Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AN ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL COHESION ON JOHN CHEEVER’S THE
FIVE-FORTY EIGTH
A Thesis
Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Strata One (S1)
Nurul Ulya
1112026000078
ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT
LETTERS AND HUMANITIES FACULTY
STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH
JAKARTA
2017
i
ABSTRACT
Nurul Ulya, An Analysis of Lexical Cohesion on John Cheever’s The Five-Forty
Eight. Thesis: English Letters Department, Letters and Humanities Faculty, UIN
Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2017.
The research has two purposes, i.e. to know the kinds of lexical cohesions
and to explain how lexical cohesions make the narrative text, The Five-Forty
Eight, coherent. The data is taken from an anthology of John Cheever‘s short
stories, The Stories of John Cheever. The research uses qualitative method. The
story is analyzed using cohesion theory by Michael Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan.
The result of the research shows that all lexical cohesion types, repetition,
synonymy, antonymy, meronymy, hyponymy and collocation, are found in the
text. Based on the analysis, the lexical cohesive ties in the text construct the unity
as well as the context in the text. In other words, the lexical cohesion makes the
text function in which it is embedded. It can be said that the lexical cohesions
create the coherence of the text.
Keywords: Lexical cohesion, unity, coherence, short story.
ii
iii
iv
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by
another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the
award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other institute of higher
learning, except where due acknowledgment has been made in the text.
Jakarta, February 2017
Nurul Ulya
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.
All praise to Allah SWT, the Lord of the world, who has given us His
mercy and blessing. His guidance and aid lead me to finish this thesis. Shalawat
and salam always be upon to Prophet Muhammad SAW, his family, companions
and blessing.
In this occasion, the greatest gratitude is given to my beloved parents:
Sriwati and Hasan Bisri who always give their prayer, care and affection to me.
Then the deep and sincere gratitude and thankfulness are also expressed to:
1. Prof. Dr. Sukron Kamil, M.A., the dean of Faculty of Letters and
Humanities.
2. Dr. Saefudin, M.Pd., the head of English Letters Department.
3. Elve Oktafiyani M.Hum., the secretary of English Letters Department.
4. Alfi Syahriyani, M.Hum., the advisor, for her precious time, suggestion
and idea to guide me to write and complete this thesis
5. My family, my sisters and my brothers
6. All of the lecturers of English Letters Department for their valuable
knowledge
7. My best friends Girls Without Boys for their support
8. My best friends of Al-Hikmah Kajen the year of 2010 who always
motivate and entertain me
vi
9. My friends and my little sisters in Alphabet House who support and
bother me
10. The mood booster when I was down
11. All friends in English and Letters Department of the year 2012.
Finally, the writer would like to say thank you for everyone who might not
be mentioned one by one here. May Allah the Almighty bless them. The writer
realizes that this thesis is not perfect. Therefore, the writer welcomes to receive
the critic and suggestion for this thesis to be better. The writer hopes this thesis
will be useful, particularly for the writer and for those who are interested in this
field.
Jakarta, February 2017
The Writer
vii
LIST OF TABLE
Table 1: Illustration of Lexical Items Table................................................6
Table 2: Repetition Items...........................................................................23
Table 3: Synonymy Items..........................................................................28
Table 4: Antonymy Items..........................................................................30
Table 5: Meronymy Items.……...............................................................31
Table 6: Hyponymy Items..…..................................................................32
Table 7: Collocations................................................................................33
viii
TABLE OF CONTENT
ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................i
APPROVAL SHEET .............................................................................................. ii
LEGALIZATION...................................................................................................iii
DECLARATION…………………………………………………………............iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENT…………………………………………………............v
THE LIST OF TABLE…………………………………….......………………...vii
TABLE OF CONTENT…………………………………………………............viii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION………………………………………………….1
A. Background of the Study…………………………………………………1
B. Focus of the Study………………………………………………………..4
C. Research Questions..……………………………………………………..4
D. Objectives of Research...…………………………………………………4
E. Significance of the Study………………………………………………...4
F. Research Methodology……………………………………………….......5
1. Method of the Research...……………………………………………5
2. Technique of Data Collection and Data Analysis Technique……….5
3. Instrument of the Research…………………………………………..7
4. Unit of the Analysis……………………………………………….....7
ix
CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK………………………………..8
A. Previous Research…………………………………………………………8
B. Discourse Analysis………………………………………………………10
1. Discourse…………………………………………………………….10
2. Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics...………………………………..10
C. Text………………………………………………………………………11
D. Coherence………………………………………………………………..12
E. Cohesion………………………………………………………………....14
F. Cohesive Devices………………………………………………………..15
1. Grammatical Cohesion……………………………………………....16
2. Lexical Cohesion…………………………………………………….17
G. Context…………………………………………………………………..27
CHAPTER III FINDINGS AND DATA ANALYSIS………………………...29
A. Data Description……………………………………………………….29
B. Data Analysis………………………………………………………….39
CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION………………………..61
A. Conclusion…………………………………………………………......61
B. Suggestion……………………………………………………………..61
BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………..63
APPENDIX.....………………………………………………………………...65
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of Study
Linguistics theory development has resulted text as a linguistics unit
of analysis. ‗Text can be anything from a momentary cry for help to an all-
day discussion‘. However, it should be noticed that text is a semantic unit of
meaning. It is a semantic edifice that is realized in one symbolic system
(Halliday and Hasan 2). So, a text is a word or sentences that are united
wholly.
In addition, Halliday considers text as form of social exchange of
meaning. When people produce text, they seem to arrange words or sentences
(11). In fact, they transfer meaning. They convince their idea to others
through this linguistic unit. Naturally, the idea, knowledge or anything people
attempt to share with others is to be understood by participants . To achieve
this successful communication, what speakers or writers say or write must
cohere; it hangs together (Halliday and Hasan 113).
―Coherence is realized in relation existing between parts‖ (Taboada
155). The content in discourse must be relevant to the situation in which it is
placed. They must match with itself and with context of situation (Halliday
48). In other words, discourse is stated coherent when the whole content of
discourse is relevant from the beginning to the end. It is also understandable
by the listeners or readers.
2
The construction of coherence can be achieved through cohesion. It is
a set of linguistic resources that every language has, for linking one part of a
text to another. These are the semantic relations that enable one part of the
text to function as the context for another (Halliday 48). It is realized in
linguistic features, that is lexico-grammatical features. It can be said that there
are two kinds of cohesion, that is grammatical and lexical cohesion.
However, this research only focuses on lexical cohesion because it has
contribution in making coherent text. It provides the relation between words
or sentences in the text so that the readers or listeners can easily understand
the text.
Discussion about lexical cohesion, it is interesting to analyze lexical
cohesion as a textual signal to coherence in fictive narrative text such as short
story. It is because cohesion shows relation from one word to another word in
order to make the text cohesive. This argument is strengthened by Alden J.
Moe who states that the more implicit the cohesive relationship is, the more
difficult the text is to be understood (19). So, to make the message in the
short story delivered clearly, it should be cohesive.
In this case, the short story which will be analyzed is from a prolific
writer, John Cheever, i.e. The Five-Forty Eight. This is one of his best short
stories in his anthology The Stories of John Cheever. This story represents the
characters of his that is the duality of human nature. In this story, Cheever
emerged two characters which embody bad and good characters. The bad
characters in the story are hurting people that is owned by Blake and anger
3
that is owned by Miss Dent. In the short story, it tells that Blake neglects and
fires Miss Dent after he sleeps with Miss Dent. Then, few months later, Miss
Dent comes to take revenge. Next, the good character is forgiving that is
owned by Miss Dent. Actually, Miss Dent will kill Blake, but she cancels her
willing and chooses to forgive him.
Furthermore, John Cheever uses a flashback in its plot. The roles of
lexical cohesions in the text help the readers to understand the plot of the
story. For further explanation, it can be seen in the following examples:
(1) He ordered a Gibson and shouldered his way in between two
other men at the bar, so that if she should be watching from the
window she should lose sight of him.
(2) Blake drank a second Gibson and saw by the clock that he had
missed the express.
The word Gibson in the example (1) is found in the first paragraph 5
and it is repeated in paragraph 10. Example (1) tells that he ordered a Gibson.
Then, paragraph 6, 7, 8 and 9 tell about the past event, that is about his
meeting with the girl until he spends a night with her. Afterwards, the words
Gibson is restated in paragraph 10 (example 2) to show that the plot of the
story has come back.
Based on the reasons above, the story is interesting to analyze
because it is assumed there are many repetitions and other lexical cohesions
4
that creating this interesting story in order to be coherent. Right or not this
assumption will be proved in this research.
B. Focus of the Study
The focus of the research is to identify the types of lexical cohesion
and to analyze how lexical cohesion creates coherence in John Cheever‘s The
Five-Forty Eight.
C. Research Questions
Accordance with the background of the study, the main problem of
this research is related to the application of lexical cohesion in the short story.
Thus, the research questions are:
1. What are lexical cohesive devices applied in John Cheever‘s The Five-
Forty-Eight?
2. How do the lexical cohesions create coherence in John Cheever‘s The
Five-Forty-Eight?
D. Objectives of Research
Based on the research questions, the purposes of this research are:
1. to identify lexical cohesion applied in John Cheever‘s The Five-Forty-
Eight
2. to explain how lexical cohesions create coherence in John Cheever‘s The
Five-Forty-Eight.
E. Significance of the Study
Theoretically, this research is expected to be useful to enrich the
previous studies in linguistics about discourse analysis, especially cohesion
5
and coherence anlysis. This research is also exepected to be beneficial for
referent or comparison for the next study. So, it will give the next researchers
some ideas to improve research on cohesion and coherence.
Practically, it is expected to be beneficial for linguistics students,
linguists and other experts to know about cohesion and coherence especially
in short story related to the flow of the plot and the story.
F. Research Methodology
1. Method of the Research
This research uses qualitative method in analysis of lexical
cohesion on John Cheever‘s The Five-Forty-Eight. Qualitative research is
an inquiry that the data collection process result in open-ended, non-
numerical data, and analyzed primarily by non-statistical method
(Dӧrnyei 24). The research is in Discourse Analysis field using Halliday
and Hasan‘s cohesion combining with Brian Paltridge. The data is a short
story, The Five-Forty Eight, from The Stories of John Cheever.
2. Techniques of data collection and data analysis
This research uses bibliography technique to collect data.
Bibliography technique means using written sources to get data. Written
sources are chosen which describe synchronic language use (Subroto 5).
The collecting data follows these steps:
1. Identifying data which is restricted for the goal of the research. The
goal of the research is to analyze lexical cohesion in the short story.
The data is taken from The Stories of John Cheever. Then the content
6
is read to be understood, and choose one interesting story that is The
Five-Forty Eight.
2. Reducing the data that is not necessary. After the story is chosen as
data, the unnecessary data is reduced. The analyzed data is only the
paragraphs that involve Blake and Mrs. Dent. Then it is derived thirty
two paragraphs.
After data is collected, the next process is analyzing data. The steps of
the proccess are:
1. dividing texts into sentences
2. identifying the lexical cohesive devices
3. classifying the data based on the lexical cohesion types
4. putting the data into the data cards which contain sentence number,
sentence, ties and lexical cohesion items
Table 1: Illustration of Lexical Item Table
Sentence
Number
Text Ties Lexical
Cohesion Items
5. then representing the findings of the analysis in descriptive
explanation. In explaining the findings, coding is used to show the
position of the data. For example:
The thought of this, and a whiff of sugary warmth from the
coffee ring, cheered him (P.4/S.45).
7
P. is abbreviation of paragraph, showing the position of the
sentence in paragraph. Meanwhile S. is abbreviation of sentence in
the text. So, (P.4/S.45) means the data is in paragraph 4 and
sentence 45.
3. Instrument of the Research
The instrument of this research to get the data is the writer. The
writer selects one short story. Then, she collects the data and analyzes it.
The last, she presents in descriptive explanation.
4. Unit of Analysis
The analyzed data is lexical cohesion in The Five-Forty-Eight story
by John Cheever. The data is taken from The Stories of John Cheever, an
anthology of John Cheever‘s short stories. There are forty one paragraphs
in the story, but the unit of analysis is limited on the paragraphs that tell
about both Blake and Miss Dent. There are thirty two from forty one
paragraphs that involve Blake and Miss Dent.
8
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
A. Previous Study
Several studies have similar topic to this research. They are used as
reference in analyzing cohesion in this research. To begin with, Zubairu
Malah‘s study in Research Journal of English Language and Literature
entitles Lexical Cohesion in Academic Discourse: Exploring Applied
Linguistics Research Articles Abstract. He analyzed lexical cohesion types,
its frequencies and its contribution to coherence of abstracts. Then, the
research used quantitative and qualitative method. The result of the research
shows that the percentage of repetition use is 54%, of collocation use is 14%
and of hyponymy use is 11% and those lexical devices contribute to the
propositional development of all the move structures. It is different from this
research in unit, method and purpose of the study. The unit analysis of this
research is short story, the method is only qualitative and the purpose is not to
identify the frequencies of cohesive items.
The second research comes from Paul A. Crane under the tittle
Texture in Text: A Discourse Analysis of a News Article Using Halliday and
Hasan’s Model of Cohesion. Crane studied grammatical and lexical cohesion
put forth by Halliday and Hasan (1976) and Bloor and Bloor (1995) in news
week article. The findings show cohesion as linkage elements in the text
within sentence or paragraph.
9
The third research is a study on narrative texts in Kompas short story
anthology. The study by Dumaria Simanjuntak is to analyse cohesion
markers, the dominant reference markers and the form of reference of the
third personal pronoun in the discourse. The findings show that all cohesion
markers both grammatical and lexical are used in the text, and they make a
text coherent. The dominant third personal pronoun is her/his. There are some
differences between Dumaria‘s study and this study. The first, this study is
limited on the lexical cohesion. The second, the data is also different. The
data used in this study is Cheever‘s The Five-Forty Eight. Meanwhile, the
data in the previous study is Kompas short stories.
