Applying Prevention through Design (PtD) to Solar Systems ...€¦ · Systems in Small Buildings Researchers - Dr. Hyun Woo Lee, Assistant Professor, Department of Construction Management,

8484 Georgia Avenue

Suite 1000

Silver Spring, MD 20910

phone: 301.578.8500

fax: 301.578.8572

w w w. c p w r. c o m • w w w. e l c o s h . o rg

Applying Prevention through Design (PtD) to Solar Systems in Small Buildings

Hyun Woo LeeJohn GambateseChung Ho

University of WashingtonOregon State University

July 2017CPWR Small Study Final Report

©2017, CPWR-The Center for Construction Research and Training. All rights reserved. CPWR is the research and training arm of North America’s Building Trades Unions. Production of this document was supported by cooperative agreement OH 009762 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIOSH.

PreventionthoughDesignforSolarSafetyonSmallBuildings

CPWR FINAL REPORT ApplyingPreventionthroughDesign(PtD)toSolar

SystemsinSmallBuildings

Researchers- Dr.HyunWooLee,AssistantProfessor,DepartmentofConstructionManagement,UniversityofWashington.- Dr.JohnGambatese,Professor,SchoolofCivilandConstructionEngineering,OregonStateUniversity.- ChungHo,PhDStudent,DepartmentofConstructionManagement,UniversityofWashington.

Submittedto - CenterforConstructionResearchandTraining(CPWR)

JULY2017

PREAMBLE

This protocol provides guidance on applying Prevention through Design (PtD) to the design and installation of solar energy systems for small residential buildings. Seven PtD attributes with related design and installation issues are introduced, including roof materials, roof slopes, panel layouts, roof accessories, fall protection systems, lifting methods, and electrical systems. These attributes should be incorporated into the design documents of solar energy systems to improve the safety of solar workers during the installation processes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful for the research grant support of the Center for Construction Research and Training (CPWR). We would also like to express our sincere gratitude toward the companies and individuals that participated in interviews and provided case studies for this research. We also thank and appreciate the Department of Construction Management at the University of Washington and the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University for their support throughout our research progress and the development of this protocol.

@ 2017, CPWR - The Center for Construction Research and Training. All rights reserved. This publication was made possible by CPWR – The Center for Construction Research and Training through cooperative agreement number U60-OH009762 from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CPWR or NIOSH.


TABLEOFCONTENTS

1. ABSTRACT..........................................................................................................................................................1 2. KEYFINDINGS..................................................................................................................................................1 3. INTRODUCTIONANDLITERATUREREVIEW.....................................................................................1 4. RESEARCHOBJECTIVES...............................................................................................................................3 5. RESEARCHMETHODS...................................................................................................................................3 6. ACCOMPLISHMENTS.....................................................................................................................................3 Summary..................................................................................................................................................................3 Task1.Investigatesafetymanagementpracticesinsolardesignandinstallation.................4 Task2.IdentifyPtDattributesofsolarsystems......................................................................................5 Task3.AnalyzePtDattributesthroughcasestudyprojects.............................................................6 Task4.DevelopPtDprotocolforsolardesignandinstallation....................................................11 Task5.ObtainindustryfeedbackregardingthePtDprotocol.......................................................11 7. CHANGES/PROBLEMSTHATRESULTEDINDEVIATIONS.........................................................15 8. LISTOFPRESENTATIONS,PUBLICATIONS.......................................................................................15 9. DISSEMINATIONPLAN...............................................................................................................................15 10. CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................................15 11. REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................................................A 12. APPENDIX1–INTERVIEWQUESTIONAIRE.......................................................................................B 13. APPENDIX2–PROCESSMAPPING.........................................................................................................D 14. APPENDIX3–PtDATTRIBUTES..............................................................................................................E 15. APPENDIX4–SEMINARFLYER................................................................................................................L 16. APPENDIX5–SURVEYQUESTIONAIREFORTHEPROTOCOL.................................................M 17. APPENDIX6–RESULTSOFTHEONLINESURVEYABOUTTHEPROTOCOL.......................O 18. APPENDIX7–SOLARPTDPROTOCOL.................................................................................................P


July2017 Page

1

1. ABSTRACTAsaviable,efficient,clean,andrenewableenergysource,solarinstallationsintheU.S.havedrasticallyincreasedinrecentyearsduetoareducedpaybackperiod.Mostfuturesolarinstallationsareexpectedtotakeplaceontherooftopsofexistinghouses,performedbysmall‐tomid‐sizedcontractors.Thistypeofinstallationforcesworkerstofaceuniquesafetyhazardsintermsofexistingroofconditionsandpanelinstallations.PreventionthroughDesign(PtD)wasdevelopedasaproactivemethodindesignprocessestoeliminatesafetyhazardsintheworkplace.However,noidentifiedstudyhasaimedatdetermininghowPtDcanbeeffectivelyappliedtopreventsafetyhazardsduringsolarinstallation.Tofillthisknowledgegap,thisresearchaimstoinvestigatehow,duringthedesignprocess,toaddressworkers’safetyconcernsduringsolarinstallationsonsmallbuildings.Thisdocumentservesastheresearch’sfinalreport,presentingresearchfindingsandtheobjectivesthattheresearchteamhasaccomplished.2. KEYFINDINGSThekeyresultsofthisresearchinclude:‐ IdentificationofsevenPtDattributesforthedesignandinstallationofsolarsystemsforsmallresidentialbuildings,includingroofingmaterial,roofslope,roofaccessories,panellayout,fallprotectionsystem,liftingmethods,andelectricalsystem.‐ DevelopmentofaprotocolguidingtheimplementationofPtDforsolarsystemdesignandinstallations.Industryfeedbackabouttheprotocolindicatesthattheprotocolwillcontributetoimprovingthesafetyperformanceofsolarcontractors.Thekeyfindingsofthisresearchare:‐ MostsolarcontractorswhoparticipatedintheinterviewexpressedapositiveattitudetowardPtD,suggestingthatPtDhasapotentialtoimprovesafetyperformanceinthesolarindustry.However,somecontractorssuggestedthatsafetyenforcementismoreimportant.‐ Althoughallsolarcontractorsacknowledgedtheimportanceofsolarinstallationsafety,safetyperformancevariesfromcontractortocontractor.Somecontractorsfollowsafetyrulesclosely,whileothercontractorsstillignorecertainsafetyrulestoachievegainsinproductivity.‐ Smallsolarcontractorsmaystillresistcarryingoutsafetymeasuresasrequiredbyregulations,suchastheuseofliftingequipmenttocarrysolarpanelstotherooftopanduseoffallprotectionsystems.Aspertheinterviewedsolarcontractors,thisresistanceislargelyduetocostandtimeimpactswhenimplementingthesafetymeasures.3. INTRODUCTIONANDLITERATUREREVIEW

SafetyintheSolarIndustrySolarinstallationintheU.S.hassignificantlyincreasedinrecentyears.Asof2015,theresidentialsolarsectorhasachievedmorethan50%annualgrowthfora fourthconsecutiveyear(GTM/SEIA,2016).Theincreasedutilizationofsolarenergyalsocreatesnewbusinessopportunitiesandgeneratesmorejobsforthelabormarket.AccordingtotheSolarEnergyIndustriesAssociation(SEIA,2017),CaliforniastandsastheleadingsolarmarketintheU.S.withmorethan2,625solarcompaniesandprovidingjobsfor 100,050 people.While the proliferation of the solar industry indicates positive impacts for theenvironment and society, its labor intensiveness also raises concerns about the safety of workersinvolvedinsolarsystems.Thesafetyconcernsarisebecausemostsolarinstallationsareexpectedtohappenonroof tops, forcingworkers tobe facedwithuniquerisksandhazards.TheU.S.BureauofLabor Statistics report about Green Jobs (produced by Hamilton, 2011) indicates that safety is a


July2017 Page

2

priority consideration during the installation of solar systems, since the installers face the risks ofbeingelectrocutedorfallingfromaroof.Cautionisneededduringinstallationbecausethepanelsareheavy,fragile,andexpensivetoreplaceifbroken.Instructions on safety practices for solar installations have been addressed in some publications. Aguideline on safety for solar construction, which complies with Occupational Safety and HealthAdministration (OSHA) standards and considers theunique conditionsof solar energy installations,waspublishedbytheOregonSolarEnergyIndustriesAssociation(OSEIA).Solarsafetyinformationisalsoincludedinaguidelineforsolarelectricsystemdesign,operations,andinstallationsissuedbytheExtension Energy Program of Washington State University (WSUEEP 2013). However, few studiesinvestigatedhowtoreducesafetyhazardsforsolarinstallersduringthedesignprocess.Forexample,Bucher’s study (1998) about solar modules suggested that a module’s safety documents need toinclude testing information, such as insulation tests, glassbreakage tests, edge sharpness tests, andwet leakage current tests.Nevertheless, this studydidnotaddress the impactof roof conditionsonsafetyduringsolarinstallations.Althoughtherearefewstudiesaddressingsafetyduringthesolardesignprocess,attentionhasbeenpaidtothepotentialhazardsofsolarenergysystemsfor fire fightersduringfires(Kreis2009,Paiss2009). Studies on this aspect have led to specific requirements about the clearance between solarpanels and roof edges.Although the influenceof solar systemson fire fighters is outof thepresentresearch scope, the research does include the regulations regarding clear access pathways andclearance between panel edges and roof ridges that can contribute to improving safety in solarinstallations.PreventionthroughDesignandItsApplicationsPtDis“Thepracticeofanticipatingand“designingout”potentialoccupationalsafetyandhealthhazardsandrisksassociatedwithnewprocesses,structures,equipment,ortools,andorganizingwork,suchthatit takes into consideration the construction,maintenance, decommissioning, and disposal/recycling ofwaste material, and recognizing the business and social benefits of doing so” (Schulte 2008). PtDinvolves all attempts to recognize and design out hazards for workers, from work methods andprocesses to equipment, tools, materials, and technologies. In 2007, the National Institute forOccupationalSafetyandHealth(NIOSH)launchedaPtDinitiativeaimingtochangeculturalnormsthatwillachievedesigningoutoccupationalhazards.Upto2014,PtDconceptshavebeenusedinover25standards, including those issued by American National Standards Institute, American Society ofHeating, Refrigerating and Air‐Conditioning Engineers, American Society of Safety Engineers,American Industrial Hygiene Association, Underwriters Laboratory, Semiconductor Equipment andMaterialsInternational,andtheInternationalOrganizationforStandardization(NIOSH2014).Previous studies on construction hazard prevention have shown that almost 50% of constructionfatalitiesandaccidentsarelinkedtoupstreamdecisionsmadeduringthedesignprocess(Behm2005;Gibb et al. 2004). Behm (2005) reviewed 224 fatality reports and found that 42% of fatalities arelinked to design for construction safety. Gambatese and Behm (2008) reviewed the study of Behm(2005)andagreedwith71%of thereviewedcases.Walline(2014)suggested incorporating lessonsfrom proven solutions and past‐mishaps into design to prevent hazards and reduce risks. Toole &Gambatese (2008) claimed that althoughConstructionHazardsPrevention throughDesign (CHPtD)hasreceivedmuchresearchattention,technicalprinciplessupportingthisconceptarenotavailabletohelpdesignerstoimplementPtD.Asproactivemethodstoeliminatehazardsaresaferandmorecost‐effectivethanreactivemethods,TooleandGambatese(2008)suggestedthatthelong‐termapplicationofCHPtDwillevolvealongfourtrajectories:(1)increasedconstructionprefabrications,(2)increased


