5
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201000339 Analysis of Ball-Milled ZrAlNiCu Bulk Metallic Glass Powders** By Jiang Wu, * Samuel Margueron, Nathalie Allain-Bonasso, Patrice Bourson, Eric Gaffet, Chuang Dong and Thierry Grosdidier* Over the last two decades, particular interest has been paid to the preparation of bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) due to their unique and original properties. [1,2] Ball-milling (BM) of blended pure elements or pre-alloyed compounds is an efficient technique for producing glassy powders. [3] Com- bined with the powder consolidation within the supercooled liquid region, bulk samples with amorphous structures can be easily formed. [4,5] However, the crystallization of amorphous alloys under ball-milling, which is considered as mechanically induced crystallization (MIC), has been observed extensively in a number of alloy systems, i.e., Al-, Fe-, Ti- and Zr-based ones. [6–14] In particular, a cyclic crystalline–glassy–crystalline phase transformation induced by BM has been reported in CoTi, ZrNi, ZrAlNi and ZrAlNiCuPd sys- tems. [12–15] These previous works have shown that the crystallization process and the corresponding procedures under ball-milling are significantly different from those obtained under conventional thermal crystallization, indicat- ing that the MIC cannot be attributed only to the local temperature rise. [8,9] The exact mechanisms of MIC are not fully understood but have been suggested to be related to the effects – possibly combined – of pressure and mechanically induced defects. [7–11,16] This manuscript gives the first results of an on-going research project set up to improve the understanding of MIC in Zr-based BMGs. To this end, the crystallization behaviors of Zr 65 Al 7.5 Ni 10 Cu 17.5 (Z1) and Zr 58 Al 16 Ni 11 Cu 15 (Z2) BMGs under ball-milling and thermal cycles are here compared. Experimental BMG Preparation Master ingots with nominal compositions Zr 65 Al 7.5- Ni 10 Cu 17.5 and Zr 58 Al 16 Ni 11 Cu 15 (at-%) were prepared by arc melting under an argon atmosphere. The levels of purity for the different constituting elements are 99.9 wt-% for Zr, 99.999 wt-% for Al, and 99.99 wt-% for Cu and Ni. From these COMMUNICATION [*] Dr. J. Wu, Dr. N. Allain-Bonasso, Prof. T. Grosdidier Laboratoire d’Etude des Microstructure et de Me´canique des Mate´riaux (LEM3, UMR CNRS 7239), Universite´ Paul Verlaine-Metz, Ile du Saulcy, F57045 Metz, (France) E-mail: [email protected]; Thierry.grosdidier@univ- metz.fr Dr. S. Margueron, Prof. P. Bourson Laboratoire Mate´riaux Optiques, Photonique et Syste`mes (LMOPS),Universite´ Paul Verlaine-Metz, 2 Rue Edouard Belin, F57070 Metz, (France) Dr. E. Gaffet Nanomaterials Research Group (NRG, UMR CNRS 5060), Site de Se´venans (UTBM), F90010 Belfort Cedex, (France) Dr. J. Wu, Prof. C. Dong Key Laboratory of Materials Modification (Ministry of Education), Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, (PR China) [**] The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2007CB613902) and help from the China Scholarship Council. This manuscript gives the first results of an ongoing research project focusing on the crystallization processes of Zr 65 Al 7.5 Ni 10 Cu 17.5 (Z1) and Zr 58 Al 16 Ni 11 Cu 15 (Z2) bulk metallic glasses. Crystal- lization, induced by ball-milling and thermal annealing, has been observed and compared using differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. The thermal crystal- lization end-products obtained for the two alloys were different: tetragonal Zr 2 Cu and hexagonal Zr 6 Al 2 Ni for Z1, while Z2 contained hexagonal Zr 2 Al, big cubic Zr 2 Ni and some a-Zr solid solution. For both alloys, the thermal crystallization products were different from those obtained after ball- milling. Interestingly, however, the stable phase obtained after sufficient mechanical milling was an FCC phase for both alloys. Raman spectroscopy suggests that nitrogen has an effect on the formation of this stable final product. 616 wileyonlinelibrary.com ß 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS 2011, 13, No. 7

