Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
local development framework
Annual MonitoringReport 2013
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
ROYAL BOROUGH OF KINGSTON UPON THAMES
December 2013
31 Executive Summary
52 Introduction
73 Borough Context
94 Progress on Kingston's LDF
185 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators18Housing and Affordability33Retail and Town Centres37Economy and Employment40Other Themes
536 Future Development
Appendices
70Appendix 1: Core Strategy and Waste Plan Indicators
73Appendix 2: K+20 Indicators
75Appendix 3: Five Year Housing Land Supply
87Appendix 4: Proposals Site Update
90Appendix 5: Glossary
Contents
1 Executive Summary
1.1 This Annual Monitoring Report (AMR)covers the financial year 1 April 2012to 31 March 2013 and includes a briefcommentary on development activityand planning application trends inChapter 6.
1.2 To reflect the sentiments of theLocalism Act, 2011 and competingpriorities in the Development, Planningand Regeneration Team, the Councilhas taken the decision to further reducethe number of indicators it reports on.This means that it will not report on allindicators currently included in the CoreStrategy, 2012, Kingston Town CentreArea Action Plan, 2008 and JointWaste DPD 2012. It will not report onthose indicators which:
have no easily obtainable datasourceare not of significant local orstrategic importanceare monitored in other Councildocuments
1.3 It should be noted that the indicatorscontained in Core Strategy, 2012superseded all those in the UnitaryDevelopment Plan (UDP), 2005 uponadoption. As such UDP indicators willno longer be monitored.
1.4 In 2012/13 the Borough continues tofare better than other parts of the UK.For example, unemployment rates havecontinued to decrease gradually since2009/10 and remain at about 2%whichdemonstrates an element of stability.However, over the past few years, theaverage economic activity rate hasfluctuated from 76.6% and 68.7%(76.5% in 2013) which suggests thatthe Borough has not been totallyunscathed from the recession.Performance with regard to towncentres has been mixed. In the primary
shopping frontages of Kingston TownCentre vacancy rates are low, and havenot changed since 2011/12. Lowvacancy rates are an indication of goodretail health. Therefore, it is crucial tomaintain these conditions if Kingstonis to continue to attract investment,retain its Metropolitan Town Centrestatus and effectively compete withnewer retail developments such asthose in the pipeline for Croydon. In thethree District Centres vacancy rateshave fluctuated since last year, exceptin New Malden where they haveremained at 5% since 2009/10. Withregards to protecting A1 uses in theDistrict Centres, the targets set out inCore Strategy Policy DM19, have notbeen met, despite those targets beinglower than those set by thesupersesded UDP. None of the DistrictCentres have retained a predominanceof A1 uses in 2012/13.
1.5 A significant amount of employmentland/floorspace remains available,despite a continuing net loss of "B"class uses. This points to a stagnationof investment in this sector, and likethe average economic activity rateindicator, shows that the Borough isexperiencing wider economic structuralchange. Therefore, the results of theEconomic Analysis Studycommissioned in 2013 will be vital ininforming how the Council caneffectively enhance the local economywhilst managing competing pressuresfor future land use.
1.6 Standards of living in the Boroughcontinue to be high. This fact,combined with the Borough’s otherattractive attributes such as higheducational attainment is contributingtowards an increasing population. It ispredicted that the population willcontinue to increase along withincreasing life expectancies.Consequently, there will be increasing
Executive Summary 1
3
need to meet higher housing targets.Nevertheless, housing deliverycontinues to be challenging. Kingstonwas unsuccessful in meeting itsLondon Plan target for new homesover the past monitoring year (29%short of target). The delivery ofaffordable housing was also 72% belowthe London Plan target. This elementof planning policy is of major concern.Therefore, the implementation of CoreStrategy policy and changes to marketconditions needs to be closelymonitored. Should housing delivery andaffordable housing delivery continue tobe unsuccessful, an alternative strategymay be required.
1.7 In other areas, performance regardingcharacter, design and heritage hasbeen consistently good and policieshave remained effective for manyyears. Very little has changed in termsof heritage assets as there have beenno additional Listed Buildings, Buildingsof Townscape Merit or Buildings addedto the Buildings at Risk Register. Thereis also little change to report in termsof environment, sustainability andclimate change as there have been nonew or amended nature reserves, etc.The character of the Borough isprotected by directing developmentaway fromGreen Belt andMetropolitanOpen Land towards land innon-designated sustainable locations.
1 Executive Summary
4
2 Introduction
What is an Annual Monitoring Report?
2.1 An AMR is a policy monitoringdocument which forms part of the suiteof documents that comprise the LocalDevelopment Framework (LDF).
Why produce an Annual MonitoringReport?
2.2 The Council has a statutory obligationto produce a planning monitoringreport. Although the Localism Act 2011and Town and Country Planning (LocalPlanning) (England) Regulations 2012have reduced previous monitoringrequirements for Local PlanningAuthorities, it is now a matter forindividual councils to decide on thecontent of their monitoring reports, aslong as they comply with national andEU legislation. The elements of theLocalism Act 2011 and planningregulations related to monitoring canbe accessed via the links below:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/section/113
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/767/regulation/34/made
2.3 In line with the above centralgovernment directions, the sentimentsof the Localism Act 2011 andcompeting priorities in the LDF andPolicy Team. The Council reports on areduced number of indicatorscompared with previous years. Thismeans that it will not report on all of theindicators currently included in the CoreStrategy (2012), Kingston Town CentreArea Action Plan (K+20) (2008) andJoint Waste DPD (2012). It will notreport on those indicators which:
have no identified data source
are not of significant local orstrategic importanceare monitored in other Councildocuments
What is the purpose of the AnnualMonitoring Report?
2.4 The purpose of an AMR is to reviewthe progress of development activityand the extent to which Local Planpolicies are achieving their objectives.
2.5 Specifically the AMR should:
report progress on the timetableand the stage of each documentin the LDS including reasons forlack of progress where appropriate
report on the adoption of LocalDevelopment Documents (LDDs)including Development PlanDocuments ((DPDs (some ofwhich are now often referred to asLocal Plans)) and SupplementaryPlanning Documents (SPDs)within the monitoring period
indicate any unimplementedpolicies in the Local Plandocuments, giving reasons andthe steps the Council is taking toensure the policy is implemented
provide information on the numberof net additional dwellings andaffordable dwellings completedduring themonitoring report period
provide details of any localdevelopment order orneighbourhood plans made in theBorough
provide information specified inregulation 62(4) of the CommunityInfrastructure Levy Regulationswhich can be accessed via the linkbelow:
Introduction 2
5
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/948/regulation/62/made
provide information on where theCouncil has cooperated with otherlocal planning authorities, CountyCouncil, or bodies and/or personsdescribed under section 33 of theLocalism Act 2011, giving detailsof what actions have been takenduring themonitoring report period
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/section/110
Annual Monitoring Report covering period
2.6 This AMR covers the financial year 1April 2012 to 31 March 2013.
What policy documents and indicatorsdoes the Annual Monitoring Reportreview?
2.7 The documents which are containedwithin Kingston's LDS and theirassociated timelines can be found inChapter 4 - Progress on Kingston'sLDF. With regard to targets, this AMRwill focus on reviewing selectedindicators outlined in the Core Strategy(2012) (Kingston's principaldevelopment plan document), theKingston TownCentre Area Action Plan(K+20) (2008) and the South LondonWaste Plan (2012).
2.8 In Chapter 5 of this AMR, indicators arerated against the previous year'sperformance where possible. Thefollowing system will be used to rateperformance:
Direction Of TravelThis Period Compared To LastPeriod
Good PerformanceIs Typified By:
Results are higherBigger is better
Results are identical
Results are lower
Results are higherSmaller is better
Results are identical
Results are lower
2 Introduction
6
3 Borough Context
3.1 The Royal Borough of Kingston uponThames is situated in south westLondon. It is bordered by the Londonboroughs of Richmond upon Thames,Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth, and
the Surrey districts of Elmbridge, MoleValley, and Epsom and Ewell. In termsof geographical area, the Borough isthe seventh smallest of all LondonBoroughs and covers 38.66km². TheRiver Thames runs along part of thenorth west boundary.
3.2 The Royal Borough of Kingston uponThames comprises sixteen wardswhich combine to form fourneighbourhoods: Kingston Town,Maldens and Coombe, Surbiton andSouth of the Borough.
3.3 For further contextual data, please referto the 2012/13 Borough Profile. Thisdocument covers a range of subjectsincluding: population; housing and
households; ethnicity; deprivation;children and young people; crime;health and social care; local economy;waste; air quality; ecological footprintand transport. The Borough Profile isavailable at the following web address:
www.kingston.gov.uk/downloads/download/121/borough_profile
Borough Context 3
7
Kingston's Key Statistics
Population: 163,900 – (ONS, 2012 mid year estimate)
Unemployment Rate (residents claiming Jobseekers' Allowance):
RBK - 2.2%Greater London average – 5.4%(GLA, June 2013)
Average House Price: £337,285 (Land Registry May 2013)
% of pupils at RBK Secondary Schools attaining 5 or more grades A*- C atGCSE: (including English and maths) = 70% (DfE 2012)
20 Indices of Deprivation Rank: 264th out of 354 nationally. (1=most deprived,354=least deprived (DCLG 2010))
Crime and Safety: 4th Safest Borough in London based on all recorded offences(Metropolitan Police, April 2012)
3 Borough Context
8
4 Progress on Kingston's LDF
Planning System Overview
4.1 The Localism Act 2011 sought todecentralise many governmentalpowers and transfer them toindividuals, communities and localcouncils. Rather than an emphasis ona target driven planningdecision-making process, localcommunities are now beingincentivised to become involved inencouraging sustainable developmentin their area.
National and Regional Developments
4.2 The National Planning PolicyFramework (NPPF) was published inMarch 2012, thereby superseding allPlanning Policy Statements (PPSs) andPlanning Policy Guidance (PPGs).
4.3 Some of the decentralised powersintroduced by the Localism Act 2011have direct implications for the planningsystem. These can be found in Part 6of the Act comprising seven chapters:
Chapter 1 – Plans and StrategiesChapter 2 – CommunityInfrastructure LevyChapter 3 – NeighbourhoodPlanningChapter 4 – ConsultationChapter 5 – EnforcementChapter 6 - Nationally SignificantInfrastructure ProjectsChapter 7 - Other planningmatters
4.4 In summary, the main planningprovisions of the Act are:
the abolition of Regional SpatialStrategies (RSSs), although theLondon Plan is exempt from thisdirection and remains as theregional tier of planning policy forLondon
the devolution of executive powersover housing investment from theHomes and Communities Agency(HCA) to the Greater LondonAuthority (GLA)the abolition of the LondonDevelopment Agency (LDA)new powers for the Mayor ofLondon to create MajorDevelopment Corporations tofocus regeneration where it is mostneeded, e.g. help secure London’sOlympic legacymore control for Boroughs overmajor planning applications, i.e.the London Mayor will onlycomment on the largest planningapplicationsabolition of the InfrastructurePlanning Commission to bereplaced by a Major InfrastructurePlanning Unit within the PlanningInspectorateretention of the CommunityInfrastructure Levy (CIL) butamended so that Councils cancharge developers to pay forinfrastructure. The Act alsoenables some funds to be passedthrough to the local communitywhere development has takenplaceremoval of the requirement to takeaccount of the Inspector’srecommendations following theExamination of a LDDintroduction of a new tier of spatialplanning in the form ofneighbourhood planning.Neighbourhood plans can beproduced by a recognisedcommunity and approved if theyreceive 50% of the votes cast in areferendumrequirement for prospectivedevelopers to consult communitieswhen submitting major planningapplications
Progress on Kingston's LDF 4
9
4.5 The complete version of the Act canbe accessed via the link below:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/contents
4.6 In addition, the Town and CountryPlanning (Local Planning) (England)Regulations 2012 came into force inApril 2012 and served to update certainelements of the Planning andCompulsory Purchase Act 2004. Thecomplete version of the Act can befound via the link below:
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/767/contents/made
4.7 In 2013, significant changes weremade to legislation regarding permitteddevelopment rights. In January, theDepartment for Communities and LocalGovernment (DCLG) proposedalterations to the Town and CountryPlanning (General PermittedDevelopment) Order 1995, asamended through the Town andCountry Planning (General PermittedDevelopment) (Amendment) (England)Order 2013, to allow offices to changeuse to residential use. Local authoritiesacross England were given theopportunity to apply for exemptions tothese proposals by defining andjustifying areas within their remit if theybelieved that:
there would be loss to a nationallysignificant area of economicactivity; and/or,there would be substantial adverseeconomic consequences at thelocal authority level which are notoffset by the positive benefits thenew rights would bring.
4.8 Kingston applied for exemption statusfor three areas (under the second ofthe above criteria) covering theKingston Town Centre Area,Chessington Industrial Estate and
Barwell Business Park, however theapplication was rejected. As such, from30 May 2013 changes to permitteddevelopment rights apply across theBorough. Since that time to October2013, approximately 30 priornotification applications have beenreceived.
4.9 In August 2013, DCLG consulted localauthorities on further proposals toextend permitted development rights,and give greater flexibility for changesof use. These proposals covered thefive following areas:
to create a permitted developmentright to assist change of use andthe associated physical works froman existing building used as asmall shop or provider ofprofessional services (A1 and A2uses) to residential use (C3);to create a permitted developmentright to enable retail use (A1) tochange to a bank or buildingsociety;to create a permitted developmentright to assist change of use andthe associated physical works fromexisting buildings used foragricultural purposes to change ofuse to residential (C3);to extend the permitteddevelopment rights for premisesused as offices (B1), hotels (C1),residential (C2 and C2A),non-residential institutions (D1)and leisure and assembly (D2) tochange use to a state fundedschool, to also be able to changeto nurseries providing childcare;and,to create a permitted developmentright to allow a building used foragricultural purposes of up to500m2 to be used as a new stateschool or nursery providingchildcare.
4 Progress on Kingston's LDF
10
4.10 The Council is very concerned aboutthese proposals and has objected tothem for the following main reasons:
the negative impact on the vitalityand viability of town centres at allscales in the retail hierarchy; andundermining the Council’s abilityto meet local retail and serviceneeds as well as achievesustainable communities;the negative visual impact onheritage, townscape and localcharacter; and,the loss of financial contributionstowards essential infrastructure asproposed changes of use will notbe liable for CIL or S106contributions. This puts furtherpressure on existing school placeswhich are already oversubscribed,thereby leading the Council to putgreater demands on theDepartment of Education forfunding.
4.11 DCLG has not yet confirmed theoutcome of this consultation.
4.12 As outlined above, London has beenexempt from the direction to abolishRSSs. The London Plan remains validregional guidance (adopted on 22 July2011) and in the past monitoring year,the GLA has progressed a number ofSupplementary Planning Guidancedocuments. In 2012 those of mostrelevance to Kingston relate toHousing, Land for Industry andTransport and the All London GreenGrid. In 2013 a draft Town CentresSPG and draft ShapingNeighbourhoods - Play and InformalRecreation SPG were produced.Revised Early Minor Alterations(REMA) of the London Plan have alsobeen adopted.
4.13 Despite the government changesdirected at making the planning systemmore efficient and locally accountable,planning's fundamental operationsremain unchanged. Local authoritiesare still required to preparedevelopment plans and to determineplanning applications in accordancewith the development plan, havingregard to material considerations suchas the impact of development.Neighbourhood Planning has added anew layer of local planning, but it doesnot reduce the general principle of adevelopment plan led planning system.It is worth noting that in Kingston therehas been little interest from thecommunity in producingNeighbourhood Plans compared withother London boroughs.
The Kingston Plan
4.14 Kingston's Sustainable CommunityStrategy (SCS), The Kingston Plan,was adopted in November 2008. It setsout the economic, social, educational,cultural and environmental vision forthe Borough until 2020. The documentwas prepared by the Kingston StrategicPartnership which is made up of anumber of organisations such asKingston University, the Council, theMetropolitan Police, NHS Kingston, thevoluntary sector and business andcommunity groups. The Kingston Planinforms the Local DevelopmentFramework which is the spatialexpression of the Kingston Plan's threecross-cutting themes and tenobjectives, which are:
Theme 1 - A sustainable Kingston- protecting and enhancing ourenvironment for us and futuregenerations
Objective 1 - Tackle climatechange, reduce our ecological
Progress on Kingston's LDF 4
11
footprint and "reduce, reuseand recycle"Objective 2 - Ensure thesustainable development ofour borough and thepromotion of sustainabletransportObjective 3 - Protect andimprove the quality of ourlocal environment
Theme 2 - Prosperous andInclusive - sharing prosperity andopportunity
Objective 4 - Sustain andshare economic prosperityObjective 5 - Raiseeducational standards andclose gaps in attainmentObjective 6 - Increase supplyof housing and its affordability
Theme 3 - Safe, healthy andstrong - preventing problems andpromoting responsibility andindependence
Objective 7 - makecommunities saferObjective 8 - improve overallhealth and reduce healthinequalitiesObjective 9 - support peopleto be independentObjective 10 - encouragepeople to take an active partin the social and cultural lifeof the community
4.15 The LDF and its component documentsconcur with the themes and objectivesset out in the Kingston Plan andcontribute to their achievement.
