Upload
vunhi
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EMN Annual Policy Report 2012 Malta
1 of 59
Annual Policy Report 2012
on Migration and Asylum Policy
in Malta
EUROPEAN MIGRATION NETWORK
NATIONAL CONTACT POINT
MALTA
2013
Desk study completed by Maltese National Contact Point of the European Migration Network, which is co-financed by
the European Commission and the Maltese Ministry for Home Affairs and National Security.
This report is provided solely for the purpose of completing an EMN synthesis report on
Migration and Asylum Policy in Malta during 2012. The views expressed in this report do not
necessarily reflect those of the Maltese National Contact Point or that of the Maltese
Government.
The European Migration Network (EMN) is co-ordinated by the European Commission with National Contact Points
established in each EU Member State plus Norway.
2
ANNUAL REPORT 2012
ON MIGRATION AND ASYLUM POLICY
IN MALTA
Executive Summary
In 2012, Malta continued to experience an influx of migrants entering the country irregularly
by boat. In this regard it is important to mention that a total of 1,890 irregular migrants have
reached the shores of Malta from Libya. The claimed nationalities of those persons who arrived
in 2012 were mainly Somali (1233), Eritrean (454) and Nigerian (79).
Similar to previous years, one of the main difficulties encountered in 2012 was the large
number of irregular migrants who arrived undocumented and the difficulties encountered in
relation to the procurement of travel documents for the return of those who were not eligible
for international protection. In this regard, as for previous years, efforts were conducted by
local authorities in the sphere of voluntary return by implementing a number of projects aimed
to improve the return of such immigrants. In this regard it is pertinent to mention the
RESTART III project, which provides a number of re-integration assistance packages for
irregular migrants opting to return voluntarily to their country of origin.
Moreover in 2012 local authorities implemented the Cooperation between Malta and African
countries to enhance migration dialogue and development) project (COMAM), administered by
IOM and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry for Home Affairs. The project aimed to
enhance diplomatic and administrative relations between the Maltese authorities and their
counterparts in Countries of Origin in Sub Saharan Africa in order to develop specific and
sustainable actions in the area of assisted voluntary return.
In 2012 the Maltese authorities also aimed to further strengthen Malta’s cooperation with
important Countries of Origin and reinforce its return management capacities in order to better
manage the return operations of illegal migrants by implementing the Strengthening Malta's
Long-term Return Management Capacity Project (MAREMCA II). The aim of the project was to
address Malta’s challenges related to the return of those migrants who do not (or no longer)
fulfil the conditions for stay in Malta. The MAREMCA II is organised by the Ministry for Home
Affairs and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD).
In the asylum sphere, in 2012 the extension of the Pilot Project for the relocation of
beneficiaries of international protection from Malta was being implemented, with some of the
relocation initiatives taking place on a bilateral basis and others being part of the EU co-
3
financed extension of the Pilot Project. Following the relocation of beneficiaries of international
protection that took place in 2011, with 147 departing to Germany and another 10 to Ireland,
in 2012 more beneficiaries of international protection were relocated to participating Member
States. Germany relocated another 6 persons bringing the total to 153, Ireland relocated
another 20 beneficiaries, the Netherlands relocated 20 beneficiaries, 10 beneficiaries were
relocated to Denmark, Norway relocated a total of 31 beneficiaries, another 19 were relocated
to Switzerland, 4 were relocated to Lithuania, 4 were relocated to Portugal and 1 was relocated
to Liechtenstein.
It is also pertinent to mention that in 2012 a total of 307 beneficiaries of international
protection were resettled to the United States under the Unites States Resettlement
Programme bringing the total to 1,118 since 2007.
Throughout 2012, the Office of the Refugee Commissioner continued with its work to achieve a
sustainable asylum system, particularly aiming to further improve the quality of the asylum
decision. Similar to previous years, in 2012 the Office of the Refugee Commissioner invested in
a number of training initiatives to its asylum determination staff.
In 2012 the Agency for the Welfare of Asylum Seekers (AWAS) implemented a number of
integration oriented projects for the benefit of beneficiaries of international protection through
EU co-financing under the European Refugee Fund. One such project is the SPARKLET
(Supporting Open and Closed Reception Systems in Malta by Profiling, Action
Research and Knowledge Transfer).
During 2012, the National Commission for the Promotion of Equality (NCPE) carried out the EU
co-funded project JUST/2011/PROG/AG/1902 I’m Not Racist, But … with the aim of enhancing
equal treatment on the grounds of race or ethnic origin.
Several actions have been undertaken in the reporting year by way of implementation of the
National Action Plan on Combating Trafficking in Persons. In this regard it is pertinent to
mention that a number of training sessions were delivered by IOM experts to professionals
experienced in the field. Other initiatives were undertaken in 2012 such as the setting up of a
Stakeholder Task Force at Operational Level made up of several stakeholders and the
establishment of a Prostitution and Trafficking in Human Beings Unit within the Police Vice
Squad for further specialisation. Furthermore in 2012, work was conducted vis-à-vis an
awareness raising campaign. It should also be noted that the actions being implemented by
Malta in 2012, also contribute to the implementation of provisions Directive 2011/36/EU on
preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing
4
Council Framework Decision 2002/629/EC, particularly vis-à-vis victim protection measures
and the provision of training.
Also during 2012, the FRONTEX co-financed the project MELITA. The Malta Police hosted the
consular officers of Ghana, Nigeria and Bangladesh to carry out interviews with irregular
migrants. As a result of these interviews, documents for Nigerian and Ghanaian nationals were
procured and repatriation flights to these destinations were organized.
During 2012 Malta continued to participate in FRONTEX co-ordinated activities and operations.
Police officers were sent to Operation Poseidon as in previous years. Malta also participated in
five Joint Return flights to Accra and Lagos.
Efforts in 2012 were also conducted by the Malta Police together with the Italian Department
of Public Safety in order to foster the cooperation and communication methods used in order to
tackle various issues related to irregular migration. In this regard it is relevant to mention that
in October 2012 the respective authorities signed a Memorandum of Understanding between
the Malta Police and the Italian Department of Public Security to strengthen police cooperation
in the fight against trafficking in human beings, illegal immigrants, organised crime and
terrorism.
1. INTRODUCTION
Compilation of the Maltese Annual Policy Report 2012 was coordinated by the Policy
Development Directorate and the National Contact Point which operates within the Third
Country Nationals Unit of the Ministry for Home Affairs. The information used was from
published and unpublished reports with a view to report policy developments and also from
consultation with relevant departments and entities for supplementary information and data.
The aim of the report is to provide an insight into the most significant political and legislative
developments, as well as public debates, in the area of migration and asylum. The EMN Annual
Policy Report 2012 covers the period 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2012.
Consultation with various relevant departments and entities involved in the migration scenario
was conducted in order to compile the EMN Annual Policy Report 2012. These entities provided
official information and statistical data relating to their respective areas of competence. Within
the Ministry for Home Affairs, contacts involved the Office of the Refugee Commissioner, the
Malta Police Force Immigration Section within the Special Branch and the Agency for the
Welfare of Asylum Seekers. The Department for Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs and the
Central Visa Unit, as well as the Global Issues Directorate falling under the Ministry for Foreign
5
Affairs were also contacted. The Ministry for Education and Employment and the Ministry for
Justice, Dialogue and the Family and their institutions, namely the National Commission for the
Promotion of Equality (NCPE), Aāenzija Appoāā and the Employment and Training Corporation
were also consulted. Consultations were also held with the Migrant Health Unit within the
Ministry for Health and the Elderly. Published Statistical data was solicited from the National
Statistics Office.
The terms and definitions adopted in the EMN report are faithful to the terms and definitions
found in the EMN Glossary.
The terms ‘reallocation’, ‘relocation’ and ‘resettlement’ are used interchangeably and refer to
the transfer of beneficiaries of international protection from the country in which they were
first granted international protection to another which has agreed to host them.
1.1 Structure of Asylum and Migration policy
The Ministry for Home Affairs has leading responsibility for asylum and illegal immigration,
while other aspects of migration fall under the responsibility of the Ministry of Education and
Employment, the Ministry of Finance, the Economy and Investment and the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs.
As mentioned in previous Annual Policy Reports the enactment of the Refugees Act (Cap 420)
in 2002 paved the way for the creation of the two asylum determination bodies, namely the
Commissioner for Refugees and the Refugee Appeals Board. Responsibility for overseeing the
provisions of the Immigration Act (Cap 217) and the control of illegal immigration lies with the
Police Special Branch, whilst the Armed Forces of Malta, which falls under the responsibility of
the Office of the Prime Minister, is responsible for maritime border surveillance and rescue
Within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Department of Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs
deals with citizenship issues in accordance with the Maltese Citizenship Act (Cap 188) and
applies the relevant provisions of the Immigration Act (Cap. 217) relating to residence permits.
Also within the same Ministry, the Central Visa Unit is responsible for handling visa requests,
and facilitates networking between all of Malta’s diplomatic missions and consular posts, thus
playing a key role in application and authorisation procedures.
The Employment and Training Corporation (ETC), which falls under the Ministry of Education
and Employment, primarily provides and maintains an employment service for prospective
employees and for employers. The ETC also provides training courses to those wanting to
improve their skills. Information regarding employment and training opportunities, as well as
other practical information relevant to migrant workers and their families, is also available on
6
the ETC website. Beneficiaries of international protection are also entitled to attend training
courses organised by the ETC, in the same way as nationals. They also have access to services
offered by the ETC.
The National Statistics Office (NSO) under the Ministry of Finance the Economy and
Investment is responsible for the collection, compilation, analysis and publication of a wide
range of statistical information and related matters.
2. OVERVIEW OF ASYLUM AND MIGRATION POLICYDEVELOPMENTS (6-8 pages)
2.1 Political developments
Pursuant to in the Cabinet reshuffle of January 2012, the Ministry for Justice and Home Affairs
was re-designated as the Ministry for Home and Parliamentary Affairs. Following the
resignation of the Minister for Home and Parliamentary Affairs in May 2012 the Ministry was
re-designated as the Ministry for Home Affairs, under the direct responsibility of the Prime
Minister. The Justice portfolio passed to a new Ministry, namely the Ministry for Justice,
Dialogue and the Family. Another two Ministries were affected by the changes made, namely
the Ministries re-designated as the Ministry of Finance, the Economy and Investment and the
Ministry of Education and Employment.
The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Hon. Dr. Tonio Borg was nominated
for the post of European Commissioner by the Maltese Government in October 2012. Following
his official confirmation, Hon. Dr. Tonio Borg resigned as Deputy Prime Minister and also
resigned as Minister of Foreign Affairs once he took his seat at the Commission. Dr. Francis
Zammit Dimech took his role as Minister of Foreign Affairs in November 2012.
In December 2012, the Prime Minister advised the President to dissolve Parliament and an
election is being called on the 9th of March 2013.
2.2 Overall developments in asylum and migration
In 2012 Malta continued to experience an influx of migrants entering the country illegally by
boat, even after the termination of hostilities in Libya. In fact, a total of 1,890 illegal migrants
have reached the shores of Malta (as at 11 December 2012) from Libya. The claimed
nationalities of those persons who arrived in 2012 were mainly Somali (1233), Eritrean (454)
and Nigerian (79).
7
At the same time, the extension of the Pilot Project for the relocation of beneficiaries of
international protection from Malta was being implemented, with some of the relocation
initiatives taking place on a bilateral basis pursuant to pledges made in a European context,
with others being part of the EU co-financed extension of the Pilot Project in terms of the
European Refugee Fund Community Actions.
Following the relocation of beneficiaries of international protection that took place in 2011,
with 147 departing to Germany and another 10 to Ireland, in 2012 more beneficiaries of
international protection were relocated to participating Member States. Germany relocated
another 6 persons bringing the total to 153, Ireland relocated another 20 beneficiaries, the
Netherlands relocated 20 beneficiaries, 10 beneficiaries were relocated to Denmark, Norway
relocated a total of 31 beneficiaries, another 19 were relocated to Switzerland, 4 were
relocated to Lithuania, 4 were relocated to Portugal and 1 was relocated to Liechtenstein. It is
also pertinent to mention that in 2012 a total of 307 beneficiaries of international protection
were resettled to the United States under the Unites States Resettlement Programme bringing
the total to 1,118 since 2007.
