Appendices - SBCAGmeetings.sbcag.org/Meetings/Joint TTAC TPAC JTAC/2017/05 May/… · APPENDICES 1 Appendix 1: Glossary and Acronyms. ... law to be consistent with the ALUP. ... APCD

Appendices

August 17, 2017

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)

i

DRAFT Fast Forward 2040 Appendices

Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy

Prepared by:

Santa Barbara County Association of Governments

260 North San Antonio Road, Suite B

Santa Barbara, CA 93110

805-961-8900

www.sbcag.org

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)

i

Table of Contents

Appendix 1: Glossary and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. 1

Appendix 2: Project Lists ............................................................................................................................... 21

Appendix 3: SCS Development ..................................................................................................................... 51

Scenarios .................................................................................................................................................... 51

Technical Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 52

Appendix 4: Revenue Sources .................................................................................................................... 105

Federal-Aid Highway Program ............................................................................................................... 105

Federal Lands and Tribal Transportation ............................................................................................. 105

Miscellaneous Federal Programs .......................................................................................................... 106

Federal Transit Administration Programs ............................................................................................ 106

State Fuel Tax Highway Programs......................................................................................................... 107

Cap-and-Trade Programs ....................................................................................................................... 107

State Transit Programs ........................................................................................................................... 108

Appendix 5: Legal Requirements ................................................................................................................ 111

Federal ...................................................................................................................................................... 111

State .......................................................................................................................................................... 114

Appendix 6: Comments and Responses .................................................................................................... 119

Appendix 7: Adopting Resolution ............................................................................................................... 121

Figures

• Figure 1: Scenarios Pyramid ................................................................................................................ 52

Tables

• Table 1: Programmed – Measure A ..................................................................................................... 21

• Table 2: Programmed – Other .............................................................................................................. 26

• Table 3: Planned Projects .................................................................................................................... 36

• Table 4: Illustrative Projects ................................................................................................................. 44

• Table 5: Airport Projects ....................................................................................................................... 49

• Table 6: UPlan and Travel Model Parameters ..................................................................................... 55

Draft (4

/24/17

)

i i

• Table 7: VMT Adjustments to 2005 and 2014 Baseline Years ............................................................ 57

• Table 8: Year 2010 Inter-regional VMT Based on "50/50 IX-XI Split" With Neighboring Counties ..... 58

• Table 9: Performance Results for Scenario 1: Future Baseline (Business as Usual) ......................... 83

• Table 10: Performance Results for Scenario 2: No Project ................................................................. 86

• Table 11: Performance Results for Scenario 2a: No Build .................................................................. 89

• Table 12: Performance Results for Scenario 3: TOD/Infill with Enhanced Transit Strategy ............... 92

• Table 13: Performance Results for Scenario 5: Blended Infill/Expansion ........................................... 95

• Table 14: Performance Results for Scenario 6: TOD/Infill with Enhanced Transit Strategy ............... 98

• Table 15: Performance Results for Scenario 7: TOD/Infill and Maximum Enhanced Transit............ 101

Draft (4

/24/17

)

A P P E N D I C E S 1

Appendix 1: Glossary and Acronyms

AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic: The total volume for the year divided by 365 days.

Accessibility: A concept used in transportation planning to describe the ease with which an individual has an opportunity to participate in an activity. The more accessible the activity, the fewer barriers there are that must be overcome to reach the activity.

ADA Americans with Disabilities Act: The landmark 1990 civil rights legislation bars discrimination against people with disabilities in all major areas of life: employment, public accommodations, transportation, and communications. As it relates to provision of transportation services, the ADA requires that transportation providers ensure nondiscriminatory accessible service for disabled individuals and that public transportation providers operating fixed-route bus service provide paratransit service comparable to the fixed-route service.

ADT Average Daily Traffic: The number of vehicles traveling through a particular roadway segment in a typical weekday 24-hour period.

AHSC Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities: A program administered by the Strategic Growth Council that provides grants and affordable housing loans for compact transit-oriented development and related infrastructure and programs that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Allocation: The amount of funding that is specified to a certain program or project.

ALUC Airport Land Use Commission: Agency responsible under State law (CA PUC Sec. 21674) to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring that vacant lands in the vicinity of airports are planned and zoned for uses compatible with airport operations. (SBCAG is the region’s ALUC).

ALUP Airport Land Use Plan: A plan that provides for the orderly growth of the airports in the region. Local general plans, specific plans, zoning ordinances, and other local land use regulations are required by State law to be consistent with the ALUP.

AMBAG Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments

APCD Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District: The local agency responsible for controlling air pollution. The APCD monitors the air in the County, prepares clean air plans, develops rules, implements federal and State programs for sources of air pollution, issues and enforces permits, inspects businesses, responds to complaints from the public, implements clean air technologies, reviews environmental documents for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and educates and assists businesses and the public about keeping the air clean.

Apportionment: An amount of funding available from a funding source.

APS Alternative Planning Strategy

ARB California Air Resources Board

ATP Active Transportation Program: A program administered by Caltrans that consolidated federal and State programs (the Transportation Alternatives Program, the Bicycle Transportation Account, and Safe

Draft (4

/24/17

)

2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Routes to School) with a focus on more efficiently funding active transportation projects statewide to increase

use of active modes of transportation, such as bicycling and walking.

Automation: See Self-Driving Vehicles.

Breeze: Regional bus service operated by the City of Santa Maria that runs Monday - Saturday between Santa Maria, Vandenberg Air Force Base, and Lompoc. Starting in January 2013, the Breeze expanded service to also run between Santa Maria, Los Alamos, Buellton, and Solvang.

Buildout: Maximum development permitted by a plan or regulations.

Bus: A self-propelled, rubber-tired road vehicle designed to carry a substantial number of passengers that typically has enough headroom to allow passengers to stand upright after entering. Propulsion may be by gasoline, diesel fuel, natural gas, electricity, or other energy sources.

CAA Clean Air Act

CAE Clean Air Express: A unidirectional bus service that operates weekdays during peak commute hours with routes from Lompoc, Santa Maria, and the Santa Ynez Valley to the South Coast. Saturday service available from Santa Ynez Valley to the South Coast.

Cal/EPA California Environmental Protection Agency

Caltrans California Department of Transportation: Agency responsible for statewide transportation programs in California, and for the California Transportation Plan. Caltrans is the implementing agency for most State highway projects and for the intercity rail program.

Clean Air Plan: See Ozone Plan.

Cap-and-Trade Program: The State’s Cap-and-Trade Program, administered by the California Air Resources Board, sets a statewide limit on sources responsible for 85% of California’s greenhouse gas emissions, and establishes a price signal needed to drive long-term investment in cleaner fuels and more efficient use of energy. The program is designed to provide covered entities the flexibility to seek out and implement the lowest-cost options to reduce emissions.

Capital Costs: The costs of long-term assets such as property, buildings, vehicles, and other long-lived equipment. Capital costs can be differentiated from operating costs, which refer to recurring expenses to maintain equipment and services.

CARB See ARB.

CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy: National standards enacted by the U.S. Congress and promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to improve the average fuel economy of cars and light trucks sold in the U.S.

CASP California Aviation System Plan: Statewide aviation system planning effort responding to State law (PUC 21701-21707). The CASP is updated biennially by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics, and approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC). The law mandates the CASP to include identification of air transportation issues, a capital improvement element, a

Draft (4

/24/17

)


regional system element and a statewide system element. The biennial update of the CASP Capital

Improvement Element provides the basis for the development of the State Aeronautics Capital Improvement Program, under which State funding is programmed for the various aviation and airport projects throughout the State.

CBD Central Business District: The downtown business area of a city; historically, the central downtown area.

CCT California Coastal Trail

CEQA California Environment Quality Act: A law that requires that governmental decision makers be provided with adequate information about the potentially significant environmental impacts of proposed projects. CEQA also mandates ways to avoid or significantly reduce damage to the environment.

Charter Service: Any transportation of a group of persons for a common purpose under a single contract at a fixed charge for the vehicle or service.

Choice Rider: A transit passenger who has at least two modes of travel available and selects transit.

CHP California Highway Patrol

CIP Capital Improvement Program: A list of projects, their estimated cost, and schedule, contained within a report approved by the responsible agency.

CMA Congestion Management Agency: The county agency responsible for developing, coordinating, and monitoring the congestion management program. SBCAG has been designated by the cities and the county as the CMA for the region, responsible for the development and implementation of the countywide Congestion Management Program (CMP) required by Cal. Gov. Code §65088. SBCAG is responsible, in cooperation with local and State agencies, for identifying and resolving traffic congestion problems within the county pursuant to specific legislative requirements.

CMIA See Proposition 1B Corridor Mobility Improvement Account.

CMP Congestion Management Program/Process/Plan: The CMP is a comprehensive program designed to reduce auto-related congestion through provision of roadway improvements, travel demand management, and coordinated land use planning among all local jurisdictions. The program is required of every county in California with an urbanized area of at least 50,000 people. The CMP is updated biennially.

CMS Changeable Message Signs: Electronic traffic signs displaying information that could affect travelers (e.g. accidents, congestion, construction).

CMS Congestion Management System: A CMS is required of all Transportation Management Areas (TMAs). In the Santa Barbara County region, a CMS was an adopted part of the CMP, and is comprised primarily of the State Highways and principal arterials in the region.

CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level: Noise exposures generated by aircraft operations at airports are expressed as CNEL values. CNEL values are used as a method of specifying aircraft noise and designating limiting criteria for residential and other land uses around airports.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

CO2 Carbon Dioxide

Coastal Express: See VISTA Coastal Express.

COLT City of Lompoc Transit: The provider of fixed-route and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) curb-to-curb services within Lompoc city limits and to the neighboring communities of Mission Hills and Vandenberg Village. Lompoc also operates the Wine Country Express.

Commuter Bus Service: Transportation provided on a regularly-scheduled basis during peak travel periods for users commuting to work, school, and similar destinations.

Consultation: One or more parties confer with other identified parties in accordance with the established process and, prior to taking action(s), consider the views of the other parties and periodically inform them about action(s) taken (2010 RTP Guidelines)

Coordination: The cooperative development of plans, programs and schedules among agencies and entities with legal standing in order to achieve general consistency. (2010 RTP Guidelines)

CVMT Congested Vehicle Miles Traveled: Summary compilation of VMT on roadways with a volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.9 or greater.

CRCC Coast Rail Coordinating Council: A council of elected representatives from the transportation planning agencies of the coastal counties formed to investigate the future of the Union Pacific Coast Line. A stated objective of the group is to improve rail frequencies and speed on the coast route between San Francisco and Los Angeles.

CSMP Corridor System Management Plan: Plan required by the CTC for all corridors receiving Corridor Mobility Improvement Account funds from Proposition 1B.

CTC California Transportation Commission: A body appointed by the governor that is responsible for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the development of the Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines, and statewide transportation policy.

CTSA Consolidated Transportation Service Agency: In accordance with State statute AB 120, SBCAG designates a Consolidated Transportation Service Agency. The CTSA’s primary role is to promote coordination and consolidation of social service transportation. Two CTSAs have been designated within SBCAG’s jurisdiction: Easy Lift and SMOOTH (Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers). Easy Lift Transportation, Inc. has served as the CTSA for the South Coast region since 1981. In 1999, SMOOTH, Inc. was designated as the CTSA for the Santa Maria region (including the cities of Santa Maria and Guadalupe and the unincorporated Orcutt area). Designation entitles the CTSAs to claim Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 4.5 monies.

Curb-to-Curb Service: A service that picks up and delivers passengers at the curb or roadside, as distinguished from door-to-door service. Passenger service is not rendered other than for actual boarding and alighting.

Cuyama Transit: A regional transit service providing deviated fixed-route service between the Cuyama Valley and Santa Maria on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The County of Santa Barbara operates the service.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


CVMT Congested Vehicle Miles Traveled: Roadways with a volume-to-capacity ratio greater than 0.9.

Demand-Response Service: Transit service where individual passengers can request door-to-door or curb-to-curb transportation from a specific location to another specific location at a certain time. These services may require advance reservations. Also referred to as Dial-a-Ride Service.

Density: The number of units in a given area. Development density is often expressed in dwelling units per acre for residential and floor area ratio for nonresidential uses.

Deplaned: Refers to passengers deboarding or getting off an aircraft as a given location.

Dial-a-Ride: See Demand-Response Service.

Disadvantaged Community: Area specifically targeted for investment of proceeds from the State’s cap-and-trade program. These investments are aimed at improving public health, quality of life and economic opportunity in California’s most burdened communities at the same time they’re reducing pollution that causes climate change.

Discretionary Funds: Funds granted at the discretion of the funding agency in the amount it desires (as opposed to funding levels determined by a mathematical formula).

Door-to-Door Service: A service that picks up passengers at the door of their place of origin and delivers them to the door of their destination. This service may necessitate passenger assistance between the vehicle and the doors.

DOT Department of Transportation

Easy Lift Transportation: The Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) for Santa Barbara County’s South Coast.

EIR/EIS Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement: An analysis of the environmental impacts of proposed land development and transportation projects; it is an EIR when conducted in response to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and an EIS is conducted for federally funded or approved projects per the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A draft EIR or draft EIS (DEIR or DEIS) is normally circulated to the public and agencies for comments.

EJ Environmental Justice: Identifying and addressing any disproportionately adverse effects of programs, policies, or activities on minority and low-income populations.

EMFAC Emissions Factor Model: Air quality model developed by the California Air Resources Board to quantify criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions in this RTP/SCS.

Enplaned: Refers to passengers that have boarded or gotten on aircraft at a given airport. (Count includes passengers transferring between airplanes.)

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

FAA Federal Aviation Administration: As an agency under the U.S. Department of Transportation, FAA is responsible for all federal aviation programs.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

FAR Floor Area Ratio: Floor area ratio is calculated by dividing the total gross building floor area (square feet) by the land area of the lot.

FAST Act Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act: Federal transportation bill that authorizes $305 billion over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology and statistics programs.

Fare Revenue: The money or tickets collected as payments for rides; can be cash, tickets, tokens, transfers, or pass receipts.

Farebox Recovery Ratio: A measure of the proportion of operating expenses covered by passenger fares; found by dividing fare revenue by total operating costs.

FCAA Federal Clean Air Act: Federal legislation that sets national air quality standards and requires each state with areas that have not met federal air quality standards to prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 1990 FCAA amendments established air quality requirements for the development of metropolitan transportation plans and programs.

FHWA Federal Highway Administration: As an agency under the U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA is responsible for all national road and federal highway programs.

Fixed-Route Service: Service provided on a repetitive, fixed schedule basis along a specific route with vehicles stopping to pick up passengers from and deliver passengers to specific locations. Typically, fixed route service is characterized by features such as printed schedules or timetables, designated bus stops where passengers board and disembark, and the use of the larger transit vehicles.

FSP Freeway Service Patrol

FSTIP Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program: The FSTIP is a four-year statewide program of transportation projects proposed for federal transportation funding, taken from each regionally-adopted Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). Caltrans prepares the FSTIP to meet the federal requirements of 23 USC.

FTA Federal Transit Administration: A division of the United States Department of Transportation that is responsible for administering federal public transportation funding within local communities. The FTA provides funding for capital and operating costs, as well as for training, technical assistance, and research.

FTA 5307 Urbanized Area Program: A federal formula grant program emanating from the federal gas tax that provides funding in urbanized areas for transit capital, operating and planning activities. SBCAG is the designated recipient of FTA 5307 funding for Santa Barbara County. SBCAG currently grants this funding to Lompoc, Santa Barbara and Santa Maria.

FTA 5310 Elderly and Disabled Program: A federal grant program emanating from the federal gas tax that provides funding to states for the purpose of meeting the transit related special needs of older adults and persons with disabilities. Only capital expenditures are an eligible activity.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


FTA 5311 Non-Urbanized Area Program: A federal formula grant program emanating from the federal gas

tax that provides funding to states for the purpose of supporting transit in rural areas, with populations less than 50,000. Recipients may use the funding for capital, operating, and administrative expenses for public transportation projects that meet the needs of rural communities. The state must use 15 percent of its annual apportionment to support intercity bus service, unless the Governor certifies, after consultation with affected intercity bus providers that the needs of the state are adequately met.

FTA 5316 Jobs Access and Reverse Commute (JARC): A funding program under SAFETEA-LU that provided public transit operators and private non-profit organizations with funding for capital, operating and planning projects that transported low income individuals to and from jobs and activities related to employment, and for reverse commute projects. JARC was removed as a standalone program in MAP-21, but JARC activities are eligible under the FTA 5307 and FTA 5311 programs.

FTA 5317 New Freedom: An expired federal funding program emanating from the federal gas tax provided public transit operators and private non-profit organizations with funding for capital, operating and planning projects that provided new services beyond those required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), that are designed to assist individuals with disabilities. New Freedom was removed as a standalone program in MAP-21, but New Freedom activities are eligible under the FTA 5310 program.

FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program: The FTIP is a multi-year program of transportation projects for Santa Barbara County that are funded from predominantly federal sources. The FTIP is developed and adopted by SBCAG on a biennial basis. Once adopted, the FTIP is submitted to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and the federal funding agencies.

FY Fiscal Year: Any yearly accounting period, regardless of its relationship to a calendar year. The fiscal year for the federal government begins on October 1 of each year and ends September 30 of the following year; it is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. The fiscal year for the State of California and SBCAG begins on July 1 of every year and ends on June 30 of the following year.

Future Baseline: This term refers to expected conditions in the future assuming no change to existing policies or plans and that only already committed transportation improvements are constructed. The future baseline scenario can also be described as the “business-as-usual” scenario.

GAA General Aviation Airport: An airport that does not have scheduled air service and that serves only general aviation aircraft.

GHG Greenhouse Gas: A gas that absorbs infrared radiation in the atmosphere. GHGs include, but are not limited to, water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), ozone (O3), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).

GHG Emissions per Capita: Metric used to assess performance towards meeting the CARB target of zero growth in GHG emissions per capita by 2020 and zero growth by 2035. The metric is calculated by determining the carbon dioxide emissions from passenger vehicle emissions (pounds per day) and dividing the total by the region’s population for years 2005, 2020, and 2035. See Technical Methodology for additional information.

GGRF Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: The State’s portion of proceeds from the Cap-and-Trade program are deposited into the GGRF. GGRF funds are used to develop programs and activities to invest in

Draft (4

/24/17

)

8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

sustainable communities and clean transportation, clean energy and efficiency, and natural resources and

waste diversion.

Guadalupe Flyer: Fixed-route transit service that circulates through Guadalupe and connects to Santa Maria. It began operations in June 1998 and is operated under contract by SMOOTH (Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers).

Guadalupe Shuttle: Deviated fixed-route transit service in the City of Guadalupe that operates Monday through Friday.

HCM Highway Capacity Manual: Describes the relationships between roadway capacity and travel/flow characteristics.

HCS Highway Capacity Software: Computer software developed to analyze changes in travel/flow characteristics associated with changes in roadway capacity.

HDV Heavy Duty Vehicles: Vehicles (trucks) that have three or more axles.

Headway: The time interval between vehicles moving in the same direction on a fixed route.

Household: Per the U.S. Census Bureau, a “household includes all the persons who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. A housing unit is a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live and eat separately from any other persons in the building and which have direct access from outside the building or through a common hall. The occupants may be a single family, one person living alone, two or more families living together, or any other group of related or unrelated persons who share living arrangements. (People not living in households are classified as living in group quarters.)”1

Housing Tenure: Housing tenure refers to the arrangement under which a housing unit is occupied. The most common types of housing tenure are owner occupancy and renter occupancy.

Housing Type: Housing type refers to the type of housing unit, such as house, apartment, mobile home, etc.

HOV High Occupancy Vehicle: A vehicle that is transporting more than one person. HOV lanes are segments of roadway that are restricted to HOV vehicles.

HPMS Highway Performance Monitoring System: A roadway data collection system administered by the Federal Highway Administration involving metropolitan planning organizations.

HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program

IIP Interregional Improvement Program: One of the two broad programs that make up the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The IIP is funded from 25% of new STIP funds. Caltrans programs IIP funds to projects through the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) process.

1 U. S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_HSD310211.htm. Accessed 16 July 2013.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_HSD310211.htm


Intensity: The “magnitude of a quantity (as force or energy) per unit (as of area, charge, mass, or time).”2

E.g., the carbon intensity of fuel is the amount of carbon contained in a gallon of that fuel.

Intercity Bus: A large bus with luggage space, and frequently a bathroom, used primarily for transportation between cities.

Intercity Transportation: Transportation service provided between cities by certified carriers, usually on a fixed route with a fixed schedule.

IRI International Roughness Index: The Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) standard reference roughness index.

IRRS Interregional Road System: California State Routes of statewide importance identified by statute in 1989.

ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act: Federal transportation legislation enacted in 1991 that initiated broad changes to the way transportation funding decisions were made. It emphasized diversity, balance of modes, and the preservation of existing systems. ISTEA authorized the expenditure of $151 billion over its six-year life.

ITIP Interregional Transportation Improvement Program: A program prepared biennially by Caltrans that includes interregional highway and intercity rail projects proposed for funding through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). This program has two parts. The first is funded from 10% of new STIP funds and is nominated solely by Caltrans. The second part is funded from at least 15% of new STIP funding and is limited to intercity rail projects. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) may projects for consideration by Caltrans for inclusion in the ITIP.

ITS Intelligent Transportation System: Advanced electronic and information systems that can improve the safety, operational efficiency, and productivity of the transportation system.

Jobs/Housing Balance: “Jobs/housing balance is a planning tool that local governments can use to achieve a roughly equal number of jobs and housing units (or households) in a jurisdiction. The notion of balancing jobs and housing goes well beyond trying to attain numerical equality. Ideally, the jobs available in a community should match the labor force skills, and housing should be available at prices, sizes, and locations suited to workers who wish to live in the area. Hence, there is a qualitative as well as quantitative component to achieving jobs/housing balance. Jobs/housing balance is a planning technique rather than a regulatory tool.”3

JARC See FTA 5316.

JTAC (RTP-SCS) Joint Technical Advisory Committee: JTAC is SBCAG’s ad hoc advisory committee for the development of the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy. JTAC is composed of the members of TTAC and TPAC.

2 http://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed 17 July 2013. 3 Weitz, Jerry. Jobs-Housing Balance. APA Planning Advisory Service Report Number 516, November 2003. http://www.planning.org/pas/reports/subscribers/pdf/PAS516.pdf.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

http://www.merriam-webster.com/

1 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

LCP Local Coastal Plan: Guides the development of land within the coastal areas of California. The zoning

ordinances of the jurisdictions within the region implement provisions of the LCP.

LOS Level of Service: A measure of congestion on a highway facility or intersection based primarily on the comparison between the facility's capacity and the speed and density of its traffic volume. Increasing levels of congestion are designated along a scale from A to F.

LOSSAN Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency: An agency seeking to increase ridership, revenue, reliability, and safety on the six-county coastal rail corridor from San Luis Obispo to San Diego.

LTA Local Transportation Authority: In its role as the LTA for the region, SBCAG administers the 30 year, Measure A transportation sales tax program.

LTF Local Transportation Fund: Funding generated by the general State sales tax, with each county receiving ¼ cent of the current State sales tax levied on every eligible dollar collected in the county. These funds are available for transportation purposes such as Transportation Development Act (TDA) administration, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, community transit services, public transportation, and, if there are no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet, streets and roads. See also TDA.

LSTP Local Surface Transportation Program

MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century: Two-year federal transportation legislation enacted in 2012 that builds on the initiatives established in 1991. MAP-21 provided over $105 billion for surface transportation programs for fiscal years (FY) 2013 and 2014. MAP-21 creates a streamlined, performance-based, and multimodal program to address the many challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. These challenges include improving safety, maintaining infrastructure condition, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency of the system and freight movement, protecting the environment, and reducing delays in project delivery.

Measure A: A local sales tax measure that will provide more than $1 billion in estimated revenues for transportation projects in Santa Barbara County over 30 years (through 2040). Measure A was approved by 79% of Santa Barbara County voters in November 2008.

MOU Memorandum of Understanding: A document that outlines an agreement between two or more parties.

MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization: Under federal law, the organization designated by the governor as responsible for transportation planning and programming activities required under federal law in an urbanized area. It serves as the forum for cooperative decision making by a regional board made up of local elected officials. As the region’s designated MPO, SBCAG is responsible for development of the federal long-range transportation plan and multi-year funding programs, and the selection and approval of transportation projects using federal funds.

MTD (Santa Barbara) Metropolitan Transit District: The provider of fixed-route transit service on the South Coast of Santa Barbara County including the cities of Santa Barbara, Goleta, and Carpinteria.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

A P P E N D I C E S 1 1

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards: Standards set by the federal Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) for the maximum levels of air pollutants that can exist in the outdoor air without unacceptable effects on human health or the public welfare.

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act: Federal legislation that establishes requirements and procedures for documenting the environmental impacts of federally funded projects, including transportation improvements.

New Freedom: See FTA 5317.

NHS National Highway System: Required under Section 1006 of the ISTEA, the NHS is comprised of major arterials that serve interstate and interregional travel, connecting major population centers, ports, airports, public transportation facilities, major travel destinations, international border crossings, and major military installations.

NOx Oxides of Nitrogen: A secondary criteria pollutant that can, in the presence of sunlight, lead to the formation of ozone.

Operating Cost: Refers to all recurring costs associated with operating and maintaining a, for example, transit system, including facility and equipment rental, labor, fuel, and maintenance. Operating costs can be differentiated from capital costs, which refer to one-time expenses to purchase equipment or facilities.

Ozone: An effect manifested by complex atmospheric reactions involving oxides of nitrogen and reactive organic gases with ultraviolet energy from sunlight. Motor vehicles are the major source of nitrogen and reactive organic gases in the region. Ozone in high concentrations (0.15 ppm to 0.50 ppm) can also directly affect the lungs, causing respiratory and coronary irritation and possible changes in lung functions.

Ozone Plan: Formerly known as the Clean Air Plan, a plan that provides an overview of air quality and air pollution sources, and identifies the pollution-control measures necessary to meet clean air standards. Santa Barbara County is required to prepare a maintenance plan under Section 110(a)(1) of the federal Clean Air Act. Under the California Clean Air Act, the County is required to prepare a Triennial Progress Report and a Triennial Plan Revision. In addition the Ozone Plan must provide for an annual 5% emission reduction of ozone precursors (or, if this cannot be done, every feasible measure as part of the emission control strategy) and attainment of the State ambient air quality standards at the earliest possible date.

Paratransit: Types of passenger transportation which are more flexible than conventional fixed-route transit but more structured than the use of private automobiles. Paratransit includes demand response (DR) transportation services, shared-ride taxis, car-pooling and vanpooling (VP), and jitney (JT) services. Most often refers to wheelchair-accessible, demand response (DR) service.” (National Transit Database)

PeMS Performance Measurement System: The Caltrans Performance Measurement System, available only to subscribers, includes a map of real-time traffic data and over ten years of data for historical analysis.

PM Particulate Matter

PM Post Mile

Primary Airport: A commercial service airport that enplanes more than 10,000 passengers/year.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Proposition 1B Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA): Proposition 1B included $4.5 billion for

the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account. The funds in the CMIA were available to the California Transportation Commission for allocation for performance improvements on the State highway system or major access routes to the State highway system.

Proposition 1B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA): This Proposition 1B program provides $3.6 billion to transit operators over a ten year period for transit rehabilitation, safety or modernization improvements, capital service enhancements or expansions, new capital projects, bus rapid transit improvements, or rolling stock procurement, rehabilitation or replacement.

Proposition 1B State Local Partnership Program (SLPP): The Proposition 1B program provides $1 billion for the State-Local Partnership Program. The funds have been available to the California Transportation Commission for allocation over a five-year period to eligible transportation projects nominated by an applicant transportation agency. A dollar for dollar match of local funds is required for an applicant transportation agency to receive State funds under this program. The SLPP program includes a formula program for voter-approved taxes and fees and a competitive program to match uniform developer fees.

Proposition 1B Transit Security Program: Included in Proposition 1B is the Transit Security Program. This program provides $1 billion to transit operators for capital projects that provide increased protection against security and safety threats. Funds may also be used for capital expenditures to increase the capacity of transit operators, including waterborne transit operators, to develop disaster response transportation systems that can move people, goods, and emergency personnel and equipment in the aftermath of a disaster that impairs the mobility of goods, people, and equipment.

Proposition 1B Transportation Bond Program: On November 7, 2006, California voters approved the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, known as Proposition 1B. Proposition 1B authorized the State of California to sell $19.925 billion of general obligation bonds to fund transportation projects "to relieve congestion, improve the movement of goods, improve air quality, and enhance the safety and security of the transportation system."

PSR Project Study Report: A preliminary engineering study that evaluates project scope, cost, alternatives, environmental and technical issues for use in making programming decisions. A new project may not be included in a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) or Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) without a completed PSR.

PTMISEA See Proposition 1B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account.

Regional Greenprint: Identifies existing land uses in Santa Barbara County for restricting future development for purposes of SBCAG’s land use model development; examples include protected lands, open space, habitat, and farmland.

Reliever Airport: A general aviation airport that is designated by the FAA as a "reliever airport." It must be near a metropolitan area, providing an alternate landing site. A reliever airport is intended to reduce congestion at the large primary airports.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


RGF Regional Growth Forecast: A report that presents long-term population and employment forecasts for

Santa Barbara County, its major economic and demographic regions, and its eight incorporated cities. The forecast is mandated by State and federal transportation planning law.

RHNA Regional Housing Needs Allocation: State law requires that SBCAG adopt a final plan for allocation of the regional housing need following opportunity for local governments to request revisions to and appeal the draft allocation.

RIP Regional Improvement Program: One of the two broad programs that make up the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The RIP is funded from 75% of new STIP funds and further subdivided by formula into county shares. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) program RIP funds to projects through the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) process.

ROC Reactive Organic Compounds: A secondary criteria pollutant that can, in the presence of sunlight, lead to the formation of ozone.

ROG Reactive Organic Gases: A primary criteria pollutant that can, in the presence of sunlight, lead to the formation of ozone.

RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Program: The portion of the federal Surface Transportation Program that is directly allocated to regions. RSTP funds are programmed by SBCAG in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP).

RTA See SLORTA.

RTAC Regional Targets Advisory Committee

RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program: Prepared and adopted biennially by SBCAG, the RTIP includes projects from the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Action Element nominated for State highway, transit and rail funds. The RTIP when adopted is submitted to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

RTP Regional Transportation Plan: The RTP is a long-range plan (covering a twenty-year planning period) to improve a region's state highways; local streets, roads, and bikeways; airports and marine facilities; transit, paratransit, and passenger rail services. The RTP addresses both State and federal requirements for transportation plans. A guide for the development of these facilities, the RTP describes the priorities for making investments in a region's transportation system.

RTPA Regional Transportation Planning Agency: The multi-county or county-level agency responsible under State law for the preparation of all federal and State transportation plans, and programs that secure transportation funding for highways, local streets and roads, transit, aviation, rail, and bikeway/pedestrian facilities. RTPAs can be local transportation commissions, Councils of Governments, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), or statutorily-created agencies. SBCAG is the designated RTPA for Santa Barbara County.

SAFE Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies: State legislation (Senate Bill 1199) enacted in 1985 authorized the establishment of local SAFEs for purposes of installing, maintaining, and operating a network of motorist aid call boxes. The program is funded by a $1/year fee on all registered motor vehicles in the county.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users:

Federal transportation legislation enacted in 2005 that builds on the initiatives established by ISTEA and TEA-21. It emphasizes mobility, community preservation, livability, sustainability, and environmental protection. It provides guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation totaling $244.1 billion. All federal funding programs for transit are included in SAFETEA-LU.

SB 45 Senate Bill 45: State legislation enacted in 1997 that substantially changed the process for allocating State and federal transportation funds through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The major changes include consolidation of several STIP funding programs into two broad programs, increased programming flexibility, authority, and accountability for regional agencies and full accounting of all project costs in the STIP. In addition, SB 45 shortened the STIP period from 7 years to 4 years.

SB 375 Senate Bill 375: A law passed by the California legislature in 2008 that requires each MPO to demonstrate, through the development of an SCS, how its region will integrate transportation, housing, and land use planning to meet the GHG reduction targets set by the State.

SB 743 Senate Bill 743: Updates certain provisions of Division 13, Section 21099 of the California Public Resources Code to reform aesthetics and parking analysis in CEQA for urban infill projects, eliminate the measurement of auto delay, including level of service, as a metric that can be used for measuring traffic impacts in transit priority areas.

SBCAG Santa Barbara County Association of Governments: SBCAG is a voluntary council of governments formed under a joint powers agreement executed by each of the general purpose local governments in Santa Barbara County. SBCAG is an independent entity governed by a thirteen-member board consisting of a city council representative from each of the eight cities in the County and the five members of the County Board of Supervisors. The city representatives are appointed by their respective city councils. SBCAG is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) (State planning mandate) and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) (federal planning mandate) for Santa Barbara County.

SBCAPCD See APCD.

SBCTAC Santa Barbara County Transit Advisory Committee: SBCTAC serves as SBCAG’s Social Services Transportation Advisory Council as required by the Transportation Development Act. SBCTAC advises the SBCAG Board on transit issues in the region.

SBMTD See MTD.

SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy: A component of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), required by Senate Bill 375 (SB 375), that sets forth a forecasted development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from passenger vehicles and light trucks to achieve the GHG reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board. The future land use and transportation scenario presented in the SCS must accommodate forecast population, employment, and housing sufficient to meet the needs of all economic segments of population, including the State-mandated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), while considering State housing goals.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Self-Driving Vehicle: Vehicle in which operation occurs without direct driver input to control the steering,

acceleration, and braking and is designed so that the driver is not expected to constantly monitor the roadway while operating in self-driving mode.

SGC California Strategic Growth Council: Comprised of agency secretaries from the California Business Consumer Services and Housing Agency (BCSH), California Health and Human Services (CHHS), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA), the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) and the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA); the director of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR); and three public members – one each appointed by the Governor, Senate Committee on Rules, and Speaker of the Assembly. The SGC coordinates activities that support sustainable communities emphasizing strong economies, social equity and environmental stewardship.

SHS State Highway System

SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan: A statewide data-driven traffic safety plan that coordinates the efforts of a wide range of organizations to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. In coordination with federal, state, local and private sector safety stakeholders, the SHSP establishes goals, objectives, and emphasis (or challenge) areas.

SHOPP State Highway Operation and Protection Plan: A program of projects adopted biennially by Caltrans to preserve and protect the State highway system and provide for its safe operation. SHOPP projects include traffic safety, pavement and bridge rehabilitation, seismic retrofit, earthquake and storm damage repair and traffic operational improvements.

