Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“What’s New?” – Bed Bug
Research Updates
Dr. Susan C. Jones
Professor of Entomology
Health Effects from Bed Bugs
• Skin reactions (avg. 70% of humans)
• Redness
• Welts
• Itching
• Secondary bacterial infections
• Anemia
• Asthma
• Anaphylactic shock
• Psychological effects
• Sleeplessness
• Agitation
• Anxiety …
urticaria atypical bullous lesions
common distribution of skin lesions
Clinical Manifestations of Bed Bug Bites
Hypothetical Scheme Of Skin Reaction
Latency To Bed Bug Bites
Reinhardt et al. 2009. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 23: 163–166.
How quickly do humans react to bed bug bite(s)?
Canadian Medical Association Journal 181: 287–88.
Anemia From Bed Bug Bites
Anemia From Bed Bug Bites
A single blood meal of an adult bed bug may have a volume of
up to 7 mm3. Therefore, it would take a minimum of 286,000
bites to suffer a blood loss of 2 liters.
“...the number of bites suffered by the (two) victims … must
have been far larger than 286,000.”
2009. JAMA 301(13): 1358-1366.
“There are few data to support bed
bugs as vectors for transmission of
human disease agents. …
transmission of a human disease is
yet to be firmly established.”
Pesticide Misuse
Pesticide Misuse By Desperate
Residents With Bed Bugs
Photos courtesy of
Andrew Christman
Pesticide Misuse By Desperate
Residents With Bed Bugs
Research On Bed Bug Detection
--Bed Bug Inspection--
Bed Bug-Sniffing Dogs
• Dog and handler should be
specially trained and certified
• Dog requires daily training, too
• The dog’s handler is important
• Can have high accuracy
• Enable rapid inspections
• Expensive
Rutgers University Field Study
August 2011
‘Detection
Tools and
Techniques’
By: Changlu Wang and Richard Cooper
Canine team performance (7 firms; 24 apts.)
Average Range
Inspection time 150 minutes 100-250 min.
Cost $750 $500-1,000
Detection rate 43% 11-83%
False positive rate (signaling
bed bugs that weren’t there) 0-38%
Much variability among canine
detection firms.
Can be a useful tool in large-scale
inspections.
Overview of the Verifi™
Bed Bug Detector
Components
CO2 BOOSTER PACK
(lasts for 24 hours)
A
LURE (lasts for 90 days)
--Pheromone chamber (mimics bed bug
aggregation scent)
--Kairomone chamber (mimics host odor)
B
PITFALL C
HARBORAGE D
ADHESIVE E
front view
(cut away) back view
PITFALL
http://www.fmcprosolutions.com/BedBugs/PropertyManager/Home.aspx
--Active Monitoring Device--
4 in
3 in
5 in
Columbus, Ohio Study Site June-July 2011
o 13-story high-rise apartment building o Rooms were selected from a list of occupied apts with:
• suspected bed bug activity • low-level infestations
— OSU Research Study —
• Canine Teams
(2 dogs, same handler/room;
single company)
• Do-it-yourself Dry Ice Traps
(1/room)
• Verifi™ Bed Bug Detectors
(near-final prototype; 3/room)
Three Detection Methods Were Used
In Each of 20 Occupied Rooms
— OSU Research Study —
Placement of Verifi Detectors
(total of 3 / room)
• On or near:
• Bed
or
• Upholstered furniture
or
• Baseboard
— OSU Research Study —
• Numerous contact points
for bugs to access each
Verifi detector
Verifi™ Detector Placement --On Or Near Bed--
• Placed flush
against a piece of
furniture or wall.
• Total of 3 Verifi
detectors per room.
— OSU Research Study —
PITFALL — OSU Research Study —
All Stages Of Bed Bugs Were
Captured In The Verifi™ Detector Pitfall.
Some Bed Bugs Were Found On
The Verifi™ Detector Harborage.