During the year immigration-related issues were extensively covered by the media. The main
focus was on the rescue operations by the Armed Forces of Malta, which resulted in illegal
migrants being brought over to Malta. Reference was also made in the media to the
implementation of the extension of the Pilot Project for the intra-EU relocation of beneficiaries
of international protection from Malta (EUREMA) and the ongoing resettlement programme
with the United States.
Coverage was also conducted on a pending court case relating to Detention Service officials
accused of the murder of a Malian migrant.
3. LEGAL MIGRATION AND MOBILITY (5-10 pages)
3.1 Economic migration
In 2011 efforts were conducted to improve the employability of migrants legally living in Malta
by the Employment and Training Corporation (ETC)1. The Agency for the Welfare of Asylum
Seekers (AWAS) provided additional support to beneficiaries of international protection.
The Conditions of Entry and Residence of Third-Country Nationals for the purpose of Highly
Qualified Employment Regulations (LN 433 of 2011) transposed Council Directive.
1 The Employment and Training Corporation (ETC) is the public entity responsible for the employment sector. The ETC also offers training to service users. ETC falls under the responsibility of the Ministry of Education and Employment.
8
ETC attempts to forecast and anticipate skills through monitoring of vacancies submitted
directly to the Corporation, through the monitoring of local newspapers vacancy adverts,
through meetings with various stakeholders and through monitoring of employment licences
applied for. This gives an indication of the type and the extent of skills required in the labour
market and the shortages being experienced in particular occupational sectors.
The Corporation strives to strengthen its links with private employment agencies, social
partners and other organisations including Malta Enterprise in order to better understand the
extent and remit of local and foreign direct investment and therefore, the type of occupations
that will be available in the short and medium term. As such the situation pertaining to
specific skills shortages is effected by a number of other factors which are beyond the control
of the PES. To this end, greater collaboration amongst the various stakeholders, social partners
and employers is needed to spur on a greater understanding of labour market dynamics.
In an effort to address such needs the Corporation operates a number of employment and
training schemes, intended to facilitate the integration of jobseekers as well as cater for the
labour market demands including specific skills shortages.
EURES Malta strives to attract more highly skilled EU nationals to Malta, in areas where labour
market shortages exist. The supply in sectors such as construction, hospitality and caring is
lacking, as local jobseekers and workers are aspiring for better quality jobs. EU and third
country nationals are, to a certain extent, filling gaps in the aforementioned sectors.
Applications for an Employment Licence from TCNs are subject to a labour market test. There
are many aspects to labour market consideration, including the national situation in respect of
surpluses or shortages in the given occupation and sector; the employer’s history and situation
in terms inter alia of recruitment and redundancy patterns; business investments; and
contractual commitments. The third country national’s skill level, relevant experience and
overall suitability for the position in question are also taken into account.
Applications for third country nationals from firms that have effected redundancies in the post
in question, or in similar positions to that being applied to, in the preceding twelve months will
not be entertained.
Moreover there are a number of specific occupational/sectoral considerations as follows:
In the case of applications for highly qualified employment, applications will generally be
considered favourably, in line however with the labour market situation. To be treated as
highly qualified employment, applications must illustrate clearly that certain conditions will be
met, which include the following. The third country national concerned must hold qualifications
at ISCED levels 5a, 6 or above and which must be validated by Malta Qualifications Council;
must hold any necessary documents in the case of regulated professions; must have a job
offer which may be considered as highly qualified employment and which involves the payment
of at least 1.5 times the average gross annual salary as defined in the most recent Labour
9
Force Survey issued by the National Statistics Office (www.nso.gov.mt) but without prejudice
to any applicable collective agreements in the area concerned.
In respect of family members of diplomats stationed in Malta, applications are referred to the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs in view of the possible existence of reciprocity agreements. Where
no such agreements are in place, applications are subject to labour market considerations.
In respect of home-based carers, applications are at present not subject to a labour market
test. However, a medical certificate declaring that the applicant requires a full-time carer to
meet his or her daily needs, must be submitted with the application. In respect of carers for
children, a clear case must be made for the need to recruit foreign nationals, and if born
outside Malta copies of the birth certificates of children (aged under 16) must be submitted
with the application. If the children were born in Malta details regarding date of birth need to
be submitted for the Corporation to be able to retrieve a copy of the birth certificate from the
Public Registry.
In respect of culture and entertainment, the employer does not need to provide evidence of a
search for EEA/Swiss/Maltese candidates. He or she does however have to elaborate in the
covering letter on the reasons for the choice of the third country nationals concerned.
In respect of steel fixers, form work erectors and concrete shutterers, evidence of work
contracts is necessary. Employers may be required to actively participate in Open Days held by
the ETC and to interview suitable EEA/Swiss/Maltese candidates on request. Failure to do so
may result in non-issue of employment licences and/or revocation of current ones.
In respect of cleaners and room attendants, evidence of work contracts is
necessary. Employers may be required to actively participate in recruitment drives held by ETC
and to interview suitable EEA/Swiss/Maltese candidates on request. Failure to do so may result
in non-issue of employment licences and/or revocation of current ones.
In respect of chefs in restaurants offering ethnic cuisine, prior approval of the Malta Tourism
Authority is required in each case. Outlets with up to thirty covers may apply for up to two
third country nationals; outlets with up to one hundred covers may apply for up to three third
country nationals; outlets with over one hundred covers may apply for up to four third country
nationals. Applications from employers that engage the services of EEA/Swiss/Maltese
nationals as part of their staff complement will assist in the favourable consideration of an
application.
In respect of sportspersons, ETC will obtain the prior approval of the Malta Council for
Sports. In the case of footballers a copy of the contract of work submitted to the Malta Football
Association, would need to be submitted with the application for issue of Licence.
10
In respect of foreign minors to work in film productions, these applications are referred for the
views of the Department of Industrial and Employment Relations (DIER) and a Licence is given
upon DIER consent.
3.2 Family Reunification
No developments to be reported
3.3 Students and Researchers
No developments to report
3.4 Other legal migration
No new developments to report
In 2011 amendments were made to the national “Status of Long term residents (Third Country
Nationals) Regulations”, which transpose the provisions of Directive 2003/109/EC, whereby
integration measures were introduced in connection with the acquisition of such status. All
relevant information on legal migration to Malta was made publicly accessible on the websites
of the Employment and Training Corporation and also the Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs
Department.
3.5 Integration
In 2011, efforts were conducted to integrate legal migrants residing in Malta by the
Employment and Training Corporation (ETC) and the Agency for the Welfare of Asylum Seekers
(AWAS). The Ministry of Health, the Elderly and Community Care also embarked on a number
of measures aimed at promoting integration. It is also relevant to mention that in 2011 the
National Commission for the Promotion of Equality (NCPE) continued to raise awareness and
disseminating information on equality, diversity and non-discrimination issues, including
racism and xenophobia. In addition, research on discriminatory treatment on the grounds of
race or ethnic origin was conducted in order to further knowledge on this subject matter.
The Agency for the Welfare of Asylum Seekers (AWAS) implemented a number of integration
oriented projects for the benefit of beneficiaries of international protection through EU co-
11
financing under the European Refugee Fund. One such project is the SPARKLET (Supporting
Open and Closed Reception Systems in Malta by Profiling, Action Research and
Knowledge Transfer). This project had two phases – the first lasting 15 months from
February 2011 to May 2012 and the second phase commencing on June 2012 and ending on
the 15th November 2012. The overall purpose of the SPARKLET Project has been the
integration of the closed and open reception organisation in Malta, through the establishment
of a profiling system for service users. This project was led by the Agency for the Welfare of
Asylum Seekers and partnered by the Detention Service (DS), the Foundation for Educational
Services (FES), the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), Centraal Orgaan Opvang
Asielzoekers (COA) and the University of Malta (UOM).
The Responsible Authority (RA) of the General Programme Solidarity and Management of
Migration Flows has continued the implementation of the European Fund for the Integration of
Third Country Nationals (IF) and the European Refugee Fund (ERF), two funds under the
programme that try and facilitate the integration in Malta of Third Country Nationals (by
means of IF) and asylum seekers and refugees (by means of ERF). In the Annual Programmes
2013 (AP), which have been put forward for the European Commission’s approval in relation to
both funds, a number of actions are being proposed to be carried out between January 2013
and June 2015. The said actions are based on feedback received from a public consultation
session, which was organised by the RA on the 3rd of September, whereby attendees were
asked for feedback on the actual needs that can be assisted by the Funds in relation to
integration, amongst other actions. The AP 2013 for IF is therefore proposing to target various
actions focusing on the implementation of the common basic principles for policy of integration
of immigrants in the EU, through the:
1. Improvement of procedures for preparation of admission procedure to ensure
better integration;
2. Development and improvement of programmes and activities for the
introduction of newly arrived third-country nationals to the Maltese society and
their knowledge about Malta.
3. Development and improvement of the programmes and activities to provide
various consultations and information to third-country nationals in creating more
favourable opportunities for them to use public and private services.
4. Develop and Improve programmes and activities to provide consultations and
information to third-country nationals in creating more favourable opportunities
for them to use public and private services.
Other actions will focus on the elaboration of indicators and methodologies of evaluation for
appraisal of progress, adjustment of policies and measures and facilitation of coordination of
comparative learning through:
12
5. The creation and implementation of the systems dedicated to collect and analyze
information on the needs of various categories of third-country nationals
Actions have also been identified to build on capacities within policy, coordinate and build
intercultural knowledge on various levels and governmental departments through:
6. The training on the intercultural competence, capacity strengthening and
diversity management for policy makers, servants and other persons working in
the areas pertinent to the objectives of IF;
7. Create and improve systems for cooperation, co-ordination and maintenance of
relations of competent institutions and other interested parties.
Lastly the IF will also be used to promote the exchange of experience, verified procedures and
information in the field of integration among member states:
8. To support cooperation, exchange of experience and good practice among
involved Member States on all levels of the integration process
On the other hand the ERF will be utilised to target various actions focusing on the different
aspects of reception and integration of asylum seekers and refugees. Focus is once again
being proposed for the:
1. Enhancement of assistance provided to vulnerable persons through the provision of
welfare–oriented services;
2. Continued provision of educational services and cultural orientation classes.
Apart from the proposed actions above, projects awarded under the 2011 Annual Programmes
have been implemented in the reporting year. Such activities are planned to be carried out till
June 2013. A number of these projects target integration from different aspects, such as for
example training to front liners dealing with third country nationals, organised by the Ministry
for Foreign Affairs and training provided to teachers on the teaching of languages to third
country nationals, organised by the Ministry of Education. Another project provides extra
curricular activities for teens and youngsters within a locality, which has a large number of
TCNs. The aim of this project, organised by the Foundation for Educational Services in
collaboration with the St Pauls Bay Local Council, is to facilitate their integration amongst their
Maltese counterparts. Studies in this regard are also being conducted by the Jesuit Refugee
Services, specifically amongst young refugees and the difficulties they encounter in order to
integrate into Maltese society. It is also pertinent to mention that other activities are being
13
organised to bring the Maltese community closer to the third country nationals through food
tasting activities and the dissemination of recipe books with various food items prepared in the
TCN’s country of origin. This project is being organised by SOS Malta. Training addressing
directly TCNs is also being provided by the Employment and Training Cooperation to increase
their knowledge on the local aspects of daily life, while vocational training is being given to
asylum seekers and refugees by various NGOs such as Kopin Malta.
The implementation of such projects is made possible by means of apposite EU Funding
mechanisms. Funding does not only guide the way to integration through the pre-defined
priorities identified by Maltese authorities through the multi-annual programme, but also
provides the necessary assistance in order to enable specific activities to kick start. In fact the
IF through the implementation of 3 projects carried out at different periods between 2009 and
2012, has targeted directly 316 TCNs, while a larger number of asylum seekers and refugees
have been assisted through ERF amounting to over 11,000 immigrants.
Initiatives carried out in 2012 by the National Commission for the Promotion of
Equality to safeguard equal treatment on the grounds of race and ethnic origin
In 2012, the National Commission for the Promotion of Equality (NCPE) had its remit widened
to cover equal treatment on the grounds of race and ethnic origin (among other grounds) in
employment, education and training, as well as by banks and financial institutions. In fact,
Chapter 456 of the Laws of Malta – Equality for Men and Women Act was amended to enhance
the protection against discrimination on these grounds, thus extending NCPE’s remit.