Analysis of Ball-Milled ZrAlNiCu Bulk Metallic Glass Powders

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

COM

MUNIC

ATIO

N

DOI: 10.1002/adem.201000339

Analysis of Ball-Milled ZrAlNiCu Bulk MetallicGlass Powders**

By Jiang Wu,* Samuel Margueron, Nathalie Allain-Bonasso, Patrice Bourson, Eric Gaffet,Chuang Dong and Thierry Grosdidier*

This manuscript gives the first results of an ongoing research project focusing on the crystallizationprocesses of Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5 (Z1) and Zr58Al16Ni11Cu15 (Z2) bulk metallic glasses. Crystal-lization, induced by ball-milling and thermal annealing, has been observed and compared usingdifferential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. The thermal crystal-lization end-products obtained for the two alloys were different: tetragonal Zr2Cu and hexagonalZr6Al2Ni for Z1, while Z2 contained hexagonal Zr2Al, big cubic Zr2Ni and some a-Zr solid solution.For both alloys, the thermal crystallization products were different from those obtained after ball-milling. Interestingly, however, the stable phase obtained after sufficient mechanical milling was anFCC phase for both alloys. Raman spectroscopy suggests that nitrogen has an effect on the formation ofthis stable final product.

Over the last two decades, particular interest has been paid

to the preparation of bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) due to their

unique and original properties.[1,2] Ball-milling (BM) of

blended pure elements or pre-alloyed compounds is an

efficient technique for producing glassy powders.[3] Com-

bined with the powder consolidation within the supercooled

liquid region, bulk samples with amorphous structures can be

easily formed.[4,5]

[*] Dr. J. Wu, Dr. N. Allain-Bonasso, Prof. T. GrosdidierLaboratoire d’Etude des Microstructure et de Mecanique desMateriaux (LEM3, UMR CNRS 7239), Universite PaulVerlaine-Metz, Ile du Saulcy, F57045 Metz, (France)E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Dr. S. Margueron, Prof. P. BoursonLaboratoire Materiaux Optiques, Photonique et Systemes(LMOPS),Universite Paul Verlaine-Metz, 2 Rue EdouardBelin, F57070 Metz, (France)

Dr. E. GaffetNanomaterials Research Group (NRG, UMR CNRS 5060),Site de Sevenans (UTBM), F90010 Belfort Cedex, (France)

Dr. J. Wu, Prof. C. DongKey Laboratory of Materials Modification (Ministry ofEducation), Dalian University of Technology, Dalian116024, (PR China)

[**] The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support fromthe National Basic Research Program of China (No.2007CB613902) and help from the China Scholarship Council.

616 wileyonlinelibrary.com � 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co

However, the crystallization of amorphous alloys under

ball-milling, which is considered as mechanically induced

crystallization (MIC), has been observed extensively in a

number of alloy systems, i.e., Al-, Fe-, Ti- and Zr-based

ones.[6–14] In particular, a cyclic crystalline–glassy–crystalline

phase transformation induced by BM has been reported in

Co�Ti, Zr�Ni, Zr�Al�Ni and Zr�Al�Ni�Cu�Pd sys-

tems.[12–15] These previous works have shown that the

crystallization process and the corresponding procedures

under ball-milling are significantly different from those

obtained under conventional thermal crystallization, indicat-

ing that the MIC cannot be attributed only to the local

temperature rise.[8,9] The exact mechanisms of MIC are not

fully understood but have been suggested to be related to the

effects – possibly combined – of pressure and mechanically

induced defects.[7–11,16]

This manuscript gives the first results of an on-going

research project set up to improve the understanding of MIC

in Zr-based BMGs. To this end, the crystallization behaviors of

Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5 (Z1) and Zr58Al16Ni11Cu15 (Z2) BMGs

under ball-milling and thermal cycles are here compared.

