33
8/20/2019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/an-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1/33  An Invitation to ANALYTIC CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY Thomas H. McCall

An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 133

An Inv i ta t ion t o

A N A L Y T I C

C H R I S T I A N

T H E O L O G Y

Thomas H McCal l

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 233

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 333

An Invitation to

ANALYTIC

C H R I S T I A NT H E O L O G Y

Thomas H McCall

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 433

InterVarsity Press

PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094

ivpresscom

emailivpresscom

copy983090983088983089983093 by Tomas H McCall

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from

InterVarsity Press

InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of

students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United

States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For

information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg

All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken from HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL

VERSION reg NIV reg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved

worldwide

Cover design David Fassett

Interior design Beth McGill

Images Geometric abstract copy marigold_983096983096iStockphoto

Celtic knotwork copy imaconiStockphoto

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (print)

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983097983097983091983088-983090 (digital)

Printed in the United States of America

As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment

and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

McCall Tomas H

An invitation to analytic Christian theology Tomas H McCall

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (pbk alk paper)

983089 TeologymdashMethodology 983090 Analysis (Philosophy) 983091 Philosophical theology I itle

BR983089983089983096M983090983092 983090983088983089983093

983090983091983088rsquo983088983092983094mdashdc983090983091

983090983088983089983093983088983091983091983092983093983089

P 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089

Y 983091983093 983091983092 983091983091 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 533

Contents

Introduction 1048633

983089 What Is Analytic heology 983089983089

983090 Analytic heology and Christian Scripture 10486271048631

1048627 Analytic heology and the History o Doctrine 10486321048627

1048628 Analytic heology or the Church and the World 9830899830901048627

1048629 Analytic heology to the Glory o God 9830891048630983089

Author Index 9830891048632983089

Subject Index 98308910486321048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 633

Introduction

983144983141 983159983145983140983141 983154983137983150983143983141 983151983142 983141983158983141983150983156983155 and publications that are loosely

gathered under the label ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is both quite broad

and very active Proponents and practitioners range rom traditionally

minded Orthodox and Roman Catholic philosophers and theologians

through Anglican Lutheran Methodist and other tradition-sensitive

scholars to conservative evangelicals and to revisionist or ldquoprogressiverdquo

theologians In some quarters enthusiasm runs high In other sectors

o the theological (and philosophical) academy suspicion and even

hostility run deep Misunderstanding ofen accompanies the label and

questions abound But just what is this thing called ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo

What are its ldquoaccidentalrdquo eatures and what are its ldquoessentialrdquo attributes

And what are we to make o it as theology Or is it merely a technically

precise and agenda-driven subdiscipline o analytic metaphysics

Where is it going Is there some discernible direction that it willmdashor

shouldmdashtake

In this book I introduce nonspecialists to analytic theology I try to

make clear both what it isnrsquot and what it is Accordingly I discuss what

makes analytic theology analytic and I try to lay out what makes analytic

theology really theology Specifically I outline analytic theologyrsquos con-

nections to Scripture Christian tradition and culture (broadly con-ceived) and I do so by using case studies to illuminate the relationships

and the need or urther integration Here I must also coness to an

agenda I am hoping to influence the uture o analytic theology by

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 733

1048625983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

calling the discipline to a deeper engagement with the traditional re-

sources o the theological task

I come to the work o analytic theology as someone who is by trainingand by vocation a theologian Tus I am especially grateul or the pa-

tience and graciousness o those riends and colleagues who have

genuine expertise in epistemology metaphysics and philosophy o re-

ligion (as well as the history o philosophy) I am deeply indebted to you

or whatever abilities I have as an analytic theologian and I am truly

grateul or your collegiality and encouragement I am also thankul or

those ellow theologians who have taken up the mantle o analytic the-ology and I am grateul as well to those who led the way by actually

doing it beore it was ever called by that name Oliver Crisp Mike Rea

and Billy Abraham read the manuscript and offered very helpul critique

and encouragement and the book is much improved as a result (All

remaining aults are o course entirely mine)

In addition I am grateul or the community o saints and scholars

who surround me at rinity Evangelical Divinity School (and especiallythe members o the Deerfield Dialogue Group who read part o the

manuscript) and I am indebted as well to the administration and the

board o regents or a sabbatical in the all o 10486269830881048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 2: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 233

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 333

An Invitation to

ANALYTIC

C H R I S T I A NT H E O L O G Y

Thomas H McCall

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 433

InterVarsity Press

PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094

ivpresscom

emailivpresscom

copy983090983088983089983093 by Tomas H McCall

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from

InterVarsity Press

InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of

students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United

States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For

information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg

All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken from HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL

VERSION reg NIV reg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved

worldwide

Cover design David Fassett

Interior design Beth McGill

Images Geometric abstract copy marigold_983096983096iStockphoto

Celtic knotwork copy imaconiStockphoto

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (print)

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983097983097983091983088-983090 (digital)

Printed in the United States of America

As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment

and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

McCall Tomas H

An invitation to analytic Christian theology Tomas H McCall

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (pbk alk paper)

983089 TeologymdashMethodology 983090 Analysis (Philosophy) 983091 Philosophical theology I itle

BR983089983089983096M983090983092 983090983088983089983093

983090983091983088rsquo983088983092983094mdashdc983090983091

983090983088983089983093983088983091983091983092983093983089

P 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089

Y 983091983093 983091983092 983091983091 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 533

Contents

Introduction 1048633

983089 What Is Analytic heology 983089983089

983090 Analytic heology and Christian Scripture 10486271048631

1048627 Analytic heology and the History o Doctrine 10486321048627

1048628 Analytic heology or the Church and the World 9830899830901048627

1048629 Analytic heology to the Glory o God 9830891048630983089

Author Index 9830891048632983089

Subject Index 98308910486321048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 633

Introduction

983144983141 983159983145983140983141 983154983137983150983143983141 983151983142 983141983158983141983150983156983155 and publications that are loosely

gathered under the label ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is both quite broad

and very active Proponents and practitioners range rom traditionally

minded Orthodox and Roman Catholic philosophers and theologians

through Anglican Lutheran Methodist and other tradition-sensitive

scholars to conservative evangelicals and to revisionist or ldquoprogressiverdquo

theologians In some quarters enthusiasm runs high In other sectors

o the theological (and philosophical) academy suspicion and even

hostility run deep Misunderstanding ofen accompanies the label and

questions abound But just what is this thing called ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo

What are its ldquoaccidentalrdquo eatures and what are its ldquoessentialrdquo attributes

And what are we to make o it as theology Or is it merely a technically

precise and agenda-driven subdiscipline o analytic metaphysics

Where is it going Is there some discernible direction that it willmdashor

shouldmdashtake

In this book I introduce nonspecialists to analytic theology I try to

make clear both what it isnrsquot and what it is Accordingly I discuss what

makes analytic theology analytic and I try to lay out what makes analytic

theology really theology Specifically I outline analytic theologyrsquos con-

nections to Scripture Christian tradition and culture (broadly con-ceived) and I do so by using case studies to illuminate the relationships

and the need or urther integration Here I must also coness to an

agenda I am hoping to influence the uture o analytic theology by

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 733

1048625983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

calling the discipline to a deeper engagement with the traditional re-

sources o the theological task

I come to the work o analytic theology as someone who is by trainingand by vocation a theologian Tus I am especially grateul or the pa-

tience and graciousness o those riends and colleagues who have

genuine expertise in epistemology metaphysics and philosophy o re-

ligion (as well as the history o philosophy) I am deeply indebted to you

or whatever abilities I have as an analytic theologian and I am truly

grateul or your collegiality and encouragement I am also thankul or

those ellow theologians who have taken up the mantle o analytic the-ology and I am grateul as well to those who led the way by actually

doing it beore it was ever called by that name Oliver Crisp Mike Rea

and Billy Abraham read the manuscript and offered very helpul critique

and encouragement and the book is much improved as a result (All

remaining aults are o course entirely mine)

In addition I am grateul or the community o saints and scholars

who surround me at rinity Evangelical Divinity School (and especiallythe members o the Deerfield Dialogue Group who read part o the

manuscript) and I am indebted as well to the administration and the

board o regents or a sabbatical in the all o 10486269830881048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 3: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 333

An Invitation to

ANALYTIC

C H R I S T I A NT H E O L O G Y

Thomas H McCall

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 433

InterVarsity Press

PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094

ivpresscom

emailivpresscom

copy983090983088983089983093 by Tomas H McCall

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from

InterVarsity Press

InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of

students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United

States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For

information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg

All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken from HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL

VERSION reg NIV reg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved

worldwide

Cover design David Fassett

Interior design Beth McGill

Images Geometric abstract copy marigold_983096983096iStockphoto

Celtic knotwork copy imaconiStockphoto

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (print)

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983097983097983091983088-983090 (digital)

Printed in the United States of America

As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment

and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

McCall Tomas H

An invitation to analytic Christian theology Tomas H McCall

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (pbk alk paper)

983089 TeologymdashMethodology 983090 Analysis (Philosophy) 983091 Philosophical theology I itle

BR983089983089983096M983090983092 983090983088983089983093

983090983091983088rsquo983088983092983094mdashdc983090983091

983090983088983089983093983088983091983091983092983093983089

P 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089

Y 983091983093 983091983092 983091983091 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 533

Contents

Introduction 1048633

983089 What Is Analytic heology 983089983089

983090 Analytic heology and Christian Scripture 10486271048631

1048627 Analytic heology and the History o Doctrine 10486321048627

1048628 Analytic heology or the Church and the World 9830899830901048627

1048629 Analytic heology to the Glory o God 9830891048630983089

Author Index 9830891048632983089

Subject Index 98308910486321048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 633

