APPENDIX C AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS …eng2.lacity.org/techdocs/emg/docs/griffith/Appendix_C... · 2019-09-01 · AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C

AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS

EMISSIONS ANALYSIS

City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project Draft EIR State Clearinghouse No. 2013011012 October 2013

AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ANALYSIS

GRIFFITH PARK CRYSTAL SPRINGS NEW BASEBALL FIELDS PROJECT

PREPARED FOR:

City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering 1149 S. Broadway Los Angeles, CA 90015 Contact: Maria Martin (213) 485‐5753

PREPARED BY:

ICF International 601 W. Fifth Street, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Contact: Paulette Franco (213) 312‐1753

October 2013

ICF International. 2013. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis, Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project. October. (ICF 00327.13.) Los Angeles, CA. Prepared for Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering, Los Angeles, CA.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project TOC‐i October 2013

ICF 00327.13

Contents

Page

Summary .......................................................................................................................................... S‐1

Introduction and Project Description ................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location and Setting .................................................................................................................. 1 1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................ 1 Construction .......................................................................................................................................... 4

Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................................................... 8 Federal ................................................................................................................................................... 8 State ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 Local ..................................................................................................................................................... 19

Environmental Setting ........................................................................................................................ 22 Regional Context .................................................................................................................................. 22

Environmental Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................... 26 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Thresholds of Significance ................................................................................................................... 29 Construction Impacts ........................................................................................................................... 32 Operational Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 35

Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................... 41

Significant Unavoidable Impacts ......................................................................................................... 42

Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 42

References .......................................................................................................................................... 43

Appendix A ............................................................................................................... CalEEMod Outputs

Appendix B ........................................................................................................ Health Risk Assessment

Appendix C ........................................................................................ Ambient Background Information

Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Contents

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project TOC‐ii October 2013

ICF 00327.13

List of Tables

1 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status ....................................... 9

2 Ambient Background Concentrations from the Burbank – West Palm Avenue (ARB 70069) Monitoring Station ..................................................................................................................... 24

3 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds (pounds per day) .............................................................................. 30

4 Worst‐Case Regional Construction Emissions for All Alternatives (pounds per day) ............. 32

5 Worst‐Case Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day) .................................................... 33

6 Estimate of GHG Emissions during Construction (metric tons) ........................................................ 35

7 Estimate of Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions for All Alternatives (pounds per day) ..................................................................................................................................................... 36

8 Worst‐Case Localized Operational Emissions for All Alternatives (pounds per day) .............. 37

9 Annual DPM Concentration and Risk Values .............................................................................................. 38

10 Estimate of Project‐Related GHG Emissions during Operations for All Alternative (metric tons per year) .......................................................................................................................................... 41

List of Figures

Figure Page

1 Regional Location Map ............................................................................................................................................ 2

2 Project Location Map ................................................................................................................................................ 3

3 Alternative 1, Option A – Crystal Springs North ........................................................................................... 5

4 Alternative 1, Option B – Crystal Springs South ........................................................................................... 6

5 Alternative 2 – North Atwater Park ................................................................................................................... 7

6 Key Milestones in Climate Change Legislation ........................................................................................... 15


Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project TOC‐iii October 2013

ICF 00327.13

Acronyms and Abbreviations

µg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter AB Assembly Bill ACMs asbestos‐containing materials AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ARB California Air Resources Board BACT Best Available Control Technology Basin South Coast Air Basin BAU business as usual CAA Clean Air Act CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model Caltrans California Department of Transportation CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CCAA California Clean Air Act CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 methane City City of Los Angeles CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent CPUC California Public Utilities Commission DEIR draft environmental impact report DPM diesel particulate matter EIR environmental impact report EO Executive Order EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FY fiscal year GHG greenhouse gas H2S hydrogen sulfide HAP hazardous air pollutants HI hazard index Hot Spots Act Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987 HR House Resolution HRA Health Risk Assessment I‐5 Interstate 5 LADWP Los Angeles Department of Water and Power LCFS low‐carbon fuel standard LOS level of service


Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project TOC‐iv October 2013

ICF 00327.13

LST Localized Significance Threshold MATES III Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study III MICR maximum individual cancer risk MMT million metric tons MMTCO2e million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent mpg miles per gallon MPO metropolitan planning organization MSAT mobile‐source air toxics MT metric tons MTCO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent mty metric tons per year MW megawatt N2O nitrous oxide NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NGOs nongovernmental organizations NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NO2 nitrogen dioxide NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOX nitrogen oxides O3 ozone ODCs ozone‐depleting compounds OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Pb lead PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric PM particulate matter PM10 particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less PM2.5 particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million RCPG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide REL reference exposure level Reporting Rule Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule RES Renewable Energy Standard RfDs reference doses ROG reactive organic gases RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard RTP Regional Transportation Plan SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCE Southern California Edison SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SDG&E San Diego Gas & Electric SIP State Implementation Plan


Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project

TOC‐v

October 2013 ICF 00327.13

SO2 sulfur dioxide SOX sulfur oxides SR‐134 State Route 134 SRA Source Receptor Area TACs toxic air contaminants Tanner Act Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act UTM Universal Transverse Mercator V/C vehicle to capacity VMT vehicle miles traveled VOCs volatile organic compounds VRPs visibility‐reducing particles WCI Western Climate Initiative

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project S‐1 October 2013

ICF 00327.13

Summary This report analyzes potential air quality and climate change impacts related to the Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project. All analyses have been conducted to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements for air quality and climate change assessments and satisfy California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. The findings are as follows:

• The proposed project‘s emissions during construction and operations would not exceed SCAQMD regional mass emissions thresholds.

• The proposed project‘s emissions during construction and operations would not exceed SCAQMD localized mass emissions thresholds.

• The proposed project would not result in elevated health risks due to proximity to nearby pollution sources.

• The proposed project’s carbon monoxide (CO) emissions during long‐term project operations would not create any new or exacerbate any existing CO hot spots.

• The proposed project would be consistent with air quality policies set forth by SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments, as presented in the region’s most recent Air Quality Management Plan.

• The proposed project would not conflict with the state’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

• The proposed project would not result in a cumulative air quality impact.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Griffith Park Crystal Springs New Baseball Fields Project 1 October 2013

ICF 00327.13

Introduction and Project Description Introduction The City of Los Angeles (City) is proposing the construction of two new youth baseball fields in one of three locations being considered within Griffith Park. An initial study was completed by the City in January 2013. The initial study concluded that the preparation of additional technical studies and of a draft environmental impact report (DEIR) should be initiated. These studies are being prepared with the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The purpose of this report is to analyze the potential for project impacts related to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Project Location and Setting

Location The proposed project would be located in the Hollywood community of the city of Los Angeles and entirely within Griffith Park. The park is located northwest of downtown Los Angeles, just west of the Golden State Freeway (Interstate 5 [I‐5]), roughly between Los Feliz Boulevard on the south and the Ventura Freeway (State Route 134 [SR‐134]) on the north (see Figure 1).

As shown in Figure 2, three locations are being considered for the proposed project. Alternative 1, Option A (Alternative 1A), would be located at 4730 Crystal Springs Drive, within the northeastern part of the Crystal Springs Picnic Area of the park. The Alternative 1A site, which covers approximately 4 acres, is northeast of Pote Field, south of Harding Municipal Golf Course, and west of I‐5. Alternative 1, Option B (Alternative 1B), would also be located in the Crystal Springs Picnic Area but just southeast of Pote Field, on the grassy area across from the loop driveway and parking lot. Alternative 2 would be located in North Atwater Park, across from I‐5 and the Los Angeles River.

Project Description

Alternatives Two alternatives are being considered as part of this technical study. Alternative 1 would locate the proposed baseball fields within the Crystal Springs Picnic Area of the park and include two options (Option A and Option B) for placement of the fields. Alternative 2 would locate the baseball fields just across from I‐5 and the Los Angeles River, within the North Atwater Park area of Griffith Park. The alternatives are described in more detail below.

Alternative 1, Option A – Crystal Springs North

The City is proposing to construct two youth baseball fields within the north Crystal Springs Picnic Area of Griffith Park. Each baseball field would include a home plate, bases, a pitcher’s mound, batters’ and catchers’ boxes, two dugouts (with two benches, approximately 20 seats each), two

Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering


ICF 00327.13



ICF 00327.13



ICF 00327.13

bleachers, 16‐foot‐high outfield/perimeter fencing, natural grass, warm‐up areas, and a scoreboard (refer to Figure 3 for the conceptual project layout under Alternative 1A). Landscaping and an irrigation system would also be installed. In addition, Alternative 1A would involve upgrades to the existing restroom facility. Restroom upgrades would be limited to interior remodeling and measures to increase access for those with disabilities.

Under this alternative, seven picnic tables would be relocated within or near the Crystal Springs Picnic Area. The northeast segment of the loop driveway, which currently supports vehicle circulation around the Crystal Springs Picnic Area, would be removed to accommodate the baseball fields (see Figure 3). As a result, five parking spaces would be removed and two “hammerhead” turning circles would be created, replacing the existing access loop.

Alternative 1, Option B – Crystal Springs South

The baseball fields proposed under Alternative 1B would include the same elements proposed under Alternative 1A. One baseball field would be located just southeast of Pote Field; the second would be located southeast of the first field, in the area across from the loop driveway and parking lot (see Figure 4). Alternative 1B would also involve upgrades to the existing restroom facility. Restroom upgrades would be limited to interior remodeling and measures to increase access for those with disabilities.

To accommodate this alternative, 56 picnic tables would be relocated within or near the Crystal Springs Picnic Area. No changes to existing circulation or parking are anticipated under this alternative.

Alternative 2 – North Atwater Park

Under Alternative 2, an existing softball field would be retrofitted to accommodate youth baseball and a new youth baseball field would be constructed (see Figure 5). The existing backstop, bleachers, and players’ benches would remain; the rest of the softball field would be upgraded. The new youth baseball field would be constructed just north of the existing softball field. The new bleachers, backstop, and players’ benches would match those of the existing field.

To accommodate this alternative, an existing basketball court and sand volleyball court would be removed. Unlike Alternative 1, Alternative 2 would not displace picnic tables, although new picnic tables would be added to the area as part of the project.

Construction Construction is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2015 and be completed in the summer of 2016 (approximately 12 months). Post‐construction activities (e.g., finalizing as‐built plans, training the maintenance and operations staff regarding the use of the scoreboard, irrigation systems, security lights, and other systems) would occur in the fall and winter of 2016–2017. The baseball fields would be fully operational in the spring of 2017.

Currently, it is anticipated that Pote Field and a portion of the Crystal Springs Picnic Area would remain open during construction of Alternative 1. Under Alternative 2, a portion of the North Atwater Park area would also remain open during construction.



ICF 00327.13



ICF 00327.13



ICF 00327.13



ICF 00327.13

The analysis in this document assumes that, unless otherwise stated, the project would be designed, constructed, and operated in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, and formally adopted City standards, including, but not limited to:

Los Angeles Municipal Code

Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety Code

Bureau of Engineering Standard Plans

Urban Forest Program/Tree Care Manual

Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction

Work Area Traffic Control Handbook

Additions and Amendments to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction

Regulatory Setting Air quality in the United States is governed by the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). However, in addition to the requirements of the CAA, air quality in California is also governed by the more stringent regulations of the California Clean Air Act (CCAA). At the federal level, the CAA is administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In California, the CCAA is administered by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) at the state level and by air districts at regional and local levels.

Federal

Federal Clean Air Act The CAA was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years (1963, 1965, 1967, 1970, 1977, and 1990). The CAA establishes federal air quality standards, known as National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and specifies future dates for achieving compliance. The CAA also mandates that the state submit and implement a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for local areas that fail to meet the standards. The plan must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met. The city of Los Angeles is within the Los Angeles County portion of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), an area that has been designated as a nonattainment area for certain pollutants that are regulated under the CAA.

The 1990 amendments to the CAA identify specific emission‐reduction goals for areas that fail to meet the NAAQS. These amendments require both a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporation of additional sanctions for failure to attain or meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA that would most substantially affect development of the proposed project include Title I (Nonattainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile‐Source Provisions). Title I provisions were established with the goal of attaining the NAAQS for criteria pollutants. Table 1 shows the NAAQS currently in effect for each criteria pollutant.

The Basin fails to meet national standards for ozone (O3), inhalable particulate matter (i.e., particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less [PM10] and particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less [PM2.5]), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and lead and is, therefore, considered to be a federal nonattainment area for those pollutants. Table 1 also provides the federal attainment status for each pollutant.



ICF 00327.13

Table 1. Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status

Pollutant Averaging Time

Stateh Standard

Federalh Standard

Principal Health and Atmospheric Effects Typical Sources

Project Area Attainment Status

Ozone (O3)b 1 hour 8 hours

0.09 ppm 0.070 ppm

—d 0.075 ppm (4th highest in 3 years)

High concentrations irritate lungs. Long‐term exposure may cause lung tissue damage and cancer. Long‐term exposure damages plant materials and reduces crop productivity. Precursor organic compounds include many known toxic air contaminants. Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may also contribute.

Low‐altitude O3 is formed almost entirely from reactive organic gases (ROGs)/VOCs and nitrogen oxides (NOX) in the presence of sunlight and heat. Common precursor emitters include motor vehicle engines and other internal combustion engines, boilers, furnaces, and industrial processes. Also, solvent evaporation.

Federal: Nonattainment State: Nonattainment

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

1 hour 8 hours 8 hours (Lake Tahoe)

20 ppm 9.0 ppma 6 ppm

35 ppm 9 ppm —

CO interferes with the transfer of oxygen to the blood and deprives sensitive tissues of oxygen. CO also is a minor precursor for photochemical O3. Colorless, odorless.

Combustion sources, especially gasoline‐powered engines and motor vehicles. CO is the traditional signature pollutant for on‐road mobile sources at the local and neighborhood scale.

Federal: Attainment/ Maintenance State: Nonattainment

Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) b

24 hours Annual

50 μg/m3

20 μg/m3

150 μg/m3 —b (expected number of days above standard < or equal to 1)

Irritates eyes and respiratory tract. Decreases lung capacity. Associated with increased cancer and mortality. Contributes to haze and reduced visibility. Includes some toxic air contaminants. Many toxic and other aerosol and solid compounds are part of PM10.

Dust‐ and fume‐producing industrial and agricultural operations, combustion smoke and vehicle exhaust, atmospheric chemical reactions, construction and other dust‐producing activities, unpaved road dust and re‐entrained paved road dust, and natural sources.


Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) b

24 hours Annual 24 hours (conformity process)e Secondary Standard (annual; also for conformity process)e

— 12 μg/m3 — ‐—

35 μg/m3 12.0 μg/m3 65 μg/m3 15 μg/m3 (98th percentile over 3 years)

Increases respiratory disease, lung damage, cancer, and premature death. Reduces visibility and produces surface soiling. Most diesel exhaust particulate matter—a toxic air contaminant—is in the PM2.5 size range. Many toxic and other aerosol and solid compounds are part of PM2.5.

Combustion associated with motor vehicle engines and other mobile sources. Industrial activities. Residential and agricultural burning. Also formed through atmospheric chemical and photochemical reactions involving other pollutants, including NOX, sulfur oxides (SOX), ammonia, and ROGs.




ICF 00327.13


Stateh Standard

Federalh Standard



Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)

1 hour Annual

0.18 ppm 0.030 ppm

0.100 ppmf (98th percentile over 3 years) 0.053 ppm

Irritating to eyes and respiratory tract. Colors atmosphere reddish‐brown. Contributes to acid rain and nitrate contamination of stormwater. Part of the “NOX” group of O3 precursors.

Motor vehicle engines and other mobile or portable engines, especially diesel; refineries; industrial operations.

Federal: Attainment/ Maintenance State: Nonattainment

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

1 hour 3 hours 24 hours

0.25 ppm — 0.04 ppm

0.075 ppmg

(99th percentile over 3 years) 0.5 ppmi

Irritates respiratory tract; injures lung tissue. Can yellow plant leaves. Destructive to marble, iron, steel. Contributes to acid rain. Limits visibility.

Fuel combustion (especially coal and high‐sulfur oil), chemical plants, sulfur recovery plants, and metal processing. Some natural sources, such as active volcanoes. Limited contribution possible from heavy‐duty diesel vehicles if ultra‐low‐sulfur fuel not used.

Federal: Attainment State: Attainment

Lead (Pb)c Monthly Rolling 3‐month average

1.5 μg/m3

— — 0.15 μg/m3

Disturbs gastrointestinal system. Causes anemia, kidney disease, and neuromuscular and neurological dysfunction. Also a toxic air contaminant and water pollutant.

Lead‐based industrial processes, such as battery production, and smelters. Lead paint and leaded gasoline. Aerially deposited lead from older gasoline use may exist in soils along major roads.


Sulfate 24 hours 25 μg/m3 — Premature mortality and respiratory effects. Contributes to acid rain. Some toxic air contaminants attach to sulfate aerosol particles.

Industrial processes, refineries and oil fields, mines, and natural sources, such as volcanic areas, salt‐covered dry lakes, and large sulfide rock areas.

Federal: n/a State: Attainment

Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)

1 hour 0.03 ppm — Colorless, flammable, poisonous. Respiratory irritant. Neurological damage and premature death. Headache, nausea. Strong odor.

Industrial processes associated with refineries and oil fields, asphalt plants, livestock operations, sewage treatment plants, and mines. Some natural sources, such as volcanic areas and hot springs.

Federal: n/a State: Unclassified



ICF 00327.13


Stateh Standard

Federalh Standard



Visibility‐Reducing Particles (VRPs)

8 hours Visibility of 10 miles or more (Tahoe = 30 miles) at relative humidity of less than 70%

— Reduces visibility. Produces haze. NOTE: Not directly related to the Regional Haze Program under the CAA, which is oriented primarily toward visibility issues in National Parks and other “Class I” areas. However, some issues and measurement methods are similar.

See particulate matter, above. May be related more to aerosols than to solid particles.

Federal: n/a State: Unclassified

Vinyl Chloridec 24 hours 0.01 ppm — Neurological effects, liver damage, cancer. Also considered a toxic air contaminant.

Industrial processes Federal: n/a State: Unclassified

Source: ARB 2013a, ARB 2012a, EPA 2013a, EPA 2012a Notes: ppm = parts per million; μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; ppb=parts per billion (thousand million) a) Rounding to an integer value is not allowed for the state 8‐hour CO standard. A violation occurs at or above 9.05 ppm. b) Annual PM10 NAAQS revoked October 2006; was 50 μg/m3. The 24‐hour PM2.5 NAAQS tightened October 2006; was 65 μg/m3. Annual PM2.5 NAAQS tightened from 15 μg/m3 to 12 μg/m3 December 2012 and secondary annual standard set at 15 μg/m3.

c) ARB has identified vinyl chloride and the particulate matter fraction of diesel exhaust as toxic air contaminants. Diesel exhaust particulate matter is part of PM10 and, in larger proportion, PM2.5. Both ARB and EPA have identified lead and various organic compounds that are precursors to O3 and PM2.5 as toxic air contaminants. There are no exposure criteria for adverse health effect due to toxic air contaminants, and control requirements may apply at ambient concentrations below any criteria levels specified above for these pollutants or the general categories of pollutants to which they belong.

d) Prior to June 2005, the 1‐hour O3 NAAQS was 0.12 ppm. Emission budgets for 1‐hour O3 are still in use in some areas where 8‐hour O3 emission budgets have not been developed, such as the San Francisco Bay Area.

e) The 65 μg/m3 PM2.5 (24‐hour) NAAQS was not revoked when the 35 μg/m3 NAAQS was promulgated in 2006. The 15 μg/m3 annual PM2.5 standard was not revoked when the 12 μg/m3 standard was promulgated in 2012.

f) Final 1‐hour NO2 NAAQS published in the Federal Register on February 9, 2010, effective March 9, 2010. Initial area designation for California (2012) was attainment/unclassifiable throughout.

g) EPA finalized a 1‐hour SO2 standard of 75 ppb in June 2010. Nonattainment areas have not yet been designated as of September 2012. h) State standards are “not to exceed” or “not to be equaled or exceeded” unless stated otherwise. Federal standards are “not to exceed more than once a year” or as described above. i) Secondary standard set to protect public welfare rather than health. Conformity and environmental analyses address both primary and secondary NAAQS.



ICF 00327.13

Federal Hazardous Air Pollutant Regulations The CAA identified 188 pollutants as air toxics, which are also known as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). From this list, EPA identified a group of 21 toxics as mobile‐source air toxics (MSATs) in its final rule, Control of Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants from Mobile Sources (66 Federal Register 17235), in March 2001. From this list of 21 MSATs, EPA has identified seven MSATs (acrolein, benzene, 1,3‐butadiene, diesel particulate matter plus diesel exhaust organic gases [diesel PM], formaldehyde, naphthalene, and polycyclic organic matter) as priority MSATs. To address issues related to emissions of MSATs, EPA has issued a number of regulations that have and will continue to decrease levels of MSATs dramatically through cleaner fuels and cleaner engines.

Federal Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change Policy Although there is currently no federal overarching law specifically related to climate change or the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs), EPA is developing regulations under the CAA that may be adopted pursuant to EPA’s authority under the CAA in the next two years. Foremost among recent developments have been the settlement agreements between EPA, several states, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to address issues related to GHG emissions from electric generating units and refineries, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, and EPA’s Endangerment Finding, Cause or Contribute Finding, and Mandatory Reporting Rule. Although periodically debated in Congress, no federal legislation concerning GHG limitations is likely until at least 2013, if then. In Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld EPA’s authority to regulate GHG emissions under the CAA.

Massachusetts et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Twelve U.S. states, including California, in conjunction with several environmental organizations, sued to force EPA to regulate GHGs as a pollutant pursuant to the CAA (Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 [2007]). The court ruled that the plaintiffs had sufficient standing to sue and that GHGs fit within the CAA’s definition of a pollutant and EPA’s reasons for not regulating GHGs were insufficiently grounded under the CAA.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mandatory Reporting Rule for GHGs (2009) On September 22, 2009, EPA released its final Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (Reporting Rule). The Reporting Rule is a response to the fiscal year (FY) 2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act (House Resolution [H.R.] 2764; Public Law 110–161), which required EPA to develop regulations regarding “mandatory reporting of greenhouse gases above appropriate thresholds in all sectors of the economy.” The Reporting Rule applies to most entities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year. Starting in 2010, facility owners from 41 industrial categories were required to submit annual GHG emissions reports with detailed calculations regarding facility GHG emissions. An additional 12 categories were reported beginning in calendar year 2011. The Reporting Rule mandates recordkeeping and administrative requirements in order for EPA to verify annual GHG emissions reports.