SIP State Implementation Plan: A document prepared by each state, with input from local Air Pollution Control Districts, describing the existing air quality conditions and measures that will be taken to attain and maintain national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). In California, the SIP is prepared by the California Air Resources Board (ARB).

SLOCOG San Luis Obispo Council of Governments

SLORTA San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority: SLORTA, or RTA, provides intercommunity public transportation in San Luis Obispo County and into northern Santa Barbara County. SLORTA provides regional fixed-route service and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit service. SLORTA was formed through a joint powers agreement (JPA) between the County of San Luis Obispo and each of the seven cities incorporated within the County (Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, El Paso de Robles, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, and San Luis Obispo). SLORTA operates Route 10 that provides service between Santa Maria and San Luis Obispo.

SLPP See Proposition 1B State Local Partnership Program.

SMAT Santa Maria Area Transit: The provider of fixed-route and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) curb-to-curb services in the City of Santa Maria and the unincorporated areas of Orcutt and Tanglewood. Service is administered by the City of Santa Maria.

SMOOTH Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers: The Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) for the Santa Maria Valley. SMOOTH also operates, under contract, a medical bus from

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

North County to Santa Barbara, transit for the City of Guadalupe, and transit service between Los Alamos and

Santa Maria. SMOOTH also provides other services such as senior dial-a-ride in Santa Maria and Orcutt.

SOV Single Occupancy Vehicle

SR State Route

SRTP Short Range Transit Plan: SRTPs are useful planning and management tools for transit operators to identify and plan for short-term capital and operating needs, identify fare policies, and establish system goals, objectives, and performance standards. SRTPs also provide a means for public involvement in the transit planning process. There are no formal guidelines regarding the preparation, format, or content of SRTPs.

SR2S Safe Routes to School (State program)

SRTS Safe Routes to School (federal program)

STA State Transit Assistance: Funding generated by the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel. These funds are available for transit purposes only. The formula that determines the amount of STA funding for each region allocates 50% of the funds based on a County’s population compared to the State population. The other 50% is allocated based on the amount of passenger fares and local support revenues collected by the County’s operators compared to the amount collected by operators statewide. See also TDA.

STIP State Transportation Improvement Program: A statewide program of transportation projects adopted biennially by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) that governs the expenditure of State revenues for transportation over the succeeding seven-year period.

STP Surface Transportation Program: A funding program under ISTEA, SAFTEA-LU, and MAP-21 that provides flexibility in the use of available funding for either highway or mass transit capital projects.

STRAHNET Strategic Highway Network: The federally-designated system of highways providing access to major U.S. military installations.

SYVT Santa Ynez Valley Transit: The provider of fixed-route and dial-a-ride services for the Santa Ynez Valley. SYVT connects the communities of Buellton, Solvang, Santa Ynez, Ballard, and Los Olivos. The service is administered by the City of Solvang under an MOU between the Cities of Solvang and Buellton and the County of Santa Barbara.

TAP Transportation Alternatives Program: A federal funding program emanating from federal gas tax that, under MAP-21, consolidates the Transportation Enhancements, Recreational Trails, Safe Routes to School, and several other discretionary programs into a single funding source.

TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone: A geographical area delineated for the purpose of transportation modeling. TAZs are the major units of transportation modeling analysis and are delimited on the basis of socio-economic, topographic, political, and transportation facilities information.

TCM Transportation Control Measure: Any strategy to reduce vehicle trips, vehicle use, vehicle miles traveled, vehicle idling, or traffic congestion for the purpose of reducing motor vehicle emissions.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


TDA Transportation Development Act: A law enacted by the California legislature to improve existing public

transportation services and encourage regional transportation coordination. It provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit related purposes that comply with regional transportation plans. The TDA provides two funding sources: 1) Local Transportation Fund (LTF), which is derived from a ¼ cent of the general sales tax collected statewide, and 2) State Transit Assistance fund (STA), which is derived from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel.

TDM Transportation Demand Management: The implementation of measures that encourage people to change their mode of travel, or not to make a trip at all, e.g., ridesharing, pricing incentives, parking management, and telecommuting.

TE Transportation Enhancements: A program under ISTEA and TEA-21 that sets aside a portion of Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds for several categories of projects whose purpose is to enhance the transportation system. Enhancement funds can be used for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, landscaping and scenic highway programs, restoration of historic rail stations, and various other purposes.

TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century: Federal transportation legislation enacted in 1998 that built on the initiatives established by ISTEA. It authorized the federal surface transportation programs for highways, highway safety, and transit during its six-year life. This bill was reauthorized by SAFETEA-LU in 2005.

TIP Transportation Improvement Program: See FTIP, RTIP, and STIP.

TMA Transportation Management Area: A region that is subject to certain planning requirements under ISTEA. Any urbanized area with a population of more than 200,000 is automatically a TMA. Other urbanized areas may request designation as a TMA, as did SBCAG.

TNC Transportation Network Company: A company that uses an online-enabled platform to connect passengers with drivers using their personal, non-commercial, vehicles.

TPAC Technical Planning Advisory Committee: TPAC is SBCAG's regional planning advisory committee, serving as a communication link between SBCAG and all planning agencies in the county. TPAC is composed of planning representatives from the eight cities, the County, and the Air Pollution Control District. Ex-officio members include the U.S. Air Force, UCSB, the LAFCO Executive Officer, and the County’s Housing Program Manager.

Traffic Solutions: A division of SBCAG. The Transportation Demand Management agency for Santa Barbara County, Traffic Solutions promotes and encourages alternatives to driving alone, with the goals of reducing traffic congestion, air pollution, and vehicle miles driven, and improving the quality of life for employees, visitors, and residents.

Transit Needs Assessment: The Transportation Development Act requires SBCAG, as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), to conduct an annual process to determine if there are any unmet transit needs in Santa Barbara County that are reasonable to meet. If it is determined that there is an unmet transit need that is reasonable to meet within a jurisdiction that does not allocate all Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funding on transit, then that jurisdiction must set aside LTF funding to meet that need before expending funding on non-transit purposes such as streets and roads.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

TSM Transportation System Management: Relatively low-cost improvements designed to make the

transportation system work more efficiently and to increase its people-carrying capacity.

TSPM Transportation System Performance Measures: Tools that can be used to determine whether or not the region is meeting its goals and objectives as defined in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Selected TSPMs should allow SBCAG to measure both the performance of the current system and the expected performance of the future planned system.

TTAC Technical Transportation Advisory Committee: TTAC is SBCAG’s regional transportation advisory committee, serving as a communication link between SBCAG and all transportation agencies in the county. TTAC is composed of public works representatives from the eight cities, the County, Santa Barbara MTD, the Air Pollution Control District, and Caltrans. Ex-officio members include the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the U.S. Air Force, and UCSB.

UCSB University of California, Santa Barbara

Unmet Transit Need: An expressed or identified community need for additional public transportation services to meet existing basic mobility needs that are not currently being met through the existing system of public transit services or private transportation services. SBCAG is required to hold public hearings annually to determine whether there are unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet within a local agency’s jurisdiction before that local agency can use Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds toward local streets and roads. See California Public Utilities Code Sections 99401.5 and 99401.6.

UP Union Pacific Transportation Company: Owner and operator of private rail services along the entire coast line and two branch lines in Santa Barbara County.

Urbanized Area: An urban area, as defined by the 2010 Census, with 50,000 or more people. (An urban cluster is an urban area with between 2,500 and 50,000 people.)

V/C Volume-to-Capacity Ratio: The number of vehicles traveling through a particular roadway segment in relation to the amount of traffic the roadway was designed to handle.

VAFB Vandenberg Air Force Base

VCTC Ventura County Transportation Commission

VISTA Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority

VISTA Coastal Express: Inter-county service that connects the cities of Oxnard, Ventura, Carpinteria, Santa Barbara, and Goleta. It is operated by the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) and SBCAG under an MOU and is administered by VCTC under the auspices of the Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA).

VHD Vehicle Hours of Delay: VHD is computed as the congested vehicle time minus vehicle free flow time multiplied by vehicle volumes in a typical weekday 24-hour period.

VHT Vehicle Hours Traveled: VHT is computed as the product of the roadway link volume and the roadway link travel time, summed over all roadway links. Links are individual roadway segments within the SBCAG regional travel demand model.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled: VMT is the sum of miles traveled by all vehicles during a fixed period of time

on a fixed expanse of highways.

Wine Country Express: Regional weekday bus service between Lompoc, Buellton, and Solvang, operated by the City of Lompoc.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Appendix 2: Project Lists

Fast Forward 2040 projects are presented in four categories with all but Illustrative being fiscally constrained.

• Programmed Measure A: projects reflect the Measure A Program of Projects

• Programmed-Other: projects currently programmed by Caltrans, SBCAG (TIP documents), or member jurisdictions

• Planned Projects: projects that are not yet programmed, yet they are expected to be funded through the life of the plan

• Illustrative Projects: desired but unfunded projects.

Projects lists contain projects to be implemented or constructed between 2016 and 2040. Several projects are funded with prior year funds, i.e.; funds allocated prior to 2016. Where applicable, this is noted in the project’s description.

For information purposes, airport projects are also included.

Table 1: Programmed – Measure A

Project Type

Phase Route Description Year Cost

($000) CALTRANS

PRMA 1: SR 246 Passing Lanes – Western Operational Improvements (FTIP CT07)

HWY Construction 246

The project will improve the traffic safety and operations on SR 246 between Buellton and Lompoc by adding a westbound and eastbound passing lane, profile correction near Tularosa Rd., channelization improvements to Tularosa, Hapgood and Santa Rita Rd. Intersections. All funding is prior year.

2017 24,732

PRMA 2: South Coast HOV Widening (FTIP CT20)

HWY Engineering, Construction

Support 101

US 101 - Add HOV lanes (one in each direction) between 0.2 miles south of Bailard Avenue in the City of Carpinteria (PM 1.4) and Sycamore Creek in the City of Santa Barbara (PM 12.3). Interchange modification at Hot Springs/Cabrillo and Sheffield. A Planned project covers non-programmed portion. Includes non-Measure A funds.

2029 89,850

CITY OF BUELLTON PRMA 3: Street Maintenance

ST/RDS Street

Maintenance

Supplement local funding to better preserve local transportation assets. Ongoing 805

PRMA 4: Circulation Improvements

ST/RDS Circulation

Improvements

Construct Buellton circulation improvements, including McMurray/SR 246 TS, north leg widening and traffic signal improvements

2018 2,380

PRMA 5: Alternative Transportation Enhancements

BIKE/PED Alternative

Transportation Enhancements

Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing sidewalk and concrete repairs, and reducing transit fares for seniors and the disabled.

Ongoing 8

PRMA 6: Regional Transit Support

TRANSIT Regional Transit

Support

Support regional transit services: Wine Country Express and Breeze 200 Ongoing 400

CITY OF CARPINTERIA PRMA 7: Street Maintenance

Draft (4

/24/17

)

2 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project

Type Phase Route Description Year

Cost ($000)

ST/RDS Street

Maintenance

Supplement local funding to maintain, improve, or construct roadways and bridges, including: Street Maintenance Program, Right-of-Way Maintenance Program, Transportation Parking and Lighting Program, Carpinteria Avenue bridge replacement project, Ash Avenue maintenance project, and pavement maintenance project.

Ongoing 1,280

PRMA 8: Safety Improvements

ST/RDS Safety

Improvements

Supplement local funding to construct safety improvements, including the Traffic Safety Program. Ongoing 40

PRMA 9: Landscape Maintenance and Urban Forestry

ST/RDS Maintenance Supplement local funding to perform landscape maintenance and urban forestry. Ongoing 640

PRMA 10: Traffic Maintenance and Signal Coordination

ST/RDS Engineering Supplement local funding to perform traffic maintenance and traffic signal coordination, including: Carpinteria Ave/Palm Ave signalization and Traffic Operations Program.

Ongoing 90

PRMA 11: Storm Damage Repair

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to repair storm damage as part of the Via Real storm water management project. 2019 150

PRMA 12: Circulation Improvements ST/RDS Construction Construct Carpinteria circulation improvements. 2018 1,000


BIKE/PED Construction

Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing maintenance, repair, improvement, and engineering of bike and ped facilities, including: the concrete repair and curb ramp program, Santa Monic Creek Ped Bridge rehabilitation projects, and bike path maintenance program.

Ongoing 450

PRMA 14: Safe Routes to School Improvements


Construct Safe Routes to School improvements, including: Concha Loma Drive/Calle Ocho intersection improvements, Linden Ave/Nipomo Drive intersection improvements, Carpinteria Ave/Santa Ynez Ave intersection improvements.

2019 20

PRMA 15: Local Transit Support and Improvements

TRANSIT Support,

Construction

Support local bus and rail transit services and facilities, including: support Easy Lift Transportation, support HELP of Carpinteria, improve Carpinteria Ave bus stop at Seaside building, improve Carpinteria Ave bus stop at Elm Ave.

Ongoing 80

CITY OF GOLETA PRMA 16: Street Maintenance and Improvements

ST/RDS Construction

Supplement local funding to better preserve local transportation assets, to include: pavement rehabilitation, pavement maintenance, striping and signage, Ekwill and Fowler extensions, and San Jose Creek Phase 2.

Ongoing 1,884

PRMA 17: Landscape Maintenance and Urban Forestry

ST/RDS Maintenance Supplement local funding to perform landscape maintenance and urban forestry. Ongoing 1,000

PRMA 18: Traffic Signal Coordination and Maintenance

ST/RDS Engineering Supplement local funding to perform traffic signal and traffic signal maintenance. Ongoing 800

PRMA 19: Goleta US 101 Overpass

ST/RDS R/W. Engineering The project will improve traffic circulation in Goleta by constructing a new overpass of US 101. This project is for pre-construction phases. Construction is a planned project.

2021 7,847



Enhance the alternative transportation environment by supporting bike and ped projects, including: Hollister Avenue Class I Bikeway, miscellaneous capital improvement projects, concrete and access ramp maintenance, Cathedral Oaks crib

Ongoing 1,074

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

wall, Old Town sidewalk project, Maria Ygnacio bike path lighting project, and school crossings.

PRMA 21: Local Transit Support

TRANSIT Support Support local transit services by providing for reduced transit fares for seniors and the disabled using Easy Lift. Ongoing 100

CITY OF GUADALUPE PRMA 22: Street Maintenance

ST/RDS Construction

Supplement local funding to better preserve local transportation assets, to include: street sweeping; maintenance of streets, curbs, gutters, and drainage facilities; engineering services; and paving.

Ongoing 1,648

PRMA 23: Circulation Improvements ST/RDS Construction Construct Guadalupe circulation improvements. 2018 3,000


BIKE/PED Construction,

Planning

Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing maintenance of sidewalks, crosswalks, and bike and ped facilities; and ADA work into contract paving.

Ongoing 86

CITY OF LOMPOC PRMA 25: Street Maintenance

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to better preserve local transportation assets, to include: street maintenance, engineering, overlays and rehabilitation, and urban forestry.

Ongoing 7,763


BIKE/PED Construction,

Planning

Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing maintenance, repair, improvement, and engineering of bike and ped facilities.

Ongoing 964

PRMA 27: Local Transit Support TRANSIT Support Support local transit services. Ongoing 300

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA PRMA 28: Street Maintenance

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to better preserve local transportation assets, to include: pavement maintenance, roadway maintenance, and engineering services.

Ongoing 7,091

PRMA 29: Storm Damage Repair

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to repair storm damage, including storm drain repair and maintenance. Ongoing 631


BIKE/PED Construction Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing maintenance of sidewalks and improving sidewalk access ramps.

Ongoing 2,418


TRANSIT Support Support local transit services, including Easy Lift and the Shuttle Bus Program. Ongoing 3,564

CITY OF SANTA MARIA PRMA 32: Street and Bridge Maintenance

ST/RDS Construction,

Monitoring

Supplement local funding to maintain, improve, or construct roadways and bridges. Ongoing 6,696

PRMA 33: Safety Improvements

ST/RDS Construction

Supplement local funding to construct safety improvements, to include: signage replacements and improvements; street lighting maintenance and improvements; and pavement delineation and maintenance.

Ongoing 6,437

PRMA 34: Traffic Signal Coordination, Intersection Channelization

ST/RDS Engineering, Construction

Supplement local funding to improve intersection operations, including: traffic signal enhancements, traffic signal coordination improvements, and traffic signal maintenance.

Ongoing 1,938

PRMA 35: Landscape Maintenance

Draft (4

/24/17

)

2 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

ST/RDS Maintenance Supplement local funding to perform landscape maintenance. Ongoing 1,247


BIKE/PED Construction Enhance the alternative transportation environment by improving ADA sidewalk ramps and preforming sidewalk improvements.

Ongoing 2,880

CITY OF SOLVANG PRMA 37: Street and Bridge Maintenance

ST/RDS Construction

Supplement local funding to maintain, improve, or construct roadways and bridges, including: slurry sealing, performing pavement overlays and crack sealing, and preforming miscellaneous road repairs.

Ongoing 960

PRMA 38: Urban Forestry

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to perform the Urban Forestry Street Tree Program Ongoing 20

PRMA 39: Roadway Drainage Improvements

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to improve roadway drainage at various locations. Ongoing 320

PRMA 40: Circulation Improvements ST/RDS Construction Construct Solvang circulation improvements. 2018 3,000


BIKE/PED Construction Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing sidewalk infill and repair, and constructing ADA sidewalk ramps.

Ongoing 175

PRMA 42: Local Dial-a-Ride Support

TRANSIT Support Support of the operations of the Santa Ynez Valley Transit Dial-a-Ride service. Ongoing 8

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PRMA 43: Street and Bridge Maintenance in the North County

ST/RDS Construction

Supplement local funding to maintain, repair, construct, and improve streets and bridges, including: roadway maintenance and repair; surface treatments; bridge maintenance; bridge replacement and rehabilitation; and signs, striping, and marking.

Ongoing 10,040

PRMA 44: Street and Bridge Maintenance on the South Coast

ST/RDS Construction

Supplement local funding to maintain, repair, construct, and improve streets and bridges, including: roadway maintenance and repair; surface treatments; bridge maintenance; bridge replacement and rehabilitation; and signs, striping, and marking.

Ongoing 10,277

PRMA 45: Safety Improvements in the North County

ST/RDS Maintenance Supplement local funding to construct safety improvements, to include the West Betteravia HSIP project. Ongoing 41

PRMA 46: Traffic Maintenance on the South Coast

ST/RDS Maintenance Supplement local funding for traffic maintenance, including the maintenance of signs, striping, markings, and traffic work orders.

Ongoing 600

PRMA 47: Urban Forestry in the North County

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to perform the Urban Forestry Street Tree Program Ongoing 1,100

PRMA 48: Urban Forestry on the South Coast

ST/RDS Construction Supplement local funding to perform the Urban Forestry Street Tree Program Ongoing 1,100

PRMA 49: Alternative Transportation Enhancements (North County)


Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing maintenance, repair, construction, and improvement of the bike and ped facilities in the North County, including: neighborhood sidewalk replacements (Partnership Program), and hardscape repairs and maintenance

Ongoing 650

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

PRMA 50: Alternative Transportation Enhancements (South Coast)


Enhance the alternative transportation environment by performing maintenance, repair, construction, and improvement of the bike and ped facilities on the South Coast, including: neighborhood sidewalk replacements (Partnership Program), and hardscape repairs, Calle Real CDBG sidewalk, and school zone refreshing.

Ongoing 1,100

PRMA 51: Safe Routes to School Improvement in the North County

BIKE/PED Construction Construct Safe Routes to School improvements in the North County, including: at Norris and Twitchell, along Clark Ave, and refreshing school zones.

Ongoing 525

PRMA 52: Local Dial-a-Ride Support

TRANSIT Support Support reduced transit fares for seniors and the disabled in the Santa Ynez Valley. Ongoing 14


TRANSIT Support Support local transit services by providing for reduced transit fares for seniors and the disabled using Easy Lift. Ongoing 270

SBCAG PRMA 54: SR 166 Safety Improvements

HWY Construction,

Support 166

Enhance the safety of SR 166 by supporting CHP operations, improving Cuyama bus stops, improving the Black Road intersection, and improving the Hwy 1 intersection.

Ongoing 2,369

PRMA 55: South Coast Bicycle and Pedestrian Program

BIKE/PED Construction Enhance the alternative transportation environment by providing financial support for various South Coast bicycle and pedestrian programs and projects.

Ongoing 50

PRMA 56: South Coast Safe Routes to School Program

BIKE/PED Construction Enhance the Safe Routes to School environment by construction various Safe Routes to School projects on the South Coast.

2017 551

PRMA 57: North County Safe Routes to School, Bicycle and Pedestrian Program

BIKE/PED Construction Enhance the alternative transportation environment by providing financial support for yet to be identified North County projects.

Ongoing 391

PRMA 58: North County Interregional Transit Program

TRANSIT Support Support the North County Interregional Transit Program by providing funding for planning and Clean Air Express operations, capital, and marketing.

Ongoing 3,400

PRMA 59: South Coast Interregional Transit Program

TRANSIT Support Support the South Coast Interregional Transit Program by providing funding for planning and Coastal Express operations and marketing.

Ongoing 3,301

PRMA 60: South Coast Commuter/Passenger Rail Program

TRANSIT Support Support the planning and operations of Pacific Surfliner peak-hour service. Ongoing 10,850

PRMA 61: Carpool and Vanpool Program Support (North County)

TDM Support

Support the North County carpool and vanpool programs, including, employer outreach and counseling, carpool matching system management, vanpool formation assistance, community education and outreach, general marketing, and incentives.

Ongoing 245

PRMA 62: Carpool and Vanpool Program Support (South Coast)

TDM Support

Support the North County carpool and vanpool programs, including, employer outreach and counseling, carpool matching system management, vanpool formation assistance, community education and outreach, general marketing, and incentives.

Ongoing 861

SANTA BARBARA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT PRMA 63: South Coast Transit Capital Program TRANSIT Support Provide funding for SBMTD capital purchases. Ongoing 3,516

Draft (4

/24/17

)

2 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

PRMA 64: South Coast Transit Operations Program TRANSIT Support Provide funding for SBMTD operations Ongoing 7,592

EASY LIFT PRMA 65: Local Transit Support (South Coast)

TRANSIT Support Support local specialized transit services for the elderly and disabled – South Coast. Ongoing 781

SANTA MARIA ORGANIZATION OF TRANSPORTATION HELPERS PRMA 66: Local Transit Support (North County)

TRANSIT Support Support local specialized transit services for the elderly and disabled – North County. Ongoing 587

PROGRAMMED – MEASURE A TOTAL 221,255

Table 2: Programmed – Other

Project Type


($000) CALTRANS

PRO 1: San Ysidro, Olive Mill, Upper State St. Bridge Railings Replacement

HWY Candidate 101 Bridge rail replacement in Santa Barbara Bounty from San Ysidro Road to State street 2023 19,000

PRO 2: Bridge Preventative Maintenance (1C410K) (portion of FTIP CT14)

HWY Candidate 154 Preventative bridge maintenance in Santa Barbara Co, Near Los Alamos at the Alamo Pintado Cr Ped Br (Br # 51-0076Y) 2023 905

PRO 3: Roadside Safety Improvements (1E000K)

HWY Candidate 101 Roadside Safety - Pave slopes, relocate roadside facilities away from traffic, install worker access gates, and safety improvements.

2022 33,759

PRO 4: ADA Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvement (1E040K)

BIKE/PED Candidate 101 ADA pedestrian infrastructure – Construct ramps, improve pedestrian travel way in Santa Barbara County on Highway 101 at the Butterfly Lane Undercrossing

2022 17,580

PRO 5: Replace Bridge Deck (1F500K) (portion of FTIP CT14)

HWY Candidate 101 In Santa Barbara Co near Los Alamos at the SRs 101/135 Separation (Br # 51- 0073R/L) 2022 34,640

PRO 6: Bailard Ave – Vertical Clearance Improvements

HWY Candidate 101 Vertical clearance improvements in Santa Barbara County in Carpinteria at Bailard Ave 2022 2,640

PRO 7: Pavement Preservation – Restore (1F710K)

HWY Candidate 1 Pavement preservation in Santa Barbara County near Lompoc from the Jct. of SRs 101/01 Separation to Jct. Rte 246/01

2019 4,673

PRO 8: Bridge Preservation – Replace Bridge Rail (1F790K)

HWY Candidate 101 Bridge preservation in Santa Barbara County at Nojoqui Creek Bridges (# 51- 0018 L/R) 2022 6,290

PRO 9: Bridge Seismic Retrofit – Construct Column Shells (1F830K) (portion of FTIP CT14)

HWY Candidate 135 Bridge seismic retrofit in Santa Barbara County near Los Alamos at San Antonio Creek Bridge ( BR # 51-0006) 2022 1,500

PRO 10: Pavement Preservation – Restore Pavement Condition (1G300K)

HWY Candidate 1 Pavement preservation in Santa Barbara County near Santa Maria from Solomon Road to Jct. SRs 166/01 2021 5,789

PRO 11: Coastal Trail Advanced Mitigation

BIKE/PED Candidate Trail Development in Santa Barbara County and various locations. Cost not yet available. 2020 2,800

PRO 12: Sign Upgrades (1G300K)

HWY Candidate State Highways in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties 2020 873

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

PRO 13: SB, SLO County Curb Ramps

HWY Construction In Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties on SRs 1, 101, and 135 at various locations. Upgrade pedestrian curb ramps.

2017 5,990

PRO 14: Fire Damage Reconstruction

HWY Construction 101 In San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties on US 101 at various locations. Restore roadway facilities damaged by wildfire.

2018 23,153

PRO 15: Goleta Drainage Culverts Upgrade (CT#OG070)

HWY Construction 101 Near Goleta, between Fairview Avenue and Los Carneros Road. Upgrade drainage culverts. 2018 23,687

PRO 16: Construct Roadside Paving, Access Gates, Weed Barriers and Relocate Facilities


In and near the city of Santa Barbara, from Milpas Street to Hollister Avenue; and on SR 217 from Goleta Slough to US 101. Construct roadside paving, access gates , weed barriers and relocate facilities.

2017 17,008

PRO 17: Rehabilitate Pavement

HWY Construction 101 In Goleta, from Maria Yngacio Creek Bridge 1.1 miles north of Hollister Avenue overcrossing. 2017 930

PRO 18: Upgrade Highway Signs and Lighting

HWY Construction In Santa Barbara, Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo and Santa Cruz counties at various locations. 2018 500

PRO 19: Upgrade Signalized Intersections

HWY Construction

Upgrade signalized intersections to include Accessible Pedestrian System (APS) push buttons and countdown pedestrian heads in Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and Santa Cruz counties at various intersections.

2018 500

PRO 21: VEN-SB Rail Siding Project (Seacliff)

RAIL Environmental

From MP 423.0 to MP 368.6, Pacific Surfliner route, complete environmental clearance, design, engineering and permitting for siding projects in Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties. All funding is prior year.

2017 24,320

PRO 22: Gaviota Rest Area Water Systems Upgrade

HWY PA&ED 101 Near Gaviota, at the Gaviota Safety Roadside Rest Area. Upgrade wastewater system. Cost not yet available. 2020 5,295

PRO 23: Cold Springs Bridge Maintenance Inspection Access (FTIP CT76)

HWY PA&ED 154 Near Lake Cachuma at Cold Spring Canyon Bridge No. 51-0037. Install inspection access system below bridge and paint structure.

2020 20,117

PRO 24: Refugio Bridge Replacement (FTIP CT77)

HWY PA&ED 101 Near Goleta, at Refugio Road Undercrossing No. 51-0215 L/R. Replace bridges. 2023 653

PRO 25: San Antonio Creek Bridge Scour Mitigation (FTIP CT75)

HWY PA&ED 1 Near Lompoc, at San Antonio Creek Bridge No. 51-0237 L/R. Bridge scour mitigation. 2021 3,054

PRO 26: Replace Bridge (portion of FTIP CT14)

HWY PA&ED 217 Near Goleta, at the San Jose Creek Bridge # 51-0217. Replace bridge. 2023 5,154

PRO 27: Rehabilitate Roadway (3R)

HWY PA&ED 101 In Carpinteria, between Casitas Pass and west of Sandpiper Drive. Rehabilitate roadway. 2020 1,600

PRO 28: Arroyo Parida Bridge Replacement (CT #39610)

HWY PS&E/RW 192 Replace Arroyo Parida Creek Bridge on SR 192 near Carpinteria 2019 1,000

PRO 29: Salsipuedes Creek Slope Protection Reconstruction (CT#OA050)

HWY PS&E/RW 1 Near Lompoc, at the Salsipuedes Creek. Reconstruct slope protection. All funding is prior year. 2020 6,506

PRO 30: Gaviota Roadway Alignment (CT#OT630)

Draft (4

/24/17

)

2 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

HWY PS&E/RW 101 In Gaviota, from 0.7 mile north of Beckstead Overcrossing to 0.8 mile south of Gaviota Tunnel. Improve roadway alignment.

2018 11,152

PRO 31: Linden Ave/Casitas Pass Interchanges (101 Widening Phase 3)(CT#4482U)(FTIP CT01, CT94, CT95)


Reconstruct Linden Ave and Casitas Pass Rd interchanges in Carpinteria. Construct missing link in frontage road system. Reconstruct US 101 bridge over Carpinteria Creek. Includes Measure A funds. Includes mitigation planting and mitigation monitoring.

2019 79,676

PRO 32: Goleta Drainages Landscape Mitigation

HWY PS&E/RW 101 In and near Goleta from 0.2 mile east to 0.7 mile west of the Fairview Avenue Overcrossing. Landscape mitigation for PPNO 0707.

2016 2,800

PRO 33: Exit Retrofit Signs

HWY PS&E/RW In Santa Barbara, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz, and San Luis Obispo counties at various locations. Upgrade highway signs and lighting.

2019 658

PRO 34: 154/246 Roundabout Planting

HWY PS&E/RW 154 Near Santa Ynez, at and near SR 246 intersection. Landscape mitigation. 2017 1,120

PRO 35: Gaviota Curve Mitigation Planting

HWY PS&E/RW 101 In Gaviota, from 0.7 mile north of Beckstead Overcrossing to 0.8 mile south of Gaviota Tunnel. Planting mitigation. 2016 3,329

PRO 36: Rehabilitate Pavement

HWY PS&E/RW 246 Near Buellton, from 0.4 mile east of Santa Rosa Creek Bridge to SRs 101/246 Separation. 2016 4,677

PRO 37: Construct Roadside Paving, Access Gates, Weed Barriers and Relocate Facilities

HWY PS&E/RW 101 In and near the city of Santa Barbara, on US 101 at various locations. Construct roadside paving, access gates, weed barriers and relocate facilities.

2016 11,105

PRO 38: Restore Pavement Condition

HWY PS&E/RW 154 Near Santa Ynez, from Baseline Avenue to Cold Spring Canyon Bridge. Rehabilitate pavement. 2016 2,928

PRO 39: Roadside Safety Improvements

HWY PS&E/RW 101

In and near Goleta, from Patterson Avenue to Gaviota State Park Entrance - roadside safety improvements. Pave slopes, areas beyond the gores & narrow areas, relocate roadside facilities away from traffic install worker access gates and safety improvements.

2017 4,707

PRO 40: Grouped Projects for SHOPP Minor Program (FTIP CT24)

HWY

Railroad highway crossing, safety improvements, shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and operating assistance, intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers, pavement resurfacing and /or rehabilitation, emergency relief (23 U.S.C. 125), widening narrow pavements or reconstruction bridges (no additional travel lanes.) Projects are consistent with the applicable classifications under 23 CFR 771.117(c) and (d).

2017 7,147

LOCAL PROJECTS - VARIOUS PRO 41: Highway Safety Improvement Program (FTIP LOCALHSIP)

HWY Ongoing Highway Safety Improvement Program (Note that HSIP replaces HES) Ongoing 7,147

PRO 42: System-Level Maintenance & Rehabilitation

ST/RDS Ongoing

Maintenance of city streets and county roads including patching, overlay, and sealing; maintenance of street lights and traffic signals; and snow removal and storm damage repair

Ongoing 231,404

PRO 43: Lump Sum – Local Agency – HBP and Seismic Project ST/RDS Ongoing Local HBP Lump Sum Ongoing 313,773

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

PRO 44: Safe Routes to School

BIKE/PED Ongoing Infrastructure-related projects that are consistent with the applicable classifications under 23 CFR 771.117(c) and (d). Ongoing 35,503

PRO 45: UC Santa Barbara North Campus Open Space Multi-Modal Trail (FTIP UCSB03)

BIKE/PED Construction Construct a 1.2 mile permeable, recreational trail that will traverse three tributaries to Devereux Slough. 2017 2,449

PRO 46: Recreational Trails Program (FTIP VAR17) BIKE/PED Construction Recreational trails program grouped project 2016 117

CITY OF BUELLTON PRO 47: SR2S Improvements at the Intersection of SR 246 and Sycamore Drive (FTIP BUELL07)

BIKE/PED Construction 246 Installation of high visibility crosswalk, roadway tapering, extended curbs, and updated ADA ramps at the intersection. 2020 784

CITY OF CARPINTERIA PRO 48: Carpinteria Avenue Bridge Replacement Project

ST/RDS PS&E Replace the existing bridge. Does not increase transportation related capacity 2016 17,000

PRO 49: Ash Avenue Improvements ST/RDS PS&E Sidewalk Infill and frontage improvements along Ash Ave 2016 500

PRO 50: Carpinteria Ave/Elm Ave Crosswalk Relocation BIKE/PED Construction Adjust crosswalk locations to enhance safety 2016 253

PRO 51: 5th Street Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study

BIKE/PED Study Study Feasibility of constructing a pedestrian bridge over Franklin Creek near Aliso School 2016 63

PRO 52: Carpinteria Ave Ped Improvements – Dump to Bluffs BIKE/PED Construction Sidewalk infill along Carpinteria Ave 2016 300

PRO 53: Rincon Trail (FTIP SBCAG29)

BIKE/PED PS&E Construct a multiuse trail from Rincon Park to Carpinteria Avenue (part of the Carpinteria Coastal Vista Trail) 2016 6,933

PRO 54: Main School Sidewalk

BIKE/PED PS&E Sidewalk infill along Walnut and 6th around the perimeter of Main School 2016 200

CITY OF GOLETA PRO 55: Storke Road Widening

HWY Construction Location: Storke Rd from Whittier to City limits. Widen roadway. 2020 1,378

PRO 56: US 101/Cathedral Oaks Landscaping Enhancement (FTIP GOLETA18)

HWY Construction 101 Design and install landscaping at the US 101/Cathedral Oaks Interchange 2017 325

PRO 57: Fowler & Ekwill / Fairview / Kellogg / SR 217 (FTIP GOLTETA08)

ST/RDS ROW & Final

Design to Construction

Local road improvements & interchange modifications at Ekwill and Fowler Rds. Construct new east-west roadways & extend Fowler Rd and Ekwill St from Fairview Ave on the west to Kellogg Ave & SR 217 on the east.