The fourth study is Asri Sukowati‘s work entitling Cohesion Analysis
of Crime NewsTexts in New York Daily News and The Village Voice. She
analyzed two articles from crime feature in online mass media. The result
shows that there are 43 items of grammatical cohesion devices in New York
Daily News and 78 items in article from The Village Voice. Meanwhile, there
are 20 items lexical cohesion devices in New York Daily News article and 44
lexical device items in The Village Voice article. The research is different
from this research in the data and purpose.
Overall, the differences among the researches above are not only on
the data resource but also the purpose of the research. The first research is to
identify the frequency of lexical cohesions occurrence, the third study is to
identify the dominant pronoun of third person, and this research is to identify
the type of lexical cohesion and how it creates coherence.
10
B. Discourse Analysis
1. Disourse
Discourse is the way of combining and integrating language, actions,
interactions, and ways of thinking, believing, and valuing by using various
symbols, tools, and objects to enact a particular sort of socially recognizable
identity (Gee and Handford 21).
2. Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics
Discourse analysis is a study of meaning on the use of language and the
action when language is used in specific context. It has similarity to
pragmatics. Both are the approaches to studying language‘s relation to the
contextual background features. Both study context, text and function. First,
Both pragmatics and discourse analysis study the meaning of words in
context, analysing the parts of meaning that can be explained by knowledge
of the physical and social world, and the socio-psychological factors
influencing communication, as well as the knowledge of the time and place
in which the words are uttered or written (Cutting 1-2).
The second, pragmatics and discourse analysis study text. They
concentrate on how stretches of language become meaningful and unified for
their users. Discourse analysis calls it coherence; pragmatics calls it
relevance. Finally, pragmatics and discourse analysis concern with function
that is they study the speakers‘ short-term purposes in speaking, and long-
term goals in interacting verbally (Cutting 2).
11
Furthermore, discourse analysis also covers the study of text. This view
considers that text is synonymous with discourse. Then, the analysis sees text
as language element strung together in relationship with one another to create
meaning (McCharty 6).
The relationship makes discourse understandable and is requirement
to be text. It is the most salient phenomenon of discourse and two concepts,
cohesion and coherence, are used referring to the relationship.
Sometimes, discourse analysis is also defined as the study of language
above sentence level (Gee and Harold 1). Further, Stubbs defined that it
concerns the interrelationship between language and society, and concerns the
interactive or dialogic properties of everyday communication (Slembrouck 1).
In other words, the study is not restricted on morphem or word or sentence
level. This view is on the base that discourse gives attention to the study of
connected sentences or utterances and the interrelation between language and
its external factors.
C. Text
Text is a unit of language in use. Some researchers such as Stubbs and
Chafe viewed text as unit of language in use that larger than sentence
(Widdowson 5-6). On the contrary, Halliday and Hasan do not restrict the
size. They used it to refer to any passage of language of whatever lengths that
forms a unified whole (1). Another definition in agreement with this
statement comes from Lyons. According to him, text is made up of a
sequence of sentence, sentence-fragments and ready-made locutions that is
12
connected in some contextual way (263). So, text is any language in use that
is connected in some contextual way.
Text is semantic unit of meaning coded in lexico-grammatical system
(Halliday and Hasan 2). In linguistic system, meaning is expressed in lexico-
grammatical features. It can be sound or writing. So, a word, a sentence, or
sentences are representation of text.
Then, the meaning in the text must show unity. This unity is the
character of text that distinguishes it from what is not text. It is a text when
the meaning is contingent between parts, if not it is only a stretch of sentences
(Halliday and Hasan 2). At the same time, language in use is called text when
it becomes functional. Functional means that language takes its role in some
context in which it is placed. It is opposed to isolated words or sentences.
(Halliday 10).
D. Coherence
A text is characterized by coherence; it hangs together (Halliday 48).
Coherence means that the meaning of sentences in text are interrelated and
make sense (McCharty 26). Furthermore, Teun A. van Dijk stated coherence
is achieved when the propositions expressed by composite sentences or
sequences of sentences are inter-related (95). According to Lyons, coherence
is viewed from relatedness of content. A strecth of sentences is coherent when
the content of text connects one another. What is stated in any one text-unit is
relevant to what has been stated in the preceding text unit (264).
13
Halliday and Hasan describe coherence as ‗a unity of meaning in
context‘. The meaning in a text relates as a whole to the environment in
which it is placed (293).
One of the important resources of coherence is cohesion (Halliday and
Hasan 20). Cohesion provides continuity as well as context in the text.
Cohesion provides continuity between one part of the text and another. The
relation that cohesion expresses dealing with what has gone before. The point
of this contact shows that there are some entity or some circumstance, some
relevant feature or some threads of argument persist from one moment to
another in the semantic process, when the meanings unfold. This continuity is
not the whole of coherence but it adds further element that must be present in
order for the discourse come to life as text (Halliday and Hasan 299).
Furthermore, this continuity serves cohesion as context in interpreting
text (Halliday and Hasan 299). It is semantic relation which cohesion
expresses between parts that enable one part of text to function as context.
The preceding element is present as an environment for the following element
and this sets up internal expectation. Then this internal expectation is matched
up with the expectation, the listener or reader brings from the external source,
from the context of situation and of culture (Halliday 48). In other words, the
parts of text is coherence when it can be interpreted successfully in particular
context (Taboada 158).
14
E. Cohesion
Halliday and Hasan have much attention to cohesion. In their work
Cohesion in English, they define it explicitly. To begin with, cohesion is
meaning relations which can connect between parts of the text (26). Cohesion
arises when the interpretation of elements in text relates to another element.
The one functions as presupposing item to the other in making sense of the
interpretation. This occurrence establishes a cohesive relation and the relation
constitutes a tie, i.e. a term for one occurrence of two cohesively related
elements, the presupposing and the presupposed items (Halliday and Hasan 3-
4).
The following example provides the presence of a cohesive relation and
a tie.
(3) Wash and core six cooking apples. Put them into a fireproof dish.
In the example (3), the interpretation of them in second sentence needs
to recourse to something other than itself. It is clear that them refers back to
the six cooking apples in the first sentence. This anaphoric function of them
sets cohesive relation. Then the relation constitutes a tie (Halliday and Hasan
4).
The tie shows essential role of cohesion. It concerns with how the
text is constructed as semantic edifice (Hasan 73). In building a semantic unit,
cohesion shows the continuity of meaning that exists between parts. The
relation that cohesion expresses in the text shows the continuity of meaning in
the text in the point of contact with what has gone before: that some entity or
15
some circumstance, some relevant feature or some thread of argument persists
from one moment to another in semantic process, as the meaning unfold
(Halliday and Hasan 299). For example:
(4) Wash and core six cooking apples. Put the apples into a fireproof
dish.
In the example (4), there is just one tie between the apples and six
cooking apples. The repetition relates two separated sentences – the
repetition of apples relates first sentence and second sentence. So, the
sentences are related because there is a continuity of idea in the sentences that
is apples. Therefore, the idea in the text can be understood that after the
apples are washed and cored, the next step is put the apples into a fireproof
dish.
Cohesion is considered as semantic relation, it is expressed through
the stratal organization of language. As mentioned in the discussion of text,
meaning is coded in wording; means the choice lexicogrammatical form.
Then, wording is expressed through sound or writing (Halliday and Hasan 5).
F. Cohesion Devices
Based on Halliday and Hasan, cohesion is expressed by grammar and
vocabulary. The former is called grammatical cohesion, and it has four
devices; reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction. The later is called
lexical cohesive, and it has five devices; repetition, synonymy, general words,
superordinate and collocation (6).
16
1. Grammatical Cohesion
Under the notion of grammatical cohesion there are reference,
substitution, ellipsis and conjunction. The first device is reference. It is ‗the
specific nature of information that is signaled for retrieval‘. The retrieved
information is the same thing in the text that comes in a second time. There
are two kinds of reference; endophoric and exophhoric reference.
Endhophoric reference or endophora is reference referring to a thing as
identified in the context of situation while endophora or endophoric is
reference referring to thing as identified in the surrounding text (Halliday and
Hasan 31-32).
The next grammatical cohesion item is substitution. It is a relation
between linguistics items when one linguistics item is used to substitute and
point to another linguistic item not to its referents. Substitution comes in
three kinds: nominal, verbal or clausal depending on the item being
substituted. In addition to grammatical cohesion is ellipsis. It essentially has
the same process as substitution; replacing items. However, ellipsis does not
have something to substitute another word or sentence. Therefore, it is
called zero substitution (Taboada 162).
The last grammatical cohesive is conjunction. Conjunction shows
relationship which indicates how subsequent sentence or clause should be
link to the preceding or following sentence (Renkema 114). Conjunction
does not achieve cohesiveness by itself. Yet, the cohesion lies on meaning
17
expressed by conjunctive elements which connect between preceding and
following element in the text (Halliday and Hasan 227). However, in this
study the grammatical cohesion devices are not analyzed because the study
focuses on the lexical cohesion devices.
2. Lexical Cohesion
Lexical cohesion is the cohesive effect achieved by the selection of
vocabulary (Halliday and Hasan 274). Lexical cohesion refers to
relationship in meaning between lexical items in a text and, in particular,
content words and the relationship between them (Paltridge 133). The
principle behind this lexical type is the cohesive effect achieved by the
continuity of lexical meaning (Halliday and Hasan 320).
According to Halliday and Hasan, there are two classification of
lexical cohesions;
1. Reitereation
Reiteration is lexical cohesion which takes place through repetition of
identical lexical items or occurrence of a different lexical item that
systematically related to the first one. Reiteration is divided into four kinds;
a). Repetition
Repetition means restating the same unit that has been mentioned
before in a text (Halliday and Hasan 278). Repetition can be word or
words that are restated in the same sentence or different sentence or
different paragraph. For example:
(5) I turned to the ascent of the peak. The ascent is perfectly easy.
18
The ascent in the first sentence and second sentence are repetition.
Those two lexical items whose interpretation in the instance shows
identical with that of earlier lexical item to which they are related.
Based on the place of words, phrases or clauses, repetition can be
divided into eight (Sumarlam, 35). They are:
1). Epizeuxis is repetition of word or words which happen several
times repeatedly. For example:
(6) Impossible! Impossible! Amos must be wrong.
The word impossible in the line aboveis repeated in one line
successively.
2). Tautotes is repetition of words for several times in the text
(Sumarlam, 36). For example:
(7) In times like this, it is helpful to remember that there will be
times like this.
In the above example, the phrase in the first sentence, times like
this, is repeated in the last sentence.
3). Anaphora is repetition of first word or phrase in every following
line or sentence. It usually happens on poem or prose. For example:
(8) It is not lust,
It is not face,
It is not body,
I love you because of yourself
It is not in the poem is repeated two times in the first line. The
repetition like this is called anaphora.
19
4). Mesodiplosis is repetition of words in the middle of line or sentence
for many times. For example:
(9) Small employee is forbidden to steal carbon paper
Servant is forbidden to steal chicken bone
Functionary is forbidden to steal gasoline
Forbidden in the text is repeated in the middle of line for several
times.
5). Episthrophe is repetition of word or words in the end of line or
sentence. For example:
(10) ―I hate being called a killer. I am not a killer.‖
6). Symploce is repetition of word or words at the beginning and at the
end of line or sentence for several times. For example:
(11) You say life is nothing. I don’t care
You say life is useless. I don’t care
7). Epanalepsis is repetition of word or words, which the words in the
first sentence repeated in the last sentence. For example:
(12) Nothing can be created out of nothing.
8). Anadiplosis is repetition of word or phrase in the last line becoming
the word or phrase in first next line. For example:
(13) In life, there‘s aim
Aim is achieved with struggle
Struggle is supported with pray
Every last word in the above poem is repeated in the first sentence
of the next line. They are aim is positioned in the last sentence of line 1
and it is repeated in the first line of line 2 and struggle in the last
sentence of line 2 is repeated in the first sentence of line 3.
20
b). Synonymy
Synonymy occurs when a lexical item has identical meaning with
another lexical item. For example:
(14) Most of the way I sank waist deep, almost out of sight in
some places. After spending the whole day to within half an
hour or so of sundown, I was still several hundred feet below
the summit. Then my hopes were reduced to getting up in
time to see the sunset.
Sunset and sundown are near-synonyms, sunset referring to a
particular event considered as perceptual phenomenon, and sundown
referring to the same event considered as defining a moment in time.
This lexical devices contributes to cohesiveness of the text.
c). Superordinate
Superordinate is a name for a more general class (Halliday and
Hasan 278). Cohesion can be achieved through relation between
general class and sub-class. For example:
(15) Henry bought himself a Jaguar. He practically lives in the
car.
Car refers back to Jaguar. Car is a superordinate of Jaguar – that is a
name for general class. This relation can contribute to the cohesiveness
of text.
d). General Word
General word refers to major classes of lexical items. It is such as
thing, person, make, do and so on. General words can function
cohesively only when they are nouns and when it is used in the context
of reference that is when it has the same referent as it whatever it is
21
presupposing, and when it is accompanied by a reference item. For
example:
(16) There‘s a boy climbing the old elm. That old thing isn‘t very
safe.
Thing is a very general word and in this sentence thing becomes
general word for elm. So, the word thing in the sentence can give
cohesive effect and relates sentences in the text.
2. Collocation
Collocation is lexical cohesion that is achieved through the association
of lexical items that regularly co-occur. It also includes pairs of words
drawn from the same ordered series such as colours, numbers, months, days
of weeks and the like (Halliday and Hasan 285). For instance, if Tuesday
occurs in one sentence and Thursday in another, the effect will be cohesive.
Besides that, collocation involves unordered lexical sets, like
basement ... roof, red ... green. A part to part that is used adjacently is
included as well. Collocation can also be co-hyponyms of the same
superordinate term, both members of the same more general class such as
chair…table (both hyponyms of furniture) (Halliday and Hasan 285).
