Upload
megan-melton
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Anti-Correlated Lags in Compact Stellar X-ray Sources
Dr. Kandulapati Sriram
Collaborators: Prof A. R. Rao (TIFR) Dr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal (ISRO/TIFR).
Dr. Ranjeev Misra (IUCAA)
The Work is based on published papers by our group
1. Anticorrelated Hard X-Ray Time Lag in GRS 1915+105: Evidence for a Truncated Accretion Disk Choudhury, M., Rao, A. R., Dasgupta, S., Pendharkar, J., Sriram, K., & Agrawal, V. K. 2005, ApJ
2. Anticorrelated Hard X-Ray Time Lags in Galactic Black Hole Sources Sriram, K., Agrawal, V. K., Pendharkar, Jayant, & Rao, A. R., 2007, ApJ
3. Energy-dependent Time Lags in the Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 4593 Sriram, K.; Agrawal, V. K.; Rao, A. R., 2009, ApJ
4. A truncated accretion disk in the galactic black hole candidate source H1743-322 Sriram, K.; Agrawal, V. K.; Rao, A. R., 2009, RAA
And some other work carried out at KASI
OverviewA. Introduction
1. Mass transfer and Disk formation
2. SS disk and Why ADAF?
3. Basic X-ray continuum models
B. About
1. RXTE Satellites
2. X-ray spectral states in GBHs
3.VH/SPL/IM state and possible geometry
C. Method, Application & Results
1. CCF
2. ACL in GBHS, NS
3. physical interpretation and Results
D. Conclusion
Mass Transfer in Binary StarsIn a binary system, each star controls a finite region of space,
bounded by the Roche Lobes (or Roche surfaces).
Matter can flow over from one star to another through the Inner Lagrange Point L1.
Lagrange points = points of stability, where matter can
remain without being pulled towards one of the stars.
Accretion from stellar windAccretion through Roche lobe outflow
Two mechanisms of mass transfer in a binary system
How Disk forms?
Jet
disk
L1
• Accretion in LMXB is due Roche Lobe Overflow
• As secondary star evolves it fill up its Roche lobe (equipotential surface)
• Mass transfer take place from Lagrange point L1
Formation of disk..
Low AM
High AM
• Matter passing through L1 has AM
• forms an elliptical orbit around primary
• For continues stream of matter, form a ring
• to sink in the gravitational potential of primary, it loses AM
• matter slowly spiral inwards in circular orbit and forms an accretion disk
How does disk heats up?How does disk heats up?Two main process responsible for heating up the disk
1. Gravitational Binding energy : Matter goes in -----> decrease in GBE results in hot disk 2. Viscous Dissipation: Friction between two layer----transport the AM outside—heat up the disk
3. Because of heating---->~disk temp. goes to 107-8 K (X-ray band)
Black Body approximation SS DiskBlack Body approximation SS DiskFor steady geometrically thin (h<<r) and optically thick disk
Each ring “dR” loses GΩ'dR of mechanical energy into heat energy (G is torque)
for upper and lower face of disk D(R)=9/8*νΣGM/R3 (D(R)=rate / unit surface area
ν- kinematic viscosity Σ-surface density)changing νΣ in terms of Mdot and R, we get
D(R)=3GMMdot
/ 8ΠR3 [1-(R*/R)1/2]
Total rate at which energy is dissipated
3GMMdot
/2ΠR2 [1-(R*/R)1/2]
Emitted spectrumσT4=D(R)---> T= (3GMM
dot / 8ΠR3 σ)1/4
Multi BB components in Disk
Standard accretion disk spectrum looks like super-positon of blackbody spectra multi-color disk-blackbody approximation works (diskbb in xspec)
Each disk annuli is responsible Each disk annuli is responsible for obs. Disk temperature for obs. Disk temperature
Problems..
• SS disks are ideal and occasionally seen
• Remedy: ADAF, radiative inefficient (developed by Narayan and collaborators)
• Most probable model to explain the low luminous episodes in X-ray binaries
Why Is the Flow Advection-dominated?• Radiation comes primarily from electrons
• At low , ion-electron (Coulomb) coupling is weak
• Plasma becomes two-temperature --- heat energy is locked up in the ions and advected to the center
• Radiative efficiency of electrons is also low, so electrons also advect their energy
• Very hot, optically thin gas. Quasi-spherical. Non-blackbody spectrum
(Shapiro, Lightman & Eardley 1976; Ichimaru 1977; Bisnovatyi–Kogan & Lovelace 1997; Quataert 1998; Gruzinov 1998; Quataert & Gruzinov 1998 ; Blackman 1998; Medvedev
2000)
1210 1110 K
~ , ~ 10 Ki eT Tr
M
Too Many changes in disk theory to explain observations, ADIOS, CDAF, slim disk model etc.