Kingston's Local Development Scheme
4.16 An LDS is a document which sets outthe timetable for preparing LDDs andforms part of the LDF document suite.
4.17 Kingston's LDS was updated in 2012to coincide with the adoption of theCore Strategy and the LDS 2012/15was approved by the Place andSustainability Committee in April2012. The 2012 Planning Regulationsrequire local authorities to produce aLDS, specifying the titles of local plansor SPDs, their subject matter andscope and the timetable for theirpreparation and revision.
4.18 LDDs (any document in the LDS) whichdo not follow the prescribed preparationstages cannot be described as localplans and may not be referred to in thedetermination of planning applications.
4.19 The following chart sets out the keystages for preparing LDDs. Furtherdetail can be found in the LDSdocument available via the followinglink:
www.kingston.gov.uk/downloads/download/34/local_development_scheme_2012-15
4 Progress on Kingston's LDF
12
RB
Kin
gsto
nup
onTh
ames
Loca
lDev
elop
men
tSch
eme
2012
/15
Sum
mar
yC
hart
–ef
fect
ive
1A
pril
2012
2014
/15
2013
/14
2012
/13
Key
Fina
ncia
lYea
rMar
Feb
Jan
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Month
Dev
elop
men
tPla
nD
ocum
ents
HogsmillValley
GypsyandTravellerSites
CommunityInfrastructureLevy
CoreStrategyReview
KingstonTownCentreAAP(K+20)
Supp
lem
enta
ryPl
anni
ngD
ocum
ents
⌂AffordableHousing
⌂ResidentialDesign
⌂SustainableTransport
⌂ClimateChange
⌂TallBuildingsandKeyViews
⌂PublicRealm
Key
toSt
ages
(with
reco
mm
ende
dPI
NS
timin
g)
Dev
elop
men
tPla
nD
ocum
ent
EvidenceGathering+Preparation
PublicParticipation+SA(2008Regs
25+26,2012Regs19,20+21)
Pre-submissionPublication(2008Regs
27+28,2012Reg20)
SubmissiontotheSecretaryofState
(2008Reg30,2012Reg23)
�IndependentExaminationbyaPlanning
Inspector(2004,reg34,2012Reg25)
●PublicPre-hearingMeeting(Submission
plus8weeks)
?ExaminationinPublic(plus14weeks)
PublicationofEiPInspector'sFinal
Report(submissionplus29weeks)
AdoptionbyCouncil(2004Reg36,2012
Reg27)
Supp
lem
enta
ryPl
anni
ngD
ocum
ent
EvidenceGathering,Stakeholder
Involvement
⌂StakeholderInvolvementStarts
PublicParticipationforRepresentations
(2004Regs17+18,2012Reg13)
AdoptionbyP+S
(2004Reg19,2012
Reg15)
13
4.20 Kingston’s Core Strategy was adoptedby Full Council on the 17th April 2012,and the South LondonWaste Plan wasadopted on the 24th January 2012. Interms of SPDs, three documents havebeen progressed in 2013. These arediscussed in more detail below.
Kingston's Local DevelopmentFramework
4.21 Kingston's LDF comprises the adoptedCore Strategy, the Kingston TownCentre Area Action Plan (K+20), theJoint South London WasteDevelopment Plan Document, the AMRand Supplementary PlanningDocuments (SPDs) such as theStatement of Community Involvement(SCI). The documents are discussedbelow.
4 Progress on Kingston's LDF
14
Core Strategy
4.22 The Core Strategy sets out the vision,objectives and policies for managingfuture growth, change anddevelopment within the Borough for thenext 15 years (up to 2027). Thedocument includes developmentmanagement policies and hassuperseded the policies in the UnitaryDevelopment Plan (2005).
4.23 The Core Strategy includes monitoringand performance indicators and targetsfor each thematic policy area. Thenumber of indicators included has beenreduced. For further information on theCore Strategy please refer to the linkbelow:
www.kingston.gov.uk/info /200207/local_development_framework /275/core_strategy
South London Waste Plan
4.24 In partnership with the neighbouringboroughs of Croydon, Merton andSutton, Kingston jointly produced theSouth LondonWaste Plan (Joint WasteDPD) which was adopted by all theboroughs in early 2012. In 2013, Suttonproduced a Waste AMR for all fourboroughs, covering the years2011-2013. For further information onthe South London Waste DPD and theWaste AMR, please refer to the linksbelow:
www.kingston.gov.uk/info/200207/local_development_framework/285/development_plan_documents/3
and
www.sutton.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=22365&p=0
Progress on Kingston's LDF 4
15
The Kingston Town Centre Area ActionPlan (K+20)
4.25 The K+20 AAP (2008) was the firstdocument to be adopted in Kingstonunder the LDF system. The Council isnow working with partners andstakeholders to implement this plan.As part of the implementation process,an initiative to coordinate investmentwithin Kingston Town Centre called'Kingston Futures' has beenestablished, which seeks to transformthe area and enable development.
4.26 The LDS Summary Chart includes areview of the K+20 AAP starting inautumn 2012 and is intended to updatethe plan to reflect proposal siteinformation and availability, and ensurethat policies and proposals remainrelevant in the current economicclimate. The timetable for this reviewhas slipped. However, the Councilintends to progress this DPD in 2014in coordination with the preparation ofspecific site briefs through the KingstonFutures initiative.
Hogsmill Valley DPD
4.27 A Hogsmill Valley Masterplan was firstdiscussed in the 2008 AMR, but wasdeleted from the 2009 LDS as its scopewas incorporated into the CoreStrategy. However, the Masterplanproduced in 2010 is a document in itsown right and forms part of the LDFevidence base.
4.28 As a result of the Core Strategy EiP,specific policies and proposals for theHogsmill Valley were required to beprepared in a DPD format.
4.29 The Inspector recommended that a"broad location" approach be adoptedfor the Hogsmill Valley area due touncertainties about the delivery ofsome key regeneration aspects.Proposals include a strategic allocation
in respect of the Kingston Universityowned playing field on the eastern sideof the Clayhill campus (toaccommodate an additional 300student bedspaces). Due to theInspector’s recommendations, therehave been further discussions with keystakeholders, notably Thames Water,and further evidence has beencollected on odour issues. Arising fromthese developments the project will bere-scoped. Despite the project'sinclusion in the LDS 2012/15, theproject timetable has slipped.
Gypsy and Traveller Sites DPD
4.30 At the Core Strategy EiP, the Councilproposed a DPD within the first half ofthe plan period, in conjunction withsub-regional partners, to meet theneeds of gypsies and travellers.However, following discussions,production of a joint plan was notagreed with neighbouring authoritiesand it is proposed to prepare a DPDfor Kingston only. The timetable forproduction is set out in the LDSsummary chart on page 13, howeverthis timetable has slipped.
4.31 The Gypsy and Traveller Sites DPDwill assess the needs of Gypsy andTraveller communities in terms of thenumber and quality of pitches to beprovided. It includes reviews ofpotential sites.
4.32 For more details on the projected pitchneeds of Gypsy and Travellercommunities in Kingston, please referto Chapter 5 page 31.
Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)
4.33 The Community Infrastructure Levy(CIL) will replace S106 LegalAgreements as the Council’s principalmethod of raising developercontributions for the provision of newinfrastructure in the Borough.
4 Progress on Kingston's LDF
16
4.34 The CIL charging schedule is a form ofDPD because it follows similar stagesof preparation, and is subject to aprocess of examination. For this reasonit is included in the LDS to enableinterested parties and the public to beaware of the preparation programmeand opportunities for involvement inpublic participation. The Councilcommenced preparation of theBorough CIL in 2012/13 by undertakinga viability assessment and preparingfor the Preliminary Draft ChargingSchedule public consultation that tookplace in spring 2013.
4.35 In order to comply with the 2012Planning Regulations, AMRs shouldinclude information specified inregulation 62(4) of the CommunityInfrastructure Levy Regulations2010(b).
4.36 Additional to RBK CIL, Mayoral CILcharges also apply to those wishing todevelop in Kingston at a rate of £35 persquare metre. The intention of MayoralCIL is to raise approximately £300million towards the delivery of Crossrail,which does not deliver any discerniblebenefits for residents and businessesin Kingston. The inequity of the fundingposition is illustrated by the fact thatlocations outside of London that are onthe route and benefit from newCrossrail stations such as Maidenheadand Ebbsfleet are not required tocontribute at all to the funding ofCrossrail. In 2012/13, a total of £74,427 of Mayoral CIL receipts werecollected by the Council.
SPDs
4.37 Although the Planning Act 2008removed the obligation to include SPDsin the LDS they are included inKingston’s 2012/15 LDS forcompleteness and clarity regarding theCouncil’s programme for preparing
LDDs. This AMR and future editionswill comment on SPD delivery. In2012/13, the Council successfullyadopted three SPDS. The AffordableHousing and the Sustainable TransportSPDs were adopted on 23 May 2013,and the Residential Design SPD on 9July 2013.
4.38 Work on a Tall Buildings and KeyViews SPD and Climate Change andSustainable Construction SPD has notyet begun as detailed in the LDSsummary chart.
4.39 In addition to the SPDs listed in theLDS, the Council is considering theproduction of other planning strategiesand guidance to assist developers andlandowners who want to develop in theBorough in the short term, e.g. planningbriefs.
Indicator Update
4.40 Upon adoption of the Core Strategy inApril 2012, UDP indicators weresuperseded, and will no longer bereported in the AMR. The 2013 AMRreports on Core Strategy, SouthLondon Waste Plan and K+20indicators only.
Progress on Kingston's LDF 4
17
5 Policy Performance AgainstTargets and Indicators
Housing and Affordability
Houses in Norbiton
Targets for this topic relate to:
Core Strategy Policies
Policy CS10 Housing DeliveryPolicy DM13 Housing Quality and MixPolicy DM14 Loss of HousingPolicy DM15 Affordable HousingPolicy DM16 Gypsy and Traveller Sites
Kingston Plan
Theme 2 - Prosperous and inclusive - sharing prosperity and opportunityObjective 6 - Increase supply of housing and its affordability
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
18
Key Facts
Total dwelling stock: 65,420 (ONS 2012)Average household size: 2.5 (Census 2011)Average house price: £337,285 (Land Registry May 2013)
5.1 The 2011 Census recorded 63,639households in the Borough. It isestimated by the GLA that this numberis expected to further increase to
69,900 by 2021. Current householdsizes are likely to remain at 2.5 personsper household in 2026.
Number of Dwellings in the Borough (Office for National Statistics Data April 2012)
No.Dwelling Stock By Tenure, 2012
65,420Total Dwelling Stock
4,840Local Authority Dwelling Stock
2,360Registered Social Landlord Stock
0Other Public Sector Dwelling Stock
58,220Owner Occupied and Private rented Dwelling Stock
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
19
Housing Delivery
5.2 The London Plan (July 2011) requiresthe Council to deliver at least 3,750 netadditional homes during the period2011 to 2021, equivalent to 375 netnew homes per annum. The target isset out in Core Strategy Policy CS10Housing Delivery.
5.3 As part of demonstrating progressagainst this target, the Council isrequired (by the National PlanningPolicy Framework) to demonstrate theavailability of five years worth of‘deliverable’ sites and where possible‘developable’ sites for years six to tenand eleven to fifteen. The HousingTrajectory, shown in Table 1, showsprojected delivery against the 15 yeartarget as required by the NPPF. Inaccordance with guidance in theLondon Plan (see policy 3.3 IncreasingHousing Supply) the 375 unit annualtarget has been rolled forward to coverthe fifteen years up to 2027/28.
5.4 In addition to demonstrating projecteddelivery, the Housing Trajectory alsosets out actual completions for thecurrent monitoring year (2012/13) andthe four years prior to that. Completionsfor three of these years are shownagainst the previous London Plantarget of 385 units per annum (whichchanged in the 2011 London Plan).
5.5 The components of the projecteddelivery (column 3 of table 1) aresummarised in Table 2 and covered infurther detail in the explanatory notesand tables 3-5.
5.6 Projected housing supply is based onthe availability of sites and thelikelihood of development taking place.The first five years includes units onsites currently under construction, siteswhere planning permission has beengranted, and sites where
pre-application discussion are at anadvanced stage (for further informationon the first five years of projecteddelivery see Appendix 3), whichprovides confidence in the figures.Beyond the first 5 years the figures arebased on site availability and LDFOpportunity Sites.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
20
Tabl
e1
2013
Hou
sing
Traj
ecto
ry
76
54
32
1NumberAboveor
Below
Cumulative
Requirement
2011/12-2027/28
NumberAbove
orBelow
Cumulative
Requirement
2008/09-
2010/11
Cumulative
Requirement
2011/12-2027/28
Cumulative
Requirement
2008/09-
2011/12
AnnualNet
AdditionalHomes
Requirement
20011/12-2027/28
AnnualNet
Additional
Homes
Requirement
2008/09-
2010/11
Cumulative
Completions
2011/12-
2027/28
CumulativeProjected
Completions2008/09-
2010/11
Projected
HousingDelivery
(SeeTable2)
NetAdditional
New
Homes
Completed
FinancialYear
--82
-770
-385
-688
-398
2008/09
--318
-1155
-385
-837
-149
2009/10
--567
-1540
-385
-973
-136
2010/11
-147
-375
375
-228
--
228
2011/12
-255
-750
-375
-495
--
267
2012/13
-20
-1125
-375
-1105
-610
-2013/14
45-
1500
-375
-1545
-440
-2014/15
135
-1875
-375
-2010
-465
-2015/16
399
-2250
-375
-2649
-639
-2016/17
624
-2625
-375
-3249
-600
-2017/18
1026
-3000
-375
-4026
-777
-2018/19
968
-3375
-375
-4343
-317
-2019/20
1185
-3750
-375
-4935
-592
-2020/21
1192
-4125
-375
-5317
-382
-2021/22
1147
-4500
-375
-5647
-330
-2022/23
908
-4875
-375
-5779
-132
-2023/24
861
-5250
-375
-6111
-332
-2024/25
696
-5625
-375
-6321
-210
-2025/26
453
-6000
-375
-6453
-132
-2026/27
210
-6375
-375
-6585
-132
-2027/28
21
Tabl
e2
Com
pone
nts
ofK
ings
ton'
sPr
ojec
ted
Hou
sing
Del
iver
y(th
isda
tain
form
sTa
ble
1,C
olum
n3)
87
65
43
21
TotalProjected
NumberofHomes
(including
non-conventional
supply)
Non-conventional
Supply(student
housingetc.)
Total
Conventional
DwellingSupply
SmallSites
Windfall
Estimate
OtherSites
LDF
Opportunity
Sites
SitesWith
Planning
Permissionor
Under
Construction
Year
610
156
454
00
0454
2013/14
440
87353
00
0353
2014/15
465
236
229
00
0229
2015/16
639
0639
132
55435
172016/17
600
300
300
132
28140
02017/18
777
100
677
132
110
435
02018/19
317
0317
132
70115
02019/20
592
0592
132
35425
02020/21
382
0382
132
50200
02021/22
330
0330
132
98100
02022/23
132
0132
132
00
02023/24
332
200
132
132
00
02024/25
210
0210
132
780
02025/26
132
0132
132
00
02026/27
132
0132
132
00
02027/28
6090
1079
5011
1584
628
1850
1053
Total
22
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
23
Notes (and explanatory tables) for Table 2
The components of Kingston's projected housing delivery are set out in Table 2. Thesites that make up each component are detailed in Appendix 3, and in tables 3-5.
Table 2: Column 1 - Year: 1st April to 31st March.
Table 2: Column 2 - Sites with planning permission or under construction (seeAppendix 3: Tables 9 and 10): Schemes currently under construction or with valid butas yet unimplemented planning permissions. The details of these sites can be found inthe 5 Year Land Supply in Appendix 3.
Table 2: Column 3 - LDF Opportunity Sites (Priority 1 sites) (see Table 3): Thesesites are the Priority 1 Opportunity Sites (with housing capacity) as set out in the Council'sLDF Delivery Plan. All sites are over 0.25 ha, and are expected to come forward forresidential or mixed-use redevelopment, but do not yet have planning permission (toavoid duplication with column 2). Further information on the LDF Opportunity Sites is setout in Chapter 6. Assumptions about capacity on these sites are based on discussionswith the Development Management Team, taking into account factors such as site size,densities, constraints etc.
Table 2: Column 4 - Other Sites (see Table 4): These are sites with an identifiedhousing capacity that do not fall within the other categories. Assumptions about capacityon these sites are based on discussions with the Development Management Team,taking into account factors such as site size, densities, constraints etc.
Table 2: Column 5 - Small sites windfall estimate: In addition to the identified sites,an analysis of past development trends strongly supports the assumption that windfallsites will also come forward during this period. Based on the evidence produced tosupport the Core Strategy it is assumed that an additional 40% of the conventional targetwill be delivered through small (less than 10 unit) windfall sites. This equates to 132 unitsper annum. This additional windfall allowance is only assumed for year 4 onwards toreflect the fact that completions in earlier years (1-3) will come from those schemes thatalready have planning permission.
Table 2: Column 6 - Total Conventional Dwelling Supply: This shows the totalpredicted supply of conventional housing.
Table 2: Column 7 - Non-conventional Supply (see Table 5): Shows the predictedsupply of non-conventional homes. These include student accommodation and carehomes.
Table 2: Column 8 - Total projected number of homes: The sum total of all sourcesof housing supply includes non-conventional homes, such as student halls of residence,as well as conventional dwellings. (These figures form column 3 of Table 1.)