Introduction

983144983141 983159983145983140983141 983154983137983150983143983141 983151983142 983141983158983141983150983156983155 and publications that are loosely

gathered under the label ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is both quite broad

and very active Proponents and practitioners range rom traditionally

minded Orthodox and Roman Catholic philosophers and theologians

through Anglican Lutheran Methodist and other tradition-sensitive

scholars to conservative evangelicals and to revisionist or ldquoprogressiverdquo

theologians In some quarters enthusiasm runs high In other sectors

o the theological (and philosophical) academy suspicion and even

hostility run deep Misunderstanding ofen accompanies the label and

questions abound But just what is this thing called ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo

What are its ldquoaccidentalrdquo eatures and what are its ldquoessentialrdquo attributes

And what are we to make o it as theology Or is it merely a technically

precise and agenda-driven subdiscipline o analytic metaphysics

Where is it going Is there some discernible direction that it willmdashor

shouldmdashtake

In this book I introduce nonspecialists to analytic theology I try to

make clear both what it isnrsquot and what it is Accordingly I discuss what

makes analytic theology analytic and I try to lay out what makes analytic

theology really theology Specifically I outline analytic theologyrsquos con-

nections to Scripture Christian tradition and culture (broadly con-ceived) and I do so by using case studies to illuminate the relationships

and the need or urther integration Here I must also coness to an

agenda I am hoping to influence the uture o analytic theology by

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 733

1048625983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

calling the discipline to a deeper engagement with the traditional re-

sources o the theological task

I come to the work o analytic theology as someone who is by trainingand by vocation a theologian Tus I am especially grateul or the pa-

tience and graciousness o those riends and colleagues who have

genuine expertise in epistemology metaphysics and philosophy o re-

ligion (as well as the history o philosophy) I am deeply indebted to you

or whatever abilities I have as an analytic theologian and I am truly

grateul or your collegiality and encouragement I am also thankul or

those ellow theologians who have taken up the mantle o analytic the-ology and I am grateul as well to those who led the way by actually

doing it beore it was ever called by that name Oliver Crisp Mike Rea

and Billy Abraham read the manuscript and offered very helpul critique

and encouragement and the book is much improved as a result (All

remaining aults are o course entirely mine)

In addition I am grateul or the community o saints and scholars

who surround me at rinity Evangelical Divinity School (and especiallythe members o the Deerfield Dialogue Group who read part o the

manuscript) and I am indebted as well to the administration and the

board o regents or a sabbatical in the all o 10486269830881048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 4: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 433

InterVarsity Press

PO Box 983089983092983088983088 Downers Grove IL 983094983088983093983089983093-983089983092983090983094

ivpresscom

emailivpresscom

copy983090983088983089983093 by Tomas H McCall

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from

InterVarsity Press

InterVarsity Pressreg is the book-publishing division of InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAreg a movement of

students and faculty active on campus at hundreds of universities colleges and schools of nursing in the United

States of America and a member movement of the International Fellowship of Evangelical Students For

information about local and regional activities visit intervarsityorg

All Scripture quotations unless otherwise indicated are taken from HE HOLY BIBLE NEW INERNAIONAL

VERSION reg NIV reg Copyright copy 983089983097983095983091 983089983097983095983096 983089983097983096983092 983090983088983089983089 by Biblica Inctrade Used by permission All rights reserved

worldwide

Cover design David Fassett

Interior design Beth McGill

Images Geometric abstract copy marigold_983096983096iStockphoto

Celtic knotwork copy imaconiStockphoto

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (print)

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983097983097983091983088-983090 (digital)

Printed in the United States of America

As a member of the Green Press Initiative InterVarsity Press is committed to protecting the environment

and to the responsible use of natural resources o learn more visit greenpressinitiativeorg

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

McCall Tomas H

An invitation to analytic Christian theology Tomas H McCall

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index

ISBN 983097983095983096-983088-983096983091983088983096-983092983088983097983093-983091 (pbk alk paper)

983089 TeologymdashMethodology 983090 Analysis (Philosophy) 983091 Philosophical theology I itle

BR983089983089983096M983090983092 983090983088983089983093

983090983091983088rsquo983088983092983094mdashdc983090983091

983090983088983089983093983088983091983091983092983093983089

P 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093 983089983092 983089983091 983089983090 983089983089 983089983088 983097 983096 983095 983094 983093 983092 983091 983090 983089

Y 983091983093 983091983092 983091983091 983091983090 983091983089 983091983088 983090983097 983090983096 983090983095 983090983094 983090983093 983090983092 983090983091 983090983090 983090983089 983090983088 983089983097 983089983096 983089983095 983089983094 983089983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 533

Contents

Introduction 1048633

983089 What Is Analytic heology 983089983089

983090 Analytic heology and Christian Scripture 10486271048631

1048627 Analytic heology and the History o Doctrine 10486321048627

1048628 Analytic heology or the Church and the World 9830899830901048627

1048629 Analytic heology to the Glory o God 9830891048630983089

Author Index 9830891048632983089

Subject Index 98308910486321048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 633

Introduction

983144983141 983159983145983140983141 983154983137983150983143983141 983151983142 983141983158983141983150983156983155 and publications that are loosely

gathered under the label ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is both quite broad

and very active Proponents and practitioners range rom traditionally

minded Orthodox and Roman Catholic philosophers and theologians

through Anglican Lutheran Methodist and other tradition-sensitive

scholars to conservative evangelicals and to revisionist or ldquoprogressiverdquo

theologians In some quarters enthusiasm runs high In other sectors

o the theological (and philosophical) academy suspicion and even

hostility run deep Misunderstanding ofen accompanies the label and

questions abound But just what is this thing called ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo

What are its ldquoaccidentalrdquo eatures and what are its ldquoessentialrdquo attributes

And what are we to make o it as theology Or is it merely a technically

precise and agenda-driven subdiscipline o analytic metaphysics

Where is it going Is there some discernible direction that it willmdashor

shouldmdashtake

In this book I introduce nonspecialists to analytic theology I try to

make clear both what it isnrsquot and what it is Accordingly I discuss what

makes analytic theology analytic and I try to lay out what makes analytic

theology really theology Specifically I outline analytic theologyrsquos con-

nections to Scripture Christian tradition and culture (broadly con-ceived) and I do so by using case studies to illuminate the relationships

and the need or urther integration Here I must also coness to an

agenda I am hoping to influence the uture o analytic theology by

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 733

1048625983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

calling the discipline to a deeper engagement with the traditional re-

sources o the theological task

I come to the work o analytic theology as someone who is by trainingand by vocation a theologian Tus I am especially grateul or the pa-

tience and graciousness o those riends and colleagues who have

genuine expertise in epistemology metaphysics and philosophy o re-

ligion (as well as the history o philosophy) I am deeply indebted to you

or whatever abilities I have as an analytic theologian and I am truly

grateul or your collegiality and encouragement I am also thankul or

those ellow theologians who have taken up the mantle o analytic the-ology and I am grateul as well to those who led the way by actually

doing it beore it was ever called by that name Oliver Crisp Mike Rea

and Billy Abraham read the manuscript and offered very helpul critique

and encouragement and the book is much improved as a result (All

remaining aults are o course entirely mine)

In addition I am grateul or the community o saints and scholars

who surround me at rinity Evangelical Divinity School (and especiallythe members o the Deerfield Dialogue Group who read part o the

manuscript) and I am indebted as well to the administration and the

board o regents or a sabbatical in the all o 10486269830881048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 5: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 533

Contents

Introduction 1048633

983089 What Is Analytic heology 983089983089

983090 Analytic heology and Christian Scripture 10486271048631

1048627 Analytic heology and the History o Doctrine 10486321048627

1048628 Analytic heology or the Church and the World 9830899830901048627

1048629 Analytic heology to the Glory o God 9830891048630983089

Author Index 9830891048632983089

Subject Index 98308910486321048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 633

Introduction

983144983141 983159983145983140983141 983154983137983150983143983141 983151983142 983141983158983141983150983156983155 and publications that are loosely

gathered under the label ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is both quite broad

and very active Proponents and practitioners range rom traditionally

minded Orthodox and Roman Catholic philosophers and theologians

through Anglican Lutheran Methodist and other tradition-sensitive

scholars to conservative evangelicals and to revisionist or ldquoprogressiverdquo

theologians In some quarters enthusiasm runs high In other sectors

o the theological (and philosophical) academy suspicion and even

hostility run deep Misunderstanding ofen accompanies the label and

questions abound But just what is this thing called ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo

What are its ldquoaccidentalrdquo eatures and what are its ldquoessentialrdquo attributes

And what are we to make o it as theology Or is it merely a technically

precise and agenda-driven subdiscipline o analytic metaphysics

Where is it going Is there some discernible direction that it willmdashor

shouldmdashtake

In this book I introduce nonspecialists to analytic theology I try to

make clear both what it isnrsquot and what it is Accordingly I discuss what

makes analytic theology analytic and I try to lay out what makes analytic

theology really theology Specifically I outline analytic theologyrsquos con-

nections to Scripture Christian tradition and culture (broadly con-ceived) and I do so by using case studies to illuminate the relationships

and the need or urther integration Here I must also coness to an

agenda I am hoping to influence the uture o analytic theology by

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 733

1048625983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

calling the discipline to a deeper engagement with the traditional re-

sources o the theological task

I come to the work o analytic theology as someone who is by trainingand by vocation a theologian Tus I am especially grateul or the pa-

tience and graciousness o those riends and colleagues who have

genuine expertise in epistemology metaphysics and philosophy o re-

ligion (as well as the history o philosophy) I am deeply indebted to you

or whatever abilities I have as an analytic theologian and I am truly

grateul or your collegiality and encouragement I am also thankul or

those ellow theologians who have taken up the mantle o analytic the-ology and I am grateul as well to those who led the way by actually

doing it beore it was ever called by that name Oliver Crisp Mike Rea

and Billy Abraham read the manuscript and offered very helpul critique

and encouragement and the book is much improved as a result (All

remaining aults are o course entirely mine)

