30
Springer Series in Synergetics Anatoli Tur Vladimir Yanovsky Coherent Vortex Structures in Fluids and Plasmas

Anatoli˜Tur Vladimir˜Yanovsky Coherent Vortex Structures in … · 2017. 4. 14. · Saffman’s Vortex Dynamics(1992) deals mainly with classical problems of vortex dynamics, while

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Springer Series in Synergetics

    Anatoli TurVladimir Yanovsky

    Coherent Vortex Structures in Fluids and Plasmas

  • Springer Complexity

    Springer Complexity is an interdisciplinary program publishing the best research andacademic-level teaching on both fundamental and applied aspects of complex systems– cutting across all traditional disciplines of the natural and life sciences, engineering,economics, medicine, neuroscience, social and computer science.

    Complex Systems are systems that comprise many interacting parts with the ability togenerate a new quality of macroscopic collective behavior the manifestations of which arethe spontaneous formation of distinctive temporal, spatial or functional structures. Modelsof such systems can be successfully mapped onto quite diverse “real-life” situations likethe climate, the coherent emission of light from lasers, chemical reaction-diffusion systems,biological cellular networks, the dynamics of stock markets and of the internet, earthquakestatistics and prediction, freeway traffic, the human brain, or the formation of opinions insocial systems, to name just some of the popular applications.

    Although their scope and methodologies overlap somewhat, one can distinguish thefollowing main concepts and tools: self-organization, nonlinear dynamics, synergetics,turbulence, dynamical systems, catastrophes, instabilities, stochastic processes, chaos, graphsand networks, cellular automata, adaptive systems, genetic algorithms and computationalintelligence.

    The three major book publication platforms of the Springer Complexity program are themonograph series “Understanding Complex Systems” focusing on the various applicationsof complexity, the “Springer Series in Synergetics”, which is devoted to the quantitativetheoretical and methodological foundations, and the “SpringerBriefs in Complexity” whichare concise and topical working reports, case-studies, surveys, essays and lecture notes ofrelevance to the field. In addition to the books in these two core series, the program alsoincorporates individual titles ranging from textbooks to major reference works.

    Editorial and Programme Advisory BoardHenry Abarbanel, Institute for Nonlinear Science, University of California, San Diego, USA

    Dan Braha, New England Complex Systems Institute and University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, USA

    Péter Érdi, Center for Complex Systems Studies, Kalamazoo College, USA and Hungarian Academy of Sciences,

    Budapest, Hungary

    Karl Friston, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK

    Hermann Haken, Center of Synergetics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

    Viktor Jirsa, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille,

    France

    Janusz Kacprzyk, System Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Scott Kelso, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, USA

    Markus Kirkilionis, Mathematics Institute and Centre for Complex Systems, University of Warwick, Coventry,

    UK

    Jürgen Kurths, Nonlinear Dynamics Group, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Ronaldo Menezes, Dept of Computer Science, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA

    Andrzej Nowak, Department of Psychology, Warsaw University, Poland

    Hassan Qudrat-Ullah, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Peter Schuster, Theoretical Chemistry and Structural Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Frank Schweitzer, System Design, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Didier Sornette, Entrepreneurial Risk, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Stefan Thurner, Section for Science of Complex Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

  • Springer Series in Synergetics

    Founding Editor: H. Haken

    The Springer Series in Synergetics was founded by Herman Haken in 1977. Sincethen, the series has evolved into a substantial reference library for the quantitative,theoretical and methodological foundations of the science of complex systems.

    Through many enduring classic texts, such as Haken’s Synergetics and Informa-tion and Self-Organization, Gardiner’s Handbook of Stochastic Methods, Risken’sThe Fokker Planck-Equation or Haake’s Quantum Signatures of Chaos, the serieshas made, and continues to make, important contributions to shaping the foundationsof the field.

    The series publishes monographs and graduate-level textbooks of broad and gen-eral interest, with a pronounced emphasis on the physico-mathematical approach.

    More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/712

    http://www.springer.com/series/712

  • Anatoli Tur • Vladimir Yanovsky

    Coherent Vortex Structuresin Fluids and Plasmas

    123

  • Anatoli TurInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique

    et PlanétologieCNRS, SC. de L’Univ.Toulouse CX 04, France

    Vladimir YanovskyInstitute for Single CrystalsNational Academy of Science of UkraineKharkov, Ukraine

    ISSN 0172-7389 ISSN 2198-333X (electronic)Springer Series in SynergeticsISBN 978-3-319-52732-1 ISBN 978-3-319-52733-8 (eBook)DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52733-8

    Library of Congress Control Number: 2017932917

    © Springer International Publishing AG 2017This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part ofthe material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or informationstorage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodologynow known or hereafter developed.The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoes not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevantprotective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this bookare believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors orthe editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for anyerrors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictionalclaims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    Printed on acid-free paper

    This Springer imprint is published by Springer NatureThe registered company is Springer International Publishing AGThe registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

  • Preface

    This book discusses the vortex process of self-organization in hydrodynamics offluid and plasma. These coherent vortex structures appear in fluid as a result ofspontaneous self-organization. They usually have the form of localized vorticesand play an important role in nature and technology. These localized vorticesare well observed in shear flows, submerged jets, traces left after the body, andboundary layers. In these cases, the coherent structures mainly take the form ofvortex streets. First of all, localized vortices are responsible for the process ofmacroscopic transport of momentum, energy, and substance in fluid. They are alsoimportant in themselves. Some examples are weather-related, such as cyclonesand anticyclones, typhoons, hurricanes, and tornados, as well as vortices on otherplanetary atmospheres, such as the Great Red Spot on Jupiter. It is not surprising,therefore, that numerous books and articles have dealt with the study of vortexmotions. Paul K. Newton’s book The N-Vortex Problem (2001) gives the mostcomplete exposition of the results of the theory of point vortices and vortex patchesobtained up to the year 2000. But it does not contain newer results and does notcover many issues related to dynamics, generation, and interaction of coherentlocalized vortices. Even the classical problem of the dynamics of two-dimensionalpoint vortices still holds some unsolved questions, for instance, which singularitiesare permitted in a 2D Euler equation besides point vortices? Which other morecomplex localized vortices could contain the Euler equation? How do point vorticesinteract with potential waves? Saffman’s Vortex Dynamics (1992) deals mainly withclassical problems of vortex dynamics, while Chorin’s Vorticity and Turbulence(1996) focuses on application of vortex structures to turbulence. Finally, VortexDynamics and Chaotic Phenomena, by V.V. Melechko and M.Yu. Konstantinov,presents many examples of coherent vortex structures.

