166
Appendix 6: All completed SNA assessment forms Appendix to the report: Napier Significant Natural Areas Assessment T.S. Cornes, C.L. Kirby, R.L. Johnson, B.D. Clarkson ERI Report number: 124 Prepared for Napier City Council Environmental Research Institute University of Waikato September 2019

Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

Appendix 6:

All completed SNA assessment forms

Appendix to the report:

Napier Significant Natural Areas Assessment

T.S. Cornes, C.L. Kirby, R.L. Johnson, B.D. Clarkson

ERI Report number: 124

Prepared for Napier City Council

Environmental Research Institute

University of Waikato

September 2019

Page 2: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

2

Table of Contents Hills .................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Esk Hill 1 ......................................................................................................................................................... 4

Esk Hill 2 ......................................................................................................................................................... 9

Esk Hill 3 ....................................................................................................................................................... 15

Esk Hill 4 ....................................................................................................................................................... 19

Esk Hill 5 ....................................................................................................................................................... 23

Esk Hill 6 ....................................................................................................................................................... 28

Esk Hill 7 ....................................................................................................................................................... 32

Esk Hill 8 ....................................................................................................................................................... 36

Esk Hill 9 ....................................................................................................................................................... 40

Esk Hill 10 ..................................................................................................................................................... 44

Esk Hill 11 ..................................................................................................................................................... 48

Esk Hill 12 ..................................................................................................................................................... 52

Kaiangaroa ................................................................................................................................................... 56

Bluff hill (Mataruahou) ................................................................................................................................ 60

Lake Rotokaramu ......................................................................................................................................... 64

Halliwell Reserve 1....................................................................................................................................... 68

Halliwell Reserve 2....................................................................................................................................... 72

Dolbel Reserve 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 76

Dolbel Reserve 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 80

Otatara Park................................................................................................................................................. 85

Otatara Pa 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 89

Otatara Pa 2 ................................................................................................................................................. 93

Otatara Pa 3 ................................................................................................................................................. 97

Saline plain..................................................................................................................................................... 101

Ahuriri Estuary (Upper Ahuriri).................................................................................................................. 101

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 107

Ahuriri Estuary (Mid-Ahuriri Estuary) ........................................................................................................ 108

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 112

Ahuriri Estuary (Taipo Stream) .................................................................................................................. 113

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 116

Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Ponds).............................................................................................. 117

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 122

Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Wetland) .......................................................................................... 123

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 126

Ahuriri Estuary (Lower Ahuriri Estuary) ..................................................................................................... 127

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report. .................................................................... 130

Page 3: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

3

Bayview Wetland ....................................................................................................................................... 131

Ahuriri Plain Wetland ................................................................................................................................ 137

Embankment Road Wetland ..................................................................................................................... 141

Plains .............................................................................................................................................................. 145

Westshore Reserve Bush ........................................................................................................................... 145

Harakeke Reserve ...................................................................................................................................... 150

SH50 planting............................................................................................................................................. 154

Friend’s Bush ............................................................................................................................................. 158

Coastal ........................................................................................................................................................... 162

Esplanade Herbfield................................................................................................................................... 162

References ..................................................................................................................................................... 166

Field sheets adapted from Cornes, Thomson, Clarkson 2012. Significance criterea (Source from Draft National Poicy

Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity, Biodiversity Collaborative Group 2018 pp. 72-76)

Page 4: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

4

Hills

Esk Hill 1 Site number: 1

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933315E, 5631346N Date: 28.2.19

Area m²: 32400.71 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or

pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA) M Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures: Fencing and planting

Fencing (tick one)

No fencing

Some fencing x Mostly fenced

Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? No Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Overview

4 Vine/shed

3 Overview

Page 5: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

5

Site Map

Site Description

A-B: Kunzea robusta dominant vegetation on one side of gully only (patchy with canopy holes and dieback) and

grass cover with weeds. Other side of this block is a diverse planting with much lower canopy and younger. Kunzea

robusta unit has been used to dump organic plant rubbish.

C: Planted weedy site nearby.

D-F: Gully site dominated by Kunzea robusta canopy. Pasture grass groundcover.

Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating

(1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet

criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various sprcies planted on one side

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

Page 6: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

6

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area

1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka

forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has

special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

estimate

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 70 Kunzea robusta forest

2 1 A 4 1 30 Mixed podocarp-broadleaved forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Kunzea robusta, Melicytus ramiflorus, Coprosma repens, Cordyline australis, Pseudopanax hybrid, Dodonaea

viscosa, Podocarpus totara, Veronica spp, Sophora tetraptera, Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum crassifolium,

Griselinia littoralis, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum eugenioides, Piper excelsa, Solanum laciniatum,

Phormium cookianum, Muehlenbecka spp

Rumex sagittatus, thistle, Alocasia brisbanensis, Pinus, Aredera cordifolia, Eucalyptus, Banksia integrifolia,

Agapanthus praecox, Tropaeolum majus, Chamaecytisus proliferus, pasture grass, Conyza spp, Solanum nigrum,

Ginkgo biloba, Carex leporina, Cortaderia selloana, Persea Americana, Lilium formosanum

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. U

nit 1

Un

it 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √ ☐

Page 7: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

7

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐ √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ √

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ √

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

√ ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Quail, fantail, bellbird

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Un

it 1

Un

it 2

Notes for dominant

Species etc

Comments & suggested

management

Ground cover

weeds

1 Very common, cover

>50% ground area. ☐ ☐

Solanum nigrum, Tropaeolum

majus,

Rumex sagittatus

Will be shaded out with closed

canopy

2 Common, 10%-50%

ground area. √ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

ground area. ☐ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50%

canopy cover. ☐ ☐

Aredera cordifolia, Rumex

sagittatus

Poison or pull vine. Take care when

removing tubers to not spread to

other areas 2 Common, 10%50%

canopy cover. √ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

canopy cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. ☐ √

Page 8: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

8

Shrub/Tree

Weeds

1 Very common, <50%

understorey or canopy

cover.

☐ ☐

Pinus, Banksia integrifolia,

Chamaecytisus proliferus, Persea

americana

Drill and poison large trees what

are a seed source

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy

cover.

√ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit

1

Unit

2

Notes

Species etc.

Comments suggested

management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof

prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard Or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest /vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

2 Planting Positive Continue

Both Rubbish dumping Negative Stop

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds like Tropaeolum majus. Plant area to link this SNA to other SNA Esk Hill sites. Deter

people from dumping rubbish as it can spread weeds and is a health and safety risk. New native plantings at high

densities to reduce weed invasion.

Notes:

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:

hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 9: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

9

Esk Hill 2 Site number: 2

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932652E, 5631051N Date: 29.2.19

Area m²: 137521.8 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures: Pest control

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? No Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

3 Overview

6-9 Weta boxes

10-17

Aerial view

Page 10: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

10

Site Map

Site Description

All Esk sites: Esk Hill originally grazed planted a patch each year. Beginning to plant under Kunzea robusta. Large

Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Resident society owned. 3 to 4 archaeological sites eg

PA. 53 house lots on Esk Hill.

A, C, D, E, G-I: Kunzea robusta canopy with Pyrrosia epiphytes, Microsorum around them on ground. Lot of natural

regeneration of Corynocarpus laevigatus, Piper excelsum and Kunzea robusta. Young planting area joins on,

Ozothamnus leptophyllus mostly and sparse. Extensive planting and under planting undertaken. Soil well drained,

north facing especially. Alectryon excelsus and Podocarpus totara forest relictual according to marie taylor.

Introduced weta. Beginning to see possums. Weasel presence in gully. Four detention dams. limestone faces.

B: Has an exotic broadleaved unit. Lot of Chamaecytisus proliferus at edge and grassy patches. Deeper gully is steep

with Kunzea robusta canopy and grass groundcover. Potentially grazed. High weed presence.

F: Well drained top ridge abundant Kunzea robusta. Lower half and flats covered in Rubus fruticosus. Steep hill

limestone.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating

(1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet

criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various planted native species

Page 11: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

11

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Falcon, weta, Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Phyllocladus trichomainoides

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area

1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka

forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special

ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site 2 Largest Napier City hill site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

estimate

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 15 Kunzea robusta forest

2 1 A 2 2 15 Mixed broadleaved-exotic dominated forest

3 1 A 6 1 30 Kunzea robusta/ Piper excelsum- Melicytus ramiflorus forest

4 1 A 2,6 1 10 Kunzea robusta-Myoporum laetum / Melicytus ramiflorus forest

5 1 A 12, 6 2 30 Kunzea robusta/ Ulex europaeus forest

Page 12: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

12

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Metrosideros excelsa, Cordyline australis, Pseudeopanax crassifolius, Sophora tetraptera, Dodonaea viscosa,

Podocarpus totara, Hoheria populnea, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum crassifolium, Pittosporum

eugenioides, Phormium cookianum, Alectryon excelsus, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Coprosma robusta, Piper

excelsum, Pseudopanax hybrid, Veronica spp. cultivars, Pteris macilenta, Veronica stricta, Sophora microphylla,

Griselinia littoralis, Microsorum pustulatum, Melicytus ramiflorus, Knightia excelsa, Pyrrosia eleagnifolia,

Muehlenbeckia australis, Beilschmiedia tarairi, Melicope ternata, Hedycarya arborea, Hoheria sexstylosa,

Pseudopanax ferox, Pseudopanax crassifolius, Dacrydium cupressinum, Carpodetus serratus, Cyathea medullaris,

Prumnopitys ferruginea, Typha orientalis, Myoporum laetum, Coprosma spathulata, Ripogonum scandens,

Coprosma crassifolia, Myrsine australis, Pseudopanax arboreus, Brachyglottis repanda, Aristotelia serrata,

Ozothamnus leptophyllus, Phormium tenax, Austroderia spp, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Coprosma propinqua,

Plagianthus regius, Nestegis montana, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Rhopalostylis sapida, coprosma grandifolia,

Phyllocladus trichomanoides, Pellaea rotundifolia, passiflora tetranda, Cyperus ustulatus, Teucrium parvifolium,

Blechnum parrisiae

Chamaecytisus proliferus, Pasture grass, Agapanthus praecox, Olea spp, Solanum nigrum, Eucalyptus spp, Rubus

fruticosus, Malus x domestica, Pinus spp, Callistemon spp, Ficus carica, Laurus nobilus, Thistle, Phytolacca octandra,

Pteridium esculentum, Actinidia spp, Paspalum dilatatum, Solanum linnaeanum, Ulex europaeus,

Foeniculum vulgare, Berberis vulgaris, Prunus Americana, Verbena bonariensis, Chichorium intybus, Carex leporina,

Pinus spp.

Vegetation condition

Rating

information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit

1

Unit

2

Unit

3

Unit

4

Unit 5

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Canopy

condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ √ √ √ √

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very

occasional dieback.

√ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less

palatable species. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ √

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively

abundant. ☐ √ ☐ ☐ ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐ √ √ ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings

etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder

of forest floor. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Page 13: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

13

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf

litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐ √ √ ☐

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%.

Leaf letter on remainder.

√ √ ☐ ☐ √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Sparrow, bellbird, falcon, harrier, blackbird, tūī, fernbird, morepork, quail, fantail, kereru, weta

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate

level)

Unit

1

Unit

2

Unit

3

Unit

4

Unit

5

Notes for dominant

Species etc

Comments &

suggested

management

Ground

cover weeds

1 Very common,

cover >50%

ground area.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Solanum nigrum Phytolacca

octandra, Foeniculum

vulgare, Rubus fruticosus

Spray Rubus from

open areas. Other

species should die

under a closed canopy

2 Common, 10%-

50% ground area. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ √

3 Occasional, up to

10% ground area.

√ √ √ √ ☐

4 None present. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common,

>50% canopy

cover.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Actinidia, Rubus fruticosus Remove from open

areas

2 Common,

10%50% canopy

cover.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ √

3 Occasional, up to

10% canopy

cover.

☐ √ √ √ ☐

4 None present. √ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Shrub/Tree

Weeds

1 Very common,

<50%

understorey or

canopy cover.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Chamaecytisus proliferus,

Ficus, Ulex europaeus, Prunus

americana, Pinus

Remove self-seeding

species. Drill and

poison trees

2 Common, 10%-

50% understorey

or canopy cover.