Experimental

BMG Preparation

Master ingots with nominal compositions Zr65Al7.5-Ni10Cu17.5 and Zr58Al16Ni11Cu15 (at-%) were prepared by

arc melting under an argon atmosphere. The levels of purity

for the different constituting elements are 99.9 wt-% for Zr,

99.999 wt-% for Al, and 99.99 wt-% for Cu and Ni. From these

. KGaA, Weinheim ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS 2011, 13, No. 7

COM

MUNIC

ATIO

N

J. Wu et al./Analysis of Ball-Milled ZrAlNiCu Bulk Metallic Glass Powders

20 40 60 80 100

Inte

rnsi

ty (a

.u.)

2 Theta (degree)

Z2

Z1

Tg Tx

500 600 700 800

Exot

herm

ic

Temp.(K)

Z1

Z2

Fig. 1. XRD traces of the initial BMG blocks and the corresponding DSC scans (inset).

? ◊?

Z2

∇•

• •• •

•◊

◊◊ ∇∇∇∇∇

∇∇

∇∇

∇ Zr2Ni

?

? unknow

• Zr2Al

◊ Zr

Z1

♦♦

♦♦♦♦♦

Zr2Cu

♦Inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

20 30 40 50 60 70

2 Theta (degree)

♦Zr6Al2Ni

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of Z1 and Z2 samples annealed up to 873 K at a heating rate of20 K �min�1.

constituting elements, master alloys were melted and

re-melted four times to improve homogeneity. Rods with a

diameter of 3mm were then produced by copper mould

suction casting from themaster ingots. The amorphous nature

of these materials was examined bymeans of X-ray diffraction

(XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) before

annealing and ball-milling.

Annealing and Ball-Milling

Thermal crystallization was performed in a Netzsch-409

DSC apparatus based on the isochronal and isothermal modes

under a continuous flow of high purity argon. The samples

under the isochronal measurements were continuously

heated from room temperature to 873K at a heating rate of

20 K �min�1. Isothermal annealingwas performed for a certain

period of time (1, 5, 10, 25 or 50min) at the set temperature of

753K.

The mechanically induced crystallization was carried out

using a planetary ball-mill, Pulverisette 4 system manufac-

tured by Fritsch. The starting materials were 3mm long

blocks crushed from the as-cast BMG rods. 10 g of such

blocks together with five stainless balls were sealed into a

stainless steel vial (125mL in volume) in air and milled at

room temperature. In this machine, the shock energy and the

shock frequency can be independently selected and con-

trolled. The effects of the milling parameters have been

discussed in detail in the literature [17–19]. Here, the absolute

rotation speeds of the disk (V) and vials (v) were set,

respectively, at 350 and �200 rpm.

Microstructure Characterization

The structural changes in the annealed and the milled

powders were characterized by XRD and Raman spectro-

scopy. The X-ray system, equipped with a RU300 rotating

anode and an INEL CPS120 position sensitive detector, was

operated with the Cu-Ka radiation. For the Raman measure-

ments, an excitation line of 514 nm (Arþ laser) with a�50 long

working distance objective was used in back scattering with a

LabRam, Horiba, Jobin-Yvon spectrometer. In order to limit

heating and oxidation or reaction induced by the laser, the

Raman measurements were performed at the liquid nitrogen

temperature (77K) in a close finger LINKAM cryostat with an

incident power of about 3mW for 360 s.

Results and Discussion

Thermal Crystallization

Figure 1 shows typical XRD patterns obtained from the

initial as-cast Z1 and Z2 BMG rods. Both traces exhibit the

typical features of amorphous structures, and no obvious

sharp peaks corresponding to crystals are visible. The DSC

scans are shown in the insert image in Figure 1, in which a

distinct glass transition followed by a sharp crystallization

event is observed, confirming the glassy nature of the initial

materials again. The glass transition temperature Tg and the

onset crystallization temperature Tx for Z1 are about 643 and

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS 2011, 13, No. 7 � 2011 WILEY-VCH Verl

742K, respectively, while the corresponding values for Z2 are

732 and 809K. These results indicate that the Z2 BMG has a

higher thermal stability than the Z1 one.