July2017 Page

3

useof lesshazardousmaterialsandsystems, (3) increasedapplicationsofconstructionengineering,and(4)increasedspatialinvestigationsandconsiderations.RegardinghowtoapplyPtDtoconstruction,especiallyroofconstruction,RajendranandGambatese(2016) developed a case study focused on the financial impacts and risks of roof fall protectionsolutions. In this study, the costs for the design and installation of roof anchors andparapetswerecomparedwiththoseofotherdesignoptionsonthesameproject.Theirresearchindicatedthatitwasmoreexpensive,butsafertoinstalltheparapetsystemthaninstalltheroofanchorsystem.Theroofanchorsystemrequiredadditionaltemporaryfallprotectionmeasuresduringconstruction,leadingtomoreinjuryrisksforworkers.Despite theadvancementofPtDand itsapplications, there isnostudyaddressingtheapplicationofPtDtoimprovesafetyinsolarinstallations.Thepresentresearchisexpectedtobridgethisknowledgegapandmakeavaluablecontributionintheefforttopreventsafetyhazardsinsolarinstallations.TheresearchprojectstartedinAugust2016andcompletedinJuly2017.ThemainoutcomeoftheresearchisaPtDprotocolthatsolarcontractorscanusetoimprovetheirsafetypractice.Thisreportpresentstheresearchfindingsandresearchteam’saccomplishments,includingtheliteraturereview,industryinterviewsandcasestudies,PtDattributes,PtDprotocoldevelopment,andtheorganizationofasolarPtDseminar.4. RESEARCHOBJECTIVESTheoverallobjectiveofthisresearchistodeveloptheknowledgeandresourcesthatsupporttheapplicationofPtDinsolardesignandinstallation,leadingtotheimprovedsafetyperformanceofconstructionworkers.ThestudyresultsareexpectedtoshowthatusingPtDtodeviseproactivemeasuresinthedesignprocesscaneffectivelycontributetopreventingsafetyhazardsandrisksduringsolarinstallationwhileminimallyaffectingtheintendedsolarproductionlevelortheefficiencyoffieldoperations.Thespecificaimsofthisstudyareto:(1)identifytheattributesofsolarsystemsandroofconditionsthataffectsafetyrisk,(2)analyzetheidentifiedattributesthroughcasestudies,and(3)developaPtDprotocolforsolardesignandinstallation.Thestudytargetssolarcontractorsandtheirsafetypractices,specificallythosewhoworkinsmallbusinesses.AsolarPtDprotocolwascreatedatthefinalstageofthisstudytoassistsolarcontractorsineffectivelyimplementingPtDfortheirsolardesignandinstallation.5. RESEARCHMETHODSThisresearchreliedoncontextualdatafromactualconstructionprojectsandconstructionindustrypersonnelwhoinstallsolarsystems.Thecontextualdataallowedfortheidentificationofsafetyhazardsandrisksassociatedwithroofconditions,rooffeatures,solarpanelcharacteristics,andPtDattributes.Theresearchteamusedamixed‐methodsapproachthatincorporatedexperientialdatafrominterviewswithsolarcontractorsandobservationaldatafromin‐depthprojectcasestudies.Usingmixedmethods,thisresearchincludedthefollowingspecifictasks:(1)Investigatesafetymanagementpracticesinsolardesignandinstallation,(2)IdentifyPtDattributesofsolarsystems,(3)AnalyzePtDattributesthroughcasestudyprojects,(4)DevelopaPtDprotocolforsolardesignandinstallation,(5)ObtainindustryfeedbackregardingthePtDprotocol,and(6)Developandsubmitafinalresearchreportandanarticleforpublicationontheresearchstudyandfindings. 6. ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Summary


July2017 Page

4

At this time, all project tasks havebeen completed as scheduled. In addition, a conferencepaper isbeingpreparedtodisseminatetheresultsofthisresearch.Figure1showsresearchprogress,includinga comparison between the timeline as planned in the research proposal versus the timeline of ouractualprogress.

Figure1.ResearchProgressTimelineDetailsofeachtaskaredescribedhereinafter:Task1.InvestigatesafetymanagementpracticesinsolardesignandinstallationTask1involveddeterminingthecurrentdesignandinstallationpracticesofthesolarindustrywhenworkingonsmallbuildings.Todoso,weconductedinterviewswithsolarcontractors,targetingsmallbusinessesintheStateofWashington.Interviewinvitationsweresentouttoalistof36industryprofessionals.Atotalof13interviewswereconductedwith16solarprofessionals,includingsolardesigners,salespersons,sitemanagers,electricians,workers.Aninterviewquestionnairewascreatedpriortotheinterviews.Appendix1presentsthisinterviewquestionnaire.TheperformedinterviewsaresummarizedinTable1.Notethatduetoaconfidentialityagreement,companyandintervieweenamesarenotreported.Afterfinishingtheinterviews,theresearchersperformedacross‐analysisoftheinterviewresultstocomparedifferentpracticesandperspectivesoftheinterviewedcontractors.Wefoundthatalloftheinterviewedcompanieshaveasimilarsolardesignandinstallationprocessingeneral.However,solarcontractorperformanceandperspectivesaboutsafetyvariedfromcontractortocontractor.Althoughallsolarcontractorsacknowledgedtheimportanceofsafetyrulesforsolarinstallationandmanyfollowrulesclosely,somesolarcontractorsstillignoredcertainrulestogainhigherproductivity.WhenanintroductiontoPtDwasprovided,mostsolarcontractorsexpressedapositiveattitudetowardPtDinsolarsafety.SolarcontractorsalsosuggestedthatPtDhasapotentialtoimprovetheoverallsafetyperformanceofthesolarindustryandcommunity.SomestillsuggestedthatsafetyenforcementshouldemphasizedmorethanPtD,whileotherswereneutral,expressingnointerestorobjectiontoPtD.WhileeachnewinterviewgaveanewperspectiveandcreativeideasabouthowPtDcouldbeapplied,theinformationprovidedbythesolarcontractorswasfoundtoberatherconsistentregardingsafetyplanninginsolarinstallationandPtDattributes.InterviewresultsservedasabasisforthedevelopmentofPtDattributesinTask2,andverifiedthroughthecasestudiesinTask3.


July2017 Page

5

Table1.ListofInterviews

No.Cont‐ractor

No.ofInterviewees Interviewee'sPosition

InterviewDate

InterviewDuration InterviewLocation(WA)1 A 1 ProjectEngineer 24‐Sep‐16 1.5hours Coffeeshop,Seattle2 B 1 Company'sFounder 14‐Oct‐16 1hour Interviewee’soffice,Seattle3 C 1 ProjectEngineer 30‐Sep‐16 1hour Interviewee’soffice,Shoreline4 D 1 Company'sFounder 14‐Oct‐16 1hour Interviewee’soffice,Olympia5 E 1 SalesAssociate 26‐Oct‐16 ‐ ViaEmail6 A 1 VicePresident 21‐Oct‐16 1hour ViaGoogleCall7 F 2 SalesEngineers 9‐Nov‐16 1hour Interviewee’soffice,Seattle8 A 3 Electrician,RoofWorkers 18‐Nov‐16 3hours SolarProject,Tacoma9 A 1 RoofWorker 23‐Nov‐16 0.5hour SolarProject,Tacoma10 A 1 SiteManager 23‐Nov‐16 0.5hour SolarProject,Tacoma11 B 1 Electrician 2‐Dec‐16 1hour SolarProject,Seattle12 B 1 SiteManager 2‐Dec‐16 1hour SolarProject,Seattle13 A 1 ProjectManager 19‐Jan‐17 1hour Coffeeshop,SeattleDuringTask1,theresearchteamconductedanextensiveliteraturereviewtoidentifysolarindustrydesignandconstructionpractices,aswellassafetyhazardsandriskmitigationpractices.ThesummaryofthecompletedliteraturereviewisprovidedinSection3IntroductionandLiteratureReview.Lastly,basedontheinterviewsandliteraturereview,theresearchersdevelopedaprocessmaprepresentingcurrentpracticesinsolardesignandinstallation(seeAppendix2).TheprocessmapincorporatesthefindingsofamasterthesiswrittenbyVaishnaviNevrekar,aformerMSstudentattheUniversityofWashington,whowasinvolvedinsomeoftheinterviewsandcasestudiesinthisresearch.

Task2.IdentifyPtDattributesofsolarsystemsBasedontheresultscapturedduringTask1,Task2wasintendedtosystematicallycategorizeprimarysystemattributesthatsolarcontractorsshouldconsiderwhenimplementingPtD.Task2firstinvolveddevelopingacomprehensivelistofattributesbasedontheparametersofsolarsystemsidentifiedduringTask1.Approximately10PtDattributeswereidentified,thenanalyzed,andgroupedintosevenmajorattributesasfollows:(1)roofingmaterial,(2)roofslope,(3)roofaccessories,(4)panellayout,(5)fallprotectionsystem,(6)liftingmethods,and(7)electricalsystem.Appendix3presentsdetaileddescriptionsoftheseattributes.Second,toaugmenttheextensivenessofthedevelopedlist,Task2usedpubliclyavailabledatabasestoinvestigatethetypesofpreviousaccidentsthatoccurredinthesolarindustry.WereviewedtheOSHAdatabaseandNIOSHFatalityAssessmentandControlEvaluation(FACE)Programreportsforaccidentsthatoccurredduringthepast10years.Afterreviewingtheseincidentreports,weidentifiedalistofriskfactors,suchasfallingfromroof,fallingfromladders,fallingfromroofopening,fallingobjectsfromroof,windblow,electricshock,beingstruckbyfallingobjects,tripping,andslipping.TheseriskfactorswereusedtoanalyzetherisksinthecasestudiesperformedinTask3. Lastly,13workersfromthecasestudyprojectsincludedinTask3participatedinashortsurveytoreviewandsharetheiropinionsonthedevelopedlistofattributesintermsofthesignificanceofeachattribute.Duringtheevaluation,theparticipantswereaskedtoevaluatethelevelofimpactofeachoftheattributesusinga1to5Likertscale(1=StronglyDisagree;5=StronglyAgree).Allattributes


July2017 Page

6

receivedratingshigherthan3,rangingfrom3.2to4.7,equivalentto“Neutral”to“StronglyAgree.”Regardingthelevelofsafetyimpacts,roofslopeandroofmaterialreceivedthehighestlevelsofimpact,whileroofaccessories,electricalsystem,andinstallationsequencereceivedthelowestlevelsofimpact.Table2presentsthesurveyresults.Table2.ResultoftheSurveyontheImpactLevelofPtDAttributes

Task3.AnalyzePtDattributesthroughcasestudyprojectsTask3involvedfield‐analyzingtheapplicabilityandsignificanceofthedevelopedattributesbyobservingcasestudyprojectsthatwereperformedbysmall‐businesssolarcontractors.ThisresearchtaskwascarriedoutonfourcasestudyprojectsthatwereselectedwhileworkingwithintervieweesparticipatinginTasks1and2.Thecasestudyprojectsrepresenttheroofconditions,rooffeatures,andsolarpanelcharacteristicsoftypicalsingle‐familyhousesinWashington.Table3summarizesthecasestudyinformation. Table3.SummaryofCaseStudyProjects

ThefirsttwocasestudiesaretwohousesinTacoma,WA,whicharelocatednexttoeachother.Theseprojectswerecompletedbyonesolarcontractor(ContractorA)atthesametime,butusingtwoseparateinstallationteams.ThethirdcasestudyisahouselocatedinSeattle,WAandtheinstallationwasperformedbyContractorB.TheforthcasestudyisanotherhouselocatedinRochester,WA.ThesolarinstallationonthefourthcasestudywascarriedoutbyContractorC.Bothcasestudies1and2aresingle‐storyhouseswithagableroofanddormer.Theroofslopeonbothhousesisapproximately25to27degreesandroofingmaterialiscompositeshingles.Thesolarpanelswereplacedonthesouthwest‐facingsectionsoftheroofs.Thesolarsystemofcasestudy1wasinstalledinfourworkingdays,fromNovember18to23,2016.Oncasestudy2,installationworkstartedonedayearlierandwascompletedonthesamedayascasestudy1.Theinstallationcrewoncasestudy1includedoneelectricianandthreeroofers,whilethecrewforcasestudy2consistedofoneelectricianandtworoofers.

FACTORS RoofSlopeRoofMaterial

RoofAccessories PanelLayout

FallProtectionSystem

Liftingmethod

Electricalsystem

Installationsequence Other

CONTRACTORAWorker1 3 3 2 2 4 3 4 3Worker2 3 4 1 3 5 4 1 4Worker3 5 2 4 4 3 5 2 3 3Worker4 5 5 5 5 4 2 4 3Worker5 5 4 4 2 4 4 3 3Worker6 5 5 1 3 5 5 5 1Worker7 5 5 5 3 3 4 3 3Worker8 5 5 5 3 3 4 3 3Worker9 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4CONTRACTORBWorker1 5 5 3 5 5 5 4 4Worker2 5 5 2 2 3 2 2 4Worker3 5 5 3 4 5 4 4 3 5Worker4 5 5 3 4 4 4 3 4 4Average 4.7 4.5 3.2 3.4 4.0 3.8 3.2 3.2


July2017 Page

7

Casestudy3isatwo‐storyhousewithacrossedgableroofanddormer.Thishousehasacompositeshingleroofwithaslopeofapproximately30to35degrees.Thesolarpanelsarelocatedonthesouth‐facingandwest‐facingsectionsoftheroof.Thesolarsystemwasinstalledwithintwoworkingdays,onDecember1and2,2016.Theinstallationcrewoncasestudy3consistedofoneelectricianandthreeroofers.Casestudy4isaone‐storyhousewithacrossedgableroof.Theroofismadeofcompositeshinglesandhasaslopeof30degrees.Thesolarsystemonthishousecomprisedoftwosolararrays,bothlocatedonthesouth‐facingsectionoftheroof.Ittookonlythreedaystoinstallthesolarsystemforthishouse,fromMarch13to15,2017.Theinstallationteamincludedthreeroofersandoneelectrician.Figure2showssatellitephotosofthefourcasestudyprojectsbeforesolarinstallations.

