Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Application of Digital Tachograph Data for Commercial Vehicle Safetyin Korea
Korea Transportation Safety Authority Cheif Researcher l Dr. Youlim JANG
1. What is Digital Tachograph(DTG)?2. Application 1: Prediction for Hazardous
Section of Gyeongbu Expressway 3. Application 2: COSAS
CONTENTS
2
3
What is Digital Tachograph?
4
What is Digital Tachograph(DTG)?
5
What is Digital Tachograph(DTG)?
6
Application 1: Prediction for Hazardous Section of
Gyeongbu Expressway
7
Data
8
Correlation Analysis
Correlation Analysis between Traffic Accident Rate and Risky Driving Behavior
Speeding
Sudden Acceleration
SuddenDeparture
Sudden Deceleratio
n
Sudden Breaking
Sudden Lane
Changing
Passing
Traffic Accidents
9
Prediction for Risky Driving Behavior
Using Machine Learning(SVM: Support Vector Machine) Model
Digital Tacho Graph Data
Actual Risky Driving Behavior
Potential Risky Driving Behavior
Critical Value
YES NO
YESActual
Risky Driving BehaviorActual
Risky Driving Behavior
NOPotential
Risky Driving BehaviorNormal
Driving Behavior
Act
ual Risky
Drivi
ng B
ehav
ior
Predicted Risky Driving Behavior
10
Prediction of Hazardous Section by Risky Driving Behavior Type
Integrated Data
Bus DTG VDS Volume VDS Avg. Speed Altitude
Risky Driving + Before
3seconds
Risky Driving + Before
5seconds
Analysis Data Pre Processing
Correlation Analysis
Independent Variable : Integrated Data
Dependent Variable : Risky Driving(Y/N)
Continuous Variable : t test Nominal Variable: Chi-Square
Test
Remove unnecessary variables
Standardization Continuous Variable
Generate data for analysis
Risky Driving Data+integrated Data
Risky Driving Behavior Rate1:1
70% Studying 30% Validation
Big Data Analysis
Support VectorMachine
Kernel Trick
Radial Basis
Sigmoid
Linear
Polynomial
Regression Analysis
Ridge Logistic Regression
AnalysisModeling
RBModel
SigmoidModel
LinearModel
PolynomialModel
RidgeModel
Total Integrated Data
Model Validation
Selection Best Model
Calculation Target Rate
Learning by Model
Risky Driving Behavior = Y Data
11
Osan Seoul Osan Seoul
Pridiction Result by Sudden Lane Changing
12
DTGRoad Environment
(Travel Speed etc.)
• Machine Learning Model Performance Comparison
(Machine Learning)• Statistical Analysis• Correlation Analysis• Visualization Scatter Plot• Validation for Pre Processing
Data
(Machine Learning#1)• Input/output variable• Deep learning Model• Time Series Prediction
Model(LSTM) Prediction for
Abnormal Driving Behavior
(머신러닝)• input변수, output변수 결정• 딥러닝 모델 적용• 시계열예측 모델(LSTM) Time
Series Prediction Model(LSTM)
(Machine Learning#2)• Input/output variable• Deep learning Model• Time Series Prediction
Model(LSTM)
HypothesisDrowsy Driving: Abnormal Driving BehaviorAbnormal Driving Behavior: Speeding pattern, RPM, Braking
Pridiction for Hazardous Section with Abnormal Driving Behavior
13
Abnormal Driving Behavior presented
Prediction Results of Driving Behavior using LSTM Deep Learning
Pridiction Result for Hazardous Section by Abnormal Driving Behavior
14
Y (Risk Index)
= 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝐼𝐼𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐼𝐼 ∗ 0.261
+𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝐼𝐼𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐼𝐼 ∗ 0.383
+𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝐿𝐿𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝐶𝐶𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝐶𝐶 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝐼𝐼𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐼𝐼 ∗ 0.356
Prediction Expressway Speeding
Hazardous Section
Prediction Expressway Sudden
Acceleration Hazardous Section
Prediction Expressway Sudden
DeccelerationHazardous Section
Prediction Expressway Sudden
Lane Changing Hazardous Section
Finding Expressway Abnormal Driving
Behavior
Prediction Expressway
Abnormal Driving Section
Prediction Expressway
Hazardous Section
Integrating Model
0.261
0.383
0.356
1.0
1)
1)
1)
2)
Mach
ine
Learnin
gM
achin
e Learn
ing
Mach
ine
Learnin
gM
achin
e Learn
ing
Deep
Learn
ing
4)
3)
Pridiction Model for Hazardous Section to Drive
15
Pridiction Results for Hazardous Section to Drive
16
순위 위험 지수 상세 내역 지도
1 0.610
부산기점 403.1km● 위험지수: 0.610● 5년간 사고건수: 24(사망:4,중상:124,경상:22,부상:116)● 과속 위험지수: 0.003● 급가속 위험지수: 0.092● 급감속 위험지수: 0.372● 급진로변경 위험지수: 0.147● 이상행동 위험지수: 0.673
2 0.498
부산기점 420.1km● 위험지수: 0.498● 5년간 사고건수: 0(사망:0,중상:0,경상:0,부상:0)● 과속 위험지수: 0.043● 급가속 위험지수: 0.206● 급감속 위험지수: 0.251● 급진로변경 위험지수: 0.041● 이상행동 위험지수: 0.798
3 0.452
부산기점 403km● 위험지수: 0.452● 5년간 사고건수: 3(사망:1,중상:13,경상:4,부상:9)● 과속 위험지수: 0.005● 급가속 위험지수: 0.091● 급감속 위험지수: 0.261● 급진로변경 위험지수: 0.101● 이상행동 위험지수: 0.494
위험 지수 상세 내역 지도
0.518
부산기점 421.6km● 위험지수: 0.518● 5년간 사고건수: 0(사망:0,중상:0,경상:0,부상:0)● 과속 위험지수: 0.000● 급가속 위험지수: 0.261● 급감속 위험지수: 0.040● 급진로변경 위험지수: 0.217● 이상행동 위험지수: 0.823
0.463
부산기점 391.9km● 위험지수: 0.463● 5년간 사고건수: 0(사망:0,중상:0,경상:0,부상:0)● 과속 위험지수: 0.027● 급가속 위험지수: 0.015● 급감속 위험지수: 0.282● 급진로변경 위험지수: 0.167● 이상행동 위험지수: 0.050
0.414
부산기점 403.2km● 위험지수: 0.414● 5년간 사고건수: 7(사망:1,중상:30,경상:7,부상:22)● 과속 위험지수: 0.000● 급가속 위험지수: 0.019● 급감속 위험지수: 0.116● 급진로변경 위험지수: 0.279● 이상행동 위험지수: 0.363
Pridiction Results for Hazardous Section to Drive
17
Seoul Toll gateSuwon IC
End of Bus Lane
Suwon ICJamwon IC
Avg
. Risk
Index
Avg
. Risk
Index
Pridiction Results for Hazardous Section to Drive
18
Total
Company A
Ris
k In
dex
Pridiction Results for Hazardous Section to Drive
19
Future Application
20
Application 2: COSASConsulting Oriented Safety Assistance System
21
Introduction to COSAS(Consulting Oriented Safety Assistance System)
22
Road Safety Grade Model(1/3)
Road SPF Development
To build SPF, poisson model was selected.
• AADT : annual average traffic volume• length : length of the segment• ddra : sum of 11 hazardous driving behavior from Digital tacho Graph data(2015~2016)• lanes : number of lanes
• EPDO : the predicted traffic accident severity(2015~2016)
23
Road Safety Grade Model (2/3)
Road Safety Grade Model Development
Estimating road safety grade model using SPF-based mean EPDO of reference group.
Road safety grade is divided four grades such as A through D.
24
Road Safety Grade Model (3/3)
Service
25
SSM(surrogate Safety Measure) for Commercial Vehicle Drivers
26
SSM(Surrogate Safety Measure) for Commercial Vehicle Company
27
Service: Commercial Vehicle Company & Driver Safety Grade
28
Future Plan
Q & A