Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Appendix 6:
All completed SNA assessment forms
Appendix to the report:
Napier Significant Natural Areas Assessment
T.S. Cornes, C.L. Kirby, R.L. Johnson, B.D. Clarkson
ERI Report number: 124
Prepared for Napier City Council
Environmental Research Institute
University of Waikato
September 2019
2
Table of Contents Hills .................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Esk Hill 1 ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Esk Hill 2 ......................................................................................................................................................... 9
Esk Hill 3 ....................................................................................................................................................... 15
Esk Hill 4 ....................................................................................................................................................... 19
Esk Hill 5 ....................................................................................................................................................... 23
Esk Hill 6 ....................................................................................................................................................... 28
Esk Hill 7 ....................................................................................................................................................... 32
Esk Hill 8 ....................................................................................................................................................... 36
Esk Hill 9 ....................................................................................................................................................... 40
Esk Hill 10 ..................................................................................................................................................... 44
Esk Hill 11 ..................................................................................................................................................... 48
Esk Hill 12 ..................................................................................................................................................... 52
Kaiangaroa ................................................................................................................................................... 56
Bluff hill (Mataruahou) ................................................................................................................................ 60
Lake Rotokaramu ......................................................................................................................................... 64
Halliwell Reserve 1....................................................................................................................................... 68
Halliwell Reserve 2....................................................................................................................................... 72
Dolbel Reserve 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 76
Dolbel Reserve 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 80
Otatara Park................................................................................................................................................. 85
Otatara Pa 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 89
Otatara Pa 2 ................................................................................................................................................. 93
Otatara Pa 3 ................................................................................................................................................. 97
Saline plain..................................................................................................................................................... 101
Ahuriri Estuary (Upper Ahuriri).................................................................................................................. 101
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 107
Ahuriri Estuary (Mid-Ahuriri Estuary) ........................................................................................................ 108
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 112
Ahuriri Estuary (Taipo Stream) .................................................................................................................. 113
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 116
Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Ponds).............................................................................................. 117
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 122
Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Wetland) .......................................................................................... 123
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 126
Ahuriri Estuary (Lower Ahuriri Estuary) ..................................................................................................... 127
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 130
3
Bayview Wetland ....................................................................................................................................... 131
Ahuriri Plain Wetland ................................................................................................................................ 137
Embankment Road Wetland ..................................................................................................................... 141
Plains .............................................................................................................................................................. 145
Westshore Reserve Bush ........................................................................................................................... 145
Harakeke Reserve ...................................................................................................................................... 150
SH50 planting............................................................................................................................................. 154
Friend’s Bush ............................................................................................................................................. 158
Coastal ........................................................................................................................................................... 162
Esplanade Herbfield................................................................................................................................... 162
References ..................................................................................................................................................... 166
Field sheets adapted from Cornes, Thomson, Clarkson 2012. Significance criterea (Source from Draft National Poicy
Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity, Biodiversity Collaborative Group 2018 pp. 72-76)
4
Hills
Esk Hill 1 Site number: 1
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933315E, 5631346N Date: 28.2.19
Area m²: 32400.71 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or
pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA) M Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures: Fencing and planting
Fencing (tick one)
No fencing
Some fencing x Mostly fenced
Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? No Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Overview
4 Vine/shed
3 Overview
5
Site Map
Site Description
A-B: Kunzea robusta dominant vegetation on one side of gully only (patchy with canopy holes and dieback) and
grass cover with weeds. Other side of this block is a diverse planting with much lower canopy and younger. Kunzea
robusta unit has been used to dump organic plant rubbish.
C: Planted weedy site nearby.
D-F: Gully site dominated by Kunzea robusta canopy. Pasture grass groundcover.
Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating
(1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet
criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various sprcies planted on one side
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
6
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area
1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka
forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has
special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
estimate
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 70 Kunzea robusta forest
2 1 A 4 1 30 Mixed podocarp-broadleaved forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Kunzea robusta, Melicytus ramiflorus, Coprosma repens, Cordyline australis, Pseudopanax hybrid, Dodonaea
viscosa, Podocarpus totara, Veronica spp, Sophora tetraptera, Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum crassifolium,
Griselinia littoralis, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum eugenioides, Piper excelsa, Solanum laciniatum,
Phormium cookianum, Muehlenbecka spp
Rumex sagittatus, thistle, Alocasia brisbanensis, Pinus, Aredera cordifolia, Eucalyptus, Banksia integrifolia,
Agapanthus praecox, Tropaeolum majus, Chamaecytisus proliferus, pasture grass, Conyza spp, Solanum nigrum,
Ginkgo biloba, Carex leporina, Cortaderia selloana, Persea Americana, Lilium formosanum
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. U
nit 1
Un
it 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √ ☐
7
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐ √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ √
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ √
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
√ ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Quail, fantail, bellbird
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Un
it 1
Un
it 2
Notes for dominant
Species etc
Comments & suggested
management
Ground cover
weeds
1 Very common, cover
>50% ground area. ☐ ☐
Solanum nigrum, Tropaeolum
majus,
Rumex sagittatus
Will be shaded out with closed
canopy
2 Common, 10%-50%
ground area. √ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
ground area. ☐ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50%
canopy cover. ☐ ☐
Aredera cordifolia, Rumex
sagittatus
Poison or pull vine. Take care when
removing tubers to not spread to
other areas 2 Common, 10%50%
canopy cover. √ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
canopy cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. ☐ √
8
Shrub/Tree
Weeds
1 Very common, <50%
understorey or canopy
cover.
☐ ☐
Pinus, Banksia integrifolia,
Chamaecytisus proliferus, Persea
americana
Drill and poison large trees what
are a seed source
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy
cover.
√ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit
1
Unit
2
Notes
Species etc.
Comments suggested
management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof
prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard Or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest /vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
2 Planting Positive Continue
Both Rubbish dumping Negative Stop
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds like Tropaeolum majus. Plant area to link this SNA to other SNA Esk Hill sites. Deter
people from dumping rubbish as it can spread weeds and is a health and safety risk. New native plantings at high
densities to reduce weed invasion.
Notes:
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:
hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
9
Esk Hill 2 Site number: 2
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932652E, 5631051N Date: 29.2.19
Area m²: 137521.8 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures: Pest control
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? No Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
3 Overview
6-9 Weta boxes
10-17
Aerial view
10
Site Map
Site Description
All Esk sites: Esk Hill originally grazed planted a patch each year. Beginning to plant under Kunzea robusta. Large
Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Resident society owned. 3 to 4 archaeological sites eg
PA. 53 house lots on Esk Hill.
A, C, D, E, G-I: Kunzea robusta canopy with Pyrrosia epiphytes, Microsorum around them on ground. Lot of natural
regeneration of Corynocarpus laevigatus, Piper excelsum and Kunzea robusta. Young planting area joins on,
Ozothamnus leptophyllus mostly and sparse. Extensive planting and under planting undertaken. Soil well drained,
north facing especially. Alectryon excelsus and Podocarpus totara forest relictual according to marie taylor.
Introduced weta. Beginning to see possums. Weasel presence in gully. Four detention dams. limestone faces.
B: Has an exotic broadleaved unit. Lot of Chamaecytisus proliferus at edge and grassy patches. Deeper gully is steep
with Kunzea robusta canopy and grass groundcover. Potentially grazed. High weed presence.
F: Well drained top ridge abundant Kunzea robusta. Lower half and flats covered in Rubus fruticosus. Steep hill
limestone.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating
(1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet
criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various planted native species
11
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Falcon, weta, Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Phyllocladus trichomainoides
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area
1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka
forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special
ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site 2 Largest Napier City hill site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
estimate
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 15 Kunzea robusta forest
2 1 A 2 2 15 Mixed broadleaved-exotic dominated forest
3 1 A 6 1 30 Kunzea robusta/ Piper excelsum- Melicytus ramiflorus forest
4 1 A 2,6 1 10 Kunzea robusta-Myoporum laetum / Melicytus ramiflorus forest
5 1 A 12, 6 2 30 Kunzea robusta/ Ulex europaeus forest
12
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Metrosideros excelsa, Cordyline australis, Pseudeopanax crassifolius, Sophora tetraptera, Dodonaea viscosa,
Podocarpus totara, Hoheria populnea, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum crassifolium, Pittosporum
eugenioides, Phormium cookianum, Alectryon excelsus, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Coprosma robusta, Piper
excelsum, Pseudopanax hybrid, Veronica spp. cultivars, Pteris macilenta, Veronica stricta, Sophora microphylla,
Griselinia littoralis, Microsorum pustulatum, Melicytus ramiflorus, Knightia excelsa, Pyrrosia eleagnifolia,
Muehlenbeckia australis, Beilschmiedia tarairi, Melicope ternata, Hedycarya arborea, Hoheria sexstylosa,
Pseudopanax ferox, Pseudopanax crassifolius, Dacrydium cupressinum, Carpodetus serratus, Cyathea medullaris,
Prumnopitys ferruginea, Typha orientalis, Myoporum laetum, Coprosma spathulata, Ripogonum scandens,
Coprosma crassifolia, Myrsine australis, Pseudopanax arboreus, Brachyglottis repanda, Aristotelia serrata,
Ozothamnus leptophyllus, Phormium tenax, Austroderia spp, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Coprosma propinqua,
Plagianthus regius, Nestegis montana, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Rhopalostylis sapida, coprosma grandifolia,
Phyllocladus trichomanoides, Pellaea rotundifolia, passiflora tetranda, Cyperus ustulatus, Teucrium parvifolium,
Blechnum parrisiae
Chamaecytisus proliferus, Pasture grass, Agapanthus praecox, Olea spp, Solanum nigrum, Eucalyptus spp, Rubus
fruticosus, Malus x domestica, Pinus spp, Callistemon spp, Ficus carica, Laurus nobilus, Thistle, Phytolacca octandra,
Pteridium esculentum, Actinidia spp, Paspalum dilatatum, Solanum linnaeanum, Ulex europaeus,
Foeniculum vulgare, Berberis vulgaris, Prunus Americana, Verbena bonariensis, Chichorium intybus, Carex leporina,
Pinus spp.
Vegetation condition
Rating
information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit
1
Unit
2
Unit
3
Unit
4
Unit 5
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Canopy
condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ √ √ √ √
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very
occasional dieback.
√ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less
palatable species. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ √
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively
abundant. ☐ √ ☐ ☐ ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐ √ √ ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings
etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder
of forest floor. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
13
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf
litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐ √ √ ☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%.
Leaf letter on remainder.
√ √ ☐ ☐ √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Sparrow, bellbird, falcon, harrier, blackbird, tūī, fernbird, morepork, quail, fantail, kereru, weta
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate
level)
Unit
1
Unit
2
Unit
3
Unit
4
Unit
5
Notes for dominant
Species etc
Comments &
suggested
management
Ground
cover weeds
1 Very common,
cover >50%
ground area.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Solanum nigrum Phytolacca
octandra, Foeniculum
vulgare, Rubus fruticosus
Spray Rubus from
open areas. Other
species should die
under a closed canopy
2 Common, 10%-
50% ground area. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ √
3 Occasional, up to
10% ground area.
