Upload
rollin
View
62
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Absolute nuclear charge radii for elements without stable isotopes via precision x-ray spectroscopy of lithium-like ions. Andrew Senchuk, Gerald Gwinner, Khodr Shamseddine 2014 CAP Congress Sudbury, ON June 17, 2014. 1. Motivation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
6/17/2014 1
Absolute nuclear charge radii for elements without stable isotopes via
precision x-ray spectroscopy of lithium-like ions
Andrew Senchuk, Gerald Gwinner, Khodr Shamseddine
2014 CAP CongressSudbury, ON
June 17, 2014
6/17/2014 2
Motivation
• currently no method to experimentally determine the absolute charge radius of nuclei for elements that have no stable or extremely long-lived isotope:
• The standard methods, require macroscopic amounts of the isotope
• for nuclei with charge Z > 83, (except uranium), no experimental data for the absolute nuclear charge radius.
6/17/2014 3
Importance of Experimentally Determined Nuclear Charge Radii
• Fr, Rd, Ra (without stable isotopes): candidates for fundamental symmetry tests searches for physics beyond the Standard Model: permanent electric dipole moments and atomic parity non-conservation
For these precision measurements, nuclear charge radius information is vital.
2)1)(1(
02
2
2
)1)(12(
)3(),(
Z
r a
RZ
ZRZK
[Bouchiat, 1974]
),())(1))((1(22
),(
'
'
2
2/12/1
RZKNZQZG
pnVsn
rnnwF
PNC
relativistic fns correction
6/17/2014 4
State of the Art in Stable ElementsIn heavy, Li-like ions, the 2s-2p transitions can now be measured and
calculated to better than 100 meV.
Experiments: Beiersdorfer et al. [1,2]
E = 2788.139 ± 0.039 eVE = 280.645 ± 0.015 eV
Bi 80+, (2p3/2 - 2s)
U 89+, (2p1/2 - 2s)
Theory: Yerohkin et al. [3]
Bi 80+, (2p3/2 - 2s): 2788.12 ± 0.07 eVU 89+, (2p1/2 - 2s): 280.76 ± 0.14 eV
Conclusion: Measurements, together with known nuclear charge radii (Z < 84, Z = 92) verify QED calculations
6/17/2014 5
Experiments on Elements without Stable Isotopes
Proposal: Turn this scheme around, now that QED is verified:
Challenge: All contributions (Dirac value, photon exchange, QED) are nuclear-size sensitive and must all be evaluated as a function of Z and R (nuclear charge radius).
6/17/2014 6
6/17/2014 7
"Dirac" Value
]/)exp[(1)( 0
acrr
Solve Dirac equation for H-like ion including a finite nuclear charge distribution (Fermi):
(r) E= (r)(r))V + m + p̂ . ( C
http://pms.iitk.ernet.in/wiki/images/Akjain13.png
Evaluate numerically via "RADIAL" (Fortran) [4]
In Bismuth: EN (2s-2p3/2, 5.52 fm) ~ 10 eV
6/17/2014 8
One-loop QEDNumerically evaluate nuclear size corrections to self-energy (a) and vacuum polarization (b) Furry picture
Formulas expressed as expansions in Z and R and are a function of "Dirac" nuclear-size correction
"Dirac" FNS correctionZ, , R expansions
ljnlnljnE NPVNSE ,,G,,E = ,, NSE/NPV21
N/
For G ~ 1, ENSE/NPV comes in as 1/400 the "Dirac" value.
In Bismuth: EN (2s, 5.52 fm) ~ 10 eV and GNSE, NVP ~ 10, 9
ENSE, NVP ~ 250, 225 meV want 1-2% accuracy for G
6/17/2014 9
One-photon Exchange
Finite nuclear size enters through the electron wavefunction and state energies
Work in Furry picture QED [6]:
photon-exchange integral (a), separates into a Coulomb photon term (c), and a transverse photon part (d) [6]
In Bismuth (R = 5.52 fm), finite nuclear size contributes a ~ 9 eV difference wrt a point nucleus in 2s-2p transition
6/17/2014 10
One-photon Exchange
Finite nuclear size enters through the electron wavefunction and state energies
Work in Furry picture QED [6]:counter-term cancelled by corresponding term in self-energy
photon-exchange integral (a), separates into a Coulomb photon term (c), and a transverse photon part (d) [6]
In Bismuth (R = 5.52 fm), finite nuclear size contributes a ~ 9 eV difference wrt a point nucleus
6/17/2014 11
Estimates for Francium (Z=87)
For francium (Z=87), the finite nuclear size (R ≈ 5fm) shifts the transition by around ΔE ≈ 25 eV, and the shift is quadratic in R. From this we get a sensitivity of
ΔE/ΔR ≈ 10 eV/fm.
If the combined uncertainty of the measurement and the the QED calculation is 100 meV, the nuclear charge radius can be determined to 1/100 fm, or 0.2%
6/17/2014 12
Future Work - Outlook
Experimental Implementation: EBIT/S devices coupled to radioactive beam facilities available (TITAN-EBIT at ISAC, REXEBIS at ISOLDE, ReA EBIT,
NSCL) and more are coming online (e.g. CANREB/TRIUMF).
Challenges:Li-like breeding at Z > 83, good optical access for x-ray spectrometer.
None of the current on-line breeders achieve the 100 keV e-beams used for Bi80+ by Beiersdorfer et al.
6/17/2014 13
References:
[1] Beiersdorfer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3022 (1998)
[2] Beiersdorfer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 233003 (2005)
[3] Yerokhin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 253004 (2006)
[4] Salvat et al., Comp. Phys. Commun. 90, 151 (1995)
[5] Yerokhin, Phys. Rev. A 83, 012507 (2011)
[6] Sapirstein et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 022502 (2001)
Financial support by NSERC (Canada) and the University of Manitoba(A.S. acknowledges support by the Faculty of Science and a University ofManitoba Graduate Fellowship)