During 2012, NCPE carried out the EU co-funded project JUST/2011/PROG/AG/1902 I’m Not
Racist, But … with the aim of enhancing equal treatment on the grounds of race or ethnic
origin. The general objectives of I’m Not Racist, But … are to develop a clear understanding of
the situation of ethnic minorities and housing and to empower respective stakeholders to
prevent or combat discrimination in this area; to empower the African minority to get their
voice heard, to advocate for their rights and to report discrimination; and to raise awareness
on racial discrimination and promote cultural diversity.
In fact, research is being carried out on immigrant and ethnic minority groups, housing and
accommodation, following which a training programme for property owners and their
representatives will be developed, alongside respective information leaflets. Training will also
be held with the African Minority in Malta, where the participants will be trained on issues such
as empowerment, lobbying and advocacy, getting one’s voice heard, reporting perceived
discrimination, and rights and remedies. The project also includes an awareness raising
component, namely an Anti-Racism Theme Day, comprising of various activities creating a
14
multicultural atmosphere promoting diversity. In addition, media spots and video clips on race
and ethnic origin will be developed to spread antiracist messages and promote positive images
of ethnic minorities.
3.6 Citizenship and Naturalisation
No new developments to report
3.7 Managing Migration and Mobility
3.7.1 Visa Policy
3.7.2 Schengen Governance
3.7.3 Border Monitoring
During 2012, Immigration Police continued to participate in the joint project MAREMCA II,
(Strengthening Malta's Long-term Return Management Capacity II) organised by the Ministry
for Home Affairs and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD). The
scope of such a project is to enhance Malta’s return capabilities and in this respect negotiations
were conducted with countries of origin such as Sudan, Ghana, Nigeria, Gambia and Burkina
Faso. During the year under study some progress was reported with Nigeria and Burkina Faso
and it is foreseen that draft agreements may be signed during 2013.
Also during 2012, the FRONTEX co-financed project MELITA continued to be implemented.
Malta Police hosted the consular officers of Ghana, Nigeria and Bangladesh to carry out
interviews with migrants claiming to have their nationality. As a result of these interviews,
documents for Nigerian and Ghanaian nationals were procured and repatriation flights to these
destinations were organized.
The Armed Forces of Malta (AFM) continues to support the Malta Police in border control
issues, specifically in the protection of Malta’s blue borders. As Malta’s sole maritime force, the
AFM provides the full range of capabilities at sea required to conduct surveillance, detect
incidents and deliver and coordinate operational responses.
During 2012 the AFM continued to invest in upgrades designed to enhance these capabilities
including the procurement of a second Maritime Patrol Aircraft, improvements to the
15
infrastructure at Air Wing, enhancements to existing maritime platforms and the procurement
of new maritime platforms to enhance rapid-response capabilities. All such procurement
activities were heavily supported with funding from the EU External Borders Fund.
In 2012 there was a continuation of training initiatives to AFM personnel in support of the new
equipment as well as with a view to improving general skills and knowledge. Such training was
conducted both on a national basis as well as part of joint training activities organised by
Frontex.
While not directly related to Border Control, the AFM established significant contacts with their
Libyan counterparts during 2012. This cooperation included the provision of training to the
Libyan Navy and Naval Coastguard, the conduct of joint exercises and a limited exchange of
operational information.
The SIS II project for Malta is possible through the implementation of hardware and
software solutions. The SIS II project is in an advanced stage of completion and is
expected to go live in first quarter 2013. A number of tests have been carried out in
accordance with the global schedule for the project as designed and implemented by the
European Commission. The final implementation phase includes the migration from
SISone4ALL to SIS II, the migration from SIRENE I to SIRENE II, and training of Malta
Police Force (MPF) personnel for the day-to-day operation of SIS II and SIRENE II
functions. In view of internal developments on the MPF systems, MPF have proposed
further infrastructure improvements, equipment and training in relation to the project,
whereby contractual change requests have been analysed for the purchase of further
equipment from PTL and implementation provisions on the Live and Test environments of
MPF by TBS IT TBS IT has contractual agreements for maintenance and support up to
2018. PTL have maintenance and support agreement up to November 2013, however, the
Ministry for Home Affairs has requested the Department of Contracts to extend this
agreement up to 2016 in line with the provisions of the same contract. Malta Information
and Technology Agency will be providing consultancy support to MHA Schengen Unit. Malta
has passed all the tests to-date, namely the PSAT, CTE and QT001, Milestone 2, and
Comprehensive tests. Malta is on schedule with the SISII implementation.
16
3.7.4 Frontex
During 2012 Malta continued to participate in Frontex co-ordinated activities and operations.
Police officers were sent to Operation Poseidon as in previous years. Malta also participated in
five Joint Return flights co-ordinated by this Agency and their destination was Accra and Lagos.
AFM continued to engage with Frontex on a number of fronts. AFM assets and personnel
contributed to Joint Operations Poseidon (Greece) and Indalo (Spain). Furthermore AFM
participated in two significant initiatives being led by Frontex namely the European Patrols
Network (EPN) and EUROSUR. The former is a series of regular coordination meetings intended
to enhance cooperation between the respective national authorities in the Member States and
also supports the exchange of information on operational initiatives and technical
developments. The latter is a formal data-exchange network that will be used for the transfer
of all border-control related data between Member States over a series of information layers
integrated into a single interoperable picture.
4. IRREGULAR MIGRATION AND RETURN
4.1 Irregular Migration
During 2012, no amendments were effected to the Immigration Act. The legal framework
therefore remained the same as for the preceding year. There were no significant court cases
locally that led to any changes.
Malta has experienced significant illegal migratory influxes from North Africa since 2002. Ever
since, the number of illegal immigrant arrivals remained consistently high, reaching a record in
2008, with 2,775 arrivals. Almost all of those who reached Malta illegally proceeded to apply
for international protection and the asylum recognition rate in Malta has consistently exceeded
50% over the past years, in view of the situation in the countries from which these asylum-
seekers originate, particularly the Horn of Africa.
During 2010 Malta experienced a reduction in the number of illegal migrant arrivals with 47
persons reaching the shores of Malta. This reduction in the number of arrivals was attributed
to enhanced border control measures by the Libyan authorities as well as to the
implementation of the Italy-Libya Treaty of Friendship. In 2011, migration flows reached
considerable levels with 1,579 persons in nine different boats reaching the shores of Malta due
17
to the turmoil in the North African region. The claimed nationalities of those who arrived in
2011 were largely similar to arrivals in previous years particularly Somali (455), Eritrean
(280), Nigerian (238); however a substantial proportion of the new arrivals were clearly
established in Libya before they left.
In 2012 Malta continued to witness an influx of migrants due to the unrest in the North African
region. In fact, a total of 1,890 illegal migrants have reached the shores of Malta from Libya.
The claimed nationalities of those persons who arrived in 2012 were mainly Somali (1233),
Eritrean (454) and Nigerian (79). In consideration of this situation Malta gained access to
emergency funds to help it address challenges arising from such influxes.
Efforts in 2012 were also conducted by the Malta Police together with the Italian Department
of Public Safety in order to foster the cooperation and communication methods used in order to
tackle various issues related to irregular migration. In this regard it is relevant to mention that
in October 2012 the respective authorities signed a Memorandum of Understanding between
the Malta Police and the Italian Department of Public Security to strengthen police cooperation
in the fight against trafficking in human beings, illegal immigrants, organised crime and
terrorism.
As regards legislation, the Immigration Appeals Board (Division) Regulations, 2011 (LN 246 of
2011) were published. These Regulations enable the setting up of a second division of the
Immigration Appeals Board with a view to expedite relevant proceedings. It should be noted
that this Board hears cases relating to the continued detention of a person in terms of the
Immigration Act (Cap. 217), as well as appeals vis-à-vis custody in virtue of a deportation or
removal order.
4.2 Return
There have been no significant policy and legislative developments in this aspect during 2012.
In 2011, the Maltese authorities implemented the RESTART 2 project. The implementation of
this project involved the participation of 66 persons who were returned to their respective
countries of origin. All RESTART projects aim to offer those migrants taking up voluntary return
assistance in restarting their lives in their countries of origin through reintegration assistance
(AVRR), as well as through the enhancement of capacities at local level to deal with all related
aspects of assisted voluntary return. Returnees were offered assistance and reintegration
packages tailored to their conditions, needs and prospects of reintegration. In 2011, Malta also
embarked on the MELITA 2010 project - a joint operation between Malta and FRONTEX aimed
18
at enhancing the partnerships with identified countries of origin. Meetings with third country
delegations in Malta were also held on a regular basis.
Similar to previous years, one of the main difficulties encountered in Malta in 2012 was the
large number of illegal migrants who arrived undocumented and the difficulties encountered in
relation to the procurement of travel documents for their return. In order to address the
situation local authorities implemented a number of projects aimed to improve the return of
such immigrants. In this regard it is pertinent to mention the RESTART III project, which
provides a number of re-integration assistance packages for irregular migrants opting to return
voluntarily to their country of origin. A total of 39 migrants were assisted in this manner.
It is also pertinent to mention the Cooperation between Malta and African countries to enhance
migration dialogue and development) project (COMAM), administered by IOM and the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry for Home Affairs. The project aimed to enhance diplomatic
and administrative relations between the Maltese authorities and their counterparts in
Countries of Origin in Sub Saharan Africa in order to develop specific and sustainable actions in
the area of assisted voluntary return.
The Maltese authorities also aimed to further strengthen Malta’s cooperation with important
Countries of Origin and reinforce its return management capacities in order to better manage
the return operations of illegal migrants by implementing the Strengthening Malta's Long-term
Return Management Capacity Project (MAREMCA II). The aim of the project is to address
Malta’s challenges related to the return of those migrants who do not (or no longer) fulfil the
conditions for stay in Malta.
Targeted training and knowledge transfer from experts from the Netherlands and the United
Kingdom, to Maltese staff involved in migration, was offered in 2012 by implementing the
Enhancing the Capacities of Return Management project (ECOR). The project contributed to
the further strengthening of Malta’s capacities in the areas of migration, asylum and return
management by providing targeted training and knowledge transfer.
Malta embarked on the MELITA 2012 project- a joint operation between Malta and FRONTEX
aimed at enhancing the partnerships with identified countries of origin. Meetings with third
country delegations in Malta were also held on a regular basis.
19
Malta participated in five (5) joint return flights for the return of illegal immigrants. It is also
pertinent to mention that efforts were also conducted on a bilateral basis between Malta and
Kosovo on the readmission of persons residing irregularly. In this regard on the 21 November
2012, the Agreement between the Government of Malta and the Government of Kosovo on the
Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation and the Implementing Protocol to the
Agreement between the Government of Malta and the Government of Kosovo on the
Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation was signed.
5. INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION INCLUDING ASYLUM
In 2012, the number of irregular immigrants that entered Malta increased significantly when
compared to the previous years. In fact, 2012 ranks the second highest year since 2001 in the
number of applications for international protection received by the Office of the Refugee
Commissioner.
The majority of applications were lodged by persons who entered Malta irregularly by sea. In
fact, the Office of the Refugee Commissioner received 1805[1] applications from this
category of third country nationals (TCNs). In 2012, this Office also experienced an increase in
the number of applications from other third country nationals who either contacted this Office
personally or otherwise were apprehended by the immigration police because they were not in
possession of a valid residence permit. In fact, this Office received 237 of such applications.
The absolute majority of the latter category of applications was lodged by Syrian nationals who
led by the volatile security situation in their country, approached the Office to seek protection
in Malta.
Throughout 2012, the Office of the Refugee Commissioner has continued with its work to
achieve a sustainable asylum system, particularly aiming to further improve the quality of the
asylum decision. To this effect this Office has invested in training its asylum determination
staff.