ICF 00327.13

Update to Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards (2009) The current Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, which went into effect in 2012 for vehicles, incorporate stricter fuel economy standards into one uniform federal standard. The standards are equivalent to those previously promulgated by the state of California (see the Assembly Bill [AB] 1493 discussion below). The changes are expected to reduce GHG emissions from new vehicles by roughly 25 percent, relative to business‐as‐usual (BAU) conditions, by 2016.

In October 2012, EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) established the final rule for fleet‐wide passenger car and light‐truck model years 2017 to 2025. The new CAFE standards aim to reach an emissions rating of 163 grams of CO per mile, or the equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon (mpg), by model year 2025. Fleet‐wide fuel economy standards will become more stringent with each subsequent model year through 2025. Because of a statute that requires NHTSA to set average fuel economy standards five model years at a time, NHTSA requires model years 2017 to 2022 to have an industry fleet‐wide average of 40.3 to 41.0 mpg and estimates that 2025 model year vehicles will range from 48.7 to 49.7 mpg (EPA and NHTSA 2012).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Endangerment Finding and Cause or Contribute Finding (2009) On December 7, 2009, the EPA administrator signed two distinct findings regarding GHGs under section 202(a) of the CAA:

1. Endangerment Finding: Current and projected concentrations of GHGs in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.

2. Cause or Contribute Finding: Combined emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to GHG pollution, which threatens public health and welfare.

These findings do not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities. However, they are a prerequisite to finalizing EPA’s new CAFE standards for light‐duty vehicles, which EPA presented in a joint proposal with the U.S. Department of Transportation’s CAFE standards.

Council on Environmental Quality Draft NEPA Guidance (2010) On February 19, 2010, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued draft National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidance regarding the consideration of the effects of climate change and GHG emissions. This guidance advises federal agencies that they should consider opportunities to reduce GHG emissions caused by federal actions, adapt their actions to climate change effects throughout the NEPA process, and address these issues in their agency NEPA procedures. Where applicable, the scope of the NEPA analysis should cover the GHG emissions effects of a proposed action and alternatives as well as the relationship of climate change effects on a proposed action or alternatives. The guidance identified a reference point of 25,000 metric tons per year (mty) for direct CO2e GHG emissions as an indicator that further NEPA review may be warranted. This reference point, however, is not intended to be used as a threshold for determining a significant impact or effect on the environment due to GHG emissions. The guidance also does not propose a reference point for indirect GHG emissions. The CEQ guidance is still considered draft as of the writing of this document (Sutley 2010).



ICF 00327.13

State

California Clean Air Act The CCAA, signed into law in 1988, requires all areas of the state to achieve and maintain the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) by the earliest practical date. The CAAQS incorporate additional standards for most of the criteria pollutants and set standards for other pollutants recognized by the state. In general, the California standards are more health protective than the corresponding NAAQS. California has also set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility‐reducing particles. Table 1 shows the CAAQS currently in effect for each criteria pollutant. The Basin fails to meet state standards for O3, CO, PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and lead and is, therefore, considered a state nonattainment area for those pollutants. The Basin is in compliance with state standards for SO2, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, visibility‐reducing particles, and vinyl chloride. Table 1 lists each criteria pollutant and their related state attainment status.

California Toxic Air Contaminants Regulations California regulates Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) primarily through the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act (AB 1807, or Tanner Act) and the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588, or Hot Spots Act). In the early 1980s, ARB established a statewide comprehensive air toxics program to reduce exposure to air toxics. The Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act (AB 1807) created California’s program to reduce exposure to air toxics. The Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588) supplements the AB 1807 program by requiring a statewide air toxics inventory, notification of people exposed to a significant health risk, and facility plans to reduce these risks.

In August 1998, ARB identified particulate emissions from diesel‐fueled engines as TACs. In September 2000, ARB approved a comprehensive diesel risk reduction plan to reduce emissions from both new and existing diesel‐fueled engines and vehicles. The goal of the plan is to reduce diesel PM10 (respirable particulate matter) emissions and the associated health risk by 75 percent in 2010 and by 85 percent by 2020. The plan identifies 14 measures that ARB will implement over the next several years. Because ARB measures are enacted before any phase of construction, the project would be required to comply with applicable diesel control measures.

The Tanner Act sets forth a formal procedure for ARB to designate substances as TACs. This includes research, public participation, and scientific peer review before ARB designates a substance as a TAC. To date, ARB has identified 21 TACs and adopted EPA’s list of HAPs as TACs. In August 1998, diesel particulate matter (DPM) was added to the ARB list of TACs (ARB 1998).

The Hot Spots Act requires existing facilities that emit toxic substances above specified levels to (1) prepare a toxic emissions inventory, (2) prepare a risk assessment if emissions are significant (i.e., 10 tons per year or on a district’s Health Risk Assessment [HRA] list), (3) notify the public of significant risk levels, and (4) prepare and implement risk reduction measures. ARB’s Diesel Risk Reduction Plan outlines a comprehensive and ambitious program that includes the development of numerous new control measures over the next several years that are aimed at substantially reducing emissions from new and existing on‐road vehicles (e.g., heavy‐duty trucks and buses), off‐road equipment (e.g., graders, tractors, forklifts, sweepers, and boats), portable equipment (e.g., pumps), and stationary engines (e.g., stand‐by power generators). ARB has adopted several regulations that will reduce diesel emissions from in‐use vehicles and engines throughout California



ICF 00327.13

(ARB 2010). In some cases, the particulate matter reduction strategies also reduce smog‐forming emissions, such as NOX. As an ongoing process, ARB reviews air contaminants and identifies those that are classified as TACs. ARB also continues to establish new programs and regulations for the control of TACs, including diesel particulate matter, as appropriate.

California Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change Policy California has adopted statewide legislation to address issues related to various aspects of climate change and GHG emissions mitigation. Much of this establishes a broad framework for the state’s long‐term GHG reduction and climate change adaptation program. The governor of California has also issued several executive orders related to the state’s evolving climate change policy. Of particular importance to local governments is the direction provided by the AB 32 Scoping Plan, which recommends that local governments reduce their GHG emissions by a level consistent with state goals (i.e., 15 percent below current levels).

In the absence of federal regulations, control of GHGs is generally regulated at the state level and typically approached by setting emissions reduction targets for existing sources of GHGs, setting policies to promote renewable energy and increase energy efficiency, and developing statewide action plans. Summaries of key policies, legal cases, regulations, and legislation at the state levels that are relevant to the City are provided below. Figure 6 displays a timeline of key state and federal regulatory activity. Key statewide GHG regulations that are directly applicable to the project are discussed below.

Figure 6. Key Milestones in Climate Change Legislation



ICF 00327.13

Assembly Bill 1493—Pavley Rules (2002, amendments 2009)/Advanced Clean Cars (2011) Known as “Pavley I,” the AB 1493 standards were the nation’s first GHG standards for automobiles. AB 1493 required ARB to adopt vehicle standards that would lower GHG emissions from new light‐duty vehicles to the maximum extent feasible beginning in 2009. Additional strengthening of the Pavley standards (referred to previously as “Pavley II,” now referred to as the “Advanced Clear Cars” measure) has been proposed for vehicle model years 2017–2020. Together, the two standards are expected to increase average fuel economy to roughly 43 mpg by 2020 and reduce GHG emissions from the transportation sector in California by approximately 14 percent. In June 2009, EPA granted California’s waiver request, enabling the state to enforce its GHG emissions standards for new motor vehicles beginning with the current model year.

EPA and ARB are currently working together on joint rulemaking to establish GHG emissions standards for 2017–2025 model year passenger vehicles. The Interim Joint Technical Assessment Report evaluated four potential future standards, ranging from 47 and 62 mpg in 2025 (EPA et al. 2010). The official proposal was released by both EPA and ARB on December 7, 2011, and was unanimously approved by ARB on January 26, 2012 (ARB 2012b).

Renewable Energy Standard/Renewable Portfolio Standard (2002/2006/2011) Senate Bill (SB) 1078 (2002) and SB 107 (2006) created the Renewable Energy Standard (RES), which required electric utility companies to increase procurements from eligible renewable energy resources by at least 1 percent of their retail sales annually until reaching 20 percent by 2010. SB 2X 1 (2011) requires a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), functionally the same thing as the RES, of 33 percent by 2020. The statewide average for the three largest electrical suppliers (Pacific Gas and Electric [PG&E], Southern California Edison [SCE], and San Diego Gas & Electric [SDG&E]) in 2012 was 19.89 percent.

Executive Order S‐03‐05 (2005) and Executive Order B‐16‐2012 (2012) Executive Order (EO) S‐03‐05 is designed to reduce California’s GHG emissions to (1) 2000 levels by 2010, (2) 1990 levels by 2020, and (3) 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. EO B‐16‐2012 establishes benchmarks for reducing transportation‐related GHG emissions. It requires agencies to implement the Plug‐in Electric Vehicle Collaborative and California Fuel Cell Partnership by 2015 and sets forth targets specific to the transportation section, including the goal of reducing transportation‐related GHG emissions to 80 percent less than 1990 levels.

Assembly Bill 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006/2011 Update AB 32 codified the state’s GHG emissions target by requiring the state’s global warming emissions to be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Since being adopted, ARB, the California Energy Commission (CEC), the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), and the Building Standards Commission have been developing regulations that will help meet the goals of AB 32 and EO S‐03‐05. The AB 32 Scoping Plan identifies specific measures to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and requires ARB and other state agencies to develop and enforce regulations and other initiatives for reducing GHGs. Specifically, the scoping plan articulates a key role for local



ICF 00327.13

governments, recommending they establish GHG reduction goals for both their municipal operations and the community consistent with those of the state (i.e., approximately 15 percent below current levels).

In March 2011, a San Francisco Superior Court enjoined the implementation of ARB’s scoping plan, finding the alternatives analysis and public review process violated both CEQA and ARB’s certified regulatory program (Association of Irritated Residents et al. v. California Air Resources Board, Case No. CPF‐09‐509562, March 18, 2011). In response to this litigation, ARB adopted the new CEQA document (Final Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document) on August 24, 2011. ARB’s staff re‐evaluated the baseline in light of the economic downturn and updated the projected 2020 emissions to 545 million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e). Two reduction measures (i.e., Pavley I and the RPS) that were not included in the 2008 scoping plan baseline were incorporated into the updated baseline, thereby reducing the 2020 statewide emissions projection to 507 MMTCO2e. The updated forecast of 507 MMTCO2e is referred to as the AB 32 2020 baseline. An estimated 80 MMTCO2e reduction will be necessary to reduce statewide emissions to the AB 32 target of 427 MMTCO2e by 2020 (ARB 2011).

ARB is currently updating the scoping plan to include both a 2020 element and a post‐2020 element. The 2020 element will focus on state, regional, and local initiatives that are being implemented now to help meet the 2020 goal. The post‐2020 element will provide a high‐level view of a long‐term strategy for meeting the 2050 GHG goals, consistent with the goals set forth in EO S‐3‐05 and EO B‐16‐2012.

Executive Order S‐01‐07, Low‐Carbon Fuel Standard (2007) EO S‐01‐07 mandates (1) that a statewide goal be established to reduce the carbon intensity of California’s transportation fuels by at least 10 percent by 2020 and (2) that a low‐carbon fuel standard (LCFS) for transportation fuels be established in California. The executive order initiates a research and regulatory process at ARB. Based on an implementation plan developed by CEC, ARB will be responsible for implementing the LCFS. On December 29, 2011, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction, blocking enforcement of the LCFS and ruling that it violates the interstate commerce clause (Georgetown Climate Center 2012). On July 15, 2013, the Fifth District Court of Appeals ruled to allow LCFS regulations to remain operative while ARB analyzes the smog‐related impacts of LCFS implementation, including formulation of appropriate enforceable mitigation measures, and subsequently completes a full CEQA review, provided ARB attempts to meet its statutory requirements in good faith (see Poet, LLC et al. v. California Air Resources Board et al.).

SB 375 (Steinberg), Statutes of 2008 SB 375 requires regional transportation plans developed by metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to incorporate a “sustainable communities strategy” (SCS) that will achieve GHG emission reduction targets set by ARB. ARB finalized the regional targets in February 2011. SB 375 also includes provisions for streamlined CEQA review for some infill projects, such as transit‐oriented development. However, those provisions will not become effective until an SCS is adopted. The final targets require SCAG to identify strategies that will reduce per capita GHG emissions from passenger vehicles by approximately 8 percent by 2020 and 13 percent by 2035 over base year 2005. SCAG adopted the Final 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which incorporates the SCS, on April 4, 2012 (SCAG 2012).



ICF 00327.13

ARB GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule Title 17 (2009) In December of 2007, ARB approved a rule requiring mandatory reporting of GHG emissions from certain sources, pursuant to AB 32. Facilities subject to the mandatory reporting rule must have reported their emissions from calendar year 2009 and have had those emissions verified by a third party in 2010. In general, the rule applies to facilities emitting more than 25,000 metric tons (MT) CO2e in any given calendar year or electricity generating facilities with a nameplate generating capacity greater than 1 megawatt (MW) and/or emitting more than 2,500 MT CO2e per year. Additional requirements also apply to cement plants and entities that buy and sell electricity in the state.

State CEQA Guidelines (2011) The State CEQA Guidelines require lead agencies to describe, calculate, or estimate the amount of GHG emissions that would result from a project. Moreover, the State CEQA Guidelines emphasize the necessity to determine potential climate change effects of the project and propose mitigation as necessary. The State CEQA Guidelines confirm the discretion of lead agencies to determine appropriate significance thresholds but require the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) if “there is substantial evidence that the possible effects of a particular project are still cumulatively considerable notwithstanding compliance with adopted regulations or requirements” (Section 15064.4).

State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 includes considerations for lead agencies related to feasible mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions, which may include, among others:

measures in an existing plan or mitigation program for the reduction of emissions that are required as part of the lead agency’s decision;

implementation of project features, project design, or other measures, which are incorporated into the project to substantially reduce energy consumption or GHG emissions;

off‐site measures, including offsets that are not otherwise required, to mitigate a project’s emissions; and

measures that sequester carbon or carbon‐equivalent emissions.

California Cap and Trade (2012) The development of a cap‐and‐trade program was included as a key reduction measure in ARB’s AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan (ARB 2012e). The cap‐and‐trade emissions program developed by ARB took effect on January 1, 2012, with enforceable compliance obligations beginning January 1, 2013. The cap‐and‐trade program aims to regulate GHG emissions from the largest producers in the state by setting a statewide firm limit, or cap, on allowable annual GHG emissions. The cap contains three compliance phases. In compliance Phase 1, large emitters from the electric utility and industrial sectors come under the cap. In compliance Phase 2, which commences in 2015, fuels will be subject to the cap. Compliance Phase 3 will include electricity, industry, and fuels and run until 2020. ARB administered the first auction on November 14, 2012, with many of the qualified bidders representing corporations or organizations that produce large amounts of GHG emissions, including energy companies, agricultural and food industries, steel mills, cement companies, and universities (ARB 2012f). California is working closely with British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, and Manitoba through the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) to develop harmonized cap‐and‐trade programs that will deliver cost‐effective emissions reductions. Two lawsuits have been filed against cap‐and‐trade efforts, but the cap‐and‐trade program will be implemented as is until further notice.



ICF 00327.13

Other Vehicle Efficiency Measures from ARB The ARB has adopted or is pursuing additional measures to promote vehicle efficiency to reduce GHG emissions. In 2008, ARB adopted a measure concerning heavy‐duty vehicle aerodynamics. In 2009, ARB adopted regulations for tire pressure. ARB is also evaluating hybridization of medium‐heavy vehicles and cool car design.

Local

South Coast Air Quality Management District At the local level, responsibilities of air quality districts include overseeing stationary‐source emissions, approving permits, maintaining emissions inventories, maintaining air quality stations, overseeing agricultural burning permits, and reviewing air quality‐related sections of environmental documents required by CEQA. The air quality districts are also responsible for establishing and enforcing local air quality rules and regulations that address the requirements of federal and state air quality laws and for ensuring that the NAAQS and CAAQS are met.

SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an area of approximately 10,743 square miles. This area includes all of Orange County; all of Los Angeles County, except for the Antelope Valley; the non‐desert portion of western San Bernardino County; and the western and Coachella Valley portions of Riverside County. The Basin is a subregion of SCAQMD’s jurisdiction. Although air quality in this area has improved, the Basin requires continued diligence to meet air quality standards.

SCAQMD has adopted a series of air quality management plans(AQMPs) to meet the NAAQS and CAAQS. These plans require, among other emissions‐reducing activities, control technology for existing sources, control programs for area sources and indirect sources, a SCAQMD permitting system that allows no net increase in emissions from any new or modified (i.e., previously permitted) emission sources, and transportation control measures.

The most recent AQMP is the 2012 update, which was adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board on December 7, 2012. Control measure IND‐01 was approved for adoption and inclusion in the Final 2012 AQMP at the February 1, 2013, Governing Board meeting (SCAQMD 2012a). The Final 2012 AQMP addresses several federal planning requirements and incorporates significant new scientific data, primarily in the form of updated emissions inventories, ambient measurements, new meteorological episodes, and new air quality modeling tools. The 2007 AQMP builds upon the approaches taken in the 2007 AQMP for the Basin for the attainment of NAAQS. The 2012 AQMP addresses federal CAA requirements and includes a 24‐hour PM2.5 Plan; 8‐hour O3 measures, with a vehicle‐miles‐traveled (VMT) offset demonstration; and a 1‐hour O3 attainment demonstration with VMT offset demonstration. In addition, the AQMP highlights needed emissions reductions and notes the urgent need to identify additional strategies, especially in the area of mobile sources, to meet federal criteria pollutant standards within the timeframes allowed under the federal CAA.

The 2012 AQMP focuses on attainment of federal PM2.5 standards by the 2014 attainment date. It focuses on directly emitted PM2.5 and NOX reductions, because NOX is also a precursor to O3. The 8‐hour O3 control strategy builds on the PM2.5 strategy and is augmented with additional NOX and VOC reductions to meet the standard by 2024. The 2012 AQMP concluded that substantial emission reductions from all sources are necessary. SCAQMD has initiated development of the 2015 AQMP, which will focus on attainment of the federal 8‐hour O3 standard (0.075 ppm).



ICF 00327.13

SCAQMD has published a handbook (CEQA Air Quality Handbook) (1993) to help local governments analyze and mitigate project‐specific air quality impacts. The handbook provides standards, methodologies, and procedures for conducting air quality analyses and was used extensively in the preparation of this report. In addition, SCAQMD has published two additional documents (Localized Significance Threshold Methodology for CEQA Evaluations in 2003 and Particulate Matter [PM] 2.5 Significance Thresholds and Calculation Methodology in 2006) that provide guidance for evaluating localized effects from mass emissions during construction and operations. Both were used in the preparation of this report.

SCAQMD Rules and Regulations Through the attainment planning process, SCAQMD develops rules and regulations to regulate sources of air pollution in the Basin (SCAQMD 2011a). The SCAQMD rules that are most pertinent to construction and operation of the project are listed below. The emission sources associated with the project are considered mobile sources and are, therefore, not subject to the SCAQMD rules that apply to stationary sources, such as Regulation XIII (New Source Review), Rule 1401 (New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants), or Rule 431.2 (Sulfur Content of Liquid Fuels).

SCAQMD Rule 402—Nuisance. This rule prohibits discharge of air contaminants or other material that:

Cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public.

Endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public.

Cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury, or damage to business or property.

SCAQMD Rule 403—Fugitive Dust. This rule prohibits emissions of fugitive dust from any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area that remains visible beyond the emission‐source property line. During construction of the project, best available control measures identified in the rule would be required to minimize fugitive dust emissions from proposed earthmoving and grading activities. These measures would include site prewatering and rewatering as necessary to maintain sufficient soil moisture content. Additional requirements apply to construction projects on property with 50 or more acres of disturbed surface area or any earthmoving operation with a daily earthmoving or throughput volume of 5,000 cubic yards or more three times during the most recent 365‐day period. These requirements include submittal of a dust control plan, maintaining dust control records, and designating a SCAQMD‐certified dust control supervisor.

SCAQMD Regulation XIII. This regulation sets forth pre‐construction review requirements for new, modified, or relocated facilities to ensure that the operation of such facilities does not interfere with progress in attainment of the NAAQS and that future economic growth within the SCAQMD is not unnecessarily restricted. The specific air quality goal of this regulation is to achieve no net increases from new or modified permitted sources of nonattainment air contaminants or their precursors.

In addition to nonattainment air contaminants, this regulation will also limit emission increases of ammonia and ozone‐depleting compounds (ODCs) from new, modified, or relocated facilities by requiring the use of best available control technology (BACT).

SCAQMD Regulation XIV. This rule specifies limits for maximum individual cancer risk (MICR), cancer burden, and the noncancer acute and chronic hazard index (HI) from new permit units, relocations, or modifications to existing permit units that emit TACs. The rule establishes allowable risks for permit units requiring new permits.



ICF 00327.13

SCAQMD Rule 1403—Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of asbestos, a TAC, from structural demolition/renovation activities. The rule requires people to notify SCAQMD of proposed demolition/renovation activities and survey structures for the presence of asbestos‐containing materials (ACMs). The rule also includes notification requirements for any intent to disturb ACM, emission control measures, and ACM removal, handling, and disposal techniques. All proposed structural demolition activities associated with proposed construction would need to comply with the requirements of Rule 1403.

SCAQMD Regulation XXXV. This regulation sets forth rules for railroads and railroad operations, including requiring operators to keep a record of idling events of 30 minutes or more (Rule 3501), idling restriction on freight trains (Rule 3502), and requirements for health risk assessments at rail yards (Rule 3503). Rules within Regulation XXXV apply only to Class I freight railroads and switching and terminal freight and rail yards. Therefore, these rules are not applicable to the proposed Project.

With respect to GHGs, ARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan states that local governments are “essential partners” in the effort to reduce GHG emissions. The Climate Change Scoping Plan also acknowledges that local governments have “broad influence and, in some cases, exclusive jurisdiction” over activities that contribute to significant direct and indirect GHG emissions through their planning and permitting processes, local ordinances, outreach and education efforts, and municipal operations. Many of the proposed measures to reduce GHG emissions rely on local government actions. The Climate Change Scoping Plan encourages local governments to reduce GHG emissions by approximately 15 percent from current levels by 2020.

To provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents, SCAQMD’s staff is convening an ongoing GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group. Members of the working group include government agencies that implement CEQA regulations and representatives from various stakeholder groups that provide input to SCAQMD’s staff on developing GHG CEQA significance thresholds. To date, SCAQMD has formally adopted a 10,000 MTCO2e threshold only for industrial facilities.

Southern California Association of Governments SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties. It addresses regional issues related to transportation, the economy, community development, and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated MPO for the majority of the Southern California region and the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG) for the SCAG region. The RCPG’s Growth Management and Regional Mobility chapters provide the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP. These chapters are used in the preparation of air quality forecasts and the consistency analysis that is included in the AQMP.

City of Los Angeles The City of Los Angeles published a climate action plan in 2007 titled “GreenLA.” To provide detailed information on the action items discussed in GreenLA, the City published an implementation document titled “ClimateLA.” ClimateLA presents the existing GHG inventory for the City, includes enforceable GHG reduction requirements, provides mechanisms to monitor and evaluate progress, and includes mechanisms that allow the plan to be revised to meet targets. By 2030, the plan aims to



ICF 00327.13

reduce GHG emissions by 35 percent from 1990 levels, which were estimated to be approximately 54.1 million metric tons. Therefore, the City will need to lower annual GHG emissions to approximately 35.1 million metric tons per year by 2030. To achieve these reductions, the City has developed strategies that focus on energy, water use, transportation, land use, waste, open space and greening, and economic factors. To reduce emissions from energy usage, ClimateLA proposes the following goals: increase the amount of renewable energy provided by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), present a comprehensive set of green building policies to guide and support private sector development, reduce energy consumed by City facilities and utilize solar heating where applicable, and help citizens to use less energy. With regard to waste, ClimateLA sets the goal of reducing or recycling 70 percent of trash by 2015. With regard to open space and greening, ClimateLA includes the following goals: create 35 new parks, revitalize the Los Angeles River to create open space opportunities, plant one million trees throughout the City, identify opportunities to “daylight” streams, identify promising locations for stormwater infiltration to recharge groundwater aquifers, and collaborate with schools to create more parks in neighborhoods.

Environmental Setting Ambient air quality is affected by climatological conditions, topography, and the types and amounts of pollutants emitted. The area potentially affected by the project is located within the city of Los Angeles, within Los Angeles County, and within the Basin. The following discussion describes relevant characteristics of the Basin and an overview of conditions that affect ambient air pollutant concentrations.

Regional Context The project site is located within the Basin, an area covering approximately 6,745 square miles and bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and south and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. The Basin includes all of Orange County and the non‐desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, in addition to the San Gorgonio Pass area in Riverside County. The terrain and geographical location determine the distinctive climate of the Basin, which is a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills.

The Southern California region lies in the semi‐permanent high‐pressure zone of the eastern Pacific. As a result, the climate is mild and tempered by cool sea breezes. The usually mild climatological pattern is interrupted infrequently by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana winds. The extent and severity of the air pollution problem in the Basin is a function of the area’s natural physical characteristics (weather and topography) as well as human‐made influences (development patterns and lifestyle). Factors such as wind, sunlight, temperature, humidity, rainfall, and topography all affect the accumulation and dispersion of pollutants throughout the Basin, making it an area of high pollution potential.

The greatest air pollution impacts in the Basin occur from June through September. These are generally attributed to the large amount of pollutant emissions, light winds, and shallow vertical atmospheric mixing. This condition frequently reduces pollutant dispersion, thereby causing elevated air pollution levels. Pollutant concentrations in the Basin vary with location, season, and time of day. Ozone concentrations, for example, tend to be lower along the coast, higher in the near inland valleys, and lower in the far inland areas of the Basin and adjacent desert.



ICF 00327.13

SCAQMD completed an ambient air monitoring and evaluation study in the Basin (i.e., the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study III [MATES III] study). MATES III was a follow‐up to previous air toxics studies in the Basin and part of the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative. SCAQMD has initiated its MATES IV study, which is currently holding Technical Advisory Group meetings. The final draft is expected to be delivered to the Governing Board in March 2014 (SCAQMD 2012b).

The MATES III study concluded that the average carcinogenic risk throughout the Basin, which was attributed to TACs, is approximately 1,194 in one million. Mobile sources (e.g., cars, trucks, trains, ships, aircraft, etc.) are the greatest contributors. About 83.6 percent of all risk is attributed to DPM emissions (SCAQMD 2008).

Local Air Conditions

Local Climate

Data from the closest climate monitoring station—the Glendale station—was used to characterize project vicinity climate conditions. Average summer (August) high and low temperatures are 91°F and 65°F, respectively. The average winter (December) high and low temperatures are 67°F and 47°F, respectively. The record high and low temperatures are 110°F and 17°F, respectively. Rainfall varies widely from year to year, with an annual average of 21.41 inches (Weather Channel 2013).

The closest wind monitoring station, located approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the project area, is the Burbank wind monitoring station. Wind patterns in the project vicinity arise primarily from the southeast, with seasonal and diurnal variations resulting in northeast (during Santa Ana events) and southerly winds (before and during winter storms) (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] n.d.). Over the period of record (January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2009), winds at the Burbank station averaged a speed of 4.09 miles per hour, while calm wind conditions were present only 1.37 percent of the time (SCAQMD 2011b).

Existing Pollutant Levels at Nearby Monitoring Station SCAQMD has divided the Basin into air monitoring areas and maintains a network of air quality monitoring stations. The project site is located in the East San Fernando Valley Monitoring Area (Source Receptor Area [SRA] 7). The nearest monitoring station is the Burbank – West Palm Avenue station (ARB 70069), located approximately 4 miles northwest of the proposed project. Criteria pollutants monitored at the Burbank – West Palm Avenue station include O3, CO, NO2, PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and lead.

Concentrations of pollutants over the last 3 years (2010–2012) have been compiled from the station’s data (see Table 2). Monitoring data show the following pollutant concentration trends:

1‐hour O3 CAAQS as well as 8‐hour O3 CAAQS and NAAQS exceeded several times each year,

24‐hour PM10 CAAQS exceeded during 2011 and 2012 but not 2010,

24‐hour PM10 NAAQS not exceeded in any year,

24‐hour PM2.5 NAAQS exceeded several times each year, and

1‐hour NO2 NAAQS not exceeded in any year.

No violations of the CO CAAQS or NAAQS or NO2 CAAQS were recorded. The rolling 3‐month average for the lead NAAQS is not yet available at the Burbank – West Palm Avenue station.



ICF 00327.13

Table 2. Ambient Background Concentrations from the Burbank – West Palm Avenue (ARB 70069) Monitoring Station

Pollutant Standards 2010 2011 2012 1‐Hour Ozone (O3) State Maximum Concentration (ppm) 0.111 0.120 0.117 Number of Days Standard Exceeded CAAQS 1‐hour Standard (> 0.09 ppm) 3 8 8 8‐Hour Ozone (O3) State Maximum Concentration (ppm) 0.084 0.084 0.089 National Maximum Concentration (ppm) 0.084 0.084 0.088 National Fourth‐Highest Concentration (ppm) 0.076 0.081 0.081 National Design Value (ppm) 0.084 0.081 0.079 Number of Days Standard Exceeded CAAQS 8‐hour Standard (> 0.070 ppm) 9 10 17 NAAQS 8‐hour Standard (> 0.075 ppm) 4 6 8 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maximum Concentration 8‐hour Period (ppm) 2.35 2.37 2.35 Number of Days Standard Exceeded NAAQS 8‐hour Standard (> 9 ppm) 0 0 0 CAAQS 8‐hour Standard (> 9.0 ppm) 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Maximum 1‐hour Concentration (ppm) 82.0 67.8 79.5 Annual Average Concentration (ppm) NA NA NA Number of Days Standard Exceeded CAAQS (0.18 ppm) 0 0 0 Suspended Particulates (PM10) – Azusa Maximum State 24‐hour Concentration (µg/m3) 50.0 60.0 54.0 Maximum National 24‐hour Concentration (µg/m3) 51.0 96.7 55.0 Annual Average Concentration (µg/m3) 27.5 25.0 26.4 Number of Days Standard Exceeded CAAQS 24‐hour Standard (> 50 µg/m3) 0 2 1 NAAQS 24‐hour Standard (> 150 µg/m3) (Estimated) NA 0.0 0.0 Suspended Particulates (PM2.5) – Pasadena Maximum 24‐hour Concentration (µg/m3) 43.7 47.8 54.2 24‐hour Standard 98th Percentile (µg/m3) 30.8 33.5 32.5 National Annual Average Concentration (µg/m3) 12.7 13.4 12.5 State Annual Average Concentration (µg/m3) 12.4 13.2 12.2 Number of Days Standard Exceeded NAAQS 24‐hour Standard (> 35 µg/m3) 4 5 4 ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NA = data not available. Sources: ARB 2013b; EPA 2013b. Data compiled by ICF.



ICF 00327.13

Existing Health Risk in the Surrounding Area

According to SCAQMD inhalation cancer risk data (MATES III), the project area is within cancer risk zones of approximately 938 in one million (SCAQMD 2008), primarily due to proximity to I‐5. For comparison, the average cancer risk in the Basin is approximately 1,200 in one million.

Sensitive Receptors and Locations

SCAQMD defines sensitive receptor locations as residential, commercial, and industrial land use areas as well as other locations where sensitive populations may be located. Other sensitive receptor locations include schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, day care centers, and other locations where children, chronically ill individuals, or other sensitive persons could be exposed (SCAQMD 2005).

The proposed project would introduce additional recreational sensitive receptors to the Griffith Park area by placing ball fields near existing recreational uses and I‐5. Alternative 1A and Alternative 1B would be located west of I‐5 but near other recreational sensitive receptors within Griffith Park. Alternative 2 would be located east of I‐5, near existing light industrial and residential uses.

State Greenhouse Gas Emissions More than 97 percent of U.S. GHG emissions are the result of burning fossil fuels. Of these GHGs, 83 percent are in the form of carbon dioxide (CO2), 10 percent are methane (CH4), and 4.5 percent are nitrous oxide (N2O). Fossil fuels are burned to power vehicles, create electricity, and generate heat. Vehicle emissions are the largest source of CO2 emissions in California, representing 38 percent of statewide emissions in 2009.

Electrical generation is the second‐largest source of emissions in California, at 23 percent (ARB 2011c). On a national level, electrical generation is the largest emissions sector, and transportation is the second largest (EPA 2011). Other sources of GHG emissions generated within the U.S. and California include agriculture, land clearing, the landfilling of waste, refrigerants, and certain industrial processes.

Although many nations, including the U.S., regularly monitor and report GHG emissions, federal legislation to reduce global emissions has not been adopted and is the subject of much debate. EPA is presently pursuing regulation of GHGs through the federal CAA, following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling (Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497) to clarify that it has the authority under the CAA to do so. Many states, including California as a prominent leader, have passed legislation to reduce GHG emissions. California’s GHG regulatory framework is discussed further in the Regulatory Setting.

Greenhouse Gas Inventories

A GHG inventory is a quantification of all GHG emissions and sinks within a selected physical and/or economic boundary. GHG inventories can be performed on a large scale (i.e., for global and national entities) or on a small scale (i.e., for a particular building or person). Although many processes are difficult to evaluate, several agencies have developed tools to quantify emissions from certain sources.



ICF 00327.13

U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory EPA estimates that total U.S. GHG emissions for 2011 amounted to 6,702.3 MMT of CO2e, which represents an 8.4 percent increase over 1990 levels but a 1.6 percent decrease from 2010 levels. The decrease was due to a general decrease in carbon‐intensive coal consumption as a result of increased hydropower and natural gas usage coupled with mild winter conditions, thereby reducing the amount of electricity used for heating. The largest contributors to U.S. GHG emissions in 2011 were electricity generation (33 percent), transportation (27 percent), and the industrial sector (20 percent). Emissions in the electricity generation, transportation, residential, commercial, and industrial sectors consist primarily of CO2. GHG emissions from agriculture consist predominantly of CH4 and N2O. In general, industrial and, to a lesser extent, commercial emissions in the U.S. have declined over the last decade, while emissions in other sectors, such as transportation, have grown steadily. U.S. GHG emissions are responsible for approximately 18 percent of the global total (EPA 2013b).

California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

In 2011, total California GHG emissions were 448 MMTCO2e. Emissions decreased by 3 percent from 2000 to 2011 (463 to 448 MMTCO2e). In 2011, the transportation sector accounted for approximately 38 percent of the total emissions, the industrial sector accounted for approximately 21 percent, electricity generation accounted for approximately 19 percent, with slightly more contribution from imported than in‐state electricity (ARB 2013c). California’s per‐capita GHG emissions have decreased over the last 11 years from 13.9 to 11.9 MTCO2e per person. From a broader geographical perspective, the state of California ranked second in the U.S. for 2007 GHG emissions, behind only Texas.

City of Los Angeles Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

In 2004, total community‐wide GHG emissions were greater than 50 MMTCO2e, roughly the same amount as the country of Sweden. The transportation sector accounted for approximately 47 percent of the total emissions, electricity generation accounted for approximately 32 percent, natural gas use generates 9 percent of emissions, and the balance of 12 percent is from burning other industrial fuels. The City’s “Green LA: An Action Plan to Lead the Nation in Fighting Global Warming” includes more than 50 actions to reduce city‐wide GHG emissions as well as measures to adapt to the effects of climate change. The City’s goal is to reduce GHG emissions to 35 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (City of Los Angeles 2007).

Environmental Impact Analysis Methodology The methodology below describes methods for both quantifying construction‐ and operations‐related emissions and analyzing the effects of nearby pollution sources.

Construction Construction of the proposed project would result in the short‐term generation of criteria pollutant and GHG emissions. Mass daily and total combustion exhaust, fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5), and fugitive off‐gassing emissions from paving and architectural coating were estimated



ICF 00327.13

using SCAQMD’s California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2013.2.2. Construction‐related emissions were estimated by using CalEEMod defaults related to phasing, active pieces of construction equipment, worker trips, as well as vendor trips for construction of a 4‐acre “City Park.” Construction is anticipated to begin in summer 2016 and last approximately 12 months. Estimates of the acreage for asphalt paving were based on the site plan for the “hammerhead” turning circles associated with Alternative 1A. Estimates for the quantity of architectural coatings were based on the site plan for the proposed dugouts and upgrades to the existing restroom.

Construction‐related criteria pollutant emissions are presented at the daily time scale and compared with the SCAQMD construction thresholds discussed below. Construction‐related GHG pollutant emissions are summed and compared with the GHG thresholds discussed below. Consistent with SCAQMD guidance, total construction emissions were summed and amortized over a 30‐year period and added to operational emissions (described below).

All emissions calculation worksheets and output files are provided in Appendix A.

Operations Once constructed, operation of the proposed project would result in a long‐term source of criteria pollutant and GHG emissions. Construction of the baseball fields would result in an increase in motor vehicle trips to the project area on both weekdays and Saturdays For purposes of analysis, it was assumed the project would include grass areas that would require irrigation and landscaping. Further, it was assumed the dugouts and restroom upgrades would require re‐application of architectural coatings consistent with CalEEMod defaults. Daily criteria pollutant and annual GHG emissions were estimated in CalEEMod and based on trip generation rates from the traffic impact analysis (Fehr & Peers 2013) and modeling defaults for a 4‐acre “City Park.”

Operations‐related criteria pollutant emissions are presented at the daily time scale and compared with the SCAQMD operational thresholds discussed in below. Operations‐related GHG pollutant emissions are summed, added to the amortized construction emissions, and compared with the GHG thresholds discussed below.

All emissions calculation worksheets and output files are provided in Appendix A.

Health Risk Assessment The proposed project would place new recreational visitors near potential sources of pollution associated with I‐5. Both the ARB and SCAQMD provide recommendations for the siting of new sensitive land uses (including recreational users) near freeways. ARB has performed several air pollution studies, many focused on children, to identify the association between adverse cancer and non‐cancer health effects and living or attending school near heavily traveled roadways. Although the recreational land use proposed herein is neither a residence nor a school, long‐term exposure to nearby pollution poses a potential risk to children who access the project site. In terms of vehicle traffic, DPM from heavy‐duty truck traffic is the primary risk driver. According to SCAQMD, approximately 83 percent of all background risk associated with exposure to pollution is attributed to DPM emissions. Therefore, truck‐related DPM emissions will be the focus of the health risk assessment (HRA).



ICF 00327.13

The HRA used guidelines provided by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) for the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program (OEHHA 2003) as well as HRA guidelines developed by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and SCAQMD (CAPCOA 2009; SCAQMD 2003). The HRA is intended to identify an individual’s health risk from DPM emissions sources located within 1,000 feet of the project site. TAC emissions from all other sources are considered as contributing sources to ambient background risk.

TAC Inventory Estimates of freeway‐related DPM emissions were based on existing truck traffic data from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (Caltrans 2013) and emission rates obtained from EMFAC2011. Estimates of emission rates were based on a weighted‐average of diesel truck emission rates over a 70‐year period in grams per mile and used in the CAL3QHCR line‐source dispersion model. Ground‐level receptors had a flagpole height of 5.2 feet.

Air Dispersion Modeling The CAL3QHCR model is a steady‐state Gaussian plume model and approved by EPA for estimating ground‐level impacts from line sources, such as roadways. The model was used to calculate the contribution of truck‐related DPM emissions from the freeway to the local annual ambient DPM concentration.

Dispersion models such as CAL3QHCR require local meteorological parameters, such as wind speed, stability class, mixing height, and temperature. As such, meteorological data from SCAQMD’s Burbank monitoring station were used to represent the hourly local wind direction and wind speed conditions. Direction‐dependent calculations were obtained by identifying latitude and longitude coordinates for each discrete emissions source and receptor location. The latitude and longitude coordinates were then converted to Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) values to accommodate the CAL3QHCR model’s Cartesian grid format.

Risk Calculations Generally, “worst case” for cancer risk is based on 70 years of exposure, but shorter exposure durations are acceptable for non‐residential land uses. Worst case for acute adverse health effects is based on the hour with the highest emissions. Worst case for chronic adverse health effects is based on the annual average emissions (CAPCOA 2009).

Cancer risk is defined as the lifetime probability (chance) of developing cancer from exposure to a carcinogen, typically expressed as the increased chance in 1 million. The default cancer risk calculation for recreational visitors, which may include children, is based on the 95th percentile breathing rate for ages 2 through 16 years, as recommended by OEHHA (OEHAA 2012). The duration of exposure was assumed to be 9 years, as recommended in the CAPCOA HRA Guidance Document (CAPCOA 2009).

Noncancer chronic inhalation impacts are calculated by dividing the annual average concentration by the reference exposure level (REL) for that substance. The REL is defined as the concentration at which no adverse noncancer health effects are anticipated.

For non‐inhalation pathways, hazard indices are calculated as the ratio of calculated doses to acceptable or “reference” doses (RfDs). If the reported concentration or dose of a given chemical is considered, it is assumed that multiple threshold exposures could result in an adverse health effect.



ICF 00327.13

Thus, chemical‐specific hazard indices are summed. Typically, for a given set of chemicals, hazard indices are summed for each organ system that each chemical can affect. For any organ system, a total hazard index exceeding 1.0 indicates a potential adverse health effect, per SCAQMD guidelines. Diesel exhaust risk assessment assumes only an inhalation pathway.

Note that neither ARB nor OEHHA has identified acute health effects from diesel exhaust. Therefore, acute health effects are not included in this analysis.

Thresholds of Significance

State CEQA Guidelines For the purposes of the analysis herein, in accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project would have a significant environmental impact related to air quality and GHG if it would:

Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan,

Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation,

Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria pollutant for which the project region is a nonattainment area for an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors),

Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations,

Create objectionable odors that would affect a substantial number of people,

Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, or

Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs.

The State CEQA Guidelines also state that the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the determinations above.

Given SCAQMD’s regulatory role in the Basin, the significance thresholds and analysis methodologies outlined in the district’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (as updated, per the website), Localized Significance Threshold Methodology for CEQA Evaluations, and Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Significance Thresholds and Calculation Methodology guidance documents were used in evaluating project impacts.

L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide The L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide references the SCAQMD significance criteria to determine impacts for criteria pollutant and TAC emissions. These SCAQMD criteria are discussed below.

Criteria Pollutants As noted above, given SCAQMD’s regulatory role in the Basin, the significance thresholds and analysis methodologies outlined in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Localized Significance Threshold Methodology for CEQA Evaluations, and Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Significance Thresholds and



ICF 00327.13

Calculation Methodology guidance documents were used in evaluating project impacts. Specifically, the SCAQMD construction and operational mass emissions thresholds identified in Table 3 were used for the assessment of criteria pollutants herein. Note that Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) are based on the size or total area of the emissions source, the ambient air quality in each SRA where the emission source is located, and the distance to the sensitive receptor. The LSTs used herein are based on the project area potentially disturbed on any given day (2 acres), project location (SRA 7, East San Fernando Valley), and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor (25 meters). Table 3. SCAQMD Significance Thresholds (pounds per day)

Pollutant

Regional Emissions Thresholds

Localized Emissions Thresholds1

Construction Operation Construction Operation Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 100 55 114 114 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 75 55 N/A N/A Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10)

150 150 7 2

Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 55 55 4 1 Sulfur Oxides (SOX) 150 150 N/A N/A Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 550 786 786 Lead (Pb)2 3 3 N/A N/A

Notes: 1 Localized thresholds derived from SCAQMD’s most recent LST tables are based on the project location (SRA 7, East San Fernando Valley), the project area disturbed in any given day (2 acres), and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor (25 meters). SCAQMD has not developed LSTs for VOC, SOX, or Pb emissions. 2 The proposed project would result in no lead emissions sources during the construction or operations. As such, lead emissions are not evaluated herein. Source: SCAQMD 2009, 2011c.

Toxic Air Contaminants Regarding sensitive receptors’ exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations, SCAQMD states that the project would have a significant impact from TACs if:

TACs increase the non‐cancer health risk because of short‐term (acute) or long‐term (chronic) exposures. The screening risk assessment for those TACs must estimate the acute and/or chronic Hazard Index, as applicable.