2020 12,307

PRO 58: Hollister Redesign

ST/RDS Design to

Construction

Modify Hollister Ave left turn channelization and raise medians in Old Town area. 2019 12,000

PRO 59: Hollister Avenue Bridge Replacement

ST/RDS Preliminary

Engineering to Construction

Remove existing bridge over San Jose Creek and replace with a new, wider bridge with greater hydraulic capacity. Additional width for sidewalks and bike lanes.

2020 1,750

PRO 60: Hollister Avenue Capacity Improvement Project

ST/RDS Construction Project will construct an additional lane on the Hollister Avenue WB from Storke Road to Marketplace. 2019 2,050

Draft (4

/24/17

)

3 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

PRO 61: Patterson Avenue/US 101 Interchange NB and SB Ramp Modifications

ST/RDS Construction 101

Widen or replace existing overcrossing and overhead to accommodate additional turn lanes and Class II bike lanes. Additional left turn onto SB ramp, additional right turn onto SB ramp, additional right turn onto the NB ramp. Signal modifications as necessary to accommodate peds and bikes.

2020 6,800

PRO 62: Hollister Avenue/Patterson Avenue Operational Improvements

ST/RDS Construction

Add a WB Hollister Avenue free right turn lane onto NB Patterson Avenue; Widen Hollister on the south side as necessary; install a new traffic signal at the Hollister Avenue/Patterson Avenue intersection.

2020 1,077

PRO 63: Los Carneros Way Realignment Project

ST/RDS Construction

Realign Los Carneros Way to meet Calle Koral approximately 400 ft. southeast of its current location. This will allow for improved operations and safety while handling increased traffic volumes.

2021 275

PRO 64: Fairview Ave Traffic Signal

ST/RDS Construction Install traffic signals at the intersection of Fairview Avenue and Stow Canyon Road 2020 200

PRO 65: Fairview Avenue and Calle Real Intersection Operational Improvement Project

ST/RDS Construction

Add additional eastbound through lane on Calle Real in western leg of intersection by adding separate turn pocket. Add additional northbound left turn lane on Fairview Avenue in the southern leg of the intersection to accommodate double left turns. Add Class II bike lanes in both directions on Fairview Avenue in southern leg.

2021 1,840

PRO 66: Fairview Avenue/US 101 Interchange SB Ramp Modifications

ST/RDS Construction 101 Ramp and intersection improvements to allow for right turn lane; install bike activated signal at the SB on-ramp. 2021 4,900

PRO 67: Fairview Avenue/US 101 Interchange NB Ramp Modifications

ST/RDS Construction 101

Add WB though lane on the NB off-ramp to SB Fairview Avenue. Replace traffic signals at intersection and relocate standards. Add additional right turn lane from NB Fairview Avenue at NB 101 on-ramp.

2021 3,980

PRO 68: South Fairview Improvements

ST/RDS Construction Location: Fairview Ave, Hollister Ave to Fowler Rd. - landscaped raised medians, and vehicle capacity modifications.

2019 1,300

PRO 69: San Jose Creek Bikeway – Middle Segment

BIKE/PED Preliminary

Engineering and Design

Construct class I bike path from north of Calle Real to Hollister. 2022 4,210

PRO 70: Old Town Goleta: Hollister Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Plan (FTIP GOLETA20)

BIKE/PED Planning

A planning project that will provide a comprehensive, implementation-oriented strategy for creating pedestrian enhancements along the 0.8 miles stretch of Hollister Avenue from Fairview Avenue to SR 217. Funding is prior year.

2020 400

PRO 71: Goleta Sidewalk Infill Project

BIKE/PED Construction Install 5,000 linear feet of curb, gutter and sidewalk at various locations in the City. Ongoing 150

PRO 72: Cathedral Oaks Class I Bike Path

BIKE/PED Construction Construct a Class I bike path on Cathedral Oaks from Glen Annie to La Patera, 1.63 miles 2022 3,000

PRO 73: Patterson Avenue Class II Bike Lanes

BIKE/PED Construction Construct Class II bike lanes in both directions on Patterson Avenue between Hollister Avenue and the City Limits. 2018 129

PRO 74: Hollister Class I Bikeway (FTIP GOLETA19)

BIKE/PED Construction Construct class 1 bike path, Pacific Oaks-Ellwood Elementary. All funding is prior year. 2017 5,550

PRO 75: La Patera Overcrossing

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

BIKE/PED Prelim.

Engineering

Location: Goleta Old Town Calle Real. Construct new pedestrian overcrossing. 2025 36,000

PRO 76: Bikeway Infill Project


Location: A. La Patera, railroad to Hollister Ave, B. Hollister Ave, Kellogg to Maria Ignacio, C. Patterson Ave, Hollister to Atascadero Creek, D. Patterson Ave, Pacific Oaks. Construct A. Class II, B. Class I, C. Class I, and D. Class II bike path.

2023 575

PRO 77: Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan

BIKE/PED Planning

Prepare a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan that is comprehensive and City-wide. The master plan will replace the bicycle master plan the City adopted from the County in 2005 and updated in 2009.

2017 253

PRO 78: San Jose Creek Bike Path – Southern Extent

BIKE/PED Prelim.


This project proposes a new Class I/Class II bike path adjacent to San Jose Creek, from Hollister Avenue to the Atascadero Creek Bike Path at Goleta Beach. The scope of work includes preliminary engineering, design, construction, and coordination with the Caltrans SR 217 bridge over San Creek bridge replacement project.

2021 8,000

PRO 79: Old Town Sidewalk Improvement Project (FTIP GOLETA21)


Design

A sidewalk improvement program for the residential areas of Old Town. The project will assess sidewalk deficiencies, create a prioritization plan, and install sidewalk improvements. Work is north of Hollister from Fairview to Kellogg and on Pine Avenue south of Hollister.

2020 3,244

PRO 80: Ward Drive Class II Bike Lanes


The project will provide Class II bike lanes along Ward Drive for commuters to access the various business complexes along Ward Drive and will provide a direct connection to the Obern Trail providing access to UCSB and Isla Vista. A new sidewalk will be constructed where no sidewalk currently exists along the west side of Ward Drive in front of the Rancho Goleta Mobile Home Park and will tie into the existing sidewalk to the north.

2018 598

PRO 81: Maria Ygnacio Bike Path Lighting


The project will install approximately 12 independent solar powered LED lighting fixtures along a 1,750 linear feet portion of the Maria Ygnacio Bike Trail. Construction will include installation of direct burial poles, installation of solar powered lighting fixtures, and traffic control. All poles will be located off of the paved trail area to a max/min height of 15 feet.

2016 120

PRO 82: Hollister Avenue Crosswalk Enhancements at Orange


The project will construct pedestrian activated Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s) on Hollister Avenue at Orange Avenue to provide an additional visual cue to alert motorists when a pedestrian wishes to cross the street. The project will include new striping, signage and lighting to be placed in existing pavement, and sidewalk improvements.

2016 276

PRO 83: Path Lighting at Boys & Girls Club/GVCC


The project will remove existing fencing and install path lighting from Hollister Avenue to the back of the property where the Boys & Girls Club is located. The project will also include replacing wheel parking stops, parking lot asphalt repair, and minor path repair.

2016 175

PRO 84: RRFB’s at Chapel and HAWK at Kingston

BIKE/PED Preliminary Engineering

The project will construct pedestrian activated Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s) over travel lanes on Hollister Avenue at Orange Avenue and a High Intensity Activated Crosswalk (HAWK) system at Calle Real and Kingston Ave. Work will include new striping, signage and

2019 400

Draft (4

/24/17

)

3 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

lighting to be placed in existing pavement, and sidewalk improvements.

PRO 85: Fairview Ave at Calle Real/101 Sidewalk Infill


The project will infill sidewalk at the intersection of Fairview Avenue at Calle Real intersection near 101. 2018 350

PRO 86: Fairview Sidewalk Infill


Construct sidewalk, class II bike lane, striping, signage, and lighting for approximately 750 feet along the east side of Fairview Avenue south of Stow Canyon Road.

2018 133

PRO 87: La Patera Rd Sidewalk Infill and Class II Bike Lanes


The project will construct sidewalk infill and the addition of Class II Bike Lanes along both sides La Patera Road between the Amtrak terminal and Hollister Avenue.

2020 830

PRO 88: Hollister Ave Supersharrows

BIKE/PED Design Add green-backed bicycle share the road markings to sections of Hollister Avenue. 2017 23

PRO 89: Calle Real Corridor Improvements


Corridor improvements along Calle Real. 2022 1,000

PRO 90: School Crossing Improvements


School crossing improvements for Safe Routes To Schools including signage, striping, or rectangular rapid flashing beacons.

2022 800

PRO 91: Magnolia Sidewalk Infill Project



This project will construct a sidewalk on Magnolia, south of Hollister Avenue on the east side of Magnolia. 2017 150

PRO 92: Mid-Block Crosswalk on Calle Real 500 Feet East of Encina Lane


Install a mid-block crosswalk (HAWK signal) on Calle Real approximately 500 feet east of Encina Lane. Other improvements include signage, striping and center median island refuge.

2018 248

PRO 93: S. Los Carneros Hollister Green Bike Lane at Intersection


Install green anti-skid thermoplastic material approximately 230 feet in the bike lane of the westerly leg and 25 feet in the bike lane of the easterly leg at the of the intersection of S. Los Carneros Road and Hollister Avenue.

2019 20

PRO 94: Cathedral Oaks at Hollister Ave Intersection Sidewalk Extension


Construct new curb, gutter, and sidewalk extending the existing sidewalk along the west side of Cathedral Oaks to and crossing Hollister Avenue.

2019 159

PRO 95: Miscellaneous Traffic Signal Improvements


Improvements and upgrades to the existing traffic signals throughout the City. 2018 1,500

PRO 96: Miscellaneous School Zone and Crosswalk Improvements


Improvements and upgrades to the existing school zone and other crosswalk signage, striping and signals throughout the City.

2019 500

PRO 97: Hollister Avenue Crosswalk Enhancements at GVCC

BIKE/PED Construction Install upgraded pedestrian activated traffic control system at the crosswalk in front of the Goleta Valley Community Center on Hollister Avenue in Old Town.

2016 275

CITY OF GUADALUPE PRO 98: Operating Assistance for Guadalupe Transit (FTIP GUAD4) TRANSIT Support Transit operating assistance for Guadalupe Transit. Ongoing 319

CITY OF LOMPOC

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

PRO 99: Operating Assistance for COLT (FTIP LOMPOC9) TRANSIT Support Transit operating assistance for COLT. Ongoing 4,210

PRO 100: Bus Replacement (FTIP LOMPOC26) TRANSIT Capital Purchase 4 vehicles for City of Lompoc Transit 2016 467

PRO 101: Transit Operations and Maintenance Center (FTIP LOMPOC23)

TRANSIT Capital Purchase and construction of a new maintenance and operations center for City of Lompoc Transit 2018 11,394

PRO 102: Operating Assistance for Wine Country Express (FTIP LOMPOC13) TRANSIT Support Transit operating assistance for Wine Country Express Ongoing 64

PRO 103: Sidewalk Infill and Curb Ramp (FTIP LOMPOC24)

BIKE/PED Construction Construct sidewalk and ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps along heavily traveled school routes missing infrastructure.

2016 403

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA PRO 104: Intersection Improvements – Las Positas and Cliff (FTIP SBCITY3) ST/RDS PA&ED Construct roundabout. 2016 1,851

PRO 105: State Street Smart Corridor – Outer State Street Adaptive Signal Project ITS Advanced traffic corridor system. Project #102. 2017 1,000

PRO 106: Construct Active Transportation Program Awarded Projects (FTIP SBCITY18/19/20/21/22/23)


Projects include: Las Positas multiuse path engineering, Lower Milpas pedestrian improvements, Cacique and Soledad bridges and corridor improvements, Carpinteria at Voluntario pedestrian improvements, Westside bike boulevard gap closure, Eastside green lanes

2021 13,238

PRO 149: UPRR Bridge Replacement over Cabrillo Boulevard

ST/RDS PA&ED

Replace the Union Pacific Railroad bridge over Cabrillo Boulevard with a bridge meeting contemporary standards and enabling capacity improvements on Cabrillo Boulevard. All funds are prior year.

2018 2,477

CITY OF SANTA MARIA PRO 107: Operating Assistance for SMAT (FTIP SM010/30)

TRANSIT Support Transit Operating Assistance for SMAT, including for nighttime and Saturday service Ongoing 16,015

PRO 108: Bus Replacement and Expansion (FTIP SM025, SM50, SM51)

TRANSIT Capital Transit bus procurement for fixed route and ADA services. Includes bus purchases for Guadalupe Transit and the Clean Air Express.

2017 5,751

PRO 109: Bus Stop Improvements (FTIP SM028)

TRANSIT Capital Bus stop improvements include, but not limited to, bus shelters, bus turnouts, signage and posts, and installation costs. All funding is prior year.

2018 50

PRO 110: Planning Projects (FTIP SM029)

TRANSIT Planning . Funding for updates to the Short Range Transit Plan and other service improvement planning projects. All funding is prior year.

2017 70

PRO 111: Capital Cost of Contracting - SMAT

TRANSIT Support This activity would be used to fund the cost of overhaul work performed by the City's transit maintenance contractor (Santa Maria Diesel)

Ongoing 37,600

PRO 112: Bus Staging Expansion

TRANSIT Construction Design and construction of existing property adjacent to current maintenance and operating facility to increase bus staging capacity.

2017 540

PRO 113: SMAT Bus Yard Maintenance

TRANSIT Maintenance This project will provide capital assistance to perform maintenance to the bus yard that will extend the overall life and improve the operations of the facility.

2017 175

Draft (4

/24/17

)

3 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

PRO 114: SMAT Expansion Bus and Trolley

TRANSIT Capital This project will provide capital assistance for two expansion trolleys and one expansion bus in accordance with the SRTP and the City’s Downtown Specific Plan.

2018 426

PRO 115: ADA Security Cameras TRANSIT Construction Install security cameras at the transit center 2017 44

PRO 116: Fiber Optic Installation and IT Enhancements

TRANSIT Construction Install fiber optic communications to improve communications. Enhance SMAT's IT system. 2020 600

PRO 117: Fare Payment Upgrades

TRANSIT Construction Install a mobile payment, electronic fare media vending machine, and implement a SMART Card system 2018 1,164

PRO 118: Google Transit

TRANSIT Support Incorporate SMAT's service schedules into the Google Transit feed 2017 20

PRO 119: Replacement Vehicles TRANSIT Capital Replace road supervisor vehicle and staff car 2017 100

PRO 120: Emergency Generator Purchase

TRANSIT Capital Purchase an emergency back-up generator to ensure a continuous power supply at the transit center. 2017 89

PRO 121: Advanced Public Transportation System (APTS)

ITS Construction

Purchase and installation of an APTS with global positioning system location, automatic voice enunciation, real time arrival displays at major bus stops and transfer locations, automatic passenger counters, real-time maintenance interface, phone and web-based customer interface, dispatching management module, etc.

2018 2,495

PRO 122: SLORTA Operating Assistance (FTIP SLORTA1/02)

TRANSIT Operating Operating assistance for regional transit service provided by San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority within the Santa Maria urbanized area, including express service.

Ongoing 2,215

CITY OF SOLVANG PRO 123: Alisal Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit

ST/RDS Construction The project will seismically retrofit the existing Alisal Road Bridge over the Santa Ynez River in Solvang. 2016 1,604

PRO 124: Operating Assistance for SYVT (FTIP SOLVANG02) TRANSIT Support Transit operating assistance for SYVT. Ongoing 770

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PRO 125: Clark Ave. and US 101 NB Ramp Improvements

ST/RDS Construction 101 Location: Clark Ave and US 101. Relocate northbound on and off ramps and install signal. 2019 2,494

PRO 126: Isla Vista Infrastructure Improvements

BIKE/PED Construction Construct pedestrian and bicycle facilities throughout Isla Vista.

Ongoing, Annual

4,000

PRO 127: San Jose Creek Bikeway – North Segment

BIKE/PED Design, R/W Construct class 1 bike path from Kellogg to north end of Merida Dr. 2017 1,200

PRO 128: Operating Assistance for Cuyama Transit & Los Alamos Shuttle

TRANSIT Support Transit operating assistance for Cuyama Transit and Los Alamos Shuttle (incl. allocation for County administration). Ongoing 1,544

PRO 129: Rehabilitate and Reconstruct Pavement on Various Roads (FTIP COUNTY30)

ST/RDS Maintenance & Rehabilitation

Reconstruct and deep-lift asphalt and rehabilitate pavement on various roads throughout the district in Santa Barbara County

2017 151

PRO 130: Reconstruct Segments of Hollister Avenue (FTIP COUNTY19H)

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

ST/RDS Construction Reconstruct segments of Hollister Avenue between San Antonio Road and SR 154 in Santa Barbara County 2016 3,500

SBCAG PRO 131: Plan, Program & Monitor FY 15/16 – 18/19 (FTIP SBCAG11)

HWY Support PPM funding for FY 2015/16 through 2018/19. Ongoing 1,214

PRO 132: Operations and Management Improvements on US 101 in Santa Barbara County Study (FTIP SBCAG28)

ITS Construction 101 Operations and management improvements, including ITS technologies on US 101 in Santa Barbara County (CA 329) Study 200

PRO 133: US 101 Widening TDM Program (Carpinteria to Santa Barbara)

TDM Support 101 Program includes vanpool and carpool incentives, real-time ridesharing, transit marketing, employer outreach, and bicycle safety information.

2017/25 200

PRO 134: Freeway Service Patrol (FSP)

TDM Support A fleet of tow and pickup trucks patrol designated portions (beats) of freeways during morning and afternoon commute hours clearing accidents and removing debris.

Ongoing 4,937

PRO 135: Highway Call Box Program

TDM Support

SBCAG operates the highway call box program as a motorist aid system. The call boxes can be used to report accidents, traffic hazards, and other emergencies, and to request assistance for vehicle breakdowns.

Ongoing 6,612

PRO 136: South Coast Commuter Rail

RAIL Support Implement and support commuter rail provided by Amtrak. One peak hour train implemented by 2020 and a second by 2035.

2020/35 31,156

SANTA BARBARA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT PRO 137: South Coast Transit Priorities - Capital

TRANSIT Capital Procure four 30-ft. electric buses and enhance bus passenger shelters 2017 1,482

PRO 138: Operating Assistance for MTD (FTIP MTD1) TRANSIT Support Transit Operating Assistance for MTD Ongoing 76,641

PRO 139: Regional Intermodal Transit Center Rehabilitation TRANSIT Construction Rehabilitation of Downtown Santa Barbara Transit Center 2017 1,500

PRO 140: Smartcard

TRANSIT Capital Install contactless fare media technology in all MTD revenue vehicles 2017 1,000

PRO 141: AVL/Radio/Security Cameras on Buses

TRANSIT Capital Automated Vehicle Location (AVL) / Radio / Security Cameras on Buses 2016 2,066

PRO 142: Lines 1 & 2 A.M. Peak-Period Enhancement

TRANSIT Support Improve A.M. peak-period frequency on MTD Lines 1 & 2 from 15 minutes to 10 minutes 2015 506

PRO 143: MTD-UCSB Mitigation Agreement

TRANSIT Support New MTD Line 28 and enhancements to MTD Lines 12x & 24x 2015/16 41,703

PRO 144: Revenue Vehicle Replacement TRANSIT Capital 40-ft. Nova Diesel (3) 2017 1,425

PRO 145: Revenue Vehicle Replacement (includes FTIP MTD14) TRANSIT Capital Replace 22-ft. Electric Shuttles with 30-ft. Electric Buses (10) 2017 4,000

PRO 146: Revenue Vehicle Replacement (FTIP MTD15) TRANSIT Capital 40-ft. Nova Diesel (14) 2018 6,686

EASY LIFT PRO 147: Operating Assistance for Easy Lift TRANSIT Support Transit operating assistance for Easy Lift. Ongoing 17,572

SANTA MARIA ORGANIZATION OF TRANSPORTATION HELPERS

Draft (4

/24/17

)

3 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

PRO 148: Operating Assistance for SMOOTH TRANSIT Support Transit operating assistance for SMOOTH. Ongoing 11,992

PROGRAMMED - OTHER TOTAL 1,426,945

Table 3: Planned Projects

Project Type


($000)

CALTRANS PL 1: US 101 HOV Widening (FTIP CT20)

HWY Construction 101 Parts of this project are programmed. This project highlights the out-years of the overall project. 2029 308,395

PL 2: SR 246 Passing Lanes – East Segment


East and west bound passing lanes from east of Big Ranch Road to west of Drum Canyon Road, channelization at Drum Canyon and Mail Road, and bridge widening at Santa Rita Creek.

2031 50,229

PL 3: Relocate Gaviota Roadside Rest Area (CT# 49730) HWY Construction 101 Relocate Gaviota roadside rest area on US 101 2020 20,800

PL 4: SR 217 at US 101 Ramp Meter HWY Construction 217 Ramp meter SR 217 to US 101 southbound 2017 1,000

PL 5: US 101 at Patterson Avenue Ramp Meter HWY Construction 101 Ramp meter southbound on US 101 at Patterson Avenue 2017 1,000

PL 6: US 101 at Fairview Lane Extension

HWY Construction 101 Extend third northbound lane on US 101 from Fairview to Glen Annie Rd. 2035 10,000

PL 7: US 101 at Glen Annie Operational Improvements

HWY Construction 101 Operational Improvements northbound on US 101 at Glen Annie Rd. off ramp 2017 5,000

SHOPP – see FTIP for a list of projects

PL 8: SHOPP – Bridge Preservation (FTIP SHOPP1)

HWY Maintenance & Rehabilitation

Var. SHOPP funded Bridge Preservation projects. As individual projects are identified they are listed on the programmed projects list.

Ongoing 178,508

PL 9: SHOPP – Collision Reduction (FTIP SHOPP2)


Var. SHOPP funded Collision Reduction projects. As individual projects are identified they are listed on the programmed projects list.

Ongoing 64,846

PL 10: SHOPP – Roadway Preservation (FTIP SHOPP3)


Var. SHOPP funded Roadway Preservation projects. As individual projects are identified they are listed on the programmed projects list.

Ongoing 235,149

PL 11: SHOPP – Roadside Preservation


Var. SHOPP funded Roadside Preservation projects. Ongoing 31,392

PL 12: SHOPP - Mobility


Var. SHOPP funded Mobility projects. Ongoing 17,000

PL 13: SHOPP – Emergency Response Program


Var. State highway projects to repair damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts. Project will be funded as needed with available SHOPP revenues.

Ongoing SHOPP

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

PL 14: SHOPP - Mandates


Var. SHOPP mandates Ongoing 75,294

CITY OF BUELLTON PL 15: Various Traffic Signal Improvements

HWY Construction 246 Location: SR 246 and Sycamore Drive, La Lata Dr., Albertson's Driveway. Add traffic signals and turn lanes. 2020 873

PL 16: Transportation Network Maintenance and Locally – Funded Improvements


Var. Maintain the local transportation network and construct locally-funded projects Ongoing 10,600

PL 17: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation

BIKE/PED Construction Var.

Implement high priority projects listed in the Regional Active Transportation Plan. Detailed project lists may be viewed online (http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302 /ratp_final_august2015.pdf).

2016/40 520

PL 18: SR 246 Pedestrian Safety Improvements

BIKE/PED Construction 246 Pedestrian Safety and Improvements along SR 246 between Avenue of Flags and US 101 provide upgrades to ADA access.

2018 500

PL 19: North Ave of Flags Park & Ride

TRANSIT Capital 246 Construction of second Park & Ride facility at the north end of Ave of Flags. 2018 1,000

CITY OF CARPINTERIA PL 20: Transportation Network Maintenance and Locally – Funded Improvements


Var. Maintain the local transportation network and construct locally-funded project. Ongoing 40,681




2016/40 1,477

PL 22: Holly Avenue Undercrossing

BIKE/PED Construction Local Construct a bicycle and pedestrian undercrossing of UPRR corridor. All funding is prior year. 2015 2,323

PL 23: Santa Clause Lane to Carpinteria Avenue Multiuse Trail (FTIP SBCAG27)

BIKE/PED Construction Local

Construct a multiuse trail from Santa Claus Lane to Carpinteria Avenue adjacent to the Sandyland Area Salt Marsh (part of the Carpinteria Coastal Vista Trail). 2017 FTIP does not provide funding for the project.

2020 1,289

PL 24: Franklin Creek Multiuse Path

BIKE/PED Construction Local Construct a multiuse path along Franklin Creek from Carpinteria Ave to 7th St. 2017 750

PL 25: Third Street Improvements Project

BIKE/PED Construction Local Construct a multiuse trail along Third Street from Linden Avenue to the Carpinteria Marsh Park (part of the Carpinteria Coastal Vista Trail). All funding is prior year.

2013 760

PL 26: Franklin Creek Pedestrian Lighting

BIKE/PED Construction Local Place lighting facilities along the new 9th St Pedestrian Bridge and proposed Franklin path 2018 100

PL 27: Via Real Pedestrian Bridge Replacement

BIKE/PED Construction Local Replace existing pedestrian bridge over Santa Monica Creek at Via Real 2017 700

PL 28: El Carro Pedestrian Bridge Replacement

BIKE/PED Construction Local Replace existing pedestrian bridge over Santa Monica Creek at El Carro 2017 500

CITY OF GOLETA

Draft (4

/24/17

)

3 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)




PL 30: Goleta US 101 Overpass

ST/RDS Engineering, Construction

101 The project will improve traffic circulation in Goleta by constructing a new overpass of Highway 101. 2025 12,208




2016/40 107

PL 32: Covington Way Pedestrian Bridge Replacement

BIKE/PED Construction Local Remove existing bridge over San Pedro Creek and Replace with a new bridge that meets current standards for bicycle and pedestrian use.

2019 437

CITY OF GUADALUPE PL 33: Transportation Network Maintenance and Locally – Funded Improvements






2016/40 761

PL 35: Bus Replacement and Expansion

TRANSIT Capital Var. Purchase one bus every 5 years. Every 5 years

917

PL 36: Operating Assistance for Guadalupe Transit TRANSIT Operations Var. Transit operating assistance for Guadalupe Transit. Ongoing 25,503

CITY OF LOMPOC PL 37: Circulation Improvements

HWY Construction Local Circulation improvements on arterials and/or collectors. 2021 3,367

PL 38: Central/H St. Intersection Improvements HWY Construction 1 Central/H St. intersection widening improvements 2018 1,746

PL 39: SR 246 Santa Ynez River Bridge


The project will improve access to Lompoc across the Santa Ynez River by a providing a bridge raised above flood level with wider shoulders that can safely accommodate vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians.

2039 17,318







2016/40 4,053

PL 42: Bike Path on Southside of Santa Ynez River

BIKE/PED Construction Local Location: Southside of SY River from SR 1 (H St) to Riverbend Park. Construct class I bike path. 2021 1,372

PL 43: Class II Bikeways

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

BIKE/PED Construction Var. Construct Class 2 Bikeways at Locations: B) A St, Chestnut Ave to Central Ave; D) Floradale Rd/Santa Lucia Canyon Rd, adjacent to Federal Correctional Institution.

2020 1,497

PL 44: Bus Replacement

TRANSIT Capital Var. Purchase buses. Every 2 years

434

PL 45: Transit Transfer Center TRANSIT Capital Local Transit transfer center 2016 800

PL 46: Operating Assistance for COLT TRANSIT Operations Var. Transit operating assistance for COLT Ongoing 204,622

PL 47: Operating Assistance for Wine Country Express TRANSIT Operations Var. Transit operating assistance for Wine Country Express Ongoing 6,491

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA PL 48: Cottage Hospital Access

HWY Construction 101 Location: US 101 between Mission St/Las Positas St. Access Improvements 2020 18,740



Var. Maintain the local transportation network and construct locally-funded projects. Ongoing 286,579

PL 50: Intersection Improvements – Olive Mill and Coast Village ST/RDS Construction Local Capacity improvements 2020 3,435

PL 51: Intersection Improvements – Various Locations

ST/RDS Construction Local Capacity improvements at various intersections throughout the City of Santa Barbara 2020 40,561

PL 52: Intersection Improvements – Carrillo and San Andres ST/RDS Construction Local HSIP intersection improvements 2020 2,604

PL 53: Corridor and Intersection Improvements – State Street between De La Vina and Constance ST/RDS Construction Local Capacity improvements 2025 8,000

PL 54: Class II Bike Lanes and Pedestrian Pathways - Various

BIKE/PED Construction Var. Location: Various locations within City of Santa Barbara. Construct class II bike lanes and pedestrian pathways. 2016 1,863

PL 55: Las Positas-Modoc Multiuse Path

BIKE/PED Construction Local Location: Modoc from Calle de los Amigos to Las Positas Rd and down to Cliff Dr. Construct a Class I pathway for bicycle and other recreational users.

2025 10,450

PL 56: Cliff Drive Class I Connection – Hendry’s Beach to Castillo Street

BIKE/PED Construction Local Create a separate/protected bikeway along Cliff Drive which may require corridor intersection improvements 2029 15,000

PL 57: Class I Beachway Connection – Ledbetter Beach

BIKE/PED Construction Local Create a separate/protected bikeway connecting the Beachway through Ledbetter Beach to Shoreline Park 2030 500

PL 58: Modoc Class I Connection to Las Positas Corridor – Over US 101 through Municipal Golf Course

BIKE/PED Construction Local Create a separate/protected bikeway over US 101 from Modoc to State Street 2031 15,000

PL 59: BMP Regionally Significant Projects

BIKE/PED Construction Var. Implement the 2016 City of Santa Barbara Bicycle Master Plan 2032 10,000

PL 60: Cash-Out Parking Ordinance

TDM Support Local City wide development of a cash-out parking ordinance for employers with more than 20 employees. All funding is prior year.

2016 138

PL 61: Downtown Parking Pricing Program

TDM Support Local Downtown parking pricing program to charge for public on-street parking 2020 2,998

Draft (4

/24/17

)

4 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

CITY OF SANTA MARIA PL 62: 101/135 Interchange Improvements

HWY Construction 101 Location: Main Street at US 101. Add capacity to approaches and on/off ramps. 2021 31,277

PL 63: 101/Betteravia Interchange Improvements

HWY Construction 101 The project will improve the operations of intersections at Betteravia Road and US 101 by constructing a northbound loop on ramp in the south east interchange quadrant.

2033 4,151

PL 64: US 101 – McCoy Interchange


The project will connect McCoy Lane to US 101 through a new interchange including northbound and southbound on and off ramps to provide Santa Maria residents and businesses with improved access to the highway.

2035 21,817

PL 65: Transportation Network Maintenance and Locally-Funded Improvements


Local Maintain the local transportation network and construct locally-funded projects Ongoing 190,043

PL 66: Miller Widening

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Miller St, between Robles St and Stowell Rd. Widen arterials to City standards. 2020 7,152

PL 67: Alvin Widening

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Alvin Ave between Curryer St and Miller St. Modify to secondary arterial stands with class II bike lanes. 2025 10,280

PL 68: Fesler/Depot/RR Roundabout

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Intersection of Depot, Railroad and Fester. Construct a roundabout 2025 1,160

PL 69: Stowell/College Intersection Improvements

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Stowell Rd at College Dr. Lengthen E/B left turn lane. 2030 1,122

PL 70: Betteravia Road Widening

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Betteravia Rd: E St. to SR 135. Purchase ROW, widen to 6 lanes, signalize intersections. 2030 18,238

PL 71: Widen College Drive ST/RDS Construction Local Widen to 4 lanes, from Battle Rd to Betteravia Rd. 2017 1,844

PL 72: A Street Widening

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: A Street between McCoy Lane and Stowell Rd - Modify to secondary arterial standard 2025 4,960

PL 73: Miller Street Widening

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Miller St between Barcelius to Stowell Rd - Widen to four lanes w/ channelization and class II bike lane. 2025 5,175

PL 74: McCoy Lane Extension ST/RDS Construction Local Location: McCoy Ln between A St and Mahoney Rd 2022 4,310

PL 75: Foster Road Widening

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Foster Rd between SR 135 and Blosser Rd. Widen to four lanes and construct class II bike lane. 2021 2,250

PL 76: Widen Miller Street

ST/RDS Construction Local Widen to 4 lanes. Phase 1-Roble to Stowell ($6.6. million). Phase 2-Chapel to Alvin ($4.7 million). 2025 14,667

PL 77: Stowell Road ST/RDS Construction Local Widen to 4 lanes between Blosser Road and "A" Street 2025 1,172

PL 78: Hanson Way ST/RDS Construction Local Widen to 4 lanes between Route 166 and Stowell Road 2025 2,315

PL 79: SR 135/Broadway ST/RDS Construction 135 Widen to 6 lanes from Union Valley Parkway to SM Way 2025 17,675

PL 80: SR 166/Main Street

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

ST/RDS Construction 166 Widen to 4 lanes between Panther Drive and easterly City Limit boundary 2020 815

PL 81: Depot Street

ST/RDS Construction Local Construct secondary arterial standards between McCoy Lane and Battles 2020 790




2016-2040 12,876

PL 83: Bikeway Improvements

BIKE/PED Construction Local Location: UVP, Bradley Channel, Jones Trail, Blosser Trail and from levee to La Brea. Construct commuter bikeway (Phase II).

2017-2031 7,167

PL 84: Urban Bus Replacement

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase urban buses 2/yr average 26,882

PL 85: Complementary Transit Van Replacement

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase transit vans for complementary transit service 1.4/yr average 7,396

PL 86: Operating Assistance for SMAT TRANSIT Operating Local Operating assistance for SMAT Ongoing 56,372

PL 87: Breeze Bus Replacement TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase one intercity bus for Breeze 2026/38 1,506

PL 88: Fare Payment Upgrades

TRANSIT Capital Local Install a mobile payment, electronic fare media vending machine, and implement a SMART Card system 2018 1,164

PL 89: Google Transit

TRANSIT Capital Local Incorporate SMAT's service schedules into the Google Transit feed 2017 20

PL 90: Replacement Vehicles TRANSIT Capital Local Replace road supervisor vehicle and staff car 2017 100

CITY OF SOLVANG PL 91: Alisal Road Bridge Replacement and Widening Project

ST/RDS Construction Local Project includes replacement of structurally deficient Alisal Road Bridge over the Santa Ynez River with widened bridge to accommodate new Class 2 bike lanes.