According to Brian Paltridge lexical cohesion is classified into six
kinds (133). They are:
1. Repetition
Repetition means restating the same unit that has been mentioned
before in a text (Paltridge 133). For example:
22
(17) A conference will be held on national environmental policy. At
this conference the issue of salination will play an important role.
The important word in the text is repeated. The word conference is
mentioned in the second sentence after it is mentioned previously.
2. Synonymy or near-synonymy
Synonymy refers to words which are similar in meaning (Paltridge 134;
Lyons 60). It is another way to make text coherent. Synonyms are used in
the text to avoid repeating the same words for many times because in
English it is not good to repeat the words continuously. The example of
synonymy can be seen as follows:
(18) ―I‘am just not one of those blokes that finds approaching women
easy. The book assumes all men are confident, or that if they
really like a girl, they‘ll overcome their shyness. The opposite is
true.‖
Both blokes and men are referring to the same concept, i.e. male, but
they are stated in different words. Those words are used to make the
vocabularies various.
3. Antonymy
Antonymy describes opposite or contrastive meanings (Paltridge 134).
Using the two words near each other obviously enables the write to express
a contrast, but it also contributes to cohesion of the text (Salkie 23). For
instance:
(19) The old movies just don‘t do it anymore. The new ones are more
appealing
23
The words old and new are antonyms because they have opposite
meaning. Their relation in the text is called antonymy and it can contribute
to make text cohesion and coherent
4. Meronymy
Meronymy is where lexical items are in a whole-part relationship with
each other. As a result, Brian Paltridge states meronymy as lexical
taxonomy in the form of composition (135). For further explanation, see the
following example:
(20) At its six-month checkup, the brakes had to be repaired. In
general, however, the car was in good condition.
Brakes are parts of car. This whole-part relation is called meronymy
and it can give cohesiveness to the text. Car in the text units the idea in the
text when the sentence tells about the car generally.
5. Hyponymy
Hyponymy refers to classes of lexical items where the relationship
between them is one of ‗general-specific‘, ‗an example of‘ or in a ‗class to
member‘ type relationship (Paltridge 135). The general word is called
superordinate, and the more specific one is called a hyponym. For example:
(21) Brazil, with its two-crop economy, was even more severely hit by
the Depression than other Latin American states and the country
was on the verge of complete collapse.
The link here is between Brazil and country. Brazil is a specific
instance of general word country.
24
6. Collocation
Collocation describes associations between vocabulary items which
have tendency to co-occur, such as combinations of adjectives and nouns, as
in real-estate agent (Paltridge 137). For example in the sentence below:
(22) Sarah Hughes, 21, a real-estate agent, agrees that Aussie men
need more help than most when it comes to romance.
According to Paltridge, real-estate agent is collocation because it is a
combination of noun and adjective that is commonly used in English.
From the synthesis theory between Halliday and Hasan‘s cohesion
theory and Brian Paltridge‘s theory, it is derived the types of lexical
cohesion used in the analysis as follows:
1. Repetition
Repetition means restating the same unit that has been mentioned
before in a text. The form of repetition can emerge in identical item or
another different one with more or less information. The restated items can
be a word, a phrase or a sentence (Taboada 171). For example:
(23) I turned to the ascent of the peak. The ascent is perfectly easy.
The ascent in the first sentence and second sentence are repetition.
Those two lexical items whose interpretation in the instance shows identical
with that of earlier lexical item to which they are related.
2. Synonymy or Near-synonymy
Synonymy refers to words which are similar in meaning. Near-
synonymy is lexical item that is more or less similar as another, but not
identical, in meaning (Lyons 60). For example:
25
(24) Miss Dent‘s cloth was thin cloth, he saw, and she wore gloves and
carried a large pocketbook. She opened her purse and reached
for her handkerchief.
The word pocketbook refers back to purse, which is synonym because both
have meaning ―small bag‖. Synonymy is used to avoid repeating the same
words in order to make the story interesting. It also contributes to
coherence.
3. Antonymy
Antonymy describes opposite or contrastive meanings (Paltridge 134).
Using the two words near each other obviously enables the write to express
a contrast, but it also contributes to cohesion of the text (Salkie 23). For
example:
(25) The old movies just don‘t do it anymore. The new ones are more
appealing
The words old and new are antonyms because they have opposite
meaning. Their relation in the text is called antonymy and it can contribute
to make text cohesion and coherent
4. Meronymy
The term meronymy refers to a part – whole relation as in the case of
tree, limb and root. Limb and root are co-meronyms, naming parts of
superordinate tree (Hasan 81). For example:
(26) Blake ordered a Gibson and shouldered his way in between two
other men at the bar, so that if she should be watching from the
window she would lose her sight.
26
Window in the text is part of bar. Therefore, the relation is called
meronymy. Further, the word window in the text relates the idea about bar
and it makes the text united.
5. Hyponymy
Hyponymy is a relation that holds between a general class and its sub-
classes. The item referring to the general class is called superordinate; those
referring to its sub-classes are known as its hyponym (Hasan 80). For
example:
(27) Henry bought himself a Jaguar. He practically lives in the car.
Car refers back to Jaguar. Car is a superordinate of Jaguar – that is a
name for general class.
6. Collocation
Collocation refers to the relationship between words on the basis of the
fact that these often occur in the same surroundings. Some examples are
sheep and wool, congress and politician (Renkerma 105). For example:
(28) Red Cross helicopters were in the air continuously. The blood
bank will soon be desperately in need of donors.
Red cross, blood and donors are in the same field that is health. When
those words come together in a text, they are called collocation. Collocation
is one of devices that contribute to coherence.
A lexical item coheres by itself; it does not depend on the relation of
referent. Whether or not there is referential relation it still gives cohesion
effect. However, the second occurrence may concern with reference. As far
27
as reference is concerned, it may be (a) identical; having the same referent
to the first item, (b) inclusive; including the first item and others as well, (c)
exclusive; excluding the previous item or (d) unrelated; not having relation
at all to the previous item (Halliday and Hasan 283).
G. Context
Context is an important notion for understanding language-in-use (Gee
100) and text is language-in-use. So, the study of text cannot separate from
the study of context. The reason is that context gives message something
works in function. In this occurrence context can function as giving true
pragmatic meaning of utterance (Mey 41). Moreover, it assists the
participants to understand the linguistic expression in communication (Mey
39).
To understand text, it is necessary as well to understand what means by
context. The term context denotes the environment of discourse; it might be
the situation of discourse or the surrounding element in text. The situation of
text is well-known as social context. It is divided into context of situation and
context of culture. Then, another is well-known as co-text, that is verbal
context or textual environment as opposed to social context or pragmatic
context. The instance of co-text is a word, a phrase, a sentence or a paragraph
(Renkema 45).
According to Malinowski, there are two kinds of context; context of
situation and context of culture. Context of situation is the total environment
28
involving not only the situation in which the text is placed but also the verbal
environment of text. The verbal environment can be the sentences before and
after the particular sentence that one was looking at (Halliday 6).
Another context by Malinowski is context of culture. The concept is
broader than just actual circumstance. It includes the total cultural
background behind the participants, and behind the act that they are engaging
in (Halliday 6).
29
CHAPTER III
FINDINGS AND DATA ANALYSIS
A. Data Description
In this chapter, the data is analyzed to identify the lexical cohesive
devices and to explain their roles in creating coherence of the short story
based on the context. In this study the short story used as data is divided into
paragraphs that consist of sentences. Each sentence is numbered to ease the
analysis. In the analysis, the data is coded according to the position of
paragraph and of sentence in the text. For example:
The thought of this, and a whiff of sugary warmth from the coffee
ring, cheered him (P.4/S.45).
P. is abbreviation of paragraph, showing the position of the sentence
in paragraph. Meanwhile S. is abbreviation of sentence in the text. So,
(P.4/S.45) means the data is in paragraph 4 and sentence 45 Lexical.
Table 2: Repetition Items
Sentence
Number
Text Ties Lexical
Cohesion Items
12 It had been raining all day, and he
noticed now how much louder the
rain made the noises of the street.
1 rain
16-17 He wondered what she hoped to gain
by a glimpse of him coming out of
the office building at the end of the
day. Then he wondered if she was
following
1 wondered
30
18-20 Walking in the city, we seldom turn
and look back. The habit restrained
Blake. He listened for a minute –
foolishly – as he walked, as if he
could distinguish her footsteps from
the worlds of sound in the city at the
end of a rainy day.
3 walking, city, at
the end of rainy
day
23 & 25 Blake stopped opposite here and
looked into a store window. The
window was arranged like a room in
which people live and entertain their
friends.
1 window
26 There were cups on the coffee table,
magazines to read, and flowers in the
vases, but the flowers were dead and
the cups were empty and the guests
had not come.
2 flowers, cups
27-28 &
32
In the plate glass, Blake saw a clear
reflection of himself and the crowds
that were passing, like shadows, at his
back. Then he saw her image—so
close to him that it shocked him.
The suddenness with which he moved
when he saw the reflection of her face
tipped the water out of his hatbrim in
such a way that some of it ran down
his neck.
2 Saw
35-36 He could see ahead of him the corner
of Madison Avenue he would be all
right. He felt that if he could get to
Madison Avenue he would he all
right.
1 Madison
Avenue
35&37-
38
He could see ahead of him the corner
of Madison Avenue, where the lights
were brighter. At the corner, there
was a bakery shop with two
entrances, and he went in by the door
on the crosstown street, bought a
coffee ring, like any other commuter,
and went out the Madison Avenue
door. As he started down Madison
Avenue, he saw her waiting for him
by a hut where newspapers were sold.
2 corner, Madison
Avenue
43 He could run—although he was
afraid that if he did run, it might
precipitate the violence he now felt
1 run
31
sure she had planned.
55 They had brought in on their
clothes—on their shoes and
umbrellas—the rancid smell of the
wet dusk outside, but Blake began to
relax as soon as he tasted his Gibson
and looked around at the common,
mostly not-young faces that
surrounded him and that were
worried, if they were worried at all,
about tax rates and who would be put
in charge of merchandising.
1 worried
56 He tried to remember her name—
Miss Dent, Miss Bent, Miss Lent—
and he was surprised to find that he
could not remember it, although he
was proud of the retentiveness and
reach of his memory and it had only
been six months ago.
1 remember
60 After she had been working for him a
few days, she told him that she had
been in the hospital for eight months
and that it had been hard after this for
her to find work, and she wanted to
thank him for giving her a chance.
1 work
61 Her hair was dark, her eyes were
dark; she left with him a pleasant
impression of darkness.
1 darkness
63-64 Once she was speaking to him of
what she imagined his life to be –
full of friendships, money, and a large
and loving family – he had thought he
recognized a peculiar feeling of
deprivation. She seemed to imagine
the lives of the rest of the world to be
more brilliant than they were.
1 imagine
65-66 Once, she had put a rose on his desk,
and he had dropped it into the
wastebasket.
―I don‘t like roses,‖ he told her.
1 Rose
67-68 She had been competent, punctual,
and a good typist, and he had found
only one thing in her that he could
object to – her handwriting. He
could not associate the crudeness of
her handwriting with her
1 handwriting
32
appearance.
71-72 When she had been working for him
three weeks—no longer—they stayed
late one night and he offered, after
work, to buy her a drink.
―If you really want a drink,‖ she said,
―I have some whiskey at my place.‖
2 work, drink
83 The only light came from the
bathroom—the door was ajar—and in
this half light the hideously scrawled
letters again seemed entirely wrong
for her, and as if they must be the
handwriting of some other and very
gross woman.
1 light
92&95 When he left the bar the sky was still
light; it was still raining. He was still
not quite himself, he realized, because
he had left his coffee ring at the bar,
and he was not a man who forgot
things.
2 left, bar
154-155 He remember her name then – Miss
Dent. ―Hello, Miss Dent,‖ he said.
1 Miss Dent
170&177 She opened her purse and reached
for her handkerchief. When she
opened her purse, he remembered
her perfume.
1 She opened her
purse
183-185 ―Where are you working now?‖
―What?‖
―Where are you working now?‖
1 ―Where are you
working now?‖
215-216 ―You understand me now, don‘t
you?‖ she said. ―You understand
that I‘m serious?‖
1 understand
224-225 Someone, noticing the look on his
face or her peculiar posture, would
stop and interfere, and it would all be
over. All he had to do was to wait
until someone noticed his
predicament.
1 noticed
230-231 Help would come in a minute, he
thought. Help would come before
they stopped again; but the train
stopped, there were some comings
and goings, and Blake still lived on,
at the mercy of the woman beside
him.
2 Help would
come in a
minute, stopped
232-233 The possibility that help might not 1 possibility
33
come was one that he could not face.
The possibility that his predicament
was not noticeable, that Mrs.
Compton would guess that he was
taking a poor relation out to dinner at
Shady Hill, was something he would
think about later.
238&243 ―I want to talk with you.‖
―I think we can talk here.
1 Talk
256-257 ―You‘re thinking that I‘m crazy, and I
have been very sick again but I‘m
going to be better. It‘s going to make
me better to talk with you.‖
1 better
284-285 ―... I would have mailed it to you, but
I‘ve been too sick to go out. I haven‘t
gone out for two weeks.
1 gone out
295-296 I have always had a gift for dreams. I
dreamed on Tuesday of a volcano
erupting with blood.
1 dreams
297 When I was in the hospital they said
they wanted to cure me but they to
cure me but they only wanted to take
away my self-respect.
1 wanted
305-307 “I know what you’re thinking. I can
see it in your face. You’re thinking
you can get away from me in Shady
Hill, aren‘t you?
1 you‘re thinking
315-316 Oh, sometimes I think that I ought to
kill you. Sometimes I think you‘re
the only obstacle between me and my
happiness.
1 I think
378-379 I’m afraid to go out in the daylight.
I’m afraid the blue sky will fall
down on me.