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
24
Table 3 LDF Opportunity Sites
Site TypeExpectedCompletion
CapacitySite AddressLDFDelivery
PlanReference
LDF Allocation2021/2250Clarence Street North01
LDF Allocation2019/20100EdenQuarter South of ClarenceStreet
02
LDF Allocation2020/21200Eden Quarter East of Eden St& Ashdown Road
03
LDF Allocation2020/2125St James’s04
LDF Allocation2019/2015Cattle Market05
LDF Allocation2018/1915Kingfisher Area06
LDF Allocation, Planning applicationsubmitted
2016/1797Northern Riverfront, includingVicarage Road
09
LDF Allocation2018/19380Kingston College, KingsgateBusiness Centre and Printing
10/11
Works and KingstonGasHolderStation
LDF Delivery Plan Site2017/18140Cocks Crescent15
LDF Delivery Plan Site2020/21200Surbiton Station Car Park16
LDF Delivery Plan Site2021/22150Tolworth Tower17
LDF Delivery Plan Site; Planningapplication submitted
2016/17270Former Government Offices,Hook Rise South
18
LDF Delivery Plan Site2018/1940Land at Jubilee Way/ KingstonRoad, Tolworth
20
Pre-application discussions underway2016/1768Latchmere House, LatchmereLane
21
LDF Delivery Plan Site2022/23100Tolworth Girls School PlayingFields
22
1850Total
NB. Opportunity Site 15: Cocks Crescent does not include Brycbox House, which hashistorically been treated as a separate site within the AMR.
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
25
Table 4 Other Potential Housing Sites
Site TypeExpectedCompletion
CapacitySite AddressRef
Pre-application discussionsunderway
2016/17305-29 Coombe Road, New MaldenHTO1
Pre-application discussionsunderway
2016/1725Shell Garage, 71-73 Coombe Road,New Malden
HTO2
Pre-application discussionsunderway
2017/1828Sundial Court, Tolworth Rise SouthHTO3
RBK site2018/1950Piper Hall/Tadlow, Piper RoadHTO4
LDF Delivery Plan Site (Priority2)
2018/1950Oakhill Health CentreHTO5
RBK owned site2018/1910Charles Sumner House, Hobill WalkHTO6
LDF Delivery Plan Site (Priority2)
2019/2070Tolworth Hospital, Red Lion RoadHTO7
LDF Delivery Plan Site (Priority2)
2020/2135Unigate Milk Depot, Lower MarshLane/Villiers Avenue
HTO8
LDF Delivery Plan Site (Priority2)
2021/2250Kaleidoscope, Cromwell RoadHTO9
LDF Delivery Plan Site (Priority2)
2022/2320Moor Lane Centre, Moor Lane,Chessington
HTO10
RBK owned site2022/2358Hobkirk HouseHTO11
RBK owned site2022/2320Land at Cumberland HouseHTO12
RBK owned site2025/2678Land at Sheephouse WayHTO13
524Total
Table 5 Non-conventional Housing Supply
Site TypeExpectedCompletion
CapacitySite AddressRef
Under construction2013/1492190-196 Coombe Lane West11/14797Under construction2013/1464Cumbrae' & 'Oakdene', Upper
Brighton Road08/16232
Planning permission2014/15873-5 Penrhyn Road12/12103Planning permission, LDF DeliveryPlan Site
2015/16130Kingston Plaza (180 -190 LondonRoad/ 8-11 Station Road)
11/12492
Planning permission2015/166Four Oaks Centre 105aMount Road12/10277Planning permission2015/1610080 Cambridge Road12/12545LDF Delivery Plan Site2017/18300Hogsmill Valley13LDF Allocation2018/19100Kingsgate Car Park and Richmond
Rd11
LDF Allocation2024/25200Kingston Station081079Total
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
26
Analysis of Results
5.7 Table 1 (Housing Trajectory)summarises both housing supply andthe relevant targets.
5.8 Past Completions
5.9 As Table 1 shows, housing delivery inthe period 2008/9 to 2012/13 fell shortof the cumulative target by 255 units.This downturn in development activityreflects a national trend as a result ofthe economic recession. In Kingstonhowever, this has been furtherexacerbated by the relatively smallnumber of large development sites. Ina small suburban borough such asKingston, housing delivery is veryreliant on the successfulredevelopment of a limited number oflarge sites, therefore if progress onthese schemes stalls (as has happenedon a few key Kingston Town Centresites) there is a significant impact ondelivery.
5.10 Projected Delivery
5.11 The future supply of new housing isalso reliant on the development of afew key sites, as can be seen in thefigures for projected housing delivery.It is expected that there will be peaksin housing completions in 2013/14,2016/17 and 2018/19. These peaks arelargely due to anticipated completionson these key sites:
Kingston Power Station, KingstonTown Centrethe Former Government Offices,TolworthNorth Kingston development site(Proposals Site P19 and P20)
5.12 As a result overall housing completionsfor the 15 year period are expected toexceed the 6,375 unit cumulative target(refer to Table 1) by 210 units (3%).
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
27
Key Housing Sites
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
28
Affordable Housing
5.13 Average house prices in Kingstonincreased by 39% between April 2009and May 2013, from an average sales
price of £261,543 to £337,285. Thechart below details the change over theyear compared to the London average.
Graph to Show Average House Prices
5.14 Kingston continues to have a shortfallin the availability of affordable housingwith demand outstripping supply.
5.15 During 2012/13, a total of 39 affordablehousing units were completed. Theproportion of affordable units of totalcompletions has reduced over the past3 years.
5.16 Table 6 shows the number of new buildaffordable homes built each yearcompared with total dwellingcompletion figures. The requirement toprovide affordable housing does notgenerally apply to proposals forreturning long term vacant units to use,or non self-contained accommodation,therefore, only conventional supply isshown in the table.
Table 6 Affordable Housing Delivery 1998/1999 to 2012/13
% AffordableAffordable new buildunits
Net ConventionalHousing Completions
Financial Year
8354151999/00
291083752000/1
23251072001/2
4245802002/3
17734432003/4
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
29
% AffordableAffordable new buildunits
Net ConventionalHousing Completions
Financial Year
311595172004/5
8232892005/6
17543102006/7
361022872007/8
22401842008/9
20301492009/10
48651352010/11
36812282011/12
19392032012/13
5.17 TheCouncil's Strategic HousingMarketAssessment (2009) highlights anumber of issues affecting the deliveryof affordable housing; including thehigh costs of building and land in theBorough, the economic situation andthe lack of larger sites available forredevelopment. The policy approachset out in the Core Strategy seeks tomitigate these issues by lowering thethreshold at which the affordable
housing policy applies, therebyincreasing the number of sites whereaffordable housing will be sought.
5.18 Prior to the adoption of the CoreStrategy, the Council’s affordablehousing policy was set out in UDPPolicy H9 which only applied to sitescapable of delivering ten or more unitsor with site areas greater than 0.3ha.Table 7 highlights the limited numberof residential schemes that werecaptured under Policy H9 (only 7% ofapproved schemes in 2010/11).
Table 7 Summary of Approved Schemes Showing Maximum Affordable HousingPotential
Total % if50% AHachievedon H9*sites
TotalNo.ofUnits
Assumed50% AH
Requirement
TotalUnitswithinH9*
Schemes
No. of UNITS onSites
%Schemesto whichPolicy H9can apply
Total No.of
Schemes
TotalPotentialH9*
Schemes
No. of SCHEMESApproved
Year
25+10-240-925+units
10-24Units
0-9Units
20%43787173140782197%97734902010/11
19%2825410839691748%66514612009/10
30%748228456430262924%1205321152008/9
17%4968717388853235%1527251452007/8
11%333357044262633%1153121122006/7
26%6791743482481003319%12811471172005/6
31%6952164323081242639%12211381112004/5
31%50215631213517719017%8314212692003/4
21%33271142291131908%107918982002/3
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
30
5.19 Outside of the planning system, theCouncil has always sought additionalways to tackle housing need, such asmaking use of the private rented sectoras a source of supply (e.g. PrivateLeasing Scheme, Tenant FinderService) and progressing sites inpartnership with Registered Providersfor 100% affordable housing. Inaddition to these initiatives, the Council
has produced an Affordable HousingImprovement Plan, a BoroughInvestment Plan and a HousingStrategy.Work in these documents wasguided by the Affordable HousingDelivery Group and Board (made up ofrepresentatives from Housing,Planning, Legal Services and BoroughValuers).
Specialist and Special NeedsHousing
5.20 In Kingston, the most significantdemand for specialist housing is forpurpose built student accommodation.During 2011/12 one new studenthousing development in Kingston Town
Centre was completed, delivering 64new student bedrooms. In addition,permission was granted for 187 studentbedrooms in two schemes.
Gypsies and Travellers
5.21 The Council is committed to monitoringthe provision of new Gypsy andTraveller Pitches.
5.22 Separate projected need for the EnglishGypsies and Irish Travellers has beenidentified, totalling a cumulative needof 11 additional pitches.
Previously Developed Land
5.23 The Council is committed to thedelivery of new residential developmenton previously developed land. In2012/13 100% of residentialcompletions took place on previouslydeveloped land.
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
31
Progress Summary
The delivery of new homes in 2012/13 was, once again, below the LondonPlan target of 375 but was an improved performance from the previous year.Despite this slight improvement, the on-going under achievement continuesa trend of under-achieving performance and reflects the national situationwhich may be attributed to the recession and wider economic difficulties. TheLondon Development Database shows that since the end of 2007, boroughsacross London have experienced a decline in all planning permissions, includingresidential, and yet the Borough population continues to grow. This raises concernsabout potential occupancy levels, overcrowding and quality of life in future years.
In terms of affordable housing delivery, the Council delivered a reduced number ofcompletions, and the target of delivering 140 affordable units per annum is still not beingachieved.
To help address the Council's concerns on affordable housing, the Core Strategy requiresaffordable units to be provided on schemes of five units and more, (previously ten unitsand more). A revised Affordable Housing SPD was adopted in May 2013 to assist withthe delivery of affordable housing and the implementation of policy. It is recognised thatthe implementation of this policy will have to be closely monitored, as its viability maybe questioned by developers if economic conditions do not improve.
In contrast, performance has remained good in terms of the number of homes built onpreviously developed land, with the 100% target being met.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
32
Retail and Town Centres
Tolworth Broadway
Targets for this topic relate to:
Core Strategy Policies
CS12 - Retail and Town CentresDM19 - Protecting Existing Retail UsesDM20 - New Retail Development
Kingston Plan
Theme 1 - A sustainable Kingston - protecting and enhancing the environment forus and future generations
Objective 2 - Ensure the sustainable development of our borough and thepromotion of sustainable transport
Theme 2 - Prosperous and inclusive - sharing prosperity and opportunity
Objective 4 - Sustain and share economic prosperity
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
33
Key Facts
Number of units in Kingston Town Centre primary shopping frontage: 248
Number of vacant units in Kingston Town Centre primary shopping frontage: 9
UK Shopping Venue Ranking: 17 (2013)
5.24 Throughout the recession, KingstonTown Centre has remainedcomparatively healthy. One indicatorof good retail health is low vacancyrates. Out of 248 units in the primaryshopping frontage, only nine werevacant at the time of survey (August2013). This reflects a 4% vacancy ratewhich has remained unchanged since2011/12. Although some retailers suchas Esprit, The Early Learning Centre,Dwell and Thorntons have closed, newarrivals include Cos, Global Sports USand Taking Shape, plus new chainrestaurants such as Pret a Manger andYo Sushi!, demonstrating the continueddemand for premises.
5.25 From April 2012, Core Strategy PolicyDM19 Protecting Existing Retail Usesapplied, and requires a predominance(defined as greater than 50%) of retailuses to be retained in the Borough'sDistrict Centres. Even though thispolicy sets a lower requirement thanprevious UDP policy, New Malden,Surbiton and Tolworth continue to
struggle to retain shop units in theirshopping frontages. All District Centreshave experienced a decrease in theirA1 percentages since the previousmonitoring year. This is mainly due tochanges of use such as loss to cafesand restaurants and financial andprofessional services. However, it isimportant to consider other factorswhich affect this calculation, such asthe amalgamation and sub-division ofunits. In addition, prior to the adoptionof the Core Strategy, shoppingfrontages in the District Centre weredifferentiated between primary andsecondary frontages. The CoreStrategy does not make this distinction.
5.26 It is likely that in future there willcontinue to be pressure on A1 units.However, a high percentage of retailunits is required in the Borough’sDistrict Centres to protect and enhancetheir vitality and viability. As such, thisissue will be carefully monitored, andgiven particular attention in thedetermination of planning applications.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
34
5.27 An audit of Kingston’s Local Centres,in spring 2012, revealed that generallythey are in good health and stillproviding essential local goods andservices to their communities. Forinstance there has been little changein the total number of units since thelast survey in 2007 and the past trendof declining A1 uses has stabilised.Vacancy rates have also generallydeclined since 2007, except in theSouth of the Borough neighbourhood,where they have increased. This risein vacancy rates in the South of theBorough should be monitored,particularly as the neighbourhood doesnot have a District Centre to serve itsresidents, making their Local Centreseven more significant.
5.28 Even though Kingston Town Centre iscurrently performing well, LDF policiesmust continue to be effective and viableso that it retains its Metropolitan Town
Centre status during challengingeconomic times. Despite slippage inthe programme, the LDS SummaryChart factors in a review of K+20 andis intended to update the plan andprepare site development briefs. Thisis in order to reflect accurately newevidence, proposal site information andavailability, as well as ensuring thatpolicies and proposals are viable.
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
35
Progress Summary
As in previous years, the performance of Kingston’s retail and town centresin 2012/13 has been mixed. Despite the continuing difficult economicconditions, confidence in the retail sector is high in Kingston Town Centre.This is demonstrated by low vacancy rates and demand for premises.
There are signs that the recession is impacting development elsewhere in theBorough. Very little additional floorspace has been completed for town centreuses except for the climbing centre in South of the Borough (D2), and the loss of officefloorspace persists (-2,924m² B1(a)), even though the loss is less than it was in 2011/12.
Despite the lower Policy DM19 percentage A1 unit requirement compared to those inthe superseded UPD, retaining a predominance of A1 uses remains difficult. Only NewMalden is successfully performing and is composed of 52% A1 uses. Surbiton has 49%A1 use and Tolworth 48% A1 use. Vacancy rates have also fluctuated since last year,except in New Malden where they have remained at 5% since 2009/10. In Surbitonvacancies have decreased to 5%, a reduction of 7%, but in Tolworth there has been anincrease from 1% up to 5%.
Though mixed, the health of Kingston's town centres has been reasonably stable sincethe last monitoring year. Continued careful monitoring and development managementdecision-making to minimise negative economic impacts and ensure residents' needsare met is needed. This is especially important at the higher end of the retail hierarchyin Kingston Town Centre, where the retention of its market share and Metropolitan statusis essential if it is to compete effectively with newer retail developments such as thosein Croydon Town Centre and Westfield Shepherds Bush.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
36
Economy and Employment
Barwell Business Park
Targets for this topic relate to:
Core Strategy Policies
CS11 - Economy and EmploymentDM17 - Protecting Existing Employment Land and PremisesDM18 - New Employment Uses
Kingston Plan
Theme 2 - Prosperous and inclusive - sharing prosperity and opportunity
Objective 4 - sustain and share economic prosperity
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
37
Key Facts
Kingston average economic activity rate: 76.5% (ONS, APS July 2012-June 2013)
Employment Rate (age 16-64):
Full-time: 78%Part-time: 22% (ONS, APS, July 2012 - June 2012)
Unemployment rate: 2.2% (July 2013)Average weekly income: £679.60 (Greater London: £613.30 approximately)(Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (Provisional)), 2012Number of business start ups: 985 (ONS Business Demography, 2011)Number of designated industrial/warehouse/business areas: 8Number of Strategic Industrial Locations: 2
5.29 Difficult global economic conditionspersist and despite this having limitedimpact on Kingston’s retail sector, otherindicators are being affected. Forinstance, the recession is likely toaccount for the increase in theunemployment rate from 1% in 2007/09to 2.2% in 2012/13 (the rate hasdecreased marginally by 0.4% since2010/11).
5.30 Another key sign of economic downturnis the loss of employment land to otheruses. For instance, in the lastmonitoring year 2,924m² of B1(a) landhas been lost. To address the loss ofemployment land and in line withregional and national policy guidance,Core Strategy Policy DM17 details thelocations in whichindustrial/employment land will beprotected. These locations includenewly designated Locally SignificantIndustrial Sites (LSISs) in the London
Road and Cambridge Road/HampdenRoad areas which increase the amountof protected employment floorspacevia formal designation.
5.31 Following the recommendation in lastyear's AMR, an update of theEmployment Land Review 2008 hasbeen commissioned, in part to addressthe issue of reducing B1 floorspace inthe Borough. The Economic AnalysisStudy, 2013 will also provide detailedevidence on current market conditions,assess the quantity and quality ofindustrial/employment land and identifydemand for such uses. This informationcan then be used to inform future policydevelopment.
5.32 The impact of the new PermittedDevelopment Rights for change of usefrom B1 to C3, implemented in May2013, is a concern for the Borough. Theloss of office space will be monitoredas a result of this change in legislation.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
38
Progress Summary
The 2012/13 monitoring year has been both positive and negative in terms ofperformance against economy and employment policies.
The difficult economic conditions have not significantly affected the retail offerin Kingston Town Centre and it has remained successful. This stability andconfidence is vitally important due to retail's crucial role in the wider Boroughand sub-regional economy. For instance, unemployment rates are almost unchangedsince 2011/12 and are still significantly below the Greater London average of 5.4%.
