Apple vs Android 10.12.02

8/8/2019 Apple vs Android 10.12.02

1/25

Appleversus

Android

The patentbattlefield

as of

02 Dec 10

The next 13pages show

how thisconflict hasescalated.Thereafter,referencematerial.

2010 by Florian Muellerhttp://fosspatents.blogspot.com

Twitter: @FOSSpatents

version 10.12.02.100

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

430

607

828

315

002

WDW

IWesternDistrict

ofWisconsin

4 3 6 12 6

6 12 12 3 18

34

6

12

6 8

4

12

12

3

3

3

560

509

456

3

6

6

3

6 6

NDI

L

18
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/http://twitter.com/FOSSpatentshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/http://twitter.com/FOSSpatentshttp://fosspatents.blogspot.com/


2/25

Apple

HTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

Move #1

02 Mar 10

AppleversusHTC

Move #1, part 2/2:Apple also sues HTC in the

US District Court for the District of Delawareover the alleged infringement of 10 other patents.



10 10

10 10

Move #1, part 1/2:Apple files an ITC complaint against HTC

over the alleged infringement of 10 patents.


3/25

Apple

HTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

183

957

800

505

Move #2

12 May 10

HTCversusApple

Move #2:HTC files an ITC complaint against Appleover the alleged infringement of 5 patents.

998



5

10 10

5

10 10


4/25

Apple

HTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

Move #3

21 Jun 10

AppleversusHTC:

amendedcomplaintplus newcomplaint

Move #3, part 2/2:...files a second Delaware complaint against HTC,which contains the '453 and '849 patents droppedfrom the first complaint as well as two new ones.

183

957

800

505

998



5

10 10 12

5

10 10 8

12

Move #3, part 1/2:Apple amends its original Delaware complaint against HTC,

which no longer contains the '453 and '849 patents, but... 4

3


5/25

Move #4

06 Jul 10

HTCversusApple

(again)

Apple

HTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

354

578

Move #4:As part of its defense against Apple's Delaware complaint,

HTC makes counterclaims including the alleged infringementof three of its patents by Apple.

183

957

800

505

998

032



53

10 12

35

10 8

12

4

3


6/25

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

Move #5

06 Oct 10

MotorolaversusApple

Move #5, part 1/3:Motorola files an ITC complaintagainst Apple over the alleged

infringement of 6 patents.

Move #5, part 3/3:Furthermore,Motorola filesa complaint

against Applein the Southern

District of Floridaover the alleged

infringementof 6 patents

it doesn't assert

against Appleanywhere else.

NDI

L

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032



5 3 6 12 6

10 12

35

10 8

12

6 6 6

12

12

Move #5, part 2/3:Motorola also files

complaintsagainst Apple

in the Northern

District of Illinoisover the alleged

infringementof the 6 patentsit also assertsagainst Apple

before the ITC,plus 6 more.

4

3


7/25

5 3 6 12 6

10 12 12

35

10 8

12

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

Move #6

08 Oct 10

MotorolaversusApple:

request fordeclaratoryjudgment

NDI

L

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032



12

12

6

12

6 6

4

3

Move #6:Two days after its three complaints alleging that Apple infringes

a total of 18 different Motorola patents, Motorola filesin the District of Delaware a request for declaratory judgment

that Motorola does not infringe 12 Apple patents(and that those patents be deemed invalid in the first place).Those 12 patents include the 10 patents asserted by Apple

against HTC before the ITC as well as 2 of the patentsover which Apple sues HTC in the District of Delaware.

With this pre-emptive move, Motorola effectively triggeredthe equivalent of being sued by Apple over those 12 patents.


8/25



Move #7

28 Oct 10

Appledrops

4 patents

from ITCcomplaintagainst

HTC

5 3 6 12 6

12 12

35

8

12

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

NDI

L

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

12

12

6

12

6 6

4

310 6

10 6

Move #10:Apple files an unopposed

motion for partial terminationof the investigation, droppingfour patents.

The ITC makes itsaccording determination

on 16 Nov 2010.