√ √ √ √ ☐
4 None present. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common,
>50% canopy
cover.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Actinidia, Rubus fruticosus Remove from open
areas
2 Common,
10%50% canopy
cover.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ √
3 Occasional, up to
10% canopy
cover.
☐ √ √ √ ☐
4 None present. √ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Shrub/Tree
Weeds
1 Very common,
<50%
understorey or
canopy cover.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Chamaecytisus proliferus,
Ficus, Ulex europaeus, Prunus
americana, Pinus
Remove self-seeding
species. Drill and
poison trees
2 Common, 10%-
50% understorey
or canopy cover.
☐ √ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to
10% understorey
or canopy cover.
☐ ☐ √ √ √
4 None present. √ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
14
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit
1
Unit
2
Unit
3
Unit
4
Unit
5
Notes
Species
etc.
Comments
suggested
management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major
tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen
throughout area.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes
scattered. Occasional stock heard or seen,
confined to scattered areas on edge.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only
near edges. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √ √ √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Potentially grazed Negative Fence from stock
Pest management: 100 bs doc200s Positive Continue
Nest boxes for weta Positive Continue
Planting Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fence area from stock as currently natural regeneration is begin suppressed. Remove ecological weeds. Continue
pest control. Plant trees at higher densities to create a closed canopy.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:
hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
15
Esk Hill 3
Site number: 3
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932211.75E, 5631140N Date: 1.3.19
Area m²: 14263.4 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures: Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Overview of mixed unit
2/7
Kunzea robusta behind mixed unit
3
Grass area
Site Map
16
Site Description
Very dense forest patch dominated by Kunzea robusta. Has a closed canopy and is likely to be pest managed. Has been under planted. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. An open grass turf area separated sections of the block.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating
(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2
Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Some diversity of indigenous species
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical R
egime
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 80 Kunzea robusta forest
2 1 A 2 1 20 Sophora - mixed broadleaved forest
17
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Kunzea robusta, Pittosporum eugenioides, Phormium cookianum, Myoporum laetum, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pittosporum crassifolium, Coprosma robusta, Dodonaea viscosa, Pteris macilenta, Cordyline australis, Corokia x cheesemanii, Arthropodium cirratum, Coprosma hybrid, Pittosporum ralphii, Melicytus ramiflorus, Ozothamnus leptophyllus, Sophora tetraptera, Leptospermum scoparium, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Alectryon excelsus, Pseudopanax arboreus, Rhopalostylis sapida, Piper excelsum, Carex species.
Pasture grass, Paspalum dilatatum, Solanum nigrum, Thistle
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐ √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ √
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ √
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
√ ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Thrush, tūī, blackbird, silvereye, harrier
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Unit 2
Notes for dominant
Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐ Solanum nigrum thistle
Paspalum dilatatum Will be shaded out by a closed
canopy over time 2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐ ☐
18
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. ☐ √
4 None present. √ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √
Pest animals If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof
prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Planting Positive Increase
Likely pest managed Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant in canopy gaps. Underplant shade tolerant species in areas of dense canopy. Where possible plant to connect this site with other Esk Hill sites. Continue pest management.
Note
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
19
Esk Hill 4
Site number: 4
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932283.875E, 5630993N Date: 28.2.19
Area m²: 4491.65 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
x No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
2/3
Site view general
Site Map
20
Site Description
Young block at Esk Hill Road, well established. Is on private property near houses on a small rise. Dead pine present among shrubland.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating
(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation left on the hills in Napier City.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved shrubland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.) Phormium cookianum, Sophora tetraptera, Austroderia spp., Kunzea robusta, Leptospermum scoparium, Pittosporum ralphii, Coprosma robusta, Corokia x cheesemanii, Pteris tremula, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pittosporum eugenioides, Cordyline australis, Melicytus ramiflorus, Veronica stricta, Dodonaea viscosa, Hoheria angustifolia Pasture grass, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Pinus spp., thistle, Solanum nigrum, Conyza spp.
21
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √
Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Fantail
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Solanum nigrum Will be shaded out with canopy closure
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Cotoneaster glaucophyllus pinus
Cut or drill and poison
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
22
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Planting
Pest plant control
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Plant to reduce exposed margins. Plant to connect SNA to others.
Notes
23
Esk Hill 5
Site number: 5
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932206E, 5630895N Date: 29.2.19
Area m²: 27638 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA) M Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
General overview of vegetation
2/3
Pond/ecotone
24
Site Map
Site Description
Kunzea robusta canopy. There is a small pond/lake in the site with ecotones from raupō and Lemna in water and grasses and Carex around edge. SNA terrain is a mix of flats and steep gully. A walkway runs through. Planting has begun under Kunzea robusta canopy. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. High Solanum nigrum presence. Pest managed.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating
(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2
Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 High species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Sedge and grass to Typha orientalis and Lemna
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Small wetland present
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
25
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
estimate
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 90 Kunzea robusta/ Piper excelsum forest
2 4 B 24 25 23 1 10 Typha orientalis/ Paspalum distichum Carex spp. wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Myoporum laetum, Pyrrosia eleagnifolia, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Blechnum parrisiae, Microsorum pustulatum, Griselinia littoralis, Veronica stricta, Asplenium polyodon, Muehlenbeckia australis, Dicksonia squarrosa, Pittosporum eugenioides, Pittosporum ralphii, Piper excelsum, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pteris tremula, Melicytus ramiflorus, Plagianthus regius, Podocarpus totara, Cyathea dealbata, Brachyglottis repanda, Coprosma robusta, Phormium cookianum, Kunzea robusta, Dodonaea viscosa, Cordyline australis, Sophora tetraptera, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Nestegis montana, Nestegis cunninghamii, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Helichrysum lanceolatum, Typha orientalis, Lemna spp, Cyperus ustulatus, Polystichum richardii, Veronica spp. cultivar
Solanum nigrum, Verbena bonariensis, Paspalum distichum, pasture grasses, Foeniculum vulgare, Pinus radiata, Rubus fruticosus, Erigeron karvinskianus, Helminthotheca echioides
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit.
Unit 1 Unit 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √ √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √ √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
√ ☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
☐ √
26
Wetland/Estuary Unit:2
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake √ Shallow water <2m √
Swamp ☐ Marsh ☐ Fen☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √
Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system?
Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes☐ No √ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity
Clear ☐ Water Quality
Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐
Translucent ☐
Opaque √
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation
Sedge/grass 60 Herbs 40 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation
Sedge/grass 100 Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte %
OBL 35 FACW 20 FAC 25 FACU 20 UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring √ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Fantail, chaffinch, blackbird, dragonfly, tūī
Threats Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Unit 2
Notes for dominant species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐ ☐
Erigeron karvinskianus Spray
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area.
√ √
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐ ☐
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐
Rubus fruticosus Spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. √ ☐
4 None present. ☐ √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
Pinus Remove any seedlings
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey
or canopy cover. √ ☐
4 None present. ☐ √
Pest animals
27
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √
Human Associated Activities (Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Pest managed Positive Continue
Planting Positive Continue at higher densities
Dogs off leash Neutral
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant in canopy gaps to close the canopy. Underplant dense canopy areas with shade tolerant species. Continue pest control. Plant areas between other Esk Hill sites to increase connectivity. Plant wetland species in and around the pond.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
28
Esk Hill 6
Site number: 6
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932870E, 5630734N Date: 1.3.19
Area m²: 2723.15 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
x No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
3/4
Mixed broadleaved unit
2
Kunzea robusta unit
Site Map
29
Site Description
Development planting of a previously grazed site. Species diverse however there is a lot of bare ground. Broadleaved mix with lot of exotics. 2nd unit is native with grass groundcover. Some Kunzea robusta regeneration is present among grasses.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating
(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2
Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planted, species diverse
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2
<1% native vegetation left on the hills within the Naiper City boundary. Contains some remnant Kunzea.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical R
egime
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 1 a 2 2 60 Mixed native-exotic broadleaved forest
2 1 a 6 2 1 40 Mixed broadleaved- Kunzea robusta forest
30
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Griselinia littoralis, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pittosporum eugenioides, Coprosma hybrid, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum crassifolium, Veronica stricta, Cordyline australis, Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum ralphii, Coprosma robusta, Kunzea robusta, Phormium tenax, Dodonaea viscosa, Phormium cookianum cultivar
Callistemon spp, Hydrangea macrophylla, Acer spp, Agapanthus praecox, pasture grass
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.
√ √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.
☐ ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. √ √
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
√ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
☐ √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Thrush, tūī, sparrow
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐
Agapanthus praecox Spray or had remove
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. √ ☐
4 None present. ☐ √
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √
31
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
Hydrangea, Acer spp, cultivars
Remove if reproducing
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey
or canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. √ ☐
4 None present. ☐ √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Weed management Posiitve Continue
Planting Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fence from stock. Underplant exotic dominant areas with naitves. Plant to reduce margins and connect to other SNA sites.
Notes
32
Esk Hill 7
Site number: 7
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932643E, 5630451N Date: 28.2.19
Area m²: 86138.1 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal m Reserve (TA) m Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? No Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
3
Weedy entrance
1
Carex/unit 2
Site Map
33
Site Description
This block is all built up planting, with Kunzea robusta the dominant species. High amount of weeds at the entry. There is a poorly drained gully at the bottom with rush and sedgeland (Unit 2). Drainage ditches are present. A walking track runs through starting at pavilion. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Rabbit seen.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Diverse planting of species
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site 2 Second largest hill site in Napier City
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 90 Kunzea robusta /Pteris tremula forest
2 5 B 23 24 1 10 Kunzea robusta / Carex spp- Cyperus ustulatus- Juncus pallidus forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Dodonaea viscosa, Sophora tetraptera, Coprosma robusta, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Kunzea robusta, Podocarpus totara, Veronica stricta, Cordyline australis, Carex secta, Carex geminata, Pittosporum eugenioides, Plagianthus regius, Pteris tremula, Carpodetus serratus, Coprosma areolata, Piper excelsum, Myoporum laetum, Solanum laciniatum, Alectryon excelsus, Melicytus ramiflorus, Brachyglottis repanda, Pseudopanax lessonii, Myrsine australis, Nestegis montana, Sophora microphylla, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Elaeocarpus dentatus, Melicope ternata,
34
Muehlenbeckia spp, Juncus pallidus, Phormium cookianum, Hoheria angustifolia, Cyperus ustulatus, Coprosma hybrid
Conyza spp, thistle, pasture grasses, Paspalum dilatatum, Cichorium intybus, Foeniculum vulgare, Verbena bonariensis, Solanum nigrum, Helminthotheca echioides
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √ ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ √
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √ √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
√ √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Fantail, greywarbler, quails, rabbit
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐
Thistle Verbena bonariensis Cichorium intybus Solanum
nigrum
Planting to close canopy should eliminate these
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. √ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
ground area. ☐ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
canopy cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
35
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage.
√ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Pruning around paths Negative Limit
Planting Positive Continue
Pest management Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Pruning of plants could be limited to only when plants are creating a hazard along paths. Continue pest management. Plant in canopy gaps to reduce weeds. Plant around the margins of the site to connect blocks within the SNA and this site to other Esk Hill sites.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
36
Esk Hill 8
Site number: 8
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932386E, 5630643N Date: 28.2.19
Area m² : 4797.61 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
x No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1/2
Site overview
Site Map
37
Site Description
Young block at Heipipi Drive, well established. Is on private property near houses on a small rise. Mixed broadleaved shrubs to small trees.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Diverse but has Metrosideros excelsa and cultivars
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation left on the hills in Napier City.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 11 1 100 Mixed broadleaved shrubland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Sophora tetraptera, Kunzea robusta, Cordyline australis, Phormium cookianum, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dodonaea viscosa, Coprosma robusta, Veronica stricta, Hoheria angustifolia, Hoheria populnea, Leptospermum scoparium, Meryta sinclairii, Podocarpus totara, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Metrosideros excelsa, Rhopalostylis sapida, Griselinia lucida, Melicytus ramiflorus, Alectryon excelsus, Plagianthus regius, Pittosporum crassifolium, Aristotelia serrata, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum ralphii, Veronica spp. cultivar
Pasture grass, garden variety shrubs at edges by properties
Vegetation condition
38
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
√
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Fantail
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐
4 None present. √
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
39
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Planting Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant canopy gaps densely. Plant to connect SNA to others on Esk Hill.
Notes
40
Esk Hill 9
Site number: 9
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932194E, 5630623N Date: 29.2.19
Area m²: 18050.06 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA) M Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known): only temporary electric
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Overview of canopy and grass
2
Overview and stock fence
41
Site Map
Site Description
Kunzea robusta canopy dominates. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Bare understorey throughout and pasture grass ground cover only. Currently has stock in it and temporary electric fence is up. Pest managed. Young plantings around the edge of the site.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of are 1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
42
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
estimate
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 Kunzea robusta forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Kunzea robusta, Melicytus ramiflorus, Piper excelsum
Pasture grass, Rubus fruticosus
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Tūī
43
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐
4 None present. √
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
Rubus fruticosus Spray to remove
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds 1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
√ Stock
present Fence off
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. ☐
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Pest managed Positive Continue
Grazed Negative Fence to remove stock
Plantings Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Build a permanent fence to eliminate stock from the site. Plant within canopy gaps to close the canopy. Plant around the margins and between stands to reduce the area exposed to external conditions. Increase planting density in current plantings. Plant to connect to other Esk Hill sites. Continue pest management.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
44
Esk Hill 10
Site number: 10
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932899E, 5630609N Date: 1.3.19
Area m²: 20849.66 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
2
Overview with weeds
8
Kunzea robusta over grass
4/5
Track
9
Gully with Rubus fruticosus
45
Site Map
Site Description Canopy is sparse and dominated by Kunzea robusta. There is a gully in the middle. Very weedy especially high presence of Rubus fruticosus. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Steep banks either side. High fantail presence noted.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet
criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
46
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 2 1 100 Kunzea robusta forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Muehlenbeckia spp, Austroderia spp, Kunzea robusta, Coprosma robusta, Ripogonum scandens, Pteris tremula, Pseudopanax hybrid, Veronica stricta
Rubus fruticosus, Verbena bonariensis, Ulex europaeus, Foeniculum vulgare, Anredera cordifolia, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Conyza spp, Pinus spp, Paspalum dilatatum, Helminthotheca echioides, Crataegus monogyna, Aredera cordifolia
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. √
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Sparrow, pheasant, fantail, blackbird
47
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Foeniculum vulgare Rubus fruticosus
Spray Rubus.
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. √
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐
Rubus fruticosus Anredera cordifolia
Spray vines. Hand remove Anredera where possible.
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. √
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Ulex europaeus Cotoneaster glaucophyllus Pinus
Drill and poison Pinus and Cotoneaster
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey
or canopy cover. √
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges.
☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Planting Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fence area from stock. Plant around the margins of the site to connect blocks within the SNA and this site to other Esk Hill sites. Remove ecological weeds.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
48
Esk Hill 11
Site number: 11
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932289E, 5630438N Date: 28.2.19
Area m²: 7667.38 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal x Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos.
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Asparagus scandens
2
Inside site, Kunzea robusta over grass cover
3
Overview of site
Site Map
49
Site Description
Well-established canopy of Kunzea robusta in the gully with grass groundcover. No understorey present. Asparagus scandens is present. Lot of Foeniculum vulgare at entry. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Underplanting would benefit this SNA. Opposite is a young hillside planting.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1
<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 100 Kunzea robusta forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Pteris tremula, Kunzea robusta, Pseudopanax hybrid, Coprosma robusta
Foeniculum vulgare, thistle, pasture grass, Hedera helix, Nephrolepis cordifolia, Rubus fruticosus, Solanum nigrum, Asparagus scandens, Aredera cordifolia, Carex leporina
50
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √
Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Blackbird
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Foeniculum vulgare Solanum nigrum
Will be shaded out with a closed canopy.
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
Asparagus scandens Anredera cordifolia
Cut, spray and dig out tubers
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey
or canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
51
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 planted Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Densely plant to fill canopy gaps.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
52
Esk Hill 12
Site number: 12
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932521E, 5629916N Date: 29.2.19
Area m²: 16461.18 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions √ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
√ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Overview
2
Big pine and entrance
Site Map
53
Site Description
Kunzea robusta dominated hillside, with some grassland above hill rd. Some limestone exposed throughout. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted.
B: High Pinus presence with young Pinus around. Plantation of Pinus behind. Cortaderia selloana and grass around the site. Orchard on other side of road
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains some remnant Kunzea in canopy
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2
<1% native vegetation left on the hills within the Naiper City boundary. Remnant kānuka in canopy.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 100 Pinus/Kunzea robusta forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Kunzea robusta, Sophora microphylla, Sophora tetraptera, Coprosma robusta
Pinus spp, Calystegia sylvatica, Rubus fruticosus, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Cortaderia selloana, pasture grass
54
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. √
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Sparrows, harrier
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Calystegia silvatica Rubus fruticosus Cortaderia selloana
Hand remove or spray
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐
Rubus fruticosus Calystegia silvatica
Hand remove or spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Pinus spp Chamaecytisus proliferus Cut or drill and poison
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey
or canopy cover. √
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
55
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Chopped pines Positive Need to make sure gaps are replanted
1 Planting Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Connect blocks by planting. Fully fence from stock. Plant canopy gaps densely. Plant to connect to other Esk Hill SNA.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
56
Kaiangaroa
Site number: 13
Recorder: MC, RJ, BC Grid Ref/GPS: 1932238E, 5629198N Date: 1.3.19
Area m²: 5300.05 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled m No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Adjoining young planting
2
Tallest Myoporum laetum
3/4/5/6
Overview
Site Map
57
Site Description
Planted hillside with 7m tallest trees. Adjoining is a much younger planting. Veronica speciosa is in road reserve nearby only 1. A walking path runs the full length of the SNA.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A – Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Planted Pittosporum ralphii
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical R
egime
Catego
ry C
od
e C
haracter
Hab
itat area Estim
ate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 11 1 100 Mixed broadleaved shrubland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Pittosporum ralphii, Sophora tetraptera, Kunzea robusta, Ozothamnus leptophyllus, Phormium cookianum, Myoporum laetum, Coprosma repens, Dodonaea viscosa, Pittosporum crassifolium, Olearia solandri, Hoheria angustifolia, Austroderia spp, Leptospermum scoparium, Rhopalostylis sapida
Solanum nigrum, pasture grass
58
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. x
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. x
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. x
Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Blackbird
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
Solanum nigrum Will be shaded out when canopy closes
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
59
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
planting Positive Continue
Managed area Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant natives at higher density to close canopy. Try to connect to other SNA sites by planting.
Notes
60
Bluff hill (Mataruahou)
Site number: 19
Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1936899E, 5622698N Date: 26.02.19
Area m²: 9196.37 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures: Pest control
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
√ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description 1
Vegetation regeneration
2
Underplanting 3/4/5
Vegetation/overview
15
Concrete stream
Site Map
61
Site Description
Native forest bush patch surrounded by exotic vegetation in a steep gully. Walking track runs through the site. Upper and lower areas have had grass maintenance. There is some planting of natives along the concrete. Other bank along drain is weedy. Planted Veronica and Agathis australis along track. Natural regeneration of Piper excelsum and Corynocarpus laevigatus. Pest management poisoning in area. Pampas at edge of surveyed area.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA Significance criteria Rating
(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Has old native trees. However, Metrosideros excelsa, Agathis australis
and Vitex lucens are outside distribution limit
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various native plant species but not all native to the area
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical R
egime
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area estim
ate
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 3 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Meryta sinclairii, Myoporum laetum, Phormium tenax, Cordyline australis, Alectryon excelsus, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Metrosideros excelsa, Podocarpus totara, Piper excelsum, Arthropodium cirratum, Pseudopanax ferox, Melicope ternata, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Kunzea robusta, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Coprosma repens, Dodonaea viscosa, Myrsine australis, Melicytus ramiflorus, Sophora microphylla, Veronica spp,
62
Hoheria sexstylosa, Sophora tetraptera, Agathis australis, Beilschmiedia tawa, Asplenium bulbiferum, Pteris tremula, Hedycarya arborea, Cyathea dealbata, Dacrydium cupressinum, Vitex lucens, Rhopalostylis sapida, Pittosporum crassifolium, Griselinia littoralis, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cyathea medullaris, Hoheria populnea, Entelea arborescens
Chamaecytisus proliferus, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Hedera helix, Conyza spp, Eriobotrya japonica, Acacia spp, Robinia pseudoacacia, Eucalyptus spp, Tradescantia fluminensis, Trachycarpus fortunei, Delairea odorata, Crassula spp, Populus alba, Cortaderia selloana at border Piptatherum miliaceum
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Tūi, kereru, bellbird, fantail, sparrow, Kaka visiting – anecdotal
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Hedera helix, Tradescantia fluminensis, Crassula spp
Cut and poison ivy Hand remove T. fluminensis and
Crassula
2 Common, 10%-50%
ground area. √
3 Occasional, up to 10%
ground area. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐
Hedera helix, Delairea odorata Cut and poison ivies
2 Common, 10%50%
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ Cotoneaster glaucophyllus,
Trachycarpus fortuna, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Robinia pseudoacacia
Hand remove or poison. Trees can be kept standing if no danger to the public
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover.
√
63
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover.
☐
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Mowing grass negative Stop mowing inside SNA
1 Pruning negative Stop pruning away from paths
1 Planting Positive Increase planting to close canopy
1 Pest control Positive Continue pest control
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Increased planting to create a closed forest canopy. Stop mowing the area. Plant natives into the connected exotic dominant areas to increase size and connectivity. Remove environmental weeds. Investigate reducing the amount of concrete in the area.
