-
[email protected]
ANDREA AICARDI
CV & ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO
-
info
education
work experience
name: Andrea
surname: Aicardi
birth date:
adress:
contacts:
PARTITA IVA
2011-2014
2014july/sept
Current from 2014
oct
2013 - presentmarch
2012march/oct
2011march/Jun
2010may/sept
2006apr/oct
2014march/aug
2007-2011
2002-2007
01. June 1988. Finale ligure, (SV) Italy
Via San Sebastiano 123, Tovo San Giacomo (SV) 17020 Italy
cell: (+39) 338 7695798
email: [email protected]
Skype: andre.aicardi
LinkedIn: http://it.linkedin.com/pub/andrea-aicardi/b/927/3a
01659680092
University of Genoa, Faculty of Architecture; master graduate
cum laude
Global Planning Associates, Milan, Italy - architecture office;
www.globalplanning.itInternship [3 month]Competition Gugghenheim
museum, Helsinki;active part of the design team, 3D modeling,
research, ;
Studio associato Brugnara e Sidoti, Milan, Italy - architecture
office;Collaboration [few weeks]Competition Polaris 10000, Milan;3D
modeling & Rendering, graphical presentation;15 Store
Residential Buildig (80 apartments) in the historical center of
Milano, in progress, designed with Revit.Hotel in Linate, in
progress, designed with Revit
MXM Architettura, Genoa, Italy - architecture office;
mxmarchitettura.itInternship and collaboration restyling WTC
building Genoa, competition; Masterplan at Segrate (MI); Via
Cornigliano, Genoa, competition;
OBR, Genoa, Italy - architecture office;
www.openbuildingresearch.comInternship [8 month]Competition
restyiling of a building in Milano, Kalyan Mart Project,
Jaipur;
Arch. Enrico Rosasco, Genoa, Italy - architecture office;
http://www.studiorosasco.eu/Internship [4 month]Apartments sestri
Levante (GE);
ARRED, Genoa, Italy - architecture office;
http://www.arred.it/Internship [5 month]Competition restyiling of a
building in Genoa;
Geom. Maurizio Vigolungo, Loano (SV), Italy - office;Internship
[7 month]landscape mapping, cad;
Updated on December 2014Autorizzo il trattamento dei dati
personali contenuti nel mio curriculum vitae in base art. 13 del D.
Lgs.
196/2003
Palma e Vannicola design, Genoa, Italy - architecture office;
www.palmavannicola.comInternship [5 month]Interior design, 3D
renderings and graphical presentation;
University of Genoa, Faculty of Architecture; first level
graduate cum laude
ISS Giovanni Falcone, Loano (SV), Geometra
-
QUALIFICATION AN LECTURES
workshop
201422nd September
201226-28, oct
2012nov/dec
2013 19-26, jun
2014 17-19, may
201228-30, sept
20129-13, May
2011/2012
20125th June
Lecture at Form after Form symposium at the University of
GenoaDiscussant with a preview of Diploma Work FluxCO structure
Lecture at University of Genoa about structural form-finding
technique using parametric software, focus on Grasshoppers plug-in
Karamba and Millipede
Processing Workshop, GenovaEmergentaGEtutor Co-de-iT
Intensive Workshop, ADDVARIANCE 3, Aalto University,
HelsinkiProcessin, Rhino+Grasshoper, Maya, Digital
fabrication.tutor Roland Snooks
Workshop Competition, RESITE dPav, PragueResearch,
Rhino+Grasshoper+ rhinoscript, Digital fabrication.tutor T. Hosmer,
C. Balmond
Grasshopper Workshop, GenovaEmergentaGEtutor Co-de-iT
Co-tutoring Grasshopper workshop, GenovaEmergentaGEtutor
Co-de-iT
Advanced Workshop of Grasshopper,
RomeGrasshoper+Geco+WeaverBird+Kangaroo.tutor Arturo Tedeschi
Collaboration with Andrea Anselmo e Giovanni Glorialanza on the
deve-lopment of HANGitOVER, winner of GAU:DI competition,
exhibition during Venice Biennale 2012
Level BASIC INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED
Level BASIC INTERMEDIATE MOTHERLANGUAGE
3D\cad\renderingRhinocherosMayaMeshmixerSketchupCinema 4DKeyshot
LumionBlender
ParametricGrasshopper\\Weaverbird\\Karamba\\Millipede\\Kangaroo\\gecoProcessing
Autocad
Adobe suite:PhotoshopIllustratorInDesignPremiereAfter
Effects
Prezi
BIMRevit
ArchitectureVasariNavisworksShowcaseAllplanVectorWorksArchicad
3D printingCuraMeshmixer
Office/OSOffice suiteWindows OSiOS
Italian
English
certificate by Arturo Tedeschi advanced Worksohop
certificate by Co-de-iT Worksohop
TOOLS/SKILLS
LANGUAGES
-
mauro marsullo architetto
Data: 10 settembre 2014
Oggetto: lettera di referenze per Andrea Aicardi
Andrea ha collaborato inizialmente con il mio studio in
occasione di un periodo di tirocinio formativo connesso con il suo
piano di studi.
