Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7
4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
Appendix D Cone Penetration Testing Report
LANKELMA Limited
Cold Harbour Barn, Cold Harbour Lane, Iden East Sussex, TN31 7UT
T: +44 (0)1797 280050 E: [email protected]
www.lankelma.com
Project ref.: P-107234-7
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
SOIL INVESTIGATION
CPT REPORT
Cone penetration test Magnetometer test
Geotechnical data interpretation
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
PROJECT:
The Airfields Deeside
CLIENT:
JPG
FIELDWORK
CPT rig(s) 18.5-tonne rubber-tracked CPT unit (UK8) Date fieldwork started 11th July 2019 Date fieldwork completed 11th July 2019 Lankelma’s representative Emma Stickland Client’s representative Molly Peckham
REPORT
Status Revision Action Date Name
Final 00 Completed 19/07/19 Chris Player Checked 19/07/19 Emma Stickland Approved 19/07/19 Joseph Hobbs
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
DISCLAIMER 1
COMPLETED WORKS 1
FIELDWORK GENERAL 1
CONE PENETRATION TESTS 2 CPT Data Reduction and Presentation 2 In-situ Stress Conditions 3 Soil Behaviour Type 4 Soil Behaviour Type Index – Ic 4 Relative Density 5 Undrained Shear Strength 5 Overconsolidation Ratio 7 SPT N60 Values 8 Friction Angle 8
Coefficient of Volume Change 10 Young’s Modulus 10
MAGNETOMETER TESTING 11
CPT INTERPRETATION NOTES 11
REFERENCES 14
APPENDIX A SUMMARY TABLES
APPENDIX B GENERAL INFORMATION
APPENDIX C CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX D STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 1
APPENDIX E STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 2
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
1 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
INTRODUCTION
At the request of JPG, a soils investigation was carried out on project The Airfields Deeside.
Site location (in the general region of):
The Airfields Deeside CH5 2RD
DISCLAIMER
The investigation information, raw data and interpretations provided in this report are for the sole benefit of the Client identified at the front of the report.
Lankelma has exercised reasonable skill, care and diligence in the fieldwork and preparation of this report. This report has been completed based on information available to Lankelma at the time of preparation. The measurement and interpreted data in this report do not constitute recommendations for design purposes. An appropriately qualified person must review and interpret the data given in this report, together with any assumptions we have made that affect the data, before using the data for design or recommendation.
Lankelma accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or appropriateness of any assumptions, derived soil parameters, soil descriptions or soil unit boundaries contained in this report.
COMPLETED WORKS
• 8 nr. combined magnetometer-cone penetration tests (CPTu) with piezo measurement; and
• Factual report plus additional geotechnical data interpretation. The Summary Tables section contains tabulated summaries of the works completed together with analysis results where necessary.
FIELDWORK GENERAL
Fieldwork was performed with an 18.5-tonne rubber-tracked CPT unit (UK8) equipped with a 15-tonne capacity hydraulic ram set.
The Client was responsible for the positioning and re-survey of all investigative locations.
The target depth for the investigation was 15 m below ground level. Table 1 details the final test depths and reasons for test termination (refusal factor). Where penetration refusal was
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
2 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
encountered the termination depth was advised to, and agreed with, the Client’s on-site representative.
CONE PENETRATION TESTS
Cone penetration testing was carried out in general accordance with BS ISO 22476-1:2012.
Penetrometer measurements included cone tip resistance, friction sleeve resistance and dynamic pore water pressure sampled at a 10 mm resolution.
The penetrometer was calibrated in accordance with BS8422:2003 and ASTM E74-13a. The management of calibration records is in accordance with ISO 10012. Copies of all calibration certificates for the cones used are provided in Appendix B.
The piezometer filter element was in the u2 position and was vacuum saturated. The pore pressure system was saturated with de-aired 10000 cSt silicone oil.
CPT DATA REDUCTION AND PRESENTATION
The CPT results are presented in Appendix C. The corrected cone resistance (qt), local side friction (fs), dynamic pore water pressure (u2), friction ratio (Rf) and inclination are all presented against depth and elevation in accordance BS ISO 22476-1:2012. CPT data and the associated derived geotechnical parameters are included in the AGS 3.1 and 4.0 data files provided.
The cone tip resistance and sleeve force measurements were converted to pressures using the nominal dimensions of the penetrometer.
For piezocone tests the corrected tip resistance was calculated according to the formula:
𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 = 𝑞𝑞𝑐𝑐 + 𝑢𝑢2 × (1 − 𝑎𝑎)
Where 𝑎𝑎 is the ‘area ratio’ and (1- 𝑎𝑎) is the proportion of cross-sectional area between the cone tip and cone body where pore pressures (positive or negative) can act to add or subtract from the total external axial force on the tip. The difference between measured and corrected values is largest in low strength soils with large excess pore pressures. The relationship between measured resistance, excess pressure and correction difference is described by the curves in the following chart for alpha factor of 0.8:
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
3 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
Figure 5-1 corrected tip resistance fraction with measured tip resistance
Penetration length readings were corrected for inclination and sleeve readings were depth corrected for the dimensional offset between cone tip and sleeve during post processing. An additional shift of -80 mm was applied to the sleeve to account for tip failure zone offset (see ‘CPT Interpretation Notes’). ‘Rod spikes’, artefacts of the pause for push rod addition, were filtered from the cone tip and sleeve data.
The raw (or corrected) data are presented in Appendix C.
Geotechnical parameters appropriate for drained and undrained cone penetration conditions were derived for corresponding drained and undrained derived soil behaviour types (SBTs) respectively, however, to account for uncertainty in the SBT correlation with drainage behaviour, all parameters were derived over a range of transitional soils within the range 2.4 < Ic < 2.7 (see section 6.3).
In general, the engineering parameters derived are intended for non-cemented predominantly silicate soils.
IN-SITU STRESS CONDITIONS
The in-situ total and effective stress state was calculated based on an assumed total unit weight of 17 kN/m3 above the principal phreatic surface and 18 kN/m3 below.
The depth of the principal phreatic surface, or groundwater table, was taken as equal to the groundwater level(s) provided by the Client.
Note: The term phreatic surface is used here, however when it is based on piezocone measurements it is assumed that the piezometric level (under hydrostatic conditions) and groundwater table coincide. The phreatic or piezometric surface reported is intended to provide information about the assumed pore pressure distribution for calculation of relevant derived parameters from the CPT and may not represent the true position of the groundwater table or perched water bodies. Complex groundwater pressure distributions, if they are observed from the measurements, will be applied to relevant derived parameters.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
4 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE
The soil behaviour type (SBT) was interpreted using the Robertson (1990) classification system based on the normalised cone resistance (Qt) and normalised friction sleeve resistance (Fr) for silicate soils.
While the classification based on normalised parameters is considered more accurate, particularly at depths exceeding 15-20 m, the classification is often significantly in error (artificially granular/drained) at very shallow depth (< 1-3 m). The error at shallow depth is associated with the potentially large difference between the estimated vertical effective stress (applied in normalisation) and the unknown horizontal stress influencing penetration resistance.
Robertson (2010) proposed a non-normalised version of the 1990 chart which uses dimensionless cone resistance (qc/Pa) and friction ratio, Rf. The classification according to this chart can be more reliable at shallow depth and has been plotted as an approximate SBT index (discussed below) for comparison to the normalised classification.
The SBT chart is provided in Appendix B – General Information, titled ‘CPT Soil Behaviour Type Chart’.
It should be noted that the SBT classification provides the general soil ‘type’ which typically provides a similar CPT measurement range of qc and fs. Correspondingly, it will also show biased towards the soil fraction that dominates the mechanical behaviour. While the repeatability and behavioural bias of the SBT is usually beneficial, the classification is not always an appropriate substitute for classification based on grain-size distribution.
The results are presented on the plots of Appendix D.
SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE INDEX – IC
The main trend in soil behaviour type (SBT) variation can be expressed a continuous index, IC, proposed by Robertson and Wride (1998) based on a similar index proposed by Jefferies and Davies (1993). The index provides a continuous profile of SBT variation with depth for end-user analysis of soil units and variation within units.
The equivalent non-normalised version, as proposed by Robertson (2010), is provided for comparison.
The basis of Ic and its approximation of the original chart classification zones may be seen from Appendix B figure ‘CPT Soil Behaviour Type Chart’. The method does not identify zones 1 (sensitive fine grained) and zones 8 & 9 (overconsolidated or cemented).
Normalised SBT index IC (Robertson and Wride, 1998):
𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐 = [(3.47− log 𝑄𝑄𝑡𝑡)2 + (𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐹𝐹𝑟𝑟 + 1.22)2]0.5
Non-normalised SBT index IC (Robertson, 2010):
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
5 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐 = ��3.47− log �𝑞𝑞𝑐𝑐𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎
��2
+ (𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑅𝑅𝑓𝑓 + 1.22)2�
0.5
(See glossary of terms and symbols Appendix B)
The results are presented on the plots of Appendix D.
RELATIVE DENSITY
The relative density of sands was calculated based on an empirical relationship proposed by Jamiolkowski et al. (2001) based on a large database of undisturbed frozen samples and calibration chamber tests. The expected accuracy may be evaluated from the figures presented below.
𝐷𝐷𝑟𝑟 = 100 �0.268 ∙ ln�𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎⁄
�𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣′ 𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎⁄� − 𝑘𝑘�
(See glossary of terms and symbols Appendix B)
𝑘𝑘 = Compressibility dependant constant can be taken as -0.675 for medium compressibility (applied value in our interpretation), <= 1 for high compressibility and >= 2 for compressible sands.
Figure 5-2 Relative density with normalised tip stress and sand compressibility from calibration chamber tests (left) and undisturbed frozen samples (right). Jamiolkowski et al. (2001). Reproduced from Mayne (2007).
The results are presented on the plots of Appendix E– Standard interpretation results (set 2).
UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH
The undrained shear strength su is usually estimated as a factor of net cone tip resistance (Lunne et al, 1981):
𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑢 =𝑞𝑞𝑐𝑐 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣0
𝑁𝑁𝑘𝑘
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
6 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
where Nk is an empirical cone factor which varies with soil type, stress history, structure/fabric, plasticity and the mode of shearing.
(See glossary of terms and symbols Appendix B)
Mayne and Peuchen (2018) performed and evaluation of 407 high-quality triaxial compression tests against net tip resistance and proposed Nkt factors with regression analysis details for five categories of clays shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Summary of CAUC su versus qnet for clays. Reproduced from Mayne and Peuchen (2018).
Clay Group Number of sites
No. Data Correlation Coefficient r2
Factor Nkt Mean Pore Pressure Parameter Bq
Offshore NC-LOC 17 115 0.98 12.32 0.51
Onshore NC-LOC 30 191 0.867 12 0.53
Sensitive NC-LOC 5 43 0.507 10.33 0.84
OC Intact 5 36 0.862 13.57 0.49
OC Fissured 5 22 0.393 22.47 -0.01
All clays 62 407 0.923 13.33 0.55
Alternatively, a variable Nkt factor can be estimated for the profile as a function of the pore pressure parameter Bq, applicable for Bq values of > -0.01. The following equation proposed by Mayne and Peuchen is based on the same database evaluation:
𝑁𝑁𝑘𝑘𝑡𝑡 = 10.5 − 4.6 ∙ ln�𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞 + 0.1�
Where the pore pressure parameter Bq is the ratio of excess pore pressure to net tip resistance:
𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞 = 𝑢𝑢2 − 𝑢𝑢0𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣0
The Nkt estimate has a standard error of 2.4 Nk and correlation coefficient of 0.645.
The estimate based on Bq is presented as ‘su5’ on the parameter plots and is only suitable for tests that have a high-quality pore pressure data, often indicated by a positive, repeatable and dynamic response. For tests that have a reliable pore pressure response throughout, the evaluation on a point by point basis is warranted. For projects with variable response quality and with possible piezo desaturation (for example in the unsaturated zone or by dilation/cavitation) it is preferable to identify zones with reliable pore pressure response for representative soils and select a characteristic value of Bq for evaluation of Nkt. Lankelma are not always in view of the effort that has been made in preparation of the test location to maintain saturation of the piezo sensor.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
7 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
Note: Nkt (with subscript ‘t’) indicates a Nk factor that has been established using the corrected tip resistance qt. Nkt can be applied to the uncorrected tip resistance qc (non-piezocone tests) but results in a slightly lower estimate of su depending on the correction magnitude (qc - qt) in lower strength soils. Undrained shear strengths corresponding to selected values of Nk are presented on the plots of Appendix D. ‘su3’ on the logs (Nk = 15) has been included as a reference for comparison to traditional arbitrary Nk values of 15 and 20.
OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO
The preconsolidation stress 𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′ was calculated based on the method proposed by Mayne et al (2009):
𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′ = 𝑘𝑘 ∙ (𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣)𝑎𝑎′
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑅𝑅 = 𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′/𝜎𝜎′𝑣𝑣0′
(See glossary of terms and symbols Appendix B)
Mayne et al found that the trend with mean grain size followed a power law through the addition of exponent m’ and that its value can be estimated by relation to soil behaviour type index Ic:
𝑚𝑚′ = 1 − 0.28
1 + 𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐2.65
25
Figure 5-3 Preconsolidation stress with net cone resistance power law, reproduced from Mayne (2014).
An additional 𝜎𝜎𝑝𝑝′ and OCR was calculated for 𝑚𝑚′ = 1.1 to reflect the upper trend for over consolidated fissured clays not captured by the soil behaviour type index Ic
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
8 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
SPT N60 VALUES
Equivalent SPT N60 values, defined as the non-normalised SPT blow count over a 30 cm interval, were derived for two correlations and are presented together in the results section for comparison.
Method 1 - Lunne et al. (1997)
𝑁𝑁60 =𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡
8.5 ∙ 𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑚𝑚 ∙ �1− 𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐4.6�
Method 2 - Robertson (2012)
�𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡𝑝𝑝𝑎𝑎�
𝑁𝑁60= 10(1.268−0.2817𝐼𝐼𝑐𝑐)
(See glossary of terms and symbols Appendix B)
The correlations are intended for clays, silts and sands and not for carbonates or cemented geo-materials.