    In Chap. 2, we present the general theory of the motion of point singularitiesin 2D Euler equations. It is shown that in addition to the usual point vortices, theEuler equation can contain more complicated moving singularities of dipole type.We consider the interactions of a usual point vortex and point dipole. We also studypoint dipole motion in areas with boundaries.

    v

  • vi Preface

    Chapter 3 covers the interaction of point vortices and sound waves. Thedynamic of these processes is described by a nonlinear system that belongs tothe reversible class. It holds an intermediate position between Hamiltonian anddissipative systems, because it contains the attractor. Due to these particularities,the interaction of point vortices and sound waves has numerous dynamical andchaotic modes. The most interesting of them is a new mechanism of interactionof resonances with attractor, which is presented in detail in this chapter.

    Chapter 4 contains exact solutions of nontrivial vortex configurations. First ofall, these are solutions of 2D Euler equations that have a singularity of point vortextype and a smooth part of the velocity field that looks like vortex necklaces aroundthe point vortex. Then we describe in detail stationary exact solutions with morecomplicated singularities than point vortices. At the end of Chap. 4, we presentexact solutions in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) that give three-dimensionalconfigurations of velocity and a magnetic field with nontrivial topology (topologicalsolitons).

    One of the key questions is how coherent large-scale vortices can be generatedby small-scale turbulence. It would seem at first sight that small-scale turbulencemust destroy such vortices. This is the subject of Chap. 5. It contains the theoryof generation of large-scale vortex structures in usual and magnetic hydrody-namics under the impact of small-scale exterior force (small-scale turbulence).The development of these instabilities engenders nonlinear helical periodic waves,vortex solitons, and kinks. We consider the cases of fluids with stratification andhumidity, rotating fluids, and electrically conductive fluids. We also examine thetheory of generation of nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic vortices in conductivefluids (nonlinear dynamos).

    Chapter 6 deals with plasma hydrodynamics. We begin by introducing pointvortices that are the exact solutions of equations of two-fluid plasma hydrodynamics.We also present Hamiltonian equations of motion for them. We present exact three-dimensional solutions in hydrodynamics of two-component plasma, describingvortices of nontrivial topology with linkage of stream lines and magnetic field.We finish the chapter by formulating a formalism that relates the solutions of 2Dhydrodynamics equations and 3D magnetostatics and permits the construction of astationary magnetic configuration for each known 2D hydrodynamics solution.

    This book does not claim to be comprehensive; we mainly examine questionsthat are close to our own interests. Nevertheless, we hope that the book will beinteresting to a wide range of readers interested in the issues of self-organizationand hydrodynamics and that it will serve as a new contribution to this old field ofresearch.

    We wish to express our deepest gratitude to Hermann Haken for his interest inour work and his support of this book.

    We are very grateful to Christian Caron and Gabriele Hakuba for their invaluablehelp in editing this book.

    We would like to thank Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie(CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier) and particularly Philippe Louarn for his support

  • Preface vii

    of our project. We also thank Tatiana Tour for her assistance in the preparation ofthis book.

    Toulouse, France Anatoli TurKharkov, Ukraine Vladimir YanovskyMay 2016

  • Contents

    1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.1 Equations of Motion of Hydrodynamic Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.2 Invariant Properties of Hydrodynamic Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71.3 Properties of Vortex Motions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    2 Dynamics of Point Vortex Singularities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152.1 Vortex Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152.2 General Theory of Point Singularities

    in Two-Dimensional Nonviscous Hydrodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262.3 Motion of Point Vortices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332.4 Interaction of a Point Vortex and a Dipole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372.5 Motion of a Dipole Point Vortex in Areas with Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . 532.6 The Evolution of a Dipole-Type Point Vortex in a Circular Area. . . . . 63References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

    3 Influence of Potential Waves on Point Vortex Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 753.1 The Mechanism of the Influence of Waves on Vortex Motion .. . . . . . . 753.2 Influence of the Wave on the Interacting Vortex Pair. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783.3 Dynamics of Vortices in Large Wave Envelope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003.4 Interaction of Resonances with Attractor in Reversible Systems . . . . . 1073.5 Vortex Motion Equation in Potential Wave Field Near the Wall . . . . . . 115References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

    4 Nontrivial Stationary Vortex Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1294.1 Vortex Necklaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1294.2 Vortex Structures with Complex Point Singularities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1414.3 Topological Nontrivial Vortices in a Hydrodynamic Medium . . . . . . . . 161References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

    ix

  • x Contents

    5 Generation of Large-Scale Vortices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1755.1 Nonlinear Vortex Structures in a Stratified Fluid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1755.2 Large-Scale Convective Instability

    in an Electroconducting Medium.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1945.3 Large-Scale Instability in a Rotating Fluid

    with Small-Scale Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2275.4 Nonlinear Vortex Structures in an Obliquely Rotating Fluid . . . . . . . . . 239References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252

    6 Vortices in Plasma Hydrodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2556.1 Elements of Plasma Hydrodynamics .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2556.2 Point Vortices in Two-Fluid Plasma Hydrodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2626.3 Equations of Motion of Point Vortices in Plasma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2716.4 Topological Solitons in Hydrodynamics

    of Two-Component Plasmas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2836.5 Relation of 2D Hydrodynamics and 3D Magnetostatics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297

    Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301

    Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303

  • Chapter 1Introduction

    Hydrodynamics is one of the oldest sciences. It has a history of several centuriesof intense research. Despite this, not only are numerous problems far from beingsolved, they continue to generate new directions in theoretical physics.

    The main feature of hydrodynamics—classical fields—needs to be emphasized.It appears that the notion of velocity fields anticipated the emergence of fields inelectrodynamics and other sciences, wherein problems related to the nonlinearityand dissipation of these fields are apparently more complicated than similarproblems of the contemporary field’s theories. It is significant that even thetheorem of existence and uniqueness of the 3D Navier–Stokes equation, which isa central hydrodynamic equation, has not yet been proved and remains an unsolvedMillennium Problem of the Clay Mathematics Institute.

    Vortices and waves are important objects in all hydrodynamic media. Waves,especially linear ones, are far more studied than vortices, which are more complexstructures. This is due to the fact that they are solutions of nonlinear hydrodynamicequations and are inevitably multidimensional objects, and research methods suchas linearization and monomerization cannot be applied to them. As noted by F.Saffmen, an interest in vortices is reborn every 50 years or so [1]. At present,they attract interest for several reasons. First, vortices are substantially coherentobjects [2, 3], whose coherence is not destroyed even by a random field such asturbulence [4]. In addition, vortices are interesting as exact solutions of quasisolitons[5] or three-dimensional topological solitons [6], or as the formation of vortex-typepatches [7].

