for
the scopes of work, with the aim to measure adjustment in a more complex way.
[16] Thus, the DPR 2010 research surveyed the requirements perceived by
employees on the basis of the workplace experience of graduates of various fields,
ranking the importance of the respective competencies as experienced in their
work. In the next section we summarize the finding of this research (DPR 2010,
GVI 2011) because since then this research has not measured competencies.
The DPR 2010 domestic research conducted with a high number of subjects
(N=4511), surveying the opinions of graduates who had graduated three years
before and had already entered the labour market, and the employer surveys
performed by GVI MKIK in 2008 (N=3200) and repeated in 2011 (N=1313) give
an opportunity for the comparison of the views of the two sides. [16] [33]
The research findings recorded by GVI in 2011 revealed a radically different order
of preferences compared to three years before. Examining the values on the same
scale as the one used for the categories in DPR 2010, research participants
evaluated the importance of competencies along a much wider span than before
(the lowest mean value being 2.8 and the highest 4.75), which may indicate that
they perceived preferences more precisely. Requirements having become clearer
is also reflected by the fact that the corporate preferences shown in 2011 reflected
a much similar picture as the views of graduates interviewed in 2010 (DPR 2010).
When arranging data into quartiles, the most important competencies appear to be
precision, self-reliance, high work endurance, ability to work in teams and ability
to achieve goals (Figure 1). The second quartile includes competencies related to
professional proficiency, practical experience and learning. Interestingly,
innovation skills, entrepreneurial spirit and foreign language skills, which could
be key factors amidst the changing economic requirements to future success, were
ranked among less important competencies. Considering this it can be assumed
that the emergence of clear requirements can in fact be attributed to a temporary,
but strong appearance of self-sustaining functions related to the economic crisis. It
is with language skills that the opinions of employers and graduates differ to the
greatest extent; graduates regard it even less decisive for their work than
employers. At the same time, awareness of social issues, entrepreneurial spirit and
written communication skills were competencies regarded less important by
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 175 –
employers, while graduates ranked these requirements higher than the actual
requirements placed upon them.
In the DPR 2010 research, the competency categories of the Tuning project were
applied for the sake of comparability. On the basis of a person-oriented income
approach, the thus applied categories formulate basic skills deducible from the
original arrangement of the competencies. In the course of the analysis examining
the co-occurrences of young graduates’ responses revealed by factor analysis, the
20 competencies used in the research, displaying a relatively clear structure, were
arranged in four dimensions accounting for 49% of the variance on the whole. [16]
Abilities and skills related to self-reliant work performance and contact
maintenance were assigned in the Cooperation factor. The second, Instrumental-
cognitive factor includes the use of technical devices and basic cognitive
competences (writing, reading, computation) and, even though assigned medium
weight, the knowledge of foreign languages was also put into this category
according to respondents’ opinions. Entrepreneurial spirit and openness towards
innovation were categorised under the third factor, Social initiatives. The fourth
factor of Professionalism includes theoretical and practical professional
proficiency and the ability to develop these.
As a way of summary, the domestic DPR 2010 research outlined above explored
the competency requirements perceived by graduates, while in the analyses
performed by GVI, the ranking of importance of requirements placed upon fresh
graduates was made on the basis of corporate opinions. In our own research, we
also examined corporate requirements of graduates in the case of technical and
economic employees. At the time the data were recorded for our research, the
research findings of GVI 2011 were not yet known so we were unable to use the
experience; therefore, we used the research findings retrospectively for our
comparative analysis.
2 Corporate Survey
2.1 Objective and Methodology of the Survey
In our survey we examined the opinion of the demand side through a relatively
narrow corporate group, also narrowing the field included in the survey. We
examined the workplace requirements of primarily large companies actively
recruiting fresh graduates from technical and economic fields. Our research
findings created opportunity for examining new aspects: the differences according
to corporate size and fields of specialisation. We focused on the HR
representatives who participate in job fairs, because we believe that they have
clear ideas about requirements for fresh graduates to meet, and have the
appropriate insight into corporate requirements of graduates. It can be assumed
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 176 –
that companies exhibiting at a job fair have a conscious concept on the recruitment
of graduates, have requirements in place and await fresh graduates with adequate
recruitment and training programmes. For this reason, we believe that we
managed to reach an important target group from the point of view of our
research since we were able to address companies actively looking for graduates
and explore their views.