In addition I am grateul or the community o saints and scholars

who surround me at rinity Evangelical Divinity School (and especiallythe members o the Deerfield Dialogue Group who read part o the

manuscript) and I am indebted as well to the administration and the

board o regents or a sabbatical in the all o 10486269830881048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 6: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 633

Introduction

983144983141 983159983145983140983141 983154983137983150983143983141 983151983142 983141983158983141983150983156983155 and publications that are loosely

gathered under the label ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is both quite broad

and very active Proponents and practitioners range rom traditionally

minded Orthodox and Roman Catholic philosophers and theologians

through Anglican Lutheran Methodist and other tradition-sensitive

scholars to conservative evangelicals and to revisionist or ldquoprogressiverdquo

theologians In some quarters enthusiasm runs high In other sectors

o the theological (and philosophical) academy suspicion and even

hostility run deep Misunderstanding ofen accompanies the label and

questions abound But just what is this thing called ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo

What are its ldquoaccidentalrdquo eatures and what are its ldquoessentialrdquo attributes

And what are we to make o it as theology Or is it merely a technically

precise and agenda-driven subdiscipline o analytic metaphysics

Where is it going Is there some discernible direction that it willmdashor

shouldmdashtake

In this book I introduce nonspecialists to analytic theology I try to

make clear both what it isnrsquot and what it is Accordingly I discuss what

makes analytic theology analytic and I try to lay out what makes analytic

theology really theology Specifically I outline analytic theologyrsquos con-

nections to Scripture Christian tradition and culture (broadly con-ceived) and I do so by using case studies to illuminate the relationships

and the need or urther integration Here I must also coness to an

agenda I am hoping to influence the uture o analytic theology by

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 733

1048625983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

calling the discipline to a deeper engagement with the traditional re-

sources o the theological task

I come to the work o analytic theology as someone who is by trainingand by vocation a theologian Tus I am especially grateul or the pa-

tience and graciousness o those riends and colleagues who have

genuine expertise in epistemology metaphysics and philosophy o re-

ligion (as well as the history o philosophy) I am deeply indebted to you

or whatever abilities I have as an analytic theologian and I am truly

grateul or your collegiality and encouragement I am also thankul or

those ellow theologians who have taken up the mantle o analytic the-ology and I am grateul as well to those who led the way by actually

doing it beore it was ever called by that name Oliver Crisp Mike Rea

and Billy Abraham read the manuscript and offered very helpul critique

and encouragement and the book is much improved as a result (All

remaining aults are o course entirely mine)

In addition I am grateul or the community o saints and scholars

who surround me at rinity Evangelical Divinity School (and especiallythe members o the Deerfield Dialogue Group who read part o the

manuscript) and I am indebted as well to the administration and the

board o regents or a sabbatical in the all o 10486269830881048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 7: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 733

1048625983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

calling the discipline to a deeper engagement with the traditional re-

sources o the theological task

I come to the work o analytic theology as someone who is by trainingand by vocation a theologian Tus I am especially grateul or the pa-

tience and graciousness o those riends and colleagues who have

genuine expertise in epistemology metaphysics and philosophy o re-

ligion (as well as the history o philosophy) I am deeply indebted to you

or whatever abilities I have as an analytic theologian and I am truly

grateul or your collegiality and encouragement I am also thankul or

those ellow theologians who have taken up the mantle o analytic the-ology and I am grateul as well to those who led the way by actually

doing it beore it was ever called by that name Oliver Crisp Mike Rea

and Billy Abraham read the manuscript and offered very helpul critique

and encouragement and the book is much improved as a result (All

remaining aults are o course entirely mine)

In addition I am grateul or the community o saints and scholars

who surround me at rinity Evangelical Divinity School (and especiallythe members o the Deerfield Dialogue Group who read part o the

manuscript) and I am indebted as well to the administration and the

board o regents or a sabbatical in the all o 10486269830881048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 8: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 833

983089

What Is Analytic Theology

Fear of scholasticism is the mark of the false prophet

K983137983154983148 B983137983154983156983144

A B983154983145983141983142 H983145983155983156983151983154983161 983151983142 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161Where we were Te revival of philosophy of religion For a good deal

o the twentieth century academic philosophymdashespecially Anglo-

American ldquoanalyticrdquo philosophymdashwas ofen taken to be hostile to tradi-

tional theistic belie in general and perhaps especially so to Christian

belie983089 Logical positivism insisted that theological claims were not only

alse but indeed meaningless and many philosophers ound it difficult

even to take theology seriously Te conclusions o A J Ayer are bothrepresentative and influential He claims that the very ldquopossibility o re-

ligious knowledgerdquo has been ldquoruled out by our treatment o metaphysicsrdquo983090

I the ldquocriterion o verifiabilityrdquo eliminates metaphysics and i theology

is only a subcategory o metaphysics then theology is obviously elimi-

natedmdashthe very possibility has been ruled out and all God-talk is literally

Epigraph Karl Barth Church Dogmatics vol I1048625 Te Doctrine of the Word of God ed F

orrance trans Geoffrey Bromiley (Edinburgh amp Clark 1048625983097983095983093) p 10486269830959830971I realize that (at least on some understandings o the term) the story o analytic theology ar

predates the modern era and indeed has ar more in common with scholasticism than it does

with either twentieth-century philosophy or modern theology More on this anon2Alred Jules Ayer Language ruth and Logic (New York Dover 10486259830979830931048626) p 10486251048625983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 9: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 933

10486251048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

nonsensical983091 Hud Hudson says ldquoInormed that questions about the ex-

istence nature and significance o the deity were hereafer to be engaged

exclusively under the guidance o linguistic analyses o religious lan-guage and menaced with (inexplicably popular) verificationist theories

o meaning theologians were told by analytic philosophers that they had

not even achieved the minimal distinction o saying anything alse or

they had not managed to say anything at allrdquo1048628

Te response o many theologians in the late modern era to the develop-

ments in mainstream philosophy in Anglo-American circles was under-

standable they largely ignored the work o these philosophers andlooked elsewhere or intellectual resources and conversation partners

Some sought reuge in ldquoContinentalrdquo philosophy while others decried

any engagement between philosophy and theology

But the second hal o the twentieth century witnessed some re-

markable changes As Hudson notes ldquoTis most unortunate moment in

the history o analytic philosophy was merciully temporary as was its

slavish devotion to linguistic analyses verificationism and all the un-ounded suspicion o metaphysics ethics and religion that ollowed in its

wakerdquo1048629 Logical positivism couldnrsquot bear its own weight and Ayerrsquos con-

fident pronouncements are now valued more as a quaint museum artiact

o philosophical history (ldquoLook kids isnrsquot it amazing that anyone ever

said thatmdashand especially that he seemed so cocksure about itrdquo) than as

a helpul repository o philosophical insight With the collapse o posi-

tivism came a rebirth o serious metaphysicsmdashand with that collapse and

the rebirth o metaphysics came a revival o philosophy o religion983094

Where philosophical consideration o theological issues had been deemed

an utter waste o time now it was seen as an interesting area o inquiry

Serious and sustained engagement with perennial issues o religious and

theological interest was happening again and many o the philosophers

3Ibid p 10486279830934Hud Hudson Te Fall and Hypertime (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486269830881048625983092) p 9830925Ibid p 9830936For a telling o this tale see Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoHow Philosophical Teology Became Pos-

sible Within the Analytic radition o Philosophyrdquo in Analytic Teology New Essays in the Phi-

losophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press

1048626983088983088983097) pp 1048625983093983093-1048630983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 10: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1033

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983091

engaged in this work weremdashand aremdashcommitted Christians

Not all philosophers rejoice at these developments but it is increas-

ingly hard or them not to notice them Quentin Smith describesmdashanddecriesmdashthis development

Te secularization o mainstream academia began to quickly unravel upon

the publication o Plantingarsquos influential book on realist theism God and

Other Minds in 1048625983097983094983095 It became apparent to the philosophical proession

that this book displayed that realist theists were not outmatched by natu-

ralists in terms o the most valued standards o academic philosophy con-

ceptual precision rigor o argumentation technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldview Tis book ollowed seven years

later by Plantingarsquos even more impressive book Te Nature of Necessity

made it maniest that a realist theist was writing at the highest qualitative

level o analytic philosophy on the same playing field as Carnap Russell

Gruumlnbaum and other naturalists1048631

Smith in what basically amounts to something o an alarmist ldquocall to

armsrdquo to his ellow atheists concludes that ldquoGod is not lsquodeadrsquo in aca-demia he returned to lie in the late 1048625983097983094983088rsquos and is now alive and well in

his last academic stronghold philosophy departmentsrdquo1048632

While triumphalism on the part o Christian philosophers would be

both very premature and unseemly (they remain by all measures in the

substantial minority within academic philosophy) nonetheless Smith is

right that the situation is very different than it was only a ew decades

ago Te Society o Christian Philosophers ounded in 1048625983097983095983096 as a small

group o diverse scholars who were more unified by common interests

than by shared commitment to a particular creed now has in the neigh-

borhood o a thousand members Several journalsmdashnotably Faith and

Philosophy Philosophia Christi Religious Studies Sophia Philo and the

International Journal of Philosophy of Religionmdashare devoted to issues

broadly related to the study o the philosophy o religion and Christian

philosophers are very active in these and other venues At the same time

Christian philosophers are very active in other more ldquomainstreamrdquo areas

o contemporary philosophy important recent work in metaphysics and

7Quentin Smith ldquoTe Metaphilosophy o Naturalismrdquo Philo 983092 no 1048626 (10486269830889830881048625) 10486268Ibid p 1048627

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 11: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1133