1 I‘m afraid
383-384 I still have good dreams sometimes. I
dream about picnics and Heaven and
the brotherhood of man, and about
castles in the moonlight and a river
with willow trees all along the edge
of it and foreign cities, and after all I
know more about love than you.‖
1 dream
388-390 The noise of a train coming down
from the north drowned out her voice,
but she went on talking. The noise
filled his ears, and the windows
where people ate, drank, slept, and
2 noise, train
34
Table 3: Synonymy Items
Sentence
Number
Text Ties Lexical
Cohesion Items
5&8 He did not approach her. He turned
and walked toward the glass doors at
the end of the lobby, feeling that faint
guilt and bewilderment we experience
when we bypass some old friend or
classmate who seems threadbare, or
sick, or miserable in some other way.
1 walked toward-
approach
11-12 As he waited his turn at the revolving
doors, he saw that ut was still raining.
It had been raining all day, and he
noticed now how much louder the rain
made the noises of the street.
1 noticed-saw
14-15 Traffic was tied up, and horns were
blowing urgently on a crosstown street
in the distance. The sidewalk was
crowded.
1 crowded-tied up
22 Something had been torn down; 1 risen –put up
read flew past. When the train had
passed beyond the bridge, the noise
grew distant, and he heard her
screaming at him, ―Kneel down!
397 ―You see, if you do what I say, I
won‘t harm you, because I really
don‘t want to harm you, I want to
help you, but when I see your face it
sometimes seems to me that I can‘t
help you.
2 harm, help
399 Oh, I’m better than you, I’m better
than you, and I shouldn‘t waste my
time or spoil my life like this.
1 I‘m better than
you
408 ―Now I can wash my hands of you, I
can wash my hands of all this,
because you see there is some
kindness, some saneness in me that I
can find again and use.
1 I can wash my
hands
411-412 He heard the clearer and more distant
sound they made on the hard feeling
of the platform. He heard them
diminish
1 Heard
35
something was being put up, but the
steel structure had only just risen
above the sidewalk fence and daylight
poured through the gap.
27-
28&30
In the plate glass, Blake saw a clear
reflection of himself and the crowds
that were passing, like shadows, at his
back. Then he saw her image – so
close to him that it shocked him.
He could have turned then and asked
her what she wanted, but instead of
recognizing her, he shied away
abruptly from the reflection of her
confronted face and went along the
street.
2 shadow-
reflection,
image-shadow
58-59 He saw a dark woman – in her
twenties, perhaps – who was slender
and shy. Her dress was simple, her
figure was not much, one of her
stockings was crooked, but her voice
was soft and he had been willing to try
her out.
1 soft-slender
78 Her diffidence, the feeling of
deprivation in her point of view,
promised to protect him from any
consequences.
1 feeling of
deprivation-
diffidence
78-79 Her diffidence, the feeling of
deprivation in her point of view,
promised to protect him from any
consequence. Most of the many
women he had known had been picked
for their lack of self-esteem.
1 lack of self-
esteem –
diffidence
95-96 He was still not quite himself, he
realized, because he had left his coffee
ring at the bar, and he was not a man
who forgot things. This lapse of
memory pained him.
1 lapse of
memory-forgot
162 He had been frightened when he
looked up and saw her, but her timid
voice rapidly reassured him.
1 saw-looked up
167&170 Her coat was a thin cloth, he saw, and
she wore gloves and carried a large
pocketbook. She opened her purse
and reached for her handkerchief.
1 purse-
pocketbook
172-173 He turned his head to see if anyone in
the car was looking, but no one was.
1 train-car
36
He had sat beside a thousand
passengers on the evening train.
289 The cheap paper felt abhorrent and
filthy to his fingers.
1 filthy-abhorrent
327 The coach rocked gently, and the
coats and mushroom-colored raincoats
that hung between the windows
swayed a little as the car moved.
1 car-coach
385&388 He heard from off the dark river the
drone of an outboard motor, a sound
that drew slowly behind it.
The noise of a train coming down
from the north drowned out her voice,
but she went on talking.
1 noise-sound
Table 4: Antonymy Items
Sentence
Number
Text Ties Lexical
Cohesion Items
22 Something had been torn down;
something was being put up, but the
steel structure had only just risen
above the sidewalk fence and daylight
poured through the gap.
1 put up-torn
down
37 At the corner, there was a bakery shop
with two entrances, and he went in by
the door on the crosstown street,
bought a coffee ring, like any other
commuter, and went out the Madison
Avenue door.
1 went out-went in
55 They had brought in on their clothes—
on their shoes and umbrellas—the
rancid smell of the wet dusk outside,
but Blake began to relax as soon as he
tasted his Gibson and looked around at
the common, mostly not-young faces
that surrounded him and that were
worried, if they were worried at all,
about tax rates and who would be put
in charge of merchandising.
1 worried-relax
90-91 Blake drank a second Gibson and saw
by the clock that he had missed the
express. He would get the local – the
five forty eight.
1 get-missed
162 He had been frightened when he 1 reassured-
37
looked up and saw her, but her timid
voice rapidly reassured him.
frightened
176 He had marked them as rich, poor,
brilliant or dull, neighbors or
strangers, but no one of the thousands
had ever wept.
3 poor-rich,
dull-brilliant,
strangers-
neighbors
195-197 The train stopped. A nun and a man in
in overalls got off. When it started
again, Blake put on his hat and
reached for his raincoat.
1 started-stopped
209-210 Blake sat back abruptly in his seat. If
he had wanted to stand and shout for
help, he would not have been able to.
1 stand-sat
215 He tried to speak but he was still
mute.
1 mute-speak
231 Help would come before they stoped
again; but the train stopped, there were
some comings and goings,
1 goings-comings
239-240 ―You can come to my office.‖
―I went there every day for two
weeks.‖
1 went-come
Table 5: Meronymy Items
Sentence
Number
Text Ties Lexical
Cohesion Items
1-2 When Blake stepped out of the
elevator, he saw her. A few people,
mostly men waiting for girls, stood in
the lobby watching the elevator doors
1 elevator doors-
elevator
25 The window was arranged like a
room in which people live and
entertain their friends.
1 room-window
53 He ordered a Gibson and shouldered
his way in between two other men at
the bar, so that if she should be
watching from the window she would
lose sight of him.
1 window-bar
83 The only light came from the
bathroom—the door was ajar—and
in this half light the hideously
scrawled letters again seemed entirely
wrong for her, and as if they must be
the handwriting of some other and
1 door-bathroom
38
very gross woman.
84&86 The next day, he did a sensible thing.
Then he took the afternoon off.
1 afternoon-day
91-92 He would get the local – the five forty
eight. When he left the bar the sky was
still light; it was still raining.
1 left-get
98 The local was only half full when he
boarded it, and he got a seat on the
river side and took off his raincoat.
1 seat-the local
318-320 She touched Blake with the pistol. He
felt the muzzle against his belly. The
bullet, at that distance, would make a
small hole where it entered, but it
would rip out of his back a place as
big as a soccer ball.
2 muzzle-pistol,
bullet-pistol
Table 6: Hyponymy Items
Sentence
Number
Text Ties Lexical
Cohesion Items
31 She might be meaning to do him harm
– she might be meaning to kill him.
1 kill-harm
50 The reports in his briefcase had no
bearing on war, peace, the dope
traffic, the hydrogen bomb, or any of
the other international skulduggeries
that he associated with pursuers, men
in trench coats, and wet sidewalks.
1 international
skullduggeries-
war, peace, dope
traffic, hydrogen
bomb
53-54 He ordered a Gibson and shouldered
his way in between two other men at
the bar, so that if she should be
watching from the window she would
lose sihgt of him. The place was
crowded with commuters putting
down a drink before the ride home.
2 place-bar,
drink-Gibson
59 Her dress was simple, her figure was
not much, one of her stockings was
crooked, but her voice was soft and he
had been willing to try her out.
1 stockings-dress
72 ―If you really want a drink,‖ she said,
―I have some whiskey at my place.‖
1 whiskey-drink
92&94 When he left the bar, the sky was still
light; it was still raining.
Once or twice, he looked over his
1 walking-left
39
shoulder, walking to the station, but
he seemed to be safe.
147-148 Out of the corner of his eye he could
see the landscape. It was industrial
and, at that hour, sad.
1 industrial-
landscape
Table 7: Collocation Items
Sentence
Number
Text Ties Lexical items
194 He was conscious of her heavy
breathing and the smell of her rain-
soaked coat.
1 heavy-
breathing
213 All he could think of to do then was to
wait for his heart to stop its hysterical
beating, so that he could judge the extent
of his danger.
1 beating-heart
B. Data Analysis
1. Repetition
(1) Walking in the city, we seldom turn and look back. The habit
restrained Blake. He listened for a minute – foolishly – as he
walked as if he could distinguish her footsteps from the world of
sound in the city at the end of a rainy day (P.2/S.17).
There are three cohesive ties of repetitions in the sentence walked,
city and end of a rainy day. Walked is verbal repetition because it has
been mentioned previously in S.18 but it extends in the different
morphological form walking. However, it remains cohesion because
lexical cohesion is not bound to particular morphological form.
Another repetition is the word city. It is called repetition because it
has been mentioned formerly in S.18. City in S.20 has no referential
40
relation to the city previously stated. Further, city in S.20 cannot involve
the city in S.18 because city in S.18 is a generalization as beginning of
paragraph. Meanwhile, city in S.20 shows the place where he walked
while listening to her footsteps.
The other repetition in the text is end of a rainy day. End of a
rainy day is noun repetition of end of the day in S.16. Then they, end of
a rainy day and end of the day, establish a tie which link S.20 and S.16.
Both are used as prepositional phrase which occurs in the context of time.
The text is coherent. The coherence is created by repetition
providing the continuity. The repetition shows the continuity of a process
of leaving office at the time. At first, the activity is he came out of the
office (S.16). It means he was not in the office any longer. Then he
walked in the city at the end of rainy day in S.20 comes as the next
process of leaving the office.
So, the text tells the readers that the actor, he i.e. Blake, walked in
the city at the end of rainy day after coming out of the office building.
When he walked he tried to listen to her footsteps.
(2) Blake stopped opposite here and looked into a store window. It
was a decorator‘s or an auctioneer‘s. The window was arranged
like a room in which people live and entertain their friends. There
were cups on the coffee table, magazines to read, and flowers in
the vases, but the flowers were dead and the cups were empty and
the guests had not come (P.2/S.23-26).
There are three repetitions in the passage. The first is the word
window. Window repeats store window in S.25. In S.23 a store window
41
as object and in the following sentence window comes as subject. This
repetition explains the condition of store window in Blake‘s view.
The second repetition is cups because cups has been mentioned
previously in the same sentence. Cups are repeated exactly the same. The
cups has same identical referent with cups in the previous sentence. It
shows that the empty cups were cups on the coffee table.
This occurrence is also applied in the word flowers. Flowers
(were dead) is repetition of flowers (in the vases). The repetition of
flowers has identical referent as flowers in the previous part. So, the dead
flowers were flowers in the vases.
The repetetitions create coherence of the text through the ties. The
repetition of windows ties S.23 and S.25. Then, the repetition of cups ties
wo clauses in the same sentence. The last is the repetition of flowers. It
ties two clauses in the same sentence.
(3) In the plate glass, Blake saw a clear reflection of himself and the
crowds that were passing, like shadows, at his back. Then he saw
her image—so close to him that it shocked him (P.2/S.27-28).
Saw in S.28 is also repetition because it has been mentioned in the
previous sentence. The repetition ties S.28 and S.27. So, the repetition of
saw in S.28 gives the cohesive effect.
In creating coherence, the repetition of saw gives the continuity of
sequential activities. Saw in S.28 and S.27 has the same actor, Blake. This
tie shows the sequential things that Blake saw in the plate glass, a clear
42
reflection of himself and the crowds, and her image. It is reinforced by
the conjunction then in S.28. So, it can be interpreted that besides seeing
his reflection, Blake also saw her image which made him shocked.
(4) The suddenness with which he moved when he saw the reflection
of her face tipped the water out of his hatbrim in such a way that
some of it ran down his neck (P.3/S.32).
There are two repetitions in the text. The first is repetition of saw.
Saw in S.32 is called repetition because it has been mentioned in S.28.
Saw in S.32 establishes a tie between S.32 and S.27. Besides saw,
reflection of her face in S.32 also includes lexical repetition. Reflection
of her face repeats reflection of her contorted face in S.30. The cohesive
item, reflection of her face, is stated in less information than the
presupposed item. It does not contain information contorted nevertheless
it remains cohesive. So, the repetition establishes a tie between S.32 and
S.30.
The repetitions contribute to coherence through creating a context
in the text. The repetition of saw in S.32, which is the beginning of
paragraph 3, emphasizes that the event he moved suddenly is the result of
what he saw. Then, the repetition of reflection of her face shows that this
sentence has the relation of meaning with the previous sentence S.30. It
becomes context explaining that this sentence, S.32, is a seriality of the
text before.
(5) He tried to remember her name – Miss Dent, Miss Bent, Miss Lent
– and he was surprised to find that he could not remember it,
43
although he was proud of the retentiveness and reach of his
memory and it had only been six months (P.5/S.56).
The writer used remember as cohesive item through its repetition
in the text. Remember in he could not remember it is second occurrence
of remember in he tried to remember. Therefore, remember is called
repetition.
Remember in the first occurrence emerges as the object of tried. It
means that he did not remember her name and tried to. However, the verb
remember is repeated which is accompanied by negation, could not
remember. It shows his incapability of remembering the woman‘s name.
So, it can be understood that the text tells about the failure of the actor in
attempting to remember the woman‘s name.
(6) As he got to know her better, he felt that she was oversensitive and,
as a consequence, lonely. Once, when she was speaking to him of
what she imagined his life to be—full of friendships, money, and a
large and loving family—he had thought he recognized a peculiar
feeling of deprivation. She seemed to imagine the lives of the rest
of the world to be more brilliant than they were. Once, she had put
a rose on his desk, and he had dropped it into the wastebasket. ―I
don‘t like roses,‖ he told her (P.6/S.62-66).
