Upload
quiana
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2 nd Annual Meeting of the African Community of Practice (AfCOP) on MfDR held in Port Louis, Mauritius 27 th – 30 th October 2008. AN OVERVIEW OF TANZANIA’s EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS (MfDR) Presented By: Mr. Eric Shitindi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
POPSM
2nd Annual Meeting of the African Community of Practice (AfCOP) on MfDR
held inPort Louis, Mauritius
27th – 30th October 2008
AN OVERVIEW OF TANZANIA’s EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING MANAGING FOR DEVELOPMENT
RESULTS (MfDR)
Presented By:
Mr. Eric Shitindi
President’s Office, Public Service Management
POPSM
Agenda
Introduction about Tanzania
Background
Introduction of Result Based Management (RBM) to TZ Public Service
Some Implementation challenges
Addressing the challenges
Conclusion
POPSM
About Tanzania
Located in East Africa
Total Area 943,000 Sq Km
Total population of about 35 million
Neighbours: Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, Congo DRC, Malawi, Zambia, Mozambique and Comoro
The Economy depends on Agriculture, Mining and Tourism.
POPSM
Tanzania Safaris
POPSM
Tanzania Land of Kilimanjaro
POPSM
Background to RBM in Tanzania
Economic difficulties of 1980s
Cost of running the Government became unsustainable
Declining service delivery to the citizens (poor services) and almost collapse of service delivery systems.
Shortage of resources and Budget not linked to resources
Outdated HR policies and Non existence of legal frameworks to enforce HR and performance management
Red tape and corruption in service delivery
POPSM
Background to RBM in Tanzania
RBM introduced to promote individual and institutional accountability, responsiveness and strategic thinking to service delivery.
Piloting of RBM started in Executive Agencies in 1997
Introduction of Performance Budgeting in 1999
Adoption of Public Service Management and Employment Policy (PSMEP) in 1999 promoting RBM and Meritocracy.
Legal framework mandating all Public institutions to implement RBM and meritocracy enacted through Public Service Act No. 8 of 2002.
POPSM
Introduction of Performance Management Systems (PMS) 2000 - 2007
Use of PMS as a tool for managing performance and results was introduced in the public service from 2000 using PIM.
Implemented as part of ongoing reforms in the Public Service
The tools aimed at promoting individual and institutional accountability and responsiveness to service delivery.
Aimed at strengthening the linkage between individual objectives and organizational objectives.
PIM Tools included Strategic Planning, Annual Plans, Operational Planning (MTEF), Service Delivery Survey, Self Assessments, Client Service Charters, M&E, and Open Performance Review and Appraisal System (OPRAS).
POPSM
Individual Performance Agreements (PA’s) & Reviews
All public servants are required to sign performance agreements with their immediate supervisors at the beginning of financial or calendar year. Legal requirement
The PA’s stipulates the agreed objectives and targets to be met by individuals based on organisational annual plan.
Open Performance Review and Appraisal System (OPRAS) replaced the confidential system was introduced in year 2004.
POPSM
Implementation Challenges and Lessons
Resistance to Change (mind set)
Weak local ownership in Ministries, Departments (commitment at all levels especially Top leadership)
Supply driven vs demand driven helps to strengthen ownership
Over ambitious (too many interventions)
Shortage of skilled staff to undertake reforms
Lack of Clear Guidelines
POPSM
Implementation Lessons and Challenges
Management of consultants
Inter-ministerial collaborations (Are we talking the same language?)
Resources allocation and coordination problems (agencies having more than one strategic plan)
Sequencing of Interventions is important
Legal frameworks need to be in place
Lack of Incentives and sanctions
Weak Monitoring and Evaluation.
POPSM
Addressing challenges
National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (MKUKUTA) launched in 2005. Provides an overarching framework for:
- Coordinating MDAs
- resource allocation,
- development management and
- fighting poverty
POPSM
MKUKUTA is based on three clusters: - (i) growth and reduction of income poverty; (ii) improved quality of life and social well-being; and - (iii) good governance and accountability.
MKUKUTA M&E framework
POPSM
Coordination Framework
National Medium Term Strategies
MKUKUTA Ruling Party Manifesto
Cross Cutting Reforms
PSRP
LSRP
LGRP
PFMRP
NACSAP
MDAs and LGAs Medium Term Strategic Plan
and Budget
Sector Development Programmes
Health Sector
Agriculture
Service Delivery
M&E
Feedback
M&E
Feedback
Long Term Development Vision
Vision 2025
PSCP
M&E M&E
Education
Etc.
POPSM
Addressing challenges
Inter-ministerial collaborations (joint teams, joint guides) – Finance & planning, POPSM, RALG
Harmonized and simplified Medium Term Planning and budgeting guidelines
Guidelines on Client service charters and Individual Performance agreements
Performance Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting: - Result frameworks; Periodic reporting on progress in reaching targets, improving service delivery, meeting outcome indicators and financial performance (quarterly, half-year, annual and 3year outcome reports)
POPSM
Addressing challenges
Harmonization and Coordination of Development Partners Organized through JAST (General Budget Support & Basket Funding through SWAPs).
Deepening use of PMS tools and customization
NGOs and DPs key partners in MfDR process (PER mechanisms, independent studies, empowering citizens)
Need to simplify M&E tools is in a process to be a day to day management tool
Incentives and sanctions???
Capacity building.
POPSM
THE END
I thank you for your kind attention!!!