Grazie alla possibilit di valutare le sue caratteristiche
personali e professionali, seppur in una fase didattica, ho
individuato alcuni elementi peculiari che mi hanno portato a
coinvolgerlo in attivit professionali connesse con alcuni
lavori.
In particolare ho avviato un rapporto di collaborazione su due
temi caratterizzati da una scala progettuale molto diversa.
Una primo progetto ha riguardato la definizione di un concept
per il ridisegno dell'area reception di un importante edificio
direzionale a Genova, la Torre WTC.
Il secondo ha sviluppato un master plan per la realizzazione di
comparti residenziali e polo scolastico all'interno di un Programma
Integrato di Intervento (PII) a Segrate (MI).
La collaborazione ha poi interessato alcuni progetti connessi
con la mobilit urbana all'interno di attivit divulgative e
promozionali.
In ogni occasione Andrea Aicardi ha dimostrato caratteristiche
non comuni che evidenziano notevoli capacit gi acquisite unite a
grandi potenzialit di crescita.
Grazie alla propensione alla ricerca teorica ed alla
consapevolezza delle potenzialit offerte dallo sviluppo delle
tecnologie digitali ha maturato un'ampia conoscenza dei software di
progettazione con capacit di interazione tra i diversi strumenti a
partire dai programmi convenzionali per la gestione del progetto bi
e tridimensionale fino alla conoscenza di programmi parametrici
evoluti riservati a professionisti altamente qualificati.
Dispone di una elevata capacit di gestione del lavoro ed in
grado di coordinare le attivit di un gruppo di progettazione
risultando naturalmente un riferimento per i colleghi.
Il livello raggiunto nei diversi ambiti abbinato a capacit,
passione e personalit costituisce un valore aggiunto per ogni sua
futura collaborazione professionale.
Mauro Marsullo
piazza giacomo matteotti 2/6Acap. 16123 - genova italia
tel./fax 010 531145 cell.: 347
7931546mail:[email protected]
web: MXMarchitettura.it
Milan, Italy8th September 2014
To whom it may concern,The purpose of this letter is to
recommend An-drea Aicardi, who has worked in our office as teams
member for the International Design Com-petition Guggenheim Museum
in Helsinki. In that time Andrea performed with success all tasks
expected in a professional and competent manner.Andrea is an
individual with positive attitude who accept responsibility to
complete a task with little direction. He is a good team player and
has a deep understanding of contemporary architecture.In addition,
Andrea has excellent skills for modeling and parametric
architecture.Andrea worked on architectural drawings, 3D mo-delling
with different programs, images, plans and he play a key role in
term of architectural research and design.It has been a pleasure
working with Andrea, he has always dedicated and passionate about
his work.His drive and abilities will truly be an asset to any
office he goes to in the future.
THANK YOU TO MY ENCOURAGIN MENTORS AND PEERSLeft | Letter from
Luca Vigliero, Design mana
ger and architect at OMA , Fuksas and RMJM.Right | Letter from
Mauro Marsullo owner MXM ARCHITETTURA, architecture office
REFERENCE LETTERS
Genova, Italy10th June 2014
To whom it may concern,Andrea worked in my architectural office
during a period of apprenticeship of his University.In this period
I valued some interesting per-sonal and professional
characteristics that bring me to involve Andrea to other works of
the office.I involve Andrea in two different project cha-racterized
in two different scale.The first one was a concept for the
restyling of the first floor of the WTC Building in Geno-va. The
second was a masterplan ( residential building and school complex )
in Segrate, close to Milano. We also join some project connected on
the urban mobility and the competition Via Cornigliano (
reconfiguration of the main road of Cornigliano, Genova). For every
occasion Andrea Aicardi showed uncommon characteristics ad
significant growth opportunities. Thanks to his inclination to
theory research and his personal interest on architectural software
form the basic ones to the most interesting parametric design and
software focus on form finding techniques.Andrea has great skill to
manage work and is able to coordinate the activities of a team,
becoming the reference for the colleagues.The level achieved in the
various areas com-bined with ability, passion and personality
constitutes an added value to any future pro-fessional
collaboration.