We narrowed down our focus to two segments of graduates namely technical and
economic fields, because according to KSH in 2012 most of the tertiary graduates
belong in these two segments (38%). They reasonably face and in future will have
to face more competition while seeking for job. Our analysis of the arrangement of
competency requirements delivered findings that prove interesting especially in
comparison with the findings of the DPR 2010 research.
Our primary research was conducted at the Faculty of Business and Management
of Óbuda University (hereinafter OE). The aim of our research was to explore
workplace requirements of economic and technical graduates. In the OE survey,
we interviewed the HR representatives of companies at 4 job fairs held in the
Central Hungarian region (in Kecskemét, Gödöllő and 2 in Budapest: organised at
Óbuda University and by HVG Publisher respectively) with the help of
interviewers1. Considering that there was convenient sampling, our findings
cannot be regarded as representative considering company size or ownership
structure in Hungary. On the other hand, we believe we managed to reach an
important segment in term of our research (HR representatives participating in job
fairs, who have clear requirements for fresh graduates).
In our research we sought responses to the following questions:
1) What requirements do companies actively looking for graduates have of
graduates? What are competencies of outstanding and of lesser importance?
2) How are competency requirements arranged in the respondents’ ways of
thinking?
3) Do corporate requirements of technical and economic graduates differ?
In the first part of the questionnaire, we asked about the characteristics of the
respondents’ companies and the recruitment procedures applied by them. Based
on the findings of the GVI 2011 research, companies attribute several advantages
to employing graduates. According to two thirds of the companies participating in
their research, young people bring new spirit and new ideas to the company, they
are easy to shape, they become most valuable work force in the medium run
already and take on more workload. [32] We therefore regarded it as important to
first of all examine for what positions the companies exhibiting at job fairs look
1 Students Enikő Kardos and Lajos Barcza performed the interviews within the
framework of their activities in the Scientific Student Association.
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 177 –
for graduates. We also wanted to know to what extent companies are conscious in
shaping their requirements in the recruitment process of graduates and whether
they used competency-based recruitment tools. According to research conducted
in Northern Hungary, the practice of large multinational companies is
characterised by conscious and planned training activity. [20] Considering that
corporate training and recruitment are systems closely built upon one another, it
could be assumed that the organisations of respondents, most of whom belonged
to corporate circles, used consciously designed and shaped procedures for
determining recruitment criteria and implementing the recruitment procedure.
Based on the list of competencies presented in the second part of the
questionnaire, we asked respondents to mark the importance of competencies
expected with reference to the positions concerned on a 7 point Likert scale. The
competencies used in the research were formulated according to the categories
generally used in education. We designed our competency list based on Sonntag &
Schaffer-Rauser’s model [7]. This competency model includes professional,
methodological, social and personal skills as well, so, similar to DPR research, it
examines cognitive and non-cognitive competencies alike. Based on the
competency categories of this model, we finalised the list by consulting researcher
and experts of this topic at the university. We add new competencies compared to
the competency lists used in earlier research, which we judged could be important
in scopes of work performed by higher education graduates. These included
among others ethical behaviour and demand for multidisciplinary knowledge.
In the questionnaire we asked respondents to evaluate separately requirements
towards graduates having technical and economic qualifications in order to
understand the differences in the competencies required. Our original sample of
respondents was 98 companies, but owing to deficiencies in filling in some of the
questionnaires, the final number of questionnaires that could be processed was 88.
Considering that respondents could make the competency evaluation with
reference to the positions to fill, we were able to use 111 work scope evaluations
when analysing the competency evaluations, of which 73 referred to positions
requiring technical and 38 requiring economic qualifications. The data were
analysed with the help of the SPSS 19 programme package.