The results are presented in Appendix D.
FRICTION ANGLE
Sands
The peak friction angle of granular materials was calculated using the Kulhawy and Mayne (1990) method and is an empirical relationship as a function of stress normalised cone tip resistance. The relationship is based on a calibration chamber database from 24 sands of varying mineralogy. The relationship has the form:
ф′ = 17.6 + 11.0 ∙ log (𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡1 )
Where:
ф′ = Peak friction angle (degrees)
𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡1 = stress normalised cone resistance =
�𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎
� / �𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣0′𝜎𝜎𝑎𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑎
�0.5
The presence of compressible minerals tends to reduce tip resistance resulting in lower estimate of friction angle, while very coarse (sand) or larger grain size tends to increase tip resistance resulting in higher estimate.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
9 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
Figure 5-4 Peak triaxial friction angle from undisturbed sands with normalised cone resistance.
Fine grained soils
The effective friction angle for fine grained soils was calculated based on the Senneset et al. (1988, 1989) method by applying the approximate closed form solution by Mayne & Campanella (2005) as a direct function of the pore pressure parameter Bq and normalised tip resistance Q. The method is applicable where 0.1 < Bq < 1.0 and 20° < ф′< 45°and generally appropriate for non-cemented NC-LOC soils.
ф′ = 29.5° 𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞0.121[0.256 + 0.336 𝐵𝐵𝑞𝑞 + log𝑄𝑄]
Figure 5-5 [Left] Theoretical curves with function approximation (dots) overlay [Right] calibration data from geotechnical centrifuge tests for a variety of soils. Redrawn from Ouyang & Mayne (2018).
The results are presented in Appendix E.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
10 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
COEFFICIENT OF VOLUME CHANGE
Coefficient of volume change (mv) defined as the inverse of the constrained modulus (M), is evaluated for all soil types using the constrained modulus method proposed by Mayne (2006) cited in Mayne (2007) applicable to the present state of vertical effective stress up to the pre-consolidation stress.
𝑚𝑚𝑣𝑣 =1𝑀𝑀
Where:
𝑀𝑀 = 𝛼𝛼 ∙ (𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣)
𝛼𝛼 = 5
An alpha factor of 8.25 reported by Kulhawy & Mayne (1990) for fine grained soils appears to provide a better fit through the data for intact non-organic clays, reducing to around 1 to 2 for organic plastic clays.
Figure 5-6 Constrained modulus of Mayne (2006). Annotated/redrawn from NCHRP Synthesis 368 (2007).
The results are presented on the plots of Appendix D.
YOUNG’S MODULUS
The Young’s Modulus at 25% mobilised shear strength (FOS = 4) was calculated according to the method proposed by Robertson (2009):
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
11 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
𝐸𝐸′ = 𝛼𝛼(𝑞𝑞𝑡𝑡 − 𝜎𝜎𝑣𝑣) Where:
𝛼𝛼 = 0.015(100.55𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰+1.68)
(See glossary of terms and symbols Appendix B)
The method described by Robertson may be adapted to estimate E’ for loading at different percentages of yield stress.
The results are presented in Appendix E.
MAGNETOMETER TESTING
A combined CPT/magnetometer was used at prescribed locations to provide the data for in-site safety management of UXO risk. As such, no data has been processed or reported here in.
The magnetometer used in the Lankelma magcone system comprises a Bartington Instruments 3-axis flux gate magnetometer that is capable of measuring disturbances in the Earth’s field of less than 1 part in a million. Buried ferrous items, such as UXO, result in localized distortions of the magnetic field. The detection radius of the works undertaken was dependent upon the level of magnetic field distortion noise and the size of the ferrous object(s) of interest. The magnetometer data was reviewed in real-time.
The magnetometer probe was pushed into the soil using a standard CPT rig up to a maximum applied force of 15 Tonnes.
CPT INTERPRETATION NOTES
Provided below is a non-exhaustive set of notes on interpretation of the acquired CPT data with reference to examples within the dataset where appropriate.
DRAINED AND UNDRAINED SOIL BEHAVIOUR
Geotechnical parameters appropriate for drained and undrained cone penetration conditions are derived for drained and undrained soil behaviour types (SBTs) respectively, however, to help mitigate the uncertainty in the SBT correlation with drainage behaviour, all parameters are derived over the Soil Behaviour Type range 2.4 < Ic < 2.7. For partially drained conditions, error will be introduced within derived parameters.
Piezocone dynamic pore pressure and dissipation tests may be used to identify drainage conditions. Dissipation t50 values exceeding 50 seconds indicate undrained penetration behaviour based on the findings of Kim et al. (2008).
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
12 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
In partially drained materials the friction sleeve resistance may rise significantly immediately following a pause in penetration due to consolidation and increased effective stress on the friction sleeve.
DYNAMIC PORE PRESSURE DATA (CPTu)
While the piezo system is saturated before use, testing through unsaturated soils may result in some degree of desaturation leading to a less accurate and more ‘sluggish’ pore pressure response. Desaturation can also occur during penetration due to suction during dilative shear at the cone shoulder. Dissipation tests that are undertaken following desaturation are likely to have a more pronounced initial rise and some degree of error will be present in the analysis.
If the system becomes desaturated it may or may not re-saturate at higher excess pressures later in the test. The pore pressure response in saturated contractive soils normally have a dynamic ‘peaky’ appearance.
The tip resistance in lower strength contractive soils without pore pressure measurement in the u2 position is likely to be significantly lower than the equivalent corrected tip resistance depending on the magnitude of pore pressure acting in the gap between cone tip and cone body.
CONE TIP AND SLEEVE OFFSET
The accuracy of the SBT over thin layers and at layer boundaries is sensitive to offset error in the friction ratio often seen as sharp spikes or drops at boundaries. The friction ratio is often inaccurate in heavily disturbed soils with a ‘blocky’ macro fabric.
For this investigation a friction sleeve depth offset correction of -80mm was applied together with a 5-point moving average on the friction ratio to minimise the influence of this effect.
CONE TYPE
The reference cone type has a 10 cm2 projected cone tip area and 150 cm2 friction sleeve area, however it is common to use the larger 15 cm2 cone with 225 cm2 friction sleeve area for improved sensitivity and penetration depth potential. Use of the 15 cm2 cone will produce more pronounced transitions zones and thin layer effects (larger zone of influence and failure zone).
TRANSITION ZONES AND THIN LAYER EFFECTS
During penetration at the boundary between soils of contrasting stiffness, a transition zone is often evident prior to mobilisation of the true soil stiffness. These should be cautiously ignored in assessment of soil behaviour type and parameter evaluation. Where the stiff layer is thin (<~0.75 m) mobilised resistance may be significantly less than that of an equivalent thick layer. The effect for thin low stiffness layers is less significant. Procedures for thin-layer effect correction are provided by Robertson and Wride (1998).
GRAVELS
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
13 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
The presence of gravel or larger clasts in a soil is often characterised by short peaks in the CPT tip and sleeve readings, possibly with associate inclinometer ‘shake’ and/or sharp reductions in pore water readings due to dilation effects. Frequent gravels in soft or loose soils may generate localised erroneous friction ratio values.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
14 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
REFERENCES
ASTM E74-13a (2013), Standard Practice of Calibration of Force-Measuring Instruments for Verifying the Force Indication of Testing Machines, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. British Standards Institution (2003) BS 8422:2003, Force measurement – Strain gauge load cell systems – Calibration method. London: British Standards Institution. Houlsby, G.T. and Teh, C.I. (1988) “Analysis of the Piezocone in Clay”. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Penetration Testing (ISOPT-1), Orlando, Vol. 2, pp. 777-783. Balkema Pub., Rotterdam. ISO 10012:2003 Measurement management systems - Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards (2003). ISO 22476-1:2012 Geotechnical investigation and testing - Field testing - Part 1: Electrical cone and piezocone penetration test. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards (2012). ISSMGE, 1999. International reference test procedure for the cone penetrometer test CPT and the cone penetration test CPTU, Report of ISSMGE TC16 on Ground Property Characterisation for in situ Testing, In Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 3:2195-222 (1999). Jamiolkowski, M., LoPresti, D.C.F., and Manassero, M. (2001) “Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from Cone Penetration Test and Flat Dilatometer Test”. Soil Behaviour and Soft Ground Construction (GSP119), American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 201-238. Reston, Va. 2001 Jefferies, M.G. and Davies M.P. (1993),” Use of CPTu to estimate equivalent SPT N60”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, 16(4), pp. 458-467. Kim, K., Prezzi, M., Salgado, R., and Lee, W. (2008) “Effect of Penetration Rate on Cone Penetration Resistance in Saturated Clayey Soils”, Journal of Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 134(8), pp. 1142-1153. Kulhawy, F.H. and Mayne, P.W. (1990) “Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design”. Report EPRI EL-6800 Research Project 1493-6, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 306. Ladd, C.C. and DeGroot, D.J. (2003) “Recommended Practice for Soft Ground Site Characterization: Arthur Casagrande Lecture”. Soil & Rock America 2003 (Proceedings. 12th Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Boston, MA). Verlag Glückauf, Essen, Germany. pp. 3–57. Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K. and Powell, J.J.M. (1997) “Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice” Blackie Academic, New York 1997. Lunne, T. and Kleven, A. (1981) “Role of CPT in North Sea Foundation Engineering”. Session at the ASCE National Convention: Cone Penetration Testing and Materials. pp. 76-107. American Society of Engineers (ASCE). Mayne, P.W. and Campanella, R.G. (2005) “Versatile Site Characterisation by Seismic Piezocone”. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 2. Millpress, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2005. pp 721-724. Mayne, P.W. and Peuchen J. (2018), "Evaluation of CPTU Nkt cone factor for undrained strength of clays". Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'18), 21-22 June 2018, Delft, The Netherlands. CRC Press. pp. 423-429. Mayne, P.W. (2007) “Cone Penetration Testing – A Synthesis of Highway Practice”. NCHRP Synthesis 368, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Mayne, P.W. (2014). KN2: “Interpretation of geotechnical parameters from seismic piezocone tests”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'14), June 2014, ISSMGE Technical Committee TC 102, Edited by P.K. Robertson and K.I. Cabal: pp. 47-73. Parez, L. and Fauriel, R. (1988). “Le piézocône. Améliorations apportées à la reconnaissance de sols”. Revue Française de Géotech, Vol. 33, 13-27. Robertson, P.K. (2009). Cited in “Guide to Cone Penetration Testing - 6th edition (2015)”, pp. 58, Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Robertson, P.K. (2009). Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46, p. 1337–1355. Robertson, P.K. (2010) “Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update”. 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. Huntingdon Beach, CA, USA.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
15 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
Robertson, P.K. (2012). Interpretation of in-situ tests – some insights, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Geotechnical & Geophysical Site Characterization, ISC’4, Brazil, 1. Robertson, P.K (2014) “Estimating in-situ soil permeability from CPT & CPTu”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'14), June, 2014, ISSMGE Technical Committee TC 102. Senneset, K., R. Sandven, and N. Janbu (1989), “Evaluation of Soil Parameters from Piezocone Tests,” Transportation Research Record 1235, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C, pp. 24-37. Sully, J.P., Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G. and Woeller, D.J. (1999) “An approach to evaluation of field CPTU dissipation data in overconsolidated fine-grained soils”. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. Vol. 36, pp. 369-381.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
16 Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
APPENDICES
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
APPENDIX A SUMMARY TABLES
Table 1 CPT summary
Test ID Fina
l dep
th
(mBG
L)
Cone ID {C=Cone tip; F=Friction Sleeve; I= Inclination; P = Piezo; S=Subtraction cone; 15/10 = cone projected area (cm2) )} CP
T ri
g
Pre-
drill
ed /
in
spec
tion
pit
(m
)
Casi
ng d
epth
(m
)
Refu
sal f
acto
r
Dis
sipa
tion
s
Seis
mic
con
e
Sam
ples
East
ing
Nor
thin
g
Elev
atio
n (m
)
Dat
e of
tes
t
Remarks CP301 9.96 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP302 10.20 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP303 10.78 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP304 9.10 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP305 11.46 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP306 7.92 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP307 8.96 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019 CP308 7.84 S15-CFIP.1526 UK8 Lateral support 11/07/2019
CPT test plots are presented in Appendix C.