1048625983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

epistemology in particular has been influenced by philosophers with

religious interests and well-known Christian commitments

Not surprisingly the growth o Christian involvement in philosophyhas been accompanied by increased interest in issues o perennial

concern in philosophy o religion Work on such issues had never en-

tirely disappeared o course or prominent philosophers such as Basil

Mitchell Peter Geach Austin Farrer and others were making significant

contributions well beore the current renaissance o Christian philosophy

really took off1048633 However engagement has been growing at an astounding

rate Issues surrounding religious pluralism and exclusivism problemso evil (including not only the ldquologicalrdquo problem o evil but also ldquoevi-

dentialrdquo problems) religious epistemology religious experience mir-

acles theistic arguments (particularly various versions o ontological

cosmological teleological and moral arguments) and science and re-

ligion have been explored with impressive vigor and analyzed with or-

midable rigor9830891048624 Positions have been set out and explained attacked and

deended modified and surrendered Te work in philosophy o religionhas not been cordoned off rom other more ldquomainstreamrdquo philosophical

work o the contrary in many ways it has remained vitally engaged with

9Eg Basil Mitchell Te Justification of Religious Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830961048625)

Mitchell Faith and Criticism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983097983093) Mitchell Morality Reli-

gious and Secular Te Dilemma of the raditional Conscience (Oxord Oxord University Press

10486259830979830961048630) Peter Geach God and the Soul (South Bend IN St Augustinersquos Press 10486259830971048630983097) Geach

Providence and Evil (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Te Virtues (Cam-

bridge Cambridge University Press 1048625983097983095983095) Geach Logic Matters (Berkeley University o Cali-ornia Press 10486259830979830951048626) Austin Farrer Te Freedom of the Will (London Black 1048625983097983093983096) Farrer Love

Almighty and Ills Unlimited An Essay on Providence and Evil (London Collins 104862598309710486301048625) Farrer

Saving Belief A Study of Essentials (London Hodder amp Stoughton 10486259830971048630983092) Farrer Faith and Spec-

ulation An Essay in Philosophical Teology (London Black 10486259830971048630983095)10Te contentsmdashand perhaps the very existencemdasho the numerous and massive ldquohandbooksrdquo and

ldquocompanionsrdquo to philosophy o religion bear weighty testimony to this act See eg William J

Wainwright ed Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion (New York Oxord University

Press 1048626983088983088983093) Philip L Quinn and Charles aliaerro eds A Companion to Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095) William E Mann ed Te Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion

(Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983093) Michael L Peterson and Raymond J VanArragon eds Contemporary

Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983092) J P Moreland and William Lane

Craig eds Te Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology (Oxord Blackwell 1048626983088983088983097) Justin Mc-

Brayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder eds Te Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil (Oxord

Blackwell 104862698308810486251048627) Chad Meister and Paul Copan eds Te Routledge Companion to Philosophy of

Religion 1048626nd ed (New York Routledge 104862698308810486251048627) See also the impressive series Oxord Studies in

Philosophy o Religion edited by Jon Kvanvig

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 12: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1233

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983093

cutting-edge work in epistemology ethics and metaphysics to use the

latter as an example rom Alvin Plantingarsquos early work Te Nature of

Necessity to Brian Lefowrsquos recent contributions in God and Necessity important work in the metaphysics o modality has been deeplymdashand

some might say ldquoessentiallyrdquomdashconnected to philosophy o religion983089983089

Judging rom the interest and output analytic philosophy o religion is

not only alive and well but indeed healthy and robust

How we got here From philosophy of religion to philosophical the-

ology But or all the vigor and intellectual energy that is captured and

reflected in work on general or generic issues in philosophy o religion theinterests o Christian philosophers have not been limited to those issues

Instead Christian philosophers have been deeply interested in distinctly

Christian theological topics and they have devoted much energy to the

analysis and deense o Christian doctrine Te past ew decades have wit-

nessed important work on the doctrine o revelation (and divine speech)

the inspiration authority and interpretation o the Christian Scriptures

divine attributes (particularly simplicity necessity aseity omnipotenceomniscience eternity and reedom) divine action in creation providence

miraculous intervention theological anthropology original sin incar-

nation atonement resurrection and eschatology983089983090

Where we are Philosophical theology and analytic theology More

recently the term analytic theology has come into use Tere are o

course important orebears to this work David Kelsey Nicholas Wolt-

erstorff and others at Yale disparate figures such as William P Alston

Norman Kretzmann George Mavrodes Keith Yandell and others else-

where in the United States Paul Helm and Richard Swinburne in the

United Kingdom and Vincent Brummer and others o the Utrecht

11See Alvin Plantinga Te Nature of Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983092) and Brian

Lefow God and Necessity (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626) See also the recent proposals

o Hugh J McCann Creation and the Sovereignty of God (Bloomington Indiana University Press

104862698308810486251048626)12Once again the prolieration o ldquoreadersrdquo ldquohandbooksrdquo and ldquocompanionsrdquo stands as evidence

o the breadth and depth o the work undertaken eg Oliver D Crisp ed A Reader in Contem-

porary Philosophical Teology (New York amp Clark 1048626983088983088983097) Michael C Rea ed Oxford Read-

ings in Philosophical Teology 1048626 vols (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) Tomas P Flint

and Michael C Rea eds Te Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Teology (Oxord Oxord Uni-

versity Press 1048626983088983088983097) Charles aliaerro and Chad Meister eds Te Cambridge Companion to

Christian Philosophical Teology (Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10486269830881048625983088)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 13: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1333

1048625983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

school o philosophical theology in the Netherlands Following trail-

blazers such as these and building on the recent renaissance o meta-

physics and philosophy o religion the analytic theology movement isnow growing Te publication o the volume Analytic Teology Essays

in the Philosophy of Teology edited by Oliver D Crisp and Michael C

Rea marked an important moment Te Analytic Teology Project

(sponsored and promoted by Notre Damersquos Center or Philosophy o

Religion as well the University o Innsbruck in Austria and the Shalem

Center in Jerusalem and unded by generous grants rom the John em-

pleton Foundation) with its annual Logos conerence and other activitiesthe launch o the Journal of Analytic Teology and the inauguration o

the book series Oxord Studies in Analytic Teology all lend support to

this growing movement

Te meaning o the term analytic theology can vary in common par-

lance and it is sae to say that there is no single decisively settled meaning

o the term when it is used as a label Still perhaps we can saely say that

what is common across the range o uses is this analytic theology sig-nifies a commitment to employ the conceptual tools o analytic phi-

losophy where those tools might be helpul in the work o constructive

Christian theology Scholars will naturally enough disagree among

themselves about just which o those tools are most helpul which

projects are best served by their use and other matters but on the whole

such a minimalist characterization seems sae enough William J

Abraham offers this helpul summary analytic theology ldquocan be useully

defined as ollows it is systematic theology attuned to the skills re-

sources and virtues o analytic philosophyrdquo983089983091 As such analytic theology

is a growing and energetic field at the intersections o philosophy o re-

ligion and systematic theology

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155 (983151983154 S983144983151983157983148983140 B983141)

Such minimalist characterization while airly sae does not take us very

ar What more precisely is one doing when one does analytic theology

13William J Abraham ldquoSystematic Teology as Analytic Teologyrdquo in Analytic Teology New

Essays in the Philosophy of Teology ed Oliver D Crisp and Michael C Rea (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 983093983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 14: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1433

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983095

Just what is analytic theology Perhaps it will help first to consider what

is so analytic about analytic theology Following this we shall think

about how it is an exercise in theology Analytic theology as analytic theology As we have seen Quentin Smith

praises Plantingarsquos work or its excellence in ldquothe most valued standards o

analytic philosophy conceptual precision rigor o argumentation tech-

nical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo9830891048628 Oliver

D Crisp echoes this estimation o what counts as good work in analytic

philosophy he observes that analytic philosophy is characterized by ldquoa

logical rigour clarity and parsimony o expression coupled with attentionto a certain cluster o philosophical problemsrdquo9830891048629 Analytic theology is rel-

evantly similar he says or it ldquowill prize intellectual virtues like clarity

parsimony o expression and argumentative rigourrdquo983089983094 Michael C Rearsquos

description o analytic philosophy echoes these accounts in some ways

While recognizing that clear and sharp lines between ldquoanalyticrdquo and ldquonon-

analyticrdquo (or ldquoContinentalrdquo) philosophical approaches are neither easy to

come by nor perhaps really worth all the work he characterizes analyticapproaches to philosophy in terms o style and ambition9830891048631 Te ambitions

are generally ldquoto identiy the scope and limits o our powers to obtain

knowledge o the worldrdquo and ldquoto provide such true explanatory theories

as we can in areas o inquiry (metaphysics morals and the like) that all

outside the scope o the natural sciencesrdquo9830891048632 Rea characterizes the style as

including the ollowing prescriptions

P1048625 Write as i philosophical positions and conclusions can be adequately or-mulated in sentences that can be ormalized and logically manipulated

P1048626 Prioritize precision clarity and logical coherence

P983091 Avoid substantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other tropes

whose semantic content outstrips their propositional content

14Smith ldquoMetaphilosophyrdquo p 104862615Oliver D Crisp ldquoOn Analytic Teologyrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology p 104862798309316Ibid pp 1048627983095-104862798309617Michael C Rea introduction to Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 1048627-983092 See also Nick raka-

kis ldquoMeta-Philosophy o Religion Te Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy o Religionrdquo

Ars Disputandi 983095 (1048626983088983088983095) 1048625983095983097-1048626104862698308818Rea introduction p 983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 15: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1533

1048625983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

P983092 Work as much as possible with well-understood primitive concepts and

concepts that can be analyzed in terms o those

P983093 reat conceptual analysis (insoar as possible) as a source o evidence9830891048633