9/25

5 3 6 12 6

12 12 6

35

8

12

12

3

3

3

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

NDI

L

SDF

L 2010 by Florian Mueller

http://fosspatents.blogspot.comTwitter: @FOSSpatents

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

430

607

828

315

002

Move #8

29 Oct 10

Appleversus

Motorola

WDW

IWesternDistrict

ofWisconsin

3

3

6

3

6

12

6 6

6

3

4

3

Move #8, part 1/2:Apple sues Motorola in the

Western District of Wisconsinover 6 patents: the '949 patent

previously asserted againstHTC in Delaware, as well as

5 patents not previously used.Apple files two simultaneous

suits over 3 patents each.

6

6 Move #8, part 2/2:Apple additionally asserts

the first of the two setsof 3 patents used in the

Western District of Wisconsinagainst Motorola through acomplaint it files with the

US InternationalTrade Commission.


10/25



Move #9

05 Nov 10

HTCdrops

1 patent

from ITCcomplaintagainstApple

5 4

5 4 3 6 12 6

12 12 6

3

8

12

12

3

3

3

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

NDI

L

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

430

607

828

315

002

WDW

IWesternDistrict

ofWisconsin

3

3

6

3

6

12

6 6

6

3

Move #9:HTC files an unopposed

motion for partial terminationof the investigation, dropping

one patent.The ITC makes its

according determinationon 08 Nov 2010.

4

3

6

6


11/25



Move #10

09 Nov 10

Motorolarelocates

claims

regarding12 patents

fromNorthernIllinois toWestern

Wisconsin

3 6 12 6

12 12 6

3

8

12

12

3

3

3

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

NDI

L

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

430

607

828

315

002

WDW

IWesternDistrict

ofWisconsin

3

3

6

3

6

12

6 6

6

3

Move #10, part 2/3:Motorola withdraws itstwo Illinois complaints

(related to 6 patents each)by giving notice of "voluntarydismissal without prejudice"

on 09 November 2010,but...

4

4

Move #10, part 2/2:...on the same day

makes counterclaimsagainst Apple in the two

Wisconsin cases.Those counterclaims

are equivalent tothe withdrawn

Illinois complaints.

4

3

6

6


12/25



Move #11

18 Nov 10

Applemakes

counter-

claims inSouthernFlorida

3 6 12 6

12 12 6

3

8

12

12

3

3

3

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

T

radeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

NDI

L

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

430

607

828

315

002

WDW

IWesternDistrict

ofWisconsin

3

3

6

3

6

12

6 6

6

3

4

4

Move #11:Apple makes counterclaims

against Motorola in theSouthern Florida case.

Apple asserts 6 patents:3 smartphone patents

that were previouslyasserted against HTC,and 3 new ones that

allegedly read on variousMotorola set-top boxes

and DVRs.

6

6 3

6

6

3

509

456

560

4


13/25



Move #12

30 Nov 10

Appleand

Motorola

file jointmotion tostay theirclaims in

one of thetwo

Wisconsincases

3 6 12 6

12 12 6

3

8

12

12

3

3

3

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

TradeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

NorthernDistrict

ofIllinois

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

NDI

L

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

430

607

828

315

002

WDW

IWesternDistrict

ofWisconsin

3

3

6

3

6

12

6 6

6

3

4

4

6

6 3

6

6

3

509

456

560

4

Move #12:The parties file a

joint motion in oneof the two Wisconsin

cases (a case inwhich they assert the

same sets of patentsagainst each other as intheir ITC complaints).Apple and Motorola

propose a stayconcerning each set of

claims during therespective

ITC investigation.


14/25



Move #13

01 Dec 10

Appleassertsthe 12

patentsrelated to

whichMotorola

seeksdeclaratoryjudgment

Apple

MotorolaHTC

ITC

DE

USInternational

TradeCommission

D

istrictofDelaware

SouthernDistrict

ofFlorida

RE486

721

867

337

131

852

647

705

983

263

599

105

726

354

331

453

381

949

076

849

646

116

317

223

697

862

333

826

516

712

230

193

559

898

987

119

006

737

531

161

SDF

L

354

578

183

957

800

505

998

032

430

607

828

315

002

WDW

IWesternDistrict

ofWisconsin

4 3 6 12 6

6 12 12 3 6 18

34

6

12

6 8

4

12

12

3

3

6 18

3

560

509

456

3

6

6

3

6 6

NDI

L

Move #13:Apple amends one of its two

Western Wisconsin complaintsand asserts the 12 patentsrelated to which Motorola

sought declaratory judgment.The following day

(02 December 2010),Apple files a motion fordismissal of Motorola'sDelaware complaint or,alternatively, transfer to

Western Wisconsin.