☐ √ ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to

10% understorey

or canopy cover.

☐ ☐ √ √ √

4 None present. √ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Page 14: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

14

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit

1

Unit

2

Unit

3

Unit

4

Unit

5

Notes

Species

etc.

Comments

suggested

management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major

tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen

throughout area.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes

scattered. Occasional stock heard or seen,

confined to scattered areas on edge.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only

near edges. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √ √ √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Potentially grazed Negative Fence from stock

Pest management: 100 bs doc200s Positive Continue

Nest boxes for weta Positive Continue

Planting Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fence area from stock as currently natural regeneration is begin suppressed. Remove ecological weeds. Continue

pest control. Plant trees at higher densities to create a closed canopy.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:

hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 15: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

15

Esk Hill 3

Site number: 3

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932211.75E, 5631140N Date: 1.3.19

Area m²: 14263.4 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures: Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Overview of mixed unit

2/7

Kunzea robusta behind mixed unit

3

Grass area

Site Map

Page 16: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

16

Site Description

Very dense forest patch dominated by Kunzea robusta. Has a closed canopy and is likely to be pest managed. Has been under planted. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. An open grass turf area separated sections of the block.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating

(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2

Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Some diversity of indigenous species

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical R

egime

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 80 Kunzea robusta forest

2 1 A 2 1 20 Sophora - mixed broadleaved forest

Page 17: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

17

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Kunzea robusta, Pittosporum eugenioides, Phormium cookianum, Myoporum laetum, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pittosporum crassifolium, Coprosma robusta, Dodonaea viscosa, Pteris macilenta, Cordyline australis, Corokia x cheesemanii, Arthropodium cirratum, Coprosma hybrid, Pittosporum ralphii, Melicytus ramiflorus, Ozothamnus leptophyllus, Sophora tetraptera, Leptospermum scoparium, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Alectryon excelsus, Pseudopanax arboreus, Rhopalostylis sapida, Piper excelsum, Carex species.

Pasture grass, Paspalum dilatatum, Solanum nigrum, Thistle

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐ √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ √

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ √

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

√ ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Thrush, tūī, blackbird, silvereye, harrier

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Unit 2

Notes for dominant

Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐ Solanum nigrum thistle

Paspalum dilatatum Will be shaded out by a closed

canopy over time 2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐ ☐

Page 18: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

18

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. ☐ √

4 None present. √ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √

Pest animals If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof

prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Planting Positive Increase

Likely pest managed Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant in canopy gaps. Underplant shade tolerant species in areas of dense canopy. Where possible plant to connect this site with other Esk Hill sites. Continue pest management.

Note

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 19: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

19

Esk Hill 4

Site number: 4

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932283.875E, 5630993N Date: 28.2.19

Area m²: 4491.65 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

x No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

2/3

Site view general

Site Map

Page 20: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

20

Site Description

Young block at Esk Hill Road, well established. Is on private property near houses on a small rise. Dead pine present among shrubland.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating

(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation left on the hills in Napier City.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved shrubland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.) Phormium cookianum, Sophora tetraptera, Austroderia spp., Kunzea robusta, Leptospermum scoparium, Pittosporum ralphii, Coprosma robusta, Corokia x cheesemanii, Pteris tremula, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pittosporum eugenioides, Cordyline australis, Melicytus ramiflorus, Veronica stricta, Dodonaea viscosa, Hoheria angustifolia Pasture grass, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Pinus spp., thistle, Solanum nigrum, Conyza spp.

Page 21: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

21

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √

Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Fantail

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Solanum nigrum Will be shaded out with canopy closure

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Cotoneaster glaucophyllus pinus

Cut or drill and poison

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Page 22: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

22

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Planting

Pest plant control

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Plant to reduce exposed margins. Plant to connect SNA to others.

Notes

Page 23: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

23

Esk Hill 5

Site number: 5

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932206E, 5630895N Date: 29.2.19

Area m²: 27638 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA) M Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

General overview of vegetation

2/3

Pond/ecotone

Page 24: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

24

Site Map

Site Description

Kunzea robusta canopy. There is a small pond/lake in the site with ecotones from raupō and Lemna in water and grasses and Carex around edge. SNA terrain is a mix of flats and steep gully. A walkway runs through. Planting has begun under Kunzea robusta canopy. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. High Solanum nigrum presence. Pest managed.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating

(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2

Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 High species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Sedge and grass to Typha orientalis and Lemna

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Small wetland present

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

Page 25: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

25

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

estimate

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 90 Kunzea robusta/ Piper excelsum forest

2 4 B 24 25 23 1 10 Typha orientalis/ Paspalum distichum Carex spp. wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Myoporum laetum, Pyrrosia eleagnifolia, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Blechnum parrisiae, Microsorum pustulatum, Griselinia littoralis, Veronica stricta, Asplenium polyodon, Muehlenbeckia australis, Dicksonia squarrosa, Pittosporum eugenioides, Pittosporum ralphii, Piper excelsum, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pteris tremula, Melicytus ramiflorus, Plagianthus regius, Podocarpus totara, Cyathea dealbata, Brachyglottis repanda, Coprosma robusta, Phormium cookianum, Kunzea robusta, Dodonaea viscosa, Cordyline australis, Sophora tetraptera, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Nestegis montana, Nestegis cunninghamii, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Helichrysum lanceolatum, Typha orientalis, Lemna spp, Cyperus ustulatus, Polystichum richardii, Veronica spp. cultivar

Solanum nigrum, Verbena bonariensis, Paspalum distichum, pasture grasses, Foeniculum vulgare, Pinus radiata, Rubus fruticosus, Erigeron karvinskianus, Helminthotheca echioides

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit.

Unit 1 Unit 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √ √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √ √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

√ ☐

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

☐ √

Page 26: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

26

Wetland/Estuary Unit:2

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake √ Shallow water <2m √

Swamp ☐ Marsh ☐ Fen☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √

Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system?

Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes☐ No √ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity

Clear ☐ Water Quality

Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐

Translucent ☐

Opaque √

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation

Sedge/grass 60 Herbs 40 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation

Sedge/grass 100 Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte %

OBL 35 FACW 20 FAC 25 FACU 20 UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring √ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Fantail, chaffinch, blackbird, dragonfly, tūī

Threats Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Unit 2

Notes for dominant species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐ ☐

Erigeron karvinskianus Spray

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area.

√ √

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐ ☐

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐

Rubus fruticosus Spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. √ ☐

4 None present. ☐ √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Pinus Remove any seedlings

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey

or canopy cover. √ ☐

4 None present. ☐ √

Pest animals

Page 27: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

27

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √

Human Associated Activities (Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Pest managed Positive Continue

Planting Positive Continue at higher densities

Dogs off leash Neutral

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant in canopy gaps to close the canopy. Underplant dense canopy areas with shade tolerant species. Continue pest control. Plant areas between other Esk Hill sites to increase connectivity. Plant wetland species in and around the pond.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 28: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

28

Esk Hill 6

Site number: 6

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932870E, 5630734N Date: 1.3.19

Area m²: 2723.15 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

x No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

3/4

Mixed broadleaved unit

2

Kunzea robusta unit

Site Map

Page 29: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

29

Site Description

Development planting of a previously grazed site. Species diverse however there is a lot of bare ground. Broadleaved mix with lot of exotics. 2nd unit is native with grass groundcover. Some Kunzea robusta regeneration is present among grasses.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating

(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2

Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planted, species diverse

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2

<1% native vegetation left on the hills within the Naiper City boundary. Contains some remnant Kunzea.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical R

egime

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 1 a 2 2 60 Mixed native-exotic broadleaved forest

2 1 a 6 2 1 40 Mixed broadleaved- Kunzea robusta forest

Page 30: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

30

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Griselinia littoralis, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pittosporum eugenioides, Coprosma hybrid, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum crassifolium, Veronica stricta, Cordyline australis, Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum ralphii, Coprosma robusta, Kunzea robusta, Phormium tenax, Dodonaea viscosa, Phormium cookianum cultivar

Callistemon spp, Hydrangea macrophylla, Acer spp, Agapanthus praecox, pasture grass

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.

√ √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.

☐ ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. √ √

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

√ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

☐ √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Thrush, tūī, sparrow

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐

Agapanthus praecox Spray or had remove

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. √ ☐

4 None present. ☐ √

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √

Page 31: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

31

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Hydrangea, Acer spp, cultivars

Remove if reproducing

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey

or canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. √ ☐

4 None present. ☐ √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Weed management Posiitve Continue

Planting Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fence from stock. Underplant exotic dominant areas with naitves. Plant to reduce margins and connect to other SNA sites.

Notes

Page 32: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

32

Esk Hill 7

Site number: 7

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932643E, 5630451N Date: 28.2.19

Area m²: 86138.1 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal m Reserve (TA) m Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? No Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

3

Weedy entrance

1

Carex/unit 2

Site Map

Page 33: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

33

Site Description

This block is all built up planting, with Kunzea robusta the dominant species. High amount of weeds at the entry. There is a poorly drained gully at the bottom with rush and sedgeland (Unit 2). Drainage ditches are present. A walking track runs through starting at pavilion. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Rabbit seen.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Diverse planting of species

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site 2 Second largest hill site in Napier City

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 90 Kunzea robusta /Pteris tremula forest

2 5 B 23 24 1 10 Kunzea robusta / Carex spp- Cyperus ustulatus- Juncus pallidus forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Dodonaea viscosa, Sophora tetraptera, Coprosma robusta, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Kunzea robusta, Podocarpus totara, Veronica stricta, Cordyline australis, Carex secta, Carex geminata, Pittosporum eugenioides, Plagianthus regius, Pteris tremula, Carpodetus serratus, Coprosma areolata, Piper excelsum, Myoporum laetum, Solanum laciniatum, Alectryon excelsus, Melicytus ramiflorus, Brachyglottis repanda, Pseudopanax lessonii, Myrsine australis, Nestegis montana, Sophora microphylla, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Elaeocarpus dentatus, Melicope ternata,

Page 34: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

34

Muehlenbeckia spp, Juncus pallidus, Phormium cookianum, Hoheria angustifolia, Cyperus ustulatus, Coprosma hybrid

Conyza spp, thistle, pasture grasses, Paspalum dilatatum, Cichorium intybus, Foeniculum vulgare, Verbena bonariensis, Solanum nigrum, Helminthotheca echioides

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐ ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √ ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ √

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐ ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √ √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

√ √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Fantail, greywarbler, quails, rabbit

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐

Thistle Verbena bonariensis Cichorium intybus Solanum

nigrum

Planting to close canopy should eliminate these

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. √ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

ground area. ☐ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

canopy cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Page 35: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

35

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage.

√ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Pruning around paths Negative Limit

Planting Positive Continue

Pest management Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Pruning of plants could be limited to only when plants are creating a hazard along paths. Continue pest management. Plant in canopy gaps to reduce weeds. Plant around the margins of the site to connect blocks within the SNA and this site to other Esk Hill sites.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 36: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

36

Esk Hill 8

Site number: 8

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932386E, 5630643N Date: 28.2.19

Area m² : 4797.61 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

x No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1/2

Site overview

Site Map

Page 37: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

37

Site Description

Young block at Heipipi Drive, well established. Is on private property near houses on a small rise. Mixed broadleaved shrubs to small trees.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Diverse but has Metrosideros excelsa and cultivars

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation left on the hills in Napier City.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 11 1 100 Mixed broadleaved shrubland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Sophora tetraptera, Kunzea robusta, Cordyline australis, Phormium cookianum, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dodonaea viscosa, Coprosma robusta, Veronica stricta, Hoheria angustifolia, Hoheria populnea, Leptospermum scoparium, Meryta sinclairii, Podocarpus totara, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Metrosideros excelsa, Rhopalostylis sapida, Griselinia lucida, Melicytus ramiflorus, Alectryon excelsus, Plagianthus regius, Pittosporum crassifolium, Aristotelia serrata, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum ralphii, Veronica spp. cultivar

Pasture grass, garden variety shrubs at edges by properties

Vegetation condition

Page 38: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

38

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Fantail

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐

4 None present. √

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Page 39: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

39

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Planting Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant canopy gaps densely. Plant to connect SNA to others on Esk Hill.

