Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“Green analytical chemistry: Trace elemental analysis on water
samples by liquid-liquid microextration (LLME)-laser-
induced breakdown spectroscopy
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)”
Hristina Nikolova, Miguel Angel Aguirre, Montserrat Hidalgo and Antonio Canals
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Overview
� Introduction� Green chemistry
� Green analytical chemistry
� Sample preparation
� Miniaturization on sample preparation
� Liquid -liquid microextraction (LLME)
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
� Liquid -liquid microextraction (LLME)
� Detection techniques for LLME
� Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for trace elemental analysis
� Evaluating LIBS for the analysis of Mn in microdrop lets
� Direct microdroplets on aluminium substrates
� Testing the combination of LLME-LIBS: preliminary r esults
Introduction
‘‘Sustainable development’’‘‘Sustainable development’’
“protection of theenvironment’’
“protection of theenvironment’’
Green Chemistry
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
development’’development’’ environment’’environment’’
“a form of development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs’’
“a form of development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs’’
Introduction
“it is an unfortunate irony that environmentalanalytical methods often contribute to furtherenvironmental problems through the chemicals
“it is an unfortunate irony that environmentalanalytical methods often contribute to furtherenvironmental problems through the chemicals
Green Analytical Chemistry(I)
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
environmental problems through the chemicalsused in the analysis”environmental problems through the chemicalsused in the analysis”
From : P.T. Anastas, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 29(3), 167-175 (1999)
Introduction
“The goal of Green Analytical Chemistry is touse analytical procedures that generate lesshazardous waste and that are safer to use and
“The goal of Green Analytical Chemistry is touse analytical procedures that generate lesshazardous waste and that are safer to use and
Green Analytical Chemistry(II)
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
hazardous waste and that are safer to use andmore benign to the environment”hazardous waste and that are safer to use andmore benign to the environment”
Introduction
Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry on Analytical Chemistry
� The elimination (or at least, the significant reduction) ofreagents, particularly organic solvents, from analyticalprocedures
� Reduced emissions of vapours and gases, as well as liquidand solid wastes generated in analytical laboratories
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, BulgariaFrom: M. Tobiszewski, A. Mechlinska, J. Namiesnik, C hem. Soc. Rev., 39, 2869–2878 (2010)
and solid wastes generated in analytical laboratories
� The elimination of highly toxic and/or eco-toxic reagents fromanalytical procedures (e.g., the substitution of benzene withother solvents)
� Reduced labour and energy consumption of analyticalprocedures (per single analyte)
� Reduced time gap between sampling and the desiredinformation becoming available (i.e., real time analysis)
Introduction
Challenges in Green Analytical Chemistry
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, BulgariaFrom: M.Tobiszewski, A. Mechlinska, J. Namiesnik, Ch em. Soc. Rev., 39, 2869–2878 (2010)
Sample preparationSample preparation
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Sample preparationSample preparation
Sample preparation
� Sample conditioning: Adapt the physical orchemical state to the requirements of theinstrument.
� Removal of interfering species: Masking orseparation techniques (e.g., adsorption,absorption, dialysis, precipitation, supercritical
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
absorption, dialysis, precipitation, supercriticalfluid extraction, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE),solid phase extraction (SPE), etc.)
� Additional operations: Dilution,(pre)concentration , chemical transformationsand derivatization, etc.
Sample preparation
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Sample preparation is the Achilles’ Heel of total analytical process!!!!
Sample preparationSample preparation
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Publications
Sample preparation
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Solid phase extraction
Microextraction/m
iniaturization
Liquid-liquid extraction
Heating
Digestion
Mixing
Derivatization
Automation
Centrifugation
Filtration
Enrichment
Membrane extraction/dialysis
Drying
Precipitation
Homogenization
Stirring
Weighing
Headspace
Purge-trap
Evaporation
Organic extraction
Soxhlet extraction
Solid-liquid extraction
Supercritical fluid extraction
Cooling
Distilation
Therm
al desorption
Lixiviation
Combustion
Publications
(Source: SciFinder Scolar® 2010)
Sample preparation
30
40
50
60
N.
of
publ
icat
ions
/yea
rSample preparation and miniaturization
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, BulgariaSource: SciFinder ® (26/05/2012)
0
10
20
N.
of
publ
icat
ions
/yea
r
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Year
Classification of main extraction techniques:� Headspace extraction techniques:
� Static Headspace (SH)� Purge & Trap (dynamic headspace, P&T)
� Membrane extraction techniques
� Sorptive extraction techniques:
Sample preparation
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
� Solid-phase extraction (SPE)� Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE)� Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)
� Solvent extraction techniques:� Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE)� Liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME)
� Hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME)� Single drop microextraction (SDME)� Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME)
Detection techniques for LLMEDetection techniques for LLME
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Detection techniques for LLMEDetection techniques for LLME
Detection techniques for LLME
� Organic analytes
�HPLC, GC, CE before FID, ECD, UV-Vis, MS, etc.