On‐site stationary sources emit carcinogenic or TACs that individually or cumulatively exceed the maximum incremental cancer risk of 10 in 1 million (1.0 x 10‐5) or an acute or chronic Hazard Index of 1.0 (SCAQMD 2005, 2011c).

Hazardous materials associated with on‐site stationary sources result in an accidental release of air toxic emissions or acutely hazardous materials, posing a threat to public health and safety (SCAQMD 1993).

Note that the project would not result in any stationary sources of emissions.



ICF 00327.13

Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots Regarding carbon monoxide hot spots, SCAQMD states that a project impact is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards:

1‐hour standards of 20 ppm (state) and 35 ppm (federal), and

8‐hour standards of 9.0 (state) and 9 ppm (federal).

Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas Emissions State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 provides guidance to lead agencies for determining the significance of impacts from GHG emissions. Section 15064.4(a) provides that a lead agency should make a good‐faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate, or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project. Section 15064.4(a) further provides that a lead agency shall have the discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether (1) to use a model or methodology to quantify GHG emissions resulting from a project and which model methodology to use and/or (2) to rely on qualitative analysis or performance‐based standards.

Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a), the analysis presented herein uses a model or methodology to quantify the GHG emissions resulting from the project. The analysis contained herein provides a “good‐faith effort” to describe, calculate, and estimate GHG emissions resulting from the project and compare those emissions with the chosen threshold level.

State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(b) also provides that, when assessing the significance of impacts from GHG emissions, a lead agency should consider (1) the extent to which the project may increase or reduce GHG emissions compared with existing conditions, (2) whether the project’s GHG emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project, and (3) the extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. The analysis of the potential impacts from the project’s GHG emissions follows this approach.

There are currently no adopted quantitative thresholds relevant to the project. Although SCAQMD has adopted a 10,000 MT significance threshold level for industrial projects, this threshold would not be applicable to the proposed project. The project is a recreational land use project that does not fit into the industrial project category. SCAQMD has proposed a 3,000 MTCO2e threshold level for all land use development projects, which would encompass recreational land use projects, but this threshold has not been adopted. Thus, for purposes of this analysis, both direct and indirect GHG emissions from the project are discussed with respect to the CAPCOA threshold level of 900 MT.

Cumulative Impacts Potential cumulative air quality impacts would result when other projects’ pollutant emissions combine to degrade air quality conditions below acceptable levels. This could occur on a local level (e.g., increased vehicle emissions at congested intersections or concurrent construction activities at sensitive receptor locations), a regional level (e.g., potential O3 impacts from multiple past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects within the Basin), or globally (e.g., the potential impact of GHG emissions on global climate change).



ICF 00327.13

The Basin experiences chronic exceedances of the NAAQS and CAAQS and is currently in nonattainment status for various pollutants. These nonattainment conditions within the region are considered to be cumulatively significant. SCAQMD thresholds have been established to ensure attainment of the NAAQS and CAAQS; therefore, an exceedance of SCAQMD threshold levels must be considered a significant cumulative impact.

Impacts related to GHGs and climate change are exclusively cumulative impacts, and there are no non‐cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective (CAPCOA 2008). Therefore, in accordance with scientific consensus regarding the cumulative nature of GHGs, the analysis herein analyzes the cumulative contribution of project‐related GHG emissions.

Construction Impacts

Regional Construction Impacts

Alternative 1

Construction of the each of the proposed alternatives has the potential to create air quality impacts through the use of heavy‐duty construction equipment, construction workers’ vehicle trips, material deliveries, and trips by heavy‐duty haul trucks. In addition, earthwork activities would result in fugitive dust emissions, and paving operations would release VOCs from off‐gassing. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of operation, and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. The assessment of construction air quality impacts considers each of these potential sources. Fugitive PM10 and PM2.5 emissions estimates take into account compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403.

Option A

Construction‐related emissions are shown in Table 4. It was assumed that all phases of construction would occur sequentially and would not overlap on any given day. As shown in Table 4, maximum daily project‐related criteria pollutant emissions would not exceed SCAQMD construction‐period thresholds for any pollutant. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Table 4. Worst‐Case Regional Construction Emissions for all Alternatives (pounds per day)

ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 5 57 44 0 7 4 Site Grading 4 41 28 0 5 4 Building Construction 4 33 28 0 3 2 Paving 2 18 14 0 1 1 Architectural Coatings 6 2 3 0 0 0 Maximum Daily 6 57 44 0 7 4 Regional Construction Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod emission modeling by ICF International, 2013 (Appendix A).



ICF 00327.13

Option B

Construction‐related emissions associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A, as shown in Table 3. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2 Construction‐related emissions associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Alternative 1, as shown in Table 3. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Local Construction Impacts

Alternative 1 In addition to regional emissions thresholds, SCAQMD has developed a set of mass emissions rate look‐up tables that can be used to evaluate localized impacts that may result from construction‐period emissions. If the on‐site emissions from proposed construction activities are below the LST emission levels found in the LST mass rate look‐up tables for the project vicinity SRA, then project emissions would not have the potential to cause a significant localized air quality impact.

When quantifying mass emissions for LST analysis, only emissions that occur on‐site are considered. Consistent with SCAQMD LST guidelines, emissions related to off‐site delivery/haul truck activity and employee trips are not considered in the evaluation of localized impacts.

Option A

A conservative estimate of the project’s construction‐period mass emissions is presented in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, maximum daily project‐related criteria pollutant emissions would not exceed SCAQMD localized construction‐period thresholds. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Table 5. Worst‐Case Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day)

NOX CO PM10a PM2.5a Site Preparation 57 43 4.7 2.4 Site Grading 40 27 2.5 1.3 Building Construction 30 19 2.1 2.0 Paving 18 13 1.1 1.0 Architectural Coatings 2 2 0.2 0.2 Maximum Daily 57 43 4.7 2.4 Localized Significance Thresholdsb 114 786 7 4

Exceed Threshold No No No No Source: CalEEMod emission modeling by ICF International (Appendix A). a PM10 and PM2.5 emissions estimates assume compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements for fugitive dust suppression, which require that no visible dust be present beyond the site boundaries.

b The project site is located in SCAQMD SRA Number 7. These LSTs are based on the site location SRA, distance to nearest sensitive receptor location from the project site (25 meters), and project area that could be under construction on any given day (2 acres).



ICF 00327.13

Option B

Construction‐related localized emissions associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A, as shown in Table 5. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related localized emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2 Construction‐related localized emissions associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A, as shown in Table 5. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related localized emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Toxic Air Contaminants

Alternative 1

Option A

The greatest potential for TAC emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during site grading activities. SCAQMD does not consider diesel‐related cancer risks from construction equipment to be an issue because of the short‐term nature of construction activities. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would be sporadic, transitory, and short term in nature. The assessment of cancer risk is typically based on a 70‐year exposure period. Because exposure to diesel exhaust would be well below the 70‐year exposure period, construction of the proposed project is not anticipated to result in an elevated cancer risk to exposed persons because of the short‐term nature of construction. As such, project‐related toxic emission impacts during construction would be less than significant.

Option B

Construction‐related TAC emissions associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related TAC emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2

Construction‐related TAC emissions associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related TAC emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Climate Change /Greenhouse Gas Emissions GHG emissions from development of the proposed projects can be divided into two categories, those produced during construction and those produced during operations. GHG emissions produced during construction are discussed below.

Alternative 1

Option A

Short‐term construction activities would result in GHG emissions from fuel combustion associated with off‐ and on‐road construction equipment and vehicles. Emissions associated with the approximate 12‐month construction period are summarized in Table 6.



ICF 00327.13

Table 6. Estimate of GHG Emissions during Construction (metric tons)

Phase Total CO2e Site Preparation 10 Site Grading 12

Building Construction 444

Paving 18

Architectural Coatings 4

Total Construction Emissions 487

30‐year Amortized Total 16

CAPCOA Threshold 900 Exceed Significant Threshold? No Source: Emissions modeling by ICF 2013 (Appendix A).

As shown in Table 6, the impact of construction‐related GHG emissions from the project would be less than significant. Consistent with SCAQMD draft guidelines, construction emissions are summed and amortized over a 30‐year project life and then added to operational emissions, as shown in Table 10. Option B

Construction‐related GHG emissions associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related GHG emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2

Construction‐related GHG emissions associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Alternative 1. Consequently, the impact of construction‐related GHG emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Operational Impacts

Regional Operational Impacts

Alternative 1

Operation of the proposed project has the potential to create air quality impacts associated with an increased number of motor vehicle trips, on‐site use of solvents and consumer products, and exhaust emissions from landscaping equipment (e.g., mowers, etc.). The operational analysis used trip generation data from the traffic analysis (Fehr & Peers 2013) as well as CalEEMod (version 2013.2.2) defaults regarding area and energy sources for a “City Park” land use.



ICF 00327.13

Option A

As shown in Table 7, maximum daily emissions during operations are not expected to exceed SCAQMD operations‐period thresholds for any pollutant. Consequently, the impact of operations‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Table 7. Estimate of Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions for all Alternatives (pounds per day)

ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Mobile Sources 1 3 12 0 2 1 Consumer Products < 1 — — — — — Architectural Coatings 4 — — — — — Landscaping < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Maximum Daily 5 3 12 0 2 1 Regional Operational Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod emission modeling by ICF International, 2013 (Appendix A). Emissions from each source are the maximum of summer and winter emissions. Emissions may not add up because of rounding.

Option B

Regional operations‐related emissions associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A, as shown in Table 6. Consequently, the impact of operations‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2

Regional operations‐related emissions associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Alternative 1, as shown in Table 6. Consequently, the impact of operations‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Localized Operational Impacts

Alternative 1

SCAQMD’s LST methodology was developed to aid operational analysis of land use development projects. It directs analyses to focus on emissions from stationary sources (i.e., natural gas furnaces, emergency generators, etc.) and mobile equipment (i.e., landscaping equipment) operating on‐site. Note that no stationary sources (i.e., natural gas furnaces, emergency generators, etc.) are included as part of the proposed project. Consistent with SCAQMD’s LST guidelines, emissions related to vehicle travel are not considered in the evaluation of localized impacts.

Option A

As shown in Table 8, localized emissions during operations would not exceed LSTs for the project area. Impacts would be less than significant.



ICF 00327.13

Table 8. Worst‐Case Localized Operational Emissions for all Alternatives (pounds per day)

NOX CO PM10a PM2.5a Consumer Products — — — — Architectural Coatings — — — — Landscaping < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Maximum Daily < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 Localized Significance Thresholdsb 114 786 2 1

Exceed Threshold No No No No Source: CalEEMod emission modeling by ICF International (Appendix A). a PM10 and PM2.5 emissions estimates assume compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements for fugitive dust suppression, which require that no visible dust be present beyond the site boundaries.

b The project site is located in SCAQMD SRA Number 7. These LSTs are based on the site location SRA, distance to nearest sensitive receptor location from the project site (25 meters), and project area that could be under operation on any given day (2 acres).

Option B

Localized operations‐related emissions associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A, as shown in Table 8. Consequently, the impact of localized operations‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2

Localized operations‐related emissions associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A, as shown in Table 8. Consequently, the impact of localized operations‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Operational Toxic Air Contaminants

Alternative 1 With respect to potential TAC emissions associated with buildout and long‐term operation of the proposed project, SCAQMD recommends that an HRA be conducted for projects with substantial diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) or certain industrial projects with acute and/or chronically hazardous TAC pollutants. The proposed project would not create new emissions sources, nor would it affect the distribution of diesel‐powered vehicles. Therefore, the project would not expose receptors to acute and/or chronically hazardous TAC pollutants. Impacts related to potential project‐generated exposure to TACs on surrounding land uses would be less than significant.

Each of the proposed project alternatives would place recreational sensitive receptors near the existing pollution source (i.e., I‐5). Cancer and non‐cancer health effects were estimated using the methodology described above.

Option A

As shown in Table 9, the incremental health risk associated with exposure to freeway‐related emissions would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for identifying long‐term health risk impacts at a distance of approximately 150 meters (492 feet) or less west of I‐5 and approximately 175 meters



ICF 00327.13

Table 9. Annual DPM Concentration and Risk Values

Distance from I‐5

Annual DPM Concentration

(µg/m3) Cancer Risk (in 1 million)

Non‐Cancer Hazard Index

West of I‐5 25 meters (82 feet) 0.3480 37 0.070 50 meters (164 feet) 0.2360 25 0.047 75 meters (246 feet) 0.1789 19 0.036 100 meters (328 feet) 0.1445 15 0.029 125 meters (410 feet) 0.1210 13 0.024 150 meters (492 feet) 0.1036 11 0.021 175 meters (574 feet) 0.0900 9 0.018 200 meters (656 feet) 0.0791 8 0.016 225 meters (738 feet) 0.0703 7 0.014 250 meters (820 feet) 0.0631 7 0.013 275 meters (902 feet) 0.0571 6 0.011 300 meters (984 feet) 0.0521 5 0.010 325 meters (1,066 feet) 0.0477 5 0.010 350 meters (1,148 feet) 0.0439 5 0.009 375 meters (1,230 feet) 0.0405 4 0.008 400 meters (1,312 feet) 0.0374 4 0.007 East of I‐5 25 meters (82 feet) 0.3841 40 0.077 50 meters (164 feet) 0.2622 28 0.052 75 meters (246 feet) 0.1990 21 0.040 100 meters (328 feet) 0.1600 17 0.032 125 meters (410 feet) 0.1334 14 0.027 150 meters (492 feet) 0.1137 12 0.023 175 meters (574 feet) 0.0986 10 0.020 200 meters (656 feet) 0.0865 9 0.017 225 meters (738 feet) 0.0768 8 0.015 250 meters (820 feet) 0.0689 7 0.014 275 meters (902 feet) 0.0623 7 0.012 300 meters (984 feet) 0.0568 6 0.011 325 meters (1,066 feet) 0.0521 5 0.010 350 meters (1,148 feet) 0.0481 5 0.010 375 meters (1,230 feet) 0.0445 5 0.009 400 meters (1,312 feet) 0.0413 4 0.008 SCAQMD Significance Threshold NA 10 (long‐term) 1.0 (short‐term) Source: ICF International, 2013 (Appendix B).



ICF 00327.13

(574 feet) or less east of I‐5. Keeping in mind that the area’s ambient risk is estimated to be approximately 938 in 1 million, per SCAQMD’s MATES III study, the risk estimates identified below take into account I‐5 emissions only.

It is important to reiterate that the cancer risk estimates presented below assume a continuous exposure over a 9‐year timeframe. As such, it is not very meaningful to evaluate long‐term cancer impacts from exposure that would be short term and intermittent for park patrons. A more appropriate measure of significance to intermittent short‐duration exposures would be the hazard index criterion. As shown below, all hazard index values would remain below the 1.0 significance criteria. As such, impacts would be less than significant.

Option B

Operations‐related TAC emissions and risk values associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A. Consequently, the impact of TAC emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2

Operations‐related TAC emissions and risk values associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A. Consequently, the impact of TAC emissions from the project would be less than significant.

Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots

Alternative 1

Within an urban setting, vehicle exhaust is the primary source of CO. Consequently, the highest CO concentrations are generally found close to congested intersections. Under typical meteorological conditions, CO concentrations tend to decrease as the distance from the emissions source (i.e., congested intersection) increases. For purposes of providing a conservative worst‐case impact analysis, CO concentrations are typically analyzed at congested intersection locations. If impacts are less than significant close to congested intersections, impacts will also be less than significant at more distant sensitive‐receptor locations.

Option A

Project traffic during the operational phase of the project would have the potential to create local CO impacts. To ascertain the proposed project’s potential to generate localized air quality impacts, the project‐specific traffic impact analysis (Fehr & Peers 2013) was reviewed to determine the potential for the creation of localized CO hot spots at congested intersection locations. SCAQMD recommends a hot‐spot evaluation of potential localized CO impacts when vehicle‐to‐capacity (V/C) ratios are increased by 2 percent or more at intersections with a level of service (LOS) of C or worse. It was determined that V/C ratios would not increase by 2 percent or more at intersections with an LOS of C or worse under the existing or future‐year project scenarios. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not create congested conditions on nearby roadways. The project is not expected to result in violations of state or federal 1‐ or 8‐hour CO standards. The impact would be less than significant.



ICF 00327.13

Option B

Operations‐related CO hot spots associated with implementation of Option B are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A. Consequently, the impact of operations‐related CO hot spots from the project would be less than significant.

Alternative 2

Operations‐related CO hot spots associated with implementation of Alternative 2 are expected to be the same as they would be under Option A. Consequently, the impact of operations‐related CO hot spots from the project would be less than significant.

Consistency with AQMP SCAQMD is required, pursuant to the CAA, to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment status (i.e., O3, PM10, and PM2.5). The proposed project would be subject to SCAQMD’s AQMP, which contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies to reduce emissions and achieve ambient air quality standards. These strategies are based, in part, on regional population, housing, and employment projections prepared by SCAG.

The proposed project is generally consistent with the City of Los Angeles General Plan because it would develop additional recreational land uses within an existing recreational setting. The proposed project would be compatible with surrounding recreational land uses. Although the project would place recreational receptors near existing pollution sources, impacts related to this exposure are expected to be far below SCAQMD health‐risk thresholds.

Because the proposed project is consistent with the general plan, pursuant to SCAQMD guidelines, the proposed project is considered to be consistent with the region’s AQMP. As such, project‐related emissions are accounted for in the AQMP, which is crafted to bring the Basin into attainment for all criteria pollutants. Accordingly, the proposed project would be consistent with the projections in the AQMP, thereby resulting in a less‐than‐significant impact.

Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Long‐term operation of the proposed project would result in GHG emissions from fuel combustion (i.e., from on‐road motor vehicles associated with the increased number of recreational visitor trips on weekdays and Saturdays), water consumption associated with increased irrigation, solid waste generation, and landscaping. Estimated emissions associated with long‐term operations compared with existing conditions are shown in Table 10. As shown in Table 10, total annual GHG emissions (the sum of amortized construction from Table 6 and annual operational emissions) for the proposed project are not expected to exceed the 900 MTCO2e threshold. However, the construction and operational analyses herein do not include the potential reductions associated with statewide GHG‐reduction efforts. For example, the Pavley standard aims to improve the efficiency of automobiles and light‐duty trucks by 17 percent, the Advanced Clean Car Standards aim to improve the fuel efficiency of light‐duty vehicles by an additional 2.5 percent over Pavley, LCFS aims to reduce the carbon intensity of diesel and gasoline transportation fuels by 8.9 percent, and the renewable portfolio and renewable electricity standards aim to reduce electricity‐related GHG emissions by 19.1 percent (ARB 2011d). Although reductions associated with statewide measures would further reduce project‐related emissions, these emissions are not quantified herein.



ICF 00327.13

Table 10. Estimate of Project‐Related GHG Emissions during Operations for all Alternative (metric tons per year)

Operations Total CO2e

Mobile Sources 204 Water 30 Solid Waste < 1 Landscaping < 1 Total Operations 234 Total Operations plus Amortized Construction* 250

CAPCOA Threshold 900 Exceed Significant Threshold? No *Amortized Construction (16 MTCO2e) is summarized in Table 6. Source: Emissions modeling by ICF 2013 (Appendix A).

It is worth noting that the 900 MTCO2e threshold is more conservative (i.e., lower) than any other bright‐line numeric threshold adopted or proposed within the state. For example, SCAQMD once contemplated a 3,000 MTCO2e bright‐line threshold for commercial and residential land use projects. Implementation of statewide measures associated with AB 32 would further reduce emissions beyond those shown herein. Consequently, the impact of construction‐ and operations‐related emissions from the project would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary.

Various lead agencies and air districts have adopted and/or drafted numeric mass emissions thresholds as a way to close the gap between emissions reductions from land use–driven sectors that occur at the state level (including Pavley, LCFS, and RPS, among others) and the necessary emissions reductions from land use development projects that have a lower carbon intensity, consistent with the goals of AB 32. Although the 900 MT threshold used herein has not been formally adopted by any lead agency or air district in the state, it is worth noting that 900 MT is lower than any numerical mass emissions threshold adopted, proposed, or drafted within the state. For example, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District has adopted a 1,100 MTCO2e mass emissions threshold for land use projects, while SCAQMD has drafted a 3,000 MTCO2e mass emissions threshold for commercial/residential projects.

As discussed above and shown within Table 10, proposed project‐related GHG emissions are expected to be far below the chosen CAPCOA threshold of 900 MTCO2e. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with the AB 32 goal of reducing statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of GHGs. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary.

Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are necessary.



ICF 00327.13

Significant Unavoidable Impacts There would be no significant unavoidable impacts.

Cumulative Impacts SCAQMD’s approach for assessing cumulative impacts is based on the AQMP forecasts of attainment of ambient air quality standards, in accordance with the requirements of the federal and state Clean Air Acts. As previously discussed, the proposed project would be consistent with the AQMP, which is intended to bring the Basin into attainment for all criteria pollutants.1

As discussed above, the project is consistent with the AQMP and SIP. Furthermore, emissions would be below SCAQMD regional thresholds and would not result in substantial pollutant concentrations at nearby sensitive receptors. The proposed project would comply with SCAQMD rules and regulations, including Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust Control) and Rule 1108 (Cutback Asphalt), during construction as well as all other adopted AQMP emissions control measures. Per SCAQMD rules and mandates, as well as the CEQA requirement that significant impacts be mitigated to the extent feasible, these same requirements (i.e., Rule 403 compliance, the implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, and compliance with adopted AQMP emissions control measures) would also be imposed on all projects Basin‐wide, which would include all nearby projects. As such, cumulative impacts with respect to criteria pollutant emissions would be less than significant. Following construction, operation of the proposed project or an alternative would result in emissions that would be below SCAQMD regional thresholds, and exposure to nearby freeway emissions would be below SCAQMD risk thresholds. Therefore, the project’s long‐term contribution to cumulative air quality impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

With regard to GHG emissions, the project is expected to result in a small increase in GHG emissions under the build condition compared with existing conditions.. However, this increase would not exceed the chosen threshold, nor would the project impede implementation of AB 32 and associated efforts. As such, the proposed project’s contribution to climate change/worldwide GHG emissions would be less than significant.