Tis much at least is characteristic o analytic philosophy So what

about analytic theology As Rea sees things ldquoanalytic theology is just the

activity o approaching theological topics with the ambitions o an ana-

lytic philosopher and in a style that conorms to the prescriptions that

are distinctive o analytic philosophical discourse It will also involve

more or less pursuing those topics in a way that engages the literature

that is constitutive o the analytic tradition employing some o the tech-

nical jargon rom that tradition and so on But in the end it is the style

and ambitions that are most centralrdquo9830901048624

All this is helpul but perhaps a bit more explanation would be ben-

eficial Consider P1048625 Tis need not mean that all meaningul statements

in theology (or philosophy) need to be expressed ormally it should

not be taken to mean that every theological claim should be stated in

an apparatus with numbered propositions and a ormal structure

What it does mean however is that the deault setting or theologians

should be to communicate propositions that could be expressed this

way For as Rea says ldquoabsent special circumstancesrdquo things have ldquogone

very much amissrdquo i a view ldquois expressed in such a way that it has no

clear logical outcomesrdquo983090983089

Consider also P1048626 Tis need notmdashand should notmdashbe taken to mean

that logical precision and coherence are the only important criteria ora theologian and neither should it be taken to imply even that logical

precision and coherence are the most important criteria Te theologian

who is convinced that her first commitment is fidelity to the priority and

ultimacy o divine revelation should have no difficulty in assenting to P1048626

Neither urther should P1048626 be taken to imply that the same levels o

logical precision are possible with all theological topics nor yet that all

theological projects require the same levels o precision and argumentative

19Ibid pp 983093-104863020Ibid p 98309521Ibid p 983093 n 983093

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 16: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1633

What Is Analytic heology 1048625983097

rigor Consider by way o example childrenrsquos catechetical literature

Surely this literature is theological but it neither can nor should attempt

to display the same level o logical precision or argumentative rigor assay advanced work in scholastic theology P1048626 does not clam that such

theological literature should do so or that all work in theology must

always do so

Neither should P1048626 be misunderstood with respect to claims about the

importance o ldquoclarityrdquo Rea notes that this claim can seem ironic ldquoin light

o the act that quite a lot o analytic philosophy [and we could add

some analytic theology] is very difficult even or specialists and totallyinaccessible to non-specialistsrdquo983090983090 But ldquoclearrdquo does not mean ldquoeasyrdquo In-

stead it expresses a commitment to the work o ldquospelling out hidden

assumptions scrupulously trying to lay bare whatever evidence one has

(or lacks) or the claims that one is making and on taking care to confine

onersquos vocabulary to ordinary language well-understood primitive con-

cepts and technical jargon definable in terms o theserdquo983090983091 Finally we

should note that P1048626 does not imply that everything (or everything worthtalking about) in theology will become crystal clear Te goal o analytic

theology is not (or at least need not be) the removal o all mystery in

theology o the contrary analytic philosophers o religion have long

been keenly aware o the place o mystery in theology and it may be that

at certain points an important role o the theologian is to clariy just

where the mystery really lies P1048626 does not suggest that analytic theology

will make everything ldquoclearrdquo in the sense that it makes everything ldquoeasy

and readily accessible to the nonspecialistrdquo Instead what it prioritizes is

clarity to the appropriate audiences and to the greatest possible degree

And it insists that ldquomysteryrdquo must not be conused with logical inco-

herence and it likewise insists that we do not gloriy what is clearly in-

coherent with the shroud o ldquomysteryrdquo As Alan G Padgett says theology

should ldquoseek the truth about Godrdquo and ldquothereore must shun incoherence

and irrationalityrdquo9830901048628 Where ldquosometimes lsquomysteryrsquo is evoked as an excuse

22Ibid p 983093 n 104863023Ibid24Alan G Padgett ldquoTe rinity in Teology and Philosophy Why Jerusalem Should Work with

Athensrdquo in Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity ed Tomas McCall and Michael

C Rea (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983097) p 104862710486271048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 17: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1733

1048626983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

or sloppy thinking this must be anathema to any academic theology

worthy o the namerdquo For ldquoafer all the mystery o God does not end

when theology speaks clearly Te simple phrase lsquoJesus loves me this Iknow or the Bible tells me sorsquo covers vast deep mysteries that even the

angels gaze into with awe and wonderrdquo9830901048629

P983091 rules out ldquosubstantive (non-decorative) use o metaphor and other

tropes whose semantic content outstrips their propositional contentrdquo

Tis does not or at least need not mean that there is no valid or valuable

place or metaphor in theology Analytic theologians will disagree among

themselves as to howmdashand how muchmdashmetaphor is useul and legiti-mate983090983094 But the basic point is airly plain on P983091 theologians are not at

liberty to trade loosely in metaphor without ever being able to speciy

just what is meant by those metaphors Tey are not then ree to make

claims the meaning o which cannot be specified or spelled out Teolo-

gians are not licensed to trade in what Randal Rauser calls ldquounclarifiable

unclarityrdquo9830901048631 P983092 calls the analytic theologian to work with ldquowell-understood

primitive conceptsrdquo that are reasonably taken to be basic intuitive or(minimally) uncontroversial (and with concepts that can be understood

in terms o such primitive concepts) Some theologians will be quick to

raise concerns here they will worry that the very notion o ldquowell-

understood primitive conceptsrdquo may both conceal blind spots o social

location and privilege and be a Procrustean bed that restricts theological

concepts to ldquowhat we already know to be truerdquo and thus curtails the

possibility o engagement with divine revelation But once again it is

important not to misunderstand P983092 Te ldquoas much as possiblerdquo is key

here i the preunderstood concepts donrsquot do enough work then some o

them can be adjusted Others wonrsquot be so easy to adjust or discard but

this category o primitive concepts is both quite small and very basic (eg

the law o noncontradiction) Simply put there is no good reason to

25Ibid26I thank Billy Abraham or pressing this point Te ldquostandardrdquo work on metaphor in theology

remains Janet Martin Soskice Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983096983095)27Randal Rauser ldquoTeology as a Bull Sessionrdquo in Crisp and Rea Analytic Teology pp 983095983092-983095983093 See

also Harry Frankurt On Bullshit (Princeton NJ Princeton University Press 1048626983088983088983093) and Frank-

urt Bullshit and Philosophy ed Gary L Hardcastle and George A Resich (Chicago Open

Court 1048626983088983088983093)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 18: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1833

What Is Analytic heology 10486261048625

think that the notion o ldquowell-understood primitive conceptsrdquo must

unction as a Procrustean bed

Finally Rea says that P983093 calls us to ldquotreat conceptual analysis (insoaras it is possible) as a source o evidencerdquo It should be obvious that he

does not say that conceptual analysis is the only source o evidence and

there is no reason to think that it should be taken this way Neither does

he claim that conceptual analysis is the primary or ultimate source o

evidence P983093 makes an important claim but it is a rather modest one

What it insists on is this i close conceptual analysis reveals that some

theological proposition P is say internally inconsistent then thatanalysis gives us all the evidence we need to reject P No matter how

grand the claims o Prsquo s supporters in deense o the supporting evidence

for it i P is incoherent (sel-reerentially or otherwise) then it is not true

Once we have established that P is incoherent (which is a task much

harder than is sometimes supposed) we have all the reason we need to

conclude that it is wrong In addition o course conceptual analysis

might count as evidence in other and more positive ways as well Con-sider perect being theology or example here theologians analyze ldquoper-

ectionrdquo and then take deliverances o that analysis as evidence in support

o their theological conclusions

Much more could be said about what makes analytic theology truly

analytic o course While this could be expanded on and broadened

(particularly in directions that put less o a premium on precision) Rearsquos

P1048625-P983093 give us an initial sense o what it means to say that theology is

analytic theology Generally speaking analytic theology is theology that

is attuned to and committed to the ldquogoals and ambitionsrdquo o analytic

philosophy a commitment to truth wherever it may be ound clarity o

expression and rigor o argumentation Very ofen it will not hesitate to

make appropriate use o the available tools o analytic philosophy espe-

cially as these aid conceptual precision and argumentative rigor

Analytic theology as analytic theology But i echoing Smith it is the

concern with ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo that

makes analytic theology analytic then what is it that makes analytic

theology really theology Tis book develops an answer to this question

but an initial summary may help Recall that Smith talks not only about

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 19: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 1933

10486261048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo but also about ldquotech-

nical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo For

the analytic philosopher ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo will naturally involvemastery o the requisite field (metaphysics philosophy o mind epis-

temology etc) but it may also include competence in other related

fields (biology or philosophy o biology neurology or philosophy o

mind etc) For the analytic theologian such erudition will include com-

petence in the relevant areas o philosophical study that are necessary or

ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquorigor o argumentationrdquo But or the analytic

theologian qua theologian it must involve much more than this Forunless analytic theology is merely ldquoarmchair theologyrdquo (albeit armchair

theology done by very bright people) it will be grounded in the

Christian Scriptures it will be inormed by the great tradition o doc-

trinal development it will be ldquochristologically normedrdquo and it will be

culturally engaged As theology it will seek to articulate what we may

know o God as God has revealed himsel to us As Nicholas Wolterstorff

puts it to theologiansDo not be ersatz philosophers do not be ersatz cultural theorists do not be

ersatz anything Be genuine theologians Be sure-ooted in philosophy But

then be theologians What we need to hear rom you is how things look

when seen in light o the triune Godmdashmay his name be praisedmdashwho creates

and sustains us who redeems us and who will bring this rail and allen

though yet glorious humanity and cosmos to consummation9830901048632

Accordingly analytic theology is theology done by theologians who areldquosure-ootedrdquo in philosophy (many o whom will have extensive training

and proessional expertise there and indeed may be leaders within their

field) but it is a kind o theology nonetheless

Such a conception o theology is o course not remotely new What

we may useully reer to as ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo is very similar in many

respects to deeply traditional ways o doing theology We can see this

kind o work exemplified in the theology o the scholastics (both me-dieval and post-Reormationearly modern) So in some sense the re-

28Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoo Teologians From One Who Cares About Teology but Is Not One

o Yourdquo Teological Education (1048626983088983088983093) 9830971048625-9830971048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 20: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2033

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983091

birth o analytic theology may be thought o as scholasticism redivivus

As Richard Swinburnemdashsurely a pioneer o analytic theologymdashsays

ldquolarge-scale theology needs clear and rigorous argumentrdquo and it is ldquohightime or theology to returnrdquo to the standards set by Tomas Aquinas

John Duns Scotus and others9830901048633 But it is not only the ldquohigh scholasticsrdquo

who worked this way or we can also witness many o these virtues in

theologians rom the patristics to the pietists9830911048624 Many theologians in the

Christian tradition were concerned with both ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and

ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo as well as ldquotechnical eruditionrdquo and the ldquoin-depth

deense o an original worldviewrdquoConsider what John Wesleymdashan evangelist hardly known as a ldquoscho-

lasticrdquo or an ldquoanalytic theologianrdquomdashhas to say about the importance o

acquiring the tools or ldquoconceptual precisionrdquo and ldquoargumentative rigorrdquo

Logic he says is ldquonecessary next to and in order to the knowledge o

Scripturerdquo983091983089 Despite the act that it is ldquonow quite unashionablerdquo none-

theless logic is invaluable For with it we have the possibility o ldquoappre-

hending things clearly judging truly and reasoning conclusivelyrdquo

983091983090

Andas with logic so also with metaphysics Tus Wesley will ask o clergy

Am I a tolerable master o the sciences Have I gone through the very gate o

them logic I not I am not likely to go much urther when I stumble at the

threshold Do I understand it so as to be ever the better or it o have it

always ready or use so as to apply every rule o it when occasion is almost

as naturally as I turn my hand Do I understand it at all Can I reduce an

indirect mood to a direct a hypothetic to a categorical syllogism Rather have

not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe what the

little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm ldquothat logic is good or nothingrdquo It is

good or this at least (wherever it is understood) to make people talk less by

showing them both what is and what is not to the point and how extremely

29Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism 1048626nd ed (Oxord Oxord University Press 10486259830979830971048627)

p 98309530See eg Gregory o Nyssa Against Eunomius 10486259830921048626 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers ed Philip

Schaff series 1048626 (10486259830969830961048630ndash1048625983096983096983097 repr Peabody MA Hendrickson 1048625983097983097983092) 983093983097983096-983097983097 (Patrologia

Graeca [= Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca] ed Jacques-Paul Migne [Paris 1048625983096983093983095ndash

10486259830969830961048630] 9830929830939830921048630983088-10486301048625)31John Wesley ldquoAddress to the Clergyrdquo in Te Works of John Wesley vol 1048625983088 Letters Essays Dialogs

and Addresses (Grand Rapids Zondervan nd) p 983092983096104862732Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 21: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2133

1048626983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

hard it is to prove anything Do I understand metaphysics i not the depths

o the Schoolmen the subtleties o Scotus or Aquinas yet the first rudiments

the general principles o that useul science983091983091

Consider urther what Wesley says about the importance o ldquotechnical

eruditionrdquo in theology Insisting on the importance o knowledge o the

scope o Christian Scripture as well as acility in the relevant ancient

languages he asks

Have I (1048625) such a knowledge o Scripture as becomes him who undertakes

so to explain it to others Have I a ull and clear view o the analogy o

aith which is the clue to guide me through the whole Am I acquainted with

the several parts o Scripture with all parts o the Old estament and the

New Upon the mention o any text do I know the context and the parallel

places Do I know the scope o each book and how every part tends

thereto Have I the skill to draw the natural inerences deducible rom each

text (1048626) Do I understand Greek and Hebrew Otherwise am I not at

the mercy o everyone who does understand or pretends to understand the

original For which way can I conute his pretence Do I understand the lan-

guage o the Old estament Critically At all Can I read into English one o

Davidrsquos Psalms or even the first chapter o Genesis Do I understand the

language o the New estament Am I a critical master o it Have I enough

o it even to read into English the first chapter o St Luke I not how many

years did I spend at school How many at university And what was I doing

all those years9830911048628

Wesley says similar things about the indispensability o knowledge o

the Christian tradition But the basic point should be clear important

elements o what we now call ldquoanalytic theologyrdquo have deep roots in the

broad Christian theological tradition Indeed or an evangelist like John

Wesley this is simply the kind o theology that any Christian minister

should be doing

W983144983137983156 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 T983144983141983151983148983151983143983161 I983155983150rsquo983156 M983145983155983157983150983140983141983154983155983156983137983150983140983145983150983143983155

983137983150983140 O983138983146983141983139983156983145983151983150983155

Many systematic theologians are suspicious o analytic theology Indeed

33Ibid pp 9830929830971048625-983097104862634Ibid pp 983092983097983088-9830971048625

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 22: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2233

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983093

some are deeply suspicious Te concerns come rom several angles Here

are some o the most common9830911048629

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on a univocal account of religious languagerdquoSome theologians may worry that the current analytic discussions

proceed with an unrealistic and unhealthy naiveteacute regarding the nature

and unction o religious language For instance Stephen R Holmes

thinks that ldquoanalytic discussions o the rinity seem generally to proceed

with a remarkable confidence about the success o language in reerring

to the divinerdquo he thinks that the assumption o analytic theology ldquowould

always seem to be that language reers univocally to the divine and thecreatedrdquo Indeed he thinks that analytic theology would be ldquoimpossiblerdquo

without a commitment to univocity983091983094 More worrisome the concern may

be that analytic theologyrsquos commitment to univocity implicates it in

something that is (at least potentially) idolatrous9830911048631

A general treatment o religious language is beyond the scope o our

discussion but several observations may be helpul First it should be

noted that the case against univocity should not be merely assumed (asi some particular theological proposal could be damned by nothing

more than the charge o univocity) Nor is the case for univocity nearly

so weak as is ofen supposed o the contrary univocity has serious and

sophisticated deenders today and a case can be made that ldquothe doctrine

o univocity is true and salutaryrdquo9830911048632

Te second major point is perhaps more important or our purposes

It is this analytic theology as such requires no commitment to univocity

whatsoever Indeed many analytic theologians reject univocity in avor

35Tis section draws heavily rom my ldquoTeologians Philosophers and the Doctrine o the rinityrdquo

in McCall and Rea Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 1048627983092983088-98309298309636Stephen R Holmes Te Quest for the rinity Te Doctrine of God in Scripture History and Mo-

dernity (Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 104862698308810486251048626) p 1048627104862637See eg Jean-Luc Marion God Without Being trans Tomas A Carlson (Chicago University

o Chicago Press 10486259830979830971048625) and John Milbank Te Word Made Strange (Oxord Blackwell 1048625983097983097983095)

See also the discussion in Daniel P Horan Postmodernity and Univocity A Critical Account of

Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus (Minneapolis Fortress 10486269830881048625983092)38Tomas Williams ldquoTe Doctrine o Univocity Is rue and Salutaryrdquo Modern Teology 10486261048625 (1048626983088983088983093)

983093983095983093-983096983093 See also William P Alston Divine Nature and Human Language Essays in Philosophical

Teology (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983096983097) pp 1048625983095-10486251048625983095 and Keith E Yandell ldquoNot

Conusing Incomprehensibility and Ineffability Carl Henry on Literal Propositional Revela-

tionrdquo rinity Journal (10486269830881048625983092) 10486301048625-983095983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 23: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2333

1048626983094 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

o other approaches (the doctrine o analogy being avored by many)

and at least one prominent philosopher o religion deends apophati-

cism9830911048633 Perhaps there is a general sense in which it is true that analytictheologians are naive about religious language Perhaps they aremdash

although I doubt this very much But even i it were true this would not

obviously make analytic theology different rom or inerior to many

other approaches to the theological task Te concernmdasheven i it were

substantiatedmdashwould give us no reason to avoid or dismiss analytic the-

ology It might give us reason to want to do it better it might motivate

analytic theologians to pay closer attention to important issues relatedto theological language But the concern itselmdasheven i substantiatedmdash

would not count against the proper exercise o analytic theology It is at

best a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is an exercise in natural theologyrdquo Some critics

might charge analytic theology with reliance on ldquonatural theologyrdquo Tis

observation will seem benign to other theologians some analytic theo-

logians might even take this judgment as a badge o honor But to thosetheologians o the house and lineage o Karl Barth this will be the mark

o damnation some may take natural theology to be ldquothe invention o

the Antichristrdquo as something that can serve only to reinorce idolatry

and corrupt the truth10486281048624 Other theologians might not be so hostile but

they still might worry that natural theology distracts us rom obedience

and fidelity to the reality o divine revelation So i analytic theology is

an exercise in natural theology or even relies on it it should be held at

armrsquos length i not shunned entirely

Much could be said about this cluster o issuesmdashand indeed more will

be said in the next chaptermdashbut at this point a basic conusion needs to

be cleared away Fundamentally it is simply a misunderstanding o ana-

lytic theology to think that it is an exercise in natural theology Granted

some prolific analytic theologians are heavily invested in the project o

natural theology and we can say with confidence that rumors o the

39Eg Jonathan D Jacobs ldquoTe Ineffable Inconceivable and Incomprehensible God Fundamen-

tality and Apophatic Teologyrdquo in Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion orthcoming40More precisely Barth says that the analogia entis (which interpreters ofen take to be the basis

o all natural theology) is the ldquoinvention o the Antichristrdquo Doctrine of the Word of God p xiii

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 24: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2433