Notes

Page 40: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

40

Esk Hill 9

Site number: 9

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932194E, 5630623N Date: 29.2.19

Area m²: 18050.06 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA) M Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known): only temporary electric

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Overview of canopy and grass

2

Overview and stock fence

Page 41: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

41

Site Map

Site Description

Kunzea robusta canopy dominates. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Bare understorey throughout and pasture grass ground cover only. Currently has stock in it and temporary electric fence is up. Pest managed. Young plantings around the edge of the site.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of are 1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Page 42: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

42

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

estimate

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 Kunzea robusta forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Kunzea robusta, Melicytus ramiflorus, Piper excelsum

Pasture grass, Rubus fruticosus

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Tūī

Page 43: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

43

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐

4 None present. √

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

Rubus fruticosus Spray to remove

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds 1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

√ Stock

present Fence off

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. ☐

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Pest managed Positive Continue

Grazed Negative Fence to remove stock

Plantings Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Build a permanent fence to eliminate stock from the site. Plant within canopy gaps to close the canopy. Plant around the margins and between stands to reduce the area exposed to external conditions. Increase planting density in current plantings. Plant to connect to other Esk Hill sites. Continue pest management.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 44: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

44

Esk Hill 10

Site number: 10

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932899E, 5630609N Date: 1.3.19

Area m²: 20849.66 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

2

Overview with weeds

8

Kunzea robusta over grass

4/5

Track

9

Gully with Rubus fruticosus

Page 45: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

45

Site Map

Site Description Canopy is sparse and dominated by Kunzea robusta. There is a gully in the middle. Very weedy especially high presence of Rubus fruticosus. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Steep banks either side. High fantail presence noted.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet

criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Page 46: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

46

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 2 1 100 Kunzea robusta forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Muehlenbeckia spp, Austroderia spp, Kunzea robusta, Coprosma robusta, Ripogonum scandens, Pteris tremula, Pseudopanax hybrid, Veronica stricta

Rubus fruticosus, Verbena bonariensis, Ulex europaeus, Foeniculum vulgare, Anredera cordifolia, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Conyza spp, Pinus spp, Paspalum dilatatum, Helminthotheca echioides, Crataegus monogyna, Aredera cordifolia

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. √

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Sparrow, pheasant, fantail, blackbird

Page 47: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

47

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Foeniculum vulgare Rubus fruticosus

Spray Rubus.

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. √

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

Rubus fruticosus Anredera cordifolia

Spray vines. Hand remove Anredera where possible.

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. √

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Ulex europaeus Cotoneaster glaucophyllus Pinus

Drill and poison Pinus and Cotoneaster

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey

or canopy cover. √

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges.

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Planting Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fence area from stock. Plant around the margins of the site to connect blocks within the SNA and this site to other Esk Hill sites. Remove ecological weeds.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 48: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

48

Esk Hill 11

Site number: 11

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932289E, 5630438N Date: 28.2.19

Area m²: 7667.38 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal x Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos.

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Asparagus scandens

2

Inside site, Kunzea robusta over grass cover

3

Overview of site

Site Map

Page 49: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

49

Site Description

Well-established canopy of Kunzea robusta in the gully with grass groundcover. No understorey present. Asparagus scandens is present. Lot of Foeniculum vulgare at entry. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Underplanting would benefit this SNA. Opposite is a young hillside planting.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early successional forest

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1

<1% native vegetation left on the hills and one of few remaning kānuka forest remnants within the Naiper City boundary.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 100 Kunzea robusta forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Pteris tremula, Kunzea robusta, Pseudopanax hybrid, Coprosma robusta

Foeniculum vulgare, thistle, pasture grass, Hedera helix, Nephrolepis cordifolia, Rubus fruticosus, Solanum nigrum, Asparagus scandens, Aredera cordifolia, Carex leporina

Page 50: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

50

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √

Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Blackbird

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Foeniculum vulgare Solanum nigrum

Will be shaded out with a closed canopy.

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

Asparagus scandens Anredera cordifolia

Cut, spray and dig out tubers

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey

or canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Page 51: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

51

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 planted Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Densely plant to fill canopy gaps.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 52: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

52

Esk Hill 12

Site number: 12

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932521E, 5629916N Date: 29.2.19

Area m²: 16461.18 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA) x Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions √ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

√ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Overview

2

Big pine and entrance

Site Map

Page 53: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

53

Site Description

Kunzea robusta dominated hillside, with some grassland above hill rd. Some limestone exposed throughout. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted.

B: High Pinus presence with young Pinus around. Plantation of Pinus behind. Cortaderia selloana and grass around the site. Orchard on other side of road

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains some remnant Kunzea in canopy

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2

<1% native vegetation left on the hills within the Naiper City boundary. Remnant kānuka in canopy.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other SNA Esk Hill sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 100 Pinus/Kunzea robusta forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Kunzea robusta, Sophora microphylla, Sophora tetraptera, Coprosma robusta

Pinus spp, Calystegia sylvatica, Rubus fruticosus, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Cortaderia selloana, pasture grass

Page 54: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

54

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. √

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Sparrows, harrier

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Calystegia silvatica Rubus fruticosus Cortaderia selloana

Hand remove or spray

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

Rubus fruticosus Calystegia silvatica

Hand remove or spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Pinus spp Chamaecytisus proliferus Cut or drill and poison

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey

or canopy cover. √

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Page 55: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

55

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Chopped pines Positive Need to make sure gaps are replanted

1 Planting Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Connect blocks by planting. Fully fence from stock. Plant canopy gaps densely. Plant to connect to other Esk Hill SNA.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 56: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

56

Kaiangaroa

Site number: 13

Recorder: MC, RJ, BC Grid Ref/GPS: 1932238E, 5629198N Date: 1.3.19

Area m²: 5300.05 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled m No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Adjoining young planting

2

Tallest Myoporum laetum

3/4/5/6

Overview

Site Map

Page 57: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

57

Site Description

Planted hillside with 7m tallest trees. Adjoining is a much younger planting. Veronica speciosa is in road reserve nearby only 1. A walking path runs the full length of the SNA.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A – Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Planted Pittosporum ralphii

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical R

egime

Catego

ry C

od

e C

haracter

Hab

itat area Estim

ate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 11 1 100 Mixed broadleaved shrubland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Pittosporum ralphii, Sophora tetraptera, Kunzea robusta, Ozothamnus leptophyllus, Phormium cookianum, Myoporum laetum, Coprosma repens, Dodonaea viscosa, Pittosporum crassifolium, Olearia solandri, Hoheria angustifolia, Austroderia spp, Leptospermum scoparium, Rhopalostylis sapida

Solanum nigrum, pasture grass

Page 58: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

58

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. x

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. x

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. x

Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Blackbird

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

Solanum nigrum Will be shaded out when canopy closes

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Page 59: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

59

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

planting Positive Continue

Managed area Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant natives at higher density to close canopy. Try to connect to other SNA sites by planting.

Notes

Page 60: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

60

Bluff hill (Mataruahou)

Site number: 19

Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1936899E, 5622698N Date: 26.02.19

Area m²: 9196.37 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures: Pest control

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

√ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos Mark photo points on map with a cross. Indicate direction of photographs taken with arrow.

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description 1

Vegetation regeneration

2

Underplanting 3/4/5

Vegetation/overview

15

Concrete stream

Site Map

Page 61: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

61

Site Description

Native forest bush patch surrounded by exotic vegetation in a steep gully. Walking track runs through the site. Upper and lower areas have had grass maintenance. There is some planting of natives along the concrete. Other bank along drain is weedy. Planted Veronica and Agathis australis along track. Natural regeneration of Piper excelsum and Corynocarpus laevigatus. Pest management poisoning in area. Pampas at edge of surveyed area.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA Significance criteria Rating

(1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Has old native trees. However, Metrosideros excelsa, Agathis australis

and Vitex lucens are outside distribution limit

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various native plant species but not all native to the area

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical R

egime

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area estim

ate

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 3 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Meryta sinclairii, Myoporum laetum, Phormium tenax, Cordyline australis, Alectryon excelsus, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Metrosideros excelsa, Podocarpus totara, Piper excelsum, Arthropodium cirratum, Pseudopanax ferox, Melicope ternata, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Kunzea robusta, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Coprosma repens, Dodonaea viscosa, Myrsine australis, Melicytus ramiflorus, Sophora microphylla, Veronica spp,

Page 62: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

62

Hoheria sexstylosa, Sophora tetraptera, Agathis australis, Beilschmiedia tawa, Asplenium bulbiferum, Pteris tremula, Hedycarya arborea, Cyathea dealbata, Dacrydium cupressinum, Vitex lucens, Rhopalostylis sapida, Pittosporum crassifolium, Griselinia littoralis, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cyathea medullaris, Hoheria populnea, Entelea arborescens

Chamaecytisus proliferus, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Hedera helix, Conyza spp, Eriobotrya japonica, Acacia spp, Robinia pseudoacacia, Eucalyptus spp, Tradescantia fluminensis, Trachycarpus fortunei, Delairea odorata, Crassula spp, Populus alba, Cortaderia selloana at border Piptatherum miliaceum

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Tūi, kereru, bellbird, fantail, sparrow, Kaka visiting – anecdotal

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Hedera helix, Tradescantia fluminensis, Crassula spp

Cut and poison ivy Hand remove T. fluminensis and

Crassula

2 Common, 10%-50%

ground area. √

3 Occasional, up to 10%

ground area. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

Hedera helix, Delairea odorata Cut and poison ivies

2 Common, 10%50%

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ Cotoneaster glaucophyllus,

Trachycarpus fortuna, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Robinia pseudoacacia

Hand remove or poison. Trees can be kept standing if no danger to the public

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover.

Page 63: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

63

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover.

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Mowing grass negative Stop mowing inside SNA

1 Pruning negative Stop pruning away from paths

1 Planting Positive Increase planting to close canopy

1 Pest control Positive Continue pest control

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Increased planting to create a closed forest canopy. Stop mowing the area. Plant natives into the connected exotic dominant areas to increase size and connectivity. Remove environmental weeds. Investigate reducing the amount of concrete in the area.

Notes

Page 64: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

64

Lake Rotokaramu

Site number: 20

Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1929034E, 5621904N Date: 26.2.19

Area m²: 37171.9 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) ☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased √ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

x No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions √ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

7/8

Margin/fence/maimai

1/2/6/10/17/18

Overview of lake

3

Grey heron/Eleocharis

Site Map

Page 65: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

65

Site Description

Non-draining Peat wetland - lot of Lemna, Eleocharis sedge and Typha orientalis common in water. 30 percent vegetation is Eleocharis. Juncus and pasture weeds, willows present in and out. Ricciocarpos natans- Nationally endangered present. No fish – anecdotal. Drained 1920 and cleared by digger. 99% private owned on Napier City boundary side. Potential for willow removal. Some parts protected.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Eleocharis Typha orientalis

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals 1 Freshwater wetland birds present

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Various wetland species

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1 Ricciocarpos natans

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 The largest freshwater wetland in the city

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 5 B 22 23 25 2 100 Eleocharis sphacelata- Typha orientalis-Juncus wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, under

Typha orientalis, Kunzea robusta, Glossostigma elatinoides, Ricciocarpos natans (threatened), Eleocharis sphacelata, Lemna, Azolla

Paspalam distichum, pasture weeds, Salix fragilis, Salix cinerea, Rubus fruticosus, Crataegus monogyna, Juncus spp, Ulex europaeus, Persicaria maculosa

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake √ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Page 66: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

66

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity

Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms √ Pollution √

Translucent ☐

Opaque √

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 0 Shrubs 0 Trees 5

Wetland margin vegetation

Sedge/grass 90 Herbs 5 Shrubs 0 Trees 5 Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 25 FAC 25 FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover % 90 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous x

Source of water: spring √ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Agricultural activity

Grazed

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Pukeko, swallow, sparrow, tūī, harrier, spoonbill, dabchick, grey teal, bittern, white-faced heron, fantail, shag, mallard, Australian shoveller, brown teal, blackbird, rail, Nz dragonfly, Green and golden bell frog

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

No pest weeds

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

Rubus fruticosus Spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Salix spp Drill and poison

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. √

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Page 67: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

67

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Maimai duck hut Neutral

1 Grazing on the other side Negative Exclude stock from SNA

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fully fence SNA from stock. Plant margins to increase site and provide and ecotone from wetland to forest. Remove ecological weeds.

