Analysis of WOR Performance

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Analysis of WOR Performance in order to estimate the ultimate recovery

Citation preview

  • 1

    Pe523AnalysisofWORPerformance

    Dr. Saber Elmabrouk

    Steady-State WOR Model

    )/ln(. we rrp

    Bkhq 1

    2141

    1oo

    ww

    BB

    Linear log(krw/kro) versus Sw rorww kk

    f 11

    Conventional WOR Analysis

    ow

    ww qq

    qf ow

    qqWOR

    Np fw

    Conventional WOR Analysis log(fw) versus Np

  • 2

    fw = 1

    Conventional WOR Analysis log(fw) versus Np

    pssbmtpq

    bpss m

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

    mbtAhc

    BrCe

    AkhB

    qp

    twA

    2339.04ln6.70 2

    Blasingame and Lee

    o

    w

    qqWOR

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

    pssbmtpq

  • 3

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

    psswww

    pssooo

    btmbtm

    WOR

    o

    po q

    Nt

    w

    pw q

    Wt

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model

    psswww

    pssooo

    btmbtm

    WOR

    mo mw

    bppsw bppso

    fw tw to

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model log(fw) versus Np

  • 4

    fw tw to

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model log(fw) versus Np

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model Results from the PSS WOR model versus the field production data

    10-2

    10-1

    100

    101

    Cal

    cula

    ted

    Wat

    er-O

    il R

    atio

    (pss

    mod

    el)

    10-2 10-1 100 101

    Measured Water-Oil Ratio (WOR = qw/qo)

    Unit Slope Line

    Pseudosteady-State WOR Model Results from the PSS WOR model versus the field production data

  • 5

    Estimation of Movable Oil Conventional techniques

    log(qo) versus production time, t qo versus cumulative oil production, Np fo versus cumulative oil production, Np log(fw) versus cumulative oil production, Np Ershagi's X-function 1/fw versus cumulative oil production, Np 1/qo versus oil material balance time, to

    Analysis of WOR Data

    Qualitative Analysis log(fwc) versus cumulative oil production, Np log(WORc) versus cumulative oil production,

    Np log(WOR) versus total production, (Np+Wp) log(fo) versus total material balance time, tt WOR and WOR associated functions versus

    time, t (to)

    Analysis of WOR Data

    Analysis of WOR Data log(qo) and log(qw) versus t

  • 6

    qo=0

    Analysis of WOR Data qo versus Np

    fo=0

    Analysis of WOR Data fo versus Np

    fw = 1

    Analysis of WOR Data log(fw ) versus Np

  • 7

    1/fw=1

    Analysis of WOR Data 1/fw versus Np

    1/qo

    Np /qo

    Analysis of WOR Data 1/qo versus Np/qo

    )/(/ opo qNbaq 1po bNaq 1

    0oq bNp /1

    Reciprocal of qo versus oil material balance time

    Analysis of WOR Data

  • 8

    bNp1

    b

    Analysis of WOR Data 1/qo versus Np/qo

    Np,mov = 164,500 STB

    0.20

    0.15

    0.10

    0.05

    0.00

    Rec

    ipro

    cal o

    f Oil

    Rat

    e, 1

    /qo,

    1/S

    TB/D

    ay

    8,0006,0004,0002,0000

    Oil Material Balance Time (Np/qo), days

    1/qo = 1.5927x10-2 + 5.6306x10-6(Np/qo) 1/STB/D

    Np, mov = 177,600 STB

    Legend: NRU 104 1/qo Function 1/qo Linear (Np/qo) Model

    Analysis of WOR Data 1/qo versus Np/qo

    Np,mov = 164,500 STB

    Analysis of WOR Data fwc versus Np

  • 9

    Comparison of the estimated Np values

    Analysis of WOR Data

    Method Np value,STB

    Method Np value,STB

    1 log(qo) versus t 86,800 5 1/fw versus Np 86,800

    2 qo versus Np 86,800 6 1/qo versus Np/qo 86,800

    3 fo versus Np 86,800 7 Ershagis X-plot 145,000

    4 log(fw) versus Np 86,800 8 Log(fwc) versus Np 95,000