However, in 2013 there have been further net losses of employment floorspace (-2,924m²of B1(a)). The Economic Analysis Study 2013 will identify the reasons for this and providerobust evidence to inform future policy development.
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
39
Other Themes
Character, Design and Heritage
Surbiton Station
Targets for this topic relate to:
Core Strategy Policies
CS8 - Character, Design and HeritageDM10 - Design Requirements for New Developments (including House Extensions)DM11 - Design ApproachDM12 - Development in Conservation Areas and Affecting Heritage Assets
Kingston Plan
Theme 1 - A sustainable Kingston - protecting and enhancing the environment forus and future generations
Objective 1 - Tackle climate change, reduce our ecological footprint and "reduce,reuse and recycle"Objective 3 - Protect and improve the quality of our local environment
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
40
Theme 2 - Prosperous and inclusive - sharing prosperity and opportunity
Objective 6 - Increase supply of housing and its affordability
Theme 3 - Safe, healthy and strong - preventing problems and promotingresponsibility
Objective 7 - making communities safer
Key Facts
Total Number of Conservation Areas: 26Total Number of Listed Buildings: 268Total Number of Buildings of Townscape Merit: 116Number of properties on the Heritage at Risk Register (formerly known as theBuildings at Risk Register): 3
5.33 There have been no additions to ListedBuildings, Buildings of TownscapeMerit (BTM) or to the Buildings at RiskRegister. However, there is a potentialloss of a BTM on Richmond Roadsubject to application 13/12805/DEM.
5.34 Further progress has been made onpublic realm projects in the Borough,particularly the Ancient Market Area(AMA) project in Kingston Town Centreand the Tolworth Greenway project.
5.35 The Council is working with the GLA,Kingstonfirst and contractors, BalfourBeatty, to unlock the full potential ofKingston Ancient Market. Work beganon site at the end of September 2013and is due for completion by the endof March 2014. The improvements willbe reported in the 2013/14 AMR.
5.36 In partnership with Transport forLondon, the aim of the TolworthBroadway project was to develop an
exemplary design for a new publicrealm that not only addressedimmediate and local issues, but alsointegrated a wider area of regenerationalong the A240 corridor. Proposalsinclude the removal of central barriersto form a central ‘greenway’ (along theA240) to increase pedestrianaccessibility both across and betweenthe District Centre, Tolworth Stationand beyond. The shared space willinclude lower kerbs adding to thechoice and ease of negotiation forpedestrians wanting to cross the street,and signalised and informal crossingpoints for disabled and blind users. Itis hoped that an overall enhancementof the character and quality of thepublic realm along the Broadway willlever in investment to provide for longerterm regeneration of the area. Theworks began in March 2013 andcompleted in October 2013. Theimprovements will be fully reported inthe 2013/14 AMR.
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
41
Progress Summary
In 2012/13 no additions to Listed Buildings, Buildings of Townscape Merit orthe Buildings at Risk Register. Performance has been good and policies haveremained effective.
Policy implementation has continued to be supported by the use of the BoroughCharacter Study, 2011 and the recently adopted Residential Design SPD,2013. For instance, the Borough Character Study, 2011 has been used to justify theprotection of character with regard to appeal decisions such as 145 Elm Road, (KingstonTown Neighbourhood).
In the past monitoring year significant progress has been made on public realm projectssuch as Kingston Town Centre’s AMA and Tolworth Broadway.
Updates on the AMA and Tolworth Broadway projects will be reported on in next year’sAMR.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
42
Open Space and Biodiversity
Bunkers Hill, Chessington
Targets for this topic help us deliver:
Core Strategy Policies
CS3 - The Natural and Green EnvironmentCS4 - Thames Policy AreaDM4 - Water Management and Flood RiskDM5 - Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) and Open Space NeedsDM6 - BiodiversityDM7 - Thames Policy Area
Kingston Plan
Theme 1 - A sustainable Kingston - protecting and enhancing the environment forus and for future generations
Objective 3 - protect and improve the quality of our local environment
Theme 3 - Safe, healthy and strong - preventing problems and promotingresponsibility and independence
Objective 8 - Improve overall health and reduce health inequalitiesObjective 10 - Encourage people to take a active part in the social and culturallife of the community
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
43
Key Facts
Number of local open spaces and school open spaces: 64Total area of local open spaces and school open spaces: 98.6haArea of Green Belt: 640haNumber of local nature reserves: 9Number of Sites of Special Scientific Interest: 0Length of riverside walk improved in 12/13: 0mNumber of Council owned visitor mooring sites: 2
5.37 The Council recognises the importanceof open space and biodiversity andcomplying with national policy. GreenBelt and Metropolitan Open Land(MOL) cover almost a third of theBorough and the Core Strategycontains specific policies which protectthese designations. Core Strategypolicies CS3 and DM5 strictly protectsthe Borough’s Green Belt and MOL byresisting development except in veryspecial circumstances. There are,however, some uses deemedappropriate which include outdoorsport, agriculture and forestry,cemeteries and appropriate residentialinfill.
5.38 There are also many other parks andsmaller open spaces in the Borough.Currently there is public park provisionof 1.12ha/1000 people which does notpresent an overall deficiency.Nevertheless, there are some areaswith localised deficiency (i.e. they aresituated more than 800m from a publicpark). These areas lie within theMaldens and Coombe and Surbitonneighbourhoods. Consequently, CoreStrategy policies have been developedto protect public open space anddesignate more of it as part of newdevelopments (see policies NM1, S1,CS3, DM5 and DM6).
5.39 There are now three parks of GreenFlag status (Manor Park, CanburyGardens and Fishponds), though theCouncil’s Open Space Study statesthat most parks score well (achievingbetween 6 and 7) against the GreenFlag Assessment.
5.40 The Borough has an under provisionof formal opportunities for children’splay within public parks, as all residentsshould be within 400m of children’splay facilities, and this has not beenachieved. Again, this issue has beenincorporated in Core Strategy PolicyDM5 which seeks to ensure that newdevelopments contribute towards theprovision and improvement of children'splay and sports facilities.
5.41 There are nine local nature reservesand 39 Sites Important for NatureConservation ((SINC) which overlapwith nature reserves). The north of theBorough borders Richmond Park andWimbledon Common, both of whichare “European sites” designated asSpecial Areas for Conservation (SAC).These areas play an important role inmeeting the needs of Kingston’spopulation regarding access to naturalgreen space.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
44
5.42 Additionally, there are some 41.7 ha ofactively managed allotment land. Thisis spread across 23 sites containing980 plots. Some 14.34ha of additionalallotment land would be needed by2016 to meet anticipated growth indemand for allotments.
5.43 Kingston's rivers and watercourses arealso highly valued. Not only do theyprovide valuable resources for wildlifeand biodiversity, but locations for sportsand recreation too. They are protectedby Core Strategy Policies CS4 andDM7).
5.44 With respect to the number of planningapplications for new buildings in theGreen Belt, the number of permissionshas dramatically increased since the
previous monitoring year (from 15 to29). The number of permissions fornew buildings in MOL has alsoincreased from 15 to 31. In terms of thepercentage of permissions granted onbrownfield land, performance in2012/13 has reduced compared to2011/12, achieving 98%. Although, itshould be noted that 100% of allbuilding completions were onbrownfield land. These statistics raiseconcerns about the impact of futuredevelopment on the Borough's greenspaces and should therefore be closelymonitored to assess the effectivenessof Core Strategy Policy DM5 in its aimof protecting nature conservation areas.We will work with local environmentgroups to seek to obtain biodiversityindicator data to help monitor impact.
Progress Summary
There is little change to report regarding the performance of open space andbiodiversity indicators within the 2011/12 monitoring year. There has beenlittle change in the data held for local nature reserves, improvements to thenatural environment etc. However, data for the monitoring indicators on thistopic have been difficult to obtain. We shall work with local environment groupsto see if data can be obtained to assist monitoring.
An area which needs highlighting is the performance regarding development on GreenBelt and MOL. The number of planning permissions in such designated areas hasincreased since the last monitoring year. Data will be monitored to establish if this is atrend.
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
45
Sustainable Travel
Buses in Kingston Town Centre
Targets for this topic relate to:
Core Strategy Policies
CS5 - Reducing the Need to TravelCS6 - Sustainable TravelCS7 - Managing Vehicle UseDM8 - Sustainable Transport for New DevelopmentDM9 - Managing Vehicle Use for New Development
Kingston Plan
Theme 1 - A sustainable Kingston - protecting and enhancing the environment forus and for future generations
Objective - 1 - tackle climate change, reduce our ecological footprint and "reduce,reuse and recycle"Objective - 2 - Ensure the sustainable development of our borough and thepromotion of sustainable transport
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
46
Key Facts
Percentage of households that own 2 cars/vans: 22% (Census 2011)Number of buses arriving in Kingston Town Centre per hour at peak times: 122(data from 2013 and does not include Park and Ride Services)Number of taxi ranks: 14 (2013)Total Number of workplace travelplans: 59 (2012)
5.45 The Council is committed to promotingsustainable transport across theBorough. This is demonstrated throughthe implementation of Core StrategyPolicies CS5, CS6, CS7, DM8 andDM9 and the adoption of theSustainable Transport SPD, 2013which aim to reduce the need to travel,especially by private car, limit thelength of journeys and promote the roleof public transport, cycling andwalking.
5.46 The 2011 Census recorded that 16%of the Borough’s residents travel towork by train. This figure is lower thanthat recorded by the 2001 Censuswhich totalled 21%. However, Kingstonstill exceeds the London average forthis mode of travel to work (9%).Surbiton Station has a particularly goodservice to central London which makesit popular with commuters as off-peakjourneys to Waterloo Station take aslittle as 16 minutes. It has the highestrail passenger flow of all the Borough’sten stations. Kingston Station issituated on a loop line which is alsoconnected to London Waterloo.However, it has fewer services and isnot as busy as Surbiton with passengerflows spread more evenly throughoutthe day.
5.47 Bus services within the Borough aregenerally very good. However, orbitalpublic transport links are still
comparatively poor to parts of southLondon, leading to increased car useand congestion.
5.48 Kingston Town Centre, Surbiton, andto a lesser extent New Malden, havehigh Public Transport AccessibilityLevels (PTALs), although much of theBorough does not. Areas in the southof the Borough which extend into theGreen Belt have lower transportaccessibility, despite some high tripgenerating land uses such asChessington World of Adventures.
5.49 The A3 trunk road bisects the Borough.Eastbound it leads to central London,westbound it leads to Guildford andPortsmouth. Whilst this facilitatesvehicle flows in these directions, it canalso act as a barrier to alternativetransport modes across the Borough,including walking and cycling routes.
5.50 Traffic congestion is an issue for localresidents. In and around KingstonTown Centre it can be particularlyproblematic particularly where sevenmain roads converge. Kingston’s statusas a Metropolitan Town Centre andriverside location also attracts highvolumes of visiting traffic for shopping,leisure and work place journeys.
5.51 Travel plans are an attempt to managerush hour traffic flows, and toencourage the use of alternativemodesof transport for commuters. Between
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
47
2008/09 and 2011/2012 an additionalsixteen travel plans were adoptedacross the Borough. It is clear thatthere has been a general increase incyclists in the Borough over the pastfew years, especially through theintroduction of work place and SchoolTravel Plans. The London Area TravelSurvey identifies that 4% of all journeysin the Borough are undertaken by bike.This is the second highest figure inouter London, and comparesfavourably with a 2% London average.Additional cycle parking has beenprovided across the Borough, fundedby the Local Implementation Plan, theBiking Borough scheme and S106. Atotal of 85 cycle parking racks wereadded in 12/13.
5.52 A Movement Study has beencommissioned to ensure thatmanagement of transport enables,rather than constrains, the developmentof key sites and the growth of KingstonTown Centre in a co-ordinated,
integrated and planned way. Overall itwill assist with the implementation ofthe Borough’s transport anddevelopment proposals.
5.53 A key piece of transport infrastructurethat the Council is lobbying hard to seeintroduced is Crossrail 2. The Councilsupports the Regional option forCrossrail 2 that would be the catalystfor significant developmentopportunities in Kingston Town Centre,and would also provide significanttransport connectivity improvements inother parts of the Borough, particularlyin the south that are currently servedby low frequency train services tostations such as Malden Manor andChessington South.
5.54 For further information on sustainabletransport, please refer to the Borough'sLocal Implementation Plan, 2011(LIP2): www.kingston.gov.uk/info/200197/transport/663/local_implementation_plan
Progress Summary
Sustainable travel policy performance continues to be good.
However, there are recognised areas for improvement, such as the linksbetween Kingston and the Surrey districts, and the frequency of trains to andfrom Kingston Station. Consequently, Core Strategy policies (particularly CS6)aim to address these issues by committing to work with and lobby partnerssuch as Transport for London (TfL), South West Trains and neighbouring authorities tomaintain and improve regional, sub-regional and cross boundary public transport. Thepolicy also seeks better transport integration between transport nodes.
In 2013 the Council successfully implemented the Sustainable Transport SPD whichexpands upon particular aspects of Sustainable Transport policy set out in the CoreStrategy and the Local Implementation Plan 2. See Chapter 4 for further detail.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
48
Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Management
Kingston Recycling Lorry
Targets for this topic help us deliver:
Core Strategy Policies
CS1 - Climate Change MitigationCS2 - Climate Change AdaptationCS9 - Waste Reduction and ManagementDM1 - Sustainable Design and Construction StandardsDM2 - Low Carbon DevelopmentDM3 - Designing for Climate Change
Kingston Plan
Theme 1 - A sustainable Kingston - protecting and enhancing the environment forus and for future generations
Objective 1 - tackle climate change, reduce our ecological footprint and "reduce,reuse and recycle"Objective 2 - Ensure the sustainable development of our borough and thepromotion of sustainable transportObjective 3 - Protect and improve the quality of our local environment
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
49
Key Facts
Waste per household in kgs: 488.21kgsPercentage of household waste reused, recycled or composted: 46.3%
5.55 The Council recognises the growingimportance of climate change andsustainability issues. In line with theKingston Plan and national andregional guidance, the Core Strategypolicies seek to address these issues.
Waste and Recycling
5.56 The Council has a single wastemanagement facility at Villiers Roadwhich is used as a transfer station andlocal recycling centre. As previouslymentioned in Chapter 4, the Councilhas successfully progressed a JointWaste DPD with the London Boroughsof Merton, Sutton and Croydon. Thedocument sets out policies andidentifies potential sites for new andenhanced waste management facilitiesto serve the needs of all four boroughs.
5.57 With regard to household wastegeneration and recycling rates,Kingston has continued to perform wellin 2012/13 by exceeding its targets.(The target for waste per household is445kgs and the target for householdwaste reused, recycled or compostedis 25%.)
5.58 For further information on the SouthLondon Waste DPD and the WasteAMR, please refer to the links below:
www.kingston.gov.uk/ info/200207/local_development_framework/285/development_plan_documents/3
and
www.sutton.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=22365&p=0
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency
5.59 The London Plan requires thatdevelopment proposals recognise thepotential implications of climatechange. The Core Strategy wasdeveloped in accordance with thisguidance along with the sentiments ofthe Kingston Plan. As such, the CoreStrategy includes policies onsustainable design and constructionstandards, low carbon development,water management and flood risk andrenewable energy generation (seepolicies CS1, CS2, DM1, DM2 andDM3). The Council is considering astrategy on Climate Change to supportthese policies.
5.60 In 2009 the Energy Strategy wasadopted which set outs how the Councilaims to significantly reduce its carbonemissions and energy use. Every yearthe priorities and projects are revisedthrough the Annual ImplementationPlan and adopted by the Place andSustainability Committee.
5.61 The Council’s framework for majorprocurement exercises includes aformal Sustainable Procurementsection with specific environmentalrequirements including CO2 reduction.
5.62 In 2013 the Council progressed itsDistrict Heating project to the EnergyMasterplanning stage. The EnergyMasterplan (EMP) has come to apositive conclusion in regard to thepotential for Kingston Town Centre:
The EMP has identified the extentof a market competitive strategic
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
50
district heating network that coulddeliver significant CO2 reductions,energy cost savings, and helpimprove energy security;The EMP outlines a short, mediumand long term phasedimplementation strategy;The Phase 1 kick-start scheme isbased around public sectorbuildings. The c.£8m investmenthas the potential to beimplemented at public sector ratesof return, deliver energy costsavings and reduce CO2 emissionby over 25%;The initial scheme would act as aspringboard to supply commercialcustomers in the future phases ofdevelopment;The public sector has a key rolein allocating an initial site for theenergy centre. In the longer term,and as the scheme develops,alternative energy productionoptions would include heatrecovery from the local sewageworks and extracting thermalenergy from the River Thames bymeans of heat pumps. The originalenergy centre could then bedecommissioned and put to otheruse.
5.63 The Council successfully bid for DECCfunding to progress to the next stageof this project – Energymaster-planning, and this work willprogress in 13/14.
Flood Risk and Water Quality
5.64 The responsibilities for watermanagement and flood risk are sharedacross many different Councildepartments and the Council isrequired to take a lead role inmanaging local flood risk under thestatutory responsibilities set out in theFlood and Water Management Act(2010).
5.65 The planning aspects of managingfloodrisk include preparing theBorough-wide Strategic Flood RiskAssessment (SFRA), 2011 and aSurface Water Management Plan,2011. They have informed thepreparation of LDF documents, andare used in determining planningapplications, along with data providedby the Environment Agency.