Basic Continuum models
• Two kind spectral components In BHB• 1. Soft X-ray component ( few eV to ~ 1 keV)
• Thermal in nature, black body radiation
• No census of BB component
• Each radii in disk emits a BB spectrum know MCD model
Conti..• 2. Hard X-ray Component
– Not exactly known in terms of physical location, exact mechanism (thermal,non-thermal, processes) etc.
– Spectral domain is vast (few keV to GeV)– Many possible Mechanism
» Thermal Comptonization» Non thermal Comptonization» Syncrhoton» Bremmstrulung
The Comptonization ProcessDiscovered by A.H. Compton in 1923
gain/loss of energy of a photon after collision with an electron
If electron at rest:
Compton
Inverse Compton
For non-stationary electron:
Thermal Comptonization
mean relative energy gain per collision
mean number of scatterings
➨ Compton parameter
for E < kT, unsaturated Compt.
for E ≳ kT
Tsoft
Tc, Hot phase
= coronaComptonization on a thermal plasma of electrons characterized by a temp. T and optical depth τ
Cold phase= acc. disc
For E~KT saturated Comptonization
Non-thermal Comptonizaton
Comptonization by a non-thermal distribution of electrons
For electron with large Lorentz factor
➥ very efficient energy transfert
⇒
Possible non-thermal electrons are from jets close to X-ray binaries
Disk Corona Geometries..slab, sandwich
sphere+disk geometry
patchy
RXTE Satellite
PCA Energy range: 2 - 60 keV
Energy resolution: < 18% at 6 keV
Time resolution: 1 microsec
Spatial resolution: 1 degree
Detectors: 5 proportional counters
Collecting area: 6500 square cm
HEXTE
Energy range 15-200 keV
Time resolution min 32 sec
4 NaI/CsI Scintillation counter
Area : 1600 sq. cm
All Sky Monitor (ASM)
Remarkable temporal resolution and covers spectrum domain of 2.5-200 keV
COSPAR Workshop, Udaipur 2003
Unfolding Spectrum: the Basic Problem
Suppose we observe D(I) counts in channel I (of N) from some source. Then :
D(I) = T ∫ R(I,E) A(E) S(E) dE
• T is the observation length (in seconds)
• R(I,E) is the probability of an incoming photon of energy E being registered in channel I (dimensionless)
• A(E) is the energy-dependent effective area of the telescope and detector system (in cm2)
• S(E) is the source flux at the front of the telescope (in photons/cm2/s/keV
COSPAR Workshop, Udaipur 2003
Conti..
D(I) = T ∫ R(I,E) A(E) S(E) dE
We assume that T, A(E) and R(I,E) are known and want to solve this integral equation for S(E). We can divide the energy range of interest into M bins and turn this into a matrix equation :
Di= T ∑ Rij Aj Sj
where Sj is now the flux in photons/cm2/s in energy bin J. We want to find Sj.
COSPAR Workshop, Udaipur 2003
Conti..
Di = T ∑ Rij Aj Sj
The obvious tempting solution is to calculate the inverse of Rij, premultiply both sides and rearrange :
(1/T Aj) ∑(Rij)-1Di = Sj
This does not work ! The Sj derived in this way are very sensitive to slight changes in the data Di. This is a great method for amplifying noise.
COSPAR Workshop, Udaipur 2003
Mathematical Methods
In mathematics the integral is known as a Fredholm equation of the first kind. Tikhonov showed that such equations can be solved using “regularization” - applying prior knowledge to damp the noise.
A familiar example is maximum entropy but there are a host of others. Some of these have been tried on X-ray spectra - none have had any impact on the field.
COSPAR Workshop, Udaipur 2003
Define Model
Calculate Model
Convolve with detector response
Compare to data
Change model parameters
Solution: Forward-fitting algorithm
The aim of the forward-fitting is then to obtain the best-fit
and confidence ranges of these
parameters.