2038 28,983

PL 92: Solvang Circulation ST/RDS Construction Local Construct locally significant circulation improvements 2024 1,913







2016/40 514

PL 95: SR 246 (Mission Drive) East End Bikeway Improvements

BIKE/PED 246 Project includes Mission Drive shoulder widening and bikeway improvements from Pine Street to Alamo Pintado Road.

2025 748

PL 96: South Alisal Road Bikeway Improvements

BIKE/PED Local Project includes construction of 2 miles of Class 2 bike lanes along Alisal Rd from the Santa Ynez River to the southerly City Limits.

2034 522

PL 97: SR 246 West End Bikeway Improvements, Phase 1

Draft (4

/24/17

)

4 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

BIKE/PED 246 Project includes construction of Class 2 bike lane along the south side of SR 246 from the westerly City limits to Fifth Street.

2030 8,666

PL 98: SR 246 West End Bikeway Improvements, Phase 2

BIKE/PED 246 Project includes construction of Class 1 bike path along the north side of SR-246 from Skytt Mesa Drive thru Hans Christian Andersen Park to Nykobing.

2035 8,666

PL 99: SYVT Bus Replacement

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase replacement buses. Replace two of five buses every two years. 1/yr 5,005

PL 100: SYVT Operating Assistance TRANSIT Operations Local Operating assistance for SYVT Ongoing 22,344

PL 101: SYVT Operations Expansion TRANSIT Operations Local Increase service frequency 25% by 2030 and 50% by 2040. 2030/40 5,800

PL 102: SYVT Service Expansion

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase "service expansion" bus to expand SYVT fleet. Add one bus for expansion of SYVT service approximately every 7 years.

Every 5 yrs.

1,015

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PL 103: La Purisima Road Improvements

HWY Construction Local Location: La Purisima Rd between US 101 and SR 246 near the City of Lompoc. Widen La Purisima Rd to include standard lane widths, shoulders and class II bike lanes.

2020 4,308

PL 104: San Ysidro Interchange

HWY Construction 101 Construct interchange and frontage improvements at San Ysidro Lane and US 101 interchange 2019 10,000




PL 106: Reconstruct segments of Hollister Ave

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Hollister Ave between San Antonio Rd and US 101/SR 154. Widen to 4 lanes with channelization and bike lanes; reconstruct UPRR overcrossing.

2030 51,000

PL 107: Clark Ave. and Bradley Road Intersection Improvements

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Clark Avenue and Bradley Rd. Widen intersection to provide additional left & right turn lanes. 2020 649

PL 108: Clark Ave. and US 101 SB Ramp Improvements

ST/RDS Construction 101 Location: Clark Ave and US 101. Relocate on and off ramps and install signals. 2020 3,000

PL 109: Santa Claus Lane Streetscape Project

ST/RDS Construction Local Streetscape improvements to include parking, sidewalks, landscaping and a Park & Ride area. 2018 2,000

PL 110: Los Carneros Road Widening

ST/RDS Construction Local Location: Los Carneros, Goleta. Widen from El Colegio to Goleta city limits. 2020 3,847




2016/40 15,316

PL 112: West Main Class II Bike Lanes

BIKE/PED Construction Local Location: Guadalupe to Guadalupe Dunes County Park. Construct class II bike lanes/road shoulders. 2020 3,748

PL 113: Santa Maria Levee Multi Use Trail

BIKE/PED Construction Local Location: Along the Santa Maria levee, Santa Maria to Guadalupe. Construct multi-purpose bikeway. 2020 249

PL 114: Mission Canyon Corridor Improvements

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

BIKE/PED Construction Local Realign and widen roadway, drainage improvements and reconstruct pedestrian path along Mission from the city limits north to SR 192.

2025 2,700

PL 115: CA Coastal Trail Feasibility Study


Location: CA Coastal Trail/Bacara Resort to El Capitan Cyn Rd; Refugio State Beach to Canada San Onofre. Trail feasibility analysis for construction of 9.0 miles of state mandated bicycle/pedestrian trail. Cost estimate is for Phase I from Gaviota State Park to San Onofre

2025 2,700

SANTA BARBARA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT PL 116: Rail Transit Connection, Capital TRANSIT Capital Local Rail Transit Connection, Capital 2018 3,623

PL 117: Rail Transit Connection, Operations TRANSIT Operations Local Rail Transit Connection, Operating Ongoing 44,060

PL 118: Transit Operating Assistance for MTD TRANSIT Operations Local Transit operating assistance Ongoing 930,955

PL 119: South Coast Service Expansion, Capital TRANSIT Capital Local South Coast Service Expansion, Capital 2018 5,175

PL 120: South Coast Service Expansion, Operations TRANSIT Operations Local South Coast Service Expansion, Operating Ongoing 19,053

PL 121: Revenue Vehicle Replacement TRANSIT Capital Local 30-ft. Electric Bus (2nd Cycle - 14) 2027 7,700

PL 122: Revenue Vehicle Replacement TRANSIT Capital Local 40-ft. Gillig Hybrid (8) 2024 7,042

PL 123: Revenue Vehicle Replacement TRANSIT Capital Local 40-ft. Gillig Diesel (15) 2021 7,478


PL 125: Revenue Vehicle Replacement TRANSIT Capital Local 29' Gillig Hybrid 2026 2,566

PL 126: Transit Facilities Master Plan TRANSIT Capital Local Analysis of SBMTD Facility Needs 2018 150

PL 127: Photovoltaic System TRANSIT Capital Local Indirect Bus Battery Charging 2018 1,250



PL 130: Revenue Vehicle Replacement TRANSIT Capital Local 40-ft. Gillig Hybrid (7) 2028 6,935



PL 133: Revenue Vehicle Replacement TRANSIT Capital Local 60-ft. Nova Diesel (3) 2030 3,611

SBCAG PL 134: Transit Operating Improvements for Implementing the SCS

Draft (4

/24/17

)

4 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

TRANSIT Operations Local Operational improvements on high performing transit routes from across the region. Ongoing 204,323

EASY LIFT PL 135: Easy Lift FTA 5310 Bus Replacement

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase two vehicles biennially Every 2 yrs.

4,387

PL 136: East Lift FTA 5310 Bus Expansion

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase one vehicle biennially Every 2

yrs. 2,194

PL 137: Operating Assistance for Easy Lift TRANSIT Operations Local Transit Operating Assistance for Easy Lift Ongoing 14,428

SANTA MARIA ORGANIZATION OF TRANSPORTATION HELPERS PL 138: SMOOTH FTA 5310 Bus Replacement

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase two vehicles biennially Every 2 yrs.

4,387

PL 139: SMOOTH FTA 5310 Bus Expansion

TRANSIT Capital Local Purchase one vehicle biennially Every 2 yrs.

2,194

PL 140: Operating Assistance for SMOOTH TRANSIT Operations Local Transit Operating Assistance for SMOOTH Ongoing 9,234 PLANNED PROJECTS TOTAL 4,414,737

Table 4: Illustrative Projects

Project Type

Phase Route Description Cost

($000)

CALTRANS IL 1: SR 1 Widening over Santa Maria River

HWY Construction 1 Widen SR 1 over Santa Maria River 10,000

IL 2: US 101 Widening From Clark Ave to Santa Maria Way HWY Construction 101 Widen US 101 from Clark Ave to Santa Maria Way 7,000

IL 3: SR 1 Widening from Clark Ave to SR 1/166 Junction

HWY Construction 1 Widen SR 1 from Clark Ave to SR 1/166 Junction (widen travel lanes and shoulders to standard widths) 51,000

IL 4: SR 246 Widening HWY Construction 246 Widen SR 246 between Buellton and Lompoc from 2.3 lanes to 4 lanes. 70,000

IL 5: Castillo Street Seal Slab (CT # 49290) HWY Construction 101 US 101/Castillo interchange improvement 40,000

IL 6: 101 Auxiliary Lanes Northbound from Fairview Ave to Storke Rd and Southbound from Los Carneros to Fairview

HWY Construction 101 US 101 auxiliary lanes northbound from Fairview Ave to Storke Road. And southbound from Los Carneros to Fairview 5,000

IL 7: SR 166 Widening – Guadalupe to Santa Maria (CT # OC620) HWY Construction 166 On SR 166 – Guadalupe to Santa Maria City limits, widen to 4 lanes. 50,000

IL 8: Lane Realignment on US 101 at Arroyo Quemado Canyon Bridge (CT # 40260)


101 Lane realignment on US 101 at Arroyo Quemado Canyon bridge, south of Gaviota pass 10,000

IL 9: SR1 Widening and Realignment

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project

Type Phase Route Description

Cost ($000)

HWY Construction 1 Location SR 1; Las Cruces to Lompoc 8,325

IL 10: Anapamu POC Replacement (CT # OH850) BIKE/PED Construction 101 Pedestrian improvements on US 101 at Anapamu Street. 15,000

IL 11: US 101 ITS ITS Construction 101 US 101: Ramp metering, ITS 10,000

IL 12: MP 276 Track Realignment and SR 1 Overpass Replacement (LOSSAN # SB-01) RAIL MP 276 track realignment and SR 1 overpass replacement 62,000

IL 13: Guadalupe Siding Extension and Island CTC (LOSSAN # SB-02) RAIL Construction Guadalupe siding extension and island CTC 20,000

IL 14: Waldorf Siding Extension and Island CTC (LOSSAN # SB-03)

RAIL Construction Extend the current Waldorf siding one mile southward to MP 278.6, etc. (Location: 30 miles south of SLO and 4 miles south of Guadalupe) 12,000

IL 15: Devon to Tangair Curve Realignments (LOSSAN # SB-04)

RAIL Construction Relocate 12.1 miles of main line track between MP 279.8, etc. (Location: 14 miles south of Guadalupe) 196,000

IL 16: Tangair Siding Extension and Island CTC (LOSSAN # SB-05)

RAIL Construction Extend existing Tangair siding 0.85 miles northward, etc. (Location: 18 miles south of Guadalupe) 12,000

IL 17: Santa Barbara County Curve Realignment Projects (LOSSAN # SB-06)

RAIL Construction Realign track: Surf to Arguello, Sudden to Conceptcion, Concepcion to Gato, San Augustine to Sacate, Gaviota to Tajiguas, Tajiguas to Ellwood 677,000

IL 18: Narlon, Honda, Concepcion – Island CTC (LOSSAN # SB-07) RAIL Construction Upgrade three sidings to centralized traffic control (CTC), etc. 30,000

IL 19: Capitan Siding Extension and Island CTC (LOSSAN # SB-08) RAIL Construction Extend the existing siding at Capitan, etc. 10,000

IL 20: Goleta Service Track Extension (LOSSAN # SB-09) RAIL Construction Extend the existing service track at Goleta Station, etc. 10,000

IL 21: Sandyland Siding (LOSSAN # SB-10)

RAIL Construction Add a new siding from MP 373.25 to MP 378.10, north of the existing Carpinteria Station, etc. 15,000

IL 22: Carpinteria Siding (LOSSAN # SB-12) RAIL Construction Construct a new siding at the Carpinteria Station, etc. 10,000

IL 23: Increased Pacific Surfliner Service

RAIL Construction Implement additional Surfliner service (increase service by 2 roundtrips). (Location: Los Angeles to San Luis Obispo) State

IL 24: Increased Coast Daylight Service

RAIL Construction Implement additional train for Coast Daylight. (Location: (SBC) Los Angeles to San Francisco). State

LOCAL PROJECTS - VARIOUS IL 25: Bike Share Program BIKE/PED Construction Construct, operate, and maintain a bike share program. TBD

IL 26: Relocation of Entrance Road to Hollister Ranch and Gaviota State Park

ST/RDS Construction Identify and construct alternative access road into Hollister Ranch and Gaviota State Park. 2,474

CITY OF BUELLTON IL 27: Avenue of Flags Circulation Improvements – Road, Bike, Ped. BIKE/PED Construction Improve bike and pedestrian environment along Avenue of Flags. 2,000

IL 28: Santa Ynez River Trail BIKE/PED Construction Bicycle and pedestrian trail along the Santa Ynez River in Buellton. 2,000

IL 29: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – Buellton Projects

Draft (4

/24/17

)

4 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

BIKE/PED Construction Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the City of Buellton. Detailed project lists may be viewed online http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302/ratp_final_august2015.pdf.

2,941

CITY OF CARPINTERIA IL 30: Various – Vial Real to Santa Monica Creek Bridge and Via Real from Santa Monica Road to Santa Ynez Road ST/RDS Construction Roadway capacity improvements 2,500

IL 31: Santa Ynez Ave Overcrossing Widening/Replacement ST/RDS Construction Santa Ynez Ave Overcrossing widening/replacement 15,000

IL 32: US 101/SR 150 Interchange Improvements Project ST/RDS Construction 101 US 101/SR 150 interchange improvement project 25,000

IL 33: US 101/Bailard Road Interchange Improvements ST/RDS Construction Roadway capacity improvements 15,000

IL 34: Calle Ocho Undercrossing BIKE/PED Construction Construct bike path rail undercrossing at Calle Ocho 507

IL 35: Carpinteria Bluffs Undercrossing BIKE/PED Construction Construct the bike path rail undercrossing at Carpinteria Bluffs. 2,835

IL 36: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – Carpinteria Projects


Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the City of Carpinteria. Detailed project lists may be viewed online (http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302 /ratp_final_august2015.pdf).

11,354

IL 37: Bailard Park and Ride TRANSIT Capital Construct a park and ride facility at the US 101/Bailard Road interchange. 679

IL 38: Rail Quiet Zone Amenities RAIL Construction Evaluate and install quiet zone amenities in City limits. 2,750

CITY OF GOLETA IL 39: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – Goleta Projects

BIKE/PED Construction Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the City of Goleta. Detailed project lists may be viewed online http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302/ratp_final_august2015.pdf.

61,198

CITY OF GUADALUPE IL 40: Widen or Bypass SR 1 through/around Guadalupe

HWY Construction 1 Location: SR 1 through Guadalupe. Reconstruction, widen to four lanes, bring up to standard. 2,874

IL 41: Emergency Vehicle Railroad Overpass

ST/RDS Construction Construct an emergency vehicle railroad overpass between SR 1 and 4th Street. 12,000

IL 42: Bike Lanes and Pedestrian Pathways

BIKE/PED Construction Location: Guadalupe St to coastal area (~4.5 miles) along Santa Maria River. Construct multi-use levee/walkway. 9,359

IL 43: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – Guadalupe Projects


Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the City of Guadalupe. Detailed project lists may be viewed online (http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302 /ratp_final_august2015.pdf).

6,266

CITY OF LOMPOC IL 44: Bike Path near Lompoc Airport

BIKE/PED Construction Location: Northside and/or Southside of Lompoc Airport, from H Street/SR 1 to V Street. Construct class I bike path. 1,200

IL 45: Bike/Ped Undercrossing connecting SR 1 to Allan Hancock Bikeway

BIKE/PED Construction Location: H Street (SR 1) at south side of Santa Ynez River. Construct class I bike path underpass connecting both sides of H Street (SR 1) to the Allan Hancock Bikeway.

1,700

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Project


Cost ($000)

IL 46: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – Lompoc Projects


Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the City of Lompoc. Detailed project lists may be viewed online (http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302 /ratp_final_august2015.pdf).

5,163

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA IL 47: Intersection Improvements – Olive Mill/Coast Village Road Roundabout

ST/RDS Construction Capacity and operational improvements at the intersection of Olive Mill, Coast Village Road, and US 101 northbound ramps. Build a roundabout to accommodate anticipated demand and alleviate existing congestion.

8,000

IL 48: Intersection Improvements – Cabrillo Bl./Los Patos Road

ST/RDS Construction Capacity and operational improvements at the intersection of Cabrillo Boulevard and Los Patos Road. Add capacity and/or a traffic signal to accommodate anticipated demand and alleviate existing congestion.

1,000

IL 49: UPRR Bridge Replacement over Cabrillo Boulevard

ST/RDS Construction Replace the Union Pacific Railroad bridge over Cabrillo Boulevard with a bridge meeting contemporary standards and enabling capacity improvements on Cabrillo Boulevard

25,000

CITY OF SANTA MARIA IL 50: Cook & McClelland Intersection Enhancements

ST/RDS Construction Create Civic Center Entry Improvements (including public art, decorative concrete, landscaping). 179

IL 51: Bikeway Masterplan Projects: Per City of Santa Maria CIP

BIKE/PED Construction Class I Bikeways along Jones St., SMVRR, Seward Extension, S. College Dr 2,543

IL 52: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – Santa Maria Projects


Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the City of Santa Maria. Detailed project lists may be viewed online (http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302 /ratp_final_august2015.pdf).

38,882

CITY OF SOLVANG IL 53: SR 246/Alamo Pintado Rd Intersection Improvements


Widen highway, improve intersection, install roundabout or signals, and widen Alamo Pintado Bridge including bicycle/pedestrian improvements across Alamo Pintado Creek to extend existing bikeway along SR 246 from Santa Ynez to Solvang.

21,627

IL 54: SYVT Corporate Yard for Vehicle Storage TRANSIT Capital Purchase land and develop Corporate yard for SYVT vehicle storage. 1,500

IL 55: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – Solvang Projects


Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the City of Solvang. Detailed project lists may be viewed online (http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302 /ratp_final_august2015.pdf).

4,134

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA IL 56: Bike Path near RR Corridor

BIKE/PED Construction Construct Class I Bike Path near Railroad corridor along US 101 Right-of-Way, from Patterson Ave. to City of Santa Barbara @ Mission St. 5,000

IL 57: Regional Active Transportation Plan Implementation – County of Santa Barbara Projects


Implement all not individually listed Regional Active Transportation Plan projects for the County of Santa Barbara. Detailed project lists may be viewed online (http://www.sbcag.org/uploads/2/4/5/4/24540302 /ratp_final_august2015.pdf).

120,256

SANTA BARBARA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT IL 58: Bus Signal Priority TRANSIT Operations State/Hollister corridor 120

IL 59: UCSB Service Enhancement for LRDP – Operations

Draft (4

/24/17

)

4 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project


Cost ($000)

TRANSIT Operations Enhanced service to UCSB to meet increased demand 103,688

IL 60: UCSB Service Enhancement for LRDP – Capital TRANSIT Capital Enhanced service to UCSB to meet increased demand 25,245

IL 61: SBCC Service Enhancement – Operations TRANSIT Operations Enhanced service to SBCC to meet increased demand 15,158

IL 62: SBCC Service Enhancement – Capital TRANSIT Capital Enhanced service to SBCC to meet increased demand 3,645

IL 63: Hollister Corridor Service Enhancement – Operations TRANSIT Operations Enhanced service on Hollister corridor to increase modal choice 140,582

IL 64: Hollister Corridor Service Enhancement – Capital TRANSIT Capital Enhanced service on Hollister corridor to increase modal choice 34,155

IL 65: Goleta Service Enhancement – Operations TRANSIT Operations Enhance transit availability in Goleta 31,616

IL 66: Goleta Service Enhancement – Capitals TRANSIT Capital Enhance transit availability in Goleta 7,695

IL 67: Airport Service Enhancement – Operations TRANSIT Operations Provide enhanced service to Santa Barbara Airport 32,422

IL 68: Airport Service Enhancement – Capital TRANSIT Capital Provide enhanced service to Santa Barbara Airport 4,050

IL 69: Carpinteria Service Enhancement – Operations TRANSIT Operations Enhance transit availability in Carpinteria 16,198

IL 70: Carpinteria Service Enhancement – Capital TRANSIT Capital Enhance transit availability in Carpinteria 3,915

IL 71: Regional Service Enhancement – Operations TRANSIT Operations Enhanced service between Carpinteria, Santa Barbara, and Goleta 23,660

IL 72: Regional Service Enhancement – Capital TRANSIT Capital Enhanced service between Carpinteria, Santa Barbara, and Goleta 5,805

IL 73: Interregional Service Enhancement – Operations

TRANSIT Operations Expand “last mile” service for commuters traveling between Ventura County and the South Coast 17,212

IL 74: Interregional Service Enhancement – Capital

TRANSIT Capital Expand “last mile” service for commuters traveling between Ventura County and the South Coast 4,185

IL 75: Aging Population Service Enhancement – Operations

TRANSIT Operations Santa Barbara core service increase to transport increasing elderly population 42,354

IL 76: Aging Population Service Enhancement – Capital

TRANSIT Capital Santa Barbara core service increase to transport increasing elderly population 10,260

IL 77: Upper State Street Transit Hub TRANSIT Capital Upper State Street transit hub 10,383

IL 78: Regional Intermodal Transit Center Expansion TRANSIT Capital Downtown transit center 20,767

ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS TOTAL 2,271,360

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Table 5: Airport Projects

Project Funding Source Program Year

Total ($000)

Lompoc Airport (General Aviation)

Apron Rehabilitation Project, Construction, Phase 2 FAA, State, Local 2016 $1,400

Reconstruct Ramp Areas FAA, State, Local 2017 $1,748

Airfield Electrical FAA, State, Local 2019 $2,670

Overlay and extend RWY & TWY to 22,000 lbs. per wheel FAA, State, Local 2019 $1,400

Construct Perimeter Access Road Local 2023 $307

Total: $7,525

Santa Barbara Municipal Airport (Commercial Service Primary)

General Aviation Pavement Replacement FAA, Local 2016 $1,400

Goleta Slough Mouth Management FAA, Local 2016 $100

Taxiway E/K Realignment FAA, Local 2016 $1,200

Runway 7-25 Overlay FAA, Local 2017 $2,800

ARFF Vehicle Replacement FAA, Local 2018 $1,600

Security System Upgrade FAA, Local 2018 $900

Taxiway H Extension FAA, Local 2019 $10,916

RPZ Acquisition FAA, Local 2020 $4,500

Total: $23,416

Santa Maria Public Airport (Commercial Services Primary)

Rehabilitate Terminal Ramp FAA, Local 2016 $5,600

EA-Taxiway B Extension & Infield Drainage Improvements FAA, Local 2016 $270

Master Plan Update FAA, Local 2016 $350

Rehabilitate Hotel Apron (design) FAA, Local 2017 $350

Extend Twy B South from Twy E to B7 Including Drainage FAA, Local 2018 $4,400

Rehabilitate Taxiways A, A2-A8, and Taxiways K-V (design) FAA, Local 2019 $370

Rehabilitate Hotel Ramp FAA, Local 2019 $3,100

Rehabilitate Taxiways A, A2-A8, and Taxiways K-V FAA, Local 2020 $4,800

Rehabilitate Runway 12-30 (design) FAA, Local 2020 $280

Rehabilitate Twy E & H, Including Adj. Taxilanes (design) FAA, Local 2021 $240

Rehabilitate Runway 12-30 FAA, Local 2021 $4,380

EA - Taxiway B Extension to North, Cargo Ramp Expansion FAA, Local 2022 $310

Rehabilitate Main Hangar Apron (design) FAA, Local 2023 $180

Rehabilitate Taxiways E & H, Including Adjacent Taxilanes FAA, Local 2023 $2,400

Expand & Strengthen Cargo Apron & Rwy 30 Holding Bay FAA, Local 2024 $220

Rehabilitate Main Hangar Apron FAA, Local 2024 $2,800

Expand & Strengthen Cargo Apron & Rwy 30 Holding Bay FAA, Local 2025 $3,400

Extend Twy B North to Twy B2, with Upgrades to B2 (design) FAA, Local 2025 $230

Total: $89,744

Santa Ynez Valley Airport (General Aviation)

Construct Airfield Electrical Upgrades FAA, State, Local 2016 $1,342

Construct Security Enhancements & Rwy 26 Threshold Markings FAA, State, Local 2016 $900

Design: Airfield Electrical Upgrades FAA, State, Local 2016 $180

Design: Security Enhancements, Fencing & Eros Cntrl Grdg FAA, State, Local 2016 $130

Construct: Security Enhancements, Fencing & Eros Cntrl Grdg FAA, State, Local 2017 $500

Draft (4

/24/17

)

5 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Project Funding Source Program

Year Total ($000)

Design: Rehab Rwy 8-26, Including Localized Remove & Reconst FAA, State, Local 2018 $150

EA for Far East Apron w/ Drainage Improvements FAA, State, Local 2018 $250

Construct: Rehabilitate Runway 8-26 FAA, State, Local 2019 $520

Design: Far East Apron with Drainage Improvements FAA, State, Local 2020 $160

Construct: Far East Apron with Drainage Improvements FAA, State, Local 2021 $1,250

Design: Airfield Safety Grading and Drainage Imps FAA, State, Local 2021 $140

Construct: Airfield Safety Grading and Drainage Imps FAA, State, Local 2022 $780

Design: Apron Lighting and Beacon Replacement FAA, State, Local 2022 $140

Construct: Apron Lighting and Beacon Replacement FAA, State, Local 2023 $400

Design: Rehabilitate Parallel and Connecting Taxiways FAA, State, Local 2023 $160

Construct: Rehabilitate Parallel and Connecting Taxiways FAA, State, Local 2024 $1,650

Design: Perimeter Fence and Access Control FAA, State, Local 2024 $270

Construct: Perimeter Fence and Access Control FAA, State, Local 2025 $920

Total: $9,842

TOTAL: $130,527

Some of these projects from the 2012-2021 CIP have been completed, but are nonetheless included for informational purposes.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Appendix 3: SCS Development

Scenarios Development of Fast Forward 2040 involved the study of seven separate land use and transportation scenarios, each analyzing different combinations of land use and transportation variables. The preferred scenario was selected from these scenario options on the basis of scenario performance as quantified by the adopted performance measures tied to the overall Fast Forward 2040 goals. All scenarios applied the same region-wide population, employment and housing projections from the 2012 SBCAG Regional Growth Forecast (RGF), described in Chapter 4. Sub-regional distribution of forecast population growth varies by scenario consistent with allowable land uses, residential land use capacity and policy assumptions.

Scenario 1: Future Baseline

The future baseline scenario is based on existing, adopted General Plan land uses. This alternative also assumes that current sub-regional growth trends will continue, consistent with the 2012 RGF.

Scenario 2: No Project

Scenario 2 is identical to Scenario 1, with the exception that planned transportation projects are not included. (Programmed projects are included because they are already funded and assumed to be part of the baseline.)

Scenario 2a: No Build

Similar to the previous two scenarios, this scenario does not consider any transportation projects, planned or programmed, in the analysis.

Scenario 3: TOD/Infill with Enhanced Transit Strategy (Recommended Preferred Scenario)

This scenario selectively increases residential and commercial land use capacity within existing transit corridors. Land use change assumptions are made based on the location of existing transit routes and service in consultation with SBCAG member agencies. Assumed changes in land use capacity reflect local planning discussions about possible future land use and General Plan and Community Plan updates. This scenario also addresses jobs/housing balance issues by emphasizing job growth in the North County and housing growth in the South County. The Enhanced Transit Strategy is a commitment to identify potential funding for transit service expansion when (1) transit enhancements are actually needed and (2) existing funding for competing local demands is protected.

Scenario 5: Blended Infill/Expansion

This scenario has future growth occurring on land contiguous with and adjacent to the urban edge in a low-density pattern. This scenario also distributes growth based on increased residential and commercial land use capacity both in core urban areas along transit lines as in Scenario 3.

Scenario 6: North County-Weighted Jobs, South County-Weighted Housing

This scenario begins with existing, adopted land uses, but applies weights to make specific growth distribution assumptions, emphasizing job growth in the North County and housing growth in the South County, within

Draft (4

/24/17

)

5 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

existing available land use capacity. It does not continue past trends, but also does not focus on infill along

transit corridors. Infill occurs only as supported by local plans.

Scenario 7: TOD/Infill and Maximum Enhanced Transit

Based on the land use pattern from the TOD/Infill scenario, this scenario enhances transit by maximizing alternative mode projects using all available flexible funding sources for transit and assumes possible new funding sources for transit. It makes specific transit enhancements and generally doubles bus frequencies along existing local transit routes during peak periods. This scenario is not fiscally constrained and therefore is not eligible to be selected as the preferred scenario.

The “scenarios pyramid” figure below illustrates the relationship between the four scenarios meeting minimum SB 375 emission requirements. Scenario 3 (TOD/Infill with Enhanced Transit Strategy) applies the same North/South County emphasis in distribution of future jobs and population, but focuses this growth within existing transit corridors consistent with selectively increased residential and commercial land use capacities. Scenario 5 applies the same growth distribution emphasis as Scenarios 3 and 6, but opens up new land to development at the urban edge in addition to increasing land use capacity in infill locations as for Scenario 3. Scenario 7 also does everything Scenario 3 does, but in addition makes specific transit enhancements (doubling bus frequencies along existing transit routes during peak periods) using all existing, flexible funding sources for transit and assuming possible new funding sources.

Figure 1: Scenarios Pyramid

Technical Methodology In May of 2015, SBCAG prepared a memorandum that described the technical methodology to be used to estimate greenhouse gas emissions in Fast Forward 2040. The technical methodology was reviewed and approved by SBCAG’s Joint Technical Advisory Committee and was subsequently forwarded on to the California Air Resources Board staff liaison in June 2015. Consequently, the California Air Resources Board requested minor revisions to the methodology in February 2016 which SBCAG integrated into a revised memorandum for approval in June 2016. In developing and analyzing alternative land use and transportation scenarios, staff followed this technical methodology.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) requires the planning and programming of transportation investments while taking

land use and growth into account and meeting greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance targets created new technical challenges. These requirements necessitated the use of a multi-modal computer travel demand model with integrated land use modeling capability. Together, the land use and travel demand models allowed the study and analysis of a range of alternative land use and transportation scenarios to determine transportation system performance for any set of land use and transportation assumptions. Following certain post-processing steps (e.g., base year back-casting and integration of external trip calculations), travel model outputs were further converted into air quality measures using a third model, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) 2014 Emissions Factors model (EMFAC).

Following definition in the UPlan land use model and analysis using the TransCAD regional travel demand model and EMFAC air quality model, alternative land use and transportation scenarios were evaluated to determine their performance against Fast Forward 2040 performance measures discussed in Chapter 2. Since performance measures are tied to Fast Forward 2040 goals, scenario performance indicates how well given scenarios perform with respect to the Fast Forward 2040 goals and objectives.

To evaluate the scenarios studied, the performance of modeled scenarios for each target year (2020, 2035 and 2040) is compared with the base year and the future baseline year. As a threshold determination, scenarios studied had to meet the SB 375 GHG emission targets in order to be viable as candidates for consideration as the preferred Fast Forward 2040 scenario. To determine compliance with the SB 375 GHG emission targets, per capita GHG passenger vehicle emissions for each scenario and target year were compared with the 2005 base year emissions. Only those scenarios meeting at minimum the SBCAG regional GHG target of zero net increase in per capita GHG emissions from base year emissions were qualified for further consideration. Ultimately, with decision-maker input and feedback from public outreach, the preferred scenario was selected by the SBCAG Board from among the range of scenarios meeting the GHG target, taking into account scenario performance across a range of performance measures.

A more detailed description of the land use, travel, and emissions models and technical methodology for preparing various components of the Plan is contained below.

UPlan Land Use Model UPlan is an application that was developed at the Information Center for the Environment (University of California at Davis) which allows users to project future land use patterns. Users can also overlay environmental data with the urban footprint to identify potential conflicts. UPlan was designed for use in California and has been widely applied in land use and environmental planning.

SBCAG worked closely with its stakeholders to support UPlan as a tool for incorporating land use and smart growth into the travel forecasting process. UPlan was utilized for both the allocation of the Regional Growth Forecast and as the testbed of alternative land use scenarios for Fast Forward 2040.

UPlan is based on the following assumptions:

• Population growth can be converted into demand for land use by applying conversion factors to county-level employment and household forecasts (i.e., persons per household, employees per household, square footage per employee, and floor area ratios).

• New urban expansion can be concentrated into areas designated for future development, consistent with underlying allowable land uses densities.

• Cells (50-by-50-meter grids) have different attraction weights because of accessibility to transportation and other infrastructure.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

5 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

• Some grid cells, such as lakes and streams, protected open space or certain already developed

urban areas, will not be further developed and are “masked,” while other cells, such as agricultural land and flood plains, may “discourage” new development.

By applying a set of formulas, UPlan converts population and employment growth into land consumption in terms of 50-meter grids based on residential, commercial, and industrial development densities. These density categories include industry, high density commercial, high density residential, low density commercial, medium density residential, low density residential, and very low density residential. Similarly, the percentage allocation of employees to the industrial and commercial categories is based on employees per square foot and floor area ratios. These conversion parameters are primarily based on 2010 U.S. Census data for Santa Barbara County.

In a UPlan run, grid-level allocated consumption is constrained to available land. This process can be described using the following general demographic rules:

• People take up space

• People live in groups (e.g., households) • Different households take up different amounts of space (residential densities) • The number of households multiplied by the space needed per household equals the

residential space needed

• Some portion of each household is employed • Different forms of employment require different amounts of space • The number of employees multiplied by the space needed per employee equals the total

employment space needed

The land consumption parameters used in this model are listed in 0 and were calibrated specifically for Santa Barbara County and were then applied to a set of generalized land use categories. In the base year model runs, allowable land uses in the model were designed to replicate the existing land use designations allowed by SBCAG member jurisdictions in their General Plan Land Use and Housing Elements. Although the generalized nature of the UPlan land use categories inherently loses some of the specificity of the local General Plans, SBCAG staff worked closely with the Joint Technical Advisory Committee (JTAC) and local government planning staff to verify that starting land uses were as accurate as possible. In this manner, UPlan essentially starts by replicating existing allowable land use designations across all SBCAG member jurisdictions and “identifies the general location of uses, residential densities and building intensities within the region” as required by Senate Bill 375 (SB 375).