15/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-1

United States International Trade CommissionInvestigation no. 337-TA-710 on "certain personal data and mobile communications devices and relatedsoftware" -- complaint filed on 02 March 2010

Apple Inc. and NeXT Software (both of Cupertino, CA 95014)vs. High Tech Computer Corp. (of Taiwan), HTC America, Inc. (of Bellevue, WA 98005) and Exedea Inc. (of Houston, TX 77036)

Partial consolidation stated further below (added Nokia Corp. and Nokia Inc. as defendants).

Allegedly infringing productsApple's complaint distinguishes between two groups of products:1) "Android": computing and mobile communication devices running the Android operating system;examples: HTC Nexus One, HTC Dream (T-Mobile G1), HTC Magic (HTC myTouch 3G), HTC Hero, HTC Droid Eris2) "DSP": other HTC products with digital signal processing functionality;examples: HTC Touch Pro, HTC Touch Diamond, HTC Touch Pro2, HTC Tilt II, HTC Pure, HTC HD2, HTC Imagio

Apple alleges that products in the "Android" group infringe all 10 asserted patents while "DSP" products infringe only the '263 patent.

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in documents filed with the ITC)

asserted by Apple in original complaint5,481,721 ("721") Method for providing automatic and dynamic translation of object oriented programming language-based

message passing into operating system message passing using proxy objects5,519,867 ("867") Object-oriented multitasking system dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 20106,275,983 ("983") Object-oriented operating system5,566,337 ("337") Method and apparatus for distributing events in an operating system5,929,852 ("852") Encapsulated network entity reference of a network component system

dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 20105,946,647 ("647") System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data5,969,705 ("705") Message protocol for controlling a user interface from an inactive application program6,343,263 ("263") Real-time signal processing system for serially transmitted data5,915,131 ("131") Method and apparatus for handling I/O requests utilizing separate programming interfaces to access separate

I/O service dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 2010RE39,486 ("RE486") Extensible, replaceable network component system dropped as a result of Apple motion of 28 Oct 2010

Partial consolidationOn 26 Apr 2010, the ITC ordered the partial consolidation of case no. 337-TA-704 into this one. As a result, Nokia Corp. (of Espoo,Finland) and Nokia Inc. (of White Plains, NY 10604) have to defend themselves alongside HTC against allegations of infringement of fivepatents (the '867, '131, '705, '263 and RE486 patents). An unopposed Apple motion for partial termination on 28 Oct 2010 (relating tofour patents, three of which were subject to partial consolidation) reduced that subset of patents to two (the '705 and '263 patents).Information concerning Nokia's allegedly infringing products will be provided athe document covering the Apple/Nokia dispute.




16/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-2

United States District Court for the District of DelawareCase no. 1:10-cv-00167 -- complaint filed on 02 March 2010

Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)vs. High Tech Computer Corp. (of Taiwan), HTC (B.V.I.) Corp. Inc. (of the British Virgin Islands),HTC America, Inc. (of Bellevue, WA 98005) and Exedea Inc. (of Houston, TX 77036)

On 21 June 2010, Apple filed another suit against the same defendants with the same court (case no. 1:10-cv-00544).

Allegedly infringing products"certain mobile communication devices including cellular phones and smart phones, including at least phones incorporating theAndroid Operating System" (item 13 of the complaint)

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the complaint)

Apple and HTC asserted patents against each other, and each party asserted a patent ending with "354". In this document, the contextalways makes it clearwhich party holds the relevant patent.

asserted by Apple in original complaint7,362,331 ("331") Time-based, non-constant translation of user interface objects between states7,479,949 ("949") Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics7,657,849 ("849") Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image

removed in amended complaint filed on 21 June 2010, simultaneously asserted in another suit (1:10-cv-00544)7,469,381 ("381") List scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display5,920,726 ("726") System and method for managing power conditions within a digital camera device7,633,076 ("076") Automated response to and sensing of user activity in portable devices5,848,105 ("105") GMSK signal processors for improved communications capacity and quality7,383,453 ("453") Conserving power by reducing voltage supplied to an instruction-processing portion of a processor

removed in amended complaint filed on 21 June 2010, simultaneously asserted in another suit (1:10-cv-00544)5,455,599 ("599") Object-oriented graphic system6,424,354 ("354") Object-oriented event notification system with listener registration of both interests and methods