HARBORAGE
— OSU Research Study —
4 eggs
1 adult female
Cumulative number of rooms with bed bug
captures over a 7-d period using Verifi™ Detectors
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1 2 7
# o
f ro
om
s w
ith V
eri
fi d
ete
cting
be
d
bug
s_
Time (Days)Note: 3 of the 20 original rooms had no evidence of bed bugs.
— OSU Research Study —
• Within 24 h, 10 of 17 rooms were confirmed to have bed bugs.
• By 7 d, bed bugs had been captured from 14 of 17 rooms.
Verifi™ Bed Bug Detector
Performance
• In the 14 rooms where bed bugs were
captured, an overall average of 36.9
bed bugs was detected
• In 7 rooms, ≤10 bed bugs were
captured (avg. = 4.4 bed bugs)
— OSU Research Study —
Bed Bug Captures In Verifi™ Detectors
At Different Placements
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
bed upholstered furniture baseboard
Pro
port
ion (
+/-
95%
CI)
of V
erifi
dete
cto
rs w
ith b
ed b
ugs
Verifi placementn=18 n=20 n=12
No significant difference in bed bug captures was
evident for placements on/near the bed, upholstered
furniture, or baseboards.
— OSU Research Study —
Comparison of Erroneous Results with
Canine Team, Dry Ice Trap, and Verifi™ Detector
— OSU Research Study —
0
1
2
3
Dog 1 Dog 2 Dog 1 Dog 2
False Positive False Negative FalsePositive
FalseNegative
FalsePositive
FalseNegative
Canine Team Dry Ice Trap Verifi Detector
Nm
be
r o
f E
rrro
rs
Detection Method
Climbup™ Interceptor
On-site Bed Bug Monitoring
Active Monitor
Verifi™ Bed Bug Detector
Passive Monitor
4 Climbups and 4 Verifis were placed in each room/open area.
— OSU Research Study —
Pre-treatment Visual Inspection
box springs in master bedroom
headboard in master bedroom
nightstand in master bedroom
carpet in dining room laundry basket in guest bedroom
— OSU Research Study —
Bed Bug Distribution Pre-treatment—Visual Inspection
c
l
o
s
e
t
Breakfast Nook
bed
Living Room
Dining Room
Master Bedroom
Guest Bedroom
Bath Room
bed
Kitchen
recliner
closet stairs to
basement
c
l
o
s
e
t
live
dead
dead
dead
dead
dead
dead
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live live
live
live
live
dead
dead
dead
dead
dead
dead
Home vacated late Aug 2012
5 rooms total 1,054 ft2 (98 m2 )
— OSU Research Study —
Bed Bug Numbers In/On Detectors (9 d after placement)
c
l
o
s
e
t
Breakfast Nook
bed
Living Room
Dining Room
Master Bedroom
Guest Bedroom
Bath Room bed
Kitchen
recliner
closet stairs to
basement
c
l
o
s
e
t
live
dead
dead
dead
dead
dead
dead
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live
live live
live live
live
dead
dead
dead
4 Climb-up interceptors had a total of 38 bed bugs (all stages) from master bedroom only.
8 Verifi detectors had a total of 58
bed bugs (all stages) from living room,
dining room, guest bedroom, and
master bedroom.
dead
dead
dead
Key Climb-up Verifi
— OSU Research Study —
Long-Term Monitoring with Verifi™ Bed Bug Detectors
(Feb., March 2013 to date)
• Sites with variable bed bug problems; same management company and pest control company – High-rise apartment building (long history of bed bug infestation)
• rental office • security booth
– Townhome office building (few bed bug problems) • rental office • manager’s office • community room • meeting room
• 4 Verifi detectors per office or room – Positioned near upholstered furniture or seating areas
• Starting in late June 2013, management instituted monthly treatments with Temprid SC in all inspected areas.
— OSU Research Study —
Verifi™ Long-Term Monitoring Results
High-rise apartment building
(long history of bed bug infestation)
— OSU Research Study —
Security Booth
Rental Office
Bed bugs were frequently captured in Verifi detectors in the
security booth.
Starting in late June 2013, management instituted monthly treatments with Temprid SC in all
inspected areas.