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
APPENDIX B GENERAL INFORMATION
LIST OF FIGURES
Description Pages included
Cone calibration certificate: S15-CFIP.1526 1
Data sheet: 18.5-tonne rubber-tracked CPT unit (UK8) 1
CPT soil behaviour type chart 1
Glossary of terms 1
REFERENCE INSTRUMENTS:
IDTYPEUNCERTAINTY (±%)
Nominal pressure (MPa,MPa,MPa)Maximum pressure (MPa,MPa,MPa)Area (cm²)Sensitivity (mV/MPa)
Calibration file scaling factor: Nominal cal force (kN, kN, BAR)Calibration number (mV)Zero point (mV)Sensitivity (mV/kN, mV/kN, mV/BAR)Inclination factors (mV)
Measured alpha factor:
Uncertainty (%):ReproducibilityLinearityHysteresisCombined expanded (k=2)
Application class
S15-150kN
X -20°= 455, 0°= 2476, 20°= 4445 / Y -20°= 325, 0°= 2243, 20°= 4129
Calibration signed and dated by: Calibration checked and dated by:
06/09/2019
Instrument: Location: Lankelma Calibration LaboratorySerial Number: S15.CFIIP-1526 Temperature(° C) 19.7Manufacturer: Geopoint Calibration Engineer ed f. white Date of calibration: 07/06/2019 Calibration Expiry
1 1 10.11 0.430.27
0.05 0.07 0.180.02 0.01 0.03
0.80
0.01 0.04 0.09
4554 4691 4253319 273 455
75 75 10
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATEGeopoint-S15-150kN-2MPa
Cone Serial Number: S15.CFIIP-1526
AM DSCC-100kN AM DSCC-100kN Druck DPI 10451998 51998 4009509
CONE END RESISTANCE SLEEVE FRICTION PORE WATER PRESSURE
0.01 0.01 0.05
60.720 62.545 425.287
50.00 3.33 1.00100.00 6.67 2.00
15 225 N/A91.08 1407.27 4252.87
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0
REFE
RENC
E (M
Pa)
Tip (mV)
CALIBRATION LINE TIP
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0
REFE
RENC
E (M
Pa)
SLEEVE (mV)
CALIBRATION LINE SLEEVE FRICTION
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
0.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 3500.00 4000.00 4500.00 5000.00
REF
EREN
CE
(MPa
)
PWP (mV)
CALIBRATION LINE PORE WATER PRESSURE
www.lankelma.com
Tel: +44 (0)1797 280050 Fax: +44 (0)1797 280195 Email: [email protected]
Lankelma Limited, Cold Harbour Barn, Cold Harbour Lane, Iden, East Sussex. TN31 7UT
Applications Specialist testing
• Seismic
• Pressuremeter
• Magnetometer
• Video cone
• Wing cone
• Push-in Vane
Installations
• VWP
• Piezometer
• Inclinometer
Sampling
• MOSTAP
• Shelby
UK8
TRACKED RIG
TECHNICAL DETAILS
Rig Weight 18.5 T Maximum Operating
Ram Capacity 15 T
Maximum Travelling Speed 15 km/h
Track Material Rubber Track Length 3.40 m Track Width 0.75 m
Maximum Ground Clearance on Jacks 0.21 m
Maximum Ground Bearing Pressure
Tracking / Pushing – 35 kPa
Pulling – 63 kPa
Maximum Testing Gradient
Flat – No Self-Levelling
Maximum Traversing Gradient
35 degrees (operator assessed)
Noise Output at 2 m Testing – 74 dBA Driving – 95 dBA
Clamp Arrangement 36/55 Push Pull Clamp
Ram Stroke 0.70 m Maximum Casing Size 55 mm
Our ‘bogskipper’ tracked rig’s low bearing pressures, large footprint,
and high ground clearance make it ideal for working sites with boggy
or soft ground conditions.
Unique to the UK, this rig is suitable for intertidal projects, peat
bogs and weight-sensitive sites. The rubber tracks minimize
the potential for any damage to delicate infrastructure, such as
a sea wall.
Performance Rates
An expected 100m+ of standard CPTu testing can be
executed in a day (dependent on site conditions and access).
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
CPT SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE CHART
Non-normalised SBT chart by Robertson et al. (2010) based on dimensionless cone resistance (qc/Pa) and friction ration, Rf, showing contours of Ic index. The chart is also applicable to normalised tip/sleeve values Qt and Fr.
Zone Soil Behaviour Type (SBT)
1 Sensitive fine-grained 6 Sands: clean sand to sandy silt
2 Clay – organic soil 7 Dense sand to gravelly sand
3 Clays: Clay to silty clay 8 Stiff sand to clayey sand*
4 Silt mixtures: clayey silt to silty clay 9 Stiff fine grained*
5 Sand mixtures: Silty sand to sandy silt *Overconsolidated or cemented
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
GLOSSARY OF CPT TERMS AND SYMBOLS
SYMBOLS qc :- Cone resistance. The total force acting on the cone Qc, divided by the
projected area of the cone, Ac; (qc=Qc/Ac).
qt :- Corrected cone resistance. The cone resistance qc corrected for unequal pore water pressure effects on the cone face and shoulder.
fs :- Friction sleeve resistance. The total frictional force acting on the friction sleeve, Fs, divided by its surface area, As.fs= Fs/As.
Rf :- Friction ratio The ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the sleeve friction, fs,
to the cone resistance, qc, both measured at the same depth; [Rf= (fs/qc) . 100].
qt-net :- Net cone resistance (Method 1) = (qc – σv)
Qt :- Normalised cone resistance (Method 1) = (qc – σv)/σ’v
qt1:- Normalised cone resistance (Method 2) = (qt)/(σ’v)0.5 Fr:- Normalised friction sleeve resistance = fs /(qc- σv)
σv:- Total overburden stress σ’v:- Effective overburden stress
σatm, or, Pa:- Reference atmospheric stress = 100kPa Ic:- Soil Behaviour Type Index
Bq :- Pore pressure ratio. The net pore pressure normalized with respect to the net cone resistance. = (u2 – u0)/(qt -σv)
TERMS Cone (or ‘tip’): - The conical tip section of the cone penetrometer. Friction sleeve: - The section of the cone penetrometer upon which the sleeve friction is measured, located behind the cone tip.
Piezocone: - A cone penetrometer with a pore pressure measurement system.
Dynamic pore pressure: - The pore pressure generated during penetration and measured by a pore pressure sensor on the conical tip face (u1) or just behind the conical tip (u2).
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
APPENDIX C CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS
RAW DATA PLOTS
LIST OF FIGURES:
Location ID Pages included
CP301 1
CP302 1
CP303 1
CP304 1
CP305 1
CP306 1
CP307 1
CP308 1
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 09:24:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP301
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
Terminated at 9.96 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:07:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP302
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
32.6
30
Terminated at 10.20 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:54:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP303
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
32
29.6
Terminated at 10.78 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 11:52:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP304
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
32.2Terminated at 9.10 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 12:22:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP305
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
30.4
Terminated at 11.46 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 13:26:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP306
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
Terminated at 7.92 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 14:09:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP307
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
Terminated at 8.96 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Client: JPG
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
DissipationTest
InternalQC Diss.
0 2010
Inclination (degrees)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650Friction Sleeve Resistance f s (kPa)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.3
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Operator: Walter GeddesCone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Rig Used: UK8
Date of test: 11/07/2019 15:04:00
Cone area (mm2):1500
Termination Remark: Lateral support
Remarks:*Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:Page 1 of 1
TEST ID: CP308
-100
Assumed In-situ Pore Pressure u0 (kPa)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Dynamic Pore Water Pressure u2 (kPa)
6000 82 4 6
Friction Ratio (%)
Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq
1-1 -0.5 0 0.5
Terminated at 7.84 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB001
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
APPENDIX D STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 1
UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH COEFFICIENT OF VOLUME CHANGE
OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE (SBT) DESCRIPTIONS
LIST OF FIGURES:
Location ID Pages included
CP301 1
CP302 1
CP303 1
CP304 1
CP305 1
CP306 1
CP307 1
CP308 1
1.04
9.96
Gravelly sand to sand
Sands - clean sand to silty sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 09:24:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP301
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
Terminated at 9.96 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
0.98
10.20
Gravelly sand to sand
Sands - clean sand to silty sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:07:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP302
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
32.6
30
Terminated at 10.20 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
10.78
Sands - clean sand to silty sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:54:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP303
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
32
29.6
Terminated at 10.78 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
9.10
Sands - clean sand to silty sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 11:52:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP304
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
32.2Terminated at 9.10 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
1.52
11.46
Gravelly sand to sand
Sands - clean sand to silty sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 12:22:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP305
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
30.4
Terminated at 11.46 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
1.22
Gravelly sand to sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 13:26:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP306
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
Terminated at 7.92 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
1.40
8.96
Gravelly sand to sand
Sands - clean sand to silty sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 14:09:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP307
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
Terminated at 8.96 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
7.84
Sands - clean sand to silty sand
Client: JPG
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
PenetrationPause (<1cm/s)
Cone area (mm2):1500
Operator: Walter Geddes
Elevation:
Coordinates: ,
Location: Deeside, UK
Checked by:Chris Player
ConeID: S15-CFIP.1526
Termination Remark:Lateral support
Rig Used: UK8
DissipationTest
Date of test: 11/07/2019 15:04:00
Date of plot: 12-07-19
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Remarks: *Phreatic surface origin: Arbitrary value Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated formixed SBTs = Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and
Undrained Behaviour' for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation. Page 1 of 1
InternalQA Diss. TEST ID: CP308
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
100 300 5000-100
Insitu Pore Pressure
Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)
700 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Undrained Shear Strength 'su (kPa)
su3 (Nk,15.00) (Reference)
su1 (Nk,12.00) (CAUC) Onshore NC-LOC
su2 (Nk,13.57) (CAUC) OC Intact
su4 (Nk,2.47) (CAUC) OC Fissured
0
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2
2.4
0.24
Coefficient of Volume Compressibility
mv (m2/MN) Mayne (2006)
00 3010 20
Mayne (2009)
Overconsolidation Ratio
Mayne (2009)OC Fissured Clays
1 2 3
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
4
(3)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
(7)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(6)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(5)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(4)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600
Gra
phic
Log
Material Description
Robertson 1990 Extrapolated
Terminated at 7.84 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB003
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
Report no. P-107234-7R00CP
APPENDIX E STANDARD INTERPRETATION RESULTS - SET 2
EQUIVALENT SPT N60 PEAK FRICTION ANGLE
RELATIVE DENSITY YOUNG’S MODULUS
LIST OF FIGURES:
Location ID Pages included
CP301 1
CP302 1
CP303 1
CP304 1
CP305 1
CP306 1
CP307 1
CP308 1
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 09:24:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP301
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
Terminated at 9.96 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:07:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP302
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
32.6
30
Terminated at 10.20 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 10:54:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP303
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
32
29.6
Terminated at 10.78 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 11:52:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP304
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
32.2Terminated at 9.10 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 12:22:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP305
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
30.4
Terminated at 11.46 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 13:26:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP306
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
Terminated at 7.92 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 14:09:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP307
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
Terminated at 8.96 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
Cone area (mm2):1500
Cone ID: S15-CFIP.1526
Date of test: 11/07/2019 15:04:00
Operator: Walter Geddes
Location: Deeside, UK
Coordinates: ,
Elevation:
Coordinate system:
Lankelma Project Ref:P-107234-7
Page 1 of 1
Client: JPG
Checked by:Chris Player
Date of plot: 12-07-19Both drained and undrained parameters are calculated for mixed SBTs
= Ic 2.40-2.70. See report section 'Drained and Undrained Behaviour'for discussion.
See report section 'Interpretive Data' for methods and discussion of parameter evaluation.
Project: THE AIRFIELDS DEESIDE
TEST ID: CP308
1 42 3
(Non-normalised)
(Stress normalised)
Soil Behaviour Type Index Ic
DE
PT
H(m
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EL
EV
AT
ION
(m)
0
0
30
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
5 10 15 20 25
100 200 300 400 500Friction Sleeve Resistance fs (kPa)
(qt Small Scale)
Cone Resistance qt (MPa)
600 0 6010 20 30 40 50
Robertson (2012)
Lunne et al. (1997)
SPT N60' Values
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Robertson (2009)
Young's Modulus E' (MPa)
20 50
Peak Friction Angle phi' (deg)
Kulhaway & Mayne (1990)
25 30 35 40 45 1000 20 40 60 80
Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)
Relative Density Dr' (%)
(6)
Den
se s
and
to g
rave
lly s
and
(5)
San
ds: c
lean
san
d to
silt
y sa
nd
(4)
San
d m
ixtu
res:
silt
y sa
nd to
san
dy s
ilt
(3)
Silt
Mix
ture
s: c
laye
y si
lt to
silt
y cl
ay
(2)
Cla
ys -
cla
y to
silt
y cl
ay
(1)
Cla
y -
orga
nic
soil
Terminated at 7.84 m
DATGEL CPT TOOL DGD LIB 5.23 LANKELMA.GLB005
Phreatic Surface 3.00 m
The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7
4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
Appendix E Groundwater and Gas Monitoring Results
GAS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS
Site: Plots H6 & H7, The Airfields, Deeside
Job No: 4671 Client: Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
Visit No: 1 Date:
Highest Highest Lowest
CO2 CO2 H2S CO O2
% lel %v/v % % lel %v/v % ppm ppm % Peak Steady (m) bgl
BH301 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 1 2 20.2 0.0 0.0 1.35 9.10
BH302 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 2 16.9 0.1 0.1 1.20 3.58
BH303 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 3 13 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.92 6.65
BH304 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 2 19.7 0.0 0.0 1.25 9.41
BH305 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1 3 20.1 0.0 0.0 1.42 3.60
BH306 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 10.6 3 3 13.9 0.0 0.0 2.25 3.86
BH307 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 3 20.9 -0.1 -0.1 1.78 9.58
BH308 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 2 3 20.9 0.0 0.0 1.17 3.80
CH4 0.0 %v/v CO2 0.1 %v/v
O2 20.9 %v/v
Start 1012 Monitoring Equipment: GA5000
End 1014 Serial Number of Equipment: G505491
Rising locally, falling regionally. Date of Last Calibration: 03.May.2019
Sunny spells. Operator: JRP
NR - Not Recorded
Ambient Concentration (% volume):
Barometric Pressure:
Barometric Pressure Trend:
Weather:
NA - Not Applicable
11/07/2019
GWL Base of
Standpipe
Monitoring
Location
Litre/Hour
Gas ConcentrationGas Emission Rate
CH4
Peak Steady
BHCH4
Key Remarks
Checked: Approved:
GAS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS
Site: Plots H6 & H7, The Airfields, Deeside
Job No: 4671 Client: Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
Visit No: 2 Date:
Highest Highest Lowest
CO2 CO2 H2S CO O2
% lel %v/v % % lel %v/v % ppm ppm % Peak Steady (m) bgl
BH301 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0 0 20.3 0.0 0.0 1.46 9.10
BH302 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 3.3 0 0 16.3 0.0 0.0 1.33 3.58
BH303 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.97 6.65
BH304 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0 20.2 0.0 0.0 1.29 9.41
BH305 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 0 0 19.2 0.0 0.0 1.57 3.60
BH306 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 10.2 0 0 13.8 0.0 0.0 NR 3.86
BH307 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 0 18.8 0.0 0.0 1.82 9.58
BH308 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 0 20.1 0.0 0.0 1.23 3.80
CH4 0.0 %v/v CO2 0.1 %v/v
O2 20.9 %v/v
Start 1009 Monitoring Equipment: GA5000
End 1011 Serial Number of Equipment: G505491
Rising locally, falling regionally. Date of Last Calibration: 03.May.2019
Cloudy and dry. Operator: JRP
NR - Not Recorded
Ambient Concentration (% volume):
Barometric Pressure:
Barometric Pressure Trend:
Base of
Standpipe
Peak Steady
CH4 Litre/Hour
18/07/2019
Monitoring
Location
Gas ConcentrationGas Emission Rate
GWL
BHCH4
Weather:
Key Remarks
NA - Not Applicable
Checked: Approved:
Peak CH4 Peak CH4 Steady CH4 Steady CH4 Peak CO2 Peak CO2 Steady CO2 Steady CO2 H2S CO O2 O2 max limiting max limiting Peak Flow Steady Flow SWL SWL
(% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) ppm ppm (% v/v) (% v/v) bh flow bh flow (l/hr) (l/hr) (m bgl) (m bgl)
MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX MAX MAX MIN MAX rate for CH4* rate for CO2** MAX MAX MIN MAX
BH301 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 1 2 20.2 20.3 0 0 0 0 1.35 1.46
BH302 0 0 0 0 0.1 3.3 0.1 3.3 1 2 16.3 16.9 0 0.0033 0.1 0.1 1.20 1.33
BH303 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 3 13 19.6 21.1 0 0 0 0 0.92 0.97
BH304 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 2 19.7 20.2 0 0 0 0 1.25 1.29
BH305 0 0 0 0 1 1.7 1 1.7 1 3 19.2 20.1 0 0 0 0 1.42 1.57
BH306 0 0 0 0 10.2 10.6 10.2 10.6 3 3 13.8 13.9 0 0 0 0 2.25 2.25
BH307 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.2 2 3 18.8 20.9 0 0 0 0 1.78 1.82
BH308 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 2 3 20.1 20.9 0 0 0 0 1.17 1.23
MB Start
MB Finish
Pressure Trend
0 0
0 0 0Rising locally, falling regionally.