To examine the changes in the microstructure of the

starting BMGs after annealing, the completely crystallized

samples which were heated up to 873K at a heating rate of 20

K �min�1 were analyzed by XRD. The results are shown in

Figure 2. The XRD pattern of the Z1 sample is similar to those

recorded by other researchers from the annealed Zr65Al7.5-Ni10Cu17.5 metallic glasses.[20–22] It can be indexed as amixture

of tetragonal Zr2Cu and hexagonal Zr6Al2Ni phases. The

isothermal crystallization procedure of the Z1 BMGs has been

investigated extensively by other authors. In general,

ag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim http://www.aem-journal.com 617

COM

MUNIC

ATIO

N

J. Wu et al./Analysis of Ball-Milled ZrAlNiCu Bulk Metallic Glass Powders

∇∇

∗(42

2)

∗(42

0)∗(

331)

∗(40

0)

∗(22

2)∗ (

311)

∗(22

0)∗(20

0)

12h

4h

2h

1h

Inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

∗(11

1)

initial

(a) Z1

∗ FCC

∇ Cubic Zr2Ni

20 40 60 80 100 120

Tetragonal Zr2Cu

2 Theta (degree)

20 40 60 80 100 120

∗ (4

22)

∗ (4

20)

∗ (3

31)

∗ (2

22)

∗ (3

11)

∗ (2

20) ∗

(200

)

∗ (1

11)

12h

2hInte

nsity

(a.u

.)

2Theta (degree)

initial

1h

4h

∗ FCC (b) Z2

Fig. 3. XRD traces of a) Z1, and, b) Z2 powders showing the transformation afterdifferent milling durations.

Fig. 4. Brightfield TEM image and corresponding diffraction pattern of Z1 powder after12 h of milling.

quasicrystals, big cubic Zr2Ni, and tetragonal Zr2Cu phases

are the phases that precipitate at the first stage of isothermal

crystallization for Z1 BMGs. Correspondingly, the tetragonal

Zr2Cu and the hexagonal Zr6Al2Ni phases were also the final

stable products for Z1 BMGs on high temperature anneal-

ing.[20–22] For the Z2 sample, the analysis of the XRD traces in

Figure 2 shows that the peaks are associated with the big cubic

Zr2Ni and hexagonal Zr2Al compounds together with a-Zr

solid solution, while a few unidentified lines still exist. A

detailed analysis has revealed that the primary phase

precipitating from the amorphous matrix was a cubic phase

with a lattice parameter of about 0.360 nm. Subsequently, new

crystalline phases including big cubic Zr2Ni and hexagonal

Zr2Al compounds together with a-Zr were observed, while

the intensity of the initial cubic phase decreased. Such

evolution implies that the primary phase probably served

as the nucleation core for the formation of new phases. No

new phases appeared under further annealing and the XRD

pattern of the completely crystallized sample for the high

temperature isothermal annealing was very similar to the one

obtained in Figure 2 for continuous heating. The most

interesting point revealed in this section is that the thermal

crystallization processes for these two alloys are different.

Milling-Induced Crystallization

Figure 3 shows the XRD traces obtained on the powder

after ball-milling for different times. The initial as-cast

amorphous rod is also shown for comparison. Sharp

diffraction peaks corresponding to crystalline phases appear

after milling. For the Z1 alloy (Fig. 3a), the analysis reveals that

a big cubic Zr2Ni phase and a tetragonal Zr2Cu phase, together

with a phase having FCC features, form from the metallic

glass matrix at the early stage of milling (from 1 to 4 h of

milling). However, only the FCC-type phase remains after 12 h

of milling. This observation indicates that the big cubic Zr2Ni

and tetragonal Zr2Cu phase are metastable and transform into

the FCC phase during the milling. Comparatively, in the case

of the Z2 alloy (Fig. 3b), only the FCC phase is detected by

XRD over the entire range of milling time (1 to 12 h). Figure 4

shows a TEM brightfield image of the Z1 alloy after milling for

12 h. Nanocrystals formed in the milled powders and most of

the crystals have a size below 20 nm. The selected area

diffraction pattern, as shown in the insert image of Figure 4

and consistently with results from XRD, confirmed the

presence of a FCC structure. This implies that the amorphous

phase has almost entirely changed to the FCC phase. It was

also established in a previous DSC and TEM study that some

residual amorphous phase remained at the early stage of

milling but that the Z1 and Z2 alloys almost completely

crystallized after 12 h of milling.[23]