Figure2.CaseStudyProjects(GoogleMap2017)Asstatedpreviously,thePtDattributesunderconsiderationinthecasestudiesincludedroofingmaterial,roofslope,roofaccessories,panellayout,fallprotectionsystem,liftingmethod,andelectricalsystem.ThesiteobservationsperformedbytheresearchersfocusedonidentifyingthelinkbetweentheidentifiedPtDattributesandinstallationactivities/roofcharacteristics.Theimplicationsoftheidentifiedattributeswithinthecontextofthecasestudyprojectsarepresentedherein.RoofingMaterialTheroofsintheseprojectsareallmadeofcompositeshingles,whicharelessslipperythanmetalorwoodroofs.Inparticular,compositeshinglesmakeiteasierfortheinstallationofmountingsystemsbecausetoinstallamountingsystem,rooftilesatconnectionlocationsshouldbelifteduptoinsertconnectionplates.Compositeshinglesarethinandeasytolift,comparedtometal,concrete,orwoodtiles,whicharethickerandheavier.Theageofroofingmaterialscanalsocreateadifferenceinsafety.Thecompositeshinglesincasestudy4werenewerthanthoseintheothercasestudies.Newershingleshavemoregranularityandarelessslippery.Agedcompositeshinglestendtoadherewitheachother,makingithardertoliftuptheshinglestoinserttheconnectionsforsolarsystems.Comparedwithotherprojects,thenewercompositeshinglesincasestudy4madeiteasierandsaferfortheinstallationprocess.RoofSlopeTheroofslopesincasestudies1and2wereabout25to27degrees,whiletheslopeswere30to35degreesincasestudies3and4.Sincetheroofslopesarenotverysteep,theworkerscouldmovearoundontheroofswithnospecificproblems,anddidnotneedanyspecialworkingplatformforrooftopoperation.Nevertheless,itshouldbenotedthattheseroofsareclassifiedas“steeproofs”pertheOSHAstandardsandmustadheretothefollowingOSHAregulation:“1926.501(b)(11):Eachemployeeonasteeproofwithunprotectedsidesandedges6feet(1.8m)ormoreabovelowerlevelsshall

CASE

STUDY 2

CASE

STUDY 1

CASE STUDY 3

CASE STUDY 4


July2017 Page

8

Figure2.PanelLayoutinCaseStudy2(courtesyofContractorA,PicturetakenbyChungHoonNov.18,2016atCaseStudy

2)

beprotectedfromfallingbyguardrailsystemswithtoeboards,safetynetsystems,orpersonalfallarrestsystems.”(OSHA,2017a).RoofAccessoryTherewasoneskylightandafewroofventsoncasestudy1.Thepanellayoutwasdesignedtoavoidtheskylightlocation.Theskylightandroofventsposedatrippinghazardtotheworkers.Theskylightopeningwascoveredbyafixedglazingpanel,andthesafetyhazardoffallingthroughtheskylightopeningdidnotappearsignificantinthiscase.Asaresult,nobarricadeorcoveringwasinstalledfortheskylight.Itwasinterestingtonotethatthecrewactuallytookadvantageoftheskylightbyplacingtoolsandmaterialsagainstthesideoftheskylighttopreventthemfromslidingdowntheroof.Noskylightswerepresentoncasestudy2.However,achimney,dormer,andafewroofventswerepresentonitssouthwestfacingsectionoftheroofwherethesolarpanelswereinstalled.Thepanellayoutwassignificantlyimpactedbytheexistingroofaccessoriesonthisproject.Becauseofthelimitedroofarea,somesolarpanelswereinstalledonthedormer’sroof.Inaddition,asmallspaceattheroofareaadjacenttothedormerwasalsoutilizedforsolarpanels.Twosolarpanelswereplacedhorizontallytofitintothisspace(Figure3).Fromasafetyperspective,thechimneyanddormersometimesblockedthelanyardsusedbytheworkersandhinderedtheworkers’movements.Thesafetylanyardwasoccasionallytrappedbyinstalledrackings,forcingtheworkerstostoptountangleit.Differentfromcasestudies1and2,casestudy3hadnoskylight,dormer,orchimneypresentatthesouth‐facingandwest‐facingsectionsoftheroofwherethesolarpanelswereinstalled.However,someroofventswerepresent,posingtrippinghazardsforworkers.Noskylightwaspresentoncasestudy4,yetachimneywasatthemiddleofthesouth‐facingroofsectionthatcausedaneedtoseparatethesolarsystemintotwoarrays.Althoughthisseparationwasduetothechimney,clearancebetweenthesearraysmadeitmoreconvenientfortheworkerstomovearoundontheroof.Someroofventsonthesouth‐facingroofsectionposedtrippinghazards.However,theworkerscouldstilltakeadvantageoftheseaccessoriesbyleavingtoolsandmaterialsrestingagainstthevents,usingtheventsasthebackingobjectstopreventmaterialsfromslidingdowntheroof.PanelLayoutThroughtheinterviewsconductedduringTask1,theresearchteamdeterminedthattheclearancebetweenpaneledgeandroofedgecanhaveasignificantimpactonsafety.Theclearancebetweenpaneledgesandroofedgesoncasestudy1wasrelativelysmall,approximately12inches.Thelimitedspacecausedarelativelyhigherleveloffallinghazardfortheworkerswhenmovingalongtheroofedge,requiringthemtotakegreatcaution.Thesolarpanelswereextendedtotheroofedgeincasestudy2,leavingnoclearancefromthepaneledgetotheroofedge(seeFigure3).Asaresult,althoughtheworkerscouldmovealongtheroofedgeduringtheinstallationofthemountingsystem,noaccesstotheinstallationareawaspossibleafterthepanelshadbeeninstalled.Then,theroofvalleyalongthedormerbecametheonlyegressfortheworkers.Theunoccupiedareaalongthisvalleyappearedtohelpfacilitatethesafemovementofworkers,andreducedtheshadingimpactofthechimneyonthepanels.Nevertheless,theinstallation


July2017 Page

9

sequencehadtostartfromthespacewithlimitedaccessandendatthespacewithampleaccess.Thesequencewasneededinordertosecureanexitpointfortheworkersafterinstallingallofthepanels.Thelayoutofpanelsincasestudy3includedan18‐inchclearancebetweenpaneledgeandroofedge.Thisclearanceallowedtheworkerstomoveeasilyalongtheroofedge,althoughtheroofslopeonthisprojectwassteeperthanthatoncasestudies1and2.Inaddition,themovementoftheworkersontheroofwasalsoeasierbecauseofthevalleyalongthecrossedgambleroof.Similartocasestudy3,casestudy4alsohasan18‐inchclearancebetweenpaneledgeandroofedge.Thisampleclearance—plustheclearancebetweenthetwosolararrays—allowedtheworkerstomovearoundontheroofeasily.FallProtectionSystemThecrewinstalledtwoanchorsforcasestudy1inadditiontothetwoexistingsafetyanchorsontherooftop.Threesafetyanchorswereinstalledincasestudy2,sinceithadnoexistingsafetyanchor.Inbothcasestudies1and2,allworkerswereequippedwithpersonalfallarrestsystems(seeFigure3),includingsafetyharness,lanyard,andlifeline.Ittooktimetoinstallapersonalfallarrestsystemandadditionaltimetohookandunhooksafetyanchorsduringtheoperation.Itwasalsoobservedthattheusageofthesystemsloweddownthemovementsofworkers.Nevertheless,itisanutmostimportantsafetymeasure,sinceitprotectstheworkersfromfalling.Incasestudy3,theworkersdidnotwearanypersonalfallarrestsystems,whichappearedtomaketheworkersmovefasterandbemoreproductive.Theworkersalsomentionedthatnosafetyanchorinstallationshortenstheinstallationduration.Theinstallationdurationonthisprojectwastwodays,relativelyfastcomparedwithcasestudies1and2.However,thislackoffallprotectionwasaviolationofthesafetyregulationinsection1926.501(b)(11)oftheOSHAstandardsforsteeproofs(OSHA,2017a),andcouldleadtosignificantinjuriesforworkersiftheyshouldfallfromtherooftop.Noexistingsafetyanchorwasavailableincasestudy4,sotheworkersinstalledtwosafetyanchorsforthisproject.Althoughtheworkersusedpersonalfallprotectionsystemswiththesafetyanchorsduringourfirstvisit,noneoftheworkersusedanyfallprotectionmethodsduringoursecondvisit.Itappearedthattheworkersdidnotpreferusingthesystemevenifitwasavailableonsite.LiftingMethodOnallfourofthecasestudies,theworkersusedladderstoliftpanelsandothermaterialstotherooftop.Itwasobservedinthefirstthreecasesthatwhenliftinguppanelsthroughaladder,theworkersusedonehandtoholdupasolarpanelorothermaterialwhiletheirotherhandwasusedtoholdontotheladder.Whengettingclosetotheroof,theworkerstayedontheladderandhandedthepanelorothermaterialtoanotherworkerwhowaswaitingtotakeitontherooftop.Regardingsafetyregulationsonladderhandling,OSHAsection1926.1053(b)(22)(OSHA,2017a)requiresthat“Anemployeeshallnotcarryanyobjectorloadthatcouldcausetheemployeetolosebalanceandfall.”Morespecifically,OSHA’sarticle,GreenJobHazards(OSHA,2017b),statesthat“Workersshouldneverbeallowedtoclimbladderswhilecarryingsolarpanels.”Althoughtheworkerssaidthatitwasmoreconvenientforthemtocarrypanelstotheroofbyclimbingtheladder,thiswasapparentlyaviolationofthesafetyruleandcouldleadtoinjuryincidents,suchastrippingandfallingfromtheladder.Incasestudy4,theworkersdidnotcarrysolarpanels.Instead,theworkerspushedpanelsalongtheladderwhileclimbing.Aworkerrestedasolarpanelontheladderfirst,thenpushedthepaneluptotherooftop.Bothoftheworker’shandsheldandpushedthesolarpanel,concurrentlyleaningontheladder’ssiderailswhilehewasclimbing.Whengettingclosetotheroof,theworkerstillstayedonthe

Figure3.FallProtectionSystem(PicturetakenbyChungHoonNov.17,2016at

CaseStudy1)


July2017 Page

10

ladderandanotherworkerontherooftookthepanel.AlthoughnospecificregulationintheOSHAstandardsprohibitspushingsolarpanelsuptheladdertotherooftop,thisactionisstillaviolationperWashingtonAdministrationCode:“WAC‐296‐876‐40025ClimbingandDescending:(1)Youmusthavebothhandsfreetoholdontotheladder”(WAC,2016).ElectricalSystemEachprojecthadoneelectricianwhowasinchargeoftheelectricalinstallationforthesolarsystem.Asinformedbytheinterviewees,allelectriciansarerequiredtoparticipateinextensivesafetytrainingdesignedspecificallyfortheirwork.Sinceelectricalhazardscancauseseriousinjuries,electriciansinsolarinstallationsarerequiredtofollowstrictsafetyrulesforelectricalwork(OSHA,2017c).Itisarequirementtoincludearapidshutdownfunctioninsolarsystems.Centralizedrapidshutdownsystemswereinstalledincasestudies1and4forsafetyduringtheoperationasrequiredbytheNationalElectricalCode.Anoptimizerwasinstalledateachsolarpanelincasestudy2insteadofacentralizedrapidshutdown.Theoptimizersfunctionedasrapidshutdownsaswellasdevicestobalancetheelectricitygenerationamongpanelsandmakethesystemmoreproductive.Casestudy3compliedwiththerequirementforrapidshutdownbyincludingtheinstallationofamicroinverterateachsolarpanel.Inadditiontotheabove‐listedPtDattributes,theresearchersidentifiedothersafetyfactors,suchasweatherconditionsanduniqueworkingconditionsatthebeginningandendofinstallationprocesses.Theadditionalsafetyconcernsaredescribedbelow.WeatherConditionsTheinterviewsrevealedthatweatherconditionshaveasignificantimpactonsafetyperformance.SpecifictothestateofWashington,therainy,coldwintermakestheinstallationworkhardanddangerous.Therainmakestheroofwetandslippery,andthecoldweathermakesworkers’movementsclumsy,causingthemtooftendroptoolsandhurttheirhandsorfeet.Theimpactofcoldandrainyweathertosafetywasapparentduringthesitevisits.Incasestudies1and2,theweatherwascoldanddryduringthefirstvisit,whileitwasrainyduringthesecondvisit.Theairtemperaturewasapproximately45degreesFahrenheit.Theweatheratthefirstvisitdidnotcauseasignificantissuetotheworkerssinceitwasdryandactivitiescouldwarmuptheworkersatthatmoderatewintertemperature.However,therainduringthesecondvisitworsenedthecoldnessandimpededworkers’movements.Itwasrainyandmuchcolderduringthesitevisitforcasestudy3.Theairtemperaturedroppedtoaround40degreesFahrenheit.Despitetheunfavorableweather,thecrewsinthecasestudiesstillperformedtheirworkasplanned.Althoughtherainmadetheroofsmoreslippery,itdidnotcauseanyseriousissuesontheprojectsbecauseallofthehousescontainedcompositeroofs.However,thecoldweathermadeitharderfortheworkersincasestudy3toperformthework;theirhandswereverycoldandtheirmovementssloweddown.Theworkerswerealsogettingtiredeasilyandtookmorebreakstowarmup.Itisinterestingtonotethatoneoftheworkersdressedinabatteryheatedjacket.Theheatedjacketkepttheworkerwarmandmadehimcomfortablewhileworkinginthechillyweather.Thisobservationshowedthatproperprotectiveclothingisimportanttoprotecttheworkersinunfavorableweatherandwouldimprovetheirsafety.UniqueWorkingConditionsWhilethecrewcanfollowsafetyrulesformostpartsoftheinstallation,itishardtofollowtherulesentirelyatsomeparticulartimes,especiallyatthebeginningandtheendofthejob.Atthebeginning,theworkershavetoclimbupwithoutafallprotectionsystemtoinstallsafetyanchors.Similarly,atthe