5.66 In respect of air quality, following theclosure of DEFRA's Automatic UrbanNetwork (AUN) monitoring station(located at the London A3 road-side)in 2008/09, it has not been possible tocapture Borough-wide data onemissions and air pollution. Thisremains an important issue that mustbe resolved so that monitoring can beundertaken in future years.
5.67 Monitoring the various aspects ofclimate change and sustainability isparticularly challenging. However, theCouncil recognises the importance ofaddressing the topic as reflected by theobjectives of the Kingston Plan, and infuture years the importance andresponsibility of monitoring will need tobe prioritised across a number ofCouncil Departments.
Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators 5
51
Progress Summary
To address climate change in Kingston, the Council is committed to exploringthe opportunities for a district heating network.
Climate change data is difficult to obtain, and the Council is partially relianton external sources for some data eg air quality, Improving performance andmonitoring systems in this area should be a key priority in order that effectivemonitoring can be undertaken in future years.
5 Policy Performance Against Targets and Indicators
52
6 Future Development
Trends and Issues
6.1 In preparation for the Core StrategyExamination in Public in September2011, consultants BNP Paribas werecommissioned to comment ondeveloper's perceptions of Kingston.They concluded that developers viewthe Borough positively and thisconfidence is demonstrated by wellknown large companies activelyseeking to purchase and develop sites.These include Redrow, Berkeley Groupplc, Crest Nicholson and Barratt. Aspecialist developer is also currentlyseeking consent for an innovativescheme for floating homes on the RiverThames in Surbiton, that is subject topublic inquiry in November 2013.
6.2 Kingston has many positive attributes,but a key constraint is the poortransport links compared to other highvalue areas such as Richmond andWimbledon, which benefit from higherfrequency train services to CentralLondon and underground connectionswhich boost property values.
6.3 Other macro-economic barriers todevelopment (not related to Kingstonspecific issues) also have a negativeimpact, such as reduced social housinggrant availability and an unwillingnessof landowners to accept lower landvalues.
6.4 However, overall, Kingston farescomparatively well. In socio-economicterms its high proportion of ABC1residents alongside the strong retailoffer of Kingston Town Centre continueto make the Borough popular withdevelopers. In addition, strong houseprice growth over the last two yearsdespite difficult economic conditionsgives a degree of stability to the area.This growth indicates that house buyers
in Kingston are able to fund purchasesfrom either their own resources oraccess affordable finance.Furthermore, Kingston's location andaccess to the River Thames and anumber of London's finest parks helpssustain comparatively high values.
6.5 Surveying practice, Savills, predict thathouse values in non-prime parts ofLondon, including Kingston, willincrease by a further 29.1% by 2015,which would take values to 22.9%above their 2007 peak. Therefore, thereis hope that the market will not be hitas hard as other parts of the UK, anddevelopment in Kingston will remainbuoyant.
Planning Applications
6.6 The total number of planningapplications received remains high,slightly above the previous monitoringyear. In 2012/13 a total of 2,103applications were received (excludingpre-applications, tree applications andconditions). However, these figures arestill lower than those received in thepeak years of 2004/05 and 2007/08.The number of “major” applicationsreceived in 2012/13 also remainedcomparable to 2011/12. Over the pastfive years it is the “other” category ofplanning applications that has beensubject to comparatively greaterfluctuation. For example, in 2008/091,119 “other” applications werereceived, compared with 1,377 in2012/13.
6.7 Planning application trends need to bemonitored closely as they have a directimpact on service delivery, theCouncil's ability to meet targets andmeet local needs. For instance, if
Future Development 6
53
planning applications for residentialschemes were to decrease, this couldreduce housing delivery, and the abilityof the Council to meet London Plantargets. The impact of the recent andproposed legislative changes regardingpermitted development described in
Chapter 4 need careful monitoring asthis could have significant impacts onemployment opportunities, the healthof the town and district centres, albeitit could lead to an increase in privatehousing delivery.
Delivery
6.8 Transforming Kingston requires achange in the Council’s approach if itis to deliver the growth the Boroughwants to see. The Council’s newapproach involves:
Developing a clear programme forregeneration and place shaping inaccordance with the One Kingstonprogramme, taking an investmentand growth led approach. The coreof this programme is KingstonFutures, which is focused onrevitalising Kingston Town Centre;Taking a robust leadership roleand building effective policies andpartnership models to deliver astep change in the transformationof the Borough’s infrastructure andeconomic prospects; andorganising the full range of
professional disciplines in theCouncil to sharpen our focus onregeneration delivery. A particularfocus will be a shift in emphasisfrom plan making to placeshaping;The Council is developing arefreshed and more robustapproach to attractinginvestment to the Borough, andsecuring the socio-economicbenefits of regeneration for localpeople and businesses.The Council is working with TfL todeliver various infrastructureprojects to encourage cycling andimprove associated safety. RBKhas made a submission to TfL tobecome a ‘Mini Holland’ with theaim of transforming cycling in theBorough through substantialfunding (£35m) concentrated in
6 Future Development
54
specific areas to provide a stepchange in cycle mode share.
6.9 Whilst Kingston Town Centre is asuccessful Metropolitan Centre, theneed for action to revitalise it has longbeen recognised. There are concernsabout the attractiveness of some partsof it and its ability to attract investment,such as new retail. There is alsorecognition that Kingston Town Centreis not reaching its full potential to bemore than just a shopping destination,with scope to broaden its offer in termsof leisure, culture and tourism. This iscrucial at a time when new trends, suchas a rise in internet shopping, areseeing a fall in visitors to retaildestinations. To remain competitive,the town centre has to be more than aretail destination. Furthermore, thetown centre also has potential to deliveron the Council’s education, health andhousing objectives – the developmentof new housing is an important elementof the drive to improve its vitality.
6.10 But crucially, major investment is nowgoing into Kingston’s competitors, suchas nearby Croydon and Guildford towncentres. Failure to take action couldresult in stagnation and the loss ofmuch needed investment, threateningKingston’s place as a top destination.
6.11 This is addressed through a towncentre investment programme,Kingston Futures. The KingstonFutures programme is guided by theK+20 document, “Kingston TownCentre Area Action Plan”, which wasadopted in 2008 and will shortly bereviewed.
6.12 Many of the sites in Kingston TownCentre are in private ownership, whosesupport is essential if the objectives forthe town centre are to be achieved. TheCouncil has, for some time, convenedmeetings of these and landowners and
other key stakeholders to promote theidea of coming together in partnershipto drive delivery of the revitalisation ofKingston Town Centre. The aim nowis to formalise these arrangementsunder the Kingston Futuresprogramme, calling this partnership theKingston Futures Stakeholder Group.
6.13 The Council’s initiative has beenwelcomed, particularly as we enter intothe delivery phase, with somelandowners now bringing forwardproposals for their sites. These and anumber of others will be the focus ofthe programme in the short to mediumterm, so that we will begin to see actionin the following town centre areas:
Eden QuarterKingston Rail Station EnvironsCattle Market Car Park & FairfieldBus StationKingston RiversideAncient MarketOther Gateways & Public RealmImprovementsNorth Kingston – Kingston College& Adjoining Sites, KingsgateBusiness Centre and PrintingWorks, Canbury Place Car Parkand Kingston Gas Holder Station
Borough-wide Opportunity Sites
6.14 The successful implementation of theCore Strategy's spatial objectives,policies and proposals involves thedevelopment of identified "opportunitysites" in the Borough. Opportunity sitescover a range of uses including newand upgraded shopping and businessfacilities, housing and new andexpanded schools. Opportunity siteshave been defined as sites that are:
of 0.25 hectares or abovedevelopable and deliverable(according to the NPPF definition)not under construction
Future Development 6
55
not completednot fully utilised
6.15 In total, 22 sites with developmentpotential have been identified. Thereis overlap with sites included in theKingston Futures programme, theHousing Trajectory and the list ofKingston Town Centre Proposal Sites.
6.16 The progress associated withimplementing opportunity sites is setout in Table 8.
6 Future Development
56
Tabl
e8
Opp
ortu
nity
Site
s(B
orou
gh-w
ide)
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
Nocomprehensive
redevelopment.
Planning
2021/22
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
Development
ManagementProcess
EnhancedA1,A2,A3,
improvedservicing,plus
C3,B1orcommunity/D2
uses
A1
1.02
P1-Clarence
StreetNorth
1Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
permissiongranted
forvariousretail
upgradesand
K+20Proposal
Site
KeyViews
MotorVehicle
RestrictedArea
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
refurbishmente.g.
13/12530andthe
conversionof
PrimaryShopping
Area
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
AdditionstoCycle
Network
upperfloorson
ClarenceStreetto
residentialunits
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
e.g.
13/12686)/FUL
and
PrimaryShopping
Frontage
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
13/12586/PNO.
TheCouncilis
engagedwiththe
landowner(s).
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
Nocomprehensive
redevelopment.
2019/20
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
PrivateSector
EnhancedA1plusA2,
A3C3,B1or
community/D2uses
A1,A2
2.25
P2southof
Clarence
St/EdenWalk
2Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
Phase1upgrade
ofEdenWalk
DevelopmentInitiative,
Development
ManagementProcess
MotorVehicle
RestrictedArea
K+20Proposal
Site
ShoppingCentre
(completed2011);
PrimaryShopping
Area
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
Phase2upgrade
ofEdenWalk
(includinganew
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
mediumsizedunit
–11/12278)not
started.The
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
PrimaryShopping
Frontage
Councilisengaged
withthe
landowners)and
Secondary
Shopping
Frontages
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
willprogressa
developmentbrief
forthearea.
57
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
Landmark
Sites/Gateway
Improvements
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
New/Improved/Relocated
CarParks
Nocomprehensive
redevelopment.
Application
2020/21
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
RBKCorporate
Property,JointVenture,
Development
Management
Process
ExtensionofPrime
ShoppingAreaand
enhancedA1,A2,A3
andcommunity
facilities/D2
Multistoreycar
park,surfacecar
park,A1,A2,A3,
C1,SG
3.6
P3eastof
EdenSt/
AshdownRd
sites/Eden
Quarter
3Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
13/12032
permittedto
demolishexisting
buildingtoprovide
30residentialunits
andcommercial
K+20Proposal
Site
KeyViews
MotorVehicle
RestrictedArea
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
New
PublicSpace
PrimaryShopping
Area
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
useatground
floor.Application
12/12800
TownCentreRoad
Network
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
completedto
demolishexisting
buildingsand
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
ProposedCycle
Routes
replacewithnew
Bank.Application
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
11/12906toextend
andrefurbish
Primarkstore
Secondary
Shopping
Frontages
withdrawn.The
New/Improved/Relocated
CarParks
landownerofP3a
isactively
ImprovedBus/Rail
Stations
marketingthesite
toobtaina
ProposedSecure
CycleParking
development
partner.The
Councilisengaged
withthe
landowner.
Noupdate.The
Councilisengaged
withthe
landowner(s).
2020/21
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
Development
ManagementProcess
EnhancedA1,A2,A3,
communityfacilities/D2,
C3andstudenthousing
(SG)
Multistoreycar
park,A1,SG,A4,
B1
0.8
P4StJames
Area
4Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
K+20Proposal
Site
KeyViews
MotorVehicle
RestrictedArea
58
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
PrimaryShopping
Area
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
Secondary
Shopping
Frontages
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
New/Improved/Relocated
CarParks
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
Noupdate.
However,thissite
hasbeenidentified
2019/20
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
RBKCorporate
Landlord,Development
ManagementProcess
Improvedbusstation,
parking,marketfacilities,
pluslimitedaffordable
housing(C3)
Busterminal,
surfacecarpark
0.65
P5Cattle
Marketcar
parkand
Fairfieldbus
station
5Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
bytheKingston
Futures
programmeto
K+20Proposal
Site
KeyViews
TownCentreRoad
Network
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
include
comprehensive
improvementsto
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
thebusstation,
pedestrianlinks
acrossWheatfield
GreenCorridor
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
KeyImproved
PedestrianLinks
WaytoAdams
Walk,and
improvedfacilities
fortheMonday
Market.
New/Improved
Bus/RailStations
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
New/Improved/Relocated
CarParks
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
59
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
Noupdate.
However,thissite
hasbeenidentified
2018/19
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
RBKCorporate
Landlord,Development
ManagementProcess
Enhancedleisure,
communityfacilities/D2,
publicopenspaceand
C3inc.affordable
housing(C3)
D1(Kingston
Library,Kingston
MuseumandArt
Gallery),D2
(Kingfisher
LeisureCentre)
openspace
1.35
P6Kingfisher
leisurecentre,
openspace,
Kingston
Library&
Museum
6Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
bytheKingston
Futures
programmeto
comprehensively
K+20Proposal
Site
ConservationArea
KeyViews
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
LocalOpenSpace
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
improvepedestrian
linksacross
WheatfieldWayto
AdamsWalk,and
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
improvedfacilities
fortheMonday
Market.
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
13/12892/NMA
Non-material
amendmentto
2012/13
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
PrivateSector
A1,A3,A4,D2,B1,student
accommodation(SG)
A1,A2,A3,A4,
A5,SG(student
accommodation),
B1
0.59
P8eastof
ClarenceSt
7Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
planning
DevelopmentInitiative,
K+20Proposal
Site
KeyViews
permission
11/12251/FUL
beingprocessed
forchangeofuse
Development
ManagementProcess
MotorVehicle
RestrictedArea
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
PrimaryShopping
Area
ofupperfloors
fromB1toC3(64
bedrooms)
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
TownCentreRoad
Network
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
Secondary
Shopping
Frontages
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
60
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
PolicyCS15-
FutureNeedsof
Kingston
University,
KingstonCollege
andSchools
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
Inrelationto
Application
2013/14
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
Stationupgrade
RailwayStation
andA1,A3
0.69
P10Kingston
Station
8Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
11/12403
extensionstothe
Partnershipworking,
NetworkRail,South
KeyViews
K+20Proposal
Site
lengthofplatform
havebeen
WestTrains,
Development
ManagementProcess
MotorVehicle
RestrictedArea
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
approved.This
sitehasalsobeen
identifiedbythe
TownCentreRoad
Network
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
KingstonFutures
programmefor
majorpublicrealm
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
improvements
workingin
ProposedCycle
Routes
partnershipwith
NetworkRailand
Secondary
Shopping
Frontages
Transportfor
London.Public
realm
Landmark
Sites/Gateway
Improvements
improvements
currentlyunder
way.
New/Improved
Bus/RailStations
ProposedSecure
CycleParking
Application
07/12536
completedforthe
2016/17
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
PrivateSector
C1,C3led
redevelopmentwith
A1,A3,A4andnewpublic
space/mooringsfacilities
A2,A3,C3,D2,
multi-storeycar
park
1.87
P12Northern
Riverfront
9Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
redevelopmentof
Turk’slandsitefor
DevelopmentInitiative,
Development
ManagementProcess
KeyViews
K+20Proposal
Site
56flatsaboveG/F
A3use.Application
61
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
for13/12264for97
residentialunits,
publicrealm
MotorVehicle
RestrictedArea
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
TownCentreRoad
Network
improvementsand
commercial
PolicyCS3-The
Naturaland
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
floorspaceis
currentlybeen
processed.
Green
Environment
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
ProposedCycle
Routes
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
Secondary
Shopping
Frontages
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
Landmark
Sites/Gateway
Improvements
PolicyCS8-
Character,
New/Improved
Bus/RailStations
Designand
Heritage
ProposedSecure
CycleParking
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
Thissitealongwith
P20hasbeen
identifiedbythe
2018/19
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
Partnershipworking,
Development
ManagementProcess
Upgradedfacilitiesfor
KingstonCollege(D1)
andmixeduse
developmentincluding
A1,A2,A3,B1.
A1,A3,B1,C3,
D1(KingstonArt
College),Gas
Holders
1.99
P19Kingston
College/Gas
Holders
10Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
KingstonFutures
programmefor
ProposalSite
KeyViews
TownCentreRoad
Network
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
residentialled
mixeduse
redevelopment.A
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
planningbriefhas
beenapprovedto
guideprospective
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
developersand
ensure
comprehensive
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
redevelopmentof
theentiresite.
62
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
Application
13/12046for
constructionofa3
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS15-
FutureNeedsof
storeycollege
extension,
Kingston
demolitionofthe
University,
PennyGalleryand
aretailunitrelates
tositeP19b.
KingstonCollege
andSchools
Thissitealongwith
P19hasbeen
2018/19
KingstonTownCentre
AreaActionPlan2008,
Mixedusedevelopment
includingA1,C3
A1,A2,A3,A4,
A5,carpark,
0.55
P20Kingsgate
carpark/
Richmond
Roadfrontage
11Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
KingstonTown
CentreKeyArea
ofChange
identifiedbythe
KingstonFutures
Partnershipworking,
Development
ManagementProcess
(includingaffordable
housing)D1education
uses/Studenthousing
(SG),B1andD2
KeyViews
K+20Proposal
Site
programmefor
residentialled
TownCentreRoad
Network
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
mixeduse
redevelopment.A
planningbriefis
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
currentlybeing
producedtoguide
prospective
GreenCorridors
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
OtherShopping
Frontages
developersand
ensure
comprehensive
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
redevelopmentof
theentiresite.