Through an ERF project referred to below, the entire team of asylum determination officers
attended an intensive training course on document analysis which aimed at developing their
level of expertise on the subject and at improving the asylum determination process. They
were provided with a personal document analysis kit which enables them to perform
preliminary analysis of documents presented by applicants. In 2012, six asylum determination
officers attended a ten-day training course in document analysis at an advanced level. These
persons have been trained to use state of the art forensic equipment which is available at the
20
Office of the Refugee Commissioner. In April 2012, two of these six asylum determination
officers, travelled to the Netherlands where they observed work practices at the Immigration
and Naturalisation Service – Documents Unit, and also received further education and
guidance on the analysis of breeder documents by the Dutch experts. This experience
contributed not only towards strengthening the cooperation between Malta and the other
Member State but has also indirectly led towards more harmonized procedures.
All the asylum determination officers have also attended a training course on Profiling Skills
that aims to assist them during the asylum interview.
Also throughout the year, eleven (11) asylum determination officers out of seventeen (17),
that is sixty-five (65) percent, attended seven (7) different modules of the European Asylum
Curriculum (EAC) now under the Centre for Training, Quality and Expertise (CTQE) within the
European Asylum Support Office (EASO).
The Office of the Refugee Commissioner continued with its good practice to provide the
necessary information to potential asylum-seekers, soon after their arrival in Malta (in case of
TCNs entering the Island irregularly by boat). Personnel from the Office visit the centers and
deliver information about the asylum procedure and inform them of their right to apply for
asylum in Malta. The Office delivers information through different means, including verbally
with the help of interpreters, through an audio-visual presentation and a booklet, both
available in eleven different languages. After the provision of such information, the potential
asylum-seekers are asked whether they need any clarifications. They are then asked whether
they would like to apply for asylum. Ninety-five (95.5) per cent of the persons that entered
Malta by boat (total number of 1890 persons) applied for international protection that is 1805
applications.
In June 2012, the Office of the Refugee Commissioner concluded two projects, namely: an ERF
Project entitled ‘Document Analysis in the Asylum Determination Process, Training and
Implementation’ and a GDISC project that the Office has benefitted from.
The ERF Project entitled ‘Document Analysis in the Asylum Determination Process, Training
and Implementation’ developed the level of expertise in the field of documentation analysis
within the Office. Through this project, the Office had all of its asylum determination officers
attend an intensive training on document analysis and also on profiling skills that aimed to
assist them during the asylum interviews.
The Office of the Refugee Commissioner has benefited from a GDISC Project that started back
in 2009 and ended in June 2012. Through its work with GDISC, the Office benefitted from
linguistic analysis, as well as, from the services of interpreters from the United Kingdom to
21
Malta when there was a need of an increased interpreter’s capacity for a short period to
provide practical assistance on the spot. This project allowed GDISC to assess this method of
interpreter’s pool that was envisaged as a task of the asylum support teams within EASO. This
Project has assisted Malta in developing practical cooperation with other member states in the
field of asylum.
In June 2012, the Office of the Refugee Commissioner has also embarked on a new ERF co-
funded Project entitled ‘Putting Integration into Perspective: Studying integration efforts of
beneficiaries of international protection and identifying areas where special input is needed’.
This project is a research study conducted through compiling questionnaires assisted by
cultural mediators. Through this project, the Office of the Refugee Commissioner aims to
assess the efforts made by beneficiaries of international protection to integrate into Maltese
society and to make them aware of any services that these may be entitled to.
5.1 Common European Asylum System
5.2 European Asylum Support Office
Two Ministry officials sit on the EASO Management Board as Board Member and alternative
representative. The role of the Board is to provide guidance the Executive Director and
approve the annually work programme, budget and procedural aspects of EASO. As a member
of the management board Malta also participates in the debates that provide direction to
ensure that EASO fulfils its remit. Moreover the members of the Management Board act as
national contact point and facilitators for dissemination of information and statistical data
between EASO and Member States.
5.3 Intra-EU Solidarity including Relocation
An example of topics presented by EMN NCPs in 2011 included the delivery of joint activities
amongst Member States to relocate beneficiaries of international protection from a single
Member State, e.g. the EUREMA (European Re-allocation for Malta) project.
The implementation of the first phase of the Pilot Project for the intra-EU relocation of
beneficiaries of international protection from Malta (EUREMA) began in January 2010. By the
time the project came to a close, 227 beneficiaries were relocated to Member States as seen
below:
22
EUREMA I: 2009-2010
Member State Number of
relocation
places
pledged
Number of
beneficiaries
relocated
Germany 100 102
France2 90 95
United Kingdom 10 10
Slovenia 10 8
Luxembourg 6 6
Portugal 6 6
Hungary 10 0
Slovakia 10 0
Romania 7 0
Poland 6 0
Total 255 227
In view of the influx of immigrants from Libya (following the Libyan uprising in 2011 and the
disproportionate burden borne by Malta), in April 2011 Council decided on a proposal from
Commissioner Malmström to ‘extend’ the Pilot Project for the relocation of beneficiaries of
international protection from Malta3 (EUREMA II).
The following pledges were made by Member States in 2011 for the relocation of beneficiaries
of international protection from Malta under the second phase - some on a bilateral basis and
others as part of the ‘extension’ of the Pilot Project to be co-funded under the European
Refugee Fund Community Actions (EUREMA II) as seen below:
2 France had also relocated 95 beneficiaries of international protection before EUREMA I. This was done bilaterally but France used EU-co-funding under its national programme. One reason behind France’s initiative may have been the fact that the first time intra-EU relocation featured in an EU document, was the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum of 2008, which the French Presidency had pushed as one of its major initiatives. EUREMA I was then the first multi-lateral relocation project. 3 EUREMA II end-date has now been extended from June 2013 to December 2013 in order to make up for the delays resulting from the delay in the funding being made available. This will enable post-relocation measures (integration measures) to be applied as planned with the assistance of co-financing, despite the fact that actual relocation is taking place later than originally planned (this delay was also due to difficulties in identifying beneficiaries to be relocated).
23
EUREMA II: 2011-2013
Member
State/Schengen
Associated State
Number
of
relocation
Number of
beneficiaries
relocated4
Bilateral/EU
funded
project
Germany 150 1535 Bilateral
Poland 50 EU-funded
Spain 25 Bilateral
The Netherlands 20 206 Bilateral
Denmark 10 107 Bilateral
Romania 10 EU-funded
Slovakia 10 EU-funded
Hungary 5 EU-funded
Ireland 10 208 Bilateral
Lithuania 6 49 EU-funded
Portugal 610 4 EU-funded
Bulgaria 4 EU-funded
Norway 30 3111 Bilateral
Switzerland 19 1912 Bilateral
Liechtenstein 1 113 Bilateral
Total 356 262
This project is ongoing and is set to come to a close in December 2013.
5.4 Cooperation with third countries including Resettlement
In October 2005, the United States (US) acknowledged Malta’s request for assistance, by
offering it a special programme of assistance modelled on the US Refugee Admissions
Programme. The United States Resettlement Programme (USRP) in Malta developed in two
phases. The first phase, which started in 2006, led to the resettlement of 28 beneficiaries of
protection during 2007. The second United States Resettlement Programme Phase 2 (USRP II)
reaffirmed the US’s commitment to help ease the disproportionate burden that migration
4 As at 18 October 2012
5 Germany has relocated a total of 153 beneficiaries of international protection from Malta on a bilateral basis. On 29 November 2011, 147 beneficiaries departed and on the 13 February 2012 another 6 persons departed to Germany, bringing the total to 153. 6 20 left for the Netherlands on 6 June 2012.
7 1 beneficiary left Malta for Denmark on 26 March 2012; a further 7 beneficiaries left for Denmark on 17 October 2012; and 2 left on 11 December 2012. 8 10 beneficiaries left Malta for Ireland on 13 December 2011. In 2012 Ireland pledged to relocate a further 10 beneficiaries from Malta. These 10 beneficiaries left Malta on 6 November 2012.
9 4 left on 12 December 2012. 10 Four beneficiaries have been relocated to Portugal on the 18 December with the remaining two expected to leave during the first quarter of 2013. 11 Norway has relocated a total of 31 beneficiaries of international protection from Malta on a bilateral basis. On 31 January 2012 8
beneficiaries departed, on 14 February another 4 departed, on 12 March another 9 departed, on 26 March another 3 departed, on 26 April another 3 departed and on 15 May 4 departed.
12 18 left Malta for Switzerland on 25 April 2012 and 1 left on 29 August 2012. 19 were originally selected by the Swiss authority, but 1 had been reported missing at the time of the departure of the first group.
13 1 left Malta for Liechtenstein on 25 April 2012. This was carried out as part of the Swiss exercise.
24
places on Malta and is giving rise to an increasing number of beneficiaries being resettled in
the US as a result of this initiative.
The United States Resettlement Programme is based on a collaborative partnership between
the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the International
Office of Migration (IOM), the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), government
entities and local non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active in the field of asylum. The
Malta-US resettlement initiative considers persons in urgent need of protection. It benefits
beneficiaries of international protection residing in Malta and originating from countries in the
Horn of Africa. Special consideration is given to women at risk, beneficiaries of international
protection with healthcare needs, unaccompanied minors, victims of torture or violence and
elderly beneficiaries of protection who may be considered vulnerable, where resettlement may
be the best solution in terms of integration due to family, and cultural ties. The process of
determining the beneficiaries of protection in Malta involves collaboration between the UNHCR,
the IOM, the DHS and the Maltese authorities.
So far, 1,11814 beneficiaries of protection have been resettled under this programme since
2007, 307 of whom left Malta in 2012.
6. UNACCOMPANIED MINORS AND OTHER VULNERABLE GROUPS
6.1 Unaccompanied Minors
The protection of unaccompanied minors in 2011 was one of the main priorities for the Agency
for the Welfare of Asylum Seekers, which falls under the remit of the Ministry for Home
Affairs. In this regard, the ERF co-funded project “Implementing a Socio-Educational
Programme for Unaccompanied Minor Asylum Seekers under a Care Order” was implemented.
This project aimed to address the social and educational needs of unaccompanied minors. The
service relating to the family-tracing of unaccompanied minors has also been enhanced
through the broader SPARKLET (Supporting Closed and Open Centres through Profiling, Action
Research and Knowledge Transfer) project.
Similar to previous years, in the local scenario a good number of persons arriving by boat
claimed to be unaccompanied and under the age of eighteen. In actual fact the numbers of
unaccompanied minors increased considerably with Malta issuing 86 Care Orders in 2012, in
order to protect and support these youngsters. The services offered to unaccompanied minors
remained the same in the reporting; however through the Sparklet Project (European Refugee
Fund, 2008-2011), the Agency embarked on piloting 15 cases of family tracing and is further
studying on how this can be consolidated in normal business operations.
14 As at 12 December 2012.
25
An interesting development in age assessment has been the implementation of age
assessment out of the Closed Centres. This enabled fast tracking of very young cases out of
the Closed Centres to Open Centres, in some cases, in the span of a couple of days. Age
Assessment was carried out at a later stage. In these cases the alleged minor was issued with
an Interim Care Order instead of a Care Order until the age was concluded.
Malta has also participated in the EASO expert meetings on unaccompanied minors taking
place in 2012, with the aim of sharing good practices and learning from other Member States.
6.2 Other Vulnerable Groups
In 2011, the then Ministry of Health, the Elderly and Community Care provided humanitarian
assistance during the Libyan crisis. In this regard it is relevant to mention that injured
individuals flown from Libya were provided with medical and surgical treatment.
Malta’s assessment of vulnerability remained linked to the fast-tracking of vulnerable asylum
seekers out of the Closed Centres as per Government’s policy. The Sparklet Project
(mentioned earlier), further assisted amongst other things, the identification of potential
persons having special needs. The comprehensive profiling of persons living in the Closed
Centres with the aim of getting to know the person at an early stage provided feedback of
possible vulnerable cases,. These cases were then referred to the Agency for the Welfare of
Asylum Seekers for assessment of vulnerability.
The tool used for this particular assessment was further reviewed and developed in 2012.
The VAAT Assessment Tool has been developed to incorporate a more holistic approach in
understanding both the service user's vulnerability and resiliency in the closed centre. It takes
a psycho-social approach and uses vulnerability and resiliency indicators across the service
users social and psychological context, to direct the assessment. The tool also incorporates a
scale to provide a further indication of high, moderate or low vulnerability and/or resilience.
26
7. ACTIONS AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS
Pursuant to the appointment of Malta’s first Anti-Human Trafficking Coordinator by the Prime
Minister in 2010, the Prime Minister established a Monitoring Committee, which convened for
the first time in May 2011.
