Looking at the global population clock, there are about 7, 247, 248, 231 humans living in and it keeps growing. here are about 7, 12! births in "ust 2# minutes a$ter midnight. %ub &2' deaths that occur in e(actl) the same time as birth, there is an estimated number o$ 4 minutes. hat means that birthrate and population growth greatl) outnumbers mortalit) rate simple mathematics to calculate where this number would go in the ne(t $ew hours, the ne(t ne(t $ew )ears. +oreover, it onl) takes simple common sense to know that these numbers do represent e uipoise. *t does not portra) parit). Looking at the big picture, these numbers the supposed -balance in nature. /h) is this so bad0 /hat could go wrong0 *sn t the more
Looking at the global population clock, there are about 7, 247,
248, 231 humans living in this biomeand it keeps growing. There are
about 7, 126 births in just 25 minutes after midnight. Subtracting
the 3, 029 deaths that occur in exactly the same time as birth,
there is an estimated number of 4, 400 in just 25 minutes. That
means that birthrate and population growth greatly outnumbers
mortality rate. It only takes simple mathematics to calculate where
this number would go in the next few hours, the next few days, the
next few years. Moreover, it only takes simple common sense to know
that these numbers do not represent equipoise. It does not portray
parity. Looking at the big picture, these numbers do not delineate
the supposed balance in nature. Why is this so bad? What could go
wrong? Isnt the more the merrier?