July2017 Page

11

endofthejob,theyhavetoclimbuptounhooktheanchorandclimbdownwithoutafallprotectionsystem.Itisalsomoredifficulttoclimbdownafterfinishingsolarinstallationssincealmostalloftheavailableroofspacehasbeenoccupiedbythenewly‐installedpanels.OtherTheelectricianincasestudy2expressedhisconcernsaboutsafetyinsolarinstallationsthattheresearchersfoundworthytobeincludedinthisreport.Theelectricianclaimedthattherearemanyhousesthathavepoorroofingqualityandunevenroofsurfaces.Theseproblemsrenderadditionalsafetyhazardstoworkersinvolvedinroofmaintenanceorsolarinstallation.Theelectriciansuggestedthatmoreinspectionsareneededonroofingconstructiontoensuresafetyforfuturerooftopactivities.Inaddition,manysolarcontractorsinthemarketdonotfollowsafetyrulessincetheybelievethatignoringsafetyrulescanhelpthemworkfasterandreduceinstallationcosts.Thispracticeisnotonlydangeroustoinstallationcrews,butalsomayhelpcontractorswithoutwell‐establishedsafetypracticesoutbidcontractorswithstrongsafetypractices.Thus,itcanhurtthebottomlineofcontractorswhofollowsafetyrulescloselybecausehomeownersoftenmaketheirdecisionbasedonbidprices,notacontractors’safetyperformance.Theelectriciansuggestedthatstrongersafetyenforcementisneededtomakesolarinstallationssaferandtoencouragefaircompetitioninthesolarindustry.Task4.DevelopPtDprotocolforsolardesignandinstallation.ThepurposeofTask4wastodevelopaPtDprotocolthatsmallbusinessescanapplytoimprovethesafetyoftheirworkers.Byusingthisguideline,solarcontractorscanidentifypotentialsafetyhazardsbasedonvarioustypesofexistingroofconditionsandcandevelopoptimalsolarpanellayoutsandinstallationmethodsthatproactivelyeliminateorpreventsafetyhazards.Theresearchteamdevelopedtheprotocolbasedontheattributesthatwereverifiedthroughthecasestudies,includingroofingmaterials,roofslope,roofaccessories,panellayout,fallprotectionsystem,liftingmethods,andelectricalsystem.Wealsoincorporatedthelessonslearnedfromtheextensiveliteraturereviewintotheprotocol.Theprotocoliscomprisedoftwomainsections.Thefirstsectionprovidesabriefexplanationabouttheapplicationoftheprotocol,thePtDconcept,andsolarPtDimplementationprocedure.ThesecondsectiondescribestheinfluenceofeachPtDattributetosafetyinsolarinstallationsandhowtoincorporatetheseattributesintothedesignprocesstoproactivelyimproveworkersafetyduringtheinstallation.Task5.ObtainindustryfeedbackregardingthePtDprotocolTask5consistedofvalidatingtheeffectivenessandapplicabilityoftheprotocol,identifyingimprovementopportunities,andpromotingthedisseminationofthePtDprinciplestosmall‐businesssolarcontractors.Task5wascenteredaroundaseminarorganizedonMay12,2017,inwhichtheresearchersintroducedthePtDconcept,presentedthePtDprotocol,andgatheredfeedbackfromparticipatingsolarcontractors.TheactivitiesthatwereimplementedinTask5include:developingalistofpotentialguestsfortheseminar,preparingalistofsurveyquestions,sendingouttheinvitationtothegueststogetherwithasurveyrequest,organizingtheseminar,andcollectingandanalyzingfeedback.ThelistofpotentialguestsfortheseminarincludedtheintervieweesandcontractorswhoparticipatedinTasks1through3,themembercompaniesoftheSolarEnergyIndustriesAssociations(SEIA)inthePacificNorthwest,theSolarInstallersofWashington,andSolarWashington.Inadditiontothesesolarcontractors,theresearchersalsoinvitedotherguestsfromacademiaincludingthemembersofUWSolarandsomePhDstudentsandresearchersintheUniversityofWashington’sDepartmentofConstructionManagement.


July2017 Page

12

Theresearcherspreparedaseminarflyertoinformguestsofthetime,location,andthecontentoftheevent.Theseminarinvitationandtheflyerwassentoutviaemailtoover40peopleand/orcompaniesincludedintheguestlist.TheseminarflyerisincludedinAppendix4.Aweb‐basedGoogleFormsurveywassenttothesolarcontractorstwoweekspriortotheseminartoinformtheparticipantsoftheprotocolandgatherfeedbackinadvance.ThedraftversionofthePtDprotocolwasprovidedtothesolarcontractorsinadvancethroughalinkincludedintheonlinesurvey.Appendix5showsacopyofthesurveyandAppendix6summarizesthesurvey’sresults.Aftersendingtheelectronicinvitationstoapproximately40people/solarcompanies,theresearchersfollowedupwithdirectphonecallsandreminderemails.Elevenpeopleconfirmedtheirparticipation.However,onlysevenofthemattendedtheevent,includingfoursolarcontractorsandthreeobservers.Theseminartookplacefrom1:00pmto4:00pmataconstructioneducationbuildinginSeattle,WA.TheseminarstartedwithapresentationaboutthePtDconceptandthecontentoftheprotocol.Basedonfeedbacksreceivedfromtheseminardiscussionandonlinesurvey,thePtDprotocolwasupdated(seeAppendix7).Thecontentoftheseminardiscussionandtheresponsestotheonlinesurveyaredescribedbelow.SeminarDiscussionTheseminardiscussionlastedforoneandhalfhours,andthediscussioncovereddiversetopicsregardingsafetyinsolarenergyinstallation.Thediscussionaroundeachtopicissummarizedbelow.ThedifferencebetweenfederalandlocalsafetyregulationsThediscussionstartedwithaclaimfromasolarcontractorthatfor40%to50%ofthejobstheyhavedone,theywouldneverhavebeenabletomeettheclearingrequirementbecausetheymayloseasignificantportionofavailableroofareaiftherequirementwasfollowed.ThisclaimwasraisedbecausetheprotocolreferstothenationalIFC(InternationalFireCode)codes,whilethelocalcodegovernsoverthenationalcode.Thelocalcodeforclearancesislessstringentthanthenationalcode.Similarly,safetyrequirementsarealsogovernedbylocalregulations.However,OSHAsetsahigherstandardforlocallawsregardingsafetyasitrequiresthatlocallawsbe“atleastaseffective”asOSHA(OSHA,2017d).Thatiswhywhenaddressingladderusages,OSHAsection1926.1053(b)(22)onlystates,“Anemployeeshallnotcarryanyobjectorloadthatcouldcausetheemployeetolosebalanceandfall”, whiletheWashingtonAdministrativeCode‐WAC‐296‐876‐40025setsforthamorestringentrequirement,“Youmusthavebothhandsfreetoholdontotheladder”(WAC,2016).Thedifferencesbetweenfederalandlocallaws,codes,andstandardsmakeitdifficultandconfusingforsolarcontractorswhenimplementingthesafetyrequirementsintotheirwork.Furthermore,eachstate,city,orcountymayhavedifferentversionsoflaws,codes,andstandards.Asonesolarcontractorsaid,“Itistricky,evenforustolookatdifferentcodesandfigureitout.”AddressingeachlocalregulationisoutofthescopeofthePtDprotocol.Theprotocolisdesignedforthenationallevelandreadersareencouragedtorefertocorrespondinglocalregulationsforimplementationontheirspecificprojects.HowtobalancesafetywithothercriteriaindecisionmakingTheresearchersfoundageneralresistancetowardsafetyrequirementsfromthesolarcontractors,althoughthecontractorsarestilltryingtofollowthesafetyregulationsatcertainlevels.Toexplorethereasonbehindthisobjection,theresearchersaskedthesolarcontractorshowtheybalancesafetywithothercriteriaindecisionmakingandreceivedvaryingresponses.Whileonesolarcontractorsaidthathewouldnotminddesigninglesspanelsonarooftoptomakeitsaferwhileensuringaneffectivesolarsystem,whileanothersolarcontractorstatedthatstrictlyfollowingsafetyregulationswillincrease


July2017 Page

13

laborcosts.Thelattercontractorprovidedanexamplethataladderlifttakestwohourstoinstallandtwohourstotakedown.Therefore,usingaladderliftwouldturnaone‐dayjobintoatwo‐dayjob.Thecontractoradded,“Thereisnotenoughprofitinthesolarindustrytodoublethehourstotaketodothework.”Othercontractorsalsocomplainedabouttheinefficiencyofaladderlift.Despitetheseconcerns,allofthecontractorsbelievedthattechnologyshouldbeimprovedtosupportsafetyinsolarinstallation.Forexample,aladderliftshouldbemoreconvenientforthesolarindustry,andsolarpanelsshouldbemoreefficientsothatasmallerfootprintisneededforthesameelectricaloutputtoprovidesolarcontractorsmoreroomtofollowclearancerequirements.WhetheraslopedrooforaflatroofisbetterforthesafetyinsolarinstallationsSlopedandflatroofsrenderdifferentimpactsonworkersafety.Intermofproduction,slopedroofsmaybebettertoorientsolarpanelsbecauseslopedroofsdonotrequireadditionalframesthatareneededforflatroofstoachievethedesirableslopeofthesolarpanels.Inaddition,itwasfoundthatworkerswouldneedtokneeldownmoretoworkonflatroofsthanslopedroofs.Whenaskedifitwasmoreconvenientforworkerstoworkonslopedroofsthanflatroofs,thecontractorsrespondedthateventhoughflatroofsrequiremorekneeling,theyarestillpreferredoverslopedroofssinceworkersdonotneedtostandonaslopedsurfaceforalongtime.SafetyhazardsandincidentsinsolarinstallationsThesolarcontractorslistedtripping,slipping,andheatexhaustionascommonsafetyhazards.Trippinghazardscanbecausedbyroofprojections,andeventheroundropesofafallprotectionsystem.Slippinghazardsareoftenpresentwhenworkingonmetalroofs,compositeroofswithlowgranularity,orroofscontainingmoss.Heatexhaustionisseriouswhenworkingonmetalroofsinthemiddleofthesummer.Whenitgetshot,suddenlystandingupcanmakeaworkerlosehis/herbalance.Regardinginjuriesduringsolarinstallations,onecontractorsaidthathiscompanyhadoneincidentoffallingfromaroofineightyears.Onecontractorsaidthathiscompanyhavenothadanyfallsfromroofsyet,buthashadworkerstripontheroofbecauseofslipperyconditions.Anothercontractorsaidthathiscompanyhadtwoworkersfallfromroofs.ElectricalissuesinsolarsafetyAlthoughsolarpanelscangenerateenergywhenexposedtothesun,electricalhazardsarenotabigconcerntosolarcontractorssincetheelectricitywouldnotflowuntilthecrewcompletedthecircuit,whichdoesnothappenuntiltheworkershavefinishedinstallingthesolarpanels.Electricalconnectorsthatconnectthesolarpanelswithothersare“fullyenclosed,fullywrapped,fullyinsulated….havetohaveaspecialtooltoeventakethemapart.”Inaddition,theelectricalcomponentshavebeenfullytestedfromthemanufacturingsidebeforereachingthemarket.Furthermore,inWashingtonasolarcontractormusthavealicensedelectricianonsite,andallelectricalworksarecarriedoutbyalicensedelectrician.PtDinthemanufacturingsideversusconstructionsidePtDonthemanufacturingsidereceivedpositivefeedbackfromthesolarcontractors.However,thecontractorswerenotveryinterestedinPtDontheconstructionside.Themanufacturingsidewaspreferredbythesolarcontractorssince“Itisstandardizedforeverybody,”“Wedon’thaveanythingtodowiththat,withelectricalthing.ThatwasenforcedbyOSHAandallthosepeopleonthemanufacturingsideofthat.Theycometousalreadythatway.”Ontheotherhand,PtDontheconstructionsidesomehowdoesnotseemverypracticaltothesolarcontractors.Forexample,strictlyfollowingIFC’sclearancerequirementsmaymeanlosingasignificant