The Committee members are major stakeholders in the sector, including the Attorney General,
the Commissioner of Police and the Permanent Secretary, Ministry for Home Affairs. The scope
of the Committee is to monitor the implementation of commitments relating to the fight
against human trafficking by the competent authorities, be this in this sphere of prevention,
prosecution of offenders or the protection of victims.
During its meeting of 30th September 2011, the Monitoring Committee formally approved
Malta’s first National Action Plan on Combating Trafficking in Persons
(http://mjha.gov.mt/MediaCenter/PDFs/1_Action%20Plan%20Trafficking.pdf).
The Action Plan, which covers the period 4th quarter 2011- 4th quarter 2012, provides for
actions aimed at preventing human trafficking, prosecuting offenders as well protecting
victims.
In 2011 the Maltese authorities have also teamed up with IOM who are assisting in the
implementation of the National Action Plan through the “Launching Initiatives supporting
Malta’s efforts to Suppress trafficking (LIMES)” project.
During 2012 several actions have been undertaken by way of implementation of the National
Action Plan on Combating Trafficking in Persons. In this regard:
• The Monitoring Committee was convened on a regular basis in order to ensure that
human trafficking was being addressed and countered in a strategically effective
manner, to ensure adequate monitoring and to make the necessary policy proposals;
• The Stakeholder Task Force at Operational Level was set up during the first quarter of
2012 and was also convened. The Task Force is made up of several Government
stakeholders, including the Police and Aāenzija Appoāā among others, as well as two
NGOs, namely Caritas and JRS, which have joined the Task Force on invitation in
September 2012;
• A Prostitution and Trafficking in Human Beings Unit was established within the Police
Vice Squad to provide for a greater degree of specialisation. This reform entered into
effect on 25th January 2012;
27
• Training sessions by IOM experts were delivered as part of the LIMES project in March
2012. This programme, delivered by two experts from IOM Rome, was held with a view
to define a formalised victim referral mechanism for Malta. The Stakeholders and the
IOM experts prepared a draft victim referral mechanism, which was submitted to the
Monitoring Committee. The Monitoring Committee formally approved the Mechanism in
question during its meeting of 19th June 2012. This Mechanism is being elaborated by
means of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), which are currently being discussed
by the stakeholders concerned;
• In July 2012, the same IOM experts delivered another training programme on victim
identification and victim support. This training led to the development of human
trafficking indicators for Malta. Pursuant to further consultations, the indicators were
submitted to the Monitoring Committee for approval;
• Information relating to human trafficking was published on the Ministry for Home Affairs
website on 10th September 2012 (http://mjha.gov.mt/page.aspx?pageid=207). Further
to providing information on what constitutes a human trafficking offence, the text in
question addresses victim identification and indicates the authorities to be contacted in
case of difficulty. The same information was also uploaded on the Aāenzija Appoāā
website on 12th September 2012.
A number of initiatives are currently ongoing, including the development of Standard Operation
Procedures (SOPs), which are being discussed by the Stakeholder Taskforce at Operational
Level. These SOPs build upon the Victim Referral Mechanism approved by the Monitoring
Committee.
Moreover, work is also ongoing vis-à-vis the awareness raising campaign. The services of an
international expert in the field have also been recruited in November 2012. Such expert will
be providing ‘on-the-ground’ assistance to local authorities and NGOs, further to conducting
research on the Maltese human trafficking scenario.
Another two important developments have also taken place. Firstly, in February, the Maltese
authorities hosted for the first time the Council of Europe’s Group of Experts on Action against
Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA). Secondly, this year’s United States TIP report, which
was published in June, rated Malta in Tier 2, up from last year’s Tier 2 (Watchlist) rating. The
report notes the significant progress that has been made by the Maltese authorities in this
sphere.
28
It should also be noted that the actions being implemented by Malta during the present year,
further to ensuring the fulfilment of the commitments entered into as a result of the adoption
of the National Action Plan on Combating Trafficking in Persons, also contribute to the
implementation of provisions Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in
human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision
2002/629/EC, particularly vis-à-vis victim protection measures and the provision of training.
The actions in question also significantly contribute to the implementation of the objectives of
the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the
European Economic and Social Affairs Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The EU
Strategy towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings 2012-2016, in particular
through:
• The establishment of a formal referral mechanism, which is being further developed
through Standard Operating Procedures;
• The development of National Human Trafficking Indicators; and,
• The establishment of the Prostitution and Trafficking in Human Beings Unit, which
effectively constitutes a multi-disciplinary law enforcement unit, particularly as it may
draw on the experience and assistance of other units, including that responsible for
Economic Crimes. This also enables proactive financial investigations.
8. MIGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY
Migration is one of the ten areas of focus in Malta’s Development Policy, showing the
importance that Malta relates to the nexus between migration and development. This regard
towards the phenomenon of migration also arises from Malta’s experience in the reception of
migration coming irregularly mostly by boat and mostly from the shores of North Africa. Malta
is at the southernmost frontier of the EU and as a consequence faces a high level of irregular
migration.
Migration is an important and complex issue in the context of development. It presents both
challenges and opportunities to both developed and developing countries. It is recognised that
well-managed legal migration can be a positive phenomenon when it satisfies the aspirations
of the migrants and their families, contributes to counteract the negative population growth
and/or economic expansion needs in host societies which have such needs. On the other hand,
whilst highly skilled, well educated and professional migration provides an input to the
developed economies many times it consists of a brain drain to developing countries and
29
therefore undermines their development, although remittances from migrants are an important
source of income for some countries.
In fact remittances generated by migrant populations in host countries are also seen as an
important element in development and to provide an essential injection of capital into the
developing economies to complement the flow of aid and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). In
this regard, it is important to exploit the potential benefits of the link between well-managed
legal migration and development.
The benefits of legal migration are undermined by the dangerous phenomenon of illegal or
irregular migration which is often controlled by criminal gangs and has resulted in many lives
lost on land and at sea, notwithstanding all efforts at search and rescue.
Malta remains committed to a humanitarian approach to the issues of migration and asylum
and notwithstanding pressures on its capacity, continues to honour its international obligations
in search and rescue and in providing assistance to all asylum seekers and legal protection to
refugees and persons holding humanitarian status.
Equally Malta continues to call for control of this phenomenon by collaboration between the
countries of origin, transit and destination and its positions internationally, and within the
European Union, have been instrumental in greater consciousness about this problem and in
the beginnings of greater international collaboration. It also calls for solidarity by the European
Union and its member states, and by the international community in responsibility-sharing in
addressing this phenomenon, including by the acceptance of resettlement of refugees and
persons holding humanitarian status in accordance with international law.
Notwithstanding these various aspects of this phenomenon, Malta continues to emphasise that
development policies and programmes are the only way to lastingly address the root-causes of
migration. In this regard, it continues to make its contribution, including financial
contributions, within the context of the European Union and the European Development Fund
while developing its own new programmes bilaterally. In this context, Malta continues to
pursue a policy whereby the European Union should provide development incentives for
countries which adhere to good governance and respect for the rule of international law,
respecting their international obligations including those undertaken, with regard to illegal
immigration, under the Cotonou agreement. This conforms with established practice of the
European Union to condition development assistance to good governance and respect for
human rights and the rule of law.
In its geographical focus, Malta will concentrate on specific areas which include the countries of
origin of migration without excluding development programmes addressed at other countries,
30
particularly in Africa. This aspect is considered under another section of the development policy
document.
9. IMPLEMENTATION OF EU LEGISLATION
There have been no changes in policy or practice as a result of EU developments.
9.1 Transposition of EU legislation 2012
N/A
9.2 Experiences, debates in the (non-) implementation of EU legislation
ANNEXES:
Annex A: Methodology and Definitions
A1. Methodology
Compilation of the Maltese Annual Policy Report 2012 was coordinated by the Policy
Development Directorate and the National Contact Point which operates within the Third
Country Nationals Unit of the Ministry for Home Affairs. The information used was from
published and unpublished reports with a view to report policy developments and also from
consultation with relevant departments and entities for supplementary information and data.
The aim of the report is to provide an insight into the most significant political and legislative
developments, as well as public debates, in the area of migration and asylum. The EMN Annual
Policy Report 2012 covers the period 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2012.
Consultation with various relevant departments and entities involved in the migration scenario
was conducted in order to compile the EMN Annual Policy Report 2012. These entities provided
official information and statistical data relating to their respective areas of competence. Within
the Ministry for Home Affairs, contacts involved the Office of the Refugee Commissioner, the
Malta Police Force Immigration Section within the Special Branch and the Agency for the
Welfare of Asylum Seekers. The Department for Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs and the
Central Visa Unit, as well as the Global Issues Directorate falling under the Ministry for Foreign
Affairs were also contacted. The Ministry for Education and Employment and the Ministry for
Justice, Dialogue and the Family and their institutions, namely the National Commission for the
Promotion of Equality (NCPE), Aāenzija Appoāā and the Employment and Training Corporation
were also consulted. Consultations were also held with the Migrant Health Unit within the
31
Ministry for Health and the Elderly. Published Statistical data was solicited from the National
Statistics Office.
A2. Terms and Definitions
The terms and definitions adopted in the EMN report are faithful to terms and definitions found
in the EMN Glossary.
The terms ‘reallocation’, ‘relocation’ and ‘resettlement’ are used interchangeably and refer to
the transfer of beneficiaries of international protection from the country in which they were
first granted international protection to another which has agreed to host them.
Annex 2: National Statistics
Annex 3: Bibliography / References /Sources
***********************
Annex
32 of 59
ANNEX
2012 NATIONAL CONTRIBUTION OF MALTA TO COMMISSION AND
TO EASO ANNUAL REPORTS
1. LEGAL MIGRATION AND MOBILITY
1.1 Key Statistics
First residence permits, by reason
Total Family reasons Education reasons
Remunerated
activities reasons
Other
reasons
First permits
N.B.
Statistics of residence permits will be available as per provisions of statistics
regulations when they are submitted to Eurostat. Actual current date is not
available in view of the fact that a new IT System has been implemented to
cater for the issue of documents in harmonised format containing biometric
features. Data is still being organised as it is currently available on two
electronic systems.
1.2 Promoting legal migration channels
Relevant information is regularly updated on the respective Ministry websites and on the
EU Immigration Portal.
1.3 Economic migration
1.3.1 Satisfying labour market needs
The Employment and Training Corporation (ETC) attempts to forecast and anticipate
skills through monitoring of vacancies submitted directly to the Corporation, through the
monitoring of local newspapers vacancy adverts, through meetings with various
stakeholders and through monitoring of employment licences applied for. This gives an
Annex
33
indication of the type and the extent of skills required in the labour market and the
shortages being experienced in particular occupational sectors.
The Corporation strives to strengthen its links with private employment agencies, social
partners and other organisations including Malta Enterprise in order to better understand
the extent and remit of local and foreign direct investment and therefore, the type of
occupations that will be available in the short and medium term. As such the situation
pertaining to specific skills shortages is effected by a number of other factors which are
beyond the control of the Public Employment Service (PES). To this end, greater
collaboration amongst the various stakeholders, social partners and employers is needed
to spur on a greater understanding of labour market dynamics.
In an effort to address such needs the Corporation operates a number of employment
and training schemes, intended to facilitate the integration of jobseekers as well as cater
for the labour market demands including specific skills shortages.
EURES Malta strives to attract more highly skilled EU nationals to Malta, in areas where
labour market shortages exist. The supply in sectors such as construction, hospitality
and caring is lacking, as local jobseekers and workers are aspiring for better quality jobs.
EU and third country nationals (TCNs) are, to a certain extent, filling gaps in the
aforementioned sectors.
Applications for an Employment Licence from TCNs are subject to a labour market test.
There are many aspects to labour market consideration, including the national situation
in respect of surpluses or shortages in the given occupation and sector; the employer’s
history and situation in terms inter alia of recruitment and redundancy patterns; business
investments; and contractual commitments. The third country national’s skill level,
relevant experience and overall suitability for the position in question are also taken into
account.
Applications for third country nationals from firms that have effected redundancies in the
post in question, or in similar positions to that being applied to, in the preceding twelve
months are not entertained.
