Anpqp Version 2.2-Feb 2011

1

Feb 2011

ANPQP Maintenance Committee

ANPQP Revision

Version 2.2

2

Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”

3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1

4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements

5. Other Changes

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

3


Main Request

� Collect all requirements deployed since V2.1 publication and incorporate into the new

revision.

Alliance

�Study and improve commonisation to support optimised joint procurement e.g.

Alliance “High Volume Parts”.

�Implement changes in global supplier training.

Nissan

�Incorporate new requirements for “Important C” to improve customer satisfaction.

�Incorporate reinforced requirements such as “Examples of Process/Facility Site

Changes” to clarify change management requirements and reduce concerns caused by

un-approved changes.

Renault

�Reduce the number of ANPQP requirements and focus on the product and process

conformity.

�Ensure consistency with the V3P milestones.

4

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan RequirementsCommonised “Process Potential FMEA”, “Supplier Digital Test Report” and

“Part Submission Warrant (PSW)”.

2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”Reinforced “Sub-Supplier Management” and reviewed “Change Management”

and “Identification and Traceability” to prevent an issue and/or contain it

immediately.


5

3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1Standardised Nissan unique requirements for “Important C” and reinforced

requirements for change management through addition of “Examples of

Process/ Facility Site Changes”.

Incorporated Renault/Nissan requirements for “Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)”.

4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements (Renault）Removed the Environmental outputs and the EDI requirements as they are

not specific to a part but to a plant location.

5. Other Changes


6

Index






5. Other Changes


7

1) “Process Potential FMEA”（Activity 5.1）Merged the Renault “Process AMDEC” into the “Process Potential FMEA”.

2) “Supplier Digital Test Report” (Activity 6.1）Renault has commonised this requirement with Nissan to improve the

robustness of design and minimise the risk of having to introduce late

modifications.

3) “Part Submission Warrant (PSW)”（Activity 7.1）Merged the Renault “AFF” into the “Part Submission Warrant（PSW）” in

order to have a commonised PSW.

New Revision Contents1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

8

Index






5. Other Changes


9

1) Reinforced Sub-Supplier Management�Reinforced the Tier 1 responsibilities and Part Submission Warrant (PSW)

approval timing for their bought out products.

�Reviewed the items covered in the CSCC*.

�Added the requirement for “Sub-Supplier PSW or equivalent”（Renault）

New Revision Contents2. Reinforced Requirements for “High Volume Parts”

Notes

�“The Tier 1 supplier shall a

system/procedure in place to select

new suppliers and to evaluate

current suppliers”.

Activity – Phase 4

�“Approve sub-supplier Part

Submission Warrant (PSW) or

equivalent”.

Activity 2.1

Note: Some details have been omitted for presentation purposes

Reviewed the items covered by the CSCC

and focus on features for “Supplier”,

“Manufacturing Process” and “Product”.

Format “CSCC”

Unique DCI

*) Component Supply Chain Chart

Added the requirement for “Sub-supplier

PSW or equivalent”.

10

2) Reinforced Change Management (Design Change)�Reviewed and commonised the definition.


� Mechanism or structure

� Electrical function

� Material

� Dimensions or mass

� Other changes

(None)�Mechanism or structure

�Electrical function

�Material

(incl. supporting material such as grease,

paint, welding rod etc. )

�Dimensions or mass

�Sub-component layout

�Affecting homologation/safety/regulation

DCI

Activity 9.1


11

3) Reinforced Change Management (Process Change)�Reviewed and reinforced the definition.


Examples of changes:

�Facility site transfer/relocation

�Change to a Sub-supplier

�Change within a Sub-supplier

�Upgrade or rearrangement of

existing tooling or equipment

�Process related to a Special

Characteristic or Key Feature

�Process related to new

technology

�Control method used

�Process flow

Example of Changes that require Renault/

Nissan authorization include (but are not limited

to):

�All changes to or within a sub-supplier

�All Facility site transfers / relocations

�All changes affecting the process flow

�All changes relating to the addition,

modification or replacement of existing

equipment

�All changes relating to the manufacture or

inspection of Special Characteristics or Key

Features

�All changes relating to the manufacturing,

inspection or control method used

�All changes relating to logistics or packaging

Activity 9.2Activity 9.2


12

4) Reviewed Identification/Traceability Requirements�Combined existing Lot Control and Parts Labeling activities.

�Developed a common activity description to clarify the Tier 1 responsibility.


Activity Purpose:

Renault/Nissan requires its suppliers to operate an effective identification and

traceability system.