1009 0
Cloudy and dry. 0
1011 0
0 0 0
0
SUMMARY OF GROUND GAS MONITORING
BH NO.
** Based on steady CO2 and steady flows.
* Based of peak CH4 and peak flows.
VISIT 1 VISIT 2 VISIT 3 VISIT 4 VISIT 5 VISIT 6
1012
1014
The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7
4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
Appendix F Geotechnical Testing Results
5 – 7 Hexthorpe Road, Hexthorpe, Doncaster DN4 0AR tel: +44 (0)844 815 6641 fax: +44 (0)844 815 6642 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]
A copy of the Laboratory Schedule of accredited tests as issued by UKAS is attached to this report. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results
reported herein relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be reproduced other than in full, without the prior written approval of the laboratory.
Checked and Approved Signatories: R Gunson A Watkins R Berriman (Director) (Director) (Quality Manager) S Royle S Eyre L Knight
(Laboratory Manager) (Senior Technician) (Senior Technician) Page 1 of
LABORATORY REPORT
4043
Contract Number: PSL19/4133
Report Date: 23 July 2019 Client’s Reference: 4671 Client Name: JPG Leeds
5 John Charles Way Leeds West Yorkshire LS12 6QD
For the attention of: John Parkinson Contract Title: Airfields
Date Received: 8/7/2019 Date Commenced: 8/7/2019 Date Completed: 23/7/2019 Notes: Opinions and Interpretations are outside the UKAS Accreditation
* Denotes test not included in laboratory scope of accreditation $ Denotes test carried out by approved contractor
Hole Sample Sample Top Base
Number Number Type Depth Depth m m
TP301 2 Bulk 0.00 0.45 MADE GROUND brown sandy silty gravel with many cobbles.TP304 2 Bulk 1.00 1.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP305 2 Bulk 0.15 0.65 Brown clayey very silty SAND.TP308 Dist 0.00 0.50 Brown silty SAND.TP309 2 Bulk 0.50 1.00 Brown slightly gravelly very silty SAND.TP312 Dist 2.20 2.70 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP314 Dist 0.00 0.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP315 2 Bulk 0.00 0.50 Greyish brown silty SAND.TP317 Dist 0.05 0.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.TP319 2 Bulk 1.50 2.00 Brown slightly gravelly very silty SAND.TP320 Dist 0.00 0.50 Greyish brown very silty SAND.
Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4043 4671
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
Description of Sample
Airfields
(BS1377 : PART 2 : 1990)
Moisture Linear Particle Liquid Plastic Plasticity PassingHole Sample Sample Top Base Content Shrinkage Density Limit Limit Index .425mm Remarks
Number Number Type Depth Depth % % Mg/m3 % % % %m m Clause 3.2 Clause 6.5 Clause 8.2 Clause 4.3/4 Clause 5.3 Clause 5.4
TP301 2 Bulk 0.00 0.45 8.5 2.55TP304 2 Bulk 1.00 1.50 21 2.50TP305 2 Bulk 0.15 0.65 23 2.50TP308 Dist 0.00 0.50 18TP309 2 Bulk 0.50 1.00 19 2.48TP312 Dist 2.20 2.70 22TP314 Dist 0.00 0.50 17TP315 2 Bulk 0.00 0.50 21 2.49TP317 Dist 0.05 0.50 14TP319 2 Bulk 1.50 2.00 12 2.52TP320 Dist 0.00 0.50 14
SYMBOLS : NP : Non Plastic * : Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Wet Sieved.
4043
Contract No:
SUMMARY OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTS
PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4671
Airfields
Hole Number: Top Depth (m):
Sample Number: Base Depth(m):
Sample Type:
BS Test Percentage 1 1 Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing 1 1 Fraction Percentage
125 100 1 175 69 1 1 Cobbles 3963 61 1 1 Gravel 40
37.5 57 1 1 Sand 1620 49 1 1 Silt/Clay 510 37 1 16.3 31
3.35 252 21
1.18 180.6 150.3 12
0.212 9 Remarks:0.15 8 See Summary of Soil Descriptions
0.063 5
4043 4671
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990
Wet Sieve, Clause 9.2
0.00
0.45
Contract No:
TP301
2
Bulk
PSL19/4133Client Ref:Airfields
0.00
2
0.00
6
0.02
0
0.06
3
0.15
0 0.
212
0.30
0
0.60
0
1.18
2.00
3.35
6.3
10.0
20.0
37.5
63
75
125
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Perc
enta
ge P
assi
ng.
Particle Size (mm).
TP301 0.00
2 0.45
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: Vibro
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.55 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043Client Ref
4671
12
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
8.5
43
8
Separate Samples
Non compliance with BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.88
Measured
1.74
1.76
1.78
1.80
1.82
1.84
1.86
1.88
1.90
8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
Hole Number: TP301 Top Depth (m): 0.00
Sample Number: 2 Base Depth (m): 0.45
Sample Type: Bulk
Moisture Content: 8.4 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 8.5 Sample Top 71.3Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.83 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 8.3 Sample Bottom 77.5Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.69 Swelling mm: 0.00
51
Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4043 4671
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST Non compliance with BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
C.B.R. Value %Final Moisture Content %
Airfields
Percentage retained on 20mm BS test sieve:
Initial Sample Conditions Sample Preparation
Compaction Conditions 2.5kg
Remarks : See Summary of Soil Descriptions.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Forc
e on
plu
nger
(kN
)
Penetration of Plunger (mm)
Top Bottom
Hole Number: Top Depth (m):
Sample Number: Base Depth(m):
Sample Type:
BS Test Percentage Particle Percentage Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing Diameter Passing Fraction Percentage
125 100 2 275 100 0.02 6 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 0
37.5 100 0.006 3 Sand 8020 100 2 2 Silt 1810 100 0.002 2 Clay 26.3 100
3.35 1002 100
1.18 1000.6 1000.3 100
0.212 83 Remarks:0.15 41 See Summary of Soil Descriptions
0.063 20
4043 4671
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990
Wet Sieve & Pipette Analysis, Clause 9.2 & 9.4
1.00
1.50
Contract No:
TP304
2
Bulk
PSL19/4133Client Ref:Airfields
0.00
2
0.00
6
0.02
0
0.06
3
0.15
0 0.
212
0.30
0
0.60
0
1.18
2.00
3.35
6.3
10.0
20.0
37.5
63
75
125
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Perc
enta
ge P
assi
ng.
Particle Size (mm).
TP304 1.00
2 1.50
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 2.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.5 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043Client Ref
4671
17
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
21
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.70
Measured
1.60
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
TP304 1.00
2 1.50
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 4.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.5 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
21
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.77
Measured
Client Ref4671
14
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
1.78
9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
Hole Number: TP304 Top Depth (m): 1.00
Sample Number: 2 Base Depth (m): 1.50
Sample Type: Bulk
Moisture Content: 21 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 21 Sample Top 20.8Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.96 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 21 Sample Bottom 20.1Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.61 Swelling mm: 0.00
0
Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4043 4671
Percentage retained on 20mm BS test sieve:
Initial Sample Conditions Sample Preparation
Compaction Conditions 2.5kg
Remarks : See Summary of Soil Descriptions.
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
C.B.R. Value %Final Moisture Content %
Airfields
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Forc
e on
plu
nger
(kN
)
Penetration of Plunger (mm)
Top Bottom
Hole Number: Top Depth (m):
Sample Number: Base Depth(m):
Sample Type:
BS Test Percentage Particle Percentage Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing Diameter Passing Fraction Percentage
125 100 2 275 100 0.02 15 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 0
37.5 100 0.006 8 Sand 6720 100 2 2 Silt 2810 100 0.002 5 Clay 56.3 100
3.35 1002 100
1.18 990.6 970.3 93
0.212 91 Remarks:0.15 86 See Summary of Soil Descriptions
0.063 33
4043 4671
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990
Wet Sieve & Pipette Analysis, Clause 9.2 & 9.4
0.15
0.65
Contract No:
TP305
2
Bulk
PSL19/4133Client Ref:Airfields
0.00
2
0.00
6
0.02
0
0.06
3
0.15
0 0.
212
0.30
0
0.60
0
1.18
2.00
3.35
6.3
10.0
20.0
37.5
63
75
125
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Perc
enta
ge P
assi
ng.
Particle Size (mm).
TP305 0.15
2 0.65
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 2.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.5 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
23
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.75
Measured
Client Ref4671
14
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
TP305 0.15
2 0.65
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 4.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.5 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
23
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.82
Measured
Client Ref4671
12
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
1.78
1.80
1.82
1.84
8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
Hole Number: TP305 Top Depth (m): 0.15
Sample Number: 2 Base Depth (m): 0.65
Sample Type: Bulk
Moisture Content: 22 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 22 Sample Top 1.6Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.95 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 23 Sample Bottom 2.5Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.60 Swelling mm: 0.00
0
Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4043 4671
Percentage retained on 20mm BS test sieve:
Initial Sample Conditions Sample Preparation
Compaction Conditions 2.5kg
Remarks : See Summary of Soil Descriptions.
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
C.B.R. Value %Final Moisture Content %
Airfields
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Forc
e on
plu
nger
(kN
)
Penetration of Plunger (mm)
Top Bottom
Hole Number: Top Depth (m):
Sample Number: Base Depth(m):
Sample Type:
BS Test Percentage Particle Percentage Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing Diameter Passing Fraction Percentage
125 100 2 275 100 0.02 10 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 1
37.5 100 0.006 4 Sand 7520 100 2 2 Silt 2210 100 0.002 2 Clay 26.3 100
3.35 992 99
1.18 980.6 970.3 95
0.212 94 Remarks:0.15 88 See Summary of Soil Descriptions
0.063 24
4043 4671
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990
Wet Sieve & Pipette Analysis, Clause 9.2 & 9.4
0.50
1.00
Contract No:
TP309
2
Bulk
PSL19/4133Client Ref:Airfields
0.00
2
0.00
6
0.02
0
0.06
3
0.15
0 0.
212
0.30
0
0.60
0
1.18
2.00
3.35
6.3
10.0
20.0
37.5
63
75
125
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Perc
enta
ge P
assi
ng.
Particle Size (mm).
TP309 0.50
2 1.00
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 2.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.48 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
19
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.73
Measured
Client Ref4671
15
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
TP309 0.50
2 1.00
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 4.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.48 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043Client Ref
4671
13
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
19
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.79
Measured
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
1.78
1.80
8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
Hole Number: TP309 Top Depth (m): 0.50
Sample Number: 2 Base Depth (m): 1.00
Sample Type: Bulk
Moisture Content: 19 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 19 Sample Top 16.9Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.95 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 19 Sample Bottom 19.0Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.64 Swelling mm: 0.00
0
Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4043 4671
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
C.B.R. Value %Final Moisture Content %
Airfields
Percentage retained on 20mm BS test sieve:
Initial Sample Conditions Sample Preparation
Compaction Conditions 2.5kg
Remarks : See Summary of Soil Descriptions.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Forc
e on
plu
nger
(kN
)
Penetration of Plunger (mm)
Top Bottom
Hole Number: Top Depth (m):
Sample Number: Base Depth(m):
Sample Type:
BS Test Percentage 1 1 Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing 1 1 Fraction Percentage
125 100 1 175 100 1 1 Cobbles 063 100 1 1 Gravel 0
37.5 100 1 1 Sand 9220 100 1 1 Silt/Clay 810 100 1 16.3 100
3.35 1002 100
1.18 990.6 990.3 99
0.212 99 Remarks:0.15 95 See Summary of Soil Descriptions
0.063 8
4043 4671
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990
Wet Sieve, Clause 9.2
0.00
0.50
Contract No:
TP315
2
Bulk
PSL19/4133Client Ref:Airfields
0.00
2
0.00
6
0.02
0
0.06
3
0.15
0 0.
212
0.30
0
0.60
0
1.18
2.00
3.35
6.3
10.0
20.0
37.5
63
75
125
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Perc
enta
ge P
assi
ng.
Particle Size (mm).
TP315 0.00
2 0.50
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 2.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.49 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043Client Ref
4671
16
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
21
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.72
Measured
1.60
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
TP315 0.00
2 0.50
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 4.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.49 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043Client Ref
4671
14
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
21
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.78
Measured
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
1.78
8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
Hole Number: TP315 Top Depth (m): 0.00
Sample Number: 2 Base Depth (m): 0.50
Sample Type: Bulk
Moisture Content: 21 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 21 Sample Top 16.3Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.95 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 21 Sample Bottom 13.9Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.61 Swelling mm: 0.00
0
Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4043 4671
Percentage retained on 20mm BS test sieve:
Initial Sample Conditions Sample Preparation
Compaction Conditions 2.5kg
Remarks : See Summary of Soil Descriptions.