In the passage, once S.65, imagine S.64 and roses S.66 are lexical
repetitions. Once in S.65 repeats once in S.63. The occurrence of the two
establishes a cohesion tie. Once is one of narrative characteristics. It is
used to describe event at past. In this case once is used in the context of
past event. Then the repetition of once indicates that the events; she was
44
speaking to him in S.63 and she had put a rose on his desk in S.65 take
different times.
Repetition in the passage is also found in imagine S.64. Imagine
in S.64 displays a semantic relation between S.64 and S.63 through
repetition because it has been mentioned previously. The repetition is
preceded by seemed to, explaining what the speaker says about thoughts,
feeling or action is less strong. So, imagine in S.64 shows the Blake‘s
thought about what she imagined. The text tells that after she spoke about
her imagination of Blake‘s life, he thought that she had a feeling of
deprivation. Then it makes Blake think she also imagined other lives more
brilliant.
Repetition also occurs to roses in the last sentence. The lexical tie
is between roses in S.66 and rose in S.66. Roses in S.66 is a restatement
of rose in S.65. It can be interpreted that roses in S.66 includes the rose in
the previous sentence and others as well.
(7) When she had been working for him three weeks—no longer—they
stayed late one night and he offered, after work, to buy her a drink.
―If you really want a drink,‖ she said, ―I have some whiskey at my
place,‖ (P.7/S71-72).
Drink in S.72 is a repetition form of drink in S.71. A drink in
S.72 excludes a drink referred to in the preceding sentence. It is reinforced
with her statement some whiskey at my place showing that a drink she
45
offered is her whiskey at her place. Meanwhile, a drink in the previous
sentence is a drink at work.
The text tells us that at night when they stayed late he bought her a
drink, they stayed late one night and offered, after work, to buy her a
drink. Afterwards, it is the girl that offered another drink. It is described
by her next utterance I have some whiskey at my place showing another
place where she stored the drink.
(8) When he left the bar the sky was still light; it was still raining. He
looked carefully up and down the street and saw that the poor
woman had gone. Once or twice, he looked over his shoulder,
walking to the station, but he seemed to be safe. He was still not
quite himself, he realized, because he had left his coffee ring at the
bar, and he was not a man who forgot things (P.10/S.92-95).
There are three repetition items in the sentence; left, coffee ring
and bar. To begin with, repetition includes left in S.95 because it has been
stated initially in S.92. However, left in S.95 and in S.92 has different
context. Left in S.95 is used in the context of unintentional action and the
initial is on the contrary condition.
The next repetition in the text is coffee ring in S.95. Coffee ring
restates coffee ring in S.37 and S.45. It refers to coffee ring in the
previous occurrence, S.37 and S.45. So, coffee ring he left is a coffee
ring he bought in the bakery shop. The last repetition in the text is bar.
Bar in S.95 is repetition of bar in S.92. The repetition establishes a tie
46
between S.95 and S.92. The bar stated formerly has the same referent as
the bar in S.95.
The text tells that he felt unsafe when he left the bar. He looked up
carefully up and down the street and once or twice, he looked over his
shoulder indicate that someone is in fear. As a consequence, he forgot his
coffee ring and left it at the bar which he left before. So, it can be
understood that he left the bar in fear so that he forgot his coffee ring and
left it.
(9) When she opened her purse, he remembered her perfume. It had
clung to his skin the night he went to her place for a drink
(P.18/S.177-178).
There are two repetitions in the sentences. First, she opened her
purse is sentence repetition of she opened her purse in S.170. This
restatement of the sentence is placed at the end of the paragraph signaling
the reader that the semantic unit represented by this paragraph is now
complete. It tells that she opened her purse to take handkerchief and she
began to cry. When she did, it reminds him of her perfume.
Then night is also repetition. It has been stated in S.71. Night ties
S.178 and S.71 by means of repetition. The night in S.178 refers to the
night in S.71. It comes in the context of time when he went to her place.
The repetition shows that at the night they stayed late, S.71, and then they
drank at her place, S.72, he smelt her perfume. He smelt it again when she
opened her purse.
47
(10) Help would come in a minute, he thought. Help would come
before they stopped again; but the train stopped, there were some
comings and goings, and Blake still lived on, at the mercy of the
woman beside him (P.24/S230-231).
There are three repetitions in the text. The first is repetition of
clause help would come. The clause help would come in this paragraph
occurs twice in S.230 and in S.231. It has been stated in S.222. It is
adjacent with repetition thought in the same sentence. Thought is
repetition of thought in S.222. Those repetitions describe Blake‘s strong
expectation to get help.
Then the following repetition in this passage is stopped in the
train stopped repeats stopped in they stopped again. The other
repetition found in the text is Blake. Blake has been stated in S.222. It is
called repetition then because item which is restated is repetition.
The text describes Blake‘s strong expectation to get help in a
minute. Then the clause is restated with the specific time before they
stopped. However, the verb stopped is mentioned again to state contrary
condition, but the train stopped. It indicates that his expectation will not
occur. Nonetheless, Blake is still safe.
(11) The possibility that help might not come was one that he could not
face. The possibility that his predicament was not noticeable, that
Mrs. Compton would guess that he was taking a poor relation out
to dinner at Shady Hill, was something he would think about later
(P.24/S.232-233).
48
There are five repetitions in the text. The first is clause help might
not come. Help might not come S.232 is repetition of help would come
S.231. Help would come has been stated in S.231, S.230 and S.222. This
repetition creates the unity of the text through the meaning relation. It
relates S.232, S.231, S.230 and S.222.
In addition, possibility is also included in repetition item.
Possibility in S.233 repeats possibility in S.232. It is adjacent with the
repetitions of predicament and noticeable. Predicament extends as
repetition in the text because it is a second occurrence of predicament in
S.225. Predicament in S.233 refers back to predicament in S.225. It is
adjacent with the repetition of noticeable. Noticeable repeats noticed in
S.225. It remains being called repetition item although both items have the
different form. The repetition is accompanied by negation.
The last repetition in the text is think. It is restatement of thought
in S.230. Restating the same item is called repetition. Therefore, think in
S.233 is called repetition although it extends in different form.
The repetition gives the continuity of the environment of the
contrary event that he expected. Blake thought help would come when
someone notices his predicament but in this event this possibility is not
fulfilled because his predicament is not noticeable.
(12) ―It‘s on the seat. Pick it up. I would have mailed it to you, but I‘ve
been too sick to go out. I haven‘t gone out for two weeks. I haven‘t
49
had any work for three months. I haven‘t spoken to anybody but
the landlady. Please read my letter,‖ (P.29/S.282-288).
The repeatitions in the text above are verbal phrase and noun
repetitions. It is found two verb repetitions. The first verb repetition is
read my letter in S.288. It has been stated in S.281.
The second verb repetition is gone out in S.185. Gone out restates
the word go out in S.285. They are called repetitions because they have
been stated previously although for the presupposed item of gone out has
different morphological forms. Lexical item is not bound to a particular
grammatical category.
Miss Dent‘s utterance I haven’t gone out for two weeks can be
interpreted as the consequence of his illness. It has been mentioned in the
preceding I’ve been too sick to go out.
2. Synonymy or Near synonymy
(13) He did not approach her. She had no legitimate business with him.
They had nothing to say. He turned and walked toward the glass
door at the end of the lobby, feeling that faint guilt and
bewilderment we experience when we bypass some old friends or
classmate who seems threadbare, or sick, or miserable in some
other way (P.1/S.5-8).
Walked toward is synonymous with approach in S.5. Approach
means to come near to somebody or something in distance or time.
Meanwhile, walked toward also has meaning walking to come near
something. They have the similar meaning although it is not exactly. So,
their relation is called synonymy.
50
The text tells about his reaction (Blake‘s reaction) when saw her.
He keeps away from her because he does not have business with her. It
shows by the verb approach accompanied by negation. Then, it is asserted
by the following sentence they had nothing to say. He walked toward
the glass door emphasizes that Blake did not approach her, but he
approached to the glass door.
(14) He could have turned then and asked her what she wanted, but
instead of recognizing her, he shied away abruptly from the
reflection of her contorted face and went along the street
(P.2/S.30).
The cohesive tie in the text is achieved through synonymy between
reflection S.27 and S.30 and image S.28. Reflection and image have the
meaning a picture of something or somebody seen in a mirror. In this
context they refer to a picture seen in the plate glass. The similarity of
meaning they have constructs synonymy.
The text shows the chronological event when Blake looked the
plate glass of the store. At first, Blake saw reflection of himself,
afterwards he saw her image. When he saw it he realized that she was so
close to him. Then this condition made Blake shy away from the reflection
of her contorted face.
(15) Her diffidence, the feeling of deprivation in her point of view,
promised to protect him from any consequences. Most of the many
women he had known had been picked for their lack of self-esteem
(P.8/S.78-79).
There is one tie of synonymy in the text. It is established between
lack of self-esteem and diffidence. The word diffidence has meaning not
51
having much confidence. It is synonymous with the phrase lack of self-
esteem. The synonymy in this passage establishes a tie between S.79 and
S.78 describing an inclusive referent. Their lack of self-esteem includes
her diffidence and other women he had known.
The repetition extends in the last sentence of the paragraph to
conclude the paragraph. It tells that her diffidence is the reason he chosen
her like any other women. The paragraph tells about her (the woman). It
tells how she treats Blake and her diffidence drives her to protect him.
(16) Her coat was thin cloth, he saw, and she wore gloves and carried a
large pocketbook (P.17/S.167)
She opened her purse and reached for her handkerchief
(P.18/S.170).
In the passage above, the synonyms are nouns purse in S.170 and
pocketbook in S.167. Both purse and pocketbook carry meaning small
bag. The word that has similar meaning to another item is called synonym
and the relation between them is called synonymy.
The repetition that occurs in the beginning of the paragraph
indicates a relation between two paragraphs that are paragraph 17 and 18.
The purse in S.170 refers to a large pocketbook in S.167. So, this cohesive
tie gives the interpretation that purse she opened is the same as a large
pocketbook she carried.
3. Antonymy
(17) Then he noticed, ahead of him on the other side of street, a break in
the wall of buildings. Something had been torn down; something
52
was being put up, but the steel structure had only just risen above
the sidewalk fence and daylight poured through the gap (P.2/S.21-
22).
Verbal phrase put up has opposite meaning to torn down. Put up
means to build something. On the contrary, torn down means to knock
down a building, wall etc. Items that have the opposite meaning are known
as antonyms. So, the relation between put up and torn down is called
antonymy.
The text tells what Blake noticed in the street. He saw the break
wall of building which built partly. The verb torn down and put up are
used and both are in the passive form. Those two contrary verbs is used to
describe the condition of the wall i.e., there is something torn down on one
side and there is something built on the other side. Further, it is the steel
structure just risen above gives the further explanation about what is built
up.
(18) They had brought in on their clothes – on their shoes and umbrellas
– the rancid smell of the wet dusk outside, but Blake began to relax
as soon as he tasted his Gibson and looked around at the common,
mostly not-young faces that surrounded him and that were
worried, if they were worried at all, about tax rates and who would
be put in charge of merchandising (P.5/S.55).
There is one tie of antonymy in the text, that is between worried
and relax. Worried has opposite meaning to relax. Worried has meaning
to keep thinking about unpleasant thing and relax has meaning to allow
your attention or effort to become weaker. Two words that have opposite
53
meaning are called antonyms. So, the words worried and relax in the text
establish antonymy.
The antonyny constitutes coherence of the text. The antonyms
show people in the bar were worried and it is opposed to Blake‘s
pshycological condition after drinking Gibson. It is seen from Blake
began to relax as soon as he tasted his Gibson. So, it can be understood
that Gibson can release Blake‘s anxiousness.
(19) Blake drank a second Gibson and saw by the clock that he had
missed the express. He would get the local – the five forty eight
(P.10/S.90-91).
The word get in this environment is opposite to missed. Get in
S.91 means to catch and missed in S.90 means to fail to catch. Two items
that have opposite meaning creates antonymy. So, get and missed
establish antonymy.
The antonymy between get and missed in the text above describes
consequence of missing the express. It makes Blake use the local instead
of the express. It can be understood that the text tells Blake get the local
because he had missed the express.
(20) The train stopped. A nun and a man in overalls got off. When it
started again, Blake put on his hat and reached for his raincoat
(P.20/S.195-197).
There is one antonymy in the text. It is between started and
stopped. Started in S.197 is antonymous with stopped in S.195. Started
54
means to begin to operate while stopped means no longer move. The verb
started in this context means that the train begins to move.
Further, it describes the condition of the train begins to run; the
later on its condition not moving. The antonymy in the text come in the
context of time. The train stopped shows the time when people got off
the train. Then, when it started again shows the time when Blake
prepares to get off the train in the next station.
(21) Blake sat back abruptly in his seat. If he had wanted to stand and
shout for help, he would not have been able to (P.22/S.209-210).
Stand in S.210 builds antonymy relation to sat S.209. Sat means to
rest weight on bottom with back vertical on/in a chair. Stand means to be
on your feet; to be in a vertical position. Stand is used in conditional
sentence describing the contrary activity of what Blake was doing.
The sentences come after the utterance don’t move or I’ll kill you.
It can be understood that he hoped to stand and shout for help but in the
fact he sat.
4. Meronymy
(22) He turned and walked toward the glass doors at the end of the
lobby, feeling that faint guilt and bewilderment we experience
when we bypass some old friend or classmate who seems
threadbare, or sick, or miserable in some other way (P.1/S.8).
End of the lobby in S.8 establishes meronymy relation with lobby
in S.2. End of the lobby is part of lobby. This part-whole relation is called
meronymy relation. This cohesive tie relates S.8 and S.2.