    From a physical point of view, the difference between waves and vortices hasdeep origins. It is known that waves transport energy and momentum, but not thesubstance of the medium. Unlike waves, vortices can transport not only energyand momentum, but the substance of the medium as well. This is an essentialphysical difference between waves and vortices. For example, it can be observedin the contrast between the smoke rings produced by a cigar smoker and devastatinghurricanes. Since vortices and waves are always present in nature, the crucial issue

    © Springer International Publishing AG 2017A. Tur, V. Yanovsky, Coherent Vortex Structures in Fluids and Plasmas,Springer Series in Synergetics, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52733-8_1

    1

  • 2 1 Introduction

    is to understand the impact of these objects on each other. This question remainsthe least studied. It should be noted that the earliest studies of vortex motion wereundertaken a long time ago by the famous scientists René Descartes, ChristiaanHuygens, Johann and Daniel Bernoulli, and many others. The main driving forcebehind this research was an attempt to explain the interaction of bodies by vortexmotions of ether. These studies made progress in understanding vortex interaction,but were superseded by Newton’s theory of gravitation. The detailed description ofthis period of development of vortex theory is given in [8]. After a decline of interestin vortices, a new wave of research dates to the middle of the nineteenth centurythanks to the remarkable works foremost of Helmholtz, Kelvin, and Kirchhoff. Theirstudies led to fundamentally new hydrodynamic results.

    At the root of the theoretical description of vortex objects was Helmholtz.His work Über Integrale hydrodynamischen Gleichungen, welche den Wirbelbe-wegungen entsprechen [9] played a key role in the development of vortex theory.First of all, he singled out vortex motion. According to Helmholtz, fluid motionfor which there is no potential of velocity is called vortex motion. Helmholtzestablished an analogy between the motion of fluids and magnetic manifestationsof electric currents. This analogy allowed him to introduce the rectilinear and ringvortices. In addition, he proved the main theorems on vortex motions of an idealfluid. The significance of these studies was highly appreciated later, and Poincaréconsidered them the most important contribution to hydrodynamics [8]. The mainfactor allowing Helmholtz to make substantial progress in the study of vortex motionwas an understanding of frozen-in vortex lines in medium motions. This gave himthe possibility to use general laws of classical mechanics for the vortex objects.Modern notions of hydrodynamic invariants can be found in [10–12].

    1.1 Equations of Motion of Hydrodynamic Media

    Before starting to discuss the vortices, let us consider the important elements of thedescription of hydrodynamic media. A simple question arises: what is understoodby hydrodynamic media? First of all, most substances exist in four states ofaggregation: solids, liquids, gases, and finally, plasmas. It seems to us that we caneasily distinguish these aggregate states from each other. In fact, however, this isnot always the case. There are certain difficulties in the separation of aggregatestates. However, we will not go into their differences. There is only one propertythat is important for us that distinguishes solids: the preservation of their form. Theremaining aggregate states, on being placed in an arbitrary receptacle, assume itsshape. Thus, the aggregate states have flow properties. This feature can be takenas a basis for the concept of hydrodynamic media. The second important featureof hydrodynamic media is the preservation of their continuity. This means thatthe study of motion of such media does not take into account the processes ofspontaneous emergence of areas inside the medium where the medium is absent

  • 1.1 Equations of Motion of Hydrodynamic Media 3

    Fig. 1.1 Selected volume ofmedium ˝, confined by thesurface @˝. Here n is thenormal to this surface

    nV

    Ω ∂Ω

    or another medium appears. Examples of this are the liquid boiling process andcavitation.

    These specific processes in hydrodynamic media are studied by special methods.Motions of hydrodynamic media are described by the evolution of certain

    fields over time and space. As mentioned previously, hydrodynamic media givean example of classical field theory. It is clear that these fields are described byparticular derivative equations. One of the universal characteristics of hydrodynamicmedia is a field density of the medium �.t; x/. The second is the medium’s velocityvector field V.t; x/.

    These values are sufficient to obtain the equation that determines the changein density of the medium [13]. Indeed, we can imagine some selected volume ofmedium˝0, as shown in Fig. 1.1.

    The mean mass of the medium in this selected volume is equal toR˝�dx. Then,

    any change of the mass in this volume is determined by the mass flow q D �Vacross the boundary of the selected volume. The mass can flow only in or out of theselected volume. Other mechanisms by which mass in this volume can change areimpossible, because of the preservation of the medium’s continuity. We thereforeobtain

    Z

    ˝

    @�

    @tdx D �

    Z

    �Vds:

    The minus sign on the right-hand side is associated with the selection of the externalnormal directed outward from the region (Fig. 1.1). Now let us use Stokes’s theorem,which, in particular, allows us to switch from the integral over a closed surface tothe integral over the volume

    Z

    Fds DZ

    ˝

    divFdx;

    where @˝ is the closed surface surrounding the volume ˝ . After a transformation,we obtain

    Z

    ˝

    @�

    @tdx D �

    Z

    ˝

    div�Vdx:

  • 4 1 Introduction

    Given that the volume was selected arbitrarily, we finally obtain the followingequation:

    @�

    @tC div�V D 0; (1.1)

    which is called the equation of continuity (see, for example, [14–16]). This equationis a consequence of the law of mass conservation and describes the change in themedium’s density as it flows. Similarly, we can obtain the equation of motion ofan ideal fluid [17, 18]. According to Newton’s second law, the acceleration a of amass m is proportional to the force F applied to it. The proportionality coefficient isassociated with the mass m:

    ma D F:

    Let us consider a small volume of fluid and determine its change in velocity. It istrivial to find the velocity derivative:

    dV D @V@t

    dt C @V@xi

    dxi:

    From this, it is similarly trivial to obtain

    dVdt

    D @V@t

    C .Vr/V:

    Thus, the acceleration of the fluid element consists of the local accelerationassociated with a change in velocity with time at a fixed point and the “convective”acceleration associated with a change in velocity passing from one point to another.An extremely important object has now appeared, namely the substantial derivative:

    d

    dtD @@t

    C V � r: (1.2)

    This operator gives the total derivative of the field for an observer moving with thefluid at the point x at time t.