July2017 Page

14

roofareaforsolarpanelsandmaynotmeettheneededsolarcapacity.Therequirementinusingladderliftsforcarryingsolarpanelsuptotheroofalsocauseddifficultiesforsolarcontractorsbecauseofthelongsetuptimeofaladderlift.Thesesolarcontractorsalsoarguedthatthepersonalfallarrestsystemwastooheavyandcouldcausefurthertrippinghazards,withonecontractorstating“Ithinkthatthesafetydevicesthatareoutthereareveryimpracticalininstallingthesolar.”PtDforsolarinstallationsfornewbuildingconstructionsToexplorefurtherideasaboutPtDforsolarinstallationsinnewbuildingconstruction,solarcontractorswereaskedtostatewhattheywouldwantifahousecouldbedesignedforasolarsystem.ResponsesfromthecontractorsindicatedanumberofPtDopportunities,including:‐ “Nothingextrudingtherooffromthesouthsideofthehouse”‐ “Noshakeroof,notileroof;”“Havinganchorpointsreadytoinstall”‐ “Makingtheroofatleast4feetmorebetweenthetopandbottomand6feetmoreoneachside”fortheusageofroofareaforsolarpanels‐ “Thehouseismadesolarreadybyputtinginwiring,ithastobepre‐wired”‐ “Singlestoryhouse”‐Easyaccesstotherooflessthan2:12slope‐ “BuildaflatsurfaceoverhereupontheroofandIwouldbringmymaterialoverandsettingupthere,

thenIcouldjustcarryoverandknockitout.”ItisinterestingtonotethattheSeattleDepartmentofConstructionandInspectionshasissuedTip422forSeattlePermitsnamed“RenewableEnergyandSolar‐ReadyRoofsforCommercialBuildings”fordesigningsolar‐readybuildings(SDCI,2017).ApplicationoftheprotocolDuringthediscussion,theresearchersinformedtheparticipantsthatsincethereisnostandardonhowtoimplementPtDinsolarinstallations,theresearchprojectaimedatcollectinganddocumentingtheknowledgefromsolarexperts.Theprotocolcanbeusedasatrainingtoolforthepeoplewhowanttoenterthesolarindustryforthefirsttime.Althoughthereisahesitanceinfullyimplementingsafetyregulationsfromsomesmallsolarcontractors,theyallagreethatthisprotocolisofnecessityandwillfacilitatealearningprocessregardingsafetyforthesolarindustry.FeedbacktoimprovetheprotocolValuablefeedbacksfromthesolarcontractorstoimprovetheprotocolwerecollected,including:‐ Conflictinginformationabouttheusageofladdersintheprotocolshouldberevised‐ Theprotocolshouldbeconsistentbyreferringtonationalregulations‐ Theprotocolshouldaddthecontentaboutprovidinghydration,sunscreen,andhatsforworkerswhenworkinginahotweather‐ “Makingsurethattheaccessesareaccessibleduringtheconstruction”‐ Addingtheinfluenceofmaterialsonflatroofssuchas“FlatPVC,plasticroofscanhavemoredust,mud.”Theresearchersrevisedtheprotocolaccordinglytoincorporatethefeedbackfromthecontractors.SurveyResponsesaboutthePtDProtocolOutofapproximately40onlinesurveyrequeststhatweresentoutfortheprotocol,theresearchersobtainedsevenresponses.Theoverallfeedbackforthefirstsectionaboutthelevelofimportanceoftheprotocolwaspositive.Theaveragescoresforallquestionsinthissectionareequaltoorhigherthan4.0(4.0isequivalenttoagree,while5.0isequivalenttostronglyagree).Feedbackwasprovided


July2017 Page

15

inthesecondsectionofthesurveyinordertoimprovetheprotocol.Theresearchteamhasconsideredand/orincorporatedthefeedbackobtainedfromtheonlinesurveyandtheseminardiscussionintothefinalversionoftheprotocol(Appendix7).ThesurveyresultsaresummarizedinAppendix6.7. CHANGES/PROBLEMSTHATRESULTEDINDEVIATIONSDuringtheperformanceoftheresearch,theresearchersencountereddifficultiesinfindingcasestudyprojectsandreceivingfeedbackfromsolarcontractorsabouttheprotocol.However,theresearcherswerestillabletoperformthestudyaspertheplannedmethodswithoutanychanges.8. LISTOFPRESENTATIONS,PUBLICATIONSTheresearchfindingshavebeenpresentedintwoconferencesandoneseminarincluding:‐ March2017:OralpresentationatNewFrontiersinConstructionConference2017,sponsoredbytheCenterforEducationandResearchinConstruction(CERC),Seattle,WA.‐ April2017:PosterpresentationattheAssociatedSchoolsofConstruction(ASC)53rdAnnualConference,Seattle,WA.‐ May2017:SolarPtDSeminar,Seattle,WA.9. DISSEMINATIONPLANTheresearcherssubmittedanabstracttotheASCEConstructionResearchCongress2018,oneofthelargestconstructionconferencesintheworld.Theabstracthasbeenacceptedandtheresearchersareintheprocessofpreparingafullpaperfortheconference.Theresearchersalsoplantodevelopacoupleofjournalpapersonthestudytobesubmittedtotopacademicjournals.10. CONCLUSIONTheresearcherssuccessfullycompletedalltasksplannedfortheresearchproject.SevenPtDattributeshavebeenidentifiedincluding:(1)roofingmaterial,(2)roofslope,(3)roofaccessary,(4)panellayout,(5)fallprotectionsystem,(6)liftingmethod,and(7)electricalsystem.Theseattributeswereverifiedandrankedthroughfourcasestudyprojectsandthesurveysonsite.Eachattributeposesvaryinglevelsofsafetyimpactstosolarinstallation.TheresearchersdevelopedasolarPtDprotocolbasedonthefindingsfromtheinterviewsandcasestudies.TheprotocolincludesinstructionsforimplementingPtDinsolardesignandinstallation,anddetailedguidanceonaddressingeachPtDattribute.Thecontentoftheprotocolhasbeenverifiedandimprovedbasedonindustryfeedbacksthroughanonlinesurveyandaseminardiscussion.SolardesignersmustaddressthepotentialsafetyhazardsassociatedwiththePtDattributesanddocumentedintheprotocolinordertoreducesafetyhazardsfromthedesignprocess.Throughouttheimplementationofthisresearchproject,theresearchersencounteredsignificantresistanceaboutmeetingsafetyregulationsfromsmallsolarcontractors.Thisresistancefocusedonareassuchas(1)IFCclearancerequirementsthatcansignificantlyreduceavailableroofareasforplacingsolarpanels,(2)ladderliftsorotherliftingequipmentthatinvolvesalengthysetup,and(3)personalfallprotectionsystemsthatfeeltooheavyorcouldleadtotrippinghazards.TheseproblemsshouldbeaddressedinfutureresearchinordertodeviseasolutiontofacilitateandimprovesafetyperformanceandincreasechancesofimplementingPtDinsolardesignandinstallations.


July2017 Page

A

11. REFERENCESBehm,M.(2005).“LinkingConstructionFatalitiestotheDesignforConstructionSafetyConcept.”SafetyScience.Volume43,Issue8.589‐611.Bucher,K.;Kleiss,G.,Batzner,D.(1998).“PhotovoltaicModulesinBuildings:Performanceandsafety.”RenewableEnergy.Volume15,Issues1‐4,545‐551.Gambatese,J.A.(2008).“Rapporteur’sReport:ResearchissuesinPreventionthroughDesign.”JournalofSafetyResearch.Volume39.153‐156.GoogleMap(2017).https://www.google.com/maps/GTM/SEIA(2016).“GTMResearch/SEIAU.S.SolarMarketInsight–2015YearinReview.”GTMResearchandSolarEnergyIndustriesAssociation.Hamilton,J.(2011).“CareersinSolarPower.”U.S.Bureauoflaborstatistics.Kreis,T.(2009).“TheImpactofSolarEnergyonFirefighting.”FireEngineering.Volume79.NIOSH(2014).“TheStateofNationalInitiativeonPreventionthroughDesign.”Progressreport2014.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices.CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention.NationalInstituteforOccupationalSafetyandHealth.PublicationNo.2014‐123.OSEIA.“SolarConstructionSafety.”OregonSolarEnergyIndustriesAssociation.OregonOccupationalSafetyandHealthDivision,DepartmentofConsumerandBusinessServices.OSHA(2017a).“PART1926SafetyandHealthRegulationsforConstruction.”OccupationalSafety&HealthAdministration.https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owasrch.search_form?p_doc_type=STANDARDS&p_toc_level=1&p_keyvalue=1926OSHA(2017b).“GreenJobHazards:SolarEnergy–Falls.”OccupationalSafety&HealthAdministration.https://www.osha.gov/dep/greenjobs/solar_falls.html.OSHA(2017c).“GreenJobHazards:SolarEnergy–Electrical.”OccupationalSafety&HealthAdministration.https://www.osha.gov/dep/greenjobs/solar_electrical.html.OSHA(2017d).“OSHAActof1970–Section19–StateJurisdictionandStatePlans.”OccupationalSafety&HealthAdministration.https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=3372&p_table=OSHACTPaiss,M.(2009).“SolarElectricSystemsandFirefighterSafety.”FireEngineering.Page83‐88.Rajendran,S.;Gambatese,J.(2016).“RiskandFinancialImpactsofPreventionthroughDesignSolutions.”PracticePeriodicalonConstructionDesignandConstruction.Vol.18,Issue1.SchulteP,RinehartR,OkunA,GeraciC,HeidelD[2008].“NationalPreventionthroughDesign(PtD)Initiative.”JournalofSafetyResearch39:115–121.www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/pdfs/Schulte.pdfSDCI(2017).“Tip422–SeattlePermits–RenewableEnergyandSolar‐ReadyRoofsforCommercialBuildings.”SeattleDepartmentofConstructionandInspections.http://www.seattle.gov/DPD/Publications/CAM/Tip422.pdfSEIA(2017).“WashingtonSolar.”SolarEnergyIndustriesAssociation.http://www.seia.org/state‐solar‐policy/washingtonSEIA(2017).“CaliforniaSolar.”SolarEnergyIndustriesAssociation.http://www.seia.org/state‐solar‐policy/californiaToole,T.M.;Gambatese,J.(2008).“TheTrajectoriesofPreventionthroughDesigninConstruction.”JournalofSafetyResearch39.225‐230.USCD(2017).“ClimateSeattle–Washington.”U.S.ClimateData.http://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/seattle/washington/united‐states/uswa0395.WAC(WashingtonAdministrativeCodes).2016.“Ladders,PortableandFixed.”SafetyandHealthCoreRules,296‐876WAC.http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=296‐876Walline,D.(2014).“PreventionthroughDesign–ProvenSolutionsfromtheField.”AmericanSocietyofSafetyEngineers.ProfessionalSafety.Volume59,Issue11.WSUEEP(2013).“SolarElectricSystemDesign,OperationandInstallation–AnOverviewforBuildersintheU.S.PacificNorthwest”.WashingtonStateUniversity.ExtensionEnergyProgram.


July2017 Page

B

12. APPENDIX1–INTERVIEWQUESTIONAIRE

INTERVIEWQUESTIONAIREApplyingPreventionThroughDesign(PtD)to

SolarSystemsonSmallBuildingsINTRODUCTIONWearearesearchteamfromtheDepartmentofConstructionManagementattheUniversityofWashington.FederallyfundedthroughtheCenterforConstructionResearchandTraining(CPWR),weareconductingaresearchprojectaimedatinvestigatinghow,duringdesignprocess,toaddresssafetyconcernsrelatedtoexistingroofcondition,accessaryfeatures,andsolarpanelcharacteristicsduringsolarinstallationonsmallbuildings.Asthestartoftheproject,thisopen‐endedinterviewtargetstocapturethecurrentsafetypracticesofthesolarindustryandthecommonsafetyhazardstowhichsolarinstallersareexposed.Basedonthecapturedcurrentpractices,variousattributesofsolarsystemswillbeidentifiedandthenanalyzedthroughcasestudyprojects.Thisresearchwillendwiththedevelopmentofadesignprotocolforsolarsystemsthatsmallbusinessescanapplytoimprovetheirsafetypractices.Yourparticipationinthisinterviewwillgreatlycontributetothesuccessfulcompletionoftheresearchproject.Thanksforyoursupport.Pleaseshareyourexperienceinsolardesignandinstallationonresidentialorcommercialbuildingsasfollows.CurrentSolarDesignandInstallationProcess1. Explainyourroleinsolardesignandinstallationprocess.2. Explainstepsforsolardesignprocess.3. Explainstepsforinstallationprocessofsolarsystem.SafetyPlanningforSolarInstallation4. Whatfieldissueshaveyouobservedintermsofoccupationalsafetyandhealth?