1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3) states “A lead agency may determine that a project's incremental contribution to a cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a previously approved plan or mitigation program which provides specific requirements that will avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem (e.g. water quality control plan, air quality plan, integrated waste management plan) within the geographic area in which the project is located. Such plans or programs must be specified in law or adopted by the public agency with jurisdiction over the affected resources through a public review process to implement, interpret, or make specific the law enforced or administered by the public agency.”



ICF 00327.13

References California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2009. Health Risk Assessments for Proposed

Land Use Projects. CAPCOA Guidance Document. Available: <http://www.capcoa.org/>. July.

California Air Resources Board. 1998. The Report on Diesel Exhaust. July. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/dieseltac/de‐fnds.htm>.

California Air Resources Board. 2010. Summary of ARB Regulations on Diesel Activities. Last Reviewed: January 2010. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/mobile.htm>. Accessed: November 2011.

California Air Resources Board. 2011. Final Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document. August. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/ document/final_supplement_to_sp_fed.pdf>.

California Air Resources Board. 2012a. Area Designations Maps. Posted: July 20, 2012. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm>. Accessed: August 20, 2012.

California Air Resources Board. 2012b. News Release – California Air Resources Board Approves Advanced Clean Car Rules. January 27. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/newsrel/newsrelease.php?id=282>.

California Air Resources Board. 2013a. Ambient Air Quality Standards. Last Revised: June 4, 2013. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf>.

California Air Resources Board. 2013b. iADAM: Air Quality Statistics. June. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/index.html>. Accessed: October 2, 2013.

California Air Resources Board. 2013c. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data – 2000 to 2011. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm>. Accessed: October 7, 2013.

California Department of Transportation. 2013. Truck Traffic. Available: <http://traffic‐counts.dot.ca.gov/>.

City of Los Angeles. 2007. GREEN LA: An Action Plan to Lead the Nation in Fighting Global Warming. May. Available: <http://environmentla.org/pdf/GreenLA_CAP_2007.pdf>.

Fehr & Peers. 2013. Draft Traffic Study for the Crystal Springs Baseball Fields. September.

Georgetown Climate Center. 2012. Summary of the Federal District Court’s Order Enjoining California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard. January. Available: <http://www.georgetownclimate.org/sites/default/files/Summary_of_Court_Enjoining_CA_LCFS.pdf>. Accessed: June 13, 2013.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. n.d. Climate of Los Angeles. Available: <http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/climate/climate_intro.php>. Accessed: June 13, 2013.

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2003. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. August.



ICF 00327.13

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2012. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines: Technical Support Document for Exposure Assessment and Stochastic Analysis. June.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. April.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2003. Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions. August.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2006. Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Significance Thresholds and Calculation Methodology. October.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008. MATES III Final Report. September. Available: <http://www.aqmd.gov/prdas/matesIII/MATESIIIFinalReportSept2008.html>.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2009. Localized Significance Threshold Methodology for CEQA Evaluations. June.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2011a. SCAQMD Rules and Regulations. Last Updated: June 9, 2011. Available: <http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/rulesreg.html>.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2011b. Table 1: Meteorological Sites. Available: <http://www.aqmd.gov/smog/metdata/AERMOD_Table1.html>.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2011c. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. March. Available: <http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/signthres.pdf>.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2012a. 2012 Air Quality Management Plan.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2012b. Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES III). MATES IV Technical Advisory Group Meeting. Available: <http://www.aqmd.gov/prdas/MatesIV/Meetings/MatesIV042412.html>.

Southern California Association of Governments. 2012. 2012–2035 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy. April.

Sutley, N. H. 2010. Draft NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies. February 18. Available: <http://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ Consideration_of_Effects_of_GHG_Draft_NEPA_Guidance_FINAL_02182010.pdf>.

The Weather Channel. 2013. Monthly Averages for Glendale. Available: <http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/monthly/USCA0423>. Accessed: October 3, 2013.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012a. National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Last Updated: December 14, 2012.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012b. Monitor Values Report. Available: <www.epa.gov/air/data/monvals.html>. Accessed: September 28, 2011.



ICF 00327.13

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013a. Greenbook of Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. Available: <http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk>. Accessed: October 3, 2013.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013b. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2011. EPA 430‐R‐13‐001. April.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2012. Regulatory Announcement: EPA and NHTSA Set Standards to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Improve Fuel Economy for Model Years 2017–2025 Cars and Light Trucks. August. Available: <http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f12051.pdf>.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the California Air Resources Board. 2010. Interim Joint Technical Assessment Report: Light‐Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 2017–2025. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/clean_cars/ ldv‐ghg‐tar.pdf>.

Appendix A CalEEMod Outputs

Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

Crystal Springs

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

Other Asphalt Surfaces 5.66 1000sqft 0.13 5,660.00 0

City Park 4.00 Acre 4.00 174,240.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

11

Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

2017Operational Year

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/8/2013 4:48 PMPage 1 of 23

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - assuming 4 acre city park for all options. no lighting for nighttime games but watering. 5,655 ft2 of asphalt based on site plan of Alt1a "hammerhead" turning circles.

Construction Phase - no demolition

Demolition - no demolition

Grading -

Architectural Coating - coatings only on dugouts and restroom?

Vehicle Trips - 160 ADT/weekdays, 320 ADT/Saturday, 0 ADT/Sundays

Area Coating - coatings only on dugouts and restroom?

Energy Use - default no lighting for city park

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - -

Off-road Equipment - -

2.0 Emissions Summary

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 89,950.00 2,000.00

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 269,850.00 6,925.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 269850 6925

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/5/2015 6/7/2015

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2017

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 80.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 40.00


2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

2015 4.3115 42.5956 32.8023 0.0443 12.2118 2.4187 14.6306 6.6649 2.2252 8.8901 0.0000 4,301.4519

4,301.4519

0.9596 0.0000 4,321.6033

2016 6.1807 31.4701 26.7271 0.0442 1.0304 2.0151 3.0455 0.2768 1.8923 2.1691 0.0000 4,241.9823

4,241.9823

0.7176 0.0000 4,257.0512

Total 10.4923 74.0657 59.5293 0.0885 13.2422 4.4338 17.6760 6.9417 4.1175 11.0592 0.0000 8,543.4342

8,543.4342

1.6772 0.0000 8,578.6545

Unmitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year lb/day lb/day

2015 4.3115 42.5956 32.8023 0.0443 4.8649 2.4187 7.2836 2.6264 2.2252 4.8517 0.0000 4,301.4518

4,301.4518

0.9596 0.0000 4,321.6033

2016 6.1807 31.4701 26.7271 0.0442 1.0304 2.0151 3.0455 0.2768 1.8923 2.1691 0.0000 4,241.9823

4,241.9823

0.7176 0.0000 4,257.0512

Total 10.4923 74.0657 59.5293 0.0885 5.8953 4.4338 10.3291 2.9032 4.1175 7.0207 0.0000 8,543.4342

8,543.4342

1.6772 0.0000 8,578.6545

Mitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.48 0.00 41.56 58.18 0.00 36.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


2.2 Overall Operational


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Category lb/day lb/day

Area 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mobile 1.0922 2.9583 12.1170 0.0300 1.9554 0.0433 1.9987 0.5229 0.0398 0.5627 2,558.1120

2,558.1120

0.1020 2,560.2541

Total 4.9619 2.9583 12.1180 0.0300 1.9554 0.0433 1.9987 0.5229 0.0398 0.5627 2,558.1141

2,558.1141

0.1020 0.0000 2,560.2564

Unmitigated Operational


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mobile 1.0922 2.9583 12.1170 0.0300 1.9554 0.0433 1.9987 0.5229 0.0398 0.5627 2,558.1120

2,558.1120

0.1020 2,560.2541

Total 4.9619 2.9583 12.1180 0.0300 1.9554 0.0433 1.9987 0.5229 0.0398 0.5627 2,558.1141

2,558.1141

0.1020 0.0000 2,560.2564

Mitigated Operational


3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/1/2015 6/7/2015 5 5

2 Grading Grading 6/8/2015 6/17/2015 5 8

3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/18/2015 5/4/2016 5 230

4 Paving Paving 5/5/2016 5/30/2016 5 18

5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/31/2016 6/23/2016 5 18

OffRoad Equipment


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 6,925; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,000 (Architectural Coating – sqft)

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4

Acres of Paving: 0


Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor

Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40

Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37

Grading Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38

Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29

Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45

Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56

Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42

Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 130 0.36

Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38

Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Site Preparation 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Building Construction 9 76.00 29.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Architectural Coating 1 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT


3.2 Site Preparation - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 12.0442 0.0000 12.0442 6.6205 0.0000 6.6205 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 2.4170 2.4170 2.2237 2.2237 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360

Total 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 12.0442 2.4170 14.4612 6.6205 2.2237 8.8441 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360

Unmitigated Construction On-Site


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418

Total 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Water Exposed Area




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 4.6972 0.0000 4.6972 2.5820 0.0000 2.5820 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 2.4170 2.4170 2.2237 2.2237 0.0000 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360

Total 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 4.6972 2.4170 7.1143 2.5820 2.2237 4.8057 0.0000 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360

Mitigated Construction On-Site


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418

Total 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418

Mitigated Construction Off-Site


3.3 Grading - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 2.3284 2.3284 2.1421 2.1421 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328

Total 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 6.5523 2.3284 8.8807 3.3675 2.1421 5.5096 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418

Total 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418



3.3 Grading - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 2.5554 0.0000 2.5554 1.3133 0.0000 1.3133 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 2.3284 2.3284 2.1421 2.1421 0.0000 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328

Total 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 2.5554 2.3284 4.8838 1.3133 2.1421 3.4554 0.0000 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418

Total 0.0740 0.0930 1.1469 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 190.7132 190.7132 0.0109 190.9418



3.4 Building Construction - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483

Total 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.2777 2.8675 3.2197 6.3800e-003

0.1808 0.0481 0.2288 0.0514 0.0442 0.0956 645.5944 645.5944 5.1800e-003

645.7032

Worker 0.3748 0.4712 5.8111 0.0111 0.8495 8.4900e-003

0.8580 0.2253 7.7800e-003

0.2331 966.2803 966.2803 0.0552 967.4384

Total 0.6525 3.3387 9.0308 0.0174 1.0303 0.0566 1.0868 0.2767 0.0520 0.3287 1,611.8747

1,611.8747

0.0603 1,613.1416





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 0.0000 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483

Total 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 0.0000 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.2777 2.8675 3.2197 6.3800e-003

0.1808 0.0481 0.2288 0.0514 0.0442 0.0956 645.5944 645.5944 5.1800e-003

645.7032

Worker 0.3748 0.4712 5.8111 0.0111 0.8495 8.4900e-003

0.8580 0.2253 7.7800e-003

0.2331 966.2803 966.2803 0.0552 967.4384

Total 0.6525 3.3387 9.0308 0.0174 1.0303 0.0566 1.0868 0.2767 0.0520 0.3287 1,611.8747

1,611.8747

0.0603 1,613.1416





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890

Total 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.2443 2.5378 2.9484 6.3700e-003

0.1809 0.0397 0.2205 0.0515 0.0365 0.0879 638.6398 638.6398 4.6900e-003

638.7382

Worker 0.3385 0.4260 5.2721 0.0111 0.8495 8.0300e-003

0.8575 0.2253 7.3800e-003

0.2327 934.0562 934.0562 0.0509 935.1240

Total 0.5828 2.9638 8.2205 0.0174 1.0304 0.0477 1.0781 0.2768 0.0439 0.3206 1,572.6960

1,572.6960

0.0555 1,573.8622





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 0.0000 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890

Total 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 0.0000 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.2443 2.5378 2.9484 6.3700e-003

0.1809 0.0397 0.2205 0.0515 0.0365 0.0879 638.6398 638.6398 4.6900e-003

638.7382

Worker 0.3385 0.4260 5.2721 0.0111 0.8495 8.0300e-003

0.8575 0.2253 7.3800e-003

0.2327 934.0562 934.0562 0.0509 935.1240

Total 0.5828 2.9638 8.2205 0.0174 1.0304 0.0477 1.0781 0.2768 0.0439 0.3206 1,572.6960

1,572.6960

0.0555 1,573.8622



3.5 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.7956 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557

Paving 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.8145 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0891 0.1121 1.3874 2.9100e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 245.8043 245.8043 0.0134 246.0853

Total 0.0891 0.1121 1.3874 2.9100e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 245.8043 245.8043 0.0134 246.0853



3.5 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.7956 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 0.0000 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557

Paving 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.8145 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 0.0000 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0891 0.1121 1.3874 2.9100e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 245.8043 245.8043 0.0134 246.0853

Total 0.0891 0.1121 1.3874 2.9100e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 245.8043 245.8043 0.0134 246.0853



3.6 Architectural Coating - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 5.7455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.3685 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449

Total 6.1139 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0668 0.0841 1.0406 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 184.3532 184.3532 0.0100 184.5639

Total 0.0668 0.0841 1.0406 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 184.3532 184.3532 0.0100 184.5639



4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 5.7455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.3685 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449

Total 6.1139 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0668 0.0841 1.0406 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 184.3532 184.3532 0.0100 184.5639

Total 0.0668 0.0841 1.0406 2.1800e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 184.3532 184.3532 0.0100 184.5639




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 1.0922 2.9583 12.1170 0.0300 1.9554 0.0433 1.9987 0.5229 0.0398 0.5627 2,558.1120

2,558.1120

0.1020 2,560.2541

Unmitigated 1.0922 2.9583 12.1170 0.0300 1.9554 0.0433 1.9987 0.5229 0.0398 0.5627 2,558.1120

2,558.1120

0.1020 2,560.2541

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

City Park 160.00 320.00 0.00 460,406 460,406

Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 160.00 320.00 0.00 460,406 460,406

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6

Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

0.532559 0.058242 0.178229 0.125155 0.038934 0.006273 0.016761 0.032323 0.002478 0.003154 0.003685 0.000544 0.001663


5.0 Energy Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



NaturalGas Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Other Asphalt Surfaces

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N


6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Unmitigated 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003


NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated


7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Architectural Coating

0.3075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

3.5620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Landscaping 1.0000e-004

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Total 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Unmitigated


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.3075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

3.5620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Total 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Mitigated


8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

10.0 Vegetation

9.0 Operational Offroad

Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type


Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

Crystal Springs

1.1 Land Usage



City Park 4.00 Acre 4.00 174,240.00 0


Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

11














Grading -



















2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year lb/day lb/day

2015 4.3570 42.6058 32.7360 0.0436 12.2118 2.4187 14.6306 6.6649 2.2252 8.8901 0.0000 4,241.9163

4,241.9163

0.9596 0.0000 4,262.0677

2016 6.1834 31.5802 27.0468 0.0436 1.0304 2.0155 3.0459 0.2768 1.8927 2.1695 0.0000 4,184.2472

4,184.2472

0.7177 0.0000 4,199.3188

Total 10.5404 74.1860 59.7828 0.0872 13.2422 4.4342 17.6764 6.9417 4.1179 11.0596 0.0000 8,426.1634

8,426.1634

1.6773 0.0000 8,461.3866



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year lb/day lb/day

2015 4.3570 42.6058 32.7360 0.0436 4.8649 2.4187 7.2836 2.6264 2.2252 4.8517 0.0000 4,241.9163

4,241.9163

0.9596 0.0000 4,262.0677

2016 6.1834 31.5802 27.0468 0.0436 1.0304 2.0155 3.0459 0.2768 1.8927 2.1695 0.0000 4,184.2472

4,184.2472

0.7177 0.0000 4,199.3188

Total 10.5404 74.1860 59.7828 0.0872 5.8953 4.4342 10.3295 2.9032 4.1179 7.0211 0.0000 8,426.1634

8,426.1634

1.6773 0.0000 8,461.3866



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.48 0.00 41.56 58.18 0.00 36.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mobile 1.1484 3.1154 12.2170 0.0286 1.9554 0.0434 1.9989 0.5229 0.0400 0.5629 2,446.7790

2,446.7790

0.1021 2,448.9231

Total 5.0181 3.1154 12.2180 0.0286 1.9554 0.0434 1.9989 0.5229 0.0400 0.5629 2,446.7811

2,446.7811

0.1021 0.0000 2,448.9253



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mobile 1.1484 3.1154 12.2170 0.0286 1.9554 0.0434 1.9989 0.5229 0.0400 0.5629 2,446.7790

2,446.7790

0.1021 2,448.9231

Total 5.0181 3.1154 12.2180 0.0286 1.9554 0.0434 1.9989 0.5229 0.0400 0.5629 2,446.7811

2,446.7811

0.1021 0.0000 2,448.9253




Construction Phase

Phase Number




2 Grading Grading 6/8/2015 6/17/2015 5 8


4 Paving Paving 5/5/2016 5/30/2016 5 18


OffRoad Equipment


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




Acres of Paving: 0




















Trips and VMT


Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length












Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 12.0442 0.0000 12.0442 6.6205 0.0000 6.6205 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 2.4170 2.4170 2.2237 2.2237 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360

Total 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 12.0442 2.4170 14.4612 6.6205 2.2237 8.8441 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447

Total 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447



Water Exposed Area




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 4.6972 0.0000 4.6972 2.5820 0.0000 2.5820 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 2.4170 2.4170 2.2237 2.2237 0.0000 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360

Total 3.9878 42.5026 31.6553 0.0302 4.6972 2.4170 7.1143 2.5820 2.2237 4.8057 0.0000 3,177.8131

3,177.8131

0.9487 3,197.7360



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447

Total 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447



3.3 Grading - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 2.3284 2.3284 2.1421 2.1421 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328

Total 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 6.5523 2.3284 8.8807 3.3675 2.1421 5.5096 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447

Total 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447



3.3 Grading - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 2.5554 0.0000 2.5554 1.3133 0.0000 1.3133 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 2.3284 2.3284 2.1421 2.1421 0.0000 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328

Total 3.8327 40.4161 26.6731 0.0298 2.5554 2.3284 4.8838 1.3133 2.1421 3.4554 0.0000 3,129.0158

3,129.0158

0.9341 3,148.6328



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447

Total 0.0771 0.1031 1.0807 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.6800e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.5300e-003

0.0460 180.0161 180.0161 0.0109 180.2447





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483

Total 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.3073 2.9414 3.8687 6.3400e-003

0.1808 0.0487 0.2294 0.0514 0.0447 0.0962 640.2574 640.2574 5.3200e-003

640.3692

Worker 0.3906 0.5225 5.4755 0.0104 0.8495 8.4900e-003

0.8580 0.2253 7.7800e-003

0.2331 912.0817 912.0817 0.0552 913.2398

Total 0.6979 3.4639 9.3442 0.0168 1.0303 0.0572 1.0874 0.2767 0.0525 0.3292 1,552.3391

1,552.3391

0.0605 1,553.6090





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 0.0000 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483

Total 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 0.0000 2,689.5771

2,689.5771

0.6748 2,703.7483



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.3073 2.9414 3.8687 6.3400e-003

0.1808 0.0487 0.2294 0.0514 0.0447 0.0962 640.2574 640.2574 5.3200e-003

640.3692

Worker 0.3906 0.5225 5.4755 0.0104 0.8495 8.4900e-003

0.8580 0.2253 7.7800e-003

0.2331 912.0817 912.0817 0.0552 913.2398

Total 0.6979 3.4639 9.3442 0.0168 1.0303 0.0572 1.0874 0.2767 0.0525 0.3292 1,552.3391

1,552.3391

0.0605 1,553.6090





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890

Total 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.2696 2.6015 3.5897 6.3300e-003

0.1809 0.0401 0.2210 0.0515 0.0369 0.0883 633.3371 633.3371 4.8200e-003

633.4384

Worker 0.3521 0.4724 4.9504 0.0104 0.8495 8.0300e-003

0.8575 0.2253 7.3800e-003

0.2327 881.6236 881.6236 0.0509 882.6914

Total 0.6217 3.0739 8.5401 0.0168 1.0304 0.0481 1.0785 0.2768 0.0443 0.3210 1,514.9608

1,514.9608

0.0557 1,516.1298





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 0.0000 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890

Total 3.4062 28.5063 18.5066 0.0268 1.9674 1.9674 1.8485 1.8485 0.0000 2,669.2864

2,669.2864

0.6620 2,683.1890



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.2696 2.6015 3.5897 6.3300e-003

0.1809 0.0401 0.2210 0.0515 0.0369 0.0883 633.3371 633.3371 4.8200e-003

633.4384

Worker 0.3521 0.4724 4.9504 0.0104 0.8495 8.0300e-003

0.8575 0.2253 7.3800e-003

0.2327 881.6236 881.6236 0.0509 882.6914

Total 0.6217 3.0739 8.5401 0.0168 1.0304 0.0481 1.0785 0.2768 0.0443 0.3210 1,514.9608

1,514.9608

0.0557 1,516.1298



3.5 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.7956 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557

Paving 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.8145 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0927 0.1243 1.3028 2.7400e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 232.0062 232.0062 0.0134 232.2872

Total 0.0927 0.1243 1.3028 2.7400e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 232.0062 232.0062 0.0134 232.2872



3.5 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.7956 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 0.0000 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557

Paving 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.8145 18.3417 12.5623 0.0186 1.1065 1.1065 1.0198 1.0198 0.0000 1,902.2212

1,902.2212

0.5588 1,913.9557



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0927 0.1243 1.3028 2.7400e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 232.0062 232.0062 0.0134 232.2872

Total 0.0927 0.1243 1.3028 2.7400e-003

0.2236 2.1100e-003

0.2257 0.0593 1.9400e-003

0.0612 232.0062 232.0062 0.0134 232.2872





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 5.7455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.3685 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449

Total 6.1139 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0695 0.0932 0.9771 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 174.0047 174.0047 0.0100 174.2154

Total 0.0695 0.0932 0.9771 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 174.0047 174.0047 0.0100 174.2154






Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 5.7455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.3685 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449

Total 6.1139 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0695 0.0932 0.9771 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 174.0047 174.0047 0.0100 174.2154

Total 0.0695 0.0932 0.9771 2.0600e-003

0.1677 1.5900e-003

0.1693 0.0445 1.4600e-003

0.0459 174.0047 174.0047 0.0100 174.2154




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 1.1484 3.1154 12.2170 0.0286 1.9554 0.0434 1.9989 0.5229 0.0400 0.5629 2,446.7790

2,446.7790

0.1021 2,448.9231

Unmitigated 1.1484 3.1154 12.2170 0.0286 1.9554 0.0434 1.9989 0.5229 0.0400 0.5629 2,446.7790