2.2 Characteristics of the Companies Participating in the
Survey
We aimed to address companies actively looking for graduates. 78% of the
companies participating in the research liked to employ graduates, out of which
48% said that they very much liked to recruit graduates. Companies do not only
look for trainees at job fairs; 92% of the responding corporations employed
graduates full-time. At the same time, internship and trainee programmes are
popular as well: 53% of the companies interviewed advertised such positions.
These positions offered excellent opportunities to graduates and assumed, on the
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 178 –
companies’ part, a conscious and planned workforce asset training programme by
which the company prepared for its future workforce demand by recruiting
talented young people. 18% of the respondents looked for graduates for temporary
employment, which could be either genuine temporary demand or often served as
a trial period in the course of which the workplace management were able to
survey the young people’s abilities and their attitude to work in the practice.
As regards their fields of activity, the companies in the sample having a seat in
Hungary operate in a wide range of fields. As regards size, it was primarily large
companies that were included in the sample, which can partly be explained by
their presence at the job fair. In 83% of the companies interviewed, the number of
employees was above 250 people; in the case of 14%, it was between 50-250
people and in the case of 3% it was under 50. Considering ownership relations,
75% of the sample were foreign-owned, 9 % were of mixed ownership and 15%
Hungarian-owned.
The sample included companies of larger sizes the majority of which were foreign
owned or had mixed ownership, which assumingly had a relatively conscious
recruitment strategy. Findings only partly confirmed the latter assumption. The
recruitment practice of the companies interviewed is based on a competency-
based concept only in the case of less than half of the companies in the sample. In
the practice of only 38% of the companies interviewed do they use uniform
competency profiles for scopes of work or the company as a whole; 55% of them
conduct competency-based interviews and only 31% recruit graduate employees
by using an Assessment Centre. In the recruitment of graduates, the most decisive
recruitment tool applied is a job interview with the manager (84%); 58% of the
companies have applicants also fill in an aptitude test, while only 8% of the
companies require that written technical papers be submitted.
3 The Importance of Required Competencies
The HR representatives participating in the survey evaluated the importance of the
competencies listed with reference to the advertised positions on a 7 point Likert
scale. Table 1 shows the competencies in order of their importance perceived by
companies actively looking for graduates. Mean scores range between values of
6.39 and 3.47. (Table 1) In our analysis, we first present the results calculated for
the total sample, followed by the presentation of the differences between the two
fields of study.
The most important competency requirement among participating HR
representatives was problem-solving skill (M=6.39, SD=0.755). This is followed
by self-reliant and precise work performance (M=6.38, SD=0.825), cooperation
with others (M=6.23, SD=0.835), information acquisition and processing skills
(M=6.06, SD=0.920) and foreign language proficiency (M=6.01, SD=1.404), and
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 179 –
finally, ethical behaviour (M=0.6, SD=1.206). Competencies ranked in the first
quartile according to importance serve current performance primarily. Companies
actively looking for graduates expressed that most important competency they
expected from graduates were self-reliant and efficient work performance ’from
the very first moment’. These competencies closely related to work performance
that determines the success of their recruitment.
The further competencies in the order of importance judged as important by
companies, i.e. commitment to further continuous learning, openness to changes,
flexibility, self-confidence and inner motivation, workload tolerance and
endurance, and oral communication skills can still be categorised as competencies
fostering independent work performance. However, this second quartile already
includes competencies that may serve future work performance. These are:
creativity, openness and flexibility, and information acquisition and processing
skills and the ability to manage changes. These competencies were less highly
ranked in previous research and were often in the less important part of the list.
This may suggest that in the sample including large companies primarily,
companies are further-sighted and their preferences include, in addition to the
criteria for present success, success factors for the future as well. Therefore, they
formulate much more complex requirements of higher education graduates.
According to the findings of the survey, companies ranked theoretical and
practical professional proficiency in the third quartile. This result could suggest
that there is less emphasis on professional proficiencies, but in fact these
requirements, too, had very high scores. Theoretical knowledge was ranked 5.65
and applied practical proficiency 5.28 on the 7 point scale. Thus, in fact results do
not reflect a ‘depreciation’ of professional proficiency but a growing role of soft
skills related to other work performance. In complex scopes of work requiring a
higher education degree, successful work performance is not guaranteed by high
professional proficiency in itself. Without personal and social competencies,
professional tasks cannot be successfully accomplished.