HTC counterclaims (06 July 2010 answer to first amended complaint)

Allegedly infringing products

"personal computers (such as the MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac Mini) and mobile communications devices (such as the iPhone,iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS)" (item 91 of 06 July 2010 HTC answer to Apple's first amended complaint)

Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing)

asserted by HTC in counterclaims (part of answer to first amended complaint, dated 06 July 2010)7,278,032 ("032") Circuit and operating method for integrated interface of PDA and wireless communication system5,377,354 ("354") Method and system for sorting and prioritizing electronic mail messages6,188,578 ("578") Integrated circuit package with multiple heat dissipation paths




17/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-3

United States International Trade CommissionInvestigation no. 337-TA-721 on "certain portable electronic devices and related software" --complaint filed on 12 May 2010

HTC Corp. (of Taiwan)vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)


"The Accused Products include, but are not limited to, Apple's iPod, iPhone, and iPad product lines." (item 14 of the complaint)The infringement claim charts attached to the original complaint use the iPhone as an example of an allegedly infringing product.Chapter VII of the complaint states as "specific instances" the iPhone 3GS, iPod Touch, and iPad.


asserted by HTC in original complaint6,999,800 ("800") Method for power management of a smart phone5,541,988 ("988") Telephone dialler [sic] with a personalized page organization of telephone directory memory6,058,183 ("183") Telephone dialler [sic] with a personalized page organization of telephone directory memory

dropped as a result of HTC motion (dated 05 November 2010) for partial termination6,320,957 ("957") Telephone dialler [sic] with a personalized page organization of telephone directory memory7,716,505 ("505") Power control methods for a portable electronic device

United States District Court for the District of DelawareCase no. 1:10-cv-00544 -- complaint filed on 21 June 2010

Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)vs. High Tech Computer Corp. (of Taiwan), HTC (B.V.I.) Corp. Inc. (of the British Virgin Islands),HTC America, Inc. (of Bellevue, WA 98005) and Exedea Inc. (of Houston, TX 77036)

On 02 March 2010, Apple had already filed a suit against the same defendants with the same court (case no. 1:10-cv-00167).

Allegedly infringing products"certain mobile communication devices including cellular phones and smart phones, including at least phones incorporating the

Android Operating System" (item 13 of the complaint)


asserted by Apple in original complaint7,383,453 ("453") Conserving power by reducing voltage supplied to an instruction-processing portion of a processor

previously asserted in (but dropped from) case 1:10-cv-001677,657,849 ("849") Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image

previously asserted in (but dropped from) case 1:10-cv-001676,282,646 ("646") System for real-time adaptation to changes in display configuration7,380,116 ("116") System for real-time adaptation to changes in display configuration




18/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-4

United States International Trade CommissionInvestigation no. 337-TA-745 on "certain wireless devices, portable music and data processing devices,computers and components thereof" -- complaint filed on 06 October 2010

Motorola Mobility, Inc. (of Libertyville, IL 60048)vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)


"The accused wireless communication devices include, but are not limited to, the Apple iPhone 3G, the Apple iPhone 3GS and the AppleiPhone 4.." (item 18 of the complaint)"The accused portable music and data processing devices include, but are not limited to, the iPod touch" (item 19 of the complaint)"The accused computers include, but are not limited to, the AppleTV, Mac Pro, iMac, Mac mini, MacBook Pro, MacBook, MacBook Air,iPad and iPad 3G" (item 20 of the complaint)

Examples of allegedly infringing products besides the ones mentioned above are given in connection with the alleged infringement of the'333 patent (the Apple App Store), and in connection with the alleged infringement of the '223 patent (AppleTV).


asserted by Motorola in original complaint6,272,333 ("333") Method and apparatus in a wireless communication system for controlling a delivery of data6,246,862 ("862") Sensor controlled user interface for portable communication device6,246,697 ("697") Method and system for generating a complex pseudonoise sequence for processing a code division

multiple access signal5,359,317 ("317") Method and apparatus for selectively storing a portion of a received message in a selective call receiver5,636,223 ("223") Methods of adaptive channel access attempts7,751,826 ("826") System and method for E911 location privacy protection

All infringement allegations are open-ended ("include, but are not limited to"). However, the specific examples provided in the complaintindicate which patents Motorola asserts against which types of products. Below, a matrix of asserted patents and accused products.