Starting from these existing, allowable land use designations, SBCAG staff developed alternative land use scenarios by selectively changing allowable land use densities and areas open to development as appropriate for the particular scenario. For example, within the preferred scenario, residential and commercial land use intensities were selectively increased in existing urban areas along transit corridors to allow for transit-oriented, infill development. As for the base year land uses, SBCAG staff worked closely with JTAC and local planning staff on the development of these alternatives.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Table 6: UPlan and Travel Model Parameters

Model Parameters Input by Base Year Type Source3 2010 2020 2035 2040

Population present Res Census, Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF 411683 423895 445891 507482

Population future Res Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF 423895 445891 507482 519965

Population future - Special Res Local knowledge, Publications (UCSB 2010 LRDP)

-- 434786 507482 519965

Residents per household Res Census, Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF 2.98 2.97 2.86 2.83

Employees per household (non-Ag)1 Emp Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF 1.25 1.26 1.18 1.18

Employees present (non-Ag) Emp Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF 171942 160700 189102 208782 Employees future (non-Ag) Emp Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF 161408 189102 208782 216070 Employees future (non-Ag) + Redevelopment - Special Emp Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF 161408 191561 207980 215926

Vacant Inner Res Local Knowledge 0 0 0 0 Vacant Outer Res Local Knowledge 0 0 0 0 Space per household - gross acres by type Res Parcels

-- Residential High 0.025902 0.025902 0.025902 0.025902 -- Residential Medium 0.18475 0.18475 0.18475 0.18475 -- Residential Low 0.564939 0.564939 0.564939 0.564939 -- Residential Very Low 7.570521 7.570521 7.570521 7.570521

Space - Avg building sq. footage per employee by type Emp

Publications (SB City Building Area Per Employee)

-- Industrial 800 800 800 800 -- Commercial High 250 250 250 250 -- Commercial Low 500 300 300 300 Space per employee - floor area ratios (FAR)2 by type Emp Current values, Publications

(Santa Maria FAR)

-- Industrial 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 -- Commercial High 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 -- Commercial Low 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Residential Ratios Res Parcels, General Plans -- % Residential High 47.573 47.573 47.573 47.573 -- % Residential Medium 31.447 31.447 31.447 31.447 -- % Residential Low 20.405 20.405 20.405 20.405 -- % Residential Very Low 0.575 0.575 0.575 0.575 Employee Ratios Emp Cal Trans, SBCAG RGF -- % Industrial 14.1 15.5 14.2 13.8 -- % Commercial High 17.7 21.4 22.4 22.7 -- % Commercial Low 68.3 63.1 63.4 63.5

Redevelopment Population Res 2010 Blocks with 2010 Census -- 7420 0 0

Redevelopment Employment Emp 3148 Special Generator Population Res SBCAG, Local knowledge 11105 Special Generator Employment Emp SBCAG, Local knowledge 688 802 144 1 The explicit employment method is used, and so this variable is not used directly in UPlan 2 Dividing the total square footage of a building by the square footage of its lot 3 Caltrans Data was used for 2005; 2012 SBCAG RGF data was use for future year runs

Draft (4

/24/17

)

5 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Accommodation of Future Growth & Housing Need

For each scenario and future model year, UPlan assigns new employment and households within the model environment, allocating population, household and employment growth as projected in the 2012 Regional Growth Forecast (RGF) according to available land use capacity and other assumptions. The RGF contains growth estimates of population, employment, and households to 2040 based on the Census 2010 residential and related socioeconomic data. The forecast is based on a two-step growth forecast methodology, involving a County-wide, top-down employment and population forecast in the first step and distribution of both employment and population forecasts at the sub-regional level, using a bottom-up method considering local General Plan land uses, in the second step. The RGF addresses net migration into the region as well as population growth, household formation and employment growth.

Future model years analyzed are 2020, 2035 and 2040 (the two SB 375 target years and the plan horizon year). For all scenarios and all model years, the total forecast growth assumptions drawn from the RGF are the same. Only the sub-regional distribution of forecast growth differs between scenarios based on the scenario’s underlying land use assumptions. For example, the sub-regional distribution of growth in the future baseline scenario (which does not propose land use changes) matches, to the maximum extent practicable, the RGF sub-regional allocation, whereas in the preferred scenario distribution of growth is adjusted to reflect scenario assumptions regarding land use changes. In all scenarios, the distribution of the growth is consistent with the land use designations and available land use capacity of the scenario in question.

In each scenario studied, sufficient land use capacity is made available in UPlan to accommodate all growth in population, households and employment projected in the RGF. Thus each scenario identifies areas within the region sufficient to house all the forecast population of the region to the plan horizon year. Furthermore, modeled scenarios supply enough residential housing capacity by jurisdiction to accommodate housing need projected in the eight-year, 2014-2022 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) cycle, as given to SBCAG by the State Department of Housing and Community Development and allocated to SBCAG member jurisdictions according to the adopted RHNA methodology. Available residential capacity in each jurisdiction is sufficient to accommodate at minimum that jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need of 11,030 units as required by Gov. Code Section 65080(b)(2)(B)(iii).

Special Generators In addition to the allowable land uses of SBCAG member jurisdictions, the SBCAG Regional Travel Demand Model (RTDM) accounts for allowable land uses and planned growth at institutions not subject to local land use control. In Santa Barbara, such institutions include, most notably, UCSB, Vandenberg Air Force Base and the Santa Ynez Chumash tribal reservation lands. These locations are commonly referred to as “special generators”, cannot be modeled within UPlan, and have predetermined trips associated with them based on planning information available from these institutions. In UPlan, these land use areas exist but are “masked” (areas that will not be used for new development) and not part of the allocation process. The future population and employment are subtracted from the total forecast growth that is automatically assigned by UPlan to other jurisdictions.

UPlan Land Use Model to TransCAD Regional Travel Demand Model Bridge Population and employment zonal totals from UPlan are aggregated to traffic analysis zones (TAZs) and exported for input into the SBCAG RTDM. Trip estimation is then performed by the SBCAG RTDM which uses the household, employment, and land use unit outputs from UPlan, alongside other input land use data by TAZ to estimate trips. The trip models are combinations of trips generated by population, households, and employees, plus trips generated by land use value (e.g., trips per 1,000 square feet of commercial floor space, which are output from UPlan).

Draft (4

/24/17

)


SBCAG Regional Travel Demand Model (RTDM)

The SBCAG RTDM is an enhanced 4-step model that performs the following classical modeling steps: trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and assignment. It incorporates “4D” variables that can account for Density, Diversity, Design, and Destination (“the four Ds”) during the trip generation phase of the model run. This allows the SBCAG RTDM to be more responsive to changes within various land use scenarios.

The SBCAG RTDM replicates the region’s existing transportation network as well as future planned and programmed transportation projects as defined in each modeled scenario. The transportation network and projects include not only roads and highways, but also rail, transit networks, and bikeways, as well as the ability to model pedestrian trips. In this way, the SBCAG RTDM is multi-modal and identifies, for each scenario studied, “a transportation network to service the transportation needs of the region.”

Post-Processing Steps Several additional steps are required for travel model outputs to calculate base year values and account for trips that originate or end (or both) outside the region (inter-regional and external trips). During the target-setting process, the ARB set the year 2005 as the base year from which all Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) would measure their net change in passenger vehicle greenhouse gas emissions per capita. Consistent with the base year used for the regional target setting and per ARB staff’s direction, SBCAG used 2005 as the base year for modeling purposes. Updated 2005 data was derived from current 2010 data, back-cast to 2005. 2010 Census data is more current and therefore able to reflect the current economic conditions more accurately. County-wide vehicle miles traveled (VMT) data is available for both 2005 and 2010 from the Caltrans Public Road Data documents available via the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS). The back-cast 2005 and 2011 vehicle miles traveled are calculated from this data as the ratio of the modeled 2010 outputs and the 2010 HPMS data, multiplied by the 2005 and 2011 HPMS data.

Table 7: VMT Adjustments to 2005 and 2014 Baseline Years

SBCAG Regional Model VMT 9,365,327 2010 HPMS VMT* 9,741,300 SBCAG Model: HPMS Adjustment Factor 0.9614

Variable 2005 2014 HPMS VMT* 10,123,000 9,743,730 A. VMT w/ SBCAG Model: HPMS Adj. Factor 9,732,295 9,367,663 B. Inter-regional VMT Factor ** 1.0182 C. Minus external VMT (3.9% of total)** 389,292 365,339 Total = (A * B) – C 9,520,567 9,173,236 *Source: Public Road Data, Caltrans, 2005, 2010, 2014. ** Source: Data developed based on information obtained from Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG).

Important to note, the 2005 base year used in Fast Forward 2040 to demonstrate compliance with passenger vehicle emissions targets under SB 375 is different from the baseline year for purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (2014). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) baseline year is determined by the date of publication of the Notice of Preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (and most recent available data). Because Fast Forward 2040 and the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) use two, different base years for two, different purposes (Fast Forward

Draft (4

/24/17

)

5 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

2040 demonstrates compliance with specified per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets, while the

EIR assesses potential impacts of the plan to air quality), the emissions data shown in the two documents also differs somewhat. “Inter-regional” and “external-to-external” trips are defined within SBCAG’s modeling process according to the California Air Resources Board’s Recommendations to the Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) Pursuant to SB 375. Inter-regional trips are those that begin or end outside the SBCAG region. External-to-external trips are those trips that both begin and end outside of the SBCAG region, after traveling across some portion of the region.

As recommended by the RTAC, SBCAG addresses inter-regional trips by simply splitting VMT equally between the two MPOs affected, so that SBCAG takes responsibility for one-half of each such inter-regional trip. SBCAG does not account for external-to-external trips for purposes of the development of the SCS. For inter-regional trips, SBCAG coordinated with neighboring regions (San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) to the north and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to the south) by obtaining inter-regional trips from these regions (e.g. average daily traffic (ADT) volumes where major freeways or highways connect our regions, such as U.S. 101 or Highway 1 in the Guadalupe area) for the base year and future years 2020 and 2035. To ensure accuracy and consistency with neighboring regions, SBCAG then used the methodology recommended by the California Air Resources Board’s Regional Targets Advisory Committee, taking each region’s inter-regional trips, dividing the number by 2 and multiplying the quotient by the average inter-regional trip distance. Given that the SBCAG RTDM is a three-county model, which includes origins and destinations within Ventura and San Luis Obispo Counties, staff multiplied the inter-regional trips times the SBCAG RTDM inter-regional average trip distance to calculate the inter-regional VMT for each scenario. The base year 2010 estimates are shown in Table A-3 below, the additional tables (for all future years and scenarios) can be made available on request.

Table 8: Year 2010 Inter-regional VMT Based on "50/50 IX-XI Split" With Neighboring Counties

2010 Total Vehicle Trips I-I IX-XI X-X Total SBCAG 1,178,953 124,449 4,123 1,307,525 SCAG (Ventura Co. Line) n/a 66,500 n/a SLOCOG (SLO County Line) n/a 70,700 n/a

Subtotal SCAG + SLOCOG 137,200 Reduce IX-XI by 50%

Total Adj. Trips 1,178,953 130,824 4,123 1,444,725 2010 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled I-I IX-XI (a) X-X (b) VMT 5,658,997 3,506,092 371,106 9,536,196 Total Adj. VMT 5,658,997 3,506,092 n/a 9,165,090 (a) Inter-regional VMT = Total adj. trips x SBCAG model avg. IX-XI trip distance (26.8 miles). (b) External-to-External VMT = Total adj. trips x SLO County line-to-Ventura County line distance on US 101 (90 miles).

Air Quality & Emissions Modeling SBCAG applies the EMFAC 2014 model to the SBCAG RTDM outputs (VMT, trips, VMT by speed class) in order to calculate corresponding vehicle emissions, including GHG emissions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are used as the overall indicator of greenhouse gas emissions. For purposes of SB 375

Draft (4

/24/17

)


compliance, SBCAG uses CO2 emissions for the vehicle classes that meet the ARB definition of “passenger

vehicle”:

• Light-duty autos (LDA)

• Light-duty trucks (LDT1) (less than 3,750 lbs.)

• Light-duty trucks (LDT2) (3,751-5,750 lbs.)

• Medium-duty trucks (MDT) (5,751-8,500 lbs.)

• Motorcycles (MCY)

The 2014 EMFAC model includes information on projected effects on emissions of the Pavley standards and Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), two regulatory measures that will significantly reduce emissions directly from passenger vehicles. The EMFAC2014 also incorporates newly enacted ARB regulations implemented from the prior iteration of the EMFAC2011 software, including the Advanced Clean Cars Program, the Heavy-Duty GHG Phase 1, and Truck and Bus Regulation. However, because these measures will operate independently of SB 375, SBCAG in its analysis does not take the additional benefits of these standards into account in demonstrating compliance of Fast Forward 2040 with the SB 375 emission reduction targets.

As described earlier in this section, SBCAG prepared a memorandum that described the technical methodology to be used to estimate greenhouse gas emissions in Fast Forward 2040. The technical methodology is shown below.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

6 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Technical Methodology Memorandum Submitted to California Air Resources Board

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

6 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

6 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

6 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

6 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

7 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

7 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

7 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

7 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

7 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


79

Draft (4

/24/17

)

8 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Draft (4

/24/17

)

8 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Performance

Table 9: Performance Results for Scenario 1: Future Baseline (Business as Usual) Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference

Total Population People 423,885.00 434,853.00 10,968.00 496,460.00 72,575.00 508,906.00 85,021.00 Total Households Households 142,097.00 145,797.00 3,700.00 167,325.00 25,228.00 171,721.00 29,624.00 Total Employment Jobs 192,107.00 220,235.99 28,128.99 239,035.99 46,928.99 246,086.99 53,979.99 Vehicle Trips Trips 1,307,524.79 1,366,904.14 59,379.34 1,569,046.78 261,521.99 1,617,138.14 309,613.35 Vehicle Miles (Interzonal) Vehicle Miles 9,320,120.96 10,539,262.27 1,219,141.31 12,633,602.05 3,313,481.09 13,029,972.11 3,709,851.15 Vehicle Hours (Interzonal) Vehicle Hours 193,055.50 214,756.12 21,700.62 255,267.07 62,211.57 262,982.73 69,927.23 Vehicle Miles (Intrazonal) Vehicle Miles 45,206.59 39,617.62 -5,588.96 45,383.71 177.13 46,732.27 1,525.68 Vehicle Hours (Intrazonal) Vehicle Hours 3,484.60 3,176.25 -308.35 3,693.57 208.97 3,812.77 328.17 Vehicle Miles (Total) Vehicle Miles 9,365,327.54 10,578,879.89 1,213,552.35 12,678,985.76 3,313,658.22 13,076,704.38 3,711,376.83 Vehicle Hours (Total) Vehicle Hours 196,540.10 217,932.37 21,392.26 258,960.64 62,420.54 266,795.50 70,255.40 Vehicle Miles/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Miles/Trip 7.16 7.74 0.58 8.08 0.92 8.09 0.92 Vehicle Hours/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Hours/Trip 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.17 0.01 0.16 0.01 Vehicle Miles/Capita Vehicle Miles/Person 22.09 24.33 2.23 25.54 3.44 25.70 3.60 Vehicle Hours/Capita Vehicle Hours/Person 0.46 0.50 0.04 0.52 0.06 0.52 0.06 Vehicle Miles/Commercial KSF Vehicle Miles/1000SF 223.34 232.35 9.02 260.52 37.18 266.01 42.67 Peak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.41 8.76 0.35 8.55 0.14 8.41 0.00 Offpeak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.71 9.07 0.36 9.03 0.32 8.90 0.19 All Day Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.57 8.93 0.35 8.81 0.24 8.67 0.10 Average Travel Distance (All) Miles 8.00 8.72 0.73 9.03 1.03 9.08 1.08 Average Travel Distance (w/o XI) Miles 5.97 6.63 0.66 7.04 1.07 7.06 1.09 Average Peak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.43 15.84 0.42 15.86 0.44 15.78 0.35 Average OffPeak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.33 15.76 0.43 15.83 0.50 15.74 0.40 Average Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.38 15.80 0.42 15.85 0.47 15.76 0.38 Average Travel Time Minutes 14.18 15.05 0.87 15.47 1.30 15.61 1.43 Average Travel Time (w/o XI) Minutes 12.04 12.83 0.79 13.39 1.35 13.46 1.43 Average Peak Transit Travel Time Minutes 107.78 102.48 -5.30 105.26 -2.51 104.94 -2.84 Average OffPeak Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.04 100.18 -4.86 102.30 -2.74 101.97 -3.08 Average All Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.95 100.96 -4.99 103.30 -2.65 102.96 -2.99 Peak Transit Average Time Minutes 107.78 102.48 -5.30 105.26 -2.51 104.94 -2.84 OffPeak Transit Average Time Minutes 105.04 100.18 -4.86 102.30 -2.74 101.97 -3.08 All Transit Average Time Minutes 105.95 100.96 -4.99 103.30 -2.65 102.96 -2.99 Peak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.94 7.12 0.17 7.89 0.95 8.03 1.09 OffPeak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.58 7.33 0.75 8.06 1.48 8.22 1.65 All Transit Average Distance Miles 6.70 7.26 0.56 8.00 1.31 8.16 1.46 All-Day Walk Average Time Minutes 31.91 31.80 -0.11 32.15 0.24 32.18 0.27 All-Day Walk Average Distance Miles 1.60 1.59 -0.01 1.61 0.01 1.61 0.01 All-Day Bike Average Time Minutes 14.43 14.50 0.07 14.47 0.04 14.47 0.04 All-Day Bike Average Distance Miles 3.23 3.23 0.00 3.23 0.00 3.23 0.00 Transit Ridership (Unlinked) Passengers 34,413.95 40,764.44 6,350.49 45,696.34 11,282.39 47,451.09 13,037.14 Transit Ridership (Linked) Passengers 25,877.76 31,329.58 5,451.82 34,570.88 8,693.12 35,789.87 9,912.11 % Mode Share DA (All) Percent Share 50.21 49.48 -0.72 49.70 -0.51 49.62 -0.59 % Mode Share SR (All) Percent Share 42.48 42.79 0.31 42.73 0.25 42.78 0.30 % Mode Share Transit (All) Percent Share 1.34 1.54 0.20 1.48 0.14 1.49 0.15 % Mode Share Walk (All) Percent Share 3.78 3.82 0.04 3.76 -0.02 3.76 -0.02 % Mode Share Bike (All) Percent Share 1.05 1.06 0.01 1.04 0.00 1.05 0.00 % Mode Share School Bus (All) Percent Share 1.14 1.31 0.17 1.29 0.15 1.31 0.17 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (All) Percent Share 4.83 4.88 0.05 4.80 -0.03 4.81 -0.02 % Mode Share DA (Work) Percent Share 86.84 86.63 -0.21 86.62 -0.22 86.61 -0.23 % Mode Share SR (Work) Percent Share 8.62 8.60 -0.02 8.61 -0.01 8.61 -0.01

Draft (4

/24/17

)

8 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference

% Mode Share Transit (Work) Percent Share 0.80 1.06 0.25 1.01 0.21 1.00 0.20 % Mode Share Walk (Work) Percent Share 2.15 2.13 -0.02 2.15 0.01 2.16 0.01 % Mode Share Bike (Work) Percent Share 1.59 1.59 -0.01 1.61 0.02 1.63 0.03 % Mode Share School Bus (Work) Percent Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Work) Percent Share 3.74 3.72 -0.03 3.77 0.03 3.78 0.04 % Mode Share DA (Peak) Percent Share 47.00 46.07 -0.93 46.42 -0.58 46.33 -0.67 % Mode Share SR (Peak) Percent Share 45.62 45.98 0.37 45.81 0.20 45.85 0.23 % Mode Share Transit (Peak) Percent Share 1.37 1.61 0.23 1.54 0.16 1.54 0.16 % Mode Share Walk (Peak) Percent Share 3.38 3.44 0.06 3.35 -0.02 3.36 -0.02 % Mode Share Bike (Peak) Percent Share 0.91 0.92 0.01 0.91 0.01 0.92 0.01 % Mode Share School Bus (Peak) Percent Share 1.72 1.97 0.25 1.96 0.24 2.00 0.29 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Peak) Percent Share 4.28 4.36 0.08 4.27 -0.01 4.28 0.00 % Mode Share DA (OffPeak) Percent Share 51.74 51.13 -0.61 51.27 -0.47 51.19 -0.55 % Mode Share SR (OffPeak) Percent Share 40.98 41.25 0.27 41.25 0.27 41.30 0.32 % Mode Share Transit (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.33 1.50 0.18 1.46 0.13 1.47 0.14 % Mode Share Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 3.98 4.01 0.03 3.95 -0.03 3.95 -0.03 % Mode Share Bike (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.11 1.12 0.01 1.11 0.00 1.11 0.00 % Mode Share School Bus (OffPeak) Percent Share 0.86 0.99 0.13 0.96 0.10 0.98 0.12 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 5.09 5.13 0.04 5.06 -0.03 5.06 -0.03 Auto Operating Cost ($) Dollars 1,857,500.11 2,100,474.97 242,974.86 2,517,876.89 660,376.78 2,596,873.44 739,373.33 Auto Operating Cost ($) Per Capita Dollars/Person 4.38 4.83 0.45 5.07 0.69 5.10 0.72 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 69.44 70.73 1.29 69.20 -0.24 69.31 -0.13 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 75.98 73.57 -2.41 71.56 -4.42 70.20 -5.78 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 69.24 69.72 0.48 68.26 -0.98 68.40 -0.84 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.70 47.20 0.50 46.28 -0.42 46.29 -0.41 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.89 57.85 -4.04 55.41 -6.48 53.98 -7.91 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.16 46.23 0.08 45.40 -0.76 45.44 -0.72 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 21.88 34.52 12.64 34.63 12.75 34.66 12.78 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 39.00 45.78 6.78 43.60 4.59 42.46 3.46 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 22.43 32.13 9.70 32.55 10.12 32.63 10.21 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 11.43 19.30 7.87 18.22 6.79 17.95 6.52 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 25.00 35.87 10.86 33.57 8.56 32.63 7.62 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.02 19.99 7.97 18.79 6.77 18.49 6.47 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 4.84 6.77 1.93 6.52 1.68 6.42 1.58 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 18.01 19.53 1.51 18.31 0.29 17.78 -0.23 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.44 7.61 2.17 7.24 1.80 7.11 1.68 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 88.84 88.71 -0.13 88.09 -0.75 88.11 -0.73 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 87.92 86.27 -1.65 85.73 -2.20 84.57 -3.36 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.82 88.41 -0.40 87.81 -1.01 87.84 -0.98 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 67.02 67.23 0.22 66.61 -0.41 66.80 -0.21 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 75.07 72.06 -3.01 70.77 -4.31 69.28 -5.79 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 65.59 65.99 0.40 65.51 -0.08 65.74 0.15 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 33.26 50.76 17.51 51.19 17.93 51.54 18.29 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 52.24 62.09 9.85 59.90 7.66 58.51 6.27 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.33 48.03 13.70 48.83 14.50 49.26 14.93 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 18.45 29.65 11.20 27.98 9.53 27.66 9.21 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 30.93 46.48 15.56 43.53 12.60 42.30 11.38 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 19.98 31.05 11.06 29.13 9.15 28.76 8.78 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.30 11.18 0.89 10.87 0.57 10.92 0.62 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 26.03 24.55 -1.48 23.09 -2.93 22.43 -3.59 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 11.49 12.72 1.23 12.19 0.70 12.22 0.72 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 84.08 86.12 2.04 83.66 -0.42 83.78 -0.30

Draft (4

/24/17

)



Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 84.86 82.23 -2.62 78.21 -6.65 77.30 -7.56 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.63 88.40 -0.23 84.84 -3.79 84.89 -3.74 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.42 63.14 1.71 61.94 0.52 60.75 -0.67 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 74.22 69.87 -4.35 65.63 -8.58 64.91 -9.31 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 68.01 65.99 -2.02 63.68 -4.34 62.19 -5.82 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 32.20 50.80 18.60 52.49 20.29 51.40 19.20 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 49.88 63.82 13.95 59.33 9.45 58.69 8.81 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.65 51.20 16.56 52.98 18.33 51.71 17.06 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 5.91 28.05 22.14 22.19 16.28 21.02 15.11 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 32.40 52.14 19.73 46.91 14.51 46.16 13.75 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.63 29.10 16.47 22.12 9.49 20.80 8.17 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.12 4.89 -0.23 4.79 -0.33 4.64 -0.48 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 29.09 28.80 -0.29 25.95 -3.14 25.53 -3.56 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.89 10.34 -0.55 8.37 -2.52 7.92 -2.97 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 97.86 97.68 -0.18 97.56 -0.30 97.58 -0.28 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 95.40 93.85 -1.55 93.11 -2.29 92.44 -2.96 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 98.04 97.77 -0.27 97.61 -0.43 97.62 -0.42 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 88.40 87.00 -1.40 86.64 -1.76 86.97 -1.43 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 90.29 87.00 -3.29 85.58 -4.71 85.01 -5.28 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 89.86 86.94 -2.92 86.56 -3.30 86.94 -2.92 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 44.34 68.87 24.53 71.27 26.93 72.12 27.78 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 65.14 81.24 16.10 77.12 11.99 76.69 11.55 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 42.90 65.66 22.76 69.47 26.57 70.58 27.68 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 8.33 39.54 31.20 31.02 22.68 29.75 21.42 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 36.05 63.53 27.48 57.13 21.08 56.23 20.18 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 16.91 37.56 20.65 28.60 11.69 27.36 10.45 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 8.32 7.44 -0.88 7.88 -0.44 7.96 -0.36 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 34.87 36.48 1.62 32.92 -1.94 32.39 -2.47 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 16.90 14.88 -2.02 12.85 -4.05 12.55 -4.35 Average Low Income Peak Trip Time Minutes 15.26 15.98 0.71 16.70 1.44 16.93 1.67 Peak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.11 -0.69 87.10 -0.70 87.36 -0.43 Peak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.11 -0.69 87.10 -0.69 87.38 -0.42 Peak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 6.18 10.95 4.77 10.74 4.56 10.77 4.59 OffPeak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.90 -0.69 86.64 -0.95 86.87 -0.72 OffPeak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.90 -0.69 86.68 -0.91 86.94 -0.65 OffPeak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 7.19 8.26 1.06 8.26 1.06 8.28 1.08 Percent of Population to Airport Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 50.85 51.78 0.93 52.97 2.11 53.18 2.33 Percent of Population to Beach Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 20.36 19.89 -0.47 18.55 -1.81 18.34 -2.03 Percent of Population to Building Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.58 30.69 0.11 28.96 -1.62 28.70 -1.88 Percent of Population to College/Univ Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 49.80 50.62 0.81 51.45 1.64 51.73 1.92 Percent of Population to Hospital Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.74 30.02 -0.72 28.48 -2.26 28.18 -2.56 Percent of Population to Park Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 76.90 76.80 -0.10 76.24 -0.66 76.25 -0.65 Percent of Population to Post Office Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 25.15 24.67 -0.48 23.19 -1.95 22.96 -2.19 Percent of Population to School Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 90.69 90.66 -0.03 90.05 -0.64 90.03 -0.66 Percent of Population to all Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 92.77 92.75 -0.02 92.71 -0.07 92.73 -0.04

Draft (4

/24/17

)

8 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Table 10: Performance Results for Scenario 2: No Project

Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference Total Population People 423,885.00 434,853.00 10,968.00 496,460.00 72,575.00 508,906.00 85,021.00 Total Households Households 142,097.00 145,797.00 3,700.00 167,325.00 25,228.00 171,721.00 29,624.00 Total Employment Jobs 192,107.00 220,235.99 28,128.99 239,035.99 46,928.99 246,086.99 53,979.99 Vehicle Trips Trips 1,307,524.79 1,372,086.12 64,561.33 1,575,735.44 268,210.64 1,623,952.92 316,428.13 Vehicle Miles (Interzonal) Vehicle Miles 9,320,120.96 10,666,938.18 1,346,817.22 12,763,738.99 3,443,618.03 13,163,535.51 3,843,414.55 Vehicle Hours (Interzonal) Vehicle Hours 193,055.50 217,110.43 24,054.93 257,819.50 64,763.99 265,675.12 72,619.61 Vehicle Miles (Intrazonal) Vehicle Miles 45,206.59 39,656.40 -5,550.19 45,484.13 277.54 46,921.16 1,714.58 Vehicle Hours (Intrazonal) Vehicle Hours 3,484.60 3,180.34 -304.26 3,702.35 217.75 3,826.68 342.08 Vehicle Miles (Total) Vehicle Miles 9,365,327.54 10,706,594.58 1,341,267.04 12,809,223.11 3,443,895.57 13,210,456.67 3,845,129.13 Vehicle Hours (Total) Vehicle Hours 196,540.10 220,290.78 23,750.67 261,521.84 64,981.74 269,501.80 72,961.69 Vehicle Miles/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Miles/Trip 7.16 7.80 0.64 8.13 0.97 8.13 0.97 Vehicle Hours/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Hours/Trip 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.17 0.02 0.17 0.02 Vehicle Miles/Capita Vehicle Miles/Person 22.09 24.62 2.53 25.80 3.71 25.96 3.86 Vehicle Hours/Capita Vehicle Hours/Person 0.46 0.51 0.04 0.53 0.06 0.53 0.07 Vehicle Miles/Commercial KSF Vehicle Miles/1000SF 223.34 235.16 11.82 263.19 39.86 268.73 45.39 Peak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.41 8.63 0.22 8.36 -0.05 8.22 -0.19 Offpeak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.71 9.06 0.35 9.02 0.31 8.89 0.18 All Day Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.57 8.86 0.29 8.72 0.14 8.58 0.01 Average Travel Distance (All) Miles 8.00 8.70 0.70 9.00 1.00 9.06 1.06 Average Travel Distance (w/o XI) Miles 5.97 6.60 0.63 7.02 1.04 7.04 1.07 Average Peak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.43 15.81 0.39 15.75 0.32 15.67 0.25 Average OffPeak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.33 15.75 0.41 15.83 0.49 15.74 0.41 Average Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.38 15.78 0.40 15.79 0.41 15.71 0.33 Average Travel Time Minutes 14.18 15.05 0.88 15.48 1.31 15.63 1.45 Average Travel Time (w/o XI) Minutes 12.04 12.82 0.79 13.39 1.36 13.48 1.44 Average Peak Transit Travel Time Minutes 107.78 100.85 -6.92 103.46 -4.32 103.47 -4.30 Average OffPeak Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.04 100.01 -5.03 102.04 -3.00 102.19 -2.85 Average All Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.95 100.29 -5.66 102.50 -3.45 102.61 -3.34 Peak Transit Average Time Minutes 107.78 100.85 -6.92 103.46 -4.32 103.47 -4.30 OffPeak Transit Average Time Minutes 105.04 100.01 -5.03 102.04 -3.00 102.19 -2.85 All Transit Average Time Minutes 105.95 100.29 -5.66 102.50 -3.45 102.61 -3.34 Peak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.94 6.90 -0.04 7.69 0.75 7.83 0.89 OffPeak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.58 6.93 0.35 7.62 1.04 7.77 1.20 All Transit Average Distance Miles 6.70 6.92 0.22 7.64 0.95 7.79 1.09 All-Day Walk Average Time Minutes 31.91 31.80 -0.11 32.14 0.24 32.16 0.25 All-Day Walk Average Distance Miles 1.60 1.59 -0.01 1.61 0.01 1.61 0.01 All-Day Bike Average Time Minutes 14.43 14.48 0.05 14.45 0.02 14.45 0.02 All-Day Bike Average Distance Miles 3.23 3.24 0.01 3.24 0.01 3.24 0.01 Transit Ridership (Unlinked) Passengers 34,413.95 38,622.55 4,208.61 43,044.65 8,630.71 44,403.05 9,989.10 Transit Ridership (Linked) Passengers 25,877.76 30,115.88 4,238.12 33,065.51 7,187.75 34,044.02 8,166.26 % Mode Share DA (All) Percent Share 50.21 49.52 -0.69 49.73 -0.48 49.65 -0.56 % Mode Share SR (All) Percent Share 42.48 42.80 0.32 42.75 0.27 42.80 0.32 % Mode Share Transit (All) Percent Share 1.34 1.48 0.14 1.42 0.08 1.42 0.07 % Mode Share Walk (All) Percent Share 3.78 3.83 0.05 3.77 -0.02 3.77 -0.02 % Mode Share Bike (All) Percent Share 1.05 1.06 0.02 1.05 0.00 1.05 0.01 % Mode Share School Bus (All) Percent Share 1.14 1.31 0.17 1.29 0.15 1.31 0.17 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (All) Percent Share 4.83 4.89 0.06 4.82 -0.01 4.82 -0.01 % Mode Share DA (Work) Percent Share 86.84 86.72 -0.11 86.71 -0.13 86.70 -0.14 % Mode Share SR (Work) Percent Share 8.62 8.61 -0.01 8.62 0.00 8.62 0.00 % Mode Share Transit (Work) Percent Share 0.80 0.92 0.12 0.87 0.07 0.86 0.06

Draft (4

/24/17

)