Notes

Page 68: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

68

Halliwell Reserve 1

Site number: 23

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1930359E, 5618128N Date: 2.3.19

Area m²: 11338.8 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal X Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) open gate ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

4-6

Overview

1

Passionfruit vine

3

Dacrycarpus dacrydioides dominated

Site Map

Page 69: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

69

Site Description

Totally planted in 2012, very species diverse. Dacrycarpus dacrydioides dominated in low flatter area, 6 to 8 metre trees. No areas of closed canopy. Pinus plantation behind which may be potential problem. Gardens are at the edges with exotics.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Species diverse. Flat area kahikatea dominant

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planted various

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation left on the hills in Napier City.

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 4 1 100 Mixed broadleaved-Dacrycarpus dacrydioides forest.

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Pittosporum eugenioides, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Phormium tenax, Dacrydium cupressinum, Austroderia spp, Cordyline australis, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Pseudopanax hybrid, Coprosma robusta, Carpodetus serratus, Podocarpus totara, Hoheria sexstylosa, Myoporum laetum, Melicytus ramiflorus, Sophora microphylla, Phormium cookianum, Coprosma repens, Leptospermum scoparium, Kunzea robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Hoheria sexstylosa, Dodonaea viscosa, Veronica stricta, Sophora tetraptera, Pittosporum ralphii, Knightia excelsa

Rubus fruticosus, Paspalum dilatatum, Passiflora caerulea, Rumex sagittatus, Lolium arundinaceum, Foeniculum vulgare, Prunus spp, Calystegia sylvatica, pasture grass

Page 70: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

70

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Fantail, silvereye, tūī, blackbird

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Lolium arundinaceum Rubus fruticosus Foeniculum vulgare

Spray Rubus. Others die under canopy shade

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

Passiflora caerulea Calystegia silvatica Rubus fruticosus

Spray Rubus. Others had remove and poison stumps.

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. √

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Prunus Drill and poison if reproducing

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Page 71: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

71

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Planted Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Plant natives denser. Try to plant to join to other Halliwell SNA.

Notes

Page 72: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

72

Halliwell Reserve 2

Site number: 24

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1930353.125E, 5617860N Date: 2.3.19

Area m²: 12149.2 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) open gate

☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

6/7

Overview

1-3

Younger plantings

Site Map

Page 73: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

73

Site Description

Totally planted in 2012. Surrounded by gardens. Some young plants at top and within. Lower than Halliwell 1, 6m height trees. Upper vegetation only reaches 1 to 3m. Terrain is a steep hill.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains mixed broadleaved with coastal species

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planting is species diverse. However, Metrosideros excelsa, Fuscospora

fusca, Agathis australis and Vitex lucens are outside distribution limit

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 11 1 100 Mixed broadleaved-podocarp shrubland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Coprosma robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Podocarpus totara, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Sophora tetraptera, Knightia excelsa, Plagianthus regius, Dodonaea viscosa, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pittosporum ralphii, Pennantia corymbosa, Olearia solandri, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dacrydium cupressinum, Phormium tenax, Metrosideros excelsa, Cordyline australis, Sophora microphylla, Pseudopanax hybrid, Kunzea robusta, Myoporum laetum, Leptospermum scoparium, Pittosporum crassifolium, Melicope ternata, Agathis australis, Vitex lucens, Beilschmiedia tawa, Entelea arborescens, Veronica stricta, Sophora prostrata, Pseudopanax arboreus, Fuscospora fusca, Myrsine australis

Paspalum dilatatum, Hedera helix, pasture grass, Convolvulus arvensis, Solanum nigrum

Page 74: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

74

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Blackbird, harrier

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Pasture grass Solanum nigrum

Will be shaded out in time

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

Hedera helix Convolvulus arvensis

Hand remove and spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Page 75: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

75

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage.

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Planted Positive Continue

Pest animal control Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Plant natives at higher densities. Try to plant to connect to other SNA sites.

Notes

Page 76: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

76

Dolbel Reserve 1

Site number: 26

Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1929564E, 5616892N Date: 26.2.19

Area m²: 22173.7 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures: Planting, has care group

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

√ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

2

Stile into site

3

Track and vegetation

4/6

Character of canopy

Site Map

Page 77: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

77

Site Description

Fenced native broadleaved forest with some sections of closed canopy. Walking tracks run through the forest. Adjacent patch of young planted native trees. Natural regeneration of Dacrycarpus dacrydioides and Dodonaea viscosa. Large Kunzea robusta are natural secondary growth, not planted. Clianthus maximus (threatened – nationally critical) is planted.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Broadleaved native forest. However, Vitex lucens, Fuscospora fusca, Agathis

australis and Metrosideros excelsa are outside distribution range

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 High planted species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

regime

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area estim

ate Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Coprosma repens, Cordyline australis, Rhopalostylis sapida, Podocarpus totara, Agathis australis, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dacrydium cupressinum, Alectryon excelsus, Dodonaea viscosa, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cyathea dealbata, Hoheria sexstylosa, Pteris tremula, Melicytus ramiflorus, Poa spp, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Myrsine australis, Astelia spp, Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Sophora microphylla, Veronica spp, Coprosma robusta, Pittosporum crassifolium, Clianthus maximus, Griselinia littoralis, Fuscospora fusca, Metrosideros excelsa, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Vitex lucens, Kunzea robusta, Piper excelsum, Veronica stricta, Pseudopanax discolor, Leptospermum scoparium, Olearia solandri, Elaeocarpus dentatus, Sophora prostrata, Carpodetus serratus, Ripogonum scandens, Sophora tetraptera, Corokia x cheesemanii, Arthropodium cirratum, Melicope ternata, Phormium tenax cultivar. Nephrolepis cordifolia, Conyza spp, Iris spp Abies spp, pasture grass, Persea americana, Solanum nigrum

Page 78: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

78

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Fantail, tūī, blackbird, silvereye, sparrow, myna

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

Nephrolepis cordifolia

Hand removal

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Persea americana No action needed if not reproducing

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Page 79: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

79

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Dogs off leash Neutral

Walking track Positive Increase plantings along walking track

Planting Positive Continue planting

Pruning Negative Only prune if plantings interfering with safety along walkway

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Increased and denser planting of ecologically appropriate species to reduce weeds and help develop the forest to become humid enough for later successional species. Fully fence from stock. Remove ecological weeds like Nephrolepis cordifolia. Plant along hill to connect Dolbel sites.

Notes

Page 80: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

80

Dolbel Reserve 2 Site number: 27

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929510E, 5616582N Date: 27.2.19

Area m²: 24591.63 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures: planting. Has care group

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

√ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Plantings

2

Adjacent pasture land

3

Forest overview

4

Entrance

7 Path and vegetation

8 Perimeter

10 Fenceline

Page 81: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

81

Site Map

Site Description

A: Young planted forest with younger plantings within. Steep hillside with low canopy surrounded by

park/farmland. Species diverse. Exotic specimen trees ie oak in nearby land. Walking track through. Young planting

is adjoining the SNA.

B: Native planting on steep hillside, species diverse. Surrounded by agriculture and parkland. Closed canopy in

centre. Piper excelsum natural regeneration in places. Pseudopanax laetus planted. Track through middle. Oak

regeneration in some places.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Diverse native plantings but not all species native to the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 High diversity but Metrosideros excelsa, Fuscospora truncata and Vitex lucens are outside distribution range

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

Page 82: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

82

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area

2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

estimate

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Corynocarpus laevigatus, Dodonaea viscosa, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Sophora microphylla, Pittosporum

tenuifolium, Alectryon excelsus, Pittosporum eugenioides, Melicytus ramiflorus, Pittosporum crassifolium, sophora

tetraptera, Vitex lucens, Pseudopanax hybrid, Coprosma robusta, Melicope ternata, Cordyline australis, Fuscospora

truncata, pseudopanax discolor, Beilschmiedia tawa, Phormium tenax, Pseudopanax arboreus, Podocarpus totara,

Brachyglottis repanda, Rhopalostylis sapida, Carpodetus serratus, Leptospermum scoparium, Coprosma repens,

Kunzea robusta, Veronica stricta, Dacrydium cupressinum, Aristotelia serrata, Entelea arborescens, Hoheria

populnea, Knightia excelsa, Metrosideros robusta, Pteris tremula, Piper excelsum, Hoheria sexstylosa, Dicksonia

squarrosa, Corokia x cheesemanii, Prumnopitys taxifolia, Metrosideros excelsa, Pseudopanax laetus, Pseudowintera

colorata, Veronica spp. Cultivar. Pasture grasses, thistles, Solanum nigrum, Conyza spp, Prunus spp, Rubus

fruticosus, Tradescantia fluminensis, Pastinaca sativa, Cupressaceae spp, Agapanthus praecox, Lilium formosanum,

Eucalyptus spp.

Page 83: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

83

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Fantail, kereru, silvereye, sparrow, blackbird

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ Tradescantia fluminensis, Agapanthus praecox, Lilium formosanum

Hand remove

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ Rubus fruticosus Spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐

Page 84: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

84

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ Prunus, Eucalyptus Can leave if not reproducing

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey

or canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Pruning Negative Only prune if plantings interfering with safety along walkway

1 Planting Positive Increase plantings and plant denser

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant the area to link the two parts of the SNA to each other and to Dobel 1. Plant at higher densities to increase

canopy cover and reduce weeds. Remove ecological weeds like Rubus fruticosus.

Notes

Page 85: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

85

Otatara Park

Site number: 29

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929723.125E, 5615939N Date: 2.3.19

Area m²: 6099.2 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal x Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

9

Kereru 11/12

Path and vegetation

Site Map

Page 86: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

86

Site Description

Planted small park with exotic and cultivars at the top. Centre and lower section well-established natives has been underplanted. Garden-like perimeter with Acacia regeneration. Bare ground with leaf litter. Dodonaea viscosa regeneration. Coprosma regeneration too.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains broadleaved forest species

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse, Vitex lucens, Agathis australis and

Metrosideros excelsa out

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2

Planted in 1993. Less than 10% left of forest vegetation in Napier City boundary

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 A 2 1 Mixed broadleaved forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Entelea arborescens, Coprosma repens, Austroderia spp, Corokia x cheesemanii, Dodonaea viscosa, Pittosporum ralphii, Arthropodium cirratum, Corokia cotoneaster, Pseudopanax discolor, Coprosma robusta, Pseudopanax laetus, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Phormium cookianum, Pittosporum eugenioides, Sophora tetraptera, Cordyline australis, Griselinia littoralis, Metrosideros excelsa, Cyathea dealbata, Plagianthus regius, Podocarpus totara, Melicope ternata, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Alectryon excelsus, Hoheria populnea, Solanum laciniatum, Pteris tremula, Myrsine australis, Asplenium bulbiferum, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Pseudopanax arboreus, Pseudopanax crassifolius, Vitex lucens, Sophora microphylla, Dacrydium cupressinum, Kunzea robusta, Pseudopanax hybrid, Agathis australis, Clianthus maximus, Rhopalostylis sapida, Coprosma cultivars, Veronica spp. cultivar, Phormium cultivar. Agapanthus praecox, Acacia spp, Solanum nigrum, Prunus spp, Carex leporina, Liriodendron tulipifera, Trachycarpus fortunei, Salix cinerea

Page 87: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

87

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. √

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Kereru, fantail, bellbird

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

Solanum nigrum

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Prunus and Acacia regen

Drill and poison over time

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Page 88: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

88

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage.

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Pruning Negative Only prune if vegetation is a hazard

1 Spraying Positive/Negative Removes weeds but can reduce natural regerenation as well

1 Mowing Negative Reduce so natural regerenation can happen

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Increase canopy by planting in gaps and planting around the margins. Remove regenerating exotic trees. Make sure this is done slowly so it won’t create large canopy gaps.