Andrea ha collaborato inizialmente con il mio studio in
occasione di un periodo di tirocinio formativo connes-so con il suo
piano di studi. Grazie alla possibilit di valutare le sue
caratteristiche personali e professiona-li, seppur in una fase
didattica, ho individuato alcuni elementi peculiari che mi hanno
portato a coinvolgerlo in attivit professionali connesse con alcuni
lavori. In particolare ho avviato un rapporto di collaborazione su
due temi caratterizzati da una scala progettuale molto diversa. Una
primo progetto ha riguardato la definizione di un concept per il
ridisegno dellarea reception di un importante edificio direzionale
a Genova, la Torre WTC. Il secondo ha sviluppato un master plan per
la realizza-zione di comparti residenziali e polo scolastico
allin-terno di un Programma Integrato di Intervento (PII) a Segrate
(MI). La collaborazione ha poi interessato alcuni progetti connessi
con la mobilit urbana allinterno di attivit divulgative e
promozionali. In ogni occasione Andrea Aicardi ha dimostrato
caratteristiche non comuni che evidenziano notevoli capacit gi
acquisite unite a grandi potenzialit di crescita. Grazie alla
propensione alla ricerca teorica ed alla consapevolezza delle
poten-zialit offerte dallo sviluppo delle tecnologie digitali ha
maturato unampia conoscenza dei software di progetta-zione con
capacit di interazione tra i diversi strumenti a partire dai
programmi convenzionali per la gestione del progetto bi e
tridimensionale fino alla conoscenza di programmi parametrici
evoluti riservati a professionisti altamente qualificati. Dispone
di una elevata capacit di gestione del lavoro ed in grado di
coordinare le at-tivit di un gruppo di progettazione risultando
natural-mente un riferimento per i colleghi. Il livello raggiunto
nei diversi ambiti abbinato a capacit, passione e perso-nalit
costituisce un valore aggiunto per ogni sua futura collaborazione
professionale.
Lo scopo di questa lettera di raccomandare An-drea Aicardi che
ha lavorato nel nostro ufficio quale membro del team per il
Concorso museo Gug-genheim di Helsinki. In quelloccasione Andrea ha
portato a termine con successo in modo pro-fessionale tutti gli
incarichi a lui assegnati.Andrea una persona con un atteggiamento
po-sitivo che accetta incarichi di responsabilit e li completa
seguendo le linee guida. E un buon giocatore di squadra ed ha una
profon-da conoscenza dellarchitettura contemporanea. Inoltre,
Andrea ha eccellenti capacit nella mo-dellazione e nellarchitettura
parametrica.Andrea produce disegni architettonici e modella-zione
3D con diversi programmi, render, piante e gioca un ruolo chiave
nella ricerca architetto-nica e nel progetto.E stato un piacere
lavorare con Andrea, si sempre dedicato con passione a questo
lavoro. La sua unicit e abilit sar sicuramente una preziosa risorsa
per ogni ufficio in cui andr in futuro.