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
C.B.R. Value %Final Moisture Content %
Airfields
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Forc
e on
plu
nger
(kN
)
Penetration of Plunger (mm)
Top Bottom
Hole Number: Top Depth (m):
Sample Number: Base Depth(m):
Sample Type:
BS Test Percentage Particle Percentage Soil TotalSieve (mm) Passing Diameter Passing Fraction Percentage
125 100 2 275 100 0.02 8 Cobbles 063 100 2 2 Gravel 1
37.5 100 0.006 3 Sand 7920 100 2 2 Silt 1810 100 0.002 2 Clay 26.3 100
3.35 1002 99
1.18 990.6 980.3 98
0.212 98 Remarks:0.15 91 See Summary of Soil Descriptions
0.063 20
4043 4671
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TESTBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990
Wet Sieve & Pipette Analysis, Clause 9.2 & 9.4
1.50
2.00
Contract No:
TP319
2
Bulk
PSL19/4133Client Ref:Airfields
0.00
2
0.00
6
0.02
0
0.06
3
0.15
0 0.
212
0.30
0
0.60
0
1.18
2.00
3.35
6.3
10.0
20.0
37.5
63
75
125
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Perc
enta
ge P
assi
ng.
Particle Size (mm).
TP319 1.50
2 2.00
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 2.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.52 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
12
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.73
Measured
Client Ref4671
16
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
1.62
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
TP319 1.50
2 2.00
Bulk
Initial Moisture Content: Method of Compaction: 4.5kg
Particle Density (Mg/m3): 2.52 Material Retained on 37.5 mm Test Sieve (%):
Maximum Dry Density (Mg/m3): Material Retained on 20.0 mm Test Sieve (%):
Optimum Moisture Content (%):
Remarks
4043
DRY DENSITY / MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP
12
0
0
Separate Samples
BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
Hole Number:
Sample Type:
Top Depth (m) :
Sample Number: Base Depth (m) :
1.80
Measured
Client Ref4671
14
Contract
See summary of soil descriptions.
PSL19/4133Airfields
1.64
1.66
1.68
1.70
1.72
1.74
1.76
1.78
1.80
9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0
Dry
Den
sity
(Mg/
m3)
Moisture Content (%)
Sample
0 % Air voids
5 % Air voids
10 % Air voids
Hole Number: TP319 Top Depth (m): 1.50
Sample Number: 2 Base Depth (m): 2.00
Sample Type: Bulk
Moisture Content: 12 Surcharge Kg: 4.20 Sample Top 12 Sample Top 34.0Bulk Density Mg/m3: 1.85 Soaking Time hrs 0 Sample Bottom 12 Sample Bottom 35.0Dry Density Mg/m3: 1.66 Swelling mm: 0.00
0
Contract No:PSL19/4133Client Ref:
4043 4671
Percentage retained on 20mm BS test sieve:
Initial Sample Conditions Sample Preparation
Compaction Conditions 2.5kg
Remarks : See Summary of Soil Descriptions.
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST BS 1377 : Part 4 : 1990
C.B.R. Value %Final Moisture Content %
Airfields
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Forc
e on
plu
nger
(kN
)
Penetration of Plunger (mm)
Top Bottom
Certificate Number 22-Jul-19Client
Our Reference
Client Reference
Order No
Contract Title
Description
Date Received
Date Started
Date Completed
Test Procedures
Notes
Approved By
Adam Fenwick
Opinions and interpretations are outside the laboratory's scope of ISO 17025
accreditation. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation
requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results reported herein
relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be
reproduced except in full, without the prior written approval of the laboratory.
Contracts Manager
Airfields
7 Soil samples.
12-Jul-19
12-Jul-19
22-Jul-19
Identified by prefix DETSn (details on request).
Certificate of Analysis
19-13219
Professional Soils Laboratory Ltd
5/7 Hexthorpe Road
Hexthorpe
DN4 0AR
19-13219
PSL19/4133
(not supplied)
Derwentside Environmental Testing Services LimitedUnit 2, Park Road Industrial Estate South, Consett, Co Durham, DH8 5PY
Tel: 01207 582333 • email: [email protected] • www.dets.co.uk Page 1 of 4 .
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13219
Client Ref PSL19/4133
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No 1530766 1530767 1530768 1530769 1530770 1530771
Sample ID TP301 TP304 TP305 TP309 TP312 TP315
Depth 0.00-0.45 1.00-1.50 0.15-0.65 0.50-1.00 2.20-2.70 0.00-0.50
Other ID
Sample Type SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
Sampling Date n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 2008# 9.8 8.7 8.2 8.9 8.8 9.1
DETSC 2055 1 mg/l 12 11 13 10 9.5 21
DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l 190 29 20 28 22 13
DETSC 2320 0.01 % 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 < 0.01
pH
Chloride Aqueous Extract
Sulphate Aqueous Extract as SO4
Sulphur as S, Total
Inorganics
Page 2 of 4Key: # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13219
Client Ref PSL19/4133
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No
Sample ID
Depth
Other ID
Sample Type
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 2008#
DETSC 2055 1 mg/l
DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l
DETSC 2320 0.01 %
pH
Chloride Aqueous Extract
Sulphate Aqueous Extract as SO4
Sulphur as S, Total
Inorganics
1530772
TP319
1.50-2.00
SOIL
n/s
n/s
8.8
8.8
< 10
< 0.01
Page 3 of 4Key: # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Information in Support of the Analytical ResultsOur Ref 19-13219
Client Ref PSL19/4133Contract Airfields
Containers Received & Deviating Samples
Lab No Sample ID
Date
Sampled Containers Received Holding time exceeded for tests
Inappropriate
container for
tests1530766 TP301 0.00-0.45 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),
Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365
days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)
1530767 TP304 1.00-1.50 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),
Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365
days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)1530768 TP305 0.15-0.65 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),
Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365
days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)
1530769 TP309 0.50-1.00 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),
Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365
days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)
1530770 TP312 2.20-2.70 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),
Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365
days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)1530771 TP315 0.00-0.50 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),
Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365
days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)
1530772 TP319 1.50-2.00 SOIL PT 1L Sample date not supplied, Anions 2:1 (365 days),
Total Sulphur ICP (365 days), Metals ICP Prep (365
days), pH + Conductivity (7 days)
Soil Analysis NotesInorganic soil analysis was carried out on a dried sample, crushed to pass a 425µm sieve, in accordance with BS1377.
Organic soil analysis was carried out on an 'as received' sample. Organics results are corrected for moisture and expressed on a dry weight basis.
The Loss on Drying, used to express organics analysis on an air dried basis, is carried out at a temperature of 28°C +/-2°C.
DisposalFrom the issue date of this test certificate, samples will be held for the following times prior to disposal :-
Soils - 1 month, Liquids - 2 weeks, Asbestos (test portion) - 6 months
Key: P-Plastic T-Tub
DETS cannot be held responsible for the integrity of samples received whereby the laboratory did not undertake the sampling. In this instance samples received may
be deviating. Deviating Sample criteria are based on British and International standards and laboratory trials in conjunction with the UKAS note 'Guidance on
Deviating Samples'. All samples received are listed above. However, those samples that have additional comments in relation to hold time, inappropriate containers
etc are deviating due to the reasons stated. This means that the analysis is accredited where applicable, but results may be compromised due to sample deviations. If
no sampled date (soils) or date+time (waters) has been supplied then samples are deviating. However, if you are able to supply a sampled date (and time for waters)
this will prevent samples being reported as deviating where specific hold times are not exceeded and where the container supplied is suitable.
Page 4 of 4
The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7
4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
Appendix G Chemical Testing Resultsand HazWaste Classification
The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7
4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
The results of the chemical analysis have been assessed in accordance with CL:AIRE (ContaminatedLand: Applications in Real Environments) ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with aCritical Concentration’ published by the CIEH, May 2008.
This guidance provides a statistical approach to objectively evaluate the evidence for and againstparticular propositions/hypothesis and has the useful attribute of enabling decision makers to reachconclusions about the available evidence, with at least some understanding of the validity of theresults.
The guidance approaches this in the context of assessing the results from two different perspectives,the Planning Scenario and Part 2A.
When assessing in terms of the Planning Scenario, the key question would be ‘can we confidentlysay that the level of contamination on this land is low relative to some appropriate measure of risk?’Under Part 2A, the question would be ‘can we confidently say that the level of contamination is highrelative to some appropriate measure of risk?’
These questions are addressed through the use of formal hypothesis – the “Null Hypothesis” and the“Alternative Hypothesis”.
This assessment will be carried out in accordance with the Planning Scenario, where the aim is todemonstrate ‘suitability for use’. The Null Hypothesis is that the level of contamination is the same as,or higher than the critical concentration/GAC. The Alternative Hypothesis is that the level ofcontamination is lower than the critical concentration/GAC. Under Part 2A the opposite set ofpropositions are applicable.
By convention, the Null Hypothesis is the starting proposition against which the key question, asexpressed by the Alternative Hypothesis, can be tested.
The assessment of the results relies on there being a normal distribution of results for a particularcontaminant and that the data set under consideration is representative of the particular materialwhich is being assessed. If more than one dataset is present, then the hypothesis should be appliedindividually for each data set.
Under the Planning Scenario, the statistical test is used to demonstrate that there is a 95% probabilitythat the true population mean falls below the critical concentration/GAC.
Appropriate data sets must be created to enable the statistical testing to be carried out and threekey elements must be considered prior to statistical analysis. These are as follows:
Dealing with non-detects; Understanding the statistical distribution of data; and Dealing with outliers.
The results can then be assessed, and the results will be compared against the following:
Sample Mean – if the sample mean of the data set is in excess of the GAC then the UpperConfidence Limit of the true population mean will be higher than the critical concentration.
95% of the Upper Confidence Limit. One Sample T Test (parametric test) carried out at the 95% confidence level.
On the basis of these tests, the validity of the Null Hypothesis can be assessed.
Certificate Number 16-Jul-19Client
Our Reference
Client Reference
Order No
Contract Title
Description
Date Received
Date Started
Date Completed
Test Procedures
Notes
Approved By
Adam Fenwick
Opinions and interpretations are outside the laboratory's scope of ISO 17025
accreditation. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation
requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results reported herein
relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be
reproduced except in full, without the prior written approval of the laboratory.
Contracts Manager
Airfields
17 Soil samples, 4 Leachate samples.
10-Jul-19
10-Jul-19
16-Jul-19
Identified by prefix DETSn (details on request).
Certificate of Analysis
19-13052
JPG (Leeds) LTD
Civil & Structural Engineers
5 John Charles Way
Leeds
LS12 6QA
19-13052
4671
(not supplied)
Derwentside Environmental Testing Services LimitedUnit 2, Park Road Industrial Estate South, Consett, Co Durham, DH8 5PY
Tel: 01207 582333 • email: [email protected] • www.dets.co.uk Page 1 of 10 .