55
The end of the lobby in the sentence is placed as object of
preposition showing the place. This lexical item shows the specific place
he reached in the lobby. This shows continuity of the event takes place.
The glass doors he walked toward are still in the lobby area.
(23) Traffic was tied up, and horns were blowing urgently on a
crosstown street in the distance. The sidewalk was crowded
(P.1/S.14-S.15).
Sidewalk in S.15 and street in S.14 establishes a tie between S.15
and S.14 through meronymy relation. Sidewalk is a part at the side of a
street for people to walk on. Part-whole relation is called meronymy. So,
the relation between sidewalk and street is called meronymy.
This tie constructs coherence of the text. It can be understood that
the sentence describes the condition of traffic of the time that is tied up so
that the sidewalk is crowded.
(24) The only light came from the bathroom – the door was ajar – and
in this half light the hideously scrawled letters again seemed
entirely wrong for her, and as if they must be handwriting of some
other and very gross woman (P.9/S.83).
Door and bathroom in S.83 creates meronymy relation that shows
door is a part of bathroom. So, the door in the sentence above means
door of the bathroom.
This semantic relation constructs coherence of the text. The text
can be interpreted that the condition of the bathroom door – ajar –
describes how the light came to the room. So, it can be interpreted that the
56
text tells the readers about how light comes. Then, it is used for lighting to
read the scrawled letters.
(25) The next day, he did what he felt was the only sensible thing.
When she was out for lunch, he called personnel and asked them to
fire her. Then he took the afternoon off (P.9/S.86).
Afternoon plays an important role in constructing day. The use
afternoon in this sentence can be said as part of day. This part-whole
relation is called meronymy relation then.
Afternoon sets up the unity in the text through its tie between S.86
and S.84 in the context of time. The next day is a time when he fired her
and it is the day when he took the afternoon off.
(26) She touched Blake with the pistol. He felt the muzzle against his
belly. The bullet, at that distance, would make a small hole where
it entered, but it would rip out of his back a place as big as a soccer
ball (P.32/S.318-320).
There are two ties of meronymy in the text. Both ties have the same
superordinate, i.e. pistol. The first tie is set up by muzzle and pistol.
Meanwhile, the second tie is established by bullet and pistol. Bullet S.320
and muzzle S.319 are parts of pistol. Muzzle is the open end of a gun,
where the bullet comes out. Bullet is a small object that is fired from the
gun. The occurrence of bullet, muzzle and pistol in the adjacent sentences
builds meronymy relation. This meronymy relation sets up the unity in the
text. Bullet is related to pistol and muzzle also related to pistol.
The meronymy relation describes the more detail way the pistol
works. Pistol as a whole item exists as a manner she touched Blake with
57
the pistol. The muzzle against his belly shows the next step using the
pistol.
5. Hyponymy
(27) The reports in his briefcase had no bearing war, peace, the dope
traffic, the hydrogen bomb, or any of the other international
skullduggeries that he associated with pursuers, men in trench
coats, and wet sidewalk (P.4/S.50).
In this sentence, there is hyponymy relation. This relation is
constructed by international skullduggeries and war, dope traffic and
hydrogen bomb. War, dope traffic and hydrogen bomb are specific
kinds of skullduggery. The relation between specif and general words is
called hyponymy. So, the relation between war, dope traffic and
hydrogen bomb and skullduggeries is included in hyponymy.
This hyponymy relation shows the specific kinds of international
skullduggeries that he supposes as the reason someone follows him. The
use of specificity followed by general thing in the text to emphasize that
nothing important in his (Blake‘s) briefcase.
(28) He ordered a Gibson and shouldered his way in between two other
men at the bar, so that if she should be watching from the window
she would lose sight of him. The place was crowded with
commuters putting down a drink before the ride home (P.5/S.53-
54).
A hyponymy relation is established between the words place and
bar. They are called hyponymy because place is general term of bar. Bar
is a place where someone can buy and drink alcoholic and other drinks.
The general-specific relation is called hyponymy.
58
The hyponymy in the text (29) creates coherence of the text by
providing the continuity of idea that is bar. Bar in S.53 is used as a place
he ordered Gibson. The place in the text refers to the bar in S.53. So, the
place in this context can be understood as the bar. The text tells the
readers that the bar was tight with the people returning from work.
(29) When she had been working for him three weeks – no longer –
they stayed late one night and he offered, after work to buy her a
drink. ―If you really want a drink,‖ she said, ―I have some whiskey
at my place (P.7/S.71-72).
Whiskey is hyponym of superordinate drink. Whiskey is one kind
of a drink. Then the tie between whiskey and drink is called hyponymy
relation, that is a tie set up by relation between general class and
subclasses. So, the continuity of this sentence is achieved by hyponymy
that describes the more specific drink she offers.
It can be understood that the text tells about their continuity of
having a drink at the night. The previous text explains that they stayes late
after work. Then, Blake buys her a drink. Afterwards, she offers him
another drink by mentioning the kind of alcoholic drink, whiskey. In
addition, the place of whiskey also indicates that they continue drinking at
her place.
(30) When he left the bar, the sky was still light; it was still raining. He
looked carefully up and down the street and saw that the poor
woman had gone. Once or twice, he looked over his shoulder,
walking to the station, but he seemed to be safe (P.10/S.92-94).
The hyponymy in the text occurs between walking and left in S.92.
Walking relates S.95 to S.92 through hyponymy. Walking is one kind of
59
leaving. Leave means to go away from a person or a place. Walking
means move or go somewhere by putting one foot in front of the other.
Subclass and general class relation is called hyponymy. Therefore,
walking and left relation is called hyponymy.
This lexical cohesion constructs coherence through creating a
context of leaving the bar. In this passage, walking describes the way he
left the bar. He walked from the bar to the station. It is stated in S.94
walking to the station. The previous sentence, S.93, shows how he
walked that is he walked carefully. It is indicated by he looked carefully
up and down the street. So, it can be understood that the text tells us
about the way he left the bar that is walking to the station carefully.
6. Collocation
(31) He took breath. He looked with deep feeling at the half-filled, half
lighted coach to affirm his sense of actuality, of a world in which
there was not very much bad trouble after all. He was conscious of
her heavy breathing and the smell of her rain-soaked coat
(P.20/S.192-194).
The collocation items in the text are heavy and breathing because
the words are fixed combinations. Heavy breathing means that someone
breathes noisely. In the text, this collocation shows that she breathes
deeply because of walking. It is unusual to say noisy breathing. So, heavy
and breathing gives cohesive effect.
60
Then, the coherence of the text can be understood that the context
of the text is her heavy breathing heard by him (Blake). The text can be
understood that he was aware of her breathing after walking.
(32) All he could think of to do then was to wait for his heart to stop its
hysterical beating, so that he could judge the extent of his danger
(P.22/S.213).
In the text beating and heart emerge as the second tie. Beating is a
verb that associated with heart. Beating collocates with heart because
beating is heart‘s activity. The use of beating in the sentence adjacent
with heart creates cohesion and coherence. It describes the extraordinary
activity of Blake‘s heart. The cohesive ties of collocation describe Blake‘s
fear.
61
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
This research studies the lexical cohesions in the short story, The
Five-Forty Eight. The analysis uses Halliday and Hasan‘s theory of
cohesion combining with Brian Paltridge to answer the questions about
kinds of lexical cohesion and application of the lexical cohesions in
creating coherence of the text.
To sum up, all types of lexical cohesions are found in the text.
They are repetition, synonymy, antonymy, meronymy, hyponymy and
collocation. Repetition occurs in the exact words and with more
information. The next lexical cohesion that occurs in the text is synonymy.
Then antonymy is also found in the text. The collocation cohesion occurs
in the text shows the relation of part-to-part, the members of the same
general things and the items in the proximity with each other of pairs.
Furthermore, based on the analysis, the lexical cohesions
contribute to coherence of the text. The cohesive relations that occur in the
text contribute to continuity and also set up the context for the
interpretation.
B. Suggestion
The study of cohesion and coherence needs to be explored. There
are some suggestions for the next researchers who are interested in
62
cohesion and coherence. To begin with, it would be better for the next
researchers to analyze grammatical and lexical cohesions for getting the
comprehensive result. Unlike this study which focuses on lexical
cohesions so that the analysis of the coherence is less profound.
Besides that, the suggestion for the next researchers is also to
explore different text types from this research uses such as expository,
argumentative, etc. In addition, the next researchers are suggested to use
other theories to explain coherence such as relational coherence or
cohesive harmony. So, it can complete research related to cohesion and
coherence.
63
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bamberg, Betty. ―What Makes a Text Coherent?‖ College Composition and
Communication 34 (1983): 417-429. Web. 1 Dec. 2016.
Cheever, John. The Stories of John Cheever. United States: Alfred A. Knopf,
1978. Print.
Crane, A. Paul. ―Texture in Text: A Discourse Analysis of News Article Using
Halliday and Hasan‘s Model of Cohesion.‖ Journal of School of Foreign
Languages 30 (2006): 131-156. Web. 10 Dec. 2016.
Cutting, Joan. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students.
Florence: Routledge, 2002. Print
Gee, James Paul and Michael Handford. ―Introduction.‖ The Routledge Handbook
of Discourse Analysis. Ed. James Paul Gee and Michael Handford. London:
Routledge, 2012. 1-6. Print.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. Cohesion in English. London: Longman
House, 1975. Print.
---. Language, Context and Text: Aspect of Language in a Social Perspective.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Print.
Halliday, M.A.K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of
Language and Meaning. Maryland: University Park Press, 1978. Print.
Lyons, John. Linguistics Semantics An Introduction. New York: Continuum,
2001. Print.
Malah, Zubairu. ―Lexical Cohesion in Academis Discourse: Exploring Applied
Linguistics Research Article Abstracts.‖ Research Journal of English
Language and Literature 3 (2015): 291-299. Web. 11 Nov. 2016.
McCharty, Michael. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2000. Print.
Mey, Jacob L. Pragmatics An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001.
Print.
Moe, Alden J. ―Cohesion, Coherence, and the Comprehension of Text.‖ Journal
of Reading No. 1. Vol. 23. Oct. 1979: 16-20. Web. 21 Sept. 2016.
Paltridge, Brian. Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, 2008. Print.
64
Renkerma, Jan. Introduction to Discourse Studies. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing Company, 2004. Print.
Salkie, Raphael. Text and Discourse Study. London: Routledge, 1995. Print.
"short story". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2016. Web. 15 Nov. 2016
<https://www.britannica.com/art/short-story>.
Simanjuntak, Dumaria. Pemarkah Kohesi sebagai Penyelaras Wacana: Kajian
terhadap Kumpulan Cerita Pendek Kompas.Depok: Universitas Indonesia,
2008. Print.
Slembrouck, Stef. ―What is Meant by Discourse Analysis?‖ English Studies.
Universiteit Gent, 2007. Web. 18 Sept. 2015. <www.english.urgent.be/da>.
Subroto, Edi. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Linguistik Struktural. Surakarta:
Sebelas Maret University Press, 1992. Print.
Sukowati, Asri. Cohesion Analysis of Crime News Text in New York Daily News
and The Village Voice. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2015. Print
Taboada, María Teresa. Building Cohesion and Coherence. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company, 2004. Print.
Widdowson, H.G. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. Print.
Zoltán, Dӧrnyei. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative,
Qualitative and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2007. Print.
65
APPENDIX
The Five-Forty-Eight
By John Cheever
[1] When Blake stepped out of the elevator, he saw her (1). A few
people, mostly men waiting for girls, stood in the lobby watching the
elevator doors (2). She was among them (3). As he saw her, her face took on
a look of such loathing and purpose that he realized she had been waiting
for him (4). He did not approach her (5). She had no legitimate business
with him (6). They had nothing to say (7). He turned and walked toward the
glass doors at the end of the lobby, feeling that faint guilt and bewilderment
we experience when we bypass some old friend or classmate who seems
threadbare, or sick, or miserable in some other way (8). It was five-eighteen
by the clock in the Western Union office (9). He could catch the express
(10). As he waited his turn at the revolving doors, he saw that it was still
raining (11). It had been raining all day, and he noticed now how much
louder the rain made the noises of the street (12). Outside, he started
walking briskly east toward Madison Avenue (13). Traffic was tied up, and
horns were blowing urgently on a crosstown street in the distance (14). The
sidewalk was crowded (15). He wondered what she had hoped to gain by a
glimpse of him coming out of the office building at the end of the day (16).
Then he wondered if she was following him (17).
[2] Walking in the city, we seldom turn and look back (18). The habit
restrained Blake (19). He listened for a minute—foolishly—as he walked, as
if he could distinguish her footsteps from the worlds of sound in the city at
the end of a rainy day (20). Then he noticed, ahead of him on the other side
of the street, a break in the wall of buildings (21). Something had been torn
down; something was being put up, but the steel structure had only just risen
above the sidewalk fence and daylight poured through the gap (22). Blake
stopped opposite here and looked into a store window (23). It was a
66
decorator‘s or an auctioneer‘s (24). The window was arranged like a room
in which people live and entertain their friends (25). There were cups on the
coffee table, magazines to read, and flowers in the vases, but the flowers
were dead and the cups were empty and the guests had not come (26). In the
plate glass, Blake saw a clear reflection of himself and the crowds that were
passing, like shadows, at his back (27). Then he saw her image—so close to
him that it shocked him (28). She was standing only a foot or two behind
him (29). He could have turned then and asked her what she wanted, but
instead of recognizing her, he shied away abruptly from the reflection of her
contorted face and went along the street (30). She might be meaning to do
him harm—she might be meaning to kill him (31).