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
Application
11/12492for130
2015/16
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
Residential(C3)led
mixeduse
C3,SG
(nightclub),
surfacecarpark
0.83
Kingston
Plaza,London
Rd,Station
Rd,Coombe
Rd,Norbiton
12Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
studentbedspaces
approved.
Application
Development
ManagementProcess
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
12/12302formixed
usedevelopment
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
and209student
bedspaces
refused.Appeal
GreenCorridors
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
dismissed
11/0713.
63
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
DPDbeing
developedaspart
2017/18
PartnershipWorking,
Development
ManagementProcess
MixedUseswhichcould
includeMOL,student
accommodation(SG),
Sewage
treatmentworks,
B2,B8,C3,
151
Hogsmill
ValleyKey
Areaof
13Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
PolicyHV1and
HV1AHogsmill
ValleyKeyArea
ofChange
ofLDF.Emerging
OdourSurvey
resultssuggest
outdoorrecreation
facilities(D2)newschool
cemeteries,
allotments,waste
Change/
Kingsmeadow
GreenChains
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
LocalOpenSpace
andrecycling
centre,D2
(University
thatthe
development
potentialofthe
provision(D1)and
housing(C3)
LocallySignificant
IndustrialSite
PolicySUR1-
Surbiton
Neighbourhood
MajorDeveloped
Site
recreation
grounds),
Metropolitan
Councilowned
landcouldbe
restricted.
MetropolitanOpen
Land
PolicyCS3-The
Naturaland
OpenLand,SG
(student
accommodation)
SiteofImportance
forNature
Conservation
Green
Environment
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
StrategicSite
Allocation
WasteSite
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
Additionsto
StrategicCycling
Network
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS15-
FutureNeedsof
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
Kingston
University,
GreenCorridors
KingstonCollege
andSchools
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
Nocomprehensive
redevelopment.
2015/16
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
B1,B2,B8
A1,A3,B1,B2,
B8,D1
11.39
StJohn's
Industrial
14LocallySignificant
IndustrialSite
PolicyMC1-
Maldensand
Coombe
Neighbourhood
(ambulance
stationand
Roselands
/Business
Area,Kingston
Road,New
Malden
Application
13/14743/PNOfor
officetoresidential
conversion
PartnershipWorking,
Development
ManagementProcess,
RBKCorporate
Landlord
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
Resource
Centre),car
parking
approved.
Pre-application
GreenCorridors
13/14184/PREfor
341student
bedspaces.
64
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
Nocomprehensive
redevelopment.
Pre-application
2019/20
PartnershipWorking,
Development
ManagementProcess,
Mixedusedevelopment
includingC3,A1,D2and
parking
D1,D2,
multistoreycar
park
2.4
Cocks
Crescent,
Blagdon
15DistrictCentre
InsetArea
PolicyMC1-
Maldensand
Coombe
Neighbourhood
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
Road,New
Malden
discussionsfor
residential-led
RBKCorporate
Landlord
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
mixed-use
developmenton
23-27Blagdon
Road.
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
BrycboxHouse
developmentis
underconstruction
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
(11/14533).The
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
Councilis
consideringan
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
updateofthe2009
PlanningBrieffor
thesite.
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
Noupdate.Site
briefproducedin
2004.
2021/22
PartnershipWorking,
Development
ManagementProcess
C3andparking
Surfacecarpark
1.36
Surbiton
StationCar
Park,Surbiton
16BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
SUR1-Surbiton
Neighbourhood
CS5-Reducing
theNeedto
Travel
CS6-
Sustainable
Travel
CS7-Managing
VehicleUse
CS10-Housing
Delivery
Pre-application
13/16291for
2021/22
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
Mixeduse-A1,B1,C2,
C3,D1/D2(community
facilities)andparking
A1,B1,A3/A4,
C1
1.5
Tolworth
Tower,Ewell
Road,
Tolworth
17DistrictCentre
InsetArea
PolicyTOL1-
TolworthKey
AreaofChange
changeofusefrom
officestostudent
accommodation.
Development
ManagementProcess
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
65
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
Shopping
Frontages
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
Application
12/10141formixed
2015/16
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
C3leddevelopment,
D1/D2(community
facilities
Clearedsite
5.4
FormerGovt
Offices,Toby
Jugand
18Adjacentto
StrategicRail
FreightSite
PolicyTOL1-
TolworthKey
AreaofChange
usedevelopment
including269C3
Development
ManagementProcess
Marshall
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
Housesite,
Kingston
Rd/HookRise
units,2900m2A1,
A3,and406m2
D1uses.
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
South,
Tolworth
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
PolicyCS12-
RetailandTown
Centres
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
13/10091/PREfor
demolitionof
2020/21
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
C1,D2,A3
SG(garageand
carforecourt)
1.97
12Kingston
Road,
Tolworth
19AdjacenttoGreen
Chains
PolicyTOL1-
TolworthKey
AreaofChange
existingbuildings
anderectionofa6
Development
ManagementProcess
AdjacenttoMOL
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
66
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
to8storey286
room
student
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
accommodation
andancillary
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
facilities.Application
12/10267/EXTto
implement
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
09/10132for
demolitionof
existingbuildings
andconstructionof
a6storey142
bedroomhotel
(useclassC1)
including
conference
facilities,gym,
licensedrestaurant
andbasement
parking.
Noupdate.
2017/18
Development
ManagementProcess,
D2(Indoor/outdoor
recreation/leisure).
D2(Go-karting
andmotorbike
scramblingtrack)
1.72
Landat
Jubilee
Way/Kingston
20AdjacenttoGreen
Chains
PolicyTOL1-
TolworthKey
AreaofChange
RBKCorporate
Landlord
Potentiallysome
enablingC3
AdjacenttoMOL
Road,
Tolworth
PolicyCS5-
Reducingthe
NeedtoTravel
Adjacentto
StrategicRail
FreightSite
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
PolicyCS7-
Managing
VehicleUse
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
PolicyCS11-
Economyand
Employment
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
Acrossboundary
PlanningBriefwas
2016/17
Development
ManagementProcess,
C3leddevelopmentand
elementofD2
(communityfacilities)
Decommissioned
Prisonand
ancillaryuses
2.18
Latchmere
House,
Latchmere
Lane
21AdjacenttoLocal
AreaofSpecial
Character
PolicyKT1-
KingstonTown
Neighbourhood
producedin
partnershipwith
Partnershipworking
67
Prog
ress
/Add
itiona
lC
omm
ents
Phas
ing
Del
iver
yM
echa
nism
Pote
ntia
lUse
sPo
licy
Con
stra
ints
Rel
ated
Cor
eSt
rate
gyPo
licie
s/D
esig
natio
nsEx
istin
gU
seSi
teA
rea
(ha)
Site
Nam
e/A
ddre
ssO
ppor
tuni
tySi
teN
umbe
r
withLondonBorough
ofRichmond
RichmondCouncil
toprovide
PolicyCS6-
Sustainable
Travel
developerswith
guidanceand
PolicyCS8-
Character
ensurea
comprehensive
Designand
Heritage
approachto
redevelopment.
PolicyCS10-
HousingDelivery
ThePlanningBrief
wasadoptedin
Kingstonon14
March2013.
Application
12/12698/PRE
receivedfor
residentialled
redevelopment.
Noupdate
2022/23
PrivateSector
DevelopmentInitiative,
D1,D2andC3?
D1(Secondary
school),D2
6.84
TolworthGirls
School,
22Areaof
Archaeological
Significance
PolicyTOL1-
TolworthKey
AreaofChange
(Tolworth
Recreation
Centre)
FullersWay
North,
Surbiton
Development
ManagementProcess
AdjacenttoGypsy
andTravellerSite
(SwallowPark)
PolicyCS10-
Housing
Delivery?
PolicyCS15-
FutureNeedsof
AdjacenttoLocally
Significant
IndustrialSite
Kingston
University,
SchoolOpen
Space
KingstonCollege
andSchools
OppositeStrategic
IndustrialLocation
PolicyCS16-
Community
Facilities
(Chessington
IndustrialArea)
BoroughStrategic
WalkingNetwork
BoroughStrategic
CyclingNetwork
68
Future Development 6
69
Appendix 1: Core Strategy andWaste Plan Indicators
Since April 2012, Core Strategy indicators are active and supersede those contained in theUDP, 2005.
2012/13 ResultIndicator/ ActionTarget
Indicator/ActionDescription
RelatedPolicy
Indicator/ActionCode
100% of new residentialdevelopments met Code 4.
100% of new residentialdevelopments to meet targets
% of new residential developmentsthat meet required sustainabilitystandards set out in Policy DM1
DM1MI1
Despite the requirements ofset out in Policy DM1 underCode for Sustainable Homes Policy DM1 the London Plan,
2011 has only applied Code 5since October 2013.
21 sites managed for natureconservation
Number of sites with natureconservation managementplans
Improve local biodiversity -proportion of local sites wherepositive conservation managementhas been or is being implemented
CS3, DM6MI6
3 sites:Number of open spacesmanaged to Green FlagAward standard
Amount of eligible open spacesmanaged to Green Flag AwardStandards importance
CS3MI8Canbury GardensFishpondsManor Park
Green Belt:Maintain or reduce numbersof permissions for new
Planning permissions for newbuildings in the Green Belt andMOL
CS3, DM5MI9
buildings in the Green Beltand MOL
Permitted = 21Refused = 6Conditions Discharged =2Total = 29
MOL:
Permitted = 29Refused = 1Conditions Discharged =1Total = 31
9 local nature reservesIncrease number of localnature reserves
Number of Local Nature ReservesCS3, DM5,DM6, CS4
MI10
13Reduce number of "allowed"appeal decisions
Planning Appeal decisions inrespect of householder applications
CS8,DM10MI24
3Reduce the number of entrieson the Heritage atRiskRegister
Number of entries on the Heritageat Risk Register
CS8,DM12MI26
No change (26 areas in total)Change in number ofconservationareas
Conservation AreasCS8,DM12MI28
See Housing Trajectory2012/13-2026/27Housing targets for the plan periodCS10MI33
5625 homes
267375 per annumNet additional dwellings for thereporting year
CS10MI34
Appendix 1: Core Strategy and Waste Plan Indicators
70
2012/13 ResultIndicator/ ActionTarget
Indicator/ActionDescription
RelatedPolicy
Indicator/ActionCode
See Housing TrajectorySee Housing TrajectoryNet additional dwellings in futureyears
CS10MI35
100% residential completionson brownfield land
100% on Brownfield landNew and converted dwellings onCS10MI36
previously developed land
0
Target to be determinedthrough future Gypsy andTravellers DPD.
Net additional pitches (Gypsies andTravellers)
CS10,DM16
MI37
392000 new units over the2012/13 to 2026/27
Gross affordable housingcompletions
CS10,DM15
MI38
77:2370:30Intermediate and social renteddwellings as a % of total
CS10,DM15
MI40
GrossB1: 722m²B2: 680m²B8: 680m²NetB1: -2,739m²B2: 497m²B8: -2,282m²
Restrict loss of employmentfloorspace in designatedemployment/business/warehouseareas over the life of the plan(from 2012 base year)
Total amount of additionalemployment floorspace - by type
CS11,DM18
MI43
0 completions(150 under construction re.06/12424)
Increase in number of hotelbedrooms (from 2012baseyear over the life of theplan)
Hotel bedroomsCS11MI47
i) in town centresIncrease total amount offloorspace for "town centreuses" over the life of the plan
Total amount of floorspace for "towncentre uses" within: i) town centresand ii) the borough
CS12,DM19,DM20
MI48Kingston Town Centre GrossA1: 0m²A2: 0m²B1(a): 0m²D2: 0m²Total: 0m²Kingston Town Centre NetA1: -34m²A2: 0m²B1(a): -1,513m²D2: 0m²Total: -1,547m²Surbiton GrossA1: 0m²A2: 0m²B1(a): 0m²D2: 0m²Total: 0m²Surbiton NetA1: 0m²A2: 0m²B1(a): 0m²D2: 0m²Total: 0m²New Malden GrossA1: 0m²A2: 0m²B1(a): 0m²D2: 0m²Total: 0m²
Core Strategy and Waste Plan IndicatorsAppendix 1:
71
2012/13 ResultIndicator/ ActionTarget
Indicator/ActionDescription
RelatedPolicy
Indicator/ActionCode
New Malden NetA1: 0m²A2: 0m²B1(a): 0m²D2: 0m²Total: 0m²Tolworth GrossA1: 0m²A2: 0m²B1(a): 0m²D2: 0m²Total: 0m²Tolworth NetA1: 0m²A2: 0m²B1(a): 0m²D2: 0m²Total: 0m²ii) the Borough GrossA1: 463m²A2: 45m²B1(a): 42m²D2: 1,162m²Total: 1,712m²NetA1: 272m²A2: -17m²B1(a): -2,924m²D2: 1,162m²Total: -1,507m²
in both the town centre andthewhole Borough (from 2012base year)
% of A1 uses in the DistrictCentres shopping frontages
A1 uses in the District Centres'shopping frontages
CS12,DM19,DM21
MI49 New Malden = 52%Surbiton = 49%Tolworth = 48%
64Number of new managedstudent accommodation unitscompleted
Managed student accommodationcompleted
CS15MI61
No dataMaintain or increase numberof a) leisure centres b) outdoorsports facilities in the Borough
Leisure facilitiesCS16,DM25
MI63
Since January 2012, South London Waste Plan indicators are active and supersede anywaste related indicators contained in the UDP, 2005. A separateWaste Plan Annual MonitoringReport was produced in October 2013 covering the four south London Boroughs. The mostpertinent indicators for Kingston are listed below for information. The full list will be availablevia the following link:
www.sutton.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=22365&p=0
Appendix 1: Core Strategy and Waste Plan Indicators
72
App
endi
x2:
K+2
0In
dica
tors
ThefollowingK+20indicatorsspecificallyrelatetoKingstonTownCentre.Thetargetsapplytothelifeoftheplanwhichextendsupuntil
2020.
Dire
ctio
nof
Trav
el12
/13
Perf
orm
ance
12/1
3Ta
rget
11/1
2Pe
rfor
man
ce11
/12
Targ
etIn
dica
tor/A
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nR
elat
edPo
licy
Indi
cato
r/Act
ion
Cod
e
Seeindicator/actiondescription
Seeindicator/actiondescription
Increasedfootfallfrombaseyear
2006
K1
K+20-2
06:approx.19million
06:approx.19
million
09:approx.21million
09:approx.21
million
11:21,478,32
11:21,478,329
(Increaseof14.2%)
12:20.81million
13:20.58million
(decreaseof1.1%)
12:20.81million
4%Max.1.5%
4%Max.1.5%
ProportionofG/Fvacantpropertyin
primaryfrontage
K1
K+20-4
4%Max.4%
3%Max.4%
ProportionofG/Fvacantpropertyin
secondaryfrontage
K1
K+20-5
59Provideapprox.1000newhomes
onproposalsitesacrossthetown
centre(overthelifeoftheplan).
125
Provideapprox.1000newhomes
onproposalsitesacrossthetown
centre(overthelifeoftheplan).
No.ofcompletedhomeseachyear
K7
K+20-22
9units
16%
50%affordablehousingon
qualifyingsites
46 37%
50%affordablehousingon
qualifyingsites
No.and%ofaffordablehomes(N155
definition)
K7
K+20-23
64netadditionalbedspaces
Provisionof500studentplaces
inmanagedstudenthousing
0netadditionalbedspaces
Provisionof500studentplaces
inmanagedstudenthousing
Numberofstudentplacesinmanaged
studenthousing
K7
K+20-24
431totalbedspaces
367totalbedspaces
0m²*
Completionofupgradingof
PenryhnRoadcampusand
KingstonCollegeby2020.
0m²*
Completionofupgradingof
PenryhnRoadcampusand
KingstonCollegeby2020.
CompletedD1floorspaceforKingston
UniversityandKingstonCollege
K8
K+20-25
73
Dire
ctio
nof
Trav
el12
/13
Perf
orm
ance
12/1
3Ta
rget
11/1
2Pe
rfor
man
ce11
/12
Targ
etIn
dica
tor/A
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nR
elat
edPo
licy
Indi
cato
r/Act
ion
Cod
e
N/A
SeeAppendix4forK+20
ProposalSiteinfo.
Completionofdevelopmentof
proposalsitesby2020,including
the3landmarksites.
SeeAppendix5forK+20
ProposalSiteinfo.
Completionofdevelopmentof
proposalsitesby2020,including
the3landmarksites.
Phasedimplementationof20
proposalsitesand3landmarksites
K9
K+20-26
2Reductioninnumberfrom2006
baseyeartozeroby2020
2Reductioninnumberfrom2006
baseyeartozeroby2020
NumberofBuildingsontheBuildings
atRiskRegister
K11
K+20-30
60ListedBuildings
50BTMs(Proposed
developmentsonProposal
SiteP19mayresultintheloss
ofoneBTM)
Noloss
60ListedBuildings
50BTMs
Noloss
NumberofListedBuildingsand
BuildingsofTownscapeMerit
K11
K+20-31
7,175spaces
Parkingprovisionmaintainedat
around7,000spaces
6,988spacesasatMarch
09.Thisprovisionisbeing
maintained.
Parkingprovisionmaintainedat
around7,000spaces
Noofpublicoff-streetparkingspaces
(total)
K20
K+20-59
3de
velo
pmen
tpro
posa
lsw
hich
requ
ireflo
odzo
neas
sess
men
tN
ode
velo
pmen
tapp
rova
lsin
flood
zone
sw
ithou
tflo
odris
km
anag
emen
tmea
sure
s.