Fallhazards Electricalhazards Heatstresshazards Other(pleaseexplain)5. Whatsafetycode/regulationdoyouapplyinsolarinstallation?6. Whatsafetyplanningdoyouapplytoprotectworkersfrom: Fallingfromtherooforladder? Injuryduetofallingobjects? Openingsontheroof? Injuryduetoheavylifting? Heatstress? Electricshock?

DesignAttributesinSolarDesignandConstruction7. Brieflyexplaintypesofbuildingsandroofsthatyoutypicallydealwithforyourinstallation.


July2017 Page

C

8. Howdoestheroofshapesandtypesaffectyoursafeoperations? Rooftypes Rooflayouts Roofaccessorystructures Other(pleaseexplain) 9. Whatelementsofsolarsystemsaffectyoursafeoperations? Panelsizesortypes Location Layout Supportstructuresizesortypes Other(pleaseexplain) 10. Whatshouldbespecifiedinsolardesigndocumenttoimprovethesafetyofsolarsysteminstallation?11. Pleaseexplain,inthecurrentpractice,whatinformationiscommunicatedbetweenprojectpartiestoimproveoccupationalsafetyandhealthduringsolardesignandinstallation? Informationflowduringpre‐construction Informationflowduringconstruction

Lastly,wearelookingforcasestudyopportunities.Pleaseletusknowifyouhaveanupcomingprojectwheresolarsystemsareinstalledontherooftopofasmallbuilding,andifwecanhaveafieldobservationontheproject.Thankyousomuchforyourparticipation.


July2017 Page

D

13. APPENDIX2–PROCESSMAPPING


July2017 Page

E

14. APPENDIX3–PtDATTRIBUTESByanalyzingthedatacollectedfromthe13interviewsandfourcasestudyprojects,theresearchersidentifiedsevenmajorPtDattributesincluding(1)roofingmaterial,(2)roofslope,(3)roofaccessary,(4)panellayout,(5)fallprotectionsystem,(6)liftingmethod,and(7)electricalsystem.Eachattributeisdescribedinfurtherdetailinthissection.1. RoofingMaterialAsmostsolarinstallationactivitiesareperformedontherooftop,roofingmaterialshaveasignificantimpactonthesafetyperformanceofsolarcontractors.Compositeshingleroofsaremostconvenientfortheinstallationcrewbecausetheyarenotveryslippery,evenwhenraining.Figure4showsanexampleofacompositeshingleroof.Woodroofs,tileroofs,metalroofs,androofslosinggranulesaremoreslippery,especiallywhenwet,makingthemmoredangerousforthecrew.Theresearchersfoundthatinstallationcrewsstillworkevenwhenraining.However,forsafetyreasons,solarinstallationonmetalandwoodroofswhenrainingshouldbecarefullyconsideredandifpossible,notperformed.

Figure4.CompositeShingleRoof(PicturetakenbyChungHoon11/17/2016atCaseStudy1)Thereareafewmoreuniqueissuesformetalroofsandwoodroofs.First,besidesbeingslippery,metalroofscreateglareonsunnydays,causingworkerstofeeldizzyiftheyworkforalongtimeandpotentiallycausingvisibilityconcerns.Second,itismoredifficulttodrivenailsonwoodroofswhenattachingmountingsystemstotheroof.Withoutpre‐drilling,itishardtodeterminewhetherthenailhasgonethroughthewoodtilesandhasreachedtheroofframe.Asaresult,thereisanincreasedchanceofhavingamountingsystemnotfullyattachedtotheroofframe.Third,certaintypesofroofs,suchasshakeroofs,requirewearingspecialfootweartogainmoretractionandavoidbreakingtheroofingmaterials.However,wearingthisfootwearhamperstheworkers’movement,causingothertrippinghazards.Thestrengthofaroofstructureisafactorthatsolarcontractorshavetoconsiderwhenperformingasiteassessment.Theroofstructuremustbestrongenoughtosupporttheintendedsolarsystem.Reinforcementisrequirediftheroofstructureisnotstrongenough.Inaddition,sincethelifespanofatypicalsolarsystemisapproximately25years,roofingmaterialsshouldbeabletolastoverthatperiod.Beforeinstallingsolarpanels,thehomeownershouldconsiderreplacingtheroofingmaterialsiftheremaininglifeoftheroofingmaterialsisdeterminedtoberelativelyshort;aftersolarpanelinstallation,itwillbecomplicatedtoreplacetheroofing.


July2017 Page

F

2. RoofSlopeRoofslopehasasignificantimpactonsafetyperformance.Simplyput,thesteepertheroofslope,themoredangerousthesolarinstallation.Roofslopecanaffectdecisionmakingonliftingmethodsandinstallationsequences.Inmostcaseswithmoderately‐slopedroofs,theinstallationcrewcanusealaddertoclimbupandstandontheroofsurfacetoperformtheinstallation.Forsteeproofs,thecrewoftenneedstouseascissorliftasaworkingplatformtoperformthework.Thebottom(lowest)rackisalwaysinstalledfirstforsteeproofssothatworkerscanfacedownwardastheinstallationprogressesupward.Eachanchorpointistypicallyusedforoneworkerasafallarrestsystemforusualcases,whileforsteeproofs,twoanchorpointsforeachworkermaybeneededtoensuresafety.Figure5showstheworkers’positioningwheninstallingconnectionsforamountingsystemonamoderately‐slopedroof.

Figure5.InstallingConnectionsforMountingSystem(PicturetakenbyChungHoon11/17/2016atCaseStudy1)3. RoofAccessoryRoofaccessoriesmaypresentbothadvantagesanddisadvantagesforsolarinstallations.First,shadingfromchimneyscansignificantlyimpacttheefficiencyofsolarsystems.Thus,solarcontractorsneedtodesignthelocationofsolarpanelsaroundchimneys.Fromasafetyperspective,theinstallationcrewmayusechimneysasananchorpointforatemporaryfallprotectionsystem.However,mostsolarcontractorsdonotpreferusingachimneyasasupportforafallprotectionsystemunlessthechimneyisstructurallyrobustandcansupporttheloadfromthefallprotectionsystem.Roofaccessories,especiallysmallfeaturessuchasroofvents,cancreatetrippinghazardsforworkers.Solarpanellayoutsaredesignedtoaccountfortheseaccessories.Figure6showshowthesolarpanellayoutwasalteredtoavoidaskylight.Atemporarybarricadeorcovershouldbeinstalledtoprotectworkersfromsteppingonorfallingthroughaskylightorotheropeningsontheroof.


July2017 Page

G

Figure6.SolarPanelsonRoofwithSkylight(PicturetakenbyChrisLeeon11/23/2016atCaseStudy1)Besidesthesafetyhazardissuesmentionedabove,sometimessolarworkerscantakeadvantageoftheaccessories,suchasachimneyorskylight,toholduptoolsandmaterials,preventingthemfromslidingdownalongaslopedroof.Figure7showshowtheworkersweretakingadvantageoftheskylightforholdingupinstallationmaterials.

Figure7.UsingSkylighttoHoldupInstallationToolsandMaterials(PicturetakenbyChungHoon11/17/2016atCaseStudy1)4. PanelLayoutToachievethedesiredelectricalgenerationoutput,solardesignersmayneedtoincludeasmanysolarpanelsaspossibleinasystem.However,thelayoutandmaximumnumberofpanelsarelargelydeterminedbyconsideringavailableroofspace,rooflayout,roofdirection,roofaccessories,requiredclearancebetweenpaneledgeandroofedge,andvoltagelimitsetforresidentialbuildings.Section605.11oftheInternationalFireCode(IFC)setsaclearaccesspathwayforpanellayout,andaclearancebetweenthepaneledgeandroofridgetoassisttheoperationoffirefightersincaseoffire.Althoughtherequirementregardingclearaccesspathwaysisappliedonlytoresidentialbuildingswitharoofslopethatis2:12orsteeper,nolimitationonsloperangesisappliedfortheclearancerequirementbetweenthepaneledgeandroofridge.ThepathwayrequirementissummarizedinTable4.


July2017 Page

H

Table4.PathwayRequirmentsBasedonRoofTypes RoofTypes IFCRequirements

HipRoof Aclearaccesspathwaythatis3feetwideorlargerextendingfromtheeavetotheridgeshouldbeprovidedoneachroofslopewherethepanelsarelocated.SingleRidge AtleasttwoclearaccesspathwaysRoofHipsandValleys

Aclearaccesspathwayshouldbemorethan1.5feetwideiftherewillbepanelsonbothsidesofthevalley.Ontheotherhand,ifpanelswillonlybeononesideofthehiporvalleythatisofequallength,noclearanceisrequired.Specifictoresidentialbuildings,thepanelshouldbelocatednohigherthan3feetfromtheroofridgetoallowforsmokeventilationoperations.Althoughtheseclearancerequirementsareforfirefighters,theycanalsohelptheinstallationcrewmoveupanddownontheroofbyprovidingmorespace,andhenceimproveoverallsafetyinsolarinstallation.Theclearancebetweenthepaneledgeandroofridgealsomakesitconvenientfortheinstallationandusageofsafetyanchors,whichareusuallyinstalledattheroofridge.Theinterviewsrevealedthata1footclearancebetweenpaneledgeandroofridgeispreferredfortheinstallationofsafetyanchors.Figure8showsthepanellayoutofahousewithasingleridge.However,thepanellayoutprovidesneithertwoclearaccesspathwaysfromtheeavetotheroofridge,northeclearancebetweenpaneledgeandroofridgeasrequiredbytheInternationalFireCode.

Figure8.PanelLayoutonaGableRoofwithDormer(PicturetakenbyHyunWooLeeon11/23/2016atCaseStudy2)Besidestheclearancerequirements,thelayoutofpanelsshouldbecarefullydesignedtoallowforaconvenientloadingpointformaterialhoistingaswellasanaccesspointforworkersonaladder.5. FallProtectionSystemOSHArequiresthatworkersbeprotectedfromfallswhenworkingonanunprotectedsideoredgethatismorethan6feethigherthanthelowerlevel.PerOSHAstandards,Sections1926.501(b)(10),and1926.501(b)(11),multiplefallprotectionoptionscanbeusedwhenworkingonslopedroofs,


July2017 Page

I

suchasguardrailsystems,safetynetsystems,orpersonalfallarrestsystems.Itisimportanttonotethatguardrailsystemsshouldincludetoeboardsforsteeproofs.Theinterviewsrevealthatpersonalfallarrestsystemsarecommonlyusedforsolarinstallation.Eitherlifelinesorindividualanchorpointscanbeusedforapersonalfallarrestsystem.Thelocationofanchorpointsshouldbeconsideredaspartofroofconstructionsothattheanchorscanbeusedforwindowcleaningorbuildingmaintenanceduringtheuseofthebuilding.Forresidentialbuildings,aminimumoftwoanchorpointsperroofshouldbeinstalled.Themaximumdistancebetweentwoanchorpointsshouldbedeterminedtoensurethemovementoftheworkerwithinthelanyardlength.Anchorpointsshouldbeinstalledonbothsidesofanyobstructionsontheroof,suchasadormer,chimney,orskylight,becausetheseobstructionscanhinderthemovementofworkerswearingafallarrestsystem.SectionII.minSubpartMAppendixCoftheOSHAstandardsalsosuggestsconsideringobstructionswhendecidingontie‐offlocations.Figure9showsexamplesofanchorsthatsolarcontractorstypicallyuseforafallarrestsystem.

Figure9.SafetyAnchorsforPersonalArrestSystem(Source:roofingcontractor.com;us.msasafety.com)6. LiftingMethodStandardsolarmodulesthatarecommonlyusedonresidentialbuildingsare40”x66”or40”x78”.Eachsolarpanelweighsbetween30and40pounds,whichiswithinOSHA’smanualliftinglimitof50lbs.However,toliftpanelsandsystemcomponentstotheroof,OSHA(2017b)suggestsusingliftingequipmentsuchasladderhoists,swinghoists,ortruck‐mountedcranes/conveyorswheneverpossible.Ifusingaladderisunavoidable,sections1926.1053(b)(21)and(22)oftheOSHAstandards(2017a)requireusingatleastonehandtoholdontotheladderwhileprogressingupanddowntheladder,andworkersshallnotcarryanobjectorloadthatcouldcausealossofbalanceorafall.Nevertheless,theinterviewsshowedthatforresidentialbuildings,mostsolarcontractorsstillprefermanualliftingbyaladdersinceittakeslesstimethanusingmechanicalliftingequipmentthatrequiresadditionaltimetosetup.Formanuallifting,threemethodsareidentifiedthatsolarcontractorscommonlyuse:(1)oneworkercarryingpanelsuptotheroof;(2)twoworkerscarryingpanelstogether;and(3)aftertyingoffpanels,havingoneworkerliftingthepanelsbyusingarope.Theresearchersfoundthatthefirstmethodismostcommonlyusedbysolarcontractorswhowereinterviewed,yetitisaviolationoftheOSHAstandards.Figure10showsahydraulicladderandmanualladderusedforsolarinstallation.


