Upload
others
View
39
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An Approach to the Integration of
New CHED Policies and Standards
(PSGs) in the Teacher Education
Curriculum
Rita Bumanglag-Ruscoe, Ph.D
Philippine Normal University
2018 Annual AACCUP Accreditors’ Conference
Source: Understand the power of alignment through metaphors.
https://www.slideshare.net/thomasmg/the-power-of-alignment-metaphors
Source: Understand the power of alignment through metaphors. https://www.slideshare.net/thomasmg/the-power-of-alignment-metaphors
Washington Accord
CHED PSGs-CMO
Board of Engineers
Philippine Qualifications
Framework
ASEAN Qualifications/
Reference Framework
Internal Qualifications
framework
Professional Body Qualifications Body
ASAIHL 2014 Conference
What are the outcomes—skills, knowledge, and other
attributes—that graduates of the program should attain?
OUTCOMES BASED ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
To what extent is the program enabling its graduates to attain the outcomes?
How can faculty use what they learn from program assessment to improve their programs ?
The Outcomes Based Teacher Education Curriculum (
OBTEC)
Professional Education
develops in the students
an orientation to the
teaching profession and
education as a field of
discipline to enable them
to become reflective
teachers ( NCBTS based)
Specialization Outcomes - The breadth and depth of
understanding necessary to teach the discipline across levels
with strong mastery of the content.
This includes disciplinal content, theories, methods of inquiry,
and applied knowledge of the discipline.
The Revised OBTEC FRAMEWORK
General Education outcomes
include: (CHED Memo No. 20
s 2013)
• Intellectual competencies
such as critical, analytical
and creative thinking and
multiple forms of
expression
• Civic capacities demanded
of membership in the
community, country and
the world
RATIONALE
• Education 4.0, the vision for the future of education, responding to the needs of the fourth industrial revolution, harnessing the potential of digital technologies, and establishing a blueprint for the future of learning – lifelong learning – from childhood schooling, to continuous learning in the workplace, to learning to play a better role in society.
• Framework for the 21st Century Learning, important competencies, like collaboration, critical thinking, digital literacy, and problem-solving, that will help students succeed in contemporary times.
• ASEAN Quality Reference Framework (AQRF), a shared reference framework that enables comparisons of education qualifications across participating ASEAN member states.
RATIONALE
• Philippine Qualifications Framework (PQF), quality assured national system for the development, recognition and ward of qualifications based on standards of knowledge, skills and values acquired in different ways and methods by learners and workers of the country
• Philippine Professional Standards for Teacher (PPST), new standards defining the competencies of teacher quality, both in pre-service and in-service education, and in the context of the K to 12 reform.
• New Commission on Higher Education (CHEd) latest policies, standards and guidelines (PSGs) and the new CMOs for Teacher Education.
The Philippine Normal
University Institutional
OutcomesPNU is committed to producing:
Innovative Teachers who are:
• Excellent in their discipline and at par with the best graduates of Teacher Education in the world
• Responsive and deeply rooted in one’s heritage, sensitive to cultural diversity and appreciative of different value systems
• Empowered and committed to social transformation
Education Leaders who are competent with knowledge, skills, attitudes, values and ethics to lead and manage high quality education programs
Research Scholars who are proficient in ground breaking cross-disciplinary inquiries
University Curriculum Management and instructional Materials Office Property. Do
not Reproduce without permission.
The New Teacher Education Program ( NTEP) is committed to producing teachers who are
Discipline Grounded,
professionally
competent and
innovative practitioner
Teachers who are steeped and grounded in content knowledge of a
discipline and at the same time posses pedagogical knowledge to
teach in any of the levels in Basic Education
Reflective Specialist Reflective practitioner with knowledge, dispositions and strong
orientation to the teaching profession and education engaging in
innovative teaching practice.
Humane, Ethical and Moral
Person
Well rounded individuals who manifest intellectual competencies,
conscious of their personal and civic responsibilities and possessing
practical skills for lifelong learning
Transformative Educator Teachers who can effectively navigate the expanding environments
from the home to the larger society and capable of educating Filipino
learners to understand the changes that are taking place in their
environment so as to effect constructive actions.
Critical, creative and
responsible educational
technology expert
Teachers who are critical and creative in the development and
application of technology to facilitate and enhance instruction
OBTEC Program Outcomes
Alignment - the degree to which the components of an education system—such as standards, curricula, assessments, and instruction—work together to achieve desired goals.