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No 1529398 1529399 1529400 1529401 1529402 1529403
Sample ID TP301 TP302 TP303 TP303 TP304 TP305
Depth 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.20 0.00-0.20 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.25 0.00-0.15
Other ID
Sample Type SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
Sampling Date 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19
Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg 5.7 11 11 13 9.9
DETSC 2301# 0.1 mg/kg 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5
DETSC 2301# 0.15 mg/kg 9.6 17 15 19 15
DETSC 2204* 1 mg/kg < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg 11 13 12 13 13
DETSC 2301# 0.3 mg/kg 250 91 80 100 78
DETSC 2325# 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 0.06 0.06 < 0.05 < 0.05
DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg 7.2 15 10 18 12
DETSC 2301# 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg 64 130 140 110 140
DETSC 2008# 10.9 7.8 8.1 8.6 8.1 7.4
DETSC 2130# 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1
DETSC 2002# 0.1 % 0.4 3.6 5.7 2.0 6.2
DETSC 2055 1 mg/kg 29.0 3.6 16.9 7.8 14.2
DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l 95 20 23 16 14 31
DETSC 2024* 10 mg/kg < 10 < 10 < 10 16 < 10
DETSC 2321# 100 mg/kg 1550 362 738 252 823
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01
DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg < 1.5
DETSC 3072# 1.2 mg/kg < 1.2
DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg < 1.5
DETSC 3072# 3.4 mg/kg < 3.4
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg < 10
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg < 0.01
DETSC 3072# 0.9 mg/kg < 0.9
DETSC 3072# 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5
DETSC 3072# 0.6 mg/kg < 0.6
DETSC 3072# 1.4 mg/kg < 1.4
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg < 10
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg < 10
DETSC 3311# 10 mg/kg < 10
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
Metals
Inorganics
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
PAHs
Aromatic C16-C21
Aromatic C21-C35
Aromatic C5-C35
TPH Ali/Aro Total
EPH (C10-C40)
Naphthalene
Aliphatic C5-C35
Aromatic C5-C7
Aromatic C7-C8
Aromatic C8-C10
Aromatic C10-C12
Aromatic C12-C16
Aliphatic C6-C8
Aliphatic C8-C10
Aliphatic C10-C12
Aliphatic C12-C16
Aliphatic C16-C21
Aliphatic C21-C35
Organic matter
Chloride
Sulphate Aqueous Extract as SO4
Sulphide
Sulphate as SO4, Total
Aliphatic C5-C6
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
pH
Cyanide, Free
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Chromium, Hexavalent
Copper
Lead
Page 2 of 10Key: * -not accredited. # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No 1529398 1529399 1529400 1529401 1529402 1529403
Sample ID TP301 TP302 TP303 TP303 TP304 TP305
Depth 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.20 0.00-0.20 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.25 0.00-0.15
Other ID
Sample Type SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
Sampling Date 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19
Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.07 0.31 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.11
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg 0.03 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.31 0.70 0.03 0.03 0.20
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.38 0.54 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.18
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.26 0.34 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.09
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg 0.31 0.32 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.56 0.36 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.11
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.21 0.11 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.04
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.46 0.23 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.10
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.25 0.10 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.07 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg 0.33 0.10 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06
DETSC 3303 0.1 mg/kg 3.3 3.2 < 0.10 < 0.10 1.1
DETSC 2130# 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
PAH - USEPA 16, Total
Phenol - Monohydric
Phenols
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Page 3 of 10Key: * -not accredited. # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No
Sample ID
Depth
Other ID
Sample Type
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.1 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.15 mg/kg
DETSC 2204* 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.3 mg/kg
DETSC 2325# 0.05 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.5 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2008#
DETSC 2130# 0.1 mg/kg
DETSC 2002# 0.1 %
DETSC 2055 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l
DETSC 2024* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 2321# 100 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.2 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 3.4 mg/kg
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 0.9 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 0.5 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 0.6 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.4 mg/kg
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3311# 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
Metals
Inorganics
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
PAHs
Aromatic C16-C21
Aromatic C21-C35
Aromatic C5-C35
TPH Ali/Aro Total
EPH (C10-C40)
Naphthalene
Aliphatic C5-C35
Aromatic C5-C7
Aromatic C7-C8
Aromatic C8-C10
Aromatic C10-C12
Aromatic C12-C16
Aliphatic C6-C8
Aliphatic C8-C10
Aliphatic C10-C12
Aliphatic C12-C16
Aliphatic C16-C21
Aliphatic C21-C35
Organic matter
Chloride
Sulphate Aqueous Extract as SO4
Sulphide
Sulphate as SO4, Total
Aliphatic C5-C6
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
pH
Cyanide, Free
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Chromium, Hexavalent
Copper
Lead
1529404 1529405 1529406 1529407 1529408 1529409
TP306 TP308 TP310 TP311 TP312 TP313
0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19
n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
6.4 6.5 5.1 4.4 4.4 5.4
0.3 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
10 14 8.0 8.8 6.5 9.2
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
7.2 6.9 3.9 5.9 4.4 4.6
45 34 16 19 14 26
< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
9.3 13 6.8 7.7 5.9 8.9
< 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
64 50 29 31 27 33
9.9 8.5 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.6
< 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
1.3 1.0 0.6 < 0.1 0.7 0.3
9.0 6.3 5.2 5.4 8.2 4.4
56 22 11 < 10 11 11
12 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10
265 140 < 100 200 300 300
< 10
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
Page 4 of 10Key: * -not accredited. # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No
Sample ID
Depth
Other ID
Sample Type
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.1 mg/kg
DETSC 2130# 0.3 mg/kg
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
PAH - USEPA 16, Total
Phenol - Monohydric
Phenols
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
1529404 1529405 1529406 1529407 1529408 1529409
TP306 TP308 TP310 TP311 TP312 TP313
0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.50-1.00 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
03/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19 04/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19
n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
0.12 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08 < 0.03
0.06 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
0.23 0.06 0.04 < 0.03 0.15 < 0.03
0.20 0.06 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.13 < 0.03
0.10 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.07 < 0.03
0.08 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06 < 0.03
0.10 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.09 < 0.03
0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03 < 0.03
0.07 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08 < 0.03
0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.04 < 0.03
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.04 < 0.03
1.1 0.19 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.78 < 0.10
< 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
Page 5 of 10Key: * -not accredited. # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No
Sample ID
Depth
Other ID
Sample Type
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.1 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.15 mg/kg
DETSC 2204* 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.2 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.3 mg/kg
DETSC 2325# 0.05 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 0.5 mg/kg
DETSC 2301# 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2008#
DETSC 2130# 0.1 mg/kg
DETSC 2002# 0.1 %
DETSC 2055 1 mg/kg
DETSC 2076# 10 mg/l
DETSC 2024* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 2321# 100 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.2 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.5 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 3.4 mg/kg
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3321* 0.01 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 0.9 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 0.5 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 0.6 mg/kg
DETSC 3072# 1.4 mg/kg
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3072* 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3311# 10 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
Metals
Inorganics
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
PAHs
Aromatic C16-C21
Aromatic C21-C35
Aromatic C5-C35
TPH Ali/Aro Total
EPH (C10-C40)
Naphthalene
Aliphatic C5-C35
Aromatic C5-C7
Aromatic C7-C8
Aromatic C8-C10
Aromatic C10-C12
Aromatic C12-C16
Aliphatic C6-C8
Aliphatic C8-C10
Aliphatic C10-C12
Aliphatic C12-C16
Aliphatic C16-C21
Aliphatic C21-C35
Organic matter
Chloride
Sulphate Aqueous Extract as SO4
Sulphide
Sulphate as SO4, Total
Aliphatic C5-C6
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
pH
Cyanide, Free
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Chromium, Hexavalent
Copper
Lead
1529410 1529411 1529412 1529413 1529414
TP316 TP317 TP318 TP319 TP320
0.00-0.10 0.05-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19
n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
13 9.4 4.7 6.8 5.4
0.6 0.2 < 0.1 0.2 0.2
21 14 9.5 9.9 10
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
18 9.1 5.0 7.8 7.2
120 70 21 40 23
0.06 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
17 14 8.9 9.9 8.8
< 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
180 69 35 54 90
7.0 7.9 8.5 8.4 8.5
0.3 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
4.2 0.7 0.5 1.5 1.2
11.7 3.6 8.6 4.5 5.7
20 13 < 10 15 10
< 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10
308 142 < 100 160 < 100
< 10 < 10 < 10
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
Page 6 of 10Key: * -not accredited. # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No
Sample ID
Depth
Other ID
Sample Type
Sampling Date
Sampling Time
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303# 0.03 mg/kg
DETSC 3303 0.1 mg/kg
DETSC 2130# 0.3 mg/kg
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
PAH - USEPA 16, Total
Phenol - Monohydric
Phenols
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
1529410 1529411 1529412 1529413 1529414
TP316 TP317 TP318 TP319 TP320
0.00-0.10 0.05-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19 03/07/19
n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03 0.14
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03
0.13 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.08 0.25
0.12 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06 0.23
0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.05 0.12
0.07 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.03 0.11
0.09 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.05 0.15
0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.06
0.05 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.11
0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.07
< 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.07
0.66 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.29 1.3
< 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
Page 7 of 10Key: * -not accredited. # -MCERTS (accreditation only applies if report carries the MCERTS logo). n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Leachate SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No 1529415 1529416 1529417 1529418
Sample ID TP302 TP304 TP308 TP318
Depth 0.00-0.20 0.00-0.25 0.00-0.50 0.00-0.50
Other ID
Sample Type LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
Sampling Date 03/07/19 04/07/19 04/07/19 03/07/19
Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s n/s
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 1009* Y Y Y Y
DETSC 2306 0.16 ug/l 0.52 0.32 1.1 0.74
DETSC 2306 0.03 ug/l < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l 9.9 0.29 < 0.25 0.32
DETSC 2203 0.007 mg/l < 0.007 < 0.007 < 0.007 < 0.007
DETSC 2306 0.4 ug/l 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1
DETSC 2306 0.09 ug/l 5.3 0.45 0.42 0.71
DETSC 2306 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 2306 0.5 ug/l < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l < 0.25 0.92 0.47 < 0.25
DETSC 2306 1.3 ug/l 1.5 2.8 < 1.3 < 1.3
DETSC 2008 7.1 7.1 7.5 7.7
DETSC 2130 20 ug/l < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
DETSC 2055 0.1 mg/l 4.0 1.5 3.1 1.6
DETSC 3304 0.05 ug/l < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.2 ug/l < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20
DETSC 2130 100 ug/l < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
PAH Total
Phenol - Monohydric
Preparation
Metals
Inorganics
PAHs
Phenols
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Cyanide, Free
Sulphate as SO4
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Lead, Dissolved
Mercury, Dissolved
Nickel, Dissolved
Selenium, Dissolved
Zinc, Dissolved
pH
NRA Leachate Preparation
Arsenic, Dissolved
Cadmium, Dissolved
Chromium, Dissolved
Chromium, Hexavalent
Copper, Dissolved
Page 8 of 10Key: * -not accredited. n/s -not supplied.
Summary of Asbestos Analysis
Soil SamplesOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title Airfields
Lab No Sample ID Material Type Result Comment* Analyst1529398 TP301 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529399 TP302 0.00-0.20 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529400 TP303 0.00-0.20 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529402 TP304 0.00-0.25 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529403 TP305 0.00-0.15 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529404 TP306 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529405 TP308 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529406 TP310 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529407 TP311 0.50-1.00 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529408 TP312 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529409 TP313 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529410 TP316 0.00-0.10 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529411 TP317 0.05-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529412 TP318 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529413 TP319 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
1529414 TP320 0.00-0.50 SOIL NAD none Colin Patrick
Crocidolite = Blue Asbestos, Amosite = Brown Asbestos, Chrysotile = White Asbestos. Anthophyllite, Actinolite and Tremolite are other forms of Asbestos.
Samples are analysed by DETSC 1101 using polarised light microscopy in accordance with HSG248 and documented in-house methods. NAD = No Asbestos
Detected. Where a sample is NAD, the result is based on analysis of at least 2 sub-samples and should be taken to mean 'no asbestos detected in sample'. Key: * -
not included in laboratory scope of accreditation.
Page 9 of 10
Information in Support of the Analytical ResultsOur Ref 19-13052
Client Ref 4671Contract Airfields
Containers Received & Deviating Samples
Lab No Sample ID
Date
Sampled Containers Received
Holding time
exceeded for
tests
Inappropriate
container for
tests1529398 TP301 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529399 TP302 0.00-0.20 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529400 TP303 0.00-0.20 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529401 TP303 0.50-1.00 SOIL 03/07/19 PT 1L
1529402 TP304 0.00-0.25 SOIL 04/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529403 TP305 0.00-0.15 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529404 TP306 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529405 TP308 0.00-0.50 SOIL 04/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529406 TP310 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529407 TP311 0.50-1.00 SOIL 04/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529408 TP312 0.00-0.50 SOIL 04/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529409 TP313 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529410 TP316 0.00-0.10 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529411 TP317 0.05-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529412 TP318 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529413 TP319 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529414 TP320 0.00-0.50 SOIL 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529415 TP302 0.00-0.20 LEACHATE 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529416 TP304 0.00-0.25 LEACHATE 04/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529417 TP308 0.00-0.50 LEACHATE 04/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
1529418 TP318 0.00-0.50 LEACHATE 03/07/19 GJ 250ml, GJ 60ml, PT 1L
Soil Analysis NotesInorganic soil analysis was carried out on a dried sample, crushed to pass a 425µm sieve, in accordance with BS1377.
Organic soil analysis was carried out on an 'as received' sample. Organics results are corrected for moisture and expressed on a dry weight basis.
The Loss on Drying, used to express organics analysis on an air dried basis, is carried out at a temperature of 28°C +/-2°C.
DisposalFrom the issue date of this test certificate, samples will be held for the following times prior to disposal :-
Soils - 1 month, Liquids - 2 weeks, Asbestos (test portion) - 6 months
Key: G-Glass P-Plastic J-Jar T-Tub
DETS cannot be held responsible for the integrity of samples received whereby the laboratory did not undertake the sampling. In this instance samples received may
be deviating. Deviating Sample criteria are based on British and International standards and laboratory trials in conjunction with the UKAS note 'Guidance on
Deviating Samples'. All samples received are listed above. However, those samples that have additional comments in relation to hold time, inappropriate containers
etc are deviating due to the reasons stated. This means that the analysis is accredited where applicable, but results may be compromised due to sample deviations. If
no sampled date (soils) or date+time (waters) has been supplied then samples are deviating. However, if you are able to supply a sampled date (and time for waters)
this will prevent samples being reported as deviating where specific hold times are not exceeded and where the container supplied is suitable.
Page 10 of 10
Certificate Number 21-Aug-19Client
Our Reference
Client Reference
Order No
Contract Title
Description
Date Received
Date Started
Date Completed
Test Procedures
Notes
Approved By
Adam Fenwick
Opinions and interpretations are outside the laboratory's scope of ISO 17025
accreditation. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation
requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results reported herein
relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be
reproduced except in full, without the prior written approval of the laboratory.
Contracts Manager
Identified by prefix DETSn (details on request).
The Airfields, Deeside
3 Water samples.
01-Aug-19
01-Aug-19
21-Aug-19
This report supersedes 19-14617-2, amendments.
Certificate of Analysis
19-14617-3
JPG (Leeds) LTD
Civil & Structural Engineers
5 John Charles Way
Leeds
LS12 6QA
19-14617-3
4671
(not supplied)
Derwentside Environmental Testing Services LimitedUnit 2, Park Road Industrial Estate South, Consett, Co Durham, DH8 5PY
Tel: 01207 582333 • email: [email protected] • www.dets.co.uk Page 1 of 3 .
Summary of Chemical Analysis
Water SamplesOur Ref 19-14617-3
Client Ref 4671
Contract Title The Airfields, Deeside
Lab No 1540234 1540235 1540236
Sample ID BH301 BH304 BH308
Depth
Other ID
Sample Type WATER WATER WATER
Sampling Date 30/07/19 30/07/19 30/07/19
Sampling Time n/s n/s n/s
Test Method LOD Units
DETSC 2306 0.16 ug/l 5.3 1.4 0.67
DETSC 2306 0.03 ug/l < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03
DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l < 0.25 < 0.25 0.40
DETSC 2306 0.4 ug/l < 0.4 1.7 1.4
DETSC 2306 0.09 ug/l 0.32 0.31 0.15
DETSC 2306 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 2306 0.5 ug/l 1.9 3.3 0.8
DETSC 2306 0.25 ug/l < 0.25 0.48 0.73
DETSC 2306 1.3 ug/l 3.8 7.4 2.6
DETSC 2008 pH 7.1 7.4 7.6
DETSC 2130 20 ug/l < 20 < 20 < 20
DETSC 2055 0.1 mg/l 33 15 24
DETSC 3304 0.05 ug/l < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.01 ug/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
DETSC 3304 0.2 ug/l < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20
DETSC 3451* 0.5 ug/l < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
Metals
Inorganics
PAHs
Phenols
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
PAH Total
Phenol
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Sulphate as SO4
Naphthalene
Selenium, Dissolved
Zinc, Dissolved
pH
Cyanide, Free
Copper, Dissolved
Lead, Dissolved
Mercury, Dissolved
Nickel, Dissolved
Arsenic, Dissolved
Cadmium, Dissolved
Chromium, Dissolved
Page 2 of 3Key: * -not accredited. n/s -not supplied.