Basic Spectral states in GBHs
Soft State, thermalBB
Hard State, thermal Comp.
orNon-thermal
IM state/VHS/SPL
Cyg X-1
Figure is taken from Zdziarski et al. 2002
Soft State, Non-thermal
Three-state classification
Remillard & McClintock 2006In this classification the luminosity is not used as one of parameters.
VH state, special spectral state..
GRO J1655–40
• Most often brightest state among all
• Steep unbroken (X-ray to gamma-ray) PL ( ≥ 2.4-2.8), no evidence for high-energy cutoff
• transitions between TD and LH states usually pass through SPL state
• essentially radio-quiet; though sometimes shows impulsive jets
• QPOs in 0.1–30 Hz range and HFQPO are also found in this state
• Both soft (disk) and hard (Compton cloud/corona) component dominates
Disk and jet connection
(Fender et al. 2004, Remillard, McClintock astro-ph/0606352)
The model for systems with radio jets
LS – low/hard stateHS – high/soft stateVHS/IS –very high andintermediate states
The shown data arefor the source GX 339-4.
Typical outburst of BH source
QPO propagation during an Outburst
26 March 2008 Truncated disc and X-ray spectral states
31
Spectral states – moving truncation radius
Lh/Ls
hard state
hard state
soft state
soft state
Possible generalized geometry of AD
• LH- large truncation of accretion disk
• VHS/SPL/IM- less truncation of disk
• High state/Thermal dominated disk: No truncation
More about SPL state..More about SPL state..Steep Power-Law (SPL)/VHS/IM
⌂physical origin still an outstanding problem
⌂spectrum extends to ~1MeV, may be higher
⌂possible physical model:
Inverse Compton scattering for a radiation mechanism
Perhaps scattering occurs in a thermal corona below 100 keV and non thermal corona at high energies.
Disk is observationally found to be truncated at ~10-30 Rs
PL gets stronger and steeper as disk luminosity and radius decrease, while keeping high temperature
Possible geometrical configuration of VH state
Disk, seed soft photons
Corona, Compton cloud, thermal Comptonized hard photons
How can we detect these signatures in a short time of few kiloseconds instead of waiting for whole long outbusrt of typical duration few days to few 100 days????
Method: Cross-correlation Method
• To understand the disk Geometry, we use three different ways
• 1.Cross-Correlation • 2. Model independent & dependent Spectral study• 3. QPO analysis
• Cross correlation is a standard method of estimating the degree to which two time series are correlated. ALL the data used belongs to SPL/VH/IM state
CCF?
Two series are highly correlated, Two series are highly correlated, with no lag, then with no lag, then
CCF peak points to ZeroCCF peak points to Zero
In anti-correlation, In anti-correlation, CCF peak shift to the -tive side.CCF peak shift to the -tive side.
First such source to show lags is Cyg X-3
• First source in which ACL was detected was Cyg X-3
• Brightest X-ray source in Radio band
• Orbital period ~4.8 hrs• no optical counterpart has
been found• no information on
Compact object• strong evidence of jetlike
structures • Spectral studies reflects
typical BH spectrum
Choudhury & Rao 2004, ApJL
• GRS 1915+105
• Harbours Most massive BH (~14 solar mass)
• Orbital period~33 days (largest among GBHs)
• LMXB, secondary is K/MIII type star
• Show relativistic jet
• Highly variable X-ray source among all the BH
• distance 6~10kpc
Chi state
Choudhury et al. 2005, ApJ
H1743-322, H1743-322, Sriram et al. 2009, RAASriram et al. 2009, RAA
XTE J1550-564, XTE J1550-564, Sriram et al. ApJ, 2007Sriram et al. ApJ, 2007
First Neutron stars source to show ACL
Lei et al. 2008, ApJLCyg X-2
GX 339-4, first BH source to show AC soft lag
Sriram, Rao & Choi submitted to ApJ
ACL for GX339-4 using RXTE and INTEGRAL
Various Timescale is Accretion disk
• Viscous timescale : tv~R/v
r
• Dynamical time scale : tφ~1/Ωk
(QPO ???)
