Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
Analyzing the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction in Food
Sector, an Evidence from Southern Punjab, Pakistan
Muhammed Shan, Fahad Laber and Mubashar Maqbool Institute of Banking & Finance
Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan. Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected]
Abstract
Purpose- Customer satisfaction is of utmost importance in the food sector. The purpose of this study is to analyze the key determinants such as communication skills, Product availability, price and product quality and cleanliness contributing to CS. Design/methodology/approach- It is a cross sectional survey research. Data was collected through questionnaire. Regression analysis is used to analyze the results. Findings-The findings contradict with the previous studies conducted in foreign cultures. In Pakistan, customers want cleanliness in the place where food is cooked. There is no strong influence of product availability, price, and quality individually with customer satisfaction. However collectively all the variables influence significantly on customer satisfaction. Practical Implications-This study is useful for hotel industry to improve their customer satisfaction and remain competitive in market by retaining their customers. Originality Value- Previously no research has been done in the context of Southern Pakistan on food sector. Keywords Communication skills, product availability, price, product quality, cleanliness
Research Type Research Paper
___________________________________________ The current issue of this journal is available on the official website of Institute: http://www.ibfbzu.edu.pk/sajbs
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
138
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Sales turnover of an organization is supported by satisfaction which the customer
expects to receive from the consumption of products. Customers have a perception in their
minds about the product features, characteristics, nature, and benefits when they purchase a
product. When the organization does not fulfill the customer perception (force influence to
purchase) dissatisfied the customer then that event decreased the chances for the customer
repurchase.
To achieve customer satisfaction (CS), communication skills, product availability, price,
product quality have major impact. Communication skill is the ability to deliver accurate and
desired information to the customer with inspired attitude. Product availability is a term to
provide access of the all requires products at the required place on the required time. Price is
monitory value for exchange of goods or services. The level of excellence is known as quality.
Price and CS are related (Herrmann, A.et al., 2007). CS is extended on how much quality is
available in the product delivered by the restaurants. Quality provides the inner satisfaction and
also fulfills the level of expectation in the customer. Consumer expectation on food products is
flavorful, nutritious, safe, convenient, affordable and colorful. Thousands of ingredients are
using in preparing of food products. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains a list of
over 3000 ingredients in its database "Everything Added to Food in the United States", many of
which we use at home every day (e.g., sugar, baking soda, salt, vanilla, yeast, spices, and
colors). Cleanliness means very neat and clean environment (free from dust and expire
products) in the place where foods cooked and stored. In the context of Pakistan there are
many hotels are not clean. Foods authority of Pakistan sealed some of big hotels by the end of
2015.The study is aimed at analyzing the determinants of CS in the food sector of Pakistan.
2.0 LITRETURE REVIEW
Consumer satisfaction is an attitude that shows customer evaluation when they acquire
consumer goods (Chi, H. K et al,. 2009). Dissatisfaction is a factor that provides the base to
customers' decreasing repurchase intentions (Angriawan, F., 2011).Customers cannot always
display dissatisfaction before moving from provider (Colgate, M., & Hedge, R., 2001). Yadav
(2015) finding shows that there is a positive relationship between quality and customer satisfaction. High
quality in the consumer's product affects the performance of the firm (Atilgan, E. et al., 2003).
Quality influences on the performance of a firm many studies measured service quality in a
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
139
variety of service industries and hotels including healthcare (Carman, Kilbourne et al., 2004;
Silvestro, 2005) and websites (Van Iwaarden et al., 2003). Figueiredo (2000) displayed issue by
highlighting product line that could not be easily identifiable related to the quality of the product
from the website. A study by Cho (2011) addressed the importance of advanced services, such
as customization, in the case of purchase decision via virtualized environments, particularly
when customers consider products that contain sensory attributes. For all chain members,
important determinant of performance is CS. However, it is either not measured at all, or it is
measured indirectly (Lusine H. Aramyan,).in 2000, Van der Vorst made a differentiation
between performance identifier of the company on supply chain (e.g. responsiveness, quality,
total supply chain Costs and delivery reliability). The change in policy concern the environmental
problems which have a big influence on agriculture-food supply chains. When the farmer uses
the pesticides and chemicals influence a negative effect on customer' buying attitude. So, the
customer demands a wide range quality like production characteristics, food safety,
convenience sensory properties, reliability, (Van der Spiegel, 2004). Marketing efforts display
the quality attributes (e.g. promotions efforts), influencing quality expectations (Luning et al.,
2002).High-level agreement for "product quality" categories may demonstrate the breeding
company format an integral chain for care system to become guarantee product having the
quality (Lusine H. Aramyan et al., 2000). These things are highly interrelated, but information
technology is an underlying force based on many of these because it easily changes the
identical nature and type of products, communications, services, structures, functions,
processes, and structures (Brookes et al., 2000). Quality also influences CS and purchase
intention (Bitner, M. J., & Hubbert, A. R. 1994). A study defines the relationship between the
quality and CS and satisfaction influence the purchase intention (Taylor, S. A., & Baker, T. L.