(Feb. 2013 to date)
Date
High-rise apt. building
Rental office Security booth
2/14/2013 Install
2/21/2013 0 Install
2/28/2013 2 bed bugs 2 bed bugs
3/13/2013 0 2 bed bugs (dead)
5/3/2013 0 5 bed bugs (dead)
6/25/2013a 0 1 bed bug (dead)
7/2/2013 0 1 bed bug (live)
10/22/2013a 0 1 bed bug (dead)
aVerifi lure components replaced in all detectors; wiped free of debris.
— OSU Research Study —
Verifi™ Long-Term Monitoring Results
aVerifi lure components replaced in all detectors; wiped free of debris.
— OSU Research Study —
Verifi™ Long-Term Monitoring Results
Date
Townhome office building
Rental
office
Management
office
Community
room
Meeting
room
3/13/2013 Install Install Install Install
3/20/2013 0 0 0 0
5/3/2013 0 0 0 0
6/25/2013a 0 0 0 0
7/2/2013 0 0 0 0
10/22/2013a 0 0 0 0
No bed bugs have been captured in Verifi detectors
in the four rooms. Office personnel have expressed
relief and increased peace-of-mind.
— OSU Research Study —
• Similar numbers of bed bugs
were found on the Verifi
harborage/in the pitfall with
both attachment methods. BACKPLATE
Research Objective: To Assess
Functionality of the Verifi™ Backplate
Functionality of the Verifi™
backplate was demonstrated:
• No back plates broke with 100
docking/undocking attempts.
• Verifi units docked easily and
securely into back plates.
ADHESIVE
Research On Do-it-yourself
Bed Bug Products
cockroach feces
cockroach shed skin
bed bugs nearby
DO NOT use “bug bombs” against bed bugs!
- ”Bug Bombs” don’t work
- Few bugs will be killed!
- “Bug Bombs” can cause bed bugs to scatter!!!
“Bug Bombs” may worsen the bed bug problem!!
Over-The-Counter Fogger Efficacy
• Hotshot® Bedbug and Flea Fogger – Pyrethrins 0.05%, Esfenvalerate 0.1%,
Piperonyl Butoxide 0.1% (synergist),
MGK® 264 0.167% (synergist),
Nylar 0.1% (IGR)
• Spectracide® Bug Stop®
Indoor Fogger – Bed bugs are not listed on label
– Tetramethrin 0.1%, Cypermethrin 0.6%
• Eliminator® Indoor Fogger – Bed bugs are not listed on label
– Cypermethrin 0.515%
— OSU Research Study —
• Pyrethroid-resistant bed bugs did not die or become severely affected after fogging (statistically the same as controls).
• Nymphs and adults showed a statistically similar lack of response.
• Even pyrethroid-susceptible bed bugs were unaffected if they were in a harborage.
• There was a lack of insecticide penetration into harborages.
Over-the-Counter Foggers
--Conclusions--
Words of caution regarding over-the-counter ‘natural
products’ for bed bug control:
• Exempt from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registration
• EPA requires no efficacy data
• Claims often based on “satisfied customers”—be sure to ask for their research data and evaluate it carefully
• Botanical (plant based) products often have a strong odor
• Botanical products often have limited, if any, residual activity
March 2013 By: Narinderpal Singh, Changlu Wang, and Richard Cooper
Rutgers Univ. Study: Natural Pesticides
Mortality (>50%) at 10 days
100%
Low mortality (<50%)
92%
60%
Low mortality (<50%)
Low mortality (<50%)
Low mortality (<50%)
Low mortality (<50%)
Low mortality (<50%)
Low mortality (<50%)
Low mortality (<50%)
100% @ 3d
Low mortality (<50%)
• 60 bed bug nymphs per pesticide (presumably pyrethroid resistant)
• Directly sprayed at a rate of 1 gallon/1000 ft2
Rutgers Univ. Study: Natural Pesticides
Natural pesticides
that ARE NOT
regulated by
the EPA
Synthetic pesticides that ARE
regulated by the EPA
Research On Insecticide Resistance
In Bed Bugs
Some Reasons For the Resurgence of Bed Bugs
• International travel and commerce
• Housing with high tenant turnover
• Pesticide use has changed • Pesticide bans
• Failure to re-register insecticides
• Baits to control ants & cockroaches
• Insecticide resistance
Pyrethroid Resistance
• Extremely high levels of resistance to
two pyrethroid insecticides
(deltamethrin and -cyhalothrin) were
detected in bed bug populations
collected from human dwellings in
Kentucky and Ohio.