'333

'862

'697

'317

'223

'826

iPhone

3G

iPhone

3GS

iPhone

4

iPad iPad3G

AppleA

ppSto

re

iPodTouch

4

AppleT

V

MacBo

ok

MacBo

okPro

MacBo

okAir

iMac

Macmi

ni

MacPro




19/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-5

United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisCase no. 1:10-cv-06381 -- complaint filed on 06 October 2010 but withdrawn on 09 November 2010

Motorola Mobility, Inc. (of Libertyville, IL 60048)vs. Apple, Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)

Simultaneously with this complaint, Motorola filed another suit against the same defendant with the same court (case no. 1:10-cv-06385;below). On 09 November 2010, Motorola withdrew this complaint (dismissal without prejudice) and reintroduced the same infringementallegations in another suit (as counterclaims in case no. 1:10-cv-00662 in the Western District of Wisconsin).

Allegedly infringing products"Apple iPhone, the Apple iPhone 3G, the Apple iPhone 3GS, the Apple iPhone 4, the Apple iPad, the Apple iPad with 3G, eachgeneration of the Apple iPod Touch, the Apple MacBook, the Apple MacBook Pro, the Apple MacBook Air, the Apple iMac, the Apple Macmini and the Apple Mac Pro" (for a matrix indicating which patents allegedly read on which of the aforementioned products, see sectionon Western District of Wisconsin case no. 1:10-cv-00662)


asserted by Motorola in original complaint -- entire complaint withdrawn on 09 November 20105,311,516 ("516") Paging system using message fragmentation to redistribute traffic5,319,712 ("712") Method and apparatus for providing cryptographic protection of data stream in a communication system5,490,230 ("230") Digital speech coder having optimized signal energy parameters

5,572,193 ("193") Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunications systems6,175,559 ("559") Method for generating preamble sequences in a code division multiple access system6,359,898 ("898") Method for performing a countdown function during a mobile-originated transfer for a packet radio system

United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisCase no. 1:10-cv-06385 -- complaint filed on 06 October 2010 but withdrawn on 09 November 2010


Simultaneously with this complaint, Motorola filed another suit against the same defendant with the same court (case no. 1:10-cv-06381;above). On 09 November 2010, Motorola withdrew this complaint (dismissal without prejudice) and reintroduced the same infringementallegations in another suit (as counterclaims in case no. 1:10-cv-00661 in the Western District of Wisconsin).

Allegedly infringing products & asserted patents (in order of appearance in the complaint)

The relevant patents and products (and the relationships between them) are consistent with the original complaint that led to ITCinvestigation no. 337-TA-745 (previous page).




20/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-6

United States District Court for the Southern District of FloridaCase no. 1:10-cv-23580 -- complaint filed on 06 October 2010


Allegedly infringing productsMobileMe service, Apple App Store, iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPad, iPad 3G, iPod Touch (each generation), MacBook,

MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Pro


asserted by Motorola in original complaint5,710,987 ("987") Receiver having concealed external antenna5,754,119 ("119") Multiple pager status synchronization system and method5,958,006 ("006") Method and apparatus for communicating summarized data6,008,737 ("737") Apparatus for controlling utilization of software added to a portable communication device6,101,531 ("531") System for communicating user-selected criteria filter prepared at wireless client to communication server

for filtering data transferred from host to said wireless client6,377,161 ("161") Method and apparatus in a wireless messaging system for facilitating an exchange of address information

All infringement allegations are open-ended ("include, but are not limited to"). However, the specific examples provided in the complaint

indicate which patents Motorola asserts against which types of products. Below, a matrix of asserted patents and accused products.

'987

'119

'006

'737

'531

'161

iPhone

iPhone

3G/3G

S

iPhone

4

iPad

iPad3

GAp

pleAp

pStor

e

iPodT

ouch*

Mobile

Me

MacB

ook

MacB

ookPro

MacB

ookAir

iMac

Macm

ini

MacP

ro

* all iPod Touch product generations

On 18 November 2010, Apple brought counterclaims against Motorola (more detail on the next page).