Information in Support of the Analytical ResultsOur Ref 19-14617-3
Client Ref 4671Contract The Airfields, Deeside
Containers Received & Deviating Samples
Lab No Sample ID
Date
Sampled Containers Received Holding time exceeded for tests
Inappropriate
container for
tests1540234 BH301 WATER 30/07/19 GB 1L, GV, PB 1L pH/Cond/TDS (1 days)
1540235 BH304 WATER 30/07/19 GB 1L, GV, PB 1L pH/Cond/TDS (1 days)
1540236 BH308 WATER 30/07/19 GB 1L, GV, PB 1L pH/Cond/TDS (1 days)
DisposalFrom the issue date of this test certificate, samples will be held for the following times prior to disposal :-
Soils - 1 month, Liquids - 2 weeks, Asbestos (test portion) - 6 months
Key: G-Glass P-Plastic B-Bottle V-Vial
DETS cannot be held responsible for the integrity of samples received whereby the laboratory did not undertake the sampling. In this instance samples received may
be deviating. Deviating Sample criteria are based on British and International standards and laboratory trials in conjunction with the UKAS note 'Guidance on
Deviating Samples'. All samples received are listed above. However, those samples that have additional comments in relation to hold time, inappropriate containers
etc are deviating due to the reasons stated. This means that the analysis is accredited where applicable, but results may be compromised due to sample deviations. If
no sampled date (soils) or date+time (waters) has been supplied then samples are deviating. However, if you are able to supply a sampled date (and time for waters)
this will prevent samples being reported as deviating where specific hold times are not exceeded and where the container supplied is suitable.
Page 3 of 3
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 1 of 38
Waste Classification Report
N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V
Job name
4671 The Airfields Deeside H6&H7
Description/Comments
4671 The Airfields Deeside H6&H7
Project
4671
Site
The Airfields Deeside H6&H7
Related Documents# Name Description
None
Waste Stream Template
JPG WASTE STREAM V20
Classified by
Name:Dominic HorneDate:23 Jul 2019 13:30 GMTTelephone:07814008742
Company:JPG Leeds5 John Charles WayLeedsLS12 6QA
Report
Created by: Dominic HorneCreated date: 23 Jul 2019 13:30 GMT
Job summary# Sample Name Depth [m] Classification Result Hazard properties Page1 TP301 Non Hazardous 3
2 TP302 Non Hazardous 5
3 TP303 Non Hazardous 7
4 TP303[2] Non Hazardous 9
5 TP304 Non Hazardous 10
6 TP305 Non Hazardous 12
7 TP306 Non Hazardous 14
8 TP308 Non Hazardous 16
9 TP310 Non Hazardous 18
10 TP311 Non Hazardous 20
11 TP312 Non Hazardous 22
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 2 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
# Sample Name Depth [m] Classification Result Hazard properties Page12 TP313 Non Hazardous 24
13 TP316 Non Hazardous 26
14 TP317 Non Hazardous 28
15 TP318 Non Hazardous 30
16 TP319 Non Hazardous 32
17 TP320 Non Hazardous 34
Appendices PageAppendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands 36Appendix B: Rationale for selection of metal species 37Appendix C: Version 38
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 3 of 38
Classification of sample: TP301
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP301
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
5.7 mg/kg 1.32 7.526 mg/kg 0.000753 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.3 mg/kg 1.142 0.343 mg/kg 0.0000343 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 9.6 mg/kg 1.462 14.031 mg/kg 0.0014 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
11 mg/kg 1.126 12.385 mg/kg 0.00124 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 250 mg/kg 1.56 389.954 mg/kg 0.025 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
7.2 mg/kg 2.976 21.429 mg/kg 0.00214 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
64 mg/kg 2.774 177.545 mg/kg 0.0178 %024-007-00-3
11TPH (C6 to C40) petroleum group
<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH
12pH
10.9 pH 10.9 pH 10.9 pH PH
13
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 4 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
15acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
16acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
17fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
18phenanthrene
0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
19anthracene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 204-371-1 120-12-7
20fluoranthene
0.31 mg/kg 0.31 mg/kg 0.000031 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
21pyrene
0.38 mg/kg 0.38 mg/kg 0.000038 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
22benzo[a]anthracene
0.26 mg/kg 0.26 mg/kg 0.000026 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
23chrysene
0.31 mg/kg 0.31 mg/kg 0.000031 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
24benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.56 mg/kg 0.56 mg/kg 0.000056 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
25benzo[k]fluoranthene
0.21 mg/kg 0.21 mg/kg 0.000021 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
26benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
0.46 mg/kg 0.46 mg/kg 0.000046 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
27indeno[123-cd]pyrene
0.25 mg/kg 0.25 mg/kg 0.000025 % 205-893-2 193-39-5
28dibenz[a,h]anthracene
0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
29benzo[ghi]perylene
0.33 mg/kg 0.33 mg/kg 0.000033 % 205-883-8 191-24-2
30phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.05 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 5 of 38
Classification of sample: TP302
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP302
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
11 mg/kg 1.32 14.524 mg/kg 0.00145 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.4 mg/kg 1.142 0.457 mg/kg 0.0000457 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 17 mg/kg 1.462 24.846 mg/kg 0.00248 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
13 mg/kg 1.126 14.637 mg/kg 0.00146 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 91 mg/kg 1.56 141.943 mg/kg 0.0091 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } 0.06 mg/kg 1.16 0.0696 mg/kg 0.00000696 % 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
15 mg/kg 2.976 44.644 mg/kg 0.00446 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
130 mg/kg 2.774 360.639 mg/kg 0.0361 %024-007-00-3
11pH
7.8 pH 7.8 pH 7.8 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
0.1 mg/kg 1.884 0.188 mg/kg 0.0000188 %
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 6 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
0.31 mg/kg 0.31 mg/kg 0.000031 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.7 mg/kg 0.7 mg/kg 0.00007 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.54 mg/kg 0.54 mg/kg 0.000054 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.34 mg/kg 0.34 mg/kg 0.000034 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
0.32 mg/kg 0.32 mg/kg 0.000032 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.36 mg/kg 0.36 mg/kg 0.000036 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
0.23 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 % 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 % 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0558 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 7 of 38
Classification of sample: TP303
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP303
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
11 mg/kg 1.32 14.524 mg/kg 0.00145 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.5 mg/kg 1.142 0.571 mg/kg 0.0000571 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 15 mg/kg 1.462 21.923 mg/kg 0.00219 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
12 mg/kg 1.126 13.511 mg/kg 0.00135 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 80 mg/kg 1.56 124.785 mg/kg 0.008 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } 0.06 mg/kg 1.16 0.0696 mg/kg 0.00000696 % 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
10 mg/kg 2.976 29.763 mg/kg 0.00298 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
140 mg/kg 2.774 388.381 mg/kg 0.0388 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.1 pH 8.1 pH 8.1 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
0.2 mg/kg 1.884 0.377 mg/kg 0.0000377 %
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 8 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0553 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 9 of 38
Classification of sample: TP303[2]
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP303[2]
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1pH
8.6 pH 8.6 pH 8.6 pH PH
Total: 0%
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 10 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP304
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP304
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
13 mg/kg 1.32 17.164 mg/kg 0.00172 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.4 mg/kg 1.142 0.457 mg/kg 0.0000457 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 19 mg/kg 1.462 27.77 mg/kg 0.00278 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
13 mg/kg 1.126 14.637 mg/kg 0.00146 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 100 mg/kg 1.56 155.982 mg/kg 0.01 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
18 mg/kg 2.976 53.573 mg/kg 0.00536 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
110 mg/kg 2.774 305.156 mg/kg 0.0305 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.1 pH 8.1 pH 8.1 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 11 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0523 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 12 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP305
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP305
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
9.9 mg/kg 1.32 13.071 mg/kg 0.00131 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.5 mg/kg 1.142 0.571 mg/kg 0.0000571 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 15 mg/kg 1.462 21.923 mg/kg 0.00219 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
13 mg/kg 1.126 14.637 mg/kg 0.00146 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 78 mg/kg 1.56 121.666 mg/kg 0.0078 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
12 mg/kg 2.976 35.715 mg/kg 0.00357 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
140 mg/kg 2.774 388.381 mg/kg 0.0388 %024-007-00-3
11pH
7.4 pH 7.4 pH 7.4 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 13 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.2 mg/kg 0.2 mg/kg 0.00002 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.18 mg/kg 0.18 mg/kg 0.000018 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.09 mg/kg 0.09 mg/kg 0.000009 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0557 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 14 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP306
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP306
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
6.4 mg/kg 1.32 8.45 mg/kg 0.000845 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.3 mg/kg 1.142 0.343 mg/kg 0.0000343 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 10 mg/kg 1.462 14.616 mg/kg 0.00146 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
7.2 mg/kg 1.126 8.106 mg/kg 0.000811 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 45 mg/kg 1.56 70.192 mg/kg 0.0045 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
9.3 mg/kg 2.976 27.679 mg/kg 0.00277 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
64 mg/kg 2.774 177.545 mg/kg 0.0178 %024-007-00-3
11pH
9.9 pH 9.9 pH 9.9 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 15 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
0.12 mg/kg 0.12 mg/kg 0.000012 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.23 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.2 mg/kg 0.2 mg/kg 0.00002 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg 0.00001 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0287 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 16 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP308
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP308
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
6.5 mg/kg 1.32 8.582 mg/kg 0.000858 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.1 mg/kg 1.142 0.114 mg/kg 0.0000114 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 14 mg/kg 1.462 20.462 mg/kg 0.00205 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
6.9 mg/kg 1.126 7.769 mg/kg 0.000777 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 34 mg/kg 1.56 53.034 mg/kg 0.0034 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
13 mg/kg 2.976 38.691 mg/kg 0.00387 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
50 mg/kg 2.774 138.707 mg/kg 0.0139 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.5 pH 8.5 pH 8.5 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 17 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0253 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 18 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP310
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP310
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
5.1 mg/kg 1.32 6.734 mg/kg 0.000673 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 8 mg/kg 1.462 11.692 mg/kg 0.00117 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
3.9 mg/kg 1.126 4.391 mg/kg 0.000439 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 16 mg/kg 1.56 24.957 mg/kg 0.0016 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
6.8 mg/kg 2.976 20.239 mg/kg 0.00202 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
29 mg/kg 2.774 80.45 mg/kg 0.00805 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.9 pH 8.9 pH 8.9 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 19 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0144 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 20 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP311
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP311
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
4.4 mg/kg 1.32 5.809 mg/kg 0.000581 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 8.8 mg/kg 1.462 12.862 mg/kg 0.00129 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
5.9 mg/kg 1.126 6.643 mg/kg 0.000664 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 19 mg/kg 1.56 29.636 mg/kg 0.0019 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
7.7 mg/kg 2.976 22.917 mg/kg 0.00229 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
31 mg/kg 2.774 85.999 mg/kg 0.0086 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.8 pH 8.8 pH 8.8 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 21 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0158 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 22 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP312
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP312
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
4.4 mg/kg 1.32 5.809 mg/kg 0.000581 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 6.5 mg/kg 1.462 9.5 mg/kg 0.00095 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
4.4 mg/kg 1.126 4.954 mg/kg 0.000495 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 14 mg/kg 1.56 21.837 mg/kg 0.0014 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
5.9 mg/kg 2.976 17.56 mg/kg 0.00176 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
27 mg/kg 2.774 74.902 mg/kg 0.00749 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.8 pH 8.8 pH 8.8 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 23 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.15 mg/kg 0.15 mg/kg 0.000015 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.13 mg/kg 0.13 mg/kg 0.000013 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.09 mg/kg 0.09 mg/kg 0.000009 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
0.04 mg/kg 0.04 mg/kg 0.000004 % 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0132 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 24 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP313
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP313
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
5.4 mg/kg 1.32 7.13 mg/kg 0.000713 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 9.2 mg/kg 1.462 13.446 mg/kg 0.00134 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
4.6 mg/kg 1.126 5.179 mg/kg 0.000518 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 26 mg/kg 1.56 40.555 mg/kg 0.0026 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
8.9 mg/kg 2.976 26.489 mg/kg 0.00265 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
33 mg/kg 2.774 91.547 mg/kg 0.00915 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.6 pH 8.6 pH 8.6 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 25 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0174 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 26 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP316
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP316
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
13 mg/kg 1.32 17.164 mg/kg 0.00172 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.6 mg/kg 1.142 0.685 mg/kg 0.0000685 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 21 mg/kg 1.462 30.693 mg/kg 0.00307 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
18 mg/kg 1.126 20.266 mg/kg 0.00203 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 120 mg/kg 1.56 187.178 mg/kg 0.012 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } 0.06 mg/kg 1.16 0.0696 mg/kg 0.00000696 % 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
17 mg/kg 2.976 50.597 mg/kg 0.00506 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
180 mg/kg 2.774 499.346 mg/kg 0.0499 %024-007-00-3
11pH
7 pH 7 pH 7pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
0.3 mg/kg 1.884 0.565 mg/kg 0.0000565 %
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 27 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.13 mg/kg 0.13 mg/kg 0.000013 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.12 mg/kg 0.12 mg/kg 0.000012 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.09 mg/kg 0.09 mg/kg 0.000009 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0744 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 28 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP317
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP317
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