• Resistance to pyrethroid insecticides
is widespread in U.S. bed bug
populations.
Romero, Alvaro; Potter, Michael F.; Potter, Daniel A.; Haynes, Kenneth F. (2007) Insecticide Resistance in the Bed Bug: A Factor in the Pest's Sudden Resurgence? Journal of Medical Entomology 44(2): 175-178.
Genes involved in insecticide
detoxification were at very high levels in
field-collected bed bugs from Ohio.
Pesticide-exposed bb Pesticide-susceptible bb
Cytochrome P450 (CYP9) Glutathione S-transferase (GST)
Pesticide-exposed bb Pesticide-susceptible bb (Harlan strain)
Xiaodong Bai, Praveen Mamidala, Swapna P. Rajarapu, Susan C. Jones, & Omprakash Mittapalli. Transcriptomics of the bed bug (Cimex lectularius). January 2011. PLoS One 6(1): e16336.
15 BED BUG POPULATIONS SAMPLED FOR
RESISTANCE MUTATIONS
Collection Dates
7/15/2010
7/26/2010
7/26/2010
8/9/2010
8/10/2010
8/25/2010
9/1/2010
10/24/2010
10/26/2010
11/10/2010
11/18/2010
3/9/2011
4/8/2011
4/22/2011
10/10/2011
— OSU Research Study —
• 15 Ohio bed bug populations had kdr point mutations, V419L & L925I, in the sodium ion channel (nerve cells). • These results are consistent with previously sampled Ohio bed bugs:
15/18 other populations from OH had these two kdr mutations (Zhu et al. 2010).
• Knockdown resistance is prevalent in Ohio bed bug populations.
One major reason for Ohio’s growing problem with bed bug infestations may be the widespread presence of knockdown resistance mutations.
KNOCKDOWN RESISTANCE (KDR) MUTATIONS
L925I V419L
voltage-gated sodium ion channel
— OSU Research Study —
March 14, 2013
http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130314/srep01456/pdf/srep01456.pdf
Resistance genes were very active in
the bed bug cuticle (skin).
Research On Efficacy Of Various Insecticides Against
Bed Bugs
Effects of ActiveGuard™ Liner on Bed Bugs
— OSU Research Study —
The liners consist of finely woven polyester fabric impregnated with 1.64% permethrin . The liners are kept in place on mattresses and box springs beneath bedding.
Bed bugs were not repelled from ActiveGuard liners so they remained in contact with the toxicant.
Treatments Controls C C T C
Bed Bug Movement on ActiveGuard™ Liners
— OSU Research Study —
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Treatment Control Treatment Control Treatment Control Treatment Control Treatment Control
EPM Marcia Earl FV Harlan
Dis
tan
ce T
ravel
ed (
cm)
Bed Bug Movement on ActiveGuard™ Liners
— OSU Research Study — Susceptible and moderately pyrethroid-resistant bed bugs traveled much shorter distances when exposed to
ActiveGuard™ fabric compared to controls. Variability was noted among populations.
— OSU Research Study —
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Me
an (
+/-
SE)
pe
rce
nt
mo
rib
un
d/d
ead
Days
EPMMarciaEarlHarlan
Cumulative percentage corrected mortality (avg ± SE) of bed bugs from four populations that were continuously exposed to ActiveGuard fabric.
Contact with ActiveGuard fabric caused bed bugs from susceptible and moderately resistant populations to die
within ~1 day; a highly resistant population (Marcia) began dying after ~4 days exposure.
