Upload
barney
View
47
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
An Introduction to Understanding the OT and OTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluations (FWPEs). Karen Atler, MS, OTR Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Roberta Wimmer, OTR/L Pacific University, Forest Grove, OR. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
An Introduction to Understanding the OT and OTA
Fieldwork Performance Evaluations
(FWPEs)
Karen Atler, MS, OTR Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Roberta Wimmer, OTR/L Pacific University, Forest Grove, OR
2003 The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. www.AOTA.org
2
Task Force Members Carole Dennis, PhD, OTR
Ithaca College, New York Carole Hays, MA, OTR
Springfield Hospital Center, Maryland Becky Robler, MEd, OTR
Pueblo Community College, Colorado Karen Atler, MS, OTR, Co-Chairperson
Colorado State University Roberta Wimmer, OTR, Co-Chairperson
Pacific University, Oregon
3
Objectives
Describe the Entry-level practice competencies for
OT and OTA students Purpose, format, content, and scoring
of the companion evaluation forms New concepts and terminology used in
the FWPE from the OT Practice Framework
Begin to score items on the FWPE
4
Task Force’s Charge Revise/develop evaluation tools to measure
assistant and professional Level II fieldwork student performance.
Expectations Conduct review of literature across disciplines Synthesize feedback on current AOTA FWE/OT
forms Incorporate 1997 NBCOT Practice Analysis results Address identified desired characteristics
5
Desired Characteristics
Companion documents for assistant and professional level that Measure entry-level competence Focus on occupation-based practice Reflect current and future practice Can be used in a variety of settings Provide feedback to students Can be easily used in a timely manner
6
NBCOT Practice Analysis 1997
What OTs & OTAs Do
Determining needs/priorities for interventions
Identifying/designing interventions
Implementing interventions Reporting/evaluating
intervention effectiveness Providing OT services for
populations Managing delivery of OT
services Advancing effectiveness of
the OT profession
What OTs & OTAs Need To Know
Human development and performance
Principles/strategies in the identification/evaluation of strengths and needs
Principles/strategies in intervention/treatment planning
Principles/strategies inintervention
Nature of occupation and occupational performance
Service management Responsibilities as a professional
7
Standards of Practice for Occupational Therapy Identifies minimum standards Identifies key performance areas for the
OT and OTA Professional standing and responsibility Referral Screening Evaluation Intervention plan Intervention Transition services Discontinuation
8
ACOTE: Minimum Standards and Outcomes
OT Be a generalist Achieve entry-level
competence Articulate, apply, and justify
occupation interventions Supervise and collaborate
with the OTA Keep current with best
practice Uphold the ethics, values,
and attitudes of the profession
Be an effective consumer of research and knowledge
OTA Be a generalist Achieve entry-level
competence Work under the
supervision of and in cooperation with the OT
Articulate, apply, and justify interventions related to occupation
Keep current with best practice
Uphold the ethics, values, and attitudes of the profession
9
Goal of Level II Fieldwork Education for the OT and OTA Student
Develop competent, entry-level generalists
Include an in-depth experience in delivering occupational therapy services
Be designed to promote reasoning, enable ethical practice, and develop professionalism
10
The Process
Began with OTA evaluation Reviewed by experienced panel Submitted to COE Made revisions Completed pilot studies (2 OTA, 1
OT)
11
Design and Analysis of Pilot Studies: The Rasch Measurement Model
less able Student Ability more able
12
Results of Pilot Studies Good representation in pilot samples Students and educators preferred new form Good scale and response validity Inaccurate use of scale
Rating Scale Usage in Pilot Studies II and III
4 = Exceeds Standards
3 = Meets Standards
2 = Needs Improvement
1 = Unsatisfactory
Rating Scale Descriptors
2934
5356
1310
00
% Usage OTA% Usage OT
13
The FWPEs for OT and OTA Students Companion documents Terminology Content layout Purpose Design Rating scale Scoring system
14
FWPEs OT and OTACompanion Documents Focus
The occupational therapy process The clinical reasoning process Roles and responsibilities of the OT and OTA
Structure Collaborative process—student and FW
educator Same layout Same rating/scoring system
15
Terminology of the FWPEs Reflects
Standards of Practice for Occupational Therapy and ACOTE Education Standards
Occupational Therapy Practice Framework The glossary
16
Content Layout of FWPEs Summary Sheet Overview/instructions Organization of items Space for comments—midterm and