-
0 100 1000 m
A91A12categoria 1989 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2030
Total Passengers 16.117.277 16.956.000 20.406.000 24.500.900
28.750.100 33.684.200 39.219.000 45.368.300 59.172.400International
8.604.084 9.380.000 11.835.500 14.256.900 16.675.100 20.210.500
23.531.400 27.221.000 35.503.400Domestic 7.513.193 7.580.000
8.570.500 10.324.000 12.075.000 13.473.700 15.687.600 18.147.300
23.669.000
Peak Month 1.586.823 1.720.633 2.070.727 2.494.380 2.917.456
3.418.150 3.979.802 4.603.810 6.004.600International 907.182
1.035.957 1.307.151 1.574.578 1.841.652 2.232.113 2.598.884
3.006.375 3.921.110Domestic 744.630 771.796 872.649 1.051.191
1.229.478 1.371.894 1.597.313 1.847.760 2.409.380
Average Day 52.894 57.354 69.024 83.146 97.248 113.938 132.661
153.460 200.153International 30.239 33.418 42.166 50.793 59.408
72.000 88.835 96.980 126.487Domestic 24.821 25.726 29.088 35.040
40.983 45.730 53.244 61.592 80.313
Peak Hour 5.625 5.941 7.149 8.612 10.073 11.802 13.741
Peak Hour 13.741
15.895 17.600International 4.175 3.967 5.006 6.030 7.052 8.547
9.952 11.512 15.000Domestic 2.917 2.864 3.238 3.901 4.562 5.091
5.927 6.856 8.170
Total Operations 165.179 157.000 175.400 199.200 216.600 241.200
273.000 294.200 354.600International 79.861 77.200 94.400 106.000
111.200 116.800 126.600 134.000 169.000Domestic 85.318 80.900
81.000 93.200 105.400 124.400 146.400 160.200 185.600
Peak Month 15.105 14.444 16.137 18.326 19.927 22.190 25.116
27.066 32.623
Average Day 503 465 520 591 643 716 810 873 1.052
Peak Hour 43 43 47 54 58 65 74 79 95Arrivals 23 25 28 32 34 38
44 47 56Departures 25 28 30 35 37 42 47 51 61
IATAA B C
CHECK-IN 1,8 1,6 1,4WAIT 2,7 2,3 1,9
HOLD ROOM 1,4 1,2 1BAG CLAIM AREA 2 1,8 1,6GOV INSPECTION 1,4
1,2 1,2
A B C
CHECK-IN 24.734 21.986 19.237WAIT 37.101 31.604 26.108
HOLD ROOM 19.237 16.489 13.741BAG CLAIM AREA 27.482 24.734
21.986GOV INSPECTION 19.237 16.489 16.489
seat range AEF (2) X (4) average seat Airline Other Public
Services
ATO Concession TunnelsRestaurant StairsFood&beverage
Restroom Store
Baggage
OperationalAdministration
Airport - Exits Electrical
Miscellaneus
38% 17% 30% 15%125.318 56.063 98.935 49.468
Airport Terminal Facilities Area [mq]
1
Airline counters frontage/check-in (see at-tachment), AEF 29.5,
length of linear counter 170, width area = 2,15 m required area 170
x 2,15
365,50
2Airline Ticket Office (ATO) and Support Space (see
attachment)
3.600,00
3Lobby and Ticketing, area of graph = 12000 ticket counter =
11.634,00
4Lobby Waiting Area (see attachment), seat-ing for up to 25% at
peak hours = seating for 3460 passenger/hour
7.940,00
5 Departure Lounge, (see AEF), area needed 7.580,00
6 Outbound Baggage Room, (see attachment) 2.500,00
7
Inbound Baggage Claim, (see attachment), 27% arrival = 55 AEF x
0,27 = 15 AEF, estimated that 70% passenger ame at first 20 minutes
= 15 x 70 % = 10,5 AEF, required 200 m long for baggage claim area,
baggage claim type D
1.200,00
8Food and Beverage, 58% x 36000000 (annual passenger), (see
attachment) with usage fac-tor of 40%
30.000,00
9Airline Operations and Support Areas, 2 x ATO area
7.200,00
10 Other Airline Space, 20% x poin no. 9 1.440,00
11
Lobby Bag Claim, estimates of 2 pick-up pas-senger/passenger + 1
passenger (3 people), estimated waiting time average was 30
min-utes, area needed 1.8 m/passenger and 27% of arrival peak flow
= 3 x 1,8 m x 0,5 jam x 0,27 x 13741
10.017,00
12 Other Concessions and Terminal Services, 58% x 36000000
(annual passenger)
20.000,00
13 Other rental areas, 50% of poin 12 10.000,00
14 Other Circulation Areas, 0,7 x (total item 1,2,5,6,7,9,10) x
2
33.439,70
Subtotal 1 146.916,20
Subtotal 2 (sub 1 x 2 Terminal) 293.832,40
15 Area Mekanikal = 15% x subtotal 1 44074,86
Subtotal 2 337.907,26
16 Struktur = 10% x subtotal 2 33790,7311758,00
TOTAL [mq] 371.698,00
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Airbus A 380 6 555-853 5 30 750 4500Airbus A 350 6 314-366 3 18
340 2040Airbus A 320 15 220 -280 2,4 36 250 3750Boeng 747-400 5
300-420 3,5 17,5 380 1900Boeng 737-300 20 90-110 1 20 100 2000
52 121,5 14190
Gross Area 24 mq /pak hour 329784 mq
74 mov/h
Administration
Connessioni da e per laeroporto
Bowling
Affitto camere
Servizio doccia
Biblioteca
Beauty center
Cinema
Ristorante/fastfood
Bar
Toilette
Tapis roulant
Ascensore
Scala mobile
ArriviPartenzeBusinessServizi
Legenda
Check-in e bag drop
Uffici
Sale dattesa
Immigrazione
Bigliettera e Infopoint
Controllo biglietti
Controllo valigie
Ritiro bagagli
Smistamento bagagli
Carico scarico bagagli
The question of structural morphology in our time is face from
architect and engineer in an innovative way, the application of
computational software helps to solve ever more complex problems.
