20
An Update on TBSSs and Relatively Moist Environments Matthew J. Bunkers 2006 Spring Training

An Update on TBSSs and Relatively Moist Environments Matthew J. Bunkers 2006 Spring Training

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

An Update on TBSSs and Relatively Moist Environments

Matthew J. Bunkers2006 Spring Training

Three-Body Scatter Spike (TBSS)

TBSS Review

• Radar artifact typically associated with hail ≥ 1”(high POD and low FAR)

• Observed down-radial of ~62+ dBZ core(use 4-panel and/or all-tilts displays)

• May also indicate potential for damaging winds?

• More at P:\Training\8thGreatDivide\TBSS

Recent Trends

• At least two events in 2005 with TBSSs but only limited, or no, severe hail

• Another case around the same time with TBSSs and very large hail

• What’s going on here?

#1 – 10 August 2005, 2130z

Max Ref = 68.5 dBZ

Hgt50dBZ = 20,345 ft AGL

TBSS length = 8 nm

POSH = 50 %

MEHS = 1 ¼ “ (250%)

MLT = 11,180 ft AGL

WBZ = 9,849 ft AGL

RH700-300mb = 33 %

Max Obs. Hail = ½ “*** Next five sets of images are all the at same scale

#2 – 11 August 2005, 0214z

Max Ref = 70 dBZ

Hgt50dBZ = 31,590 ft AGL

TBSS length = 12 nm

POSH = 90 %

MEHS = 2 ½ “ (143%)

MLT = 11,180 ft AGL

WBZ = 9,849 ft AGL

RH700-300mb = 33 %

Max Obs. Hail = 1 ¾ “

#3 – 25 July 2005, 0438z

Max Ref = 65.5 dBZ

Hgt50dBZ = 33,689 ft AGL

TBSS length = 8 nm

POSH = 80 %

MEHS = 2 ¼ “ (225%)

MLT = 13,322 ft AGL

WBZ = 9,885 ft AGL

RH700-300mb = 19 %

Max Obs. Hail = 1 “

#4 – 25 July 2005, 0453z

Max Ref = 65.5 dBZ

Hgt50dBZ = 33,931 ft AGL

TBSS length = 10 nm

POSH = 70 %

MEHS = 2 “ (400%)

MLT = 13,322 ft AGL

WBZ = 9,885 ft AGL

RH700-300mb = 19 %

Max Obs. Hail = ½ “

#5 – 20 July 2005, 2224z

Max Ref = 66.5 dBZ

Hgt50dBZ ≥ 31,500 ft AGL

TBSS length = 9 nm

POSH = 70 %

MEHS = 2 “ (73%)

MLT = 12,133 ft AGL

WBZ = 10,911 ft AGL

RH700-300mb = 23 %

Max Obs. Hail = 2 ¾ “

What does this show?

• Not much difference up to this point…– Similar max reflectivity, TBSS lengths, and

MLT/WBZ levels

• Generally small-to-moderate storm cores

• Is there a pattern in the moisture field that can help explain this?

#1 – 10 August 2005, 2131z (wv sat)

#2 – 11 August 2005, 0215z (wv sat)

#3,4 – 25 July 2005, 0445z (wv sat)

#5 – 20 July 2005, 2224z (wv sat)

From AWOC…

• Recall that a moist atmosphere can accelerate the hail melting process

• Flash presentation… http://www.wdtb.noaa.gov/courses/awoc/ICsvr1/ICSvr1-lesson3/ic1-lesson3_color/

• Let’s look at one final case from 2004

#6 – 3 July 2004, 2128z

Max Ref = 74.5 dBZ

Hgt50dBZ = 33,348 ft AGL

TBSS length = 22 nm

POSH = 100 %

MEHS > 4 “ (400%)

MLT = 9,153 ft AGL

WBZ = 8,017 ft AGL

*RH700-300mb = 50 %

Max Obs. Hail = 1 “*** Note this is at a smaller scale than the previous radar images

Produced flash flooding and copious small hail

03 July 2004, 2115z (wv sat)

Summary

• Phone logs indicate these storms with TBSSs and sub-severe to marginally severe hail produced very heavy rainfall and copious small hail

• Some of these storms were supercells, but still struggled to produce very large hail

• The best discriminator for these events may be the water vapor imagery

Summary

• The length of the TBSSs were below average, based on J. Johnson’s local study(however the last event was 22 nm)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

<5 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-24 25-28 29-32 33-36 >37

Max TBSS Length (nm)

# o

f T

BS

S's

<5

5-8

9-12

13-16

17-20

21-24

25-28

29-32

33-36

>37

Summary

• The SOO proposes an additional CTA for severe thunderstorm warnings to account for these kinds of events/environments…

“This storm is capable of producing a lot of small to moderate size hail and very heavy rainfall…possibly causing low lying roads to become covered with ice.”

(or something like this)