    Now we calculate the force acting on the selected volume. Taking into accountthat the force is due to the presence of pressure in the fluid, we obtain the resultantforce by calculating the integral

    F D �Z

    Pds:

  • 1.1 Equations of Motion of Hydrodynamic Media 5

    The integral is calculated over the surface bounding the selected volume ˝ . Again,we transform it using Stokes’s theorem:

    F D �Z

    ˝

    rPdx:

    Going back to Newton’s equation and using the relations above, we finally obtainEuler’s equation

    �@V@t

    C .Vr/V�

    D �rP: (1.3)

    Two comments must be made. Equation (1.3) does not take into account theprocesses associated with internal friction or viscosity of the medium. It is thereforecalled the equation of an ideal medium. The pressure in this equation is determinedby the thermodynamic properties of the medium [19]. The adiabatic processapproximation is used quite often, in which the equation of the ideal gas stateP D const�� , where � D CpCv is the adiabatic index. In an adiabatic process, theexchange of heat inside the fluid and with the external medium is absent. Whenusing other equations of state of the medium, we have to introduce into the mediuma system of hydrodynamic equations to describe the dynamics of the other fieldsincluded in these state equations. For example, it is often required to take intoaccount the temperature of the field or the density of entropy. Naturally, if otherexternal forces act on the medium, such as gravity �g, they need to be added tothe right-hand side of Eq. (1.3). For a compressible hydrodynamic medium with theequation of adiabatic state, the closed system of equations consists of Eqs. (1.3) and(1.1):

    �@V@t

    C .Vr/V�

    D �rP;

    @�

    @tC div�V D 0;

    P D const�� (1.4)

    There is another important approximation to describe the dynamics of a medium thatis an incompressible fluid. In this model, the density does not change with pressure,and the velocity of sound correspondingly tends to infinity. This approximation isapplicable in a hydrodynamic medium if the Mach number is small, M D Vc � 1[16, 20]. Therefore, this model is applicable to a large number of processes andphenomena. The equation of motion of an incompressible fluid is given in Eq. (1.3).The pressure entering into it is determined by the condition of incompressibilitydivV D 0, and not the equation of state. In order to understand this condition, we

  • 6 1 Introduction

    return to Eq. (1.1) and write it in the following form:

    @�

    @tC .V � r/�C �divV D 0:

    Using the total derivative (1.2), we write this equation in the following form:

    d�

    dtC �divV D 0:

    Preservation of density means d�dt D 0 and consequently leads to the incompress-ibility condition divV D 0.

    An incompressible ideal fluid is the simplest and most commonly used model:

    �@V@t

    C .Vr/V�

    D �rP;

    divV D 0 (1.5)

    This model is applicable to fluids and gases in motion with low Mach number.The equations of motion of ideal hydrodynamic media will be closer to reality

    if we add the dissipative processes, in particular the viscous contributions to thehydrodynamic equations.

    For a description of ideal hydrodynamic media, two approaches are used: thoseof Euler and Lagrange [17, 18, 21]. We used the Euler approach above, whereby apoint x is selected and the changes over time in the field at this point are observed.From the viewpoint of an Euler medium, motion is known if we know the functions� D �.t; x/, V D V.t; x/ and other fields that enter the hydrodynamic model of themedium. The variables t; x are called Euler variables.

    In the Lagrangian approach, the central role is played by the concept of theLagrangian particle. It is a sufficiently small volume of the medium that can beconsidered a point. Of course, from a physical point of view, it must contain manyelementary building blocks of our medium (i.e., atoms or molecules). In addition,the microscopic elements of a Lagrangian particle are in a state of local statisticalequilibrium. Now, numbering these liquid particles by their positions x0 at t D 0, itis sufficient to trace their motions in space:

    x D x.x0; t/:

    For a given value x0, this function of t describes the trajectory of the Lagrangianparticle, which goes out from x0 at time t D 0. This information is sufficient todetermine the characteristics of our medium at any point at the selected moment oftime. For example, to calculate the velocity at point x at t, we have to calculate

    V.x0; t/ D dx.x0; t/dt

    :

  • 1.2 Invariant Properties of Hydrodynamic Media 7

    The velocity in x at t is determined by this derivative taken from the Lagrangianparticle that came at this time to the point x. Thus, the Lagrangian variablesthat describe the evolution of a continuous medium are .x0; t/, and the remainingvariables are functions of these values. It should be noted that the choice of tagsas initial positions of Lagrangian particles is not the only one. It is only importantto distinguish the Lagrangian particles on selected tags; their corresponding coordi-nates will be admissible.

    Of course, these approaches are linked to each other. The transition fromLagrange to Euler variables is made by the expression of the initial positions ofthe particles through the coordinates of the point x. For example,

    V.x; t/ D V.x0; t/jx0Dx0.x;t/;

    where x0 D x0.x; t/ is the initial position of the Lagrangian particle’s coordinates,which will be at point x at time t. To find the Lagrange variables at a givenvelocity field V.x; t/ in the Euler representation, it is necessary to solve a systemof differential equations of the first order:

    dxdt

    D V.x; t/;

    with the initial condition x D x0 with t D 0. The transition from Euler to Lagrangevariables is also easy to carry out by substitution of the relation x from the Lagrangecoordinates:

    V.x; t/ D V.x.x0; t/; t/:

    Thus, these two approaches are equivalent, but each has a number of advantageswhen one is considering the various aspects of hydrodynamics. In the future, wewill use both approaches.

    1.2 Invariant Properties of Hydrodynamic Media

    As already discussed, the motion of hydrodynamic media is described by systemsof nonlinear partial differential equations. Exact solutions can be found only insome particular and very special cases. Some will be discussed below. Theseequations generate many very complex problems, and the invariants have greatsignificance. Of course, it makes sense to speak about preserved values in theabsence of dissipative processes. In other words, when discussing the invariantproperties, we restrict ourselves to the ideal hydrodynamic media. From a geometricpoint of view, dimensionality of space plays a key role in such field theories.For hydrodynamics, space dimensionality is also important. In particular, spacedimensionality determines the number of invariant types that can appear in the

  • 8 1 Introduction

    hydrodynamic medium. The most convenient approach to their description isachieved in terms of invariant differential forms [10]. However, we shall try toexpress the invariant properties without the use of invariant form language.