Moreover there are a number of specific occupational/sectoral considerations as follows:
In the case of applications for highly qualified employment, applications are generally
considered favourably, in line however with the labour market situation. To be treated
as highly qualified employment, applications must illustrate clearly that certain conditions
Annex
34
will be met, which include the following. The third country national concerned must hold
qualifications at ISCED levels 5a, 6 or above and which must be validated by the Malta
Qualifications Council; must hold any documents necessary in the case of regulated
professions; must have an offer of a job which may be considered highly qualified
employment and which involves the payment of at least 1.5 times the average gross
annual salary as defined in the most recent Labour Force Survey issued by the National
Statistics Office (www.nso.gov.mt) but without prejudice to any applicable collective
agreements in the area concerned.
In respect of family members of diplomats stationed in Malta, applications are referred to
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in view of the possible existence of reciprocity
agreements. Where no such agreements are in place, applications are subject to labour
market considerations.
In respect of home-based carers, applications are at present not subject to a labour
market test. However, a medical certificate declaring that the applicant requires a full-
time carer to meet his or her daily needs, must be submitted with the application. In
respect of carers for children, a clear case must be made for the need to recruit foreign
nationals, and if born outside Malta copies of the birth certificates of children (aged under
16) must be submitted with the application. If the children were born in Malta details
regarding date of birth need to be submitted for the Corporation to be able to retrieve a
copy of the birth certificate from the Public Registry.
In respect of culture and entertainment, the employer does not need to provide evidence
of a search for EEA/Swiss/Maltese candidates. He or she does however have to elaborate
in the covering letter on the reasons for the choice of the third country nationals
concerned.
In respect of steel fixers, form work erectors and concrete shutterers, evidence of work
contracts is necessary. Employers may be required to actively participate in Open Days
held by the ETC and to interview suitable EEA/Swiss/Maltese candidates on
request. Failure to do so may result in non-issue of employment licences and/or
revocation of current ones.
In respect of cleaners and room attendants, evidence of work contracts is
necessary. Employers may be required to actively participate in recruitment drives held
by ETC and to interview suitable EEA/Swiss/Maltese candidates on request. Failure to do
so may result in non-issue of employment licences and/or revocation of current ones.
Annex
35
In respect of chefs in restaurants offering ethnic cuisine, the policy is as follows. The
prior approval of the Malta Tourism Authority is required in each case. Outlets with up to
thirty covers may apply for up to two third country nationals; outlets with up to one
hundred covers may apply for up to three third country nationals; outlets with over one
hundred covers may apply for up to four third country nationals. Applications from
employers that engage the services of EEA/Swiss/Maltese nationals as part of their staff
complement will assist in the favourable consideration of an application.
In respect of sportspersons, ETC will obtain the prior approval of the Malta Council for
Sports. In the case of footballers a copy of the contract of work submitted to the Malta
Football Association, would need to be submitted with the application for issue of Licence.
In respect of foreign minors to work in film productions, these applications are referred
for the views of the Department of Industrial and Employment Relations (DIER) and a
Licence is given upon DIER consent.
1.3.2 Skills Recognition
The Malta Qualification Recognition Information Centre (MQRIC), within the National
Commission for Further and Higher Education (NCFHE), is the official national body to
deal with the recognition and comparability of both academic and vocational
qualifications.
Furthermore, as from September 2012, the legal notice for the validation of informal and
non-formal learning has come into force and hence resident third country nationals also
have the opportunity of having their skills and competences assessed and validated for
the occupational standards already developed.
With regard to any measures introduced for already resident third-country nationals (in
the context of better integration), third country nationals that reach Malta in an irregular
manner, irrelevant of their subsequent status (Asylum Seeker, Failed Asylum Seeker,
Temporary Humanitarian Protection, Subsidiary Protection, Refugee), gender or race and
on equal measure as Maltese nationals can participate in the training programmes
organized by the Employment Training Corporation under the EU funded Employability
Programme. Such training programmes include English for foreigners. Additionally in
order to overcome possible communication barriers the Corporation, if demand exists for
particular courses, also organizes courses solely for such migrants. It has also been the
Annex
36
case, through the Corporation’s participation in integration initiatives (organized by
INTEGRA Foundation), that training programmes were held at Open Centres.
From a training perspective, additionally employers of such migrants can claim for refund
of costs under the EU Funded Training Aid Framework, for training that these migrants
would have successfully participated in at a cost.
From an employment perspective, such migrants also have equal access as Maltese
Nationals to services provided through the Corporation’s Job Centres, namely information
regarding jobs in the private sector and referral for same. In the case of persons granted
the Refugee or LTR status and their family members in Malta under the family
reunification rules, they can also participate under the EU funded Employment Aid
Programme.
With regards to Employment Licences, in order to facilitate access into the labour market
in the case of Refugees and persons granted the status of Temporary Humanitarian
Protection or Subsidiary Protection, such Licences can be applied for by the migrants
themselves (and not necessarily against a job offer). It is to be noted that such persons
are being allowed to hold down more than one job at any one time including self
employment.
It is also worth noting that at present the Employment and Training Corporation is also a
partner in the project called “An Employment Support Initiative for Refugees and
Beneficiaries of Protection”, an EU-funded programme led by the Agency for the Welfare
of Asylum Seekers (AWAS) to address the integration of former asylum seekers into the
labour market and to assist such migrants in finding active formal employment. The
Corporation trained staff working in the employment support offices set up by AWAS and
provided expertise on matters related to employment and training of migrants.
The above is not applicable to persons who are not citizens of the European Union within
the meaning of Article 20 of the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union.
1.3.3 Cooperation with partner / third countries for economic migration
N/A
Annex
37
Type of agreement Third countries involved Main purpose and
rationale for the
agreement
(EU or bilateral)
1.3.4 Highly qualified workers
In the case of applications for highly qualified employment, applications are generally
considered favourably, in line however with the labour market situation. To be treated
as highly qualified employment, applications must illustrate clearly that certain conditions
will be met, which include the following:
- The third country national concerned must hold qualifications at ISCED (see
below) levels 5a, 6 or above and which must be validated by Malta Qualifications
Council
- must hold any documents necessary in the case of regulated professions
- must have an offer of a job which may be considered highly qualified employment
and which involves the payment of at least 1.5 times the average gross annual
salary as defined in the most recent Labour Force Survey issued by the National
Statistics Office (www.nso.gov.mt) but without prejudice to any applicable
collective agreements in the area concerned.
To date no applications have been received by the Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs
Department however it is noted that enquiries have been made.
1.3.5 Students and researchers
Various scholarship schemes have been established by the Government of Malta to
facilitate mobility of Maltese at undergraduate, postgraduate and doctoral level. These
include the Malta Government Scholarship Scheme Undergraduate, the Malta
Government Scholarship Scheme Postgraduate, the Malta Science Scholarships, the Malta
Arts Scholarships Scheme, the Malta Sports Scholarship Scheme, the Scholarships to
Achieve Results in ICT and Financial Services (STAR), the Strategic Educational Pathways
Scholarship Scheme (STEPS). These scholarship schemes were developed to incentivise
participation in further rand higher education to facilitate economic development and
innovation potential. The development of targeted scholarship schemes in this regard
aims at increasing participation in further and higher education in these priority areas.
Annex
38
Furthermore, particular incentives are provided within the Malta Government Scholarship
Scheme Postgraduate in High Priority Areas of Study identified in consultation with the
Malta Council for Science and Technology (MCST).
1.4 Family Reunification
No new policies were established.
1.5 Integration15
1.5.1 Promoting integration through participation: socio-economic contribution
of migrants
The Responsible Authority (RA) of the General Programme Solidarity and Management of
Migration Flows has continued the implementation of the European Fund for the
Integration of Third Country Nationals (IF) and the European Refugee Fund (ERF), two
funds under the programme that try and facilitate the integration in Malta of Third
Country Nationals (by means of IF) and asylum seekers and refugees (by means of ERF).
In the Annual Programmes 2013 (AP), which have been put forward for the European
Commission’s approval in relation to both funds, a number of actions are being proposed
to be carried out between January 2013 and June 2015. The said actions are based on
feedback received from a public consultation session, which was organised by the RA on
the 3rd of September, whereby attendees were asked for feedback on the actual needs
that can be assisted by the Funds in relation to integration, amongst other actions. The
AP 2013 for IF is therefore proposing to target various actions focusing on the
implementation of the common basic principles for policy of integration of immigrants in
the EU, through the:
1. Improvement of procedures for preparation of admission procedure to
ensure better integration;
2. Development and improvement of programmes and activities for the
introduction of newly arrived third-country nationals to the Maltese society
and their knowledge about Malta.
3. Development and improvement of the programmes and activities to provide
various consultations and information to third-country nationals in creating
more favourable opportunities for them to use public and private services.
15Please also refer to the European Agenda for the Integration of third-Country nationals, COM(2011)455 final.
Annex
39
4. Develop and Improve programmes and activities to provide consultations
and information to third-country nationals in creating more favourable
opportunities for them to use public and private services.
Other actions will focus on the elaboration of indicators and methodologies of evaluation
for appraisal of progress, adjustment of policies and measures and facilitation of
coordination of comparative learning through:
5. The creation and implementation of the systems dedicated to collect and
analyze information on the needs of various categories of third-country
nationals
Actions have also been identified to build on capacities within policy,
coordinate and build intercultural knowledge on various levels and
governmental departments through:
6. The training on the intercultural competence, capacity strengthening and
diversity management for policy makers, servants and other persons
working in the areas pertinent to the objectives of IF;
7. Create and improve systems for cooperation, co-ordination and maintenance
of relations of competent institutions and other interested parties.
Lastly the IF will also be used to promote the exchange of experience, verified
procedures and information in the field of integration among member states:
8. To support cooperation, exchange of experience and good practice among
involved Member States on all levels of the integration process
On the other hand ERF will be utilised to target various actions focusing on the different
aspects of reception and integration of asylum seekers and refugees. Focus is once again
being proposed for the:
1. Enhancement of assistance provided to vulnerable persons through the provision of
welfare–oriented services;
2. Continued provision of educational services and cultural orientation classes.
Annex
40
Apart from the above proposed actions, projects awarded under the 2011 Annual
Programmes are being implemented with activities planned to be carried out till June
2013. Amongst the projects being implemented, a number target specifically integration
from different aspects, starting from training to front liners dealing with Third Country
nationals organised by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, to training to teachers on the
teaching of languages to third country nationals organised by the Ministry of Education,
to the provision of extra curriculum activities for teens and youngsters within a locality
which has a large number of TCNs so to enable their integration with their Maltese
counterparts. The said project is being organised by the Foundation for Educational
Services in collaboration with the St Pauls Bay Local Council. Studies are being compiled
amongst refugees of a younger age on the difficulties they are encountering in
integrating into the Maltese society. The said research is being carried out by the Jesuit
Refugee Services. Other activities are being organised to bring the Maltese community
closer to the third country nationals through food tasting activities and the dissemination
of recipe books with various food items prepared in the TCN’s country of origin. The
project is being organised by SOS Malta. Training addressing directly TCNs is also being
provided by the Employment and Training Cooperation to increase their knowledge on
the local aspects of daily life, while vocational training is being given to asylum seekers
and refugees by various NGOs such as Kopin Malta.
The above and much more is all being made possible through the Funds which provide
financial assistance to a number of projects which if not so assisted the projects would
have been of a more limited nature and in case of NGOs would not have even been able
to materialise. The Fund in fact does not only guide the way to integration through the
pre defined priorities identified by Maltese authorities in Malta through the multi-annual
programme but also provides the necessary assistance in order to enable the activities to
kick start. In fact IF through the implementation of 3 projects carried out at different
periods between 2009 and 2012, has targeted directly 316 TCNs, while a larger number
of asylum seekers and refugees have been assisted through ERF amounting to over
11,000 immigrants.
Annex
41
Information in relation to labour market integration has been provided as
requested in Section 1.3.2
Annual average unemployment rates of (Member) State citizens versus third-
country nationals residing in the (Member) State for 2012
Third country nationals Total national population
Unemployment rate (%)
1.5.2 Promoting integration through participation: rights and obligations –
achieving equal treatment and belonging
N/A
1.5.3 Promoting action at local level
As indicated under Section 1.5.1, the Foundation for Education Services in collaboration
with the St Pauls Bay Local Council is providing extra curriculum activities for teens and
youngsters within the locality which has a large number of TCNs so to enable their
integration with their Maltese counterparts.