Among less important competencies, but still in the third quartile we also find IT
skills, tolerance, strategic thinking as well as decision making and risk taking
skills. The companies interviewed regard management and leadership skills and
multidisciplinary knowledge as the least important among the requirements placed
on graduates. The competencies ranked less important are primarily used in the
performance of duties related to managerial duties, which is proven by the other
competencies at the bottom of the ranking whose ranking is lower even in absolute
terms, like negotiation techniques, high-level writing skills and influencing and
supervisory skills. On the basis of the evaluation monotony tolerance does not
seem to be relevant for the recruitment of graduates, either.
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 180 –
Table 1
The importance of respective competencies based on the OE research
(Scale of 7; 1- not important at all, 7 – extremely important; mean, standard deviation, N=111)
Source: authors’ calculations
economic
qualification
technical
qualification Total
M SD M SD M SD
Problem solving skills 6,38 ,721 6,40 ,777 6,39 ,755
Self-reliant, precise work
performance; initiative approach
6,65 ,484 6,24 ,927 6,38 ,825
Cooperation with others, working in
group
6,50 ,655 6,10 ,885 6,23 ,835
Information acquisition and
processing skills
6,36 ,798 5,92 ,946 6,06 ,920
High proficiency in at least one
foreign language
6,14 1,475 5,95 1,373 6,01 1,404
Commitment to ethical action 6,22 1,134 5,89 1,234 6,00 1,206
Commitment to further continuous
learning
5,81 1,175 6,08 1,057 5,99 1,100
Openness to changes, flexibility 6,16 ,764 5,89 1,061 5,98 ,977
Self-confidence and inner
motivation
6,14 1,110 5,88 1,079 5,96 1,091
Responsibility taking skills 6,08 1,064 5,88 1,260 5,95 1,197
Creative thinking skills 5,68 1,292 6,03 1,093 5,91 1,170
Workload tolerance and endurance 6,05 ,998 5,81 1,002 5,89 1,003
Oral communication skills 6,35 ,824 5,50 1,252 5,78 1,194
Ability of manage conflict 5,97 ,910 5,68 1,035 5,77 1,001
Ability of manage changes 5,78 ,976 5,63 1,173 5,68 1,108
High professional proficiency, up-
to-date theoretical knowledge
5,14 1,291 5,90 1,157 5,65 1,250
Proficiency in the use of modern IT 5,20 1,389 5,48 1,237 5,39 1,289
Awareness of the practical methods
applied
4,89 1,326 5,47 1,311 5,28 1,338
Tolerance of other (various) views 5,44 1,340 5,08 1,372 5,20 1,367
Decision-making skills 5,32 1,292 4,99 1,494 5,10 1,433
Strategic thinking skills 4,70 1,288 4,89 1,309 4,83 1,299
Risk-taking skills 4,78 1,377 4,68 1,433 4,72 1,409
Presentation skills 5,00 1,309 4,54 1,426 4,69 1,400
High-level writing skills 5,11 1,308 4,41 1,489 4,65 1,463
Application of learning techniques
and strategies
4,64 1,376 4,65 1,385 4,64 1,375
Tolerance of monotony 4,86 1,549 4,46 1,357 4,59 1,429
Application of negotiation
techniques
4,69 1,618 4,11 1,505 4,30 1,561
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 181 –
Considering the findings, there are no clearly formulated competency
requirements related to learning. The application of learning techniques and
strategies is ranked 25th
in the list, which is even more surprising given the fact
that commitment to continuous learning was ranked 7th
in the order of preferences.
As regards competencies newly included in our competency list, ethical behaviour
had a high ranking, while the survey did not confirm any demand for
multidisciplinary knowledge.
