An analytic approach to the Lyot coronagraph 1. Illustrative numerical examples for the response of a Lyot coronagraph to point sources 2. Outline of the

Claude Aime - Sunspot July 2010 1

An analytic approach to the Lyot coronagraph

• 1. Illustrative numerical examples for the response of a Lyot coronagraph to point sources

• 2. Outline of the analytical approach based on a Zernike decomposition (due to André Ferrari), and first results for a resolved source.


The diffraction halo of the Sun at the output of a Lyot coronagraph

• Each point of the solar disc produces its own diffraction pattern in the image plane through the coronagraph. The observed diffraction halo is the sum of all contributions.

The Sun Lyot coronagraph Observing plane


Lyot drawing of the coronagraph

© Observatoire de Paris — Patrimoine Scientifique de l'Observatoire de Meudon


The 4 planes.

Pupil plane Focal plane Pupil plane Focal plane

MASK STOP

A B C D



• 1. Illustrative numerical examples for the response of the Lyot coronagraph to point sources

• 2. Outline of the analytical approach based on a Zernike decomposition (due to André Ferrari), and first results for a source of large angular diameter.

Claude Aime - Sunspot July 2010

6

On axis point source, no turbulence, perfect instrument

FT FT FT

A B C D

(Units are different in pupil and focus planes)


Lyot mask:

Alternative not considered here:


8

Lyot mask + Lyot stop

A few l/D D or <D

Residual image


9

Illustration: focal plane


10

Pupil plane


11

Pupil plane


12

Larger mask


13

Larger mask


14

Lyot Mask, no Lyot stop


15Lyot Mask, Lyot stop = aperture(Arago – Poisson – Fresnel spot)


16Lyot Mask, Lyot stop = 0.9 aperture(Arago – Poisson –Fresnel spot)


17

An off-axis point source behind the Lyot mask


18

An off-axis point source behind the Lyot mask(smaller Lyot stop)


19

A point source close to the edge of the Lyot mask


20

Addition in intensity of all contributions



• 1. Illustrative numerical examples for the response of the Lyot coronagraph to point sources

• 2. Outline of the analytical approach based on a Zernike decomposition (due to André Ferrari), and first results for a source of large angular diameter.


22Outline of the analytic approach(see Ferrari 2007, Ferrari et al 2010)

Starting point: decompose the waves on a Zernike base

where r and q are the polar coordinates, and are the Zernike radial polynomials, m < n, same parity (otherwise = 0)

For a point source in the direction a in units of l/D, the wavefront writes:

Then use the properties of Fourier transform of Zernike polynomials:

where r and f are the conjugate variable to r and q .


The effect similar to the Poisson-Arago spot is well retrieved using the series expansion


24

The integrated intensity in plane D (and C) takes the form of (intricate) infinite series

with


25

Convergence and limitations

• The series converges with a reasonable number of terms for a star of small angular diameter (a fraction of or a few l/D), but not for the solar case, for which the diameter is thousands of l/D.

• The expression in plane D assumes that the Lyot stop is exactly the size of the entrance aperture (no analytic expression for a different size)

• This strong limitation for the solar case is acceptable for the stellar case since (prolate) apodized aperture will be used rather than clear aperture.

NUMERICAL ILLUSTRATIONS =>


Radial cut of the intensity in plane C, inside the pupil image, for a Lyot mask of diameter 12 l/D

Stars of differentangular diameters

“diffraction ring”


Focal plane in units of resolution

Radius of the source in units of resolution

Lyot mask of radius:


Focal plane in units of resolution

Radius of the source in units of resolution

Lyot mask of radius:

Claude Aime - Sunspot July 2010 29Source angular diameter

Radius of the mask in units of resolution


Pro et contra of the approach

(+) Exact calculation of the propagation through the coronagraph.

(+) Approach can be very general (for exoplanet).(-) The result is given by slowly converging series:

difficult to apply to the solar case (not yet realistic).(-) The computation is fully analytic only for a Lyot stop

equal to the aperture (OK if an apodized aperture is used – not presented here)


Thank you


32

Clear vs apodized (Sonine, s=1) aperture





Documents

An analytic approach to the Lyot coronagraph 1. Illustrative numerical examples for the response of a Lyot coronagraph to point sources 2. Outline of the