Ananda, S. (2003). Rethinking issues of alignment under No Child Left Behind. San Francisco: WestEd
NEW CHED MEMORANDUM ORDERS
(CMOs)
CMO no. 74 series of 2017 (Bachelor of Elementary Education)
CMO no. 75 series of 2017 (Bachelor of Secondary Education)
CMO no. 76 series of 2017 (Bachelor in Early Childhood Education)
CMO no. 77 series of 2017 (Bachelor of Special Needs Education)
CMO no. 78 series of 2017 (Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood
Education)
CMO no. 80 series of 2017 (Bachelor of Physical Education)
CMO no. 82 series of 2017 (Bachelor of Culture and Arts Education)
KEY FEATURES OF THE REVISED OUTCOMES BASED TEACHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM
(OBTEC)
Outcomes Based
New Set of Outcomes
Outcomes common to all programs in all types of schools
Outcomes common to the discipline (Teacher Education)
Outcomes specific to a sub-discipline and major
Outcomes common to graduates of a horizontal type of
institution as defined in CMO no. 46 series of 2012
Performance / Behavioral Indicators
The New Teacher Education Standards • Minimum Standards Common to
all Programs in all Types of Schools
• Common to the Disciplines ( Teacher Education)
• Specific to a sub discipline and major
• Common to graduates of a horizontal type of institution as defined in CMO 46, 2012
• Articulate and discuss the latest developments in the specific fields of practice (PQF Level 6 descriptor)
• Effectively communicate in English and Filipino, both orally and in writing
• Work effectively and collaboratively with a substantial degree of independence in multidisciplinary and multicultural teams (PQF Level 6 descriptor)
• Act in recognition of professional , social and ethical responsibility
• Preserve and promote “ Filipino historical and cultural heritage” ( RA 7722)
Minimum Standards Common to all Programs in all Types of Schools
Common to graduates of a horizontal type of institution as defined in CMO 46, 2012
•Graduates of Universities contribute to the generation of new knowledge by participating in various research and development projects
Outcomes Specific to the Specialization
1. Disciplinal Knowledge
2. Pedagogical Practice
3. Competency and Proficiency
4. Professional Accountability and Responsibility
5. Research and Extension
The Outcomes Based Teacher Education Curriculum : CONTENT SPECIALIZATION
RESPONSIVE AND Discipline
GroundedSPECIALIST
◦ Course Content ( List and Description of courses/ corresponding number of units; should follow the PNU standard coding of courses )
◦ Curriculum Matrix of the Program Outcomes and Course Intended Learning Outcomes ( CILO) the corresponding title /description of courses which will match the CILO
Teaching and learning take place in a whole system where all aspects of teaching and assessment are tuned to support high level learning .
Curriculum Map
Listed according to the degree of breadth and depth that these courses contribute to achieving the program outcomes:
Degree of Emphasis: How Program Outcomes and Courses are to be covered.
I- Introduced (basic concepts are merely introduced; program outcomes are merely introduced)
P- Practiced (the concepts and principles are presented with applications ; program outcomes are not just introduced but practiced in the course)
D- Demonstrated I+ P with skills acquisition ( program outcomes are practiced and demonstrated)
I –Introduced - Introduction of concepts and principles through lectures and demonstration
P-Practiced-Practice of the Outcomes measures done with supervision
D- Demonstrated demonstration by the students of the Outcomes
Bachelor in Elementary Education
Program Outcomes Performance indicators C1 C2 C3 C4
Demonstrate in-depth understanding of the diversity of learners in various learning areas.
1. Identify various types of learners and provide them with appropriate, culturally relevant activities and experiences
2. Develop and utilize relevant materials that match the learning styles , goals and culture
3. Select Instructional strategies for the development of learner’s and critical and creative thinking skills
4. Utilize developmentally appropriate activities in teaching the different learning areas.
C1- The Child and Adolescent Learners and Learning PrinciplesC2 – The Teacher and the Community , School, Culture and Organizational LeadershipC3- Assessment in Learning 1C4- Teaching Multi grade classes
Constructive Alignment
Source: Assessment Matters ! http://app.griffith.edu.au
Outcomes determine the curriculum content, the teaching methods and strategies, and the assessment process.