• Deviation in vertical
structure timescale : tz~tφ
• Thermal time scale : tth~M-2tv
• Compton cooling timescale:
tcool = 10−6 × R37 Ṁ
−117 m
−110
T8
tcool <~ tφ ~ tz <
tth << tv
(for complete derivation of Compton cooling time scale see Sriram et al. 2009, RAA)
Typical timescales in different size BH
Timescale GBHs ULXs SMBH
Viscous Few days - weeks
~ Few 10's years
Few thousand to million years
Dynamical 0.1-100's Hz
Few milli Hz
Few hoursQPO in AGN (Gierlinski et al. 2009, Nature)
Compton cooling
Few milli-micro sec
Few 10's sec
Few 100's-1000's sec (see Sriram et al. 2009, ApJ)
Truncation radius assuming that they indicate small viscous delays
α is the viscosity parameter in units of 0.01, M is the mass of the compact object in solar mass units, R is the radial location in the accretion disk in units of 107 cm, and Mdot is the mass accretion rate in units of 1018 g s-1
Taking α = 1, M = 10, and Mdot= 3 , we get R ~ 7 for a viscous timescale of 1000 s. Thus ~25 Schwarzschild radius.
Similar dimension for truncation radius is observed in SPL state using QPO frequency (see Done et al. 2007)
QPO changes???
GRS 1915+105, Choudhury et al. 2005XTE J1550-564Sriram et al. 2007, ApJ
For source H1743-322
For GX 339-4 QPO changes
Spectral changes Model independent changes
GRS 1915+105 Cyg X-3
XTE J1550-564
For H1743-322
GX 339-4 spectral changes
Spectral Ratio
Spectral changes•More importance is given to know the change in spectral parameters.
•spectral fitting was carried for H1743-322, XTE J1550-564 , GRS 1915+105 (all of them were in VHS or SPL state)
•Spectra were obtained from initial and final part of the Lc, for the resp. sources for which QPO shift was found
•Model used : Smedge(Diskbb+Gaussian+ThComp+PL)
•PL index =2.2 and Gaussian Line=6.4 keV were fixed
Simultaneous Spectral fitting
– Data is not sufficient to know which parameter is changing
– Fitted the initial and final part spectra simultaneously
– all the parameters tied to the initial spectrum
– Initially the χ2 was very high
– Nthcomp of two parts allowed to vary independently(χ2 improved).
– Then Ndisk and kTin were allowed to vary one by one
– continued the process no considerable improvement was observed in the fit
– Suggest that Normalisation and disk parameters significantly varied between these two parts.
Most important result is change in disk and Corona flux (unit: 10-9 ergs/cm2/sec) during lag in different source
XTE J1550-564flux A B--------soft 20.9 22
hard 56.5 52.5________________2nd Obsev.flux A B--------soft 17.3 23.2
hard 52.5 42
H1743 A1 B1 A2 B2 A3 B3 A4 B4 -332
Soft 7.90 7.41 61.10 100.20 119.1 84.10 4.3 3.9
Hard 41.17 46.50 10.1 8.10 12.6 10 3.9 5.6
GRS 1915+105 A BSoft 8.5 6.2
Hard 11.4 22.0
For GRS 1915+105, we found electron temperature is changed by ~4 keV Sriram et al. 2007, ApJ
GX 339 -4 unfolded residual with same model used for A section spectrum
Physical Interpretation of temporal and spectral delays of VH state In GBHs
Disk, seed soft photons
Corona, Compton cloud, thermal Comptonized hard photons
As Disk goes in, Soft photons increases and cools the cororna and hard photons decreases
Conclusion
• Still the Hard X-ray source location in accretion process in BH, NS and CV is poorly know.
• Cross-Correlation method is one of the powerful tool to constrain the physical location in accretion disk (BH, NH)/ column (polar).
• Similar kind of work can be extended to other BHs, NSs, CVs inorder to constrain the geometrical and physical regions in the accretion processes
Conclusion
• Still the Hard X-ray source location in accretion process in BH, NS and CV is poorly known.
• Cross-Correlation method is one of the powerful tool to constrain the physical location in accretion disk (BH, NH)/ column (polar) or IPs
• Similar kind of work can be extended to other BHs, NSs, CVs inorder to constrain the geometrical and physical regions in the accretion processes .
Work carried out at KASI during Dec 16-till Now
X-ray Work• Anti-Correlated soft lags in Intermediate state of BH source
GX 339-4 (Sriram, Rao & Choi submitted to ApJ)
• XMM-Newton observation of a cataclysmic variable candidate: AX J1853.3-0128 (Hui, Sriram & Choi planning to submit in ApJ)
Optical Work
• Photometric study of Contact binary systems in omega Centauri
(Sriram et al. , submitted to Ap&SS)
• Photometric study of W Uma type variable in LMC
(Shanti, Sriram and Vivekananda Rao submitted to RAA)