July2017 Page

J

Figure10.HydraulicLadderandManualLadder(PicturestakenbyChungHoon9/28/2016duringinterview,andon11/23/2016atProject1)7. ElectricalSystemElectricalworkforsolarinstallationmustbeperformedbyqualifiedelectriciansandfollowtherulesandregulationsestablishedforelectricalsafety.Whilethescopeofthepresentresearchisnotfullyfocusedonelectricalsafetyhazards,itisworthnotingthatsolarinstallationindeedinvolveselectricalsafetyconcerns.IFC605.11.1.2requiresthat“Conduit,wiringsystems,racewaysforphotovoltaiccircuitsshallbelocatedascloseaspossibletotheridgeorhiporvalley,andfromthehiporvalleyasdirectlyaspossibletooutsidewallasdirectaspossibletoreducetriphazardandmaximizeventilationopportunity.”Inaddition,theNationalElectricalCode2014NEC690.12requiresinstallingarapidshutdowndevicetoquicklyde‐energizetheconductorassociatedwithasolarsystem.Figure11depictsthewireinstallationofcasestudy3.


July2017 Page

K

Figure11.RunningtheWireforSolarSystem(PicturetakenbyChungHoon12/02/2016atProject3)8. OtherFactorsAffectingSafetyInadditiontotheabove‐listedPtDattributes,otherfactors,suchasinstallationsequenceandweatherconditions,influencesafetyduringsolarinstallation.Installationsequencecanplayanimportantroleinreducingsafetyhazards.Installationshouldbeginfromthebottom(lowest)racksofthemountingsystemandmoveupwardstowardupperracks.Theracksshouldbeinstalledhorizontallyratherthanvertically.Thisinstallationsequencemakesitsaferforsolarworkerssincethebottomrackcanserveasabackupfortheinstallationoftheuppercomponents.Foraccesspoints,itissuggestedthatsolarpanelsareinstalledfromthepointwithlimitedaccesstothepointwithampleaccesssothatworkerscaneasilyexittheroofafterfinishingtheinstallation.Sincemostsolarinstallationworkisperformedoutside,weatherconditionscanhaveasignificantimpactonsafetyoperations.Suncancreateglareonmetalroofsandmayalsoresultinheatstresstosolarworkers.Bigwindgustsmayknockoversolarpanels,leadingtofallingandstrikinghazards.Raincancauseslipsandfalls,andcoldtemperaturescancausefreezingandfatigue.Safetyplansshouldconsiderpotentialhazardscausedbyweatherconditions.Inthecaseofunfavorableweatherconditions,postponingorreschedulingtheinstallationshouldbeconsidered.


July2017 Page

L

15. APPENDIX4–SEMINARFLYER

PREVENTION THROUGH DESIGN FOR SOLAR SAFETY

Almost 50% of construction accidents are linked to decisions made during the

design phase. Recognizing this, how can solar designers proactively address workers’ safety concerns?

Through several solar project case studies and interviews, UW & OSU researchers have developed a Prevention through Design Protocol. Intended for solar energy

systems designers, this Protocol supports those interested in applying Prevention through Design (PtD) practices to improve solar safety for small residential buildings.

Please join us on May 12, 2017 for a 3-hour seminar to learn about Prevention through Design and discuss this Protocol. We also look forward to gathering your

feedback to support continued improvement of this Protocol as we prepare to publish it for the industry.

Everyone is welcome. Snacks and drinks will be provided. For more information and

to RSVP, please contact Chung Ho ([email protected]). See cm.be.uw.edu/cerc for directions.

SOLAR PtD

SEMINARFRIDAY, MAY 12, 2017 1:00pm-

4:00pm CERC/Sandpoint

PD Koon Room @ Building 5B, 7543 63rd Ave NE,

Seattle, WA 98115


July2017 Page

M

16. APPENDIX5–SURVEYQUESTIONAIREFORTHEPROTOCOL

SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE

Prevention through Design (PtD) Protocol

to Improve Safety in Solar Designs and Installations

PART A: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

1. It is practical to apply this protocol into the design and installation of solar systems for small residential buildings.

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

We will appreciate it if you can provide the reason for your response.

2. The information provided in this protocol is sufficient for me to implement prevention through design (PtD) on solar

designs and installations.


☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐


3. The protocol is clear and easy to understand.


☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐


4. The information provided in the protocol is helpful for the solar industry in general.


☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐


5. Implementing the PtD protocol will help to improve worker safety during solar installations.


☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐


6. I will apply this protocol to my current practice.


☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐


7. Do you think the application of the protocol can impact the cost, schedule, or quality of your work?

Please explain why or why not.


July2017 Page

N

PART B: Please provide your comments about the content of the protocol, and any

suggestions to improve it.

Section Comment

Introduction

PtD application

procedure

PtD Attributes

1. Roofing

material

2. Roof slope

3. Roof

accessary

4. Panel layout

5. Fall

protection

system

6. Lifting

method

7. Electrical

system

End of the survey. Thank you very much for your support!


July2017 Page

O

17. APPENDIX6–RESULTSOFTHEONLINESURVEYABOUTTHEPROTOCOL

Score

Comment

Score

Comment

Score

Comment

Score

Comment

Score

Comment

Score

Comment

Score

Comment

1.Itispractica

ltoapplyt

hisprotocol

intothedesig

nandinstalla

tionofsolar

systemsforsm

allresiden

tialbuildings.

5Essentialto

proper

lyinstalla

solarsystem.

4Mostofever

ythingin

theprotocolis

practical

toapplytoall

solarinstalla

tions.4

3Dependson

howsmallt

hearrayis.

Thereisalimi

tofhowm

anyhourswe

canadd

totheinstalla

tionto

accommodate

"safety".

44Basic

ideastokeep

system

ssafe5Itisp

racticalto

implement.

4.1

2.Theinform

ationprovid

edinthis

protocolissu

fficient

formetoimp

lement

preventionth

roughdesign

(PtD)onsola

rdesign

sandinstalla

tions.

4Ithinkyoun

eedmored

iscussion

aboutactions

requireddurin

gthedesign

toprovide

existingcond

itions,i.e.as‐b

uiltsdocum

ents,compre

hensivesite

visit.Suggesty

ouinclude

achecklist

ofconsiderati

onsanddo

cumentsasa

basisofdesig

nandinstalla

tionmethod

statement.

44Most

ofitsalready

inpractic

e4Itise

nough informationto

include

thenotesand

instruc

tionsinthe

designdrawin

gs.3

45

4.0

3.Theprotoc

oliscleara

ndeasyto

understand.

4Iliketheinc

lusionofappl

icableOHSA/

WISHArules.

5Theprotoc

olwaswritten

verywelland

iseasyto

understanda

ndfollow.

4Coupleofar

eaneed

clarifications

uchasSet‐bac

krequiremen

tneedto

bemodified

45

45

4.4

4.Theinform

ationprovid

edinthe

protocolishe

lpfulfor

thesolarindu

stryingenera

l.5Havi

nga protocol/chec

klistssimplif

iesthewhole

proces

s.Hopefullyit

willleadtogr

eatersafetya

ndefficien

cy.

5Theinform

ationwillbe

abenefittop

eopleenterin

gtheindustry

withlit

tleorno

experience.

44

35

54.4

5.Implementi

ngthePtDpro

tocolwillhelp

toimpr

oveworker

safetyduring

solarinstalla

tions.5Prov

ides consideration

ofsafetyd

uringthe

designphase

andwillho

pefully

includethe

installationtea

minputa

ndlessons

learnedduring

thedesign

phase.

44

45

45

4.4

6.Iwillapply

thisprotoc

oltomy

currentpract

ice.5Iwil

liftheoccasio

narises?

4Wealready

usethe

majorityofw

hatisin

theprotocolo

nalljobs.

43

35

54.1

Average

Score

PARTA:Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatements?

Responder7

Responder6

STATEMENT

Responder1

Responder2

Responder3

Responder4

Responder5


July2017 Page

P

18. APPENDIX7–SOLARPTDPROTOCOL

SAFETY PROTOCOL

Prevention through Design for Safety in Solar Installations

CPWR Center for Construction Research and Training

Hyun Woo Lee John Gambatese Chung Ho July 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. Introduction B. PtD Attributes:

1. Roofing Material 2. Roof Slope 3. Roof Accessories 4. Panel Location 5. Fall Protection System 6. Lifting Methods 7. Electrical System

C. References

A - INTRODUCTION THIS PROTOCOL: PREVENTION THROUGH DESIGN (PtD)

Eliminates or reduces occupational safety and health hazards during the design process.

Can be incorporated into the design of new processes, structures, equipment, tools, and work methods.

Prevention through Design (PtD) is “the practice of anticipating and ‘designing out’ potential occupational

safety and health hazards and risks associated with new processes, structures, equipment, or tools, and organiz-ing work, such that it takes into consideration the construction, maintenance, decommissioning, and disposal/recycling of waste material, and recognizing the business and social benefits of doing so” (Schulte et al. 2008).

Provides A guidance for application of Prevention through Design (PtD) into the design and installation of solar energy systems.

Applies To existing residential buildings.

Addresses Safety hazards and risk in the installation of solar energy systems.

Considers Roof materials, roof slopes, roof accessories, roof layouts, fall protection systems, lifting methods, and electrical systems.

SAFETY FACTS · Falls account for 35%

of fatalities in construction (Wang et al. 2015).

· Almost 50% of construction fatalities and accidents are linked to design decisions (Behm 2005)

Page 1

A - INTRODUCTION (cont.) PtD APPLICATION PROCEDURE

Basic steps

Define the expected solar energy system. Review the design of the existing roof, evaluating how it impacts the solar

panel layout and safety in solar installations (e.g. roof structures, roofing materials, roof accessories, roof layout).

Review the solar energy system (e.g. panel layouts, roof access points, installation methods), including safety issues.

Prepare initial design documents. Review the design and incorporate safety into the design and the design

documents. Finalize the design documents. Safety personnel backcheck the design documents. Develop a safety implementation plan and enforce safety rules.

Fig. 1 PtD Implementation Procedure (adapted from Anderson & Galecka 2014)

Involved parties: Project managers, designers, contractors, and safety per-sonnel

Safety conditions: Addressed in design documents (e.g. drawings, specs)

Safety enforcement: Applied during installation processes

8. Install the system, enforce safety rules

(safety incorporation)

6. Finalize the design documents

7. Backcheck the design documents


4. Prepare initial design documents

3. Review the solar energy system


1. Define the solar energy system

2. Review the design of the existing roof


Page 2

5. Review the design documents


B - PtD ATTRIBUTES . ROOFING MATERIAL

Roofing materials influence solar safety in different ways. While composite shingles present convenient installation conditions, metal roofs and cedar shakes pose high safety risks and hazards.

Consider the following factors for roofing materials when designing solar panel layouts and installation methods.

Only install solar panels on structurally sound roofs that are unlikely to be damaged during the lifecycle of the solar energy systems.

Structurally unsound roofs or damaged roofs should be upgraded before installing solar energy systems.

If possible, include the layout of roof structures in the solar design documents.

Locate safety anchors along roof ridges whenever possible.

Composite shingle roofs: Safety anchors should be located at any suitable areas in addition to roof ridges.

Metal roofs: Safety anchors should be located only along metal roof ridge caps (if possible) to avoid roof leaks caused by connection holes.

¨ Metal roofs, wood roofs, and roofs losing granular particles are slippery, es-pecially when raining.

¨ Metal roofs increase the heat stress on hot days and glare under sunlight. ¨ Cedar shakes can crack or split when workers step on them. ¨ Concrete tiles are heavy, making it difficult to install connections for

mounting systems.

Factors Design suggestions

Roof Structures

Safety Anchors

Page 3

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES

. ROOFING MATERIAL (cont.)

Consider the following factors for roofing materials when designing solar panel layouts and installation methods.

Wood roofs: Include a recommendation in the design documents to use predrills to create pilot holes when connecting safety anchors and mounting systems with wood roof structures.

Wood roofs: Include a recommendation in the design documents to use special working boots to avoid cracking wood tiles.

Roofs losing granular material: Include a recommendation in the design documents to use special working boots with high slip resistance capacity.

Metal roofs: Provide sunglasses and sufficient hydration for workers when working on sunny days.


Installation Methods

Personal Protective Equipment

Fig. 2 Lifting up composite shingles to inset connection plates

Page 4

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 2. ROOF SLOPE

Roof slope has a significant impact on solar safety. The steeper the roof, the more dangerous it is to install solar systems.

¨ Steeper roofs are more slippery, especially in the rain. ¨ Flat roofs can be slippery with the development of ponding and mosses ¨ Standing on steep roofs increases stress and pain in workers’ ankles. ¨ Tools or materials slide along and drop from steep roofs more frequently.

Page 5

Fig. 3 Installing connection brackets on a sloped roof.

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 2. ROOF SLOPE

Consider the following factors regarding roof slope when designing solar panel layouts and installation methods.

