Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Analysis of Houston's 2000 CAMx SIP Model: Radical sensitivity
Rapid Science Synthesis Group Austin, TX
10/12/2006
William Vizuete
Harvey Jeffries
http://ftpozone.sph.unc.edu/
Work Supported By• Eight Hour Ozone Coalition• HARC
– H60 “Regional Transport Modeling for East Texas”– Jay Olaguer, Project Officer.
• TCEQ – Thanks Jim Smith for supplying CAMx ready
outputs for SIP Modeling• AG
– Also thank Dennis McNally and Tom TescheAlpine Geophysics for sharing simulation results.
• UNC Modeling Air Quality (MAQ) Lab – Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Barron
Henderson, Leiran Biton
RSSG Question K
How can observation and modeling approaches be used for determining (i) the sensitivities of high ozone in the HGB non-attainment area to the precursor VOC and NOx emissions, and (ii) the spatial/temporal variation of these sensitivities?
Outline• Base Model
– The 2000 Houston Attainment Model– CAMx– TCEQ “base1b”
• VOC Sensitivity– CO: Radical propagation– Xylene: Internal radical source– Formaldehyde: Direct radical source
• Process Analysis Results
The 2000 Houston Attainment Model
• Comprehensive Air Quality model with Extensions (CAMx)
• TCEQ “base1b”• NOx (esp NO2), CO, HRVOCs bias
high at surface, esp. East.• Ozone peak bias low.
VOC Sensitivity :CO and Xylene+Toluene
• Two CO sensitivity runs– 4xCO: 4 times the gridded CO emissions– 0.25xCO: 1/4 times the gridded CO emissions– Full length run (08.22-09.06.2006)– Domain wide imputation (36km, 12km, and 4km)
• Xylene and Toluene sensitivity run– 2xXYL_TOL: 2 times the Xylene and Toluene
gridded emissions– Full length run– Domain wide imputation
VOC Sensitivity : Formaldehyde
• Two Formaldehyde sensitivity runs– Flares (FL_FORM)
• We assumed that HCHO emitted was equal to 1% of total VOC flow rate.
– Mobile sources (CO_FORM)• Recent data (SWRI, 2005*) on Heavy Duty
Diesel show that HCHO is 23% of VOC and ethene is 18% of THC. HCHO was 5% of CO.
• We added HCHO at 4% of low level CO.
*Reference: Diesel Exhaust Standard-Phase II: CRC Project No. AVFL-10b SwRI Poject No. 03.10410 Fanick, Robert. 2005
Peak Ozone at Houston Monitors:Obs, Base, and FL_FORM
•Process Analysis•CAMx/CMAQ quantifies the chemical and physical processes that lead to ozone formation for each grid cell•Process Analysis is a post processor suite of programs that extracts, aggregates and calculates several chemical parameters.
•Chemical parameters•Total OH Balance•Total VOC Reacted•New NO•Total NO Reacted•Total NO2 Available•O3 Source Balance•O3 Balance•New O3 per new NO and VOC reacted
What is Process Analysis?
Map of what?CHOU(13x6)WHOU(7x4)EHOU(6x4)
VOC Sensitivity: CHOU Ozone Impact
999994938487Ozone Peak
129122119120100105Ozone Produced
CO_FORMFL_FORM2xXYL_TOL4xCO0.25xCOBase
Values representative entire CHOU area
Total OH Balance
19.3 18.7 20.3 20.3 21.4 21.2
14.4 14.4 14.4 16 16.8 18.474.1 68.6 90.9 81.8 85.2 89.8
3.23.1
3.6 3.23.3
3.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO
_FORM
PA Focus Regions
#:OH cyclesrecreated OHnew OH, org new OH, inorg
CHOU8/25
Total VOC+CO Reacted
80 74 98 89 93 98
449 334785 452 461 467
1.8
1.9
1.7
1.8 1.8 1.8
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO
_FORM
PA Focus Regions
Total VOC Reacted
66 66 6574 77 8077 76 7780 88 94
2.2 2.1 2.52.2
2.12.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO_F
ORM
PA Focus Regions
CHOU8/25
#:(NO to NO2)/VOCVOC availableVOC reacted
OH + VOCs, CO, CH4, NO2
NO2 23%
CO 14%
FORM 15%
ALD2 12%
MGLY 0%
OPEN 0%
CH4 4%
PAR 7%
MEOH 1%
ETOH 0%
ETH 6%
OLE 9%
TOL 1%
XYL 1%
CRES 1%
ISOP ISPD
3%
CHOU8/258hr
OH + VOCs, CO, CH4, NO2
NO2 22%
CO 14%
FORM 18%
ALD2 12%
MGLY 0%
OPEN 0%
CH4 4%
PAR 8%
MEOH 1%
ETOH 0%
ETH 6%
OLE 8%
TOL 0%
XYL 1%
CRES 1%
ISOP
ISPD 2%
CHOU8/25
FORMeqFLVOC
OH Reacted with VOC…
Total OH Reacted: 107 ppbTotal VOC Reacted: 80 ppb
Total OH Reacted: 129 ppbTotal VOC Reacted: 93 ppb
NO reacted
2.0 1.9
2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4
020406080
100120140160180
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO
_FORM
PA Focus Regions
# NO Cyclerecreated NO Total new NO
CHOU8/25
Total NO2 Balance
-200-180-160-140-120-100
-80-60-40-20
020
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO
_FORM
PA Focus Regions
NO2 Photolyzed NO2 entrain/dil NO2 chem. loss NO2 deposition NO2 trans NO2 Final
CHOU8/25
O3 Source Balance
0
50
100
150
200
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO_F
ORM
PA Focus Regions
new O3O3, V transport O3, initial
CHOU8/25
O3 Balance
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO_F
ORM
PA Focus Regions
O3, photolyzedO3, reactedO3, entr/dilO3, H transport O3, final O3, deposition
CHOU8/25
Total OH Balance
19.9 19.2 21.3 21.3 21.6 22.5
14.2 14.2 14.2 16.1 14.1 19.672.3 65.2 95.4 82.2 76.8
94
3.12.9
3.7
3.1
3.2
3.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO
_FORM
PA Focus Regions
WHOU8/25
#:OH cyclesrecreated OHnew OH, org new OH, inorg
Total OH Balance
17.8 17.3 18.2 18.3 20.6 18.8
15.5 15.5 15.6 1722 18.4
76 72.5 84.4 8299.4
85.6
3.3 3.23.5
3.3
3.33.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Base
0.25
xCO
4xCO
2xXYL_
TOL
FL_F
ORMCO
_FORM
PA Focus Regions
EHOU8/25
•Radical Sensitivity•VOC/NOx Ratio •Observational evidence
•Monitor•Aircraft
•How can we assess the correct radical source strength at surfacesites?
–Should we be making Kleinman-like measurements (canister VOCs, aldehydes, NOy and N-species, and radiation measurements) at several monitor sites and apply his constrained steady state model to estimate P(O3) and thus infer radical source strengths from measurements that can be compared with model.
RSSG Question K