9.4 mg/kg 1.32 12.411 mg/kg 0.00124 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.228 mg/kg 0.0000228 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 14 mg/kg 1.462 20.462 mg/kg 0.00205 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
9.1 mg/kg 1.126 10.246 mg/kg 0.00102 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 70 mg/kg 1.56 109.187 mg/kg 0.007 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
14 mg/kg 2.976 41.668 mg/kg 0.00417 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
69 mg/kg 2.774 191.416 mg/kg 0.0191 %024-007-00-3
11pH
7.9 pH 7.9 pH 7.9 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 29 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0351 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 30 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP318
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP318
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
4.7 mg/kg 1.32 6.206 mg/kg 0.000621 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 9.5 mg/kg 1.462 13.885 mg/kg 0.00139 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
5 mg/kg 1.126 5.629 mg/kg 0.000563 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 21 mg/kg 1.56 32.756 mg/kg 0.0021 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
8.9 mg/kg 2.976 26.489 mg/kg 0.00265 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
35 mg/kg 2.774 97.095 mg/kg 0.00971 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.5 pH 8.5 pH 8.5 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 31 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0175 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 32 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP319
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP319
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
6.8 mg/kg 1.32 8.978 mg/kg 0.000898 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.228 mg/kg 0.0000228 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 9.9 mg/kg 1.462 14.469 mg/kg 0.00145 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
7.8 mg/kg 1.126 8.782 mg/kg 0.000878 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 40 mg/kg 1.56 62.393 mg/kg 0.004 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
9.9 mg/kg 2.976 29.465 mg/kg 0.00295 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
54 mg/kg 2.774 149.804 mg/kg 0.015 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.4 pH 8.4 pH 8.4 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 33 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.08 mg/kg 0.08 mg/kg 0.000008 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.05 mg/kg 0.05 mg/kg 0.000005 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0256 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 34 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Classification of sample: TP320
Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04
in the List of Waste
Sample details
Sample Name:TP320
LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil
from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05
03)
Hazard properties
None identified
Determinands
Moisture content: 0% No Moisture Correction applied (MC)
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }
5.4 mg/kg 1.32 7.13 mg/kg 0.000713 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3
2cadmium { cadmium oxide }
0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.228 mg/kg 0.0000228 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0
3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 10 mg/kg 1.462 14.616 mg/kg 0.00146 %
215-160-9 1308-38-9
4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <1 mg/kg 1.923 <1.923 mg/kg <0.000192 % <LOD
024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0
5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }
7.2 mg/kg 1.126 8.106 mg/kg 0.000811 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1
6lead { lead chromate }
1 23 mg/kg 1.56 35.876 mg/kg 0.0023 %082-004-00-2 231-846-0 7758-97-6
7 mercury { mercury(II) sulphide } <0.05 mg/kg 1.16 <0.058 mg/kg <0.0000058 % <LOD 215-696-3 1344-48-5
8nickel { nickel chromate }
8.8 mg/kg 2.976 26.191 mg/kg 0.00262 %028-035-00-7 238-766-5 14721-18-7
9
selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.5 mg/kg 2.554 <1.277 mg/kg <0.000128 % <LOD
034-002-00-8
10zinc { zinc chromate }
90 mg/kg 2.774 249.673 mg/kg 0.025 %024-007-00-3
11pH
8.5 pH 8.5 pH 8.5 pH PH
12
cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }
<0.1 mg/kg 1.884 <0.188 mg/kg <0.0000188 % <LOD
006-007-00-5
13naphthalene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 35 of 38
#Determinand
CLP
Not
e
User entered dataConv.Factor
Compound conc.Classification
value
MC
App
lied
Conc. NotUsed
CLP index number EC Number CAS Number
14acenaphthylene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8
15acenaphthene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9
16fluorene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7
17phenanthrene
0.14 mg/kg 0.14 mg/kg 0.000014 % 201-581-5 85-01-8
18anthracene
0.03 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.000003 % 204-371-1 120-12-7
19fluoranthene
0.25 mg/kg 0.25 mg/kg 0.000025 % 205-912-4 206-44-0
20pyrene
0.23 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 % 204-927-3 129-00-0
21benzo[a]anthracene
0.12 mg/kg 0.12 mg/kg 0.000012 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3
22chrysene
0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9
23benzo[b]fluoranthene
0.15 mg/kg 0.15 mg/kg 0.000015 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2
24benzo[k]fluoranthene
0.06 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.000006 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9
25benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene
0.11 mg/kg 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8
26indeno[123-cd]pyrene
0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 % 205-893-2 193-39-5
27dibenz[a,h]anthracene
<0.03 mg/kg <0.03 mg/kg <0.000003 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3
28benzo[ghi]perylene
0.07 mg/kg 0.07 mg/kg 0.000007 % 205-883-8 191-24-2
29phenol
<0.3 mg/kg <0.3 mg/kg <0.00003 % <LOD604-001-00-2 203-632-7 108-95-2
Total: 0.0334 %
KeyUser supplied data
Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason
Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)
Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration
<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 36 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
Appendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands
chromium(III) oxide (EC Number: 215-160-9, CAS Number: 1308-38-9)
Conversion factor: 1.462Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Repr. 1B H360FD , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Resp. Sens. 1 H334 ,Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 4 H302 , Acute Tox. 4 H332
mercury(II) sulphide (EC Number: 215-696-3, CAS Number: 1344-48-5)
Conversion factor: 1.16Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , STOT RE 2 H373 , Acute Tox. 2 H300 , Acute Tox. 1 H310 , AcuteTox. 3 H331
pH (CAS Number: PH)
Description/Comments: Appendix C4Data source: WM3 1st Edition 2015Data source date: 25 May 2015Hazard Statements: None.
salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides and mercuricoxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex
CLP index number: 006-007-00-5Description/Comments: Conversion factor based on a worst case compound: sodium cyanideData source: Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 - 1st Adaptation to Technical Progress for Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.(ATP1)Additional Hazard Statement(s): EUH032 >= 0.2 %Reason for additional Hazards Statement(s)/Risk Phrase(s):14 Dec 2015 - EUH032 >= 0.2 % hazard statement sourced from: WM3, Table C12.2
acenaphthylene (EC Number: 205-917-1, CAS Number: 208-96-8)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 1 H310 , Acute Tox. 1 H330 , Acute Tox. 4 H302
acenaphthene (EC Number: 201-469-6, CAS Number: 83-32-9)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 2 H411 , Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 ,Eye Irrit. 2 H319
fluorene (EC Number: 201-695-5, CAS Number: 86-73-7)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400
phenanthrene (EC Number: 201-581-5, CAS Number: 85-01-8)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Carc. 2 H351 , STOT SE 3H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 4 H302
anthracene (EC Number: 204-371-1, CAS Number: 120-12-7)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , EyeIrrit. 2 H319
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
www.hazwasteonline.com N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V Page 37 of 38
fluoranthene (EC Number: 205-912-4, CAS Number: 206-44-0)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 21 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Acute Tox. 4 H302
pyrene (EC Number: 204-927-3, CAS Number: 129-00-0)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 2014Data source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 21 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315
indeno[123-cd]pyrene (EC Number: 205-893-2, CAS Number: 193-39-5)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Carc. 2 H351
benzo[ghi]perylene (EC Number: 205-883-8, CAS Number: 191-24-2)
Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 28/02/2015Data source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 23 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400
TPH (C6 to C40) petroleum group (CAS Number: TPH)
Description/Comments: Hazard statements taken from WM3 1st Edition 2015; Risk phrases: WM2 3rd Edition 2013Data source: WM3 1st Edition 2015Data source date: 25 May 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 2 H411 , Repr. 2 H361d , Carc. 1B H350 , Muta. 1B H340 , STOT RE 2 H373 , Asp. Tox. 1 H304 ,Flam. Liq. 3 H226
Appendix B: Rationale for selection of metal species
arsenic {arsenic trioxide}
Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight and low solubility. Industrial sources include: flame retardants inelectrical apparatus, textiles and coatings.
cadmium {cadmium oxide}
Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight, very low solubility in water. Industrial sources include:electroplating baths, electrodes for storage batteries, catalysts, ceramic glazes, phosphors, pigments and nematocides.
chromium in chromium(III) compounds {chromium(III) oxide}
Reasonable case species based on hazard statements/molecular weight. Industrial sources include: tanning, pigment in paint, inks andglass.
chromium in chromium(VI) compounds {chromium(VI) oxide}
Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight. Industrial sources include: production stainless steel,electroplating, wood preservation, anti-corrosion agents or coatings, pigments
copper {dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide}
Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight and insolubility in water. Industrial sources include:oxidised copper metal, brake pads, pigments, antifouling paints, fungicide. (edit as required) Worse case copper sulphate is very solubleand likely to have been leached away if ever present and/or not enough soluble sulphate detected.
lead {lead chromate}
Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight.
mercury {mercury(II) sulphide}
Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight.
nickel {nickel chromate}
Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight.
selenium {selenium compounds with the exception of cadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex}
Harmonised group entry used as most reasonable case. Pigment cadmium sulphoselenide not likely to be present in this soil. Noevidence for the other CLP entries: sodium selenite, nickel II selenite and nickel selenide, to be present in this soil.
Report created by Dominic Horne on 23 Jul 2019
Page 38 of 38 N7MH3-KPAZ4-KA82V www.hazwasteonline.com
zinc {zinc chromate}
Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight.
cyanides {salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides andmercuric oxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex}
Harmonised group entry used as most reasonable case as complex cyanides and those specified elsewhere in the annex are not likelyto be present in this soil: [Note conversion factor based on a worst case compound: sodium cyanide]
Appendix C: Version
HazWasteOnline Classification Engine: WM3 1st Edition v1.1, May 2018HazWasteOnline Classification Engine Version: 2019.197.3909.7942 (16 Jul 2019)HazWasteOnline Database: 2019.197.3909.7942 (16 Jul 2019)
This classification utilises the following guidance and legislation:WM3 v1.1 - Waste Classification - 1st Edition v1.1 - May 2018CLP Regulation - Regulation 1272/2008/EC of 16 December 20081st ATP - Regulation 790/2009/EC of 10 August 20092nd ATP - Regulation 286/2011/EC of 10 March 20113rd ATP - Regulation 618/2012/EU of 10 July 20124th ATP - Regulation 487/2013/EU of 8 May 2013Correction to 1st ATP - Regulation 758/2013/EU of 7 August 20135th ATP - Regulation 944/2013/EU of 2 October 20136th ATP - Regulation 605/2014/EU of 5 June 2014WFD Annex III replacement - Regulation 1357/2014/EU of 18 December 2014Revised List of Wastes 2014 - Decision 2014/955/EU of 18 December 20147th ATP - Regulation 2015/1221/EU of 24 July 20158th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2016/918 of 19 May 20169th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2016/1179 of 19 July 201610th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2017/776 of 4 May 2017HP14 amendment - Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 201713th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2018/1480 of 4 October 2018POPs Regulation 2004 - Regulation 850/2004/EC of 29 April 20041st ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 756/2010/EU of 24 August 20102nd ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 757/2010/EU of 24 August 2010
The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7
4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
Appendix H Notes on Limitations
The AirfieldsDeesidePlots H6 & H7
4671 Praxis Real Estate Management Limited
GeneralJPG (Leeds) Limited have prepared this report solely for the use of the Client and those parties with whom a warrantyagreement has been executed, or with whom an assignment has been agreed. Should any third party wish to use orrely upon the contents of the report, written approval must be sought from JPG (Leeds) Limited; a charge may belevied against such approval.
JPG (Leeds) Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for:
a) the consequences of this document being used for any purpose or project other than for which it wascommissioned, and
b) this document to any third party with whom an agreement has not been executed.
Phase I Desk Study ReportsThe work undertaken to provide the basis of this report comprised a study of available documented information froma variety of sources (including the Client), together with (where appropriate) a brief walk over inspection of the siteand meetings and discussions with relevant authorities and other interested parties. The opinions given in this reporthave been dictated by the finite data on which they are based and are relevant only to the purpose for which thereport was commissioned. The information reviewed should not be considered exhaustive and has been accepted ingood faith as providing true and representative data pertaining to site conditions. Should additional informationbecome available which may affect the opinions expressed in this report, JPG (Leeds) Limited reserves the right toreview such information and, if warranted, to modify the opinions accordingly.
It should be noted that any risks identified in this report are perceived risks based on the information reviewed; actualrisks can only be assessed following a physical investigation of the site.
Phase II Geo-Environmental InvestigationsThe investigation of the site has been carried out to provide sufficient information concerning the type and degree ofcontamination, geotechnical characteristics and ground and groundwater conditions to allow a reasonableassessment of the environmental risks together with engineering and development implications. The objectives of theinvestigation have been limited to establishing the risks associated with potential human targets, building materials,the environment (including adjacent land), and to surface and groundwater.
The amount of exploratory work and chemical testing undertaken has necessarily been restricted by the shorttimescale available, and the locations of exploratory holes have been restricted to the areas unoccupied by thebuilding(s) on the site and by buried services. A more comprehensive investigation may be required if the site is to beredeveloped as, in addition to risk assessment, a number of important engineering and environmental issues mayneed to be resolved.
For these reasons if costs have been included in relation to site remediation these must be considered as tentativeonly and must, in any event, be confirmed by a qualified quantity surveyor.
The exploratory holes undertaken, which investigate only a small volume of the ground in relation to the size of the site,can only provide a general indication of site conditions. The opinions provided and recommendations given in thisreport are based on the ground conditions apparent at the site of each of the exploratory holes. There may beexceptional ground conditions elsewhere on the site which have not been disclosed by this investigation and whichhave therefore not been taken into account in this report.
The comments made on groundwater conditions are based on observations made at the time that site work wascarried out. It should be noted that groundwater levels will vary owing to seasonal, tidal and weather related effects.
The number of sampling points and the methods of sampling and testing do not preclude the existence of localised"hotspots" of contamination where concentrations may be significantly higher than those actually encountered.
The risk assessment and opinions provided, inter alia, take in to consideration currently available guidance valuesrelating to acceptable contamination concentrations; no liability can be accepted for the retrospective effects ofany future changes or amendments to these values.
The scope of the investigation was selected on the basis of the specific development proposed by the Client and maybe inappropriate to another form of development or scheme.
5 John Charles WayLEEDSLS12 6QA
Tel: 0113 263 [email protected]