1.5.4 Involvement of countries of origin
The Ministry for Home Affairs, together with the International Organization for Migration
(IOM) as the implementing agency, Germany, The Netherlands, and Ghana, as project
partners is participating in a project called ‘Reintegr-Action’ and which is co-financed
under the European Return Fund 2010 Community Actions. The project aims to enhance
cooperation between participating EU Member States and Ghana, a Sub-Saharan African
country with high migratory pressures towards Europe. This objective is implemented by
developing and testing common reintegration strategies aimed at ensuring a
standardised and sustainable reintegration of voluntary returns to Ghana.
A steering committee, made up of representatives from the participating countries and
IOM, was set up in June 2012 and entrusted with the task of taking strategic and
technical decisions on the implementation of the project activities. A study on the
current socio-economic climate in Ghana was commissioned and has been finalised in
December 2012. The study also analyses specific business-gaps in five regions of
Ghana. The identification of these gaps will serve to offer better reintegration
possibilities through business start-ups that have greater growth potential.
Annex
42
A seminar, together with a steering committee meeting was held in Ghana during 2-3
October 2012. The seminar provided an opportunity for international organisations to
discuss their work in Ghana and the expectations for the project. The preliminary results
of the study were also presented. During 2013 the project will provide for the return of
up to 50 Ghanaian nationals (20 from Germany, 20 from the Netherlands, and 10 from
Malta), the dissemination of information materials in the 3 Member States, assistance
being given to the returnees in Ghana according to a detailed business plan, and the
possible formation of a cooperative to contribute to the local socio-economic
development and increase the sustainability of the businesses set-up. The project will be
concluded in June 2013.
1.5.5 Cooperation, consultation and coordination of stakeholders
N/a
1.6 Managing Migration and Mobility
1.6.1 Visa Policy
Visas issued in 2012
Schengen Visas National Visas
Visas
1.6.2 Schengen Governance
2. IRREGULAR MIGRATION
2.1 Strategic Priorities
Priority I: Strengthening cooperation with third countries of transit and origin
on migration management
Annex
43
The relevant challenges in the Strategic Response for this sub-section are in particular:
I.2. Ensure implementation of all EU readmission agreements to their full effect
N/a
I.3. Enhance the capacity of countries of origin and transit to manage mixed
migration flows
N/a
I4-7 Prevention of irregular migration from (a) the Southern Mediterranean
countries; (b) the Eastern Partners; (c) the Western Balkans; and (d) the
Western Mediterranean and the African Atlantic coast
(a) The Armed Forces of Malta (AFM) has instituted an enhanced patrol regime in light of
increased migration flows during the reference period when compared to 2011.
Furthermore efforts to enhance the joint AFM-Police response to actual incidents
continued with a view to ensuring the smoothest gestation of all activities related to the
management of migrants when such persons actually land in Malta.
(b) N/a
(c) N/a
(d) N/a
Priority II: Enhanced border management at the external borders
The relevant challenges in the Strategic Response for this sub-section are in particular:
II.2 Preventing and combating irregular immigration by ensuring strong and
efficient border control
Agreements with third countries
In the reference period the AFM began engagements with Libyan counterparts from the
Libyan Navy and Naval Coastguard. Such contacts are still at the initial phase and the
training provided thus far to Libyan personnel has been limited to basic techniques
related to the boarding of vessels, Search and Rescue and Operational Maritime Law.
Annex
44
Border control including Frontex operations
In the reference period the AFM continued to consolidate the aviation capabilities used to
conduct surveillance of the maritime borders both by means of the procurement of
additional platforms as well as improvements to the land infrastructure supporting these
platforms in order to enhance their operational responsiveness. Procurement was also
initiated of enhanced surveillance systems for existing maritime platforms as well as new
maritime platforms to provide enhanced rapid-response capabilities
The local Immigration IT system PISCES was enhanced during 2012. The Visa
Management System was made available to border control officers at Border Control
Points (BCP’s) who are now in a position to check all Schengen visas issued by Maltese
consular offices abroad. Equipment for VIS was also installed at BCP’s during 2012.
The SIS II project for Malta is possible through the implementation of hardware and
software solutions. Malta has contracted Philip Toledo Limited (Maltese), TBS IT (Italian)
and Malta Information Technology Agency for this aim. The SIS II project is in an
advanced stage of completion and is expected to go live in first quarter 2013. A number
of tests have been carried out in accordance with the global schedule for the project as
designed and implemented by the European Commission. The final implementation phase
includes the migration from SISone4ALL to SIS II, the migration from SIRENE I to
SIRENE II, and training of Malta Police Force (MPF) personnel for the day-to-day
operation of SIS II and SIRENE II functions. Malta has passed all the tests to-date,
namely the PSAT, CTE and QT001, Milestone 2, and Comprehensive tests. Malta is on
schedule with the SIS II implementation.
b. Please describe any relevant (planned) actions taken to better coordinate
different types of border checks (e.g. automated and non-automated, fast-track
and non-fast-track) at the external borders.
Any queries that the border control officer may have with regards to any Schengen visa
issued by Malta can be directly verified through the VMS (Visa Management System).
The officers at border control points now have direct access to this system on a read-only
basis.
Annex
45
c. Please describe any relevant (planned) developments to ensure more
effective control of the external land, sea and air borders, such as reinforcing
border control staff, providing training, increasing overall resources etc.
During the year under review, training remained an ongoing monthly exercise which is
compulsory for all border guards and police officers. There were no significant changes
with regards to the complement of officers deployed at BCP’s.
Following the conduct of a Schengen Evaluation on Malta’s Sea Borders, the AFM is
responding to feedback from the evaluators and conducting an exercise to increase the
compliance of AFM training with the Common Core Curriculum (CCC). Staff levels are
scheduled to remain relatively stable in the next 12 months. Equipment will continue to
be improved and enhanced including the procurement of new maritime helicopters, an
EBF-funded contract initiated in 2012 and that should result in the delivery of a first
platform in 2014.
d. Please describe whether your (Member) State has benefited from / has
provided any support with regard to border control in case of specific and
disproportionate pressures in your / in another (Member) State. Also provide
information on your (Member) State’s relevant participation in Frontex
activities, by type of activity (e.g. joint operations).
As stated earlier, in the area of border control, police officers were deployed during
Operation Poseidon which had the principal aim of preventing illegal border crossings
between Turkey and Greece.
AFM participation in Joint Operations included:
- 3 x 6-man border surveillance teams participated in JO Poseidon Land on the Greek-
Turkey Border.
- 1 x Maritime Patrol Aircraft was deployed for a 30-day period on JO Indalo conducting
patrol missions out of Malaga, Spain.
e. Please describe any additional (planned) activities not already described
above that contribute to the strengthening of security and preventing irregular
migration at the external borders e.g. (i) use of advanced passenger
information in accordance with Directive 2004/82/EC; (ii) identification of
irregular migration routes - specifically inside the Schengen area.
Annex
46
During 2012, Immigration Police embarked on an EU funded project in order to establish
the best way forward with regards to set up of an advanced passenger data information
system.
Priority III: Preventing irregular migration via the Greek-Turkish Border
The relevant challenges in the Strategic Response for this sub-section are in particular:
III.1 Ensuring effective border controls are in place at the Greek-Turkish border
Police officers sent for this Joint Operation contributed by effecting debriefing interviews
of the apprehended migrants and thus contributed towards having a better intelligence
picture.
AFM deployed 3 x 6-man special teams within the framework of JO Poseidon Land in
support of the Greek authorities. Tasks conducted by the teams included routine
patrolling of the border, manning of static observation posts and response to specific
incidents under the leadership of the Host Member State.
III.2 Combating irregular immigration transiting Turkey to EU
N/a
Priority IV: Better tackling of abuse of legal migration channels
The relevant challenges in the Strategic Response for this sub-section are in particular:
IV.1 Prevent an increase in unfounded asylum applications as a direct
consequence of introducing visa free regimes in third countries and decrease
the number of overstayers in the Schengen area
N/a
IV.2 Combating and preventing irregular migration caused by visa liberalisation
There were no significant developments to report for 2012.
Priority V: Safeguarding and protecting free movement by prevention of abuse
by third-country nationals
The relevant challenges in the Strategic Response for this sub-section are in particular:
Annex
47
V.1 Improve the understanding of abuse of free movement rights by third
country nationals and organised crime aiming at facilitating irregular
immigration
General investigating processes and training of staff when interfacing with migrants to
detect such abuse are ongoing processes.
V.2 Prevent the fraudulent acquisition and use of free movement rights by
third-country nationals
Third country family members of EU nationals will be issued with improved security
documentation in electronic card format containing security features provided for in
Regulation 2002/1030.
Priority VI: Enhancing migration management, including cooperation on return
practices
The relevant challenges in the Strategic Response for this sub-section are in particular:
VI.1 Ensuring that all Member States have efficient migration management
systems in place in order to be prepared for fluctuating migration pressures
No particular developments to report
VI.2 Maximising the potential of a common EU approach in the field of return,
both voluntary and forced in compliance with existing EU acquis
The Ministry for Home Affairs, in collaboration with the International Organisation for
Migration, supports an EU co-financed Assisted Voluntary Return and Re-integration
Project for third country nationals in Malta. The project, Restart III, is a continuation of
previous AVR projects and is funded under the European Return Fund. During 2012, a
total of 39 persons were assisted to varying degrees to voluntarily return to their country
of origin, including for the first time persons returning to Somaliland.
During 2012, the Immigration Police through various projects, continued to try and
enhance the return capabilities. An important part of this process is having good and
established contacts with the countries of origin. This is particularly important in Malta’s
scenario as nearly all the arriving illegal migrants do not have any means of
identification. Moreover, the countries of which they claim to be nationals do not have
Annex
48
any local representation. Therefore the input of the countries of origin is essential in
order to establish and confirm nationality. In this context, various initiatives were
undertaken. These involved but were not limited to, invitations issued to consular officers
to visit Malta and conduct interviews with a view of issuing travelling documents to the
identified migrants. This proved quite successful this year as both the Ghanaian and the
Nigerian consular officers who came over managed to identify their nationals and issue
the required laissez-passer for them. This led to the organization of two charter flights
by the Immigration Police with Lagos and Accra being the destinations.
2.2 Key statistics
Third-country nationals returned (by nationality where possible)16
Returned as part
of forced return
measures
Returned
voluntarily
Among third-country nationals
returned voluntarily, the number
of third-country nationals
returned as part of an assisted
return programme
Nigeria 69 26 26
Ghana 59 5 5
Egypt 58
Libya 29
Somalia 3 3
Chad 1 1
Ethiopia 1 1
Guinea 1 1
Mali 1 1
Nigeria 2 1
Others 51
Total 266 39 39
16 Please provide the total number of third country nationals ordered to leave and returned in 2012. Please provide a breakdown of this total by nationality where possible.
Annex
49
3. INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION INCLUDING ASYLUM
3.1 Common European Asylum System
Back in 2011, the Office of the Refugee Commissioner started the implementation of a
GDISC interpreter’s pool project financed by the ERF Funds. This Project has been
expanded to include a pilot project on actually sending interpreters from the United
Kingdom to Malta when there is a need for interpreters for a short period to provide
practical assistance on the spot. The Office managed to bring over to Malta six (6)
interpreters in different languages.
The Office of the Refugee Commissioner must note and remark that the help received in
having professional and well trained interpreters available for our own asylum
determination process though the GDISC project has been extremely important and a
concrete sign of solidarity.
Another project undertaken through GDISC, that ended in June 2012, was the adoption
of language analysis which was conducted in partnership with a Swedish company. Malta
faces challenges with performing language analysis checks and this project assisted Malta
in conducting almost 150 language analysis.
These projects assisted Malta in developing practical cooperation with other Member
States in the field of asylum and it also indirectly led towards more harmonized
procedures.
3.2 Cooperation with the European Asylum Support Office (EASO)
3.2.1 Participation in EASO activities
From the 4 to the 6 June 2012, an asylum determination officer participated in the EASO
Asylum Support Team in Greece for the EAC module of Interviewing Techniques to
deliver the didactic part of the training course. The group was composed of Greek
nationals and one Cypriot national. The training program was spread over three days,
two of which focused mainly on the content part of the module whilst one day centered
on didactics.