On the basis of the research findings, there seem to emerge some remarkable
differences between competency requirements for technical and economic
positions. As the highlighted figures of Table 1 show there are higher
requirements as regard to oral and written communication as well as management
skills for economic positions as compared to technical jobs. At the same time,
technical fields pose higher requirements in professional and practical proficiency
and creative thinking. Self-reliance, endurance, cooperation skills, information
management, decision making and negotiation skills were ranked somewhat
higher for economic positions. Strategic thinking and IT skills, on the other hand,
proved somewhat more important for technical fields. Learning competences have
about the same place in the ranking of the two fields, while the mean values are a
little higher for technical graduates.
4 Structure of Competencies
The 30 items of competencies were subjected to principal component analysis
(PCA) using SPSS. Prior to performing PCA the suitability of data for factor
analysis was assessed. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling
adequacy value was 0.73, and the Barlett’s test of Sphericity reached statistical
significance, supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix. Using Kraiser’s
criterion principal component analysis revealed the presence of seven components
with eigenvalues exceeding 1, explaining 67% of total variance. To aid in the
interpretation of these components, Varimax rotation was performed. The rotated
solution is presented in Table 2.
Ability to influence and supervise
others
4,22 1,530 3,75 1,489 3,91 1,512
Management and leadership skills 4,03 1,647 3,44 1,500 3,64 1,568
Proficiency in several fields of
science
3,33 1,454 3,54 1,452 3,47 1,449
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 182 –
Table 2
Competency factors based on the OE research
Source: drafted by the authors
Competency
components Competencies
Factor weight
Adaptation Workload tolerance, endurance .781
competencies Commitment to ethical action .765
Responsibility taking skills .749
Ability of manage conflict .709
Risk taking skills .678
Self-confidence, inner motivation .663
Ability of manage changes .573
Communication Application of negotiation techniques .811
skills Presentation skills .775
Management and leadership skills .760
Ability to influence and supervise others .605
Oral communication skills .538
Proficiency in several fields of science .534
High-level writing skills .518
Openness Openness to changes, flexibility .690
Creative thinking skills .687
Commitment to further continuous learning .670
Tolerance of other (various) views .636
Application of learning techniques and
strategies
.557
Problem and Use of modern IT .704
task solving Problem solving skills .689
Information acquisition and processing skills .656
Self-reliant, precise work performance;
initiative approach
.493
Professional Awareness of the practical methods applied .825
proficiency
High professional proficiency, up-to-date
technical knowledge
.806
Cooperation High proficiency in at least one foreign
language
.849
Tolerance of monotony .661
Cooperation with others, working in group .520
Decision-
making
Decision-making skills .716
Strategic thinking skills .475
The first component, which can be regarded as the competency group of
Adaptation competencies includes workload tolerance, ethical behaviour,
responsibility taking, conflict management, risk taking, self-confidence and ability
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 183 –
to manage changes. This component could be interpreted as a requirement of
ability to adapt to a rapidly changing environment, and to integrate into the
organization. The second component consists of competencies that represent
various Communication skills, since this component includes items as negotiation
techniques, presentation skills, management and leadership skills, ability to
influence and supervise others, oral and written communication skills and
proficiency in several fields of science. Openness to change, flexibility, tolerance,
creative thinking and learning competences are placed in the third component,
which we termed the component of Openness. The fourth component includes
competencies determining Problem-solving ability, like problem-solving skills,
information management skills, use of IT, self-reliant and precise work
performance and initiative approach. The fifth component is made up by just two
competencies, high-level professional proficiency and awareness of the practical
methods applied. We called this component Professional proficiency. Unlike in
different research findings, cooperation with others was ranked only to the sixth
component. Although proficiency in foreign languages and tolerance of monotony
“fit” this category to a lesser extent, considering the importance of social
competency we termed this factor Cooperation. The seventh component can be
described as a requirement for Decision-making competencies, and this is
associated with the competencies of decision-making skills and strategic thinking.