2,446.7790

0.1021 2,448.9231






City Park 160.00 320.00 0.00 460,406 460,406


Total 160.00 320.00 0.00 460,406 460,406



City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6



0.532559 0.058242 0.178229 0.125155 0.038934 0.006273 0.016761 0.032323 0.002478 0.003154 0.003685 0.000544 0.001663


5.0 Energy Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated


4.4 Fleet Mix




6.0 Area Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003


1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003


NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated


7.0 Water Detail



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.3075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

3.5620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Total 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Unmitigated


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.3075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

3.5620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Total 3.8697 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.1100e-003

2.1100e-003

1.0000e-005

2.2400e-003

Mitigated




8.0 Waste Detail

10.0 Vegetation




Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

Crystal Springs

1.1 Land Usage



City Park 4.00 Acre 4.00 174,240.00 0


Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

11














Grading -



















2.1 Overall Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year tons/yr MT/yr

2015 0.3307 2.6350 2.1709 3.3000e-003

0.1286 0.1686 0.2972 0.0495 0.1581 0.2076 0.0000 292.0732 292.0732 0.0526 0.0000 293.1784

2016 0.2507 1.5966 1.3528 2.1900e-003

0.0484 0.1014 0.1499 0.0130 0.0952 0.1082 0.0000 190.8103 190.8103 0.0340 0.0000 191.5242

Total 0.5813 4.2316 3.5237 5.4900e-003

0.1771 0.2700 0.4471 0.0625 0.2533 0.3158 0.0000 482.8836 482.8836 0.0866 0.0000 484.7026



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year tons/yr MT/yr

2015 0.3307 2.6350 2.1709 3.3000e-003

0.0943 0.1686 0.2629 0.0312 0.1581 0.1893 0.0000 292.0730 292.0730 0.0526 0.0000 293.1782

2016 0.2507 1.5966 1.3528 2.1900e-003

0.0484 0.1014 0.1499 0.0130 0.0952 0.1082 0.0000 190.8102 190.8102 0.0340 0.0000 191.5241

Total 0.5813 4.2316 3.5237 5.4900e-003

0.1427 0.2700 0.4128 0.0442 0.2533 0.2975 0.0000 482.8832 482.8832 0.0866 0.0000 484.7022



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.40 0.00 7.68 29.30 0.00 5.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 0.7062 0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004

Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mobile 0.0990 0.2889 1.1146 2.6300e-003

0.1745 3.9400e-003

0.1784 0.0467 3.6200e-003

0.0504 0.0000 204.3078 204.3078 8.4100e-003

0.0000 204.4845

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0690 0.0000 0.0690 4.0800e-003

0.0000 0.1547

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.4908 29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501

Total 0.8052 0.2889 1.1148 2.6300e-003

0.1745 3.9400e-003

0.1784 0.0467 3.6200e-003

0.0504 0.0690 233.7989 233.8679 0.0132 1.4000e-004

234.1895





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 0.7062 0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004

Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mobile 0.0990 0.2889 1.1146 2.6300e-003

0.1745 3.9400e-003

0.1784 0.0467 3.6200e-003

0.0504 0.0000 204.3078 204.3078 8.4100e-003

0.0000 204.4845

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0690 0.0000 0.0690 4.0800e-003

0.0000 0.1547

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.4908 29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501

Total 0.8052 0.2889 1.1148 2.6300e-003

0.1745 3.9400e-003

0.1784 0.0467 3.6200e-003

0.0504 0.0690 233.7989 233.8679 0.0132 1.4000e-004

234.1895



Construction Phase


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


Phase Number




2 Grading Grading 6/8/2015 6/17/2015 5 8


4 Paving Paving 5/5/2016 5/30/2016 5 18


OffRoad Equipment




Acres of Paving: 0




















Trips and VMT


Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length












Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0301 0.0000 0.0301 0.0166 0.0000 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 9.9700e-003

0.1063 0.0791 8.0000e-005

6.0400e-003

6.0400e-003

5.5600e-003

5.5600e-003

0.0000 7.2072 7.2072 2.1500e-003

0.0000 7.2523

Total 9.9700e-003

0.1063 0.0791 8.0000e-005

0.0301 6.0400e-003

0.0362 0.0166 5.5600e-003

0.0221 0.0000 7.2072 7.2072 2.1500e-003

0.0000 7.2523



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.8000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 4.2000e-004

1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 0.4148 0.4148 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4154

Total 1.8000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 4.2000e-004

1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 0.4148 0.4148 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4154



Water Exposed Area




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0117 0.0000 0.0117 6.4500e-003

0.0000 6.4500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.1063 0.0791 8.0000e-005

6.0400e-003

6.0400e-003

5.5600e-003

5.5600e-003

0.0000 7.2072 7.2072 2.1500e-003

0.0000 7.2523

Total 9.9700e-003

0.1063 0.0791 8.0000e-005

0.0117 6.0400e-003

0.0178 6.4500e-003

5.5600e-003

0.0120 0.0000 7.2072 7.2072 2.1500e-003

0.0000 7.2523



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.8000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 4.2000e-004

1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 0.4148 0.4148 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4154

Total 1.8000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 4.2000e-004

1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 0.4148 0.4148 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4154



3.3 Grading - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0153 0.1617 0.1067 1.2000e-004

9.3100e-003

9.3100e-003

8.5700e-003

8.5700e-003

0.0000 11.3544 11.3544 3.3900e-003

0.0000 11.4256

Total 0.0153 0.1617 0.1067 1.2000e-004

0.0262 9.3100e-003

0.0355 0.0135 8.5700e-003

0.0220 0.0000 11.3544 11.3544 3.3900e-003

0.0000 11.4256



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.9000e-004

4.2000e-004

4.4100e-003

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.7000e-004

1.0000e-005

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.6637 0.6637 4.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6646

Total 2.9000e-004

4.2000e-004

4.4100e-003

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.7000e-004

1.0000e-005

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.6637 0.6637 4.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6646



3.3 Grading - 2015


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0102 0.0000 0.0102 5.2500e-003

0.0000 5.2500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0153 0.1617 0.1067 1.2000e-004

9.3100e-003

9.3100e-003

8.5700e-003

8.5700e-003

0.0000 11.3544 11.3544 3.3900e-003

0.0000 11.4256

Total 0.0153 0.1617 0.1067 1.2000e-004

0.0102 9.3100e-003

0.0195 5.2500e-003

8.5700e-003

0.0138 0.0000 11.3544 11.3544 3.3900e-003

0.0000 11.4256



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.9000e-004

4.2000e-004

4.4100e-003

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.7000e-004

1.0000e-005

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.6637 0.6637 4.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6646

Total 2.9000e-004

4.2000e-004

4.4100e-003

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.0000e-005

6.6000e-004

1.7000e-004

1.0000e-005

1.8000e-004

0.0000 0.6637 0.6637 4.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6646





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.2580 2.1171 1.3215 1.8900e-003

0.1492 0.1492 0.1403 0.1403 0.0000 172.0160 172.0160 0.0432 0.0000 172.9223

Total 0.2580 2.1171 1.3215 1.8900e-003

0.1492 0.1492 0.1403 0.1403 0.0000 172.0160 172.0160 0.0432 0.0000 172.9223



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0209 0.2115 0.2625 4.5000e-004

0.0125 3.4100e-003

0.0159 3.5700e-003

3.1300e-003

6.7100e-003

0.0000 41.1466 41.1466 3.4000e-004

0.0000 41.1537

Worker 0.0260 0.0378 0.3939 7.5000e-004

0.0587 6.0000e-004

0.0593 0.0156 5.5000e-004

0.0161 0.0000 59.2705 59.2705 3.5300e-003

0.0000 59.3446

Total 0.0469 0.2493 0.6564 1.2000e-003

0.0712 4.0100e-003

0.0753 0.0192 3.6800e-003

0.0229 0.0000 100.4171 100.4171 3.8700e-003

0.0000 100.4982





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.2580 2.1171 1.3215 1.8900e-003

0.1492 0.1492 0.1403 0.1403 0.0000 172.0158 172.0158 0.0432 0.0000 172.9221

Total 0.2580 2.1171 1.3215 1.8900e-003

0.1492 0.1492 0.1403 0.1403 0.0000 172.0158 172.0158 0.0432 0.0000 172.9221



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0209 0.2115 0.2625 4.5000e-004

0.0125 3.4100e-003

0.0159 3.5700e-003

3.1300e-003

6.7100e-003

0.0000 41.1466 41.1466 3.4000e-004

0.0000 41.1537

Worker 0.0260 0.0378 0.3939 7.5000e-004

0.0587 6.0000e-004

0.0593 0.0156 5.5000e-004

0.0161 0.0000 59.2705 59.2705 3.5300e-003

0.0000 59.3446

Total 0.0469 0.2493 0.6564 1.2000e-003

0.0712 4.0100e-003

0.0753 0.0192 3.6800e-003

0.0229 0.0000 100.4171 100.4171 3.8700e-003

0.0000 100.4982





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.1516 1.2685 0.8236 1.1900e-003

0.0876 0.0876 0.0823 0.0823 0.0000 107.7584 107.7584 0.0267 0.0000 108.3196

Total 0.1516 1.2685 0.8236 1.1900e-003

0.0876 0.0876 0.0823 0.0823 0.0000 107.7584 107.7584 0.0267 0.0000 108.3196



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0116 0.1181 0.1534 2.8000e-004

7.9200e-003

1.7700e-003

9.6900e-003

2.2600e-003

1.6300e-003

3.8900e-003

0.0000 25.6918 25.6918 1.9000e-004

0.0000 25.6958

Worker 0.0148 0.0216 0.2250 4.7000e-004

0.0371 3.6000e-004

0.0374 9.8400e-003

3.3000e-004

0.0102 0.0000 36.1630 36.1630 2.0500e-003

0.0000 36.2061

Total 0.0264 0.1397 0.3783 7.5000e-004

0.0450 2.1300e-003

0.0471 0.0121 1.9600e-003

0.0141 0.0000 61.8548 61.8548 2.2400e-003

0.0000 61.9020





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.1516 1.2685 0.8235 1.1900e-003

0.0876 0.0876 0.0823 0.0823 0.0000 107.7582 107.7582 0.0267 0.0000 108.3195

Total 0.1516 1.2685 0.8235 1.1900e-003

0.0876 0.0876 0.0823 0.0823 0.0000 107.7582 107.7582 0.0267 0.0000 108.3195



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0116 0.1181 0.1534 2.8000e-004

7.9200e-003

1.7700e-003

9.6900e-003

2.2600e-003

1.6300e-003

3.8900e-003

0.0000 25.6918 25.6918 1.9000e-004

0.0000 25.6958

Worker 0.0148 0.0216 0.2250 4.7000e-004

0.0371 3.6000e-004

0.0374 9.8400e-003

3.3000e-004

0.0102 0.0000 36.1630 36.1630 2.0500e-003

0.0000 36.2061

Total 0.0264 0.1397 0.3783 7.5000e-004

0.0450 2.1300e-003

0.0471 0.0121 1.9600e-003

0.0141 0.0000 61.8548 61.8548 2.2400e-003

0.0000 61.9020



3.5 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0162 0.1651 0.1131 1.7000e-004

9.9600e-003

9.9600e-003

9.1800e-003

9.1800e-003

0.0000 15.5310 15.5310 4.5600e-003

0.0000 15.6268

Paving 1.7000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0163 0.1651 0.1131 1.7000e-004

9.9600e-003

9.9600e-003

9.1800e-003

9.1800e-003

0.0000 15.5310 15.5310 4.5600e-003

0.0000 15.6268



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 7.9000e-004

1.1500e-003

0.0120 3.0000e-005

1.9700e-003

2.0000e-005

1.9900e-003

5.2000e-004

2.0000e-005

5.4000e-004

0.0000 1.9247 1.9247 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.9270

Total 7.9000e-004

1.1500e-003

0.0120 3.0000e-005

1.9700e-003

2.0000e-005

1.9900e-003

5.2000e-004

2.0000e-005

5.4000e-004

0.0000 1.9247 1.9247 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.9270



3.5 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0162 0.1651 0.1131 1.7000e-004

9.9600e-003

9.9600e-003

9.1800e-003

9.1800e-003

0.0000 15.5310 15.5310 4.5600e-003

0.0000 15.6268

Paving 1.7000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0163 0.1651 0.1131 1.7000e-004

9.9600e-003

9.9600e-003

9.1800e-003

9.1800e-003

0.0000 15.5310 15.5310 4.5600e-003

0.0000 15.6268



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 7.9000e-004

1.1500e-003

0.0120 3.0000e-005

1.9700e-003

2.0000e-005

1.9900e-003

5.2000e-004

2.0000e-005

5.4000e-004

0.0000 1.9247 1.9247 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.9270

Total 7.9000e-004

1.1500e-003

0.0120 3.0000e-005

1.9700e-003

2.0000e-005

1.9900e-003

5.2000e-004

2.0000e-005

5.4000e-004

0.0000 1.9247 1.9247 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.9270





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 0.0517 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0214 0.0170 3.0000e-005

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 2.7000e-004

0.0000 2.3036

Total 0.0550 0.0214 0.0170 3.0000e-005

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 2.7000e-004

0.0000 2.3036



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 5.9000e-004

8.6000e-004

8.9800e-003

2.0000e-005

1.4800e-003

1.0000e-005

1.4900e-003

3.9000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 1.4435 1.4435 8.0000e-005

0.0000 1.4453

Total 5.9000e-004

8.6000e-004

8.9800e-003

2.0000e-005

1.4800e-003

1.0000e-005

1.4900e-003

3.9000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 1.4435 1.4435 8.0000e-005

0.0000 1.4453






Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 0.0517 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0214 0.0170 3.0000e-005

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 2.7000e-004

0.0000 2.3036

Total 0.0550 0.0214 0.0170 3.0000e-005

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

1.7700e-003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 2.7000e-004

0.0000 2.3036



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 5.9000e-004

8.6000e-004

8.9800e-003

2.0000e-005

1.4800e-003

1.0000e-005

1.4900e-003

3.9000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 1.4435 1.4435 8.0000e-005

0.0000 1.4453

Total 5.9000e-004

8.6000e-004

8.9800e-003

2.0000e-005

1.4800e-003

1.0000e-005

1.4900e-003

3.9000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.1000e-004

0.0000 1.4435 1.4435 8.0000e-005

0.0000 1.4453




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 0.0990 0.2889 1.1146 2.6300e-003

0.1745 3.9400e-003

0.1784 0.0467 3.6200e-003

0.0504 0.0000 204.3078 204.3078 8.4100e-003

0.0000 204.4845

Unmitigated 0.0990 0.2889 1.1146 2.6300e-003

0.1745 3.9400e-003

0.1784 0.0467 3.6200e-003

0.0504 0.0000 204.3078 204.3078 8.4100e-003

0.0000 204.4845






City Park 160.00 320.00 0.00 460,406 460,406


Total 160.00 320.00 0.00 460,406 460,406



City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6



0.532559 0.058242 0.178229 0.125155 0.038934 0.006273 0.016761 0.032323 0.002478 0.003154 0.003685 0.000544 0.001663


5.0 Energy Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Electricity Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Electricity Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


4.4 Fleet Mix




NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated



6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Electricity Use

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr

City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unmitigated

Electricity Use


Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr

City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 0.7062 0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004

Unmitigated 0.7062 0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr


0.0561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.6501 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004

Total 0.7062 0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004

Unmitigated




Category MT/yr

Mitigated 29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501

Unmitigated 29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501

7.0 Water Detail



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr


0.0561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.6501 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004

Total 0.7062 0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.4000e-004

2.4000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 2.5000e-004

Mitigated



7.2 Water by Land Use

Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr

City Park 0 / 4.76593

29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501


0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501

Unmitigated

Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr

City Park 0 / 4.76593

29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501


0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 29.4908 7.0000e-004

1.4000e-004

29.5501

Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail



MT/yr

Mitigated 0.0690 4.0800e-003

0.0000 0.1547


0.0000 0.1547

Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr

City Park 0.34 0.0690 4.0800e-003

0.0000 0.1547


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0690 4.0800e-003

0.0000 0.1547

Unmitigated


10.0 Vegetation

8.2 Waste by Land Use

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr

City Park 0.34 0.0690 4.0800e-003

0.0000 0.1547


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0690 4.0800e-003

0.0000 0.1547

Mitigated




Appendix B Health Risk Assessment

Risk Calculations

meters feet

annual avg

concentration

DPM

slope

DBR

(95th %ile for

2‐16yrs olds)

Inhalation

Absorption

Factor

Exposure

Frequency

ED

(9 yrs for

recreational)

Averaging

Time (days) risk/million

Chronic

Hazard

East

25 82 0.3480 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 37 0.07050 164 0.2360 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 25 0.04775 246 0.1789 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 19 0.036100 328 0.1445 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 15 0.029125 410 0.1210 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 13 0.024150 492 0.1036 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 11 0.021175 574 0.0900 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 9 0.018200 656 0.0791 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 8 0.016225 738 0.0703 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 7 0.014250 820 0.0631 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 7 0.013275 902 0.0571 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 6 0.011300 984 0.0521 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 5 0.010325 1,066 0.0477 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 5 0.010350 1,148 0.0439 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 5 0.009375 1,230 0.0405 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 4 0.008400 1,312 0.0374 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 4 0.007

West

25 82 0.3841 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 40 0.07750 164 0.2622 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 28 0.05275 246 0.1990 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 21 0.040100 328 0.1600 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 17 0.032125 410 0.1334 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 14 0.027150 492 0.1137 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 12 0.023175 574 0.0986 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 10 0.020200 656 0.0865 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 9 0.017225 738 0.0768 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 8 0.015250 820 0.0689 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 7 0.014275 902 0.0623 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 7 0.012300 984 0.0568 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 6 0.011325 1,066 0.0521 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 5 0.010350 1,148 0.0481 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 5 0.010375 1,230 0.0445 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 5 0.009400 1,312 0.0413 1.1 745 1 365 9 25550 4 0.008

DBR, Table 3.1, from OEHHA Technical Support:

http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/pdf/2012tsd/Chapter3_2012.pdf

9‐year Exposure Duration from CAPCOA HRA Handbook, Section 1.3

http://www.capcoa.org/wp‐content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8‐6‐09.pdf

Receptors

CAL3QHCR (Dated: 12340)

DATE : 10/ 8/13 PAGE: 1

TIME : 15:11:32

JOB: C:\Lakes\CALRoads View\LABOE_CS\LABOE_CS RUN: CAL3QHCR RUN

===================

General Information

===================

Run start date: 1/ 1/81 Julian: 1

end date: 12/31/81 Julian: 365

A Tier 1 approach was used for input data preparation.

The MODE flag has been set to P for calculating PM averages.

Ambient background concentrations are included in the averages below.

Site & Meteorological Constants

-------------------------------

VS = 0.0 CM/S VD = 0.0 CM/S Z0 = 100. CM ATIM = 60.

Met. Sfc. Sta. Id & Yr = 51100 81

Upper Air Sta. Id & Yr = 99999 81

Urban mixing heights were processed.

In 1981, Julian day 1 is a Thursday.

Link Data Constants - (Variable data in *.LNK file)

-------------------

LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE H W NLANES

* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (M) (M)

--------------------------------------------*--------------------------------------------------*--------------------------------------------

1. Link_1 * 382312.00 3778137.00 382536.00 3777139.00 * 1023. 167. AG 0.0 50.0

Receptor Data

-------------

* COORDINATES (M)

RECEPTOR * X Y Z

---------------------------------------------*----------------------------------------

1. R_001 * 382363.16 3777683.25 1.8

2. R_002 * 382338.16 3777683.25 1.8

3. R_003 * 382313.16 3777683.25 1.8

4. R_004 * 382288.16 3777683.25 1.8

5. R_005 * 382263.16 3777683.25 1.8

6. R_006 * 382238.16 3777683.25 1.8

7. R_007 * 382213.16 3777683.25 1.8


DATE : 10/ 8/13 PAGE: 2

TIME : 15:11:32


Receptor Data

-------------

* COORDINATES (M)

RECEPTOR * X Y Z

---------------------------------------------*----------------------------------------

8. R_008 * 382188.16 3777683.25 1.8

9. R_009 * 382163.16 3777683.25 1.8

10. R_010 * 382138.16 3777683.25 1.8

11. R_011 * 382113.16 3777683.25 1.8

12. R_012 * 382088.16 3777683.25 1.8

13. R_013 * 382063.16 3777683.25 1.8

14. R_014 * 382038.16 3777683.25 1.8

15. R_015 * 382013.16 3777683.25 1.8

16. R_016 * 381988.16 3777683.25 1.8

17. R_017 * 382463.16 3777683.25 1.8

18. R_018 * 382488.16 3777683.25 1.8

19. R_019 * 382513.16 3777683.25 1.8

20. R_020 * 382538.16 3777683.25 1.8

21. R_021 * 382563.16 3777683.25 1.8

22. R_022 * 382588.16 3777683.25 1.8

23. R_023 * 382613.16 3777683.25 1.8

24. R_024 * 382638.16 3777683.25 1.8

25. R_025 * 382663.16 3777683.25 1.8

26. R_026 * 382688.16 3777683.25 1.8

27. R_027 * 382713.16 3777683.25 1.8

28. R_028 * 382738.16 3777683.25 1.8

29. R_029 * 382763.16 3777683.25 1.8

30. R_030 * 382788.16 3777683.25 1.8

31. R_031 * 382813.16 3777683.25 1.8

32. R_032 * 382838.16 3777683.25 1.8


DATE : 10/ 8/13 PAGE: 3

TIME : 15:11:32


Model Results

-------------

Remarks : In search of the wind direction corresponding

to the maximum concentration, only the first

direction, of the directions with the same maximum

concentrations, is indicated as the maximum.