Annex
50
Malta also contributed its experience and proposal to the EUREMA evaluation report
conducted by EASO.
The Office of the Refugee Commissioner has also ensured that it is duly represented by
members of staff in meetings organized by the European Asylum Support Office. Such
meetings include:
- EASO Training National Contact Point Meetings
- EASO Training Didactic Experts Meetings
- EASO Meetings on the Quality Matrix
- EASO Consultative Forum Meetings
- EASO Practical Cooperation Workshops (Syria, Afghanistan)
- EASO Meetings on unaccompanied minors
3.2.2 Provision of support by EASO to the Member States
Both the Office of the Refugee Commissioner and the Agency for the Welfare of Asylum
Seekers (AWAS) participated in training offered by EASO.
The Office of the Refugee Commissioner has been participating actively in the training
being organised by the European Asylum Support Office. In 2012, asylum determination
officers from the Office of the Refugee Commissioner attended the following EASO
training modules: International Refugee Law and Human Rights, Introduction to EU
Asylum Law and Police; Inclusion, Asylum Procedures Directive, End of Protection,
Interviewing Children and Evidence Assessment.
By the end of 2012, thirteen out of seventeen officers of the Refugee Commission
attended one or more of the EASO Training Modules since four new asylum determination
officers were recruited recently (that is, 76.5 percent). The Office of the Refugee
Commissioner has planned that by the end of 2013, all of the asylum determination
officer would have attended one or more of the EASO Training Modules.
Annex
51 of 59
EASO Training
Modules Total
Asylum Determination
Officers Inte
rnat
ion
al
refu
gee
law
Intr
od
uct
ion
to
EU
Asy
lum
Law
and
Po
licy
Du
blin
Reg
ula
tio
n
Incl
usi
on
Exc
lusi
on
Asy
lum
Pro
ced
ure
Dir
ecti
ve
En
d o
f
Pro
tect
ion
Co
un
try
of
ori
gin
info
rmat
ion
Inte
rvie
win
g
Tec
hn
iqu
es
Inte
rvie
win
g
child
ren
In
terv
iew
ing
Vu
lner
able
Peo
ple
Evi
den
ce
Ass
essm
ent
Dra
ftin
g a
nd
Dec
isio
n-
mak
ing
A 4
B 3
C 1
D 2
E 2
F 3
G 4
H 3
I 2
J 2
K 2
M 2
N 2
O 1
P 1
Q 0
R 1
Total 2 4 3 5 0 1 2 6 2 3 1 3 3 35
Annex
52 of 59
Participation in EASO Meetings:
The Office of the Refugee Commissioner has also ensured that it is duly represented by
members of staff in meetings organized by the European Asylum Support Office. Such
meetings include:
EASO Management Board Meetings
EASO Training National Contact Point Meetings
EASO Training Didactic Experts Meetings
EASO Meetings on the Quality Matrix
EASO Consultative Forum Meetings
EASO Practical Cooperation Workshops (Syria, Afghanistan)
EASO Meetings on unaccompanied minors
3.3 Intra-EU solidarity including Relocation
3.3.1 Support to national asylum systems
N/a
3.3.2 Relocation
In view of the disproportionate pressures facing Malta, and following an inter-Ministerial
pledging conference organised by the European Commission in May 2011, relocations of
protected persons from Malta to other Member States took place during 2012 as follows: 6 to
Germany, 10 to Denmark, 20 to The Netherlands, 10 to Ireland, 4 to Lithuania and 4 to
Portugal. Additionally other relocations to EEA countries have also taken place during 2012
including, 31 persons to Norway, 19 to Switzerland and 1 to Liechtenstein.
No relocations from other Member States to Malta took place.
Third-country nationals Relocated to your (Member) State
Relocated
Third-country nationals n/a
Annex
53
3.4 Enhancing the external dimension including Resettlement
3.4.1 Cooperation with third countries
N/a.
3.4.2 Resettlement
In view of the disproportionate pressures facing Malta, persons granted international
protection are resettled to other countries from Malta, particularly to the United States
with 307 beneficiaries of protection being resettled to this country.
No resettlements from other Member States to Malta took place.
Third-country nationals Resettled in your (Member) State
Resettled
Third-country nationals N/a
4. UNACCOMPANIED MINORS AND OTHER VULNERABLE GROUPS
4.1 Unaccompanied minors and other vulnerable groups
This year Malta experienced a considerable increase in the arrivals of unaccompanied
minors. A total of 86 Care Orders have been issued. Nonetheless Malta consistently
ensured a good support and protection level to unaccompanied minors. A new initiative
has been the piloting of 15 cases of family tracing through the collaboration with IOM on
the Sparklet Project under the European Refugee Fund, 2008-2011. This proved to be a
challenging yet interesting mechanism which the Agency for the Welfare of Asylum
Seekers is exploring how this mechanism can be sustained in normal business
operations.
Annex
54
4.2 Key statistics
Unaccompanied minors
Total Unaccompanied minors not
applying for asylum
Unaccompanied minors
applying for asylum
86 86
5 ACTIONS AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS
This Section should be completed also in the context of the "EU Strategy towards the
Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings (2012-2016)”17, and you should liaise with
your national rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings.
5.1 Measures to identify, protect and assist victims of trafficking
During the course of 2012, in fulfilment of the first National Action Plan on Combating
Trafficking in Persons, covering the period 4th quarter 2011-4th quarter 2012, the Maltese
authorities held training, which was delivered by IOM experts, in relation to victim
referral (March 2012) and victim identification/support (July 2012).
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) involving both Government stakeholders and
NGOs were discussed by the Stakeholders’ Taskforce. The Taskforce, which was set up
pursuant to the National Action Plan, is composed of Government stakeholders, namely
the Ministry for Home Affairs, the Office of the Attorney General, the Police, the
Employment and Training Corporation, the Central Visa Unit, the Citizenship and
Expatriate Affairs Department, the Agency for the Welfare of Asylum Seekers, Aāenzija
Appoāā, the national social welfare agency,, as well as two NGOs, namely Caritas and the
Jesuit Refugee Service. The Taskforce was established in early 2012, whilst the two NGOs
were invited to join the Taskforce in July.
Draft National Human Trafficking Indicators have also been prepared and submitted to
the Monitoring Committee for approval pursuant to the necessary consultations.
Moreover, ‘on-the-ground’ training for stakeholders in the sector was planned with a view
to further enhance victim identification capabilities. Awareness-raising measures have
17http://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/
Annex
55
also been planned, pursuant to the publication of information on human trafficking in the
websites of the Ministry for Home Affairs and Aāenzija Appoāā.
5.2 Measures to prevent trafficking in human beings, and to increase the
prosecution of traffickers
The ‘awareness’ aspects mentioned in section 5.1 are also preventive in nature.
Moreover, the authorities are planning to hold targeted awareness sessions for
potentially vulnerable persons, by way of prevention.
A Prostitution and Trafficking in Human Beings Unit has been set up within the Police Vice
Squad in January 2012, with a view to intensifying efforts in this sphere. This has led to
increasing numbers of inspections at premises potentially vulnerable to human
trafficking. Although this has not always led to the prosecution of human trafficking
cases, it has contributed to the detection and prosecution of other offences.
5.3 Coordination and cooperation among key actors
Reference is made to section 5.1, particularly training and the Standard Operating
Procedures, which would result to better coordination and cooperation among key actors.
The establishment of the Stakeholders’ Taskforce early in 2012, which Taskforce now
also includes two major NGO’s, also enhances coordination and cooperation among key
actors, as well as policy coherence.
Government also recruited the services of an international expert in November 2012.
Among other tasks, the expert would be conducting research on the human trafficking
scenario in Malta, thereby contributing to the acquisition of data and knowledge about
prevailing trends.
Cooperation with third countries vis-à-vis ongoing cases is conducted as necessary.
Annex
56
5.4 Key statistics
Third-country nationals receiving a residence permit as victims of human
trafficking
Third-country nationals 0
Traffickers arrested as suspects and traffickers convicted
Arrested / otherwise
involved in a criminal
proceeding Convicted
Traffickers 2 1 (sentence subject to appeal)
6. MAXIMISING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT OF MIGRATION AND MOBILITY
6.1 Mainstreaming of migration in development policies
Malta’s Development Policy highlights the link between migration and development,
making migration one of the ten areas of focus of Malta’s development work. Specifically
there is an emphasis that Malta’s development assistance should prioritise the Horn of
Africa region, since the majority of third country nationals that seek asylum in Malta
come from the region. Therefore Malta recognizes in its development policy and also
through its multilateral and bilateral development projects the need to support the
countries and territories in the Horn of Africa region. Various bilateral development
projects run by Malta’s civil society have been co-funded by the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs in the Horn of Africa region. Malta has also participated, through its military in
the European Union Training Mission to Somalia, which is based in Uganda, as a further
evidence of development activities emanating from the migration nexus.
6.2 Migrants’ Remittances
Malta does not regulate the amount of charges that are levied on customers when they
send money from Malta. Essentially, such charges are established by market forces.
Each entity which provides such a service is, however, required to be transparent in its
charging structure and that the customer availing himself of such a service is fully aware
of the charges which will be incurred BEFORE the transaction takes place.
Annex
57
In principle, Malta does not object to the proposal of having cheaper charges for migrants
when remitting money to their homeland. In fact Malta believes that refugees should not
only be given access to low-cost, secure and efficient remittance services, but also be
provided with the opportunity to open a basic bank account to manage their money. The
regulating financial body in Malta, the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA), does
not regulate charges, and in principle such charges should be determined by market
forces. To facilitate competition, the MFSA website http://mymoneybox.mfsa.com.mt
contains a section which compares charges levied by banks in Malta for bank transfers.
Malta encourages free market competition such that new entrants can provide
differentiated remittance services and provide a better service and at a lower cost for the
consumer. Furthermore the MFSA continues to process and licence - subject always to a
rigorous and comprehensive vetting/application process - institutions such as Payment
Institutions in terms of the Payment Services Directive and electronic money institutions
in terms of the Electronic Money Directive is in itself a tangible demonstration of
providing the requisite environment for increased and increasing competition in this area.
6.2 Migrants’ Remittances
Remittances generated by migrant populations in host countries are also seen as an
important element in development, providing an essential injection of capital into the
developing economies to complement the flow of aid and Foreign Direct Investment
(FDI). In this regard, it is important to exploit the potential benefits of the link between
well-managed legal migration and development.
Malta does not regulate the amount of charges that are levied on customers when they
send money from Malta. Essentially, such charges are established by market forces.
Each entity which provides such a service is, however, required to be transparent in its
charging structure and that the customer availing himself of such a service is fully aware
of the charges which will be incurred BEFORE the transaction takes place.
In principle, Malta does not object to the proposal of having cheaper charges for migrants
when remitting money to their homeland. In fact Malta believes that refugees should not
only be given access to low-cost, secure and efficient remittance services, but also be
provided with the opportunity to open a basic bank account to manage their money. The
regulating financial body in Malta, the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA), does
Annex
58
not regulate charges, and in principle such charges should be determined by market
forces. To facilitate competition, the MFSA website http://mymoneybox.mfsa.com.mt
contains a section which compares charges levied by banks in Malta for bank transfers.
Malta encourages free market competition such that new entrants can provide
differentiated remittance services and provide a better service and at a lower cost for the
consumer. Furthermore the MFSA continues to process and licence - subject always to a
rigorous and comprehensive vetting/application process - institutions such as Payment
Institutions in terms of the Payment Services Directive and electronic money institutions
in terms of the Electronic Money Directive is in itself a tangible demonstration of
providing the requisite environment for increased and increasing competition in this area.
6.3 Working with Diasporas
N/a
6.4 Efforts to mitigate ‘brain drain’.
No such measures have been implemented or are planned.
7. PROVISION AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION TO SUPPORT POLICY
DEVELOPMENT
7.1 Exchange of Information at EU level
Malta has contributed to the exchange of information through the European Migration
Network both through reports and replies to ad hoc queries launched by other Member
States; through the EASO including with the review of the pilot project, and; through
other fora as relevant.
7.2 Exchange of Information at Regional and National levels
N/a
***********************