Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Annexure – II
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth. N. Sangma
Teaching: Core Papers II (Educational Psychology and Statistics)
Paper IV (Educational Technology and Management)
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the
day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:
Qs
Dr. (Mrs.) R. N. Sangma (87)
A % B % C % D %
1 64 73.56 18 20.69 5 5.75 0.00
2 46 52.87 36 41.38 5 5.75 0.00
3 66 75.86 15 17.24 6 6.90 0.00
4 54 62.07 24 27.59 9 10.34 0.00
5 48 55.17 31 35.63 8 9.20 0.00
6 56 64.37 23 26.44 8 9.20 0.00
7 40 45.98 30 34.48 17 19.54 0.00
8 51 58.62 26 29.89 10 11.49 0.00
9 58 66.67 24 27.59 5 5.75 0.00
10 58 66.67 24 27.59 5 5.75 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
66.67
27.59
5.75 0.00
Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth N. Sangma
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Ms. Dianghun Shullai
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Khasi
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken
Khasi as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
Ms. D. Shullai (33)
A % B % C % D %
1 24 72.73 8 24.24 1 3.03 0.00
2 20 60.61 12 36.36 1 3.03 0.00
3 20 60.61 10 30.30 3 9.09 0.00
4 22 66.67 9 27.27 2 6.06 0.00
5 19 57.58 12 36.36 2 6.06 0.00
6 17 51.52 11 33.33 5 15.15 0.00
7 16 48.48 14 42.42 3 9.09 0.00
8 16 48.48 11 33.33 6 18.18 0.00
9 23 69.70 9 27.27 1 3.03 0.00
10 23 69.70 8 24.24 2 6.06 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
69.70
24.24
6.06 0.00
Ms. Dianghun Shullai
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Ms. Darihun Kharnongrum
Teaching: Core Paper IV (Educational Technology and Management)
Elective Paper VII (Career Guidance and Counselling )
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the
day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:
Qs
Ms. D. Kharnongrum (92)
A % B % C % D %
1 56 60.87 28 30.43 8 8.70 0.00
2 46 50.00 38 41.30 8 8.70 0.00
3 47 51.09 29 31.52 12 13.04 4 4.35
4 39 42.39 32 34.78 18 19.57 3 3.26
5 39 42.39 39 42.39 11 11.96 3 3.26
6 42 45.65 29 31.52 15 16.30 6 6.52
7 38 41.30 33 35.87 15 16.30 6 6.52
8 37 40.22 30 32.61 20 21.74 5 5.43
9 42 45.65 32 34.78 18 19.57 0.00
10 39 42.39 35 38.04 15 16.30 3 3.26
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
42.39 38.04
16.30
3.26
Ms. D. Kharnongrum
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Mrs. Calmy. R. Kharlukhi
Teaching: Elective Paper VII (Environmental Education) and Methodology of Teaching of Physical
Science and Life Science
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the
day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:
Qs
Mrs. C. Kharlukhi (90)
A % B % C % D %
1 66 73.33 22 24.44 2 2.22 0.00
2 62 68.89 20 22.22 8 8.89 0.00
3 57 63.33 26 28.89 7 7.78 0.00
4 51 56.67 32 35.56 7 7.78 0.00
5 49 54.44 35 38.89 5 5.56 1 1.11
6 49 54.44 30 33.33 10 11.11 1 1.11
7 41 45.56 30 33.33 18 20.00 1 1.11
8 47 52.22 28 31.11 15 16.67 0.00
9 61 67.78 23 25.56 6 6.67 0.00
10 53 58.89 32 35.56 5 5.56 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
58.89
35.56
5.56 0.00
Mrs. Calmy Kharlukhi
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Ms. Alfa Mary Kurbah
Teaching: Core Paper III - Development of Educational System in India
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the
day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:
Qs
Ms. A. Kurbah (90)
A % B % C % D %
1 81 90.00 9 10.00 0.00 0.00
2 72 80.00 17 18.89 1 1.11 0.00
3 79 87.78 11 12.22 0.00 0.00
4 74 82.22 14 15.56 2 2.22 0.00
5 65 72.22 20 22.22 5 5.56 0.00
6 59 65.56 27 30.00 4 4.44 0.00
7 61 67.78 25 27.78 4 4.44 0.00
8 59 65.56 30 33.33 1 1.11 0.00
9 70 77.78 17 18.89 3 3.33 0.00
10 73 81.11 15 16.67 2 2.22 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
81.11
16.67
2.22 0.00
Ms. Alfa Mary Kurbah
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Mrs. Inrilin Marwein
Teaching: Core Papers II (Educational Psychology and Statistics), Elective Paper VII (Computer) and
Methodology of Teaching of History and Social Studies
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the
day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:
Qs
Mrs. I. Marwein (91)
A % B % C % D %
1 63 69.23 22 24.18 6 6.59 0.00
2 60 65.93 23 25.27 7 7.69 0.00
3 41 45.05 41 45.05 8 8.79 1 1.10
4 55 60.44 32 35.16 4 4.40 0.00
5 41 45.05 41 45.05 8 8.79 1 1.10
6 33 36.26 42 46.15 15 16.48 1 1.10
7 22 24.18 48 52.75 21 23.08 0.00
8 34 37.36 35 38.46 20 21.98 2 2.20
9 52 57.14 31 34.07 7 7.69 1 1.10
10 41 45.05 39 42.86 10 10.99 1 1.10
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory
45.05 42.86
10.99
1.10
Mrs. Inrilin Marwein
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Dr. (Mrs.) Sutapa Sengupta
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Geography (Part-Time)
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken
Geography as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
Dr. (Mrs.) S. Sengupta (7)
A % B % C % D %
1 5 71.43 2 28.57 0.00 0.00
2 2 28.57 4 57.14 1 14.29 0.00
3 1 14.29 3 42.86 3 42.86 0.00
4 1 14.29 2 28.57 4 57.14 0.00
5 1 14.29 6 85.71 0.00 0.00
6 0.00 2 28.57 3 42.86 2 28.57
7 1 14.29 3 42.86 2 28.57 1 14.29
8 2 28.57 4 57.14 0.00 1 14.29
9 2 28.57 5 71.43 0.00 0.00
10 1 14.29 6 85.71 0.00 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory
14.29
85.71
0.00 0.00
Dr. (Mrs.) Sutapa Sengupta
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Dr. (Ms.) Jaya. G. Choudhury
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Mathematics (Part-Time)
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken
Mathematics as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
Dr. (Ms) J. Choudhury (4)
A % B % C % D %
1 4 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 3 75.00 1 25.00 0.00 0.00
3 3 75.00 1 25.00 0.00 0.00
4 2 50.00 1 25.00 1 25.00 0.00
5 1 25.00 3 75.00 0.00 0.00
6 1 25.00 1 25.00 2 50.00 0.00
7 2 50.00 2 50.00 0.00 0.00
8 1 25.00 3 75.00 0.00 0.00
9 1 25.00 2 50.00 1 25.00 0.00
10 1 25.00 3 75.00 0.00 0.00
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
25.00
75.00
0.00 0.00
Dr. (Ms.) Jaya G. Choudhury
STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013
Mrs. Sharmistha Purkayastha
Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of English (Part-Time)
The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken
English as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:
Qs
Mrs. S. Purkayastha (15)
A % B % C % D %
1 11 73.33 3 20.00 1 6.67 0.00
2 13 86.67 0.00 2 13.33 0.00
3 11 73.33 3 20.00 0.00 1 6.67
4 7 46.67 7 46.67 0.00 1 6.67
5 8 53.33 4 26.67 3 20.00 0.00
6 7 46.67 3 20.00 4 26.67 1 6.67
7 5 33.33 8 53.33 1 6.67 1 6.67
8 7 46.67 6 40.00 1 6.67 1 6.67
9 9 60.00 2 13.33 3 20.00 1 6.67
10 9 60.00 5 33.33 0.00 1 6.67
The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:
Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory
60.00
33.33
0.00
6.67
Mrs. Sharmistha Purkayastha
Feedback from the Alumni:
Through meetings held with the Alumni, they realised that the course conducted by the college has
brought tremendous change in the field of teaching profession for their career. They appreciated the
dedication and hard work of the teachers and the management as a whole. They realised that the
training programme has equipped them well to face classroom challenges. Their sense of appreciation
is identified with their readiness to organise and participate in different activities of the college both
scholastic and co-scholastic.
The testimonies of appreciation can be understood from their expression: “I have learned from SMCTE
that teaching is not a mere job but true vocation”. “I have learned to improve my teaching skill in
SMCTE”. “SMCTE taught me to teach effectively”. “SMCTE has taught me to unearth the hidden
capabilities within myself”. “SMCTE has prepared me to face the modern students with the help of
technology”.
Feedback from Parents:
Through parents meeting, the college could gather a sense of appreciation for the college in promoting
quality education, and the efforts made to cater to the needs and interests of each and every individual
student.
Feedback from Employers:
The employers of the college highly appreciated the services rendered by the teaching and non-
teaching staff. Their dedication to their work is unquestionable.