It is interesting to notice here that the FCC phase is always

the final crystallization product under the present milling

conditions and that it is completely different from the phases

found under thermal crystallization by annealing. The lattice

constants of the FCC phase were calculated to be 0.453 and

0.456 nm, respectively, from the XRD traces of Z1 and Z2

618 http://www.aem-journal.com � 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS 2011, 13, No. 7

COM

MUNIC

ATIO

N

J. Wu et al./Analysis of Ball-Milled ZrAlNiCu Bulk Metallic Glass Powders

0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

Wavenumber (cm-1)

Z1-12h

Z2-12h

165 220 500

Spectra of ZrN(FCC+defects)

Fig. 5. Raman spectra of Z1 and Z2 powders milled for 12 h.

powders. Such values compare very well the lattice parameter

of several reported Zr-based phases having FCC structures.

They are for example: Zr2Ni (0.451 nm),[12] Zr2Cu

(0.468 nm),[22] Zr3Al (0.438 nm, JCPDS 49-1316), ZrN

(0.458 nm, JCPDS 65-9413) and ZrO (0.462 nm, JCPDS

22-1058). In addition, FCC phases were also obtained after

milling of more complex Zr-based chemistry.[14,15,23]

A question then rises as to the exact nature of the FCC

phases that formed in these more complex alloys, as well as to

the small deviation of the lattice constant (< 3%) calculated

between the different reported FCC phases. To gain further

insights into the nature of the milled powders, Raman

spectroscopy was used. Raman spectroscopy is a technique

that can be sensitive to the formation of oxide and nitride but

not metallic compounds. Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra

for the Z1 and Z2 powders after 12 h of milling. Three

dominating peaks are found around 165, 220, and 500 cm�1.

These Raman spectra can be compared to those obtained by

Moura et al., who systemically investigated the ZrN and

ZrOxNy compounds having FCC structures.[24] They are very

similar to the Raman spectrum corresponding to the FCC ZrN

phase containing a little oxygen.[24] Also, according to their

results, the shifts of the peak positions towards the high

frequency region that we observed in our spectra can

correspond to structural defects.[24]

According to our Raman analysis, it can be suggested that

the contamination of nitrogen plays an important role in the

stabilization of the FCC phase during milling. Zr is a very

reactivemetal and can form easily interstitial compoundswith

oxygen, carbon or nitrogen. It is interesting to notice here that

the stabilization of a TiN-type of phase having an FCC

structure was also reported in TiAl-based alloys.[10] Guo et al.

reported that their powder milled for 30 h contained as much

as 32.6 at-% N.[25] The amount of N was still very high when

themillingwas done in the controlled argon atmosphere glove

box. Also, Goodwin and Ward-Close reported 6.8 to 7.8 wt-%

N when their vials were loaded in a glove box containing

99.995% pure argon.[26] Thus, it can be suggested that the FCC

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS 2011, 13, No. 7 � 2011 WILEY-VCH Verl

phase that has formed after milling in both the Z1 and Z2

alloys has been stabilized by the presence of N. Further work

is now underway to completely clarify this issue and

quantitatively determine the exact amount of N in the milled

powders.

Conclusions

The structure changes of Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5 (Z1) and

Zr58Al16Ni11Cu15 (Z2) bulk metallic glasses under annealing

and ball-milling were studied. The thermal crystallization

processes of the two alloys were different. The tetragonal

Zr2Cu and hexagonal Zr6Al2Ni were the stable end-products

for the Z1 alloy. Comparatively, the Z2 alloy contained the

hexagonal Zr2Al, big cubic Zr2Ni and some a-Zr solid solution

after complete crystallization.