Performance
Indicator and
the Evidence
of
Performance
Indicator Evidence Standard
Create a brochure on
various ecosystems
(aquatic and terrestrial)
Critique a paper and
defend a position that
tackles humans and their
interactions with the
environment
Create a video
presentation on the
principles of environmental
science
Create an advocacy or
campaign ad that manifests
environmental awareness
and concern in the
university
Brochure
Critique paper and oral
defense
Video presentation
output
Clean Up Drive
Rubric for Brochure:
Content – 40% Creativity – 20% Originality – 20% Presentation – 20%
TOTAL – 100%
Rubric for Reaction
Paper/Critique
Content – 40%
Organization – 30%
Relevance – 30%
TOTAL – 100%
Rubric for Oral, visual, and
other Multimedia Presentation:
Content – 30%
Originality – 20%
Relevance – 20%
Presentation – 20%
Class Evaluation – 10%
TOTAL – 100%
Rubric for Advocacy or
Campaign Ad
Participation – 40%
Commitment – 40%
Journal Reflection – 20%
TOTAL – 100%Consultation Period Subject to change and availability
Outcomes Performance Indicators THROUGH Learning Activities
Evidence of Achievement
Performance Standards
1. Manifest awareness of current trends and issues in S & T and their importance to society
2. Actively respond to current socio-cultural issues as affected by science and technology
3. Demonstrate rational understanding of current developments in science and technology and its effects on human activities
4. exhibit values and attributes to arrive at relevant solutions to problems concerning STS
Create a photo essay that
tackles one of the following
topics:
• Biological warfare
• Chemical warfare
• Nuclear warfare
• Biochemical warfare
• Bioterrorism
2. Participate in debates on
issues of population dynamics
3. Create a portfolio and poster presentation regarding
environmental issues tackled in the immersion
4. Start a campaign or advocacy ad that stresses the importance of environmental awarenes
1. Photo Essay
2. Debate
3. Portfolio/Poster Presentation
4. Campaign/Advocacy act
Rubric for Photo EssayPresentation:• Content Relevance –40%• Originality – 30%• Creativity – 20%• Neatness – 10%TOTAL – 100%
Rubric for Debate:• Logical Reasoning –30%• Extent of Research –20%• Topic Coherence andRelevance – 20%• Ideas and Viewpoints– 20%• Articulation – 10%TOTAL – 100%
Learning Outcomes Assessment
• Development of Institutional Learning Outcomes Plan (LOAP)
• Development of Strategies for Institutional learning Outcomes Assessment
• Development of Program Learning Outcomes Assessment
• Development of Specialization Learning Outcomes Assessment
• Development of Course Learning Assessment
Institutional Outcomes
Program Objectives
Program Outcomes
Program Specialization Outcomes
Program Specialization Outcomes
Program Specialization Outcomes
General Ed. Outcomes
Specialization. Outcomes
PofessionalEd. Outcomes
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
CLO
UCMIMO Property. Do not reproduce without permission.
Mechanisms for Quality Audit of Pre-service Teacher Education Curriculum
1. Development of a Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan ( LOAP)
• Begin with the review of the Standards and the OBTEC program outcomes.
• Map the standards vis-à-vis the general education, professional education, and specialization courses.
• Do the basic and differentiated audit using the heat maps.
• Review and refinement of syllabus to check alignment
Checking the alignment of OBTEC outcomes vis-à-vis the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Prof Ed courses Science Social Science Languages
One-way analysis :looking
only whether each Prof Ed
program outcomes are
reflected in the PPST
standards and not vice-
versa
Program outcomes were
aligned with the PPST.
(This may be expected
since the Prof Ed course
outcomes is anchored on
the NCBTS framework.)
Two-way analysis: checking
both the alignment of the
outcomes against the PPST
standards and the domains
in which the outcomes are
represented
Most of the program
outcomes are represented
in the PPST standards but
there are also specific
program outcomes which
are not found in the PPST
(research component of
the program outcomes).
The PPST standards
were reflected more
in the Values
Education program
than in the Social
Science program.
Checking the alignment of
the program outcomes
against the PPST standards
posted a realization that
OBTEC program outcomes
seem to be too difficult for
a beginning teacher, on
the perspective of PPST
standards.
Mechanisms for Quality Audit of Pre-service Teacher Education
Curriculum2. Development of tools for assessing attainment of outcomes at the course, specialization, program and institutional levels.
Collecting direct evidence of student learning outcomes Standardized test for Collegiate Learning Assessment?Course embedded assessmentPortfolio AssessmentDevelopment and carrying out of institutional surveys for effective assessment of institutional learning outcomes Systematize and institutionalize learning outcomes assessment methods
Enhancing program quality for achieving learning outcomesLevels of Assessment
Areas of Outcomes Assessment
Strategies for Assessment Concerned Unit Assessment Output (Evidence)
Institutional / (PNU) - Program Educational Outcomes
Institutional Outcomes and Program Educational Outcomes
VP Academics
Collegiate (CTD) -Program outcomes
Teacher Education Program to include Gen. Ed and Prof. Ed
CTD
Faculty / Institute/ School-Specialization Outcomes
Specialization-CK. PK, PCK, TPCK, Practicum
Faculty, Institutes,Schools
Individual / Cluster Faculty-Course Learning Outcomes
Specific courses Individualfaculty or cluster of Faculty teaching the courseUCMIMO Property. Do not reproduce without permission.
Collaborative Review of Existing Courses
• Audit of existing courses
• Workshops and meetings
• Data collection
• Construction of program profiles
• Analysis of program profiles
• Review of existing units ( courses and developments of new units ( courses)
• Re-analysis of program profiles
PNU, the National Center for Teacher Education….molding the mind, strengthening the body and touching the heart
of every innovative teacher
References
Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1(1), 5-22.
CHED -CMO 74,75,76 s 2017
Handbook on Outcomes Based Education, CHED
PNU Outcomes Based Teacher Education Curriculum 2011
Shuell, T.J. (1986) Cognitive conceptions of learning, Review of Educational Research, 56: 411–36.
Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ATHERTON, J. S. (2005) Learning and Teaching: SOLO taxonomy.