[3] The suddenness with which he moved when he saw the reflection
of her face tipped the water out of his hatbrim in such a way that some of it
ran down his neck (32). It felt unpleasantly like the sweat of fear (33). Then
the cold water falling into his face and onto his bare hands, the rancid smell
of the wet gutters and pavings, the knowledge that his feet were beginning
to get wet and that he might catch cold—all the common discomforts of
walking in the rain—seemed to heighten the menace of his pursuer and to
give him a morbid consciousness of his own physicalness and of the ease
with which he could be hurt (34). He could see ahead of him the corner of
Madison Avenue, where the lights were brighter (35). He felt that if he
could get to Madison Avenue he would he all right (36). At the corner, there
was a bakery shop with two entrances, and he went in by the door on the
crosstown street, bought a coffee ring, like any other commuter, and went
out the Madison Avenue door (37). As he started down Madison Avenue, he
saw her waiting for him by a hut where newspapers were sold (38).
[4] She was not clever (39). She would be easy to shake (40). He could
get into a taxi by one door and leave by the other (41). He could speak to a
policeman (42). He could run—although he was afraid that if he did run, it
might precipitate the violence he now felt sure she had planned (43). He was
67
approaching a part of the city that he knew well and where the maze of
street-level and underground passages, elevator banks, and crowded lobbies
made it easy for a man to lose a pursuer (44). The thought of this, and a
whiff of sugary warmth from the coffee ring, cheered him (45). It was
absurd to imagine being harmed on a crowded street (46). She was foolish,
misled, lonely perhaps—that was all it could amount to (47). He was an
insignificant man, and there was no point in anyone‘s following him from
his office to the station (48). He knew no secrets of any consequence (49).
The reports in his briefcase had no bearing on war, peace, the dope traffic,
the hydrogen bomb, or any of the other international skulduggeries that he
associated with pursuers, men in trench coats, and wet sidewalks (50). Then
he saw ahead of him the door of a men‘s bar (51). Oh, it was so simple! (52)
[5] He ordered a Gibson and shouldered his way in between two other
men at the bar, so that if she should be watching from the window she
would lose sight of him (53). The place was crowded with commuters
putting down a drink before the ride home (54). They had brought in on
their clothes—on their shoes and umbrellas—the rancid smell of the wet
dusk outside, but Blake began to relax as soon as he tasted his Gibson and
looked around at the common, mostly not-young faces that surrounded him
and that were worried, if they were worried at all, about tax rates and who
would be put in charge of merchandising (55). He tried to remember her
name—Miss Dent, Miss Bent, Miss Lent—and he was surprised to find that
he could not remember it, although he was proud of the retentiveness and
reach of his memory and it had only been six months ago (56).
[6] Personnel had sent her up one afternoon—he was looking for a
secretary (57). He saw a dark woman—in her twenties, perhaps—who was
slender and shy (58). Her dress was simple, her figure was not much, one of
her stockings was crooked, but her voice was soft and he had been willing to
try her out (59). After she had been working for him a few days, she told
him that she had been in the hospital for eight months and that it had been
hard after this for her to find work, and she wanted to thank him for giving
68
her a chance (60). Her hair was dark, her eyes were dark; she left with him a
pleasant impression of darkness (61). As he got to know her better, he felt
that she was oversensitive and, as a consequence, lonely (62). Once, when
she was speaking to him of what she imagined his life to be—full of
friendships, money, and a large and loving family—he had thought he
recognized a peculiar feeling of deprivation (63). She seemed to imagine the
lives of the rest of the world to be more brilliant than they were (64). Once,
she had put a rose on his desk, and he had dropped it into the wastebasket
(65). ―I don‘t like roses,‖ he told her (66).
[7] She had been competent, punctual, and a good typist, and he had
found only one thing in her that he could object to—her handwriting (67).
He could not associate the crudeness of her handwriting with her appearance
(68). He would have expected her to write a rounded backhand, and in her
writing there were intermittent traces of this, mixed with clumsy printing
(69). Her writing gave him the feeling that she had been the victim of some
inner—some emotional—conflict that had in its violence broken the
continuity of the lines she was able to make on paper (70). When she had
been working for him three weeks—no longer—they stayed late one night
and he offered, after work, to buy her a drink (71). ―If you really want a
drink,‖ she said, ―I have some whiskey at my place (72).‖
[8] She lived in a room that seemed to him like a closet (73). There
were suit boxes and hatboxes piled in a corner, and although the room
seemed hardly big enough to hold the bed, the dresser, and the chair he sat
in, there was an upright piano against one wall, with a book of Beethoven
sonatas on the rack (74). She gave him a drink and said that she was going
to put on something more comfortable (75). He urged her to; that was, after
all, what he had come for (76). If he had had any qualms, they would have
been practical (77). Her diffidence, the feeling of deprivation in her point of
view, promised to protect him from any consequences (78). Most of the
many women he had known had been picked for their lack of self-esteem
(79).
69
[9] When he put on his clothes again, an hour or so later, she was
weeping (80). He felt too contented and warm and sleepy to worry much
about her tears (81). As he was dressing, he noticed on the dresser a note she
had written to a cleaning woman (82). The only light came from the
bathroom—the door was ajar—and in this half light the hideously scrawled
letters again seemed entirely wrong for her, and as if they must be the
handwriting of some other and very gross woman (83). The next day, he did
what he felt was the only sensible thing (84). When she was out for lunch,
he called personnel and asked them to fire her (85). Then he took the
afternoon off (86). A few days later, she came to the office, asking to see
him (87). He told the switchboard girl not to let her in (88). He had not seen
her again until this evening (89).
[10] Blake drank a second Gibson and saw by the clock that he had
missed the express (90). He would get the local— the five-forty-eight (91).
When he left the bar the sky was still light; it was still raining (92). He
looked carefully up and down the street and saw that the poor woman had
gone (93). Once or twice, he looked over his shoulder, walking to the
station, but he seemed to be safe (94). He was still not quite himself, he
realized, because he had left his coffee ring at the bar, and he was not a man
who forgot things (95). This lapse of memory pained him (96).
[11] He bought a paper (97). The local was only half full when he
boarded it, and he got a seat on the river side and took off his raincoat (98).
He was a slender man with brown hair—undistinguished in every way,
unless you could have divined in his pallor or his gray eyes his unpleasant
tastes (99). He dressed—like the rest of us—as if he admitted the existence
of sumptuary laws (100). His raincoat was the pale, buff color of a
mushroom (101). His hat was dark brown; so was his suit (102). Except for
the few bright threads in his necktie, there was a scrupulous lack of color in
his clothing that seemed protective (103).
[12] He looked around the car for neighbors (104). Mrs. Compton was
several seats in front of him, to the right (105). She smiled, but her smile
70
was fleeting (106). It died swiftly and horribly (107). Mr. Watkins was
directly in front of Blake (108). Mr. Watkins needed a haircut, and he had
broken the sumptuary laws; he was wearing a corduroy jacket (109). He and
Blake had quarrelled, so they did not speak (110).
[13] The swift death of Mrs. Compton‘s smile did not affect Blake at all
(111). The Comptons lived in the house next to the Blakes, and Mrs.
Compton had never understood the importance of minding her own business
(112). Louise Blake took her troubles to Mrs. Compton, Blake knew, and
instead of discouraging her crying jags, Mrs. Compton had come to imagine
herself a sort of confessor and had developed a lively curiosity about the
Blakes‘ intimate affairs (113). She had probably been given an account of
their most recent quarrel (114). Blake had come home one night,
overworked and tired, and had found that Louise had done nothing about
getting supper (115). He had gone into the kitchen, followed by Louise, and
he had pointed out to her that the date was the fifth (116). He had drawn a
circle around the date on the kitchen calendar (117). ―One week is the
twelfth,‖ he had said (118). ―Two weeks will be the nineteenth (119).‖ He
drew a circle around the nineteenth (120). ―I‘m not going to speak to you for
two weeks,‖ he had said (121). ―That will be the nineteenth (122).‖ She had
wept, she had protested, but it had been eight or ten years since she had been
able to touch him with her entreaties (123). Louise had got old (124). Now
the lines in her face were ineradicable, and when she clapped her glasses
onto her nose to read the evening paper she looked to him like an unpleasant
stranger (125). The physical charms that had been her only attraction were
gone (126). It had been nine years since Blake had built a bookshelf in the
doorway that connected their rooms and had fitted into the bookshelf
wooden doors that could be locked, since he did not want the children to see
his books (127). But their prolonged estrangement didn‘t seem remarkable
to Blake (128). He had quarrelled with his wife, but so did every other man
born of woman (129). It was human nature (130). In any place where you
71
can hear their voices—a hotel courtyard, an air shaft, a street on a summer
evening—you will hear harsh words (131).
[14] The hard feeling between Blake and Mr. Watkins also had to do
with Blake‘s family, but it was not as serious or as troublesome as what lay
behind Mrs. Compton‘s fleeting smile (132). The Watkinses rented (133).
Mr. Watkins broke the sumptuary laws day after day—he once went to the
eight-fourteen in a pair of sandals—and he made his living as a commercial
artist (133). Blake‘s oldest son—Charlie was fourteen—had made friends
with the Watkins boy (134). He had spent a lot of time in the sloppy rented
house where the Watkinses lived (135). The friendship had affected his
manners and his neatness (136). Then he had begun to take some meals with
the Watkinses, and to spend Saturday nights there (137). When he had
moved most of his possessions over to the Watkinses‘ and had begun to
spend more than half his nights there, Blake had been forced to act (138).
He had spoken not to Charlie but to Mr. Watkins, and had, of necessity, said
a number of things that must have sounded critical (139). Mr. Watkins‘ long
and dirty hair and his corduroy jacket reassured Blake that he had been in
the right (140).
[15] But Mrs. Compton‘s dying smile and Mr. Watkins‘ dirty hair did
not lessen the pleasure Blake took in settling himself in an uncomfortable
seat on the five-forty-eight deep underground (141). The coach was old and
smelled oddly like a bomb shelter in which whole families had spent the
night (142). The light that spread from the ceiling down onto their heads and
shoulders was dim (143). The filth on the window glass was streaked with
rain from some other journey, and clouds of rank pipe and cigarette smoke
had begun to rise from behind each newspaper, but it was a scene that meant
to Blake that he was on a safe path, and after his brush with danger he even
felt a little warmth toward Mrs. Compton and Mr. Watkins (144).
[16] The train travelled up from underground into the weak daylight,
and the slums and the city reminded Blake vaguely of the woman who had
followed him (145). To avoid speculation or remorse about her, he turned
72
his attention to the evening paper (146). Out of the corner of his eye he
could see the landscape (147). It was industrial and, at that hour, sad (148).
There were machine sheds and warehouses, and above these he saw a break
in the clouds—a piece of yellow light (149). ―Mr. Blake,‖ someone said
(150). He looked up (151). It was she (152). She was standing there holding
one hand on the back of the seat to steady herself in the swaying coach
(153). He remembered her name then—Miss Dent (154). ―Hello, Miss
Dent,‖ he said (155).
[17] ―Do you mind if I sit here? (156)‖
―I guess not (157).‖
―Thank you (158). It‘s very kind of you (159). I don‘t like to inconvenience
you like this (160). I don‘t want to. . . (161)‖ He had been frightened when
he looked up and saw her, but her timid voice rapidly reassured him (162).
He shifted his hams—that futile and reflexive gesture of hospitality—and
she sat down (163). She sighed (164). He smelled her wet clothing (165).
She wore a formless black hat with a cheap crest stitched onto it (166). Her
coat was thin cloth, he saw, and she wore gloves and carried a large
pocketbook (167).
―Are you living out in this direction now, Miss Dent? (168)‖
―No. (169).
[18] She opened her purse and reached for her handkerchief (170). She
had begun to cry (171). He turned his head to see if anyone in the car was
looking, but no one was (172). He had sat beside a thousand passengers on
the evening train (173). He had noticed their clothes, the holes in their
gloves; and if they fell asleep and mumbled he had wondered what their
worries were (174). He had classified almost all of them briefly before he
buried his nose in the paper (175). He had marked them as rich, poor,
brilliant or dull, neighbors or strangers, but no one of the thousands had ever
73
wept (176). When she opened her purse, he remembered her perfume (177).
It had clung to his skin the night he went to her place for a drink (178).
[19] ―I‘ve been very sick,‖ she said (179). ―This is the first time I‘ve been out of
bed in two weeks (180). I‘ve been terribly sick (181).‖
―I‘m sorry that you‘ve been sick, Miss Dent,‖ he said in a voice loud
enough to be heard by Mr. Watkins and Mrs. Compton (182).
―Where are you working now? (183)‖
―What? (184)‖
―Where are you working now? (185)‖
―Oh don‘t make me laugh,‖ she said softly (186).
―I don‘t understand (187).‖
―You poisoned their minds (188).‖
[20] He straightened his back and braced his shoulders (189). These
wrenching movements expressed a brief—and hopeless—longing to be in
some other place (190). She meant trouble (191). He took a breath (192).
He looked with deep feeling at the half-filled, half-lighted coach to affirm
his sense of actuality, of a world in which there was not very much bad
trouble after all (193). He was conscious of her heavy breathing and the
smell of her rain-soaked coat (194). The train stopped (195). A nun and a
man in overalls got off (196). When it started again, Blake put on his hat
and reached for his raincoat (197).
[21] ―Where are you going?‖ she said (198).
―I‘m going up to the next car (199).‖
―Oh, no,‖ she said (200). ―No, no, no (201).‖
74
She put her white face so close to his ear that he could feel her warm breath
on his cheek (202). ―Don‘t do that,‖ she whispered (203). ―Don‘t try and
escape me (204). I have a pistol and I‘ll have to kill you and I don‘t want to
(205). All I want to do is to talk with you (206). Don‘t move or I‘ll kill you
(207). Don‘t, don‘t, don‘t! (208)‖
[22] Blake sat back abruptly in his seat (209). If he had wanted to stand
and shout for help, he would not have been able to (210). His tongue had
swelled to twice its size, and when he tried to move it, it stuck horribly to
the roof of his mouth (211). His legs were limp (212). All he could think of
to do then was to wait for his heart to stop its hysterical beating, so that he
could judge the extent of his danger (213). She was sitting a little sidewise,
and in her pocketbook was the pistol, aimed at his belly (214).