Steep roofs (slope > 4:12): Use either a guardrail system with toeboards, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.

Low-slope roofs (slope ≤ 4:12): Use either a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system, or a combination of warning line system and safety monitoring system.

More than safety anchor should be installed for each worker for high steep roofs.

Low-slope roof and moderately-steep roofs: Use the roof surface as a working platform.

High-slope roofs: Use mechanical lifts as a working platform.

Steep roof: Install bottom racks first to serve as a support point for installing other racks.

OSHA 1926.500(b)(2): Steep roof means a roof having a slope greater than 4 in 12 (vertical to horizontal).


Safety Systems

Safety Anchors

Working Platforms

Installation Sequences

Page 6

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 3. ROOF ACCESSORIES

Roof accessories may present both advantages and disadvantages for solar safety. Solar designers should be fully aware of existing roof accessories and their impacts to safety during solar installations.

¨ Unprotected skylight openings may cause falling hazards. ¨ Roof accessories may cause tripping hazards, but can also serve as a

backing object to keep materials from sliding along roof slopes. ¨ Chimneys may obstruct the movement of workers, but can also serve as an

anchor point if they are structurally able to support a worker in a fall.

Fig. 4 This chimney obstructs the movement of the workers and reduces resistance capacity of the safety line

Fig. 5 This skylight and exhaust vent prevent installation materials from slid-ing, while the small drain vents pose high tripping hazards for the worker

Page 7

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 3. ROOF ACCESSORIES (cont.)

Consider the following factors regarding roof accessories when designing solar energy systems.

Chimneys should not be used as a safety anchor unless they are structurally attached to the building’s structure and can support a worker in a fall.

Locate safety anchors on both sides of dormers and chimneys in case these accessories obstruct the movement of the workers.

Equip the workers with personal fall arrest systems, or install covers or guardrail systems for the openings.

If using covers, ensure that they can support twice the load that may be imposed on them.

Do not place solar panels on the top of skylights or chimneys.

OSHA 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces shall be protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes.

When cover is used, OSHA requires that: OSHA 1926.502(i): ... covers shall be capable of supporting, without failure, at least twice the weight of employ-ees, equipment, and materials that may be imposed on the cover at any one time.


Fall from openings

Solar panel layouts

Safety anchors

Fig. 6 This solar energy system is divided into two arrays to avoid the existing chimney

Page 8

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 4. PANEL LOCATION

Choices about solar panel locations influence solar installation safety. Solar panel locations determine worker access areas, and decisions that facilitate or impede the movement of the workers. To allow access for fire fighters in case of an emergency, the International Fire Code (IFC 2012) requires clear access pathways and the clearances between solar panel edges and roof ridges.

¨ Locating solar panels over the entire roof and to the roof ridge makes it difficult to install safety anchors and to unhook from safety anchors.

¨ Covering the entirety of a roof with solar panels also impedes the ability of

workers to perform maintenance after installation.

IFC 605.11.3.2.3 Residential buildings with roof hips and valleys. Panels/modules installed on residential buildings with roof hips and valleys shall be located no closer than 18 inches (457 mm) to a hip or valley where pan-els/modules are to be placed on both sides of a hip or valley. Where panels are to be located on only one side of a hip or valley that is of equal length, the panels shall be permitted to be placed directly adjacent to the hip or valley. (Exception: roof slopes ≤ 2:12).

IFC 605.11.3.2.4 Residential buildings with smoke ventilation. Panels/modules installed on residential build-ings shall be located no higher than 3 feet (914 mm) below the ridge in order to allow for fire department smoke ventilation operations.

Fig. 7 Minimum clear access pathways and clearances between panels and roof ridges for residential building with roof hips and valleys

Page 9

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 4. PANEL LOCATION (cont.)

Fig. 8 Minimum clear access pathways and clearances between panels and roof ridges for a residential building with a hip roof

IFC 605.11.3.1 Roof access point. Roof access points shall be located in areas that do not require the place-ment of ground ladders over openings such as windows or doors, and located at strong points of building construc-tion in locations where the access point does not conflict with overhead obstructions such as tree limbs, wires, or signs.

IFC 605.11.3.2.1 Residential buildings with hip roof layouts. Panels/modules installed on residential buildings with hip roof layouts shall be located in a manner that provides a 3-foot-wide (914 mm) clear access pathway from the eave to the ridge on each roof slope where the panels/modules are located. The access pathway shall be located at a structurally strong location on the building capable of supporting the live load of fire fighters accessing the roof. (Exception: roof slopes ≤ 2:12).

IFC 605.11.3.2.2 Residential buildings with a single ridge. Panels/modules installed on residential buildings with a single ridge shall be located in a manner that provides two, 3-foot-wide (914 mm) access pathways from the eave to the ridge on each roof slope where panels/modules are located (Exception: roof slopes ≤ 2:12).

Fig. 9 Minimum clear access pathways and clearances between panels and roof ridges for a residential building with a single ridge

Page 10

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 4. PANEL LOCATION (cont.)

Consider the following factors regarding solar panel locations when designing solar en-ergy systems.

Buildings with hip roofs: Allow a 3-feet-wide clear access pathway from the eave to the ridge of each roof slope where panels are located.

Buildings with a single ridge: Allow two, 3-feet-wide clear ac-cess pathways from the eave to the ridge of each roof slope where panels are located.

Buildings with hip roofs and valleys:

¨ If panels are located on both sides of a hip or valley, locate the panels no closer than 8 inches from the hip or valley.

¨ If panels are located on only one side of a hip or valley that is of equal length, locate the panels directly adjacent to the hip or valley.

Do not place the panels higher than 3 feet below roof ridges, unless approved by the fire chief (for smoke ventilation).

Locate roof access points on the areas that do not require placing ground ladders over openings, such as windows and doors.

Locate roof access points on areas that are structurally suffi-cient to support access.

Allow sufficient areas for roof access and hoisting materials during installation.


Clearances between panels and roof ridges

Clear access path-ways (for roof slopes > 2:12)

Roof access points

Roof access areas

IFC 605.11.3.1 Roof access point. Roof access points shall be located in areas that do not require the placement of ground ladders over openings such as windows or doors, and located at strong points of building construction in locations where the access point does not conflict with overhead obstructions such as tree limbs, wires, or signs.

Page 11

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 5. FALL PROTECTION SYSTEM

Multiple options can be used for fall protection, such as guardrail systems, safety net systems, and personal fall arrest systems. Panel layout design should facilitate the use of proper fall protection methods. Figures 9 and 10 show examples of safety anchors that can be used for personal fall arrest systems. The maximum number of personal fall arrest systems attached to each safety anchor must be within the limit stated by the manufacturer.

Fig. 10 This project installed Hitchclips along the roof ridge to serve as safety anchors.

Fig. 11 This project installed Guardian bull ring anchors along the roof ridge.

OSHA 1926.501(b)(10): … each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safe-ty monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see Appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted.

OSHA 1926.501(b)(11): … Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.

Page 12

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 5. FALL PROTECTION SYSTEM (cont.)

Consider the following factors regarding fall protection systems when designing solar energy systems

Safety anchors are normally located along roof ridges. Solar panels should not extend to roof ridges in order to comply with the International Fire Code (see Panel Layout Section) and allow for the installation of safety anchors.

The maximum distance between two safety anchors should allow for the movement of workers within lanyard lengths.

Install safety anchors on both sides of any obstruction on the roof, such as dormers, chimneys, and skylights. The obstruction can hinder the movement of workers who are wearing a fall arrest system.

For fall protection systems on a steep roof, guardrail systems must include toeboards.

Use a combination of safety monitoring systems and warning line systems for fall protection on low-sloped roofs. These can be in addition to using guardrail systems, safety net systems, and personal fall arrest systems.

Low-sloped roofs having ≤ 50-foot width are permitted to use only a safety monitoring system for a fall protection system.


Guardrail systems

Safety anchors

Safety monitoring systems

Page 13

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 6. LIFTING METHODS

Roof heights and panel sizes influence lifting methods. Consider the size and design of panel layouts when choosing a lifting method.

¨ The standard solar panel size for residential projects is 65”x39”. The standard panel weight is about 40 lbs, within OSHA’s manual lifting limit.

¨ OSHA regulations do not allow workers to carry solar panels while climbing on a ladder.

¨ OSHA regulations require workers to use at least one hand to grasp the ladder when progressing up and down the ladder

¨ Local codes may have stricter requirements. For example, Washington Administrative Codes requires that both hands must be free to hold on to the ladder while climbing or descending.

OSHA - Green Job: Solar panels should be lifted safely to the rooftops. Workers should never be allowed to climb ladders while carrying solar panels. Lifting equipment, such as ladder hoists, swing hoists, or truck-mounted cranes/conveyors, should be used wherever possible.

Fig. 14 Ladder with a ladder safety device

Fig. 12 Ladder hoists are recommended for panel lifting

Fig. 13 Ladder stabilization device

Page 14

WAC - 296-876-40025 Climbing and Descending: (1) You must have both hands free to hold on to the lad-der.

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 6. LIFTING METHODS (cont.)

Consider the following factors for lifting solar panels when designing solar panel layouts and installation methods.

Design documents should include information about panel weights in relation to OSHA’s manual lifting limit.

Standard solar panels for residential projects should be selected whenever possible.

Panel layouts should be designed to locate ladder access points at structurally strong areas and avoid the need to place ladders over openings, such as windows or doors.

Use lifting equipment to lift solar panels to rooftops whenever possible.

Do not climb the ladder while carrying solar panels.

OSHA 1926.1052(b)(21): Each employee shall use at least one hand to grasp the ladder when progressing up and/or down the ladder

OSHA 1926.1052(b)(22): An employee shall not carry any object or load that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall.


Panel sizes

Panel layouts

Lifting methods

Page 15

Fig. 15 Use of a ladder extension can make it saf-er to step off a ladder onto the elevated surface (Source of the picture: Amazon.com)

B - PtD ATTRIBUTES 7. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Electrical systems can create several safety hazards for workers. First and foremost, the power generated from solar energy systems can cause shock hazards for workers. In addition, electrical wires or conduits can create tripping hazards during installation. Consider the following factors for electrical systems during the design phase:

Locate conduits, wiring systems, and raceways as close as possible to the ridge, hip, or valley, and from the hip or valley as directly as possible to the outside wall. Cautions is needed to ensure minimum clearance distances with existing overhead electrical lines

Design the system to include rapid shutdown devices as re-quired by the National Fire Code

IFC 605.11.1.2: Conduit, wiring systems, raceways for photovoltaic circuits shall be located as close as possible to the ridge or hip or valley, and from the hip or valley as directly as possible to outside wall to reduce trip hazard and maximize ventilation opportunity.


For safety during in-stallation

For safety during op-eration

National Electrical Code 2017 NEC 690.12 : Rapid Shutdown of PV Systems on Buildings. PV system circuits installed on or in buildings shall include a rapid shutdown function to reduce shock hazard for emergency responders in accordance with 690.12(A) through (D).

Fig. 16 Rapid shutdown device for a residential project

Page 16

C - REFERENCES

· Anderson, Marjory, and Craig Galecka. 2014. “Getting Started with Prevention through Design.” Professional Safety 59(3): 63--65.

· Behm, Michael. 2005. “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”. Safety Science 43(8): 589--611.

· ICC (International Code Council). 2012. International Fire Code (IFC). Country Club Hills, Illinois: International Code Council, Inc. .

· NFPA (National Fire Protection Association). 2016. NFPA 70: National Electrical Code (NEC). Quincy, Massachusetts: National Fire Protection Association.

· OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration). 2017. “Green Job Hazards: Solar Energy – Falls.” Occupational Safety & Health Administration. https://www.osha.gov/dep/greenjobs/solar_falls.html

· OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration). 2017. “Safety and Health Regulations for Construction.” Construction, Standards 29-CFR Code of Regulations, Part 1926. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10593

· Schulte Paul, Richard Rinehart, Andrea Okun, Charles Geraci, and Donna Heidel. 2008. “National Prevention through Design (PtD) Initiative.” Journal of Safety Research 39(2):115–121. www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/pdfs/Schulte.pdf

· WAC (Washington Administrative Codes). 2016. “Ladders, Portable and Fixed. ” Safety and Health Core Rules, 296-876 WAC. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=296-876

· Wang, Xuanwen, Julie A. Largay, and Xiuwen Sue Dong. 2015. “Fatal and Nonfatal Injuries Among Construction Trades between 2003 and 2014.” CPWR Quarterly Data Report. Silver Spring, MD: CPWR – The Center for Construction Research and Training. http://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/publications/Third%20Quarter%20QDR%20final_2.pdf

Page 17

w w w. c p w r. c o m • w w w. e l c o s h . o rg

Documents

Applying Prevention through Design (PtD) to Solar Systems ...€¦ · Systems in Small Buildings Researchers - Dr. Hyun Woo Lee, Assistant Professor, Department of Construction Management,