No
appr
oval
sgr
ante
din
Kin
gsto
nTo
wn
Cen
tre
with
outa
ppro
pria
teflo
odNodevelopmentapprovalsin
floodzoneswithoutfloodrisk
managementmeasures.
Numberofdevelopmentproposals
whichrequirefloodzoneassessment:
K24
K+20-64
Withappropriatefloodrisk
managementmeasures
0de
velo
pmen
tapp
rova
lsin
flood
zone
sw
ithou
tflo
odris
km
anag
emen
tmea
sure
s.
risk
man
agem
ent
mea
sure
s(a
sse
tout
inK
+20
Polic
y24
).Withoutappropriatefloodrisk
managementmeasures
74
Appendix 3: Five Year HousingLand Supply
The National Planning Policy Framework(NPPF) requires local planning authoritiesto identify specific deliverable sites to providefive years worth of housing sites.
The housing target for Kingston is set out inthe Council’s Core Strategy (2012) and TheLondon Plan (2011). The target for the 10year period 2011 to 2021 is 3,750, with anannual target of 375. The target consists oftwo components, conventional housing (flatsand houses) and non-self containedaccommodation (purpose built studenthousing, hostels etc.). The breakdownbetween these two components is shownbelow, setting out the 5 year requirement.
5 Year TargetAnnual Target
1645329Conventional
22545Non-self contained
1870375Total
The 2013 five year housing land supplycovers the period 1 April 2013 to 31 March2018.
In accordance with guidance set out in theNPPF, to be considered ‘deliverable’ sitesshould meet the following criteria:
be available now,offer a suitable location for developmentnow, andbe achievable with a realistic prospectthat housing will be delivered on the sitewithin five years and in particular thatdevelopment of the site is viable.
As set out in the following tables, theassessment of the capacity includes thefollowing site types:
sites that are currently underconstruction;sites with current, valid planningpermissions; and‘other’ pipeline sites with a capacity of10 or more units - those where aplanning application has beensubmitted, but not yet determined;where favourable pre-application advicehas been issued; or, the site is ownedby the Council and there are plans forhousing development. As these sitesare not yet the subject of a planningpermission, they are identified byreference number only.
The results of the assessment of identifiedsites are detailed in tables 9-13 andsummarised below:
Number of UnitsComponent
675Units Under Construction
ConventionalSupply
378Units with Planning Permission
658Other Units
1711Subtotal
Five Year Housing Land SupplyAppendix 3:
75
Number of UnitsComponent
156Units Under ConstructionNon-selfContainedSupply
323Units with Planning Permission
479Subtotal
2190Total
As set out above, the assessment of knownsites identifies capacity for 2,190 units, whichis approximately 17% more than the targetfor the period of 1,870.
In addition to the identified sites, an analysisof past development trends strongly supportsthe assumption that windfall sites will alsocome forward during this period. Based onthe evidence produced to support the CoreStrategy it is assumed that an additional 40%of the conventional target will be deliveredthrough small (less than 10 unit) windfall
sites. This equates to 132 units per annum.This additional windfall allowance isassumed for years 4 and 5 only to reflect thefact that completions in earlier years (1-3)will come from those schemes that alreadyhave planning permission. The followingtable summarises the total capacity on a yearby year basis, including this windfallassumption:
A summary of the final assessment, includingwindfall allowances (broken down by year)is set out below:
Total2017/182016/172015/162014/152013/14Year
675000228447UnderConstruction
Conventional
3780172291257With PlanningPermission
658168490000"Other" Sites
4790023687156Non-self contained
2190168507465440610Sub Total
264132132000Windfall Allowance
2454300639465440610Total
With the addition of a windfall allowance foryears 4 and 5 it is anticipated that a total of2,454 units will be delivered in the Boroughbetween 2013/14 and 2017/18, 688 units(37%) over the target for that period.
Appendix 3: Five Year Housing Land Supply
76
Con
vent
iona
lSup
ply
Tabl
e9
Site
sU
nder
Con
stru
ctio
n
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)St
artD
ate
Add
ress
Net
Gai
nPr
opos
edU
nits
Bor
ough
Ref
2013/14
18/03/2010
KingstonPowerStation,SkerneRoad
347
347
06/12424
2013/14
13/04/2012
16-18,RichmondRoad
89
07/12889
2013/14
06/03/2009
7,ParkRoad
33
07/12961
2013/14
05/10/2011
63-69,KingstonRoad
99
07/14878
2013/14
13/01/2011
LandAdjacentto18,SandalRoad
11
07/15101
2013/14
24/06/2011
29and29a,SurbitonHillRoad
89
07/16655
2013/14
24/03/2011
129,FullersWaySouth
12
08/10018
2013/14
10/08/2011
28-32,SomersetAvenue
57
08/10032
2014/15
22/08/2012
34,BerrylandsRoad
2020
08/16274
2014/15
10/01/2013
RearOf27-29,StJamesRoad
11
08/16579
2013/14
30/03/2012
RedLionPH,2,RedLionRoad
4750
09/10155
2014/15
07/09/2012
SideandRearOf55,KingstonHill
99
09/12606
2013/14
01/11/2012
58-60,KingstonRoad
66
09/14538
2014/15
21/01/2013
34,ParkRoad
12
09/16099
2014/15
16/11/2012
39-42,VictoriaRoad
3939
09/16331
2014/15
06/09/2012
Suncroft,GreenLane,Chessington
89
10/10143
77
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)St
artD
ate
Add
ress
Net
Gai
nPr
opos
edU
nits
Bor
ough
Ref
2013/14
28/11/2012
72,KingstonRoad
35
10/14047
2014/15
15/03/2013
EdwardsHouse,2,AlricAvenue
66
10/14747
2014/15
03/01/2012
100-104,MapleRoad
2121
10/16172
2014/15
28/02/2013
15-19,LangleyRoad
3434
10/16180
2013/14
20/12/2011
121,WarrenDriveSouth
11
10/16577
2014/15
30/09/2011
RearOf16-26,BerrylandsRoad
1313
10/16601
2013/14
18/11/2011
BrickStables,BarwellCourtFarm,Barwell
Lane
22
11/10196
2013/14
27/07/2012
8,BrunswickRoad
12
11/12394
2013/14
03/09/2012
130,LondonRoad
23
11/12677
2014/15
13/02/2013
FormerRemoval&StorageWarehouse,
23a,ChurchRoad
66
11/12761
2014/15
06/08/2012
LandatTheKeep&TheKeep,KingsRoad
88
11/12812
2014/15
21/03/2013
GraftonWorks,GraftonRoad
88
11/14653
2014/15
09/01/2013
FormerGarage,59,KingstonRoad
4040
11/14739
2013/14
21/02/2013
20,AshbyAvenue
11
12/10268
2014/15
22/01/2013
350-354,MaldenRoad
44
12/14363
2014/15
17/01/2013
Units2-3,ChanceryCourt
44
12/16043
2014/15
28/03/2013
LandatRearOf138-140,TolworthRise
South
22
12/16100
78
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)St
artD
ate
Add
ress
Net
Gai
nPr
opos
edU
nits
Bor
ough
Ref
2013/14
09/11/2012
93-97,BrightonRoad
22
12/16142
2014/15
25/03/2013
30,KingsCharlesRoad
44
12/16196
675
689
Tota
l
Tabl
e10
Site
sw
ithPl
anni
ngPe
rmis
sion
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Uni
tsB
orou
ghR
ef
2014/15
09/09/2005
392,LeatherheadRoad
55
05/10211
2014/15
16/11/2011
1,ChurchRoad
44
08/12724
2015/16
22/10/2010
5,FassettRoad
88
09/12390
2013/14
06/04/2010
CharterCourt,LindenGrove
33
09/14783
2015/16
24/04/2010
48,HerneRoad
34
09/16231
2015/16
17/09/2010
122-124,TolworthBroadway
24
10/10150
2014/15
15/11/2010
Field0018(AkaOakfieldFarm),Rushett
Lane
11
10/10196
2014/15
11/06/2010
139,RichmondRoad
11
10/12026
2014/15
03/11/2011
StrandHouse,169-171,RichmondRoad
66
10/12271
2015/16
16/08/2011
43,RichmondRoad
44
10/12318
2014/15
10/09/2010
11-13,AppleMarket
11
10/12347
2014/15
21/02/2011
31,CambridgeRoad
12
10/12370
79
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Uni
tsB
orou
ghR
ef
2015/16
17/06/2011
VacantPlotat126,LondonRoad
66
10/12656
2014/15
12/01/2011
24,OrchardRoad
12
10/12754
2014/15
24/03/2011
RearOf43,SurbitonRoad
11
10/12762
2015/16
12/08/2011
LandAdjacentTheLodge,41,Cambridge
Road
55
10/12777
2014/15
16/09/2010
8,PenrithRoad
11
10/14450
2014/15
26/10/2010
RearOf5,CoombeLaneWest
11
10/14590
2014/15
28/10/2010
9,LongWalk
11
10/14623
2014/15
17/02/2011
88,BurlingtonRoad
11
10/14878
2014/15
09/03/2011
RearOf3&5,CambridgeRoad
11
10/14882
2014/15
06/08/2010
306,EwellRoad
24
10/16152
2014/15
21/07/2010
54,WarrenDriveSouth
12
10/16179
2015/16
28/07/2011
12,ClaremontGardens
66
10/16241
2014/15
06/10/2010
5,SurbitonHillRoad
33
10/16242
2014/15
02/08/2010
176,TolworthRiseSouth
12
10/16248
2015/16
15/10/2010
169,SurbitonHillPark
34
10/16363
2015/16
15/11/2010
FormerCarCompoundAt2a,andLand
Adjacent2,EllertonRoad
2323
10/16400
2015/16
10/01/2011
6,ClaremontGardens
88
10/16402
80
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Uni
tsB
orou
ghR
ef
2014/15
24/05/2011
8,AshcroftRoad
12
11/10021
2015/16
30/03/2012
1-4StationBuildings,FifeRoad
48
11/12228
2016/17
30/03/2012
StJamesCourt,GroveCrescent
66
11/12382
2016/17
21/06/2012
LandAdjoining24-26DintonRoadand219,
ParkRoad
66
11/12503
2014/15
19/10/2011
'Watergate',11,AlbanyParkRoad
12
11/12535
2014/15
30/03/2012
21,CastleStreet
11
11/12690
2013/14
30/03/2012
RearOf196,ParkRoad
11
11/12824
2015/16
31/01/2012
27,OldLondonRoad
88
11/12844
2014/15
23/05/2011
RearOf122-124,CoombeLaneWest
11
11/14002
2014/15
14/03/2011
LandAdjacentTo3,CoombeLaneWest
22
11/14003
2014/15
12/04/2012
CharterCourt,LindenGrove
22
11/14044
2014/15
10/08/2011
138,ManorDriveNorth
11
11/14213
2014/15
08/06/2011
106,KingstonRoad
12
11/14275
2013/14
18/01/2012
TelegraphCottage,WarrenRoad
11
11/14479
2014/15
13/09/2011
27,GreenLane
12
11/14481
2014/15
20/03/2012
Thornton,KingstonHill
12
11/14483
2014/15
09/09/2011
7a,CoombeRoad
11
11/14486
2015/16
30/03/2012
Brycbox,CocksCrescent
5050
11/14533
81
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Uni
tsB
orou
ghR
ef
2016/17
29/01/2013
ChristchurchandVicarage,93,Coombe
Wood
56
11/14936
2014/15
16/04/2012
Mowbray,CoombeHillRoad
12
11/14958
2014/15
23/05/2011
8,HookRoad
11
11/16106
2014/15
08/04/2011
82,DouglasRoad
11
11/16110
2014/15
23/05/2011
153,TolworthRiseNorth
12
11/16171
2014/15
18/07/2011
77,MapleRoad
11
11/16216
2014/15
18/11/2011
ThorogoodHouse,30-34,TolworthClose
22
11/16229
2014/15
15/03/2012
32-33,VictoriaRoad
77
11/16302
2014/15
30/03/2012
143,RedLionRoad
11
11/16481
2014/15
30/03/2012
PemburyCourt,EwellRoad
22
11/16485
2014/15
08/12/2011
GarageandLand,45,KingsKeep
11
11/16492
2015/16
18/11/2011
6,SurbitonHillRoad
12
11/16495
2015/16
30/03/2012
LonsdaleCourt,LovelaceRoad
44
11/16535
2015/16
10/07/2012
3,TheDrive
12
11/16542
2014/15
20/03/2012
EuroluxHouse,456,EwellRoad
11
11/16598
2014/15
30/03/2012
37,VictoriaRoad
22
11/16609
2015/16
30/03/2012
133,KingCharlesRoad
12
11/16612
82
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Uni
tsB
orou
ghR
ef
2014/15
30/03/2012
Former'MapleLodge'10,Southborough
Road
11
11/16637
2014/15
28/03/2013
Flats70-89SurbitonCourt,StAndrews
Square
33
11/16648
2014/15
07/03/2013
60-62,RedLionRoad
22
12/10109
2014/15
28/01/2013
114,TolworthRoad
11
12/10154
2014/15
09/10/2012
74,LenelbyRoad
33
12/10194
2015/16
31/01/2013
Landat235-237,MoorLane
66
12/10228
2014/15
29/03/2012
TownEndHouse,1-8TownEndParade,
HighStreet
44
12/12014
2014/15
19/10/2012
TheWelshHall,ElmRoad
22
12/12066
2013/14
18/06/2012
BuildersYard,StAlbansRoad
11
12/12157
2014/15
12/10/2012
53,FassettRoad
24
12/12207
2015/16
10/10/2012
6,CadoganRoad
17
12/12332
2013/14
07/12/2012
HawksHouse,SchoolPassage
11
12/12453
2015/16
06/02/2013
28-30,CastleStreet
99
12/12589
2014/15
19/12/2012
RearOf55,MillStreet
11
12/12600
2014/15
28/03/2013
TheAlexandra,ParkRoad
33
12/12738
2014/15
09/03/2012
44,HighStreet
11
12/14001
2014/15
13/11/2012
ThreeGables,CoombeWoodRoad
12
12/14035
83
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Uni
tsB
orou
ghR
ef
2014/15
27/09/2012
Fairlawn,WarrenRoad
44
12/14141
2014/15
11/12/2012
AmyWoodgateandCoombeOak,Warren
Road
44
12/14200
2015/16
20/02/2013
66-70,CoombeRoad
1720
12/14235
2014/15
20/12/2012
9,CoombeRoad
22
12/14612
2014/15
29/10/2012
FormerGreenHollow,CoombeHillRoad
11
12/14621
2015/16
11/02/2013
56,KingstonRoad
1516
12/14862
2014/15
31/01/2013
143-145,HighStreet
11
12/14954
2014/15
25/09/2012
169,EwellRoad
11
12/16041
2014/15
07/03/2013
123,WarrenDriveSouth
11
12/16073
2014/15
28/03/2013
80,SouthwoodDrive
11
12/16138
2015/16
06/12/2012
Garages,SouthTerrace
1616
12/16166
2014/15
10/08/2012
R/O32,TheRidings
11
12/16237
2014/15
08/10/2012
5,GroveRoad
22
12/16251
2015/16
23/11/2012
AlphaWharf,HowardRoad
2828
12/16273
2014/15
31/08/2012
1,StMatthew'sAvenue
44
12/16338
2014/15
26/09/2012
62a,BrightonRoad
11
12/16354
2014/15
28/02/2013
84,EwellRoad
11
12/16379
2014/15
12/11/2012
TheVictoria,EwellRoad
11
12/16387
84
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Uni
tsB
orou
ghR
ef
2014/15
30/11/2012
7,SouthboroughRoad
11
12/16467
2014/15
17/12/2012
Garages,CranesDrive
11
12/16479
2014/15
28/03/2013
21a,VictoriaRoad
33
12/16612
2014/15
19/02/2013
306,EwellRoad
11
12/16649
2014/15
31/01/2013
31,TolworthBroadway
11
12/16685
2014/15
08/03/2013
RearOf152,ChilternDrive
11
12/16699
2014/15
18/03/2013
Birchglades,CoombePark
12
13/14056
378
417
Tota
l
Tabl
e11
Oth
erSi
tes
Pipe
line
10+
Uni
ts
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)St
atus
Add
ress
Net
Gai
nPr
opos
edU
nits
Bor
ough
Ref
2016/17
Applicationsubmitted
NorthernRiverfront,includingVicarageRoad
9797
09
2016/17
Applicationsubmitted
FormerGovernmentOffices,HookRiseSouth
270
270
18
2016/17
Pre-app
LatchmereHouse,LatchmereLane
6868
21
2016/17
Pre-app
5-29CoombeRoad,New
Malden
3030
HT01
2016/17
Pre-app
ShellGarage,71-73CoombeRoad,New
Malden
2525
HT02
2017/18
Pre-app
SundialCourt,TolworthRiseSouth
2828
HT03
2017/18
RBKSite
CocksCrescent(notincludingBrycboxHouse)
140
140
15
85
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)St
atus
Add
ress
Net
Gai
nPr
opos
edU
nits
Bor
ough
Ref
658
658
Tota
l
Non
-sel
fCon
tain
edSu
pply
Tabl
e12
Non
-sel
fcon
tain
edSi
tes
Und
erC
onst
ruct
ion
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(E
stim
ated
)St
artD
ate
Add
ress
Net
Gai
nPr
opos
edB
edro
oms
Bor
ough
Ref
2013/14
17/05/2012
Cumbrae'&'Oakdene',Upper
BrightonRoad
6464
08/16232
2013/14
08/03/2013
190-196CoombeLaneWest
9292
11/14797
156
156
Tota
l
Tabl
e13
Non
-sel
fCon
tain
edSi
tes
with
Plan
ning
Perm
issi
on
Com
plet
ion
Dat
e(e
stim
ated
)Pe
rmis
sion
Dat
eA
ddre
ssN
etG
ain
Prop
osed
Bed
room
sB
orou
ghR
ef
2014/15
09/07/2012
3-5PenrhynRoad
8787
12/12103
2015/16
30/03/2012
KingstonPlaza(180-190London
Road/8-11StationRoad)
130
130
11/12492
2015/16
19/12/2012
FourOaksCentre105aMountRoad
66
12/10277
2015/16
28/02/2013
80CambridgeRoad
100
100
12/12545
323
323
Tota
l
86
Appendix 4: Proposals SiteUpdate
The table below shows updated planning information for Proposal Sites listed in the KingstonTown Centre Area Action Plan.