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983095

demise o natural theology have been greatly exaggerated1048628983089 But there is

nothing about analytic theology as suchmdashas I have described it to this

pointmdashthat relies on natural theology Te conusion o natural theologywith the analytic project is just thatmdasha conusion Whatever we should

think about natural theology philosophically however we judge the suc-

cesses (or lack thereo) o the various theistic arguments natural the-

ology simply cannot be equated with analytic theology And whatever

we should conclude theologically about natural theology we should not

conuse it with the analytic project Once again this is a red herring

ldquoAnalytic theology is naive with respect to the history of doctrinerdquoAnother concern expressed by some contemporary systematic theolo-

gians is this analytic theology all too ofen proceeds with little awareness

o the complex but important historical actors associated with the de-

velopment and ormation o Christian doctrine o understate the point

analytic theologians are sometimes criticized or their ignorance o the

history o the development o dogma and or their lack o careul study

to understand the particular intellectual (not to mention social) settingo the person(s) controversies or eras under consideration Instead so

the story goes it is all too common or analytic theologians to approach

an issue by isolating a particular text and then breaking it down to

unpack the real ldquocorerdquo o the doctrine in question And the assumption

o the analytic theologians (again so the story goes) is ofen enough that

this can be saely or appropriately done with little or no reerence to the

particular context in which the development occurred As Fred Sanders

expresses the concern ldquophilosophers sometimes seem to think o ancient

texts as cumbersome delivery systems containing ideas which it is their

job to extract rom the delivery system and do something withrdquo1048628983090 Richard

A Muller likewise argues that lack o attention to historical context

sometimes results in problematic misunderstandings o the tradition in

41Eg Richard Swinburne Te Coherence of Teism (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983095) and

Swinburne Te Existence of God (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048625983097983095983097 [1048626983088983088983092]) For examples

o recent work see Moreland and Craig Blackwell Companion to Natural Teology and James F

Sennett and Douglas Groothuis eds In Defense of Natural Teology A Post-Humean Assessment

(Downers Grove IL IVP Academic 1048626983088983088983093)42Fred Sanders ldquoTe State o the Doctrine o the rinity in Evangelical Teologyrdquo Southwestern

Journal of Teology 983092983095 (1048626983088983088983093) 10486251048630983097

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 25: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2533

1048626983096 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

his view or instance both recent deenders and contemporary de-

tractors o the doctrine o divine simplicity commonly ldquomisinterpret the

traditional doctrinerdquo1048628983091 Robert W Jenson is more scathing he judges theanalytic enterprise to be ldquosomewhat oddly related to the Christian aith

it claims to deendrdquo and he calls the work o Richard Swinburne a ldquotruly

bizarre caserdquo10486281048628

At least this is how the story ofen goes A major underlying worry

seems to be that reading texts without proper attention to their social

location and intellectual context can cause us to misread and mis-

interpret those texts Tis strikes me as a legitimate concern and it is onethat analytic theologians would do well to hear and heed No one should

deny that it is possible to misread and misinterpret important historical

texts and it seems to me that such misreadings are ar more likely when

particular bits o the text are isolated and scrutinized apart rom the

broader literary and historical contexts Te temptation to look away

rom the context as an irrelevant distraction is real It should also be

resisted So the criticism contains an important cautionAt the same time however we should keep several additional points

in mind First the problem is not restricted to analytic theologiansmdash

constructive or systematic theologians o any stripe may be susceptible

to this temptation Indeed ironies abound on this ront Afer criticizing

analytic philosophers o religion or overlooking ldquothe essentially his-

torical character o trinitarian theologyrdquomdashand especially or missing the

important differences between the ldquoGreek (or lsquoCappadocianrsquo) Eastrdquo and

the ldquoLatin WestrdquomdashCatherine Mowry LaCugnarsquos own work has been

criticized or exaggerating those differences10486281048629 It is not as i more main-

stream nonanalytic or antianalytic theologians are immune to the temp-

tation instead so ar as I can see this is a general concern that should

serve as an important reminder that all theologians who engage with the

43Richard A Muller Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics Te Rise and Development of Reformed

Orthodoxy ca 1048625104862910486261048624ndashca 1048625104863110486261048629 vol 1048627 Te Divine Essence and Attributes (Grand Rapids Baker

Academic 10486269830889830881048627) p 983092104862544Robert W Jenson Systematic Teology vol 1048626 Te Works of God (Oxord Oxord University

Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 983096 n 104862798309345Catherine Mowry LaCugna ldquoPhilosophers and Teologians on the rinityrdquo Modern Teology 1048626

(10486259830979830961048630) 10486259830951048626

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 26: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2633

What Is Analytic heology 1048626983097

Christian intellectual tradition should do so with appropriate historical

sensitivity Second there is nothingmdashat least so ar as I can seemdashthat

makes this temptation irresistible Te act that some analytic theolo-gians have been insufficiently attentive to some historical matters does

not entail either that all analytic theologians are ignorant o the tradition

or that all analytic theologians must proceed in ignorance I see no

reason to conclude that this problem must be either essential or endemic

to analytic theology Surely more progress can be made in this area but

I see no reasons to think that such progress cannot happen Finally it is

worth noting that such progress in act is being made Tere are manyhappy exceptions to the common stereotype that analytic theologians

are ldquoahistoricalrdquo in act it is sae to say that many excellent analytic

thinkers have genuine specialization in historical scholarship Indeed

many are cutting-edge contributors1048628983094

ldquoAnalytic theology is only apologetics for conservative theologyrdquo Al-

ternatively the suspicion may be that analytic theology is too closely tied

to the Christian tradition Te assumption here is that analytic theologyis nothing more than the bastion o traditionally minded Roman Catholic

(and Orthodox) theologians and philosophers along with their conser-

vative Protestant riends and the worry is that they are interested in

nothing more than finding a sae place to deend what they already know

to be true Consequently the worry goes there is next to nothing o real

interest here or revisionist theologians o various stripes and there is

little promise or genuinely constructive theology

wo observations are important here First in principle there is

nothing about analytic theology that demands either traditional sympa-

thies or conservative conclusions Neither is there anything about ana-

lytic theology (either taken along the lines o Rearsquos P1048625-P983093 or in a somewhat

more expansive way) that precludes the use o the analytic tools by say

eminist womanist or liberationist theologies

46Stellar examples include Richard Cross Duns Scotus on God (Aldershot UK Ashgate 1048626983088983088983093) Cross

Te Metaphysics of the Incarnation Tomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxord Oxord University

Press 10486269830889830881048626) Eleonore Stump Aquinas (New York Routledge 10486269830889830881048627) Jeffrey E Brower Aquinasrsquos

Ontology of the Material World Change Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxord Oxord

University Press 10486269830881048625983092) and J Paasch Divine Production in Late Medieval rinitarian Teology

Henry of Ghent Duns Scotus and William Ockham (Oxord Oxord University Press 104862698308810486251048626)

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 27: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2733

983091983088 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Second in point o act many criticisms o traditional doctrines

have emerged rom within analytic theology Consider this example It

is hard to think o a doctrine that is more deeply traditional or moredeeply woven into the abric o historic Christian theology than the

doctrine o divine simplicity Yet this venerable doctrine has endured

intense criticism rom analytic theologians over the past several de-

cades Alvin Plantingarsquos Does God Have a Nature raised ldquotwo diffi-

cultiesrdquo or the doctrine ldquoone substantial and the other truly

monumentalrdquo10486281048631 He argues that i God is identical with each o his

properties then God has but one property But this ldquoseems flatly in-compatible with the obvious act that God has several propertiesrdquo10486281048632 He

argues urther that i God is identical with each o his properties then

God is also a property ldquoTis view is subject to a difficulty both obvious

and overwhelming [or] i God is a property then he isnrsquot a person

but a mere abstract objectrdquo10486281048633 Many analytic theologians have joined

other criticisms to those o Plantinga and it is obvious that this doc-

trinemdashwoven deeply into the abric o traditional Christian doctrineas it ismdashis under assault rom within analytic theology We could mul-

tiply examples with ease (Te traditional doctrine o divine omni-

science stands out here) Tere are o course many sophisticated de-

enders o classical orthodoxy within analytic theology but the basic

point should be clear to reduce analytic theology to apologetics or

traditional doctrine is simply a mistake

As will become obvious in the ollowing pages I think that there is

much to be gained in the work o ldquoretrieval theologyrdquo and I see it as a

natural conversation partner and compatriot o analytic theology I want

to encourage more work at the intersection o analytic theology and

theologies o retrieval But there is nothing about analytic theology as

such that demands adherence to classical Christian theology

ldquoAnalytic theology relies on lsquosubstance metaphysicsrsquo rdquo Sometimes

theologians are suspicious o analytic theology due to its alleged reliance

on substance metaphysics Tis complaint can take various orms Some-

47Alvin Plantinga Does God Have a Nature (Milwaukee Marquette University Press 1048625983097983096983088) p 98309298309548Ibid49Ibid

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 28: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2833

What Is Analytic heology 9830911048625

times it is claimed that the whole analytic enterprise is ldquopre-Kantianrdquo (as

in Kenneth Surinrsquos critique o David Brownrsquos work as being ldquorobustly

old-ashionedrdquo and ldquopre-Kantianrdquo)10486291048624 In other words critics complainthat analytic theology proceeds in blithemdashand perhaps willulmdashigno-

rance o the ldquoactrdquo that Kant undermined the entire project by destroying

the very possibility o doing it wo important claims seem to be in play

with this critique first that Kant did something to make analytic the-

ology impossible and second that analytic theologians are unaware o

what Kant did But both o these claims are problematic Te second is

simply mistaken and the first is vigorously contested As Nicholas Wolt-erstorff points out it is much more likely that the current generation o

analytic theologians is not so much ldquopre-Kantianrdquo as it is ldquopost-Kantianrdquo