Figure 2
Means of indices calculated on the basis of the competency factors
in the case of economic and technical graduates, based on the OE research
Source: drafted by the authors
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
5,5
6
6,5
7
Adaptation skills
Communication skills
Openness Problem and task solving
Professional proficiency
Cooperation skills
Decision-making competencies
economic technical
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 184 –
In the interpretation of cooperation and learning competences we attained
interesting new findings compared to previous research. Cooperation and
competencies serving self-reliant work performance are usually interpreted as
competences built upon one another in groupings, while in our research the HR
representatives of the companies interviewed interpreted cooperation separately
from competencies determining individual performance. In our sample, learning
competences were clearly arranged in the factor of openness and creativity. This
may imply that the companies interviewed think in broader terms about learning
competences, which may also refer to the method and content of learning.
Learning is thus evaluated as a tool to future adaptation especially by the HR
representatives of large companies, in contrast to previous research findings where
respondents clearly relate learning to professional competencies.
In order to analyse the differences related to positions requiring technical or
economic qualifications, we created new variables (competency factor index) by
adding scores of items belonging to a given factor and then we calculated an
average. The averages of the competency factor indexes are shown in Figure 2.
The ANOVA analysis and the nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U test)
performed revealed that in the case of five factors out of seven the expectations
towards graduates were very similar; however, there were clear differences as
regards leadership skills (F=5.610; p=0.02) and professional proficiency (F=6.542;
p=0.012). In the companies’ evaluations, the competencies of communication
skills proved more important for economic graduates, while professional
proficiency was judged more important in the technical field2.
Although general requirements and those related to specific scopes of work are
difficult to separate, the differences apparent from the findings may also suggest
that thinking in terms of general competencies is reflected in different ways in the
case of different professions. For an employee starting an engineer’s career,
professional proficiency and awareness of practical solutions are already essential
at the time of entry so that he can join the work of an engineers’ team; this basic
proficiency to be acquired at school is even necessary for the self-reliant
performance of subtasks. In the case of scopes of work requiring economic
qualifications it holds true certainly in the beginning and probably later as well
that the role of soft skills is more decisive for the successful performance of
professional tasks. Economic graduates are more likely to perform tasks requiring
complex communication skills (negotiation, presentation, coordination,
organization, supervision) and operational management tasks later on than their
colleagues working in technical fields. We would have found it interesting to
explore the differences in learning competences as well, but in our sample there
proved to be no difference between the two fields as regards this competence.
2 The variance analysis and nonparametric test performed on the original factor
variables confirmed the same correlation.
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 185 –
Conclusions
In our analysis we examined the requirements placed on graduates in the world of
work. Building on the data of secondary research, we examined workplace
adjustment in the course of the transition from school to work by presenting our
own research findings. We first compared the findings of research conducted in
the two most important target groups affected: of GVI 2011 examining the
requirements of the employer side and of DPR 2010 exploring the competency
requirements perceived by graduates. In our research, we primarily examined
corporate requirements placed on technical and economic graduates. In our sample
we addressed companies actively looking for graduates, assuming that these
companies had conscious requirements of entrants to the labour market.
Our results show that competencies serving present performance proved the most
important for companies, which implies that self-reliant and efficient work
performance is expected of graduates ‘from the first moment’. In the second
quartile of competencies we found different results compared to the GVI research.
In the GVI corporate sample of mixed composition, professional competencies
were listed in this quartile, while in our research based on a sample of primarily
large companies, competencies relevant for the future. However, in line with
previous research our survey confirmed that successful work performance is not
guaranteed by high professional proficiency in itself; without personal or social
competencies, professional tasks cannot be successfully performed. Examining the
co-occurrence of competencies based on employer responses in our research it can
be concluded that in the way of thinking of corporate representatives,
requirements are arranged very differently from the way the opinions of graduates
participating in the DPR2010 research were arranged. In the examination of
differences between the requirements of technical and economic graduates, it was
the comparison of group means per factor that generated interesting findings.
Similar results bring knowledge within a Czech context.3 Research by the National
Institute of Education of the CR focused on the requirements and expectations of
employers. In the responses of employers operating in the tertiary sectors lightly
prevailed answers preferring rather broad occupational skills than narrow and deep
professional skills of tertiary education graduates. In all monitored educational
categories employers in the tertiary sector attach the greatest importance to ability
to take responsibility, willingness to learn, read and understand the job
instructions and solve the problem. In view of the employers in the CR,
proficiency in foreign languages represents an attribute of the smallest importance.