Notes

Page 89: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

89

Otatara Pa 1 Site number: 30

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929179.875E, 5615410N Date: 2.3.19

Area m²: 11213.2 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public ☐ Private √ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

2-4

Overview

Site Map

Page 90: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

90

Site Description

Kunzea robusta dominated vegetation with some sparse areas. Trees felled on hillside. Pasture grass is the ground cover. Canopy height of 4m in the gully and ridges. Dry and well drained land.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Kunzea dominant early succession forest.

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other Pa sites and Tutaekuri River

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

estimate%

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 6 1 100 Kunzea robusta forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Kunzea robusta, Coprosma robusta, Myoporum laetum

Rubus fruticosus, Pasture grass, Lupinus spp, Foeniculum vulgare

Page 91: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

91

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √

Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Swallow

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Lupinus Foeniculum vulgare

Will get shaded out by a closed native canopy

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

Rubus fruticosus Spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Page 92: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

92

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Tree felling - species unknown

1 Planted Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Plant to reduce margins and join to other Otarata Pa SNA sites.

Notes

Page 93: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

93

Otatara Pa 2

Site number: 31

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1928991E, 5615228.5N Date: 2.3.19

Area m²: 4543.36 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public ☐ Private √ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

2

Dieback and grass cover

4/5

Overview

Site Map

Page 94: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

94

Site Description

10m tall Myoporum laetum canopy. Bare understorey, only pasture grass and Rubus fruticosus groundcover. Some dieback of Myoporum laetum. Many of the trees have galls on the bark.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other Pa sites and Tutaekuri River

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 2 1 100 Myoporum laetum forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Myoporum laetum, Coprosma robusta, Pteris tremula, Phormium cultivar

Rubus fruticosus, Pasture grass

Page 95: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

95

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

Rubus fruticosus Spray

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

Rubus fruticosus Spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Pest animals If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. ☐

Page 96: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

96

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Planted Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant to fill canopy gaps and connect to other SNA sites.

Notes

Page 97: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

97

Otatara Pa 3

Site number: 32

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929088.875E, 5615074.5N Date: 2.3.19

Area m²: 28093.06 Landform: Hill

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public ☐ Private √ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

7/8

Overview

Site Map

Page 98: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

98

Site Description

Dominated by Myoporum laetum and Chamaecytisus proliferus. 8m high canopy height. Lot of weeds in the groundcover as well as pasture grass. Some rubbish dumping.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2

Kunzea robusta

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the hills in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other Pa sites and Tutaekuri River

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 a 2 1 50 Myoporum laetum - mixed broadleaved forest

2 1 a 2 1 50 Sophora tetraptera-Chamaecytisus proliferus-Coprosma robusta forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Myoporum laetum, Sophora tetraptera, Phormium cookianum, Cordyline australis, Phormium tenax, Pittosporum ralphii, Kunzea robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Coprosma robusta, Dodonaea viscosa, Veronica stricta, Pteris tremula, Blechnum novae-zelandiae, Coriaria arborea, Pittosporum eugenioides, Sophora tetraptera

Foeniculum vulgare, Rubus fruticosus, pasture grass, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Eriobotrya japonica, Malus x domestica, Piptatherum miliaceum, Paspalum dilatatum, Calystegia sylvatica, Solanum nigrum, Crataegus monogyna Ligustrum lucidum

Page 99: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

99

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √ ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.

☐ √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. √ √

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.

☐ ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐ ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

√ √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Greywarbler, chaffinch, blackbird, tūī

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐

Foeniculum vulgare Rubus fruticosus

Spray Rubus

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. √ √

3 Occasional, up to 10%

ground area. ☐ ☐

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Rubus fruticosus Calystegia silvatica

Spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. √ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

canopy cover. ☐ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Chamaecytisus proliferus Eriobotrya japonica Ligustrum

lucidum Drill and poison trees

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover. √ √

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Pest animals

Page 100: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

100

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

All Rubbish Negative Deter people from dumping

All Pest control Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fully fence site. Remove rubbish and deter people from dumping as it is a hazard. Plant under exotic canopy and kill the exotics as the natives come up to take over the canopy. Plant area to connect to other SNA sites.

Notes

Classed in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 101: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

101

Saline plain

Ahuriri Estuary: Site number 14 is a combination of site sheets: Upper Ahuriri Estuary (14-1), Mid-Ahuriri Estuary

(14-2), Taipo Stream (14-3), Westshore Reserve ponds (14-4), Westshore Reserve wetland (14-5) and Lower

Ahuriri Estuary (14-6). All site sheets given below.

Ahuriri Estuary (Upper Ahuriri) Site number: 14 -1

Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1930305.125E, 5627119.5N Date: 27.3.19

Area m² (excluding water): 563511.6 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased x Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? √ Year fenced (if known):

Page 102: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

102

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. Block GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1 a

Drainage pipes

4-9 a

Overview

1-4 b Aerial of site

15/16/18/28 b Juncus and Salicornia quinqueflora wetland

35 b Juncus and pasture grass margin

32/33 B Cat trap

1-10 c Aerial distance

Site Map

Page 103: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

103

Site Description

A: Wetland species are Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis 1m tall and Salicornia quinqueflora. Stockbank margin is

pasture grass dominated. Abundant swallows and ducks. Ephemeral sections. Drainage pipes are in the site.

B: Large open estuarine wetland with 50cm-1m Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis. Margins mixed with pasture

grasses on opposite side. Salicornia quinqueflora abundant throughout actual wetland. Ahuriri River estuary flows

through middle. High fish abundance, high avian abundance. No trees at margins – too salty. Relictual Sophora and

Corynocarpus laevigatus at far perimeter. Drainage channels in wetland. Sedimentation problem at top end and

chemical pollution at city end. Intensive predator control to remove cats. New fencing present. Tube worm is

problem in the river. Pre-earthquake the area was a freshwater system to the edge of the lagoon then uplift has

caused it to become a saltwater influenced wetland. Channelling was put in during the 1930’s. This has been

bulldozed and destroyed.

C: Large open wetland / river. Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis 50cm-1m tall. Stopbank on opposite bank fenced.

High fish abundance. Too salty for trees at edges. Salicornia quinqueflora / Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /

green sedge-grass / pasture grass. Tube worm present, wetland birdlife in high numbers.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Typical saline wetland

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals 2 Wetland birds present

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Salicornia quinqueflora to Juncus/S. quinqueflora dominant

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Reduced in Napier by drainage and farming

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site 1 Largest site within the city boundary

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 1

Connected to other wetlands and the Ahuriri Estuary by the river

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Page 104: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

104

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 5 B 20 23 24 25 29 1 70 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/ Salicornia quinqueflora wetland

2 1 B 20 25 29 1 30 Pasture grass Lolium arundinaceum/ Salicornia quinqueflora wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Triglochin striata, Salicornia quinqueflora, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Plagianthus divaricatus, Cotula

coronopifolia, Aster subulatus, Polypogon monspeliensis, Ficinia nodosa, Deschampsia spp, Typha orientalis

Lolium arundinaceum, thistle, Rubus fruticosus, Atriplex prostrata, Plantago major, Plantago coronopus, Chloris

truncata, Ulex europaeus, Hypochaeris glauca, Lycium ferocissimum, Veronica anagallis-aquatica

Wetland/Estuary Unit:1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

Bog ☐ Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water

level changes?

Yes

√ No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water

turbidity

Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent √

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 60 Herbs 40 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin

vegetation

Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 60 FACW 30 FAC 5 FACU 5 UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover % 10 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous x

Invasive species in margin: cover % 20 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Page 105: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

105

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin

Comments

Stock get in. Stopbanks. Grazed round. Sediment deposit

No disturbance

Wetland/Estuary Unit:2

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

Bog ☐ Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water

level changes?

Yes

√ No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water

turbidity

Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent ☐

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin

vegetation

Sedge/grass 70 Herbs 30 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL may be

higher

20 FACW 20 FAC 50 FACU 10 UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover % 10 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover % 20 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous x

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin

Comments

Stock get in. Stopbanks. Grazed round.

No disturbance

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Grey heron, black swan, swallow, shag, duck, Bittern, fernbird (historic), geese, magpie, spur-winged plover,

greywarbler, royal spoonbill, harrier, paradise shelduck, pied stilt

Page 106: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

106

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant

Species etc

Comments & suggested

management

Ground cover

weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground

area. ☐ ☐ Atriplex prostrata,

Rubus fruticosus

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area.

√ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐ Rubus fruticosus Spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. ☐ √

4 None present. √ ☐

Shrub/Tree

Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey

or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ Lycium ferocissimum Cut and poison

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey

or canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey

or canopy cover.

√ ☐

4 None present. ☐ √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

☐ √ Stock, tubeworm

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ ☐

Page 107: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

107

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Stock grazing Negative

Pest management Positive Maintain

Some blocks fully fenced Positive

Drainage pipes Negative

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove environmental weeds like Rubus fruticosus. Eliminate stock from the area with more fencing. Increase

connectivity of the units by planting the edges to better join the blocks and connect to other sites along the river.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:

hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.

Page 108: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

108

Ahuriri Estuary (Mid-Ahuriri Estuary) Site number: 14 - 2

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1929869E, 5623658N Date: 2.3.13

Area m² (excluding water): 446543 (includes 84223.66 outside city limit)

Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

X Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

X No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1-6

Aerial overview

Page 109: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

109

Site Map

Site Description

Salicornia quinqueflora and Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis dominate species on the western shore side. Large

embankments along the western side, which generally have both species. Farm animals known to roam to waters

edge.

Salicornia becomes uncommon on eastern shore side. Triglochin and Thyridia repens grow in areas where tall

fescue has not taken over. Discontinuous juncus margin 1- 3 m wide.

Quarantine rd to top pumping station: Wide fringe of raupo especially on eastern shore side. Patchy juncus.

Between juncus and raupo tall bolboschoenus spp grows.

Barry Riddler (pers. comm.) – runoff is from new housing development. Bittern and kotare used to be present.

Crabs are now gone. White heron not seen in two years. Effluent and runoff from new subdivisions has caused loss

of kotare, bittern, crabs and pristine nature of wetland. No whitebait present. Swimming now unsafe in the stream.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does

not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Typical saline wetland

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals 2 Various bird species

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Salicornia quinqueflora to juncus/pasture grass

Page 110: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

110

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Tyridia repens

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Less than 10% left in the Napier City boundary

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Estuary/wetland

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site 2 Large continuous SNA site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Link to estuary and other sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area Estim

ate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 2 3 5 B 20 24 22 25 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Salicornia quinqueflora pasture grass

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Salicornia quinqueflora, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Bolboschoenus spp, Triglochin striata, Thyridia repens,

Typha orientalis. Pasture grass, Lolium arundinaceum

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √

Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐ Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Page 111: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

111

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality

Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent √

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 80 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation

Sedge/grass 80 Herbs 20 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 70 FACW 20 FAC 10 FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover % 20

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous √

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin

Comments effluent / run off stopbank and stock No disturbance

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

White-faced heron, harrier, black swan, tūī, sparrow, spoonbill, kereru, bellbird

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐ Pasture grasses, Lolium

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Page 112: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

112

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. √

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. ☐

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Walking tracks Positive

1 Effluent/run

off

Loss of bird and crustacean species. Unsafe

swimming

Upgrade effluent and stormwater system or divert.

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Management of subdivision runoff is needed to reduce pollution that is harming wildlife. Fully fence the area. Plant

natives to reduce the area of exposed boundary.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:

hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.

Page 113: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

113

Ahuriri Estuary (Taipo Stream)

Site number: 14 - 3

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1930791.375E, 5621145.5N Date: 2.3.13

Area m²(excluding water): 16365.3 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

x No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

Site Map

Page 114: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

114

Site Description

Extensive flats of Salicornia at the mouth and western side. To the south, Juncus becomes dominant.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Typical saline wetland

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Less than 10% of vegetation left in the Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Part of Ahuriri Estuary

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other estuary SNA sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 2 3 5 B 20 24 22 25 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Salicornia quinqueflora pasture grass

wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Salicornia quinqueflora, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis

pasture grasses

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)

Page 115: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

115

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent √

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 50 Herbs 50 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 80 Herbs 20 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 70 FACW 20 FAC 10 FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows √ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

No disturbance

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant

Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

Pasture grasses

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Page 116: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

116

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fully fence. Plant along stream to connect to other SNA sites.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.