21/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-7

United States District Court for the Southern District of FloridaCase no. 1:10-cv-23580 -- continued from previous page

Apple counterclaims (18 November 2010 answer to original complaint)

Allegedly infringing productsThe first three patents ('560, '509 and '456) relate to "set-top and DVR-boxes that provide or operate in conunction with an interactiveGuide (for TV or DVR functions)". The other three patents relate to Android-based smartphones. More detail below the patent list.


asserted by Apple in 18 November 2010 answer to original complaint5,583,560 ("560") Method and apparatus for audio-visual interface for the selective display of listing information on a display5,594,509 ("509") Method and apparatus for audio-visual interface for the display of multiple levels of information on a display5,621,456 ("456") Methods and apparatus for audio-visual interface for the display of multiple program categories6,282,646 ("646") System for real-time adaptation to changes in display configuration7,380,116 ("116") System for real-time adaptation to changes in display configuration7,657,849 ("849") Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image

All infringement allegations are open-ended ("include, but are not limited to"). However, the specific examples provided in the complaintindicate which patents Apple asserts against which types of products:

'560, '509 and '456 patents:"set-top and DVR boxes that provide or operate in conjunction with an interactive Guide (for TV or DVR functions), including, but notlimited to, the following products: DCT700, DCT2500, DCT3400, DCT3080, DCT6200, DCT6208, DCT6400, DCT6412, DCX700,DCX3200 , DCX3200 P2, DCX3400, DCH70, DCH100 , DCH200, DCH3200, DCH3416, DCH6200, DCH6416, DTA100, QIP2500,QIP2708, QIP6200, QIP6416, QIP7100 and QIP7216"

'646 and '116 patents:"mobile devices with a video output, including, but not limited to, the Droid X product."

'849 patent:"mobile devices with lock pattern and/or slide unlock icon to unlock functionality, including but not limited to the Droid, Droid 2, Droid X,Droid Pro, BackFlip, Charm, Cliq, Cliq XT, Defy, Devour, Milestone, Bravo, Citrus, Flipout, Flipside and i1 products."




22/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-8

United States District Court for the District of DelawareCase no. 1:10-cv-00867 -- complaint for declaratory relief filed on 08 October 2010

Motorola Mobility, Inc. (of Libertyville, IL 60048)vs. Apple, Inc. and NeXT Software, Inc. (both of Cupertino, CA 95014)

Motorola sought a judgment declaring 12 Apple patents invalid and not infringed by Motorola. On 01 December 2010, Apple (and itsNeXT subsidiary) asserted Motorola's infringement of those 12 patents (and, of course, insisted on their validity) through an amendedcomplaint in case no. 1:10-cv-00662 in the Western District of Wisconsin. The following day, Apple filed a motion in Delaware that thisdeclaratory judgment case should be (ideally) dismissed or (alternatively) transferred to the Western District of Wisconsin..

Products related to which Motorola requested declaratory judgment""Apple has professed rights [...] based on Motorola Mobility's activities related to Motorola Mobility's Droid, Droid 2, Droid X, Cliq, CliqXT, BackFlip, Devour A555, i1 and Charm products"

Relevant patentslist provided in section on case no. 1:10-cv-00662 in the Western District of Wisconsin

United States District Court for the Western District of WisconsinCase no. 1:10-cv-00661 -- complaint filed on 29 October 2010

Apple, Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)vs. Motorola, Inc. (of Schaumburg, IL 60196) and Motorola Mobility, Inc. (of Libertyville, IL 60048)

On the day of the complaint, Apple filed another suit against the same defendants with the same court (case no. 1:10-cv-00662).

Allegedly infringing productsAndroid-based mobile devices (for detail see the section on ITC investigation no. 337-TA-750).


asserted by Apple in original complaintThe 3 patents asserted by Apple in the original complaint are listed in the section on ITC investigation no. 337-TA-750.

Motorola Mobility counterclaims (18 November 2010 answer to original complaint)

On 09 November 2010, Motorola Mobiility made counterclaims alleging the infringement of 6 of its patents. Those patents werepreviously asserted in the ITC complaint that gave rise to investigation no. 337-TA-745.

Joint motion to stay claims and counterclaims

On 30 November 2010, the parties filed a joint motion to stay Apple's claims and Motorola Mobility's counterclaims during the relevantITC investigations of the same infringement allegations.




23/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-9

United States District Court for the Western District of WisconsinCase no. 1:10-cv-00662 -- complaint filed on 29 October 2010

Apple, Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)vs. Motorola, Inc. (of Schaumburg, IL 60196) and Motorola Mobility, Inc. (of Libertyville, IL 60048)

On the day of the complaint, Apple filed another suit against the same defendants with the same court (case no. 1:10-cv-00662).