    First, we start with geometrically different objects having different dimensional-ities. The simplest zero-dimensional object is a point. The next in complexity couldbe a one-dimensional object such as a line or curve. The basic two-dimensionalobject is a surface. Finally, the elementary volume is considered a three-dimensionalbasic object. It turns out that with each of these type are associated certain invariantsof hydrodynamic media [10–12]. If, for example, we paint a Lagrangian particlein blue, then it will move intact to another place only under the influence of theflow. This means that there may be scalar fields whose evolution is limited tothe transfer of their values by the fluid motion. These fields satisfy the universalequation that we discussed when we were considering the condition of incompress-ibility:

    @I

    @tC .V � r/I D 0: (1.6)

    Scalar fields satisfying this equation are called Lagrangian invariants. Examplesof these invariants are the initial positions x0 D x0.x; t/. Clearly, Eq. (1.6) canbe solved exactly in Lagrange variables, and the solution has the followingform:

    I D I.x0/:

    This solution once again reminds us of the meaning of the Lagrange invariant, asscalar fields transported by media motions.

    The next object such as a line may appear as an integral curve of the vector field.There are fields in hydrodynamic media in which integrated lines are transportedonly by medium motion. The integral curves of these fields are, so to speak, “frozeninto” the medium. Therefore, such fields have been given the name “frozen-in”fields. These fields satisfy a universal equation of the following form:

    @J@t

    C .V � r/J D .J � r/V;

    which, by introducing the vector field commutator ŒA;B� D .Ar/B � .Br/A, canbe written in a form reminding us of the Poisson equation of classical mechanics orthe Dirac equation for observables in quantum mechanics:

    @J@t

    D ŒJ;V�: (1.7)

    The values satisfying this equation are called invariants, or frozen-in integrals,and they exist in all hydrodynamic media. Frozen-in invariants are very importantfor understanding many phenomena in different hydrodynamic media. We will

  • 1.2 Invariant Properties of Hydrodynamic Media 9

    now discuss them in greater detail. In Lagrangian variables, this equation can beintegrated exactly. Its solution has the following form:

    Ji D J0.x0/j @xi@x0j

    ;

    where J0.x0/ is the initial vector field; the repeated indices, as usual, meansummation. This solution also ensures that the integral lines of this field are frozeninto the medium.

    We now turn to more complex objects: surfaces. These objects may appear asintegral surfaces or surfaces tangential to the given field of two-dimensional planes.

    This field of planes can be set up for a given vector field. Indeed, let us imaginethat at every point of our medium is a certain vector of this field. Let us place at eachpoint the plane orthogonal to this vector. This can be done in three-dimensionalspace uniquely. Then the set of planes determines the field of two-dimensionalplanes.

    The tangential surfaces to the field planes are integral surfaces. In hydrodynamicmedia, there are fields that have a surprising behavior of their integral surfaces. Theirsurfaces are transported only by the medium motion. It is clear that this property canbe considered a specific conservation of integral surfaces. The equations for thesevector fields have the following universal form:

    @Si@t

    C .V � r/Si D Sm @Vm@xi

    : (1.8)

    Fields satisfying this equation are called S-invariants. It should be noted that unlikethe integral curves, the fields of planes are not always integrable; therefore, integralsurfaces do not always exist. For this existence, the conditions of FrobeniusS�rotS D0 must be met. Of course, if this condition is respected at the initial time, it will besatisfied at all subsequent times. As well as all of the aforementioned equations,Eq. (1.8) can be integrated in the Lagrange variables. Its exact solution is

    Si D S0.x0/j @x0j@xi

    :

    Now it is necessary to focus on the final type of invariants that occur in hydro-dynamic media. We have already met this invariant: it is related to the medium’scontinuity. It turns out that there are pseudoscalar fields playing the role of thedensity of conserved values. An obvious example is the mass density entering intothe fundamental equation of hydrodynamics. It is clear that these density invariantssatisfy the continuity equation (1.1). Like all other invariants, the continuityequation can be solved exactly in Lagrange variables. Its solution is trivial:

    � D �0.x0/D.x0/D.x/

    ;

  • 10 1 Introduction

    where D.x0/D.x/ is the Jacobian of the transformation from the variables x0 to thevariables x [13, 21]. The invariants discussed above are of great importance for thedescription of the motions of the different hydrodynamic media. Some examples oftheir use are given in the following sections.

    1.3 Properties of Vortex Motions

    Under vortex motion we will understand the movement of fluid at which the vectoris not equal to zero at least in some part of fluid. Let V be the velocity field of themedium motion. Then we will call the vector

    ! D rotV (1.9)

    vorticity. The physical sense of vorticity can be understood by considering fluidrotation as a whole around an axis �. As is known, the velocity of this simple flowis determined by the ratioV D 1

    2��r. Here � is a constant vector characterizing the

    rotation velocity, and r is the vector of rotation of the orthogonal axis. In calculatingthe rotor (i.e., curl) of this velocity field, it is easy to derive that rotV D �, andtherefore, it coincides with the angular velocity of the fluid rotation. Let us nowconsider the evolution of vorticity in an ideal fluid. It is simple enough to obtainthe equation describing the variation of vorticity with time acting with the operatorrot on the equation of motion of an ideal incompressible fluid. Thus, pressure iseliminated, and the resulting equation has a rather simple form:

    @!

    @tC .Vr/! D .!r/V: (1.10)

    This equation is called the frozen-in equation of the vorticity field !. It should benoted that this equation has a purely geometric meaning, completely unrelated tothe specific form of the equations of the medium’s motion. Therefore, the valuesthat satisfy this equation are present in all hydrodynamic media [10]. The physicalmeaning of this equation represents the transport of the field lines by mediummotion fluid flow.

    This can be verified by obtaining the equation for an arbitrary vector field whoselines of force are transported by medium motion (for example [10]). In order tobetter understand the meaning of a frozen-in equation, let us consider the curve x Dx.s; t/, which is transported with time by medium motion (see Fig. 1.2). Here s isthe parameter that parameterizes the appropriate line in three-dimensional Euclideanspace, and t is time. Let us introduce the linear element of this line according to

    ı l D @x.s; t/@s

    :

  • 1.3 Properties of Vortex Motions 11

    Fig. 1.2 A parametricallydefined line in space at time twith a tangent vector ıl. Eachpoint on this line istransported with a velocityV.x; t/

    x(s, t )

    δl

    V(x,t )

    In other words, ı l is a vector tangent to the curve x D x.s; t/ at the point defined bythe parameter s at time t. Then, differentiating this with respect to time, we get

    dı ldt

    D ddt

    @x.s; t/@s

    D @@s

    dx.s; t/dt

    :

    Since by definition, the line x D x.s; t/ is moved by medium motion, it follows thatdx.s; t/

    dtD V.x; t/;

    where V.x; t/ is the velocity of medium motion in points of curve. Using this fact,we transform the previous equation to the form

    dı ldt

    DD @@s

    V.x; t/ D @xj@s

    @

    @xjV.x; t/:

    Finally, we obtain

    @ı l@t

    C .V � r/ı l D .ı l � r/V: (1.11)

    Comparing the obtained equation (1.11) with the frozen-in equation (1.10), it iseasy to see their full coincidence. That is why the geometric meaning of the frozen-in equation is to transfer the integral curves of the field ! by medium motion,determined by the velocity field V.