[23] ―You understand me now, don‘t you?‖ she said (215). ―You understand that
I‘m serious? (216)‖ He tried to speak but he was still mute (217). He nodded
his head (218). ―Now we‘ll sit quietly for a little while,‖ she said (219). ―I
got so excited that my thoughts are all confused (220). We‘ll sit quietly for a
little while, until I can get my thoughts in order again (221).‖
[24] Help would come, Blake thought (222). It was only a question of
minutes (223). Someone, noticing the look on his face or her peculiar
posture, would stop and interfere, and it would all be over (224). All he had
to do was to wait until someone noticed his predicament (225). Out of the
window he saw the river and the sky (226). The rain clouds were rolling
down like a shutter, and while he watched, a streak of orange light on the
horizon became brilliant (227). Its brilliance spread— he could see it
move—across the waves until it raked the banks of the river with a dim
firelight (228). Then it was put out (229). Help would come in a minute, he
thought (230). Help would come before they stopped again; but the train
stopped, there were some comings and goings, and Blake still lived on, at
the mercy of the woman beside him (231). The possibility that help might
not come was one that he could not face (232). The possibility that his
75
predicament was not noticeable, that Mrs. Compton would guess that he was
taking a poor relation out to dinner at Shady Hill, was something he would
think about later (233). Then the saliva came back into his mouth and he
was able to speak (234).
[25] ―Miss Dent? (235)‖
―Yes (236).‖
―What do you want? (237)‖
―I want to talk with you (238).‖
―You can come to my office (239).‖
―Oh, no. I went there every day for two weeks (240).‖
―You could make an appointment (241).‖
―No,‖ she said (242). ―I think we can talk here (243). I wrote you a letter but
I‘ve been too sick to go out and mail it (244). I‘ve put down all my thoughts
(245). I like to travel (246). I like trains (247). One of my troubles has
always been that I could never afford to travel (248). I suppose you see this
scenery every night and don‘t notice it any more, but it‘s nice for someone
who‘s been in bed a long time (249). They say that He‘s not in the river and
the hills but I think He is (250). ‗Where shall wisdom be found,‘ it says
(251). ‗Where is the place of understanding (252)? The depth saith it is not
in me; the sea saith it is not with me (253). Destruction and death say we
have heard the force with our ears (254).‘
[26] ―Oh, I know what you‘re thinking,‖ she said (255). ―You‘re thinking that
I‘m crazy, and I have been very sick again but I‘m going to be better (256).
It‘s going to make me better to talk with you (257). I was in the hospital all
the time before I came to work for you but they never tried to cure me, they
only wanted to take away my self-respect (258). I haven‘t had any work
76
now for three months (259). Even if I did have to kill you, they wouldn‘t be
able to do anything to me except put me back in the hospital, so you see I‘m
not afraid (260). But let‘s sit quietly for a little while longer (261). I have to
be calm (262).‖
[27] The train continued its halting progress up the bank of the river,
and Blake tried to force himself to make some plans for escape, but the
immediate threat to his life made this difficult, and instead of planning
sensibly, he thought of the many ways in which he could have avoided her
in the first place (263). As soon as he had felt these regrets, he realized their
futility (264). It was like regretting his lack of suspicion when she first
mentioned her months in the hospital (265). It was like regretting his failure
to have been warned by her shyness, her diffidence, and the handwriting
that looked like the marks of a claw (266). There was no way now of
rectifying his mistakes, and he felt—for perhaps the first time in his mature
life—the full force of regret (267). Out of the window, he saw some men
fishing on the nearly dark river, and then a ramshackle boat club that
seemed to have been nailed together out of scraps of wood that had been
washed up on the shore (268).
[28] Mr. Watkins had fallen asleep (269). He was snoring (270). Mrs.
Compton read her paper (271). The train creaked, slowed, and halted
infirmly at another station (272). Blake could see the southbound platform,
where a few passengers were waiting to go into the city (273). There was a
workman with a lunch pail, a dressed-up woman, and a man with a suitcase
(274). They stood apart from one another (275). Some advertisements were
posted on the wall behind them (276). There was a picture of a couple
drinking a toast in wine, a picture of a Cat‘s Paw rubber heel, and a picture
of a Hawaiian dancer (278). Their cheerful intent seemed to go no farther
than the puddles of water on the platform and to expire there (279). The
platform and the people on it looked lonely (280). The train drew away from
the station into the scattered lights of a slum and then into the darkness of
the country and the river (281).
77
[29] ―I want you to read my letter before we get to Shady Hill,‖ she said (282).
―It‘s on the seat (283). Pick it up (284). I would have mailed it to you, but
I‘ve been too sick to go out (285). I haven‘t gone out for two weeks (286). I
haven‘t had any work for three months (287). I haven‘t spoken to anybody
but the landlady (288). Please read my letter (289).‖
[30] He picked up the letter from the seat where she had put it (290).
The cheap paper felt abhorrent and filthy to his fingers (291). It was folded
and refolded (292). ―Dear Husband,‖ she had written, in that crazy,
wandering hand, ―they say that human love leads us to divine love, but is
this true? I dream about you every night (293). I have such terrible desires
(294). I have always had a gift for dreams (295). I dreamed on Tuesday of a
volcano erupting with blood (296). When I was in the hospital they said
they wanted to cure me but they only wanted to take away my self-respect
(297). They only wanted me to dream about sewing and basketwork but I
protected my gift for dreams (298). I‘m clairvoyant (299). I can tell when
the telephone is going to ring (300). I‘ve never had a true friend in my
whole life. . . . (301)‖
[31] The train stopped again (302). There was another platform, another
picture of the couple drinking a toast, the rubber heel, and the Hawaiian
dancer (303). Suddenly she pressed her face close to Blake‘s again and
whispered in his ear (304). ―I know what you‘re thinking (305). I can see it
in your face (306). You‘re thinking you can get away from me in Shady
Hill, aren‘t you (307)? Oh, I‘ve been planning this for weeks (308). It‘s all
I‘ve had to think about (309). I won‘t harm you if you‘ll let me talk (310).
I‘ve been thinking about devils (311). I mean if there are devils in the world,
if there are people in the world who represent evil, is it our duty to
exterminate them (312)? I know that you always prey on weak people (313).
I can tell (314). Oh, sometimes I think that I ought to kill you (315).
Sometimes I think you‘re the only obstacle between me and my happiness
(316). Sometimes. . . (317)‖
78
[32] She touched Blake with the pistol (318). He felt the muzzle against
his belly (319). The bullet, at that distance, would make a small hole where
it entered, but it would rip out of his back a place as big as a soccer ball
(320). He remembered the unburied dead he had seen in the war (321). The
memory came in a rush: entrails, eyes, shattered bone, ordure, and other
filth (322).
[33] ―All I‘ve ever wanted in life is a little love,‖ she said (323). She lightened
the pressure of the gun (324). Mr. Watkins still slept (325). Mrs. Compton
was sitting calmly with her hands folded in her lap (326). The coach rocked
gently, and the coats and mushroom-colored raincoats that hung between the
windows swayed a little as the car moved (327). Blake‘s elbow was on the
window sill and his left shoe was on the guard above the steampipe (328).
The car smelled like some dismal classroom (329). The passengers seemed
asleep and apart, and Blake felt that he might never escape the smell of heat
and wet clothing and the dimness of the light (330). He tried to summon the
calculated self-deceptions with which he sometimes cheered himself, but he
was left without any energy for hope or self-deception (331). The conductor
put his head in the door and said ―Shady Hill, next, Shady Hill (332).‖
―Now,‖ she said (333). ―Now you get out ahead of me (334).‖
[34] Mr. Watkins waked suddenly, put on his coat and hat, and smiled
at Mrs. Compton, who was gathering her parcels to her in a series of
maternal gestures (335). They went to the door (336). Blake joined them,
but neither of them spoke to him or seemed to notice the woman at his back
(337). The conductor threw open the door, and Blake saw on the platform of
the next car a few other neighbors who had missed the express, waiting
patiently and tiredly in the wan light for their trip to end (338). He raised his
head to see through the open door the abandoned mansion outside of town, a
no-trespassing sign nailed to a tree, and then the oil tanks (339). The
concrete abutments of the bridge passed, so close to the open door that he
could have touched them (340). Then he saw the first of the lampposts on
79
the northbound platform, the sign ―SHADY HILL‖ in black and gold, and the
little lawn and flower bed kept up by the Improvement Association, and
then the cab stand and a corner of the old-fashioned depot (341). It was
raining again; it was pouring (342). He could hear the splash of water and
see the lights reflected in puddles and in the shining pavement, and the idle
sound of splashing and dripping formed in his mind a conception of shelter,
so light and strange that it seemed to belong to a time of his life that he
could not remember (343).
[35] He went down the steps with her at his back (344). A dozen or so
cars were waiting by the station with their motors running (345). A few
people got off from each of the other coaches; he recognized most of them,
but none of them offered to give him a ride (346). They walked separately
or in pairs—purposefully out of the rain to the shelter of the platform, where
the car horns called to them (347). It was time to go home, time for a drink,
time for love, time for supper, and he could see the lights on the hill—lights
by which children were being bathed, meat cooked, dishes washed—shining
in the rain (348). One by one, the cars picked up the heads of families, until
there were only four left (349). Two of the stranded passengers drove off in
the only taxi the village had (350). ―I‘m sorry, darling,‖ a woman said
tenderly to her husband when she drove up a few minutes later (351). ―All
our clocks are slow (352).‖ The last man looked at his watch, looked at the
rain, and then walked off into it, and Blake saw him go as if they had some
reason to say goodbye—not as we say goodbye to friends after a party but
as we say goodbye when we are faced with an inexorable and unwanted
parting of the spirit and the heart (353). The man‘s footsteps sounded as he
crossed the parking lot to the sidewalk, and then they were lost (354). In the
station, a telephone began to ring (355). The ringing was loud, plaintive,
evenly spaced, and unanswered (356). Someone wanted to know about the
next train to Albany, but Mr. Flannagan, the stationmaster, had gone home
an hour ago (357). He had turned on all his lights before he went away
(358). They burned in the empty waiting room (359). They burned, tin-
80
shaded, at intervals up and down the platform. and with the peculiar sadness
of dim and purposeless light (360). They lighted the Hawaiian dancer, the
couple drinking a toast, the rubber heel (361).
[36] ―I‘ve never been here before,‖ she said (362). ―I thought it would look
different (363). I didn‘t think it would look so shabby (364). Let‘s get out of
the light (365). Go over there (366).‖
His legs felt sore (367). All his strength was gone (368). ―Go on,‖ she said
(369).
[37] North of the station there was a freight house and a coalyard and an
inlet where the butcher and the baker and the man who ran the service
station moored the dinghies from which they fished on Sundays, sunk now
to the gunwales with the rain (370). As he walked toward the freight house,
he saw a movement on the ground and heard a scraping sound, and then he
saw a rat take its head out of a paper bag and regard him (371). The rat
seized the bag in its teeth and dragged it into a culvert (372).
[38] ―Stop,‖ she said (373). ―Turn around (374). Oh, I ought to feel sorry for you
(375). Look at your poor face (376). But you don‘t know what I‘ve been
through (377). I‘m afraid to go out in the daylight (378). I‘m afraid the blue
sky will fall down on me (379). I‘m like poor Chicken-Licken (380). I only
feel like myself when it begins to get dark (381). But still and all I‘m better
than you (382). I still have good dreams sometimes (383). I dream about
picnics and Heaven and the brotherhood of man, and about castles in the
moonlight and a river with willow trees all along the edge of it and foreign
cities, and after all I know more about love than you (384).‖
[39] He heard from off the dark river the drone of an outboard motor, a
sound that drew slowly behind it across the dark water such a burden of
clear, sweet memories of gone summers and gone pleasures that it made his
flesh crawl, and he thought of dark in the mountains and the children
singing (385). ―They never wanted to cure me,‖ she said (386). ―They. . .
(387)‖ The noise of a train coming down from the north drowned out her
81
voice, but she went on talking (388). The noise filled his ears, and the
windows where people ate, drank, slept, and read flew past (389). When the
train had passed beyond the bridge, the noise grew distant, and he heard her
screaming at him, ―Kneel down (390)! Kneel down (391)! Do what I say
(392). Kneel down (393)!‖
[40] He got to his knees (394). He bent his head (395). ―There,‖ she
said (396). ―You see, if you do what I say, I won‘t harm you, because I
really don‘t want to harm you, I want to help you, but when I see your face
it sometimes seems to me that I can‘t help you (397). Sometimes it seems to
me that if I were good and loving and sane—oh, much better than I am—
sometimes it seems to me that if I were all these things and young and
beautiful, too, and if I called to show you the right way, you wouldn‘t heed
me (398). Oh, I‘m better than you, I‘m better than you, and I shouldn‘t
waste my time or spoil my life like this (399). Put your face in the dirt
(400). Put your face in the dirt (401)! Do what I say (402). Put your face in
the dirt (403).‖
[41] He fell forward in the filth (404). The coal skinned his face (405).
He stretched out on the ground, weeping (406). ―Now I feel better,‖ she said
(407). ―Now I can wash my hands of you, I can wash my hands of all this,
because you see there is some kindness, some saneness in me that I can find
again and use (408). I can wash my hands (409).‖ Then he heard her
footsteps go away from him, over the rubble (410). He heard the clearer and
more distant sound they made on the hard surface of the platform (411). He
heard them diminish (412). He raised his head (413). He saw her climb the
stairs of the wooden footbridge and cross it and go down to the other
platform, where her figure in the dim light looked small, common, and
harmless (414). He raised himself out of the dust—warily at first, until he
saw by her attitude, her looks, that she had forgotten him; that she had
completed what she had wanted to do, and that he was safe (415). He got to
his feet and picked up his hat from the ground where it had fallen and
walked home (416).