* MAXIMUM HOURLY CONCENTRATIONS WITH ANY AMBIENT BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS (BKG) ADDED

* (MICROGRAMS/M**3)

* REC0001 REC0002 REC0003 REC0004 REC0005 REC0006 REC0007 REC0008 REC0009 REC0010

----------*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAX+BKG * 1.1697 0.8140 0.6306 0.5238 0.4511 0.3969 0.3545 0.3209 0.2938 0.2714

- BKG * 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

----------*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAX * 1.1697 0.8140 0.6306 0.5238 0.4511 0.3969 0.3545 0.3209 0.2938 0.2714

WIND DIR* 147 147 141 139 136 133 131 129 127 125

JULIAN * 69 69 60 310 303 48 264 221 146 174

HOUR * 7 7 19 4 7 24 21 8 9 3


----------*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAX+BKG * 0.2525 0.2378 0.2256 0.2132 0.2017 0.1915 1.1991 0.8186 0.6330 0.5227

- BKG * 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

----------*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAX * 0.2525 0.2378 0.2256 0.2132 0.2017 0.1915 1.1991 0.8186 0.6330 0.5227

WIND DIR* 123 117 117 117 115 113 187 187 194 197

JULIAN * 351 289 289 289 269 21 294 294 40 181

HOUR * 19 19 19 19 23 5 5 5 21 3


----------*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAX+BKG * 0.4482 0.3929 0.3500 0.3165 0.2897 0.2675 0.2490 0.2371 0.2249 0.2124

- BKG * 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

----------*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAX * 0.4482 0.3929 0.3500 0.3165 0.2897 0.2675 0.2490 0.2371 0.2249 0.2124

WIND DIR* 200 203 206 305 303 301 299 297 297 296

JULIAN * 340 72 101 8 26 306 341 96 96 255

HOUR * 22 3 23 10 9 20 19 2 2 3

* REC0031 REC0032

----------*--------------------

MAX+BKG * 0.2011 0.1910

- BKG * 0.0000 0.0000

----------*--------------------

MAX * 0.2011 0.1910

WIND DIR* 294 292

JULIAN * 352 302

HOUR * 2 3


DATE : 10/ 8/13 PAGE: 4

TIME : 15:11:32


THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION OF 1.1991 UG/M**3 OCCURRED AT RECEPTOR REC0017.


DATE : 0/ 0/ 0 PAGE: 5

TIME : 0: 0: 0


==============

Output Section

==============

NOTES PERTAINING TO THE REPORT

1. THE HIGHEST AVERAGE IN EACH OF THE FIRST TWO COLUMNS OF EACH TABLE BELOW ARE SUFFIXED BY AN ASTERISK (*).

FOR PM OUTPUT, THERE IS ONLY ONE COLUMN AND ASTERISK FOR THE ANNUAL AVERAGE/PERIOD OF CONCERN TABLE.

2. THE NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES ARE THE JULIAN DAY AND ENDING HOUR FOR THE PRECEDING AVERAGE.

3. THE NUMBER OF CALM HOURS USED IN PRODUCING EACH AVERAGE ARE PREFIXED BY A C.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AVERAGES.

SIX HIGHEST 24-HOUR END-TO-END AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN MICROGRAMS/M**3

INCLUDING AMBIENT BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS.

Highest Second Highest Third Highest Fourth Highest Fifth Highest Sixth Highest

Rcptr Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending

No. Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm

1 0.7114 (250,24) C 3 0.6921 (264,24) C 3 0.6427 (328,24) C 3 0.6398 (229,24) C 1 0.6270 (128,24) C 2 0.6195 (235,24) C 1

2 0.5041 (250,24) C 3 0.4838 (264,24) C 3 0.4493 (328,24) C 3 0.4449 (229,24) C 1 0.4399 (228,24) C 3 0.4362 (241,24) C 1

3 0.3947 (250,24) C 3 0.3764 (264,24) C 3 0.3500 (328,24) C 3 0.3464 (228,24) C 3 0.3456 (229,24) C 1 0.3411 (241,24) C 1

4 0.3284 (250,24) C 3 0.3090 (264,24) C 3 0.2894 (228,24) C 3 0.2853 (328,24) C 3 0.2837 (229,24) C 1 0.2814 (241,24) C 1

5 0.2821 (250,24) C 3 0.2614 (264,24) C 3 0.2497 (228,24) C 3 0.2413 (253,24) C 2 0.2403 (229,24) C 1 0.2403 (235,24) C 1

6 0.2462 (250,24) C 3 0.2258 (264,24) C 3 0.2199 (228,24) C 3 0.2118 (253,24) C 2 0.2103 (235,24) C 1 0.2079 (241,24) C 1

7 0.2172 (250,24) C 3 0.1985 (264,24) C 3 0.1966 (228,24) C 3 0.1874 (253,24) C 2 0.1861 (235,24) C 1 0.1839 (241,24) C 1

8 0.1933 (250,24) C 3 0.1778 (228,24) C 3 0.1770 (264,24) C 3 0.1674 (253,24) C 2 0.1664 (235,24) C 1 0.1650 (241,24) C 1

9 0.1736 (250,24) C 3 0.1626 (228,24) C 3 0.1598 (264,24) C 3 0.1513 (253,24) C 2 0.1503 (235,24) C 1 0.1496 (241,24) C 1

10 0.1571 (250,24) C 3 0.1502 (228,24) C 3 0.1455 (264,24) C 3 0.1382 (253,24) C 2 0.1371 (235,24) C 1 0.1370 (241,24) C 1

11 0.1432 (250,24) C 3 0.1399 (228,24) C 3 0.1335 (264,24) C 3 0.1275 (253,24) C 2 0.1263 (241,24) C 1 0.1261 (235,24) C 1

12 0.1314 (250,24) C 3 0.1310 (228,24) C 3 0.1230 (264,24) C 3 0.1184 (253,24) C 2 0.1170 (241,24) C 1 0.1168 (235,24) C 1

13 0.1230 (228,24) C 3 0.1211 (250,24) C 3 0.1137 (264,24) C 3 0.1105 (253,24) C 2 0.1089 (241,24) C 1 0.1088 (235,24) C 1

14 0.1158 (228,24) C 3 0.1121 (250,24) C 3 0.1053 (264,24) C 3 0.1034 (253,24) C 2 0.1016 (235,24) C 1 0.1016 (241,24) C 1

15 0.1092 (228,24) C 3 0.1040 (250,24) C 3 0.0977 (264,24) C 3 0.0969 (253,24) C 2 0.0951 (235,24) C 1 0.0950 (241,24) C 1

16 0.1030 (228,24) C 3 0.0967 (250,24) C 3 0.0909 (253,24) C 2 0.0908 (264,24) C 3 0.0893 (235,24) C 1 0.0890 (241,24) C 1

17 0.9100*(342,24) C 4 0.8559*( 10,24) C 4 0.8241 (312,24) C 6 0.8226 (306,24) C 6 0.8191 ( 12,24) C 3 0.8117 ( 15,24) C 3

18 0.6397 (342,24) C 4 0.5959 ( 10,24) C 4 0.5926 (312,24) C 6 0.5836 (358,24) C 6 0.5810 ( 12,24) C 3 0.5790 (306,24) C 6

19 0.4918 (342,24) C 4 0.4671 (312,24) C 6 0.4581 ( 10,24) C 4 0.4556 (358,24) C 6 0.4498 ( 12,24) C 3 0.4473 (306,24) C 6

20 0.3978 (342,24) C 4 0.3917 (312,24) C 6 0.3742 (358,24) C 6 0.3699 ( 10,24) C 4 0.3687 ( 12,24) C 3 0.3650 ( 15,24) C 3

21 0.3404 (312,24) C 6 0.3322 (342,24) C 4 0.3181 (358,24) C 6 0.3119 ( 12,24) C 3 0.3116 ( 25,24) C 6 0.3088 ( 10,24) C 4

22 0.3011 (312,24) C 6 0.2829 (342,24) C 4 0.2767 (358,24) C 6 0.2714 ( 25,24) C 6 0.2682 ( 12,24) C 3 0.2670 (352,24) C 5

23 0.2690 (312,24) C 6 0.2440 (358,24) C 6 0.2439 (342,24) C 4 0.2397 ( 25,24) C 6 0.2374 ( 9,24) C 8 0.2366 (352,24) C 5

24 0.2424 (312,24) C 6 0.2173 (358,24) C 6 0.2143 ( 9,24) C 8 0.2141 ( 25,24) C 6 0.2127 (352,24) C 5 0.2123 (342,24) C 4

25 0.2203 (312,24) C 6 0.1956 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1951 (358,24) C 6 0.1934 (352,24) C 5 0.1932 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1865 (301,24) C 2

26 0.2017 (312,24) C 6 0.1800 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1775 (352,24) C 5 0.1766 (358,24) C 6 0.1759 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1702 (301,24) C 2


DATE : 0/ 0/ 0 PAGE: 6

TIME : 0: 0: 0


SIX HIGHEST 24-HOUR END-TO-END AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN MICROGRAMS/M**3


Highest Second Highest Third Highest Fourth Highest Fifth Highest Sixth Highest

Rcptr Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending

No. Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm Conc Day Hr Calm

27 0.1859 (312,24) C 6 0.1669 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1640 (352,24) C 5 0.1614 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1611 (358,24) C 6 0.1566 (301,24) C 2

28 0.1721 (312,24) C 6 0.1554 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1522 (352,24) C 5 0.1490 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1480 (358,24) C 6 0.1451 (301,24) C 2

29 0.1598 (312,24) C 6 0.1453 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1418 (352,24) C 5 0.1382 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1366 (358,24) C 6 0.1350 (301,24) C 2

30 0.1487 (312,24) C 6 0.1361 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1324 (352,24) C 5 0.1285 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1265 (358,24) C 6 0.1262 (301,24) C 2

31 0.1385 (312,24) C 6 0.1278 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1239 (352,24) C 5 0.1198 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1181 (301,24) C 2 0.1175 (358,24) C 6

32 0.1291 (312,24) C 6 0.1201 ( 9,24) C 8 0.1161 (352,24) C 5 0.1118 ( 25,24) C 6 0.1107 (301,24) C 2 0.1092 (358,24) C 6

THE HIGHEST ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS

IN MICROGRAMS/M**3


Receptor Maximum Ending

Number Conc Day Hr Calm

1 0.3480 (365,24) C 887

2 0.2360 (365,24) C 887

3 0.1789 (365,24) C 887

4 0.1445 (365,24) C 887

5 0.1210 (365,24) C 887

6 0.1036 (365,24) C 887

7 0.0900 (365,24) C 887

8 0.0791 (365,24) C 887

9 0.0703 (365,24) C 887

10 0.0631 (365,24) C 887

11 0.0571 (365,24) C 887

12 0.0521 (365,24) C 887

13 0.0477 (365,24) C 887

14 0.0439 (365,24) C 887

15 0.0405 (365,24) C 887

16 0.0374 (365,24) C 887

17 0.3841* (365,24) C 887

18 0.2622 (365,24) C 887

19 0.1990 (365,24) C 887

20 0.1600 (365,24) C 887

21 0.1334 (365,24) C 887

22 0.1137 (365,24) C 887

23 0.0986 (365,24) C 887

24 0.0865 (365,24) C 887

25 0.0768 (365,24) C 887

26 0.0689 (365,24) C 887

27 0.0623 (365,24) C 887

28 0.0568 (365,24) C 887


DATE : 0/ 0/ 0 PAGE: 7

TIME : 0: 0: 0


THE HIGHEST ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS

IN MICROGRAMS/M**3


Receptor Maximum Ending

Number Conc Day Hr Calm

29 0.0521 (365,24) C 887

30 0.0481 (365,24) C 887

31 0.0445 (365,24) C 887

32 0.0413 (365,24) C 887


DATE : 0/ 0/ 0 PAGE: 8

TIME : 0: 0: 0


CALM DURATION FREQUENCY

Hours of Frequency

Consecutive of

Calm Winds Occurrence (Julian day/hour ending) of Significant Occurrences

1 483 ( 2, 2)( 2,14)( 5,20)( 7, 8)( 8, 2)( 8,22)( 9, 1)( 9,11)( 9,20)( 9,23)

( 10, 2)( 10, 6)( 10,17)( 10,22)( 11, 8)( 13, 2)( 13, 4)( 13,18)( 13,23)( 14, 6)

( 14,24)( 15,10)( 16, 6)( 16,13)( 16,20)( 17, 5)( 17,10)( 17,13)( 17,17)( 18,18)

( 18,24)( 19, 2)( 19,10)( 19,12)( 20,18)( 21, 4)( 21,17)( 21,23)( 22, 3)( 22, 6)

( 22,10)( 24, 6)( 24, 9)( 25,22)( 26,10)( 26,23)( 30, 8)( 31,22)( 32, 3)( 32, 7)

( 32,20)( 33, 4)( 34, 6)( 34,22)( 34,24)( 35, 4)( 35, 6)( 35, 8)( 35,21)( 36, 6)

( 36,18)( 36,22)( 37, 9)( 37,23)( 38, 2)( 38, 6)( 39, 7)( 40,20)( 41, 2)( 41, 7)

( 44, 1)( 45, 3)( 45, 8)( 45,11)( 46, 3)( 47, 8)( 47,11)( 48,21)( 50, 3)( 50, 7)

( 53, 7)( 53,21)( 53,24)( 54, 9)( 57,19)( 59, 3)( 59, 6)( 65, 6)( 65,21)( 65,23)

( 67, 2)( 67, 5)( 67, 7)( 70,22)( 72, 2)( 72, 8)( 73, 4)( 73, 7)( 74, 2)( 74, 4)

( 76, 2)( 80, 7)( 80,22)( 81, 4)( 81,24)( 83, 4)( 86, 3)( 86, 5)( 88, 7)( 88,22)

( 89, 2)( 89, 5)( 89,19)( 89,24)( 90, 8)( 93, 1)( 94, 9)( 94,22)( 95, 9)( 95,23)

( 99, 2)(101, 6)(105, 2)(106, 3)(106, 5)(106, 7)(108,21)(110, 2)(121, 1)(124, 3)

(125, 7)(128, 5)(129, 4)(129,22)(132,21)(132,24)(133,10)(133,20)(133,23)(134, 6)

(134,20)(135, 2)(135, 4)(135, 7)(136, 2)(137, 6)(137, 9)(137,18)(138,21)(141, 4)

(141, 9)(141,24)(142, 5)(143, 2)(144, 4)(145, 4)(145, 7)(146,16)(148, 1)(148,24)

(149, 4)(149,22)(151, 5)(152, 8)(153, 5)(154, 5)(154, 7)(154,10)(155, 5)(157, 6)

(158, 3)(166,19)(167, 9)(170, 8)(172, 4)(173, 1)(173, 3)(173, 6)(173, 8)(174,24)

(175, 5)(176, 5)(177, 4)(177,10)(178, 5)(179, 3)(179, 8)(180, 5)(180, 8)(181, 1)

(181, 5)(182, 8)(184, 7)(188, 2)(189, 5)(189, 7)(190, 1)(191, 7)(192, 7)(193, 7)

(195, 3)(195, 5)(196, 3)(196, 5)(196, 8)(199, 2)(199, 5)(200, 8)(202, 7)(205, 5)

(206, 6)(207, 8)(208, 3)(209, 1)(209,24)(212, 5)(213, 3)(213, 6)(214, 4)(214, 8)

(215, 6)(217, 8)(217,24)(218, 8)(222, 8)(222,24)(223, 4)(223, 7)(224, 2)(225, 7)

(225,21)(226,23)(227, 1)(229, 5)(230, 7)(231, 2)(232,21)(232,23)(233, 2)(233, 5)

(235, 8)(236, 1)(236, 4)(236, 8)(236,23)(237, 6)(238, 8)(239,22)(240,21)(241, 5)

(242, 8)(243, 5)(244, 4)(245, 7)(247, 3)(247, 5)(247,22)(248, 2)(249, 9)(249,11)

(250, 4)(250, 9)(250,24)(251, 6)(251, 9)(252, 2)(252, 6)(252, 9)(253, 4)(254, 5)

(254,22)(254,24)(255, 4)(256, 2)(256, 4)(256, 7)(257, 1)(257, 5)(257, 7)(259,19)

(260, 4)(260,23)(261,21)(261,24)(262, 2)(262,18)(264,22)(266, 9)(267, 5)(268, 1)

(268, 9)(269, 3)(273, 1)(273, 7)(274, 1)(274,22)(275, 2)(275,10)(276,10)(276,12)

(277, 1)(277, 5)(277, 8)(277,18)(278, 8)(278,23)(279, 6)(279, 8)(279,24)(280, 4)

(281, 2)(281, 5)(282, 4)(282, 7)(283, 8)(284, 1)(284, 3)(284, 5)(285,20)(286, 5)

(286,18)(287, 2)(287, 6)(287, 8)(287,10)(287,18)(288, 2)(288, 4)(288,21)(288,23)

(289, 9)(289,23)(290, 7)(290,23)(291, 2)(292, 4)(292,11)(294, 8)(295, 2)(295, 8)

(295,20)(295,24)(297, 5)(298, 7)(298, 9)(299,20)(299,23)(300, 4)(300, 6)(300,22)

(301, 7)(301,22)(302, 4)(303,19)(304, 9)(304,17)(305,22)(306, 2)(306, 4)(306, 6)

(306,10)(306,12)(307, 9)(307,18)(307,20)(308, 7)(308,10)(308,21)(308,23)(310,20)

(310,23)(311,11)(312, 1)(312, 5)(312, 7)(312, 9)(312,22)(313, 7)(314, 2)(314, 9)

(314,12)(314,19)(314,24)(315,22)(317,19)(318, 8)(318,18)(319, 7)(319,19)(320, 6)

(321, 7)(321,21)(322, 1)(322,20)(323, 4)(324, 2)(324,19)(324,24)(326, 4)(326, 9)

(326,20)(326,23)(327,10)(328, 7)(329, 1)(330, 4)(331, 1)(331,13)(333,19)(334,22)

(335, 3)(335,22)(336, 1)(336, 3)(336,22)(337, 1)(337, 5)(337, 7)(337,17)(338, 4)

(338, 8)(338,21)(338,24)(339,19)(339,21)(341,10)(341,20)(341,23)(342, 3)(342,12)

(342,17)(342,23)(343, 1)(343, 7)(343,10)(343,19)(344, 3)(344, 6)(344,10)(344,12)

(344,24)(345, 7)(345, 9)(345,11)(345,15)(345,21)(346,12)(347,23)(348, 5)(348,10)

(348,17)(349, 2)(349, 7)(349,10)(349,19)(349,21)(349,24)(350, 3)(351, 5)(351,10)

(352, 3)(352, 6)(352, 8)(353, 5)(353, 8)(353,19)(353,21)(353,23)(354, 6)(354,15)

(355, 8)(357,20)(358,16)(359, 5)(359, 8)(359,22)(360,10)(360,17)(361,19)(362,24)

(363, 2)(363, 4)(363,18)

2 99 ( 7, 3)( 14,20)( 15, 5)( 16, 9)( 17,23)( 18, 2)( 19,22)( 23,23)( 25, 8)( 30, 5)

( 34, 9)( 37, 7)( 49,23)( 54, 4)( 58, 9)( 66,24)( 67,23)( 68, 2)( 68, 5)( 74,23)

( 76, 7)( 82, 6)( 84, 6)( 91, 1)( 93, 6)(127, 7)(129, 1)(143, 9)(143,24)(144, 8)

(150, 5)(168, 3)(170, 6)(171, 6)(171, 9)(179, 6)(184, 5)(186, 5)(193, 1)(194, 4)

(215,12)(227,10)(238, 6)(239, 3)(239, 9)(242, 5)(254, 1)(254, 8)(255, 9)(258, 1)

(261, 4)(262, 6)(262,22)(263, 8)(264, 9)(268, 6)(271, 7)(275, 6)(280,10)(282,23)

(286, 1)(287,23)(293, 8)(295, 6)(296, 3)(299, 5)(300, 9)(305,10)(307, 1)(311,23)

(317, 5)(319,23)(322, 7)(323,18)(323,24)(324,10)(325, 4)(325,10)(328,10)(333, 1)

(333, 6)(334, 8)(334,20)(339, 4)(339,10)(341, 4)(346,24)(348,22)(349, 5)(351,22)

(352,18)(354,10)(354,19)(358, 9)(358,20)(360, 1)(361, 1)(363, 7)(365, 6)

3 34 ( 12,21)( 17, 3)( 18,10)( 25,20)( 74, 8)( 88, 2)( 90, 4)( 91, 7)( 94, 7)( 95, 5)

(134, 3)(137, 2)(169, 8)(222, 5)(228, 9)(251, 4)(258, 8)(270, 7)(278, 1)(279, 4)

(288, 8)(311, 7)(313, 2)(315, 6)(319, 3)(323, 2)(323,10)(332,21)(337,24)(341, 8)

(343, 5)(344,22)(350,24)(359, 2)

4 12 ( 9, 7)( 39, 5)( 42, 4)( 49, 8)(131, 5)(141, 2)(152, 5)(201, 9)(278, 6)(292, 2)

(313,24)(346, 4)

5 3 ( 34, 3)(234, 8)(362, 6)

6 2 (146, 7)(240, 8)

8 2 (305, 6)(340, 6)

13 1 ( 5,13)