    A remarkable feature of this equation is that it is exactly integrable in Lagrangiancoordinates. Let the motion of Lagrangian particles be described by the relationsx D x.t; x0/, where x0 is the initial position of the Lagrangian particles. Then theexact solution of the frozen-in equation takes the form

    !i D !0.x0/j @xi@x0j

    :

  • 12 1 Introduction

    Here !0.x0/ is the initial vorticity at time t D 0. Certainly, the presence of thissolution does not mean the ability to set the velocity field. The reason for this is quiteobvious: we do not know the explicit form of the relation between Lagrangian andEulerian coordinates. To establish it, we need to solve complex nonlinear equations,which usually turns out to be more difficult than finding the solution of Eq. (1.10) inEuler variables. The above-described properties are of an extremely general natureand apply to all hydrodynamic equations. Detailed descriptions of the invariantproperties of hydrodynamic media can be found in [6, 10–12].

    Despite its relatively simple form, Eq. (1.10) is nonlinear (taking into accountthat ! D rotV), and the process of finding its solutions is not a trivial task. Thisproblem is simplified in some cases in the presence of special symmetries. Amongthese symmetries, there many known exact vortex flows.

    In particular, a significant simplification of the equation occurs when the vorticityvector field is two-dimensional. For example, the vorticity vector field mightbe directed along the z-axis, and the flow in this direction is absent Vz D 0.Such vortices can be considered vortex tubes, elongated strictly along the z-axis.Fluid motion in the plane perpendicular to this selected axis depends only on thecoordinates .x; y/. Then Eq. (1.10) in the two-dimensional case is considerablysimplified and takes the form

    @!z

    @tC .Vr/!z D 0 (1.12)

    of a passive impurity transport equation. From the viewpoint of vorticity, thisequation means that the specified initial vorticity !z is simply transported by thefluid in the same way as if it were a passive impurity. This transition to the two-dimensional problem allows us to simplify the search for exact vortex solutionsconsiderably. One important change is related to the possibility of obtaining anonlinear equation for only one scalar current function ', in contrast to the originalsystem of equations for the three components of the velocity.

    Indeed, using the property of incompressibility of fluid divV D 0 in the two-dimensional case,

    @Vx@x

    C @Vy@y

    D 0; (1.13)

    it is possible to write down the components of the velocity field using a singlefunction '.x; y; t/ as

    Vx D @@y'.x; y; t/;

    Vy D � @@x'.x; y; t/;

  • References 13

    for which no divergence condition of the velocity field will be automaticallysatisfied. This function '.x; y; t/ is called a stream function. Thus, it is possibleto unambiguously restore the velocity field from the known stream function.Trajectories of Lagrangian particles are found as the solutions of the equation'.x; y/ D const, at least for stationary flows. Using this representation of thevelocity field, the frozen-in equation (1.10) can be written down in terms of thestream function. Let us recall that in terms of the stream function ', the vorticity !is determined in a known manner as

    ! D ��'; (1.14)

    and after substituting into Eq. (1.10), we obtain

    @�'

    @tC f�'; 'g D 0: (1.15)

    Here � is the two-dimensional Laplace operator, fA;Bg D "ik @A@xi @B@xk is thePoisson bracket, and the indices i; k D 1; 2 are number coordinates in two-dimensional Euclidean space. The tensor "ik is the unit antisymmetric tensor. Thisequation is often called the Helmholtz equation. This form of the equations of anincompressible fluid is extremely useful, and it is often used to find exact solutionsin two-dimensional hydrodynamics. A decisive role is played here by the transitionfrom several unknown functions to a single function '. As noted above, assumptionsabout the increased symmetry of solutions lead to certain simplifications and are themain source of exact solutions. For these cases, certain methods of solution havebeen developed for the equations in the Euler variables [22] and the Lagrangiancoordinates [23] as well. It should be noted that the evolution of two-dimensionalHamiltonian systems satisfies this equation exactly. This is a useful analogy, and wewill return to it below.

    References

    1. Saffman, P.G.: Phys. Chem. Hydrodynamics. 6(5/6), 711–726 (1985)2. Williams, J.E.F., Kempton, A.J.: Structure and mechanisms of turbulence II. In: Fiedler,

    H. (ed.) Proceedings of the Symposium on Turbulence. Springer, Berlin (1977)3. Levich, E.: Coherence in turbulence: new perspective. In: Concepts of Physics, vol.VI, 3

    (2009). On-line4. Cantwell, B.J.: Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 457–515 (1981)5. Petviashvili, V.I., Pokotelov, O.A.: Solitary Waves in Plasma and the Atmosphere. Gordon and

    Breach Sciences Publishers, Amsterdam (1992)6. Sagdeev, R.Z., Moiseev, S.S., Tur, A.V., Yanovsky, V.V.: Problem of the strong turbulence and

    topological solitons. In: Nonlinear Phenomena in Plasma and Hydrodynamics, pp. 137–182.Mir Publishers, Moscow (1986)

    7. Newton, P.K.: The N-Vortex Problem. Springer, New York/Berlin/Heidelberg (2000)8. Poincare, H.: Theorie des Tourbillions. Carre, Paris (1893)

  • 14 1 Introduction

    9. Helmholtz, H.: J. Reine Angew. Math. 55, 25–55 (1858)10. Tur, A.V., Yanovsky, V.V.: J. Fluid. Mech. 248, 67–106 (1993)11. Moiseev, S.S., Sagdeev, R.Z., Tur, A.V., Yanovsky, V.V.: Sov. Phys. J. 56(1), 117–123 (1982)12. Volkov, D.V., Tur, A.V., Yanovsky, V.V.: Phys. Lett. A 203, 357–361 (1995)13. Chorin, A.J., Marsden, J.E.: A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Springer, New

    York (1993)14. Acheson, D.J.: Elementary Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)15. Patterson, A.R.: A First Course in Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    (1983)16. Faber, T.E.: Fluid Dynamics for Physicists. Cambridge University Press, New York (1995)17. Tritton, D.J.: Physical Fluid Dynamics. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York (1989)18. Kundu, P.K.: Fluid Mechanics. Academic, San Diego (1990)19. Shapiro, A.H.: The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, vols. 1 and

