35
An overview of the common law process 1 Kym Cavanagh Director and panel lawyer

An overview of the common law process

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

An overview of the common law process. Kym Cavanagh Director and panel lawyer. 1. There must be an injury and there must be a worker. An Injury is: Personal injury Arising out of the course of employment Employment is a significant contributing factor Who is a worker?. 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: An overview of the common law process

An overview of the common law process

1

Kym CavanaghDirector and panel lawyer

Page 2: An overview of the common law process

There must be an injury and there must be a worker

An Injury is:- Personal injury- Arising out of the course of employment- Employment is a significant contributing factor

 

Who is a worker?

2

Page 3: An overview of the common law process

What is the difference between a Statutory Claim and a Common Law Claim?

Statutory Claim:- ‘No Fault’ - Covers Medical, Rehabilitation, weekly benefits- Focus on Return to Work

 

Common Law Claim:- Does not always follow a Statutory Claim- Requires fault on the part of the Employer - Takes into consideration the actual loss and potential loss

3

Page 4: An overview of the common law process

Duty of Care

An Employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect an employee against foreseeable risk of injury.

An Employer’s Duty of Care is  Non-Delegable

An employer cannot escape liability for an injury to a worker by claiming that it delegated responsibility to another party (including an employee).

4

Page 5: An overview of the common law process

When can a worker pursue a Common Law claim?

An injured worker must obtain a Notice of Assessment which contains an assessment of permanent impairment relating to the injury.

Injuries sustained after 15 October 2013:- Physical injuries must exceed a permanent impairment of 5%; and- Employment to be the “major significant contributing factor” for

psychological injuries

 

A decision must be made – the Lump Sum Offer

5

Page 6: An overview of the common law process

The Start of the Common Law Claim

Delivery of the “Notice of Claim” by the injured worker

Indemnity provided by WorkCover Queensland

Involvement of the Panel Law Firm

6

Page 7: An overview of the common law process

The Usual Course

Notice of Claim

Factual Investigations

Medical Investigations

Liability Response

Compulsory Conference

7

Page 8: An overview of the common law process

What if it does not resolve at the Compulsory Conference?

Mandatory Final Offers & their purpose

Litigation

8

Page 9: An overview of the common law process

Things employers can do to minimise claims costs

9

Pat HallDirector and panel lawyer

Page 10: An overview of the common law process

Prepare Your Business

1. Injury reporting system

2. Investigation process

3. Keep records

10

Page 11: An overview of the common law process

Facts are Gold and Evidence is King

1. Keep equipment or other items relevant to the incident – eg. Ladder that toppled over.

2. Take photographs/video at the time and keep them where you can find them.

3. If there is CCTV footage relevant to the incident – retrieve it and keep it.

4. Identify witnesses and keep in touch with them.

5. Obtain a really good idea of how the event occurred and document it.

11

Page 12: An overview of the common law process

Back to Work

1. The injured worker is not your enemy.

2. Commit to Rehabilitation.

3. Look at alternatives.

12

Page 13: An overview of the common law process

Contractual and insurance issues that impact claims and your business

Hamish CraibLawyer of Hede Byrne & Hall and Panel Lawyer

13

Page 14: An overview of the common law process

Recruitment – pre-existing injuries and medical conditions

14

Now the WCRA has been amended to preclude claims where workers fail to disclose previous injuries or medical conditions.

 

The employer must:

  Request disclosure of the pre-existing condition.

Make that Request in writing.

Provide information about the duties which are the subject of the

proposed employment.

Page 15: An overview of the common law process

Issues:

It does not provide on what basis a prospective employer can discriminate ie not hire a

prospective worker who discloses the pre-existing injury or medical condition.

The Courts will construe this provision narrowly.

15

Recruitment – pre-existing injuries and medical conditions

Page 16: An overview of the common law process

Previous Claims

Employers can also obtain a previous claims history from the Workers’ Compensation Regulator.

 

The approved form can be obtained from this link:

 

http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/217317/Form-571D-Application-for-claims-history-summary.pdf

16

Page 17: An overview of the common law process

Recruitment – a stitch in time saves nine

Do reference checks.

  Assess ability before hiring eg plant operation.

  Deal with issues when they arise eg re-training, counsel for performance issues, and if

necessary terminate.

17

Page 18: An overview of the common law process

Contracting out of Common Law Liability

It can’t be done.

18

Page 19: An overview of the common law process

Who is a “worker” compared to an independent contractor?