Notes
64
Lake Rotokaramu
Site number: 20
Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1929034E, 5621904N Date: 26.2.19
Area m²: 37171.9 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
x No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions √ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
7/8
Margin/fence/maimai
1/2/6/10/17/18
Overview of lake
3
Grey heron/Eleocharis
Site Map
65
Site Description
Non-draining Peat wetland - lot of Lemna, Eleocharis sedge and Typha orientalis common in water. 30 percent vegetation is Eleocharis. Juncus and pasture weeds, willows present in and out. Ricciocarpos natans- Nationally endangered present. No fish – anecdotal. Drained 1920 and cleared by digger. 99% private owned on Napier City boundary side. Potential for willow removal. Some parts protected.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Eleocharis Typha orientalis
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals 1 Freshwater wetland birds present
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various wetland species
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1 Ricciocarpos natans
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 The largest freshwater wetland in the city
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 5 B 22 23 25 2 100 Eleocharis sphacelata- Typha orientalis-Juncus wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, under
Typha orientalis, Kunzea robusta, Glossostigma elatinoides, Ricciocarpos natans (threatened), Eleocharis sphacelata, Lemna, Azolla
Paspalam distichum, pasture weeds, Salix fragilis, Salix cinerea, Rubus fruticosus, Crataegus monogyna, Juncus spp, Ulex europaeus, Persicaria maculosa
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake √ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
66
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity
Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms √ Pollution √
Translucent ☐
Opaque √
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 0 Shrubs 0 Trees 5
Wetland margin vegetation
Sedge/grass 90 Herbs 5 Shrubs 0 Trees 5 Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 25 FAC 25 FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover % 90 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous x
Source of water: spring √ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Agricultural activity
Grazed
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Pukeko, swallow, sparrow, tūī, harrier, spoonbill, dabchick, grey teal, bittern, white-faced heron, fantail, shag, mallard, Australian shoveller, brown teal, blackbird, rail, Nz dragonfly, Green and golden bell frog
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
No pest weeds
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
Rubus fruticosus Spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Salix spp Drill and poison
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. √
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
67
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Maimai duck hut Neutral
1 Grazing on the other side Negative Exclude stock from SNA
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fully fence SNA from stock. Plant margins to increase site and provide and ecotone from wetland to forest. Remove ecological weeds.
Notes
68
Halliwell Reserve 1
Site number: 23
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1930359E, 5618128N Date: 2.3.19
Area m²: 11338.8 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal X Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) open gate ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
4-6
Overview
1
Passionfruit vine
3
Dacrycarpus dacrydioides dominated
Site Map
69
Site Description
Totally planted in 2012, very species diverse. Dacrycarpus dacrydioides dominated in low flatter area, 6 to 8 metre trees. No areas of closed canopy. Pinus plantation behind which may be potential problem. Gardens are at the edges with exotics.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Species diverse. Flat area kahikatea dominant
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planted various
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation left on the hills in Napier City.
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 4 1 100 Mixed broadleaved-Dacrycarpus dacrydioides forest.
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Pittosporum eugenioides, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Phormium tenax, Dacrydium cupressinum, Austroderia spp, Cordyline australis, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Pseudopanax hybrid, Coprosma robusta, Carpodetus serratus, Podocarpus totara, Hoheria sexstylosa, Myoporum laetum, Melicytus ramiflorus, Sophora microphylla, Phormium cookianum, Coprosma repens, Leptospermum scoparium, Kunzea robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Hoheria sexstylosa, Dodonaea viscosa, Veronica stricta, Sophora tetraptera, Pittosporum ralphii, Knightia excelsa
Rubus fruticosus, Paspalum dilatatum, Passiflora caerulea, Rumex sagittatus, Lolium arundinaceum, Foeniculum vulgare, Prunus spp, Calystegia sylvatica, pasture grass
70
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Fantail, silvereye, tūī, blackbird
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Lolium arundinaceum Rubus fruticosus Foeniculum vulgare
Spray Rubus. Others die under canopy shade
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐
Passiflora caerulea Calystegia silvatica Rubus fruticosus
Spray Rubus. Others had remove and poison stumps.
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. √
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Prunus Drill and poison if reproducing
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
71
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Planted Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Plant natives denser. Try to plant to join to other Halliwell SNA.
Notes
72
Halliwell Reserve 2
Site number: 24
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1930353.125E, 5617860N Date: 2.3.19
Area m²: 12149.2 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) open gate
☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
6/7
Overview
1-3
Younger plantings
Site Map
73
Site Description
Totally planted in 2012. Surrounded by gardens. Some young plants at top and within. Lower than Halliwell 1, 6m height trees. Upper vegetation only reaches 1 to 3m. Terrain is a steep hill.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains mixed broadleaved with coastal species
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planting is species diverse. However, Metrosideros excelsa, Fuscospora
fusca, Agathis australis and Vitex lucens are outside distribution limit
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 11 1 100 Mixed broadleaved-podocarp shrubland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Coprosma robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Podocarpus totara, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Sophora tetraptera, Knightia excelsa, Plagianthus regius, Dodonaea viscosa, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum ralphii, Pennantia corymbosa, Olearia solandri, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dacrydium cupressinum, Phormium tenax, Metrosideros excelsa, Cordyline australis, Sophora microphylla, Pseudopanax hybrid, Kunzea robusta, Myoporum laetum, Leptospermum scoparium, Pittosporum crassifolium, Melicope ternata, Agathis australis, Vitex lucens, Beilschmiedia tawa, Entelea arborescens, Veronica stricta, Sophora prostrata, Pseudopanax arboreus, Fuscospora fusca, Myrsine australis
Paspalum dilatatum, Hedera helix, pasture grass, Convolvulus arvensis, Solanum nigrum
74
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Blackbird, harrier
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Pasture grass Solanum nigrum
Will be shaded out in time
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
Hedera helix Convolvulus arvensis
Hand remove and spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
75
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage.
√
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Planted Positive Continue
Pest animal control Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Plant natives at higher densities. Try to plant to connect to other SNA sites.
Notes
76
Dolbel Reserve 1
Site number: 26
Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1929564E, 5616892N Date: 26.2.19
Area m²: 22173.7 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures: Planting, has care group
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
√ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
2
Stile into site
3
Track and vegetation
4/6
Character of canopy
Site Map
77
Site Description
Fenced native broadleaved forest with some sections of closed canopy. Walking tracks run through the forest. Adjacent patch of young planted native trees. Natural regeneration of Dacrycarpus dacrydioides and Dodonaea viscosa. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Clianthus maximus (threatened – nationally critical) is planted.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Broadleaved native forest. However, Vitex lucens, Fuscospora fusca, Agathis
australis and Metrosideros excelsa are outside distribution range
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 High planted species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
regime
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area estim
ate Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Coprosma repens, Cordyline australis, Rhopalostylis sapida, Podocarpus totara, Agathis australis, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dacrydium cupressinum, Alectryon excelsus, Dodonaea viscosa, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cyathea dealbata, Hoheria sexstylosa, Pteris tremula, Melicytus ramiflorus, Poa spp, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Myrsine australis, Astelia spp, Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Sophora microphylla, Veronica spp, Coprosma robusta, Pittosporum crassifolium, Clianthus maximus, Griselinia littoralis, Fuscospora fusca, Metrosideros excelsa, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Vitex lucens, Kunzea robusta, Piper excelsum, Veronica stricta, Pseudopanax discolor, Leptospermum scoparium, Olearia solandri, Elaeocarpus dentatus, Sophora prostrata, Carpodetus serratus, Ripogonum scandens, Sophora tetraptera, Corokia x cheesemanii, Arthropodium cirratum, Melicope ternata, Phormium tenax cultivar. Nephrolepis cordifolia, Conyza spp, Iris spp Abies spp, pasture grass, Persea americana, Solanum nigrum
78
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
√
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Fantail, tūī, blackbird, silvereye, sparrow, myna
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
Nephrolepis cordifolia
Hand removal
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Persea americana No action needed if not reproducing
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
79
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Dogs off leash Neutral
Walking track Positive Increase plantings along walking track
Planting Positive Continue planting
Pruning Negative Only prune if plantings interfering with safety along walkway
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Increased and denser planting of ecologically appropriate species to reduce weeds and help develop the forest to become humid enough for later successional species. Fully fence from stock. Remove ecological weeds like Nephrolepis cordifolia. Plant along hill to connect Dolbel sites.
Notes
80
Dolbel Reserve 2 Site number: 27
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929510E, 5616582N Date: 27.2.19
Area m²: 24591.63 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures: planting. Has care group
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
√ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Plantings
2
Adjacent pasture land
3
Forest overview
4
Entrance
7 Path and vegetation
8 Perimeter
10 Fenceline
81
Site Map
Site Description
A: Young planted forest with younger plantings within. Steep hillside with low canopy surrounded by
park/farmland. Species diverse. Exotic specimen trees ie oak in nearby land. Walking track through. Young planting
is adjoining the SNA.
B: Native planting on steep hillside, species diverse. Surrounded by agriculture and parkland. Closed canopy in
centre. Piper excelsum natural regeneration in places. Pseudopanax laetus planted. Track through middle. Oak
regeneration in some places.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Diverse native plantings but not all species native to the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 High diversity but Metrosideros excelsa, Fuscospora truncata and Vitex lucens are outside distribution range
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
82
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area
2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
estimate
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Corynocarpus laevigatus, Dodonaea viscosa, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Sophora microphylla, Pittosporum
tenuifolium, Alectryon excelsus, Pittosporum eugenioides, Melicytus ramiflorus, Pittosporum crassifolium, sophora
tetraptera, Vitex lucens, Pseudopanax hybrid, Coprosma robusta, Melicope ternata, Cordyline australis, Fuscospora
truncata, pseudopanax discolor, Beilschmiedia tawa, Phormium tenax, Pseudopanax arboreus, Podocarpus totara,
Brachyglottis repanda, Rhopalostylis sapida, Carpodetus serratus, Leptospermum scoparium, Coprosma repens,
Kunzea robusta, Veronica stricta, Dacrydium cupressinum, Aristotelia serrata, Entelea arborescens, Hoheria
populnea, Knightia excelsa, Metrosideros robusta, Pteris tremula, Piper excelsum, Hoheria sexstylosa, Dicksonia
squarrosa, Corokia x cheesemanii, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Metrosideros excelsa, Pseudopanax laetus, Pseudowintera
colorata, Veronica spp. Cultivar. Pasture grasses, thistles, Solanum nigrum, Conyza spp, Prunus spp, Rubus
fruticosus, Tradescantia fluminensis, Pastinaca sativa, Cupressaceae spp, Agapanthus praecox, Lilium formosanum,
Eucalyptus spp.