Active Ingredient
Product Name
Miscellaneous Label Notes
Diatomaceous earth
(=silicon dioxide)
Natural Guard Crawling Insect Control
Safer® Brand Ant & Crawling Insect Killer
MotherEarth™ D
- Crack & crevice applications - Slow-acting - Residual (long-lasting) activity - Dusts should be applied in thin layers - DO NOT allow product to get wet or it will lose its effectiveness - Caution: Avoid inhalation; wear a dust mask during application - Pool grade DE should NEVER be used for pest control. Pool grade DE contains crystalline silica and can be a respiratory hazard.
- Mattresses mentioned on label
Some Insecticides Registered For Use Against Bed Bugs
Efficacy of Diatomaceous Earth
Against Bed Bugs
•Water dramatically reduces
efficacy of DE, even once it
dries!
•Do not allow DE
applications to become
damp!
— OSU Research Study —
Active Ingredient (insecticide class)
Product Name(s)
Imidacloprid + ß-cyfluthrin (neonicotinoid + pyrethroid)
Temprid® SC
Chlorfenapyr (halogenated pyrrole)
Phantom® SC Phantom® PI
Acetamiprid + bifenthrin (neonicotinoid + pyrethroid)
Transport® Mikron Transport® GHP
Thiamethoxam + λ-cyhalothrin (neonicotinoid + pyrethroid)
Tandem®
Dinotefuran + diatomaceous earth (neonicotinoid + silica dioxide)
Prescription Treatment
Alpine® Dust Alpine® PI
Non-pyrethroid Insecticides For Use
Against Bed Bugs
University of Kentucky Laboratory Study
March 27, 2012
‘Dual-Action
Bed Bug
Killers’
By: Michael F. Potter, Kenneth F. Haynes, Jennifer R. Gordon, Erich Hardebeck and Wayne Wickemeyer | Effect of a pyrethroid (Suspend [deltamethrin]) or a combination product
(neonicotinoid + pyrethroid), Temprid or Transport, on resistant bed bugs.
Temprid, a
combination product,
was more potent than
a pyrethroid alone.
Transport, a
combination
product, was more
potent than a
pyrethroid alone.
OSU Research to Evaluate Contact and Residual Efficacy of Combination
Insecticides (Tandem™, Temprid™ SC, and Transport® Mikron™) Against Bed Bugs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Initial 30 m 1 h 2 h 4 h 8 h
Me
an p
erc
en
t m
ori
bu
nd
/de
ad
Cuyahoga***
— OSU Research Study —
Results Susceptible * Moderately Resistant ** Highly Resistant ***
Bed Bug Population: Even with highly resistant bed bugs (Cuyahoga population), the bugs quickly died after being sprayed with any of the
3 insecticides. (Evidence of contact toxicity.)
Susceptible * Moderately Resistant ** Highly Resistant ***
Bed Bug Population:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 h 6 h 1 d 2 d 4 d 7 d
Mea
n p
erce
nt
mo
rib
un
d/d
ead
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 h 6 h 1 d 2 d 4 d 7 d
Me
an p
erc
en
t m
ori
bu
nd
/de
ad
Pointe*** Cuyahoga***
Continuous Exposure to 6 h Residues
Results — OSU Research Study —
For some highly resistant populations, but not all, 7 days or more of continuous exposure to dry insecticide deposits
was required to kill the vast majority of bed bugs.
Bed bug populations did not respond consistently to pyrethroid-neonicotinoid combination insecticides.
Conclusions
• Quickest mortality was achieved through contacting bed bugs with the insecticide spray.
• Bed bug populations did not respond consistently to different pyrethroid-neonicotinoid insecticides.
• 7 days or more of continuous exposure to dry insecticide populations was required to kill the vast majority of bed bugs from some highly pyrethroid-resistant populations.
• Brief exposure (1 h and 24 h) to insecticide residues (aged 1 month) was effective against susceptible bed bugs, but not highly pyrethroid-resistant bugs.
• Fewer bed bugs died when exposed to residues on plywood compared to fabric.