    2. Wiley, New York (1953)20. Lighthill, M.J.S.: An Informal Introduction to Theoretical Fluid Mechanics. Oxford University

    Press, Oxford (1986)21. Meyer, R.E.: Introduction to Mathematical Fluid Dynamics. Dover, New York (1982)22. Ovsyannikov, L.V.: Group Analysis of Differential Equations. Nauka, Moscow (1978) (in

    Russian)23. Abrashkin, A.A., Yakubovich, E.I.: Vortex Dynamics in Lagrangian Description. Fizmatlit,

    Moskow (2006) (in Russian)

  • Chapter 2Dynamics of Point Vortex Singularities

    This chapter focuses on localized vortices in an incompressible fluid. We consider indetail a class of point vortices that can serve as an example of single hydrodynamicquasiparticles. The interaction and movement of even a small finite number of thesevortices generate complex hydrodynamic flows. We develop the general theory ofthe motion of complex point vortex singularities. We also examine the interactionof dipole vortices with ordinary point vortices. In addition, we study the motion ofpoint dipoles in a restricted domain. The first section presents the main propertiesof a large number of known localized vortices.

    2.1 Vortex Structures

    In this section, we describe the main types of vortex structures, their models, andtheir properties. It is known that partial solutions with high symmetry are a goodsource of vortex structures. As noted above, nonlinear hydrodynamic equations donot belong to the class of integrable ones. For a sufficiently high symmetry, onecan apply group-theoretic methods to find particular solutions for hydrodynamicequations (see, for example, [1]). Two-dimensional flows were studied first. Forthese cases, using the methods of the theory of functions of complex variables looksrather attractive. Poincaré in [2] used the method of conformal mapping to studyvortex motion (see, for example, [3]). An interesting version of this approach forfinding exact solutions of an incompressible fluid, but in Lagrangian variables, wasproposed in [4, 5]. Using this approach, some classes of exact solutions of the Eulerequation have been found. A detailed review of this topic is presented in the book[6]. The most interesting class of solutions that this method permits is that of dual-frequency solutions describing Ptolemaic flows. These solutions are determined by

    two analytic functions G.z/ and F.Nz/ that satisfy the conditionˇˇˇ dG.z/dz

    ˇˇˇ2�ˇˇˇ dF.Nz/dNz

    ˇˇˇ2 ¤ 0.

    In fact, this value determines the magnitude of the vorticity of two-dimensional

    © Springer International Publishing AG 2017A. Tur, V. Yanovsky, Coherent Vortex Structures in Fluids and Plasmas,Springer Series in Synergetics, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52733-8_2

    15

  • 16 2 Dynamics of Point Vortex Singularities

    flows. Particular cases of these solutions, such as Gerstner waves, were knownearlier [7]. Nevertheless, a significantly wider range of solutions has been obtainedin Euler variables. A few extremely important exact solutions had been derivedby the beginning of the twentieth century. In the list of these solutions shouldbe included elliptic Kirchhoff vortices [8], Hill [9] and Chaplygin–Lamb [10, 11]vortices, and the Maxwell toroidal vortex (see, for example, [11]). A search fortwo-dimensional solutions is based on the solution of Eq. (1.15). It is clear that thestationary solutions are the simplest ones. In order to find these solutions, a simplerequation should be solved. There are roughly three classes of stationary solutions:

    �' D Const; (2.1)�' D Const � '; (2.2)�' D F.'/: (2.3)

    It is easy to see that the solutions of these equations are exact stationary solutionsof the Poisson bracket (1.15). The class of solutions that satisfy the first equationcorresponds to the flows with constant vorticity in some domain. These domains canbe limited by rigid walls or partially bounded, such as, for example, the solutionsin [12, 13]. The same class of solutions includes the elliptic Kirchhoff vortexsurrounded by potential flow [8], the Rankin circular vortex [14], the Chaplyginelliptical vortex surrounded by shear flow [15], and the vortex in the velocity fieldthat depends linearly on the coordinates [16, 17].

    Some famous solutions such as the Lamb [11] and Chaplygin vortices [10] satisfythe linear equation (2.2). The basic set of known solutions of the nonlinear equation(2.3) is limited to a small choice of functions on the right-hand side. So the solutionis found when the right-hand side is chosen as F.'/ D e' . For example, thesesolutions describe the path of circular vortices in a shear flow [18]. Another exampleis the Kelvin–Stewart solution (cf. [19]). The stream function of this solution has theform

    ' D � ln�

    c � cosh y Cp

    c2 � 1 � cos x�:

    This is a one-parameter family of (see Fig. 2.1) solutions periodic over x with theconstant c � 1. The solutions with a different choice of functions are not wellknown. So F.'/ D ˛' ln' C ˇ' gives the exact solutions found in [20], and asolution with a power function was considered in [21].

    Other classes of localized vortex flows are associated with axisymmetric vortexflows. They can be considered “two-dimensional.” This class of vortices was firstconsidered by Helmholtz [22]. For these vortices, his equation takes the simple form

    d!

    dtD 0:

  • 2.1 Vortex Structures 17

    X0

    y

    0

    Fig. 2.1 Level lines of Kelvin Stewart vortex solutions. It is obvious why this solution is oftencalled cat’s eyes

    0

    z

    ρ

    Fig. 2.2 Streamlines of the Hill vortex inside a sphere and streamlines of potential flow surround-ing the sphere

    Here ! is the angular component of the vorticity in cylindrical coordinates. ThenHill found the existence of a localized vortex in an unbounded medium [9]. Hisparticular exact solution in cylindrical coordinates has the form

    vr D 2 ka2

    r.z � Z/;

    vz D �2 ka2

    r.z � Z/2 � 2 ka2.2r2 � a2/� PZ;

    ! D 10 ka2

    r:

    This solution is localized in the area of the radius a, whose center is moving withvelocity PZ. Here Z is an arbitrary function of time. Outside, the vortex is surroundedby a potential flow. Figure 2.2 shows a view of the streamlines of this vortex. TheHill vortex is, in a sense, the definitive type of a whole family of toroidal vortices

  • 18 2 Dynamics of Point Vortex Singularities

    Fig. 2.3 The streamline of fluid flow of two vortices from the toroidal family are shownschematically

    (see Fig. 2.3). An approximate solution in the form of a vortex ring was consideredin works of Hicks [23, 24]. Other solutions for vortex rings were obtained in [25–28]. Therefore, there was a problem of reconciling these results.