Interestingly, while the thermal crystallization products as

well as the sequences of phase changes involved during

milling were different for the two alloys, the same type of

stable phase was obtained after sufficient mechanical milling

in both cases. It was a FCC phase with lattice constant of the

FCC phase being 0.453 and 0.456 nm for the milled Z1 and Z2

powders, respectively. Raman spectroscopy results suggest

that the stabilization of this phase is related to some nitrogen

contamination coupled with the presence of structural defects

in the powders.

Received: November 16, 2010

Final Version: April 6, 2011

Published online: June 3, 2011

[1] A. Inoue, Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 279.

[2] W.H.Wang, C. Dong, C. H. Shek, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2004,

44, 45.

[3] C. Suryanarayana, Prog. Mater. Sci. 2001, 46, 1.

[4] J. Eckert, A. Kubler, L. Schultz, J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85,

7112.

[5] J. Eckert, J. Das, S. Pauly, C. Duhamel, J. Mater. Res. 2007,

22, 285.

[6] Y. He, G. Shiflet, S. Poon, Acta Metall. Mater. 1995, 43,

83.

[7] M. L. Trudeau, R. Schulz, D. Dussault, A. Van Neste,

Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64, 99.

[8] J. Xu, M. Atzmon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 1805.

[9] Y. Kwon, J. Kim, I. Povstugar, E. Yelsukov, P. Choi, Phys.

Rev. B 2007, 75, 144112.

[10] C. Suryanarayana, Intermetallics 1995, 3, 153.

[11] G. Chen, C. Suryanarayana, F. Froes, Metall. Mater.

Trans. A 1995, 26, 1379.

[12] M. S. El-Eskandarany, A. Inoue, Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75,

224109.

[13] M. S. El-Eskandarany, J. Saida, A. Inoue, Acta Mater.

2003, 51, 4519.

ag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim http://www.aem-journal.com 619

COM

MUNIC

ATIO

N

J. Wu et al./Analysis of Ball-Milled ZrAlNiCu Bulk Metallic Glass Powders

[14] M. S. El-Eskandarany, J. Saida, A. Inoue, Acta Mater.

2003, 51, 1481.

[15] M. S. El-Eskandarany, K. Aoki, K. Sumiyama, K. Suzuki,

Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 1113.

[16] B. Yao, S. Liu, L. Liu, L. Si, W. Su, Y. Li, J. Appl. Phys.

2001, 90, 1650.

[17] E. Gaffet, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1989, 119, 185.

[18] E. Gaffet, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1991, 132, 181.

[19] M. Abdellaoui, E. Gaffet, Acta Metall. Mater. 1995, 43,

1087.

[20] J. Eckert, N. Mattern, M. Zinkevitch, M. Seidel, Mater.

Trans, JIM 1998, 39, 623.

[21] A. Gebert, J. Eckert, L. Schultz, Acta Mater. 1998, 46, 5475.

620 http://www.aem-journal.com � 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & C

[22] T. Nagase, Y. Umakoshi, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2004, 5,

57.

[23] J. Wu, T. Grosdidier, N. Allain-Bonasso, E. Gaffet,

C. Dong, J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 504, S264.

[24] C. Moura, P. Carvalho, F. Vaz, L. Cunha, E. Alves, Thin

Solid Films 2006, 515, 1132.

[25] W. Guo, S. Martelli, F. Padella, M. Magini, N. Burgio,

E. Paradiso, U. Franzoni, Mater. Sci. Forum, 1992, 88–90,

139.

[26] P. S. Goodwin, C. M. Ward-Close, in Mechanical Alloying

for Structural Applications, (Eds: J. J. deBarbadillo,

F. H. Froes, R. B. Scwarz), ASM International, OH

1993, p. 139.

o. KGaA, Weinheim ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS 2011, 13, No. 7