— OSU Research Study —
Biopesticide (neem seed oil ) for
use against bed bugs (and eggs) & cellar spiders
EPA registered Cirkil in May 2012 Low mammalian toxicity
(‘Caution’ signal word) Label allows broadcast
application to many sites including carpet and bedding
Cirkil™ CX (EC) Cirkil™ RTU (ready-to-use)
For commercial use
For commercial use
& consumer use
(spot treatments)
RTU
CX
— OSU Research Study —
Columbus, Ohio Study Site
• Bed bugs first noticed after a used sofa brought into home.
• Elderly resident vacated home in late Aug 2012.
• Bed bug study initiated Oct 2012. • Home had average amount of
clutter (basement very cluttered).
Single family dwelling built in 1930. (1,054 ft2 total; 98 m2 total)
— OSU Research Study —
Cirkil Initial Treatment--Oct 24, 2012 3.5 gal (13.25 L) Cirkil CX + 0.17 (0.6 L) gal Cirkil RTU
Label directions: use ~1 gal diluted Circil CX per 200-800 ft2.
We evaluated a high application rate: 1 gal CX/304 ft2
Cirkil Initial Treatment--Oct 24, 2012 3.5 gal (13.25 L) Cirkil CX + 0.17 (0.6 L) gal Cirkil RTU
96 95
10 5
14
3 4 1 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Tota
l nu
mb
er
of
bu
gs in
det
ect
ors
1st treatment (3.5 gal CX + 0.17 gal RTU)
10
-24
-12
Number of Bed Bugs Detected By Verifi + Climbups After Each Cirkil Treatment ( )
2nd treatment (1.63 gal CX + 0.13 gal RTU)
11
-07
-12
3rd treatment (5 gal CX +
0.38 gal RTU)
11
-21
-12
4th treatment (5 gal CX +
0.58 gal RTU)
01
-18
-13
Total of 10 bugs in 2 wks
Total of 124 bugs in 2 wks
Total of 5 bugs
in 2 wks
Total of 6 bugs
in 6+ wks
Total of 1 bug
in 2 wks
Total volume applied: 15.13 gal (57.25l) CX + 1.26 gal (4.74l) RTU
0 0
• Bed bug numbers were greatly impacted by first Cirkil treatment , but large numbers of bugs were removed simultaneously via Climbup + Verifi pitfall captures. • Bed bugs appeared to be eliminated after 4 Cirkil treatments. Canine team alerts
were inconclusive. • Grand total of 146 bed bugs were detected during a 3+ month treatment period.
Detection devices are an extremely useful tool to assess treatment success.
Some Basics of Bed Bug Management Using
Insecticides
• There is no single “magic bullet”.
• Bed bug control typically takes several treatments.
• It is important to use several different formulations, and often, several different insecticides.
• A residual insecticide is necessary.
• Don’t keep using the same insecticide (rotate insecticide use)
http://corninfo.ps.uci.edu/reprints/RMC139.pdf
April 10, 2013
Acknowledgments
• OSU personnel
• Joshua Bryant
• Scott Harrison
• Andrew Hoelmer
• Mark Janowiecki
• Harold Harlan
(for providing bed bugs)
• Columbus Pest Control
• Lonnie Alonso
• Darren Bowman
• FMC Professional Solutions (provided funding)
• Dina Richman
• Bob Albright
• Ken Johnson
• Ken Hutto
• Tom Anderson
• Arnold Ramsey
Verifi Study
Acknowledgments
• Allergy Technologies
(provided funding)
• Joseph Latino
• Jim Ballard
ActiveGuard Study
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
• Columbus Pest Control
• Lonnie Alonso
• AJ Alonso
• Terramera Biosciences (provided funding)
• Karn Manhaus
• Annett Rozek
• Nate Woodbury
Cirkil Study
Combination Insecticide Study
• Syngenta PPM (provided funding)
• Bob Cartwright
• Nicky Gallagher
http://centralohiobedbugs.org
Thank You!
Sleep tight,
and don’t let the … … well, you know the rest