83
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Fantail, kereru, silvereye, sparrow, blackbird
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ Tradescantia fluminensis, Agapanthus praecox, Lilium formosanum
Hand remove
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ Rubus fruticosus Spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐
84
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ Prunus, Eucalyptus Can leave if not reproducing
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey
or canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Pruning Negative Only prune if plantings interfering with safety along walkway
1 Planting Positive Increase plantings and plant denser
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant the area to link the two parts of the SNA to each other and to Dobel 1. Plant at higher densities to increase
canopy cover and reduce weeds. Remove ecological weeds like Rubus fruticosus.
Notes
85
Otatara Park
Site number: 29
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929723.125E, 5615939N Date: 2.3.19
Area m²: 6099.2 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal x Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
9
Kereru 11/12
Path and vegetation
Site Map
86
Site Description
Planted small park with exotic and cultivars at the top. Centre and lower section well-established natives has been underplanted. Garden-like perimeter with Acacia regeneration. Bare ground with leaf litter. Dodonaea viscosa regeneration. Coprosma regeneration too.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains broadleaved forest species
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse, Vitex lucens, Agathis australis and
Metrosideros excelsa out
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2
Planted in 1993. Less than 10% left of forest vegetation in Napier City boundary
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 A 2 1 Mixed broadleaved forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Entelea arborescens, Coprosma repens, Austroderia spp, Corokia x cheesemanii, Dodonaea viscosa, Pittosporum ralphii, Arthropodium cirratum, Corokia cotoneaster, Pseudopanax discolor, Coprosma robusta, Pseudopanax laetus, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Phormium cookianum, Pittosporum eugenioides, Sophora tetraptera, Cordyline australis, Griselinia littoralis, Metrosideros excelsa, Cyathea dealbata, Plagianthus regius, Podocarpus totara, Melicope ternata, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Alectryon excelsus, Hoheria populnea, Solanum laciniatum, Pteris tremula, Myrsine australis, Asplenium bulbiferum, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pseudopanax arboreus, Pseudopanax crassifolius, Vitex lucens, Sophora microphylla, Dacrydium cupressinum, Kunzea robusta, Pseudopanax hybrid, Agathis australis, Clianthus maximus, Rhopalostylis sapida, Coprosma cultivars, Veronica spp. cultivar, Phormium cultivar. Agapanthus praecox, Acacia spp, Solanum nigrum, Prunus spp, Carex leporina, Liriodendron tulipifera, Trachycarpus fortunei, Salix cinerea
87
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. √
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Kereru, fantail, bellbird
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
Solanum nigrum
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Prunus and Acacia regen
Drill and poison over time
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
88
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage.
√
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Pruning Negative Only prune if vegetation is a hazard
1 Spraying Positive/Negative Removes weeds but can reduce natural regerenation as well
1 Mowing Negative Reduce so natural regerenation can happen
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Increase canopy by planting in gaps and planting around the margins. Remove regenerating exotic trees. Make sure this is done slowly so it won’t create large canopy gaps.
Notes
89
Otatara Pa 1 Site number: 30
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929179.875E, 5615410N Date: 2.3.19
Area m²: 11213.2 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public ☐ Private √ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
2-4
Overview
Site Map
90
Site Description
Kunzea robusta dominated vegetation with some sparse areas. Trees felled on hillside. Pasture grass is the ground cover. Canopy height of 4m in the gully and ridges. Dry and well drained land.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early succession forest.
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other Pa sites and Tutaekuri River
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
estimate%
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 6 1 100 Kunzea robusta forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Kunzea robusta, Coprosma robusta, Myoporum laetum
Rubus fruticosus, Pasture grass, Lupinus spp, Foeniculum vulgare
91
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √
Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Swallow
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Lupinus Foeniculum vulgare
Will get shaded out by a closed native canopy
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
Rubus fruticosus Spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
92
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Tree felling - species unknown
1 Planted Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Plant to reduce margins and join to other Otarata Pa SNA sites.
Notes
93
Otatara Pa 2
Site number: 31
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1928991E, 5615228.5N Date: 2.3.19
Area m²: 4543.36 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public ☐ Private √ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
2
Dieback and grass cover
4/5
Overview
Site Map
94
Site Description
10m tall Myoporum laetum canopy. Bare understorey, only pasture grass and Rubus fruticosus groundcover. Some dieback of Myoporum laetum. Many of the trees have galls on the bark.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other Pa sites and Tutaekuri River
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 2 1 100 Myoporum laetum forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Myoporum laetum, Coprosma robusta, Pteris tremula, Phormium cultivar
Rubus fruticosus, Pasture grass
95
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
Rubus fruticosus Spray
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
Rubus fruticosus Spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Pest animals If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. ☐
96
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Planted Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant to fill canopy gaps and connect to other SNA sites.
Notes
97
Otatara Pa 3
Site number: 32
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929088.875E, 5615074.5N Date: 2.3.19
Area m²: 28093.06 Landform: Hill
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public ☐ Private √ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
7/8
Overview
Site Map
98
Site Description
Dominated by Myoporum laetum and Chamaecytisus proliferus. 8m high canopy height. Lot of weeds in the groundcover as well as pasture grass. Some rubbish dumping.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2
Kunzea robusta
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other Pa sites and Tutaekuri River
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 a 2 1 50 Myoporum laetum - mixed broadleaved forest
2 1 a 2 1 50 Sophora tetraptera-Chamaecytisus proliferus-Coprosma robusta forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Myoporum laetum, Sophora tetraptera, Phormium cookianum, Cordyline australis, Phormium tenax, Pittosporum ralphii, Kunzea robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Coprosma robusta, Dodonaea viscosa, Veronica stricta, Pteris tremula, Blechnum novae-zelandiae, Coriaria arborea, Pittosporum eugenioides, Sophora tetraptera
Foeniculum vulgare, Rubus fruticosus, pasture grass, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Eriobotrya japonica, Malus x domestica, Piptatherum miliaceum, Paspalum dilatatum, Calystegia sylvatica, Solanum nigrum, Crataegus monogyna Ligustrum lucidum
99
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √ ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.
☐ √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ √
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.
☐ ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
√ √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Greywarbler, chaffinch, blackbird, tūī
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐
Foeniculum vulgare Rubus fruticosus
Spray Rubus
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. √ √
3 Occasional, up to 10%
ground area. ☐ ☐
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ ☐
Rubus fruticosus Calystegia silvatica
Spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. √ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
canopy cover. ☐ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
Chamaecytisus proliferus Eriobotrya japonica Ligustrum
lucidum Drill and poison trees
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover. √ √
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Pest animals
100
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
All Rubbish Negative Deter people from dumping
All Pest control Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fully fence site. Remove rubbish and deter people from dumping as it is a hazard. Plant under exotic canopy and kill the exotics as the natives come up to take over the canopy. Plant area to connect to other SNA sites.
Notes
Classed in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
101
Saline plain
Ahuriri Estuary: Site number 14 is a combination of site sheets: Upper Ahuriri Estuary (14-1), Mid-Ahuriri Estuary
(14-2), Taipo Stream (14-3), Westshore Reserve ponds (14-4), Westshore Reserve wetland (14-5) and Lower
Ahuriri Estuary (14-6). All site sheets given below.
Ahuriri Estuary (Upper Ahuriri) Site number: 14 -1
Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1930305.125E, 5627119.5N Date: 27.3.19
Area m² (excluding water): 563511.6 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased x Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? √ Year fenced (if known):
102
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. Block GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1 a
Drainage pipes
4-9 a
Overview
1-4 b Aerial of site
15/16/18/28 b Juncus and Salicornia quinqueflora wetland
35 b Juncus and pasture grass margin
32/33 B Cat trap
1-10 c Aerial distance
Site Map
103
Site Description
A: Wetland species are Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis 1m tall and Salicornia quinqueflora. Stockbank margin is
pasture grass dominated. Abundant swallows and ducks. Ephemeral sections. Drainage pipes are in the site.
B: Large open estuarine wetland with 50cm-1m Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis. Margins mixed with pasture
grasses on opposite side. Salicornia quinqueflora abundant throughout actual wetland. Ahuriri River estuary flows
through middle. High fish abundance, high avian abundance. No trees at margins – too salty. Relictual Sophora and
Corynocarpus laevigatus at far perimeter. Drainage channels in wetland. Sedimentation problem at top end and
chemical pollution at city end. Intensive predator control to remove cats. New fencing present. Tube worm is
problem in the river. Pre-earthquake the area was a freshwater system to the edge of the lagoon then uplift has
caused it to become a saltwater influenced wetland. Channelling was put in during the 1930’s. This has been
bulldozed and destroyed.
C: Large open wetland / river. Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis 50cm-1m tall. Stopbank on opposite bank fenced.
High fish abundance. Too salty for trees at edges. Salicornia quinqueflora / Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /
green sedge-grass / pasture grass. Tube worm present, wetland birdlife in high numbers.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Typical saline wetland
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals 2 Wetland birds present
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Salicornia quinqueflora to Juncus/S. quinqueflora dominant
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Reduced in Napier by drainage and farming
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site 1 Largest site within the city boundary
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 1
Connected to other wetlands and the Ahuriri Estuary by the river
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
104
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 5 B 20 23 24 25 29 1 70 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/ Salicornia quinqueflora wetland
2 1 B 20 25 29 1 30 Pasture grass Lolium arundinaceum/ Salicornia quinqueflora wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Triglochin striata, Salicornia quinqueflora, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Plagianthus divaricatus, Cotula
coronopifolia, Aster subulatus, Polypogon monspeliensis, Ficinia nodosa, Deschampsia spp, Typha orientalis
Lolium arundinaceum, thistle, Rubus fruticosus, Atriplex prostrata, Plantago major, Plantago coronopus, Chloris
truncata, Ulex europaeus, Hypochaeris glauca, Lycium ferocissimum, Veronica anagallis-aquatica
Wetland/Estuary Unit:1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐
Bog ☐ Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water
level changes?
Yes
√ No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water
turbidity
Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent √
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 60 Herbs 40 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin
vegetation
Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 60 FACW 30 FAC 5 FACU 5 UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover % 10 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous x
Invasive species in margin: cover % 20 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
105
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin
Comments
Stock get in. Stopbanks. Grazed round. Sediment deposit
No disturbance
Wetland/Estuary Unit:2
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐
Bog ☐ Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water
level changes?
Yes
√ No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water
turbidity
Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent ☐
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin
vegetation
Sedge/grass 70 Herbs 30 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL may be
higher
20 FACW 20 FAC 50 FACU 10 UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover % 10 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover % 20 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous x
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin
Comments
Stock get in. Stopbanks. Grazed round.
No disturbance
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Grey heron, black swan, swallow, shag, duck, Bittern, fernbird (historic), geese, magpie, spur-winged plover,
greywarbler, royal spoonbill, harrier, paradise shelduck, pied stilt
106
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant
Species etc
Comments & suggested
management
Ground cover
weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground
area. ☐ ☐ Atriplex prostrata,
Rubus fruticosus
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area.
√ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐ Rubus fruticosus Spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. ☐ √
4 None present. √ ☐
Shrub/Tree
Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey
or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ Lycium ferocissimum Cut and poison
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey
or canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey
or canopy cover.
