Upload
wasin-saengnumpong
View
83
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in
horizontal well
Mr. Wasin Saengnumpong ID 537 16080 21
Production Project Assignment, Production Engineering 2106564
Abstract
Inflow control devices (ICD) are the sand face completion equipment with the objective of
creating uniform flow profile across horizontal wells, delaying early water breakthrough, and
preventing water coning and/or gas cusping.
This report demonstrated the water coning/breakthrough problem for the horizontal wells.
And the application of ICD to solve the early water production problem. The case studies of
completion simulation which were extracted from Liang-Bio Ouyang (2009) were also
discussed in this report.
Finally, the simulation results show that using the optimized ICD have successfully limit the
effect of heel to toe and can delaying water coning/breakthrough.
Introduction to the ICD
Figure 1. Illustrates an orifice type ICD, oil flowing from the reservoir will enter at
the entry point and pass the restriction flow area (for this case is an orifice). Therefore the
pressure drop is induced before the oil enter the tubing.
Figure 1. An orifice type ICD
2Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Description of specific production problem
For the horizontal well along the heel to toe section have a pressure gradient due to
the frictional pressure loss. Then when petroleum flow into the well with the difference well
flowing pressure, cause the non-balance inflow from the reservoir which is resulting in water
coning/breakthrough problem as illustrated in Figure 2.
For the Heterogeneous reservoirs such as layering systems the water breakthrough
problem also occur as in the Figure 3.
Figure 2. The water coning/breakthrough in homogenous reservoir
Figure 3. The water coning/breakthrough in heterogeneous reservoir
With ICDWithout ICD
Without ICD With ICD
3Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Application of an ICD on Reducing Water Production
The main function of an ICD is providing an additional pressure drop at particular
zone, and then an ICD can be applied to reduce the water production by the following
method.
1. Delaying the water breakthrough through the water coning or the high permeability path,
by decreasing the pressure drawdown at that zone, with resulting in the lower production rate
from this zone.
As shown on the Figure x, the ICD was optimized set to math each layer pressure
drawdown and permeability. The pressure drop at ICD, DPICD = Pnw - Pwf and the pressure
drawdown, DPDD = Pr - Pnw
The disadvantage of this solution is total well production rate is lower by the ICD and
to carry out this solution the exact reservoir properties must be determined before design the
optimized ICD, otherwise the result would be miss from the expected one.
Figure x. Balancing of Inflow by using ICD at each layer (After Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009))
4Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
2. Blocking the high water saturation zone
As shown in the Figure x, the same principle as previous section is introduced again.
The flow from high water saturation is blocked by ICD, but the petroleum production also
decreasing.
About this application, Liang- Biao Ouyang (2009) had suggested that the water may
flow parallel to the wellbore and flow into the others zones as in the Figure x.
Figure x. Using ICD for Inflow Balancing in high water production zone
(After Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009))
From my point of view, Even though these applications reduce the total production
rate but the benefit is the less capacity of water treatment at the surface requirement. This
may help the cost of water handling at the surface.
By the way, the case studies of these two solutions are presented in the next section,
the appropriate of the solutions would also further discuss.
5Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Case Studies
The case studies presented here are extracted from Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009), first
case is an example of using ICD to prevent early water breakthroughs. Second case is an
example of using ICD to blocking the water production from high water saturation zone.
For both cases the 4000 ft along the wellbore section of horizontal well was
investigated.
The well completion simulation software tool used for solving both case is NEToolTM
First Case
The simulate reservoir and fluid properties distribution along the 4000 ft wellbore
section are shown in Figure 5. the fluid drainage section was divided into 4 sections, as in
table 1.
Table 1. Each section details
Section Measured Depth (ft) Permeability (mD) Sw So
1. 5000 – 5500 200 0.1 0.9
2. 5500 – 7000 900 0.1 0.9
3. 7000 – 8000 300 0.1 0.9
4. 8000 - 9000 200 0.1 0.9
The created three scenarios was set as
A. Slotted liner completion: slotted liner is used along the entire wellbore section.
B. Uniform ICD completion: ICD with same setting is installed along the entire wellbore
section.
C. Optimized ICD completion: ICD with optimized setting with reservoir parameter is
installed along the entire wellbore section.
6Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Figure 5. Reservoir properties and their distribution along the wellbore section
(After Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009))
Figure 6. Pressure Drawdown along the wellbore section
(After Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009))
7Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Table 2. Comparison of Oil, Gas and total production with Different Completion Scenarios
Scenarios Qo (STB/d) Qg (MMscf/d) Qtotal (rb/d)
A. Slotted liner completion 3357.0 2.49 3524.8
B. Uniform ICD completion 3289.0 2.44 3453.5
C. Optimized ICD completion 1619.0 1.20 1670.0
Figure 6. shows the
pressure drawdown for each
scenario. It clearly sees that
optimized ICD completion
(scenario C) has more
efficient in reducing the
pressure drawdown for high
permeability section.
Figure 7, 8 also show
the achievement of optimized
ICD in control the uniform
inflow along the entire
wellbore section.Figure 7. Oil Production Profile along the Wellbore Section
(After Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009))
Figure 8. Sandface Pressure (blue curve) and Tubing Pressure (pink curve) along the Wellbore Section (After Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009))
The comparison of total
production rate are shown in Table
2. ,the scenario C with optimized ICD
yield the lowest production rate
compare to the others scenarios. In
the other hand, even the scenario A
(slot liner) yield the highest
production rate but it came with the
highest chance of water conning
/breakthrough in the future.
8Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Second Case
The same type of data like in the first case are given in the Figure 9, but for this case
all sections have the same permeability and varying the oil and water saturations instead.
Table 3. Comparison of Oil, Gas and Water production with Different Completion Scenarios
As shown in Figure 9, the
section 2 (5500-7000 MD) has the
highest Sw and was expected to
produce a significant amount of
water from this zone.
The completion scenarios
with each results production rate
and percent of water cut are shown
in Table 3.
Figure 9. Reservoir properties and their distribution along the wellbore section (After Liang-Biao Ouyang (2009))
9Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
As expected result, the Slotted Liner completion produce highest rate with highest
water cut. For ICD completions, the important thing is the significant different of water cut
between 4 scenarios, it can infer that despite of the ICD was set but without optimized it with
reservoir data, layer location, layer properties (permeability, phase saturation, etc.) and the
predicted amount of inflow, it cannot cut much of water production compare to the optimized
case.
Discussions and Future work
From the two case studies, the use of optimized ICD for preventing water
coning/breakthrough is quite effective solution. But for the water blocking case, if the water
production from that zone is very high, Neglect this zone may be a good option (blank pipe
case). It can see that for the second case study, we have to consider the economical aspect
and its efficiency of the solution. In short, I consider the ICD application for blocking water
production is not quite effective because ICD itself is not design for trim out the water and if
the interesting section has contribute a significant of oil production also then blocking this
kind of section may be not feasible except the future work on an intelligent ICD with phase
filtering capability for blocking the undesired phase. This type of ICD is on developing right
now but not yet successfully.
However, an ICD may be optimal initially, but not when the reservoir pressure is
depleted. Moreover, for the volatile oil the gas can liberate out at the ICD due to the pressure
drop below bubble point, causing the gas blocking the fluid flow along the horizontal well
bore section.
10Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well
Conclusion
1. The ICD was proved to be effective in preventing water coning/breakthrough in horizontal
well with Heel to Toe effect for both homogenous and heterogeneous reservoirs.
2. From the case studies, the result shows that the ICD completion will not successful if we
do not know the accurate reservoir data to optimized the ICD.
3. In my view, ICD can be apply to the vertical well to prevent water coning/breakthrough
from the heterogeneous reservoirs such as layering systems, fractured system, etc.
4. For the flooding process like steam flood or water flood, ICD completion will help
stabilized the frontal displacement and increase the sweep efficiency then the water
breakthrough will be delayed.
References
1. F. T. Al-Khelaiwi and D. R. Davies: “Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value
Quantification of a Developing Technology,” paper SPE 108700, presented at the 2007
International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, 27-30 June 2007, Veracruz, Mexico
2. Bernt S. Aadnoy and Geir Hareland: “Analysis of Inflow Control Devices,” paper SPE
122824, present at the 2009 SPE Offoreshore Europe Oil &Gas Conference & Exhibition in
UK, 8-11 September 2009
3. Liang-Bio Ouyang: “Practical Consideration of an Inflow Control Device Application for
Reducing Water Production,” paper SPE 124154, present at the 2009 SPE Annual Technical
Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 4–7 October 2009
4. http://www.halliburton.com/public/cps/contents/Presentations/EquiFlow_ICD.pdf
11Reducing the water production by using an Inflow Control Device (ICD) in horizontal well