Detection techniques for LLME
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
� Inorganic analytes
�ETAAS, ETV-ICP-OES/MS, others (FAAS, CV-AFS,ICP-MS and ICP-OES)
Detection techniques for LLME
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
THIS IS NOT PORTABLE INSTRUMENTATION!!!
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for trace elemental analysis
Detection techniques for LLME
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Detection techniques for LLME
LIBSLIBS� Disadvantage: low sensitivity ���� high LODs
� Advantages: � Multielement analysis� Fast� Portability� Easy to automate
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
LLME and LIBS could be combined for trace metal analysis
LLME and LIBS could be combined for trace metal analysis
� Easy to automate� Capability to analyze very small
quantities (microdroplets) ofsample
Nd:YAGLaser
PC
2100 2120 2140 2160 2180 2200 2220
0
5x102
1x103
2x103
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Wavelength (A)
Avantesspectrometer
Opticfiber
Micro-sample
Flashlamp
Q-Switch
Photodiode
� ns Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm)� Avantes modular spectrometer
(Czerny-turner configuration +CCD - covering from 300 nm –400 nm)
� Delay system (pulsegenerators) for acquisitiontime delay control
� Oscilloscope and photodiode
Evaluating LIBS for the analysis of Mn in microdrop lets
Detection techniques for LLME
LIBS systemLIBS system
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
PulsegeneratorOscilloscope Pulse
generator
� Oscilloscope and photodiodeto monitor plasma formationand acquisition delay
� Synthetic samples with different Mn 2+ concentration were prepared� Microvolumes of the prepared samples were analyzed by using two different LIBS
experimental strategies:
� Analysis by direct laser irradiation of microdroplets� Analysis by laser irradiation of microdroplets on a metallic (aluminium) substrate
Experimental procedure Experimental procedure
Direct microdroplets on aluminium substrates
� 10 µL microdroplets were placed on analuminium substrate and left to dry for 15minutes
� Laser radiation was focused on the driedmicrodroplet to create the LIBS plasma
� Plasma emission was detected by theAvantes spectrometer
� Five spectra were taken for each singledroplet . Spectra of one single droplet
Aluminiumsubstrate
Focusing lens
Laser radiation
15 min
Sample microdroplets having differentMn2+ concentration
Plasma emission to AvaSpec
Detection techniques for LLME
Experimental procedure Experimental procedure
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
droplet . Spectra of one single dropletwere averaged
LIBS emission signal markedlyimproves when microdropletsare analyzed by usingaluminium substrates.
Direct analysis of microdroplets vs.the use of aluminium substratesOrange spectrum corresponds to ananalyte concentration 10 times lowerthan that of green spectrum
258 259 260 261 2620
1x103
2x103
3x103
4x103
5x103
6x103
Inte
nsity
(co
unts
)
1% Mndirect analysis ofthe micro-droplet
Wavelength (nm)
0.1% Mnmicro-droplet on aluminum substrate
Mn
II (2
59.3
7nm
)
Mn
II (2
60.5
7nm
)
Since laser radiation can be focused on aextremely low sample area, thisconfiguration allows several replicatemeasurements to be carried out in a singlemicrodroplet.
Several laser shots on asingle, dried, 10 µLsample droplet
ResultsResults
Direct microdroplets on aluminium substrates
y = 321.22x + 0.03R2 = 0.9969
� Higher reproducibility and better linearity (R 2=0.9969 compared to direct analysis of droplets
� Limit of detection was found to be 6x10 -4 % ofMn (6 ppm)
Considering that microextractionmethodologies can lead to micro -volumes of
Detection techniques for LLME
ResultsResults
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
(Mn
II)m/(
Al I
) m
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Analysis of microdroplets on aluminiumsubstrates (Al was used as internal standard)
(a)
LIBS signal of a 10 ppm Mn sample
258 259 260 261 262
Blank (10% Triton)
Inte
nsity
(co
unts
)
Wavelength (nm)
10 ppm Mn
methodologies can lead to micro -volumes ofextractants and high enrichment factors(more than 200, in some cases)
LIBS analysis of microdroplets on solid substrates appears to be a promising alternative to be
combined with LLME methodologies for trace elemental analysis
LIBS analysis of microdroplets on solid substrates appears to be a promising alternative to be
combined with LLME methodologies for trace elemental analysis
0 2x10-4 4x10-4 6x10-4 8x10-4 1x10-3
0.0
Mn (%, w/w)
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
After SDMEAfter SDME DryingDrying LIBS analysisLIBS analysis
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Focusing lens
Mirror
Spectrometer
LIBSplasma
Optical system
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
Univariate optimizationUnivariate optimization
�Molar ratio (APDC/analytes)
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
VariablesVariables
�Molar ratio (APDC/analytes)�pH�Extraction time�Stirring speed�Droplet volume
Detection techniques for LLME
VariableVariable
ConstantsConstants
�pH = 10�Extraction time = 10 min
Molar ratio (APDC/analytes)
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
ConstantsConstants�Extraction time = 10 min�Stirring speed = 1700 r.p.m.�Droplet volume = 5 µL
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
0 5 10
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Molar ratio
CuI 324.754
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
0 5 10
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
CuI 324.754
05000
100001500020000250003000035000400004500050000
0 5 10
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
MnII 259.373
0100020003000400050006000700080009000
10000
0 5 10
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
ZnII 206.200
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0 5 10
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Molar ratio
CrI 357.869
0 5 10Molar ratio
0 5 10Molar ratio
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 5 10
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Molar ratio
NiI 352.454
0 5 10Molar ratio
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
VariableVariable
ConstantsConstants
�Molar ratio (APDC/analytes) = 5�Extraction time = 10 min
pH
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
ConstantsConstants�Extraction time = 10 min�Stirring speed = 1700 r.p.m.�Droplet volume = 5 µL
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
pH
CuI 324.754
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
ZnII 206.200
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
MnII 259.373
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
CuI 324.754
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
0 5 10 15pH
0 5 10 15
pH
0 5 10 15pH
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
pH
NiI 352.454
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
pH
CrI 357.869
pH 10 pH 12
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
VariableVariable
ConstantsConstants
�Molar ratio (APDC/analytes) = 5�pH = 10
Extraction time
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
ConstantsConstants�pH = 10�Stirring speed = 1700 r.p.m.�Droplet volume = 5 µL
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Time (min)
CuI 324.754
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
ZnII 206.200
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
0 5 10 15In
tens
ity(a
.u.)