Page 117: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

117

Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Ponds) Site number: 14 - 4

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933261.75E, 5623290N Date: 4.3.19

Area m² (excluding water): 136429.6 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes √ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

Page 118: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

118

Site Map

Site Description

B: surrounded by broad fringe of Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, some planted flax. Ruppia polycarpa washes up

among juncus. Continuation of the pond of damp land as juncus in lower half and saline herbfield of Salicornia

species, Plantago coronopus, Spergularia tasmanica and Puccinellia which goes into turf of Selliera radicans.

Triglochin striata dominates in small wet peaty depressions.

C: Large amounts of both Myoporum spp. and Phormium tenax planted at shores. Ficinia nodosa increasing in drier

areas. Shores mostly Salicornia or Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis. Central eastern side tall vegetation is lacking

and the damp compacted gravel ground has a turf of Selliera radicans, Spergularia tasmanica, Plantago coronopus,

Isolepis cernua, Puccinellia fasciculata.

Western side of the pond is mown grassland with eucalypts. Between this and juncus is another turf zone.

Salt-pan to westshore pond: Thyridia repens, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Cotula coronopifolia in the water.

dry ground has Puccinellia fasciculata cover. Samolus repens grows here too.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

2 Typical saline vegetation

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Page 119: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

119

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

2 Juncus/Salicornia, saltmarsh turf, pasture grass and shrubs

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

2 Thyridia repens

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area

1 Less than 10% vegetation remaining in the city

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

2 Estuarine

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

2 Seventh largest SNA surveyed

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

2 Close to other estuary sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

estimate

% Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 2 B 29 1 70 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/Salicornia quinqueflora wetland

2 2 B 20 1 10 Isolepis cernua- Puccinellia fasciculata /Selliera radicans-Spergularia

tasmanica- Plantago coronopus wetland

3 2 B 20 29 1 20 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/Thyridia repens-Cotula coronopifolia

wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Phormium tenax, Myoporum laetum, Triglochin striata, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Thyridia repens, Samolus

repens, Ficinia nodosa, Cotula coronopifolia, Salicornia quinqueflora, Selliera radicans, Spergularia tasmanica,

Isolepis cernua, Ruppia polycarpa

Myoporum insulare, Plantago coronopus, Puccinellia fusciculata, Pasture grass

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Page 120: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

120

Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear √ Water Quality

Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐

Translucent ☐

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 50 Herbs 50 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation

Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 50 FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments City pollution. No disturbance

Wetland/Estuary Unit:2

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp ☐ Marsh √

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline √ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear √ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐

Translucent ☐

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 80 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 10 FAC 10 FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover % 25

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous √

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 3

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh √

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline 3 Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Page 121: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

121

Degree of water turbidity Clear √ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐

Translucent ☐

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 20 Herbs 70 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 20 FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐ ☐ ☐

Puccinellia fasciculata, plantago coronopus

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐ √ ☐

4 None present. √ ☐ √

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √ √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √ √

Page 122: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

122

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered.

Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.

☐ ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐ ☐

4 No damage.

√ √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant to connect to other SNA sites.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:

hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.

Page 123: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

123

Ahuriri Estuary (Westshore Reserve Wetland)

Site number: 14 - 5

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933554E, 5622784N Date: 1.3.19

Area m² (excluding water): 31611.3 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

x No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply) Between major roads

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

2/3

Overview of margin and wetland

Site Map

Page 124: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

124

Site Description

Open roadside wetland sea rush and grass sections. Detention dam nearby. Thyridia repens abundant in saltmarsh zone.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1 Saline wetland

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Juncus to herbaceous salt marsh

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 2 Thyridia repens

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1

Less than 10% vegetation left in the city

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Close to other estuary sites

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 2 5 B 24 1 90 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis wetland

2 2 5 B 23 20 1 10 Bolboschoenus /Samolus- Thyridia wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Samolus repens, Selliera radicans, Plagianthus divaricatus, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Scirpus spp, Triglochin striata, Ficinia nodosa, Bolboschoenus spp, Apodasmia similis, Cotula coronopifolia, Thyridia repens

Atriplex prostrata, Asparagus asparagoides, Trifolium fragiferum

Page 125: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

125

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent √

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 100 Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 100 FACW

FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover % 0 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments Roadside pollution? No disturbance

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 2

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp ☐ Marsh √

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐

Translucent ☐

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 60 Herbs 40 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 40 FACW 30 FAC 30 FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Page 126: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

126

Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐

Atriplex prostrata

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐ √

4 None present. √ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐

Asparagus asparagoides

Spot spraying

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐ √

4 None present. √ ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey

or canopy cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered.

Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.

☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response Gravel substrate in margin areas

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration

within a site.

Increase vegetation to increase connectivity with other SNA’s. Remove environmental weeds like Asparagus asparagoides.

Notes

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.

Page 127: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

127

Ahuriri Estuary (Lower Ahuriri Estuary)

Site number: 14 - 6

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933550E, 5622315N Date: 4.3.19

Area m² (excluding water): 357533.6 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures: Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply) √ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude /Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

13/14/18/19/20

Overview

15/16/17

Salicornia quinqueflora and margins

Site Map

Page 128: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

128

Site Description

Very large estuarine system. Salicornia quinqueflora dominant vegetation, on shingle. Large open areas of water in the centre. Pasture grass margins with some shrubs/trees.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1 Historic vegetation type is saline wetland

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

1 Coastal/wetland birds

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

1 Salicornia quinqueflora to pasture grass to shrubs/trees

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1

Thyridia repens

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Less than 10% left in Napier city. Large regional wetland

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 1

Large estuary

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment. 3F – An originally rare ecosystem type 3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site 1 Large estuary

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 1

Links to many sites along the Ahuriri River

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species 1 Coastal/wetland birds

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 2 B 1 2 1 100 Salicornia quinqueflora - Pasture grass wetland

Page 129: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

129

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.) Apium prostratum, Thyridia repens, Triglochin striatum, Samolus repens, Selliera radicans, Spergularia tasmanica, Bolboschoenus medianus, Isolepis cernua, Ficinia nodosa, Schoenoplectus pungens, Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Salicornia quinqueflora Helminthotheca echioides, Juncus bufonius, Juncus articulatus, Carex divulsa, Sporobolus africanus, Puccinellia fasciculata, Poa compressa, Cenchrus longisetus, Lagurus ovatus, Hordeum murinum, Cynodon dactylon, Critesion hystrix, Bromus hordeaceus, Sherardia arvensis, Bromus diandrus, Anthoxanthum odoratum, Asphodelus fistulosus, Sedum acre, Spergularia arvensis, Pennisetum clandestinum, Rumex obtusifolius, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Lycium ferocissimum, Rosa spp, Calystegia soldanella, Rubus fruticosus, Carduus tenuiflorus, Centaurea calcitrapa, Schedonorus phoenix, Solanum diflorum, physalifolium , Solanum pseudocapsicum, Trifolium dubium, Trifolium repens, Trifolium tomentosum, Verbascum thapsus, Vicia sativa, Aster subulatus, Gazania rigens, Hypochoeris radicata, Hypochoeris glauca, Sonchus oleraceus, Lysimachia arvensis, Datura stramonium, Echium vulgare, Erodium cicutarium, Glaucous form, Geranium pusillum, Lepidium africanum, Linum bienne, Linum catharticum, Atriplex prostrata, Lotus angustissimus, Lotus suaveolens, Malva parviflora, Medicago nigra, Melilotus albus, Melilotus indicus, Modiola caroliniana, Orobanche minor, Papaver rhoeas, Plantago coronopus, Plantago lanceolata, Plantago major

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake √ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp ☐ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent √

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 10 Herbs 90 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 100 Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 90 FACW 10 FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High ☐Medium √ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments City pollution. No disturbance

Fauna Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Welcome swallow, Red-billed gull, Black-billed gull, Black swan, Black-backed gull

Page 130: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

130

Threats Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

Rubus fruticosus, Atriplex prostrata

Spray Rubus

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover. ☐

Cotoneaster Cut and poison

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area. ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. √ Tubeworm

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage.

Human Associated Activities (Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Pollution Negative Reduce runoff into river

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fence to remove stock from all areas. Remove ecological weeds. Plant surrounding area to connect blocks outside of river together and with other SNA sites.

Notes Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live). Fauna and aquatic habitat in Bioresearchers (2004) report.

Page 131: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

131

Bayview Wetland

Site number: 15

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1932883E, 5627104N Date: 3.3.10

Area m²(excluding water): 250107 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply) √ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII) M Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected: If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland √ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1/2/3

Juncus wetland

9-14

Overview of wetland/waterbody 17/18/21

Lemna/Azolla

22/23

Thyridia repens

Site Map

Page 132: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

132

Site Description

50cm to 1m tall dominant Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis with Salicornia quinqueflora interspersed throughout in the wetland. Saltmarsh margins contain at risk – naturally uncommon Thyridia repens. Bike track nearby. Water in the system with wetland birds, a lot of Canada geese. Drainage ditches nearby. Signs of stock with sheep roaming throughout surrounding area.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2) Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 1

Typical saline wetland

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

2 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis-Salicornia quinqueflora wetland to Cotula-Samolus-Thyridia margin. Juncus and pasture grass wetland to Selliera radicans margin

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1 Thyridia repens

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 1 Wetlands reduced across the Hawkes Bay region

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Wetland

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site 2 Fifth largest SNA surveyed

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Link to other wetlands and estuary

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 2 5 B 24 20 1 70 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Salicornia quinqueflora wetland

2 2 5 B 20 1 10 Symphyotrichum subulatum /Cotula coronopifolia -Samolus repens - Thyridia repens wetland

3 2 5 B 24 25 1 10 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis-pasture grasses wetland

4 2 5 B 20 1 10 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis /Selliera radicans- Spergularia tasmanica wetland

Page 133: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

133

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Cotula coronopifolia, Salicornia quinqueflora, Symphyotrichum subulatum, Thyridia repens, Samolus repens, Lemna spp, Selliera radicans, Triglochin striata, Spergularia tasmanica, Azolla spp

Atriplex prostrata, Paspalum distichum, Lolium arundinaceum, Trifolium fragiferum, Foeniculum vulgare, thistle, pasture grasses

Wetland/Estuary Unit:1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent √

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 80 Herbs 20 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 20 FACW 80 FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Stock have been in

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 2

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow ☐ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent ☐

Opaque √

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs 100 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 20 FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous

Page 134: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

134

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments stock have been in No disturbance

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 3

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent √

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 100 Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL

FACW 70 FAC 30 FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Signs of stock presence

Wetland/Estuary Unit: 4

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution √

Translucent ☐

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass

Herbs

Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 10 Herbs 90 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 50 FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High ☐ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover % 5 Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch x continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments stock have been in No disturbance

Page 135: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

135

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Canada goose, swallows, goldfinch, sparrow

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Unit 2

Unit 3

Unit 4

Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Atriplex prostrata

Removal

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. √ √ √ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √ √ √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √ √ √

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Unit 2

Unit 3

Unit 4

Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

√ √ √ √ Stock around wetland

perimeter and fresh signs with the wetland

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only

near edges. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

4 No damage. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Stock Negative Fully fence area

Pest management Positive Continue management

Bike track

Notes

Page 136: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

136

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fence the wetland from stock. Reduce the area exposed to the margins by planting native vegetation in areas with large marginal edge.