Program terminated normally

EMFAC_Volume_Summary

Year

Calendar

Year

EMFAC 30

MPH

EMFAC 50

MPH

Cumulative

Traffic

Growth

1 2014 0.112833787 0.112292483 1.000

2 2015 0.084118288 0.090360495 1.010

3 2016 0.067537579 0.077870383 1.020

4 2017 0.060448869 0.071427574 1.030

5 2018 0.057697879 0.069195422 1.041

6 2019 0.055135326 0.067018752 1.051

7 2020 0.051403675 0.064135573 1.062

8 2021 0.04839985 0.060984905 1.072

9 2022 0.047731934 0.060375247 1.083

10 2023 0.047059286 0.059774278 1.094

11 2024 0.047002023 0.059933314 1.105

12 2025 0.048326401 0.060090406 1.116

13 2026 0.044760195 0.057256691 1.127

14 2027 0.044694468 0.057334402 1.138

15 2028 0.044236439 0.056854958 1.149

16 2029 0.04419098 0.056923613 1.161

17 2030 0.044174237 0.057018154 1.173

18 2031 0.04423823 0.057239002 1.184

19 2032 0.044329846 0.057458398 1.196

20 2033 0.044430326 0.057684159 1.208

21 2034 0.04450467 0.057882284 1.220

22 2035 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.232

23 2036 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.245

24 2037 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.257

25 2038 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.270

26 2039 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.282

27 2040 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.295

28 2041 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.308

29 2042 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.321

30 2043 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.335

31 2044 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.348

32 2045 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.361

33 2046 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.375

34 2047 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.389

35 2048 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.403

36 2049 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.417

37 2050 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.431

38 2051 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.445

39 2052 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.460

40 2053 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.474

41 2054 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.489

42 2055 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.504

43 2056 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.519

44 2057 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.534

Page 1 of 2

EMFAC_Volume_Summary

45 2058 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.549

46 2059 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.565

47 2060 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.580

48 2061 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.596

49 2062 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.612

50 2063 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.628

51 2064 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.645

52 2065 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.661

53 2066 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.678

54 2067 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.694

55 2068 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.711

56 2069 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.729

57 2070 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.746

58 2071 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.763

59 2072 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.781

60 2073 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.799

61 2074 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.817

62 2075 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.835

63 2076 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.853

64 2077 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.872

65 2078 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.890

66 2079 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.909

67 2080 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.928

68 2081 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.948

69 2082 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.967

70 2083 0.044585329 0.058086023 1.987

0.047313363 0.060218937

30% 70% g/mile EMFAC

Average

Growth

Factor

2014

Hourly

Volume

HRA

Traffic

Volume

0.014194009 0.042153256 0.056347265 1.438 662 952

70‐Year Average

Weightings

Weighted EMFAC

Page 2 of 2

2014

Region_Type Region CalYr Season Veh Fuel Veh & Tech MdlYr Speed ROG_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX CO_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO2_RUNEX CO2(Pavley I + LCFS)_RUNEX PM10_RUNEX PM2_5_RUNEX SOx_RUNEXCounty Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 05 MPH 2.865197521 3.261810426 5.708213374 18.91486811 2895.454167 2852.022355 0.3843902 0.353638984 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 10 MPH 1.722834384 1.961316829 3.944852467 13.8814621 2416.022023 2379.781693 0.285230923 0.262412449 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 15 MPH 0.912958253 1.039334249 2.555161613 10.21530173 2008.676601 1978.546452 0.205517721 0.189076303 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 20 MPH 0.418257351 0.476154798 1.644738532 7.870703441 1613.954218 1589.744905 0.144563509 0.132998429 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 25 MPH 0.354009908 0.403013865 1.430612409 7.272661576 1515.158578 1492.4312 0.125908432 0.115835758 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 30 MPH 0.301215807 0.342911721 1.271071002 6.79387904 1430.720829 1409.260017 0.112833787 0.103807084 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 35 MPH 0.259517216 0.295441002 1.158195699 6.429274218 1360.612165 1340.202982 0.105158013 0.096745372 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 40 MPH 0.227760965 0.259288897 1.08392752 6.176213481 1304.841571 1285.268947 0.102692965 0.094477528 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 45 MPH 0.202624513 0.230672918 1.032639306 6.023707884 1263.526969 1244.574065 0.104981761 0.09658322 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 50 MPH 0.186449141 0.212258456 1.013545739 5.986988668 1236.583264 1218.034515 0.112292483 0.103309084 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 55 MPH 0.179314198 0.204135846 1.026961947 6.074423398 1223.999266 1205.639277 0.124644196 0.11467266 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 60 MPH 0.180370883 0.205338783 1.069389209 6.295575723 1225.801294 1207.414275 0.141866644 0.130517312 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 65 MPH 0.192055324 0.218640636 1.155896386 6.679068927 1241.867209 1223.239201 0.164262455 0.151121458 0.012752615County Los Angeles 2014 Annual Trucks DSL Trucks - DSL AllMYr 70 MPH 0.223987533 0.254993101 1.332905225 7.474736348 1271.902179 1252.823647 0.197414457 0.1816213 0.012752615

2015


2016


2017


2018


2019


2020


2021


2022


2023


2024


2025


2026


2027


2028


2029


2030


2031


2032


2033


2034


2035


Appendix C Ambient Background Information

Quality Assurance Air Monitoring Site Information

This page last reviewed on November 21, 2011

Site Information for

©2013 Google -

Map data ©2013 Google -

View Larger Map

AIRS Number ARB Number Site Start Date Reporting Agency and Agency Code060371002 70069 3/1/80 South Coast AQMD (061)

Site Address County Air Basin Latitude (N)Longitude

(W)Elevation

(m)228 W Palm Av, Burbank

CA 91502Los Angeles South Coast 34.17599 -118.31701 171

Pollutants Monitored (click on parameter link for real-time data)

Note: multiple monitors may be available through the AQMIS query tool.

CO, SO2, NO2, O3, PM10, TEOMPM10, BAMPM2.5, PM2.5, Toxics, Cr6+, Outdoor Temperature, Relative Humidity, Wind Direction, Horizontal Wind Speed, Barometric Pressure, Solar Radiation

Site Photos Photo Sequences Site Surveys

--Select Photos--

--Select Position And Direction--

--Select Survey--

Other ARB Database Information Real-Time Met Data Aerial Photos and Topo Maps Of Site

--Select Database--

--Select Data Server--

--Select External Map--

Site Information Menu Top Page Quality Assurance Programs Search QA Site Information Database

For real-time air quality data visit: Air Quality and Meteorological Information System (AQMIS)

Questions regarding data or the AQMIS search tool should be submitted to:

Air Quality and Meteorological Information System (AQMIS)

For Air Monitoring Site related inquiries, please contact:

Mr. Ranjit Bhullar, Manager

Quality Assurance Section

Page 1 of 1Quality Assurance Air Monitoring Site Information

10/2/2013http://www.arb.ca.gov/qaweb/site.php?s_arb_code=70069

Top 4 Summary: Highest 4 Daily Maximum Hourly Ozone Measurements

at Burbank-W Palm Avenue2010 2011 2012

Date Measurement Date Measurement Date MeasurementFirst High: Sep 26 0.111 Aug 25 0.120 Aug 11 0.117

Second High: Sep 4 0.103 Aug 27 0.111 Aug 10 0.102Third High: Jun 5 0.096 Sep 5 0.109 Sep 21 0.102

Fourth High: Jul 14 0.092 Jul 3 0.099 Sep 15 0.098California:

# Days Above the Standard: 3 8 8California Designation

Value: 0.12 0.11 0.11

Expected Peak Day Concentration: 0.120 0.113 0.109

National: # Days Above the Standard: 0 0 0

Nat'l Standard Design Value:

0.121 0.118 0.111

Year Coverage: 92 93 93

Notes: Hourly ozone measurements and related statistics are available at Burbank-W Palm Avenue between 1978 and 2012. Some years in this range may not be represented.All concentrations expressed in parts per million.The national 1-hour ozone standard was revoked in June 2005 and is no longer in effect. Statistics related to the revoked standard are shown in italics or italics .An exceedance of a standard is not necessarily related to a violation of the standard.Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data

represent none of the high period; 100 means that data represent the entire high period. A high Year Coverage does not mean that there was sufficient data for annual statistics to be considered valid.

* means there was insufficient data available to determine the value.

Available Pollutants: 8-Hour Ozone | Hourly Ozone | PM2.5 | PM10 | Carbon Monoxide | Nitrogen Dioxide | State Sulfur Dioxide |

Hydrogen Sulfide

Page 1 of 1Top 4 Hourly Ozone Measurements

10/2/2013http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfourdisplay.php

Top 4 Summary: Highest 4 Daily Maximum 8-Hour Ozone Averages


Date 8-Hr Average Date 8-Hr Average Date 8-Hr AverageNational:

First High: Jun 5 0.084 Sep 5 0.084 Aug 11 0.088Second High: Sep 26 0.079 May 4 0.083 Aug 10 0.087

Third High: Sep 4 0.078 Jul 3 0.081 Sep 30 0.082Fourth High: Sep 25 0.076 Aug 28 0.081 Sep 21 0.081

California: First High: Jun 5 0.084 Sep 5 0.084 Aug 11 0.089

Second High: Sep 26 0.080 May 4 0.083 Aug 10 0.088Third High: Sep 4 0.079 Aug 28 0.082 Sep 30 0.082

Fourth High: Sep 25 0.077 Jul 3 0.081 Sep 21 0.081National:

# Days Above the Standard: 4 6 8Nat'l Standard Design

Value: 0.084 0.081 0.079

National Year Coverage: 93 92 94California:

# Days Above the Standard: 9 10 17California Designation

Value: 0.097 0.090 0.088

Expected Peak Day Concentration: 0.098 0.092 0.088

California Year Coverage: 92 91 91

Notes: Eight-hour ozone averages and related statistics are available at Burbank-W Palm Avenue between 1978 and 2012. Some years in this range may not be represented.All averages expressed in parts per million.An exceedance of a standard is not necessarily related to a violation of the standard.Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data




Hydrogen Sulfide

Page 1 of 1Top 4 Eight-Hour Ozone Averages


Top 4 Summary: Highest 4 Daily Maximum 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Averages


Date 8-Hr Average Date 8-Hr Average Date 8-Hr AverageNational:

First High: Dec 4 2.35 Nov 29 2.37 Jan 15 2.35Second High: Jan 8 2.33 Dec 28 2.33 Jan 15 2.01

Third High: Dec 3 2.30 Dec 9 2.33 Jan 11 1.96Fourth High: Dec 9 2.24 Dec 10 2.31 Jan 6 1.81

California: First High: Dec 3 2.35 Nov 28 2.37 Jan 14 2.35

Second High: Jan 7 2.33 Dec 27 2.33 Jan 11 1.96Third High: Dec 9 2.24 Dec 8 2.33 Jan 1 1.96

Fourth High: Dec 2 2.24 Dec 31 2.33 Jan 5 1.81National:

# Days Above the Standard: 0 0 0California:

# Days Above the Standard: 0 0 0Expected Peak Day

Concentration: 2.66 2.67 2.72


Notes: Eight-hour carbon monoxide averages and related statistics are available at Burbank-W Palm Avenue between 1963 and 2012. Some years in this range may not be

represented.All averages expressed in parts per million.An exceedance of a standard is not necessarily related to a violation of the standard.Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data




Hydrogen Sulfide

Page 1 of 1Top 4 Eight-Hour Carbon Monoxide Averages


Top 4 Summary: Highest 4 Daily Maximum Hourly Nitrogen Dioxide Measurements


Date Measurement Date Measurement Date MeasurementNational:

First High: Jan 7 82.0 Oct 13 67.8 Oct 17 79.5Second High: Aug 26 69.2 Oct 12 62.9 Oct 29 61.9

Third High: Sep 24 69.2 Oct 30 62.8 Nov 15 59.0Fourth High: Jan 6 69.0 Sep 6 60.8 Nov 14 58.0

California: First High: Jan 7 82 Oct 13 67 Oct 17 79

Second High: Jan 6 69 Oct 12 62 Oct 29 61Third High: Aug 26 69 Oct 30 62 Nov 15 59

Fourth High: Sep 24 69 Sep 6 60 Nov 14 58National:

1-Hour Standard Design Value: 72 * *

1-Hour Standard 98th Percentile: 64.3 56.2 57.0

# Days Above the Standard: 0 0 0Annual Standard Design

Value: 24 * *

California: 1-Hour Std Designation

Value: 90 80 80

Expected Peak Day Concentration: 92 79 75

# Days Above the Standard: 0 0 0Annual Std Designation

Value: 29 27 *

Annual Average: * * *Year Coverage: 77 67 74

Notes: Hourly nitrogen dioxide measurements and related statistics are available at Burbank-W Palm Avenue between 1963 and 2012. Some years in this range may not be

represented.All concentrations expressed in parts per billion.An exceedance of a standard is not necessarily related to a violation of the standard.Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data




Hydrogen Sulfide

Page 1 of 1Top 4 Hourly Nitrogen Dioxide Measurements


Top 4 Summary: Highest 4 Daily 24-Hour PM2.5 Averages


Date 24-Hr Average Date 24-Hr

Average Date 24-Hr Average

National: First High: Oct 16 43.7 Oct 24 47.8 Dec 9 54.2

Second High: Oct 14 38.7 Dec 31 42.6 Dec 7 43.7Third High: Oct 15 37.0 Dec 30 41.3 Dec 8 39.5

Fourth High: Dec 4 36.5 Oct 19 38.1 Dec 6 36.9California: First High: Oct 16 43.7 Oct 24 47.8 Dec 9 54.2

Second High: Oct 14 38.7 Dec 31 42.6 Dec 8 39.5Third High: Oct 15 37.0 Dec 30 41.3 Nov 7 34.3

Fourth High: Dec 4 36.5 Oct 19 38.1 Nov 26 32.5National: Estimated # Days > 24-

Hour Std: 4.0 5.0 4.0

Measured # Days > 24-Hour Std: 4 5 4

24-Hour Standard Design Value: 34 34 32

24-Hour Standard 98th Percentile: 30.8 33.5 32.5

Annual Standard Design Value: 14.0 13.9 12.9

Annual Average: 12.7 13.4 12.5California: Annual Std Designation

Value: 14 14 13

Annual Average: 12.4 13.2 12.2Year Coverage: 100 100 100

Notes: Daily PM2.5 averages and related statistics are available at Burbank-W Palm Avenue between 1999 and 2012. Some years in this range may not be represented.All averages expressed in micrograms per cubic meter.An exceedance of a standard is not necessarily related to a violation of the standard.State statistics are based on California approved samplers, whereas national statistics are based on samplers using federal reference or equivalent methods. State and national

statistics may therefore be based on different samplers.Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data




Hydrogen Sulfide

Page 1 of 1Top 4 Daily PM2.5 Averages


Top 4 Summary: Highest 4 Daily 24-Hour PM10 Averages


Date 24-Hr Average Date 24-Hr

Average Date 24-Hr Average

National: First High: Aug 24 51.0 Dec 1 96.7 Jan 11 55.0

Second High: Jun 1 50.0 Dec 2 64.0 Apr 21 44.0Third High: Jul 19 46.0 Nov 30 57.4 Jan 4 40.0

Fourth High: Jan 14 43.0 Jul 5 48.0 Aug 7 40.0California: First High: Aug 24 50.0 Oct 24 60.0 Jan 11 54.0

Second High: Jun 1 49.0 Dec 29 52.0 Apr 21 43.0Third High: Jul 19 45.0 Oct 18 46.0 Jan 4 39.0

Fourth High: Jan 14 42.0 Dec 5 42.0 Aug 7 39.0National: Estimated # Days > 24-

Hour Std: * 0.0 0.0


3-Yr Avg Est # Days > 24-Hr Std: * * *

Annual Average: 27.5 25.0 26.4

3-Year Average: 34 24 27

California: Estimated # Days > 24-

Hour Std: * * 6.0


Annual Average: * * 25.83-Year Maximum Annual

Average: * * 26


Notes: Daily PM10 averages and related statistics are available at Burbank-W Palm Avenue between 1988 and 2012. Some years in this range may not be represented.All averages expressed in micrograms per cubic meter.The national annual average PM10 standard was revoked in December 2006 and is no longer in effect. Statistics related to the revoked standard are shown in italics or

italics .An exceedance of a standard is not necessarily related to a violation of the standard.All values listed above represent midnight-to-midnight 24-hour averages and may be related to an exceptional event.State and national statistics may differ for the following reasons:

State statistics are based on California approved samplers, whereas national statistics are based on samplers using federal reference or equivalent methods. State and national statistics may therefore be based on different samplers.

State statistics for 1998 and later are based on local conditions (except for sites in the South Coast Air Basin, where State statistics for 2002 and later are based on local conditions). National statistics are based on standard conditions.

State criteria for ensuring that data are sufficiently complete for calculating valid annual averages are more stringent than the national criteria.Measurements are usually collected every six days. Measured days counts the days that a measurement was greater than the level of the standard; Estimated days

mathematically estimates how many days concentrations would have been greater than the level of the standard had each day been monitored.3-Year statistics represent the listed year and the 2 years before the listed year.Year Coverage indicates the extent to which available monitoring data represent the time of the year when concentrations are expected to be highest. 0 means that data




Hydrogen Sulfide

Page 1 of 1Top 4 Daily PM10 Averages


Page 1 of 2Generated: October 3, 2013

Source: U.S. EPA AirData <http://www.epa.gov/airdata>

This report is based on monitor-level summary statistics. Air quality standards for some pollutants (PM2.5 and Pb) allow for combining data from multiple monitors into a site-levelsummary statistic that can be compared to the standard. In those cases, the site-level statistics may differ from the monitor-level statistics upon which this report is based.

Readers are cautioned not to rank order geographic areas based on AirData reports. Air pollution levels measured at a particular monitoring site are not necessarily representativeof the air quality for an entire county or urban area.

AirData reports are produced from a direct query of the AQS Data Mart. The data represent the best and most recent information available to EPA from state agencies. However,some values may be absent due to incomplete reporting, and some values may change due to quality assurance activities. The AQS database is updated daily by state, local, andtribal organizations who own and submit the data. Please contact the appropriate air quality monitoring agency to report any data problems.<http://www.epa.gov/airquality/airdata/ad_contacts.html>

Get detailed information about this report, including column descriptions, at http://www.epa.gov/airquality/airdata/ad_about_reports.html#mon

Monitor Values ReportGeographic Area: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CAPollutant: PbYear: 2010Exceptional Events: Included (if any)








Duration Description=24 HOUR

DurationDescription Obs

FirstMax

SecondMax

ThirdMax

FourthMax

ExcEvents

MonitorNumber Site ID Address City County State

EPARegion

24 HOUR 55 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 None 2 060371103 1630 N Main St, Los Angeles Los Angeles LosAngeles

CA 09


CA 09

24 HOUR 57 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 None 1 060371302 700 North Bullis Road Compton LosAngeles

CA 09

24 HOUR 59 0.11 0.09 0.06 0.06 None 1 060371402 16345 Raymer (Lot A), Van Nuys, Ca 91406-1212 Los Angeles LosAngeles

CA 09

24 HOUR 56 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.11 None 1 060371403 9440 Ann Street, Santa Fe Springs, Ca 90670 Santa Fe Springs LosAngeles

CA 09

24 HOUR 53 0.22 0.18 0.17 0.17 None 1 060371404 500 S. 7th Ave. City Of Industry, Ca 91746 Industry (corporate name for City ofIndustry)

LosAngeles

CA 09

24 HOUR 117 2.5 1.79 1.04 0.9 None 1 060371405 4010 E. 26th Street, Vernon, Ca 90058 Vernon LosAngeles

CA 09


CA 09


CA 09

24 HOUR 119 0.5 0.11 0.1 0.09 None 1 060371406 Rail Road Yard Washington Blvd., Commerce, Ca90058

Commerce LosAngeles

CA 09

24 HOUR 59 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 None 1 060371602 4144 San Gabriel River Pkwy, Pico Rivera Pico Rivera LosAngeles

CA 09










FirstMax

SecondMax

ThirdMax

FourthMax

ExcEvents


EPARegion

24 HOUR 60 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 None 2 060374002 3648 N. Long Beach Blvd., Long Beach Long Beach LosAngeles

CA 09


CA 09

24 HOUR 57 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 None 2 060374004 1305 E. Pacific Coast Hwy., Long Beach Long Beach LosAngeles

CA 09

24 HOUR 55 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 None 1 060375005 7201 W. Westchester Parkway Los Angeles LosAngeles

CA 09

















FirstMax

SecondMax

ThirdMax

FourthMax

ExcEvents


EPARegion


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


LosAngeles

CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


Commerce LosAngeles

CA 09


CA 09










FirstMax

SecondMax

ThirdMax

FourthMax

ExcEvents


EPARegion


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09

















FirstMax

SecondMax

ThirdMax

FourthMax

ExcEvents


EPARegion


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


LosAngeles

CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


Commerce LosAngeles

CA 09


CA 09










FirstMax

SecondMax

ThirdMax

FourthMax

ExcEvents


EPARegion


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09


CA 09

Home Weather Monthly Weather for Glendale RSS Share Email Bookmark Print

Local Weather Alerts> See all CA alerts High Wind Watch Fire Weather Warning

Table Display Graph Display

Monthly Averages for Glendale, CA [ English | Metric ]

Monthly Averages

Month Avg.High

Avg.Low

Mean Avg.Precip

RecordHigh

RecordLow

Jan 68°F 48°F 58°F 4.54 in. 93°F (1971) 23°F (1949)

Feb 70°F 49°F 60°F 5.29 in. 92°F (1995) 17°F (2003)

Mar 72°F 50°F 61°F 3.38 in. 96°F (1997) 23°F (1978)

Apr 76°F 53°F 65°F 1.37 in. 105°F (1989) 34°F (1933)

May 79°F 57°F 68°F 0.40 in. 102°F (1942) 37°F (1930)

Jun 84°F 60°F 72°F 0.22 in. 110°F (1990) 41°F (1998)

Jul 89°F 64°F 77°F 0.05 in. 110°F (1934) 45°F (1933)

Aug 91°F 65°F 78°F 0.11 in. 107°F (1998) 48°F (1935)

Sep 89°F 63°F 76°F 0.41 in. 110°F (1988) 44°F (1948)

Oct 82°F 58°F 70°F 1.01 in. 108°F (1991) 37°F (1971)

Nov 74°F 51°F 63°F 1.50 in. 98°F (1997) 29°F (1931)

Dec 67°F 47°F 57°F 3.13 in. 93°F (1958) 26°F (1990)

Glendale, CA Weather Facts

On average, the w armest month is August.

The highest recorded temperature w as 110°F in 1934.

On average, the coolest month is December.

The low est recorded temperature w as 17°F in 2003.

The most precipitation on average occurs in February.

Details Video Text Averages

More Resources

Find Local Golf Courses

Golf Tips: Beat the Weather

Top 10 Golf Destinations

Right Now Today Hourly Tomorrow Weekend 5 day 10 day Monthly Map

Desktop Weather

Weather Lifestyle Social Maps Video News TV

Local National Forecast Severe Weather Alerts Tornado Central Safety & Preparedness Farming

Search Zip, City or Place (Disney World) SEARCH

United States (English) °F °C Sign InMount Ba…

55°F

Seattle, WA

52°F

San Diego…

68°F

WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software

WIND ROSE PLOT:

Burbank Wind Rose

COMMENTS: COMPANY NAME:

MODELER:

DATE:

10/3/2013

PROJECT NO.:

NORTH

SOUTH

WEST EAST

4%

8%

12%

16%

20%

WIND SPEED (m/s)

>= 11.1

8.8 - 11.1

5.7 - 8.8

3.6 - 5.7

2.1 - 3.6

0.5 - 2.1

Calms: 1.37%

TOTAL COUNT:

86931 hrs.

CALM WINDS:

1.37%

DATA PERIOD:

Start Date: 1/1/2005 - 00:00End Date: 12/31/2009 - 23:00

AVG. WIND SPEED:

1.83 m/s

DISPLAY:

Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)

Documents

APPENDIX C AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS …eng2.lacity.org/techdocs/emg/docs/griffith/Appendix_C... · 2019-09-01 · AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ANALYSIS