MnII 259.373
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
CuI 324.754
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
0 5 10 15Time (min)
0 5 10 15
Time (min)
0 5 10 15Time (min)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Time (min)
NiI 352.454
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Time (min)
CrI 357.869
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
VariableVariable
ConstantsConstants
Stirring speed
�Molar ratio (APDC/analytes) = 5�pH = 10
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
ConstantsConstants�pH = 10�Extraction time = 10 min�Droplet volume = 5 µL
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
rpm
CuI 324.754
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 1000 2000
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
ZnII 206.200
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 1000 2000
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
MnII 259.373
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 1000 2000
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
CuI 324.754
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
0 1000 2000
rpm
0 1000 2000rpm
0 1000 2000
rpm
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 1000 2000
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
rpm
NiI 352.454
02000400060008000
100001200014000160001800020000
0 1000 2000
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
rpm
CrI 357.869
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
VariableVariable
ConstantsConstants
Droplet volume
�Molar ratio (APDC/analytes) = 5�pH = 10
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
ConstantsConstants�pH = 10�Extraction time = 10 min�Stirring speed = 1700 r.p.m.
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Droplet volume (µL)
CuI 324.754
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
ZnII 206.200
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
MnII 259.373
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
CuI 324.754
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
0 5 10 15
Droplet volume (µL)
0 5 10 15Droplet volume (µL)
0 5 10 15Droplet volume (µL)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Droplet volume (µL)
NiI 352.454
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0 5 10 15
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Droplet volume (µL)
CrI 357.869
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
Optimized valuesOptimized values
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
�Molar ratio (APDC/analytes) = 5�pH = 10�Extraction time = 10 min�Stirring speed = 1700 r.p.m.�Droplet volume = 7.5 µL
Detection techniques for LLME
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
ZnII 206.200 nmZnII 206.200 nm
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Without SDME
With SDME
Blank100 ppb500 ppb1000 ppb
Detection techniques for LLME
Without SDME With SDME
Emission line (nm) Slope (ppb-1) LOD (ppb) Slope (ppb-1) LOD (ppb)
ZnII (206.200) 7.6±0.4 171 54±3 23
Testing the combination LLME-LIBS: preliminary resu lts
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
ZnII (206.200) 7.6±0.4 171 54±3 23MnII (259.373) 29±4 427 59±4 301CuI (324.754) 26±5 141 55±5 54NiI (352.454) 2.0±0.2 149 11.3±0.6 67CrI (357.869) 7.0±1.0 143 17.6±1.2 50
Acknowledgments
Conclusions
I. For the first time, the capability for elementalanalysis of LLME + LIBS has beenexperimentally proved
Conclusions
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
II. Nevertheless, much work is still needed inorder to definitively assess the analyticalcapabilities of LIBS to be coupled withseveral microextraction methodologies
Future workFuture work
� Study and optimization of the best solid substrate tobe used as solid-sample holder
� Study of the influence of the extraction solvent(concentration and nature – surfactants, ionic liquids,
Future work
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
(concentration and nature – surfactants, ionic liquids,organic solvents, etc.) on LIBS signal
� Study of the double pulse LIBS methodology as amean to obtain further emission intensity and S/Nenhancement
� Miniaturized/portable LIBS system
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements
I. The Spanish Government (projects CTQ2008-06730-C02-01 and CTQ2011-23968)
II. NSF of Bulgaria (GAMA project DO 02-70)
Acknowledgements
5-6 June 2012, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
II. NSF of Bulgaria (GAMA project DO 02-70)
III. European Union Seventh FrameworkProgramme (FP7). Program Capacities(REGPOT). BioSupport project