43
Analysis of Transgenic Plants II

Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Analysis of Transgenic Plants II

Page 2: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 3: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 4: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 5: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Ultimately sequencing?

Page 6: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Progeny Testing

Page 7: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

a. Segregation analysis of event 30b. Northern blot analysis

c. Root growth (trait)

What can we infer about transgene expression of events 28 and 30?

Event number27 28 29 30

All T1 generation

Page 8: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 9: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Northern Analysis, Western Analysis

Page 10: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Northern blot analysis

• Gives relative amount of gene expression-at the transcript level

• Isolate mRNA of good quality (not degraded)• Separate transcripts on a gel• Transfer to nylon filter• Probe filter with DNA of interest (transgene)

Page 11: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Northern blot example

What is missing in this experiment?

Page 12: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Western blot

• Also to measure gene expression—at the protein level.

• Extract proteins• Separate proteins on a vertical gel• Transfer to a membrane using an

electrotransfer system• Probe with antibodies.• Stain for antibodies

Page 13: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 14: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

RT-PCR

• Isolate RNA from tissues of interest• Eliminate all DNA from a sample• Make cDNA from mRNA• Perform PCR on sample using

transgene-specific primers

Page 15: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Real-time PCR or Quantitative PCR

• Real-time PCR uses fluorescence as an output for DNA amplification in real-time

• The amount of starting template DNA (or cDNA for RNA measurement (real-time RT-PCR) is correlated with the Ct number

• More DNA = lower Ct; Ct is the cycle number when a threshold amount of DNA is produced during the PCR experiment

Page 16: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVeVIM1yRMU

http://www.rt-pcr.com/ Advantages of qRT-PCR over RT-PCR?

Page 17: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Summary

• Is my plant transgenic?– Survives selection– Reporter gene

expression– Progeny analysis– PCR– Southern blot analysis

• Is my plant expressing the transgene?– Northern blot analysis– Western blot analysis– ELISA– RT-PCR– Real-time RT PCR

Page 18: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Why GM Food? [2] - Example

• The first GM whole food, FLAVR SAVRTM tomato, was marketed in the United States in 1994.– Slower ripen rate– Ripen longer on vine– Fully developed flavors

Flavr Savr Tomato developed by Calgene (Sources: http://www.ca.uky.edu/agripedia/glossary/flavr.htm)

Page 19: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Calgene

• Circumstantial evidence available in the 1980s suggested that expression of the tomato fruit enzyme polygalacturonase (PG) was key to fruit softening.

• Researchers at Calgene, Inc., in Davis, proposed to suppress PG accumulation in ripening tomatoes by introducing a reverse-orientation copy of the gene, an “antisense” copy designed to prevent or drastically reduce the formation of PG.

Page 20: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Flavr Savr Tomato

Traditional Tomato

The Flavr Savr tomato ripens on the vine – resulting in fuller flavour. It is modified so that it remains firm after harvesting

The traditional tomato must be harvested while it is still green and firm so that it is not crushed on the way to the supermarket.

Ripe and Increased Flavour.

Ripe but decreased flavour.

Supermarket

The traditional tomato is sprayed with ethylene after shipping to induce ripening.

Flavr Savr is modified tomato for suiting modern productions and distributions. Credit: Owen Koo

Page 21: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Transgenic line 1

Transgenic line 2

Transgenic line 3

Transgenic line 4

Phenotypes of chimeric CHS transgenotes and variations among flowers on single plants. A control (parental) flower is shown along with four different CHS transgenotes.

Napoli et al. The Plant Cell, Vol. 2, 279-289, April 1990

Transgene: 35S pro::CHS::nos3’

Page 22: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

• By 1987, Calgene researchers identified and cloned a tomato fruit PG gene, developed methods for tomato transformation and regeneration, and produced tomato plants with inserted PG antisense DNA constructions.

• In October 1992 the U.S. Department of Agriculture determined that the PG-antisense tomato lines were not a “plant-pest” risk and no longer required permits for field testing or transport.

Page 23: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 24: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Result

Page 25: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

• On May 21, 1994, the genetically engineered FLAVR SAVR tomato was introduced in Davis and Chicago.

• Demand for this product was high and remained high, but the product was never profitable because of high production and distribution costs.

Page 26: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Northern blot

Page 27: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

• In 1996, Zeneca, under license, introduced in the United Kingdom paste from PG-antisense tomatoes grown and processed in California, in collaboration with the grocery chains Sainsbury's and Safeway.

• More than 1.8 million cans, clearly labeled as derived from genetically engineered tomatoes, were sold from 1996 through early 1999.

Page 28: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

• 1986 Cattle in Britain begin to suffer from a condition similar to scrapie in sheep, nicknamed “mad cow disease” due to the behavior of the sick cows. The cause is unknown, though some suspect the feeding of rendered scrapie-infected sheep to cattle.

Page 29: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

• Early 1990s120,000 cattle have been diagnosed with BSE in Britain. The British government insists the disease poses no threat to humans. House cats begin dying from beef byproducts in their pet food. Five types of antelope die in British zoos from TSEs that had been fed commercial cattle feed. Through all of this, the British government continues to adamantly insist that British beef is perfectly safe, and BSE is no threat to humans.

Page 30: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

• May 1995Stephen Churchill, 19, becomes the first victim of a new version of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD). His is one of three vCJD deaths in 1995.

• July 1997 21 vCJD victims in Britain have been confirmed, many more unconfirmed cases.

Page 31: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

SOURCE: Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Wechsler, S., Livingston, M. and Mitchell, L. 2014. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. USDA Economic Research Service Report

No. 162, February 2014.

Page 32: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

SOURCE: Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Wechsler, S., Livingston, M. and Mitchell, L. 2014. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. USDA Economic Research Service Report

No. 162, February 2014.

Page 33: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

SOURCE: Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Wechsler, S., Livingston, M. and Mitchell, L. 2014. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. USDA Economic Research Service Report

No. 162, February 2014.

Page 34: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 35: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

SOURCE: Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Wechsler, S., Livingston, M. and Mitchell, L. 2014. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. USDA Economic Research Service Report

No. 162, February 2014.

Page 36: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 37: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Milestones in Food Biotechnology

• 1999:  GM corn and soybean products are present in 80% of processed foods in USA– Corn:

• starch, high fructose corn  syrup, oil

– Soy: • oil, Lecithin, protein

http://nadav.harel.org.il/cola/image/CokeClassic.jpg

Page 38: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Milestones in Food Biotechnology

• 1999:  European Union requires GM labels– blocks import of GM corn, beans

• Ban lifted 2004 – but no change in anti-GM

sentiment in Europe

– Affects African export crops• Paternalism

Page 39: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Milestones in Food Biotechnology

• 1999:  Gerber and Heinz baby foods GM-free

• 2000: Mc Donalds and Frito-Lay products GM-free

http://www.corrupt.org/articles/big_mac/bigmac.jpg

Page 40: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Milestones in Food Biotechnology

• 2000: USDA Organic Foods Standards– Must be GM-free

http://www.taquitos.net/im/sn/NaturalPlanet-YellowCorn.jpg

Page 41: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

Milestones in Food Biotechnology

• 2002 Zambia refuses GM maize as food aid– To help 2.5 million in

food shortage– Calls GM food “poison”– Heavily influenced by

European attitudes about GM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38232000/jpg/_38232577_levy150.jpg

Zambian President Mwanawasa

Page 42: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?
Page 43: Analysis of Transgenic Plants II. Ultimately sequencing?

The USDA has deregulated the first two Arctic varieties, which can now be grown in the U.S. without restriction.