Allegedly infringing products"mobile devices and related software including but not limited to [Motorola's] Android mobile phone handsets"; "mobile devices, such assmartphones, and associated software, including operating systems, user interfaces, and other application software designed for use on,and loaded onto, such devices"; examples provided by Apple: "Droid, Droid 2, Droid X, Cliq, Cliq XT, BackFlip, Devour A555, Devour i1,and Charm"; in a footnote, Apple expects "that Motorola will introduce additional products in the future that will also infringe the [patents]."


asserted by Apple in original complaint7,479,949 ("949") Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics6,493,002 ("002") Method and apparatus for displaying and accessing control and status information in a computer system5,838,315 ("315") Support for custom user-interaction elements in a graphical, event-driven computer system.asserted by Apple in first amended complaint (of 01 December 2010) in addition to original list of patents

RE 39,486 ("RE486") Extensible, replaceable network component system6,424,354 ("354") Object-oriented event notification system with listener registration of both interests and methods6,343,263 ("263") Real-time signal processing system for serially transmitted data6,275,983 ("983") Object-oriented operating system5,969,705 ("705") Message protocol for controlling a user interface from an inactive application program5,946,647 ("647") System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data5,929,852 ("852") Encapsulated network entity reference of a network component system5,915,131 ("131") Method and apparatus for handling I/O requests utilizing separate programming interfaces

to access separate I/O services5,566,337 ("337") Method and apparatus for distributing events in an operating system5,519,867 ("867") Object-oriented multitasking system5,481,721 ("721") Method for providing automatic and dynamic translation of object oriented programming language-based

message passing into operation system message passing using proxy objects

5,455,599 ("599") Object-oriented graphic system

On 09 November 2010, Motorola Mobiility made counterclaims alleging the infringement of 6 of its patents (next page).




24/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-10

United States District Court for the Western District of WisconsinCase no. 1:10-cv-00662 -- continued from previous page

Motorola Mobility counterclaims (09 November 2010 answer to original complaint)

Allegedly infringing productsiPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPad, iPad 3G, iPod Touch (each generation), MacBook, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iMac,Mac mini, Mac Pro


asserted by Motorola Mobility in 09 November 2010 answer to original complaint5,311,516 ("516") Paging system using message fragmentation to redistribute traffic5,319,712 ("712") Method and apparatus for providing cryptographic protection of data stream in a communication system5,490,230 ("230") Digital speech coder having optimized signal energy parameters5,572,193 ("193") Method for authentication and protection of subscribers in telecommunications systems6,175,559 ("559") Method for generating preamble sequences in a code division multiple access system6,359,898 ("898") Method for performing a countdown function during a mobile-originated transfer for a packet radio system

All infringement allegations are open-ended ("include, but are not limited to"). However, the specific examples provided in the complaintindicate which patents Motorola asserts against which types of products. Below, a matrix of asserted patents and accused products.

'516

'712

'230

'193

'559

'898

iPhone

iPhone

3G/3G

S

iPhone

4

iPad

iPad3

G

iPodT

ouch*

MacB

ook

MacB

ookPro

MacB

ookAir

iMac

Macm

ini

MacP

ro

* all iPod Touch product generations




25/25

Referencematerial

as per02 Dec 10

page R-11

United States International Trade CommissionInvestigation no. 337-TA-750 on "certain mobile devices and related software" --complaint filed on 29 October 2010

Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014)vs. Motorola, Inc. (of Schaumburg, IL 60196) and Motorola Mobility, Inc. (of Libertyville, IL 60048)

Allegedly infringing products"mobile devices and related software including but not limited to [Motorola's] Android mobile phone handsets"; "mobile devices, such as

smartphones, and associated software, including operating systems, user interfaces, and other application software designed for use on,and loaded onto, such devices"; examples provided by Apple: "Droid, Droid 2, Droid X, Cliq, Cliq XT, BackFlip, Devour A555, i1, andCharm"; in a footnote, Apple expects "that Motorola will introduce additional products in the future that will also infringe the [patents]."


asserted by Apple in original complaint7,812,828 ("828") Ellipse fitting for multi-touch surfaces7,663,607 ("607") Multipoint touchscreen5,379,430 ("430") Object-oriented system locator system



Documents

Apple vs Android 10.12.02