As he puts it ldquoit really is possible to be post-Kantian Itrsquos possible to re-

cover rom Kant Te choices are not exhausted between being naively

pre-Kantian on the one hand and being a Kantian o one or another

stripe on the otherrdquo1048629983089 Tere are Wolterstorff argues philosophers who

are ully aware o Kantian ldquointerpretation-universalism and ully awareo [Kantian] metaphysical anti-realism but afer serious consideration

they have rejected these options as untenablerdquo1048629983090 So many analytic theo-

logians are well aware o Kantrsquos work (and the common claims made

about that work) but they donrsquot think that he did anything to shut down

the kind o work that they are doing As Plantinga puts it ldquothey have read

him and remain unconvincedrdquo1048629983091

But aside rom Kant analytic theology is sometimes criticized and

rejected or its reliance on ldquosubstance metaphysicsrdquo Unortunately ex-

actly what critical theologians have in their crosshairs when they talk

about substance metaphysics is ofen unclear and not closely defined

But very ofen the complaint is closely tied to a rejection o doctrines

50Kenneth Surin ldquoTe rinity and Philosophical Reflection A Study o David Brownrsquos Te Divine

rinity rdquo Modern Teology 1048626 (10486259830979830961048630) 10486261048627983097-98309298308851Nicholas Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincers o Increased Diversity and Supposed Irrationalityrdquo

in God Philosophy and Academic Culture A Discussion Between Scholars in the AAR and APA

ed William J Wainwright (Atlanta Scholars Press 10486259830979830971048630) p 1048626983088 See also Wolterstorff ldquoIs It

Possible and Desirable or Teologians to Recover rom Kantrdquo Modern Teology 1048625983092 (1048625983097983097983096)

1048625-104862598309652Wolterstorff ldquoBetween the Pincersrdquo p 104862698308853Alvin Plantinga Warranted Christian Belief (Oxord Oxord University Press 1048626983088983088983088) p 1048627983088

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 29: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 2933

9830911048626 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

associated with ldquoclassical theismrdquo immutability impassibility time-

lessness and other doctrines are taken to be untenable and since they

are tied to substance metaphysics so much the worse or substancemetaphysics William P Alston defly analyzes this complaint and he

argues that substance metaphysics are really beside the point What he

says about substance metaphysics in discussions o the doctrine o the

rinity applies more broadly ldquoonce we get straight as to what is and is

not necessarily included in the metaphysics o substance we will see that

most twentieth-century objections to the use o substance metaphysics

are based on eatures o such ormulations that are not required bysubstance metaphysics as suchrdquo10486291048628 Perhaps there is something inherently

wrong with the use o substance metaphysics in theology and maybe this

counts against analytic theology But beore such a judgment can be

made we need more than the all-too-common generalizations and as-

sertions For beore we can conclude that analytic theology is atally

flawed due to a dependence on substance metaphysics we need to know

exactly what is meant by substance metaphysics we need to be shown just what is wrong (either philosophically or theologically) with sub-

stance metaphysics and we need to see that analytic theology really is (or

must be) committed to this kind o metaphysics Without the kind o

careul analysis and rigorous argumentation it is hard to see anything

here that might count as a orceul objection to analytic theology

ldquoAnalytic theology isnrsquot spiritually edifyingrdquo William Wood notes that

ldquomany conventional theologians remain deeply suspicious o analytic the-

ologyrdquo because o the worry that analytic theology is not spiritually edi-

ying As these theologians see matters ldquogenuine theology is in the first

instance practical aimed not at explanatory theories about God but at

ostering greater love or God and neighbor Genuine theology in short

is praxis one deeply woven together with a Christian lie o prayer virtue

and participation in the sacramentsrdquo10486291048629 Te basic concern is this when

more mainstream theologians look at analytic theology they donrsquot rec-

54William P Alston ldquoSubstance and the rinityrdquo in Te rinity An Interdisciplinary Symposium on

the rinity ed Stephen Davis Daniel Kendall SJ and Gerald OrsquoCollins SJ (Oxord Oxord

University Press 1048625983097983097983097) p 1048626983088104862555William Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 983092983092

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 30: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3033

What Is Analytic heology 983091983091

ognize the kind o theology-as-praxis that they value Instead they see

purported explanatory theoriesmdashmere purported explanatory theories

Sometimes these explanations appear to be a very long way indeed romthe lie o aith Indeed they see ormulas such as this (selected pretty

much at random rom among many others)

P existx (Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx) amp x made us

Q existx(Dx amp forally(Dy =gt Byx ))1048629983094

When they encounter this kind o work some theologians donrsquot rec-

ognize it as theology at all I they are willing to recognize it as theology

they tend to worry that they donrsquot see the kind o theology that promotes

love o God and neighbor they are concerned that they donrsquot see the-

ology that is connected to the lie o aith As Wood puts it they worry

that ldquoanalytic theology is spiritually sterile and thereore not really a

orm o genuine theology at allrdquo10486291048631

I think this is an important point o criticism and it raises some very

intriguing concerns But as Wood also notes it would be a ldquomistake and

urthermore a presumptuous mistake to assume that analytic philo-

sophical theology cannot in principle be spiritually nourishingrdquo10486291048632 Tree

points stand out First it is important to realize that the temptation to

construct explanatory theories about God that are divorced rom worship

and transormation is both real and present It is also nearious10486291048633 Te

temptation besets theologians o all stripesmdashanalytic or otherwise I do

not think analytic theologians are the only theologians who ace this

temptation o the contrary idolatry is no respecter o ideologies Butsurely it is not invincible surelymdashby Godrsquos gracemdashit is not irresistible

As Wood reminds us ldquoGodrsquos love rains down on logicians too afer allrdquo9830941048624

Second there is good reason to think that analytic theology maymdash

contrary to common expectationsmdashturn out to be spiritually ediying

56Peter van Inwagen ldquoAnd Yet Tey Are Not Tree Gods but One Godrdquo in McCall and Rea

Philosophical and Teological Essays on the rinity pp 10486269830921048625 1048626983092104863057Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983092 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoWhatrsquos

Wrong with the Ontotheological Errorrdquo Journal of Analytic Teology (10486269830881048625983092) 1048625-1048625104862658Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092104863059See the warnings o Merold Westphal Suspicion and Faith Te Religious Uses of Modern Atheism

(New York Fordham University Press 1048625983097983097983096)60Wood ldquoAnalytic Teology as a Way o Lierdquo p 983092983095

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 31: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3133

983091983092 I983150983158983145983156983137983156983145983151983150 983156983151 A983150983137983148983161983156983145983139 C983144983154983145983155983156983145983137983150 983144983141983151983148983151983143983161

Wood argues that analytic theology may be spiritually beneficial in

several ways He suggests that the ldquoconcentrated attention required to

read understand and develop very technical analytic argumentsrdquo maybe conducive to the kinds o intellectual virtues and habits o mind that

are spiritually beneficial983094983089 In addition he notes the ldquoargumentative

transparencyrdquo (what he terms the ldquoparadigmatic analytic virtuerdquo) may be

helpul in spiritual ormation983094983090 Wood readily admits that this tendency

toward argumentative rigor can also eed a orm o pride or even ldquointel-

lectual violencerdquo but he also points out that to make a ldquogood analytic

argument is to make that argument maximally easy or intellectual op-ponents to criticize or reuterdquo and this very transparency makes it much

harder to shield onesel rom criticisms but instead is a way to ldquomake

onesel intellectually vulnerablerdquo In this way it serves as a ldquocheck against

intellectual priderdquo983094983091 Moreover the pace demanded by such rigor and the

modesty o the claims that are rendered deensible have the potential to

cultivate epistemic humility Furthermore another important eature o

the analytic approach is the need to ldquoidentiy imaginatively with onersquosintellectual opponentsrdquo this also as Wood points out orces us to inhabit

a worldview that is not only oreign to our own but also sometimes

hostile In these ways Wood argues ldquoanalytic theology can become a

spiritual practice a way o seeking God and o training the mind and

the will to be open to gracerdquo9830941048628

Finally we should not neglect to notice those shining examples o

theologians or whom analytic theology indeed is closely related to

worship and spiritual nurture Indeed it would be hard not to notice

them or the tradition is rie with such theologians A great many pa-

tristic and most scholastic (both medieval and early modern) theolo-

gians count as ldquoanalytic theologiansrdquo For surely they fit our profile o

theologians who prize ldquoconceptual precision rigor o argumentation

technical erudition and an in-depth deense o an original worldviewrdquo

(and who would in many instances value P1048625-P983093) As an example con-

61Ibid p 98309398309362Ibid p 983093104863063Ibid64Ibid p 983093983096

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 32: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3233

What Is Analytic heology 983091983093

sider Anselmrsquos Proslogion It is obvious that Anselm values precision and

rigor and he clearly intends to convey truth claims that he finds con-

vincing But as both Wood and Marilyn McCord Adams point out thiswork is ldquomeant to do more than communicate propositional truthsrdquo or

ldquoit is meant to help reorient the wills o its readers and help bring about

effective and volitional change in themrdquo9830941048629 Despite important differences

o style and substance we could say much the same about many other

figures (both well known and less so) as well it is very difficult to read

ar into Bonaventure Richard o St Victor Aquinas Scotus Vermigli

Perkins Arminius urretin Edwards Wesley and many others withoutunderstanding that they are obviously concerned with both intellectual

rigor and spiritual ormation

65Ibid p 983093983088 See also Marilyn McCord Adams ldquoPraying the Proslogionrdquo in Te Rationality of

Belief and the Plurality of Faith ed Tomas Senor (Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 1048625983097983097983093)

pp 10486251048627-1048627983097 and Adams ldquoElegant Necessity Prayerul Disputation Method in Cur Deus Homordquo

in Studia Anselmiana Cur Deus Homo (Rome 1048625983097983097983097) pp 10486271048630983095-9830971048630

Copyrighted Material wwwivpresscompermissions

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333

Page 33: An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H. McCall - EXCERPT

8202019 An Invitation to Analytic Christian Theology By Thomas H McCall - EXCERPT

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullan-invitation-to-analytic-christian-theology-by-thomas-h-mccall-excerpt 3333