1994).
The good quality impacts CS (Bitner, M. J., & Hubbert, A. R. ,1994). Process quality
division is following Production system, an environment where food is cooked and marketed
(Luning, P. A., &Marcelis, W. J.,2006). Consumers have new demands and desires for different
attributes of food such as integrity, diversity, safety, quality and services (Van der Vorst, J.,
Beulens, A., & van Beek, P. 2005; Van der Vorst, J. G., Beulens, A. J., & van Beek, P.,2000).
Good communication skills motivate employees. Communication skills of employees build the
image of an organization. Clients in financial planning services prefer to deal with one adviser
because they feel that the critical information regarding income, savings, and marital issues
should be kept confidential (Hatfield et al., 1994).
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
140
Han, H. & Choo (2017) Communication skills provide a protocol regarding customer
satisfaction and provide the support to customer desirability. Gabler (2017) investigated that
communication skills of employees build the image of an organization. Research result shows
that’s price is the component which leads to customer satisfaction and also effect on next
purchase deceigion. ). Zhang, (2017) stated that communication skills increases the customer
valuation which leads to customer satisfaction. Bojanic (1996) found a strong and positive
association between the customer value and satisfaction to markets segmented by price.
Parasuraman et al., (1996) stated that the transaction of satisfaction is based on the customer’s
evaluations of product quality, service quality, and price. Raji (2017) stated that results shows
there is the direct relationship between price and customer satisfaction. CS is related to the
rewards and the costs associated with a product purchase (Churchill and Surprenant., 1982).
Based on the extensive review of literature following framework is proposed.
3.0 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS
DEVELOPMENT
Based on literature review, it is concluded that product 3Ps and 2 Cs affects customer
satisfaction. So, proposed framework for research is given in Fig 1.
Fig 1. Theoretical Framework
CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
2 Cs
Product quality
Product availability
Price
Communication skills
Cleanliness
3 Ps
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
141
Hypothesis development
H13Ps have significant impact on CS.
H1(a)Product availability has significant impact on CS.
H1(b)Price has significant impact on CS.
H1(c) Product quality has significant impact on CS.
H2 2Cs have significant impact on CS. H2(a) Communication skills have significant impact on CS.
H2(b) cleanliness has significant impact on CS.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
It is a cross sectional study because data was collected at one point of time. The
organizations in this study include all large medium and small scale hotels. The respondents
were customers from all sphere of life. Convenient sampling was used for data collection. Some
respondents did not disclose the income level so follow up calls on their numbers were made to
get the data. The Cronbach alpha value of the instrument has been 0.656 which shows that the
instrument was reliable. Correlation analysis was conducted to see the association between the
independent variables. Data was analyzed through multiple regression analysis using SPSS 23.
4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
H1 3Ps have significant impact on CS.
Model R Square F β
0.051 5.194 (0.001)
0.225 (0.025)
Table 1: Impact of 3Ps on CS
Result shows that 3Ps which are product availability, price and product quality has combine
effect on customer satisfaction. 3Ps are causing 5.1% variation in customer satisfaction while
1% increase or decrease in 3Ps has 22.5% increase or decrease in customer satisfaction as
shown by Table 1. All results are found to be significant at 0.05%.
H1(a) Product availability has significant impact on CS.
H1(b) Price has significant impact on CS.
H1(c) Product quality has significant impact on CS.
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
142
Model R Square F β
0.058 0.078 0.890
1.961 (0.125) 0.061 (0.632) 0.188 (0.145) 0.028 (0.793)
a. Predictors: (Constant), Product_Quality, price, product_availability b. Dependent Variable: customer_satisfaction
Table 2: Impact of Product Quality, Price and Product Availability on Customer
Satisfaction
Table 2 shows that there is no relationship between independent variables which are product
quality, price and product availability and dependent variable which is customer satisfaction. All
results are insignificant.
H2 2Cs have significant impact on CS.
Model R Square F β
0.139 15.618 (0.000)
0.372 (0.000)
Table 3: Relationship of 2Cs and CS
It can be depicted from results of table 3 that there is positive and significant rekationship
between composite impact of 2Cs on CS (β=0.372, p=0.000)
H2(a) Communication skills have significant impact on CS. H2(b) Cleanliness has significant impact on CS.