√ ☐
4 None present. ☐ √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐ √ Stock, tubeworm
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ ☐
107
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Stock grazing Negative
Pest management Positive Maintain
Some blocks fully fenced Positive
Drainage pipes Negative
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove environmental weeds like Rubus fruticosus. Eliminate stock from the area with more fencing. Increase
connectivity of the units by planting the edges to better join the blocks and connect to other sites along the river.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:
hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.
108
Ahuriri Estuary (Mid-Ahuriri Estuary) Site number: 14 - 2
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929869E, 5623658N Date: 2.3.13
Area m² (excluding water): 446543 (includes 84223.66 outside city limit)
Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
X Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
X No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1-6
Aerial overview
109
Site Map
Site Description
Salicornia quinqueflora and Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis dominate species on the western shore side. Large
embankments along the western side, which generally have both species. Farm animals known to roam to waters
edge.
Salicornia becomes uncommon on eastern shore side. Triglochin and Thyridia repens grow in areas where tall
fescue has not taken over. Discontinuous juncus margin 1- 3 m wide.
Quarantine rd to top pumping station: Wide fringe of raupo especially on eastern shore side. Patchy juncus.
Between juncus and raupo tall bolboschoenus spp grows.
Barry Riddler (pers. comm.) – runoff is from new housing development. Bittern and kotare used to be present.
Crabs are now gone. White heron not seen in two years. Effluent and runoff from new subdivisions has caused loss
of kotare, bittern, crabs and pristine nature of wetland. No whitebait present. Swimming now unsafe in the stream.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does
not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Typical saline wetland
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals 2 Various bird species
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Salicornia quinqueflora to juncus/pasture grass
110
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Tyridia repens
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Less than 10% left in the Napier City boundary
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Estuary/wetland
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site 2 Large continuous SNA site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Link to estuary and other sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area Estim
ate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 2 3 5 B 20 24 22 25 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Salicornia quinqueflora pasture grass
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Salicornia quinqueflora, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Bolboschoenus spp, Triglochin striata, Thyridia repens,
Typha orientalis. Pasture grass, Lolium arundinaceum
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √
Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐ Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
111
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality
Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent √
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 80 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation
Sedge/grass 80 Herbs 20 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 70 FACW 20 FAC 10 FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover % 20
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous √
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin
Comments effluent / run off stopbank and stock No disturbance
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
White-faced heron, harrier, black swan, tūī, sparrow, spoonbill, kereru, bellbird
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐ Pasture grasses, Lolium
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
112
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. √
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. ☐
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Walking tracks Positive
1 Effluent/run
off
Loss of bird and crustacean species. Unsafe
swimming
Upgrade effluent and stormwater system or divert.
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Management of subdivision runoff is needed to reduce pollution that is harming wildlife. Fully fence the area. Plant
natives to reduce the area of exposed boundary.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:
hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.
113
Ahuriri Estuary (Taipo Stream)
Site number: 14 - 3
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1930791.375E, 5621145.5N Date: 2.3.13
Area m²(excluding water): 16365.3 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
x No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
Site Map
114
Site Description
Extensive flats of Salicornia at the mouth and western side. To the south, Juncus becomes dominant.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Typical saline wetland
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Less than 10% of vegetation left in the Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Part of Ahuriri Estuary
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other estuary SNA sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 2 3 5 B 20 24 22 25 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Salicornia quinqueflora pasture grass
wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Salicornia quinqueflora, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis
pasture grasses
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)
115
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent √
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 50 Herbs 50 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 80 Herbs 20 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 70 FACW 20 FAC 10 FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
No disturbance
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant
Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
Pasture grasses
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
116
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fully fence. Plant along stream to connect to other SNA sites.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.
117
Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Ponds) Site number: 14 - 4
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933261.75E, 5623290N Date: 4.3.19
Area m² (excluding water): 136429.6 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes √ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
118
Site Map
Site Description
B: surrounded by broad fringe of Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, some planted flax. Ruppia polycarpa washes up
among juncus. Continuation of the pond of damp land as juncus in lower half and saline herbfield of Salicornia
species, Plantago coronopus, Spergularia tasmanica and Puccinellia which goes into turf of Selliera radicans.
Triglochin striata dominates in small wet peaty depressions.
C: Large amounts of both Myoporum spp. and Phormium tenax planted at shores. Ficinia nodosa increasing in drier
areas. Shores mostly Salicornia or Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis. Central eastern side tall vegetation is lacking
and the damp compacted gravel ground has a turf of Selliera radicans, Spergularia tasmanica, Plantago coronopus,
Isolepis cernua, Puccinellia fasciculata.
Western side of the pond is mown grassland with eucalypts. Between this and juncus is another turf zone.
Salt-pan to westshore pond: Thyridia repens, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Cotula coronopifolia in the water.
dry ground has Puccinellia fasciculata cover. Samolus repens grows here too.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
2 Typical saline vegetation
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
119
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
2 Juncus/Salicornia, saltmarsh turf, pasture grass and shrubs
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
2 Thyridia repens
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area
1 Less than 10% vegetation remaining in the city
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
2 Estuarine
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
2 Seventh largest SNA surveyed
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
2 Close to other estuary sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
estimate
% Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 2 B 29 1 70 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/Salicornia quinqueflora wetland
2 2 B 20 1 10 Isolepis cernua- Puccinellia fasciculata /Selliera radicans-Spergularia
tasmanica- Plantago coronopus wetland
3 2 B 20 29 1 20 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/Thyridia repens-Cotula coronopifolia
wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Phormium tenax, Myoporum laetum, Triglochin striata, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Thyridia repens, Samolus
repens, Ficinia nodosa, Cotula coronopifolia, Salicornia quinqueflora, Selliera radicans, Spergularia tasmanica,
Isolepis cernua, Ruppia polycarpa
Myoporum insulare, Plantago coronopus, Puccinellia fusciculata, Pasture grass
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
120
Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear √ Water Quality
Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐
Translucent ☐
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 50 Herbs 50 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation
Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 50 FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments City pollution. No disturbance
Wetland/Estuary Unit:2
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp ☐ Marsh √
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear √ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐
Translucent ☐
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 80 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 10 FAC 10 FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover % 25
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous √
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 3
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh √
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline 3 Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
121
Degree of water turbidity Clear √ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐
Translucent ☐
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 70 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 20 FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐ ☐ ☐
Puccinellia fasciculata, plantago coronopus
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐ √ ☐
4 None present. √ ☐ √
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √ √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √ √
122
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered.
Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.
☐ ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐ ☐
4 No damage.
√ √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant to connect to other SNA sites.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:
hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.
123
Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Wetland)
Site number: 14 - 5
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933554E, 5622784N Date: 1.3.19
Area m² (excluding water): 31611.3 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
x No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply) Between major roads
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
2/3
Overview of margin and wetland
Site Map
124
Site Description
Open roadside wetland sea rush and grass sections. Detention dam nearby. Thyridia repens abundant in saltmarsh zone.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Saline wetland
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Juncus to herbaceous salt marsh
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Thyridia repens
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1
Less than 10% vegetation left in the city
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other estuary sites
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 2 5 B 24 1 90 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis wetland
2 2 5 B 23 20 1 10 Bolboschoenus /Samolus- Thyridia wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Samolus repens, Selliera radicans, Plagianthus divaricatus, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Scirpus spp, Triglochin striata, Ficinia nodosa, Bolboschoenus spp, Apodasmia similis, Cotula coronopifolia, Thyridia repens
Atriplex prostrata, Asparagus asparagoides, Trifolium fragiferum
125
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent √
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 100 Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 100 FACW
FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover % 0 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments Roadside pollution? No disturbance
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 2
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp ☐ Marsh √
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐
Translucent ☐
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 60 Herbs 40 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 40 FACW 30 FAC 30 FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments No disturbance
126
Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐
Atriplex prostrata
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐ √
4 None present. √ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐
Asparagus asparagoides
Spot spraying
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐ √
4 None present. √ ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey
or canopy cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered.
Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.
☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response Gravel substrate in margin areas
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration
within a site.
Increase vegetation to increase connectivity with other SNA’s. Remove environmental weeds like Asparagus asparagoides.
Notes
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.
127
Ahuriri Estuary (Lower Ahuriri Estuary)
Site number: 14 - 6
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933550E, 5622315N Date: 4.3.19
Area m² (excluding water): 357533.6 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures: Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply) √ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude /Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
13/14/18/19/20
Overview
15/16/17
Salicornia quinqueflora and margins
Site Map
128
Site Description
Very large estuarine system. Salicornia quinqueflora dominant vegetation, on shingle. Large open areas of water in the centre. Pasture grass margins with some shrubs/trees.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1 Historic vegetation type is saline wetland
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
1 Coastal/wetland birds
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
1 Salicornia quinqueflora to pasture grass to shrubs/trees
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1
Thyridia repens
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Less than 10% left in Napier city. Large regional wetland
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 1
Large estuary
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment. 3F – An originally rare ecosystem type 3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site 1 Large estuary
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 1
Links to many sites along the Ahuriri River
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species 1 Coastal/wetland birds
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 2 B 1 2 1 100 Salicornia quinqueflora - Pasture grass wetland
129
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.) Apium prostratum, Thyridia repens, Triglochin striatum, Samolus repens, Selliera radicans, Spergularia tasmanica, Bolboschoenus medianus, Isolepis cernua, Ficinia nodosa, Schoenoplectus pungens, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Salicornia quinqueflora Helminthotheca echioides, Juncus bufonius, Juncus articulatus, Carex divulsa, Sporobolus africanus, Puccinellia fasciculata, Poa compressa, Cenchrus longisetus, Lagurus ovatus, Hordeum murinum, Cynodon dactylon, Critesion hystrix, Bromus hordeaceus, Sherardia arvensis, Bromus diandrus, Anthoxanthum odoratum, Asphodelus fistulosus, Sedum acre, Spergularia arvensis, Pennisetum clandestinum, Rumex obtusifolius, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Lycium ferocissimum, Rosa spp, Calystegia soldanella, Rubus fruticosus, Carduus tenuiflorus, Centaurea calcitrapa, Schedonorus phoenix, Solanum diflorum, physalifolium , Solanum pseudocapsicum, Trifolium dubium, Trifolium repens, Trifolium tomentosum, Verbascum thapsus, Vicia sativa, Aster subulatus, Gazania rigens, Hypochoeris radicata, Hypochoeris glauca, Sonchus oleraceus, Lysimachia arvensis, Datura stramonium, Echium vulgare, Erodium cicutarium, Glaucous form, Geranium pusillum, Lepidium africanum, Linum bienne, Linum catharticum, Atriplex prostrata, Lotus angustissimus, Lotus suaveolens, Malva parviflora, Medicago nigra, Melilotus albus, Melilotus indicus, Modiola caroliniana, Orobanche minor, Papaver rhoeas, Plantago coronopus, Plantago lanceolata, Plantago major
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake √ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp ☐ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent √
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 10 Herbs 90 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 100 Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 90 FACW 10 FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High ☐Medium √ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments City pollution. No disturbance
Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Welcome swallow, Red-billed gull, Black-billed gull, Black swan, Black-backed gull
130
Threats Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
Rubus fruticosus, Atriplex prostrata
Spray Rubus
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover. ☐
Cotoneaster Cut and poison
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. √ Tubeworm
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage.