Notes

Another name for wetland area is Keteketerau wetland

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data: hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 137: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

137

Ahuriri Plain Wetland Site number: 16

Recorder: Grid Ref/GPS: 1932330E, 5625732N Date: 4.3.19

Area m² (no water): 882725 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII) x Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing √ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

√ Dairying, cropping or horticulture √ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

Site Map

Page 138: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

138

Site Description

Large open wetland north of Hawke’s Bay airport. Dominated by Juncus kraussii subsp. australiensis and Salicornia

quinqueflora and pasture grass at margins. Monoculture vegetation like other estuarine SNAs.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating

(1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not

meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1 Typical saline wetland

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

2 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis - Salicorniaa quinqueflora

wetland to pasture grass margins

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area

1 Wetlands reduced across the Hawkes Bay region

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

2

Estuarine wetland

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special

ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

2 Second largest SNA in Napier city

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

2 Link to other wetlands and estuary

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical

Regim

e

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 2 B 20 24 25 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis- pasture grass/ Salicornia quinqueflora

wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Salicornia quinqueflora

Pasture grasses

Page 139: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

139

Vegetation condition

Wetland/Estuary Unit:1

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m √ Swamp √ Marsh

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes √ No ☐ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes √

No ☐ Unsure ☐

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐

Translucent ☐

Opaque √

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 70 Herbs 30 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 90 Herbs 10 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 80 FACW 20 FAC 25 FACU 20 UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river √ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland Wetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

Pasture grasses

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area.

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds 1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Page 140: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

140

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species

etc.

Comments suggested

management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints)

Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. stock Around perimeter

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges.

4 No damage.

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Cycling tracks Neutral

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fence the wetland from stock. Reduce the area exposed to the margins by planting native vegetation in

areas with large marginal edge.

Notes

Another name for wetland area is Keteketerau wetland

Ranked in Hawkes Bay Regional Council Ecosystem top 30% prioritization layer (Source Data:

hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live).

Page 141: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

141

Embankment Road Wetland Site number: 21

Recorder: RJ Grid Ref/GPS: Date: 4.1.19

Area m2 (no water): 20857.6 Landform: Saline plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

x No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced

Was entire fence seen? Yes/No Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions, industrial ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

Site Map

Page 142: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

142

Site Description

Small salt marsh/meadow surrounded by industrial urban Napier. Appears to be dominated by Salicornia

quinqueflora.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

2 Typical saline plain vegetation

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area

2

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

2 Estuarine

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical R

egime

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 2 B 20 1 100 Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis/ Salicornia quinqueflora – Pasture grass wetland

Page 143: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

143

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date

of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy

species, understorey species etc.)

Juncus krausii subsp. australiensis, Salicornia quinqueflora

Pasture grass

Vegetation condition

Wetland/Estuary Unit:

Description (tick appropriate category)

Lake ☐ Shallow water <2m ☐ Swamp ☐ Marsh √

Fen

☐ Bog ☐

Shrub-carr ☐

Grass/sedge meadow √ Deciduous margin ☐ Saline ☐ Other (describe)

Water in the system? Yes ☐ No √ Evidence of water level changes?

Yes

☐ No ☐ Unsure √

Degree of water turbidity Clear ☐ Water Quality Algal blooms ☐ Pollution ☐

Translucent ☐

Opaque ☐

Plant Communities (enter % cover)

Wetland vegetation Sedge/grass 10 Herbs 90 Shrubs

Trees

Wetland margin vegetation Sedge/grass 90 Herbs 10 Shrubs

Trees

Pasture

Wetland Hydrophyte % OBL 50 FACW 50 FAC

FACU

UPL

Plant vigour in wetland Wetland Wetland margin

High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐ High √ Medium ☐ Low ☐

Invasive species in wetland: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Invasive species in margin: cover %

Distribution (circle) single patch >1 patch continuous

Source of water: spring ☐ surface flows ☐ stream/river ☐ precipitation only ☐

Erosion/Disturbance Wetland WeWetland margin

Comments No disturbance

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Page 144: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

144

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating

Estimate

(Tick appropriate level) Unit 1 Notes for

dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area. ☐

Pasture grasses

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area.

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional stock

heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. Stock

4 No damage.

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation

clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Notes

Management recommendations

Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species

protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Fence. Try to plant along drains to connect to estuary.

Notes

Page 145: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

145

Plains

Westshore Reserve Bush

Site number: 18

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933392.5E, 5622971N Date: 1.3.19

Area m²: 12308.1 Landform: Plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) post and 1 rail

√ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply) road / wetland lake

☐ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

3

Overview

Site Map

Page 146: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

146

Site Description

Diverse, well established planted. 7-8m Myoporum laetum, Pittosporum species 6m. Lots of broom at edges. Smaller amounts of Foeniculum vulgare lot of Hedera helix. Good regeneration of natives in places, Sophora species and Coprosma species some Myrsine australis. Generally weedy.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit 2 Pittosporum ralphii

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 Planted in 1999

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor 2 Links to Ahuriri Estaury

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

Page 147: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

147

1 1 A 2 1 100 Mixed broadleaved Myoporum laetum forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Phormium tenax, Leptospermum scoparium, Phormium cookianum, Pittosporum ralphii, Pittosporum crassifolium, Pittosporum eugenioides, Dodonaea viscosa, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Alectryon excelsus, Myoporum laetum, Sophora tetraptera, Coprosma robusta, Kunzea robusta, Plagianthus regius, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Cordyline australis, Sophora microphylla, Carex geminata, Coprosma repens, Myrsine australis, Pseudopanax arboreus, Astelelia banksia, Lophomyrtus bullata cultivar

Acacia melonoxylon, Hedera helix, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Foeniculum vulgare, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Prunus spp, Solanum betaceum, Rubus fruticosus, Asparagus asparagoides, Piptatherum miliaceum, Carex leporina, Solanum nigrum, Lolium arundinaceum, Myoporum insulare, Genista monspessulana, Chloris truncata, Chrysanthemoides monilifera, Agapanthus praecox, Phytolacca octandra

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. √

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Sparrow, fantail, silvereye

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ Phytolacca octandra Foeniculum vulgare

Solanum nigrum Will die when shaded out by a closed canopy

2 Common, 10%-50%

ground area. √

Page 148: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

148

3 Occasional, up to

10% ground area. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

Asparagus asparagoides Hedera helix Cut and poison

2 Common, 10%50%

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to

10% canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Genista monspessulana prunus Acacia melanoxylon cytus proliferus Cotoneaster

glaucophyllus Chrysanthemoides monilifera Myoporum insulare

Cut and poison shrubs. Slowly remove exotics from canopy by drilling and poisoning

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover.

3 Occasional, up to

10% understorey or canopy cover.

4 None present. ☐

Page 149: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

149

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Pest management Positive Continue

1 Planted Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Plant in canopy gaps and around margins to increase canopy cover and link blocks.

Notes

Page 150: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

150

Harakeke Reserve

Site number: 22

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1935992.625E, 5618945.5N Date: 1.3.19

Area m²: 19422.3 Landform: Plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled regional x

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC) x Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) √ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

13

Entrance 3/9/12

Waterway vegetation/rubbish

8

Pathway 11

Muehlenbeckia overrun

Site Map

Page 151: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

151

Site Description

Pittosporums and Coprosmas dominate. 6 to 8m tallest canopy. Drain waterway alongside with Typha orientalis. Concrete pavement through reserve. Big Acer spp specimen trees at path edge, could be a future problem. Pittosporum crassifolium regeneration Acer spp regeneration at streamside. Regeneration of palm.

2 rats seen.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences 2 Ecotone from Typha orientalis to Bolboschoenus

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 <1% native vegetation is left on the plains

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 A 2 1 70 Mixed broadleaved- Pittosporum spp. forest

2 3 B 21 22 23 1 30 Typha orientalis/ Phormium tenax -Bolboschoenus wetland

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Phormium tenax, Sophora microphylla, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum eugenioides, Austroderia spp, Typha orientalis, Coprosma robusta, Alectryon excelsus, Muehlenbeckia complexa, Pittosporum crassifolium, Sophora tetraptera, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cordyline australis, Olearia solandri, Corokia x cheesemanii, Dodonaea viscosa, Bolboschoenus spp, Olearia paniculata, Kunzea robusta, Plagianthus divaricatus, Podocarpus totara, Lemna, Veronica spp. cultivar, Coprosma hybrid, Olearia spp, Lophomyrtus obcordata

Page 152: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

152

Lolium arundinaceum, Acacia melanoxylon, Araujia sericifera, Quercus spp, exotic sophora, Chloris truncata, pasture grass, Solanum nigrum, Acer spp, Prunus spp, thistle, Pinus spp, Hedera helix, Rubus fruticosus, Ipomoea indica, Echinochloa crus-galli

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √ ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.

☐ √

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.

√ ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √ ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

☐ √

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Myna, thrush, sparrow, blackbird, fantail, ducks, rats

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐

Solanum nigrum thistle Will be shaded out by a closed canopy

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

ground area. √ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Ipomoea indica, Rubus fruticosus,,Araujia

sericifera

Hand remove, spray, poison stumps

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

canopy cover. √ ☐

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Regen of exotic specimens Slowly remove adults from area and hand remove seedlings

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Page 153: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

153

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover.

√ √

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1

Unit 2

Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

√ √ Seen rats

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage.

☐ ☐

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Rubbish dumping Negative Deter people from dumping

1 Planted Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Extend the width of the planting. Link to beach by planting in adjacent area. Remove ecological weeds.

Notes

Page 154: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

154

SH50 planting Site number: 25

Recorder: MC, RJ, TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1932045E, 5616926N Date: 27.2.19

Area m²: 4776.79 Landform: Plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal M Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1

Sophora regeneration 2/3

Weeds in reserve

Site Map

Page 155: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

155

Site Description

Planted, very species diverse and weedy. Mostly closed canopy some areas of canopy collapse. Sophora spp, Hoheria, Podocarpus totara and Dacrycarpus dacrydioides the main spp. Lot of Sophora microphylla natural regeneration. Broom relevant, likely planted Carmichaelia williamsii.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Sophora and Dacrycarpus dacrydioides broadleaved mix Metrosideros excelsa,

Agathis australis present but outside of natural distributional limit.

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Species diverse

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 Under 1% of forest is left on the plains

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er

Hyd

rolo

gical R

egime

Catego

ry

Co

de

Ch

aracter

Hab

itat area

estimate

Vegetation description

(Dominant species)

1 1 A 4 1 100 Mixed podocarp- broadleaved forest

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Hoheria sexstylosa, Piper excelsum, Alectryon excelsus, Coprosma repens, Pittosporum crassifolium, Pseudopanax hybrid, Sophora tetraptera, Myrsine australis, Podocarpus totara, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Pittosporum eugenioides, Coprosma robusta, Melicope ternata, Melicytus ramiflorus, Myoporum laetum, Corynocarpus laevigatus, Prumnopitys ferruginea, Dicksonia squarrosa, Pittosporum tenuifolium, Carpodetus serratus, Astelia spp, Dacrydium cupressinum, Pseudopanax lessonii, Olearia solandri, Corokia x cheesemanii, Griselinia littoralis, Carmichaelia williamsii, Rubus schmidelioides, Muehlenbeckia complexa, Solanum laciniatum, Hoheria angustifolia, Agathis australis, Hedycarya arborea, Meryta sinclairii, Cyperus ustulatus

Page 156: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

156

Pasture grass, Hedera helix, Solanum nigrum, Prunus spp, thistle, Conyza spp, Calystegia sylvatica, Vinca major, Helminthotheca echioides, Foeniculum vulgare, Araujia sericifera, Chamaecytisus proliferus, Piptatherum miliaceum, Banksia integrifolia

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. x

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. x

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. x

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Sparrow, fantail

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Hedera helix vinca and Araujia

Hand remove and spray

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. √

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground

area. ☐

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

Hedera helix and Araujia Hand remove and spray

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy

cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ Prunus Chamaecytisus proliferus

For Cytisus cut and poison stumps. Remove Prunus if it is self-seeding

Page 157: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

157

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Pruning Negative Only prune if vegetation posing a hazard

1 Planting Positive Continue

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Plant in canopy gaps and under canopy as some canopy species are nearing end of their life. Extend planting out both length and width ways to create a vegetation corridor, which could get closer to Friend’s Bush SNA.