Engineer community of 50 years ago knew that the use of classic
analysis method offered extremely limited tools for the study of
mechanical behaviour and consequently its was necessary to add to
mathematical analysis lot of years of experience. Empiricism play a
key role in design, when you think to Gaud, and his Sagrada
Familia, or Musumeci who used incredible strategies (such as bubble
blower) to control the form.Following the path traced by the work
of architect Arata Isozaki, and especially his collaboration with
Mutsuro Sasaki in the project of railway station of Florence and
the national convention centre in Qatar, I tried to use the same
principles of topology optimization in a large scale project. The
task was to enforce the Extended Evolutionary Structure
Optimi-zation (ESO) principles used on the projects mentioned above
to design the airport of Fiumicino north, in Rome (Italy), order to
do this I used a Grasshopper, and therefore a Rhino plug-in called
Millipede.Millipede is a Grasshopper component focusing on the
analysis and optimization of structures. At the core of this
component is a library of very fast structural analysis algorithms
for linear elastic systems. The library contains its own
optimization algorithms based on topology optimization; the
plug-in, developed by Sawapan (Kaijima Sawako and Michalatos
Pa-nagiotis) allows to process very interesting solutions to
complex structural problems.The result is an indefinite unique
shape, a kind of cave that surrounds passengers from the entrance
to the flight interface.
Strctural optimization with millipede
M.Arch ThesisInternational AirportRome2014
What
WhereWhenWho
-
0 100 1000 m
A91A12categoria 1989 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2030
Total Passengers 16.117.277 16.956.000 20.406.000 24.500.900
28.750.100 33.684.200 39.219.000 45.368.300 59.172.400International
8.604.084 9.380.000 11.835.500 14.256.900 16.675.100 20.210.500
23.531.400 27.221.000 35.503.400Domestic 7.513.193 7.580.000
8.570.500 10.324.000 12.075.000 13.473.700 15.687.600 18.147.300
23.669.000
Peak Month 1.586.823 1.720.633 2.070.727 2.494.380 2.917.456
3.418.150 3.979.802 4.603.810 6.004.600International 907.182
1.035.957 1.307.151 1.574.578 1.841.652 2.232.113 2.598.884
3.006.375 3.921.110Domestic 744.630 771.796 872.649 1.051.191
1.229.478 1.371.894 1.597.313 1.847.760 2.409.380
Average Day 52.894 57.354 69.024 83.146 97.248 113.938 132.661
153.460 200.153International 30.239 33.418 42.166 50.793 59.408
72.000 88.835 96.980 126.487Domestic 24.821 25.726 29.088 35.040
40.983 45.730 53.244 61.592 80.313
Peak Hour 5.625 5.941 7.149 8.612 10.073 11.802 13.741
Peak Hour 13.741
15.895 17.600International 4.175 3.967 5.006 6.030 7.052 8.547
9.952 11.512 15.000Domestic 2.917 2.864 3.238 3.901 4.562 5.091
5.927 6.856 8.170
Total Operations 165.179 157.000 175.400 199.200 216.600 241.200
273.000 294.200 354.600International 79.861 77.200 94.400 106.000
111.200 116.800 126.600 134.000 169.000Domestic 85.318 80.900
81.000 93.200 105.400 124.400 146.400 160.200 185.600
Peak Month 15.105 14.444 16.137 18.326 19.927 22.190 25.116
27.066 32.623
Average Day 503 465 520 591 643 716 810 873 1.052
Peak Hour 43 43 47 54 58 65 74 79 95Arrivals 23 25 28 32 34 38
44 47 56Departures 25 28 30 35 37 42 47 51 61
IATAA B C
CHECK-IN 1,8 1,6 1,4WAIT 2,7 2,3 1,9
HOLD ROOM 1,4 1,2 1BAG CLAIM AREA 2 1,8 1,6GOV INSPECTION 1,4
1,2 1,2
A B C
CHECK-IN 24.734 21.986 19.237WAIT 37.101 31.604 26.108