☐
Human Associated Activities (Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Pollution Negative Reduce runoff into river
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fence to remove stock from all areas. Remove ecological weeds. Plant surrounding area to connect blocks outside of river together and with other SNA sites.
Notes Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live). Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.
131
Bayview Wetland
Site number: 15
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932883E, 5627104N Date: 3.3.10
Area m²(excluding water): 250107 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1/2/3
Juncus wetland
9-14
Overview of wetland/waterbody 17/18/21
Lemna/Azolla
22/23
Thyridia repens
Site Map
132
Site Description
50cm to 1m tall dominant Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis with Salicornia quinqueflora interspersed throughout in the wetland. Saltmarsh margins contain at risk – naturally uncommon Thyridia repens. Bike track nearby. Water in the system with wetland birds, a lot of Canada geese. Drainage ditches nearby. Signs of stock with sheep roaming throughout surrounding area.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1
Typical saline wetland
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
2 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis-Salicornia quinqueflora wetland to Cotula-Samolus-Thyridia margin. Juncus and pasture grass wetland to Selliera radicans margin
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1 Thyridia repens
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Wetlands reduced across the Hawkes Bay region
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site 2 Fifth largest SNA surveyed
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Link to other wetlands and estuary
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 2 5 B 24 20 1 70 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Salicornia quinqueflora wetland
2 2 5 B 20 1 10 Symphyotrichum subulatum /Cotula coronopifolia -Samolus repens - Thyridia repens wetland
3 2 5 B 24 25 1 10 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis-pasture grasses wetland
4 2 5 B 20 1 10 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Selliera radicans- Spergularia tasmanica wetland
133
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Cotula coronopifolia, Salicornia quinqueflora, Symphyotrichum subulatum, Thyridia repens, Samolus repens, Lemna spp, Selliera radicans, Triglochin striata, Spergularia tasmanica, Azolla spp
Atriplex prostrata, Paspalum distichum, Lolium arundinaceum, Trifolium fragiferum, Foeniculum vulgare, thistle, pasture grasses
Wetland/Estuary Unit:1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent √
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 80 Herbs 20 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 20 FACW 80 FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Stock have been in
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 2
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent ☐
Opaque √
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs 100 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 20 FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous
134
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments stock have been in No disturbance
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 3
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent √
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 100 Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL
FACW 70 FAC 30 FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Signs of stock presence
Wetland/Estuary Unit: 4
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √
Translucent ☐
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass
Herbs
Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 10 Herbs 90 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 50 FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments stock have been in No disturbance
135
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Canada goose, swallows, goldfinch, sparrow
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Atriplex prostrata
Removal
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. √ √ √ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √ √ √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √ √ √
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
√ √ √ √ Stock around wetland
perimeter and fresh signs with the wetland
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only
near edges. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4 No damage. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Stock Negative Fully fence area
Pest management Positive Continue management
Bike track
Notes
136
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fence the wetland from stock. Reduce the area exposed to the margins by planting native vegetation in areas with large marginal edge.
Notes
Another name for wetland area is Keteketerau wetland
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
137
Ahuriri Plain Wetland Site number: 16
Recorder: Grid Ref/GPS: 1932330E, 5625732N Date: 4.3.19
Area m² (no water): 882725 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII) x Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
Site Map
138
Site Description
Large open wetland north of Hawke’s Bay airport. Dominated by Juncus kraussii subsp. australiensis and Salicornia
quinqueflora and pasture grass at margins. Monoculture vegetation like other estuarine SNAs.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating
(1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not
meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1 Typical saline wetland
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
2 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis - Salicorniaa quinqueflora
wetland to pasture grass margins
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area
1 Wetlands reduced across the Hawkes Bay region
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
2
Estuarine wetland
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special
ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
2 Second largest SNA in Napier city
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
2 Link to other wetlands and estuary
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical
Regim
e
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 2 B 20 24 25 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis- pasture grass/ Salicornia quinqueflora
wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Salicornia quinqueflora
Pasture grasses
139
Vegetation condition
Wetland/Estuary Unit:1
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh
☐
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes √
No ☐ Unsure ☐
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐
Translucent ☐
Opaque √
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 70 Herbs 30 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 90 Herbs 10 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 20 FAC 25 FACU 20 UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
Pasture grasses
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area.
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds 1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
140
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species
etc.
Comments suggested
management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints)
Stock heard or seen throughout area.
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. stock Around perimeter
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges.
4 No damage.
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Cycling tracks Neutral
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fence the wetland from stock. Reduce the area exposed to the margins by planting native vegetation in
areas with large marginal edge.
Notes
Another name for wetland area is Keteketerau wetland
Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:
hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).
141
Embankment Road Wetland Site number: 21
Recorder: RJ Grid Ref/GPS: Date: 4.1.19
Area m2 (no water): 20857.6 Landform: Saline plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
x No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced
Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions, industrial ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
Site Map
142
Site Description
Small salt marsh/meadow surrounded by industrial urban Napier. Appears to be dominated by Salicornia
quinqueflora.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
2 Typical saline plain vegetation
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area
2
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
2 Estuarine
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical R
egime
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 2 B 20 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/ Salicornia quinqueflora – Pasture grass wetland
143
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date
of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy
species, understorey species etc.)
Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Salicornia quinqueflora
Pasture grass
Vegetation condition
Wetland/Estuary Unit:
Description (tick appropriate category)
Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp ☐ Marsh √
Fen
☐ Bog ☐
Shrub-carr ☐
Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)
Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water level changes?
Yes
☐ No ☐ Unsure √
Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐
Translucent ☐
Opaque ☐
Plant Communities (enter % cover)
Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 10 Herbs 90 Shrubs
Trees
Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 90 Herbs 10 Shrubs
Trees
Pasture
Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 50 FAC
FACU
UPL
Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin
High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐
Invasive species in wetland: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Invasive species in margin: cover %
Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous
Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐
Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin
Comments No disturbance
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
144
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating
Estimate
(Tick appropriate level) Unit 1 Notes for
dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐
Pasture grasses
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area.
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock
heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. Stock
4 No damage.
☐
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation
clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Notes
Management recommendations
Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species
protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Fence. Try to plant along drains to connect to estuary.
Notes
145
Plains
Westshore Reserve Bush
Site number: 18
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933392.5E, 5622971N Date: 1.3.19
Area m²: 12308.1 Landform: Plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) post and 1 rail
√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply) road / wetland lake
☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
3
Overview
Site Map
146
Site Description
Diverse, well established planted. 7-8m Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum species 6m. Lots of broom at edges. Smaller amounts of Foeniculum vulgare lot of Hedera helix. Good regeneration of natives in places, Sophora species and Coprosma species some Myrsine australis. Generally weedy.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 Planted in 1999
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Links to Ahuriri Estaury
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
147
1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved Myoporum laetum forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Phormium tenax, Leptospermum scoparium, Phormium cookianum, Pittosporum ralphii, Pittosporum crassifolium, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dodonaea viscosa, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Alectryon excelsus, Myoporum laetum, Sophora tetraptera, Coprosma robusta, Kunzea robusta, Plagianthus regius, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Cordyline australis, Sophora microphylla, Carex geminata, Coprosma repens, Myrsine australis, Pseudopanax arboreus, Astelelia banksia, Lophomyrtus bullata cultivar
Acacia melonoxylon, Hedera helix, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Foeniculum vulgare, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Prunus spp, Solanum betaceum, Rubus fruticosus, Asparagus asparagoides, Piptatherum miliaceum, Carex leporina, Solanum nigrum, Lolium arundinaceum, Myoporum insulare, Genista monspessulana, Chloris truncata, Chrysanthemoides monilifera, Agapanthus praecox, Phytolacca octandra
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. √
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
√
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Sparrow, fantail, silvereye
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ Phytolacca octandra Foeniculum vulgare
Solanum nigrum Will die when shaded out by a closed canopy
2 Common, 10%-50%
ground area. √
148
3 Occasional, up to
10% ground area. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐
Asparagus asparagoides Hedera helix Cut and poison
2 Common, 10%50%
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to
10% canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Genista monspessulana prunus Acacia melanoxylon cytus proliferus Cotoneaster
glaucophyllus Chrysanthemoides monilifera Myoporum insulare
Cut and poison shrubs. Slowly remove exotics from canopy by drilling and poisoning
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover.
☐
3 Occasional, up to
10% understorey or canopy cover.
√
4 None present. ☐
149
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Pest management Positive Continue
1 Planted Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Plant in canopy gaps and around margins to increase canopy cover and link blocks.
Notes
150
Harakeke Reserve
Site number: 22
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1935992.625E, 5618945.5N Date: 1.3.19
Area m²: 19422.3 Landform: Plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled regional x
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC) x Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
13
Entrance 3/9/12
Waterway vegetation/rubbish
8
Pathway 11
Muehlenbeckia overrun
Site Map
151
Site Description
Pittosporums and Coprosmas dominate. 6 to 8m tallest canopy. Drain waterway alongside with Typha orientalis. Concrete pavement through reserve. Big Acer spp specimen trees at path edge, could be a future problem. Pittosporum crassifolium regeneration Acer spp regeneration at streamside. Regeneration of palm.
2 rats seen.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Ecotone from Typha orientalis to Bolboschoenus
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the plains
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 A 2 1 70 Mixed broadleaved- Pittosporum spp. forest
2 3 B 21 22 23 1 30 Typha orientalis/ Phormium tenax -Bolboschoenus wetland
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Phormium tenax, Sophora microphylla, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum eugenioides, Austroderia spp, Typha orientalis, Coprosma robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Muehlenbeckia complexa, Pittosporum crassifolium, Sophora tetraptera, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cordyline australis, Olearia solandri, Corokia x cheesemanii, Dodonaea viscosa, Bolboschoenus spp, Olearia paniculata, Kunzea robusta, Plagianthus divaricatus, Podocarpus totara, Lemna, Veronica spp. cultivar, Coprosma hybrid, Olearia spp, Lophomyrtus obcordata
152
Lolium arundinaceum, Acacia melanoxylon, Araujia sericifera, Quercus spp, exotic sophora, Chloris truncata, pasture grass, Solanum nigrum, Acer spp, Prunus spp, thistle, Pinus spp, Hedera helix, Rubus fruticosus, Ipomoea indica, Echinochloa crus-galli
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √ ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.
☐ √
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.
√ ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √ ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
☐ √
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Myna, thrush, sparrow, blackbird, fantail, ducks, rats
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐
Solanum nigrum thistle Will be shaded out by a closed canopy
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
ground area. √ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ ☐
Ipomoea indica, Rubus fruticosus,,Araujia
sericifera
Hand remove, spray, poison stumps
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
canopy cover. √ ☐
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
Regen of exotic specimens Slowly remove adults from area and hand remove seedlings
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
153
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover.