[5] On the other hand, other research reports about that, “in comparison to other
European countries the employers across the Czech business sector were the most
likely highlight the importance of sector specific skills“. [24] [25]
3 Most of the studies carried out in the Czech Republic are mainly concerned with the
chances and position of the graduates in the labour market or with the economic
returns of education or with the assessment of adult competencies (e.g. research
project PIAAC) [24]
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 186 –
As a continuation of our research, we believe it would be interesting to examine
the effects of corporate size and fields of specialisation. Considering the difference
apparent between the GVI research and our sample of large companies the
question arises whether corporate size determines a different pattern of
competency requirements. When surveying the competency needs of the corporate
sector, requirements arising from the needs of the organisation or from the scope
of duties are difficult to separate in the responses. Analyses per field of
specialisation would make it possible to separate needs of various ‘origin’ and to
map other effects. The further examination of different preferences in professional
and leadership skills could reflect upon the different ‘competency management’
decisions in the respective fields or indicate different interpretations of the new
requirements of the changing economy. The examination of recruitment criteria
used in relation to graduates is not sufficient for providing information on
competencies to become useful in the future, either. It would be interesting to
examine how requirements placed on colleagues change later on, what learning
periods they are provided and what new skills they are expected to have several
years after their starting their jobs.
The differences between the factors explored in our research and those revealed in
the DPR research provide an insight into the respondents’ different thinking
schemes, indicating that the ways of thinking of fresh graduates and corporate
representatives in terms of the respective competency categories may be very
different. The differences revealed in our research on requirements towards
graduates of technical and economic specialization, may also imply that in the
case of different professions, the ways of thinking of participants in terms of
general competencies required for these different positions are reflected
differently. Competency-based thinking aims at formulating common
interpretations, thereby launching a continuous dialogue between players on issues
of requirements, learning and compliance with requirements. For researchers at
the same time, examining how the respective competencies are arranged in the
players’ views may be an important starting point for further research, since the
differences revealed in the findings of research mapping workplace requirements
may too root in different interpretations.
Revealing differences between various countries (e.g. post transformation) may be
another interesting way to continue our research and could serve exploring the
differences perceived between the requirements or may generate new results with
respect to the potentially decisive roles of corporate size or the fields of
specialisation.
References
[1] Amador, L. B., Nicolás Á. L., Vila L. E., Education and Competency
Mismatches: Job Satisfaction Consequences for Workers, XVI Jornadas
ASEPUMA – IV Encuentro International Rect@VolActas_16Issue1:105
[2] Ádler, J., Stocker, M., Competency-based, Output-oriented Education and
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13, No. 5, 2016
– 187 –
Ideal Employment, BCE Business Economy Institute for Competitiveness
Researches, Budapest, 2012
[3] CEDEFOP, Matching Skills and Jobs in Europe, 2015,
http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-
resources/publications/8088
[4] Díaz-Fernandez M., López-Cabrales A., Valle-Cabrera R., A Contingent
Approach to the Role of Human Capital and Competencies in Firm
Strategy. Business Research Quartely, 17, pp. 205-222, 2014
[5] Doležalová, G., The Needs of Employers and the Readiness of Graduates -
Research in the Tertiary Sector, Praha, 2014,
http://www.nuv.cz/uploads/Vzdelavani_a_TP/TER_Potreby_zamestnavatel
u_pro_www.pdf
[6] EU 2020 Strategy, http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020
[7] Farkas, A., Comparison of Employers’ and Student’s Ratings of Importance
of Expected Technical Skills, MEB 2008 – 6th
International Conference on
Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking, May 30-31, 2008, Budapest
[8] Forgács, K., Kaucsek, Gy., Simon, P., Assessment of the Competent
Labour Force with Psychological Test and Script Analysis. Munkaügyi
Szemle, 46/9, pp. 12-18, 2002
[9] García-Aracil, A., Rolf van der Velden, Competencies for Young European
Higher Education Graduates: Labour Market Mismatches and Their
Payoffs. High Educ 55: 219239, 2008
[10] Hajdú, M., Nyírő, Zs., Türei, G., Tóth I. J., Varga A., Data on Higher
Education and Employment of Graduates. Facts and Relationships. MKIK
GVI, 2015
[11] Halász, G., Előszó. In: Demeter, K. (eds.), Competency: Challenges and
Interpretations, National Institute of Education, Budapest, 2006
[12] Kálmán O., Czető K., The Development of the Learning Outcomes
Approach in Hungarian Higher Education, XIV. National Education
Conference Debrecen, In: Buda A. (ed.), Training and Education - Practice
and Science. 8, 2014
[13] Kiss, I., Répáczky, R., New Skills and Work Places: Competence-based
Services in Order to Higher Employment, In: Csernovitz, A., Szegedi, E.