HOLD ROOM 19.237 16.489 13.741BAG CLAIM AREA 27.482 24.734
21.986GOV INSPECTION 19.237 16.489 16.489
seat range AEF (2) X (4) average seat Airline Other Public
Services
ATO Concession TunnelsRestaurant StairsFood&beverage
Restroom Store
Baggage
OperationalAdministration
Airport - Exits Electrical
Miscellaneus
38% 17% 30% 15%125.318 56.063 98.935 49.468
Airport Terminal Facilities Area [mq]
1
Airline counters frontage/check-in (see at-tachment), AEF 29.5,
length of linear counter 170, width area = 2,15 m required area 170
x 2,15
365,50
2Airline Ticket Office (ATO) and Support Space (see
attachment)
3.600,00
3Lobby and Ticketing, area of graph = 12000 ticket counter =
11.634,00
4Lobby Waiting Area (see attachment), seat-ing for up to 25% at
peak hours = seating for 3460 passenger/hour
7.940,00
5 Departure Lounge, (see AEF), area needed 7.580,00
6 Outbound Baggage Room, (see attachment) 2.500,00
7
Inbound Baggage Claim, (see attachment), 27% arrival = 55 AEF x
0,27 = 15 AEF, estimated that 70% passenger ame at first 20 minutes
= 15 x 70 % = 10,5 AEF, required 200 m long for baggage claim area,
baggage claim type D
1.200,00
8Food and Beverage, 58% x 36000000 (annual passenger), (see
attachment) with usage fac-tor of 40%
30.000,00
9Airline Operations and Support Areas, 2 x ATO area
7.200,00
10 Other Airline Space, 20% x poin no. 9 1.440,00
11
Lobby Bag Claim, estimates of 2 pick-up pas-senger/passenger + 1
passenger (3 people), estimated waiting time average was 30
min-utes, area needed 1.8 m/passenger and 27% of arrival peak flow
= 3 x 1,8 m x 0,5 jam x 0,27 x 13741
10.017,00
12 Other Concessions and Terminal Services, 58% x 36000000
(annual passenger)
20.000,00
13 Other rental areas, 50% of poin 12 10.000,00
14 Other Circulation Areas, 0,7 x (total item 1,2,5,6,7,9,10) x
2
33.439,70
Subtotal 1 146.916,20
Subtotal 2 (sub 1 x 2 Terminal) 293.832,40
15 Area Mekanikal = 15% x subtotal 1 44074,86
Subtotal 2 337.907,26
16 Struktur = 10% x subtotal 2 33790,7311758,00
TOTAL [mq] 371.698,00
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Airbus A 380 6 555-853 5 30 750 4500Airbus A 350 6 314-366 3 18
340 2040Airbus A 320 15 220 -280 2,4 36 250 3750Boeng 747-400 5
300-420 3,5 17,5 380 1900Boeng 737-300 20 90-110 1 20 100 2000
52 121,5 14190
Gross Area 24 mq /pak hour 329784 mq
74 mov/h
Administration
Connessioni da e per laeroporto
Bowling
Affitto camere
Servizio doccia
Biblioteca
Beauty center
Cinema
Ristorante/fastfood
Bar
Toilette
Tapis roulant
Ascensore
Scala mobile
ArriviPartenzeBusinessServizi
Legenda
Check-in e bag drop
Uffici
Sale dattesa
Immigrazione
Bigliettera e Infopoint
Controllo biglietti
Controllo valigie
Ritiro bagagli
Smistamento bagagli
Carico scarico bagagli
Strctural optimization with millipede
-
- 7.0 m
+ 0.0 m
+ 6.0 m
+ 10.0 m
+ 20.0 m
0 10 100 m
Sezione A-A
- 7.0 m
+ 0.0 m
+ 6.0 m
+ 10.0 m
+ 20.0 m
0 10 100 m
Sezione A-A
-
- 7.0 m
+ 0.0 m
+ 6.0 m
+ 10.0 m
+ 20.0 m
0 10 100 m
Sezione A-A
- 7.0 m
+ 0.0 m
+ 6.0 m
+ 10.0 m
+ 20.0 m
0 10 100 m
Sezione A-A
- 7.0 m
+ 0.0 m
+ 6.0 m
+ 10.0 m
+ 20.0 m
0 10 100 m
Sezione A-A
-
Social HousingWood | 70 apartments
Genova2012Marzia pellegrini; Gianluca Frezza; Fabio Cancellieri;
Fenu Maragiovanna
What
WhereWhenWho
-
ApartmentsGenova2012
WhatWhereYear
-
Masterplan Segrate (MI)Milan2013MXM ArchitetturaMauro Marsullo,
Barbara Zuccarello,
Simone Perrone
What
WhereWhenWho
-
Guggenheim Helsinki CompetitionMilan2014Global Planning
AssociatesLuca Vigliero, Emanuela Bartolini,