√ √
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1
Unit 2
Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
√ √ Seen rats
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage.
☐ ☐
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Rubbish dumping Negative Deter people from dumping
1 Planted Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Extend the width of the planting. Link to beach by planting in adjacent area. Remove ecological weeds.
Notes
154
SH50 planting Site number: 25
Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1932045E, 5616926N Date: 27.2.19
Area m²: 4776.79 Landform: Plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal M Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1
Sophora regeneration 2/3
Weeds in reserve
Site Map
155
Site Description
Planted, very species diverse and weedy. Mostly closed canopy some areas of canopy collapse. Sophora spp, Hoheria, Podocarpus totara and Dacrycarpus dacrydioides the main spp. Lot of Sophora microphylla natural regeneration. Broom relevant, likely planted Carmichaelia williamsii.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Sophora and Dacrycarpus dacrydioides broadleaved mix Metrosideros excelsa,
Agathis australis present but outside of natural distributional limit.
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 Under 1% of forest is left on the plains
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er
Hyd
rolo
gical R
egime
Catego
ry
Co
de
Ch
aracter
Hab
itat area
estimate
Vegetation description
(Dominant species)
1 1 A 4 1 100 Mixed podocarp- broadleaved forest
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Hoheria sexstylosa, Piper excelsum, Alectryon excelsus, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum crassifolium, Pseudopanax hybrid, Sophora tetraptera, Myrsine australis, Podocarpus totara, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Pittosporum eugenioides, Coprosma robusta, Melicope ternata, Melicytus ramiflorus, Myoporum laetum, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Prumnopitys ferruginea, Dicksonia squarrosa, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Carpodetus serratus, Astelia spp, Dacrydium cupressinum, Pseudopanax lessonii, Olearia solandri, Corokia x cheesemanii, Griselinia littoralis, Carmichaelia williamsii, Rubus schmidelioides, Muehlenbeckia complexa, Solanum laciniatum, Hoheria angustifolia, Agathis australis, Hedycarya arborea, Meryta sinclairii, Cyperus ustulatus
156
Pasture grass, Hedera helix, Solanum nigrum, Prunus spp, thistle, Conyza spp, Calystegia sylvatica, Vinca major, Helminthotheca echioides, Foeniculum vulgare, Araujia sericifera, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Piptatherum miliaceum, Banksia integrifolia
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. x
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. x
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. x
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Sparrow, fantail
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Hedera helix vinca and Araujia
Hand remove and spray
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. √
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground
area. ☐
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐
Hedera helix and Araujia Hand remove and spray
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy
cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ Prunus Chamaecytisus proliferus
For Cytisus cut and poison stumps. Remove Prunus if it is self-seeding
157
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Pruning Negative Only prune if vegetation posing a hazard
1 Planting Positive Continue
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Plant in canopy gaps and under canopy as some canopy species are nearing end of their life. Extend planting out both length and width ways to create a vegetation corridor, which could get closer to Friend’s Bush SNA.
Notes
158
Friend’s Bush Site number: 28
Recorder: TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1932178.25E, 5616440.5N Date: 27.2.19
Area m²: 3736.01 Landform: Plain
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
M No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures: fenced, planted
Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? √ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
1/2
Outside 3
Entrance and inside
4-12
Vegetation
Site Map
159
Site Description
Old planting, with paths throughout. Small water features. Ferns in understorey. Open area in middle with pond. Canopy height 12-15 m.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Metrosideros excelsa, Fuscospora fusca, Agathis australis outside
of distributional limits
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planted with many natives
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2
One of few forest patches on the plain. Maybe only one in city. Planted in 1981
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 a 4 1 100 Mixed podocarp-broadleaved forest
160
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)
Canopy: Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Podocarpus totara, Pittosporum eugenioides, Agathis australis, Metrosideros excelsa, Sophora tetraptera, Beilschmiedia tawa, Fuscospora fusca, Dacrydium cupressinum, Alectryon excelsus, Cordyline australis
Subcanopy: Piper excelsum, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cyathea medullaris, Melicytus ramiflorus, Rhopalostylis sapida, Prumnopitys ferruginea, Cyathea dealbata, Hoheria angustifolia
Ground: Asplenium bulbiferum, Arthropodium cirratum, Corokia Cotoneaster, Ptisana salicina, Astelia chatham, Libertia spp, Asteria solandri, Parsonsia heterophylla, Blechnum chambersii, Microsorum pustulatum
Exotics: Bromelia spp, Camellia japonica, Chlorophytum comosum, Ophiopogon japonicus, Pteris crepis, Nephrolepis cordifolia, Hedera helix
Regeneration: Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Coprosma robusta, Melicytus ramiflorus, Pittosporum eugenioidies, Hoheria spp, Podocarpus totara, Corynocarpus laevigatus
Agapanthus praecox and roses on outside
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1
Forest/scrub
☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
√
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
Wood pigeon seen by locals, tūī, chaffinch, fantail, goldfish in pond, bees
161
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐
Agapanthus praecox, Hedera helix
Spray and hand remove
2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √
4 None present. ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐
4 None present. √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐
Camelia Drill and poison
2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or
canopy cover. ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or
canopy cover. √
4 None present. ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional
stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges.
☐
4 No damage. √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
1 Weeding Removal of natives and exotics Continue to remove exotics
1 Tracks maintained Continually cleared
1 Planting All planted Continue planting natives
Notes
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove environmental weeds. Try to reduce the distance between this and the SH50 highway SNA site by planting along the highway.
Notes
162
Coastal
Esplanade Herbfield
Site number: 17
Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933381.875E, 5624535N Date: 4.3.19
Area m²: 8037.44 Landform: Coastal margin
General information for the site:
Tenure (tick all that apply)
√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed
Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled
No legal
Reserve (TA)
Covenant (QEII)
Reserve (DoC)
Agreement (RC)
If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:
If managed what are the measures:
Fencing (tick one)
☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):
Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)
√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks
☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land
☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture
☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives
☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub
Photos
Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description
4th march folder
27/54/last photo
Overview
Site Map
163
Site Description
Gravelfield beside coast, between properties. Herbfield with a lot of exotics. Lot of Cotoneaster glaucophyllus. Train track and biking path border site. Cotoneaster glaucophyllus regeneration. Very weedy/exotic. Only SNA in coastal environment.
Succulents and garden escapees from border properties.
Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA
Significance criteria Rating (1,2)
Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.
Criteria_1 – Representativeness
1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains species typical of coastal margins
1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals
Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern
2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Only SNA to contain native gravel herbfield species
2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences
Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness
3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1 Coprosma acerosa
3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit
3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 Only coastal herbfield site in Napier City
3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Back shingle beach
3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.
3F – An originally rare ecosystem type
3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature
Criteria_4 – Ecological Context
4A – Large site
4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor
4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species
Habitat and Vegetation Description:
Un
it Nu
mb
er H
ydro
logical
Regim
e C
ategory
Co
de
Ch
aracter H
abitat area
Estimate %
Vegetation description (Dominant species)
1 1 B 36 2 20 Chrysanthemoides monilifera /Agapanthus praecox Garden mix herbfield
2 1 B 36 2 80 Cotoneaster glaucophyllus/ Pasture grass/ Gazania linearis herbfield
Flora and Fauna:
Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.) Coprosma repens, Pittosporum crassifolium, Phormium cookianum, Pimelea urvilliana subsp. urvilliana, Muehlenbeckia complexa, Ficinia nodosa, Disphyma australe, Coprosma acerosa, Phormium tenax cultivar, Agave americana, Agapanthus praecox, Lagarus ovatus, pasture grass, Verbascum thapsus, Sisyrinchium spp, Iris spp, Euphorbia spp, Chrysanthemoides monilifera, thistle, Lavendula spp, Banksia integrifolia, Chloris truncata, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Cultivars, Cytisus scoparius, Cotoneaster coriaceus, Artemisia arborescens, Alyssum spp, Agave spp, Cotyledon orbiculata, Geranium spp, Pyracantha angustifolia, Rosmarinus officinalis, Rosa spp, Amaryllis belladonna, Eschscholzia californica, Aloe arborescens, Gazania linearis, Yucca gloriosa, Pimelea urvilleana subsp. urvilleana.
164
Vegetation condition
Rating information
(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2
Forest/scrub
☐ ☐
Canopy condition
1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐
2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √
3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.
☐ ☐
4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐
Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐
2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.
√
3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐
4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐
Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √
3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.
☐ ☐
4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.
☐ ☐
Coastline habitat Unit: 1 and 2
Description %
Sand binders
Grass/Sedges x Herbs x Shrubs
Trees
Type (tick all that apply) Fore dune ☐ Second dune ☐ Rear dune √
Rocky shore ☐ Coastal cliff ☐ Wetland ☐
Substrate % Boulders/rocks 90 Mud/Silt 10 Soil
Sand
Native plant vigour in coastal habitat High ☐ Medium ☐ Low √
Erosion/Disturbance (comments)
Fauna
Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.
165
Threats
Pest plants
Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc
Comments & suggested management
Ground cover weeds
1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.
☐ ☐
Gazania linearis
2 Common, 10%-50% ground
area. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
ground area. √ ☐
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.
☐ ☐
2 Common, 10%50% canopy
cover. ☐ ☐
3 Occasional, up to 10%
canopy cover. ☐ ☐
4 None present. √ √
Shrub/Tree Weeds
1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
Cotoneaster glaucophyllus Chrysanthemoides monilifera,
Yucca Cut and poison
2 Common, 10%-50%
understorey or canopy cover.
√ √
3 Occasional, up to 10%
understorey or canopy cover.
☐ ☐
4 None present. ☐ ☐
Pest animals
If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.
Indicator Rating Estimate
(Tick appropriate level)
Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.
Comments suggested management
Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.
☐ ☐
2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered.
Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.
☐ ☐
3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐
4 No damage. √ √
Human Associated Activities
(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)
Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response
Tree felled
Gardens bordering
Notes
166
Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.
Remove ecological weeds. Plant site with native herbfield species to create native dominance.
Notes
References
Biodiversity Collaborative Group 2018 Report of the Biodiversity Collaborative Group. Biodiversity (Land and Freshwater) Stakeholder Trust.
Bioresearchers. 2004. Ahuriri Estuary Environmental Evaluation EMI: 0422 HBRC Plan No: 3503 Hawkes Bay Regional Council.
Cornes TS, Thomson RE, Clarkson BD. 2012. Key ecological sites of Hamilton City: Volume 1. CBER Contract
Report No. 121, prepared for Hamilton City Council. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Biodiversity
and Ecology Research, The University of Waikato.
Hawkes Bay Regional Council. 2019. Ecosystem Prioritzation Dataset. Source Data:
hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live
Leathwick JR, Hashiba K, Lynch B. 2017. Biodiversity rankings for the Hawkes Bay Region HBRC Report No.
RM 17-20. HBRC Publication No. 4954.