% Mode Share Walk (Work) Percent Share 2.15 2.14 -0.01 2.17 0.02 2.17 0.02 % Mode Share Bike (Work) Percent Share 1.59 1.61 0.01 1.63 0.04 1.65 0.05 % Mode Share School Bus (Work) Percent Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Work) Percent Share 3.74 3.75 0.00 3.80 0.06 3.82 0.08 % Mode Share DA (Peak) Percent Share 47.00 46.14 -0.87 46.47 -0.54 46.38 -0.62 % Mode Share SR (Peak) Percent Share 45.62 45.99 0.37 45.84 0.23 45.88 0.26 % Mode Share Transit (Peak) Percent Share 1.37 1.51 0.13 1.42 0.05 1.42 0.04 % Mode Share Walk (Peak) Percent Share 3.38 3.46 0.08 3.38 0.00 3.39 0.01 % Mode Share Bike (Peak) Percent Share 0.91 0.93 0.03 0.93 0.02 0.93 0.03 % Mode Share School Bus (Peak) Percent Share 1.72 1.97 0.25 1.96 0.24 2.00 0.29 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Peak) Percent Share 4.28 4.39 0.11 4.30 0.02 4.32 0.03 % Mode Share DA (OffPeak) Percent Share 51.74 51.15 -0.59 51.29 -0.45 51.22 -0.52 % Mode Share SR (OffPeak) Percent Share 40.98 41.27 0.28 41.27 0.28 41.33 0.34 % Mode Share Transit (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.33 1.46 0.14 1.42 0.09 1.42 0.09 % Mode Share Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 3.98 4.01 0.03 3.95 -0.03 3.95 -0.03 % Mode Share Bike (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.11 1.13 0.01 1.11 0.00 1.11 0.00 % Mode Share School Bus (OffPeak) Percent Share 0.86 0.99 0.13 0.96 0.10 0.98 0.12 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 5.09 5.13 0.04 5.06 -0.03 5.06 -0.03 Auto Operating Cost ($) Dollars 1,857,500.11 2,125,920.78 268,420.67 2,543,813.18 686,313.07 2,623,492.63 765,992.52 Auto Operating Cost ($) Per Capita Dollars/Person 4.38 4.89 0.51 5.12 0.74 5.16 0.77 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 69.44 70.73 1.29 69.20 -0.24 69.31 -0.13 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 75.98 73.57 -2.41 71.56 -4.42 70.20 -5.78 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 69.24 69.72 0.48 68.26 -0.98 68.40 -0.84 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.70 44.01 -2.69 43.46 -3.24 43.43 -3.26 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.89 56.54 -5.35 54.17 -7.72 52.77 -9.12 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.16 43.09 -3.06 42.64 -3.52 42.63 -3.52 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 21.88 20.25 -1.63 18.83 -3.05 18.54 -3.34 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 39.00 34.68 -4.32 32.47 -6.53 31.56 -7.44 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 22.43 21.01 -1.42 19.44 -2.99 19.12 -3.31 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 11.43 11.79 0.36 11.15 -0.28 10.96 -0.48 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 25.00 23.75 -1.25 22.27 -2.73 21.63 -3.37 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.02 12.07 0.05 11.36 -0.66 11.15 -0.86 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 4.84 4.20 -0.65 3.98 -0.86 3.92 -0.92 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 18.01 15.51 -2.50 14.56 -3.45 14.14 -3.87 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.44 5.04 -0.40 4.70 -0.73 4.62 -0.81 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 88.84 88.71 -0.13 88.09 -0.75 88.11 -0.73 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 87.92 86.27 -1.65 85.73 -2.20 84.57 -3.36 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.82 88.41 -0.40 87.81 -1.01 87.84 -0.98 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 67.02 61.73 -5.29 61.54 -5.48 61.77 -5.24 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 75.07 70.39 -4.69 69.12 -5.96 67.68 -7.40 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 65.59 60.71 -4.88 60.65 -4.94 60.92 -4.67 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 33.26 29.94 -3.32 28.00 -5.26 27.63 -5.63 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 52.24 45.95 -6.29 43.04 -9.20 41.83 -10.41 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.33 31.36 -2.97 29.17 -5.16 28.75 -5.58 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 18.45 20.45 2.00 19.42 0.97 19.26 0.81 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 30.93 31.84 0.91 29.88 -1.05 29.03 -1.90 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 19.98 20.95 0.96 19.81 -0.17 19.64 -0.34 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.30 8.09 -2.20 7.85 -2.45 7.89 -2.41 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 26.03 22.76 -3.26 21.34 -4.69 20.73 -5.30 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 11.49 9.62 -1.87 9.17 -2.33 9.17 -2.32 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 84.08 86.12 2.04 83.66 -0.42 83.78 -0.30 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 84.86 82.23 -2.62 78.21 -6.65 77.30 -7.56

Draft (4

/24/17

)

8 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0


Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.63 88.40 -0.23 84.84 -3.79 84.89 -3.74 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.42 51.10 -10.33 53.36 -8.07 52.21 -9.21 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 74.22 67.72 -6.49 63.72 -10.49 63.03 -11.19 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 68.01 51.51 -16.50 53.93 -14.08 52.59 -15.42 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 32.20 28.74 -3.46 22.15 -10.04 20.78 -11.41 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 49.88 47.96 -1.92 43.10 -6.77 42.41 -7.47 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.65 30.38 -4.27 22.38 -12.27 20.81 -13.84 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 5.91 7.60 1.69 6.69 0.77 6.40 0.49 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 32.40 36.42 4.02 32.75 0.35 32.23 -0.18 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.63 11.25 -1.38 8.97 -3.65 8.47 -4.16 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.12 4.54 -0.59 4.55 -0.58 4.41 -0.71 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 29.09 27.58 -1.51 24.83 -4.26 24.43 -4.66 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.89 9.53 -1.36 7.84 -3.05 7.43 -3.46 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 97.86 97.68 -0.18 97.56 -0.30 97.58 -0.28 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 95.40 93.85 -1.55 93.11 -2.29 92.44 -2.96 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 98.04 97.77 -0.27 97.61 -0.43 97.62 -0.42 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 88.40 70.76 -17.64 74.92 -13.48 75.52 -12.88 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 90.29 83.87 -6.43 82.79 -7.50 82.27 -8.03 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 89.86 68.52 -21.34 73.99 -15.87 74.74 -15.12 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 44.34 39.54 -4.80 30.72 -13.62 29.20 -15.14 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 65.14 62.28 -2.86 56.02 -9.12 55.14 -10.00 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 42.90 37.56 -5.34 28.26 -14.64 26.74 -16.16 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 8.33 25.72 17.38 20.77 12.44 19.95 11.62 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 36.05 50.32 14.27 45.24 9.18 44.53 8.48 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 16.91 25.82 8.91 20.20 3.28 19.31 2.40 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 8.32 7.42 -0.90 7.87 -0.45 7.95 -0.37 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 34.87 35.54 0.67 32.04 -2.82 31.53 -3.34 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 16.90 14.87 -2.03 12.84 -4.06 12.54 -4.36 Average Low Income Peak Trip Time Minutes 15.26 16.24 0.98 16.96 1.69 17.12 1.85 Peak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.22 -0.58 87.45 -0.34 87.72 -0.08 Peak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.22 -0.58 87.48 -0.31 87.77 -0.03 Peak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 6.18 11.16 4.98 11.08 4.90 11.15 4.97 OffPeak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.93 -0.67 86.67 -0.92 86.89 -0.71 OffPeak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.93 -0.67 86.70 -0.89 86.96 -0.64 OffPeak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 7.19 8.47 1.28 8.53 1.33 8.52 1.32 Percent of Population to Airport Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 50.85 51.66 0.81 52.66 1.80 52.85 2.00 Percent of Population to Beach Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 20.36 19.88 -0.48 18.53 -1.84 18.32 -2.05 Percent of Population to Building Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.58 30.58 0.00 28.98 -1.60 28.78 -1.80 Percent of Population to College/Univ Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 49.80 50.58 0.78 51.36 1.56 51.68 1.87 Percent of Population to Hospital Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.74 30.00 -0.73 28.46 -2.28 28.15 -2.59 Percent of Population to Park Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 76.90 76.76 -0.14 76.11 -0.79 76.09 -0.81 Percent of Population to Post Office Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 25.15 24.52 -0.63 23.14 -2.00 22.92 -2.23 Percent of Population to School Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 90.69 90.62 -0.07 89.97 -0.72 89.95 -0.74 Percent of Population to all Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 92.77 92.73 -0.05 92.64 -0.13 92.67 -0.10

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Table 11: Performance Results for Scenario 2a: No Build

Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference Total Population People 423,885.00 434,853.00 10,968.00 496,460.00 72,575.00 508,906.00 85,021.00 Total Households Households 142,097.00 145,797.00 3,700.00 167,325.00 25,228.00 171,721.00 29,624.00 Total Employment Jobs 192,107.00 220,235.99 28,128.99 239,035.99 46,928.99 246,086.99 53,979.99 Vehicle Trips Trips 1,307,524.79 1,372,200.74 64,675.95 1,575,917.16 268,392.36 1,624,342.50 316,817.71 Vehicle Miles (Interzonal) Vehicle Miles 9,320,120.96 10,635,310.33 1,315,189.37 12,690,787.94 3,370,666.98 13,074,279.79 3,754,158.84 Vehicle Hours (Interzonal) Vehicle Hours 193,055.50 216,787.27 23,731.77 257,005.05 63,949.54 264,650.11 71,594.60 Vehicle Miles (Intrazonal) Vehicle Miles 45,206.59 39,759.79 -5,446.80 45,647.04 440.45 47,165.26 1,958.67 Vehicle Hours (Intrazonal) Vehicle Hours 3,484.60 3,190.72 -293.88 3,722.86 238.26 3,857.26 372.65 Vehicle Miles (Total) Vehicle Miles 9,365,327.54 10,675,070.12 1,309,742.58 12,736,434.98 3,371,107.43 13,121,445.05 3,756,117.51 Vehicle Hours (Total) Vehicle Hours 196,540.10 219,977.99 23,437.89 260,727.91 64,187.81 268,507.36 71,967.26 Vehicle Miles/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Miles/Trip 7.16 7.78 0.62 8.08 0.92 8.08 0.92 Vehicle Hours/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Hours/Trip 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.17 0.02 0.17 0.01 Vehicle Miles/Capita Vehicle Miles/Person 22.09 24.55 2.45 25.65 3.56 25.78 3.69 Vehicle Hours/Capita Vehicle Hours/Person 0.46 0.51 0.04 0.53 0.06 0.53 0.06 Vehicle Miles/Commercial KSF Vehicle Miles/1000SF 223.34 234.47 11.13 261.70 38.36 266.92 43.58 Peak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.41 8.61 0.20 8.27 -0.14 8.12 -0.29 Offpeak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.71 9.04 0.33 8.94 0.23 8.81 0.10 All Day Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.57 8.84 0.27 8.63 0.06 8.49 -0.08 Average Travel Distance (All) Miles 8.00 8.67 0.67 8.95 0.95 8.99 0.99 Average Travel Distance (w/o XI) Miles 5.97 6.57 0.60 6.96 0.99 6.97 1.00 Average Peak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.43 15.85 0.43 15.83 0.40 15.73 0.31 Average OffPeak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.33 15.77 0.43 15.90 0.56 15.82 0.49 Average Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.38 15.81 0.43 15.86 0.49 15.78 0.40 Average Travel Time Minutes 14.18 15.09 0.91 15.72 1.54 15.91 1.73 Average Travel Time (w/o XI) Minutes 12.04 12.85 0.82 13.52 1.49 13.62 1.59 Average Peak Transit Travel Time Minutes 107.78 100.64 -7.14 103.08 -4.70 103.16 -4.62 Average OffPeak Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.04 99.84 -5.20 101.73 -3.31 101.88 -3.16 Average All Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.95 100.11 -5.84 102.17 -3.78 102.29 -3.65 Peak Transit Average Time Minutes 107.78 100.64 -7.14 103.08 -4.70 103.16 -4.62 OffPeak Transit Average Time Minutes 105.04 99.84 -5.20 101.73 -3.31 101.88 -3.16 All Transit Average Time Minutes 105.95 100.11 -5.84 102.17 -3.78 102.29 -3.65 Peak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.94 6.82 -0.13 7.53 0.59 7.63 0.69 OffPeak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.58 6.91 0.34 7.57 1.00 7.73 1.15 All Transit Average Distance Miles 6.70 6.88 0.18 7.56 0.86 7.70 1.00 All-Day Walk Average Time Minutes 31.91 31.80 -0.11 32.10 0.19 32.11 0.20 All-Day Walk Average Distance Miles 1.60 1.59 -0.01 1.60 0.01 1.61 0.01 All-Day Bike Average Time Minutes 14.43 14.50 0.07 14.47 0.04 14.48 0.05 All-Day Bike Average Distance Miles 3.23 3.25 0.02 3.25 0.02 3.25 0.02 Transit Ridership (Unlinked) Passengers 34,413.95 38,454.64 4,040.69 42,719.67 8,305.73 44,043.56 9,629.61 Transit Ridership (Linked) Passengers 25,877.76 30,004.16 4,126.40 32,885.33 7,007.57 33,858.59 7,980.83 % Mode Share DA (All) Percent Share 50.21 49.53 -0.68 49.76 -0.45 49.70 -0.51 % Mode Share SR (All) Percent Share 42.48 42.79 0.31 42.69 0.21 42.72 0.24 % Mode Share Transit (All) Percent Share 1.34 1.47 0.13 1.41 0.07 1.41 0.07 % Mode Share Walk (All) Percent Share 3.78 3.83 0.05 3.79 0.01 3.79 0.01 % Mode Share Bike (All) Percent Share 1.05 1.07 0.02 1.06 0.01 1.06 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (All) Percent Share 1.14 1.31 0.17 1.29 0.15 1.32 0.18 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (All) Percent Share 4.83 4.90 0.07 4.85 0.02 4.86 0.03 % Mode Share DA (Work) Percent Share 86.84 86.72 -0.12 86.69 -0.15 86.68 -0.16 % Mode Share SR (Work) Percent Share 8.62 8.61 -0.01 8.61 -0.01 8.61 -0.01 % Mode Share Transit (Work) Percent Share 0.80 0.92 0.11 0.86 0.06 0.85 0.05

Draft (4

/24/17

)

9 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0


% Mode Share Walk (Work) Percent Share 2.15 2.14 0.00 2.19 0.04 2.20 0.05 % Mode Share Bike (Work) Percent Share 1.59 1.61 0.02 1.65 0.06 1.66 0.07 % Mode Share School Bus (Work) Percent Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Work) Percent Share 3.74 3.75 0.01 3.84 0.10 3.86 0.12 % Mode Share DA (Peak) Percent Share 47.00 46.15 -0.86 46.50 -0.50 46.43 -0.58 % Mode Share SR (Peak) Percent Share 45.62 45.97 0.35 45.75 0.14 45.77 0.15 % Mode Share Transit (Peak) Percent Share 1.37 1.50 0.12 1.41 0.04 1.41 0.03 % Mode Share Walk (Peak) Percent Share 3.38 3.47 0.09 3.42 0.04 3.43 0.05 % Mode Share Bike (Peak) Percent Share 0.91 0.94 0.03 0.94 0.04 0.95 0.04 % Mode Share School Bus (Peak) Percent Share 1.72 1.98 0.26 1.97 0.25 2.02 0.30 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Peak) Percent Share 4.28 4.41 0.12 4.36 0.07 4.38 0.10 % Mode Share DA (OffPeak) Percent Share 51.74 51.16 -0.58 51.33 -0.41 51.27 -0.47 % Mode Share SR (OffPeak) Percent Share 40.98 41.26 0.28 41.22 0.24 41.25 0.27 % Mode Share Transit (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.33 1.46 0.14 1.41 0.08 1.41 0.08 % Mode Share Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 3.98 4.01 0.03 3.97 -0.01 3.97 -0.01 % Mode Share Bike (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.11 1.13 0.02 1.11 0.00 1.12 0.01 % Mode Share School Bus (OffPeak) Percent Share 0.86 0.99 0.13 0.96 0.10 0.98 0.12 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 5.09 5.13 0.04 5.08 -0.01 5.09 0.00 Auto Operating Cost ($) Dollars 1,857,500.11 2,119,617.35 262,117.24 2,529,274.04 671,773.93 2,605,703.96 748,203.86 Auto Operating Cost ($) Per Capita Dollars/Person 4.38 4.87 0.49 5.09 0.71 5.12 0.74 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 69.44 70.73 1.29 69.20 -0.24 69.31 -0.13 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 75.98 73.57 -2.41 71.56 -4.42 70.20 -5.78 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 69.24 69.72 0.48 68.26 -0.98 68.40 -0.84 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.70 43.94 -2.76 43.33 -3.37 43.28 -3.42 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.89 55.92 -5.97 53.60 -8.29 52.22 -9.67 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.16 43.01 -3.15 42.49 -3.67 42.47 -3.69 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 21.88 20.17 -1.71 18.66 -3.22 18.34 -3.54 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 39.00 33.73 -5.27 31.59 -7.41 30.70 -8.30 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 22.43 20.91 -1.52 19.25 -3.18 18.90 -3.53 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 11.43 11.56 0.13 10.84 -0.59 10.62 -0.81 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 25.00 22.72 -2.29 21.31 -3.70 20.70 -4.31 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.02 11.78 -0.23 11.00 -1.01 10.77 -1.25 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 4.84 3.93 -0.91 3.64 -1.20 3.56 -1.28 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 18.01 14.45 -3.57 13.57 -4.45 13.18 -4.83 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.44 4.70 -0.73 4.30 -1.14 4.20 -1.24 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 88.84 88.71 -0.13 88.09 -0.75 88.11 -0.73 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 87.92 86.27 -1.65 85.73 -2.20 84.57 -3.36 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.82 88.41 -0.40 87.81 -1.01 87.84 -0.98 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 67.02 61.61 -5.40 61.43 -5.58 61.67 -5.34 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 75.07 70.34 -4.73 69.08 -6.00 67.64 -7.44 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 65.59 60.60 -4.99 60.54 -5.05 60.82 -4.77 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 33.26 29.65 -3.61 27.49 -5.77 27.05 -6.21 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 52.24 44.20 -8.04 41.40 -10.84 40.24 -12.00 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.33 31.07 -3.26 28.65 -5.68 28.16 -6.17 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 18.45 20.13 1.68 18.77 0.32 18.53 0.08 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 30.93 29.51 -1.42 27.69 -3.23 26.91 -4.02 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 19.98 20.62 0.63 19.14 -0.85 18.89 -1.10 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.30 7.69 -2.60 7.09 -3.21 7.05 -3.24 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 26.03 20.04 -5.99 18.79 -7.24 18.25 -7.77 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 11.49 9.22 -2.28 8.39 -3.10 8.32 -3.17 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 84.08 86.12 2.04 83.66 -0.42 83.78 -0.30 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 84.86 82.23 -2.62 78.21 -6.65 77.30 -7.56

Draft (4

/24/17

)



Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.63 88.40 -0.23 84.84 -3.79 84.89 -3.74 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.42 51.10 -10.33 52.89 -8.54 51.60 -9.83 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 74.22 65.61 -8.61 61.83 -12.38 61.17 -13.04 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 68.01 51.51 -16.50 53.40 -14.61 51.90 -16.12 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 32.20 28.74 -3.46 21.39 -10.81 19.89 -12.30 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 49.88 44.74 -5.14 40.21 -9.67 39.56 -10.32 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.65 30.38 -4.27 21.51 -13.13 19.81 -14.83 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 5.91 7.60 1.69 5.89 -0.02 5.48 -0.43 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 32.40 33.14 0.73 29.80 -2.60 29.32 -3.08 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.63 11.25 -1.38 8.08 -4.55 7.44 -5.19 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.12 4.54 -0.59 3.75 -1.37 3.49 -1.63 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 29.09 24.29 -4.79 21.88 -7.21 21.53 -7.56 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.89 9.53 -1.36 6.94 -3.95 6.40 -4.50 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 97.86 97.68 -0.18 97.56 -0.30 97.58 -0.28 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 95.40 93.85 -1.55 93.11 -2.29 92.44 -2.96 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 98.04 97.77 -0.27 97.61 -0.43 97.62 -0.42 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 88.40 70.76 -17.65 74.92 -13.49 75.52 -12.88 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 90.29 83.74 -6.55 82.68 -7.61 82.16 -8.14 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 89.86 68.51 -21.34 73.98 -15.87 74.74 -15.12 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 44.34 39.54 -4.80 29.87 -14.47 27.81 -16.53 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 65.14 56.64 -8.49 50.94 -14.20 50.14 -15.00 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 42.90 37.55 -5.35 27.30 -15.60 25.18 -17.72 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 8.33 25.71 17.38 19.04 10.71 17.71 9.38 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 36.05 42.83 6.78 38.45 2.40 37.85 1.80 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 16.91 25.82 8.91 18.24 1.33 16.80 -0.11 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 8.32 7.42 -0.90 5.89 -2.43 5.48 -2.84 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 34.87 27.54 -7.33 24.80 -10.06 24.41 -10.46 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 16.90 14.87 -2.03 10.60 -6.30 9.76 -7.14 Average Low Income Peak Trip Time Minutes 15.26 16.68 1.42 17.93 2.67 18.29 3.03 Peak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.21 -0.59 87.34 -0.46 87.51 -0.28 Peak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.21 -0.59 87.34 -0.46 87.51 -0.28 Peak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 6.18 11.49 5.31 11.68 5.51 11.85 5.68 OffPeak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.92 -0.67 86.51 -1.09 86.72 -0.88 OffPeak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.92 -0.67 86.51 -1.09 86.72 -0.88 OffPeak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 7.19 8.51 1.31 8.67 1.48 8.70 1.51 Percent of Population to Airport Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 50.85 51.46 0.61 52.53 1.68 52.74 1.88 Percent of Population to Beach Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 20.36 19.85 -0.51 18.48 -1.89 18.26 -2.11 Percent of Population to Building Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.58 29.78 -0.80 27.97 -2.61 27.77 -2.81 Percent of Population to College/Univ Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 49.80 50.37 0.56 51.00 1.19 51.23 1.42 Percent of Population to Hospital Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.74 29.99 -0.75 28.46 -2.27 28.16 -2.58 Percent of Population to Park Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 76.90 76.70 -0.21 76.04 -0.87 76.02 -0.88 Percent of Population to Post Office Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 25.15 24.52 -0.63 22.75 -2.39 22.50 -2.65 Percent of Population to School Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 90.69 90.62 -0.07 89.99 -0.70 89.96 -0.73 Percent of Population to all Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 92.77 92.72 -0.05 92.64 -0.13 92.68 -0.09

Draft (4

/24/17

)

9 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Table 12: Performance Results for Scenario 3: TOD/Infill with Enhanced Transit Strategy

Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference Total Population People 423,885.00 434,854.00 10,969.00 496,459.00 72,574.00 508,905.00 85,020.00 Total Households Households 142,097.00 145,796.00 3,699.00 167,326.00 25,229.00 171,722.00 29,625.00 Total Employment Jobs 192,107.00 220,236.99 28,129.99 239,036.99 46,929.99 246,086.99 53,979.99 Vehicle Trips Trips 1,307,524.79 1,367,541.09 60,016.29 1,563,360.05 255,835.25 1,607,198.19 299,673.40 Vehicle Miles (Interzonal) Vehicle Miles 9,320,120.96 9,391,742.21 71,621.25 10,291,393.83 971,272.88 10,549,415.01 1,229,294.05 Vehicle Hours (Interzonal) Vehicle Hours 193,055.50 196,536.18 3,480.68 215,402.20 22,346.69 220,458.70 27,403.20 Vehicle Miles (Intrazonal) Vehicle Miles 45,206.59 39,783.10 -5,423.48 44,772.30 -434.28 45,340.72 134.13 Vehicle Hours (Intrazonal) Vehicle Hours 3,484.60 3,246.24 -238.36 3,819.01 334.41 3,915.70 431.10 Vehicle Miles (Total) Vehicle Miles 9,365,327.54 9,431,525.32 66,197.77 10,336,166.13 970,838.59 10,594,755.73 1,229,428.19 Vehicle Hours (Total) Vehicle Hours 196,540.10 199,782.42 3,242.32 219,221.21 22,681.10 224,374.40 27,834.30 Vehicle Miles/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Miles/Trip 7.16 6.90 -0.27 6.61 -0.55 6.59 -0.57 Vehicle Hours/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Hours/Trip 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.14 -0.01 0.14 -0.01 Vehicle Miles/Capita Vehicle Miles/Person 22.09 21.69 -0.41 20.82 -1.27 20.82 -1.28 Vehicle Hours/Capita Vehicle Hours/Person 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.44 -0.02 0.44 -0.02 Vehicle Miles/Commercial KSF Vehicle Miles/1000SF 223.34 203.88 -19.45 209.85 -13.49 210.80 -12.53 Peak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.41 8.68 0.26 8.03 -0.38 7.90 -0.51 Offpeak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.71 8.96 0.25 8.32 -0.39 8.19 -0.52 All Day Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.57 8.83 0.26 8.19 -0.39 8.06 -0.51 Average Travel Distance (All) Miles 8.00 7.81 -0.19 7.42 -0.58 7.40 -0.60 Average Travel Distance (w/o XI) Miles 5.97 5.64 -0.33 5.27 -0.71 5.20 -0.77 Average Peak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.43 15.80 0.38 15.19 -0.24 15.13 -0.30 Average OffPeak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.33 15.66 0.33 14.94 -0.40 14.83 -0.50 Average Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.38 15.72 0.35 15.05 -0.32 14.97 -0.41 Average Travel Time Minutes 14.18 14.19 0.01 13.84 -0.33 13.89 -0.29 Average Travel Time (w/o XI) Minutes 12.04 11.90 -0.14 11.57 -0.46 11.55 -0.48 Average Peak Transit Travel Time Minutes 107.78 102.13 -5.64 102.28 -5.50 101.70 -6.08 Average OffPeak Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.04 98.66 -6.38 97.46 -7.58 96.91 -8.13 Average All Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.95 99.84 -6.10 99.09 -6.86 98.54 -7.41 Peak Transit Average Time Minutes 107.78 102.13 -5.64 102.28 -5.50 101.70 -6.08 OffPeak Transit Average Time Minutes 105.04 98.66 -6.38 97.46 -7.58 96.91 -8.13 All Transit Average Time Minutes 105.95 99.84 -6.10 99.09 -6.86 98.54 -7.41 Peak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.94 6.56 -0.39 6.22 -0.72 6.17 -0.77 OffPeak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.58 6.27 -0.31 5.82 -0.76 5.81 -0.76 All Transit Average Distance Miles 6.70 6.37 -0.33 5.95 -0.74 5.93 -0.76 All-Day Walk Average Time Minutes 31.91 31.74 -0.17 31.35 -0.56 31.32 -0.59 All-Day Walk Average Distance Miles 1.60 1.59 -0.01 1.57 -0.03 1.57 -0.03 All-Day Bike Average Time Minutes 14.43 14.58 0.15 14.50 0.07 14.50 0.07 All-Day Bike Average Distance Miles 3.23 3.24 0.01 3.22 -0.01 3.22 -0.02 Transit Ridership (Unlinked) Passengers 34,413.95 40,538.46 6,124.51 50,804.14 16,390.19 52,242.19 17,828.25 Transit Ridership (Linked) Passengers 25,877.76 31,567.67 5,689.91 40,110.54 14,232.78 41,238.01 15,360.25 % Mode Share DA (All) Percent Share 50.21 49.68 -0.53 49.78 -0.43 49.68 -0.53 % Mode Share SR (All) Percent Share 42.48 42.55 0.06 42.23 -0.25 42.29 -0.20 % Mode Share Transit (All) Percent Share 1.34 1.55 0.21 1.72 0.38 1.72 0.38 % Mode Share Walk (All) Percent Share 3.78 3.85 0.07 3.94 0.15 3.95 0.17 % Mode Share Bike (All) Percent Share 1.05 1.06 0.01 1.07 0.02 1.07 0.03 % Mode Share School Bus (All) Percent Share 1.14 1.31 0.17 1.26 0.12 1.29 0.14 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (All) Percent Share 4.83 4.91 0.08 5.00 0.17 5.02 0.20 % Mode Share DA (Work) Percent Share 86.84 86.59 -0.25 86.24 -0.59 86.21 -0.62 % Mode Share SR (Work) Percent Share 8.62 8.60 -0.02 8.57 -0.05 8.57 -0.05 % Mode Share Transit (Work) Percent Share 0.80 1.09 0.29 1.23 0.43 1.23 0.43

Draft (4

/24/17

)



% Mode Share Walk (Work) Percent Share 2.15 2.14 -0.01 2.32 0.18 2.34 0.19 % Mode Share Bike (Work) Percent Share 1.59 1.58 -0.01 1.63 0.04 1.65 0.05 % Mode Share School Bus (Work) Percent Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Work) Percent Share 3.74 3.72 -0.02 3.96 0.22 3.98 0.24 % Mode Share DA (Peak) Percent Share 47.00 46.20 -0.81 46.40 -0.60 46.27 -0.73 % Mode Share SR (Peak) Percent Share 45.62 45.82 0.20 45.46 -0.15 45.52 -0.10 % Mode Share Transit (Peak) Percent Share 1.37 1.63 0.26 1.80 0.42 1.80 0.43 % Mode Share Walk (Peak) Percent Share 3.38 3.45 0.08 3.50 0.13 3.53 0.15 % Mode Share Bike (Peak) Percent Share 0.91 0.92 0.01 0.93 0.03 0.94 0.04 % Mode Share School Bus (Peak) Percent Share 1.72 1.98 0.26 1.90 0.18 1.94 0.22 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Peak) Percent Share 4.28 4.37 0.09 4.44 0.15 4.47 0.19 % Mode Share DA (OffPeak) Percent Share 51.74 51.35 -0.39 51.40 -0.34 51.32 -0.42 % Mode Share SR (OffPeak) Percent Share 40.98 40.97 -0.01 40.68 -0.30 40.73 -0.25 % Mode Share Transit (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.33 1.51 0.19 1.69 0.36 1.69 0.36 % Mode Share Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 3.98 4.04 0.07 4.14 0.17 4.15 0.17 % Mode Share Bike (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.11 1.13 0.01 1.13 0.02 1.14 0.03 % Mode Share School Bus (OffPeak) Percent Share 0.86 0.99 0.13 0.95 0.09 0.97 0.11 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 5.09 5.17 0.08 5.27 0.19 5.29 0.20 Auto Operating Cost ($) Dollars 1,857,500.11 1,871,774.22 14,274.12 2,051,074.79 193,574.68 2,102,498.41 244,998.30 Auto Operating Cost ($) Per Capita Dollars/Person 4.38 4.30 -0.08 4.13 -0.25 4.13 -0.25 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 69.44 71.58 2.15 72.99 3.56 73.36 3.92 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 75.98 75.37 -0.61 74.95 -1.03 74.61 -1.37 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 69.24 70.58 1.34 72.17 2.93 72.58 3.33 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.70 48.09 1.39 50.43 3.73 51.00 4.30 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.89 59.33 -2.56 58.71 -3.18 58.13 -3.76 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.16 47.12 0.97 49.68 3.52 50.29 4.13 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 21.88 35.17 13.29 37.21 15.33 37.73 15.85 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 39.00 46.75 7.75 44.71 5.71 43.99 4.99 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 22.43 32.78 10.35 35.20 12.78 35.80 13.37 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 11.43 20.72 9.29 22.79 11.35 23.15 11.72 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 25.00 35.16 10.15 32.45 7.44 31.54 6.53 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.02 21.42 9.40 23.47 11.46 23.84 11.82 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 4.84 7.07 2.23 7.63 2.79 7.45 2.61 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 18.01 18.98 0.96 17.49 -0.52 16.99 -1.02 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.44 7.90 2.47 8.38 2.95 8.17 2.73 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 88.84 89.01 0.17 89.92 1.07 90.10 1.26 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 87.92 87.45 -0.48 87.90 -0.03 87.70 -0.23 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.82 88.71 -0.10 89.69 0.88 89.89 1.08 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 67.02 67.61 0.59 69.79 2.77 70.27 3.26 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 75.07 73.69 -1.38 74.31 -0.76 73.97 -1.11 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 65.59 66.37 0.78 68.79 3.20 69.32 3.73 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 33.26 51.20 17.94 54.15 20.89 54.82 21.56 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 52.24 63.76 11.52 61.74 9.50 60.97 8.73 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.33 48.46 14.13 51.88 17.55 52.64 18.31 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 18.45 31.58 13.13 33.93 15.48 34.33 15.88 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 30.93 45.54 14.61 42.04 11.12 40.86 9.94 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 19.98 32.98 13.00 35.24 15.26 35.63 15.64 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.30 12.07 1.77 14.02 3.73 13.69 3.39 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 26.03 23.73 -2.30 21.88 -4.15 21.27 -4.76 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 11.49 13.61 2.12 15.44 3.95 15.06 3.56 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 84.08 90.05 5.97 87.71 3.63 87.97 3.89 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 84.86 84.21 -0.65 81.55 -3.30 81.14 -3.72

Draft (4

/24/17

)

9 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0


Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.63 93.13 4.50 89.57 0.94 89.78 1.15 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.42 65.61 4.19 66.82 5.39 66.70 5.27 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 74.22 70.48 -3.73 67.38 -6.84 66.82 -7.39 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 68.01 69.07 1.06 69.47 1.46 69.21 1.20 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 32.20 52.12 19.92 55.64 23.44 55.86 23.66 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 49.88 64.27 14.39 60.20 10.33 59.67 9.79 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.65 52.77 18.12 56.63 21.98 56.83 22.19 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 5.91 33.66 27.75 39.68 33.77 39.08 33.17 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 32.40 52.48 20.08 47.14 14.73 46.58 14.17 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.63 35.70 23.08 42.04 29.41 41.24 28.61 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.12 6.41 1.29 11.24 6.12 10.83 5.71 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 29.09 28.86 -0.23 25.89 -3.20 25.58 -3.51 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.89 12.48 1.59 16.31 5.42 15.61 4.71 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 97.86 97.98 0.12 98.28 0.43 98.35 0.49 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 95.40 94.97 -0.43 95.13 -0.26 94.70 -0.70 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 98.04 98.13 0.09 98.44 0.40 98.50 0.46 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 88.40 86.97 -1.43 88.83 0.43 89.24 0.84 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 90.29 86.33 -3.96 86.15 -4.14 85.78 -4.52 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 89.86 86.90 -2.95 89.06 -0.80 89.52 -0.34 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 44.34 68.34 24.00 74.09 29.75 75.02 30.68 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 65.14 81.02 15.88 77.48 12.34 77.08 11.94 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 42.90 64.82 21.92 72.42 29.52 73.57 30.67 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 8.33 46.14 37.81 54.78 46.45 53.86 45.52 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 36.05 63.90 27.84 57.38 21.33 56.70 20.65 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 16.91 45.10 28.19 55.33 38.42 54.24 37.32 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 8.32 9.29 0.97 20.15 11.83 19.45 11.13 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 34.87 36.39 1.52 32.66 -2.21 32.27 -2.60 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 16.90 17.56 0.66 27.69 10.78 26.54 9.64 Average Low Income Peak Trip Time Minutes 15.26 14.61 -0.65 14.22 -1.05 14.43 -0.84 Peak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.27 -0.53 88.52 0.72 88.69 0.89 Peak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.27 -0.53 88.53 0.73 88.71 0.91 Peak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 6.18 10.49 4.31 11.98 5.81 11.96 5.78 OffPeak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 87.08 -0.51 88.52 0.93 88.75 1.15 OffPeak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 87.08 -0.51 88.56 0.97 88.79 1.20 OffPeak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 7.19 8.18 0.98 9.28 2.08 9.32 2.12 Percent of Population to Airport Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 50.85 50.69 -0.16 51.89 1.04 52.22 1.37 Percent of Population to Beach Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 20.36 21.03 0.67 21.79 1.43 21.63 1.26 Percent of Population to Building Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.58 32.07 1.49 32.94 2.36 33.04 2.46 Percent of Population to College/Univ Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 49.80 50.01 0.21 52.46 2.65 52.35 2.55 Percent of Population to Hospital Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.74 31.68 0.94 33.04 2.30 33.43 2.69 Percent of Population to Park Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 76.90 77.21 0.31 78.85 1.95 79.20 2.30 Percent of Population to Post Office Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 25.15 25.77 0.63 26.06 0.92 25.77 0.62 Percent of Population to School Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 90.69 90.81 0.12 91.57 0.88 91.64 0.95 Percent of Population to all Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 92.77 92.82 0.05 93.56 0.79 93.73 0.95

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Table 13: Performance Results for Scenario 5: Blended Infill/Expansion

Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference Total Population People 423,885.00 434,853.00 10,968.00 496,460.00 72,575.00 508,907.00 85,022.00 Total Households Households 142,097.00 145,797.00 3,700.00 167,333.00 25,236.00 171,731.00 29,634.00 Total Employment Jobs 192,107.00 220,232.99 28,125.99 239,039.99 46,932.99 246,086.99 53,979.99 Vehicle Trips Trips 1,307,524.79 1,370,092.36 62,567.57 1,559,662.03 252,137.24 1,615,927.44 308,402.65 Vehicle Miles (Interzonal) Vehicle Miles 9,320,120.96 9,523,589.51 203,468.55 10,548,512.75 1,228,391.79 10,999,822.64 1,679,701.68 Vehicle Hours (Interzonal) Vehicle Hours 193,055.50 199,140.63 6,085.13 220,271.64 27,216.14 229,494.09 36,438.59 Vehicle Miles (Intrazonal) Vehicle Miles 45,206.59 40,535.93 -4,670.65 48,092.86 2,886.28 49,847.18 4,640.59 Vehicle Hours (Intrazonal) Vehicle Hours 3,484.60 3,312.38 -172.22 4,070.96 586.36 4,255.49 770.88 Vehicle Miles (Total) Vehicle Miles 9,365,327.54 9,564,125.44 198,797.90 10,596,605.61 1,231,278.07 11,049,669.82 1,684,342.28 Vehicle Hours (Total) Vehicle Hours 196,540.10 202,453.01 5,912.91 224,342.60 27,802.49 233,749.58 37,209.47 Vehicle Miles/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Miles/Trip 7.16 6.98 -0.18 6.79 -0.37 6.84 -0.32 Vehicle Hours/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Hours/Trip 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.14 -0.01 0.14 -0.01 Vehicle Miles/Capita Vehicle Miles/Person 22.09 21.99 -0.10 21.34 -0.75 21.71 -0.38 Vehicle Hours/Capita Vehicle Hours/Person 0.46 0.47 0.00 0.45 -0.01 0.46 0.00 Vehicle Miles/Commercial KSF Vehicle Miles/1000SF 223.34 207.24 -16.10 216.56 -6.77 221.01 -2.33 Peak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.41 8.69 0.27 8.27 -0.14 8.22 -0.19 Offpeak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.71 8.96 0.25 8.57 -0.14 8.56 -0.15 All Day Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.57 8.83 0.26 8.43 -0.14 8.40 -0.17 Average Travel Distance (All) Miles 8.00 7.90 -0.10 7.62 -0.38 7.65 -0.35 Average Travel Distance (w/o XI) Miles 5.97 5.73 -0.24 5.46 -0.51 5.49 -0.48 Average Peak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.43 15.81 0.38 15.45 0.02 15.54 0.11 Average OffPeak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.33 15.67 0.34 15.25 -0.08 15.31 -0.02 Average Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.38 15.73 0.36 15.34 -0.03 15.42 0.04 Average Travel Time Minutes 14.18 14.30 0.12 14.03 -0.15 14.17 -0.01 Average Travel Time (w/o XI) Minutes 12.04 12.01 -0.02 11.77 -0.27 11.87 -0.16 Average Peak Transit Travel Time Minutes 107.78 102.37 -5.41 102.43 -5.35 102.16 -5.61 Average OffPeak Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.04 99.57 -5.47 98.60 -6.44 98.30 -6.74 Average All Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.95 100.53 -5.42 99.89 -6.06 99.60 -6.35 Peak Transit Average Time Minutes 107.78 102.37 -5.41 102.43 -5.35 102.16 -5.61 OffPeak Transit Average Time Minutes 105.04 99.57 -5.47 98.60 -6.44 98.30 -6.74 All Transit Average Time Minutes 105.95 100.53 -5.42 99.89 -6.06 99.60 -6.35 Peak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.94 6.66 -0.28 6.46 -0.48 6.56 -0.39 OffPeak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.58 6.52 -0.06 6.14 -0.43 6.28 -0.29 All Transit Average Distance Miles 6.70 6.57 -0.13 6.25 -0.45 6.38 -0.32 All-Day Walk Average Time Minutes 31.91 31.85 -0.05 31.67 -0.23 31.68 -0.23 All-Day Walk Average Distance Miles 1.60 1.59 0.00 1.58 -0.01 1.58 -0.01 All-Day Bike Average Time Minutes 14.43 14.60 0.18 14.57 0.15 14.56 0.13 All-Day Bike Average Distance Miles 3.23 3.25 0.02 3.24 0.01 3.24 0.00 Transit Ridership (Unlinked) Passengers 34,413.95 40,119.17 5,705.22 48,374.64 13,960.69 50,085.05 15,671.11 Transit Ridership (Linked) Passengers 25,877.76 31,127.26 5,249.50 38,173.30 12,295.54 39,341.64 13,463.88 % Mode Share DA (All) Percent Share 50.21 49.68 -0.53 49.79 -0.42 49.77 -0.44 % Mode Share SR (All) Percent Share 42.48 42.58 0.10 42.35 -0.13 42.36 -0.12 % Mode Share Transit (All) Percent Share 1.34 1.53 0.19 1.65 0.30 1.64 0.30 % Mode Share Walk (All) Percent Share 3.78 3.84 0.06 3.88 0.10 3.89 0.10 % Mode Share Bike (All) Percent Share 1.05 1.06 0.01 1.06 0.01 1.06 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (All) Percent Share 1.14 1.31 0.17 1.27 0.13 1.29 0.15 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (All) Percent Share 4.83 4.90 0.07 4.94 0.11 4.95 0.12 % Mode Share DA (Work) Percent Share 86.84 86.60 -0.24 86.40 -0.44 86.40 -0.44 % Mode Share SR (Work) Percent Share 8.62 8.60 -0.02 8.59 -0.03 8.59 -0.03 % Mode Share Transit (Work) Percent Share 0.80 1.07 0.27 1.15 0.35 1.14 0.34

Draft (4

/24/17

)

9 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0


% Mode Share Walk (Work) Percent Share 2.15 2.15 0.00 2.25 0.10 2.25 0.11 % Mode Share Bike (Work) Percent Share 1.59 1.59 -0.01 1.62 0.03 1.62 0.03 % Mode Share School Bus (Work) Percent Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Work) Percent Share 3.74 3.73 -0.01 3.87 0.13 3.88 0.14 % Mode Share DA (Peak) Percent Share 47.00 46.22 -0.79 46.42 -0.58 46.40 -0.60 % Mode Share SR (Peak) Percent Share 45.62 45.84 0.22 45.58 -0.04 45.56 -0.06 % Mode Share Transit (Peak) Percent Share 1.37 1.60 0.23 1.71 0.34 1.70 0.33 % Mode Share Walk (Peak) Percent Share 3.38 3.44 0.07 3.44 0.07 3.46 0.08 % Mode Share Bike (Peak) Percent Share 0.91 0.92 0.01 0.93 0.02 0.93 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (Peak) Percent Share 1.72 1.98 0.26 1.92 0.20 1.95 0.23 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Peak) Percent Share 4.28 4.36 0.08 4.37 0.09 4.39 0.11 % Mode Share DA (OffPeak) Percent Share 51.74 51.34 -0.40 51.40 -0.34 51.38 -0.36 % Mode Share SR (OffPeak) Percent Share 40.98 41.02 0.03 40.81 -0.18 40.82 -0.16 % Mode Share Transit (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.33 1.49 0.16 1.61 0.29 1.61 0.28 % Mode Share Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 3.98 4.03 0.06 4.09 0.12 4.09 0.11 % Mode Share Bike (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.11 1.12 0.01 1.12 0.01 1.12 0.01 % Mode Share School Bus (OffPeak) Percent Share 0.86 0.99 0.13 0.96 0.10 0.98 0.11 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 5.09 5.16 0.07 5.22 0.13 5.22 0.13 Auto Operating Cost ($) Dollars 1,857,500.11 1,898,051.39 40,551.28 2,102,318.59 244,818.48 2,192,264.65 334,764.55 Auto Operating Cost ($) Per Capita Dollars/Person 4.38 4.36 -0.02 4.23 -0.15 4.31 -0.07 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 69.44 71.44 2.01 71.31 1.87 71.23 1.80 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 75.98 74.99 -0.99 72.97 -3.01 72.62 -3.36 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 69.24 70.44 1.20 70.43 1.19 70.37 1.13 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.70 47.56 0.86 49.21 2.51 49.14 2.44 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.89 59.66 -2.23 57.03 -4.86 56.78 -5.11 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.16 46.59 0.43 48.43 2.27 48.38 2.22 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 21.88 34.50 12.62 36.22 14.35 35.87 13.99 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 39.00 47.15 8.15 44.99 5.99 44.64 5.64 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 22.43 32.11 9.69 34.21 11.78 33.89 11.46 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 11.43 20.01 8.57 21.58 10.14 21.27 9.83 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 25.00 35.14 10.14 33.12 8.12 32.17 7.17 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.02 20.71 8.69 22.24 10.22 21.90 9.88 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 4.84 7.07 2.23 7.48 2.64 7.31 2.47 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 18.01 19.30 1.29 18.23 0.22 17.71 -0.31 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.44 7.90 2.46 8.22 2.79 8.02 2.59 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 88.84 88.99 0.14 88.79 -0.05 88.64 -0.20 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 87.92 87.03 -0.90 86.22 -1.70 85.94 -1.98 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.82 88.69 -0.13 88.53 -0.29 88.38 -0.44 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 67.02 67.25 0.23 68.66 1.64 68.70 1.69 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 75.07 73.60 -1.47 71.65 -3.43 71.60 -3.48 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 65.59 66.01 0.42 67.63 2.04 67.71 2.12 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 33.26 50.61 17.35 52.88 19.62 52.73 19.47 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 52.24 63.82 11.58 61.26 9.02 60.98 8.75 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.33 47.88 13.55 50.58 16.25 50.49 16.16 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 18.45 30.91 12.46 32.51 14.06 32.33 13.88 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 30.93 45.61 14.68 42.83 11.90 41.60 10.67 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 19.98 32.31 12.33 33.79 13.81 33.57 13.58 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.30 11.94 1.64 14.05 3.75 13.74 3.44 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 26.03 24.25 -1.78 22.90 -3.12 22.25 -3.78 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 11.49 13.48 1.99 15.47 3.98 15.11 3.62 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 84.08 89.49 5.41 87.23 3.15 87.25 3.18 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 84.86 84.37 -0.48 82.19 -2.66 81.76 -3.09

Draft (4

/24/17

)



Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.63 92.52 3.89 89.15 0.52 89.09 0.46 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.42 63.43 2.01 64.05 2.62 63.90 2.47 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 74.22 71.49 -2.72 68.75 -5.47 68.17 -6.05 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 68.01 66.58 -1.43 66.51 -1.51 66.22 -1.79 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 32.20 50.20 18.01 53.05 20.86 52.93 20.74 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 49.88 65.20 15.32 62.60 12.72 62.16 12.29 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.65 50.54 15.90 53.76 19.11 53.59 18.94 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 5.91 31.18 25.27 35.97 30.06 35.03 29.12 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 32.40 52.60 20.20 49.69 17.29 48.52 16.12 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.63 32.84 20.21 37.97 25.34 36.79 24.16 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.12 6.02 0.90 10.10 4.97 9.74 4.61 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 29.09 29.38 0.29 27.91 -1.18 27.25 -1.84 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.89 12.12 1.23 15.32 4.43 14.67 3.78 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 97.86 97.90 0.04 98.16 0.31 98.23 0.37 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 95.40 95.03 -0.37 94.75 -0.65 94.32 -1.08 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 98.04 98.04 0.00 98.31 0.27 98.38 0.34 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 88.40 85.57 -2.83 87.80 -0.60 88.03 -0.37 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 90.29 87.38 -2.91 86.29 -4.01 85.98 -4.31 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 89.86 85.26 -4.59 87.93 -1.93 88.19 -1.67 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 44.34 66.57 22.23 71.77 27.42 71.50 27.16 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 65.14 82.21 17.07 79.94 14.80 79.79 14.65 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 42.90 62.70 19.80 69.68 26.78 69.46 26.56 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 8.33 43.57 35.23 49.92 41.59 48.54 40.21 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 36.05 64.15 28.10 60.43 24.38 59.01 22.95 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 16.91 42.09 25.17 49.82 32.91 48.22 31.30 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 8.32 8.94 0.62 19.37 11.05 18.72 10.40 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 34.87 36.80 1.93 35.14 0.27 34.31 -0.55 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 16.90 17.27 0.37 27.28 10.37 26.17 9.27 Average Low Income Peak Trip Time Minutes 15.26 14.84 -0.43 14.57 -0.69 14.94 -0.32 Peak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.16 -0.64 87.95 0.15 87.85 0.05 Peak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.16 -0.64 87.96 0.16 87.87 0.07 Peak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 6.18 10.39 4.21 11.52 5.35 11.66 5.48 OffPeak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 87.01 -0.59 87.80 0.21 87.66 0.06 OffPeak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 87.01 -0.59 87.84 0.25 87.71 0.11 OffPeak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 7.19 8.04 0.85 8.90 1.70 8.99 1.80 Percent of Population to Airport Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 50.85 50.82 -0.03 51.77 0.91 52.31 1.46 Percent of Population to Beach Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 20.36 20.70 0.33 21.00 0.64 20.49 0.13 Percent of Population to Building Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.58 31.43 0.85 32.12 1.54 31.60 1.02 Percent of Population to College/Univ Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 49.80 49.81 0.01 51.64 1.83 51.11 1.31 Percent of Population to Hospital Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.74 31.24 0.50 32.28 1.54 31.61 0.87 Percent of Population to Park Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 76.90 77.08 0.18 77.66 0.75 77.39 0.49 Percent of Population to Post Office Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 25.15 25.45 0.30 25.36 0.21 24.75 -0.39 Percent of Population to School Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 90.69 90.80 0.11 90.84 0.15 90.59 -0.10 Percent of Population to all Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 92.77 92.80 0.03 92.85 0.08 92.77 -0.01

Draft (4

/24/17

)

9 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Table 14: Performance Results for Scenario 6: TOD/Infill with Enhanced Transit Strategy

Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference Total Population People 423,885.00 434,850.00 10,965.00 496,460.00 72,575.00 508,906.00 85,021.00 Total Households Households 142,097.00 145,796.00 3,699.00 167,331.00 25,234.00 171,729.00 29,632.00 Total Employment Jobs 192,107.00 220,235.99 28,128.99 239,037.99 46,930.99 246,088.99 53,981.99 Vehicle Trips Trips 1,307,524.79 1,367,688.34 60,163.55 1,561,937.46 254,412.66 1,610,626.69 303,101.90 Vehicle Miles (Interzonal) Vehicle Miles 9,320,120.96 9,635,124.22 315,003.26 10,471,146.97 1,151,026.01 10,830,565.36 1,510,444.40 Vehicle Hours (Interzonal) Vehicle Hours 193,055.50 200,752.72 7,697.22 219,239.87 26,184.36 226,421.58 33,366.08 Vehicle Miles (Intrazonal) Vehicle Miles 45,206.59 41,050.30 -4,156.28 44,592.70 -613.89 44,720.28 -486.30 Vehicle Hours (Intrazonal) Vehicle Hours 3,484.60 3,323.87 -160.74 3,709.25 224.64 3,780.13 295.53 Vehicle Miles (Total) Vehicle Miles 9,365,327.54 9,676,174.53 310,846.98 10,515,739.67 1,150,412.13 10,875,285.64 1,509,958.09 Vehicle Hours (Total) Vehicle Hours 196,540.10 204,076.58 7,536.48 222,949.11 26,409.01 230,201.71 33,661.61 Vehicle Miles/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Miles/Trip 7.16 7.07 -0.09 6.73 -0.43 6.75 -0.41 Vehicle Hours/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Hours/Trip 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.14 -0.01 0.14 -0.01 Vehicle Miles/Capita Vehicle Miles/Person 22.09 22.25 0.16 21.18 -0.91 21.37 -0.72 Vehicle Hours/Capita Vehicle Hours/Person 0.46 0.47 0.01 0.45 -0.01 0.45 -0.01 Vehicle Miles/Commercial KSF Vehicle Miles/1000SF 223.34 209.46 -13.88 215.10 -8.23 218.15 -5.18 Peak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.41 8.75 0.34 8.23 -0.18 8.16 -0.25 Offpeak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.71 9.06 0.35 8.52 -0.19 8.45 -0.26 All Day Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.57 8.92 0.34 8.38 -0.19 8.32 -0.25 Average Travel Distance (All) Miles 8.00 8.00 0.00 7.54 -0.46 7.56 -0.44 Average Travel Distance (w/o XI) Miles 5.97 5.82 -0.15 5.38 -0.59 5.38 -0.59 Average Peak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.43 15.90 0.48 15.46 0.04 15.45 0.03 Average OffPeak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.33 15.77 0.44 15.21 -0.13 15.17 -0.16 Average Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.38 15.83 0.46 15.32 -0.05 15.30 -0.07 Average Travel Time Minutes 14.18 14.39 0.22 13.99 -0.19 14.08 -0.09 Average Travel Time (w/o XI) Minutes 12.04 12.09 0.06 11.74 -0.30 11.77 -0.26 Average Peak Transit Travel Time Minutes 107.78 102.53 -5.25 103.79 -3.98 103.64 -4.14 Average OffPeak Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.04 99.28 -5.76 100.02 -5.02 99.68 -5.37 Average All Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.95 100.39 -5.56 101.28 -4.67 101.00 -4.95 Peak Transit Average Time Minutes 107.78 102.53 -5.25 103.79 -3.98 103.64 -4.14 OffPeak Transit Average Time Minutes 105.04 99.28 -5.76 100.02 -5.02 99.68 -5.37 All Transit Average Time Minutes 105.95 100.39 -5.56 101.28 -4.67 101.00 -4.95 Peak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.94 6.76 -0.19 6.39 -0.56 6.45 -0.49 OffPeak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.58 6.48 -0.09 6.00 -0.57 6.09 -0.49 All Transit Average Distance Miles 6.70 6.58 -0.12 6.13 -0.57 6.21 -0.49 All-Day Walk Average Time Minutes 31.91 31.74 -0.17 31.83 -0.08 31.91 0.00 All-Day Walk Average Distance Miles 1.60 1.59 -0.01 1.59 0.00 1.60 0.00 All-Day Bike Average Time Minutes 14.43 14.62 0.19 14.73 0.30 14.71 0.28 All-Day Bike Average Distance Miles 3.23 3.25 0.02 3.27 0.04 3.27 0.04 Transit Ridership (Unlinked) Passengers 34,413.95 40,029.44 5,615.50 51,875.95 17,462.00 53,361.88 18,947.93 Transit Ridership (Linked) Passengers 25,877.76 31,045.59 5,167.83 40,852.88 14,975.12 41,958.90 16,081.14 % Mode Share DA (All) Percent Share 50.21 49.66 -0.55 49.79 -0.42 49.72 -0.49 % Mode Share SR (All) Percent Share 42.48 42.62 0.14 42.27 -0.21 42.33 -0.15 % Mode Share Transit (All) Percent Share 1.34 1.53 0.18 1.76 0.42 1.75 0.41 % Mode Share Walk (All) Percent Share 3.78 3.83 0.04 3.85 0.07 3.85 0.07 % Mode Share Bike (All) Percent Share 1.05 1.06 0.01 1.06 0.01 1.06 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (All) Percent Share 1.14 1.31 0.17 1.27 0.13 1.29 0.15 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (All) Percent Share 4.83 4.88 0.05 4.91 0.08 4.91 0.08 % Mode Share DA (Work) Percent Share 86.84 86.63 -0.20 86.35 -0.49 86.35 -0.49 % Mode Share SR (Work) Percent Share 8.62 8.60 -0.02 8.58 -0.04 8.58 -0.04 % Mode Share Transit (Work) Percent Share 0.80 1.06 0.26 1.22 0.41 1.20 0.40

Draft (4

/24/17

)



% Mode Share Walk (Work) Percent Share 2.15 2.13 -0.02 2.24 0.09 2.24 0.09 % Mode Share Bike (Work) Percent Share 1.59 1.57 -0.02 1.61 0.02 1.62 0.03 % Mode Share School Bus (Work) Percent Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Work) Percent Share 3.74 3.70 -0.04 3.86 0.11 3.86 0.12 % Mode Share DA (Peak) Percent Share 47.00 46.16 -0.84 46.42 -0.59 46.32 -0.69 % Mode Share SR (Peak) Percent Share 45.62 45.90 0.28 45.52 -0.10 45.58 -0.03 % Mode Share Transit (Peak) Percent Share 1.37 1.60 0.23 1.81 0.44 1.80 0.43 % Mode Share Walk (Peak) Percent Share 3.38 3.44 0.06 3.41 0.04 3.42 0.04 % Mode Share Bike (Peak) Percent Share 0.91 0.92 0.01 0.93 0.02 0.93 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (Peak) Percent Share 1.72 1.98 0.26 1.92 0.20 1.95 0.23 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Peak) Percent Share 4.28 4.35 0.07 4.34 0.05 4.35 0.06 % Mode Share DA (OffPeak) Percent Share 51.74 51.34 -0.40 51.41 -0.33 51.35 -0.39 % Mode Share SR (OffPeak) Percent Share 40.98 41.04 0.06 40.71 -0.27 40.77 -0.21 % Mode Share Transit (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.33 1.49 0.16 1.73 0.41 1.73 0.40 % Mode Share Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 3.98 4.02 0.04 4.06 0.09 4.06 0.08 % Mode Share Bike (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.11 1.12 0.01 1.12 0.01 1.12 0.01 % Mode Share School Bus (OffPeak) Percent Share 0.86 0.99 0.13 0.96 0.10 0.98 0.11 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 5.09 5.14 0.05 5.18 0.10 5.18 0.09 Auto Operating Cost ($) Dollars 1,857,500.11 1,920,280.26 62,780.15 2,086,899.59 229,399.48 2,158,531.68 301,031.57 Auto Operating Cost ($) Per Capita Dollars/Person 4.38 4.42 0.03 4.20 -0.18 4.24 -0.14 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 69.44 71.37 1.93 71.84 2.40 71.65 2.21 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 75.98 74.48 -1.50 72.33 -3.65 71.16 -4.82 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 69.24 70.36 1.12 70.98 1.74 70.80 1.56 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.70 47.56 0.86 49.72 3.02 49.62 2.92 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.89 57.23 -4.66 55.24 -6.65 54.46 -7.43 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.16 46.59 0.44 48.96 2.80 48.87 2.71 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 21.88 34.72 12.84 37.12 15.24 37.20 15.32 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 39.00 44.99 5.99 43.40 4.40 42.93 3.93 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 22.43 32.33 9.90 35.13 12.70 35.26 12.84 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 11.43 20.28 8.85 22.93 11.50 22.56 11.13 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 25.00 35.34 10.34 32.58 7.58 31.76 6.76 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.02 20.98 8.96 23.64 11.62 23.23 11.21 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 4.84 7.00 2.16 8.01 3.16 7.83 2.99 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 18.01 19.32 1.31 17.81 -0.20 17.33 -0.68 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.44 7.83 2.40 8.77 3.33 8.56 3.13 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 88.84 89.00 0.15 89.12 0.27 89.16 0.32 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 87.92 87.12 -0.81 86.26 -1.67 85.13 -2.80 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.82 88.70 -0.12 88.86 0.05 88.91 0.10 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 67.02 67.28 0.26 68.66 1.64 68.76 1.74 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 75.07 71.20 -3.87 70.85 -4.22 70.07 -5.01 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 65.59 66.04 0.45 67.63 2.04 67.76 2.17 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 33.26 50.75 17.49 53.78 20.53 53.98 20.72 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 52.24 60.88 8.64 59.70 7.46 59.17 6.93 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.33 48.02 13.69 51.52 17.19 51.77 17.44 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 18.45 31.14 12.68 34.06 15.61 33.48 15.03 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 30.93 45.88 14.95 42.30 11.37 41.21 10.29 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 19.98 32.54 12.55 35.39 15.40 34.75 14.77 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.30 12.06 1.77 14.71 4.42 14.40 4.11 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 26.03 24.21 -1.82 22.31 -3.71 21.71 -4.32 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 11.49 13.61 2.11 16.16 4.67 15.79 4.30 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 84.08 89.62 5.55 86.97 2.89 84.17 0.10 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 84.86 84.29 -0.56 80.25 -4.61 79.57 -5.28

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 0 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0


Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.63 92.61 3.98 88.67 0.04 85.30 -3.33 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.42 63.85 2.43 66.32 4.90 64.86 3.44 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 74.22 69.96 -4.25 65.14 -9.07 64.76 -9.46 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 68.01 66.99 -1.02 68.87 0.86 66.92 -1.09 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 32.20 50.67 18.47 56.25 24.05 55.76 23.57 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 49.88 63.79 13.91 59.15 9.27 58.94 9.06 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.65 51.07 16.43 57.33 22.69 56.66 22.02 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 5.91 32.44 26.53 36.93 31.01 33.59 27.67 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 32.40 52.21 19.81 44.16 11.76 42.56 10.15 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.63 34.26 21.63 38.84 26.21 34.82 22.20 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.12 6.74 1.62 11.39 6.26 10.30 5.18 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 29.09 29.08 0.00 24.60 -4.49 23.72 -5.37 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.89 12.81 1.92 16.28 5.39 14.50 3.61 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 97.86 97.99 0.13 98.13 0.27 97.44 -0.42 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 95.40 95.01 -0.39 94.52 -0.88 94.08 -1.32 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 98.04 98.14 0.10 98.25 0.21 97.46 -0.58 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 88.40 85.93 -2.47 88.21 -0.19 87.04 -1.36 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 90.29 85.96 -4.34 85.99 -4.30 85.75 -4.55 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 89.86 85.69 -4.16 88.38 -1.48 87.03 -2.83 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 44.34 66.55 22.21 72.56 28.22 72.91 28.57 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 65.14 80.72 15.59 77.78 12.64 77.67 12.53 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 42.90 62.77 19.87 70.79 27.89 71.39 28.49 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 8.33 44.68 36.35 47.85 39.52 43.51 35.17 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 36.05 63.74 27.68 53.91 17.86 51.94 15.88 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 16.91 43.42 26.50 47.43 30.52 42.53 25.61 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 8.32 10.78 2.46 19.80 11.48 17.95 9.63 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 34.87 36.79 1.92 31.12 -3.75 30.01 -4.86 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 16.90 19.21 2.31 26.97 10.07 24.07 7.17 Average Low Income Peak Trip Time Minutes 15.26 14.82 -0.44 14.26 -1.00 14.35 -0.92 Peak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.11 -0.68 88.13 0.33 88.18 0.38 Peak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.11 -0.68 88.15 0.35 88.19 0.39 Peak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 6.18 10.21 4.03 11.93 5.75 11.95 5.77 OffPeak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.96 -0.63 88.11 0.51 88.17 0.58 OffPeak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 86.96 -0.63 88.15 0.55 88.22 0.63 OffPeak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 7.19 8.20 1.01 9.24 2.04 9.23 2.03 Percent of Population to Airport Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 50.85 50.99 0.14 50.27 -0.59 50.74 -0.11 Percent of Population to Beach Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 20.36 20.56 0.20 22.57 2.20 21.99 1.63 Percent of Population to Building Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.58 31.70 1.12 33.03 2.45 32.44 1.86 Percent of Population to College/Univ Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 49.80 50.05 0.24 51.93 2.13 52.03 2.23 Percent of Population to Hospital Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.74 31.18 0.44 33.43 2.69 32.73 1.99 Percent of Population to Park Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 76.90 77.11 0.21 78.04 1.14 77.75 0.85 Percent of Population to Post Office Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 25.15 25.33 0.19 26.79 1.65 26.15 1.00 Percent of Population to School Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 90.69 90.68 -0.01 90.78 0.09 90.80 0.11 Percent of Population to all Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 92.77 92.79 0.02 93.11 0.34 93.17 0.40

Draft (4

/24/17

)

A P P E N D I C E S 1 0 1

Table 15: Performance Results for Scenario 7: TOD/Infill and Maximum Enhanced Transit

Performance Measure Units 2010 Values 2020 Values 2010 to 2020 Difference 2035 Values 2010 to 2035 Difference 2040 Values 2010 to 2040 Difference Total Population People 423,885.00 434,854.00 10,969.00 496,459.00 72,574.00 508,905.00 85,020.00 Total Households Households 142,097.00 145,796.00 3,699.00 167,326.00 25,229.00 171,722.00 29,625.00 Total Employment Jobs 192,107.00 220,236.99 28,129.99 239,036.99 46,929.99 246,086.99 53,979.99 Vehicle Trips Trips 1,307,524.79 1,363,648.43 56,123.64 1,558,701.47 251,176.68 1,602,371.89 294,847.09 Vehicle Miles (Interzonal) Vehicle Miles 9,320,120.96 9,374,893.89 54,772.93 10,273,646.47 953,525.51 10,529,787.37 1,209,666.41 Vehicle Hours (Interzonal) Vehicle Hours 193,055.50 196,155.40 3,099.89 214,966.51 21,911.01 220,012.22 26,956.72 Vehicle Miles (Intrazonal) Vehicle Miles 45,206.59 39,780.48 -5,426.11 44,773.01 -433.57 45,334.78 128.20 Vehicle Hours (Intrazonal) Vehicle Hours 3,484.60 3,245.94 -238.66 3,818.80 334.19 3,914.87 430.26 Vehicle Miles (Total) Vehicle Miles 9,365,327.54 9,414,674.37 49,346.83 10,318,419.48 953,091.94 10,575,122.15 1,209,794.61 Vehicle Hours (Total) Vehicle Hours 196,540.10 199,401.34 2,861.23 218,785.31 22,245.21 223,927.08 27,386.98 Vehicle Miles/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Miles/Trip 7.16 6.90 -0.26 6.62 -0.54 6.60 -0.56 Vehicle Hours/Vehicle Trips Vehicle Hours/Trip 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.14 -0.01 0.14 -0.01 Vehicle Miles/Capita Vehicle Miles/Person 22.09 21.65 -0.44 20.78 -1.31 20.78 -1.31 Vehicle Hours/Capita Vehicle Hours/Person 0.46 0.46 -0.01 0.44 -0.02 0.44 -0.02 Vehicle Miles/Commercial KSF Vehicle Miles/1000SF 223.34 203.52 -19.82 209.49 -13.85 210.41 -12.93 Peak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.41 8.68 0.27 8.04 -0.37 7.91 -0.50 Offpeak Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.71 8.96 0.25 8.32 -0.39 8.19 -0.52 All Day Average Travel Distance (Work) Miles 8.57 8.83 0.26 8.19 -0.38 8.06 -0.51 Average Travel Distance (All) Miles 8.00 7.81 -0.19 7.42 -0.58 7.40 -0.60 Average Travel Distance (w/o XI) Miles 5.97 5.64 -0.33 5.27 -0.71 5.20 -0.77 Average Peak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.43 15.80 0.37 15.18 -0.24 15.12 -0.30 Average OffPeak Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.33 15.66 0.32 14.94 -0.40 14.83 -0.50 Average Commute Time (Workers) Minutes 15.38 15.72 0.35 15.05 -0.33 14.97 -0.41 Average Travel Time Minutes 14.18 14.19 0.01 13.84 -0.34 13.89 -0.29 Average Travel Time (w/o XI) Minutes 12.04 11.90 -0.14 11.57 -0.47 11.55 -0.49 Average Peak Transit Travel Time Minutes 107.78 100.40 -7.38 100.43 -7.35 99.99 -7.78 Average OffPeak Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.04 97.29 -7.75 96.22 -8.83 95.81 -9.23 Average All Transit Travel Time Minutes 105.95 98.40 -7.55 97.71 -8.24 97.29 -8.66 Peak Transit Average Time Minutes 107.78 100.40 -7.38 100.43 -7.35 99.99 -7.78 OffPeak Transit Average Time Minutes 105.04 97.29 -7.75 96.22 -8.83 95.81 -9.23 All Transit Average Time Minutes 105.95 98.40 -7.55 97.71 -8.24 97.29 -8.66 Peak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.94 6.41 -0.53 6.13 -0.81 6.11 -0.83 OffPeak Transit Average Distance Miles 6.58 6.14 -0.44 5.74 -0.84 5.75 -0.82 All Transit Average Distance Miles 6.70 6.24 -0.46 5.88 -0.82 5.88 -0.82 All-Day Walk Average Time Minutes 31.91 31.75 -0.16 31.36 -0.55 31.33 -0.58 All-Day Walk Average Distance Miles 1.60 1.59 -0.01 1.57 -0.03 1.57 -0.03 All-Day Bike Average Time Minutes 14.43 14.57 0.14 14.49 0.06 14.49 0.06 All-Day Bike Average Distance Miles 3.23 3.24 0.01 3.22 -0.02 3.21 -0.02 Transit Ridership (Unlinked) Passengers 34,413.95 47,855.06 13,441.11 59,516.71 25,102.77 61,276.81 26,862.87 Transit Ridership (Linked) Passengers 25,877.76 36,678.99 10,801.23 46,265.37 20,387.61 47,619.85 21,742.09 % Mode Share DA (All) Percent Share 50.21 49.52 -0.69 49.61 -0.60 49.51 -0.70 % Mode Share SR (All) Percent Share 42.48 42.48 0.00 42.17 -0.31 42.22 -0.26 % Mode Share Transit (All) Percent Share 1.34 1.80 0.46 1.99 0.65 1.99 0.65 % Mode Share Walk (All) Percent Share 3.78 3.84 0.05 3.92 0.13 3.93 0.15 % Mode Share Bike (All) Percent Share 1.05 1.05 0.01 1.06 0.01 1.07 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (All) Percent Share 1.14 1.31 0.17 1.26 0.12 1.28 0.14 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (All) Percent Share 4.83 4.89 0.06 4.98 0.15 5.00 0.17 % Mode Share DA (Work) Percent Share 86.84 86.14 -0.70 85.77 -1.07 85.73 -1.10 % Mode Share SR (Work) Percent Share 8.62 8.56 -0.06 8.53 -0.09 8.53 -0.09 % Mode Share Transit (Work) Percent Share 0.80 1.65 0.85 1.82 1.02 1.83 1.03

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 0 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0