Michela Galimberti, Corrado Lazzari
What
WhereWhenWho
-
Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in Helsinki: A Cultural Drive
through art, entertainment and knowledge.The history of Solomon R.
Guggenheims Museum is made by love and passion for knowledge. Any
foundation, museums and collectors have been able to drive with
such as passion and devotion, a way of training and culture through
art like Guggenheim. The extraordinary figure of Peggy Guggenheim
and her travels to the di-scovery knowledge through art, can be
compared to the great journey led by Ferdinando Magellano,
Cristoforo Colombo and Neil Armstrong 2 The contribution of these
figures have brought knowledge and culture to the present day and
beyond. The new Guggenheim Museum in Helsinki redrawing the
geography of the Founda-tion, bringing a new piece of knowledge in
the city of Helsinki; knowledges journey goes to the north, as
never been done before. The Guggenheims identity, his prestige,
what is in our modern culture, combined with the tradition and
culture of the Norths country and Finland, establish a trigger for
new opportunities of learning and knowledge. The new museum has
been desi-gned as landscape within the city of Helsinki where,
through an architectural space proposed as Cultural Drive 3, offers
to the city a public path as continua-tion of urban walking and
opportunity to experien-
ce the museum without necessarily pay a ticket. The different
access points are all merged into the Great Hall where ticket
office, shops, cafes and a space for artworks offers a new public
destination with many opportunities to meet, network and
entertainment. The Great Hall hosts a series of ramps that lead to
the various floors, where visitors makes their Cultural Drive
through exhibition as Experience4 more than a typical museums
journey. The exhibition rooms offers to the visitor a panorama view
overlooking the harbor and the city to ensuring the continuity
between urban space and museum while two asymmetrical cores offers
facilities and logistic services. The two middle volu-mes hosts the
permanent collections and the main faci-lities while the workshop
spaces, the multifunctional and the art storage are placed in the
south volume; the idea is to reveal and show, through a series of
common areas, the process of art: from the storage till to creation
of an artwork. The proposal Solomon R. Gug-genheim Museum in
Helsinki is an intensive space where arts, entertainment and
knowledge lead new opportunity and innovation for Helsinki and for
the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation.
-
Social HousingMilan2014Brugnara & Sidoti Architecture
WhatWhereWhenWho
-
|| 2.1Iteration
Standard Parameters
|| 2.2 Iteration after 1st strands
re-import strands bundling >
|| 2.3Strands Bundlingagent strenght >
strenght separation >scale
min 2 min 5 10 min
|| 3.1Iteration
standard Parameters > agent positions ( on > ( the vector
attractors
|| 3.2Iteration
Agent Scale >Max Force
|| 3.3Import the 3.1 strands
Strands Bundling agent strand cohesion >
scale
min 1 min 5 min 10|| 3 Wireframe Surface
Screenshot
2 || Wireframe Surface
Screenshot
Processing|Rhino|MayaWorkshopHelsinki2012 Tutor Roland
Snooks
What
WhereWhenWho
-
(Milled surface (mesh from Maya
Laboratory, images of the process
Final models
-
Workshop CompetitionPrague2013Tutor T. Hosmer, C. Balmond
WhatWhereWhenWho
-
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