(eds.), Labour market oriented higher education, TEMPUS, Budapest, 2012
[14] Kiss I., Higher Education Students Life Management, Career-Building
Issues, Career Counseling III. 7-8. pp. 6-16, 2011
[15] Kiss, P., Introduction. In: Kiss, P. (eds.), Competency-based Assessment in
Higher Education, Educatio, Budapest, 2010
[16] Kiss, P., Demand for Competencies of Graduates and Work Satisfaction,
In: Garai, O., Horváth, T, Kiss, L., Szép, L., Veroszta, Zs. (eds.), Graduate
T. Tóth-Téglás et al. An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates
– 188 –
Survey IV, 2011, Educatio, Budapest, 2011
[17] Lazányi, K., Backgrounds of Skills Mismatches in the Labour Market,
Status of Economic Students,. Munkaügyi Szemle 57:(3) pp. 50-62, 2013
[18] McClelland D. C., Testing for Competency Rather than for „Intelligence”.
American Psychologist, 28, 1-14, 1973
[19] New Skills for New Jobs, http://ec.europa.eu/social
[20] Polónyi, I., Interest of Employers in Training, In: Polónyi, I., Barizsné, H.
E. (eds.), Adult’s Training, Corporate Training, Debrecen University,
Economic Faculty, 2004
[21] Sági M., Employment Strategies of Career Starter Graduates Pályakezdő
diplomások munkába állási stratégiái. In: Garai O., Veroszta Zs.,
Frissdiplomások 2011, Educatio, 2012
[22] Schomburg, H., The Professional Success of Higher Education Graduates.
European Journal of Education. 42 (1), 35-57
[23] Simon, P., Competencies Learnt in Formal and Informal Way, Prepared:
„Personal factors of Hungarian economy“ Researches, Budapest, 2006
[24] Straková, J., Vesely, A., V. (eds.), Conditions of Success at the Work and
in Life, International Survey of Adult Skills OECD PIAAC, Praha 2013
[25] Employers’ Perception of Graduate Employability. Analytical Report. Flash
Euro barometer 304 – The Gallup Organization, 2010
[26] Szabó, K., Hámori, B, Information Economy. Akadémia, Budapest, 2006
[27] Szelestey, J., Theoretical Background of Competency Modelling, 2008
http://www.erg.bme.hu/szakkepzes/4felev/SelesteyKompetencia.pdf
[28] Teichler, U., „Employability” or „Professional Relevance”: Changes in
Relationships between Higher Education and the World of Work on the
Way towards the European Higher Education Area. In: Teicler, U.: Higher
Education and the Word of Work. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 2009
[29] Tóth P., The Role of Individual Differences in Learning. Acta Polytechnica
Hungarica 11:4 pp. 183-197, 2014
[30] Tóth P., Maior E., Pogátsnik M. (ed.), Teacher and Student Competencies
in Empirical Researches. Budapest: Ágoston Trefort Centre for Engineering
Education, 2015
[31] Tóthné Téglás T., Competence from the View of Employers, Employee and
High Education. Business Development in the 21st Century, Budapest, 2016
[32] Winterton, Delamara, What is Competency? Human Resource
Development International, Vol. 8, March, No. I, 27-46, 2005
[33] Várhalmi, Z., Graduates in Competitive Sector – 2011, MKIK GVI,
Budapest, 2012