final Performance Rating Summary
Sheet
17
Content of OT and OTA Evaluations
OTA Fundamentals of practice (3) Basic tenets (3) Evaluation/screening (5) Intervention (6)
Communication (2) Professional behavior (6)
OT Fundamentals of practice (3) Basic tenets (4) Evaluation/screening (10) Intervention (9) Management of OT services
(5) Communication (4) Professional behavior (7)
18
Primary Purpose of the FWPEs
Measures entry-level competence Designed to differentiate the
competent student from the incompetent student
Not designed to differentiate levels above entry-level competence
19
Purpose (continued)
Provides student with accurate assessment of his or her competence for entry-level practice over time Growth occurs over time Midterm and final scores reflect this
change Midterm scores: Satisfactory–
unsatisfactory Final scores: Pass–no pass
20
Purpose (continued)
Provides feedback to student Provides opportunity for student
self-assessment
21
Design of the FWPEs
The “doing” of the occupational therapy process is evaluated, not the individual tasks in isolation
NOT all items are equal in level of difficulty (i.e., simple to complex)
Evaluation is supplemented with development of site-specific objectives
22
RASCH Ordering of Items OT
- -2- - - - - - - - - -
1- - - - - - - - - -
0- - - - - - - - - -
-1- - - - - - - - - -
-2-
Interpersonal; 41
Res
pnds
2 f
dbk
38D
iver
sity
; 42
Eth
ics;
1 C
olla
b c
supe
r;36
Wor
kbeh
39,
saf
ety
2S
teps
3,R
esp;
37
Tim
emng
40; L
egib
le 3
4
Cli
ent c
ente
red
inte
rv 2
2 O
ccup
n ba
sed
inte
r 23
Sel
ects
rel
occ
u; 2
1P
rodu
ces
wor
k; 3
1C
lear
doc
umen
tati
on; 3
3O
rg g
oals
30;
ver
bl 3
2 D
ocum
ents
intr
v; 2
6C
olla
bora
tes
clnt
; 7L
angu
age
refl
ects
35
Doc
umen
ts e
val r
slts
17
OT
beli
efs
4 O
btai
n in
f 12
R
ole
of O
T; 6
Rat
iona
le T
x 18
, A
dmin
iste
r as
ses
13
Art
ic r
atin
al e
val;
8A
rtic
val
ue o
cc 5
Mod
ifie
s ap
proa
ch 2
4U
nder
st f
inan
ces;
29
Col
labo
rate
s O
TA
28
Occ
pro
f 10
, Adj
st a
ss 1
4E
st P
lan
16, A
sses
s ft
r 11
Upd
ates
; 25,
Evi
denc
e 19
In
terp
rets
eva
l res
lts;
15
Sel
ects
rel
ass
es m
ethd
; 9 A
ssig
ns r
esp
OT
A; 2
7
HARD
23
Rasch Ordering of Items OTA
Easier
2- - - - - - - - - -
1- - - - - - - - - -
0- - - - - - - - - -
-1- - - - - - - - - -
-2-
Cultural competence; 25
Ethics; 1
Interpersonal skills;24
Responds to Feedback;21
Safety; 2 and 3
Work Behaviors; 22
Therapeutic Use Self;16
Written Communication;19
Verbal Communication; 18
Self-responsibility; 20
IImplements intervntn; 14
OT/OTA Roles 5DataGather
Selects Intervention;13
Activity Analysis; 15
Evidence BasedPractic 6
Plans Intervention; 12
Reports; 10
OT Philosophy; 4
Administer Assessmnts;8
Establishes Goals; 11
Modifies Intrven Plan;17
Interprets Assessment;9
Harder
24
Rating Scale of FWPEs
4 = ExceedsStandards
3 = MeetsStandards
2 = NeedsImprovement
1 = Unsatisfactory
Performance is highly skilled and self-initiated. This rating is rarely given and would represent the top 5% of all the students you have supervised.Performance is consistent with entry-level practice. This rating is infrequently given at midterm and is a strong rating at final.
Performance is progressing but still needs improvement for entry-level practice. This is a realistic rating of performance at midterm and some ratings of 2 may be reasonable at the final.
Performance is below standards and requires development for entry-level practice. This rating is given when there is concern about performance.
25
Scoring System of FWPEs Each item must be scored Ethics and safety items must be
passed Each item rating recorded on
Performance Rating Summary Sheet All items summed up at midterm and
final Score compared to scales provided
26
Midterm and Final Scoresof the FWPEs
OTAOverall Midterm ScoreSatisfactory: 54 & aboveUnsatisfactory: 53 &
belowOverall Final ScorePass: 70 & aboveNo Pass: 69 & below
OT Overall Midterm ScoreSatisfactory: 90 &
aboveUnsatisfactory: 89 &
belowOverall Final ScorePass: 122 & aboveNo Pass: 121 & below
27
Rating Performance Using the FWPEs
Case ScenariosJohn—OT Evaluation Mary—OT Intervention Sandra—OTA Evaluation/Screening David—OTA Intervention
28
Individualizing the FWPEs
Designed for additional objectives to be written to add clarification Site-specific objectives NOT supervisor-specific
If an item is very clear and meets the RUMBA test, then there is no need to write another objective
29
Objectives: An Example From FWPE for the OT Student
16. Establishes accurate and appropriate plan School—Provides behavioral-based,
measurable OT goals during IEP process
Acute Care—Overall intervention plan is achievable within client’s length of stay
30
Summary Evaluations designed to measure
entry-level competence, NOT level of performance above competency
OT practice examined as a generalist
Evaluations reflect the occupational therapy process
Performance develops over time