    Meanwhile, the correct solution was proposed by Dayson [29]. This remarkablework describes completely all the characteristics of the steady motion of thevortex ring of the final section. The ultimate verification of these results wasperformed in [30]. A detailed numerical analysis of the motion of a vortex ring [30]confirmed the reliability of Dayson’s asymptotic development. Most of the vorticesabove discussed are the exact solutions of ideal hydrodynamics. To conclude thediscussion of vortices in a finite area, we present the Sullivan vortex [31], which isan exact solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. The velocity field of this vortexhas the form

    Vr D ˛r2

    C 6�r

    1 � e ˛r24��

    ;

    V� D �2r

    �H�˛r2

    4�

    H.1/ ;

    Vz D ˛z�

    1 � e ˛r24��

    ;

    where � is circulation at infinity, ˛ is a constant, and � is kinematic viscosity.This solution is a two-celled stationary vortex. More recently, in [32], the Sullivansolution was generalized to the nonstationary case. Families of vortices of this typeare considered in [33–36]. The elliptical vortices of Moore and Saffman [17] shouldalso be noted. It is interesting that these classical solutions are still relevant (seerecent works [37, 38]). Generalizations of these solutions are models of variouscoherent structures, vortex patches and vortex crystals (see, for example, [39–43]and references therein), which are easily observed in numerical and laboratoryexperiments (see [44–51]). Other classes of smooth exact solutions are based on the

  • 2.1 Vortex Structures 19

    equation of sinh–Poisson type for stream functions [52–54]. We should also note aninteresting class of Kida–Neu vortices [55, 56]. There are also many examples ofsolutions with a singular vorticity distribution (see [16]), as well as solutions thatcontain both the smooth part of the vorticity field and point singularities [57, 58],which are usually arranged in symmetric configurations, as will be discussed inChap. 4.

    Another important class of two-dimensional solutions consists of point vortices.These solutions relate to the singular generalized solutions of the Helmholtzequation. Such vortices appeared in [22]. The importance of these vortices inhydrodynamics cannot be overestimated. A huge number of problems have beensolved with the use of these vortices. The main element of the idealization in thetransition to these vortices is a consideration of infinitely thin vortex filaments.

    The vorticity of the vortices is concentrated on these lines. When these straightfilaments coincide with the direction of the z-axis, it is sufficient to consider themotion of the intersection points of these vortices with the plane, for example .x; y/.The image of such a rectilinear vortex is a point, which is why they are called pointvortices. The vorticity of this vortex in the plane is characterized by the followingformula:

    !z D !0ı.x � a/; (2.4)

    where the vector x belongs to the plane .x; y/, and the vector a determines theposition of the vortex. However, using point vortices allows us to consider a set ofhydrodynamic flows as being induced by a system of interacting point vortices [22].In a sense, the set of hydrodynamic problems is reduced to problems of classicalmechanics of particle motion with a special law of interaction. This approach wasalso suggested by Helmholtz, and this formulation of the problem has been appliedwidely for the study of complex vortex flows. However, there is no evidence thatall real vortex flows can be modeled solely by a system of point vortices. The mainassumption for the modeling of complex vortex flows is a theorem of frozen-invortex lines in a medium. This means that every vortex line remains constantlycomposed of the same fluid particles and moves in the fluid with them. Thus, bysetting the location of the vortex and the values of their vorticity, the fluid flow can berestored without studying the interaction of complex vortex structures. The velocityfield of a point vortex and particular cases of their interactions were consideredby Helmholtz [22]. He examined the problem of interaction of two vortices, theinteraction of vortex rings, and the evolution of a point vortex in an ideal fluidbounded by a plane, and he also studied the impact of boundaries on vortex motion.In his work, Helmholtz laid the foundations of vortex theory and also defined theprincipal directions of its development.

    However, the modern form of equations of motion of point vortices was given bythe outstanding scientist Gustav Kirchhoff. In his lectures on mathematical physics[8] he derived the equations of motion for an arbitrary number of point vortices andobtained them in Hamiltonian form. In addition, he obtained all the conservationlaws for this system. Obviously, he examined in detail the case of the motion of two

  • 20 2 Dynamics of Point Vortex Singularities

    vortices, whose study was initiated by Helmholtz. Using the point vortex approach,Kirchhoff considered an elliptical domain filled with point vortices. This solutionis known as the Kirchhoff, or elliptical, vortex [8]. The model of point vortices hasbeen generalized to some more complex media as well. The equations of motionfor point vortices in a stratified incompressible ideal fluid and the Hamiltonian formof the equations of motion were obtained in [59]. The equations of motion of pointvortices in a fluid with a free surface were obtained in [60]. Attempts to transfer thismodel to plasma hydrodynamics succeeded only recently [61].

    Another important type of vortex is called the vortex sheet. In the case of a pointvortex, vorticity is localized only on the line, but in the case of a vortex sheet,vorticity is concentrated in an infinitely thin layer along a two-dimensional surface.Analytically, this means that the vorticity of this object has the form

    ! D �ı.xn/:

    The vector � D � � determines the vorticity’s magnitude and direction, the vector� is tangent to the vortex line, and xn is the coordinate transversal to the sheet. Thevelocity field of the vortex sheet is given by

    V D � 14

    Z

    S

    .r � r 0/ � �jr � r 0 j3 ds.r

    0

    /:

    Here ds.r0

    / is the element of surface area S, and � denotes vector multiplication.It should be noted that the vortex sheet problem arises very frequently. Simpleexamples of it are the flows around the wings of aircraft, and around different planesand various objects. A flat sheet is unstable and therefore rolls into spiral vortexstructures [16, 22, 62]. This instability is the basis for explaining various effectsobserved in nature.

    Some progress has been made in the search for new vortex structures andhas led to the introduction of a new type of singular point vortex in the three-dimensional case. These vortices were named vortons [63]. Critical discussionconcerning vortons and comparative analysis of different types of them can befound in [64]. The introduction of vortons as three-dimensional point vortices isconnected with great difficulties, because the velocity field of the object must havea number of internal parameters more than those of a point vortex. Attempts toavoid such difficulties led to the introduction of vortex objects whose velocity fieldcoincides with the remote field of three-dimensional localized vortices [65, 66].However, such an idea, though physically understandable, has certain shortcomingsof a purely mathematical nature. Strictly speaking, they cannot be consideredexact solutions of the hydrodynamic equations. So, these studies point clearlyto the need to search for new types of vortices. The necessity of these objectsto explain various hydrodynamic phenomena remains topical. It should be notedthat the exact solutions of two-dimensional hydrodynamic equations are importanteven for magnetohydrodynamic issues, which seem quite distant. A theorem onthe existence of these relations was proven in [67]. It appears that the presence