% Mode Share Walk (Work) Percent Share 2.15 2.11 -0.04 2.29 0.14 2.30 0.15 % Mode Share Bike (Work) Percent Share 1.59 1.54 -0.05 1.60 0.00 1.61 0.01 % Mode Share School Bus (Work) Percent Share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Work) Percent Share 3.74 3.65 -0.09 3.88 0.14 3.91 0.17 % Mode Share DA (Peak) Percent Share 47.00 45.96 -1.05 46.14 -0.86 46.02 -0.99 % Mode Share SR (Peak) Percent Share 45.62 45.75 0.13 45.39 -0.23 45.44 -0.17 % Mode Share Transit (Peak) Percent Share 1.37 1.98 0.61 2.17 0.80 2.17 0.80 % Mode Share Walk (Peak) Percent Share 3.38 3.43 0.05 3.48 0.10 3.50 0.13 % Mode Share Bike (Peak) Percent Share 0.91 0.90 0.00 0.92 0.01 0.92 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (Peak) Percent Share 1.72 1.97 0.26 1.90 0.18 1.94 0.22 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (Peak) Percent Share 4.28 4.33 0.05 4.39 0.11 4.43 0.15 % Mode Share DA (OffPeak) Percent Share 51.74 51.23 -0.51 51.27 -0.47 51.18 -0.56 % Mode Share SR (OffPeak) Percent Share 40.98 40.91 -0.07 40.62 -0.36 40.67 -0.31 % Mode Share Transit (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.33 1.71 0.39 1.90 0.58 1.90 0.57 % Mode Share Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 3.98 4.03 0.06 4.13 0.15 4.14 0.16 % Mode Share Bike (OffPeak) Percent Share 1.11 1.12 0.01 1.13 0.02 1.14 0.02 % Mode Share School Bus (OffPeak) Percent Share 0.86 0.99 0.13 0.95 0.09 0.97 0.11 % Mode Share Bike and Walk (OffPeak) Percent Share 5.09 5.16 0.07 5.26 0.17 5.27 0.18 Auto Operating Cost ($) Dollars 1,857,500.11 1,868,416.35 10,916.25 2,047,537.74 190,037.63 2,098,586.62 241,086.52 Auto Operating Cost ($) Per Capita Dollars/Person 4.38 4.30 -0.09 4.12 -0.26 4.12 -0.26 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 69.44 71.58 2.15 72.99 3.56 73.36 3.92 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 75.98 75.37 -0.61 74.95 -1.03 74.61 -1.37 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 69.24 70.58 1.34 72.17 2.93 72.58 3.33 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.70 68.90 22.20 72.27 25.57 72.64 25.94 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.89 71.13 9.24 73.96 12.07 73.62 11.73 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 46.16 67.62 21.46 71.42 25.26 71.83 25.67 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 21.88 51.33 29.45 53.48 31.60 56.17 34.29 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 39.00 60.69 21.68 60.00 21.00 62.64 23.64 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 22.43 49.64 27.22 52.09 29.66 55.06 32.64 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 11.43 47.58 36.15 49.89 38.46 50.46 39.03 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 25.00 58.66 33.66 58.02 33.01 57.45 32.45 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.02 46.61 34.59 49.13 37.11 49.75 37.73 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 4.84 34.13 29.29 36.28 31.44 36.83 31.99 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 18.01 44.81 26.80 42.92 24.91 42.25 24.24 All 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.44 31.69 26.25 34.24 28.80 34.86 29.43 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 88.84 89.01 0.17 89.92 1.07 90.10 1.26 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 87.92 87.45 -0.48 87.90 -0.03 87.70 -0.23 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.82 88.71 -0.10 89.69 0.88 89.89 1.08 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 67.02 85.32 18.31 89.57 22.55 89.76 22.74 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 75.07 82.54 7.46 87.71 12.63 87.51 12.44 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 65.59 84.55 18.96 89.35 23.76 89.55 23.96 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 33.26 67.61 34.35 69.89 36.63 73.68 40.43 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 52.24 73.87 21.63 74.43 22.19 78.64 26.40 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.33 66.04 31.71 68.61 34.28 72.87 38.54 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 18.45 65.96 47.51 68.30 49.85 68.81 50.36 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 30.93 72.83 41.91 73.40 42.47 73.08 42.15 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 19.98 64.66 44.68 67.26 47.27 67.82 47.84 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.30 50.33 40.04 53.39 43.09 54.08 43.78 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 26.03 61.82 35.79 59.94 33.92 59.22 33.20 All 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 11.49 47.53 36.03 51.05 39.56 51.83 40.34 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 84.08 90.05 5.97 87.71 3.63 87.97 3.89 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 84.86 84.21 -0.65 81.55 -3.30 81.14 -3.72

Draft (4

/24/17

)



Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 88.63 93.13 4.50 89.57 0.94 89.78 1.15 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 61.42 89.86 28.44 86.79 25.36 87.06 25.64 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 74.22 81.90 7.68 79.59 5.38 79.20 4.98 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 68.01 92.98 24.97 88.56 20.55 88.80 20.79 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 32.20 75.56 43.37 75.19 42.99 75.92 43.73 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 49.88 73.51 23.64 70.20 20.32 70.06 20.18 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 34.65 77.79 43.14 76.72 42.08 77.50 42.86 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 5.91 65.61 59.70 66.82 60.90 66.70 60.78 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 32.40 69.95 37.55 66.84 34.43 66.28 33.88 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 12.63 69.06 56.44 69.47 56.84 69.21 56.58 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 5.12 52.10 46.98 55.63 50.51 55.85 50.72 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 29.09 63.44 34.35 59.46 30.37 58.94 29.85 Low Inc 0.25 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 10.89 52.76 41.86 56.62 45.73 56.82 45.93 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (All Routes) Percent 97.86 97.98 0.12 98.28 0.43 98.35 0.49 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (All Routes) Percent 95.40 94.97 -0.43 95.13 -0.26 94.70 -0.70 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (All Routes) Percent 98.04 98.13 0.09 98.44 0.40 98.50 0.46 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 30 minute) Percent 88.40 97.84 9.43 98.27 9.86 98.33 9.93 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 30 minute) Percent 90.29 94.46 4.16 95.02 4.73 94.59 4.29 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 30 minute) Percent 89.86 97.81 7.96 98.41 8.56 98.48 8.62 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 20 minute) Percent 44.34 87.54 43.20 89.83 45.49 90.33 45.99 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 20 minute) Percent 65.14 88.08 22.94 87.60 22.46 87.55 22.41 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 20 minute) Percent 42.90 86.91 44.01 89.72 46.82 90.40 47.50 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 15 minute) Percent 8.33 86.96 78.63 88.83 80.49 89.23 80.90 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 15 minute) Percent 36.05 86.21 50.15 85.89 49.83 85.52 49.46 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 15 minute) Percent 16.91 86.89 69.98 89.05 72.14 89.51 72.60 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Pop (<= 10 minute) Percent 8.32 68.34 60.03 74.09 65.77 75.02 66.70 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible Emp (<= 10 minute) Percent 34.87 81.02 46.15 77.48 42.61 77.08 42.21 Low Inc 0.5 Mile Transit Accessible HH (<= 10 minute) Percent 16.90 64.82 47.92 72.42 55.52 73.57 56.67 Average Low Income Peak Trip Time Minutes 15.26 14.61 -0.65 14.21 -1.06 14.41 -0.85 Peak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.20 -0.60 88.44 0.65 88.62 0.83 Peak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.80 87.20 -0.60 88.45 0.65 88.64 0.84 Peak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 6.18 9.22 3.04 10.50 4.33 10.55 4.37 OffPeak DA Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 87.05 -0.54 88.49 0.90 88.72 1.13 OffPeak SR Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 87.59 87.05 -0.54 88.54 0.94 88.77 1.18 OffPeak Transit Percent Work Trips < 30 minutes Percent 7.19 9.26 2.06 10.03 2.83 10.27 3.08 Percent of Population to Airport Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 50.85 50.71 -0.14 51.92 1.06 52.25 1.39 Percent of Population to Beach Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 20.36 21.04 0.68 21.80 1.44 21.64 1.28 Percent of Population to Building Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.58 32.13 1.55 33.00 2.42 33.05 2.47 Percent of Population to College/Univ Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 49.80 50.03 0.22 52.48 2.68 52.38 2.57 Percent of Population to Hospital Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 30.74 31.68 0.95 33.05 2.31 33.44 2.71 Percent of Population to Park Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 76.90 77.21 0.31 78.85 1.95 79.21 2.31 Percent of Population to Post Office Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 25.15 25.79 0.64 26.08 0.93 25.79 0.65 Percent of Population to School Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 90.69 90.81 0.12 91.57 0.88 91.64 0.95 Percent of Population to all Amenities in 5 minutes. Percent 92.77 92.82 0.05 93.56 0.79 93.73 0.95

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Appendix 4: Revenue Sources

Appendix 4 provides a description of all funding sources applicable to the Santa Barbara County region.

Federal Funding Programs

Federal funding programs are currently authorized by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). Federal funding is largely apportioned to the states. FAST Act funding programs not applicable to the region are not listed. Nearly all federal funding programs provide support at either the 80 percent or 90 percent level.

Federal-Aid Highway Program National Highway Performance Program This program funds projects on that maintain or improve the National Highway System and that support the implementation of each state’s asset management plan.

Surface Transportation Block Grant Program This program provides significant allocation flexibility to the states. With a few exceptions, the funds must be used on non-local roads. Eligible projects include bridges, tunnels, intelligent transportation systems capital projects and transit capital projects. The program includes a Transportation Alternatives set-aside to provide funding for trails, bicycle, and pedestrian projects.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The HSIP program provides funding to states for projects that aim to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all roads. Each state has the flexibility to determine the projects that meet the program requirements, but in general projects require consistency with each states’ Strategic Highway Safety Program.

Railway-Highway Crossings Program This program funds projects that improve the safety of railway-highway grade crossings.

Metropolitan Planning Program This program provides funding for Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), such as SBCAG, to carry out federally-required planning activities.

National Highway Freight Program This program provides funding for projects that contribute to the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network. There are a wide variety of eligible freight-related project types. By 2018, each state is required to have a freight plan and the program’s funds will then be used to implement the plan.

Federal Lands and Tribal Transportation Tribal Transportation The purpose of this program is to provide funding assistance for projects located on tribal lands, or connecting tribal lands with non-tribal areas. The funds are allocated directly to the tribes. In the SBCAG region the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians receives roughly $90,000 per year.

Federal Lands Transportation This program provides funding for projects located on property owned or managed by the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, US Army Corps of

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 0 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, or other agencies with similar responsibilities. Funding is apportioned

directly to the federal agencies.

Federal Lands Access This program provides funding assistance for transportation facilities, including transit, that provide connections to high-use recreation sites and economic generators. Program funds are apportioned to the states.

Miscellaneous Federal Programs Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) TIFIA is not a funding program, per se, but provides federal financing assistance for large projects. At the time of publication only one project in California, and none in the Santa Barbara County region has used the TIFIA program.

Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects This is a discretionary grant program, FASTLANE, which provides funding through a nationwide competitive grant process. Roughly $850 million is awarded annually for projects that benefit freight by removing bottlenecks and overhauling major freight corridors.

Federal Transit Administration Programs The following programs are funded through the FAST Act and administered by the Federal Transit Administration to support and improve transit systems across the country.

Bus and Bus Facilities (5339) This program contains a formula subprogram (a) and a discretionary subprogram (b). Funding is allocated by formula for the purchase or rehabilitation of buses and related equipment. 5339(b) provides grants for the purchase of low and no-emission buses.

Metropolitan and Statewide Planning Program (5303/5304) This program provides funding to states and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), such as SBCAG, to carry out required planning and administrative activities.

Urbanized Area Formula Program (5307) This program provides funding for nearly all aspects of administering a public transit service in an urbanized area of 50,000 persons or greater. Capital, planning, engineering, and other expenses are eligible. For transit operators serving an area between 50,000 and 200,000 people operating costs are an eligible expense.

Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (5310) This program provides funding for private non-profit organizations to provide transportation services to seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Formula Grants for Rural Areas (5311) This program is similar to 5307 except that it is for areas with populations less than 50,000. All aspects of providing transit services are eligible expenses.

State Funding Programs

Draft (4

/24/17

)


State funding programs are funded largely with various forms of fuel taxes and vehicle fees. Most programs

receive additional funding from the federal sources previously discussed. Cap-and-Trade programs are the exception. These programs are funded with revenues generated through the auction of greenhouse gas emission credits. Statewide bond programs are frequently a source of funding, however at the time of publication there were no active statewide bond programs.

State Fuel Tax Highway Programs State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The STIP program is funded with 44 percent of State and federal fuel taxes after debt service is satisfied. The program provides funding for capacity-adding projects. It contains two subprograms, the ITIP and RTIP, discussed below.

Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) The ITIP receives 25 percent of STIP funding. Projects are programmed by Caltrans and include an intercity rail set aside.

Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) The RTIP subprogram receives 75 percent of STIP funds. Projects are programmed by Regional Transportation Planning Agencies, such as SBCAG.

Local Streets and Roads This program is funded with 44 percent of State and federal fuel taxes and is passed directly to cities and counties. Funds are aimed at improving local transportation infrastructure.

State Highway Operation and Protection Plan (SHOPP) The SHOPP program provides funding for pavement rehabilitation, operation, and safety improvements on state highways and bridges. Programming is controlled by Caltrans. The program receives a 12 percent share of State and federal fuel taxes after debt service is satisfied.

Active Transportation Program This program combines State and federal funding to fund bicycle, pedestrian, and trail projects through a competitive grant process. Large MPOs are allocated a regional proportion of statewide funds. Small MPOs, such as SBCAG, compete for the remaining funds.

Cap-and-Trade Programs Since 2013 California has been collecting revenue from the auctioning of greenhouse gas emission credits. Funds generated through the program are to be used to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions. There are numerous subprograms, and two are relevant to the Santa Barbara County region.

Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) Projects selected to receive LCTOP funding support new or improved transit services, or are for transit-related facilities and equipment. Projects must demonstrate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. LCTOP receives five percent of auction proceeds and the funds are allocated to regions. Each region then selects projects for funding.

Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program (AHSC) Funds from the AHSC program are awarded through annual competitive grant cycles. Eligible projects include affordable housing projects and transportation-related infrastructure, though primarily aimed at transit, bicycle, or pedestrian modes. Projects successful in obtaining this funding are along the line of smart growth

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 0 8 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

or transit-oriented development. The Santa Barbara County region has not been successful in obtaining

funds through this program.

State Transit Programs State Transit Assistance (STA) The STA program is one of two programs falling under the Transportation Development Act (1971). The program is funded by a statewide sales tax on diesel fuel. Fifty percent of program funds are apportioned to region’s based on a population-based formula. The remaining 50 percent are apportioned by a formula considering each operator’s prior year farebox collections. STA funds must be spent for transit related purposes.

Local Transportation Funds (LTF) The LTF program, along with the STA program, comprise the Transportation Development Act (1971). The program is funded by ¼-cent of the statewide sales tax. LTF funds are apportioned by the State to the county of origin for the tax revenue. Regions apportion the funding to local transit operators. The funding can be used for a wide variety of transit-related purposes. Jurisdictions satisfying all reasonable to meet transit needs, and not using all LTF funding on transit, may use remaining funds on local streets and roads projects given certain conditions are met.

Local Funding Programs

Local funding for transportation comes from a variety of sources and for each jurisdiction the mix of funding differs. Most local funding is not programmed by SBCAG and therefore SBCAG does not track values or expenditures. Sources not tracked include, but are not limited to: developer impact fees, general fund revenues, local taxes, mitigation funds, transit advertising revenues, real property leases, and others.

Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) Program Counties in California have the authority to place a $1 per vehicle registration surcharge on each vehicle registered within the County. This surcharge provides for the management, installation, operation, and maintenance of all SAFE programs, which includes the Freeway Service Patrol and Santa Barbara County Callbox Program

Measure A At the time of passage Measure A was estimated to generate $1.050 billion over thirty (2010–2040) years for road repair, traffic relief, and transportation safety projects and programs in Santa Barbara County. Actual amounts depend on sales tax revenue collected each year. Measure A is funded via a ½-cent sales tax collected in Santa Barbara County.

The Measure A Investment Plan is divided into three program categories:

• US 101 South Coast Widening - $140 million

• North County Program - $455 million

• South Coast Program - $455 million

Within the North and South County programs there are a variety of subprojects, some of which were named prior to the Measure’s passage and some are discretionary. Following is a summary of the subprograms:

Named Projects Measure A will provide / has provided funding for a variety of projects listed in the Investment Plan.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


• US 101 South Coast Widening

• US 101/Betteravia interchange

• US 101/CA 135 interchange

• US 101/McCoy interchange

• US 101 Santa Maria River Bridge

• US 101/UVP interchange

• CA 166 safety improvements

• CA 246 passing lanes

• CA 246/Santa Ynez River Bridge

• Circulation improvements (Buellton, Carpinteria, Guadalupe, Solvang)

• US 101 overpass (Goleta)

Approximately 22% of Measure A funding is allocated to named projects.

Bicycle and Pedestrian/Safe Routes to School Measure A provides funding for bicycle, pedestrian, and safe routes to school projects in both North and South County through competitive grant processes.

Bicycle and Pedestrian projects receive approximately 3% of Measure A funding, not counting any LSTI program funding (discussed below) allocated to bicycle or pedestrian projects.

Transit Transit projects will receive approximately 14% of Measure A revenues. Measure A provides funding for the following transit projects:

• interregional transit,

• specialized transit for the elderly and disabled, and

• South Coast transit capital and operations.

Transportation Demand Management/Carpool and Vanpool Program Measure A will provide funding for Transportation Demand Management/Carpool and Vanpool Program. Funds are used in partnership with employers that are seek to improve employee retention and mitigate the jobs/housing imbalance by expanding commute options for their employees.

Transportation Demand Management/Carpool and Vanpool Program projects will receive approximately 1% of Measure A revenues.

Commuter and Passenger Rail The South Coast’s portion of Measure A will provide funding for commuter and passenger rail planning and service improvements. The project will help improve passenger rail service between Ventura and Goleta to reduce congestion on Highway 101 and provide commuters will an alternative to driving. About 2/3 of the funding will be used for operating expenses, with the remaining third for capital expenses.

Commuter and Passenger Rail projects will receive approximately 2% of Measure A revenues.

Local Street and Transportation Improvements (LSTI) Measure A LSTI funds projects of local importance selected by city councils and the Board of Supervisors. Projects eligible for funding include projects such as pothole repairs, safety improvements, bridge repairs, and

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 1 0 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

traffic signal synchronization. Each jurisdiction must spend a percentage of their funds on eligible alternative

transportation projects.

LSTI receives approximately 58% of Measure A funding.

Transit Fare Revenue Transit operators receive passenger fare revenue. The amount in the RTP is the sum of the passenger fare revenues for all transit operators based on the FY 2008/09 amounts in the FY 2007-2009 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Performance Audit Reports (October 2010).

MTD-UCSB Mitigation Agreement In 2010 UCSB updated its Long Range Development Plan which included accommodating an additional 5,000 students by 2025. To mitigate the transportation impacts of the growth USCB and MTD came to an agreement for UCSB to fund additional MTD service focused primarily on the UCSB campus community. These funds, approximately $1.75 million per year are dedicated entirely to mitigating the transportation impact through expanded transit service.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Appendix 5: Legal Requirements

SBCAG serves the roles of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the Santa Barbara County region. In these roles, SBCAG is required to prepare this long-range regional transportation plan to, among other things, prioritize the investment of federal and State transportation funding, and must follow various federal and State laws and guidelines in the planning process. The RTP is an action-oriented document used to achieve a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system.

Under California law, SBCAG also has the responsibility to prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as part of the RTP. The SCS sets forth a forecasted development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from passenger vehicles and light trucks to achieve the GHG reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board (ARB).

Federal Title 23 of the U.S. Code, Subsection 134, Metropolitan Transportation Planning, requires federally-designated MPOs such as SBCAG to develop long-range transportation plans.4 SBCAG must develop the RTP, in cooperation with the State and public transportation operators, through a performance-driven, outcome-based approach to planning.5 Federal transportation policy and funding are set by surface transportation bills, currently the FAST Act. Other federal requirements arise from various other laws, such as the Clean Air Act and others.

FAST ACT The most recent federal transportation legislation, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), which was enacted in 2015 and updates the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP–21), largely kept MAP-21 planning requirements in place, but changed several aspects for project programming:

• Quicker project review and approval processes;

• New formula and discretionary funding programs for freight projects;

• Creation of the National Surface Transportation and Innovative Finance Bureau to streamline funding; and other less significant changes.

Fast Forward 2040 embraces a performance-based approach involving the development and comparison of multiple, alternative planning scenarios, as first required by MAP-21 and continued with the FAST Act.

Consultation and Coordination The FAST Act requires that SBCAG consult with “State and local agencies responsible for land use management, natural resources, environmental protection, conservation, and historic preservation” about the development of the RTP.6 Consultation involves comparing the RTP with State conservation plans or maps and to inventories of natural or historic resources.

The FAST Act encourages SBCAG to “consult with officials responsible for other types of planning activities that are affected by transportation in the area (including State and local planned growth, economic

4 23 U.S.C. §134(c). 5 23 U.S.C. §134(c)(1). 6 23 U.S.C. §134(i)(5).

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 1 2 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

development, environmental protection, airport operations, and freight movements) or to coordinate its

planning process, to the maximum extent practicable, with such planning activities.”7

Chapter 4 discusses how SBCAG complied with these requirements in the development and drafting of Fast Forward 2040.

Scope of Planning Process The FAST Act requires that the RTP planning process “provide for consideration of projects and strategies that will:

• support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;

• increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

• increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;

• increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight;

• protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;

• enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight;

• promote efficient system management and operation; and

• emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.”8

Public Participation Plan The FAST Act requires SBCAG develop a stand-alone participation plan that ensures all interested parties have reasonable opportunities to comment on the contents of the RTP.9 SBCAG first developed its Public Participation Plan in 1992 and updates it as necessary with reauthorizations of the federal transportation bill. SBCAG’s current Public Participation Plan was updated in 2015 and meets all current requirements.

Transportation Plan Contents The FAST Act requires that the RTP contain, at a minimum, the following:

• Identification of transportation facilities

• Performance measures and targets

• System performance report

• Mitigation activities

• Financial plan

• Operational and management strategies

• Capital investment and other strategies

• Transportation and transit enhancement activities10

Environmental Justice, Civil Rights SBCAG must consider social equity and environmental justice in the RTP. The legal basis for environmental justice (EJ) stems from the Civil Rights Act of 1964, along with Executive Order 12898 (February 1994), which states that “each Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying

7 23 U.S.C. §134(g)(3)(A). 8 23 U.S.C. §134(h)(1). 9 23 U.S.C. §134(i)(6). 10 23 U.S.C. §134(i)(2).

Draft (4

/24/17

)


and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of

its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations.” SBCAG must evaluate how the RTP might impact minority and low-income populations and must ensure that the RTP does not have a disproportionate adverse impact on such populations.

In addition, per 23 C.F.R. Section 450.316(a)(1)(vii), the participation plan that SBCAG must develop and use must describe explicit procedures, strategies, and desired outcomes for “[s]eeking out and considering the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems, such as low-income and minority households, who may face challenges accessing employment and other services.”

Chapter 4 examines the performance of the Fast Forward 2040 preferred scenario and includes a detailed social equity analysis and discussion of compliance with these requirements.

Federal Clean Air Act The “Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 is the primary federal law that governs air quality.”11 The federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) sets standards—National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)—for pollutants that have been linked to health concerns, including carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM), lead (Pb), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) designates an area as in attainment if it meets the NAAQS. On August 8, 2003, the U.S. EPA officially designated Santa Barbara County as an attainment area for the federal 1-hour ozone standard.12 On June 15, 2004, the U.S. EPA replaced the 1-hour ozone standard with a more stringent 8-hour ozone standard for Santa Barbara County and most of the country. The U.S. EPA designated Santa Barbara County as an attainment/unclassifiable area for the federal 8-hour ozone standard.

The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (APCD), in cooperation with SBCAG, prepares the Ozone Plans, (formerly called Clean Air Plans (CAP)) to address the requirements of the FCAA. Clean Air Plans provide an overview of air quality and air pollution sources and identify the pollution-control measures necessary to meet federal and State air quality standards. These requirements, as well as Santa Barbara County’s air quality, determine the schedule for plan development. Clean Air Plans affect the APCD’s rules, regulations, and other programs, as well as activities outside the APCD such as SBCAG’s transportation planning. The 2013 Clean Air Plan, adopted in 2015, refined and continued the implementation of the pollution-control measures. An update to this plan, the 2016 Ozone Plan, was adopted in 2016.

As Santa Barbara County was never designated non-attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard and is not obligated to develop a maintenance plan, since the federal 1-hour ozone standard has been revoked, the area is not presently subject to conformity requirements.13 In October 2015, U.S. EPA adopted new, more stringent ozone standards and an area determination for Santa Barbara County is expected in late 2017. All indications from air quality monitoring to date are that Santa Barbara County will remain in conformity with the new federal standards. However, since SBCAG prepares transportation control measures for the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District’s Ozone Plan under a memorandum of understanding with the APCD, transportation control measures are included and discussed in Chapter 3 of this plan for purposes of consistency.

Congestion Management Process 11 2010 RTP Guidelines, 87. 12 APCD. 2016 Ozone Plan. https://www.ourair.org/wp-content/uploads/Final-2016-Ozone-Plan-Approved-October-20-2016-1.pdf. 13 APCD. 2016 Ozone Plan. https://www.ourair.org/wp-content/uploads/Final-2016-Ozone-Plan-Approved-October-20-2016-1.pdf.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 1 4 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134(k)(3)(A) states the following:

Within a metropolitan planning area serving a transportation management area, the

transportation planning process under this section shall address congestion management

through a process that provides for effective management and operation, based on a

cooperatively developed and implemented metropolitan-wide strategy, of new and existing

transportation facilities eligible for funding under this title and chapter 53 of title 49 through

the use of travel demand reduction and operational management strategies.

Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134(k)(1)(A) explains that each urbanized area (UZA) with a population of over 200,000 individuals shall be identified as a transportation management area (TMA). The largest UZA in the SBCAG region is the Santa Barbara UZA, with a population of 195,861 per the 2010 Census. Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134(k)(1)(B), however, allows the designation of any area as a TMA at the “request of the Governor and the metropolitan planning organization designated for the area.” SBCAG sought and was granted designation as a TMA in 1992. This additional requirement did not create much of an additional administrative burden as it was modeled after California’s congestion management program statutes and SBCAG already served as the Congestion Management Agency under State law.

As a federally-designated TMA, Title 23 C.F.R. Section 450.320 applies to SBCAG. Title 23 C.F.R. Sections 450.320(b) and (c) explain the requirements for the Congestion Management Process (CMP). For example:

• The development of the CMP should result in multimodal system performance measures and strategies that can be reflected in the RTP.

• Consideration should be given to “strategies that manage demand, reduce single occupant vehicle (SOV) travel, and improve transportation system management and operations.”

• “The CMP shall be developed, established, and implemented as part of the metropolitan transportation planning process that includes coordination with transportation system management and operations activities.”

SBCAG’s 2016 Congestion Management Plan fulfills both federal and State congestion management requirements.

State As explained in the 2010 Regional Transportation Guidelines (RTP) Guidelines, the primary State requirements regarding RTPs are addressed in Gov. Code Section 65080. Gov. Code Section 65080(a) requires SBCAG to “prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system, including, but not limited to, mass transportation, highway, railroad, maritime, bicycle, pedestrian, goods movement, and aviation facilities and services.” Gov. Code Section 65080(a) goes on to say that an RTP-SCS “shall be action-oriented and pragmatic, considering both the short-term and long-term future, and shall present clear, concise policy guidance to local and state officials.” The California Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted updated RTP Guidelines in January 2017, as this plan was developed. The updated Guidelines first apply to all RTPs started after the January 2017 adoption of the RTP Guidelines.14 As a result, SBCAG applied the 2010 RTP Guidelines in preparing this plan update.

California Senate Bill (SB) 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, introduced some changes to the State requirements, in particular, the inclusion of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) in the RTP. SB 375’s requirements are discussed in more detail below.

14 2017 RTP Guidelines, 4.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


An RTP-SCS is also subject to other State laws and regulations such as the California Environmental Quality

Act (CEQA). Major State requirements are described below.

SB 375 California Senate Bill 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375), requires each MPO to demonstrate, through the development of an SCS, or Alternative Planning Strategy (APS) how its region will or could integrate transportation, housing, and land use planning to meet the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets set by the State, while accommodating forecast growth. In addition to creating requirements for MPOs, it also creates requirements for the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and the California Air Resources Board (ARB). Some of the requirements include the following:

• The CTC must maintain guidelines for the travel demand models MPOs develop for use in the preparation of their RTPs.

• The ARB must develop regional GHG emission reduction targets for automobiles and light trucks for 2020 and 2035 by September 30, 2010.

• Each MPO must prepare an SCS as part of its RTP to demonstrate how it will meet the regional GHG targets.

• Each MPO must adopt a public participation plan for development of the SCS that includes informational meetings, workshops, public hearings, consultation, and other outreach efforts.

• If an SCS cannot achieve the regional GHG target, the MPO must prepare an alternative planning strategy (APS) showing how it would achieve the targets with alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or transportation measures and policies.

• Each MPO must prepare and circulate a draft SCS at least 55 days before it adopts a final RTP.

• After adoption, each MPO must submit its SCS to the ARB for review.

• The ARB must review each SCS to determine whether or not, if implemented, it would meet the GHG targets. The ARB must complete its review within 60 days.

SB 375 also has implications for local governments, primarily related to local housing elements and to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). For example, it extends the housing element revision cycle from five to eight years for local governments in certain regions. In addition, it exempts “transit priority projects” from the assessment of transportation impacts in CEQA if they meet certain requirements and are consistent with the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s SCS.

SBCAG’s greenhouse gas reduction targets applicable to this round of the RTP-SCS are zero percent per capita growth over 2005 levels for target years 2020 and 2035.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Government Code Section 21000 et seq., commonly referred to as the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), and its implementing regulations in 14 CCR Section 15000 et seq., commonly referred to as the CEQA Guidelines, require the evaluation of environmental impacts associated with all proposed planning programs or development projects. CEQA applies to the RTP-SCS and may also apply to the individual projects that implement the RTP-SCS.

To comply with CEQA, SBCAG typically prepares a program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to analyze the environmental impacts of the RTP-SCS. The EIR is an informational document for use by SBCAG, other agencies, and the general public in their consideration and evaluation of the environmental consequences of implementing the RTP-SCS.

Draft (4

/24/17

)

1 1 6 F A S T F O R W A R D 2 0 4 0

SB 743 (2014) changes CEQA to no longer consider congestion as an environmental impact. Level of

Service (LOS) is being replaced with Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) as the primary metric for analyzing transportation impacts. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) was in the process of finalizing CEQA Guidelines for SB 743 implementation as this plan was being developed. The Supplement to an EIR prepared for this RTP-SCS relies on LOS as the CEQA significance threshold.

The development of Fast Forward 2040 involved only relatively minor changes to the previously adopted RTP-SCS and therefore SBCAG is preparing a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) to satisfy CEQA requirements. The SEIR will analyze the potential environmental impacts of the differences between the two iterations of the RTP-SCS.

California Clean Air Act As explained in the 2010 RTP Guidelines,15 the “California Clean Air Act in the Health and Safety Code… is generally similar in concept to the Federal Clean Air Act.”16 Under the California Clean Air Act, the California Air Resources Board sets State air quality standards, which are usually more stringent than the federal standards. Santa Barbara County is in attainment of the State 1-hour ozone standard, but has yet to attain the State 8-hour ozone standard.17 However, the County’s status has shifted to Nonattainment transitional by operation of law at the end of 2016.

The California Clean Air Act does not include fixed attainment deadlines and conformity processes like those found in the FCAA. There are no State requirements for RTPs under the California Clean Air Act. However, per the 2010 RTP Guidelines,18 “air quality is normally addressed as part of the CEQA environmental documentation for the RTP.”19

The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (APCD), in cooperation with SBCAG, prepared the 2016 Ozone Plan to address the requirements of the California Clean Air Act.

Congestion Management Program Gov. Code Section 65089(a) states that, in counties that include urbanized areas, a “congestion management program shall be developed, adopted, and updated biennially.” Gov. Code Section 65089(b) describes what the congestion management program must contain, including traffic level of service (LOS) standards established for a system of highways and roadways designated by SBCAG, performance measures, a travel demand element that promotes alternative transportation methods, a program to analyze the impacts of land use decisions made by local jurisdictions on regional transportation systems including an estimate of the costs associated with mitigating those impacts, and a seven-year capital improvement program.

The requirement to develop a Congestion Management Program (CMP) first came into effect with the passage of Proposition 111 (1990), which increased the gas tax to fund congestion management. SBCAG became the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for Santa Barbara County and established the CMP in 1991.

The intent of the CMP is to address congestion on highways and principal arterials through a coordinated approach to state, regional, county, and local transportation and land use polices. Santa Barbara County’s CMP requires local agencies to maintain their regionally significant transportation facilities at a LOS standard 15 http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/orip/rtp/index.html. 16 2010 RTP Guidelines, 87. 17 APCD. 2013 Clean Air Plan. 18 http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/orip/rtp/index.html. 19 2010 RTP Guidelines, 90.

Draft (4

/24/17

)


of “D” or better and, if they cannot, to develop a deficiency plan that includes actions to improve circulation

and air quality. Local agencies may choose to mitigate through capital improvement or approved system-wide strategies. Agencies that do not meet SBCAG’s CMP standards risk losing certain portions of new gas tax revenues.

Within the RTP-SCS, the action element must “consider congestion management programming activities carried out within the region.”20

SBCAG’s 2016 CMP fulfills both federal and State congestion management requirements and is consistent with the RTP.

Public Participation Plan SB 375 requires that SBCAG adopt a public participation plan for development of the SCS that includes informational meetings, workshops, public hearings, consultation, and other outreach efforts. SBCAG updated the Regional Transportation Plan & Sustainable Communities Strategy Public Participation Plan for this plan cycle. As discussed above, SBCAG must also prepare a separate, federally-required public participation plan for the agency as a whole. The public participation plan prepared for this project is intended to meet the State (SB 375) requirements.

20 Gov. Code §65080(b)(3).

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Appendix 6: Comments and Responses

INSERT HERE

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)


Appendix 7: Adopting Resolution

INSERT HERE

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Draft (4

/24/17

)

260 North San Antonio Road, Suite B, Santa Barbrara, CA 93110 T 805.961.8900 F 805.961.8901

www.sbcag.org

Draft (4

/24/17

)

Documents

Appendices - SBCAGmeetings.sbcag.org/Meetings/Joint TTAC TPAC JTAC/2017/05 May/… · APPENDICES 1 Appendix 1: Glossary and Acronyms. ... law to be consistent with the ALUP. ... APCD