View
461
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presented on February 9th, 2013 at the Second Research Competitive Grants Conference in Islamabad, Pakistan.
Citation preview
AN ASSESSMENT OF SKILL GAP AMONG UNIVERSITY GRADUATES FOR EMPLOYABILITY AND PERFORMANCE
IN INDUSTRIES SITUATED IN GUJRAT- SIALKOT - GUJRANWALA INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER
Interim Report Presentation at Conference by Pakistan Strategy Support Program under the initiative of Annual Research Competitive Grants Program
Marriot Hotel, Islamabad
Feb 09, 2013
by
Dr. Faisal Mehmood Mirza and Dr. Atif Ali Jaffri
Department of Economics, University of Gujrat
Roadmap
• Research Issue
• Contribution of the study
• Research Objectives
• Methodology
• Preliminary Findings
• Conclusions
• Way Forward
“Pakistan is ranked 92 out of 133 countries in university-industry linkages index, much lower than the ranks of China and India, which are 23 and 46, respectively. Due to the weak university-industry-professional nexus in Pakistan, our youth is not able to acquire the skills sought by employers. This skill mismatch is a fundamental reason our enterprises and universities do not compete effectively in the global markets.”
NGF, Planning Commission of Pakistan
Research Issue
• Major cause of high rate of youth unemployment is the lack of relevant skills.
– Young people lack specific “21st century workplace skills” such as cooperation, communication, critical thinking, creativity, and a focus on the needs of the enterprise.
– Other factors responsible for youth unemployment include lack of entry level jobs, information, network and connections, and experience credentials.
ILO (2012)
Research Objectives
• Identification and ranking of skills considered important by employers while hiring fresh graduates.
• Assessment of the level of satisfaction of employers with the skills of fresh graduates.
• Determining the level of skill shortage among fresh graduates.• Identification of future skill requirements from job market.• Analyzing students’ perception about the required skills to get
employment and ranking of their individual skills against their perceived level of skills for employability.
• Communication of study findings with all stakeholders including Planning Commission, HEC, Industry, Punjab Government, and the research community.
Research Contribution
• Only a few recent sector specific studies estimate the skill gap between industry demand and the quality of graduates
• Current study has a wider horizon by estimating the skill gap across all the major industries situated in Gujrat-Sialkot-Gujranwala industrial cluster
• Along with the skill gap, we also estimate graduates’ perception gap and their employability gap
• To further enrich the analysis, we broaden the skill sets that many of the studies use for analyzing skill gap
Methodology
Stage 1:Employers’ Survey
– Employers were asked to rank the key employability skills at graduation level on a Likert Scale.
– Employers were asked to rate their satisfaction level with the fresh graduates on each of the ranked skills.
– The employers were also asked to rank the relative importance of each of the skills in future.
Stage 2: Students’ Survey
– Students were asked to rank their perception about the key employability skills demanded in the job market.
– Students also rated their level of possessed skills against their perception of required skills in the job market.
Methodology
Skill, Employability and Perception Gaps
Skill Gap: Employers’ Preference Score– Employers’ Assesment Score
Employability Gap: Students’ Perception Score – Students’ Own Assesment Score
Perception Gap: Employers’ Preference Score – Students’ Perception Score
Sample Selection
Straitified random sampling for the industrial and services sectors 100 respondents
Purposive sampling for universities and colleges in the region 150 respondents
Data Analysis technique
Factor analysis to group individual skills into small number of interpretable factors
– Analysis of correlation matrix: Bartlett’s test of Sphericity KMO test of
sampling adequacy– Factor extraction method: Principal axis factoring
– Factor retention method: Eigen values, Scree plot, percent of variance
extracted
– Rotation method: Oblique method
Preliminary Findings
Industry satisfaction Degree programs Curriculum3.27 3.74 3.15
Student satisfactionSatisfaction levels by industry and Students
Industry satisfaction with graduates
Student satisfaction with degree program
Student satisfaction with curriculum
Extremely satisfied 7.00 16.56 7.95Very satisfied 32.00 47.68 26.49
Somewhat satisfied 44.00 29.80 42.38Not very satisfied 15.00 5.30 19.21Not at all 2.00 0.66 3.97
Satisfaction Levels along the scaleExtremely satisfied 5
Very satisfied 4Somewhat Satisfied 3
Not very satisfied 2Not at all 1
Preliminary FindingsFactoring of Skills
Leadership skills Mean Professional skills Mean Communication skills
Mean Core employabil
ity skills
Mean Personal characteristi
cs
Mean
Efficiency 4.27 Cooperative 4.30 Technical skills related to subject
4.22 Motivation 4.31 Honesty 4.70
Ability to adopt to business environment
4.10 Ability to deal with pressure
4.13 Verbal Communication
4.04 Productivity 4.28 Reliability 4.56
Decision making skills
4.02 Creative skills 4.00 Written communication
3.94 Self Discipline
4.22 Punctuality 4.54
Ability to interpret business problems and develop appropriate
3.98 Enthusiastic 3.91 Reading Skills 3.93 Modesty 3.78 Hard Working 4.47
Ability to plan and organize
3.93 Balanced attitude to work and home life
3.83 Communication in English
3.56 Resourcefulness
3.77 Accuracy 4.35
Initiating 3.82 Entrepreneurship skills
3.50 Creativity 4.00
Ambitiousness 3.75 Sense of humor 3.45
Critical thinking 3.67
Average 3.94 3.87 3.94 4.07 4.44
Skill groups after factor analysis
Gap Analysis
Skill Gaps
Leadership Skills
Professional Skills
Communication Skills
Core Employability
Skills
Personal Characteristics
A.Employers’ Importance 3.94 3.87 3.94 4.07 4.44
B. Employers’ Satisfaction 3.27 3.42 3.47 3.37 3.61
C. Student's Perception 4.08 4.06 4.04 4.01 4.35D. Student's own assessment 3.89 3.95 3.89 3.94 4.09E. Students’ Future skills 4.15 4.15 4.24 4.22 4.5
Skill Gaps (A-B) 0.67 0.45 0.47 0.7 0.83
Perception Gap(A-C) -0.14 -0.18 -0.12 0.07 0.09
Employability Gap(C-D) 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.21 0.26
Future skill Gap( E-A) 0.21 0.28 0.3 0.14 0.07
Result Summary of Different Skill Gaps
Preliminary Conclusions
• Employers at large are not satisfied with the skill levels possessed by fresh graduates
• Soft skills are considered more important than professional skills
• Skill gap is maximum in the case of personal characteristics while professional skills exhibits minimum of the gap
• Perception gap indicates that the expectations of students regarding important skills for employability are in line with the demands of the industry
Preliminary Conclusions
• Employability gap suggests that students are more lacking in personal characteristics and core employability skills than professional and leadership skills
• Future skill gap suggests that students will need to focus more on communication and professional skills relative to core employability and leadership skills for securing employment in the job market
Addressing the policy gap Future Prospects
Thank You