Model R Square F β
0.140 0.115
7.801 (0.001) 0.163 (0.096) 0.301 (0.003)
a. Predictors: (Constant), cleanliness, Comm_Skills b. Dependent Variable: customer_satisfaction
Table 4: Relationship between Communication Skills, Cleanliness and Customer
satisfaction
Table 4 shows that individual relationship of 2Cs which are communication skills and
cleanliness exists with customer satisfaction which is a dependent variable. 1% increase or
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
143
decrease in cleanliness causes 16.3% increase or decrease in customer satisfaction. Similarly,
one percent change in communication skills causes 30.1% change in customer satisfaction.
5.0 Conclusion
It can be concluded from results given above that combine effect of 3Ps can be felt on
customer satisfaction while individual effect of 3Ps has not been proved. 2Cs combine effect as
well as individual effect has been proved from analysis of results. This shows that 2Cs matter
more for customers. If hotel management cannot communicate effectively and does not take
care of cleanliness, then customers’ switching rate can be high. Similarly, product quality and
availability and price collectively affects customer satisfaction but individual if anything is
missing, that does not affect much. So, hotel management should take care of 3Ps and 2Cs in
order to retain their customers and gain maximum advantage from the market
References
1. Aramyan, L. H., Oude Lansink, A. G., V vbbbban Der Vorst, J. G., & Van Kooten, O.
(2007). Performance measurement in agri-food supply chains: a case study. Supply
Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 304-315.
2. Aramyan, L., Ondersteijn, C. J., Van Kooten, O., & Lansink, A. O. (2006). Performance
indicators in agri-food production chains. In Quantifying the agri-food supply chain (pp.
49-66). Springer Netherlands.
3. Atilgan, E., Akinci, S., & Aksoy, S. (2003). Mapping service quality in the tourism
industry. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(5), 412-422.
4. Angriawan, F. (2011). Pengaruh Brand Image, Service Quality, dan Perceived Value
terhadap Brand Loyalty Kartu Prabayar GSM PT. INDOSAT di Semarang (Doctoral
dissertation, Universitas Diponegoro).
5. Bitner, M. J., & Hubbert, A. R. (1994). Encounter satisfaction versus overall satisfaction
versus quality. Service quality: New directions in theory and practice, 72-94.
6. Bojanic, D. C. (1996). Consumer perceptions of price, value and satisfaction in the hotel
industry: An exploratory study. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 4(1), 5-22.
7. Brookes, R., Brodie, R., & Lindgreen, A. (2000, December). Relationship marketing
practice: Understanding the implications of an increased focus on financial
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
144
accountability, loyalty and value management. In 8th International colloquium in
relationship marketing. Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Cho, Y. C. (2011). Analyzing online customer dissatisfaction toward perishable
goods. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1245-1250.
9. Churchill Jr, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of
CS. Journal of marketing research, 491-504.
10. Colgate, M., & Hedge, R. (2001). An investigation into the switching process in retail
banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(5), 201-212.
11. Chi, H. K., Yeh, H. R., & Yang, Y. T. (2009). The impact of brand awareness on
consumer purchase intention: The mediating effect of perceived quality and brand
loyalty. Journal of International Management Studies, 4(1), 135-144.
12. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge
university press, Investigating Structural Relationships Between Service Quality,
Switching Costs, and Customer Satisfaction Juan Meng Minnesota State University,
Mankato
13. Gabler, C. B., Landers, V. M., & Reynolds, K. E. (2017). Purchase decision regret:
Negative consequences of the Steadily Increasing Discount strategy. Journal of
Business Research, 76, 201-208.
14. Kilbourne, William E., et al. "The applicability of SERVQUAL in cross-national
measurements of health-care quality." Journal of services Marketing18.7 (2004): 524-
533.
15. Lu, Y., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2012). Effects of Dissatisfaction on Customer Repurchase
Decisions in E-Commerce-An Emotion-Based Perspective. Journal of Electronic
Commerce Research, 13(3), 224.
16. Luning, P. A., & Marcelis, W. J. (2006). A techno-managerial approach in food quality
management research. Trends in Food Science & Technology,17(7), 378-385.
17. Silvestro, R. (2005). Applying gap analysis in the health service to inform the service
improvement agenda. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(3),
215-233.
18. Source: Tourism: Principles, practices, philosophies (8th Edition). (2000). p. 179
19. Spiegel, V. D. M. (2004). Measuring effectiveness of food quality management.
Wageningen University
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
145
20. Taylor, S. A., & Baker, T. L. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service
quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase
intentions. Journal of retailing, 70(2), 163-178.