Notes

Page 158: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

158

Friend’s Bush Site number: 28

Recorder: TC, CK Grid Ref/GPS: 1932178.25E, 5616440.5N Date: 27.2.19

Area m²: 3736.01 Landform: Plain

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

☐ Public √ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

M No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures: fenced, planted

Fencing (tick one) ☐ No fencing ☐ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced √ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? √ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

1/2

Outside 3

Entrance and inside

4-12

Vegetation

Site Map

Page 159: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

159

Site Description

Old planting, with paths throughout. Small water features. Ferns in understorey. Open area in middle with pond. Canopy height 12-15 m.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Metrosideros excelsa, Fuscospora fusca, Agathis australis outside

of distributional limits

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Planted with many natives

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2

One of few forest patches on the plain. Maybe only one in city. Planted in 1981

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 a 4 1 100 Mixed podocarp-broadleaved forest

Page 160: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

160

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.)

Canopy: Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Podocarpus totara, Pittosporum eugenioides, Agathis australis, Metrosideros excelsa, Sophora tetraptera, Beilschmiedia tawa, Fuscospora fusca, Dacrydium cupressinum, Alectryon excelsus, Cordyline australis

Subcanopy: Piper excelsum, Pseudopanax hybrid, Cyathea medullaris, Melicytus ramiflorus, Rhopalostylis sapida, Prumnopitys ferruginea, Cyathea dealbata, Hoheria angustifolia

Ground: Asplenium bulbiferum, Arthropodium cirratum, Corokia Cotoneaster, Ptisana salicina, Astelia chatham, Libertia spp, Asteria solandri, Parsonsia heterophylla, Blechnum chambersii, Microsorum pustulatum

Exotics: Bromelia spp, Camellia japonica, Chlorophytum comosum, Ophiopogon japonicus, Pteris crepis, Nephrolepis cordifolia, Hedera helix

Regeneration: Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Coprosma robusta, Melicytus ramiflorus, Pittosporum eugenioidies, Hoheria spp, Podocarpus totara, Corynocarpus laevigatus

Agapanthus praecox and roses on outside

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1

Forest/scrub

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. ☐

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback. ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. √

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species. ☐

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. √

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. ☐

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder. ☐

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Wood pigeon seen by locals, tūī, chaffinch, fantail, goldfish in pond, bees

Page 161: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

161

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

Agapanthus praecox, Hedera helix

Spray and hand remove

2 Common, 10%-50% ground area. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% ground area. √

4 None present. ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover. ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% canopy cover. ☐

4 None present. √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

Camelia Drill and poison

2 Common, 10%-50% understorey or

canopy cover. ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10% understorey or

canopy cover. √

4 None present. ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered. Occasional

stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge. ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges.

4 No damage. √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

1 Weeding Removal of natives and exotics Continue to remove exotics

1 Tracks maintained Continually cleared

1 Planting All planted Continue planting natives

Notes

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove environmental weeds. Try to reduce the distance between this and the SH50 highway SNA site by planting along the highway.

Notes

Page 162: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

162

Coastal

Esplanade Herbfield

Site number: 17

Recorder: MC, RJ Grid Ref/GPS: 1933381.875E, 5624535N Date: 4.3.19

Area m²: 8037.44 Landform: Coastal margin

General information for the site:

Tenure (tick all that apply)

√ Public ☐ Private ☐ Māori ☐ Leased ☐ Mixed

Legal status and management (M = Managed, X = No management) management is fenced and/or pest controlled

No legal

Reserve (TA)

Covenant (QEII)

Reserve (DoC)

Agreement (RC)

If mix of legal status estimate % of legally protected:

If managed what are the measures:

Fencing (tick one)

☐ No fencing √ Some fencing ☐ Mostly fenced ☐ Fully fenced Was entire fence seen? ☐ Year fenced (if known):

Surrounding land use (tick all that apply)

√ Urban subdivisions ☐ Lifestyle blocks

☐ Garden; parkland ☐ Open space; Bare land; Recreation land

☐ Dairying, cropping or horticulture ☐ Sheep, beef or other agriculture

☐ Plantation forestry ☐ Permaculture tree lands; planted natives

☐ Coastal dunes ☐ Indigenous forest or scrub

Photos

Photo No. GPS Longitude / Easting GPS Latitude / Northing Description

4th march folder

27/54/last photo

Overview

Site Map

Page 163: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

163

Site Description

Gravelfield beside coast, between properties. Herbfield with a lot of exotics. Lot of Cotoneaster glaucophyllus. Train track and biking path border site. Cotoneaster glaucophyllus regeneration. Very weedy/exotic. Only SNA in coastal environment.

Succulents and garden escapees from border properties.

Significance Justification criteria to Identify SNA

Significance criteria Rating (1,2)

Describe why the criteria is met at the site. Leave blank if does not meet criteria.

Criteria_1 – Representativeness

1A - Typical indigenous vegetation of the area 2 Contains species typical of coastal margins

1B –Habitat for typical suite of indigenous animals

Criteria_2 – Diversity and Pattern

2A – Indigenous species diversity 2 Only SNA to contain native gravel herbfield species

2B – Presence of ecotones, gradients or sequences

Criteria_3 – Rarity and Distinctiveness

3A – Habitat for threatened indigenous plant or animal 1 Coprosma acerosa

3B – Indigenous species at/near distributional limit

3C – Reduced to <30% of past extent of area 2 Only coastal herbfield site in Napier City

3D – Sand dunes, wetlands, or estuaries 2 Back shingle beach

3E – Biogenic habitats in the marine environment.

3F – An originally rare ecosystem type

3G – Distinctive assemblage/community or has special ecological/scientific feature

Criteria_4 – Ecological Context

4A – Large site

4B – Ecological buffer, linkage or corridor

4C – Critical habitat for an indigenous animal species

Habitat and Vegetation Description:

Un

it Nu

mb

er H

ydro

logical

Regim

e C

ategory

Co

de

Ch

aracter H

abitat area

Estimate %

Vegetation description (Dominant species)

1 1 B 36 2 20 Chrysanthemoides monilifera /Agapanthus praecox Garden mix herbfield

2 1 B 36 2 80 Cotoneaster glaucophyllus/ Pasture grass/ Gazania linearis herbfield

Flora and Fauna:

Include reference of rare, threatened or distinctive plant species seen or known to be, or have been present at the site (provide source and date of information e.g. SSBI, PNAP, botanical society. Also provide general comments on forest /vegetation composition e.g. dominant canopy species, understorey species etc.) Coprosma repens, Pittosporum crassifolium, Phormium cookianum, Pimelea urvilliana subsp. urvilliana, Muehlenbeckia complexa, Ficinia nodosa, Disphyma australe, Coprosma acerosa, Phormium tenax cultivar, Agave americana, Agapanthus praecox, Lagarus ovatus, pasture grass, Verbascum thapsus, Sisyrinchium spp, Iris spp, Euphorbia spp, Chrysanthemoides monilifera, thistle, Lavendula spp, Banksia integrifolia, Chloris truncata, Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, Cultivars, Cytisus scoparius, Cotoneaster coriaceus, Artemisia arborescens, Alyssum spp, Agave spp, Cotyledon orbiculata, Geranium spp, Pyracantha angustifolia, Rosmarinus officinalis, Rosa spp, Amaryllis belladonna, Eschscholzia californica, Aloe arborescens, Gazania linearis, Yucca gloriosa, Pimelea urvilleana subsp. urvilleana.

Page 164: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

164

Vegetation condition

Rating information

(Tick appropriate level) for each unit. Unit 1 Unit 2

Forest/scrub

☐ ☐

Canopy condition

1 Very sparse foliage, many large holes, dieback>20%. ☐ ☐

2 Foliage sparse in some areas, canopy holes uncommon. Some dieback. √

3 Foliage mostly dense, only occasional sparse areas, canopy holes rare, very occasional dieback.

☐ ☐

4 Abundant dense foliage over whole canopy, no canopy holes or dieback. ☐ ☐

Mid Tier 1 No browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Understorey bare. ☐ ☐

2 Very few browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Scattered seedlings of less palatable species.

3 Moderate browse palatable species 45cm-1.35m. Other species relatively abundant. ☐ ☐

4 Abundant browse palatable species and other species present. ☐ ☐

Ground Cover 1 Bare soil, rock, >20% of forest floor. Ground vegetation (ferns, moss, seedlings etc <45cm tall) absent of uncommon. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

2 Scattered bare soil & rock. Ground vegetation<20%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor. √

3 Bare soil, rock absent or very uncommon. Ground vegetation 25%-50%. Leaf litter on remainder of forest floor.

☐ ☐

4 No bare soil or rock, or eroding soil. Ground vegetation, abundant, 50%-100%. Leaf letter on remainder.

☐ ☐

Coastline habitat Unit: 1 and 2

Description %

Sand binders

Grass/Sedges x Herbs x Shrubs

Trees

Type (tick all that apply) Fore dune ☐ Second dune ☐ Rear dune √

Rocky shore ☐ Coastal cliff ☐ Wetland ☐

Substrate % Boulders/rocks 90 Mud/Silt 10 Soil

Sand

Native plant vigour in coastal habitat High ☐ Medium ☐ Low √

Erosion/Disturbance (comments)

Fauna

Record all fauna species (exotic and native) seen (including sign) or heard during the survey.

Page 165: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

165

Threats

Pest plants

Indicator Rating Estimate (Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes for dominant Species etc

Comments & suggested management

Ground cover weeds

1 Very common, cover >50% ground area.

☐ ☐

Gazania linearis

2 Common, 10%-50% ground

area. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

ground area. √ ☐

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Vine weeds 1 Very common, >50% canopy cover.

☐ ☐

2 Common, 10%50% canopy

cover. ☐ ☐

3 Occasional, up to 10%

canopy cover. ☐ ☐

4 None present. √ √

Shrub/Tree Weeds

1 Very common, <50% understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

Cotoneaster glaucophyllus Chrysanthemoides monilifera,

Yucca Cut and poison

2 Common, 10%-50%

understorey or canopy cover.

√ √

3 Occasional, up to 10%

understorey or canopy cover.

☐ ☐

4 None present. ☐ ☐

Pest animals

If evidence of the same pest animal is present in different units, this needs to be indicated.

Indicator Rating Estimate

(Tick appropriate level)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Notes Species etc.

Comments suggested management

Stock 1 Abundant fresh signs (droppings, major tracks and hoof prints) Stock heard or seen throughout area.

☐ ☐

2 Common fresh sign but sometimes scattered.

Occasional stock heard or seen, confined to scattered areas on edge.

☐ ☐

3 Sign uncommon. Sign is often old. Only near edges. ☐ ☐

4 No damage. √ √

Human Associated Activities

(Rubbish (organic or inorganic) dumping, Stock grazing, Drainage, Earth works, Erosion, Top dressing, Fire, Vegetation clearing, Herbicide application, Harvest / vegetation clearing, Planting, Animal pest control, Domestic pets, Fencing)

Unit Activity Impact Suggested Response

Tree felled

Gardens bordering

Notes

Page 166: Appendix 6 - consultations.nz

166

Management recommendations Comment on activities such as pest control, fencing, weed control, time, planting buffers, threatened species protection and/or habitat restoration within a site.

Remove ecological weeds. Plant site with native herbfield species to create native dominance.

Notes

References

Biodiversity Collaborative Group 2018 Report of the Biodiversity Collaborative Group. Biodiversity (Land and Freshwater) Stakeholder Trust.

Bioresearchers. 2004. Ahuriri Estuary Environmental Evaluation EMI: 0422 HBRC Plan No: 3503 Hawkes Bay Regional Council.

Cornes TS, Thomson RE, Clarkson BD. 2012. Key ecological sites of Hamilton City: Volume 1. CBER Contract

Report No. 121, prepared for Hamilton City Council. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Biodiversity

and Ecology Research, The University of Waikato.

Hawkes Bay Regional Council. 2019. Ecosystem Prioritzation Dataset. Source Data:

hbrc_sde_edit.SDEADMIN.HawkesBay_TerrestrialSites_Top30Percent_Live

Leathwick JR, Hashiba K, Lynch B. 2017. Biodiversity rankings for the Hawkes Bay Region HBRC Report No.

RM 17-20. HBRC Publication No. 4954.