Worker Independent Contractor Directed how and when to do a certain task. Set hours for set pay. Does not supply own tools or materials. Works as directed. Cannot delegate or subcontract work to another individual or entity. Employer provides PPE. Wears a uniform.

Paid for an outcome eg provide and erect scaffolding. Decides when work is carried out. Provides own tools and material. Paid on completion of a job. Works for other companies. Can delegate work or subcontract. Provides own PPE.

19

Page 20: An overview of the common law process

Who is a “worker” compared to an independent contractor?

Look at the Australian Taxation Office Employee or Contractor Tool at https://www.ato.gov.au/calculators-and-tools/employee-or-contractor/.

20

Page 21: An overview of the common law process

Indemnity Clauses – issues for the Principal

The purpose of an indemnity is to either anchor liabilities where they would otherwise lie, or to shift risk from one party to another.

 

For example: 

The subcontractor indemnifies the Principal for all losses, costs and damage caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the subcontractor, its employees, agents or its subcontractors except to the extent the loss, costs and damage were caused by the negligence of the Principal.

21

Page 22: An overview of the common law process

Indemnity Clauses – issues for the PrincipalOr the Principal’s contract with the subcontractor will require an indemnity which provides:

 The subcontractor will indemnify the Principal for all costs, loss or damage however caused even if the costs, loss or damage are caused by any negligent act or omissions of the Principal.

 

This indemnity is fraught with danger:

  The subcontractor’s WorkCover policy will not respond to any contractual

risk.

Most liability insurers will expressly exclude contractual risks in the policy wording.

The Principal is left with no recourse but to pursue its own liability insurer.

22

Page 23: An overview of the common law process

Insurance Clauses

The Principal must sight the Certificate of Insurance and the policy wording.

Subcontractors must make sure they have all necessary insurances as required by the contract.

23

Page 24: An overview of the common law process

Joint and Several Liability

Any finding of negligence on the part of the Principal contractor means that it must satisfy the whole of the Judgment if the subcontractor cannot pay its share due to insolvency.

24

Page 25: An overview of the common law process

Contribution Claims

Glenda BanaghanLawyer of Hede Byrne & Hall and Panel Lawyer

25

Page 26: An overview of the common law process

26

Page 27: An overview of the common law process

Legislation

S278A of the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (WCRA) provides for the adding by WorkCover Queensland of another party as a contributor to a claim in the pre-proceedings stage.

This is achieved by the issue of a Contribution Notice.

There are time frames for these to be issued.

27

Page 28: An overview of the common law process

Where someone else is at fault, either partially or completely, for the claimant’s injury/ies.

Examples:- A faulty piece of plant/equipment manufactured/supplied by a third party;- A principal contractor;- A host employer;

Eg Duong v APS Group & Ors (2010) QSC 466

30% to Employer

70% to host- A property owner/occupier

Eg; Ronald v Cooks Transport & Toll unreported decision Botting DCJ 2012

85% to Toll as occupier, 15% to employer

No contributory negligence as mere inadvertence.

28

Circumstances in which a Contribution Notice would be issued

Page 29: An overview of the common law process

29

Page 30: An overview of the common law process

How much will they pay

Depends on the facts.

Non delegable duty of care owed by Employer to Employee.

30

Page 31: An overview of the common law process

Contributory Negligence

This refers to conduct by the Claimant which would lead to a finding that he/she acted or omitted to act in a way that contributed to their injury.

31

Page 32: An overview of the common law process

32

Page 33: An overview of the common law process

Legislation

Sections 305F to 305J

- Same principles apply to determination of this issue as to determination of breach of duty.

- Can defeat a claim (if 100%)- Presumption if intoxicated/drugs.- Not “mere inadvertence”

Bankstown Foundry v Braistina 1985-1986 160 CLR 301

Czatyrko v Edith Cowan University (2005) HCA 14

33

Page 34: An overview of the common law process

Examples

Tabulo v Bowen Shire Council 2004 QSC 038

- Walking backwards along retaining wall sweeping aggregate, fell 2m.

- 25% contribution.

Contrast

Daly v DA Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd & Letzbuild 2002 QSC 308

- Failure to inspect ladder prior to use, no contributory negligence.

 

Green v Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd (2007) QCA 260

- 30% reduction for not using a hand rail.

 

Sharp v Emicon 2014 NSWSC 1072

- 15% reduction for standing on the top railing of a scaffold.

34

Page 35: An overview of the common law process

35