21. Herrmann, A., Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Huber, F. (2007). The influence of price fairness
on customer satisfaction: an empirical test in the context of automobile purchases.
Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16(1), 49-58.
22. Han, H., Choo, S. W., Lee, J., & Hwang, J. (2017). Examining the Influence of Rapport
between Players and Dealers on Customer Satisfaction, Revisit Intentions, and Word-of-
Mouth in the Casino Industry: The Moderating Role of Gender. Journal of Quality
Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 18(1), 107-123.
23. Raji, M. N. A., & Zainal, A. (2017). The effect of customer perceived value on customer
satisfaction: A case study of Malay upscale restaurants. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of
Society and Space, 12(3).
24. Understanding Customer Experience by Christopher Meyer and Andre Schwager
25. Van der Vorst, J. G., Beulens, A. J., & van Beek, P. (2000). Modelling and simulating
multi-echelon food systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(2), 354-
366.
26. Van der Vorst, J. G., Beulens, A. J., & van Beek, P. (2000). Modelling and simulating
multi-echelon food systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(2), 354-
366.
27. Dale, B. G., Van Der Wiele, T., & Van Iwaarden, J. (2003). The received wisdom on
TQM. Managing Quality,, 58-73.
28. Van Kleef, E., Van Trijp, H. C., Luning, P., & Jongen, W. M. (2002). Consumer-oriented
functional food development: how well do functional disciplines reflect the ‘voice of the
consumer’?. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 13(3), 93-101.
29. Van der Vorst, J., Beulens, A., & van Beek, P. (2005). 10. Innovations in logistics and
ICT in food supply chain networks. Innovation in Agri-food Systems: Product Quality and
Consumer Acceptance, 245.
30. Yadav, M., & Rai, D. (2015). Exploring the Relational Impact of Service Quality on
Customer Satisfication. Ushus - Journal Of Business Management, 14(4), 17-31.
doi:10.12725/ujbm.33.2
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
146
31. Zhang, M., Guo, L., Hu, M., & Liu, W. (2017). Influence of customer engagement with
company social networks on stickiness: Mediating effect of customer value creation.
International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 229-240.
32. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of
service quality. The Journal of Marketing, 31-46.
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
147
APPENDIX
Questionnaire
We are conducting a study on customer satisfaction. We have constructed a questionnairefor collection of data. Kindly co-operate in filling the following questionnaire. Your responses would be kept confidential. Thank you!
Name Mobile/Email
Filling Instructions:
1: Strongly Disagree 2: Disagree 3: Neutral 4: Agree 5: Strongly Agree
Description Strongly Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
1 2 3 4 5
Communication Skills Q1 Timely of response/action undertaken by representatives
1 2 3 5
Q2 Response on the order. 1 2 3 4 5 Q3 accurate information is provided by the representative tothe customer.
1 2 3 4 5
Q4 Communication with regard to progress
1 2 3 4 5
Q5 Professionalism of staff members in hotel
1 2 3 4 5
Q6 The representatives would describe the food in general in a confident attitude
1 2 3 4 5
Q7 communication of representative is easily understandable.
1 2 3 4 5
Product Quality Q8 hotel staff understands your product quality requirements
1 2 3 4 5
Q9 Product specifications are appropriate to your needs.
1 2 3 4 5
Q10 Product conforms with your specifications
1 2 3 4 5
Cleanliness Q11 Do you visit the place where food is cooked.
1 2 3 4 5
Q12 Is there any deficiency of cleanness where food is cooked.
1 2 3 4 5
Q13 Ingredients use for cooking are fresh
1 2 3 4 5
Q14 does the hotel contain a separate place for the wastes
1 2 3 4 5
Product Availability
South Asian Journal of Banking and Social Sciences,
Vol. 03, No.01 (2017), ISSN: 2410-2067 © Institute of Banking & Finance, BZU Multan
148
Q15 Order placing system provided by hotel
1 2 3 4 5
Q16 On time delivery provided 1 2 3 4 5
Q17 Solutions to delivery problems 1 2 3 4 5
Price
Q18 Prices are competitive. 1 2 3 4 5
Q19 Consistent prices 1 2 3 4 5
Q20 Payment terms are provided 1 2 3 4 5
Q21 Minimum order size for delivery 1 2 3 4 5
Q22 Can you negotiate for price 1 2 3 4 5
Customer Satisfaction
Q23 I am very satisfied with the way Hotel performed
1 2 3 4 5
Q24 Hotel service representatives adhere to professional standards of conduct.
1 2 3 4 5
Q25 service representatives are well supervised
1 2 3 4 5
Q26 Poor purchase experience is faced many times
1 2 3 4 5
Your income below 30000
30000- 60000
60000 -90000
Above 90000