K+20 Kingston Town Centre Area Action Plan Proposal Sites
Planning UpdateSite NameSite No.
No comprehensive redevelopment.Planning permission granted forvarious retail upgrades and
Clarence Street NorthP1
refurbishment e.g. 13/12530 andthe conversion of upper floors onClarence Street to residential unitse .g. 13/12686)/FUL and13/12586/PNO. The Council isengaged with the landowner(s).
No comprehensive redevelopment.Phase 1 upgrade of Eden WalkShopping Centre (completed 2011);
Clarence Street South (EdenQuarter)
P2
Phase 2 upgrade of Eden Walk(including a new medium sized unit– 11/12278) not started. The Councilis engaged with the landowner(s)and will progress a developmentbrief for the area.
No comprehensive redevelopment.Application 13/12032 permitted todemolish existing building to provide
East of Eden Street, AshdownRoad,Eden Quarter
P3
30 residential units and commercialuse at ground floor. Application12/12800 completed to demolishexisting buildings and replace withnew Bank. Application 11/12906 toextend and refurbish Primark storewithdrawn. The landowner of P3a isactively marketing the site to obtaina development partner. The Councilis engaged with the landowner.
No update. The Council is engagedwith the landowner(s).
St. James AreaP4
No update. However, this site hasbeen identified by the KingstonFutures programme to include
Cattle Market, Fairfield Bus StationP5
comprehensive improvements to thebus station, pedestrian links acrossWheatfieldWay to AdamsWalk, andimproved facilities for the MondayMarket.
No update. However, this site hasbeen identified by the KingstonFutures programme to
Kingsfisher, Kingston Library andMuseum
P6
comprehensively improve pedestrian
Proposals Site UpdateAppendix 4:
87
K+20 Kingston Town Centre Area Action Plan Proposal Sites
links across Wheatfield Way toAdamsWalk, and improved facilitiesfor the Monday Market.
Application 12/12313 forredevelopment to provide a newQuaker Meeting House andcommunity use under construction.
Former Fairfield NurseryP7
13/12892/NMA Non-materialamendment to planning permission11/12251/FUL being processed forchange of use of upper floors fromB1 to C3 (64 bedrooms)
107 - 183 Clarence Street, StationBuildings, Fife Road and Rear Yard
P8
No comprehensive redevelopment.Application 12/12764/PNO beingprocessed for change of use ofupper floor from B1 to C3.
Fife Road/Wood Street CornerP9
In relation to Application 11/12403extensions to the length of platformhave been approved. This site has
Kingston StationP10
also been identified by the KingstonFutures programme for major publicrealm improvements working inpartnership with Network Rail andTransport for London. Public realmimprovements currently under way.
Constructed - application 08/12363Quebec HouseP11
Application 07/12536 completed forthe redevelopment of Turk’s land sitefor 56 flats above G/F A3 use.
Northern RiverfrontP12
Application for 13/12264 for 97residential units, public realmimprovements and commercialfloorspace is currently beenprocessed.
Planning permission (10/12058)under construction for partredevelopment/part refurbishment
Bishops Palace House and 11-31Thames Street
P13
to provide new restaurants andcommercial floorspace overlookingthe river.
No updateGuildhall 1 and Yard, County Courtand corner St. James Road/BathPassage
P14
No comprehensive redevelopment.Application 13/12782/FUL forChange of use of car park from staff
Surrey County HallP15
use only to include public use duringthe night and from 5am-11pm atweekends and bank holidayswithdrawn.
Appendix 4: Proposals Site Update
88
K+20 Kingston Town Centre Area Action Plan Proposal Sites
Early discussions regardingredevelopment of Town House sitehave taken place at end of 2013.
Kingston University, Penrhyn RoadP16
Application 06/12424 for C1 use(150 bed hotel) and C3 use (347flats) under construction.(Development known as KingstonHeights and Kingston Riverside).
Power Station and EDF sitesP17
Constructed - application 04/12170Former Lok 'n' Store 12 SkerneRoad
P18
This site along with P20 has beenidentified by the Kingston Futuresprogramme for residential led mixed
Kingston College, adjoining sites andGas Holders
P19
use redevelopment. A planning briefhas been approved to guideprospective developers and ensurecomprehensive redevelopment ofthe entire site. Application 13/12046for construction of a 3 storey collegeextension, demolition of the PennyGallery and a retail unit relates tosite P19b.
This site along with P19 has beenidentified by the Kingston Futuresprogramme for residential led mixed
Kingsgate Car Park and RichmondRoad frontage
P20
use redevelopment. A planning briefis currently being produced to guideprospective developers and ensurecomprehensive redevelopment ofthe entire site.
Proposals Site UpdateAppendix 4:
89
Appendix 5: Glossary
DefinitionTerm
reference to demographic classification. A= Upper middle class (employed in highermanagerial, administrative or professional roles). B=Middle class ( employed in intermediate
ABC1
managerial, administrative or professional roles). C=Lower Middle Class (employed insupervisory or clerical and junior managerial, administrative or professional roles)
retail sale of goods to the public (e.g. shops, post offices, travel agencies and ticketagencies, hairdressers, funeral directors and undertakers, domestic hire shops, dry cleaners,
A1- Shops use class
sandwich bars - sandwich bars or other cold food purchased and consumed off premises,internet cafes
financial services - banks, building societies and bureau de change, professional services(other than health or medical services) - estate agents
A2 - Financial andProfessional Services useclass
restaurants and cafes - use for the sale of food for consumption on the premises. Excludesinternet cafes.
A3 - Restaurants and Cafesuse class
use as a public house, wine-bar or other drinking establishmentA4 - Drinking Establishmentsuse class
use for the sale of hot food for consumption off the premisesA5 - Hot Food Takeawaysuse class
social rented, affordable rented and intermediate housing provided to eligible householdswhose needs are not met by the market. Eligibility is determined with regard to local
Affordable Housing
incomes and local house prices. Affordable housing should include provisions to remainat an affordable price for future eligible households or for the subsidy to be recycled foralternative affordable housing provision.
housing let by Local Authorities or Registered Providers to households who are eligible forsocial rented housing. Affordable Rent is subject to rent control that required a rent of nomore than 80% of the local market rent (including service charges, where applicable).
Affordable Rent
part of the Local Development Framework, the annual monitoring report will assess theimplementation of the Local Development Scheme and the extent to which policies in theLocal Development Documents are being successfully implemented.
Annual Monitoring Report(AMR)
document used to provide a planning framework for areas of change and areas ofconservation. Area Action Plans will have the status of Development Plan Documents.
Area Action Plan (AAP)
(a) Offices other than in a use within class A2 (Financial and Professional Services)
(b) Research and Development - Laboratories, studios
B1 - Business use class
(c) Light industry
general industry (Other than classified as in B1)B2 - General industrial useclass
storage or distribution centres - wholesale warehouses, distribution centres and repositoriesB8 - Storage or distributionuse class
buildings or groups of buildings which, because of their character or appearance, areconsidered to make a significant contribution to the townscape and environment of theborough.
Buildings of TownscapeMerit(BTM)
hotels, boarding houses and guesthouses. Development falls within this class if no significantelement of care is provided.
C1 - Hotels use class
hospitals, nursing homes, residential education and training centres. Use for the provisionof residential accommodation and care to people in need of care.
C2 - Residential Institutionsuse class
Appendix 5: Glossary
90
C3 - Dwellinghouses useclass
C3(a) those living together as a single household as defined by the Housing Act2004 (basically a family)C3(b): those living together as a single household and receiving care (care in thecommunity) andC3(c): those living together as a single household who do not fall within the C4definition of a house in multiple occupation.
houses in multiple occupation (3-6 occupants) applies to dwelling houses occupied bybetween three and six unrelated individuals who share basic amenities (such as studentlets).
C4 - Houses in MultipleOccupation
the government department that sets national planning policy on planning.Communities and LocalGovernment (CLG)
the achievement of benefit for the local community made through an agreement betweenthe developer and the local authority to restrict or regulate the use of land. See planningobligations.
Community Benefit
the Kingston Plan (2008) was prepared as a requirement of the Local Government Act2000, it sets out vision for Kingston based on a community planning process. It was
Community Plan
produced by the Kingston Community Leadership Forum; a partnership of organisationsrepresenting all sectors of the Kingston Community. Visit:www.kingston.gov.uk/downloads/file/240/kingston_plan-our_vision_for_2020
an area of special architectural or historic interest identified by the local planning authorityunder the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Area) Act (1990). The local planning
Conservation Area
authority has a statutory duty to preserve and enhance the character or appearance ofsuch areas. Buildings in such areas are protected from unauthorised demolition and treesmay not be felled or pruned without consent.
document setting out the long-term spatial vision for the local planning authority area,strategic objectives, and strategic policies to deliver that vision. The Core Strategy willhave the status of a Development Plan Document.
Core Strategy
medical and health services - clinics and health centres, creche, day nursery, day centresand consulting rooms (not attached to the doctors or consultants house), museums, public
D1 - Non-residentialinstitutions
libraries, art galleries, exhibition halls, non-residential education and training centres, placesof worship, religious instruction and church halls.
cinemas, dance and concert halls, sports halls, swimming baths, skating rinks, gymnasiums,bingo halls and casinos. Other indoor and outdoor sports and leisure uses, not involvingmotorised vehicles or firearms.
D2 - Assembly and Leisure
in Kingston this consists of the London Plan, saved Unitary Development Plan policies,and Development Plan Documents within the Local Development Framework.
Development Plan
spatial planning documents that are subject to independent examination, and together withthe London Plan, will form the development plan for the local authority area. Development
Development PlanDocuments (DPDs)
Plan Documents can include Core Strategy, Site-specific Allocations of Land, and AreaAction Plans (where needed). Other Development Plan Documents including genericDevelopment Control Policies, can be produced. They will all be shown geographically onan adopted proposal map. Individual Development Plan Documents or parts of a documentcan be reviewed independently from other Development Plan Documents. Each Authoritymust set out the programme for preparing its Development Plan Documents in the LocalDevelopment Scheme.
all Development Plan Documents and the Statement of Community Involvement are subjectto independent examination by the Planning Inspectorate. This examination will test the‘soundness’ of the document.
Examination
a unique form of strategic citywide government for London. It is made up of a directlyelected Mayor - the Mayor of London - and a separately elected Assembly - the London
Greater London Authority(GLA)
Assembly. The Mayor leads the preparation of statutory strategies on transport, spatialdevelopment, economic development and the environment.
a building included in the list of buildings of special architectural or historic interest compiledby the Secretary of State under Section 1 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation
Listed Building (LB)
GlossaryAppendix 5:
91
Areas) Act 1990. Listed building consent is required before whole or partial demolition orany alteration which affects the character of the building is undertaken.
encompassing ideas about de-centralisation and the "Big Society", the Government'sdefinition of localism is as follows:
Localism
Empowering local communities: giving local councils and neighbourhoods morepower to take decisions and shape their areaOpening up public services: enabling charities and social enterprises, privatecompanies and employee owned cooperatives to compete to offer people high qualityservicesPromoting social action: encouraging and enabling people from all walks of life toplay a more active part in society, and promoting more volunteering and philanthropy
the name of the portfolio of Local Development Documents. It consists of DevelopmentPlan Documents, Supplementary Planning Documents, a Statement of Community
Local DevelopmentFramework (LDF)
Involvement, the Local Development Scheme and Annual Monitoring Reports. Togetherthese documents provide the framework for delivering spatial planning strategy for a localauthority area and may also include local development orders and simplified planningzones.
document which sets out the programme for preparing Local Development Documents.This must be submitted to the Secretary of State for approval within six months of thecommencement of the Act.
Local Development Scheme(LDS)
an annual plan setting out the implementation programme for transport schemes in theBorough.
Local Implementation Plan(LIP)
the plan for the future development of the local area, drawn up by the local planning authorityin consultation with the community. In law this is described as the development plan
Local Plan
documents adopted under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. Current CoreStrategies or other planning policies which under the regulations would be considered thedevelopment plan documents, form part of the Local Plan. The term includes old policieswhich have been saved under the 2004 Act.
the Spatial Development Strategy for London. It provides a strategic framework for theborough’s Local Development Framework. It has the status of a development plan under
London Plan
the Act. The Kingston Local Development Framework is required to generally conform tothe London Plan.
a document which sets out the Government's planning policies for England and how theseare expected to be applied. It sets out the Government's requirements for the planning
National Planning PolicyFramework
system only to the extent that it is relevant, proportionate and necessary to do so. It providesa framework within which local people and their accountable councils can produce theirown distinctive local and neighbourhood plans which reflect the needs and priorities oftheir communities.
the agreements achieved between developers and the local authority which securecommunity benefit under section 106 of the ’Town and Country Planning Act 1990’. Seealso Community Benefit.
Planning Obligations
National Planning Policy Guidance notes which formerly set out Government policy priorto PPSs and have now been superseded by the NPPF.
Planning Policy Guidance(PPG)
national planning policy produced by the Government. Previously known as Planning PolicyGuidance notes (PPGs) which set out the Government's spatial planning policies for Englandand have now been superseded by the NPPF
Planning Policy Statement(PPS)
the adopted proposals map illustrates on a base map (reproduced from, or based upon amap base to registered scale) all the policies and proposals contained in Development
Proposals Map
Plan Documents, together with any saved policies. To be revised as each new DevelopmentPlan Document is adopted and it should always reflect the up-to-date planning strategyfor the area. Proposals for changes to the adopted proposals map accompany submitteddevelopment plan documents in the form of a submission proposals map.
a planning form which is submitted to the department for Communities and LocalGovernment by Local Planning Authorities which includes data of planning applicationsdetermined by the Authority
PS2
the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012The Regulations
Appendix 5: Glossary
92
an option for Council tenants, housing association tenants, priority need households andthose on the housing register to buy a share in a property. A portion cost of rent is paid on
Shared Ownership/EquityHousing
the remaining share. The owner has the opportunity to increase the share they own by"stair casing" up to 100% of the property's equity. Shared ownership is also known as NewBuild HomeBuy.
Site of Importance for Nature ConservationSINC
allocations of sites for specific or mixed uses or development to be contained inDevelopment Plan Documents. Policies will identify any specific requirements for individualproposals.
Site Specific Allocations
housing provided at rents no greater than the Homes and Communities Agency's (HCA)target rents, locally managed by a registered provider. Socially rented accommodation
Social Rented Housing
should be available to households in housing need and will be allocated according toneeds-based allocations systems administered by the Council.
the Spatial Development Strategy for London, the London Plan, provides a strategicframework for the Borough’s Local Development Framework. It has the status of a
Spatial DevelopmentStrategy for Greater London
development plan under the Act. The Kingston Local Development Framework is requiredto generally conform to the London Plan.
sets out the standards which the Council will achieve with regard to involving the communityin the preparation of Local Development Documents and development control decisions.
Statement of CommunityInvolvement (SCI)
a generic term used to describe environmental assessment as applied to policies, plansand programmes. The European ‘SEA Directive’ (2001/42/EC) requires a formal
Strategic EnvironmentalAssessment (SEA)
‘environmental assessment of certain plans and programmes, including those in the fieldof planning and land use’.
provide supplementary information in respect of the policies in Development PlanDocuments. They do not form part of the development plan and are not subject toindependent examination.
Supplementary PlanningDocuments (SPDs)
for example: retail warehouse clubs, amusement arcades, laundrettes, petrol filling stations,taxi businesses, car/vehicle hire businesses, and the selling and displaying of motorvehicles, nightclubs, theatres, hostels, builders yards, garden centres.
Sui Generis use class
tool for appraising policies to ensure they reflect sustainable development objectives (i.e.social, environmental and economic factors) and required in the Act to be undertaken for
Sustainability Appraisal (SA)
all Local Development Documents. It encompasses all the requirements of the SEA (seeabove).
a borough wide statutory development plan, setting out the Council’s policies for thedevelopment and use of land under the pre-2008 Planning system.
Unitary Development Plan(UDP)
a Development Plan Document to define planning policies and site allocations for wasteprocessing and management.
Waste Plan
GlossaryAppendix 5:
93
If you would like to discuss any aspect of this document or the Local Development Framework generally, please ring the DPR Team on 020 8547 5002 or email us at [email protected]
Printed on recycled paper © Place, RBK Published 2014
PlaceRoyal Borough of Kingston Guildhall 2Kingston upon ThamesKT1 1EU