Notes:

�The Tier 1 supplier shall;

-manage traceability for all products & components.

-deploy the requirements to their sub-suppliers.

�Requirements may be specified on the drawings and/or data notes.

�No particular requirements are specified, the supplier must comply with the

requirements contained in the ISO/TS 16949 and within the relevant company

specific requirements section.

Activity 11.2


13

Index






5. Other Changes


14

1) Standardised Special Characteristics - “Important C”�Standardised previously deployed requirements to improve customer

satisfaction by reduction of variation.

�Reviewed “Important A” and “Important B” definitions.

New Revision Contents3. Standardisation of Requirements Deployed since V2.1

Nissan Specific Requirement - Activity. 4.5


15

2) Standardized “Example of Process/Facility Change”�Incorporated a list of examples of changes requiring Nissan authorisation to

reduce concerns caused by poor change management.



Applies to all Tier 1 suppliers and all Sub suppliers to Tier N.

1st layer

2nd layer

3rd layer

Production site change

Relocation/Move to a different site

To another site owned by the parent company

To a different company ( out sourced)

Relocation/Move within the current site

Layout Change

Relocate production line (inc inspection process)

Machine/Equipment on the production line change (inc inspection machine)

Installing new equipment

Addition or replacement of machine/equipment

Example of "Process/Facility Site Change"

Remark

Object of Process Change

4M

Important Note:

Supplier shall review all changes by supplier internal cross functionally under Tier 1 responsibility.

Newly developed or Expansion to the current production line (inc inspection process)

Process sequence (inc adding or eliminating process steps)

Machine


16

3) Standardised “Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)”�Identified the Renault/Nissan common minimum content requirements for

Fault Tree Analysis and standardised the requirement in a newly developed

Document Completion Instruction (DCI).




17

Index






5. Other Changes


18

1) Removal of the EDI requirements from ANPQP� Removal of the “Supplier EDI Agreement” and “EDI Submission Warrant”

outputs from the ANPQP standard because they are related to plant location

and not to part, therefore are outside the scope of the ANPQP file.

� These requirements are already included in the Renault Suppliers Logistics

Guidebook and are applicable.

2) Removal of the Environmental outputs from ANPQP� Removal of the “Substances & Recycled or Renewable Materials “, “TDR”

and “IMDS” outputs from the ANPQP standard because they are outside the

scope of the ANPQP file.

� These requirements are already included in the 00-10-415 standard and

are applicable.

New Revision Contents4. Removal of Duplicated Requirements

19

Index






5. Other Changes


20

New Revision Contents5. Other Changes

Element Activity Renault Nissan *DCI Format Example L

1.1 Product & Process Concept

Study2

2

Renault (2)

Nissan 2

Documents Name

Product and Process Concept Proposal

Product Quality Targets Study Plan

1. CONTRACT REVIEW

1.2 Product Quality and Reliability

Management

Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)

2. SUB-SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT

Product Reliability Targets

Study Plan

1) Added a description for each Category to explain its purpose.

2) Moved one Activity - “1.2 Product Quality and Reliability Management” -

from Category 3 to Category 1

ANPQP Phase Diagram

Newly added Category description appears

when you click on each Category name.

Activity 1.2 moved from category 3

21

3) Changed the activity timings for “Supplier Master Schedule” and “Special

Characteristics and Key Features Diagram”.

4) Changed the document submission level for “Process Capability Study

Results” to reduce the supplier submission responsibilities.

Design Assurance Plan Nissan 3 2 2

Renault 1 1 1

Nissan 3 2 2

Quality Function

Deployment (QFD)Nissan (2) (2) (2)

HCPP Renault (2) 2 2

Supplier Feasibility

CommitmentRenault 2 2 2

Renault (2) (2) (2)

Nissan 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2

3 2 2

Renault (2) (2) 2 (2) (2) 2 (2)

Nissan 3 2 2 3 2 2

Process Capability Study

Results

3.2 Project Planning and Production

Preparation Monitoring

4.1 Identification and Deployment of

Special Characteristics and Key

Features

4. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Phase3

Supplier Master Schedule

(including Details)

Phase1 Phase2

Phase3 Phase4Phase2Phase1

Special Characteristics and

Key Feature Diagram

(SC & KFD)

5.4 Process Capability Study and

Improvement

Process Capability Study Plan

Phase4

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Extended activity

Shortened activity

Changed submission level


22

5) Updated the “Other Supply Requirement” and “Glossary” in the Alliance

Supplier Guide (A.S.G.)

Updated requirement Updated glossary

A.S.G


23

End of Slides